Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20070410 Ver 1_Emails_20070517Re: bake Townsend Dam replacement Subject: Re: Lake Townsend Dam replacement From: James McRight <james.mcright@ncmail.net> Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 16:24:00 -0400 To: Cyndi Karoly <cyndi.karoly@ncmail.net> This one did clear.-- my computer tracking indicates. a May 2, 2007 clearance. Cyndi Karoly wrote: Can either one of you confirm for me that this project cleared the State Clearinghouse around April 30, 2007 as planned. We are eager the issue the 401, just need to make. sure it's legal. Thanks. 1 of 1 5/17/2007 4:32 PM Greensboro Townsend Dam Replacement Subject: Greensboro Townsend Dam Replacement From: James McRight <james.mcright@ncmail.net> Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 08:09:56 -0400 To: Cyndi.Karoly@ncmail.net The EA/FONSI should clear the State Clearinghouse on April 30, 2007. Since this dam (which is failing) represents about 700 of Greensboro's drinking water supply -- any efforts that would expeditiously move the project forward are really needed. The original intent was to repair the dam but it has been determined that it will require a total new dam downstream while maintaining the original lake for drinking water purposes. The Army Corp of Engineers has already lowered the water level to take pressure off the dam. Thanks Jim McRight 1 of 1 4/9/2007 12:50 PM Re: Greensboro-L.Townsend 404/401 app (Corp# SAW-2007-00895... Subject: Re: Greensboro-L.Townsend 404/401 app (Corp# SAW-2007-00895-241) From: Fred Tarver <fred.tarver@ncmail.net> Date: Thu, OS Apr 2007 16:09:09 -0400 To: Cyndi Karoly <cyndi.karoly@ncmail.net> Thanks. Our comments are in the mail to you for the 401. (Also, Jim McWright is with Public Water Supply Sec. in DEH.) Fred Cyndi Karoly wrote: Fred - sound reasonable to me. This brings up another wrinkle in the 401 process, however. They shouldn't have submitted an application until the SEPA process was complete. I'll have to put this on hold pending documentation that the FONSI is done. I've left a message with Jim McWright in Water Resources (I understand he's the lead SEPA reviewer) to advise of the SEPA schedule for this project. Fred Tarver wrote: Cyndi- I have a question about Greensboro's 404/401 application for a new dam just downstream of the existing dam at Lake Townsend. Is DWQ amenable to the issuance of a 401 with a place-holder for any flows or flow regimes negotiated after issuance? As a condition for concurrence with the FONSI, DWR received an agreement from the city (see attached) to negotiate a new release strategy from the dam prior to completion of the new dam. The current strategy was established in 1992 and is 7 cfs at full pool and 2 cfs at any elevation below that. The city typically maintains the impoundment below full pool. DWR and WRC agreed to allow them to make the 2 cfs from their NPDES-permitted, filter backwash discharge at the WTP just below the dam. The "natural," pre-Townsend 7g10 is around 11 cfs, about 2.5 cfs prior to the expanded WTP of 1992, and less than 2 cfs post-project. There is a 303-d listed stretch of Reedy Fork downstream of the dam. The existing flow numbers may or may not change, but DWR and WRC will seek a three-tiered release from the dam. Thanks, Fred Tarver Fred R. Tarver IIT <fred.tarver(a%ncmail.net> Environmental Specialist I Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Resources -- Instream flow Unit 1 of 1 4/5/2007 4:11 PM