20210404 Ver 1_Deep River Rd NRTR_20210326

NATURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
Replace Bridge 67 on SR 1523 (Deep River Road) over Deep River
Guilford County, North Carolina
TIP B-5714
WBS Element No. 45670.1.1
jyoRrHc.4
9
ObA.
CO 7
(I z
Q�
Qo
OF TR0
THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit
Natural Environment Section
September 2016

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
2.0 METHODOLOGY AND QUALIFICATIONS 1
3.0 PHYSICAL RESOURCES 1
3.1 Soils 2
3.2 Water Resources 2
4.0 BIOTIC RESOURCES 3
4.1 Terrestrial Communities 3
4.1.1 Maintained/Disturbed 3
4.1.2 Bottomland Forest 3
4.1.3 Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest 4
4.1.4 Terrestrial Community Impacts 4
4.2 Terrestrial Wildlife 4
4.3 Aquatic Communities 4
4.4 Invasive Species 4
5.0 JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES 5
5.1 Clean Water Act Waters of the U.S. 5
5.2 Clean Water Act Permits 5
5.3 Coastal Area Management Act Areas of Environmental Concern 6
5.4 Construction Moratoria 6
5.5 N.C. River Basin Buffer Rules 6
5.6 Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 Navigable Waters 6
5.7 Wetland and Stream Mitigation 6
5.7.1 Avoidance and Minimization of Impacts 6
5.7.2 Compensatory Mitigation of Impacts 6
5.8 Endangered Species Act Protected Species 6
5.9 Bald Eagle and Golden Eagle Protection Act 8
5.10 Endangered Species Act Candidate Species 8
5.11 Essential Fish Habitat 8
6.0 REFERENCES 9
Appendix A Figures
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Project Study Area Map
Figure 3. Terrestrial Communities Map
Figure 4. Jurisdictional Features Map
Appendix B Scientific Names of Species Identified in Report
Appendix C Stream and Wetland Forms
Appendix D Qualifications of Contributors
Appendix E Jurisdictional Determination Letter
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Soils in the study area 2
Table 2. Water resources in the study area 2
Table 3. Physical characteristics of water resources in the study area 2
Table 4. Coverage of terrestrial communities in the study area 4
Table 5. Jurisdictional characteristics of water resources in the study area 5
Table 6. Jurisdictional characteristics of wetlands in the study area 5
Table 7. Federally protected species listed for Guilford County 7

1.0 INTRODUCTION
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)proposes to replace bridge
number 67 on the SR 1523 (Deep River Road) over Deep River(TIP B-5714) in Guilford
County(Figure 1). The following Natural Resources Technical Report(NRTR)has been
prepared to assist in the preparation of a Categorical Exclusion(CE) for the proposed
project.
2.0 METHODOLOGY AND QUALIFICATIONS
All work was conducted in accordance with the NCDOT Natural Environment Section
standard operating procedures and July 2012 NRTR template. Field work was conducted
on June 1, 2016 and June 27, 2016. A Jurisdictional Determination from the U.S Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the North Carolina Division of Water Resources
(NCDWR) is currently being scheduled. Documentation of this jurisdictional
determination will be provided in Appendix E. The principal personnel contributing to
this document were:
Principal
Investigator: Troy Shelton
Education: B.S. Environmental Science, 1996
Experience: Senior Environmental Scientist, Dewberry Engineers Inc. 2001-Present
United States Marine Corps, 1997-2001
Responsibilities: Wetland and stream delineations, stream assessment, T/E species
assessment, QA/QC of document
Investigator: Briana Bill
Education: B.S. Environmental Science, 2003
Experience: Senior Environmental Scientist, Dewberry Engineers Inc., 2008-Present
Environmental Health Specialist, VA Department of Health, 2004-2008
Responsibilities: Wetland and stream delineations, wetland and stream assessment, T/E
species assessment, natural communities assessment, document
preparation
Additional personnel who contributed to portions of the field work and/or documentation
for this project were Elizabeth Lusk and Anne Burroughs. Appendix D lists the
qualifications of these contributors.
3.0 PHYSICAL RESOURCES
The study area lies in the piedmont physiographic region of North Carolina(Figure 2).
Topography in the project vicinity is comprised of sloping and level floodplains along
streams. Elevations in the study area range from 770 to 800 ft. above sea level. Land use
in the project vicinity is forestland interspersed with residential properties and maintained
utility rights-of-way.

3.1 Soils
The Guilford County Soil Survey identifies four soil types within the study area(Table
1).
Table 1. Soils in the study area
Soil Series Mapping Unit Drainage Class Hydric Status
Cecil sandy clay loam CeB2 Well Drained Non-hydric
Cecil sandy clay loam CeC2 Well Drained Non-hydric
Chewacla loam ChA Somewhat Poorly Drained Hydric
Madison clay loam McD2 Well Drained Non-hydric
3.2 Water Resources
Water resources in the study area are part of the Cape Fear River basin [U.S. Geological
Survey(USGS) Hydrologic Unit 03030003]. Deep River was identified in the study area
(Table 2). The location of the water resource is shown in Figure 3.
Table 2. Water resources in the study area
Stream Name ' Map ID NCDWR Index Best Usage
Number Classification
Deep River Deep River 17-3-(1.5) WS-IV*
*Waters within a designated Critical Supply Watershed and are subject to a special management specified in 15A NCAC 2B.0248.
Deep River occurs as a river with a defined bed and bank at the bridge crossing. The
project bridge spans the main flow of Deep River. The location of the bridge is shown on
Figures 3 and 4. The right-of-way at the project bridge is maintained herbaceous
vegetation. The physical characteristics of the water resource within the study area are
provided in Table 3.
Table 3. Physical characteristics of water resources in the study area
Map ID Bank Bankfull Water Channel Velocity Clarity
Height (ft) Width (ft) Depth (in) Substrate
Deep Silt
5-8 30 >36 Slow Turbid
River — Sand
There are no designated anadromous fish waters, Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW),
High Quality Waters (HQW), or water supply watersheds (WS-I or WS-II) within the
study area or within one mile downstream of the study area. In addition, the North
Carolina 2014 Final 303(d) list of impaired waters identifies no waters within the study
area or within one mile downstream of the study area as an impaired water due to
sedimentation or turbidity.
No benthic samples have been taken at Deep River at SR 1523. No fish sampling stations
occur within one mile of the study area.

4.0 BIOTIC RESOURCES
4.1 Terrestrial Communities
Three terrestrial communities were identified in the study area: maintained/disturbed,
piedmont bottomland forest and mesic mixed hardwood forest. Figure 4 shows the
location and extent of these terrestrial communities in the study area. A brief description
of each community type follows. Scientific names of all species identified are included
in Appendix B.
4.1.1 Maintained/Disturbed
Maintained/disturbed areas comprise a portion of the study area where the vegetation is
periodically mowed, such as residential properties, roadside shoulders and utility line
easements. The vegetation in this community is comprised of grasses and herbs,
including hard fescue, Canada goldenrod, wingstem,poison ivy, sericea lespedeza, ox-
eye daisy, white and red clover and Japanese stilt grass.
A disturbed bottomland hardwood forest wetland system was identified in the maintained
utility easement west of the bridge. This area included herbs and shrubs such as black
willow, sycamore, soft rush, and fox sedge.
4.1.2 Piedmont Bottomland Forest(Subtype?)
A bottomland forest community comprises a large portion of the study area, east and west
of the bridge. Sweetgum, red oak, mockernut hickory, willow oak and green ash
dominate the overstory canopy, while box elder, black willow, American hornbeam,
Japanese stilt grass and poison ivy occur in the understory.
A bottomland hardwood forest wetland system was identified north of Deep River, west
of SR 1538, within the floodplain of the river.
Another bottomland hardwood forest wetland mosaic was identified west of the utility
easement, south of Deep River, west of the intersection of SR 1523 and SR 1538.
A piedmont bottomland forest community occurs south of Deep River, east of SR 1523.
Tulip tree, loblolly pine and sweetgum dominate the overstory canopy, while red maple,
flowering dogwood and English ivy occur in the understory. A managed area, Guilford
County Open Space, is located within this community. In addition, High Point Greenway
parallels the SR 1523 west of the forest community.
4.1.3 Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest
A mesic mixed hardwood forest community occurs on a hillside along the southeastern
side of the study area, south of Deep River, east of the SR 1523. Sweetgum, red oak,
tulip tree, loblolly pine and Virginia pine dominate the overstory canopy, while flowering
dogwood occurs in the understory.

4.1.4 Terrestrial Community Impacts
Terrestrial communities in the study area may be impacted by project construction as a
result of grading and paving of portions of the study area. At this time, decisions
regarding the final location and design of the proposed bridge replacement have not been
made. Therefore, community data are presented in the context of total coverage of each
type within the study area(Table 4). Once a final alignment and preliminary design have
been determined, probable impacts to each community type will be calculated.
Table 4. Coverage of terrestrial communities in the study area
Community Coverage (ac.)
Maintained/Disturbed 3.7
Bottomland Forest 3.1
Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest 0.4
Total i 7.2
4.2 Terrestrial Wildlife
Terrestrial communities in the study area are comprised of both natural and disturbed
habitats that may support a diversity of wildlife species (those species actually observed
are indicated with *). Mammal species that commonly exploit forested, disturbed
habitats and stream corridors found within the study area include species such as raccoon,
Virginia opossum, groundhog, striped skunk,North American beaver and white-tailed
deer*. Birds that commonly use forest and forest edge habitats include the American
crow*, Carolina chickadee, northern mockingbird, northern cardinal* and tufted
titmouse. Birds that may use the bridge within the study area include rock dove*. Birds
that may use the open habitat or water bodies within the study area include red tailed
hawk, great blue heron, belted kingfisher*, indigo bunting*, Carolina wren, mourning
dove* and turkey vulture. Reptile and amphibian species that may use terrestrial
communities located in the study area include the five-lined skink*, eastern fence lizard,
spring peeper, eastern spadefoot, marbled salamander and three-lined salamander.
4.3 Aquatic Communities
Aquatic communities in the study area consist of a perennial stream. The perennial
stream system within the study area could support a variety of sunfish(such as white
crappie,bluegill and largemouth bass) and shiners, as well as catfish. Other aquatic
species may include three-lined salamanders and marbled salamanders.
4.4 Invasive Species
Three species from the NCDOT Invasive Exotic Plant List for North Carolina were found
to occur in the study area. The species identified were sericea lespedeza(Threat),
Japanese stilt grass (Threat), and English ivy(Moderate Threat). NCDOT will manage
invasive plant species as appropriate.

5.0 JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES
5.1 Clean Water Act Waters of the U.S.
Deep River was identified in the study area as a perennial stream(Table 5) (Figure 3). A
USACE and NCDWQ stream form is included in Appendix C. The physical
characteristics and water quality designations of the system is detailed in Section 3.2.
Deep River has been designated as warm water for the purposes of stream mitigation.
Table 5. Jurisdictional characteristics of water resources in the study area
Map ID Length Classification Compensatory River Basin
(ft.) Mitigation Required Buffer
Deep River 707 Perennial Yes Subject
Four wetland areas were identified to occur within the study area (Figure 4). Wetland
classification and quality rating data are presented in Table 6. All wetlands in the study
area are within the Cape Fear River basin(USGS Hydrologic Unit 03030003). USACE
wetland delineation forms and NCDWR wetland rating forms for the site are included in
Appendix C. The North Carolina Wetland Assessment Method(NCWAM)was used to
classify wetlands. Descriptions of the terrestrial communities at each wetland site are
presented in Section 4.1. Wetland systems WB, WC and WE occur within the bottomland
forest community. Wetland system WD occurs within the maintained/disturbed utility
easement.
Table 6. Jurisdictional characteristics of wetlands in the study area
Map ID NCWAM Hydrologic NCDWQ Wetland Area (ac.)
Classification Classification Rating
Bottomland
WB Riparian 77 0.3
Hardwood Forest
WC Bottomland Riparian 25 <0.1
Hardwood Forest
W D Bottomland Riparian 29 0.29
Hardwood Forest
WE Bottomland Riparian 30 0.44
Hardwood Forest
Total 1.09
WA was flagged in the field as a potential linear wetland,but was determined to be an ephemeral channel.
5.2 Clean Water Act Permits
The proposed project has been designated as a Categorical Exclusion(CE)for the
purposes of National Environmental Policy Act(NEPA) documentation. As a result, a
Nationwide Permit(NWP)23 will likely be applicable. A NWP 33 may also apply for
temporary construction activities such as stream dewatering, work bridges, or
temporary causeways that are often used during bridge construction or rehabilitation.
The USACE holds the final discretion as to what permit will be required to authorize

project construction. If a Section 404 permit is required,then a Section 401 Water
Quality Certification(WQC) from the NCDWR will be needed.
5.3 Coastal Area Management Act Areas of Environmental Concern
No Coastal Area Management Act(CAMA)Areas of Environmental Concern(AEC)
were identified in the study area. Guilford County is not subject to the rules and policies
of the Coastal Resources Commission, which administers CAMA.
5.4 Construction Moratoria
Guilford County is not listed by North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
(NCWRC) as a Trout County. In addition, Guilford County is not on the North Carolina
Division of Marine Fisheries list of anadromous fish habitat counties, therefore there is
no in-water work moratorium.
5.5 N.C. River Basin Buffer Rules
NC River Basin Buffer Rules for the Randleman Lake Watershed apply to the portion of
Deep River within the study area and include 50-foot wide riparian buffers on all
jurisdictional surface waters. Potential impacts to protected stream buffers will be
determined once a final alignment and design have been determined.
5.6 Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 Navigable Waters
The Deep River has not been designated as a Navigable Water under Section 10 of the
Rivers and Harbors Act by the USACE.
5.7 Wetland and Stream Mitigation
5.7.1 Avoidance and Minimization of Impacts
The NCDOT will attempt to avoid and minimize impacts to streams and wetlands to the
greatest extent practicable in choosing a preferred alternative and during project design.
At this time, no final decisions have been made with regard to the location or design of
the preferred alternative.
5.7.2 Compensatory Mitigation of Impacts
The NCDOT will investigate potential on-site stream and wetland mitigation
opportunities once a final decision has been rendered on the location of the preferred
alternative. If on-site mitigation is not feasible, mitigation will be provided by North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Mitigation
Services (DMS).
5.8 Endangered Species Act Protected Species

As of March 25, 2015 the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists one
federally protected species for Guilford County(Table 7). A brief description of the
species' habitat requirements follows, along with the Biological Conclusion rendered
based on survey results in the study area. Habitat requirements for each species are based
on the current best available information from referenced literature and/or USFWS.
Table 7. Federally protected species listed for Guilford County.
Scientific Name Common Name Federal Habitat Biological
Status Present Conclusion
Isotria medeoloides Small whorled E Yes No Effect
pogonia
E-Endangered
Small Whorled Pogonia
USFWS optimal survey window: mid May-early July
Habitat Description: Small whorled pogonia occurs in young as well as maturing(second
to third successional growth)mixed-deciduous or mixed-deciduous/coniferous
forests. It does not appear to exhibit strong affinities for a particular aspect, soil
type, or underlying geologic substrate. In North Carolina, the perennial orchid is
typically found in open, dry deciduous woods and is often associated with white
pine and rhododendron. The species may also be found on dry, rocky, wooded
slopes; moist slopes; ravines lacking stream channels; or slope bases near braided
channels of vernal streams. The orchid, often limited by shade, requires small
light gaps or canopy breaks, and typically grows under canopies that are relatively
open or near features like logging roads or streams that create long-persisting
breaks in the forest canopy.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Suitable habitat for the small whorled pogonia does exist within the study area.
The study area contains open, mixed hardwood forests with light gaps and canopy
breaks near roadways and streams. A foot survey of potential small whorled
pogonia was conducted June 27, 2016 and no small whorled pogonia plants were
found. A review of NCNHP records, updated October 2015, indicates no known
occurrences within one mile of the study area.
Other Species
The USFWS has developed a programmatic biological opinion (PBO) in conjunction
with the Federal Highway Administration(FHWA), USACE, and NCDOT for the
northern long-eared bat(NLEB) in eastern North Carolina. The PBO covers the entire
NCDOT program in Divisions 1-8, including all NCDOT projects and activities. The
programmatic determination for NLEB for the NCDOT program is "May Affect, Likely
to Adversely Affect". The PBO provides incidental take coverage for NLEB and will
ensure compliance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for five years for all

NCDOT projects with a federal nexus in Divisions 1-8,which includes Guilford County,
where TIP B-5714 is located.
5.9 Bald Eagle and Golden Eagle Protection Act
Habitat for the bald eagle primarily consists of mature forest in proximity to large bodies
of open water. Large dominant trees are utilized for nesting sites, typically within 1.0
mile of open water.
A desktop-GIS assessment of the project study area, which extends 660 feet beyond the
project limits, was performed on May 9, 2016 using 2014 color aerials. It is unlikely that
Deep River is large enough or sufficiently open to be considered a potential feeding
source. No nests or individuals were observed at the time of the site visit. Additionally, a
review of the NCNHP database on May 9, 2016 revealed no known occurrences of this
species within one mile of the project study area. Due to the lack of known occurrences,
and minimal impact anticipated for this project, it has been determined that this project
will not affect this species.
5.10 Endangered Species Act Candidate Species
As of March 25, 2015, the USFWS lists no candidate species for Guilford County.
5.11 Essential Fish Habitat
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)Fisheries has not identified
Essential Fish Habitat within the study area.

6.0 REFERENCES
Burt, W.H. and R.P. Grossenheider. 1980. A Field Guide to the Mammals: North
America North of Mexico. 3rd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 289 pp.
Conant, R. and J.T. Collins. 1975. A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians: Eastern
and Central North America. 3rd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 450 pp.
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
Technical Report Y-87-1, U. S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station.
Vicksburg, Mississippi.
Miller, J.H. and K.V. Miller. 1999. Forest Plants of the Southeast and Their Wildlife
Uses. Athens: The University of Georgia Press. 454 pp.
NatureServe. 2010. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web
application]. Version 7.1. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. Available
http://www.natureserve.org/explorer. (Accessed: May 9, 2016).
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Resources.
2004. Basinwide Assessment Report. Cape Fear River Basin.
http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0907/ML090770955.pdf
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality. 2005. Cape Fear 2005: Cape Fear River
Basinwide Water Quality Plan. Raleigh,North Carolina.
http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/planning/basin-planning/water-
resource-plans/cape-fear-2005
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality. 2009. Basin Assessment Report: Cape Fear
River Basin: 2009 Biological Assessment(Template Reports). Raleigh,North
Carolina. http://deq.nc.gov/. (Accessed: May 17, 2016)
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality. Fish Stream Assessment Program: Fish
Community Data by River Basin(Cape Fear). Water Sciences Home Page,
Raleigh,North Carolina. https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-
resources/water-resources-data/water-sciences-home-page/biological-assessment-
branch/fish-stream-assessment-program (Accessed: June 22, 2016).
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality. Water Supply Watershed and GIS
Resources. http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-land-
resources/energy-mineral-land-data/wsw-maps-gis-resources (Accessed: June 22,
2016).
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality. 303(d) Impaired Water Bodies List: 2014
Draft 303(d) list. http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-
resources/planning/classification-standards/303d. (Accessed: June 22, 2016).

N.C. Department of Environmental Quality. 303(d) Impaired Water Bodies List: 2016
Draft 303(d) list. http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-
resources/planning/classification-standards/303d. (Accessed: June 22, 2016).
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality. Geospatial Community, GIS Online.
Powered by Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. (Esri). Available
http://ncdenr.maps.arcgis.com/home/. (Accessed: April 8, 2016).
N.C. Department of Transportation. 2012. Invasive Exotic Plants of North Carolina.
N.C. Natural Heritage Program. 2001. Guide to Federally Listed Endangered and
Threatened Species of North Carolina. Raleigh,NC. 134 pp.
N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission. 2005. North Carolina Wildlife Action Plan.
Raleigh,NC.
N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission. 2016. North Carolina Species: Fish.
http://www.ncwildlife.org/Learning/Species/Fish
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of
North Carolina: Third Approximation. Natural Heritage Program, Division of
Parks and Recreation,N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural
Resources. Raleigh,NC. 325 pp.
Schafale, M.P. 2012. Guide to the Natural Communities of North Carolina: Fourth
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Department of
Environment and Natural Resources,NCDENR. Raleigh,North Carolina. 208
pp.
Soil Survey Staff,Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of
Agriculture. Web Soil Survey. Available online at
http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/. (Accessed May 9, 2016).
Spira, T.P. 2011. Wildflowers and Plant Communities of the Southern Appalachian
Mountains and Piedmont. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
521 pp.
United States Army Corps of Engineers. 2012. Regional Supplement to the Corps of
Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Region. Version 2.0. Wetland Regulatory Assistance Program. 165 pp.
United States Army Corps of Engineers. 1965. Section 10 Wilmington District Waters
(NC). Wilmington District website:
www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/jurisdiction.aspx.
(Accessed May 11, 2016).

United States Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory In lieu fee and Bank Information
Tracking System (RIBITS). 2016. N.C. Wetland Assessment Method(NCWAM)
User Manual, Version 5. Prepared by the N.C. Wetland Functional Assessment
Team. https://ribits.usace.army.mil/ribits.
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1960. Soil Survey
of Guilford County,North Carolina.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service. National Wetlands Inventory. Wetlands Mapper.
Available URL: http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/mapper.html(Accessed May 9,
2016).
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 4: Southeast Region,North Carolina
Ecological Services. 2015. Threatened and Endangered Species in North Carolina:
Guilford County. Updated 25 March 2015.
http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/alamance.html
United States Geological Survey. 2013. Guilford,North Carolina, Topographic
Quadrangle(7.5-minute series).
United States Geological Survey. 2013. High Point East,North Carolina, Topographic
Quadrangle(7.5-minute series).

Appendix A
Figures

ur % Cho t Y ® j.CO + CD ��$fydNI
CD
i.
c.
•
�„l�w������� L��1 ii Q panel, S°rr SyeaPprEppje m�o S� ,dLr.r tf-' Ir 'LP �n.®_ M` ® r��y _ Eag[cr� CaroVWvv�r
irssisig&
v1 �. _
fa CID
1426 a
�i���I��Z�:,,avi-4.71s,,,,l&Altlj �� � �i Single Lea}c �: yr ® - :'Ito e
N r.l¢ %
la)
Cardiir{n ,t75i `r. F m - a a;l � �lOi �Ra
� '0 ��Ave c = CI a q `Qnn^Pak KJ
Su Fre:I.: H11Vsop Rd 1424BLSv
1Skeei Ciub Rd o "'I ii- �c x `lJVitt 1 bRd 00- e,{ Lac1 a �� ® 4 y q LLr.� ® YHunterwood'' `w a L FVy .. 'N 665: �$} r¢•a _ w nCa4 �,lD Pl 'oCD
�� -' `-�,ts .3 _ - awn nril En.ir:nddln® 1n LM1 �.,,;Wa ` -� ,�y���}� i^iii ; .� O
. H.II �'-"•�'t Tr e� --' �en:, Y rft Rd Of s�
si;�'I�;•:IIIES Etele•E' i9"'6$! ' u merfieldrows ).agu � I:I ro
ieM1�
-r 311': L.Qak � n-�;" '',,,-.9—o:: r �r•--f-"r G weWa� _ __ += $ pc
+661E walt.e ri ;15) 1 taro Or 0s re py l o CP ® ., hat❑r
iT �- Ritlg�. v e:n: ;•n,f __ 24 H+r h.:i '''Av.,,.
White F 01s SPry yam, q
S' . .:• I� �f—t -7rr`es2:4:,:- • ,q.:u 'Av trlCn /0
,' J.. J:. -0 Scarf '0, eocy .1.�r �2 ,o• 'r®fir yv yV IBC $ C \\OD�
.C: ■ 1 _•� ref' Ave L_ F ,,
CD
n �]®®]��gg''Berner$w I - ,/�, 4> rerannnial - ❑r y�eslen❑r �' jT
FI— 'il.l � ` �: ,' :E�Y'� o gi ^. �C' be ii br rake :.4 r���e Him a
P v.•cr:fa's ,� f'I:•..R_ >'a-.ia=-�•, Ft a44- 4` ;, SO' 'CO r.,t" ® HICl y
;;,. .);!' it*....- `l, eN bolo _ ��r t ? Q�,rrreeEk ��
1 •- t `4-�'...- 2 y*.,l q-- vlek.b -
CD
cl •;p _ 1" M�� r. F- 13s xRr1 Lav 's , v ®�
�I l..►. ,rr .-.y is'.66'• • T' ,i*.►- ------- -----*Z3 �' 'sr�nr x ®1 e I ® r' - 3
- 31 # 1 +I:•: ;/ a N i Rd am
i A rn ova Ave ® ` R` •.
aI.bin •.). �•.ii.s.: ':W5'' a �Rd £gfe ® Y B Y
{ H ,'h, ,_ 4 ►s■ 4.:,,
,� rcr Old Mill Rd n' t - Sf Qak How, a fie^Rd xnll® 'Je;
�. 1 S_ - 2,� 1 ' ❑: ❑ - Hartle Or
• o-/ldxay• I} `N c . a20 FI n . eva l Rn�n e
;139; 4. .5 �iaf• ft %4 yy rCD
••'r;6S.'- rhlU,`� fi.'6 e.ina%3LS3 Pp5o�k(-dWarlord fEd ®j ® .Galnasvil� jTrllll� ;uL'• 39 $nsm ,ht111,4
:-; r' -- A62. i dlaX ,Cross m7s3 g Aden f•si4....IfrIX CD 413:1)
® '_ - ®s W 2Q8. c� s,. An�P0. .. 3�4 \ 1 ) B '� •suPF Hnl raw Fe s[IV:j*• (11D ..
S:304..,' a 4 311 c r-�k nr,. CD Miliie
G �:' Randle�nan r.•. CD_�_ 1376
r l+F Wes ,..n.,:.. -
<< •
. ortl vill n B-5714
.� ios. 1 311.`i - o
Lexington t R I.A H + i .:9Y.. L .__� a H f �Sa,,ry if '4n ® 04D) • 1 '0 9° i CD
rip Q iN r r'j` A n �1,;iF °`�= o S 9 S kov Rd
1 i C,- or x q G •1rJJ - '•lr.'i nv[• a tl O Sir - SG4ID .i� C []
.. yrT d 0 S. v Pena® ® Rag C. ; ® "
o y O spc = 4g C n o� ®,
*' °�i. c� UI^ar Jnhn L Y. F-MM1InSt $d" , c t sr G`®.
B.ry `�'+ r �.a° dAvP+n'r.,.l�, Qum'?Rvn rat ❑ Jamestown CO 4121 a' 'rN
•�+ar„rQ 'r c.. ''�%rier Pr y ci O -rmdo.+n,
®-ru t}' ®', ®' .I�.... ®'. 'Roecon 'AP
.,.:� A P6 1'pr Q.d s8 .2 LaNe ..
zo pue a �A V.,1. SfrH,FL Marsden Rd o F W mains:. ❑ rP•Jr y1Ck Golf Club -
a yy nrd� w ti,llo'n Bohn Slptoke P ��(r G g 9 rvy Cha i
I ' ' Weieh 0, y 1• hl.11 c G SVrnrnit Rd .e ao P�0 Ad Rd ceo ® a 3`r'_
1 :e y �'of 90.
I .,,,.a Rrdge Pr korlhpanl Avc Fb a` :` w 3 G5
+ WParria pvc \1. g rn Ptlrrlp Rd e
® e-- �l V 6 Sale _
_ Z Ave7. s c 1383
-_a I I -0ca �� Jti1c,7k ie Loll. o v. �t
® i,
_ m t o s .� CD ,.s,.,-K` 1245 r
pvc c n y a aiws AY 9. c: l- l�qi „-
OD
® - Flsn I I .� fl v ',?--
Avey' foresNro'+r 6r a �w0s ti
v. [ a
.�.I:,. F
RI1C/6 Off`, U n �Cyos,sr. 6 0 Wrlflarn5 AYP i. ^ ° rid '�' 1332
11+P4r r vk Dr s�11 y m E v �i R. _ P-a . e .. OD 4027 Pr
hA&h/ ®••• 'fit $ 1.s
'� `-f' G4eri``
Ra ® N 7N r, N a
a_'
>° Hllicresl Dr Aver 5� �f H [' '-I
C `� C Iq 4 N v r5r,Y6 Nonh Ave Hghef'Y,nil�,2 i Camden Ave�1 III �: n S — 6Urgy d Dr �i�$' 8rlii::�
a e P``yFS,. iS P n rsirY 1Yendall Avb �r n ." R
z o 1 Q n L C a. P � `,
in
Sk'an�' �o S ,, Barbee Av' b -1 Q 4 % P Banbrl r`- %.,>> 4
jj n xi ColvnlalCT �• y r.u7uri I a uw asp �I(ivett❑r o y B0eersAve w d4eL7r v" ,�.•s` 1129
® 6 , st h p I�gluEb;i r Sunset Dr '` y f':.rk Mint Av° y c v, '®
3 rr IV' Ave `
�,Pa a `� ;o wa W Ray 4 e ��. West V Lamb .y� 2
r 3s let t7r [ k Y \ Q7 S, V.
H ® �
lr Callnf C dh qt v •P rf+ F Was�`snVio ,n _ Cui�n D` Hip �P tawnd,Jc
n 8
x W Westwood Ave i �e •CID ® _
nll CD t.x Gaie4V owl Ave se L trar+ard Ave f ? 4 ® _
1935 „,, Fern dale 13fvrt t.r mg�'` oIQaAvb ± �� 4015
qF %inn, VICINITY MAP
NORTH CAROLINA�o��; OF TRANSPORTATIONPARTMENT Replace Bridge No. 67 on SR 1523 0 0.75 Div:7 B 5714 Figure
z DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS over Deep River in Guilford County I I
Q PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND Date: I
T'',•' r Ng�Q�e ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS UNIT TIP Project B-5714 Miles DECEMBER 2015
OF TPP

• - N6 i NO, 1 ) r 4 asr,o) y
klb., io.
-.14.4"laniatialik
4.-
szeNOVAIVIN al IL
Alltitelli,
40,
willak
• i
•! �� f � • • , ( a il k
ve
fr
_4
1;
106
. (1
‘Z 1 . Deep River i" / 10 6.1 MW
y
•
11111 . • :111
•• % AP A _ix, ........4 • .
- . 03
‘lallarlf ig°444 4.104. % / kvit N.,60 /
0) , ...-at,.. . __....,
r--../. --,royNk / 44. 14 - * -"." 7 LK:: -- -. -
it
1 4 ,, ,, , • 11 • diegv‘i.,
-I a *--.r,
-,„, \
,.. -A • irio- N4 0 -) 0 \ _, ,
. FAi 0 ditt
4Mnk •Vi .• • 44 . ..M111i..,. ../ alb Dr oi •
•
4/41
• coe/ell %.i. .y- \ _a . . "111111Pir .. do. - -�
ir
tio
Anko
/ alitt4 • , fol*jft szt4 .4 .wleagialimioaa II / r
ill it : 41 1 1 .
• • i
40
0 _ • \ I --) i pro iP 1,_, • Cop right:© a o 0 0 0 0 0
�93�nl�G�ICJ Societyo& LX7
P4
oNORTF/cg9% NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT USGS MAP - GUILFORD Div: ITIP #
1 9 OF TRANSPORTATION Replace Bridge No. 67 on SR 1523 0 500 7 B-5714 Figure
o * DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS over Deep River
2
m a A o PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND I I Date:
9•` = kP ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS UNIT in Guilford County Feet
�4�NTOFTRANQ TIP Project B-5714 JULY 2016

•WHAtitil Ill'III iiiii I I I II 1 I'NI al 441 I 4110 I ri
• . -"..4"', ilt• -. •''N, -...''',$,
l /- ` ,,, L b y R,.. '
v r d5 v ` w r.
*tow 17 -N , , t. .. . , . 14f. '‘•
1.14? =f
ti- ,
L Wetland continues r
• �,p beyond Study 'A N < .`1`4: Y04
',aa+tGR '� tea► a
, ,...,,,.., ,...:., ..,.
,. . . .
.„. . , ,
.... ...,.. .....,... ‘
,-4.•• .._. ,, lor Iiiitt ..;. , _. . - :'
,i. . 4114/11111111t-.' ... . . 4-4* . .
Wetland continues )237)1
u Iilk .'t` ' ' ` 4 R ' ' \,
•• 'N .: beyond Stud,yG��iDF1 • 1101 , �, ;' a ,� �; f
* \ .i • } t , y ice , ~ 'a }'1 V' ' 440",'4 ,•. w-.' .44. '",:'-':,‘r- t N. „...,..: 4:4 s.„• ' 4tit-, - s'•
J Yj)/
�; x: a � ''r ^ el `+ � ' .
. � �, e \� . 1 �r •
. It, • . ' •• 1,', ,' ., '‘r,:'*''',!,,....‘.:11si'k".‘,. ,, --_______•---- I ,____..,_-_---...—..,-,_-_--_
:ki
.Y'4:•:4'kLT k\:'
:*
,.+ 7„ tiff L}'t - 7
r -sw " .• 1 . 1 Ki" + R } y
. . ,..i ti ..,
Legend
I t I . :�. rt ,,..
ii, �.,, Study AreaAi ii" '
•
I: t _ ' . • ' I —'1. y ~' Stream ,
4
r. i ,,tor
'. I ,,_ 1 Wetlands ha 4 II.
4s•5'
z ' c :_
I
'? e aoaffi -°C o a PBo italGlobe, GeoE e,C G a oBMEIi' raphics,C GaiiiM IA M�oC ° o N . e etmappt AArogrid,IRK ueiR swisstopoo Ili Colt n�`Y�-OE
OFtIORTHC,g9 JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES MAP
P� o�� NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT Div: TIP # Figure
9 OF TRANSPORTATION Replace Bridge No. 67 on SR 1523 0 300 7 B-5714 g
o Z DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS over Deep River I I I 3
m i a o PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND Date:
9� �P ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS UNIT in Guilford County Feet
�� T�" OFTRP TIP Project B-5714 JULY 2016

'l'ilcit .titast I, \ '. AN. ... - !ii. ,
d"0-24111/414611 ill•til 111. 4 i ki.s ea I kill I ri 1 '—!' i. ' , ° ,
alfi --'' -- --- `1,Ne,,, Ok•,•„,4,..,
r
R
.. . : _,/ :,,,,, ,A
Y .
;. N r
TRIi
ti s _ ,.1
) , ,,; •,_-..4 • 1.-• . ,.., - ---• :".A.41,. ._. 4 ,
i' . • , ,.. • R . .
, , ,,,,t.br„..,,, .,_0., ..,.: _ . .
-,.- ,,, i,. 4, s' 1.14 . . 1,. ... .. ,....„ . ,.. .....
•
*\ J fir' '�,l - ..1� , _ .R ' r :.} .,-, ', ` '', a 110 j h"yr - .�; _
,N, ..--
~ E`. v'
\•.,--... / „I .
•- / ' 4,,,
ett
;�. i X Legend
t . - Study Area
Stream
N.
- ,-
f F v
�i `: _ , • , ti -Alb' li Terrestrial Communities
' t` , 4:".. ;.' .. Maintained/Disturbed
, j / • "11111111k4. ..'" 1 7 s..,t••••: , ' .. si"..., . ..0,, .4t, ••
. +?� - Piedmont Bottomland Forest (Typic Low Subtype)
r' •
-.� ti — i
iii
, .„, ,1. I I I . r �p • - ` • t, Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest(Piedmont Subtype)
1 a RDEE -°Egf110 DtfitalGlobe, GeeE e,C G Ei ,b' a raphics.OKIMAILM F2DA MoC °LtIMEoNM e etmappa tOrogrid,IRK 1103E swisstopo,,am]t n�`Y�-OE
pF NORTH Oq9 TERRESTRIAL COMMUNITIES MAP Div: TIP #
P4 0 NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT Figure
4 9 OF TRANSPORTATION Replace Bridge No. 67 on SR 1523 0 200 7 B-5714
o Z DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS over Deep River 4
m i A o PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND I I I Date:
9� Q in Guilford County
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS UNIT Feet JULY 2016
.NTOFTRAN' TIP Project B-5714

Appendix B
Scientific Names of Species Identified in Report
Plants
Common Name Scientific Name
American hornbeam Carpinus caroliniana
Black willow Salix nigra
Box elder Acer negundo
Canada goldenrod Solidago canadensis
English ivy Hedera helix
Flowering dogwood Corvus florida
Fox sedge Carex vulpinoidea
Green ash Fraxinus pennsulvanica
Hard fescue Festuca brevipila
Japanese stilt grass Microstegium vimineum
Loblolly pine Pinus taeda
Mockernut hickory Carya tomentosa
Ox-eye daisy Leucanthemum velgare
Poison ivy Toxicodendron radicans
Red clover Trifolium pratense
Red maple Acer rubrum
Red oak Quercus rubra
Sericea lespedeza Lespedeza cuneata
Small whorled pogonia Isotria medeoloides
Soft rush Juncus effusus
Sweetgum Liquidambar styraciflua
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis
Tulip tree Liriodendron tulipifera
Virginia pine Pinus virginiana
White clover Trifolium repens
Willow oak Quercus phellos
Wingstem Verbesina alternifolia
Animals
Common Name Scientific Name
American crow Corvus brachyrhynchos
Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
Belted kingfisher Ceryle alcyon
Bluegill Lepomis macrochirus
Carolina chickadee Poecile carolinensis
Carolina wren Thryothorus ludovicianus
Catfish Ictalurus

Eastern fence lizard Sceloporus undulatus
Eastern spadefoot Scaphiopus holbrookii
Five-lined skink Plestiodon inexpectatus
Great blue heron Ardea herodias
Groundhog Marmota monax
Indigo bunting Passerina cyanea
Largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides
Marbled salamander Ambystoma opacum
Mourning dove Zenaida macroura
North American beaver Castor canadensis
Northern cardinal Cardinalis cardinalis
Northern long-eared bat Myotis septentrionalis
Northern mockingbird Mimus polyglottos
Raccoon Procyon lotor
Red tailed hawk Buteo jamaicensis
Rock dove Columba livia
Shiner Cyprinids sp.
Spring peeper Pseudacris crucifer
Striped skunk Mephitis mephitis
Three-lined salamander Eurycea guttolineata
Tufted titmouse Baeolophus bicolor
Turkey vulture Cathartes aura
Virginia opossum Didelphis virginiana
White crappie Pomoxis annularis
White-tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus

Appendix C
Stream and Wetland Forms

USACE AID# DWQ# Site#Se (indicate on attached map)
1
1 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET dd.
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1.Applicant's name: N CtOT 2.Evaluator's name:$.RA,\
3.Date of evaluation: 6.. I- 1(0 4.Time of evaluation: 1127
5.Name of stream: ::12p )ey�o I 6.River basin: CA-p2-t- .aY-
7.Approximate drainage area: '�' 3 a DA% 8. Stream order: 3+-
9.Length of reach evaluated: 1501 10.County: 6ZAA 1 fork
11.Site coordinates(if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12.Subdivision name(if any): []NJpt
,J
Latitude(ex 34.872312): 3(e ..✓oo(955- Longitude(ex.—77.556611): 7 /• /7 V S(q
Method location determined(circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho(Aeria:i Photo/GI Other GIS Other
13.Location of reach under evaluation(note nearby roads and landmarks an. attach map identifying stream(s)location):
-75-' e A-ti.-. Si Ae- ce ki,Ar
14.Proposed channel work(if any): UY•de.artx .v ..d
15.Recent weather conditions: ,C G10.4w, WAY 4A I She C.hvNe t
16.Site conditions at time of visit: Zr k\--\ cAcz.v4.4 1 WqY m.l TS--82°F,
17.Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters X Water Supply Watershed .L(I-IV)
18.Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes,estimate the water surface area:
19.Does channel appear on USGS quad map? . NO 20.Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey.. NO
21.Estimated watershed land use: Z5%Residential LC%Commercial . '%Industrial /O %Agricultural
/5%Forested 0 %Cleared/Logged 0 %Other( )
•
22.Bankfull width: 30 23.Bank height(from bed to top of bank): LtrnKrioiv
24.Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat(0 to 2%) _Gentle(2 to 4%) _Moderate(4 to 10%) _Steep(>10%)
25.Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location,terrain,vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review(e.g.,the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest),the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity,and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): . 7. Comments:
rtrid1sf-H , cam, 9-sln is , mtvics. -cs_v^ 1vv,4a _
sro vJ .6.1!,,,a. .(Grli l)t.A. 4 A 2 Si'In 1AYnYxt .vrt
Evaluator's Signature g '' Date �o` /-/ °
This channel evaluation for is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change-version 06/03. To Comment,please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
1

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
# CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain
1 Presence of flow/persistent pools in stream 0—5 0 4 T 0 5 [7
(no flow or saturation=0;strong flow=max points)
Evidence of past human alteration —
2 0 6 0- 5 0 5
(extensive alteration=0;no alteration=max points)
Riparian zone
3 (no buffer:: 0;contiguous,wide buffer=max points) 0 6 0 4 0—5
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
4 (extensive discharges=0;no discharges=max points) 0—5 0 4 0 4 L.f
�] Groundwater discharge
L.) 5 (no discharge=0;springs,seeps,wetlands,etc.=max points) 0--3 P 0—4 0—4 3
- Presence of adjacent floodplain
• 6 (no floodplain=0;extensive floodplain=max points) 0—4 0—4 0 2 3
a7 Entrenchment/floodplain access 0—5 0 4 0 2
(deeply entrenched=0;frequent flooding=max points)
Presence of adjacent wetlands
8 (no wetlands=0; large adjacent wetlands=max points) 0—6 0—4 0 2
Channel sinuosity
9 (extensive channelization=0;natural meander=max points) 0—5 0—4 0—3
10 Sediment input 0—5 0—4 0—4
(extensive deposition• 0;little or no sediment=max points)
Size&diversity of channel bed substrate *
11 _ (fine,homogenous=0; large,diverse sizes=max points) NA 0 4 0 5
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0 5 _ 0 4 0 5 a
>+ (deeply incised=0;stable bed&banks=max points)
t" 13 Presence of major bank failures 0—5 0 5 0 5
a _ (severe erosion=0;no erosion,stable banks=max points) _ 3
14 Root depth and density on banks 0—3 0—4 0—5
E0 (no visible roots=0;dense roots throughout=max points) — __
Impact by agriculture, livestock,or timber production •
15 (substantial impact=0;no evidence=max points) 0—5 0 4 0 5
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0—3 0 5 0 6
(no riffles/ripples or pools=0;well-developed=max points)
Habitat complexity
E-0 17 (little or no habitat=0;frequent,varied habitats=max points) 0—6 0 6 0 6
18 Canopy coverage over streambed
3
(no shading vegetation=0; continuous canopy=max points) _ 0—5 0 5 0 5
Substrate embeddedness
19 (deeply embedded=0;loose structure=max) NA 0 4 0 4
20 Presence of stream invertebrates(see page 4) 0—4 0—5 0—5
1 (no evidence=0; common,numerous types=max points) _ _
G� 21 Presence of amphibians 0—4 0—4 0—4
O (no evidence=0;common,numerous types=max points)
O 22 Presence of fish
3
(no evidence=0;common, numerous types=max points) 0—4 0—4 0—4
OA
Evidence of wildlife use
23 0-6 0-5 0-5
(no evidence=0;abundant evidence=max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
i
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 55
*These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: 65 71 City/County: t�U If Sampling Date:6-(-�6
Applicant/Owner: .DOT State: N Sampling Point: Dp 1
Investigator(s): Q�6tt /7"Sh 1131 Section,Township,Range:
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): ' lets lvh �1 1t Local relief(concave,convex,none): (cC A'd' Slope(%): 2-5
Subregio fn. ML 1 /13(p Lat:,„%_DOl 05�1,5- Long:-79.9 7c35 O IS Datum:
TRA
Soil Map Unit Name: lG t) Chew 6A'M) 6-2-61* S cp2$ NW classification: UPL
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X o Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks: UP F;a03•VM 1N\ t3tIANNAPACkTAT
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
Surface Water(A1) _ True Aquatic Plants(B14) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
_ High Water Table(A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Drainage Pattems(B10)
_ Saturation(A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Moss Trim Lines(B16)
_ Water Marks(B1) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
4 Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_ Drift Deposits(B3) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Iron Deposits(B5) X, Geomorphic Position(D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No )C Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)-Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: bf;',A.
PA�� Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: aV ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
3
1. p cesr Vi, • o Lt C) ( cikc... That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A)
2. oC.��}'r�`(„„S QGGtcv,„ArA S /0 N W/ Total Number of Dominant
3. V.9V MS. ' % YCS. /u NI f5°Ck Species Across All Strata: q (B)
4. rOoNe v.s v\Sv,tWc V%.\r_.. N t:AC vi
Percent of Dominant Species --��a
5• - That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: IJ �o (A/B)
6.
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
8 Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
-70 =Total Cover OBL species O x 1 = 4::),
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1 ) FACW species Z.S.- x 2= 50
1. jf0 h0. FAC species (Zs x 3= 375
2• FACU species 2- x 4= ?V
3. UPL species /0 x 5= SO
4. Column Totals: / (A) SSS (B)
5.
Prevalence Index =B/A= 3,02'
6.
7 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
9 2-Dominance Test is>50%
3-Prevalence Index is 53.0'
10.
4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
i =Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
1. CXne7+e..3 11AWl. V11Mt v1Etn.vvp _0_ y Ffr,f;,, _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
2.Zoehrr,e'r‘0- Cy(�Y\dr co= _61_ Rc.w(
3.VtvtCA,, Y1n(yo C (NOI a N UfPL_ 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
I be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
5 Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
6. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
7 more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
height.
8.
9 t Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
than 3 in.DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1
10. - m)tall.
11.
12. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
t /5 =Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 3 0 ) Woody vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
1.V l-i 5 AP.'*Va I c, /0 y FA at, height.
2. -nY‘t od tvArttn racV C.a S S .y F�a C,
3.
4.
5._ Hydrophytic
- Vegetation Y
6._ Present? Yes `\ No
IS- =Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP.l-
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Tyne' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-1 0 -7,6601 . IDa sicL.
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol(A1) _ Dark Surface(S7) _ 2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147,148)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
Stratified Layers(A5) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Other(Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Redox Depressions(F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR N, _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 147,148) MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 136,122) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: 857/' City/County: 610 i fOiA. Sampling Date: (0- -16.
Applicant/Owner: NGb131- State: Nc, Sampling Point: WADp2
Investigator(s): Ps.5,l\ ,T.%e.Vet,\ Section,Township,Range:
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.):SW4Me...- Local relief(concave,convex,none):no CM\CaVe, Slope(%): j
Subregio ( :�r: P /15 o Lat: G_QO 1 27Q. Long:- !49,g 7 35-.* / Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: C('P) \MYNA j (�—2°]� SIte€-S NWI classification: Ec?Iremeyeki
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology x significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 1C24.5within a Wetland? Yes <to
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
OJer-1 ov.r c a�v�0, c� ����, "`rll. Y00.4 'b (de."( Goo rt--le_ 0,,wevt t v-04d,
SeArS l e y 1/e3. C.bi10EA.v e, Stm - SvNe rvwv4.td j('eSIC
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
_ Surface Water(A1) _ True Aquatic Plants(B14) , ( Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
High Water Table(A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _X Drainage Patterns(B10)
_ Saturation(A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Moss Trim Lines(B16)
Water Marks(B1) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
X Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) x Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_ Drift Deposits(B3) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Iron Deposits(B5) _ Geomorphic Position(D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ` No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No )( Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)-Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: WADPZ
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) %Cover ec Spies? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A)
2. Total Number of Dominant
3. Species Across All Strata: "� (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species o))
5. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: f�Q /0 (NB)
6.
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
8. Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
=Total Cover OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) FACW species 2-° x 2= '40
1. FAC species 1 0 x 3= 30
2. FACU species x 4=
3. UPL species x 5=
4. Column Totals: 50 (A) 70 (B)
5.
6. Prevalence Index =B/A= Z•33
Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators:
7.
K 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
•
8.
2-Dominance Test is>50%
9.
10. .L 3-Prevalence Index is 53.01
4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
=Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 55 i ) data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
1. WCOC ' S eANY\541VAV\\CG.., to Y FACW - Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
2. r C.`DSA-V-SikK v, v\`M\Y\?.Vl1M
3. FOe.hr•r`c\P.`r `rOY i C(l. 5 N Faccyj 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
4. PnILAAQv\\AW\ F Y\Sil‘YCIA .V\y\^ S N c4 be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
J Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
6. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
7 more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
height.
8.
9 Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
• than 3 in.DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1
10. m)tall.
11.
12. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
b13 =Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) Woody vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
1. height.
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5. Vegetation
6. Present? Yes K No
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point:WA-
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Tvpe' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0—1 p —1.5)124/Li 8`O I D/R%a 20 D Pi.-
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol(A1) _ Dark Surface(S7) _ 2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
Stratified Layers(A5) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Other(Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Redox Depressions(F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR N, _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 147,148) MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 136,122) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes co
Remarks:
Sod rnav‘ be- Sexeie""-1 /2r tot .,‘\--evn&outs -4m `tea(
C*j,W t,et:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastem Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

WETLAND�1 DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: 5571-1 City/County: 611I t fOro1 Sampling Date:VI-It)
Applicant/Owner: NMDT State: K C Sampling Point:PAPP3
Investigator(s):$•-; /TS►tel Section,Township,Range:
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.):g.004\Aov.cla'C Local relief(concave,convex,none): CO'n.C(A,V Q, Slope(%): o<
Subregion 41" LRA P (1,e3Cel Lat%. OU1957 I Long: 19.9-)4o !-4 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name:(Ot•-tk)GWQ040., VS-O`M ) NWI classification:WO
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes )( No
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes V No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes )( No
Remarks:
Brsh lar(, �q Ord v�ood 'Pact"
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
X Surface Water(A1) _ True Aquatic Plants(B14) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
g High Water Table(A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Drainage Patterns(B10)
4 Saturation(A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Moss Trim Lines(B16)
Water Marks(eh) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_ Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_ Drift Deposits(83) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Iron Deposits(B5) _ Geomorphic Position(D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 140
Water Table Present? Yes K No Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)-Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: wf3PP3
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 8 ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1.(3,G2;f urO Y FAG That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A)
2.Sn�i X R � al /0 N F,A,CVV Total Number of Dominant
3. c�Yia�ti�`n,V6 AS4 C.\VAA A. (0 fJ FACW Species Across All Strata: (B)
4. i
Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: /00 Yo (A/B)
6.
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total`)/0 Cover of: Multiply by:
8.
r00 =Total Cover OBL species , 30 x 1 = 30
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' ) FACW species S0 x 2= 100
1.0,Ger r A,r .etO Zo Y FAC FAC species /OO x 3= 300
2. vrx 1(w�uS "Feh,NSA JAnkc.la` /0 Y cvJ FACU species ® x 4= 0
3. UPL species x 5= 0
4, Column Totals: 1$0 (A) 430 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index =B/A=
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
L 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2-Dominance Test is>50%
9.
10. 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0'
30 =Total Cover - 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
1.rn�C,YOSte.5; v," \fwv\iY\P.Uvv\- t(-O ( fa _ - Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
2.COYP 3 n g�
3.aA mac) p Sv-S LO y fibre NAi 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
5 Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
6. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
7 more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
- height.
8.
9. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
than 3 in.DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1
10. - m)tall.
11.
12. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
=Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) Woody vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
1 height.
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
- Vegetation
6. Present? Yes X No
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point:KY3,DP.3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
a- Cile11364Y 70 7 5 f *'/(o 30 C PL. CL_
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol(A1) _ Dark Surface(S7) _ 2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147,148)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_ Stratified Layers(A5) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) X Other(Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Redox Depressions(F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR N, _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 147,148) MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 136,122) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): • Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
usfv,9 GIN 1 ri Voi\Sett t Makix vat �s 3 or less , Clvr kfa1v,,
JOY s wA,1 a✓ -Fri cheoono- y-a,,,9e- (Ghrorvax_ 2. o- (ess).
1eao)C 't s Duerr S% . \Y% O A V bes+ Fr4Scsiovs41 el9R,v.,A_eAzt-
-01Na. ells .• s &x es,r. - aye. \nAam.0 YV\ ed
��►\ s G hevqa cJ& (aa,m p -Z�� 5 lo6�s (c1\A;) cus 1\\\Ks- t+-e..ol
1'hNe... USDA 012CS Web Soa sv-(ve ay ok s Cis‘tiered
..t/t0i)e01 Ctu:kt \r\t a-Arior\ a h; \-‘ wad ale.
l�/�(� �.-Cc�-u v- and G�-tP�v'tC'►a 1 bNCc " ood;y -9`rv. -p c;92,e. Greet- oVhcL,
#2,, .G\ ‘A-Y. , Al re io,�s fq\CkA ` cVlscoloreci & Ao 1\5st
vorAex P skit"dard hvl is S& ► c.c1kO1A . \ ov l t1` e ,
oc \ ed ""\k-w4J cv. o. w.k Redox cAr\cevn, 'k\i s wh `tie,
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0
1

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: 13 57 •4' City/County: 61A4\fOQA Sampling Date: — —
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: JJC. Sampling Point: DP4
Investigator(s):13.C3A\ \-V.S\INCNTO \ Section,Township,Range:
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): lootkkeNCIviN 4o2SSOFe- Local relief(concave,convex,none): CAC.( aVed Slope(%):
Subregion LRR ri.. ? / {3r0 Lat:,3(o.00CO73O Long: n/.973930,5-- Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: i'Pt) C V.war.,ct. IvArn i 0.2,10 s‘tve,s NW classification:(AA_
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes )( No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes Y No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes GI) Is
a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes )( No
Remarks:
UPI, dam -\` (0r -C.r suSSfii2Li— we-\\o k �st\, -oOdelCit.(\ flerreSS‘0,n oi- IJ
S oQ .r er ,f a;., - - ,re fre s e)n�' \A9L. -far vv2-t-1ANA Wg
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
Surface Water(A1) _ True Aquatic Plants(B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
_ High Water Table(A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Drainage Patterns(B10)
_ Saturation(A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Moss Trim Lines(B16)
Water Marks(B1) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_ Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8)
4 Drift Deposits(B3) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_ Iron Deposits(B5) _ Geomorphic Position(D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No )C Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r\ No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
•
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)-Use scientific names of plants. , Sampling Point: r)P Li
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: •
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) ) %Cover ies? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. caf fi+.si9 ()rtroV"i ctv 1X. /0 Y FftG That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (o (A)
2.-YaVirv.S 1:IE?r(\S\k\Vrc O• ,M. ap ! FEW Total Number of Dominant
3.Qu Q reAls �1�,6\os 20 Y C Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
4. Percent of Dominant Species �))
5. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (g5 -0 (NB)
6.
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
8 Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
SO =Total Cover OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: \5 ) FACW species 40 x 2= FSO
1.Carp CaTpt vo G. Coa.rliw‘,ow.oL, /0 y 'FI,C, FAC species 20 x 3= Z9O
2. AC.er Y\e.OI Undo /0 Y SAC_ FACU species 3O x4= 1-2-03. c� UPL species 0 x 5= 0 1
4. Column Totals: 1 0 (A) u40 (B)
5.
6. Prevalence Index =B/A= 2.93
7 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
8. _ 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9 2-Dominance Test is>50%
10 ji 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0'
ZJJ =Total Cover _ 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ) data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
1.Ve<- S‘y.a, r l-k-e,f,n i cbI' . /m "/ FAG _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
2.8oeMr„e r G.. G1VY•d f►C.0► n zo i cproN
3.;rnr' '�2t\OGi�/S u. Oilie_ \.A- i0 Y13,c,4 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
4.s A\\A.X Colo :tok:A /0 g be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
5.D.cir‘ay. e-lwavk caAhde*;Avow, •/D h/ FAL Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
6.V;Ai CIPS"t►dct-L.S /b N 54CA Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
7 more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
height.
8.
9 Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
than 3 in.DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1
10. m)tall.
11.
Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
12. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) Woody vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
1. height.
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
Vegetation �(
6. Present? Yes '\ No
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: J.:O `t
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-Z -2.5YR`b3 l as S;
2-9 -7,Ski le-`/, (CO Si C(..-
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol(A1) _ Dark Surface(S7) _ 2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_ Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
Stratified Layers(A5) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Other(Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Redox Depressions(F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR N, _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 147,148) MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 136,122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastem Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: 557 t City/County: &AA 1-Ord Sampling Date: (0-1—1�o
Applicant/Owner: (,'t)Cir State: NC, Sampling Point: WC,♦DPAt
Investigator(s): 5+\\ \. T S'e \kUI Section,Township,Range:
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): FicrafIchY1 Local relief(concave,convex,none): COr1C?Ne...• Slope(%): 20
Subregion wi►31' MLRA P 1.36 Lat: o-0DO71`j 7 Long:—.19. 1 G�7 31 i'w4 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: C )c,Irtewad&. k rA I 0-'eh Slopes NW classification: fss
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ) No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ANo within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ?( No
Remarks:
5\kWedr CNNAv r e\ ? veAkk k-o vwseir hvc o\csU ov"d v'ele ;.�. v.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
Surface Water(A1) _ True Aquatic Plants(B14) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
High Water Table(A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Drainage Patterns(B10)
Saturation(A3) ..Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Moss Trim Lines(B16)
Water Marks(B1) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_ Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Drift Deposits(63) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) — Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Iron Deposits(B5) — Geomorphic Position(D2)
— Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) — Shallow Aquitard(D3)
Water-Stained Leaves(B9) — Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No}i( Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No )( Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No'\ Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)-Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: I/VGDP+
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A)
2' Total Number of Dominant (�,
3. Species Across All Strata: �'' (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5• That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: /D (A/B)
6.
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
8. Total%Cover of: Multiply bv:
tt� =Total Cover OBL species CD . x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ✓ ) FACW species 3S x 2= 70
1.711W (\esv,vva0 /b r FAr, FAC species 35- x 3= 105
2. ,,Xi rw S re.)4 IV Ain i GCS.., /0 Y FACW FACU species 0 x 4=
3. UPL species 5 x 5= 2-5-
4. Column Totals: -7S (A) Z.00 (B)
5. 7 (O
Prevalence Index =B/A=
6.
7 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
8 _ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9 2-Dominance Test is>50%
3-Prevalence Index is s3.0'
10.
4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
ZQ =Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: �) ) data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
1.Sot,c a o cav,adP,hs S (IJ t) 5 N. (JP(.._ _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
2. C.G.ig!t`I59,44/i.r✓AS().... I 0 Y F►�c.nl
3.' htv\e,<A.Q. oil;A AY C/'A. s N viscc.,4 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
4. M's\�A�niA. SCQ�n()v�v.S 5- N FAGvv
5. +vx i r ara f Ati,,,1.^ fad i r v.s 10 y FA-(. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
6. Lo ( ck, ja f .i c%. /0 V FAr , Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
7. I CC�e-s S 5 N Fx0a more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
height.
8."CCAAO'$. -4-e-�e/./a- IO Y +-AC--
9 Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
than 3 in.DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1
10. m)tall.
11.
12 Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
(en =Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) Woody vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
1 height.
2.
3.
4.
5 Hydrophytic
- Vegetation
6._, Present? Yes X No
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
607• ewer =SDX=30/ Zo90=I Z-
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WC.bP4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3 Ne* 70 7 s1101- 0 30 C Ps_ CL, ..
3— 7 /OYR 9/2 c30 7 S YR i '/D C Ai,M
/0YR
lit 5-33skR 70 IbYR 440 30 1_ ��a,-►�, dad l(n+ ►
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol(A1) _ Dark Surface(S7) _ 2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
Black Histic(A3) Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147,148)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_ Stratified Layers(A5) j Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Other(Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) . Redox Depressions(F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR N, _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 147,148) MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 136,122) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

WETLAND, DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: .I,.�Q 57/�/"T City/County: (rnU4� � Sampling Date: 6-/ -
Applicant/Owner: aN C.DO State: t\\l I�, Sampling Point: DP5
Investigator(s): v.`a\\ I 1• E eJ ko'A Section,Township,Range:
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.):ctandiletw% "Frl * Local relief(concave,convex,nonGee): C Y('\ M`Q..5D Slope(%): 0
()
Subregion . LR : P / 13 2 OW c fro.O (03/0 Long: -� I• (g 7 T 1 q Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: (C. ) Cih2Wada ,\Tm 0"2'00 S\oees NW classification: UPL
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.) �/
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes /1 No
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ( No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks: L 1- II _
Suspe�f °�` „�"\ GKa y\ram, (1f i✓Y obet fAitt.v' Ae4)
h‘.a,eok r3y mix,,\ \ ow \Q a ex.eciL as ees vair * Q dJ .� eastrneAk
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required).
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
Surface Water(A1) _ True Aquatic Plants(B14) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
_ High Water Table(A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Drainage Patterns(B10)
_ Saturation(A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Moss Trim Lines(B16)
Water Marks(B1) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_ Drift Deposits(B3) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Iron Deposits(B5) _ Geomorphic Position(D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No \ Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)-Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: 1)P5"
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:_ ) %Cover Species? Status/ Number of Dominant Species
1. 7 �OC�"/]'r 9 OC.Cia.ezt,S 7 �Y fx0 That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A)
2. Total Number of Dominant
3. Species Across All Strata: Z (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: /00 (NB)
6.
7 • Prevalence Index worksheet:
8 Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
Z.- =Total Cover OBL species C x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 ) FACW species t•{' x 2=
1.-frt.14( v‘J9 Fpyw fit VQnic 2 y FActni FAC species O x 3= C
2. FACU species 0 x 4= 0
3. UPL species x 5=
4. Column Totals: y' (A) 8 (B)
5. Prevalence Index =B/A=
6.
7 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
8 _ 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9 _K 2-Dominance Test is>50%
10. 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
=Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
1. _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
2.
• 3. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
6. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
7 more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
height.
8.
9 Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
than 3 in.DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1
10. m)tall.
11.
Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
12. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
=Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) Woody vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
1. height.
2.
3.
4.
5 Hydrophytic
Vegetation
6._ Present? Yes X No
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
9. ask. 1,2 5 0,A_ S, de, Div Sui Cary o-Ce 4-rees 'or
ho Ve TXesec,:t' ekT_ c).�.0A\eA
(over-fEuw
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: sr-)P.3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
1)-9 IoYe1 / &)n *?.-y Y/ qo c Pc, 1_
•
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol(A1) _ Dark Surface(S7) _ 2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_ Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_ Stratified Layers(A5) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Other(Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Redox Depressions(F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR N, _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 147,148) MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 136,122) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
CW ea.. x%r:A-1, CA,a 1QeA 6.0,eris . c.a,,. � eb 1c,,-alan t
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: .i3571 ! City/County: 1f tP- Sampling Date: rp-'( -t�O
Applicant/Owner: NC-D oT l` State: IJL Sampling Point: Deco
Investigator(s):3. \ ( T S\"t.14 w t Section,Township,Range:
Landform(hilislope,terrace,etc.):-q00[k 00.:4\ Local relief(concave,convex,none):-CrNr\(r(X f✓ Slope(%):
Subregion _ : . IP I\�tG Lat: 3G�.001 2. 3 Long: - I !l ! a Datum:
e
Soil Map Unit Name: C Pc)C.NewAC & k5 YY‘1 O-Z -4 SIOcE NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology X significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes (No
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ", No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes � within a Wetland? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X o
Remarks:s ]�
LIS� \,ava.✓c t W'w. - OCiQl et
1•Ha.,(0 zTA ?OcJ;% \-A a\a•-eftcd 041 easaw.e�rt AAskwebowv.eS
u P(r data -carol {or votHaAol O
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that aooly) _ Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
Surface Water(A1) _ True Aquatic Plants(B14) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
_ High Water Table(A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Drainage Patterns(B10)
_ Saturation(A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Moss Trim Lines(B16)
Water Marks(B1) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_ Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_ Drift Deposits(B3) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Iron Deposits(B5) _ Geomorphic Position(D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna(B13) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:Surface Water Present? Yes No v Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No '. Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No l( Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)-Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: P10
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A)
2. Total Number of Dominant
3. Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: DO (A/B)
6.
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
8.
=Total Cover OBL species CDx 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) FACW species x 2= i Z
1. FAC species x 3= 0
2. FACU species 0 x 4=
3. UPL species x 5= 0
(
4. Column Totals: Y) (A) I Z- (B)
5.
Prevalence Index =B/A= �?
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. -
2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. -
10. A_ 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0'
=Total Cover - 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Stratum (Plot size: J� ) P
1.$oe-4.,me-riCl.. C..xj c 6r.a., Y Fp.Gv✓ - Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
2.IN.A.VTAT C.l>L(7Px ,5i FpktoN
3. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
5 Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
6. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
7 more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
height.
8.
9 Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
than 3 in.DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1
10. m)tall.
11.
12. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Co =Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) Woody vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
1. height.
2.
3.
4.
5 Hydrophytic
Vegetation
6. Present? Yes x No
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
\' tee' ve -rio,r.. ‘eJ - dh��
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: IDPO
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
— �- 7 -Yi2 3/3 90 /O1'2573 /0 D M (Z.
-J o l DYE 4/4 /00 Loam
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol(A1) _ Dark Surface(S7) 2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_ Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
Stratified Layers(A5) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Other(Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Redox Depressions(F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR N, _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 147,148) MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 136,122) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

WETLAND1 DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Eastern Mountains Mountains and Piedmont Region I/OProject/Site: 551\"1` City/County: CSU'\orc r Sampling Date: — O
Applicant/Owner: NC.. T State: IQ Sampling Point: DP 7
Investigator(s):'3. \\ 17:SNNe\kor Section,Township,Range:
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.):1etc.):lqtradplatY1 Fiat" Local reliefr7 (concave,convex,nonnee):Q \Idle., Slope(%): 0
LRR Subregion 4i1LR �I3Lp Lat: 3rv.col 4.1510 Long: /. /7`f.37 3 Datum:
0
Soil Map Unit Name:(C.- c)G �1NQG10A, lwAn J 0-2/a S,o NW classification: (Apt_
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.) •
Are Vegetation ,Soil )/ ,or Hydrology X significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes $ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Soil Present? Yes within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Remarks:
Stk5Pec4- a -plr(v Wl- ak edge o f- wood ; av4. unOti`sewPxLt-t
eAsbiyaz,,,+
',tpL cella . TOtA± -for W2iAAvetS we bt WJ
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
_ Surface Water(A1) _ True Aquatic Plants(B14) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
_ High Water Table(A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Drainage Patterns(B10)
_ Saturation(A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Moss Trim Lines(B16)
_ Water Marks(B1) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_ Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_ Drift Deposits(B3) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Iron Deposits(B5) _ Geomorphic Position(D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes o
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
•
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastem Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)-Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP7
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species [I
1.coaxir�v.S �YNrs\j Y
'vAY\�Col. �7�/ pkGJ%/ That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: T (A)
2.Arm y r40 • Lto rAG
Total Number of Dominant L�
3. Species Across All Strata: V (B)
4.
5 Percent of Dominant Species gQ/"���jj
That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (JL//a _ (NB)
6.
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
8. Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
70 =Total Cover OBL species 0 x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) FACW species 35 x 2= 70
1. .PC eAt- Y\.8 \14 j 0 5 y VC, FAC species 45- x 3= !3S
2. FACU species S x 4= Zp
3. UPL species 0 x 5=
4. Column Totals: gs (A) aa5 (B)
5. .
Prevalence Index =B/A=
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
9.
10. 1. 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
i • S =Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: .�7 ) data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
1.Fxs .V\ `; rr►CA- S Y Faces _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
2. Shu.ca_ aY1Aa(�dl. . _� F
3. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
6. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
7 more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
height.
8.
9 Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
than 3 in.DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1
10. m)tall.
11.
12. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
/0 =Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 3'J ) Woody vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
1. KO Y12.
height.
2.
3.
4.
5 Hydrophytic
Vegetation
6. Present? Yes X No
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP 7
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Tvoe' Loc2 Texture Remarks
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol(Al) Dark Surface(S7) _ 2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Polyvatue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_ Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
Stratified Layers(A5) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Other(Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Redox Depressions(F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR N, _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 147,148) MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 136,122) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Easternn��Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: f57'n1-� City/County: l?W.6r� Sampling Date:G—�NN-1(Op
Applicant/Owner: I�/l._ O State: L Sampling Point: WGDQO
Investigator(s): _B;V,1/T.S \ov1 Section,Township,Range:
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): . i:4Qvn to. Local relief(concave,convex,none): Y\O(\C-- Slope(%): dt-5
Subregion - r 1 13 b Lat: 36. 11 7 7•V) Long:„ /7 415 3 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name:( `- ^ I
G, )C tWACk 11 4w• b�&C /') S I'Ope. NWI classification: PHD
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes >( No
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes )( No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Bo'cDAN1a, ha/dw O a d. ,e59
we,-�low,d y50,4r
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
Surface Water(Al) _ True Aquatic Plants(B14) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
_ High Water Table(A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Drainage Patterns(B10)
Saturation(A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Moss Trim Lines(B16)
Water Marks(B1) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_ Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Drift Deposits(B3) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Iron Deposits(B5) _ Geomorphic Position(D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes) No Depth(inches): 0-6 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Y No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)-Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP2'
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: So ' ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. Qrer rtilorum 3U y tC.- That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: /0 (A)
2. plain c1V1 CYl_Ide-A1TAl1 s 0 N ,-�J Total Number of Dominant /�
3. I161AiAmAnlcx..r SA.A. YA(.I f f u. . i 0 N •FAC,_ Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
4.%P.1-CAA 11n e llos 2-0 Y PAL
5.- ��wttw �1S 1ex�t�y.t 1/Av\�('.0L 1 �, Percent of Dominant Species 0
h , Y That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: I Oa io (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
8. Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
9 0 =Total Cover OBL species .2-5 x 1 = 25
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: /S ) FACW species 5-0 x 2= 100
1. ace{ ru b✓1MM.. I 0 / -C. FAC species 5 x 3= 285
2.KariAt\VS C.CWO)1 to i A n A. _ r FAC.. FACU species in x 4=
3. UPL species 0 x 5=
4. Column Totals: 1? C (A) 41'O (B)
5. Prevalence Index =B/A= 2.t4 1
6.
7 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
x 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. X
2-Dominance Test is>50%
9.
10 1 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0'
I S-- =Total Cover�
4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
1. i ' &rJea, .Se-r� b f>1 is /(7 Y cat_ .- Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
2. O1 hfvP,r,e.,, c yl,�vsc&. r Ar I
3.cA.YPX 91 Q A+P.A. /h y ngr 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
4 j UvnUU$ Iris .1E:. 110 `_ F''c/ be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
5 iTtAS CZWO ViVem5 `j 0 Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
6. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
7 more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
height.
8.
9 Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
than 3 in.DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1
10. m)tall.
11.
12. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
4S =Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 3 ) Woody vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
1. -faXit azle..,dron 1rAett'CQ.raS ' S) Y -AL height.
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
Vegetation
6. Present? Yes K No
Za =Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
5% air 145= Zz.S
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastem Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: 1.A?e Deg
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
MR 5/z So 5 Y'RWL/- 2-0 C P— e
`1 I `i 2 _ S-Y(2-4/9- SD C'. 1p c.._ G c_ tvvo x cer
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol(A1) _ Dark Surface(S7) _ 2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
Stratified Layers(A5) X Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Other(Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Redox Depressions(F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR N, _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 147,148) MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 136,122) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Eastern Mountains� and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: B51 City/County: (11ln\hr€9- Sampling Date: 6—1•1 b
Applicant/Owner: 1�1 T State: NG Sampling Point:W®np?
Investigator(s):.5•'\\ S\-\e.Won Section,Township,Range:
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): CiapAC11 A "F cdr Local relief(concave,convex,none):la),(r I LO4'/Ql Slope(%): 2-5
Subregio (� I,r ?/ 13Y' Lat:c.00tI42) Long: _ 79. 9 /Lib 43 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: (-i) CIV.1(40.e,,10k, ti Z'.YV . J O—2% S1oEe.-S NWI classification: PEM
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes )( No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X ,Soil K ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes }e No Is the Sampled Area �/
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes JC No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes )X No
Remarks: 11''-
to �(11 M4SQIC, — SeWe lk�2& ertse lent' : \` °\may / �o.�S �, v?� \`eO`�'"'"�
area
(Q if e rn ock Oi,,,v) hafreil - aces+)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that aooly) _ Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
Surface Water(A1) _ True Aquatic Plants(B14) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
High Water Table(A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Drainage Patterns(B10)
Saturation(A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Moss Trim Lines(B16)
_ Water Marks(B1) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Sediment Deposits(82) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_ Drift Deposits(B3) Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Iron Deposits(B5) _ Geomorphic Position(D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? YesX No Depth(inches):a_6
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): I
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes K No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
5t f c e er- eze,d- „^ 4etxess aAs
Sa-111- W\ es2 ‘r dkeceSS1
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)-Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:W t
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species (�,
1. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: "`" (A)
2. Total Number of Dominant
3. Species Across All Strata: i0 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100 % (A/B)
6.
7 Prevalence index worksheet:
8 Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
1 =Total Cover OBL species 7 0 x 1 = ZA
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: �S ) FACW species 45- x 2= To_
1. t)( '(\\3Yalu \\ --e ..5Y ff�Cv�l FAC species I0 x 3= 3j
2.pla.A(1wu s OCC-)tl �G1Iis s- Y igcvJ FACU species 0 x 4= O
3. UPL species 0 x 5= U
4. Column Totals: 75 (A) No
5. Prevalence Index =B/A= /.g
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. x
1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
g - 2-Dominance Test is>50%
10 A_ 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
/0 =Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
1. U nG41S 2..1s%S r FA,yJ _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
2. Phiv\dPr►a CI1iAd.- rA IO '( FikcA/
3.Cf fP3t V u`Vtv,O\ki201... .20 y nh,L, 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
4.I'M pa.-V iP rl c0.p(?tlS t S f" 14N/ be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
5.c�.IGhA ntKe�tmn riCir‘oteS-1 hU m 10 Y •f�L Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
6.4e,rr-or 1 Cc. t10v&otare-v1S IS 5 1J F/ic'J• Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
7 more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
height.
8.
9 Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
than 3 in.DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1
10. m)tall.
11.
12. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
(oS =Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) Woody vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
1. height.
2.
3.
4.
5 Hydrophytic
Vegetation
6. Present? Yes X No
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Movtik C. weff a^--6( - h.;g 1. 6..�r I Gks u•lI by dw►°�t�`�`c vey vt ► eon
IA►ih e°W cra-sseS
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling PoinVP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
-LI- 6 1.1'10 -7•5YR 4/4 LI-0 -,M SCE
L I 1. 5 2 4/ 5' 64414/,oY 2o La M 1,-
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol(A1) _ Dark Surface(S7) _ 2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_ Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) -X. Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
Stratified Layers(A5) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Other(Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Redox Depressions(F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR N, _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 147,148) MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 136,122) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

wS
WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version
Project Name 5.51 J N' Nearest Road 153
County ��5.'ui\ e'd Wetland area 0.217 acres Wetland width 4.•. (op' feet
Name of evaluator -ass\0 l t)e & e Date (o-1 -1 to
Wetland location Adjacent land use
on pond or lake (within 1/2 mile upstream,upslope,or radius)
X on perennial stream )( forested/natural vegetation 2.0%
on intermittent stream X agriculture,urban/suburban 70%
within interstream divide X impervious surface /n %
other:
Soil series: Gro,Wgxia Rm. Dominant vegetation
predominantly organic-humus,muck,or (1) A(' hpQ(,l r1Lt O
peat (2) rnic,nnS+egju.rvt VIv\Alh@.UIAA
X predominantly mineral-non-sandy
predominantly sandy (3) ClIfek 919Qht8k,
Hydraulic factors Flooding and wetness
steep topography X semipermanently to permanently flooded or
ditched or channelized inundated
X total wetland width> 100 feet _seasonally flooded or inundated
_intermittently flooded or temporary surface water
_no evidence of flooding or surface water
Wetland type(select one)*
X Bottomland hardwood forest _Pine savanna
_Headwater forest Freshwater marsh
_Swamp forest _Bog/fen
_Wet flat Ephemeral wetland
Pocosin _Carolina bay
Bog forest Other:
The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
R Water storage 3 x 4.00= I a
A Bank/Shoreline stabilization 3 x 4.00= / Wetland
rating
T Pollutant removal ill-/ 5 x 5.00= aS
I Wildlife habitat a x 2.00= -7 N Aquatic life value 5 x 4.00= a-O 7
G Recreation/Education CI" x 1.00= 4
**Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and>10%nonpoint source disturbance within'/A mile upstream,upslope,or radius

WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version
Project Name J3.5 7 q- Nearest Road Sl215 a3
County 6u;l fp ek, Wetland area-''O.o!5-acres Wetland width 5- feet
Name of evaluator -'-?Dill 1 Dev313eierl Date (t -1—I(p
Wetland location Adjacent land use
on pond or lake (within %2 mile upstream,upslope,or radius)
on perennial stream X forested/natural vegetation 20 %
_on intermittent stream x agriculture,urban/suburban 75 %
--X
within interstream divide X impervious surface 5 %
( other: f aeipietiA
Soil series: 5\e vV ac(& I Ira v4 Dominant vegetation
predominantly organic-humus,muck, or (1) PkC QX r1 P.0 u rid 0
peat (2) �c a v�uc I v4 i i A-
X predominantly mineral-non-sandy �' '�
predominantly sandy (3) C q,Ye S I u A;r✓O$&
Hydraulic factors Flooding and wetness
_steep topography _semipermanently to permanently flooded or
X( ditched or channelized inundated
total wetland width> 100 feet )( seasonally flooded or inundated
X intermittently flooded or temporary surface water
no evidence of flooding or surface water
Wetland type(select one)*
X Bottomland hardwood forest _Pine savanna
_Headwater forest _Freshwater marsh
_Swamp forest _Bog/fen
_Wet flat Ephemeral wetland
Pocosin _Carolina bay
_Bog forest Other:
*The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
R Water storage I x 4.00= 4
A Bank/Shoreline stabilization O Wetland
x 4.00= v rating
T Pollutant removal I+ ( =2 "x 5.00= /0
I Wildlife habitat I x 2.00= 2
N Aquatic life value Q. x 4.00= S 5--
G Recreation/Education I x 1.00= I
**Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and>10%nonpoint source disturbance within'/2 mile upstream,upslope,or radius

L3J)
WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version
Project Name j 51 1 Nearest Road 5R
I5
County6ui L f8cpd Wetland area,--0,290 acres Wetland width '-35 feet
Name of evaluator -3• i 1 /pev.)be r►gi Date 6- i -i to
Wetland location Adjacent land use
on pond or lake (within 1/2 mile upstream,upslope,or radius)
on perennial stream )( forested/natural vegetation 20 %
on intermittent stream )( agriculture,urban/suburban 75 %
within interstream divide )( impervious surface 5- %
)( other: .i ood eln►gin (( wJ easeme.A+
Soil series: Or\& QGJQ. 1 C v\ Dominant vegetation
predominantly organic-humus,muck,or (1) Ca vex Vul f> nniAect.
peat /�� -
X predominantly mineral-non-sandy (2)J U►1 c _S su S
predominantly sandy (3) hoe_hmer►a CI L 'r d i GA,
Hydraulic factors Flooding and wetness
_steep topography _semipermanently to permanently flooded or
_ditched or channelized inundated
total wetland width> 100 feet X seasonally flooded or inundated
y intermittently flooded or temporary surface water
no evidence of flooding or surface water
Wetland type(select one)*
a( Bottomland hardwood forest _Pine savanna
Headwater forest _Freshwater marsh
_Swamp forest Bog/fen
Wet flat Ephemeral wetland
_Pocosin Carolina bay
Bog forest _Other:
•The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
R Water storage { x 4.00= y
A Bank/Shoreline stabilization I x 4.00= Li- Wetland
T Pollutant removalrating
I ♦ I'2 **x5.00= 10
I Wildlife habitat I x 2.00= 2
N Aquatic life value a x 4.00= $ 1
G Recreation/Education 1 x 1.00= 1
**Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and>10%nonpoint source disturbance within'/z mile upstream,upslope,or radius

IWETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version
Project Name B5714 Nearest Road S(t 15 23
County eu:A f o ea Wetland area—0.5 36acres Wetland width ^-9 0 feet
Name of evaluator IS-3i`\ ) �C Date (-1-1)o
Wetland location Adjacent land use
on pond or lake (within 1/2 mile upstream,upslope,or radius)
on perennial stream X forested/natural vegetation 25%
on intermittent stream K agriculture,urban/suburban 70 %
within interstream divide X impervious surface 5 %
other: e 1 Ct c'h
Soil series: Che Ain G)&, ma m Dominant vegetation
predominantly organic-humus,muck, or (1) ockrey r{,t bra rd►
peat (2) 0,,t e,efAA S f t
> predominantly mineral-non-sandy `
predominantly sandy (3) y-,1 v .S pe" I v((.IA, C
Hydraulic factors Flooding and wetness
steep topography semipermanently to permanently flooded or
ditched or channelized inundated
total wetland width> 100 feet )( seasonally flooded or inundated
K intermittently flooded or temporary surface water
no evidence of flooding or surface water
Wetland type(select one)*
)( Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savanna
Headwater forest Freshwater marsh
Swamp forest Bog/fen
Wet flat Ephemeral wetland
Pocosin Carolina bay
Bog forest Other:
•The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
--------------------------------------------------------
R Water storage 1 x 4.00= !�
A Bank/Shoreline stabilization
D x 4.00= Wetland
T Pollutant removal ** rating
� + � =� x5.00= /D
I Wildlife habitat 3 x 2.00=
N Aquatic life value Q. x 4.00= S'
IG Recreation/Education a x 1.00= a
**Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and>10%nonpoint source disturbance within'A mile upstream,upslope,or radius

Appendix D
Qualifications of Contributors
Investigator: Elizabeth Lusk
Education: B.A. German, Davidson College, 1985
Masters of Forest Management, Duke University, 1989
Experience: Senior Environmental Scientist, Dewberry Engineers Inc., 2015-Present
Environmental Supervisor,NCDOT 2002-2014
Environmental Biologist,NCDOT 1999-2002
Biologist/Forester, Coastal Zone Resources 1994-1999
Service Forester,NC Forest Service 1992-1993
Service Forester, MD Forest Service 1990-1992
Responsibilities: T/E species survey and QA/QC of document
Investigator: Anne Burroughs
Education: B.S. Biological Sciences, Minor Environmental Sciences 1992
Experience: Senior Environmental Scientist, Dewberry Engineers Inc., 2014-Present
Environmental Scientist, URS Corporation 2011-2014
Environmental Program Consultant,NCDOT 2003-2011
Responsibilities: T/E species survey and QA/QC of document