HomeMy WebLinkAbout20210304 Ver 1_Bridge 110209 Burke Environmental Documentation MCDC_20210326Page 1 of 11
10/7/2019
MINIMUM CRITERIA DETERMINATION CHECKLIST
The following questions provide direction in determining when the Department is
required to prepare environmental documents for state-funded construction and
maintenance activities. Answer questions for Parts A through C by checking either
“Yes” or “No”. Complete Part D of the checklist when Minimum Criteria Rule
categories #8, 12(i) or #15 are used.
TIP Project No.: N/A
State Project No.: 17BP.13.R.153
Project Location: Bridge No. 209 on SR 1623 (Mount Harmony Rd.) over UT to
Drowning Creek in Burke County
Project Description:
The proposed project involves replacing Bridge No. 209 on SR 1623 (Mount Harmony
Rd.) over UT to Drowning Creek in Burke County.
Bridge No. 209 will be replaced with two (2) 10’ x 9’ reinforced concrete box culverts on
the existing alignment. The culvert size is based on preliminary design information and is
set by hydraulic requirements. The road will consist of two 10-foot lanes with 4-foot
shoulders. The existing right of way width along SR 1623 is approximately 32 feet. At
Bridge 209, the existing right of way width is approximately 48 feet (24 feet right and left
of the center of bridge). It is anticipated that the improvements associated with this
project may require additional right of way and / or easements.
Due to available nearby alternative routes of this major collector, traffic will be detoured
off-site during the construction period (see Figure 3). The detour route includes SR 1627,
US 70, SR 1618, SR 1621, and SR 1623 (approximately 4 miles). Local access to
properties in the immediate vicinity of the bridge replacement can be maintained during
the construction.
The current estimated costs are as follows:
R/W Acquisition, Utilities, and Construction = $600,000
Anticipated Permit or Consultation Requirements: A Nationwide Permit (NWP) 23
will likely be applicable. An NWP No. 33 may also apply for temporary construction
activities such as stream dewatering, work bridges, or temporary causeways that are often
used during bridge construction or rehabilitation. The USACE holds the final discretion
as to what permit will be required to authorize project construction. If a Section 404
permit is required then a Section 401 Water Quality Certification (WQC) from the
NCDWR will be needed.
DocuSign Envelope ID: F83E5384-5890-4712-BABC-A7E819C49F79
Page 2 of 11
10/7/2019
Special Project Information: None
Environmental Commitments: The list of project commitments (“green sheet”) is
located at the end of the checklist.
Estimated Traffic:
ADT (2017): 950 vpd
Design Speed: 35 MPH
Crash Rates:
The crash rate at this bridge is approximately 6.41 crashes per million vehicle miles
traveled (MVMT).
Cultural Resources: This project was reviewed and cleared by NCDOT’s cultural
resources staff under a programmatic agreement with the State Historic Preservation
Office. No surveys were required.
Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodations: There is no presence of bicycle, pedestrian,
greenway, or transit facilities; therefore, no bicycle or pedestrian accommodations are
proposed for the project.
Bridge Demolition: The existing bridge is constructed of timber decking on steel I-
beams. The replacement and demolition of this type of structure is likely to result in
debris in the water based on standard demolition practices. NCDOT will ensure that the
demolition process complies with environmental permit requirements.
Design Exceptions: No design exceptions are required for this project.
Alternatives Considered:
No Build – The no-build alternative would result in eventually closing the road,
which is anticipated to cause considerable disruption to transportation users due to traffic
volumes served by this major collector.
Rehabilitation – The superstructure of the bridge is timber decking on steel I-beams.
The bridge was built in 1954. The timber piles within the bridge are reaching the end of
their useful life. Rehabilitation would require effectively replacing the bridge.
DocuSign Envelope ID: F83E5384-5890-4712-BABC-A7E819C49F79
Page 3 of 11
10/7/2019
Off-site Detour - An off-site detour was evaluated due to the available nearby route.
The off-site detour route includes SR 1627, US 70, SR 1618, SR 1621, and SR 1623
(approximately 4 miles).
On-site Detour – An on-site detour was not evaluated due to available nearby routes.
Staged Construction – Staged construction was not considered because of the
availability of an acceptable off-site detour.
New Alignment – Given that the existing alignment at the project location is
acceptable, a new alignment was not considered as an alternative.
Public Involvement: A landowner notification letter was sent to all property owners
affected directly by this project, and property owners were invited to comment. No
comments have been received to date.
DocuSign Envelope ID: F83E5384-5890-4712-BABC-A7E819C49F79
Page 4 of 11
10/7/2019
PART A: MINIMUM CRITERIA
Item 1 to be completed by the Engineer. YES NO
1. Is the proposed project listed as a type and class of activity allowed under
the Minimum Criteria Rule in which environmental documentation is not
required?
If the answer to number 1 is “no”, then the project does not qualify as a
minimum criteria project. A state environmental assessment is required.
If yes, under which category? 9
If either category #8, #12(i) or #15 is used complete Part D of this checklist.
PART B: MINIMUM CRITERIA EXCEPTIONS
Items 2 – 4 to be completed by the Engineer. YES NO
2. Could the proposed activity cause significant changes in land use
concentrations that would be expected to create adverse air quality
impacts?
3. Will the proposed activity have secondary impacts or cumulative
impacts that may result in a significant adverse impact to human health
or the environment?
4. Is the proposed activity of such an unusual nature or does the proposed
activity have such widespread implications, that an uncommon concern
for its environmental effects has been expressed to the Department?
Item 5-8 to be completed by Division Environmental Officer.
5. Does the proposed activity have a significant adverse effect on wetlands;
surface waters such as rivers, streams, and estuaries; parklands; prime or
unique agricultural lands; or areas of recognized scenic, recreational,
archaeological, or historical value?
6. Will the proposed activity endanger the existence of a species on the
Department of Interior's threatened and endangered species list?
7. Could the proposed activity cause significant changes in land use
concentrations that would be expected to create adverse water quality or
ground water impacts?
DocuSign Envelope ID: F83E5384-5890-4712-BABC-A7E819C49F79
Page 5 of 11
10/7/2019
YES NO
8. Is the proposed activity expected to have a significant adverse effect on
long-term recreational benefits or shellfish, finfish, wildlife, or their
natural habitats
If any questions 2 through 8 are answered “yes”, the proposed project may not qualify as a
Minimum Criteria project. A state environmental assessment (EA) may be required. For
assistance, contact:
Manager, Environmental Analysis Unit
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
(919) 707 – 6000
Fax: (919) 212-5785
PART C: COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS
Items 9- 12 to be completed by Division Environmental Officer. YES NO
9. Is a federally protected threatened or endangered species, or its
habitat, likely to be impacted by the proposed action?
10. Does the action require the placement of temporary or permanent
fill in waters of the United States?
11. Does the project require the placement of a significant amount of
fill in high quality or relatively rare wetland ecosystems, such as
mountain bogs or pine savannahs?
12. Is the proposed action located in an Area of Environmental
Concern, as defined in the coastal Area Management Act?
Items 13 – 15 to be completed by the Engineer.
13. Does the project require stream relocation or channel changes?
Cultural Resources
14. Will the project have an “effect” on a property or site listed on the
National Register of Historic Places?
15. Will the proposed action require acquisition of additional right of
way from publicly owned parkland or recreational areas?
Questions in Part “C” are designed to assist the Engineer and the Division Environmental
Officer in determining whether a permit or consultation with a state or federal resource
agency may be required. If any questions in Part “C” are answered “yes”, follow the
appropriate permitting procedures prior to beginning project construction.
DocuSign Envelope ID: F83E5384-5890-4712-BABC-A7E819C49F79
Page 6 of 11
10/7/2019
PART D:( To be completed when either category #8, 12(i) or #15 of the rules are
used.)
Items 16- 22 to be completed by Division Environmental Officer.
16. Project length:
17. Right of Way width:
18. Project completion date:
19. Total acres of newly disturbed ground
surface:
20. Total acres of wetland impacts:
21. Total linear feet of stream impacts:
22. Project purpose:
If Part D of the checklist is completed, send a copy of the entire checklist document to:
State Roadside Environmental Engineer
Mail Service Center 1557
Raleigh, NC 27699-1557
(919) 707-2920
Fax (919) 715-2554
DocuSign Envelope ID: F83E5384-5890-4712-BABC-A7E819C49F79
Page 7 of 11
10/7/2019
Prepared by:
Date:
Ronald (Ron) D. Allen, PE, CPM
KCI Project Manager
Reviewed by: Date:
Roger Bryan
Division Environmental Officer
Date:
Mike Calloway
Division Bridge Program Manager
DocuSign Envelope ID: F83E5384-5890-4712-BABC-A7E819C49F79
10/7/2019
10/7/2019
10/8/2019
Page 8 of 11
10/7/2019
PROJECT COMMITMENTS
Burke County
Bridge 209 on SR 1623 Mount Harmony Road over UT to Drowning Creek
W.B.S. No. 17BP.13.R.153
TIP No. N/A
Hydraulics Unit
The Hydraulics Unit will coordinate with the NC Floodplain Mapping Program (FMP), to
determine the status the of project with regard to applicability of NCDOT’S
Memorandum of Agreement, or approval of a Conditional Letter of Map Revision
(CLOMR) and subsequent final Letter of Map Revision (LOMR).
DocuSign Envelope ID: F83E5384-5890-4712-BABC-A7E819C49F79
Page 9 of 11
10/7/2019
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
DocuSign Envelope ID: F83E5384-5890-4712-BABC-A7E819C49F79
Page 10 of 11
10/7/2019
Figure 2: Jurisdictional Features Map
DocuSign Envelope ID: F83E5384-5890-4712-BABC-A7E819C49F79
Page 11 of 11
10/7/2019
Figure 3: Detour Map
DocuSign Envelope ID: F83E5384-5890-4712-BABC-A7E819C49F79