NC0085286_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2018 (2)

MichaeP F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, RE., Director
Division of Water Quality
June 12, 2003
Mr. Gregory McKeeman
URS Corporation
1600 Perimeter Park Drive, Suite 100
Morrisville, NC 27560
Subject: Rescission of NPDES Permit ovu
Permit Number NC0085286
Former Amoco Service Station .# 57
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. McKeem
NC LiED . '
AND fo# CCDDWD:4"
DORESV
JUN 1 6 2003
Reference is made to your request for rescission of the subject NPDES permit, submitted by
you on behalf of BP Products North America, Inc. Staff of the Mooresville Regional Office
have confirmed that this permit is no longer required. Therefore, in accordance with your
request, NPDES permit NC0085286 is rescinded, effective immediately. It would be greatly
appreciated if you would share this information with your client upon your receipt of this letter.
If in the future you wish to discharge wastewater to the State's surface waters, you must first
apply for and receive a new NPDES permit. Operating a facility without a valid NPDES permit
will subject the responsible party to a civil penalty of up to $25,000 per day.
If you have questions about this matter, please contact Bob Sledge at [phone], extension
547 or the Water Quality staff in our Mooresville Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
W. Klimek, P.E.
cc: Mooresville Regional Office w/attachmen
NPDES Unit
Point Source Compliance — Bob Sledge - w/attachments
Central Files - w/attachments
Fran McPherson, DWQ Budget Office
Customer Service Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
1 800 623-7748 [phone] Fax [phone]

Me o To
Prepared y
Subject
DIVISION F WATER QUALIT5
ay ,
2003
Bob Sledge
Rex Gleason
ar Bou-Ghazale
Rescission of Permit # NC0085286
Emmet oco Service Station No. 57
4475 Randolph Road
Charlotte, North Carolina
Please find enclosed ape it rescission request for the subject facility. The perm it was issued
on Fehr . 19, 1996 with an eff ti5ve date of April 1, 1996, mid an expiration date of August 31,
2000. The Corrective Action I P never approved and implemented. According to
Alen Schiff, the UST Section considers this site to be a love priority site and, therefore, has no
objections to rescission of the pennit Please remove the permit from your tracking system
If you have any quesums regarding this matter, please advise.
SBG

t request Received
Corns Bence Group 0 Region I Of ice d Unit
equest Reciev din the Fa= o
Signed Ann, Fee Inv©ice Getter 0 Other...
ck ADpr©Driatel :.
1e'isi Performed
:.n sed
ur�d�ater C©rtCerrcS �'�.�TdeSSed .. Sh4uld beaaar�� nle
k, nitQnng 25 not requ�.rec
cfe:Oe ere ceeWer....
Denied
ed I. rnediatel
y ( =� • . to ��e
�.►. ever Constructed
©Abandoned
0 Connected to City Sewer
ken
a
Return Co teted Fonn to the I
PRFcum(

t5/20P2:003 "09:05 919733961.2
PAGE 02102
May 7, 2003
Fran McPherson
NCDENR Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
RE: Re nest for Voidance of
NPDES permit No. NCO485286
Former Amoco Service Station No. 5i7
4475 Randolph Road
Charlotte, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Fr 1 McPherson:
On behalf of BP Products North America Inc., (BP), URS Corporation - North Carolina
(URS) is requesting a voidance of the above referenced permit. A remediatian treatment
system at this site was constructed and ready for use in May 1995, however the Corrective
Action Plan (CAP) was never implemented. Therefore, we formally request that the
permit be cancelled.
URS will continue free product gauging and passive recovery at the site. Semi -
product recovery reports are submitted to the NCDENR - MRO.
Thank you for your consideration,. If you have any questionsor require additional
inforrnation, please don't hesitate to contact me at 919-46
Sincerely,
71/, ./g/
Gregory lcKeeman
URS Corporation - North Carolina
cc: Ms. Rebecca Kulas, BP (electronic)
Cindy Split, Williams & Ross (electronic)
ENFOS (electronic)
URS file (hard copy)
UPS Corp©ret+cn
1600 Perimelef Perk ©rrve, 5ulte 100
Morrisville, NC 27590
Tel. [phone]©©
Fax, 919.461 1415
25.

May 7, 2003
Fran McPherson
NCDENR - Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
RE: Request for Voidance of
NPDES permit No. NC0085286
Former Amoco Service Station No. 57
4475 Randolph Road
Charlotte, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Fran McPherson:
On behalf of BP Products North America Inc., (BP), URS Corporation - North Carolina
(URS) is requesting a voidance of the above referenced permit. A remediation treatment
system at this site was constructed and ready for use in May 1995, however the Corrective
Action Plan (CAP) was never implemented. Therefore, we formally request that the
permit be cancelled.
URS will continue free product gauging and passive recovery at the site. Semi-annual free
product recovery reports are submitted to the NCDENR - MRO.
Thank you for your consideration. If you have any questions or require additional
information, please don't hesitate to contact me at 919-461-1325.
Sincerely,
/e2
Gregory McKeeman
URS Corporation - North Carolina
cc: Ms, Rebecca Kulas, BP (electronic)
Cindy Split, Williams & Ross (electronic)
ENFOS (electronic)
URS file (hard copy)
URS Corporation
1600 Perimeter Park Drive, Suite 100
Morrisville, NC 27560
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
INVOICE
Annual Permit Fee
RECEIVED
MAR 31 2m3
This annual fee is required by the North Carolina Administrative Code. It covers the administrative costs
associated with your permit. It is required of any person holding a permit for any time during the annual fee
period, regardless of the facility's operating status. Failure to pay the fee by the due date will subject the
permit to revocation. Operating without a valid permit is a violation and is subject to a $10,000 per day fine.
If the permit is revoked and you later decide a permit is needed, you must reapply, with the understanding the
permit request may be denied due to changes in environmental, regulatory, or modeling conditions.
Perrnit Numberz. _NC0085286
Amoco Oil CoI#57
JIM SCHAEFFER
AMOCO OIL CO
2475 N WIND PARKWAY STE SUITE 400
ALPHARETTA GA 30004
Annual Fee Period:
Invoice Date:
Due Date:
Annual Fee:
2/1/2003 to 1/31/2004
March 24, 2003
April 23, 2003
$715.00
Notes:
1. A $25.00 processing fee will be charged for returned checks in accordance with the North Carolina
General Statute 25-3-512.
2. Non -Payment of this fee by the payment due date will initiate the permit revocation process.
3. Remit payment to:
NCDENR -Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
4. Should you have any questions regarding this invoice, please contact the Annual Administering and
Compliance Fee Coordinator at 919-733-5083 extension 210.
$1.11.40441$11111'111$1.1,$$$.11$$11,1,1101$.$$$$$$$$.$1$1411$4$;;;111,0i$$$$$$$$$$$111$$$$$$$$Fitta$$$$$$$
ANNUAL PERMIT INVOICE
(Retum This Portion With Check)
Permit Number: NC0085286
Amoco Oil Co/#57
JIM SCHAEFFER
AMOCO OIL CO
2475 N WIND PARKWAY STE SUITE 400
ALPHARETTA GA 30004
Annual Fee Period: 2/1/2003 to 1/31/2004
Invoice Date: March 24, 2003
Due Date: April 23, 2003
Annual Fee: $715.00
Check Number:

1 11SION OF W TER , LIT`
Me r TBobSledge
From:
Prep ay°d.
Subject:
Rex Gleason
S Brae -lea
1 eseissi n of Permit NC0085286
Former Amoco Sery ee Station No, 5
4475 Randolph Road
Charlotte. North Carolina
Please Fred enclosed a permit rescission request for the subject facility. The pernut as is tied
on February. 19, 1996 with an effective date of April 1, 1996, and an expiration date of August 31
2000, The Corrective Action P1 was nearer approved and implemented, e rdin to
Allen Schiff„ the UST I' Section considers this site to be a low priority site and, therefore, has no
objections to rescission of the p it Please remove the pe lit from your tracking system,
If you have any questions egarding this matter pie e advise.
Sa

e,y ed iri the
`or.led
essec
� pp ro d Denied
; rna dtheQTv n i �11
c±nded
e e Con= r`.r ed
Boned
Con e =ted to City Sewer
emit Type
eater 0 Other.
'vfora-ori

9197339612
PAGE 0"2,�fl2
May 7, 2003
Fran McPherson
NCDENR - Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
RED Request for Voidance of
NPDES permit No. NC008528+6
Former Amoco Service Station No. 57
4475 Randolph Road
Charlotte, Nortb Carolina
Dear Ms, Fran McPherson:
On behalf of BP Products North Arne Inc., (BP), URS Corporation - North Carolina
(URS) is requesting a voidance of the above referenced penrlit. A remediation treatment
system at this site was constructed and ready for use in May 1995, however the Corrective
Action Plan (CAP) was never implemented. Therefore, we formally request that the
permit be cancelled.
URS will continue free product gauging and passive recovery at the site. Semi-a:rrnual free
product recovery reports are submitted to the NCDENR - MR©.
Thank you for your consideration. If you have any questions or require additional
information, please don't hesitate to contact me at 919-461-1325.
Sincerely,
6#7
Gregory McKeeman
URS Corporation - North Carolina
cc: Ms Rebecca Kula, BP (electronic)
Cindy Split, Williams /Q. Ross (electronic)
ENFOS (electronic)
URS file (hard copy)
URS C7rPoretoe�r
16D0 Perrrmetitr'
MPrrisviiie, NC 2756C
Tel [phone]
Fix; 919.461 1415

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
February 19, 1996
Ms. Heidi Passales
Amoco Corporation
375 Northridge Drive, 600
Atlanta, North Carolina 30350
Subject: NPDES Permit Issuance
Permit No. NC0085286
Amoco Service Station #57
Mecklenburg County
Dear Ms. Passales:
In accordance with the application for a discharge permit received on September 5, 1995, the
Division is forwarding herewith the subject NPDES permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the
requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between
North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated December 6, 1983.
If any pans, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30)
days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to
Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings, Post Office Drawer 27447, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7447. Unless such demand is
made, this decision shall be final and binding.
Please take note that this permit is not transferable. Part II, E.4. addresses the requirements to be
followed in case of change in ownership or control of this discharge.
This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by
the Division of Environmental Management or permits required by the Division of Land Resources,
Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permit that may be required.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Jeanette Powell at telephone number
[phone], extension 537.
Sincerely,
David .k
A. Preston Howard,
cc: Central Files
Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Mr. Roosevelt Childress, EPA
Permits and Engineering Unit
Facility Assessment Unit
Mecklenburg County Health Department
P.E.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Permit No. NC0085286
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT. DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards
and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management
Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
is hereby authorized to discharge wast
Amoco Corporation
ater from a facility located at
Amoco Service Station #57
4475 Randolph Road
Charlotte
Mecklenburg County
to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tribut.
oC u
n Creek in the Catawba River Basin
in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I,
II, and III hereof.
The per cit shall became effective April 1, 1996.
This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on August 31, 2000.
Signed this day February 19, 1996.
A. Preston Howard, Jr., F.E., Director
Division of Environmental Management
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

is hereby authorized to
EN TTO PERMIT COVER SHEET
Amoco Corporation
Permit o. N
After receiving an Authorization to Construct. from the Division of n irony ental
Management ement, . nstruct treatment facilities located at Amoco Service Station #57 at 4475
Randolph Road, Charlotte, in Mecklenburg County as necessary to meet the limits of this
permit for discharge of treated wastewater at outfall 001 (see Part f of this permit), and:
2. Discharge wastewater from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached'
map into an unnamed tributary to McMullen Creek which is classified Class C waters in the
Catawba River Basin.

.(1. IIiII ClENTLIMITATIONS AND MONITORIN REQUIREMENTS NAL
Duringt1
'
serial numb
Pe it N. NC
beginning on the effective date of the permit. and lasting until expiration, the Perm' i utho ed tra discharge from routta.11
Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the pemittee as specified below:
fluent Chare tertstics
Oil and Greasc
I3cnrcn
Toluene
Naphthalene
MTBE
aI
na
Sample location. E - cnt
Dts harge L
lily. Avg.
)1 4 MGD
ns
Montt°
Maas
Continuous
y
Monthly
ly
Monthly
25) tign
nq Requirements
Sample Semple
Recorder
r
Grab
Grab
Grab E
Grab E
Grab E
IIEI E SIIALL I3E NO I IS IIARGE OF FLOATING SOLIDS OR FOAMIN OTTIER TI-IAN BRACE A OUNTS.

FART
Section B. Schedule of Corny] nc
1. The pennittee shall comply with Final :Effluent Limitations specified for schar es
accordance with the following schedule:
Permittee shall comply with Final Effluent Lifflnations bythe effective date of the perm' unless
specified below,
2.. Permittee shall at all titres p side the - a on and
existing facilities at oparttum efficiency.
3 .o later th 14 c lender >°s following a date identified in the above schedule of compliance,
the pe atte shall submit either a report of`pr,rss or, in the case of specific actions being
required by identified dates, a ssmitten notice of compliance or noncompliance. In the fatter
case, the notice shall include the cause of noncompliance; any remedial actions taken, and the
probability of meeting the next schedule requirements.

Part II
Page 1 of 14
PART II
STANDARD C©NDMONS FOR NPDES PERMITS
SECTION A. D FTNIn O S
1. Permit js,sui,ng Authority
The Director of the Division of En .rottrnenta114'Ianagement
2. DAM or Pivi5ign
Means the Division of Environmental Management, Department of Environment, Health and
Natural Resources.
3.
Used herein means the North Carolina. Environmental Management Commission.
4.
,,Net or e Act",
The Federal Water Pollution Control Act, also known as the Clean Water Act, as amended, 33
USC 1251, et. seq.
5. Mass/Day Measurements
a. The °'monthly average discharge" is defined as the total mass of all daily discharges
sampled and/or measured during a calendar month on which daily discharges are sampled
and measured, divided by the number of daily discharges sampled and/or measured during
such month. It is therefore, an arithmetic mean found by adding the weights of the
pollutant found each day of the month and then dividing this sum by the number of days
the tests were reported. The limitation is identified as "'Monthly Average" in Part I of the
permit
b. The "weekly average discharge" is defined as the total mass of all daily discharges sampled
and/or measured during the calendar week (Sunday - Saturday) on which daily discharges
are sampled and measured, divided by the number of daily discharges sampled and/or
measured during such week. It is, therefore, an arithmetic mean found by adding the
weights of pollutants found each day of the week and then dividing this sum by the
number of days the tests were reported. This limitation is identified as "Weekly Average"
in Part I of the permit.
c. The "maximum daily discharge" is the total mass (weight) of a pollutant discharged during
a calendar day. If only one sample is taken during any calendar day the weight of pollutant
calculated from it is the "maximum daily discharge." This limitation is identified as "Daily
Maximum," in Part I of the permit.
d. The "average annual discharge is defined as the total mass of all daily discharges sampled
and/or measured during the calendar year on which daily discharges are sampled and
measured. divided by the number of daily discharges sampled and/or measured during such
year, It is, therefore, an arithmetic mean found by adding the 'weights of pollutants found
each day of the year and then dividing this sum by the number of days the tests were
reported. This limitat cn is defined as "Annual Average" in Pan I of the permit.

Part II
Page 2 of 14
6, Concentration Measurement
a. The "average monthly concentration," other than for fecal coliform bacteria, is the sum of
the concentrations of all daily discharges sampled and/or measured during a calendar month
on which daily discharges are sampled and measured, divided by the numbcr of daily
discharges sampled and/or measured during such month (arithmetic mean of the daily
concentration values). The daily concentration value is equal to the concentration of a
composite sample or in the case of grab samples is the arithmetic mean (weighted by flow
value) of all the samples collected during that calendar day. The average monthly count for
fecal coliforrn bacteria is the geometric mean of the counts for samples collected during a
calendar month. This limitation is identified as "Monthly Average" under "Other Limits" in
Part I of the permit.
b. The "average weekly concentration," other than for fecal coliform bacteria, is the sum of the
concentrations of all daily discharges sampled and/or measured during a calendar week
(Sunday/Saturday) on which daily discharges are sampled and measured divided by the
number of daily discharges sampled and/or measured during such week (arithmetic mean of
the daily concentration values), The daily concentration value is equal to the concentration
of a composite sample or in the case of grab samples is the arithmetic mean (weighted by
flow value) of all the samples collected during that calendar day. The average weekly count
for fecal coliforrn bacteria is the geometric mean of the counts for samples collected during
a calendar week, This limitation is identified as "Weekly Average" under "Other Limits" in
Part I of the permit.
c. The ""maximum daily concentration" is the concentration of a pollutant discharge during a
calendar day. If only one sample is taken during any calendar day the concentration of
pollutant calculated from it is the "Ivlaximum Daily Concentration", It is identified as
"Daily Maximum" under "Other Limits" in Part I of the permit.
d. The "average annual concentration," other than for fecal coliform bacteria, is the sum of the
concentrations of all daily discharges sampled and/or measured during a calendar year on
which daily discharges are sampled and measured divided by the number of daily
discharges sampled and/or measured during such year (arithmetic mean of the daily
concentration values). The daily concentration value is equal to the concentration of a
composite sample or in the case of grab sarnples is the arithmetic mean (weighted by flow
value) of all the sarnples collected during that calendar day . The average yearly count for
fecal coliforrn bacteria is the geometric mean of the counts for samples collected during a
calendar year. This limitation is identified as "Annual Average" under "Other Limits" in
Part I of the permit,
The "daily average concentration" (for dissolved oxygen) is the minimum allowable amount
of dissolved oxygen required to be available in the effluent prior to discharge averaged
over a calendar day, If only one dissolved oxygen sample is taken over a calendar day,the
sample is considered to be the "daily average concentration" for the discharge. It is
identified as "daily average" in the text of Part. I.
The "quarterly average concentration" is the average of all samples taken over a calendar
quarter. It is identified as "Quarterly Average Limitation" in the text of Part I of the permit.
A calendar quarter is defined as one of the following distinct periods: January through
March, April through June, July through September, and October through December.

Part II
Page 3 of 14
Other Measurements
a. Flow, (MGD): The flow limit expressed in this permit is the 24 hours average flow,
averaged monthly. It is determined as the arithmetic mean of the total daily flows recorded
during the calendar month.
b. An "instantaneous flow measurement" is a measure of flow taken at the time of sampling,
when both the sample and flow will be representative of the total discharge.
c. A "continuous flow measurement" is a measure of discharge flow from the facility which
occurs continually without interruption throughout the operating hours of the facility. Flow
shall be monitored continually except for the infrequent times when there may be no flow
or for infrequent maintenance activities on the flow device.
. Types of,Samples
a. Composite Sample: A composite sample shall consist of:
(1) a series of grab samples collected at equal time intervals over a 24 hour period of
discharge and combined proportional to the rate of flow measured at the time of
individual sample collection, or
(2) a series of grab samples of equal volume collected over a 24 hour period with the time
intervals between sarnples determined by a preset number of gallons passing the
sarnpling point. Flow measurement between sample intervals shall be determined by
use of a flow recorder and totalizer, and the present gallon interval between sample
collection fixed at no greater than 1/24 of the expected total daily flow at the treatment
system, or
(3) a single, continuous sample collected over a 24 hour period proportional to the rate of
flow.
In accordance with (1) above, the time interval between influent grab samples shall be no
greater than once per hour, and the time interval between effluent grab samples shall be no
greater than once per hour except at wastewater treatment systems having a detention tirne
of greater than 24 hours. In such cases, effluent grab samples may be collected at time
intervals evenly spaced over the 24 hour period which are equal in number of hours to the
detention time of the system in number of days. However, in no case may the time interval
between effluent grab samples be greater than six (6) hours nor the number of samples less
than four (4) during a 24 hour sampling period.
b. Grab Sample: Grab samples are individual samples collected over a period of time not
exceeding 15 minutes; the grab sample can be taken manually. Grab samples must be
representative of the discharge or the receiving waters.
9. Calculation of Means
a Arithmetic Mean: The arithmetic mean of any set of values is the summation of the
individual values divided by the number of individual values,
b. Geometric Mean: The geometric mean of any set of values is the Nth root of the product of
the individual values where N is equal to the number of individual values. The geometric
mean is equivalent to the antilog of the arithmetic mean of the logarithms of the individual
values. For purposes of calculating the geometric mean, values of zero (0) shall be
considered to be one (1).

Part LI
Page 4 of 14
c. Weighted by Flow Value: Weighted by flow value means the summation of each
concentration times its respective flow divided by the summation of the respective flows.
10. Calendar Day
A calendar day is defined as the period from midnight of one day until midnight of the next
day. However, for purposes of this permit, any consecutive 24-hour period that reasonably
represents the calendar day may be used for sampling.
j(&&zrdous_Sybstance
A hazardous substance means any substance designated under 40 CFR Part 1.16 pursuant to
Section 311 of the Clean Water Act.
12. Toxic Pollutant
A toxic pollutant is any pollutant listed as toxic under Section 307(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act.
CTION B. GENERAL. CCINC1TJQNS
1. Pity to Comply
The permittee must comply with all conditions of this permit. Any permit noncompliance
constitutes a violation of the Clean Water Act and is grounds for enforcement action; for permit
termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or denial of a permit renewal
application.
a. The permittee shall comply with effluent standards or prohibitions established under
section 307(a) of the Clean Water Act for toxic pollutants and with standards for sewage
sludge use or disposal established under section 405(d) of the Clean Water Act within the
time provided in the regulations that establish these standards or prohibitions or standards
for sewage sludge use or disposal, even if the permit has not yet been modified to
incorporate the requirement.
b. The Clean Water Act provides that any person who violates a permit condition is subject to
a civil penalty not to exceed $25,000 per day for each violation. Any person who
negligently violates any permit condition is subject to criminal penalties of $2,500 to
$25,000 per day of violation, or imprisonment for not more than 1 year, or both. Any
person who knowingly violates permit conditions is subject to criminal penalties of $5,000
to $50,000 per day of violation, or imprisonment for not more than 3 years, or both. Also,
any person who violates a permit condition may be assessed an administrative penalty not
to exceed $10,000 per violation with the maximum amount not to exceed $125,€ 00. [Ref:
Section 309 of the Federal Act 33 U.S.C. 1319 and 40 CFR 122.41 (a)]
c. Under state Iaw, a civil penalty of not more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) per
violation may be assessed against any person who violates or fails to act in accordance with
the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit. [Ref: North Carolina General Statutes
§ 143-215.6A]
d. Any person may be assessed an administrative penalty by the Administrator for violating
section 301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318, or 405 of the Act, or any permit condition or
limitation implementing any of such sections in a permit issued under section 402 of the
Act. Administrative penalties for Class I violations are not to exceed $10,000 per violation,
with the maximum amount of any Class I penalty assessed not to exceed $25,000.

Part II
Page 5 of 14
Penalties for Class II violations are not to exceed $10,000 per day for each day during
which the violation continues, with the maximum amount of any Class II penalty not to
exceed $125,000.
2, pllG'' to Mitigate
The permittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge or sludge use
or disposal in violation of this permit which has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting
human health or the environment.
3, Civil jndcriminal Liability
Except as provided in permit conditions on "Bypassing" (Part II, C-4) and "Power Failures"
(Pan II, C-7), nothing in this permit shall be construed to relieve the permittee from any
responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties for noncompliance pursuant to NCGS 143-215.3, 143-
215.6 or Section 309 of the Federal Act, 33 USC 1319. Furthermore, the permittee is
responsible for consequential damages, such as fish kills, even though the responsibility for
effective compliance may be temporarily suspended.
4, Oil and J-iazardous Substance Liability
Nothing in this permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action or relieve
the permittee from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties to which the permittee is or may
be subject to under NCGS 143-215.75 et seq. or Section 311 of the Federal Act, 33 USG 1321.
Furthermore, the permittee is responsible for consequential darnages, such as fish kills, even
though the responsibility for effective compliance may be temporarily suspended.
5. ` perry Rights
The issuance of this permit does not convey any property rights in either real or personal
property, or any exclusive privileges, nor does it authorize any injury to private property or any
invasion of personal rights, nor any i fringement of Federal, State or local laws or regulations.
6. 9nshore or Offshore Construction
This permit does not authorize or approve the construction of any onshore or offshore physical
structures or facilities or the undertaking of any work in any navigable waters.
7. a,verabiliry
The provisions of this permit are severable, and if any provision of this permit, or the
application of any provision of this permit to any circumstances, is held invalid, the application
of such provision to other circumstances, and the remainder of this permit, shall not be affected
thereby.
8. .per tpFrQvide Inforn do
The permittee shall furnish to the Permit Issuing Authority, within a reasonable time, any
information which the Pr: -it Iss_ing Authority rnay request to determine whether cause exists
for modifying, revoking a::.1 reissaing, or terminating this permit or to determine compliance
with this permit_ The ,"ennittec shall also furnish to the Permit Issuing Authority upon
request, copies of records requireu to be kept by this permit.

Part II
Page 6 of I4
9. Dtit' to Reapply
If the permittee wishes to continue an activity regulated by this permit after the expiration date
of this permit, the permittee must apply for and obtain a new pernnit.
10. Expiralion of Permit
The permittee is not authorized to discharge after the expiration date. In order to receive
automatic authorization to discharge beyond the expiration date, the permittee shall submit such
information, forms, and fees as are required by the agency authorized to issue permits no later
than 180 days prior to the expiration date. Any permittee that has not requested renewal at least
180 days prior to expiration, or any permittee that does not have a permit after the expiration
and has not requested renewal at least 180 days prior to expiration, will subject the permittee to
enforcement procedures as provided in NCGS 143-215.6 and 33 USC 1251 et. seq.
11. Signatory Requirements
All applications, reports, or information submitted to the Permit Issuing Authority shall be
signed and certified.
a. All permit applications shall be signed as follows:
(1) For a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer. For the purpose of this Section,
a responsible corporate officer means: (a) a president, secretary, treasurer or vice
president of the corporation in charge of a principal business function, or any other
person who performs similar policy or decision making functions for the corporation,
or (b) the manager of one or more manufacturing production or operating facilities
employing more than 250 persons or having gross annual sales or expenditures
exceeding 25 million (in second quarter 1980 dollars), if authority to sign documents
has been assigned or delegated to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures.
(2) For a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor,
respectively; or
(3) For a municipality, State, Federal, or other public agency: by either a principal
executive officer or ranking elected official,
b. All reports required by the permit and other information requested by the Permit Issuing
Authority shall be signed by a person described above or by a duly authorized
representative of that person. A person is a duly authorized representative only if:
(1) The authorization is made in writing by a person described above;
(2) The authorization specified either an individual or a position having responsibility for
the overall operation of the regulated facility or activity, such as the position of plant
manager, operator of a well or well field, superintendent, a position of equivalent
responsibility, or an individual or position having overall responsibility for
environmental matters for the company, (A duly authorized representative may thus be
either a named individual or any individual occupying a named position.); and
(3) The written authorization is submitted to the Permit Issuing Authority.

Part II
Page 7 of 14
Certifications Any person signing a document under paragraphs a. or b. of this section
shall make the following certification:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under
my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified
personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of
the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for
gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for
knowing violations."
12. Permit, Actions
This permit may be modified, revoked and reissued, or terminated for cause. The filing of a
request by the permittee for a permit modification, revocation and reissuance, or termination,
or a notification of planned changes or anticipated noncompliance does not stay any permit
condition.
13. Permit 1MQdification. Revocation And ReissuanQQ. or Terminatio
The issuance of this permit does not prohibit the pernkit issuing authority from reopening and
modifying the permit, revoking and reissuing the permit, or terminating the permit as allowed
by the laws, rules, and regulations contained in Title 40, Code of Federal. Regulations, Parts
122 and 123; Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code, Subchapter 2H .0100; and
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 et. aL
14. Previous Per-rpjts
All previous National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permits issued to this facility,.
whether for operation or discharge, are hereby revoked by issuance of this permit. [The
exclusive authority to operate this facility arises under this permit. The authority to operate the
facility under previously issued permits bearing this number is no longer effective. I The
conditions, requirements, terms, and provisions of this permit authorizing discharge under the
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System govern discharges from this facility.
i$LOTION C, OPERATION ANC,\JAJNT NANC,'E OF POLLUTION CONTROLS
1. Certified Operator
Pursuant to Chapter 90A-44 of North Carolina General Statutes, and upon classification of the
facility by the Certification Commission, the permittee shall employ a certified wastewater
treatment plant operator in cesponsible charge (ORC) of the wastewater treatment facilities,
Such operator must hold a certification of the grade equivalent to or greater than the
classification assigned to the wastewater treatment facilities by the Certification Commission.
The permittee must also employ a certified back-up operator of the appropriate type and any
grade to comply with the conWtinns of Title 15A, Chapter 8A .0202. The ORC of the facility
must visit each Class Ifacility at leastweekly and each Class II, III, and IV facility at least
daily, excluding weekends and holidays, and must properly manage and document daily
operation and maintenance of the facility and must comply with all other conditions of Title
15A, Chapter 8A .0202. Once he facility is classified, the permitiee shall submit a letter to the
Certification Commission which designates the operator in responsible charge within thirty
days after the wastewater treatment facilities are 50% complete.

2. pro.
ion artd Maintenance
Part II
Page 8 of 14
The permittee shall at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of
treatment and control (and related appurtenances) which are installed or used by the permittee to
achieve compliance with the conditions of this permit. Proper operation and maintenance also
includes adequate laboratory controls and appropriate quality assurance procedures. This
provision requires the operation of back-up or auxiliary facilities or similar systems which are
installed by a permittee only when the operation is necessary to achieve compliance with the
conditions of the permit.
3. Need to Halt or Reduce not a Defense
It shall not be a defense for a permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been
necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the
condition of this permit.
4. Bypassing of Treatment Fjcil ties
a. Definitions
(l) "Bypass" means the known diversion of waste streams from any portion of a treatment
facility including the collection system, which is not a designed or established or
operating mode for the facility.
(2) "Severe property damage" means substantial physical damage to property, damage to
the treatment facilities which causes them to become inoperable, or substantial and
permanent loss of natural resources which can reasonably be expected to occur in the
absence of a bypass. Severe property damage does not mean economic loss caused by
delays in production.
b. Bypass not exceeding limitations.
The permittee may allow any bypass to occur which does not cause effluent limitations to
be exceeded, bur only if it also is for essential maintenance to assure efficient operation.
These bypasses are not subject to the provisions of Paragraphs c. and d. of this section.
c. Notice
(1) Anticipated bypass. If the permittee knows in advance of the need for a bypass, it
shall submit prior notice, if possible at least ten days before the date of the bypass;
including an evaluation of the anticipated quality and affect of the bypass.
(2) Gnanucipated bypass. The permittee shall submit notice of an unanticipated bypass as
required in Part II, E. 6. of this permit. (24 hour notice).
d. Prohibition of Bypass
(1) Bypass is prohibited and the Permit Issuing Authority may take enforcement action
against a permittee for bypass, unless:
(A) Bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal injury or severe property
damage;
There were no feasible alternatives to the bypass, such as the use of auxiliary
treatment facilities, retention of untreated wastes or maintenance during normal

Part II
Page 9 of 14
periods of equipment downtime. This condition is not satisfied if adequate backup
equipment should have been installed in the exercise of reasonable engineering
judgment to prevent a bypass which occurred during normal periods of equipment
downtime or preventive maintenance; and
(C) The permittee submitted notices as required under Paragraph c. of this section.
(2) The Permit Issuing Authority may approve an anticipated bypass, after considering its
adverse affects, if the Permit Issuing Authority determines that it will meet the three
conditions listed above in Paragraph d. (I) of this section.
5. Upsets
a. Definition.
"Upset " means an exceptional incident in which there is unintentional and temporary
noncompliance with technology based permit effluent limitations because of factors
beyond the reasonable control of the permittee. An upset does not include noncompliance
to the extent caused by operational error, improperly designed treatment facilities,
inadequate treatment facilities, lack of preventive maintenance, or careless or improper
operation.
b. Effect of an upset.
An upset constitutes an affirmative defense to an action brought for noncompliance with
such technology based permit effluent limitations if the requirements of paragraph c. of this
condition are met, No determination made during administrative review of claims that
noncompliance was caused by upset, and before an action for noncompliance, is final
administrative action subject to judicial review.
c. Conditions necessary for a demonstration of upset.
A permittee who wishes to establish the affirmative defense of upset shall demonstrate,
through properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs, or other relevant evidence that:
(1) An upset occurred and that the permittee can identify the cause(s) of the upset;
(2) The permittee facility was at the time being properly operated; and
(3) The permittee submitted notice of the upset as required in Part II, E. 6. (b) (B) of this
permit.
(4) The permittee complied with any remedial measures required under Part II, B. 2. of this
permit.
d. Burden of proof.
Li any enforcement proceeding the permittee seeking to establish the occurrence of an upset
has the burden of proof.
6, RemQvcd Si4bstancea
Solids, sludges, filter backwash, or other pollutants removed in the course of treatment or
control of wastewaters shall be utilized/disposed of in accordance with NCGS 143-215.1 and in
a manner such as to prevent any pollutant from such materials from entering waters of the State
or navigable waters of the United States. The permittee shall comply with all existing federal

Part II
Page 10 of 14
regulations governing the disposal of sewage sludge. Upon promulgation of 40 CFR Part 503,
any permit issued by the Permit Issuing Authority for the utilization/disposal of sludge may be
reopened and, modified, or revoked and reissued, to incorporate applicable requirements at 40
CFR Part 503. The permittee shall comply with applicable 40 CFR Part 503 Standards for the
Use and Disposal of Sewage Sludge (when promulgated) within the time provided in the
regulation, even if the permit is not modified to incorporate the requirement. The permitter
shall notify the Permit Issuing Authority of any significant change in its sludge use or disposal
practices,
7. Power Failures
The permittee is responsible for maintaining adequate safeguards as required by DEM
Regulation, Title 15A, North Carolina Administrative Code, Subchapter 2H, .0124 Reliability,
to prevent the discharge of untreated or inadequately treated wastes during electrical power
failures either by means of alternate power sources, standby generators or retention of
inadequately treated effluent.
SECTION D..MQNITCRJNG AND RECORDS
1. Representative Sampling
Samples collected and measurements taken, as required herein, shall be characteristic of the
volume and nature of the permitted discharge. Samples collected at a frequency less than daily
shall be taken on a day and time that is characteristic of the discharge over the entire period
which the sample represents. All samples shall be taken at the monitoring points specified in.
this permit and, unless otherwise specified, before the effluent joins or is diluted by any other
wastestream, body of water, or substance. Monitoring points shall not be changed without
notification to and the approval of the Permit Issuing Authority.
Reporting
Monitoring results obtained during the previous months) shall be summarized for each month
and reported on a monthly Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) Form (DEM No, MR 1,1.1, 2,
3) or alternative forms approved by the Director, DEM, postmarked no later than the 30th day
following the completed reporting period.
The first DMR is due on the last day of the month following the issuance of the permit or in the
case of a new facility, on the last day of the month following the commencement of discharge.
Duplicate signed copies of these, and all other reports required herein, shall be submitted to the
following address:
Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section
ATTENTIQN: antral Files
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
Flow Measnts
Appropriate flow measurement devices and methods consistent with accepted scientific
practices shall be selected and used to ensure the accuracy and reliability of measurements of
the volume of monitored discharges, The devices shall be installed, calibrated and maintained
to ensure that the accuracy of the measurements are consistent with the accepted capability of
that type of device. Devices selected shall be capable of measuring flows with a maximum
deviation of less than + 10% from the true discharge rates throughout the range of expected

Part II
Page 11 of 14
discharge volumes. Once -through condenser cooling water flow which is monitored by pump
logs, or pump hour meters as specified in Part I of this permit and based on the manufacturer's
pump curves shall not be subject to this requirement.
4. Test Procedures
Test procedures for the analysis of pollutants shall conform to the EMC regulations published
pursuant to NCGS 143-215.63 et. seq, the Water and Air Quality Reporting Acts, and to
regulations published pursuant to Section 304(g), 33 USC 1314, of the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act, as Amended, and Regulation 40 CFR 136; or in the case of sludge use or
disposal, approved under 40 CFR 136, unless otherwise specified in 40 CFR 503, unless
other test procedures have been specified in this permit.
To meet the intent of the monitoring required by this permit, all test procedures must produce
minimum detection and reporting levels that are below the permit discharge requirements and.
all data generated must be reported down to the minimum detection or lower reporting level of
the procedure. If no approved methods are determined capable of achieving minimum.
detection and reporting levels below permit discharge requirements, then the most sensitive
(method with the lowest possible detection and reporting level) approved method must be used.
The Clean Water Act provides that any person who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly
renders inaccurate, any monitoring device or method required to be maintained under this
permit shall, upon conviction, be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000 per violation, or
by imprisonment for not more than two years per violation, or by both. If a conviction of a
person is for a violation committed after a first conviction of such person under this paragraph,
punishment is a fine of not more than $20,000 per day of violation, or by imprisonment of not
more than 4 years, or both.
6. Records Retention
Except for records of monitoring information required by this permit related to the perrnittee's
sewage sludge use and disposal activities, which shall be retained for a period of at least five
years (or longer as required by 40 CFR 503), the permittee shall retain records of all
monitoring information, including all calibration and maintenance records and all original strip
chart recordings for continuous monitoring instntmentation, copies of all reports required by
this permit, for a period of at least 3 years from the date of the sample, measurement, report
or application. This period may be extended by request of the Director at any time.
7. Recording,Result�
For each measurement or sample taken pursuant to the requirements of this permit, the
permittee shall record the following information:
a. The date, exact place, and time of sampling or measurements;
b. The individual(s) who performed the sampling or measurements;
c. The date(s) analyses were performed;
d The individual(s) who performed the analyses;
e. The analytical techniques or methods used; and
f. The results of such analyses.

Pan II
Page 12 of 14
8. Inspection and Emu
The perrnirtee shall allow the Director, or an authorized representative (including an authorized
contractor acting as a representative of the Director), upon the presentation of credentials and
other documents as may be required by law, to;
a. Enter upon the permittee's premises where a regulated facility or activity is located or
conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of this permit.
b. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the
conditions of this permit;
c. Inspect at reasonable times any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and control
equipmen(), practices, or operations regulated or required under this permit; and
d. Sample or monitor at reasonable times, for the purposes of assuring, permit compliance or
as otherwise authorized by the Clean Water Act, any substances or parameters at any
location.
SECTION E. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
I. Change in Discharge
All discharges authorized herein shall be consistent with the terms and conditions of this
permit. The discharge of any pollutant identified in this permit more frequently than or at a
level in excess of that authorized shall constitute a violation of the permit.
2. Planned Ch4tIgs
The perrnitte,e shall give notice to the Director as soon as possible of any planned physical
alterations or additions to the permitted facility. Notice is required only when:
a. The alteration or addition to a permitted facility may meet one of the criteria for determining
whether a facility is a new source in 40 CFR Part 122.29 (b); or
b. The alteration or addition could significantly change the nature or increase the quantity of
pollutants discharged. This notification applies to pollutants which are subject neither to
effluent limitations in the permit, nor to notification requirements under 40 CFR Part 122.42
(a) (1).
c. The alteration or addition results in a significant change in the permittee's sludge use or
disposal practices, and such alternation, addition or change may justify the application of
permit conditions that are different from or absent in the existing permit, including
notification of additional use or disposal sites not reported during the permit application
process or not reported pursuant to an approved land application plan.
,AmicipaLecl Noncompliance
The permittee shall give advance notice to the Director of any planned changes in the
facility or activity which may result in noncompliance with permit requirements.

Part II
Page 13 of 14
4. Transfers
This permit is not transferable to any person except after notice to the Director. The Director
may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the permittee and incorporate such
other requirements as may be necessary under the Clean Water Act.
Monitoring Reports
Monitoring results shall be reported at the intervals specked elsewhere in this permit.
a. Monitoring results must be reported on a Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) (See Part II.
D. 2 of this permit) or forms provided by the Director for reporting results of monitoring of
sludge use or disposal practices.
b. If the permittee monitors any pollutant more frequently than required by the permit, using
test procedures specified in Part II, D. 4. of this permit or in the case of sludge use or
disposal, approved under 40 CFR 503, or as specified in this permit, the results of this
monitoring shall be included in the calculation and reporting of the data submitted in the
DMR.
c. Calculations for all limitations which require averaging of measurements shall utilize an.
arithmetic mean unless otherwise specified by the Director in the permit.
6. Twenty-four Hour Reporting
a. The permittee shall report to the central office or the appropriate regional office any
noncompliance which may endanger health or the environment. Any information shall be
provided orally within 24 hours from the time the permittee became aware of the
circumstances. A written submission shall also be provided within 5 days of the time the
permittee becomes aware of the circumstances. The written submission shall contain a
description of the noncompliance, and its cause; the period of noncompliance, including
exact dates and times, and if the noncompliance has not been corrected, the anticipated time
it is expected to continue; and steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent
reoccurrence of the noncompliance.
b. The following shall be included as information which must be reported within 24 hours
under this paragraph:
(l) Any unanticipated bypass which exceeds any effluent limitation in the permit.
2) Any upset which exceeds any effluent limitation in the permit.
(3) Violation of a maximum daily discharge limitation for any of the pollutants listed by the
Director in the permit to be reported within 24 hours.
c. The Director may waive the written report on a case -by -case basis for reports under
paragraph h, above of this condition if the oral report has been received within 24 hours.
7. Other Noncompliance
The permittee shall report l i .xrances of noncompliance not reported under Part II. F. 5 and 6,
of this permit at the time TMnnoni.oring reports are submitted, Thw reports shall contain the
information listed in Part E. 6. of this permit.

Part II
Page 14 of 14
8. Other Information
Where the permittee becomes aware that it failed to submit any relevant facts in a permit
application, or submitted incorrect information in a permit application or in any report to the
Director, it shall promptly submit such facts or information.
9. Noncompliance Nisincatioa
The permittee shall report by telephone to either the central office or the appropriate regional
office of the Division as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours or on the next
working day following the occurrence or first knowledge of the occurrence of any of the
following:
a. Any occurrence at the water pollution control facility which results in the discharge of
significant amounts of wastes which are abnormal in quantity or characteristic, such as the
dumping of the contents of a sludge digester; the known passage of a slug of hazardous
substance through the facility; or any other unusual circumstances.
b. Any process unit failure, due to known or unknown reasons, that render the facility
incapable of adequate wastewater treatment such as mechanical or electrical failures of
pumps, aerators, compressors, etc.
c. Any failure of a pumping station, sewer line, or treatment facility resulting in a by-pass
directly to receiving waters without treatment of all or any portion of the influent to such
station or facility.
Persons reporting such occurrences by telephone shall also file a written report in letter form
within 5 days following first knowledge of the occurrence.
10. Availability of Reponai
Except for data determined to be confidential under NCGS 143-215.3(a)(2) or Section 308 of
the Federal Act, 33 USC 1318, all reports prepared in accordance with the terms shall be
available for public inspection at the offices of the Division of Environmental Management. As
required by the Act, effluent data shall not be considered confidential. Knowingly making any
false statement on any such report may result in the imposition of criminal penalties as provided
for in NCGS I43-215.1(b)(2) or in Section 309 of the Federal Act,
11. Penalties for Falsification of Repos
The Clean Water Act provides that any person who knowingly makes any false statement,
representation, or certification in any record or other document submitted or required to be
maintained under this permit, including monitoring reports or reports of compliance or
noncompliance shall, upon conviction, be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000 per
violation, or by imprisonment for not more than two years per violation, or by both.

PART III
OTHER REQUIREMENTS
A. Construction
No construction of wastewater treatment facilities or additions to add to the plant's treatment
capacity or to change the type of process utilized at the treatment plant shall be begun until
Final Plans and Specifications have been submitted to the Division of Environmental
Management and written approval and Authorization to Construct has been issued.
B. Groundwater Monitoring
The permittee shall, upon written notice from the Director of the Division of Environmental
Management, conduct groundwater monitoring as may be required to determine the
compliance of this NPDES permitted facility with the current groundwater standards.
C. Changes in Discharges of Toxic Substances
The permitter shall notify the Permit Issuing Authority as soon as it mows or has reason to
believe:
a.That any activity has occurred or will occur which would result in the discharge, on a
routine or frequent basis, of any toxic pollutant which is not limited in the permit, if that
discharge will exceed the highest of the following "notification levels";
(1) One hundred micrograms per liter (100 ug/1);
(2)Two hundred micrograms per liter (200 ug/1) for acrolein and acrylonitrile; five
hundred micrograms per liter (500 ug/1) for 2.4-dinitrophenol and for 2-methyl-4.6-
dinitrophenol; and one milligram per liter (1 mg/1) for antimony;
(3) Five (5) times the maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant in the
permit application.
b. That any activity has occurred or will occur which would result in any discharge, on a
non -routine or infrequent basis, of a toxic pollutant which is not limited in the permit, if
that discharge will exceed the highest of the following "notification levels";
(I) Five hundred micrograms per liter (500 ug/1);
(2) One milligram per liter (1 mg/1) for antimony;
(3) Ten (10) times the maximum concentration value reported far that pollutant in the
permit application,
D. & uirement IQS:oppaualsy Ev li�ajejt]rP • ari _ ctr ey Diseharg°.i
The permittee shall continually evaluate alI wastewater disposal alternatives and pursue the
most environmentally sound alternative of the reasonably cost effective alternatives. If the
facility is in substantial non-compliance with the terms and conditions of the NPDES permit
or governing rules, regulations or laws, the permittee shall submit a report in such form and
detail as required by the Divis,=):a evaluating these alternatives and a plan of action within
sixty (60:1 days of notification hs t .: Division.

PART
RE« 0 AN CON AN R 'G
,. The must pay the annual administering and comp ce n nits ring 0
s after being billed by the Division. Failure to pay the fee ely er
a may cause this Division to ° at actin to
revoke die permi
300 Copies of t i public docunent were pr ntedt a st of
33 or $.28 each.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
HEIDI PASSALES
Amoco Corporation
375 NORTHRIDGE RD, #600
ATLANTA, GA 30350
Dear Permittee:
January 7, 2000
ATA,
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURc ES
ViRC)-IN HT.
JAN 1 9 2000
Subject: Renewal of 286
Amoco Station #57
MECKLENBURG County
The subject permit expires on. August 31, 2000. North Carolina Administrative Code (I5A NCAC
2H.0105(e)) requires that an application for pei mit renewal be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration of the
current permit.
To satisfy this requirement, your renewal package must be sent to the Division postmarked no later than
March 4, 2000. Failure to request renewal of the pe:miit by this date will result in a civil assessment of at least
$250.00. Larger penalties may be assessed depending upon the delinquency of the request.
If any wastewater discharge will occur after August 31, 2000 (or if continuation of the permit is desired).
the current permit must be renewed. Operation of wastewater treatment works or continuation of discharge after
August 31, 2000 would violate North Carolina General Statute :143-215.1 and could result in assessment of civil
penalties of up to 825,000 per day.
If all wastewater discharge has ceased at your facility and you wish to rescind this pemiit. contact Robert
Fain er of the Division's Compliance Enforcement Unit at (919) 733-5..083, extension 531. You May also contact
the Mooresville Regional Office at (704) 663-1..699 to begin the rescission process.
Use the enclosed checklist to complete your renewal package. The checklist identifies the items you must
submit with the permit renewal application. If you have any questions, please contact me. My telephone
number, fax number and email address are listed at the bottom of this page.
cc: Central Files
Mooresville Reti
NPDES File
t3r tion
C
Sincerely,
Charles H. Weaver, Jr.
NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North, Carol ea 27699-1617 919 733-5083, extension 511 (lax) 919 733-0719
VISIT US ON THE INTERNET @ http://h2o_enr_slatemc,usiNPDES
Charies.Weaver@ncrnatnel

NPDES Permit NCO085286
Amoco Corporation
MECKLINBURG County
The following items are REQUIRED for all renewal packages:
A cover letter requesting renewal of the permit and documenting any changes at the
facility since issuance of the last permit. Submit one signed original and two copies.
J The. completed application form (copy attached), signed by the perrnittee or an Authorized.
Representative. Submit one signed original and two copies.
If an Authorized Representative (see Part ILK 1 Lb of the existing NPDES permit) prepares
the renewal package, written documentation must he provided showing the authority
delegated to the .Authorized Representative.
A narrative description of the sludge management plan for the facility. Describe how
sludge (or other solids) generated during wastewater treatment are handled and
disposed. If your facility has no such plan (or the permitted facility does not, generate
any solids), explain this in writing. Submit one signed original and two copies..
J
The following, items must be submitted ONLY by Industrial facilities
discharging process wastewater:
Industrial facilities classified as Primary Industries (see Appendix A to Title 40 of the
Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1.22) rnu,st submit. a Priority Pollutant Analysis (PPA) in
accordance with 40 CFR Part 122.21. If the PPA is not completed within one week of
March 4, 2000, submit the application package without the PPA. Submit the PPA as
soon as possible after March 4, 2000.
The above requirement does NOT apply to municipal or non -industrial
facilities.
PLEASE NOTE:
Due to a change in fees effective January 1, 1999, there is no renewal fee
required with your application package.
Send the completed renewal package to:
Mr. Charles H. Weaver, Jr.
NC DENR / Water Quality / NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
February 19, 1996
Ms. Heidi Passales
Amoco Corporation
375 Northridge Drive, #600
Atlanta, Georgia 30350
Subject: Permit No. NC0085286
Authorization to Construct
Amoco Service Station #57
Mecklenburg County
Dear Ms. Passales:
A letter of request for an Authorization to Construct was received on September 5, 1995 by
the Division and final plans and specifications for the subject project have been reviewed and found
to be satisfactory. Authorization is hereby granted for the construction of a groundwater
remediation facility with final discharge of treated wastewater into an unnamed tributary to
McMullen Creek. The approved system consists of the following components:
• 8 gpm oil/water separator
• Six tray air stripper - CarbonAir Model STAT 30 or equivalent
• HCA 15 GACA granular activated carbon canister with 400 pounds of carbon
• Associated pumps, piping, and other appurtenances
This Authorization to Construct is issued in accordance with Part III, Paragraph A of
NPDES Permit No. NC0085286 issued February 19, 1996 and shall be subject to revocation
unless the wastewater treatment facilities are constructed in accordance with the conditions and
limitations specified in Permit No. NC0085286,
The sludge generated from these treatment facilities must be disposed of in accordance with
G.S. 143-215.1 and in a manner approved by the North Carolina Division of Environmental
Management.
In the event that the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily, including the creation of
nuisance conditions, the Permittee shall take immediate corrective action, including those as may be
required by this Division, such as the construction of additional or replacement wastewater
treatment or disposal facilities.
The Mooresville Regional Office, telephone number [phone] shall be notified at
least forty-eight (48) hours in advance of operation of the installed facilities so that an in -place
inspection can be made. Such notification to the regional supervisor shall be made during the
normal office hours from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m, on Monday through Friday, excluding State
Holidays.
PSD. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity. Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Permit No. NC0085286
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTE
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards
and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management
Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Amoco Corporation
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at
Amoco Service Station #57
4475 Randolph Road
Charlotte
Mecklenburg County
to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to McMullen Creek in the Catawba River Basin
in accordance Nvith effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts 1,
11, and III hereof.
The permit shall become effective
This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on August 31, 2000.
Signed this day VtANY
A
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P,E., Director
Division of Environmental Managenient
By /kuthority of the Environmental Mitnagernent Commission

is he by aath . rir
S PI IE LNI TO P R IT COVER SHEET
Arnow Corporatio
Permit NC0085286
After receiving an Authorization to Construct from the Division of Environmental
Management, construct. treatment facilities located at Amoco Service Station #57 at 4475
Randolph Road, Charlotte, in Mecklenburg County as necessary to meet the limits of this
permit for discharge of treated wastewater at outfa l 001; (see Pact III of this permit), and
Discharg stewater from said treatment c)rks at the location specified on the attached
map into an t nnamcd tribute
Catawba Rigor Ilasi
4lttlltt `rock which is classified Class C waters in the,

e'4o7G'v

A. f IENtl" ItIMITATIONS AND MONEFORING REQIJIREMENTs FINAL Permit No NC(X)8526
During dic period beginning on the elMetive date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Pemtinee is authorized to discharge from outiall
serial number 001. Such discharges shall he linlited and monitored by the pertnitiee as specified below:
Effluent Characteristics
Discharge Limitations Monitoring_ Requirements
Measurement Sample Sample
MitatrithlY2 Avg. Polly Max* Enroluminyern Type LUSA* i o ri, I
now 0i0144 MC„ID Continuous Recorder E
Oil anti Grease Monthly Grab E
Benzene Monthly Grab
Toluene Monthly Grab E
Naphthalene Monthly Grab E
M'rBi-i] Monthly Grab E
I fetid 25,0 tnilatil Monthly Grab E
Foot notits:
1 Sample location: F Effluent
11 t1 SI fAltle BE NO DISCIIARGE OF FLOATING SOLOS OR FOAM IN OTHER THAN TRACE AMOUNTS.,

SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: Yes No X
To: Permits and Engineering Unit
Water Quality Section
Attention: Jeanette Powell
Date: November 9, 1995
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
County: Mecklenburg
MRO No.: 95-138
Permit No. NC0085286
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
Facility and Address: Amoco Service Station #57
4475 Randolph Road
Charlotte, N.C.
2. Date of Investigation: 11-1-95
3. Report Prepared By: Samar Bou-Ghazale, Env. Engineer I
4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: Mr. William Ferguson,
Hydrogeologist with Handex of the Carolinas, Inc.; Tel# 704-
598-7900
5. Directions to Site: From the intersection of Hwy 16 and
Sharon Amity Road in southern Mecklenburg County, travel North
on Sharon Amity Road approximately 0.6 mile to the
intersection with Randolph road. The site is located in the
east quadrant of the intersection.
6. Discharge Point(s). List for all discharge points:
Latitude: 35° 10' 34" Longitude: 80° 47' 54"
Attach a U.S.G.S. map extract and indicate treatment facility
site and discharge point on map.
USGS Quad No.: G 15 NE USGS Quad Name: Charlotte East
7. Site size and expansion are consistent with application?
Yes X No If No, explain:
Topography (relationship to flood plain included): Sloping at
the rate of 1 to 2%. The site is not located in a flood plain.
9. Location of nearest dwelling: Several houses and businesses

are located within 200 feet of the site.
10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Unnamed'
Tributary to McMullen Creek.
a. Classification: C
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: Catawba River Basin
c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent
downstream uses: Discharge will be into the city storm
sewer. The storm outlet is located approximately 500
feet from the site and discharges into a dry ditch
approximately 2000 feet prior to entering an unnamed
tributary to McMullen Creek. The storm sewer system
passes through a residential area prior to discharging
into the unnamed tributary. Pertinent downstream uses
are those typical for Class C Water (secondary
recreation, agriculture, etc.)
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. a.
Volume of wastewater to be permitted: 0.0144 MGD
(Ultimate Design Capacity)
b. What is the current permitted capacity of the wastewater
treatment facility? N/A.
c. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility
(current design capacity)? N/A,
d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous
Authorizations to Construct issued in the previous two
years: N/A.
e. Please provide a description of existing or substantially
constructed wastewater treatment facilities: N/A.
f. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater
treatment facilities: The proposed groundwater treatment
system will consist of monitoring wells, recovery wells,
an oil water separator, an air stripper, and carbon
adsorption system.
Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: Discharges of
this nature have been shown to be toxic.
g.
h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): N/A.
2. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme: Generation
of residuals is not expected.
NPDES Permit Staff Report
Version 10/92
Page 2

been evaluated and found not to be viable alternatives due to
limited space. However no written documentation has been
.provided.
above
is recommended that the NPDES Permit be issued once the
nentio ed concerns regarding toxicity have been addresseda
er uality R-'.,onal Super'
SPDES Permit Staff Report
Version 0/92

77IH 1N1W1

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
October 24, 1995
Ms, Heidi Passales
Amoco Corporation
375 Northridge Drivel
Atlanta,, Georgia '30350
Subject:: NPDES Permit Application
NPDES Permit NC0085286
Amoco Service Station#57
Mecklenburg County
Dear Ms. Passales;
It has come to the attention of the Division that the groundwater contamination at the subject site contains
diesel fuel constituents. Based upon these findings, the Division cannot issue a general permit for this facility.
The submitted general permit application (previously application number NCG510289) has been changed to
an individual permit application (application number NC0085286). The change in permit number does not
affect the status of this application, or the ongoing staff review. Please note, however, that an individual
permit may take up to 180 days from date of application receipt to issue.
You will be advised of any comments,. recommendations, questions, or other information necessary for
completion of the application review. If you have any questions regarding this application, please contact
Jeanette Powell at [phone], extension 537. Please reference the subject NPDES permit number in any
correspondence with this office.
id A. Goodrich, Supervisor
PDES Permits Group
cc. Mooresville Regional Office
Permit File
Handex of the Carolinas, Inc.
P,©. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-ty535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post, -consumer paper

ir
estate of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
September 22, 1995
Ms, Heidi Passales
Amoco Corporation.
375 Northridge Drive, #600
Atlanta, Georgia 30350
Subject: NPDES Permit Application
NPDES Permit NCG510289
Amoco Service Station #57
Mecklenburg County
Dear Ms. Passales:
This is to acknowledge receipt of the following documents on September 5, 1995:
• NPDES Perrnit Application Form
• Request for Permit and. Authorization to Construct
• Corrective Action Plan
• Application Fee of $400.00
• Authorization to Construct Fee of $150.00
A preliminary review of the submitted package has been performed. The following items} are needed before
final review and permit issuance can be completed:
Monitoring data for naphthalene and phenol are required under item 4.D. of the NCG510004 Notice
of Intent form that was submitted. This data is necessary to determine the presence of diesel fuel
constituents in groundwater remediation discharges, which are not currently eligible for coverage
under a general permit,
Final plans for the groundwater remediatian system must be submitted with a Professional Engineers
signature and official seal affixed.
The requested additional information must be received within 30 days of this notification. If this
information is not received prior to this date, the application will be returned to you and may be resubmitted
when complete.
I am, by copy of this letter, requesting that our Regional Office Supervisor prepare a staff report and.
recommendations regarding this discharge. You will be advised of any comments, recommendations,
questions, or other information necessary for the application review. If you have any questions regarding this
application, please contact Jeanette Powell at [phone], extension 537.
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Permit File
Handex of the Carolinas, Inc.
Sincerely,
David A. Goodrich, Supervisor
NPDES Permits Group
P.o, Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10©r'o post consumer paper

D.
!/2895
1(':13 ' j'7O4 598 2248
HANDEX/CAROLINAS
AUG
State of North Carolina.
Department of Environment, Health and. Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Junes G. Martin. Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr.. Sectary
NOTICE_ ()FINITE
NationaJ pllutant Discharge Elimination System
Application for Coverage under General Permit NCG510000 Ground
designed tea treat petroleum contaminated groundwater.
1. Narne, Address , location. and telephone number of facility reyuesti
A. Official Name:
B. Mailing Address:
(1)Street Address;
(2)City;
(3)State;
(4)Zip;
(5)County;
tion. (Attach map
(1)Street Address;
(2)City;
(3)State;
(4)County;
Telephone Nunilaea
Facility Contact
A. Name;
B. Title;
C. Company Name;
D. Phone Number,
r4M0QI RPQR4 TI©N
ATT : ,C I PASSALES
375 NORTHRIDGE FOALS, #604
A TL.ANTA
Z,'E6HG/A
30350
©i12
10:14AM
A. Prey Howes Jr., P.E.
Acting Director
GWINNETT
delineating general5 ANDOLPHIROAD
Application type (check appro;
A. New or Proposed;
B. Existing;
C. Modification;
Describe the nature of the mod*
tHARLQTTE
NORTWROMI -
MECKL F.NBURG
HEIDI PASSALES
REMEDIATION COORDINATOR
AMOCO CORPORATION
(404) 512 ., 6851
selection):
1f previously
and issue date
on
4. Description of discharge
A. Please state the number of separate discharge points.
1,7;Z.II;3T1i4,Il;..._..l1.
Page 1

/95 10:14 e704 598 2248
IIANDEVCAII CNAS
�043
AUG 28 '9 10 15AM
B. Please `be the amount of wastewater being discharged per each separate discharge point:
MAX tat,, s'%allons per day (god) NIA (god) 3. N 4 (gpd) 4 . (gpd)
C. Check the duration and frequency of the discharge, per each separate discharge point
1. ConsinuauS
2. intermittent (please desea N/A
3. Seasonal (check monthfs
May Mgt t; July1; A
4. How many days per wee
Monday Id, TuesdayXL Wednesday �, "I"hursday
5. How much of the volume discharged is treated? (st
D. Describe the type of wastewater being discharged per separate discharge point. Specify what is
being removed and products recovered. This includes a listing of any cheerio found in
detectable amounts with the maximum observed concentration reported. The summary of
analytical results containing this rnaucimum value should also be submitted (i.e. the listing, not
the graphical scan). The most recent sample must be no older than one year previous to the date
of this application. The following volatile organic compounds should be included along with
any suspected fuel additive;
1. Benzene'*,
2. Toluene;
3. Ethylbenzene';
4. Xylene*;
5. Lead;
6. Methyl tertbutylether
7. Dibromoethane (EDB);
8. 1,2-dichloroethane;
9. Isopropyl ether,
10. Naphthalene;
11. Phenol;
An EPA approved method capable of detectlart levels to 1 ppb should be used to detect these
compounds).
s).
E. Please check the appropriate type of treatment
1. OiUWater Separator.2
7. Air Stripper,,
Diffused Aeration;
Activated Carlson Absorption; X
(specify);,.._
fr. a lately, please in dpa
type of tree nt that was checked in 1 through . Include,
s information on each type of treatment. Also pie the
detected for the project, if known. Give dcs
materials used in air stripper, etc.). Existing tree i newt f*dillies
described in detail and design criteria or operational data should be provided(
calculations) to ensure that the facility can comply with requirements of the General Permit.
Please include model and calculations used in determining the design requirements ter the air
stripper.
7. What are the well sizes and how many exist.
8. Please state the pump sizes and their location In relation to the treatment used in part "
9. Please explain what fail-safe measures, such as audible and visual alarms or automatic
shutoff systems, are provided to ensure no system failures.
10. Is there an access to the effluent for sampling?( either an open pipe or a valve to obtain a
sample)
Page 2

/28/95 10:15 ' 704 598 2248
//lir
and sped
with
sets
/CM 0LINAS
9r14
AUG 2e '95 10:
NOTE: Construction of any wastewater treatment fa tties require submission of th ree (3) of plans
fications along with their application. Design of treatment facilities must comply
requirement 15A NCAC 2H .0138. If construction applies to the discharge, include the
of plans and specifications with the application.
5. What is the nature of the business applying for this permit, RETAIL GASOLINE STATION
6. Name of receiving water or waters; MCMULLEN CREEK C lastifiration:
(Attach a USGS topographical map with all discharge poindsl clearly marked)
7. Is the discharge directly to the receiving ►water?(Y, ) NO
If no, state specifically the discharge point. Mark clearly the pathway to the potential receiving
waters on the site map. (This includes tracing the pathway of the storm sewer to its discharge
point. if a storm sewer is the only viable means of discharge.)
& Please address possible non -discharge alternatives for the following options:
A. Connection to a Regional Sewer Collection System; CHA'RL©TTE-MEGKLENBURG COLLECTION SYST
IS NOT ACCEPTING NEW i)ISCHARGES.
B. Subsurface Disposal; NOT PRACTICAL DUE TO LOW PERMEAB/L/TY OF SUBSURFACE MATERIAL.
C. Spray Irrigation; NOT FEASIBLE IN URBAN LOCATION.
9. I certify that I am familiar with the info rmoation contain ued ini the application and that to the best of
my knowledge and belief such itdcr
PrintedNamecrfIloziAtSign r
NORTH CAROLINAGENERAL STA`
Any person who knowingly maany
application, record. report, plan or other document des or 21 or
regulations of the Envirorntnental Management. Commission impletar nbng that Arrticle, or who
tampers with or knowingly renders inaccurate any recording or monitoring d or method required to
be operated or maintained under Article 21 or regulations of tl En ironm►ental Management
Coon implementing that Article, shrill be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to
exceed $10,tlCO3 or by imprisonment not to exceed six months, or by both. (18 U.S.0 Section 1001 provides
a punislunent by a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment not more than 5 years, or both, for a
similar offense.)
Notice of Intent must be accompanied by a check or money order for �t0 rn
Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. Mail
package to:
Division of Environmental Management
NPDES Permits Group
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
e
Pi
Page 3

andc!x
October 13, 1995
Samar Bou-ghazale
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health & Natural Resources
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
RE: General NPDES Permit Application
AMOCO Service Station # 57
4475 Randolph Road
Charlotte, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Bou-ghazale:
uNviR07,4-0F,NT IT., Lin
OCT 1 7 1995
gp°° qq amp g�
Handex of the Carolinas, Inc. (Handex), on behalf of Amoco Corporation (Amoco), is
pursuing an application for a General NPDES Permit for the above referenced site. A
copy of the Corrective Action Plan (CAP) prepared for this site by Handex is enclosed for
your review.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding this matter, please contact our
office at [phone].
Sincerely,
Handex of The
arolinas, Inc.
William L. Ferguson
Hydrogeologist 11
c. Heidi Passales - AMOCO
3600-G Woodpark Boulevard, Charlotte, North Carolina 28206 • [phone] FAX [phone]

CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN
AMOCO SERVICE STATION #57
4475 RANDOLPH ROAD
CHARLO 1 i E, NORTH CAROLINA
INCIDENT #7208
Report Prepared For:
AMOCO OIL COMPANY
375 NORTHRIDGE ROAD, #600
ATLANTA, GA 30350
Report Prepared By:
HANDEX OF THE CAROLINAS, INC.
36009E WOODPARK BLVD.
CHARLOTTE, NC 28206
[phone]
September 25, 1995
I. L. Fergu R, ,GIT
Hydrogeolog`s
John anion, P.G.
Projec Manager
:i' ATUR L )°"L
OCT I 7 4

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Certificatiof"for the 'Submittal of a Corrective Action Plan
Under 15A NCAC 2L .0106(c)
esponsible Party
Address:
City:
Site Name:
Address
City:
AM©CO: CORPORATION
ATLANTA
A1MOCO SERVICE STATION 57
4475 RANDOLPH ROAD
cA Zip Code: 3e35°
A R r.OT Unty: NC:
de:
Groundwater Section Incident Number: 72e8
1, JOHN F. SCANLON , P . G. , a Professional Engineer/Licensed Geologist (circle
one) for HANDX OP 1'B ' CIA ROL INAS (firm or company of employment), do hereby
certify that the information indicated below is enclosed as part of the required Corrective Action
Plan (CAP) and that to the best of my knowledge the data, site assessments. engineering
plans and other associated materials are correct and accurate.
(Each item must be Initialed by hand by the certifying licensed professlonat).
A listing of the names and addresses of those individuals required to be
notified to meet the notification requirements of 15A NCAC 2L .0114(a) Is
enclosed. Copies of letters and certified mail receipts are also enclosed.
rofessional Engineer or Licensed Geologist has prepared, reviewed,
and certified all applicable parts of the CAP in accordance with
15A NCAC 2L.0103(e).
A site assessment is attached ter on file at the appropriate Regional Office
which provides the information required by 15A NCAC 2L .0106(g)_
A description of the proposed corrective action and supporting justification is
used,
fic plans and engineering details are enclosed and propose the use of
the best available technology for the restoration of groundwater quality to
the levels of the groundwater standards prescribed in 15A NCAC 2L .0202.
A schedule for the implementation and operation of the CAP is enclosed.
(OVER)
�71ev, 7/95

T Any ad
enitrig pt is er cJe+�d the : • to a to t
ve of the 3ty. a meu
pi tr e, and ee%aute e 3 .Q11Q.
suited in r
i15A NCAC'0
n
g nature)
your submittal.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM
PAGE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
1.2 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES
1.3 SOIL QUALITY SUMMARY ..... . .. . ..... . ... .
1.4 SUMMARY OF SITE HYDROGEOLOGY .........
1.5 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL DATA .......... .
1.6 SUMMARY OF ABATEMENT/REMEDIAL ACTIONS
2.0 OBJECTIVES OF THE CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN
3.0 EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT ..
3.1 HISTORICAL ANALYTICAL DATA
3.2 PHYSICAL PROPERTIES .... .
3.3 CHEMICAL PROPERTIES .... .
3.4 TRANSPORT AND FATE
3.5 POTENTIAL RECEPTORS
.3
.4
.4
.5
.6
.8
.8
8
11
11
13
4.0 REMEDIAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION 14
4.1 SOIL REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES .. „ ....... , . • . • . • . • • • • • • • • . - • • • 15
4.1.1 Soil Excavation and Treatment 15
4.1.2 Soil Vapor Extraction 16
4.2 GROUNDWATER REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES • . • ... - - 17
4.2.1 Natural Biodegradation/Attenuation ......................... 18
4.2.2 Air Sparging ..................................,...... 19
4.2.3 Pump -and -Treat ...... . ...... . ... . .............. . . . .... 20
4.3 REMEDIAL ENDPOINTS ......... - • . .............. . ..... • .... , 23
4.4 RECOMMENDED REMEDIAL ACTION ..... - .. • • ....... • .... • • . 24
4.5 TARGET START-UP AND COMPLETION DATES FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION 24
5.0 FIELD INVESTIGATIONS ....... • ,
5.1 SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION TEST .......
5.2 VACUUM -ENHANCED AQUIFER TEST ......
5.2.1 Aquifer Test Well Installation . , ....... .
5.2.2 Aquifer Test Procedure. ....... • .
5.2.3 Aquifer Test Results.
5.2.4 Vacuum -Enhanced Aquifer Test Procedure
5.2.5 Vacuum -Enhanced Aquifer Test Results . .
25
25
. 28
.28
.29
.29
. 30
. 31
ands)

ITEM
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
PAGE
6.0 REMEDIAL SYSTEMS DESIGN ..... . .... . . .
6.1 GROUNDWATER MODELING AND CAPTURE ZONE ANALYSIS
6.2 REQUIRED PERMITS.,........•.,.•.•....-•..--...
32
. 33
34
7.0 SOIL REMEDIATION SYSTEM ..............•.•.•.••...••...36
7.1 VAPOR WELL DESIGN ....................................... 36
7.2 VAPOR EXTRACTION PIPING DESIGN ....... . ....... • • . , ..... 36
7.3 SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION BLOWER SELECTION............. , ... 37
8.0 GROUNDWATER RECOVERY SYSTEM
8.1 RECOVERY WELL DESIGN ,........ .
8.2 PIPING DESIGN
8.3 GROUNDWATER PUMP SELECTION
9.0 GROUNDWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM DESIGN .........
9.1 OIL/WATER SEPARATOR
9.2 AIR STRIPPER ....................................
9.3 GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON ADSORPTION (GALA)
9.4 PRE-TREATMENT FOR IRON & BIOFOULING ............ • .
9.5 SYSTEM ENCLOSURE, CONTROLS & SAFETY MECHANISMS .
9.6 EFFLUENT DISPOSAL SYSTEM . s ..................... .
9.7 DISPOSAL OF RECOVERED LPH ......... . ...... . .... • .
10,0 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
10.1 RECOVERY SYSTEMS MONITORING
10.2 TREATMENT EQUIPMENT MONITORING
11.0 REMEDIATION PROGRESS MONITORING AND REPORTING
11.1 GAUGING OF MONITORING WELLS. ........ • .. .
11.2 WATER QUALITY SAMPLING OF MONITORING WELLS .....
11.3 QUARTERLY REPORTING ..... , .. , x ....... • . • .
11.4 ANNUAL REPORT OF REMEDIATION PROGRESS
11.5 REMEDIAL ACTION COMPLETION ....... . ..... .
38
38
. 39
40
. 41
. 41
. 42
. 43
. 45
45
. 46
. 47
47
47
. 48
49
. 50
50
. 50
. 50
51
REFERENCES ..,........H...n............ 52
andm

FIGURE 1 :
FIGURE 2:
FIGURE 3:
FIGURE 4:
FIGURE 5:
FIGURE 6 :
FIGURE 7:
FIGURE 8:
FIGURE 9 :
FIGURE 10 :
FIGURE 11 :
FIGURE 12 :
FIGURE 13 :
FIGURES
Site Location Map
Site Vicinity Map
Site Plan
Geologic Cross Section A -A'
Geologic Cross Section B-B'
Water Table Contour Map
Groundwater Benzene Concentration Map
Groundwater Total BTEX Concentration Map
Groundwater MTBE Concentration Map
Proposed Treatment System Layout
Recovery System Capture Zone Analysis
Proposed Soil Vapor Extraction Influence Map
Recovery System Schematic
TABLES
TABLE 1 :
TABLE 2:
APPENDIX A:
APPENDIX B:
APPENDIX C:
APPENDIX D:
APPENDIX E:
APPENDIX F:
APPENDIX G:
APPENDIX H:
APPENDIX I:
APPENDIX J:
APPENDIX K:
APPENDIX L:
Historical Analytical Data
Physical Properties of Selected Fluids
APPENDICES
Gauging Data and Hydraulic Gradient Calculations
Groundwater Laboratory Data (May 2, August 7, August 14, 1995)
Soil Disposal Certificate
SVE Test: Field Data, Calculations, and Air Sample Data
Aquifer Test Data
Groundwater Modeling Parameters
Soil Vapor Extraction Blower Specifications
Groundwater Pump and Air Compressor Specifications
Oil/Water Separator Specifications
Worst Case Influent Concentration and Air Stripper Specifications
GACA Unit
Particulate Filter Specifications
and

1.0 INTRODUCTION
In accordance with the authorization of Amoco Corporation (Amoco), Handex of the
Carolinas, Inc. (Handex) has prepared this Corrective Action Plan (CAP) for Amoco
Service Station # 57 (Site), located at 4475 Randolph Road, in Charlotte, Mecklenburg
County, North Carolina. The CAP was prepared in general accordance with Title 15A,
Subchapter 2L, of the North Carolina Administrative Code (15A NCAC 2L).
1.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The site is located at the northeast intersection of Randolph Road and Sharon Amity Road
in Charlotte, North Carolina. A topographic map of the site area, reproduced from the
United States Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5 minute series Charlotte East, North Carolina
quadrangle, is presented as Figure 1. Land use surrounding the site is primarily
commercial with office buildings, other retail gas stations, fast food restaurants, and a
strip mall. All four corners at the intersection of Randolph Road and Sharon Amity Road
are presently or were previously occupied by operating gasoline service stations, and a
former service station bordered the site to the north. Figure 2 is a map of the
surrounding area, and Figure 3 is a site plan.
Amoco's records show that he site was purchased by Amoco in June of 1960. On
February 4, 1992, a Notice of Violation (NOV) was issued by the North Carolina
ndc:

Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources (NCDEHNR), Division of
Environmental Management (DEM) for Amoco Service Station # 57. The NOV was
issued due to the reported presence of liquid phase petroleum hydrocarbons (LPH) in two
of the three on -site tank field observation wells (MW-1 and MW-3). Amoco retained Law
Environmental to complete an Initial Site Characterization (ISC) Report and initiate a LPH
removal program as required by the NOV.
Inventory control records indicated a loss of gasoline from the regular unleaded gasoline
underground storage tank (UST). On March 5, 1992, a tank tightness test was performed
on the regular unleaded UST. The result of this test determined the UST system to be
"tight". Therefore, the quantity and source of the LPH release remains unknown (Law
Environmental, March 27, 1992). The underground storage tanks have since been
removed and replaced.
The ISC Report was submitted on March 27, 1992, and the LPH removal program was
discontinued on March 11, 1992 after gauging of the tank field observation wells showed
no detection of LPH. As of March 11, 1992, 0.5 gallons of LPH had been recovered.
During a gauging event in May 1994, LPH was detected in MW-1, MW-3, and MW-9. LPH
recovery by hand -bailing was initiated. Approximately 37 ounces of LPH have been
recovered by hand -bailing since May 1994.
2
anda

1.2 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES
On February 4, 1992, a Notice of Regulatory Requirement (NORR) was issued by the
NCDEHNR-DEM. The NORR required a complete assessment of the horizontal and
vertical extent of hydrocarbons in soil and groundwater at the site. Law Environmental
completed an ISC Report in March 1992. Handex completed a Preliminary Site
Assessment (PSA) that was submitted to the DEM on June 10, 1992, and a
Comprehensive Site Assessment (CSA) report that was submitted to the DEM on June
22, 1994.
During the assessment activities performed at the site by Handex and others, six Type
II monitoring wells (MWs 4, 5, 6, 7, 9 and 10) and two Type III monitoring wells (MW-8D
and MW-11 D) were installed during the period from March 1992 to August 1993. MW-1
through MW-3 were already existing at the site prior to beginning assessment activities.
Petroleum hydrocarbons have been detected in groundwater samples from each of the
wells, with the highest levels of dissolved hydrocarbons in the area surrounding the UST
field.
Levels of petroleum hydrocarbons exceeding NCAC 2L Standards were detected in MW-
SD at a depth of 45 feet below land surface (BLS). Petroleum hydrocarbons were also
detected in MW-11 D at a depth of 60 feet BLS. However, only benzene was detected in
this monitoring well at a level above the NCAC 2L Standards of 1 microgram per liter
(jag/1)..
C1ndc

1.3 SOIL QUALITY SUMMARY
The soil quality at the site was assessed in the PSA and CSA. The soil analytical data
and the depth of sample collection are summarized on the geologic cross sections
(Figures 4 and 5). Additionally, soil samples were collected during the excavation and
removal of the USTs during May 1995. This data was submitted with the UST Closure
Report, dated July 5, 1995, and prepared by CBM Environmental.
During the removal of the USTs in May 1995, approximately 925 cubic yards of petroleum
impacted soils were removed from the site by CBM Environmental. The soils were
transported to the Cherokee Environmental Brick facility in Norwood, North Carolina, for
disposal. Soil samples collected from beneath the USTs by CBM Environmental
contained levels of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) ranging from 180 mg/kg
(milligrams per kilogram) to 45,000 mg/kg. During the UST removal, visual and olfactory
evidence of petroleum impacted soils were observed below the building and one of the
pump islands. However, concern of structural damage to the building and other property
prevented further soil excavation.
1.4 SUMMARY OF SITE HYDROGEOLOGY
The depth to water was gauged in the eleven monitoring wells on May 2, 1995. The
monitoring well gauging data was used to estimate water table elevations, which were
then used to prepare the relative water table contour map presented as Figure 6. This
contour map shows the direction of groundwater flow across the site is generally toward
4
ande

the west-southwest. Based on the May 2, 1995, measurements, the depth to
groundwater across the site ranges from approximately 11.23 to 14.90 feet BLS.
Referring to Figure 6, the hydraulic gradient was estimated to be 0.016 feet/feet across
the site. The well gauge report and the hydraulic gradient calculations are presented as
Appendix A.
1.5 RECENT GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL DATA
Groundwater samples were collected from the site monitoring wells on May 2, 1995. The
groundwater samples were analyzed for BTEX (benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene, and
xylenes) and MTBE (methyl -tertiary -butyl ether) sing the United States Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) Test Method 602. The analytical results for the most recent
sampling events are presented in Table 1. Three previous sampling events occurring in
1992, 1993, and 1994 are also included in Table 1. Additional groundwater samples were
collected on August 7, 1995, and August 14, 1995, for analysis of polynuclear aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAHs) and lead, respectively.
According to laboratory data from the sampling event performed on May 2, 1995, levels
of benzene ranged from 9.9 micrograms per liter (pg/1) in monitoring well MW-2 to 14,900
pg/I in monitoring well MW-9. Total BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes)
anda

concentrations ranged from 15.9 pg/I in monitoring well MW-2 to 50,200 pg/I in
monitoring well MW-9. Concentrations of methyl -tertiary -butyl ether (MTBE) ranged from
214 pg/I in MW-11D to 31,800 pg/I in MW-9.
A groundwater benzene concentration map, groundwater total BTEX concentration map,
and a groundwater MTBE concentration map, utilizing the May 2, 1995, data, have been
included as Figures 7, 8, and 9, respectively. The laboratory analytical reports for the
most recent sampling events (May and August 1995) are included as Appendix B.
1.6 SUMMARY OF ABATEMENT/REMEDIAL ACTIONS
According to the ISC report prepared by Law, LPH was detected in tank field observation
wells MW-1 and MW-3 in December 1991. A LPH bailing program was initiated by Law
Engineering at this site to recover the LPH and was discontinued in March 1992 after LPH
was no longer observed in the monitoring wells.
In May 1994, LPH was detected in MW-1 and MW-3 and for the first time in MW-9.
Handex has performed hand bailing of LPH in monitoring wells MW-1, MW-3, and MW-9
an an as needed basis since May 1994. In November 1994, an absorbent wick was
:laced in MW-9 to remove LPH from the groundwater. In February 1995, Amoco
contracted ECOVA to perform Enhanced Fluid Recovery (EFR) on MW-1, MW-3, and MW-
9 to remove LPH from the subsurface. No LPH has been detected in subsequent
6
anda:

monthly gauging events. It should be noted that monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-3
were destroyed during the UST removal in May 1995.
In May 1995, Amoco removed and replaced the three existing gasoline and one diesel
USTs. A new UST system was installed in the same location of the former USTs. During
the removal, approximately 925 cubic yards of petroleum -impacted soils were removed
from the UST tank field area. The excavated soils were transported to the Cherokee
Environmental Norwood, North Carolina Brick Facility for disposal. A Certificate of
Disposal is included as Appendix C.
2.0 OBJECTIVES OF THE CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN
The primary objective of the CAP is to detail a plan to reduce levels of hydrocarbons in
soils and groundwater at the Amoco site, in accordance with Title 15A, Subchapter 21_,
of the North Carolina Administrative Code (15A NCAC 2L). Final clean-up levels for
petroleum -impacted groundwater at this site could include application to the NCDEHNR
for alternate groundwater clean-up levels as allowed by Rule 0.0106( ) of the Amended
2L Groundwater Regulations, or a variance from existing 2L Groundwater Standards as
allowed by Rule 0.0106(m)
7

The remedial system proposed in this report is designed to address hydrocarbon-
impacted soil and groundwater associated with activities at the Amoco site and does not
propose to remediate petroleum -impacted soil and groundwater resulting from discharges
from any neighboring sites, if any.
3.0 EXPOSURE ASSESS I Ef IT
3.1 HISTORICAL ANALYTICAL DATA
The results of the most recent (May 1995) groundwater chemical analyses are
summarized in Table 1. Historical groundwater chemical analytical data, reproduced from
the Handex PSA and GSA reports are also included in i aole 1.
3.2 PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
The physical and chemical characteristics of a petroleum product contribute to the
behavior of the substance in the subsurface and may vary depending on such factors as
the refining process and conditions of special use (climate, geography). Critical
properties of refined petroleum fuel products are fluid density and dynamic viscosity.
Fluid density and dynamic viscosity can affect the mobility of liquid phase hydrocarbons.
Fluid density is the mass per unit volume. Table 2 lists the densities of selected
hydrocarbon fuels. Most petroleum fuel hydrocarbons have a density less than that of
water (1 gram per milliliter (g/mI)). This density contrast indicates that a bulk refined
petroleum fuel product will float on the groundwater surface (NWWA, 1989).
and

Dynamic viscosity is a measure of resistance of fluid to flow. The dynamic viscosity of
selected hydrocarbon fluids are also presented in Table 2. In general, as the density
increases, the viscosity of a petroleum product increases, and the ability of the product
to move through the subsurface decreases. Densities and viscosities tend to decrease
in most hydrocarbons with increasing temperature.
Of the other physical properties of a bulk refined petroleum fuel product, solubility and
volatility are most important. The volatility of a refined petroleum fuel product is directly
related to the vapor pressure (VP) of the individual components of the fuel mixture, as
illustrated by the following equation: VP, =MVP;. Typical vapor pressures for various
petroleum fuel products are summarized in Table 2 (NWWA, 1989).
The solubility of a petroleum fuel will give some indication of the potential for that fuel to
partition into the dissolved phase in groundwater. The solubility of a petroleum fuel is not
equal to the sum of the solubilities of the individual components of the fuel. The solubility
of a petroleum fuel is much lower than the solubility of some of its components. The
most soluble compounds in petroleum fuels are the lighter aromatic hydrocarbons. The
presence of hydrophilic additives such as MTBE, IPE, and ethanol can enhance the
solubility of a refined fuel product. The solubilities for selected petroleum fuel products
are included in Table 2.
C1nda:

Refined petroleum fuels can be present in the subsurface in liquid, dissolved, or vapor
phases, or in combinations of these phases. The phase is determined by the degree of
hydrocarbon saturation in the soil void spaces and by the wetting characteristics of the
subsurface materials. Liquid phase hydrocarbons can exist in the subsurface in the
following forms:
a. Immobile residual liquids in the unsaturated zone and
capillary fringe.
b. Mobile residual liquids that migrate near the top of the
capillary fringe.
c. Immobile residual liquids trapped in the saturated zone.
Dissolved phase hydrocarbons can exist in the following subsurface areas:
a. In infiltrating water in the unsaturated zone.
b. in the residual films of groundwater covering the
surfaces of solid minerals in the capi'l.ary fringe and
separate phase hydrocarbon zones.
c. In groundwater within the saturated zone.
Vapor phase hydrocarbons in the subsurface can exist in two areas:
a. In void spaces in the unsaturated zone not occupied by
water or separate phase hydrocarbons and is considered
mobile.
b. As small bubbles trapped in either the separate phase
hydrocarbons or the underlying water -bearing zone. The
bubbles are relatively immobile, but may dissolve in the
groundwater or may be released into the soil air.
10
tindcz

3.3 CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
Refined petroleum fuels are a complex mixture composed mainly of aliphatic and aromatic
compounds; these two groups are often collectively referred to as hydrocarbons.
Aliphatic compounds are orga c compounds in which the carbon atoms exist in as either
straight or branched chains. The principal aliphatic compounds present in fuels are
single -bond paraffins (alkanes); examples include pentane, hexane, and octane. Aromatic
compounds contain carbon molecular ring structures and include compounds such as
benzene, toluene, and ethylbenzene. These compounds are somewhat soluble, volatile,
and mobile in the subsurface environment and are useful indicators of hydrocarbon
migration (API Publication 1628, 1989). Gasoline contains the highest volume of aromatic
compounds. Diesel fuel, kerosene, jet fuel, and No. 2 fuel oil have much lower quantities
of aromatic compounds.
Oxygenated compounds (oxygenates) such as alcohols (methanol) and ethers (methyl
tertiary -butyl ether) are often used as octane enhancers in gasoline. These compounds
are the most soluble components of a petroleum fuel, being present in some fuels in
concentrations as high as 15 percent by volume.
3.4 TRANSPORT AND FATE
The partitioning behavior of a bulk fluid influences the transport and fate of the substance
in the subsurface. As discussed earlier, petroleum hydrocarbons typically exist in either
the liquid, dissolved, or vapor phase. The extent to which the bulk fluid partitions into the
11
nde

various phases is controlled by the physical and chemical properties of the substance and
by environmental conditions. Partitioning between phases is influenced by soil structure,
soil texture, soil organic -carbon content, soil and groundwater temperature, and the
presence of co -solvents in the dissolved phase.
In the unsaturated (vadose) zone, the migration of hydrocarbons in the liquid phase is
controlled by the permeability of the soils, viscosity of the fluid, and soil misture content.
Gravity forces the bulk fluid to migrate predominately downward. Capillary potential
induces vertical and lateral components to migration. A considerable portion of the total
volume of fluid may remain in the soil column, trapped by capillary forces (Tracy, 1989).
The vapor phase of fuel mixture is primarily limited to the vadose zone. Migration of the
vapor phase results from volatilization of the aromatic hydrocarbons from both the liquid
and dissolved phases. Due to upward vapor pressure gradients and diffusion, vapor
phase migration is primarily upward in a homogeneous matrix.
The concentrations of dissolved hydrocarbon compounds in water and the rates of
transfer from liquid phase to the groundwater system depend on several factors
interacting in a complex manner. These factors include depth to the water table, hydraulic
conductivity of the saturated zone, recharge rates, fluctuations in the water table,
groundwater velocities, water temperature, and residual hydrocarbon concentrations.
cindc

Once the hydrocarbons have entered the dissolved phase, the processes of advection
and hydrodynamic dispersion control their movement. Advection is the transportation of
chemical constituents by groundwater movement and is therefore dependent on the
hydraulic conductivity of the saturated zone. Hydrodynamic dispersion is the spread of
a chemical constituent in directions other than those that would be expected from
groundwater movement only, and is caused by mechanical mixing of constituents during
advection and chemical diffusion. Dispersion through chemical diffusion is often minimal
and occurs principally in groundwater systems with very low hydraulic conductivities and
flow velocities. The effect of hydrodynamic dispersion is to dilute the chemical
concentrations within the area of dissolved hydrocarbons.
In addition to dispersion and diffusion, other subsurface processes can attenuate and
degrade hydrocarbon compounds over time. These processes may include volatilization,
absorption, adsorption, abiotic (inorganic) transformations, and biotic (organic)
transformations.
3.5 POTENTIAL RECEPTORS
The primary routes of exposure to petroleum hydrocarbons are ingestion, dermal contact,
and inhalation. Since the hydrocarbons at this site are contained in soil and groundwater,
the possibility of dermal contact is minimal. Given the depth to groundwater and the tight
13
anda:

soils at the site, the chance of inhalation of vapors appears to be minimal. Ingestion of
groundwater is a remote possibility as drinking water is supplied to the area by the City
of Charlotte.
Based on the average depth to groundwatercross the site (13.30 ft), interception of
utility trenches or basements by hydrocarbon -impacted groundwater is not likely. The
clayey nature of the unsaturated subsurface should or may significantly retard and
attenuate (by adsorption) any vapor migration originating from dissolved phase
hydrocarbons in groundwater.
The area surrounding the site is largely commercial with water supplied to the area from
the City of Charlotte. In a 1Fd reconnaissance, survey conducted by Law Environmental
(Initial Site Characterization Report, Law Environmental, 1992), no potable wells were
observed within a 1500-foct radius of the site. No surface water intakes (i.e., rivers,
streams, etc.) were identified within a 1500-foot radius of the site.
4.0 REMEDIAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION
The following criteria were considered in evaluating the remedial action alternatives for the
site:
• Regulatory framework and remediation goals
• Risk to potential receptors
• Physical site constraints
• Groundwater and soil concentrations and distribution
-kincie

• Implementability and operation and maintenance
• Reliability and feasibility of each remedial method
• Initial cost and long term costs
These criteria were used in evaluating several groundwater and soil treatment alternatives,
including: soil excavation and thermal treatment, natural biodegradation/attenuation, air
sparging, pump -and -treat systems, and soil vapor extraction. Other factors considered
in the evaluation were the horizontal and vertical extent of hydrocarbons, concentrations
of hydrocarbons in groundwater and soil, appropriate soil and water quality goals,
physical site constraints, and the cost effectiveness of each remedial method.
4.1 SOIL REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES
In evaluating soil remedial alternatives, several remediation technologies were considered,
including excavation and treatment and in -situ :achnologies such as soil vapor extraction
(SVE).
4.1.1 Soil Excavation and Treatment
The conceptual design for this remediation method involves the physical excavation of
hydrocarbon -impacted soil. Treatment may be accomplished either by land -farming or
by thermal treatment. Soil excavation has the advantage of removing hydrocarbon -
impacted soils which could act as a future source of LPH, if any, and dissolved
hydrocarbons as water percolates through the impacted soil column.
During the removal of USTs in May 1995, approximately 925 cubic yards of petroleum -
impacted soils were removed from the site by CBM Environmental. The size of the
15

excavation was approximately 30 feet wide by 60 feet long by 14 feet deep. The
approximate depth to groundwater in the UST area has historically ranged from 10 to 15
feet BLS. The soils were transported to the Cherokee Environmental Facility in Norwood,
North Carolina, for disposal. Visual and olfactory evidence of petroleum -impacted soils
was observed below the site building and one of the pump islands. However, concern
over structural damage to the building on the property prevented further soil excavation.
Based on the physical constraints, further soil excavation and removal is not considered
to be feasible or the most cost effective remedial option for petroleum -impacted soils at
this site.
Approximate Estimated Costs: Soil Removal and Treatment $50,000 +
4.1.2 Soil Vapor Extraction
This technology involves removing volatile organic compounds (VOC) from the subsurface
using forced or drawn air currents. The conceptual design for this system consists of
inducing a forced vacuum on the soil column and removing the hydrocarbon -air mixture
to the atmosphere. This is accomplished using a regenerative or rotary lobe blower
which is connected to one or more vapor extraction or pumping wells. Soil vapor
extraction often enhances total hydrocarbon recovery from the saturated zone by
providing the additional energy required to overcome the surface tension of hydrocarbons
adsorbed onto soil particles. Furthermore, by drawing or injecting oxygen (air) into the
impacted soil column, natural biodegradation by aerobic bacteria can also be enhanced.
anda

Implementation of this type of system begins with feasibility testing to assess areal
influences (soil -to -air permeability), potential off -gas treatment needs, and effects on air
quality in the area. Once testing is complete, the final design is prepared. Following
approval of the design, permitting and construction can begin. At this site, permitting of
the hydrocarbon emissions source with the Mecklenburg County Department of
Environmental Protection (MCDEP) will be required. Depending on the results of air
emissions testing, air abatement for the soil vapor extraction system may be required.
The site has a average water table depth of approximately 13 feet BLS, which should be
sufficient for the SVE to remediate vadose zone soils. However, if SVE is used in
association with groundwater pump -and -treat, SVE can be a more effective method for
soil remediation. Based cn the extent of hydrocarbons identified in the vadose zone,
hydrocarbon concentrations, depth to water table, low operation and maintenance costs,
SVE is considered to be a feasible and cost effective option for soil remediation at this
site.
Approximate Average Costs: Initial Installation and Start-up $ 10,000 - $60 000
Annual Cost: $ 10,000 - $20,000
4.2 GROUNDWATER REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES
Remedial options for petroleum -impacted groundwater at the site included air sparging,
groundwater withdrawal and treatment techniques, and natural bioattenuation and.
biodegradation..
17
Cindc

4.2.1 Natural Biodegradation/Attenuation
Natural biodegradation and attenuation of petroleum hydrocarbons in groundwater is
possibly already occurring at the site. This method of remediation relies on micro-
organisms to aerobically break down petroleum hydrocarbons. The conceptual design
for this type of remedial plan involves regular monitoring and sampling of the site.
Monitoring would include gauging of the monitoring wells, removal of LPH by bailing or
skimming (if necessary), and groundwater sampling and analysis. The information gained
from this additional monitoring and sampling can be used to determine the extent of
migration and natural attenuation of dissolved phase hydrocarbons in the subsurface. To
evaluate vapor and residual phase hydrocarbons, soil borings may be performed at some
time interval.
The factors which will limit the effectiveness of natural biodegradation are the
concentration and availability of oxygen in soil and dissolved in groundwater. If dissolved
oxygen (DO) levels in groundwater at the site are sufficient, natural biodegradation will
continue unabated until the dissolved hydrocarbons are consumed.
Natural biodegradation will not be effective at quickly remediating LPH or high dissolved
phase hydrocarbon concentrations_ . Additionally,natural biodegradation will not be
suitable where there are continuing sources of contaminants such as LPH, petroleum
1 8
0
cinder

-impacted unsaturated soils, or high dissolved phase hydrocarbon concentrations. Based
on these factors and site specific conditions, natural bioattenuation/degradation may not
be considered as a primary remedial option at this site.
Approximate Average Costs: Initial Installation and Start-up $ 5,000 $10,000
Annual Cost: $ 5,000 - $15,000
4.2.2 Air Sparging
Air sparging (AS) is a process for enhancing desorption, volatilization, and bibremediation
of VOCs present in groundwater and sail, Clean air is injected under pressure into the
saturated zone at a point below the vertical extent of hydrocarbons. The injected air
disperses horizontally and vertically through the saturated zone and "strips" dissolved
VOCs from the groundwater. The air sparging process can also enhance naturally -
occurring aerobic biodegradation of VOCs by increasing oxygen distribution and
dissolution into the groundwater.
Soil vapor extraction is typically utilized in conjunction with air sparging to capture and
remove vapor phase hydrocarbons from the subsurface. SVE captures vapors which
have migrated to the vadose zone as a result of the air sparging process and volatilizes
and removes residual LPH within the vadose zone, In addition, SVE can enhance the
biodegradation of hydrocarbons in the unsaturated zone through the introduction of air
into the subsurface.
19
ande

Implementation of this type of system begins with feasibility testing to valuate system
performance, potential off -gas treatment needs, and appropriate air injection and
extraction rates. This information would then be utilized for the design of a
spargingiventing system. Following approval of the design, construction can begin after
all permits are received. The time frame for feasibility testing is approximately four to six
weeks. Permit approval time frames may vary depending on he type(s) of permitting
required. At present, this option was not considered to be the most effective since
downgradient capture of the dissolved hydrocarbon plume is desired and —may not be
achieved with air sparging. However, air sparging could be utilized in the future when
dissolved hydrocarbon concentrations have decreased.
Approximate Average Costs: Initial Installation and Start-up $ 20,000 - 30,000
Annual Cost: $ 20,000 - 30,000
4.2.3 Pump -and -Treat
Groundwater withdrawal and treatment is an effective and widely accepted technology for
remediating groundwater. The conceptual design of this type of system involves pumping
groundwater from designated recovery wells to a containment and treatment plant. A
purnp-and-treat system can lower the water table and provide hydraulic capture of the
dissolved and liquid phase hydrocarbon plumes. This local gradient can also capture
LPH and cause it to migrate into the recovery wells for removal with a skimmer pump, a
total fluids pump, an absorbent wick, or by mereal bailing.
20
cindc:

0
owing pumping methods for groundwater extraction were considered:
• Total Fluids Pumping - This type of pumping is designed to recover both
groundwater and LPH using a single pump. Pump selection is based on
the depth to fluids in the subsurface, the desired flow rate, and the desired
area of influence. Electric submersible pumps are generally capable of
higher flow rates than pneumatic pumps, but are not as well suited for sites
with appreciable thicknesses of LPH. Pneumatic pumps are preferable to
minimize emulsification of the LPH such that oil/water separation can be
achieved more effioie.ntly.
Dual Phase Pumping -- Dual phase pumping involves using two pumps
within one recovery well, one pump to recover groundwater and a second
pump to recover LPH. The lower pump of a dual pump system is used to
lower the water table to recover dissolved hydrocarbons and create a cone
of depression to induce LPH flow into the recovery well. The upper pump
is then used only to recover the LPH that enters the well.
Vacuum -Enhanced Total Fluids Extraction - Pumping of groundwater or
total fluids can often be enhanced by applying a vacuum to the subsurface
at the point of fluid removal. Vapor extraction and pumping augment each
other in that the application of negative pressure effectively creates a
stronger hydraulic gradient toward the recovery point and accelerates
groundwater flow toward the extraction point. This in turn increases the
recovery rate and recovery well yield. In addition, pumping groundwater or
total fluids draws down the water table and exposes soils that may also be
impacted. This allows for recovery of residual and vapor phase
hydrocarbons from the soils via the soil vapor extraction system.
Effective treatment of pumped groundwater may be accomplished by air stripping,
bioreactors, or by granular activated carbon adsorption (GALA). Air stripping involves
blowing air countercurrent to a stream of water in a packed tower or specially designed
tray or aeration tank, effecting a hydrocarbon phase transfer from the dissolved to the
vapor phase. Bioreactors use hydrocarbon -consuming bacteria to treat groundwater.
21
cindc

In carbon adsorption, hydrocarbon -impacted water is passed through a vessel containing
granular activated carbon, where hydrocarbons are adsorbed into the pores of the
carbon.
Several options for the disposal of treated groundwater are available, including discharge
to a sanitary sewer system, discharge to a storm sewer system, re -infiltration using
injection wells, and re -infiltration using an infiltration gallery. Injection of treated
groundwater through an injection well, or series of wells, was not selected due to costs,
maintenance problems, regulatory concerns, and the low hydraulic conductivity of the
native soils at the site. Re -infiltration using an infiltration gallery is not feasibleat this site
due to the low permeability of the surficial aquifer and the size of the gallery required.
Discharge to a sanitary sewer at this site is possible, as a publicly -owned treatment works
(POTW) is available at the site. To explore this option, Handex has contacted the
Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utility Department System Protection Division (CMUD-SPD)
regarding a permit to discharge the treated groundwater through a sanitary sewer at other
sites. However, CMUD-SPD currently has a moratorium denying ail discharge permits for
groundwater remediation systems. Therefore, discharge of the water through a storm
sewersystem under a General National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
permit would be a feasible discharge alternative for this site.
22
anda:

Implementation of a pump -and -treat system begins with feasibility testing to evaluate
system performance, potential groundwater and off -gas treatment needs, and appropriate
pumping rates. This information would then be utilized for the design of a final
remediation system.
Following approval of the design, construction can begin after all permits are received.
Feasibility testing has already been performed and is discussed in later sections. Permit
approval time frarries will vary depending on the type(s) of pertting required.
Approx. Average Costs: Initial Installation & Start-up $ 75,000 - 100,000
Annual Cost: $ 35,000 - 45,000
4.3 REMEDIAL ENDPOINTS
The following section summarizes the e3;ir ated length of time needed for each
technology reviewed to accomplish the appropriate remediation goals for the four phases
of hydrocarbons present in the subsurface at this site. These estimates are based on soil
types, aquifer parameters, and concentrations of hydrocarbons in soil and groundwater,
as well as experience at similar sites.
Remedial Endpoints (all times approximate):
Liquid Phase Hydrocarbons
Soil Vapor Extraction/manual removal 1 /8 inch - 1 year
Dissolved Phase Hydrocarbons - Groundwater
Passive Bioremediation
Pump -and -Treat
Pump -and Treat w/ SVE
Air Sparging w/ SVE
Declining/Asympt©tic - > 25 years
Declining/Asymptotic - 4 - 6 years
Declining/Asymptotic - 3 - 5 years
Declining/Asymptotic - 2 - 6 years

Residual Phase Hydrocarbons - Soils
Soil Vapor Extraction
Pump -and -Treat w/ SVE
Air Sparging w/ SVE
Vapor Phase Hydrocarbons - Soils
Soil Vapor Extraction
Pump -and -Treat w/ SVE
Air Sparging w/ SVE
<10 ppm 3 - 5 years
<10 ppm 3 - 5 years
< 10 ppm 3 - 5 years
<10 ppm 3 - 5 years
<10 ppm 3 - 5 years
<10 ppm 3 - 5 years
4.4 RECOMMENDED REMEDIAL ACTION
Based on the available technologies and site specific conditions, the preferred soil and
groundwater remediation method is groundwater recovery and treatment with concurrent
soil vapor extraction. These technologies should be able to provide hfdraulic control of
the dissolved phase hydrocarbon plume on -site and reduce levels of hydrocarbon-
impacted soiI and groundwater
4.5 TARGET START-UP AND COMPLETION DATES FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION
The following are target dates for document submittal, system construction, system start-
up, and project completion.
ACTIVITY
Corrective Action Plan
Final System Design
TARGET CO'1PLE'ION DATE
September 1, 1995
Four weeks following approval of CAP by
NCDEM.
System Construction Two to three months from CAP approval and
receipt of necessary permits.
24

e
Activation
Project Completion
Three to four months from CAP approval and/or
receipt of necessary permits and upon final
inspection approval by state/local agencies.
Two to three years from system activation.
Our ability to achieve the target dates •ri?I be depend t, in part, upon regulatory review,
permitting and subcontractor scheduling. The project completion date is a general
estimate only and wil! be dependent on site conditions and the effectiveness of the
proposed remedial
Final clean-up goals and project completion
y
be
determined through negotiations with : °te NCDEHNR.
5.0 FIELD INVESTIGATIONS
Field investigations to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed remedial
technolooEes were performed on November 30, 1994, and June 8, 1995. Field
investigations completed to prepare the CAP included a 2-hour soil vapor extraction test,
and a 6.5-hour aquifer test, followed by a 4.5-hour vacuum -enhanced aquifer test.
5.1 SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION TEST
On November 30, 1994, a 2-hour scsI vapor extraction test was conducted utilizing
monitoring well MW-9'. The SVE test was conducted to assess the effectiveness of soil
vapor e:raction in the area surrounding MW-9, provide information on the potential radius
25
anda

of influence and to estimate the quantity of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) that may
be extracted from the subsurface with 50 to 60 inches of water vacuum.
Vacuum was applied to MW-9 using a regenerative blower, which was equipped with flow
control valves and a sampling port. An organic vapor analyzer (OVA) was used to
monitor hydrocarbon vapor concentrations extracted from the subsurface. Induced
vacuum was monitored at MW-1, MW-7, and MW-10, using a monitoring well seal fitted
with a vacuum gauge. Additionally, two vapor monitoring points (V1 and V2) were
temporarily installed 15 and 30 feet, respectively from MW-9. Air flow generated by the
blower was measured using an aft velocity meter. Air velocity, vacuum, and OVA
readings taken during the test were recorded. The field instrument readings and emission
rate calculations from the vapor test are summarized in Appendix D.
During the SVE test, a rna
Iu
vacuum of 58 inches of water was achieved. Air flow
from the extraction well was determined to be approximately 20 cubic feet per minute
(CFM). A negative pressure was observed in each of the monitoring points during the
test. Vacuum levels in V1 and V2 were observed at 1.65 and 1.5 inches of water,
respectively. Vacuum levels in the selected monitoring wells ranged from 1 inch of water
in MW-1 located approximately 35 feet from MW-9 to 0.55 inches of water in MW-10
located approximately 65 feet from MW-9. A vacuum influence graph was prepared to
show the vacuum influence vs. distance elationships. This graph is included in Appendix
D.
26
ndc

Air samples collected near the end of the test were laboratory analyzed for benzene,
toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes (BTEX); total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH); and
methane. Data from the air samples were used to estimate hydrocarbon emissions and
mass removal rates. The laboratory analytical reports are provided in Appendix D.
Laboratory analysis indicated that near the end of the SVE test, TPH concentrations from
the extraction well were 36,800 mg/m3. This data was used to calculate the value of TPH
removal per hour from the extraction well. It is estimated that approximately 2.8 Ibs/hour
of TPH were removed during the SVE test. TPH removal calculations are presented in
Appendix D.
Based on the results of the SVE pilot test, it appears that an effective radius of influence
of up to 65 feet can be achieved using an applied vacuum of 50 to 60 inches of water at
each extraction well. The anticipated volume of air from each extraction point should be
approximately 20 CFM. Actual effective vacuum radius and air flow will vary for each
recovery well, depending on soil conditions and the heterogenity of the subsurface of
each extraction point. Based on the air flow, the radius of influence, and the TPH
concentrations observed during the test, it appears that SVE would be effective in
removing hydrocarbons from the subsurface within the anticipated radius of influence.
27
lc nde

5.2 VACUUM -ENHANCED AQUIFER TEST
A constant -rate aquifer test was conducted to estirr ate the approximate yield that can be
expected from the recovery wells and to assess the radius of influence that can be
anticipated at a given flow rate. The vacuum -enhanced portion of the aquifer test was
conducted to determine if the application of 50 to 60 inches of water vacuum to the
recovery wells would enhance groundwater recovery.
The aquifer test was conducted in three phases. The first phase was a 6.5-hour constant
pumping rate aquifer test to provide drawdown information to assess the hydraulic
conductivity of the site. The second phase of the test, conducted in rr ediately after Phase
I, was a 4,5-hour vacuum -enhanced aquifer test (conducted with a regenerative blower)
to assess the effects of induced vacuum (5u to 60 inches of water) on groundwater
recovery. After completion of the vacuum -enhanced aquifer test, the third phase included
collection of groundwater recovery data to help assess recovery of the aquifer after
pumping conditions.
5.2.1 Aquifer TestWeft lnstaliation
On May 26, 1995, an aquifer test extraction well (RW-1) was installed to a depth of
approximately 50 feet BLS. This well was constructed with 40 feet of 4-inch diameter PVC
well screen (0.020-inch slot size), and 10 feet of 4-inch diameter PVC casing. RW-1 was
completed with an 8-inch diameter, flush -grade steel manhole set in a 2-foot square
c nda

concrete pad. The extraction well was installed dawngradient of the forr tank f• etd, in
an area where monitoring points were convenient for testing purposes.
5.2.2 Aquifer Test Procedure
On June 8, 1995, a constant pumping rate aquifer test was conducted at the site.
Groundwater was pumped from recovery well RW-1 at an average rate of 1 gpm using
an electric submersible pump„ Flow was measured using a calibrated bucket and stop
watch. A throttling valve was used to set and adjust the pumping rate. The water
generated during the test was discharged into a tanker truck and removed from the site
for proper disposal.
Time and drawdown data were collected durin the test by manually gauging water levels
in selected monitoring wells. The water level data relative to static levels and drawdown-
aver time are provided in Appendix. E. The water level data recorded during the test was
analyzed using the Graphical Well Analysis Package (GWAP Version 2.38) produced by
Groundwater Graphics, Inc.
5.2.3 Aquifer Test Results
The aquifer test analyses resulted in a calculated average transmissivity value of 16.90
feet squared per day (ft2/day) for the surficial aquifer. Storativity is estimated to be
0.0013. The hydraulic conductivity of the surficial aquifer is estimated to be 0.482
feet/day, and the average groundwater velocity is estimated to be 0.116 feet/day. Under
C nde

atmospheric pressure, the downgradient stagnation point is estimated to be 151 feet
downgradient of the aquifer test well, pumping at 1.0 gpm with approximately 28 feet of
drawdown measured during the aquifer test. Additionally, drawdown was observed in the
surrounding wells ranging from 1.25 feet of drawdown in MW-11D (12 to 15 feet from RW-
1) to 0.58 feet of drawdown in MW-9 (32 feet away from RW-1). The equations and data
used to arrive at these values are included in Appendix E.
During the aquifer test, groundwater samples were collected for chemical analysis to aid
in the design of the groundwater remediation system, if necessary. The groundwater
samples were analyzed for the following parameters: volatile organic aromatics (VOAs)
using EPA Test Method 602, total hardness (TH), manganese (Mn), calcium (Ca), arid
iron (Fe). The laboratory analytical report included in Appendix E.
5.2.4 Vacuum -Enhanced Aquifer Test Procedure
At 6.5 hours into the constant rate aquifer test, vacuum was applied to well RW-1 using
a regenerative biower. The blower is capable of generating up to 50 inches of water
vacuum. This test was conducted to assess the affects of 50 inches of water vacuum on
groundwater recovery.
The blower was connected to RW-1 with a 1-inch diameter short drop tube inserted in a
well seal equipped with a port to allow the gauging of water levels within the
pumping/extraction well. The test procedure involved applying vacuum to RW-1 in
30
ande

increments of 25 inches of water and recording changes in water level and induced.
vacuum at the extraction well. Air flow generated by the blower was measured using an
air velocity meter. Water levels in surrounding wells were monitored during the vacuum -
enhanced portion of the aquifer test. Air flow generated by the blower was measured
using an air velocity meter. The water level, vacuum, and air flow data recorded during
the test are presented in Appendix E.
5.2.5 Vacuum -Enhanced Aquifer Test Results
Analysis of the vacuum -enhanced aquifer test shows that the air -flow capacity of the soil
is low. A maximum air flow of approximately 16.5 CFM was achieved at 50 inches of
water vacuum.
The groundwater pumping rate was not significantly increased under vacuum -enhanced
conditions. Under 50 inches of water vacuum, the sustained flow rate was 1 gpm. There
was no significant increase over the non -vacuum -enhanced pumping rate. After a
combined 6.5 hours of pumping and 4.5 hours of vacuum -enhanced pumping, drawdown
of 0.58 feet was observed in monitoring well MW-9 approximately 32 feet from RW-1.
Hydrocarbon vapor concentrations in the extracted air stream were monitored periodically
throughout the test using an organic vapor analyzer (OVA). A sample was collected
towards the end of the vacuum extraction test for laboratory analysis to aid in the design
of the remediation system and to assess off -gas treatment needs. The vapor sample was
ande

analyzed for BTEX, methane, and total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH). Using the
analytical data and the calculated flow, the estimated TPH removal rate for the vacuum -
enhanced aquifer test was 0.1 pounds/hour. The laboratory analytical report is included
in Appendix E.
The estimated air flow during the vacuum -enhanced aquifer test (16.5 CFM) is
comparable to air flows observed during the SVE test (20 CFM). This suggests that SVE
applied to the recovery wells should be capable of producing an equivalent radius of
influence as seen during the SVE test. Based on the vapor concentrations from the
vacuum -enhanced portion of the aquifer test, this technology should be effective in
removing hydrocarbons in subsurface soils.
6.0 REMEDIAL SYSTEMS DESIGN.
The conceptual remedial design for the site consists of soil vapor extraction combined
with groundwater recovery from five recovery wells. The soil column dewatered by
pumping may be remediated via soil vapor extraction.
Groundwater will be recovered at a rate of approximately one gallon per minute (gpm)
from each recovery well using pneumatic pumps. Recovered groundwater will be routed
to a treatment compound located on the northern portion of the site and will be pumped
through an oil/water separator and an air stripper, and then treated using a granular
32
Ctndc:

activated carbon adsorption (GACA) unit. The treated water will be discharged to the
storm sewer system in accordance with a General NPDES permit. Local, State, and
Federal permits required for the construction and operation of the system will be obtained
prior to start-up of the system. Figure 10 is a map of the proposed system layout.
6.1 GROUNDWATER MODELING AND CAPTURE ZONE ANALYSIS
As previously discussed, Handex conducted a vacuum -enhanced aquifer test at the site
to assess surficial aquifer parameters. Based on the test data, transMissivity was
estimated to be 16.90 ft2/day and hydraulic conductivity was estimated to be 0.482 ft/day.
Based on the soil types described on the boring logs (silts to sandy silts), these values
appear reasonable. Based on estimated aquifer parameters, the calculated zones of
influence of pumping wells were modeled using a particle tracking model developed and
released by the EPA. The input data, calculations, and explanations of the model
parameters are presented in Appendix F.
A capture zone analysis was employed to simulate groundwater flow in the area of the
site and determine the optimum recovery well array and flow rates. The model chosen
is a modified version of the Ressqc particle tracking groundwater flow model contained
in the WHPA (Version 2.01, Blandford and Huyakorn, 1991) well -head protection area
computer program. This program was developed by the EPA's International Groundwater
Modeling Committee,
33
ndc

The flow calculations used in the model are based on several assumptions typical of most
groundwater flow models, namely that the aquifer is isotropic and homogeneous. The
calculations are valid for horizontal flow conditions with fully penetrating wells and equal.
horizontal and vertical hydraulic conductivities. Water table geometry must be planar with
a constant gradient. Site -specific characteristics input to the model include transmissivity,
saturated aquifer thickness, porosity, direction of groundwater flow, and hydraulic
gradient.
The modeled system consists of five 4-inch diameter recovery wells. To simulate steady-
state conditions, the model was run for 45 days. A map showing the estimated capture
zone of the proposed recovery wells each operating at 1 gpm, mposed on the site
plan i s presented as Figure 11. In this figure, t`e groundwat a particle path nes are
shown, and represent the distance and path a groundwater pa icle could follow in 45
days from the start of pumping. The proposed groundwater recovery well array should
provide capture of the dissolved hydrocarbon plume on the site,
6.2 REQUIRED PERMITS
Local, State, and Federal permits required for the construction and operation of the
system will be obtained prior to start-up of the system. A Mecklenburg County
building/construction permit will be obtained prior to system construction, if ecessary.
34
-icindc

The charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities Department currently has a moratorium on discharges
to the sanitary sewer system. Therefore, the most feasible discharge option is the storm
sewer. To discharge treated effluent from the remediation system to the storm sewer, a
General NPDES Permit will be obtained. The CAP will be used to apply for the discharge
permit. The anticipated time -frame for General NPDES Permit approval is two months.
System construction will not be undertaken until the General NPDES Permit is approved.
The air discharge for the site will be registered with the State Air Quality section in
Raleigh. Following submittal of the CAP, the permitting process will be initiated to register
the vapor discharge from the proposed vapor extraction blower. The anticipated time
frame to complete point source discharge registration is six weeks.
An air discharge permit from the Mecklenburg County Department of Environmental
Protection (MODER) will be required for the SVE systems. Once the soil and groundwater
remediation is installed at the site, a pilot test will be conducted to assess the amount of
hydrocarbon emissions and the type of air treatment technologies to be utilized, if any.
Based on the hydrocarbon emissions data and the treatment unit selected (if any), an air
discharge permit application will be submitted to the MCDEP. The anticipated time frame
for an air discharge permit will be approximately three to four months.
35
nde

7.0 SOIL REIVIEDIATION SYSTEM
Soil remediation will be accomplished by extracting hydrocarbon vapors from the
subsurface using a regenerative vacuum blower. The well array was designed using the
radius of influence inferred from vapor extraction feasibility test conducted at this site.
The vapor extraction well array will be composed of wells designed for a combination of
groundwater and vapor extraction, as shown on the proposed system layout presented
on Figure 10.
7.1 VAPOR WELL DESIGN
Soil vapor extraction will be accomplished by applying vacuum to the five proposed
groundwater recovery wells. Each well constructed so that 5-10 feet of 0.020
slotted 4" diameter PVC well screen is above the static water level. The annular space
will be filled with silica sand.
7.2 VAPOR EXTRACTION PIPING DESIGN
The soil vapor extraction recovery wells will be connected to the regenerative blower
using solvent welded 2-inch diameter PVC piping. The PVC piping will be in a subsurface
trench from each well and joined to a common 4-inch. PVC header pipe leading to the
treatment compound.
clndc

The common header will terminate into a moisture collection drum designed to prevent
moisture from being drawn into the vacuum blower, From the moisture collection drum,
vapors will travel through a particulate filter before finally reaching the vacuum blower.
A map showing the anticipated vacuum influence from the SVE system is included as
Figure 12.
7.3 SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION BLOWER SELECTION
A Gast Model R6p155-Q-50 explosion -proof blower (or equivalent) has been selected for
soil vapor extraction. This blower is similar in capacity to the blower used for the SVE
test. The manufacturer specifications for the blower are included in Appendix G.
The SVE blower should be capable of achieving 50 inches of water vacuum at each
recovery well. The flow from each recovery well should be in the range of 15 to 20 GEM.
However, actual flow will vary depending on subsurface conditions.
Following activation of the SVE system, the system should be operated continuously for
five days to evaluate the need, if any, for off -gas emissions treatment. Air samples should
be collected from the soil vapor extraction blower stack to calculate the volume and
concentrations of hydrocarbon emissions. If results of the air sarnple analyses show that
vapor emissions exceed 40 pounds per day (lbs/day) of total petroleum hydrocarbons
(TPH) or 8.1 Ibs/year of benzene, reduced extraction rates or treatment may be
considered. Based on the results of the air emissions testing, a permanent off -gas
c'nda

treatment unit could be designed and installed, if necessary, and the vapor stream
generated by the blower would be routed through the treatment unit. Should off -gas
treatment be necessary, thermal or catalytic oxidizer units and a vapor phase, granular
activated carbon (GAC) would be evaluated as potential treatment methods.
8.0 GROUNDWATER RECOVERY SYSTEM
Groundwater will be pumped from five recovery wells to create a cone of depression in
the water table around the recovery wells. The lowering of the hydraulic head in the
surficial aquifer should cause groundwater containing dissolved hydrocarbons to migrate
toward the recovery wells.
The groundwater recovery system recommended for the site consists of pumping
groundwater from five recovery wells at the location shown on Figure 10. Soil -vapor
extraction was chosen to more effectively remediate soils dewatered during pumping.
The recovery system is expected to produce an average flow of approximately 1 gpm
from each groundwater extraction well.
8.1 RECOVERY WELL DESIGN
Four additional groundwater recovery wells (R`4''-2 through RW-5) will be installed at the
approximate location shown on Figure 10. RW-1 was installed prior to completion of the
38

aquifer test. The total depth of each recovery well will range from 40 to
allow for adequate drawdown to provide dissolved hydrocarbon capture.
to
Each recovery well will be constructed of 4-inch diameter Schedule 40 PVC with flush -
threaded joints, with 0.020-inch slot well screen extending from approximately 10 feet BLS
to between 40 and 50 feet BLS. The annular space of the screened interval of the
recovery well will be filled with silica sand to approximately two feet above the screen.
A bentonite seal approximately one to two feet thick will be placed above the filter pack.
The remaining annular space will be filled with cement grout.
The solid well casing above the screen will provide a good surface seal for vacuum -
enhanced groundwater recovery. The recovery well will be completed in a 2-foot by 2-
foot manhole set flush with the surrounding surface,
8.2 PIPING DESIGN
The conceptual recovery piping layout is shown on Figure 10. The groundwater recovery
piping will be constructed of PVC. The pumping equipment selected will be capable of
developing sufficient head to overcome the piping system elevation head and frictional
losses, and will be capable of delivering the anticipated max
gpm to the treatment system.
u
flow rate of up to 10
C1ndc

All piping will be completed approximately 18 inches below grade between the recovery
wells and the treatment system compound to prevent freezing during the winter months.
A flow control valve, sampling port, and totalizing flow meter will be installed on the
discharge line at the treatment compound.
8.3 GROUNDWATER PUMP SELECTION
Ejector Systems, Inc. Gladiator Model (or equivalent) controller -less pneumatic pumps
have been selected to extract groundwater from each recovery well and pump it to the
treatment system. Each pump has an operational capacity from 0 to 8 gpm. It is
expected that flow will equilibrate to approximately 1 gpm from each well. Each pump will
be equipped with a check -valve to prevent back -flow of water from the treatment system
when the pump is shut down. Because the pumps require no controllers, they will be
placed in the recovery wells without water level probes. The pumps will cycle only when
they have filled with water. Performance data for the specified pump is included in
Appendix H.
Compressed air will be supplied to the groundwater pumps by a Ingersoll-Rand Model
2540N7.5 (or equivalent) air compressor. The compressor should be equipped with a 7.5
HP, non -explosion proof motor, an 80-gallon receiver tank, and should be capable of
producing approximately 32 CFM. The manufacturer's specifications for the air
compressor are included in Appendix H.
40
nde

9.0 GROUNDWATER TREATMENT
Y
TEM DESIGN
The recommended groundwater treatment system for the site was chosen with the
requirements of the General NPDES Permit for cleanup of petroleum sites in mind. The
General NPDES Permit requires the treatment system to be configured wit+n a phase
separation oil/water separator, an aeration unit as primary treatment, and a carbon
polishing unit prior to discharge. The groundwater treatment system will be enclosed in
an atl-weather building to protect it from the elements and freezing. A system schematic
showing the recommended treatment equipment is presented as Figure 13.
9.1 OIL/WATER SEPARATOR
The first step in the proposed treatment system is the separation of liquid and dissolved
phase hydrocarbons. Although minimal LPH has been reported at this site, this step is
provided as a safety measure, and to comply with the requirements of t e General
NPDES Discharge Permit. The selected oil/water separator (OWS) is the Great Lakes
Environmental, Inc. Model SRC-M8 (or equivalent). This separator has a working capacity
of 92 gallons, slant rib coalescing packed media, and is rated at a nominal flow rate of
8 gpm. This separator should be able to accomplish phase separation even at the
maximum predicted flow rate for the system. The OWS specifications are provided in
Appendix I.
41
Linda:

The OWS will autornatically discharge LPH (if any) to a separate 55-gallon product holding
drum. The holding drum will be fitted with a high level shut-off switch to shut down the
recovery system if the drum becomes full. This fail-safe will assure that no LPH discharge
occurs. The drum will be managed in such a way that, in the event of LPH accumulation,
the drum will be emptied of LPH before automatic system shut-off occurs. The product
drum should only be added to the system if the need for bulk storage becomes apparent.
Effluent groundwater from the OWS will be pumped via a transfer pump (or by gravity
flow) directly to the influent part of the air stripper.
9.2 AIR STRIPPER
A CarbonAir Model STAT 30 (or equivalent) low profile air stripper treatment system will
provide the primary treatment for recovered groundwater using aeration. The air stripper
\.vas selected based on the manufacturer's reported removal efficiency and estimated
concentrations of dissolved hydrocarbons in the influent stream. For conservancy, worst
case concentrations of each parameter, from the most recent sampling event (May 1995),
were used for selecting the appropriate air stripper. These data are summarized in
Appendix J. CarbonAir was contacted to recommend an air stripper system capable of
achieving effluent Iirnits required by the General NPDES Discharge Permit based on the
worst case concentrations, at a nominal flow rate of up to 8 gpm.
42
-land!

The air stripper unit includes an explosion -proof blower, six aeration trays, an effluent
sump, aeration tray and sump access, sample port, pressure gauge, and exhaust stack.
The description, schematic, and performance warranty of the air stripper are included in
Appendix. J. The specifications presented by CarbonAir show that the selected air
stripper should provide removal efficiencies sufficient to produce an effluent with
concentrations below the limits of the General NPDES Discharge Permit. Treated effluent
will be pumped, via a transfer pump, through a particle filter to reduce sediment, if any,
before fiowina to a granular activated carbon adsorption (GAGA) unit.
9.3 GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON ADSORPTION (GACA)
The secondary treatment system at the site v.°iif consist of one Handex Model HCA 15 (or
equivalent) carbon adsorbtion unit. Secondary treatment by GALA should adsorb BTEX
constituents not removed by the air stripper prior to groundwater discharge to the storm
sewer system.
Concentrations of dissolved hydrocarbon constituents in the carbon influent stream were
estimated using "worst case" monitoring well concentrations based on the laboratory
analytical results of the most recent groundwater sampling event. Carbon consumption
rates for several sizes of GACA units were then estimated using the worst case
concentrations. GACA sizing calculations and carbon consumption specifications are
included in Appendix K.
ands

Treated groundwater from the air stripper wi{9 be pumped to the GAGA unit using a
Goulds Model NPE (or equivalent) transfer pump with a 2 HP explosion -proof motor. The
manufacturer's specifications for the transfer pump are included in Appendix K.
The GACA unit recommended has been sized so that there is adequate capacity in the
GACA vessel to treat the full estimated BTEX influent concentration (untreated) for
approximately nine days. However, the carbon bed life of this unit is expected to be
significantly longer based on the anticipated air stripper removal rates. in accordance
with the General NPDES Permit, the site will be visited weekly to obtain flow meter
readings and to monitor system operation.
The proposed GACA system will consist of one HCA 15 GALA unit. The unit contains
400 pounds of activated carbon. The rr anufacturer's specifications on the GACA units
are provided in Appendix K. The carbon treatment unit will be capable of backwashing
the carbon to remove particulates and extend the carbon bed life. It is proposed to
monitor the hydrocarbon concentrations in the influent and effluent to the GAC vessels,
and schedule carbon replacements before hydrocarbon breakthrough occurs. Spent
carbon from the GALA unit will be returned to the manufacturer for regeneration or
disposal.
The carbon vessel will be equipped with a pressure sensor which will shut down the
recovery system in the event that vessel pressure becomes too high due to fouling of the
44
cindc

carbon media. Sampling ports will be provided on the discharge line from carbon vessel,
and a totalizing flow meter will be installed on the final effluent discharge line.
A particulate filter installed upstream of the GALA unit will remove solids, which will extend
the carbon bed life and reduce carbon replacements. The GAGA unit, in this application
as a polishing unit, should receive limited hydrocarbons which should be treated by the
air stripper.
9.4 PRE-TREATMENT FOR IRON AND BIOFOULING
To mitigate the effects of iron precipitation in the carbon beds, influent water to the GAGA
system will be pre -filtered of sediment, precipitated iron, and other inorganics using a
Filtration Systems Model NS 112 (or eq ivalent) particulate filter. The filter housing will
be equipped with a pressure gauge to monitor particulate accumulation in the filter. Fifty
micron filters are recommended at start-up, with chances made as needed in the future.
Specifications from tie manufacturer are included in Appendix L.
9.5 SYSTEM ENCLOSURE, CONTROLS, AND SAFETY MECHANISMS
The OWS, air stripper, transfer pump, bag filter, GAGA unit, and soil vapor extra.cti an
equipment should be housed in an insulated building for security and to protect them
from the elements. The air compressor is non -explosion proof and will be located outside
of the shed. The system control panel, also non -explosion proof, will be located on one
of the exterior walls (outside of the shed).
45
cinder

The building should be of wood or steel -frame construction with a ceiling height of 7 to
8 feet, and should be equipped with an adequately sized door opening to allow easy
access for system monitoring and maintenance. The outside dimensions of the building
should be 10 feet by 12 feet, or of adequate size to house the rernediation equipment.
For security purposes, the treatment system building should be kept locked.
To regulate groundwater flow through the treatment system, a shut-off/throttling valve
should be installed on each recovery well influent line at the treatment compound manifold
so that the flow rate can easily be adjusted. An influent sampling port should be installed
on the influent line of each recovery well and again at the confluence of the recovery wells
and the manifold. An effluent sampling port should be installed on the effluent line
between the air stripper and the GAGA unit and downstream of the GACA unit. A
totalizing flow meter will be installed downstream of the GACA unit. The layout of the
piping, valves, and equipment for the groundwater remediation system are shown on
Figure 13.
9.6 EFFLUENT DISPOSAL SYSTEM
Treated groundwater will be discharged to a storm sewer out -fall located in the
southeastern corner of the site (along Sharon Amity Rd.) under a General NPDES Permit.
The CAP will be used to apply for the Permit to discharge treated groundwater from the
site. The treatment system effluent water quality objectives will be the same as the criteria
ands

listed in the General NPDES Perrnit. The discharge parameters will be determined by the
General NPDES Permitting process, and the surface water stream classification of the
receiving waters.
The effluent discharge piping will run from the system compound to the storm sewer
located on the southeastern corner of the site. The proposed discharge location is
shown on Figure 10.
9.7 DISPOSAL OF RECOVERED LPH
Recovered LPH, if any, will be disposed of in accordance with applicable local, State, and
Federal laws. Recovery of substantial amounts of LPH is not anticipated at this site.
10.0 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
The operation and maintenance of the proposed remedial system will consist of many
tasks relating to the vapor recovery, pumping, treatment, and disposal systems and
equipment at the site. A brief synopsis of the planned operation and maintenance
schedule is Iisted in the following sections.
10.1 RECOVERY SYSTEMS MONITORING
During scheduled operation and maintenance (O&M) visits, the system components
should be inspected for proper operation. The total flow from the recovery system should
47
anda

be recorded on a weekly basis. The recovery wells, pumps, and piping should be
examined during monthly O&M site visits to determine whether adjustments are needed.
Water levels within the recovery yells should be gauged periodically to confirm drawdown
within the recovery wells. Flow rates and pump intake levels should be adjusted as
needed to optimi7e system operation and ma ntain the proper cone of depression for
groundwater capture. The soil vapor extraction system should also be checked and
adjusted to produce the proper flow rate at each well.
10.2 TREATMENT EQUIPMENT MONITORING
The treatment astern is designed for continual operation v,ith minimal maintenance.
During scheduled O&M visits, the system should be inspected for proper operation of the
treatment system components and for adjustments to the vapor extraction equipment, if
needed. System controls should be adjusted as necessary. The treatment system
monitoring should consist of
-I) Weekly site visits, in accordance with the General NPDES Permt, to obtain
effiuent flow meter readings and to observe sys: rn operation,
2) Monitoring of the hydrocarbon concentrations in the treatment system
influent, air stripper effluent, and carbon treatment system effluent. Influent
and effluent water samples will be collected monthly and analyzed to verify
treatment efficiency and permit compliance. These analyses will be
conducted weekly for the first two weeks, and monthly thereafter. Influent
samples will be analyzed for BTEX. Effluent samples will be analyzed per
the General NPDES Permit requirements.
3) Monitoring of soil vapor extraction rates and hydrocarbon concentrations
from the soil vapor extraction system with field instruments. These readings
will be conducted the first two weeks, and monthly thereafter to help assess
hydrocarbon removal rates.
C1nc a

4) Monitoring of the sail vapor extraction system will be determined, in part, by
the Mecklenburg County Department of Environmental Protection (MCDEP)
Air Permit requirements.
a) Off -gas treatment equipment may be required at the site depending on the
results of a full-scale test of air emissions. Hydrocarbon emissions will be
managed, if necessary, according to the requirements of the MCDEP Air
Permit.
During the scheduled site checks, adjustment of the system will be made as necessary
to maintain system efficiency and maximize operational time.
11.0 REMEDIATION PROGRESS MONITORING AND REPORTING
Reports required for remediation tracking include quarterly remediation progress reports.
These reports will summarize monitoring information collected for the remediation system,
and describe the results of Groundwater gauging and sampling. Conclusions about the
overall effectiveness of the system to achieve remediation goals will be included along
with recommendations for system modification, if necessary. The monitoring frequency
for groundwater sampling should be evaluated after the system has been operating for
one year. At this time it could be determined if se rrai annual monitoring would be effective
for tracking the system performance.
49

11.1 GAUGING OF MONITORING WELLS
Groundwater levels should be measured in each monitoring well quarterly. The data will
aid remediation tracking. The results of the gauging activities should be summarized in
quarterly reports to be submitted to NCDEHNR.
11.2 WATER QUALITY SAMPLING OF MONITORING WELLS
Groundwater samples will be collected on a quarterly basis from site monitoring and
recovery wells. Each groundwater sample will be analyzed for BTEX and MTBE using
EPA Test Method 602 to document remediation progress. These data will be included
in quarterly groundwater monitoring reports and will be used to track progress toward
remediation goals.
11.3 QUARTERLY REPORTING
Quarterly reports will pro vit e a written summary of the remedial action progress for the
previous 3-n onth period. These reports will contain inriuent and effluent water -quality
data, flow data, and site information. This information will be used to assess remedial
progress and project necessary changes to increase the effectiveness or reduce costs
for the recovery, treatment, and disposal systems.
11.4 ANNUAL REPORT OF REMEDIATION PROGRESS
The final quarterly report each year wiYl serve as the annual report on remediation
progress. This report will provide the data for the year from the remediation system start-
50
ande

up date. The annual repo will be used to summarize the analytical results for the past
year and make recommendations for continued remediation efforts at the site. The
annual report will also include any recommendations for changes to increase the
effectiveness or reduce costs for the recovery, treatment, and disposal systems.
11.5 REMEDIAL ACTION COMPLETION
Handex will periodically monitor the effectiveness of the proposed remedial plan.
Remedial action completion may be determined through negotiations with the NCDEHNR
and may include application for alternate groundwater clean-up concentrations as alto fMred
by Rule (k) of the Amendad 2t_ Groundwater Regulations.
51
cinde

REFERENCES
American Petroleum Institute, 1989, A Guide to the Assessment and Remediation of
Underground Petroleum Releases, API Publication 1628,
Blandford, T. Neil, and Huyakorn, Peter S. (1991), WHPA - An Modular Semi -Analytical
Model for the Delineation of Wellhead Protection Areas, Version 2.01. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency Office of Groundwater Protection, Washington,
D.C.
GROUNDWATER GRAPHICS (1986, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91). GWAP - Graphical Well Analysis
Package, version 2.38„An Modular Semi -Analytical
Law Environmental, Inc. ReportofInitial Site Char' ter'izatianMarch 27, 1992.
NWWA, 1=89, Physical and Chemical Properties of Motor Fuels, In,; National Water Well
Association, Critical Issues in Underground Storage Tank Management, Properties
ca 'iotor Fuels, 1; 8
Tracy, J,V., 1989, Overviewof Factcrs Affecting Subsurface Gasoline Behavior, in:
Nstional Water Well Association, Critical Issues in Underground Storage Tank
M snagernent, Pro erties of Motor Fuels, 1989,
52
C1ndc:

FIGURES

.arfy
JrH igh"St
1/6 1/4 1✓2
NATID,
T
TERVAL 1P FEET
VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929
QUADRANGLE: LOCATION
1 MILE
CHARLOTTE - EAST, N.C.
35E90-137-TE-224
1.967
PHDTDREVISED 1.959
DMA 4654 II1 NE -SERIES V942
AMOCO OII.. COMPANY
Sta. No. 57
4475 Randolph Road
Charlotte. N.C.
GURE NO. 1
TOPOGRAPHIC LOCATION MAP

GuL
PETRO
EXPRESS
0
10 0
APPRox SCALE rt
(Former)
CROWN
Ot_Pcp WAY
DRY CLEANERS
Amoco OiL
Sto #57
c==.
SHARIO' ''.MITY ROAD
EXXON
A OCO OIL COM P Y
onclax: Sia No.7 FLUE N 0
44J '13 n o T.:1, v$CiN1.1"Y
If AD:I X Of r . . hartotte. C

w
J
m
GROUNDWAT
z
z
a

TABLE 2
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SELECTED FLUIDS
WATER.
AUTOMOTIVE GAS
0.998
0.729
AAUTOMOTIVE DIESEL 0.827
KEROSENE
0.839
ET FUEL (NO. 5) 0.844
NO. 2 FUEL OIL.
1,14
0.62
2.70
2.3©
NA
4.04*
At 25 ° C.
Sources: API Publication No. 1628 (1989).
NWWA (1989).
2.3
62-103
<6.8
55-217
<2.0
<6.8 <2.0
<6.8 <2.0
<6.8 7.9

APPENDIX
LIGING DATA AND YD .L1 •+DIENT CA CU TIONS

OBSERVATIONWELL GAUGE REPORTS
CLIENT: :3OCO
LOCATION: LO TE SS 57
STATE: NC
CLIENT CODE:
DEM CODE: 105805
print date: /1/95 Page
MONITORINGWELL C PRODUCT WATER PRODUCT PRODUCT
D,ATE TYPE-# DEPTH DEPTH THICK. ELEV.ELEV. ELEV.
(feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet)
ay-9.
-95
2-May-95
a95
2-May-95
2-May-95
-Mai`- 95
.-95
.a95
2-May-95
a95
10
12 62
54
67
14.90
38
,.
23
.20
5'7 8.5°7
8800 8.00
87.45 87.4
7. 3 87.13
86 18 86.18
86.26 .
26
87.16 7.16
" oamen s. p = pumping; N Nem -Primping, 8/A8/A = Before/After Adjustment]
Well Inaccessible; nth Monitoring Event of Da
= Dry Well; F = Film or Trace of Product) 105805

5 02 ' 5 87,5
contour
CALCULATION OF HYDRAULIC GRADIENT
AMOCO SERVICE STATION # 57
4475 RANDOLPH ROAD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
86.5
contour
80 87.50 86.50 too 0,016
The average hydraulic gradient = 0.016
HYDRAULIC GRADIENT = dh/d
WHERE: dh = change in static water level
di = distance between data points

GROUNDWATERAPPENDIX 13
""T. Y DATA
ty , 1995, , u st 7, 1995, August 14, 1995)

Received From:
Handex-NC
3600-G Wood Park Blvd.
Charlotte,NC 28206
/ C11-1EMIC %t.
LAE?C'RA` MUCUS
INCORPORATED
Date Reported : May 4 1995
Project Number : Amoco#57
PO Number : 105805-06
FDHRSDW Number : 83139
FHRS ENVNumber : E83018
FDER C0MQAPNum : 86-0008G
A2LA Number :. 0312-01
NCDEHNR Number : 296
SCDHEC Number 96019
For: 1 Day BTEXM Discount
Date Sampled:May 2 1995 Date Received:May 3 1995 Lab Numbers: 7076-7086
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
7076 7077 7078 7079 7080
Parameter Unit Method %ACC %PRC MW1 MW2 MW3 MW4 MW5
Detection
Limit
Dilution Factor - - 10.0 1.00 10.0 1.00 1.00
Benzene ug/L 0.500 101. 1.61 6950 9.91 1580 216. 655.
Toluene ug/L 0.500 105. 3.35 28000 1.36 5910 3.28 397.
Ethylbenzene ug/L 0.500 99.3 .580 2630 2.21 331. 2.61 737.
Xylene ug/L 0.500 96.6 2.42 12000 2.40 9920 26.9 3200
Total_BTEX ug/L 0.500 99.2 .410 49500 15.9 17700 249. 4990
Methyl-tert-butyleth ug/L 0.500 104. 8.96 3470 524. 459. 96.3 162.
PID_Spike ug/L 0.500 109. 2.60 97.8 104. 99.5 107. 98.7
Data Release Authorization
Sample integrity a d reliability certified by Lab personnel prior to analysis.
Methods of analys ': ac o *. e ith FCL QA and EPA approved methodology.
This Report of ma cat be eproduced in part.
effers• S. Flowers, Ph.d.
President/Technical Director
Page 1 of 3
Serving Your Analytical and Environmental Needs Since 1957
Jefferson I.-, Flower, Ph.©.
Jefferson S. Flowers, Ph.D.
481 NEWBURYPORT
P.O. BOX 150-597
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS
FLORIDA 32715-0597
BUS : [phone]
FAX: [phone]

Received From:
Handex-NC
3600-G Wood Park Blvd.
CharlotterNC 28206
C.11EMICAI.,
LACCUAT[;)FICS
INCORPORATED
Date Reported : May 4 1995
Project Number : Amoco#57
PO Number : 105805-06
FDHRSDW Number : 83139
FHRS ENVNuxnber : E83018
FDER COMQAPNum : 86-0008G
A2LA Number : 0312-01
NCDEHNR Number : 296
SCDHEC Number : 96019
For: 1 Day BTEXM Discount
Date Sampled:May 2 1995 Date Received:May 3 1995 Lab Numbers: 7076-7086
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
7081 7082 7083 7084 7085
Parameter Unit Method %ACC %PRC MW6 MW7 MW8D MW9 MW10
Detection
Limit
Dilution Factor - - -. 1.00 10.0 40.0 10.0 10.0
Benzene ug/L 0.500 101. 1.61 251. 5970 12700 14900 3420
Toluene ug/L 0.500 105. 3.35 17.3 21800 22800 22400 16000
Ethylbenzene ug/L 0.500 99.3 .580 152. 1380 1240 2530 1990
Xylene ug/L 0.500 96.6 2.42 19.3 7690 7810 10300 8260
Total_BTEX ug/L 0.500 99.2 .410 440. 36800 44500 50200 29700
Methyl-tert-butyleth ug/L 0.500 104. 8.96 556. 1060 15700 31800 280.
PID_Spike ug/L 0.500 109. 2.60 106. 91.0 110. 87.1 106.
Data Release Authorization
Sample integrity and reliability certified by Lab personnel prior to analysis.
Methods of analyR"s in accordance with FCL QA and EPA approved methodology.
This Report ofreproduced in part.
Jeffe
Flowers, Ph.d.
Presid-nt/Technical Director
Page 2
Serving Your Analytical and Environmental Needs Since 1957
Jefferson L. Flower, Ph.D.
Jefferson S. Flowers, Ph).
481 NEWBURYPORT
P.0 BOX 150-597
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS
FLORIDA 32715-0597
BUS,: [phone]
FAX„ [phone]

Received From:
Handex-NC
3600-G Wood Park Blvd.
Charlotte,NC 28206
C11,L.M1CA1_
LACI?ATCIICS
INCORPORATED
Date Reported : May 4 1995
Project. Number : Amoco#57
PO Number : 105805-06
FDHRSDW Number : 83139
FHRS ENVNumber : E83018
FDER COMQAPNum : 86-0008G
A2LA Number : 0312-01
NCDEHNR Number : 296
SCDHEC Number : 96019
For: 1 Day BTEXI4 Discount
Date Sampled:May 2 1995 Date Received:May 3 1995 Lab Numbers: 7076-7086
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Parameter
7086
Unit Method %ACC %PRC MW11D
Detection
Limit
Dilution_Factor - - - 1.00
Benzene ug/L 0.500 101. 1.61 31.1
Toluene ug/L 0.500 105. 3.35 2,52
Ethylbenzene ug/L 0.500 99.3 .580 <0.500
Xylene ug/L 0.500 96.6 2.42 27.6
Total_BTEX ug/L 0.500 99.2 .410 61.2
Methyl-tert-butyleth ug/L 0.500 104. 8.96 28.4
PID_Spike ug/L 0.500 109. 2.60 112.
Data Release Authorization
Sample integrity a reliability certified by Lab personnel prior to analysis.
Methods of analysac o th FCL QA and EPA approved methodology.
This Report of M ma cat be eproduced in part.
Jeffers+ S. Flowers, Ph.d.
esident/Technical Director
Page 3 of 3
Serving Your Analytical and Environmental Needs Since 1957
Jefferson L. Flower. Ph.0,
Jefferson 5, Flowers, Ph.©.
481 NEWBURYPORT
P.O. BOX 150-597
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS
FLORIDA 327154)597
BUS: [phone]
FAX [phone]

Received From:
Handex-NC
3600-G Wood Park Blvd.
Charlotte,NC 28206
For: 1 Day BTEXM Discount
Date Sampled:May 2 1995 Date
Parameter Unit
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylene
Total_BTEX
Methyl-tert-butyleth
PID-,Spike
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylene
Total_BTEX
Methyl-tert-butyleth
PID_Spike
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylene
Total_BTEX
Methyl-tert-butyleth
PID_Spike
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
Date Reported
Project Number
PO Number
FDHRS Number
FDER Number
NCDEHNR Number
SCDHEC Number
[IS
C1itMICAL
LAUCTATCPUICS
INCORPORATED
: May 4 1995
Amoco#57
: 105805-06
; 83139
E83018
: 296
: 96019
Received:May 3 1995 Lab Numbers: 7076-7086
REPORT OF INFORMATION
Expected
Value Range Correlation
7076
15000 15300 6950
22700 21900 28000
23700 5050 2630
35100 17100 12000
43400 62900 49500
32400 1470 3470
153. 101. 97.8
7077
15000 2120 9.91
37700 2330 1.36
23700 686. 2.21
35100 2100 2.40
44300 4710 15.9
32400 1470 524.
153. 101. 104.
7078
15000 2120 1580
37700 2330 5910
23700 2510 331.
35100 6180 9920
44300 28700 17700
32400 1470 459.
153. 101. 99.5
207 138 131
202 176
207 207 185 150
202 193 176 87
185 150
The above information is intended to highlight exceptional data as compared to the
upper control limits (Limit) established for each of the parameters. Range exceedances
are flagged by integer values in the Range column. The Expected values are derived
from historical data. Expected is computed as either the mean or computed directly
from another parameter using linear regression. All known correlation rule exceedances
are listed as enumerated rule numbers in the Correlation column. Correlation pair
rules, are defined on the last page.
Page 1
Serving Your Analytical and Environmental Needs Since 1957
Jefferson L Flower, Ph.D.
Jefferson S. Flowers, Ph.D.
481 NEWBURYPORT
P,0, BOX 150-597
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS
FLORIDA 32715-0597
BUS. „ [phone]
FAX; [phone]

Received From:
Handex-NC
3600-G Wood Park Blvd.
Charlatte,NC 28206
CtlLMiCAL
LA [ QLATCL'ItS
INCORPORATED
Date Reported : May 4 1995
Project Number : Amoco#57
PO Number : 105805-06
FDHRS Number : 83139
FDER Number : E83018
NCDEHNR Number : 296
SCDHEC Number 96019
For: 1 Day BTEXM Discount
Date Sampled:May 2 1995 Date Received:May 3 1995 Lab Numbers: 7076-7086
REPORT OF INFORMATION'
Parameter Unit
Expected Value Range Correlation
7079
Benzene ug/L 15000 2120 216.
Toluene ug/L 37700 2330 3.28
Ethylbenzene ug/L 23700 686. 2.61
Xylene ug/L 35100 2100 26.9
Total_BTEX ug/L 44300 4710 249.
Methyl-tert-butyleth ug/L 32400 1470 96.3
PID_Spike ug/L 153. 101. 107.
7080
Benzene ug/L 15000 2120 655.
Toluene ug/L 37700 2330 397.
Ethylbenzene ug/L 23700 686, 737.
Xylene ug/L 35100 2100 3200
Total_BTEX ug/L 44300 4710 4990
Methyl-test-butyleth ug/L 32400 1470 162.
PID_Spike ug/L 153. 101. 98.7
7081
Benzene ug/L 15000 2120 251.
Toluene ug/L 37700 2330 17.3
Ethylbenzene ug/L 23700 686. 152.
Xylene ug/L 35100 2100 19.3
Total_BTEX ug/L 44300 4710 440.
Methyl-tert-butyleth ug/L 32400 1470 556.
PID_Spike ug/L 153. 101. 106.
The above information is intended to highlight exceptional data as compared to the
upper control limits (Limit) established for each of the parameters. Range exceedances
are flagged by integer values in the Range column. The Expected values are derived
from historical data. Expected is computed as either the mean or computed directly
from another parameter using linear regression. All known correlation rule exceedances
are listed as enumerated rule numbers in the Correlation column. Correlation pair
rules are defined on the last page.
Page 2
Serving Your Analytical and Environmental Needs Since 1957
Jefferson 1.. Flower, Ph.D.
Jefferson S. Flowers. Ph.D.
481 NEWBURYPORT
P,O, BOX 150-597
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS
FLORIDA 32715-0597
BUS- [phone]
FAX, [phone]

Received. From:
Handex-NC
3600-G Wood Park Blvd.
Charlotte,NC 28206
C11FM1CAl..
ILA l3t RATCP US
INCORPORATED
Date Reported : May 4 1995
Project Number : Amoco#57
PO Number : 105805-06
FDHRS Number : 83139
FDER Number : E83018
NCDEHNR Number : 296
SCDHEC Number : 96019
For: 1 Day BTEXM Discount
Date Sampled:May 2 1995 Date Received:May 3 1995 Lab Numbers: 7076-7086
REPORT OF INFORMATION
Parameter Unit Limit Expected Value Range Correlation
7082
Benzene ug/L 15000 11300 5970
Toluene ug/L 37700 16200 21800 138 131
Ethylbenzene ug/L 23700 3750 1380
Xylene ug/L 35100 12700 7690 202 176
Total_BTEX ug/L 44300 49100 36800 207 185 150
Methyl--tert-butyleth ug/L 32400 1470 1060
PID_Spike ug/L 153. 101. 91.0
7083
Benzene ug/L 8810 831. 12700 150
Toluene ug/L 22700 19700 22800 207 138
Ethylbenzene ug/L 23700 4540 1240 93
Xylene ug/L 35100 15300 7810 202 176 87
Total_BTEX ug/L 43400 51400 44500 207 207 185
Methyl-tert-butyleth ug/L 32400 10000 15700 43
PID_Spike ug/L 153. 101. 110.
7084
Benzene ug/L 8810 831. 14900 150
Toluene ug/L 37700 2330 22400
Ethylbenzene ug/L 23700 5120 2530 93
Xylene ug/L 35100 17300 10300 202 176 87
Total_BTEX ug/L 43400 4720 50200 207 185
Methyl-tert-butyleth ug/L 32400 11700 31800 43
PID_Spike ug/L 153. 101. 87,1
The above information is intended to highlight exceptional data as compared to the
upper control limits {Limit) established for each of the parameters. Range exceedances
are flagged by integer values in the Range column. The Expected values are derived
from historical data. Expected is computed as either the mean or computed directly
from another parameter using linear regression. All known correlation rule exceedances
are listed as enumerated rule numbers in the Correlation column. Correlation pair
rules are defined on the last page.
Page 3
Serving Your Analytical and Environmental Needs Since 1957
Jefferson L. Flower, Ph.0.
Jefferson S. Flowers, Ph.D.
481 NEWBURYPORT
P.O. BOX 150-597
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS
FLORIDA 32715-0597
BUS: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

Received From:.
For:
Date
Handex-NC
3600-G Wood Park Blvd.
CharlotterNC 28206
1 Day BTEXM Discount
Sampled:May 2 1995 Date Received:May
REPORT OF INFORMATION
Date Reported
Project Number
PO Number
FDHRS Number
FDER Number
NCDEHNR Number
SCDHEC Number
995 Lab Numbers:
C11tM1CAL
l.Al3CRATCPICS
INCORPORATED
May 4 1995
Amoco#57
105805-06
83139
E83018
296
96019
7076-7086
Parameter Unit
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylene
Total_BTEX
Methyl-tert-butyleth
PID_Spke
Benzene
Toluene
Xylene
Total_BTEX.
Methyl-tert-butyleth
PID_Spike
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
Limit Expected Value Range Correlation
7085
15000 9070 3420
37700 13000 16000
23700 3020 1990
35100 10300 8260
44300 36500 29700
32400 1470 280.
153. 101. 106.
7086
15000 2120 31.1
37700 2330 2.52
35100 2100 27.6
44300 4710 61.2
32400 1470 28.4
153, 101. 112.
131
202
207 185 150
The above information is intended to highlight exceptional data as compared to the
upper control limits (Limit) established for each of the parameters. Range exceedances
are flagged by integer values in the Range column. The Expected values are derived
from historical data. Expected is computed as either the mean or computed directly
from another parameter using linear regression. All known correlation rule exceedances
are listed as enumerated rule numbers in the Correlation column. Correlation pair
rules are defined on the last page.
Page 4
Serving Your Analytical and Environmental Needs Since 1957
Jefferson L. Flower, Ph.D.
Jefferson S. Flowers„ Ph.D..
431 NEWBURYPORT
P,O. BOX 150-597
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS
FLORIDA 32715-0597
BUS: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

Received From:
Handex-NC
3600-G Wood Park Blvd.
Charlotte,NC 28206
For: 1 Day BTEXM Discount
Date Sampled:May 2 1995 Date
Date Reported
Project Number
PO Number
FDHRS Number
FDER Number
NCDEHNR Number
SCDHEC Number
Cult44iCI..
IBIDIPA MIMES
INCORPORATED
: May 4 1995
: Amoco#57
: 105805-06
: 83139
: E83018
: 296
: 96019
Received:May 3 1995 Lab Numbers: 7076-7086
REPORT OF INFORMATION
Correlation
43
87
93
131
138
150
176
185
193
202
207
Pairs Referenced
Benzene
Benzene
Benzene
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Ethylbenzene
Total_BTEX
Toluene,
Methyl-tert-butyleth
Xylene
Ethylbenzene
Toluene
Toluene
Total_BTEX
Xylene
Total_BTEX
Xylene
Xylene
Total_BTEX
The above information is intended to highlight exceptional data as compared to the
upper control limits (Limit) established for each of the parameters. Range exceedances
are flagged by integer values in the Range column_ The Expected values are derived
from historical data. Expected is computed as either the mean or computed directly
from another parameter using linear regression. All known correlation rule exceedances
are listed as enumerated rule numbers in the Correlation column. Correlation pair
rules are defined on the last page.
Page 5
Serving Your Analytical and Envirortmental Needs Since 1957
Jefferson L. Flower, Ph.D.
Jefferson S. Flowers, Ph.D.
481 NEWBURYPORT
PO, BOX 150-597
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS
FLORIDA 32715-0597
BUS: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

ara,
Nut 1pn Factor
Benzene ,,.,..
Toluene
xren•
Total ..,BTEX
klesny1-4r1wI nor
PO Sputce
Project Num
PO Number
Date Sampled
Date Analyzed
Compacted
Formal
Unit Cost
1 Day BTEXM
Dlacoun1
ber
n
up/1.
ucy1.
1u8&
7
0
7078
10
6950
27961
11984
495 24
2.40
15.9
524
104
©ate Received:
1 05-02-95 "
0
NormRR
Exted
13000 11 "
-643S0 1
000
7078
10
1578
5907
17739
459
99.5
MW-4
7079 7080,
216
3,28 397
L61 J37
26.9 3200
249
96..
107
4988
9&,7
05-03-95 Typed:
251 _
17.3
,152
7
7082
10 _
21757
1'9,3 ,7693-.
440 36796
FLOWERS I-IEMICAL LABORATORIES
ANALYTIC A1 11Et'LTS FORM Ha$ Humber 83139
7083
40
MW-9
10
10
:12690 14943 3418
22799 22427 13
1'4...258 1992
7813 10251 8255
44546
4 29699
15745 p17¢3. 80
110 87,1 106
05-04-95 $ent; 05-04-95
EPA80?
EPA60?
EPA6O2
EPA6p2
EPA6O2
EPA6Q2
E PA6ti2
♦ PA602
M ©t_
0,6
.4
%PS©
1.61
3,35
2.42
2.6
101
105
9,8;3,
104
109
Analys Dale
06-03-95
03-

[IA
Received From:
For:
Date
Handex-NC
3600-G Wood Park Blvd,
Charlotte,NC 28206
C'11[M1CA[.
LAL'C IPAIOI21LS
INCORPORATE
Date Reported : 995
Project Number N57
PO Number : P4a, 3` 94
FDHRSDW Number : 8313194
FHRS ENVNumber : E830r
FDER COMQAPNum : 86-0008G
A2LA Number : 0312-01
NCDEHNR Number : 296
SCDHEC Number : 96019
EPA625 Discount
Sampled:Aug 7 1995 Date Received:Aug 9 1995 Lab Numbers: 8774-8777
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Parameter
Surr_Spike(AE)
2-Nitrophenol
4--Chloro-3-methylphe
2,4,6-trichloropheno
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2-chlorophenol
2--methy1-4, 6-dinitop
4-Nitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
3,3'-Dichlrbenzidene
Benzidene
1,2-Diphenlhydrazine
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)pht
Butyl benzyl phthala
Di-n-butylphthalate
Diethylphthalate
Dimethylphthalate
Dioctylphthalate.
N-Nitrsdimethylamine
N-Nitrsdiphenylamine
N-Ntrsdi-n-prpylm.ine
2,4-dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotaluene
Data
Sample integrity and
Methods of analysis
This Report of
Je
Serving
Unit Method %ACC %PRC
Detection
Limit
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00 76.0 .030
1.00 64.4 .430
1.00 72.2 .350
1.00 64.0 .390
ug/L
ug/L 63.1 .710
ug/L 60.7 .040
ug/L 60.1 .890
ug/L 60.3 1.64
ug/L
ug/L 55.6 4.33
ug/L 60.0 .750
ug/L 70.5 2.21
ug/L
ug/L 65.5 1.73
ug/L 55.4 .200
ug/L 55.8 2.84
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L 70.7 .760
ug/L 75.7 1.61
ug/L 75.3 .970
ug/L 72.4 .580
ug/L 65.2 .390
ug/L 73.2 2.40
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
Release Authorization
8774 8775 8776 8777
MW7 MWBD MW9 MW10
72.4 107. 84.4 112.
<1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
<1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
<1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
<1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
<1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
<1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
<1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
<1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
<1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
<1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
<1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1,00
<1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
<1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
<1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
<1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
<1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
<1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
<1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
<1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
<1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
<1.00 <1.00 <1.00' <1.00
<1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
<1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
<1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
<1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
reliability certified by Lab personnel prior to analysis.
in accordance with FCL QA and EPA approved methodology.
reproduced in part.
S. Flowers, Ph.d.
Cr' airnertta Deeds Since 1957
Page 1 of 3
Jefferson 1.. Flower,, Ph.£),
Jefferson S. Flowers„ Ph.D.
481 NEWE3URYPORT
P,0. BOX 150-597
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS
FLORIDA 32715-0597
B'CUS: [phone]
FAX [phone]

Received From:
Handex-NC
3600-G Wood Park Blvd.
Charlotte,NC 28206
Date Reported
Project Number
PO Number
FDHRSDW Number
FHRS ENVNurnber
FDER COMQAPNum.
A2LA Number
NCDEHNR Number
SCDHEC Number
C1IFMLCAI_
1,4LLCCAT[?1?lIS
INC0R1+0RATE0
Aug17 1995
AMSENC-57
PRJN#34094
83139
E83018
86-0008G
0312-01
296
96019
For: EPA625 Discount
Date Sampled:Aug 7 1995 Date Received:Aug 9 1995 Lab Numbers: 8774-8777
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Parameter
Isophorone
Nitrobenzene
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dlbnz(a,h)anthracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Indn(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Naphthalene
1-methyl-Naphthalene
2-methyl-Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Intl_QA_Spike(2FBP)
4-Brmphnl_phnylether
4-Chlrphnlphnylether
B(2-chlrethox)methan
B(2-chlrisprop)ether
b(2-chlorethyl)ether
Data
Sample integrity a d
Methods of analys
This Report of
Unit Method %ACC
Detection
Limit
8774 8775 8776 8777
%PAC MW7 MW8D MW9 MW10
ug/L 1.00 60.2 1.69 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
ug/L 1.00 60.4 2.01 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
ug/L 1.00 54.2 .310 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
ug/L 1.00 61.6 1.19 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
ug/L 1.00 70,2 .040 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
ug/L 1.00 70.3 .600 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
ug/L 1.00 71.7 1.54 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
ug/L 1.00 80.9 1.78 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
ug/L 1.00 74.6 .030 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
ug/L 1.00 76.2 .290 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
ug/L 1.00 72.6 .110 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
ug/L 1.00 67.3 .880 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
ug/L 1.00 75.0 .830 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
ug/L 1.00 64.1 .440 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
ug/L 1.00 69.0 1.19 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
ug/L 1.00 58.9 2.35 111. 177. 203. 216.
ug/L 1.00 62.1 1.14 8.80 7.48 36.8 42.5
ug/L 1.00 61.3 1.95 18.0 18.4 72.1 82.0
ug/L 1.00 72.3 1.06 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
ug/L 1.00 72.9 .930 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
ug/L 1.00 86.9 .090 67.3 120. 77.4 108.
ug/L 1.00 65.8 2.02 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
ug/L 1.00 61.9 1.28 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
ug/L 1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1,00 <1.00
ug/L 1.00 60.5 .980 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
ug/L 1.00 60.0 .280 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
Authorization
ity certified by Lab personnel prior to analysis.
e ith FCL QA and EPA approved methodology.
eproduced in part.
Release
reliabi
ac o
Jelters
S. Flowers, Ph.d.
Serving Yibunkitiadyti
2 of 3
Needs Since 1957
Jefferson L. Flower, Ph.©.
Jefferson S, Flowers, Ph.D.
481 NEWBURYP©RT
P,O. BOX 150-597
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS
FLORIDA 32715-0597
BUS: (407) 33!9-5984
FAX (407) 26Si3-5113

ILCWIL IRS
Received From:
Handex-NC
3600-G Wood Park Blvd.
Charlotte,NC 28206
Date Reported
Project Number
PO Number
FDHRSDW Number
FHRS ENVNumber
FDER COMQAPNum
A2LA Number
NCDEHNR Number
SCDHEC Number
C li UMICAC
CAUCCACCCUA
INcoPPORATED
Aug17 1995
AMSENC-57
PRJN#34094
83139
E83018
86-0008G
0312-01
296
96019
For: EPA625 Discount
Date Sampled:Aug 7 1995 Date Received:Aug 9 1995 Lab Numbers: 8774-8777
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Parameter
1,2,4-trichlorobenze
o-dichlorobenzene
m-dichlorobenzene
Para-dichlorobenzene
2-Chloronapthalene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachloroethane
Hexachlorocyclopenta
Surr_Spike(DBBP)
Acid_BaseExtraction
Data
Sample integrity nd
Methods of ana
This Report of
8774 8775 8776 8777
Unit Method %ACC %PRC MW7 MWBD MW9 MW10
Detection
Limit
1.00 59.7 3.17
1.00 57.7 .490
1.00 57.6 .240
1.00 58.0 .970
1.00 61.5 1.06
1.00 68.8 1.73
1.00 57.3 .980
1.00 62.2 .180
1.00
1.00 94.9 1.61
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
Release
reliabi
<1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
<1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
<1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
<1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
<1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
<1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
<1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
<1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
<1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00
67.1 98.7 87.3 109.
Authorization
ity certified by Lab personnel prior to analysis.
e with FCL QA and EPA approved methodology.
reproduced in part.
S. Flowers, Ph.d.
President/Technical Director
Page 3 of 3
Serving Your Analytical and Environmental Needs Since 1957
Jefferson L. Flower, Ph.D.
Jefferson S. Flowers, Ph.D.
481 NEWBURYPORT
P,0 BOX 150-597
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS
FLOR(DA 32715-0597
BUS [phone]
FAX [phone]

"CT"
Received From:
Handex-NC
3600-G Wood Park Blvd.
Charlotte,NC 28206
C r1 I;
I N C ©R P O
Date Reported : Aug17 1995
Project. Number : AMSENC-57
PO Number : PRJN#34094
FDHRS Number : 83139
FDER Number E83018
NCDEHNR Number : 296
SCDHEC Number : 96019
For: EPA625 Discount
Date Sampled:Aug 7 1995 Date Received:Aug 9 1995 Lab Numbers: 8774-8777
REPORT OF INFORMATION
Parameter Unit Limit Expected Value Range Correlation
8774
Surr_Spike(AE) ug/L - - 72.4
Naphthalene ug/L 16900 330. 111.
1-methyl-Naphthalene ug/L 28400 2000 8.80
2-methyl-Naphthalene ug/L 43100 2610 18.0
Int1_QA_Spike(2FBP) ug/L 231. 87.1 67.3
Surr_Spike(DBBP) ug/L 67.1
8775
Surr_Spike(AE) ug/L - - 107.
Naphthalene ug/L 16900 330. 177.
1-methyl-Naphthalene ug/L 28400 2000 7.48
2-methyl-Naphthalene ug/L 43100 2610 18.4
Intl_QA_Spike(2FBP) ug/L 231. 87.1 120.
Surr_Spike(DBBP) ug/L - - 98.7
8776
Surr_Spike(AE) ug/L - 84.4
Naphthalene ug/L 16900 330. 203.
1-methyl-Naphthalene ug/L 28400 2000 36.8
2-methyl-Naphthalene ug/L 43100 2610 72.1
Intl__QA_Spike(2FBP) ug/L 231. 87.1 77.4
Surr_Spike(DBBP) ug/L - - 87.3
The above information is intended to highlight exceptional data as compared to the
upper control limits (Limit) established for each of the parameters. Range exceedances
are flagged by integer values in the Range column. The Expected values are derived
from historical data. Expected is computed as either the mean or computed directly
from another parameter using linear regression. All known correlation rule exceedances
are listed as enumerated rule numbers in the Correlation column. Correlation pair
rules are defined on the last page.
Page 1
Serving Your Analytical and Environmental Needs Since 1957
Jefferson L. Hower, Ph.D.
Jefferson S. Flowers, Ph.©.
451 NEWBURYPORT
P.O. BOX 150-597
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS
FLGRiDA 32715-0597
BUS: (407) 339-59E14
FAX: [phone]

Received From:
Handex-NC
3600-G Wood Park Blvd.
Charlotte,NC 28206
C11!LAICAL
ia[iCCAtc1;1C5
ONCCRP©RAtED
Date Reported : Aug17 1995
Project Number : ANSENC-57
PO Number : PRJN#34094
FDHRS Number : 83139
FDER Number : E83018
NCDEHNR.Number : 296
SCDHEC Number : 96019
For: EPA625 Discount
Date Sampled:Aug 7 1995 Date Received:Aug 9 1995 Lab Numbers: 8774-8777
REPORT OF INFORMATION
Parameter Unit Limit Expected Value Range Correlation
8777
Surr_Spike(AE) ug/L - -- 112.
Naphthalene ug/L 16900 330. 216.
1-methyl-Naphthalene ug/L 28400 2000 42.5
2-methyl-Naphthalene ug/L 43100 2610 82.0
Intl_QA_Spike(2FBP) ug/L 231. 87.1 108.
Surr_Spike(DBBP) ug/L - - 109.
The above information is intended to highlight exceptional data as compared to the
upper control limits (Limit) established for each of the parameters. Range exceedancee
are flagged by integer values in the Range column. The Expected values are derived
from historical data. Expected is computed as either the mean or computed directly
from another parameter using linear regression. All known correlation rule exceedance5
are listed as enumerated rule numbers in the Correlation column. Correlation pair
rules are defined on the last page.
Page 2
Serving Your Analytical and Environmental Needs Since 1957
Jefferson L. Flower, Ph.D.
Jefferson S. Flowers, Ph.D.
481 NEWBLJRYPORT
P.0. BOX 150.597
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS
FLORIDA 32715-0597
B11S: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

FPA525 1

a
IFILCIVU
Received From:
Handex-NC
3600-G Wood Park Blvd.
Charlotte,NC 28206
Date Reported :
Project Number :
PO Number
FDHRSDW Number :
FHRS ENVNUmber :
FDER COMQAPNum
A2LA Number :
NCDEHNR Number :
SCDHEC Number :
For: PB
Date Sampled:Aug14 1995 Date Received:Aug15 1995 Lab Numbers:
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Parameter
9480
9481
CIALAA1CALL
1_4 ICC C41 CUILS
INCORPORATED
Aug17 1995
PRJN 34099
105805-07
83139
E83014.74,
86-0008U
0312-01 Y"
296
96019
9480-9483
9482
9483
Unit Method %ACC %PRC MW7 MW8D MW9 MW10
Detection
Limit
Lead mg/L .00100 102. 3.45 0.0263 .00463 0.0139 .00442
Data Release Authorization
Sample integrity and reliability certified by Lab personnel prior to analysis.
Methods of analy "s in accordance with FCL QA and EPA approved methodology,
This Report o A13 r4t no reproduced in part.
fe S, Flowers, Ph.d.
Presid nt/Technical Director
Page 1 of 1
Serving Your Analytical and Environmental Needs Since 1957
Jefferson L Flower, Ph.D.
Jefferson S, Rowers, Ph.D.
481 NEWBURYPORT
P.O. BOX 150-597
ALTAMONTE 'SPRINGS
FLORIDA 3.2715-0597
BUS: [phone].
FAX: [phone]

Received From:
Handex-NC
3600-G Wood Park Blvd.
Chariotte,NC 28206
C11Ep,t1t A1_
1.A13O1 AiCS u 5
INCORPORATED
Date Reported : Aug17 1995
Project Number : PRJN 34099
PO Number : 105805-07
FDHRS Number : 83139
FDER Number : E83018
NCDEHNR Number : 296
SCDHEC Number : 96019
For: PB
Date Sampled:Aug14 1995 Date Received:Aug15 1995 Lab Numbers: 9480--9483
REPORT OF INFORMATION
Parameter Unit. Limit Expected Value Range. Correlation
9480
Lead mg/L 10100 152. 0.0263
9481
Lead mg/L 10100 152. .00463
9482
Lead mg/L 10100 152. 0.0139
9483
Lead mg/L 10100 152.. .00442
The above information is intended to highlight exceptional data as compared to the
upper control limits (Limit) established for each of the parameters. Range exceedancE—
are flagged by integer values in the Range column. The Expected values are derived
from historical data. Expected is computed as either the mean or computed directly
from another parameter using linear regression.. All known correlation rule exceedanc€
are listed as enumerated rule numbers in the Correlation column. Correlation pair
rules are defined on the last page.
Page 1
Serving Your Analytical and Environmental Needs Since 1957
Jefferson L, Flower, Ph_0,
Jefferson S,. Flowers, Ph.O,
481 NEWBURYPOAT
P.0, BOX 150-597
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS
FLORIDA 32715-0597
BUS, [phone]
FAX: [phone]

FLOWERS HEM IAL LAB
ANALS 9 Rr FIRM
11111111.111111111111111.11111
tit),
08 5-95
7-95 Sent:
17-95

APPENDIX
SOIL.DISPOSAL CERTlFICATE

Cherokee Environmental Grou
A Dimon of +Cla rake S
CERTIFICATION OF REMEDIATION AND RECYCLING
OF NON -HAZARDOUS HYDROCARBON
CONTAMINATED MATERIAL
ORIGINATING AT: 4475 RANDOLPH ROAD, CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAR©LINA
FROM THE „GENERATOR": AM000 01L COMPANY
Cherokee Environmental Group ('°CEG") received 1 206 .00 tons of material from the Generator on
5/ 2 4/ 9 5 thru 6/ 14 / 9 5 at its N O RW o o D facility. Receipt of this shipment
of NON -HAZARDOUS hydrocarbon contaminated material is evidencedby
3 CEG's ' manifests with control
numbers 22538 thru 22563,, 22810 thru 22824 23005
This NON -HAZARDOUS hydrocarbon contaminated material�accepted processes.dln thismaterial
to brick
will be remediated in one of CEG's fully permitted remediation/recycling acted, ink
manufacturing process, the subject material is mixed with raw materials, crushed, ground, compacted,
extruded into brick. The brick are preheated and then fired in tunnel kilns at temperatures exceeding 1700
degrees Fahrenheit for a period of approximately 12 hours. This process drives off and/or consumes any
organic constituents contained in the material, leaving dea rshed be segregated, prou free
of reany
hydiroc rbon
contamination. Material that is more suitable for bio-remediation
beneficially re -used in CEG's permitted bio-remediation operations. CEG guarantees complete remediation:
should CEG's bio-remediation processes not reduce the Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons in the subject material
to state defined "clean" soil levels, CEG will thermally remediate the material in one of its sixteen (16) brick
kilns.
It must be stressed that these processes are permitted by the State of Maryland's Department of the
Environment, the State of North Carolina's Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, the
State of South Carolina's Department of Health and Environmental Control, and the Commonwealth of
Vir inia's Department of Environmental Quality, only for the remediation and recycling of NON-
HAZARDOUS material.
con
rac
certification does not change
etty en CEG and r the Generator (or the Generator's authe terms and conditions of thorized gent)trelatting
nt(s), or certification(s)
to the referenced material.
articular job is filed as WM# 12687 . m
AtGROUP
29, 1995
CHERO ENV1R©NTA GROUP, C1 COLON ROAD, SANFO
© CEG 18A -

APPENDIX
SVE TEST: FIELD DAT CALCULATIONS, AND MR LE DATA

1 0
Hcindcx.
NANDer rzfi C iCROLINAS,
0.
DIN ( IN FEE-F) FROM SVE TEST IJELL
AMOCO OIL COMPANY - STA NO 57
44 RANDOLPH ROAD
CIITARLOTT, NORTH CAROLINA
AMOCO SO* 57
4475 RANDOLPH RD
CHARLOTTE, NC
MN -9 SVE 1EST
NOVEMBER 17 1994
0000030 INCHES H2O
k*AAL*-55 INCHES H
1 00
VACUUM NFLUENCE GRAPH (MW-9)
N FS.
'E.T/1 0715-95 W, FERGUSON isrA's, No o,S. OS V

SOIL VAPOR. EXTRACTION SYSTEM
EMISSION RATE CALCULATIONS
Site: Amoco SS# 57
4475 Randolph Road, Charlotte, NC
The test was conducted from extraction point MW-9.
A sample of the extracted vapors was collected during the test for later
laboratory analysis. Data used for the following calculations was:
The laboratory -determined Total Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbon concentration
was 36,800 mg/m3 after the laboratory removed any methane present.
Air velocity of 1000 ft/min was measured in a 2 inch diameter
pipe (actual diameter is 2.067 inches) with a Kurz Meter.
CALCULATED VALUES
Air flow was 20.6 scfm (at 60 degrees F).
The laboratory TVPH results can be converted to expected readings
on field instruments by the following formula:
Where:
Vc (ppm-v) = (Vc (mg/m3) / MW) x Vm
% LEL = Vc (ppm-v) / 140
MW = molecular weight in g/mole (N-hexane = 86.18)
Vm = Volume of 1 mole of gas in liters/mole
= 23.7 liters/mole at 60 degrees F
140 = Conversion factor when 100% LEL = 14,000 ppm-v
Using these equations, approximately 10,1.20 ppm-v hydrocarbons were present.
This converts to: 72% LEL.
HYDROCARBON EMISSION RATES
The following equation was adapted from API Publication #4410 (1985):
Vr (lb/hr) = (Vc (ppm-v) (1,000,000 ppm-v)) x (86.18 lb/lb-mole) x
(1 lb-mole/379.5 scf at 60 degrees F) x (Q (scfm)) x (60 min/hr)
Where: Vr = Vapor removal rate in lb/hr
Vc = Vapor concentration in ppm-v
Q = Air flow rate in standard cubic feet per minute
86.18 = molecular weight of N-hexane
This simplifies to:
Vr (lb/hr) = Vc (ppm-v) x Q (scfm) x (0.0000136)
Note: In the API publication, conversion from lb -moles to scf
was 385.36 scf/lb-mole. Since that publication was released, the
conversion factor was found to be 379.5 scf/lb-mole at 60 degrees F.
The above equation and subsequent simplifications use the
revised number.
Copyright 1993 Handex Environmental Recovery. All rights reserved.

Soil Vapor Extraction Sys'temp Emission: Rate Ca
Page
Site: Amoco SS# 57
4475 Randolph Road, charlotte, NC
The estimated hydrocarbon removal rate calculated
Vr - 2 8472lb/hour total hydrocarbons.
u
a.on
his equation.
LIQUID REMOVAL RATE ESTIMATION
The ol owing formula for estimatingliquid removal rates was also
adapted from API publication 4410
LPr (l/h) (Vr (lb/hr)) / (d(lbsigal))
Where: LPr = Liquid recovery rate in gal/hour
Vr Vapor removal rate in Ib/hour
P'd - Hydrocarbon density (6.17 lbsigal for gasoline)
(assumes specific gravity of gasoline to be 0.75)
for this sisite the estimated liquid removal rate from these extracti
points i
r = 0 ,.4615 gal/hour, ax
11.075 al day.
Reference: Subsurface V nting of Hydrocarbon Vapors from an Underground
Aquifer, API Publication 4410, September 9 5.
Copyright 1993 andex Environmentalonmen a Recovery. All nigh
ery

'11 '113M 1 011NOY'i ©i TI3A N0U.3V LX3 YY0113 3NYiS O
NOLLO

Received. From:
Handex NC
3600-G Wood Park
Charlotte, NC 28206
For: BTEX TRPH.
Date Sampled:Nov17 1994
Parameter
Tot_Pet .Hydrocarbons
Date Reported
Project Number :
PO Number
FDHRSDW Number :
FHRS ENVNumber
FDER COMQAPNum
A2LA Number
NCDEHNR Number :
SCDHEC Number :
Date Received:Nov18 1994 Lab Number
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
C 1tM#CA1_
LAUCVATCWILS
INCORPORATED
Nov21 1994
Amocot57
105805-04
83139
E83018
86-0008G
0312-01
296
96019
: 31053
Unit Method %ACC %PRC
Detection.
Limit
mg/m3 1.00
Benzene mg/m3
Toluene mg/m3
Ethylbenzene
Xylene
Total_BTEX
Methane
Methyl-tert-butyleth.
Carbon_Dioxide
mg/m3
mg/m3
mg/m3
mg/m3
mg/m3
mg/m3
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
Data Release Author
Sample integrity and eliability ce
Methods of analysis
This Report of Anal
fferson
President
31053
MW9
61800
471.
352.
112.
289.
1220
25000
ation
ified by Lab personnel prior to analysis.
FCL QA and EPA approved methodology.
oduced in part.
Flowers, Ph.d.
echnical Director
Page 1 of 1
Serving Your Analytical and Environmenta
Needs Since 1957
Jefferson L. Flowers, PhD
Jefferson S. Flowers, PhD
481. NEWBURYPORT Av,
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS
FLORIDA 32715 0597
BUS: (40T) 339 5984
FAX: [phone]

Received From:
Handex NC
3600-G Wood Park
Charlotte, NC 28206
For: BTEX TRPH
Date Sampled:Nov17 1994 Date
Date Reported
Project Number
Pa Number
FDHRS Number
FDER Number
NCDEHNR Number
SCDHEC Number
Received:Nov18 1994 Lab Number
REPORT OF INFORMATION
FL4WLL'S
C1ILMICAL
LA I3Cl2ATCI2ILS
INCORPORATED
Nov21 1994
Amoco#57
105805-04
83139
E83018
296
96019
: 31053
Parameter Unit
Tot_Pet_Hydrocarbons mg/m3
Benzene mg/m3
Toluene mg/m3
Ethylbenzene mg/m3
Xylene mg/m3
Total_BTEX mg/m3
56000
3970
5430
740.
1750
6380
ected Value
31053
5640 61800
249. 471.
614. 352.
74.3 112.
216. 289.
726. 1220
Range Correia
74
74
66
212
ion
The above information is intended to highlight exceptional data as compared to the
upper control limits (Limit) established for each of the parameters. Range exceedances
are flagged by integer values in the Range column. The Expected values are derived
from historical data. Expected is computed as either the mean or computed directly
from another parameter using linear regression. All known correlation rule exceedances
are listed as enumerated rule numbers in the Correlation column. Correlation pair
rules are defined on the last page.
Page 1
Serving Your Analytical and Environmental Needs Since 1957
Jefferson L. Flower, Ph.fD.
Jefferson S. Flowers, Ph.D.
461 NEWEIURYPORT
P,O, BOX 150-597
ALTAM©NTE SPRINGS
FLORIDA 32715-0597
BUS: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

Received From:
Handex NC
3600-G Wood Park
Charlotte, NC 28206
L& UCIPAY 3R
INCORPORATE
Date Reported Nov21 1994
Project Number : Amoco#57
PO Number : 105805-04
FDHRS Number : 83139
FDER Number : E83018
NCDEHNR Number : 296
SCDHEC Number : 96019
For: BTEX TRPH
Date Sampled:Nov17 1994 Date Received:Nov18 1994 Lab Number : 31053
REPORT OF INFORMATION
Correlation Pairs Referenced
66 Tot_Pet_Hydrocarbons
74 Tot_Pet_Hydrocarbons
212 Toluene
Xylene
Toluene
Total_F3TEX
The above information is intended to highlight exceptional data as compared to the
upper control limits (Limit) established for each of the parameters. Range exceedances
are flagged by integer values in the Range column. The Expected values are derived
from historical data. Expected is computed as either the mean or computed directly
from another parameter using linear regression. All known correlation rule exceedances
are listed as enumerated rule numbers in the Correlation column. Correlation pair
rules are defined on the last page.
Page 2
Serving Your Analytical and Environmental Needs Since 1957
Jefferson L, Flower, Ph.D.
Jefferson Sr Mowers, Ph.D.
481 NEWEIURYPOFIT
P.o. BOX 150-597
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS
FLORIDA 32715-0597
BUS: [phone]
PAX; [phone]

289
1224
25000
Project Number Amoco#57
P8 Number 105805-04
mpled 1 11-17-94 '
(1e1 a r4atyzed 0
0
NormRR
Exted
27500 1
-13750 1
0 NI
UnIS Coal
Day TED
ES CHEMICAL
T3CAAL iESULTS f=t
0.e �cc ba Ltd: 1 18 9 a Typed; 11-E1-4 4

APPENDIX
UIFER TEST: w T, G HS, noNs

Match.
Point
90
-3.4 -2 43
0.00
ATCH POINT
1. 00E+U000
1.00 E U0Q
. 15aE-0 0
p 1. E+C1 1? }
1.00
.Q 0
—0.43 7 1.5
Data
Type Curve
Uncenf. E9a #€ beta m 0.00 1
Tr (mom ipit
Hydraufle Coed
to
WELL 'DENT IRATI h!
ELATE OF AQQUiEER TEST
AQUIFER THICKNESS
IS I AR E T
PUMPING ELL RADIUS r
DISTANCE OF BSEF VAIION
E1
Elm IFORMA T ION
ERO PUMPIH
k' 04)
EM
00
0.00
0
0
SE Qt14 ttrr In
1447E- Qi r

Data for Pump Test
Well Narne: MW-7 Date of Test: 06/08/95
Aquifer Thickness (b): 35.000 ft
Pumped Well Discharge(Q) = 1.000 gpm
Radius of Pumping Well = 0.410 ft
Distance of Observation Well from Pumping Well - 17.000 ft
Entry
No.
********
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31.
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
2
Time(t) Drawd+wn(s) t / d
(min) (ft) (min/sq ft)
****** ************ *************
0.250 0.010 8.651E-0004
0.500 0.010 1.730E-0003
0.750 0.010 2.595E-0003
1.000 0.010 3.460E-0003
1.250 0.010 4.325E-0003
1.500 0.010 5.190E-0003
1.750 0.010 6.055E-0003
2.000 0.010 6.920E-0003
2.250 0.010 7.785E-0003
2.500 0.010 8.651E-0003
2.750 0.010 9.516E-0003
3.000 0.010 1.038E-0002
3.500 0.010 9..211E-0002
4.000 0.010 1.384E-0002
4.500 0.010 1.557E-0002
5.000 0.010 1.730E-0002
6.000 0.010 2.076E-0002
7.000 0.090 2.422E-0002
8.000 0.100 2.768E--0002
10.000 0.120 3.460E-0002
12.000 0.120 4.152E-0002
14.000 0.120 4.844E-0002
17.000 0.130 5.882E-0002.
20.000 0.130 6.920E-0002
25.000 0.160 8.651E-0002
30.000 0.160 1.038E-0001
35.000 0.160 1.211E-0001
40.000 0.170 1.384E-0001
45.000 0.170 1.557E-0001
50.000 0.180 1.730E-0001
55.000 0.180 1.903E-0001
60.000 0.180 2.076E-0001
65.000 0.190 2.249E-0001
70.000 0.200 2.422E-0001
75.000 0.220 2.595E-0001
80.000 0.230 2.768E-0001
85.000 0.240 2.941E-0001
90.000 0.270 3.114E-0001
95.000 0.300 3.287E-0001
100.000 0.320 3.460E-0001
110.000 0.350 3.806E-0001

000T'T OL6 `a
0000+az T
tit? + 'T O . ;
T 0 -°'
TO00-avoc OLL
T 0- *L OZ L'
T Ci[- T "L L'
TC t-"L
TO00-atitS*9 089 't
T 9-; L T.
T-s` ozs `'
1tL
0 0,
000 *OE
000 gIC
* t %
it 'T
1 '0 T
{ "09T
C W T'
000 . CS T
09
66

3 — Data
MATCH P 6t__
0+ E+ 0LD D
2.188E-0002
1 0 11 E+LI U LD 1
lag
Tr asrrcvli
Hydraulic Conducti
tarativit
Ua
c e
Y
.20
DLUTN
3E-0004tt rrc a
4a 72E-0003
EL
TELL IDENTIFICATION
DATE OF AQUIFER TEST
AQUIFER THICKNESS IE (L
(`DISCHARGE RATE ( )
PUMPING ELL RADIUS (r
DISTANCE OF OBSERVATION
1.00 E+0000
PUMPINGSELL (d) 00E 001

Data for Pump Test
Well Name: MW-9 Date of Test: 06/08/95
Aquifer Thickness (b): 35.000 ft
Pumped Well Discharge(Q) = 1.000 gpm
Radius of Pumping Well 0.410 ft
Distance of Observation Well from Pumping Well = 32.000 ft
2
Entry Time(t) Drawdown(s) t / d
No. (min) (ft) (min/sq ft)
******** ************ ************ *************
1 8.000 0.000 7.813E-0003
2 10.000 0.000 9.766E-0003
3 12.000 0.000 1.172E-0002
4 14.000 0.000 1.367E-0002
5 17.000 0.000 1.660E-0002
6 20.000 0.000 1.953E-0002
7 25.000 0.000 2.441E-0002
8 30.000 0.000 2.930E-0002
9 35.000 0.000 3.418E-0002
10 40.000 0.000 3.906E-0002
11 45.000 0.000 4.395E-0002
12 50.000 0.000 4.883E-0002
13 55.000 0.050 5.371E-0002
14 60.000 0.050 5.859E-0002
15 65.000 0.060 6.348E-0002
16 70.000 0.060 6.836E-0002
17 75.000 0.060 7.324E-0002
18 80.000 0.070 7.813E-0002
19 85.000 0.080 8.301E-0002
20 90.000 0.100 8.789E-0002
21 95.000 0.120 9.277E-0002
22 100.000 0.140 9.766E-0002
23 110.000 0,170 1.074E-0001
24 120.000 0.200 1.172E-0001
25 130.000 0.200 1.270E-0001
26 140.000 0.220 1.367E-0001
27 150.000 0.250 1.465E-0001
28 160.000 0.290 1.563E-0001
29 170.000 0.300 1.660E-0001
30 180.000 0.300 1.758E-0001
31 190.000 0.350 1.855E-0001
32 200.000 0.350 1.953E-0001
33 210.000 0.350 2.051E-0001
34 220.000 0.380 2.148E-0001
35 230.000 0.400 2.246E-0001
36 240.000 0.430 2.344E-0001
37 255.000 0.450 2.490E-0001
38 270.000 0.470 2.637E-0001
39 285.000 0.480 2.783E-0001
40 300.000 0.500 2.930E-0001
41 315.000 0.520 3.076E-0001

A
Is t 1n
.00 1, 2.00 3.00 4,00 ,1
00
Match
Point
b
— Data
Type Cury
Un anf' Ela t# beta '= ,1
1.000E-t-000
ELL IDENTIFICATION
GATE OF AQUIFER TEST
AQUIFER THICKNESS ()
DISCHARGE RATE :
PUMPING WELL RADIUS r
DISTANCE OF OBSERVATION
Tron ce 1 rlty° T
Hydra lle Conductivity
SE11A1"1f1.
ELt t RL1 PUMPING L
00
0 0
a
.064E-11 q ft1r
3.039E-00 ft r lrt
2.223E®-0 1/

Data for Pump Test
Well Name: MW-11D Date of Test: 06/08/95
Aquifer Thickness (b): 35.000 ft
Pumped Well Discharge(Q) = 1.000 gpm
Radius of Pumping Well = 0.410 ft
Distance of Observation Well from Pumping Well - 10.000 ft
2
Entry Time(t) Drawdown(s) t / d
No. (min) (ft) (min/sq ft)
******** ************ ************ *************
1 45.000 0.000 4.500E-0001
2 50.000 0.000 5.000E-0001
3 55.000 0.060 5.500E-0001
4 60.000 0.120 6.000E-0001
5 65.000 0.190 6.500E-0001
6 70.000 0.240 7,000E-0001
7 75.000 0.280 7.500E-0001
8 80.000 0.340 8.000E-0001
9 85.000 0.390 8.500E-0001
10 90.000 0.440 9.000E-0001
11 95.000 0.470 9.500E-0001
12 100.000 0.520 1.000E+0000
13 110.000 0.560 1.100E+0000
14 120.000 0.610 1.200E+0000
15 130.000 0.650 1.300E+0000
16 140.000 0.700 1.400E+0000
17 150.000 0.740 1.500E+0000
18 160.000 0.800 1.600E+0000
19 170.000 0.820 1.700E+0000
20 180.000 0.850 1.800E+0000
21 190.000 0.900 1.900E+0000
22 200.000 0.930 2.000E+0000
23 210.000 0.950 2.100E+0000
24 220.000 0.980 2.200E+0000
25 230.000 1.000 2.300E+0000
26 240.000 1.000 2.400E+0000
27 255.000 1.030 2.550E+0000
28 270.000 1.080 2.700E+0000
29 285.000 1.130 2.850E+0000
30 300.000 1.150 3.000E+0000
31 315.000 1.200 3.150E+0000
32 330.000 1.200 3.300E+0000
33 345.000 1.250 3.450E+0000
34 360.000 1.250 3.600E+0000
35 375.000 1.250 3.750E+0000

t-
7
PA
NriallimMammoOr
3 Sex+.crea Dr,
and=
111, Doca. Florida 32757-9784 [phone]
COMPANY: DATE STARTED: TIME STARTED:
LOCATION:
SERVICE STATIONIANDEDC I OCAII0N CODE
WELL � , STATIC WATER LEVEL:
TIME SINCE PUMPING
STARTED (min.)

L7nclax
2757-978-4
COMPANY: DATE STARTED: TIME STARTED: PAGE:, 4
LOCATION:
SERVICE STATION # HANI EX LOCATION COOEz
WELL # tki STATIC WATER LEVE
TIME SINCE PUMPING DEPTH TO WATER FROM
STARTED (min.) TOP OF CASING (feet)

7
STATIC WATER LEVEL:
andax
79. ILL Dora. F74rfda 32757-9784
7
COMPANY: DATE STARTED: TIME STARTED: PAGE: 3 o
LOCATION: .
SERVICE STATION # HANDED( LOCATION CODE:
WELL #
TIME SINCE PUMPING
STARTED (min.)

COMPANY:
LOCATION:,
SERVICE STATION #
WELL #
Surrooglo Dr,
DA
A
Ll1 ©or'o. ' F1 32757-9784 (904) 735
TII�IE STARTED:
HANDEX LOCATION CODE:
STATIC WATER LEVEL
TIME SINCE PUMPING
DEPTH TO WATER FROM
STARTED (min.) TOP OF CASING (feet)
PAG
CHANGE IN WA
6
4
1
T:
ILCHN

nd
HAMMY OF FLORIDA, INC, 100 Suneagf. Dr, P.O. Box 1579, Y[t
9'78.4 (904) 735--1800
COMPANY:_ DATE STARTED:. TIME STARTED: PAGE:, cif
LOCATION:
SERVICE STATION # HANDEX LOCATION CODE
WL�L # " STATIC WATER LEVEL:.
TIME SINCE PUMPING
STARTED (rntn.)
DEPTH TO WATER FROM CHANGE IN WATER
TOP OF CASING (feet) LEVEL (feet)
7
Cq
5
RO EOLOUST:
IA #:

n d aroc
Or., P.O.Box 1579, Wt.
COMPANY:
LOCATION:
SERVICE STATIONr #
WEU. # VA ' . ! STATIC WATER LEVEL:
764 [phone]
TIME STARTED: PA
DATE ST
AT1ON CODE:.

0are, FicKida 32757-9764 [phone]
COMPANY: DATE STARTED: TIME STARTED: PAGc
LOCATION:
SERVICE STATION s HANDEX LOCATICIwI CODE:
WELL #
STATIC WATER LEVEL
TIME SINCE PUMPING DEPTH TO WATER FROM
STARTED] (min.) TOP OF CASING (feet)
CHANGE. IN WATER
LEVEL (feet,)
6
7
7
HYIftOGEOLIST TECHNICIAN:

andex
Su eo4• Dr_ P.O. Box 1579. Mt Dom, Florida 32757-4784 [phone]
COMPANY: .. DATE STARTED: TIME STARTED: PAGE:°
LOCATION:_
SERVICE STATION #
TIME SINCE PUMPING
STARTED (ruin.)
HANDEX LOCATION CO()
STATIC WATER LEVEL
DEPTH TO WATER FROM
TOP OF CASING (feet)

A11ON CODE:
STATIC 4' ATER LEVEL:
DEPTH TO WATER
TOP OF CASING (
LT, 05-
ndax
P.O. pox 1579, Wl
32757-9784 (904) 73S-1800
COMPANY:. DATE STARVED. TIME STARTED: PAGE: 3 of
LOCATION:
SERVICE STATION #
WELL # U\ to
11ME SIN t PUMPING
STARTED (min.)
RO: OLO4 ST: C NI A

PAGE:
-.06111101"-
Suf e©gte
COMPANY: DATE ST
LOCATION:
and=
2(9O4) 735-1&O
TIME STARTED:
SERVICE STATION #_ HANDEX LOCATION CODE:
WELL # 1
eb
STATIC WATER LEVEL:.

L7ncIeac
2757 77 [phone]
COMPANY:_ DATE STARTED: TIME STARTED: PAGE
LOCATION:
SERVICE STATION #
WELL # ° 1If
HAND I LOCATION CODE:
STATIC WATER LEVEL:
TIME SING Pt {P
STARTED ('a.
0
DEPTH TO WATER FROM
TOP OF CASING (feet)
CHANGE IN WATER
LEVEL {feet,)
0
RST TECHNICIAN:

4x-kko 32757-97194 (904) 735--1800
COMPANY: DATE STARTED: TIME STARTED: w PAGE: of
LOCATION:
SERVICE STATION # HANDEX LOCATION CODE:
WELL # Ilk i1� ' �.. - STATIC WATER LEVEL:
TIME SINCE PUMPING
STARTED (min.)
DEPTH TO WATER FROM
TOP OF CASING (feet)
A
HYDRI
TEC
AN:.

2757 1F7 4 (9o4j 735--1800
STARTED:
DEPTH TO WATER FROM
TOP OF CASING (feet)
andax
RANDEX OF FLORF©A. INC.„ 100 Sun ogio Or,. P.©: Box 1572. I4L Bow
COMPANY: DATE STARTED:
LOCATION:
SERVICE STATION f___. HANDEX LOCATION CO
WELL # STATIC WATER LEVEL
TIME SINCE PUMPING
STARTED (min.)
6
HYDROGEOLOGIST: TECHNICIAN:.
PA
CHANGE IN WATER
LEVEL (feet)

STATIC WATER LEVEL:
andax
P.O. sox i579,
COMPANY: ©ATE STARTED: TIME STARTED:
LOCATION:
SERVICE STATION HAND LOCATION CODE:
WELL ¢ _ 6,1
TIME SINCE PUMPING
STARTED (min.)
HYIJROtEOLOGIST: TECHNICIAN:
(904) 735—thOO
PAGE:

(904) 735-1COO
COMPANY: DATE STARTED: TIME STARTED: PAGE:.: +f•
LOCATION
SERVICE STATION¢ HANDED( LOCATION CODE
Wl=il
ti 5 STATIC WATER LEVEL..:
� / M� --�
TIME SINCE PUMPING
STARTED (mtn.)
DEPTH TO WATER FROM
TOP OF CASING (feet)
IN WATER

Suneogi* Dr
and=
32757-0784 (5R04} 735--1808
COMPANY: DATE STARTED: TIME STARTED: PAGE
LOCATION:,� Pr.
SERVICE STATI
HANDEX LOCATION CODE:
WELL # M „STATIC WATER LEWL:
TIME SINCE PUMPING DEPTH TO WATER i0
STARTED (min..) TOP OF CASING (feet
HYUREC9,.,€IGIST:
TECI•iNICIAN:

S. nonle Dr.,
L-onclex
Dora. flgrlda 32757-9704 (G04) 735--1800
COMPANY•.
PATE STARTED: TIME STARTED: PAGE:
LOCATION:
SERVICE STATION HANDEX LOCATION CODE:
vita #
STATIC WATER LEVEL
DEPTH TO WATER FROM
TOP OF CASING (feet)

STATIC WATER LEVEL:
COMPANY
DATE STAR'
and.=
P.O. Box 1579. NL Dom Florida 32757-9764 [phone]
TIME STARTED. PAGE:. 3
LOCATION:
SERVICE STATION # HANDEX LOCATION C©I
WELL # tri
(.2

COMPANY:
LOCATION:
SERVICE STATION f
WELL #
andex
0784
DATE STARTEDTIME STARTED: PA
TIME SINCE PUMPING
STARTED (min.)
HANDS LOCATION CODE:.
STATIC WATER LEVEL _
DEPTH TO WATER FROM
TOP OF CASING (feet)

COMPANY:
2157-- 784 (90-) 735-1840
DATE STARTED: TIME STARTED: PAGE:
LOCATION
SERVICE STATION # DS LOCATION cope
WELL
WELL # (,. G'% ' STATIC WATER LEVEL_
R� 1ST: __ TECHNICIAN:

HANDEX OF FLORIO&, tt C. 100 Sur+ealIs a p Box 1579. ►i
734 [phone]
COMPANY: DATE STARTED: TIME STARTED: PAI
LOCATION:
SERVICE STATION # HANDEX LOCATION CODE:
STATIC WATER LEVEL:
WELL # V t
TIME SINCE PUMPING
STARTED (rnin.)
a
DEPTH TO WATER FROM
TOP OF CASING (feet)
H DROC OLCGIST: TECHNICIAN:

00 • Or, P.O. Box 1572. ut.
COMPANY: DA
LOCATION:
SERVICE STATION i
VEAL #
AR
2
T1 E STARTED;
PAGE
HANDEX LOCATION CODE:
STATIC WATER LEVEL: _
IE SINCE PUMPING
STARTED (min.)
DEPTH TO ATER FROM
N WATER.
TOP OF CASING (feet) LEVEL (feet)
J
HYI ROGEOLOGIST; TECHNICIAN:

:NVI3INH33L
:1SI t0
0
(� ) 13A31
J13LVM NI 3ONVI J
NtSV3 .d0 .401
1Vt 01 HId3©
13&31 ZEILYM OI1V1S
:3003 NOLLV003 XJGNVH
=Q3j ffIS 31111
©p94-srL (t06) sets—Lz£
'5LSE x00 0
rzkp ED
NI
(''4w) g3121V1S
ONId lfd 33N1S 31111.
:NOILVO©1
:ANVd1103

Narmsormar
r) Suneagl. Pr.. P.O. BOX 1579. I t Dora. Florida 327.r} -97 € (904) 735 I800
COMPANY: DATE
LOCATION: _--
SERVICE STATION
WELL, j
andaoc
TIME E STARTED: PAGE:
HAND E LOCATION CODE:
STATIC WATER LEVEL
TIME SINCE PUMPING
STARTED (rmIn.)
s
DEPTH TO WATER FROM CHANGE IN WATER
TOP OF CASING (feet)
LEVEL (feet
flu
HYDROGEOLOGIST:
TECHNIC

C761CIax
FUMED( OF FLORIDA. INC., 100 Sunecngls Dr.. P.O. Box 1579. SAL
COMPANY:
LOCATION:__
SERVICE STATION # HANDEX LOCATION CODE
WELL
STATIC WATERLEVEL:
# /r
(904) 7735-1E300
DATE STARTED: TIME STARTED: PAGE:
DEPTH TO WATER FROM
TOP OF CASING (feet)
HYDROCEOLOGIST: TECHNICIAN:

andex
HANDEX Or FLORIDA. INC, 100 Smoogto Dr, P.O. Box 1579. Mt. Dom Florida 32757-9784 [phone]
COMPANY:
LOCATION:
SERVICE STA
DATE STARTED: TIME STARTED: PAGE
HANDEX LOCATION CODE
Wu., STATIC WATER LEVEL:
of 3
TIME SINCE PUMPING
STARTED (min.)
2 5
6
• -75
ci
DEPTH TO WATER FROM
TOP OF CASING (feet)
CHANGE IN WATER
LEVEL (feet)
HYDROGEOLOGIST:
TECHN
A
;0'
12)

andax
WINDEX OF FL[7RfOA, INC.„ 100 Sun«of• O. P.O. Box 1579. Mt.
7
COMPANY: DATE STARTED: TIME STARTED: PAGE f j,
LOCATION:
SERVICE STATION O HAN©E LOCATION CODE:
WELL # STATIC WATER LEVEL
TIME SINCE PUMPING
STARTED (min.)
DEPTH TO WATER FROM CHANGE IN WATER
TOP OF CASING
LEVEL (feet)
H' DROGEOLOGIST: TECHNICIAN:

n d
ktANoEX OF FU RIDA. INC.. 100 Suneogl. Dr, P.Q. Box 1579. Mt.
COMPANY:
LOCATION:
SERVICE STATION
WELL
7 7 A75 i [phone]
DATE STARTED: TIME STARTED: PAGE:3_
HANDEX LOCATION CODE:
STATIC WATER LEVEL:
TIME SINCE PUMPING
STARTED (min.)
DEPTH TO WATER FROI
TOP OF CASING (feet)
CHANGE. IN WATER
LEVEL (feet
HYDR
ST:
CI AN.

Received From:
Handex-NC
3600-G Wood Park Blvd.
Chariotte,NC 28206
For: 3 Day BTEXM Discount
Date Sampled:Jun 8 1995 Date Received:Jun15 1995 Lab Number : 11323
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
CUFM1€A1..
CAU ATl rii
INCORPORATED
Date Reported : Jun16 1995
Project Number : AMSENC#57
PO Number : N/A
FDHRSDW Number : 83139
FHRS ENVNurnber : E83018 r..
FDER COMQAPNum : 86-0008G
A2LA Number : 0312-01 .
NCDEHNR Number : 296
SCDHEC Number : 96019
Parameter
11323
Unit Method %ACC %PRC RW1
Detection
Limit
Dilution_Factor - - - 20.0
Benzene ug/L 0.500 95.0 1.85 10300
Toluene ug/L 0.500 95.0 1.87 23000
Ethylbenzene ug/L 0.500 92.1 2.05 1420
Xylene ug/L 0.500 94.2 2.25 7140
Total_BTEX ug/L 0.500 94.1 2.09 41900
Methyl-tert-butyleth ug/L 0.500 86.5 3.77 2720
PID_Spike ug/L 0.500 102. 1.40 111.
Data Release Authorization
Sample integrity and reliability certified by Lab personnel prior to analysis.
Methods of analy`s in accordance with FCL QA and EPA approved methodology.
This Report of A ► C reproduced in part.
Jeffe 4,n S. Flowers, Ph.d.
Presidnt/Technical Director
Page 1 of 1
Serving Your Analytical and Environmental Needs Since 1957
Y
Jefferson L. Flower, Ph,f7.
Jefferson 5, Flowers, Ph.D..
481 NEWBURYPORT
P,©. BOX 150-597
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS
FLORIDA 32715-0597
BUS: [phone]
FAX [phone]'10

FLUWFrLS
Received From:
Handex-NC
3600-G Wood Park Blvd.
Charlotte,NC 28206
CI1C MICAL.
LAIMRATOI?ItS
INCORPORATED
Date Reported : Jun16 1995
Project Number : AMSENC#57
PO Number : N/A
FDHRS Number : 83139
FDER Number : E83018
NCDEHNR Number : 296
SCDHEC Number : 96019
For: 3 Day BTEXM Discount
Date Sampled:Jun 8 1995 Date Received:Jun15 1995 Lab Number : 11323
REPORT OF INFORMATION
Par
Expected Value Range Correlation
11323
Benzene ug/L 8810 831. 10300 150
Toluene ug/L 22700 18500 23000 207 138 131
Ethylbenzene ug/L 23700 4270 1420 93
Xylene ug/L 35100 14400 7140 202 176
Total_BTEX ug/L 38100 52000 41900 202 207 185
Methyl-tert-butyleth ug/L 32400 8180 2720 43
PID_Spike ug/L 153. 101. 111.
eter Unit
The above information is intended to highlight exceptional data as compared to the
upper control limits (Limit) established for each of the parameters. Range exceedance
are flagged by integer values in the Range column. The Expected values are derived.
from historical data. Expected is computed as either the mean or computed directly
from another parameter using linear regression. All known correlation rule exceedancel
are listed as enumerated rule numbers in the Correlation column. Correlation pair
rules are defined on the last page.
Page 1
Serving Your Analytical and Environmental Needs Since 1957
Jefferson L. Flower, Ph.D.
Jefferson S. Flowers, Ph.D.
481 NEWBURYPORT
P.Q. BOX 150-597
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS
FLORIDA 32715-0597
BUS: [phone]
FAX [phone]

Received From:
Handex-NC
3600-G Wood. Park Blvd.
Charlotte,NC 28206
Date Reported .
Project Number :
PO Number :
FDHRS Number :
FDER Number :
NCDEHNR Number :
SCDHEC Number :
CL1CMICAL.
LADUIPATCLICS
INCORPORATED
Jun16 1995
AMSENC#57
N/A
83139
E83018
296
96019
For: 3 Day BTEXM Discount
Date Sampled:Jun 8 1995 Date Received:Jun15 1995 Lab Number : 11323
REPORT OF INFORMATION
Correia
43
93
131
138
176
185
202
207
n Pairs Referenced
Benzene
Benzene
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
T©tal_„BTEX
Toluene
Methyl-tert-butyleth
Ethylbenzene
Toluene
Toluene
Xylene
To to l_BTEX
Xylene
Total BTEX
The above information is intended to highlight exceptional data as comparedto the
upper control limits (Limit) established for each of the parameters. Range exceedances
are flagged by integer values in the Range column. The Expected values are derived
from historical data. Expected is computed as either the mean or computed directly
fromanother parameter using linear regression. All known correlation rule exceedances
are listed as enumerated rule numbers in the Correlation column. Correlation pair
rules are defined on the last page.
Page 2
Serving Your Analytical and Environmental Needs Since 1957
Jefferson L. Flower, Ph.D.
Jefferson S. Flowers, Ph.D.
481 NEWBURYPORT
P.O. BOX 150-597
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS
FLORMA 32715-0597
BUS: [phone]
FAX [phone]

FLOWERS CFiEIwtCAL
TIES
Project Nur1
PO Number
Dale Sampled
Rate Analyzed
Compacted
Formal
Unit Cost
3 Day 8TF.XM
DeOtAttli
AMSENC#57
NIA
1 06-08-95 '
0
0
NorrnRR
Exted
10725
4828 i

Received From:
Handex-NC
3600-G Wood Park Blvd.
Chariotte,NC 28206
Date Reported
Project Number
PO Number
FDHRSDW Number
FHRS ENVNumber
FDER COMQAPNum
A2LA Number
NCDEHNR Number
SCDHEC Number
For: TDS TH FE MN CA
Date, Sampled:Jun14 1995 Date Received:Jun19 1995 Lab Number
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Parameter
Total._Hardness
TDS
Iran
Manganese
Calcium
11664
Unit Method %ACC %PRC PRW1
Detection
Limit
mg/L 0.100 96.0 1.35 26.0
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
2.50 93.9 .810
.00100 96.1 1.59
.00004 91.0 1.26
.00500 101. .100
50.0
4.86
1.52
1.45
C1 RN#CAL
ILLCRAWL?ICS
INCORPORATED
} Jun26 1995
: Amoco 11120-697
100-04
: 831i
: 03:
: 296
: 96019
: 11664
Data Release Authorization
Sample integrity and eliability certified by Lab personnel prior to analysis.
Methods of analysis or..nc th FCL QA and EPA approved methodology.
This Report of Anal uced in part.
efersanFlowers, Ph.d.
President --clinical Director
Page 1 of 1
Serving Your Analytical and Environmental Needs Since 1957
Jefferson L. Flower, Ph..©.
Jefferson S. Flowers, Ph.D,
4E11 NEWBURYPOAT
P.O. BOX 150-597
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS
FLORIDA 32715-0597
BUS: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

F1-cWFRS
Received From:
Handex-NC
3600-G Wood Park Blvd.
Chariotte,NC 28206
C
EA13n1?ATa121CS
IMCoRP©R'ATED
Date Reported Jun26 1995.
Project Number : Amoco##11120-697
PO Number : 105805-04
FDHRS Number : 83139
FDER Number : E83018
NCDEHNR Number : 296
SCDHEC Number : 96019
For: TDS TH FE MN CA
Date Sampled:Junl4 1995 Date Received:Jun19 1995 Lab Number 11664
REPORT OF INFORMATION
Parameter Unit
Expected Value Range Correlation
11664
T©tal_Hardness mg/L 4030 545. 26.0
TDS mg/L 40200 2360 50.0
Iron mg/L 2140 53.7 4.86
Manganese mg/L 67.9 0.750 1.52
Calcium mg/L 19300 168. 1.45
The above information is intended to highlight exceptional data as compared to the
upper control limits (Limit) established for each of the parameters. Range exceedances
are flagged by integer values in the Range column. The Expected values are derived
from historical data. Expected is computed as either the mean or computed directly
from another parameter using linear regression. All known correlation rule exceedances
are listed as enumerated rule numbers in the Correlation column. Correlation pair
rules are defined on the last page.
Setvine Your Ana
ica
Page 1
and Environmental Needs Since 1957
Jefferson L. Flower, Pfr.©,
Jefferson 5, Flowers, Ph.D.
451 NEWBURYP©RT
P.O. BOX 150-597
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS
FLORIDA 32715-I0597
BUS: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

26,0
0
4,I
R
FLOW RS CHEMICAL LAB
ANSDS771C:At 747SUi.TS FORM:.:..
•
Bars
MO
0774
0,0/01
EPA?9OOj
AD
LS

VA UU I ENHANCED U1FER TEST ANAL CA, RESULTS

SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION SYSTEM
EMISSION RATE CALCULATIONS
Site: Amoco Station # 57
4475 Randolph Rd, Charlotte, NC
The test was conducted from extraction point RW-1.
A sample of the extracted vapors was collected during the test for later
laboratory analysis. Data used for the following calculations was:
The laboratory -determined Total Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbon concentration
was 1,637 mg/m3 after the laboratory removed any methane present.
Air velocity of 800 ft/min was measured in a 2 inch diameter
pipe (actual diameter is 2.067 inches) with a Kurz Meter.
CALCULATED VALUES
Air flow was 16.5 scfm (at 60 degrees F).
The laboratory TVPH results can be converted to expected readings
on field instruments by the following formula:
Where:
Vc (ppm-v) = (Vc (mg/m3) / MW) x Vm
% LEL = Vc (ppm-v) / 140
MW = molecular weight in g/mole (N-hexane = 86.18)
Vm = Volume of 1 mole of gas in liters/mole
- 23.7 liters/mole at 60 degrees F
140 = Conversion factor when 100% LEL = 14,000 ppm-v
Using these equations, approximately
This converts to: 3% LEL.
450 ppm-v hydrocarbons were present.
HYDROCARBON EMISSION RATES
The following equation was adapted from API Publication #4410 (1985):
Vr (lb/hr) = (Vc (ppm-v) / (1,000,000 ppm-v)) x (86.18 x
(1 lb-mole/379.5 scf at 60 degrees F) x (Q (scfm)) x (60 min/hr)
Where: Vr = Vapor removal rate in lb/hr
Vc = Vapor concentration in ppm-v
Q = Air flow rate in standard cubic feet per minute
86.18 = molecular weight of N-hexane
This simplifies to:
Vr (lb/hr) = Vc (ppm-v) x Q (scfm) x (0.0000136)
Note: In the API publication, conversion from lb -moles to scf
was 385.36 scf/lb-mole. Since that publication was released, the
conversion factor was found to be 379.5 scf/lb-mole at 60 degrees F.
The above equation and subsequent simplifications use the
revised number.
Copyright 1993 Handex Environmental Recovery. All rights reserved.

Soil Vapor xt System Emission RateCalculatio►
Page
Site: Amoco Station # 57
4475 Randolph Rd, Charlotte, NC
The estimated hydrocarbon removal rate calculated from this equation
Vr 0.1013 lb hour total hydrocarbons.
LIQUID REMOVAL RATETION
The foliowing formula, for estimating liquid removal rates as also
adapted from API publication 4410:
L r ( al r) (V(Vr (lb/hr)) (Pd (lb/gal))
Wher EPr Liquid recovery rate in gal/hour
Vr = Vapor removal rate in lb/hour
Pd = Hydrocarbon density (6.17 lbeigal for gasoline)
(assumes specific gravity of gasoline to be 0.75)
For this site, the estimated liquid removal rate from these extraction
points is:
Er= 0.0164 gal/hour, or
4 gal day.
Reference:: Subsurface Venting of H drooarbon vapors froze an Underground
Aquifer, API Publication 4410, September 1985.
Copyright 1993Handex Environmental Recovery. All right reserved.

VACUUM
("h12D)
A W .„ ,' DATA G'
OVA
(PPM)
SAMPLE
DATE, ; y:
DISTANCE FROM EXTRA i10 Lt. TO MONITOR WELL, ft.
EXTRACTION WELL:
VACUU
{ONITOR WELLS
" H2O)
PAGE

Received From: Date Reported : Jun12 1995.
Handex-NC Project Number : AMS� - ;7105805
3600-G Wood Park Blvd. PO Number : N/A li d
Charlotte,NC 28206 FDHRSDW Number : 83139'`
FHRS ENVNumber : E83018
FDER COMQAPNum : 86-0008G
A2LA Number : 0312-01
NCDEHNR Number : 296
SCDHEC Number : 96019
For: BTEX TRPH
Date Sampled:Jun 8 1995 Date Received:Jun 9 1995 Lab Number : 32163
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Parameter
Tot_Pet_Hydrocarbons mg/m3
Benzene mg/rn3 0.500
Toluene mg/m3 0.500
Ethylbenzene mg/m3 0.500
Xylene mg/m3 0µ500
Total_BTEX mg/m3 0.500
Methane mg/m3 0,500
Methyl-tert-butyleth mg/m3 0.500
Carbon_Dioxide mg/rn3 0.500
Unit Method %ACC %PRC
Detection.
Limit
1.00
216
RW1
1750
27.2
48.3
2.33
6.52
84.3
113.
15.3
Data Release Authorization
Sample integrity and reliability certified by Lab personnel prior to analysis.
Methods of analy 's in accordance with FCL QA and EPA approved methodology.
This Report of � no +�? reproduced in part.
Jeffe nn S. Flowers, Ph.d.
Presid nt/Technical Director
Page 1 of 1
Serving Your Analytical and Environmental Needs Since 1957
Jefferson 1_. Flower, Ph.D.
Jefferson S, Flowers, Ph,U,
481 NEWBURYPORT
P,O. BOX 150-597
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS
FLORNDA 32715,0597
BUS' [phone]
FAX [phone]

Received From:
Handex-NC
3600-G Wood Park Blvd.
Charlotte,NC 28206
[RS
Cti[M1CAl_
1_AINDPAICI IFS
INCORPORATED
Date Reported : Jun12 1995
Project Number : AMSENC-57105805
Pa Number : N/A
FDHRS Number : 83139
FDER Number : E83018
NCDEHNR Number : 296
SCDHEC Number : 96019
For: BTEX TRPH
Date Sampled:Jun 8 1995 Date Received:Jun 9 1995 Lab Number : 32163
REPORT OF IN'FORMATION
Parameter Unit
Expected Value Range Correlation
32163
Tot_Pet_Hydrocarbans mg/m3 79400 7990 1750
Benzene mg/m3 3970 249. 27.2
Toluene mg/m3 5430 361. 48.3
Ethylbenzene mg/m3 740. 74.3 2.33
Xylene mg/m3 1750 216. 6.52
Totai_BTEX mg/m3 6380 684. 84.3
Methane mg/m3 11200 1220 113.
Methyl-tert-butyleth mg/m3 - - 15.3
The above information is intended to highlight exceptional data as compared to the
upper control limits (Limit) established for each of the parameters. Range exceedances
are flagged by integer values in the Range column. The Expected values are derived
from historical data. Expected is computed as either the mean or computed directly
from another parameter using linear regression. All known correlation rule exceedances
are listed as enumerated rule numbers in the Correlation column. Correlation pair
rules are defined on the last page,
Page 1
Serving Your Anal t%cal and Environmental Needs Since 1957
Jefferson L. Flo or, Ph.D..
Jefferson 5, Flowers, 'PI„ ..
481 NEWBURYPORI
P-O. BOX 150-597
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS
FLORlDA 32715-0591
BUS: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

FLOWERS CHEMIC
ANALYTICAL FtFWt,TS FARM
LABORATIR#ES
rAsNtlrreer$ 1qe
Sectten
Parameter
Tt# Pet ITXM
Teluen s
Tvra( _13TEX
methane,
1752
27,2
48.3
153
Date Re
Proved Number AMSENC-57105805
PO Number NIA
7eie Sampled 1 06-08-95 •
tide Analyzed 0
CorTpseted 0
Formai NormRR
Unit Cos* Exted
8TWTRPH/CH4 13750 1 •
pwc©unt -6187 1 .
06-09-95
Typed: _
O6-12-95 Sent
Method
EPA1B
EPA le
EPA.1B
1
0.6
�EPA1B
EPA18
%RSD
CJG
CJG
CJG
CJG,
CJG
CJG

APPENDIX
GROUND ATER MODELING PA''ETERS

TE NAME:
SITE LOCATION::.
CITY/STATE:
DATA USED FOR CAPTURE ZONE ANALYSIS'
AMOCO 57
75 RANDOLPH ROAD
CI•ARLOTTE, NC
AVE` SCE AQUIFER THICKNESS:,
AVERAGEGRADIENT:
EFFECTIVE POROSITY:
RADIUS OF EACH RECOVERY WELL CASINO:.
TRANSMISSIVITY:
NUMBER OF RECOVERY WELLS:
APPRIIMATE PUMPING RATE FOR EACH WEL
COORITIANTES OF RECOVERY WELLS
TIME PERIOD FOR ANALYSIS:
35 FEET
.I
0.1 ASSUMED
0.166 FEET
1 S.IDAY
193
45 DAYS
GPM)
ALYTICAL SOFTWARE: UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY HPA-RESSQC MODEL

APPENDIX
SVE BLOWER SPECIFICATIONS

PUMPS - REGENERATIVE BLO
Product Specifications
Model
Number Phase
R3105N-50 Single
Hz
Motor Specifications Max Vac Max Pressure Max Flow
Voltages HP Full Load Amps "H20 mbar ""H2O mbar cfm rn3h
10/220-240 1.33 3-811.9-2,0 , 28 70 31 77 43 73
0 115/208-230 0.5 5.2/2.9-2.6 40 100 43 107 53 90
R4110N-50 Single
R4310P-50 Three
110/220-240 ; 0.6 9.2/5.2-4.6 35 87 -
115/208-230 1.0 .4 -5.6 48 120 51
50 220/380 06
60 208-230/460 1.0
1.6 7 II
.4- .65 48 120 1 5
95 1 74
127 92
95 ! 74
127'92
126
56
Net. Wt.
Ibs kg
52
60
126 58
156
24
28
27
R4P115N-50 Single
60
R5125Q-50 Single 60
50
R5325R-50 Three 190-220/380-415 1,5 5.0-4.4/2.5-2 6
! 60 208-230/460 2.0 6.0-5,6/2.8
0/220-240 1,0
2 -230 r-1.5 L
40 100 ! 45 112 112 190
.7-9.1 60 149 * 65 162 133 226
R6130Q-50 Single
R6340R-50 II1li
R6P155Q-50 Single
R6P355R-50 Three
1
0 !2,0 25112,5
60 149
79
7 160272 7
6
47 ! 117
50
60 149 ! 65
25133
62 160
226
272- 7
50 220-240 112.5
60 i 230 13.0
0 -220/380-4 5 3.0
60 208-230/460 4.0
4
147-135 65 162 75 187 182 309 129 59
16,3 70 —174 60 149 215 365
14.4-13.417.2-6.8 65 ! 162 75 187 180 306
112 51
13-12/6 80 199 100 249 215 365
50 220-240 4,0 20,8-19.1 65, 162 80 199 235 399
60 230 5.5 29.9 85 212 95 237 280 476 243 110
50 190-220/380-415 ! 4.5 1. 14.9-1 .4 . 65 162 80 199 232 39/1
233 105
60 208-230/460 , 6.0 ! 20-18/9 85 212 100 249 280 ! 4/6
59
1 190-220/380-415 8.0120.8-16.9/10.4-9.5 72 1 179 80 199 ! 95 297 134
R7100R-50 Three
60 208-230/460 110.0L 26.5-24/12 90 224 90 224 420 714
NOTICE': Performance speCificztio.as subieck 10 change wahout notice.
75
0
50
VACUUM
-250
50Hz
200
150
100
0 100 200 300 400 r."'
FREE AIR FLOW (cfm)
170 PIO 510 660
PRESSURE
250
0 100 200 300 400
FREE AIR FLOW (cfm)
nml 1 1
0 170 340 510 680
0 100 200 300
FREE AIR FLOW
I —11 I
170 340 510
400
cfm)
680
100 200 300 400
FREE AIR FLOW (cfm)
1 1
0 170 040 510 E80 550
500 mbar
850
Free software
identifies best Gast
blowers for soil and
groundwater
remediation
Now you can size and select
regenerative blowers and
accessories For soil and
groundwater remediation
systems faster, easier and
more accurately than ever
before. Gast remediation
system engineering software
does the job and it is yours
for the asking. The 3)14-inch
IBM-compatible disk calculates
performance when the blower
is operating with both a
vacuum and pressure load at
the same time The programs
will also compensate For
changes in performance from
altitude and temperature,
helping you identify the
oplimurn Gast blowers for
your application.
Coll 1-800-952-4278 to
receive your free remediation
system engineering software
4

OIL VAPOR EXTRACTION Pt1�IPS
Model R3
Models R4, R4P, R5, R6
Product Di ensions
Model A
R3105N-50 131
5.17
R4110N-50 157
6.18
157
6.18
R4P115N-50 i 177
6.98
R51250-50 178
7.00
R5325R-50 178
7,00
R61300-50 197
7.75
R431 OP-50
R6340R-50 i 197
7,75
R6P1550-50 248
9.77
R6P355R-50 248 80
9.77
R7100R-50 274 92
10 79 3.64
2" PtPE (2) (R5)
PIPE (4) -.
(R4, R4P,, R5)
Metric (mr-n)
35
1,37
1.
U.S. Imperial (inches)
E F G
310 83 80
12.20 3.25 3,03
43 389 95 72
1,68 % 15.30 3 75 2,85
43 356 95 72
1.68
47
1.84
46
1.82
46
1.82
49
1.94
49
1.94
80
3.15
3.15
4.03 3.75. a 2.84
442 114
17.41 4,50
445 114
17.50 4,50
423 114
16.66 4,50
511 140
20.13 5.50
478 140
18.82 5.50
602 140
23.7 5..51
554 140
21,80 5.51
83
3.25
91
3,58
91
3.58
98
3.85
98
3.85
137
5.39
137
5,39
281
324
Models R6P, R7
34 NPT (R4, R6)
I3 NPT (R5, R4P)
11.06 i 12.75
316 313
12.44 112.31
316
12.44
354
13.93
49
1.94
99
3.88
50 ! 101
98 3.96
313 t 50
12.31 1,98
338
361 344
14.22 p 13,56
361 344
14,22 1 13.56
404 389
15,89 15.30
404
15.89
438
17.25
7
428
16.87
438 428
17,25 116.87
545 457
577 216 1 212
22.72 8.5 8.3372 21.46 ; 18.00
Notice: Specifications subject 4o change without notice
60
2.38
60
2,38
60
2.38
101
3,96
121
4.75
205
8.06
225
8.86
225
8.86
260
10.25
121 260
4.75 110.25
121
4.75
62 125
2.46 4.92
260
10.25
289
11,38
62 125 ' 289
2.46 4.92 11.38
127
5.00 -
64
2.50
64 ( 127
2.50 5.00
100
200 j
7.88 1 _ 114,76
K
206
8.12
227
8.93
227
8.93
258
9.38 10.15
254 293
10.00 11.73
'254 293
10,00 11.73
262 298 346
10,31 11.75 1 .13.6
262 298 350
10.31 11.75 13.78
262 298 j 350
10,31 11.75 i 13.78
290 329 391
11.42 12.96 15.38
1
290 329
12.96
290 325
12.80
290 325
1.42 12.80
375 C 410
16.14
1.42
1.42
390
15.34
463
8.21
463
18.21
09
20.02
N 0
13
53
175 11
6.88 .44
175 11
6.88 .44
175 15
6.88 .60
173 15
6.81 .59
183 15
7.19 .59
217 13
8.56 .52
217 13
8.56 .52
257 13
10.12 .50
257
10.1250
257 14
0.12 .56.

The moisture separator
removes liquids from the
gas stream in a soil vapor
extraction process, to help
protect both blower and
vapor treatment system
from corrosion and mineral
deposit buildup. The
moisture separator is
located between the
extraction wells and the
blower. An in -line filter is.
installed between
separator and blower..
Cud eiway do show ball float. Above
model shows opdional explosionprcof
Hoof swidch
Regen©isture Separator Specifications
Practical Design Engineered to remove and contain
moisture ranging from a fine mist to slugs of water from
blower inlet air streams, Gast moisture separators
incorporate a cyclonic action which results in a very high
degree of efficiency,
A floating ball valve which closes when the liquid level
becomes too high prevents collected liquid from
overflowing back into the air stream. When the float
valve closes an integral vacuum relief valve opens,
admitting air to cool the blower and prevent overheating.
Rugged Construction Gast moisture separator drums
are made from ribbed heavy gauge cold -rolled steel, with
heavy steel inlet, drain and float switch parts welded to
the drum wall. Drum interiors are epoxy coated to resist
abrasion, corrosion and chemicals, while the drum
exterior is coated with durable urethane. For ease of
connection, the outlet port is female pipe threaded. The
heavy-duty 304 stainless steel ball float resists chemicals.
A pilot operated precision valve capable of functioning
over a wide duty range, the vacuum relief valve is
designed and built to proven reliability and durability
standards. Moving parts are nickelplated for corrosion
resistance and smooth operation.
RESTRICTION VS. FLOW
0 100 200 300
FLOW (cfm)
0 136 272 408 544 680
RELIEF VALVE
SHIPPED
UNATTACHED
APPROX.
REF,
3/4' NPT
VALVE
NIPPLE & VALVE
SHIPPED
UNATTACHED
0
REF:
40
2
24
s
400 mbar
NPT
APPROX.
11

APPENDIX H
GROUNDWATER

It's all in the name...
EJECTOR SYSTEMS introduces a new leader,
an internally controlled ejector,
to its arsenal of groundwater remediatian pumps.
EJETm®STEMS
"T e broadest line i tlt indi. vey
910 National Avenue
Addison, Illinois 60101
1-800-OIL-LEAK
Featuring:
TOP FILL - STANDARD
UNIQUE INLET CHECK VALVE
INLET STRAINER - BUILT-IN

EJECTOR SYSTEMS INC.
GLADIATOR -OTAL FLUIDS
PUMPING SYSTEM
D AIR SUPPLY
WATER TABLE
(CONE OF DEPRESSION
GROUN
AIR LINE
VENT UNE
U P DISCHARG
GLADIATOR
TOTAL FLUIDS PUMP
GLADBG

SCHARGE
CONTRO MECHANISM

An internally controlled pneumatic ejector.
Standard Lengths:
3 and 5 feet
Diameter: 3 1/219 foi instillation in 4" diameter wells
Materials of Co
Options:
struction:
Body - 304 Stainless Steel
Fittings - Bronze
Check valve flapper - Viton
Special lengths
Air filter/regulator
All stainless steel
Counter
Well level indicator
Other Ejector Systems products:
S2 Total Fluids Ejector
Product Only Ejector
Level Tracking
Puck Pump
Two -Pump Systems
Multiwell
Air Strippers
Oil / Water Separators
VES
Sparge
Packaged Systems
lt's in the n l e...Ejecto Systems
nu acturer cif the broadest line of ejectors in the
Groundwater RemediatiOn Industry.
EJECTOR SYSTEMS, INC.
91.0 National Avenue
Addison, IL 60101
1-80'0-OIL-LEAK

APPENDIX
IL ATER SEPAw;SPECIFICATION

PERFORMANCE
The model SRC-.M Slant Rib Coalescing Oil/Water Separator will
continuously remove essentially all non. -emulsified oil from waste
water containing minimal solids, and produce an effluent with less
than 10 mg/1 of oil droplets larger than 20 microns. After separation,
the oil and water discharge through individual nozzles.
OPERATION
The SRC-M is manufactured as a single piece, molded polyester
fiberglass unit with special baffles and weirs to direct flow, skim oil
and control liquid levels in the separator, The slant rib coalescing
media is oleophilic (oil attracting) and has an efficient sinusoidal
flow pattern to promote impingement of the oil droplets on the media
surface. The oil coalesces and rises to the surface of the separator
where the oil is automatically decanted by an adjustable skimmer.
Fiberglass
Efficient
Low Cost
• Available From
Stock
APPLICATIONS
Surface skimmings
CI Ponds
C7 Wash tanks
• Rinse tanks
Ell Sumps
Ground water
Q Condensa:te
El Cooling water
[1] Floor drains
FEATURES
• Six sizes: 2 to 24 GPM
• Gravity flow
• Leak proof
• Lightweight
• Lift off cover
• Adjustable oil weir
• Clean in place
• Thmperature; range to 130 F

DRAIN
ADJUSTABLE
KIMMER
DRAIN
OIL
OUTLET
DIMENSIONS WEIGHTS & CAPACITIES
°
, :1-4( "h • „
"tr
,
Dimensions and capacities are for reference only and not to be used for construction.
Model No, represents nominal flow rate in GPM.
NOTE:
OIL
OUTLET
Fbr continuous or intermittent flows of 15 to 4000
GPM, containing solids that settle, GLE offers the
standard model SRC Slant Rib Coalescing Oil/Water
Separator in either steel or fiberglass construction.
The model SRC offers superior oil removal efficiency,
sludge chamber and oil reservoir.
Available Options
Dense coalescing pack
El Oil pump out
Li Sludge pump out
111 Effluent pump out
II Freeze protection
• 15 standard sizes
• Some models available
from stock
463 Vista • Addison, IL 60101 • 708-543-9444
FAX [phone]
CilETBae„fin STRG-M90

lui ta, a4 V V: JD
Q7U6 543 1169 Lain Gov.
t.Uf411
GREAT LAKES ENVIRONMENTAL,, LEC.
MODEL BRC_M
KOLL MED FIBERGLASS
OIL/WATER SEPARATOR
GREiT I KES \„
VIRONMGNFAL
GREAT LAMES ENVIRONMENTAL, INC,, Model SRC-M Slant Rib Coalescing
Oil/Water Separator sized and designed to remove free oil from a
solids free wastewater stream and produce an effluent containing
less than 10 mg/1 of oil droplets larger than 20 microns.
Water: 1.0 specific gravity, solids free
Oil: 0.90 specific gravity or less
Temperature 130 Degrees F or less
DESI
1) GENERAL
The separator is molded premium grade fiberglass
construction with Slant Rib ail Coalescing Media, interior
baffles and removable cover. Coalesced oil will rise to the
surface in the separation chamber and is automatically
skirmed. Oil flows from, the separator by gravity. Clean
water flows under a baffle and over a weir cascading into a
clean water chamber before exiting the separator.
2) INLET CHAMBER
Inlet nozzle that is non -clogging and disperses the flow
evenly across the depth and width of the coalescing media.
3) SEPARATION CAAABER
Slant Rib Oil coalescing media consisting of closely spaced
inclined plates designed to induce impingement of oil
droplets on the media surfaces. Media is cleanable with
1/ 4 "" maximum spacing.
463 Vista, Addison, IL 60101, 708/563-9444, FAX 708,1543-1169 1/93 SRC-K

1U/4J/U4 VU:J0
U 7Uti a4J 110V
latUJL.L LAALS ZNy. wj UUJ/ U11
CLIENT 4
CITY, STATE
Proposal. No;
DATE::
GREAT KES cj
V RGNMCN[AL ?
4) OIL 8KIKNER
Adjustable oil skimming weir. Does not require loosening of
bolts. Oil flows from the separator by gravity.
5) CLEAN WATER CHAMi' R
Treated, water leaving the coalescing media passes under an
oil retention baffle and then over a weir which maintains
the water level. Clean water flows from the separator
through a pipe outlet.
6) COVER
The separator is covered with a removable, Sift off, light
weight, FRP lid.
Two (2) nickel plated lifting handles are included..
7) MATERIALS
Tank is constructed of 1/4" thick premium grade polyester
FRP. Pipe, fittings and skimmer are Schedule 40 PVC.
Coalescing media is PVC. Wetted gaskets are Buna N.
8) DIMENSIONS
MODEL SRC -
2 M-4 M-6
M-16 M-24
Influent flow (GPM) 2 4 6 8 16 24
Total volume (GAL) 23 46 69 92 184 276
Coalescing area (sq ft) 136 272 408 544 1088 1632
Weight: empty (LBS) 80 120 170 140 200 260
operating (LBS) 272 504 745 907 1735 2562
15" 26" 39" 15" 26" 39"
45" 45" 45" 58" 58" 58"
22" 22" 22" 34" 34" 34"
Tank size width
length
height
Inlet (1)
Outlet (1
Oil (2)
Drain (2)
1/2"
1/2"
2"
3/4"
1/2" 2" 2" 3" 3"
1/2" 2" 2" 3" 3"
2" 2" 2" 3" 3"
3/4" 3/4" 3/4" 3/4" 3/4"
463 Vista, Addison, i'L 60101, 708/543-9444, fAX [phone] SRC-M

itl/Zb/1/4 Old:Jo Xiruo Aluo tlIALAt LAIMJ LINV.
MUVVVIVII
CLIENT
CITY, STATE
Proposal No:
DATE;
OPTIONAL EG
GREAT LAKES (5
V RONMeNTAL z
A) ELEVATION STAND
Carbon steel, angle iron stand to elevate the separator 36"
above grade. Elevation is suitable for locating a 55 gallon
barrel under the stand for oil collection.
13) EFFLUENT PUMP OUT
Centrifugal submersible pump, 1/3 HP, is installed in the
clean water chamber. Pump has integral high level -low level
controls for turning the pump on and off. (11OV, 1 pH, 60
Hz). Pump is plumbed with pvc piping and effluent flow
control nozzle. Pump will produce a maximum discharge
pressure of 7.5 PSI at 24 GPM.
C) HIGH -HIGH WATER, LEVEL SWITCH
Float switch installed through the side -wall of the
separator in the clean water chamber.
D) HIGH vEL-Low LEVEL LOAT 'MITCH
Dual float level switches installed through the side wall of
the separator in the clean water chamber.
E) COVER CLAMPS AND HOLDDoWN
FRP lift off cover has a neoprene gasket to seal on the lip
of the separation chamber. Clamps or bolts to hold the
cover in place are provided.
P) HOLDDOWN CABLES
Four (4) stainless steel cable straps with galvanized steel
turn buckles for anchoring the SRC-M separator to a
foundation. (Enbedment hardware by others).
G) INTEGRAL OIL RESERVOTR
Integral oil storage compartment is available on four (4)
models with rated flows of 2 GPM, 4 GPM, 8 GPM and 16 GPM.
463 vista, Addison. 1
t 60101, 708/543-9444, FAX: [phone] SRC-m

1V/4J/04 lla.JO
wnc.nl i tt1 c tti *
CLIENT
CITY, STATE
Proposal No:
DATE:
PTIO S+ UIPMEContinued
GREAT SAKES
'IRONMCNCAL z
H) RED d ` (PLYETRYLENE).
Rotationally molded, compact, rectangular polyethylene tank
with top inlet and bottom 3/4" drain (NPT) Tank will
conveniently fit under the elevation stand described in (A).
(Customer to verify this construction will meet local fire
regulations). Available sizes:
30 GAL - 19' X 25"L X 20"H," 16#
50 GAL - 19"W X 38"L X 20"H, 22.5#
100 GAL .. 3 0 "W X 3 8 "L X 2 6"H, 41. 5#
I) RECOVERED OIL TANK (DOUBLE WALD. STEEL)
Carbon steel, urethane coated, type 1 double wall, I3L
approved tank with base, top NPT nozzles, and interwall
access nozzle.
50 GAL - 24" Diameter X 24" Long
100 GAL - 24" 'Diameter X 30" Lang
150 GAL - 30" Diameter X 52" Long
J) INSTALLED BULK HEAD FITTINGS
GLE will be pleased to provide and install additional PVC
bulk head fittings with Buna N gaskets for your specific
piping ,and/or instrument needs.
( ) 3/4" Diameter ( ) 1.5" Diameter
( ) 1" Diameter ( ) 2" Diameter
X) INLETMANIFOLD DISTRIB�R
Inlet manifold fabricated out of PVC pipe and fittings to
accept and distribute oily ground water from multiple well
discharge nozzles. Manifold will be installed on the SRC-M
inlet nozzle.
1-1/2" Diameter 2 Point, 4 Point
2" Diameter 2 Point, 4 Point
3" Diameter 2 Point, 4 Point
463 Mists, Addison, IL 60101, 708/543-9444, FAX 7i3/543-1169 1/93 SRC-m

APPENDIX J
WORST CASE INFLUENT ..ONS
AND
AIR STRIPPERSPECIFICATIONS

AMOCO STATION # 57
4475 RAAN OLPH ROAD
CHARLOTTE, ( E, NC
WORST CASE CONCENTRATIONS BLEED ON HIGHEST CONCENTRATIDN FROM ELEC C MONITORING
WORT BENZENE CC)NCENTRArICN(/M)
WORST TOLUENE C NCENT TICN(69/9
WORST ETHYLBENZENE C NICEN ATICN( /1)
WORT XYLENE C()I\JCENTRATICN(/1)
TOTAL. BTEX (WORST CASE) NCEN ATICN(ug/I
WORST I ^ITEE Ct NCENTRATICN(u /1)
14900
28000
0
12000
57530
10
WORST CASE CONCENTRATIONS FRO M MAY 1 5 AIr9FLING EVENT.

AUG-11-1995 i0:12
CARBONAIR SYSTEMS 6124256882 P.03/08
Carbonair Environmental Systems
8640 Monticello Lane
Maple Grove, MN 55369
612-425-2992 800-526-4999
Fax: [phone]
___-__----_-STAT 30-------- -----
VERSION 2.4
WATER FLOW RATE: 8.0 gpm
AIR FLOW RATE: 150.0 ctm.
WATER TEMPERATURE: 60.0 F
AIR -TO -WATER RATIO: 140:1
Influent Conc. for BENZENE 14900.0 ppb
08/11/95
09:11:29
NO OF REMOVAL EFF EFF CONC OFF -GAS CONC AIR EMISSION
TRAY % ppb ug/1 lb/d
1 89.56103 1555.4068 95.3185 1.2816
2 98.87605 167.4678 105.2324 1.4149
3 99.87859 18.0901 106.2994 1.4293
4 99.98688 1.9548 106.4146 1.4308
5 99.99858 0.2112 106.4271 1.4310
6 99.99985 0.0228 106.4284 1.4310
Influent Conc. for TOLUENE 28000.0 ppb
NO OF REMOVAL EFF EFF CONC OFF -GAS CONC AIR EMISSION
TRAY % ppb ug/1 lb/d
1 86.91.967 3662.4929 173.8393 2.3374
2 98.22714 496.4021 196.4543 2.6415
3 99.75858 67.5989 199.5172 2.6827
4 99.96710 9.2114 199.9342 2.6883
5 99.99552 1.2553 199.9910 2.6891
6 99.99939 0.1711 199.9988 2.6892
Influent Conc. for ETNYLBENZENE 2630.0
ppb
NO OF REMOVAL EFF EFF CONC OFF -GAS CONC AIR EMISSION
TRAY % ppb ug/1 lb/d
1 88.46861 303.2755 16.6195 0.2235
2 98.63553 35.8855 18.5294 0.2491.
3 99.83806 4.2590 18.7553 0.2522
4 99.98077 0.5056 18.7821 0.2525
5 99.99772 0.0600 18.7853 0.2526
6 99.99973 0.0071 18.7857 0.2526
Influent Conc. for XYLENES (TOTAL) 12000.0 ppb
NO OF REMOVAL EFF EFF CONC OFF -GAS CONC AIR EMISSION
TRAY % ppb ug/1 lb/d
1 88.89184 1332.9795 76.1930 1.0245
2 98.73583 151.6998 84.6307 1.1379
3 99.85574 17.3112 85.5906 1.1508
4 99.98353 1.9761 85.7002 1.1523
5 99.99812 0.2256 85.7127 1.1525
6 99.99979 0.0258 85.7141 1.1525
-1-

AUG-11-110:12
C ARaN I R SYSTEMS
6124256882 P.04/08
Carbonair Environmental Sy►tams
8640 Monticello Lane
Maple Grove, MN 55369
612-425-2992 800-526-4999
Fax: [phone]
Influen
NO OF
TRAY
1
2
3
5
6
IMP 41101.
--------STAT 30--------------
VERSION 2.4
WATER FLOW RATE: 8.0 gpm
AIR FLOW RATE: 150.0 cfni
WATER TEMPERATURE: 60.0 F
AIR -TO -WATER RATIO: 140:1
Conc. for MTBE 31800.0 ppb
REMOVAL EFF
57.15624
80.00501
90.32298
95.23697
97.63650
98.82250
EFF CONC
ppb
13624.3168
6358.4083
3077.2914
1514.6427
751.5925
374.4461
OFF -GAS CONC
ug/1
129.8263
181.7257
205.1622
216.3240
221.7743
224.4682
Influent Conc. for TOTAL VOCs 89330.0 ppb
NO OF
TRAY
1
2
3
4
5
6
REMOVAL EFF
77.07548
91.92896
96.43507
98.28916
99.15667
99.58057
EFF CONC
PPb
20478.4714
7209.8635
3184.5506
1528.2906
753.3447
374.6728
OFF -GAS CONC
ug/1
491.7966
586.5724
615.3246
627.1551
632.6904
635.3952
08/11/95
09:11:29
AIR EMISSION
1b/d.
1.7456
2.4435
2.7586
2.9087
2.9820
3.0182
AIR EMISSION
lb/d
6.6127
7.8870
8.2736
8.4327
8.5071
8.5435

=
STAT Series
Sieve Tray Aeration Technology
Carbonair's exclusive STAT series represents the
best choice for low profile air strippers with design
simplicity, flexibility and high performance.
In Carbonair's STAT units, the water and air are
contacted in step -wise fashion on multiple trays. The
water enters at the top and flows across each tray. The
air passes upwards through openings in the trays, then
bubbles through the water to form "a surface offoam
which provides extreme turbulence and excellent
volatilization. Since the water in Carbonair's STAT
units flows horizontally across each tray, the traveling
path length of water and the required removal efficiency
can be achieved by increasing both the number and
length of the trays. Therefore, the STAT units provide
much lower tower height than the conventional
packed towers.
Another advantage of Carbonair's STAT units is
that air and blower power consumption are effectively
utilized since a single air stream passes through every
tray before exiting the tower. As a result of minimal
air flows, the organic contaminants are concentrated
and effectively removed by vapor phase carbon.
Low tower height yields numer-
ous other advantages: rapid installation,
easy winterization, inconspicuous
appearance, easy shipping and easy
maintenance. The STAT unit also re-
duces the potential for fouling since it
contains no packing media and provides
an extreme turbulent condition.
Carbonair's STAT units are avail-
able with a number of plate configura-
tions, blowers and controls, and can
achieve removal efficiency up to 99.99%.
OPTIONS
Explosion -proof controls.
Discharge pump.
Well control.
Off -gas carbon.
Humidity control.
Carbon polish.
Winterized enclosure.
FEATURES
The low air flow and minimal tower height
make the unit ideal for off -gas treatment.
The compact unit can be installed in a few
hours.
Controls include motor starter, level switch,
air pressure gauge and air pressure switch.
Panel comes with blower, manual -off -
automatic switch and alarm lights.
Computer modeling customizes the system
for optimum air flow, number and size
of trays.
SPECIFICATIONS
Listed on other side.
:CARBONAIR
°Treatment

CARBONAIR
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
8640 Monticello Lane
Maple Grove, MN 55369-4547
612-425-2992 800-526-4999
Fax [phone]
STAT SPECIFICATIONS
STAT
MODEL
15
30
80
180
*For 6-Tray unit
TRAY TRAY
LENGTH WIDTH
(ft-) (ft.)
2
3
4
6
0.75
1
2
3
HEIGHT
PER STAGE
(in.)
10
10
10
10
SUMP
HEIGHT
22
24
24
24
BENZENE REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AT 55 F
Predicted by Computer Modeling
(Graphs show removal efficiency at minimum air flow rates.
At maximum air flow rates, efficiency is slightly improved.)
50
F 5 TRAYS€
8 TRA3SF
D 4 TRAYS(
C 3 TRAYSimm
2 TRAYS w
A ; TRAY
25
STAT VJ
(60 CPO
A
WATER mow RATE (GPM)
F G TRAYS
E 5 TRAYS
C 2 TRaYA
13 2 Tf4AYs
A % TRAY
STAT 80
(300 CFM)
'J
ra
WATER E1..OW RATE €(G1111
E
C
DEMISTER
HEIGHT
(in,)
9.5
10.5
11.5
12.0
205
MAXIMUM
HEIGHT
(In.)*
93
96
97
98
F R TRAYS
E 5 TRAYS
& 4 TRAYS
C T TRA53
343 2 TRAYS
LIQUID
FLOW
(gpm)
0.5-15
1-40
5-100
10-200
MINIMUM
AIR FLOW
(cfm)
60
100
300
650
2 20 25
WATER FS,.OW' RATE (GPM)
STAT 180
(650 CFM)
MAXIMUM
AIR FLOW
(cfm)
80
150
350
700
55
4b
'NAlE,t [LOY4 RAT. ( t{�14wo,P
A
PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
Product Date Sheet EE198A-9J
1994 by Cartbuhatr

0
6 D.. AIR OUTLFT
O.D. BLOW
AIR INLET
EFFLUENT FLANGE_
NOTE Adiuc over fl neigh by 10 for each d rt
Irafl n flange on the same sid effluent
INFLUENT
Fi
tray added or deleted-
dd number or trays.
:..es Bray
567
05 . i6
-1994

STAT 30 W/ OPTIONAL KITS
EXHAUST AIR
AIR TEMPERATURE KIT AIR FL❑W KIT
(OPTI❑NAL) U (OPTI❑NAL)
BL❑WER MUFFLER
(OPTI❑NAL)
FL❑W METER KIT
(0PTI❑NAL)
ATER TEMPERATURE
KIT (DPTI❑NAL)
SAMPLE TAP KIT
(DPTI❑NAL)
SIGHT GLASS KIT PUMP D❑WN KIT
(STD W/ GRAVITY DRAIN SUMP) (DPTI❑NAL)
LEVEL C❑NTR❑L KIT
(STD W/ PUMP DOWN SUMP)
Sales Drawing # 133445
94.05.20
0 CARBQNAIR 1994

APPENDIX
T PUMP AND G NULAR ACTIVATED CARBON AD ORPTIONI.
SPECIFICATIONS

CARBON CONSUMPTION CALCULATIONS
AMOCO STATION
4479 RAND LPH ROAD
C ARLO NC
DESIGN i ARAMTERS
Liquid Flow Ra#a ()
Carbon Density (L))
Idirtiadum Retardation
Vessel Diarriat* (d)
Vassal Cross a#i aI Arsa
Carbon Volume
Carbon Weight (Wt)
Hydrosarbore(e) of coo ofo
Organic Loading Rate
influent Concenhation
II= LIQUID LOADING RATE (QC)
CONTACT OR RETENTION TIME (TR)
P
23 Ibe/ou.it
7 minutes
24 inches
3.14 sq. ft.
14.2
400 Ibs. (V )
STE (
Q.12 lbs./lb Carbon
1 ppb
TR Vol / t *7.43Sal/ a=ft
TR = 1 S ntlnutes;
14" ESTIMATED CARBON CONSUMPTION RATE (Cr)
Cr = Q * (Infiu ' t Cone'
Cr=
V. CARBON BED LIFE EXPECTENCY
fed Life (days = Wt / Cr
Sed Llfe (days = 4 J 1
REFERENCES
lb/day
ding
Artietmart Petrolau Intitute (IS ). Treatment T logy for R oval:
of Dleeol ad aecipine Com om Ground tva Publication #4 99

of Dissolved Gasoline
CARBON CONSUMPTION I CALCULATIONS
AMG G STATION 57
4475 RANDOLPH ROAD
CHARLOTTE, NC
DESIGN PARASITE
II. LIGUI
Liquid Flo Rate (0)
Garb on
Minimum
Vessel Ulan
Vessel Gro
Carbon Volume (VoI
Carbon Weight (Wt)
Hydrocarbon( of
Organic Loading Rate
Influent Concentration
LOADING RATE cot)
Fn
Pm
t
7 minutes
4 Inches
4 aq. ft
14.2 cu. f.
400 lbs. (V x
ST..
0.12 I a.71h Garton
57530 deb
GSA
preedag ft. = 2;
CONTACT OR RETENTION TIME i1
TR T Vo
TR a
IV. ESTIMATED CARBON CON UM TION RATE ( r)
V. CARGN BEG LIFE E7tPEGTENG'
REFERENCE
*7. 1
lnuts
nfluant Gone trstlon } (t rganic Loading Rate)
(days = Wt Cr
(days
Ihid y
n Petrol;m Institute (1 }, Treatment Technology for Removal
. Publication 44369.

SPECIAL
PRODUCT
PRESENTATION
RAN J11AR ACTIVATED
CARBON ADSORBER

GRANULAR AC
i
ancla
ATEB CARBON ADSORBERS
In order to meet the demand for
more cost effective GACA Vessels that will
rernain impervious to a wider range of
water chemistry, Handex is introducing a
new line of GACA's. The outer shell of
the vessels are an epoxy/fiberglass
laminate for strength, over a vinylester
liner for superior chemical resistance.
Besides the aforementioned, the fiberglass
vessels also offer a weight advantage as
can be seen in the design specifications
(below). All vessels have a design rating
of 150 psig.
In order to best fit the site specific
application, there are four sizes available
which range from 5 to 65 gpm in flow
capacity. (See table below for further
model description.) The vessels include
the internals which consist of an inlet
screen mounted in the top, as well as a
hub and screened laterals allowing for
bottom discharge. This system will also
accommodate backwashing the vessels..
The internals are made up of
polypropylene with injection molded glass
filled ABS adapters.
DESSGH SPEC
CADS
HCAS
14
HCA35 13CA6S
64.0
71.4
72.0 72,0
CAPACITY/
ra L, (WEIGHT)
44Frr124 LES
143 F /400 LBS
VESSEL ONLY
160 LBS
w
5 GPM
15 GPM
47A L S
3SGPM fx.3GPM
LSAT PSIG 154 PSIG
a
Weight of carbon based as carbon denrit7 of 18'lbtre
RO

Supplied with the vessels are
fiberglass -injection molded bases. The
bases are provided with a hole to
accommodate the underdrain pipe.
The normal operation is a down
flow process. Contaminated water enters
the top of the vessel through the inlet
screen and exits the bottom through
screened laterals radiating off a common
hub. The underdrain system is designed
to maintain a flow pattern, such that
channelling Ls eliminated and all carbon is
used to urn effectiveness. The
underdrain laterals are made of
polypropylene with openings sized to
retain 100% of the carbon and to maintain.
proper velocities and pressure drop,
based on an application rate of 5 gpm/ft2.
The vessels can stand alone or in a
parallel con€iguration. The face piping
can be simplified using hoses and quick
disconnects to allow backwash and lead
vessel changeover.

�r

NPE Close Coupled Pump Major Components: Materials of Construction
Samba Cerrada Acoplada NPE Componentes Principales: Materiales de Construccion
349
347 370 513
•
412B
408
371
Item No., Description, Materials,
Parte No. Descripcian Materiales
184 108 383 123
100 Caslng, Catcasa
101 t.mpeller, Impkilsor
108 Motor adapter, Adaptader del motor
AISI 304 SS,
AISI 304 Acero inoxidable
108A Motor ada.pler seal vent/flesh,
Sello valvulalcnorro del adaotador del motor
123 Detlector, Deflector BLINA-N
184 Seal housing, Alniamiento del sello
184 A Seal housing seal went/Push,
Sello yalvulatchorro del aloiamiento del sello
347 Guidevane, Ditusor
349 0-ring, guideyane, Anillo '0', ditosor
370 Socket head screws, casing:
Encajes cabezas de laminas, carcasa
371 Bolts, motor,
Tornillos, motor
383 Mechanical seal, Sella mecanico
408 Drain and yent plug, casing,
Enchules de drenale y valvula, carc.asa
4129 0ong drain and 'vent pluq,
enchuk de Oren* y valvula
513 0-ring, c2sing; Aniflo '0', CarC3Sii.
Motor NEMA standard, 503 flange,
Motor NEMA estandar, b6da 503
AISI 304 SS,
AISI 304 Amro inoxidable
Viton
AISI 430 SS,
AISI 430 Acero inoxidable
Plated sleet,
Acero chapeado
"see &all, ver labIa
AISI 304 SS,
AISI 304 Acero inoxidable
Viton
1 4A
108A
Seal Face Vent/Flush Option,
OpciOn Cara del Sello V,jlvirlalChorro
G

Per ormance Curves — 6i© Hz, 3500 RPM
de Funcionam"rente — 60 Hz, 3500RP
METERS E
METRES P
4
lode l r PE / 1ST Size rra�
PM 35i Curve (Curva) CN
Impeller Sfecfrons for OUP Motors
Setecciorres del tmpulsor para Motores OOP
NOTE: Not recomrnerrded tar operation beyond
printed H-0 curve
NOTA: No se recornienda para luncionatniento super'
i r pry en Ta curva H-©.
u
0
10
CAPACITY (CAPACIDAU)
del NPE / 1ST Size {TamaFio)1 x 1/.O impeller Selections for T'EFC & Exp. Proof Motors
RPM 3500 Curve (Curve) CNt3231R01 Sotertciones del impulsor para Motores TEFC & Exp. P
E: Not recommended Ear opera!
ed H-0 curve.
TA No se fedornienda para fund
fa Curv3 H-©,
2ri 30 4(1 54 00 70
5
rnAr
10
CAPACITY iCAPACI©AU
15
rrUtr
C
R
Ordering Code, imp.
C©digo de Pedido k1ia,
E 4?/i e
4d✓4
546
534
6 A
A
Ordering Code,
C©digo de Pedido
4t/
spec.
4'/1s
53/4
6

APPENDIX L.
PARTICULATE ALT P t T1

e
OUSifl4S
DU TRIAL Q ALIT
Division of Mechanical Mfg, Corporation

MODEL NS-112
TOP VEEN
TYPE 30.4
STAINLESS
/4"NPT Vent Port
/
1/4" NPT
Upstream
----Gauge Port
Handle
1.14 NPT Downstream Gauge Port
1/4NPT l,.,,':!tream 1
SiDE VIEW Gauge ,`"7 Zr' It
ir-,
Hand 1/4PT Vent I
Port I '
I , ;
-
il N
1/4" NPT 1 -
1
DoNnstrearn
Gauge Port
Adjustabl
Stand
3/4-NPT
Drain
Port
OCTEL NS-11
2" NCYT-
CONNECTION
1 5 V.11,
" NPT
nlet
NPT
Outlet
Description
Model NS-112 Bag Filter Housing in T-304 Stainless Steel at
150psi(250°F). Vessel uses a #1 size filter bag (rdia.x 16" long).
Liquid flow is from the inside of the filter bag to the outside.
The support basket and filter bag are securely locked into
a recess at the top of the overflow rim, providing a 360 degree
positive compression seal. Since the filter bag is locked in
at the top of the vessel, all of the dirt is trapped inside the bag.
The filter vessel never requires cleaning after use.
Specifications
Maximum Working Pressure 150psi
Maximum Working Temperature 250°F
Maximum Water Flow 110gpm (does not include a filter bag)
Maximum Support Basket Differential Operating Pressure 75psi
Hydrostatically Tested to 250psi
Inlet & Outlet: 2" NPT
Shipping Weight: 85 lbs.
Standard Features
Model NS-112, type 304 stainless steel, glass bead finish:
exterior, interior and basket
Model NC-112, carbon steel, one coat shop primer exterior
Over -The -Top Inlet
360° Hinged Closure with Lid Handle
Lid Safety Detents and Lid Stop
Investment Casting (Lid & Body)
Perforated T-316 S/S Support Basket with Longitudinal Taper
Gauge Ports (Upstream &Downstream) 1/4" NPT
Vent Port 1/4" NPT
Drain Port 3/4' NPT
Buna-N 0-Rings
Plated Carbon Steel Hardware - Bar Knobs
Adjustable Stainless Tripod Stand (NS-112
Adjustable Carbon Steel Tripod Stand (NC-112)
Options
Modified Connections - Flanged, Threaded or Sanitary
Interior Grade Finishes (Including 3A Sanitary)
Electropolish Finishes - Exterior, Interior or Both
Micron -Rated Strainer Baskets
Mesh & Micron Lined Baskets
Assorted 0-Ring Materials
Steam & Hot Oil Jackets
Low -Profile Horizontal Outlets
Cartridge Contaminant Chambers (holds four 10' cartridges)
Drain Valves & Vent Valves
Pressure Gauges
Available in Carbon Steel (Model NC-112) at 150psi (250°F)
14"
20*
143'
85

INGERSOLL-RAND®
AIR COMPRESSORS
PERFORMANCE DATA
AND DIMENSIONS
DISPL RCVR RCVR
MODEL BARE HP CFM SIZE CONFIG LENGTH WIDTH HEIGHT WEIGHT
234C1.5 234 1.5 6,5 60 Horizontal 51,25 22.81 40.25 337
234N1.5 1.5 6.5 80 Vertical 35,7,5 18.31 67.13 422
234C2 234 2 9.0 60 Horizontal _ 51.25 22,81 40,25
344
... _ _
, . -
234N2 234 2 9.0 80 Vertical 35.75 18.31 67.13 429
234C3 234 3 11.4 6.0 Horizontal
234D3 234 3 11.4 80 Horizontal
234N3 234 3 11.4 0 Ventio
24205
242N5
242F6T
254005
2540D7.5
2540N7,5
2540E7.5 2540 7,5 32,8 120
2540VE7„5 2540 7.5 32,8 120
2540D10 2540 10 41.
2540N10 2540 10 41.8
242 5 19,7
19,7 80
242 5
242 GAS) 20 0 30 Horizofltal 4315 24.0 44 75
2540 5 19,9 80 Horizontal 67.3129.00 46 96 680
2540 7,5 32 8 80 Horizontal 67.31 29,00 46.96 724
Vertical 41 75 29.00 73.63 724
1.25 22.81 40 25 362
67.00 22,81 41 00
447
2540E10
2540VE10
7100010
7100E10
2540 7.5 32.8 80
35.75 18.31 67,13 447
67.00 22.81 43,38 521
6,14 21,69 69.13 521
Horizwital 71,34 29.00
51.75
2540 10 41 8 120
2540 10 413 120
7100
7100
10 44,0 120
Ver,ical 41.75 31.45 76,75
500
874
874
67.31 29.00 46.96 736
Vertical 41.75 29.00 73.63 736
Horizontal 71.34
29.00 51.75
Ventical 41,75 31,45 76,75
44.0 80 Horizontal 66,59 27.31 52.00 935
71 34 27.31 56.75 1085
Horizontal
Verrical Receirer--Mounted Units
886
886
1-93
Section 3-2