20210164 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20210329

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
October 26, 2020 Ver 3.3
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
6 Yes
C No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
CYesr No
Change only 1 needed.
BIMS # Assigned* Version#*
20210164 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
No payment required
�- Fee received
6 Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office *
Central Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
Tvdn Oaks S/D, Sec 3, Ph 4
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Wyatt Brown
What amout is owed?*
F $240.00
$570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Rick Trone:eads\rvtrone
lb. Primary Contact Email:* lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
3/29/2021
Nearest Body of Water
Pole Cat Branch & Mill Branch
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
C,NSW (both)
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.49660 -78.31403
Pre -Filing Meeting Information
ID#
20210164
Pre -fling Meeting or Request Date*
2/9/2021
Attach documentation of Pre -Filing Meeting Request here:*
DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form (11).pdf
Meeting with WQ not needed.pdf
Version
1
55.68KB
75KB
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:

Johnston
Is this a NCDMS Project
✓ Yes r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
✓ Yes r No
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
17 Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
✓ Yes
✓ No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
7 Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
✓ Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 29 - Residential Developments
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
ld. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
17 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
lf. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
✓ Yes rNo
✓ 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
✓ Riparian Buffer Authorization
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
✓ Yes r No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
✓ Yes rNo
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
✓ Yes ( No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
✓ Yes r No
✓ Yes r No
✓ Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
ld. Who is applying for the permit?
17 Owner r Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
JYMCO DEVELOPMENT
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Responsible party:
Stacy Whitley
2d. Address

Street Address
1586 YELVERTON GROVE RD
Address Line 2
aty
SMITHFIELD
Postal / Zip Cade
27577-7583
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Wyatt Brown
4b. Business Name:
Brown's Environmental Group, Inc
4c.Address
Street Address
242 Batten Farm Road
Address Line 2
aty
Selma
Fbstal / ZZp Code
27576
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
b rownenvg rp@g mail. co m
Agent Authorization Letter*
06-USACE-Owners-Consent-Form-for-WyattB--SIGNED-by-Owner. pdf
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
US
2f. Fax Number:
State / Bovine / Region
NC
Country
US
4e. Fax Number:
198.63KB
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
same
lc. Nearest municipality/ town:
Smithfield
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
260300-46-0287
2c. Project Address
Street Address
not assigned, on Yelverton Grove Church Road
Address Line 2
aty
Smithfield
Postal / Zip Code
27577
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Pole Cat Branch & Mill Branch
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C,NSW (both)
2b. Property size:
State / Rovince / Region
NC
Country
US
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*

Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202011702
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
Tenn Oaks is individual family homesites made up of mobile homes. The site is an addition providing more home sites, the project is cleared land with woodland near the back property
line. The general land use in the vicinity is farming and mixed commercial.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
s Yes r No r Unknown
4c. If yes, please give the DWR Certification number or the Corps Action ID (exp. SAW-0000-00000).
200220030-Corps number from 10-3-01. (I attached the old PCN from 2001.)
Project History Upload
Old PCN.pdf
406.15KB
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
Quad.pdf 304.46KB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
soils.pdf 267.16KB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
-1.38 acres
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
517 feet
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
Purpose is to provide an existing homesite S/D for the growing need in Johnston County.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The Town of Smithfield is requiring a "stub our on Peyton Drive to be constructed at the end of the S/D to provide access for "future" development in case the adjoining property
owners decide one day to connect to the Twin Oaks development. The stub outs on Peyton drive is causing the wetland impact.
Bull doaers and motor graders will be used to extend the street (the area is already cleared and mostly flat). The asphalt street and utilities will be installed. Each lot will be hooked to
sanitary sewer.
This phase will be an 18 lot expansion. I don't know of any indirect impacts.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
3-1-21-Twin-Oaks-SD-Sectlll-PhVI-Sheet4B-for-Wyatt.pdf 357.66KB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
✓ Yes
Comments:
r No
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
✓ Preliminary r Approved c Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
6. Future Project Plans
Wyatt Brown
Brown's Environmental Group, Inc
6a. Is this a phased project?*
✓ Yes O No
r Unknown
7b. If yes, explain.
Twin Oaks is not a large development, but it has been going on since at least 2001 and has been expanding slowly and in small segments. As I noted above this phase is only 18 lots.
To best of my knowledge this should be the last expansion.
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?

Best of my knowledge this is the last phase and no other is planned. the sanitary sewer was completed many years ago.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
7 Wetlands r Streams -tributaries
F Open Waters F Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
❑ Buffers
2a. Site #* (?)
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type * (?)
2c. Type of W. *
2d. W. name *
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of
Jurisdicition * (?)
2g. Impact
area *
W-1
fill
P
Small -Basin Wetland
Wetland A
No
Both
0.018
(acres)
W-2
fill
P
Small -Basin Wetland
Wetland A
No
Both
0.056
(acres)
W-3
construction
T
Tidal Freshwater Marsh
Wetland A
No
Both
0.018
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.018
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.092
2h. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.074
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The stub road and stormwater basin was designed to minimize impact. The impact could not be avoided since the stub outs on north and south of
Peyton Drive were required by the Town of Smithfield.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Care will be taken not to drive in or impact the wetlands outside the permitted area. adequate sediment control will be installed to intercept sediment
from washing into the wetland. the construction area will be seeded and mulched to provide a temporary ground cover.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
6 Yes C No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
DWR fJ Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
(7 Mitigation bank r Payment to in -lieu fee F Permittee Responsible
program Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Wildlands
3b. Credits Purchased/Requested (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Quantity:
Non -riparian wetland 0.148 acres (assuming 2:1)
Attach Receipt and/or letter
Twin Oaks Subdivision - Wetland SOA 03-29-2021.pdf 542.29KB
3c. Comments
6. Buffer mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWR

6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? If yes, you must fill out this entire form - please contact DWR for more
information.
✓ Yes a No
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
✓ Yes r No
What type of SCM are you providing?
r Level Spreader
r Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHVVf)
r Wetland Swale (higher SI-WT)
[7 Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
fJ Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
✓ Yes G No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
✓ Yes r No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater
program?
6 Yes
✓ N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
17 Local Government r State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
I7 Phase II fJ NSW fJ USMP 17 Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
Johnston
r No
Comments:
Best of My Knowledge the Storm water Plan has been submitted to Johnston County, construction cannot start until this approval has been achieved.
rG. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
✓ Yes R No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
✓ Yes f No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
✓ Yes 6 No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This should be the last phase and is only 18 lots, this should not generate additional impacts.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
✓ Yes f No r N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)

5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
✓ Yes a No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
6 Yes rNo
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
✓ Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
✓ Yes G No
G No r Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
✓ Yes f No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
✓ Yes G No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
✓ Yes G No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
✓ Yes 6 No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
IPaC
NC Natural Heritage
Consultation Documentation Upload
IPaC_ Explore Location resources.pdf
project_report_twin_oaks_29518_29518.pdf
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
✓ Yes r No
317.12KB
690.74KB
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NOAA
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
✓ Yes f No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
SHPO
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
SHPO.pdf 217 69KB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-yearfloodplain?*
✓ Yes a No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
Link Above
Miscellaneous
Comments
Preliminary JD Package attached below.
thanks
Wyatt
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Twin Oaks Preliminary JD Package.pdf 2.31MB
Signature
*
fJ By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knoxAedge and belief; and

• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Wyatt Brown
Signature
l Ota.ts,
Date
3/29/2021

March 28, 2020
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Mr. Chris Hopper
Re: Twin Oaks S/D, Johnston County
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon
the property herein described (NC Pin : 60300-46-0287) for the purpose of conducting on -site
investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal
jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899. Also, Mr. Wyatt Brown of Brown's Environmental Group, Inc. or their subcontractors has my
permission to act as my agent on this property concerning wetlands, streams and stream buffers.

Action ID: 200220030
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Wilmington District
County: Johnston
GENERAL PERMIT REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE VERIFICATION
Property Authorized
owner: Twin Oaks Section III Phase VI Agent: Dennis Ray Blackmon, RLS
c/o Stacey Whitley C/o Andrew W. Hodge
Address: 1050 West Market Street Address: P.O. Box 1401
Smithfield, NC 27577 Smithfield, NC 27577
Telephone: [phone] Telephone: [phone]
Size and Location of Property (Waterbody, Highway name/number, town, etc.): Mr. Stacey
Whitley's Twin Oaks Section III Phase IV property located off of SR 2508, adjacent to Polecat
Branch, near Smithfield, in Johnston County, North Carolina.
Description of Activity: Proposed subdivision lot construction resulting in impacts to approximately
0.33 acre of the jurisdictional waters of an unnamed tributary of Polecat Branch.
X Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344) only.
Section 10 (River and Harbor Act of 1899) only.
Section 404 and Section 10.
X Nationwide Permit Number NWP 39
Any violation of the conditions of the Regional General or Nationwide Permit referenced above may
subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order, and or appropriate legal action.
This Department of the Army Regional General / Nationwide Permit verification does not
relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State, or local
approvals/permits. The permittee may need to contact appropriate State and local agencies before
beginning work. If you have any questions regarding the Corps of Engineers regulatory program,
please contact John Thomas at telephone number j1919) 876-8441, exte ion 25.
Regulatory Project Manager Signature
Date October 3, 2001 Expiration October 3, 2003
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORM, ETC., MUST BE
ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.
CF:

USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation Program, Geographic Names Information
System, National Hydrography Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset, and National
Transportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems; U.S. Census Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Data; Natural
Earth Data; U.S. Department of State Humanitarian Information Unit; and NOAA National Centers for
Environmental Information, U.S. Coastal Relief Model. Data refreshed May, 2020.
GENERAL NOTES FOR THIS PLAN SHEET:
I. This plan sheet is part of multiple plan sheets within an overall set of Contructlon Drawings for Site Contructlon only. The plan sheets in the
construction drawings are designed, engineered, and produced In accordance with 21 NCAC 56.0701 and .1103. Each plan sheet within
the Construction Drawings shall not be considered final for construction unless appropriafelysigned and sealed by Engineer as a final
document. Additionally, all site permits and approvals from appropriate federal, state & local agencies must be obtained prior to
beginning any construction activity related to a permit/approval. Contact Engineer if there is any question regarding permits/approvals.
2. See also pertinent Detail Sheets for specific construction details related to this plan sheet. See also Site Plan and/or Notes/Specs/Legend
sheet for additional notes or specifications pertaining to the overall project.
SPECIAL/ADDITIONAL NOTES FOR THIS PLAN SHEET:
I. Purpose: The purpose of this Overall Grading Plan (with Environmental Impacts) is to depict an overall layout with final contours for most site
construction activities that are related to grading or earth moving. More detailed Information pertaining fo erosion control and surface drainage
can be found on the Erosion Control Plan. This sheet may also depict construction limits In environmentally sensitive areas and other details
related to any environmental Impacts (le. Wetlands, Stream Buffers, etc.), IF ANY. This plan sheet Is part of a full set of Construction Drawings and
should be used In conjunction with the full set that Is approved and released for construction.
2. Standard Specifications: All grading for street construction or other vehicular areas fie, parking lots) shall be in accordance with the current standards
and specifications of NCDOT. When required or requested, CONTRACTOR shall provide for Independent testing & Inspection, Including
proof -rolling, compaction, and asphalt density testing; and shalt provide written documentation to DEVELOPER/ENGINEER Indicating acceptable
results. All other grading shall be In accordance with these Plans & Specifications; or otherwise In accordance. with Industry standards. All Erosion
Control construction shall be In accordance with the current minimum standards and specifications of NCDEQ and all conditions of permitting.
And any construction In Environmentally Sensitive Areas shall be in accordance with all conditions of any related permit. See
Notes/Specs/Legend sheet for additional specifications,
3. Work In Rights -of -Way or Easements; Any work In existing or proposed rights -of -way or easements (particularly NCDOT rights-of-way/shall be conducted
according to the standards of the holder of the right-of-way or easement. Work In existing rights -of -way or easements shall also be conducted In
accordance with any approved encroachment or permit, and all conditions within the the permit. Contact DEVELOPER or ENGINEER with any
questions regarding permitting.
4. Finish Grade Contours: The finish grade contours shown on thls plan are fo all finish surface elevations (le. asphalt, sidewalk, curb, gutter, or ground
elevations. ANY OTHER GRADING SHALL BE TO ELEVATIONS AS SPECIFIED, OR OTHERWISE FOR POSRIVE
DRAINAGE.
5. Handicap Accessibility: This site shall conform to all requirements for handicap accessibility. This may require additional asphalt or concrete surfaces as
may be required by local Inspector. It may also require that special attention be given to finish grades throughout ALL stages of grading. In
general, proposed grades and contours as indicated hereon were set in order to meet the required standards. However, because of the detail
in construction required to achieve these requirements In the field, the CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for ensuring that staking, rough
grading, base material Installation, fine grad ng, and finish surface result in the desired finish grades & slopes along accessible routes. See
Special Notes - Handicap Accessibility on Sheet 1 for additional Information related to Handicap Accessibility.
6. Overall Project Notes: See also Notes/Specs/Legend sheet for additional notes or specifications pertaining to the overall project,
LEGEND
— CML/SITE
EXISTING
PROPOSED
--Exv
WAlERUNE
- - -
(ALL
SIZES)
V
D40
BLOWOFF
H••
HYDRANT
11T
IX VALVE N
D REDUCER ►
o METER •
-----IX-u- SEWER(ALL SUES) NE
SS
®
MANHOLE •
o CLEANOUT •
0 o STORM DRAINAGE
Ns OM MI
(ALL
SIZES)
®
CATCH
BASIN
CI
DROP INLET/YARD
INLET
®
I
OTHER SYMBOLS
0 POWER/UTILITY POLE
LIGHT POLE / AREA UGHT
POWER/U11UTY POLE W/LIGHT
0-14
® OTHER UTILITY PEDESTAL or POST
OH-E
OVERHEAD
POWER/U11UAY UNE
-
-
- - - GAS--- GAS UNE (UNDERGROUND)
— UG E
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC/POWER UNE
—
--- UG COM-
UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATION UNE
DITCH/CHANNEL
— —
STREAM/CREEK/RIVER
—
/
/
/
I
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
I
to
/
+ DELINEATED
+
WETLAND LINE (TYP)
"W 1" - PERM WETLAND IMPACT
(HATCHED - TYP)
SEE ENVIRON. IMPACT TABLE THIS SHEET
•I' PROP. PRIVATE STORMWATE &
▪ DRAINAGE EASEMENT (VA ES)
4. W W W W
W + W V•
W + + W +
V• I •V y •Y W W W •V/
f�'l• W W w y W J• /
+ W W +lt
W + W W W+
W
W W + + +
/ W W * 40
W W
W + + + * W W
+ W+ W+ * W) W W W W W
�(Id* W +
4, + •V + * + W V•
+ + + + + W + +
* W + + + + + +
+ + + + 4.7 +
+ + +
/N 57°441114"W
/
c
Ni
M WATER &
NT (VARIES)
W + + W +
•V + + * W +
* + + W +
* * + W + +
* * + + *
+ W * * + W
* + + + +
+ + + + * V•
+ + * + +
+ + + * + +
+ EXIST SSM/-1
TOP RIM EL=142.92
, INV OUT EL=139.37
DELINEATED
WETLAND LINE (TYP)
"W3"-TEMP WETLAND IMPACT
(HATCHED - TYP)
SEE ENVIRON. IMPACT TABLE
THIS SHEET
+ W * + +
W W W + + *
SCM-1
'DRY POND'
SEE POND
DETAILS
4
+ PROP. 20'x20' PUB
DRAINAGE EASE
PROP. PRIVATE ST•
+ DRAINAGE EASEM
"W 2" - PERM WETLAND IMPACT
(HATCHED -TYP)
SEE ENVIRON. IMPACT TABLE
THIS SHEET
+ +40 4, + * *
309.22' (TOTAL)
3
1
SEE PLAN AND DITCH
LEGEND FOR REQUIRED
DITCH LININGS
SECTION A -A
WHERE INDICATED IN PLAN NEW
SEE PLAN AND DITCH
LEGEND FOR REQUIRED
DITCH LININGS
ime 2'
SECTION B-B
WHERE INDICATED IN PLAN VIEW
SEE PLAN AND DITCH
LEGEND FOR REQUIRED
DITCH LININGS
1
\I
D = 1.0' (MIN) 1
1
1 4'
SECTION C-C
WHERE INDICATED IN PLAN MEW
3
OUTLET DITCH/SWALE DETAIL - TYPICAL SECTIONS
NO SCALE
NOTES:1. Construct outlet ditch according to specified grades or proposed contours when Indicated an the plans. When grades or
proposed contours are NOT specified on plans; construct ditch using either of the following options:
I) Construct ditch at the minimum depth Indicated above, maintaining the minimum depthwhlle constructing the ditch
on a slope that mimics the natural tenain)topography. (Typically used when terrain has positive slope In the
direction of flow).; OR
II) Construct ditch on a minimum 0.6% grade (1% desirable), maintaining at least the minimum ditch depth. (Typically
used when terrain Is flat or terrain slope Is opposite the direction of flow - "bucking grade").
--Sometimes a combination of these two methods may be required along the entire length of Ole ditch.
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE/
CONSTRUCTION (TYP)
ROP. 20' PRIVATE
DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
MIN
PROP. 10 x70 SIGHT
TRIANGLE EASEMENT
(TYP BOTH SIDES)
DRAINAGE SWALE FOR LOT DRAINAGE
SEE EROSION PLAN FOR LINING
& DITCH SECTION THIS SHEET
TOWN WATERLINE (TYP)
SEE UTILITY/STORM PLAN
AND PLAN/PROFILE SHEETS
(
TOWN SAN. SEWER (TYP)
SEE UTILITY/STORM PLAN
AND PLAN/PROFILE SHEETS
ewe
EXIST '10' DRAINAGE & bRLITY EASEAIEN
EXIST 10x70' SIGHT TRIANGLE
EASEMENT (TYP BOTH SIDES)
(59)
N
N
Sr,
\
145— -147
LEG
PED
1+00 f1 g
_�- —- -Fx-SS
.END EXIST PVMT
CO
S57°41'14"E
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE/
CONSTRUCTION (TYP)
re-
( 60)
\ J
Tsn-' »Tym•
(58)
0' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT
PROP. 20 PRIVATE
DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
JAMES WILLIAM HUGHES
DEED BOOK 1355, PAGE 974
NC PIN # 260300-46-7578
PROP. 20' PRIVATE —
DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES IN U.S.
SURVEY FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
50
GRAPHIC SCALE
0
25 50 100
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 50 ft.
Know what's below.
Call before you dig,
FINAL DRAWING - FOR
REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
(NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION)
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS TABLE
WETLANDS & US WATERS IMPACTS
DESCRIPTION
WETLAND PERMANENT
SUB -TOTAL
WETLAND - TEMPORARY
SUB -TOTAL
US STREAMS PERMANENT
US STREAMS -TEMPORARY
US OPEN WATER
N
SQ.FT. ACRES LINEAR FT.
NC STREAM BUFFER IMPACTS (BY STREAM CROSSINGS and OTHER IMPACTS)
DESCRIPTION SQ.FT. ACRES LINEAR FT.
800 0.018 PERPENDICULAR STREAM CROSSINGS
2�445 0.056 STREAM CROSSING #1 N/A - none
3,245
N/A- none
N/A- none
N/A- none
780
780
0.074
0.018
0.018
OTHER/NON-PERPENDICULAR IMPACTS
ZONE 1- PARALLEL -PERMANENT
ZONE 1- PARALLEL -TEMPORARY
ZONE 2- PARALLEL -PERMANENT
ZONE 2- PARALLEL - TEMPORARY
BUFFERED STREAMS
N/A- none
N/A - none
N/A - none
N/A - none
N/A - none
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE/
CONSTRUCTION (TYP)
TYPICAL ROADSIDE SWALES DRAINING
TO STORM INLET SYSTEM
SEE STREET TYPICAL SECTION
SEE ALSO EROSION PLAN FOR LININGS
1101.12' (TOTAL)
PROP. 20' PRIVATE
DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
BE ' ::::::• -Fairy It a��� ' ;::::...•......
i.
�:''•l.•::'.•'.a:'.11;t��.�.��� : s-r a �e�pli�'16{�• S4C��,
N57°41'14"W
(61 )
/
EXIST 10' DRAINAGE &
UII ITY EASEMENT
ELEC
PED
Mom?
TEL CABLE
PED PED
EXIST SEWERLINE
z R-SS
10' R/W.
STORM DRAINAGE INLET
& PIPE SYSTEM (TYP)
SEE UTILITY/STORM PLAN
AND PLAN/PROFILE SHEETS
ROADSIDE SWAGES THIS SIDE
N RUN OVER TOP OF STORM PIPE
(SHOWN "SHIFTED" FOR CLARITY)
(62)
TWIN OAKS SUBDIVISION
SECTION HI PHASE V "" Z_e
PLAT BOOK 43 PAGE 437
EXIST
fa SSMH
Ek-aa—�y
EXIST WAIERUNE (APPROX) Efr -6' EX-V EX-4/
(57)
R/W
�� - -- CABLE 10'
MANSE.
PAD PED
E TEL
1ST 10' DRAINAGE &
UTILITY EASEMENT
(56)
(55)
(63)
\
(54)
SPENCER E. POWELL, Ul
DEED BOOK 5091, PAGE 416
PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 61
NC P/N If 260300-45-2668
(64)
(53)
851.97 (TOTA
(65)
\ J
RAY DRIVE
EXIST. 50' PUBLIC R/W - PAVED
T
(52)
\
1
T
DRAINAGE SWALE FOR LOT DRAINAGE
SEE EROSION PLAN FOR LINING
& DITCH SECTION THIS SHEET
"REVERSE" GRADE SWALES
BACK TO STORM INLETS
(BOTH SIDES OF ROAD)
SEE ALSO PLAN/PROFILE SHEETS
(66)
T
es— IN
( 67)
1
ea—
( 50)
PROP. IS' PRIVATE
DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
PROP. PUBLIC
DRAINAGE EASEMENTi
(VARIES)
co
e
TEL PED
ELECT. _.
MANSE.
to 'AD
(41)
J
•
( 42 )
•
0
8
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
(15)
R/M,_-L_
___� EXIST WATERLINE (APPROX)
10+0o WILL DRIVE EX -
HYD
-'--F-ET! SS EX SS
END EXIST PWT EXIST SEWER LINE
EA, - _ EXIST 50' PUBLIC
145- R/W PAVED
EXIST SSMH RAY T
TOP RIM EL=146.76
>-INV-OUT-EL=140.70
I I
I (19)
� J
(20)
ITWIN OAKS SUBDIVISION I
SEC7/0N IN PHASE IV --
PLAT BOOK 40, PAGE 1031z_0
(40)
f I TWIN OAKS SUBDIVISION I
SECTION 111 PHASE l --"Z_•
I PLAT BOOK 34, PAGE 35�
(44)
(39)
Z
O_
U)
S
W
[Y
Q
o
DATE: 2/12/21
SCALE: REF: BAR SCALE
DRAWN BY: BRL
CHECKED BY: BRL
PROJECT No: 120005.00
112 East Johnston Street w
-a
z
a
"arc
am
1C
c=i' at- 4
TWIN OAKS SUBDIVISION, SECTION III, PHASE VI
DEVELOPER JYMCO DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPER ADDRESS CONTACT: STACYWHITLEY CONTACT TELEPHONE
1586 YELVERTON GROVE ROAD 919-202-5659 (N1)
SMRHFIELD, NC 27577
WITH ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS]
_01
TOWNSHIP, COUNTY, & STATE: SMITHFIELD; JOHNSTON CO., NC
CITY OR TOWN LIMIT/ETJ: SMITHFIELD (ETJ.)
NC PIN#: 260300-46-0287 ZONING: RMH
FOI
Sheet
4B
No.
of
8
OVERALL
GRADING

* * * DISCLAIMER * * *
Johnston County assumes no legal responsibility for the information represented here.
Scale: 1:4932 - 1 in. = 410.99 feet
(The scale is only accurate when printed landscape on a 8 1/2 x 11 size sheet with no page scaling.)
Johnston County GIS
March 28, 2020
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

Wildlands Holdings III, LLC · Wildlands Engineering, Inc · 1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104, Charlotte, NC 28203

Statement of Availability

March 29, 2021

JYMCO Development
1586 Yelverton Grove Rd.
Smithfield, NC 27577-7583
Attn: Ms. Stacy Whitley

RE: Availability of Riparian Wetland Credits for the “Twin Oaks Subdivision, Sec 3, Ph 4” project
Bank Name: Falling Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank
Bank Site: Grantham Branch Mitigation Site
Bank Sponsor: Wildlands Holdings III, LLC
USACE Action ID No. 2017-00549
Riparian Wetland Credits Needed: 0.15 acres
Riparian Wetland Credits Available: 3.04 acres
Neuse 03020201 River Basin

Dear Ms. Whitley,

Wildlands Holdings III, LLC has the above-mentioned riparian wetland credits from the Falling Creek
Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank: Grantham Branch Mitigation Site to satisfy the mitigation
requirements related to the above-mentioned project. The project is located within the service area
(HUC 03020201) of the Bank.

Credits may be reserved for a period of 6 months upon the receipt of a non-refundable deposit of 10%
of the purchase price. Should credits not be reserved, they will be sold on a first come, first serve basis.
Credit prices will be guaranteed for a period of 6 months from the date of this letter and are then
subject to change.

An invoice for this transaction will be sent upon your request and we will reserve the credits and price
for a period of 30 days from invoice. This letter is a Statement of Availability as of the date provided – it
is not a reservation of credits nor a guarantee of price. Credits will be sold on a first come, first serve
basis.

Final transfer of credits will occur upon completion of the Mitigation Responsibility Transfer Form within
the 404 permit.

We appreciate the opportunity to assist you with your mitigation requirements. Please contact me at
[phone] x124 or [e-mail] if you have any questions or need any additional
information.

Wildlands Holdings III, LLC · Wildlands Engineering, Inc · 1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104, Charlotte, NC 28203
Sincerely,

Ashley N. Yarsinske
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Marketing & Credit Sales
[e-mail]
O: [phone] ext. 124
M: [phone]

Cc: Mr. Wyatt Brown, LSS, CPESC | Brown’s Environmental Group, Inc.
3/25/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/JNFNNKUS5REF3NBINQSBPGJUOQ/resources 1/10
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as
trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near
the project area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that
could potentially be directly or indirectly aected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and
extent of eects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site-specic (e.g.,
vegetation/species surveys) and project-specic (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS oce(s) with jurisdiction
in the dened project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds,
USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location
Johnston County, North Carolina
U.S. Fish & Wildlife ServiceIPaC
3/25/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/JNFNNKUS5REF3NBINQSBPGJUOQ/resources 2/10
Local oce
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Oce
 [phone]
 [phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Oce Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
3/25/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/JNFNNKUS5REF3NBINQSBPGJUOQ/resources 3/10
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species. Additional areas of
inuence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be
indirectly aected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a sh population even if that sh does not occur
at the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water ow downstream). Because species can
move, and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To
fully determine any potential eects to species, additional site-specic and project-specic information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary information whether any
species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is
conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local oce and a species list which fullls
this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an ocial species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC
(see directions below) or from the local eld oce directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an ocial
species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) and the sheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries ).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list. Please contact NOAA
Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1
2
3/25/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/JNFNNKUS5REF3NBINQSBPGJUOQ/resources 4/10
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows species that are
candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more information. IPaC only shows species that are
regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an oce of the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially aected by activities in this location:
Birds
Amphibians
Fishes
NAME STATUS
Red-cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Endangered
NAME STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi
Wherever found
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is
not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Proposed Threatened
NAME STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus
Wherever found
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is
not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
Proposed Endangered
3/25/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/JNFNNKUS5REF3NBINQSBPGJUOQ/resources 5/10
Clams
Critical habitats
Potential eects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
Migratory birds
NAME STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni
Wherever found
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is
not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Proposed Threatened
Tar River Spinymussel Elliptio steinstansana
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1392
Endangered
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act .
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their
habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described
below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
1 2
3/25/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/JNFNNKUS5REF3NBINQSBPGJUOQ/resources 6/10
THERE ARE NO MIGRATORY BIRDS OF CONSERVATION CONCERN EXPECTED TO OCCUR AT THIS LOCATION.
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round.
Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be
breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure.
To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional
measures or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species
present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specied location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species that may warrant special
attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based
on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried and ltered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identied as warranting special attention because they are a
BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to oshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds
that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specied location?
Additional information can be found using the following links:
Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-
and-guidance/
conservation-measures.php
Nationwide conservation measures for birds
http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf
3/25/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/JNFNNKUS5REF3NBINQSBPGJUOQ/resources 7/10
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN).
This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how the
probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to
the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest
there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with
it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specied. If "Breeds elsewhere" is
indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA
(including Hawaii, the Pacic Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non-BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements
(for eagles) or (for non-eagles) potential susceptibilities in oshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. oshore
energy development or longline shing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, eorts should be made, in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to
the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially aected by oshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your
project area o the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also oers data and information about other taxa
besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results les underlying the portal
maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the
Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
3/25/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/JNFNNKUS5REF3NBINQSBPGJUOQ/resources 8/10
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Models relying
on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the
nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts
occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how
your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to
generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specied location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence"
of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey eort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high
survey eort is the key component. If the survey eort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey eort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is
not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be
there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to conrm presence, and
helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be conrmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can
implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a 'Compatibility
Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATION.
3/25/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/JNFNNKUS5REF3NBINQSBPGJUOQ/resources 9/10
Fish hatcheries
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act,
or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District.
THERE ARE NO KNOWN WETLANDS AT THIS LOCATION.
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location, type and
size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identied based on vegetation, visible
hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on-the-ground inspection of any particular site may
result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classication established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the amount and quality of
the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verication work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the
source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or eld work. There may be occasional dierences in
polygon boundaries or classications between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data
source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal
zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tubercid worm reefs) have also been excluded
from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
3/25/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/JNFNNKUS5REF3NBINQSBPGJUOQ/resources 10/10
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may dene and describe wetlands in a dierent manner than that
used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to dene the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of
any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons
intending to engage in activities involving modications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state,
or local agencies concerning specied agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may aect such activities.
NCNHDE-14305
March 25, 2021
wyatt brown
Brown's Environmental Group, inc
242 Batten Farm Road
Selma, NC 27576
RE: Twin Oaks
Dear wyatt brown:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached ‘Potential Occurrences’ table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one-mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one-mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally-listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one-mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally-
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Twin Oaks
March 25, 2021
NCNHDE-14305
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
Group
EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last
Observation
Date
Element
Occurrence
Rank
Accuracy Federal
Status
State
Status
Global
Rank
State
Rank
Bird 19682 Picoides borealis Red-cockaded
Woodpecker
2005?H 3-Medium Endangered Endangered G3 S2
Dragonfly or
Damselfly
33753 Somatochlora
georgiana
Coppery Emerald 2004-Pre H?5-Very
Low
---Significantly
Rare
G3G4 S1?
Vascular Plant 36257 Eurybia spectabilis Showy Aster 2000-10-04 D?3-Medium ---Significantly
Rare Other
G5 S2?
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
No Managed Areas are Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/help. Data query generated on March 25, 2021; source: NCNHP, Q4 January 2021. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Page 3 of 3
City of Goldsboro, Johnston County, State of North Carolina DOT, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, NGA, USGS
DWR Pre-Fil ing Meeting Req u est Form
Contact Name *
Contact Email Addre ss *
Proje ct Owne r *
Proje ct Name *
Proje ct County *
Owne r Addre ss:*
Is this a transportation proje ct?*
Type (s) of approv al sought from the DWR:
Doe s this proje ct hav e an e xisting proje ct ID#?*
Do you know the name of the staff me mbe r you would like to re que st a me e ting with?
Ple ase giv e a brie f proje ct de scription be low.*
Please give a couple of dates you are available for a meeting.
Ple ase attach the docume ntation you would like to hav e the me e ting about.
Wyatt Brown
[e-mail]
JYMCO DEVELOPMENT, Stacy Whitley
Twin Oaks Section 3, Phase 6
Johnston
City
Smithfield
State / Province / Region
North Carolina
Postal / Zip Code
27577
Country
United States
Street Address
1586 YELVERTON GROVE RD
Address Line 2
Yes No
401 Water Quality Certification -
Regular
401 Water Quality Certification -
Express
Individual Permit Modification
Shoreline Stabilization
Yes No
Stephanie Goss
Twin Oaks is a Mobile Home S/D that has been in development for
many years. This should be the last phase of the S/D.
There are 2 necessary wetland impacts from construction of the dry
pond BMP and a required stub out by the Town of Smithfield.
There was a permitted wetland impact in 2003 for 0.33 acres, I have
attached the 404 but the owner did not locate the 401. Mitigation will
be necessary for the new impacts.
2/9/2021
Signature *
Submittal Date
1-24-21-Twin-Oaks-SD-UPDATED-DRAFT-
Environmental-Impacts-for-WyattB.pdf
1016.08KB
Old PCN.pdf 406.15KB
pdf only
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:

· This form completes the requirement of the Pre-Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
Rule.
· I understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre-filing
meeting request.
· I also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.

Your project’s thirty-day clock started upon receipt of this application.  You will receive notification regarding meeting location
and time if a meeting is necessary.  You will receive notification when the thirty-day clock has expired, and you can submit an
application.
1/25/2021
Pre-Filing Meeting is not needed for Twin Oaks Section 3, Phase 6 - 20210164 Ver 1
Inbox

[e-mail]

12:00 AM (10
hours ago)

to me, rick.trone

The North Carolina Division of Water Resources has received the Pre-Filing Meeting Request Form for
Twin Oaks Section 3, Phase 6 that you submitted on 1/25/2021 10:00 AM. The ID number for that
project is 20210164, Version 1.

It has been decided that no meeting is needed for this project.

Project file link: https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/WaterResources/Browse.aspx?dbid=0&startid=1578875

When you submit your application please upload a copy of the attached document in this email.

This email was automatically generated by Laserfiche workflow. Please do not respond to this email
address, as responses are not monitored.