R-2597_FieldForms_revisedonly

l /
Date : Q
Project /Site
Latitude:
Evaluator:
County:
Longitude
0
r
2
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other'
Stream is at least intermittent (
i
Ephemeral Intermittent erenn'al'
e. Quad Name
9 `i
if? 19 or erennial ifz 30*
0
1
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bankG
0
1
2
1 3)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0.5
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
''
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
1
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2X
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0:
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
',-jD,)
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal 7 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1e
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
14. Leaf litter
1.5
)
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
2
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
ties = 3
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = Ai. 5 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
�2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
21. Aquatic Mollusks
(-0"
1
2
3
22. Fish
" "0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
Q
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
175
25. Algae
Q,t
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 611
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: fr<s,<,� �,�. �. 3,
Sketch: io Sly
v'

.perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
A
+fJp
d
C iJ`VV tream Identification Form Version 4,11
Date: 12.
Project/Site:
Latitude: .411
Evaluator: . (,
County:
Longitude:
`dotal Points:
Stream Determ' circle one)
Other
Stream Is at least Intermittent
If> 19 or aererinlat if a 30*
emera "
termitte ' Perennial
e.g. Quad Name: 00 qq
.A. Geomorphology Subtotal =
Absent
Wea 1t
Moderate Strong'
1" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3, Ira- channei structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
0
1
3
d le- ool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
CV
3
5, Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
M
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
8. W'eadcuts
0
1
2
3. Grade control
0
.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
Z=
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No 0
Yes s 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. drolo Subtotal = "
12. Presence. of Basef ow
1 ` °
2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1 1.
16, Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1' 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
, Biology Subtotal = __
18, Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1 0
19. Rooted upland plants In streambed
3
1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2 3
22. Fish
0.5
1 1,5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1 1,5 ,
24. Amphibians
0.5
1 1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1 1 5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;, OBL =1.5 Other w
.perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:

�
NC D
Q^ ;
Date:
Project/Site:
Latitude
0
Total Points:
Strearn Determiria,fig (circle one)
Other
Stroam is at least intern7iflent
if >_ 19 01
__9
Ephemeral 16termitte"t� Pere/nRial
e.g, Quad Name: C,
A- G��omor tal
—sent'­
Moderate
Strong
1 a'Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
(2
3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
0
2
3
4.-Particle size of strearn substrate
0
1
3—
5. Active/relict floodplain
IV
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
3
9, Grade control
-TO
0
1
1.5
Nat'ural valley
0
O5
1
16
B. H drolo Subtotal
12. Presence of Baseflow
0,
1
2',
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
O5
0
1.5. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1,5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil-based evidence of high ��ater ta6f;
NJ 0
xKl.
Yes -/3"',
19. Rooted upland plants in strearnbed
3'
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
-0
22. Fish
23. Crayfish
01
05
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
15
V–
�perennial sirearns may also be identifled using other methods. See p. 31ol manual,
Sketch: Bank Height: 3'
Bank Width: 4-7
Water Depth: 2'0^
Substrate: Gravel, Sand
Velocity: Slow
Clarity: Clear
Amy Euliss of NC DVVQ performed a site visit nn
9/27/2Ol2 and changed the score nf the stream tn
Perennial. The change in score was based primarily nn
biology. DH

9/27/12 Revised Coordinates for S46a
35.535979
NC DWQ Sti-earn Identification Fonn Version 4.1 1, -81.966014 Coord.s for S46aa in notes below
Date: IV Project/Site Latitude: . 11 , , I I
..... . . ...... .... . i .. . . . .. .... . . ..... . . .......
Evaluator; 2, 1
County. Longitude: 64
Total Points: Cd Strearn Deters-ninatiop (circle one Other
Stream is at least intermiltent Epherner#]n - termitte4 Perennial e�q
if? 19 or verennial a/? 30' A , � Qua d Name: tJ 1,,) 1)
A. Geomo
1" Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3. In-channel structure: ex, riffle-pool, step-pool,
r ipj)le-pooI sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
5. Activelrefict floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
Absent
0
0
0
0
0
0
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
T Headcuts
0
9, Grade control
0
10. Natural valley
0
11. Second or greater order channel
No
artiricial ditches are not rated: see discussions in manual
if 2
B
'N
12, Presence of Baseflow
01
13, Iron oxidizing bacteria
11011
14. Leaf litter
1,5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
16. Organic debris lines or plies
0
17. Sail-based evidence of high water table?
3
C. Biolog Subtotal = I-L ua
--k
-18. Fibrous roots in strearnbed '
3
19. Rooted upland plants in strearnbed
2
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
01111
4
21, Aquatic Mollusks
Q:
22. Fish
1.5
. ........... .
23. Crayfish
0"
24. Amphibians
0 mm
25. Algae
0
26. Welland plants in strearnbed
1
Wrennial sirearns may also be identified using other methods, See p. 35 f rnaitua[.
Notes:
Sketch: Bankfull Height: 3'
Bankfull Width: 4'
Water Depth: Dry"
Substrate: Sand, Gravel
Amy Euliss of NC DWQ
stated to use this same
form for S46aa. Therefore,
S46aa is also perennial.
Coord.s for S46aa:
35.534267
-81.967234
S46aa originates at base of steep slope with no
ephemeral reach upstream (RD)
Amy Euliss of NC DWQ performed a
site visit on 9/29/2012 and changed
the stream score to Perennial. The
change was based primarily on biology.
DH
Moderate
Strong
2
3
2
3
if 2
3
r2
2
3
2
3
A
2
3
ll
2
3
0,5
1.5
0.5
..........
'1
1.5
Yes 3
1
2
3
2
3
1
0.5
0
E5
11.5
051
1
1.5
Yes 3
2
1
0
1
0
1
2
3
1
2
0.5
1
1,5
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
1
1.5
M
1
1.5
_J­._._...._­­_._._I
FACW = 0.75, OBL = 1.5 Other -_ 0
.. . ....... . .....
Coord.s for S46aa:
35.534267
-81.967234
S46aa originates at base of steep slope with no
ephemeral reach upstream (RD)
Amy Euliss of NC DWQ performed a
site visit on 9/29/2012 and changed
the stream score to Perennial. The
change was based primarily on biology.
DH

.perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods. See p, 35
Notes: V!
Sketch: Bankfull Height: 2.5'
Bankfull Width: 7'
Water Depth: Dry
Substrate: Sand, Gravel, Cobble
Amy Euliss of NC DWQ performed.a site visit
9/29/2012 and changed the stream score from
29.5 to 19.5.
)n
R-2597
S52b
NC DWQ Streatn'Identification Forn erslop 4.11
Date,
ProjectlSite: INS I
Latitude.
. . . . ...... ..
Evaluator ,
County-
Longitude*
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Det� !r.nflrtatiorx,(,pircle one)
Other (��,(,:[Jvvo0i,)
Quad Name:
Ephemeral, I n
terin ttent),Perennial
e•g,
if �� 19 or erennial if 2i 30'
A. Geomo p total
Ag Loqy_ (�_qb
t
Alb)sont
weak
ea
eraleFSt
Moderate
Strong
1"'Cont[nultyof channel bed and bank
0
F
3
2, Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
0
2
3
3. [n-channel structure: ex. riffle pool, step-pool,
0
2
2
3
Apple -pool sequence
2
4. Particle size of strearn substrate
0
5. Activelrelict floodplain
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
[it
T Recent alluvial LORT�Its
0
C2:7
3
8. Headcuts
2
3
9, Grade control
0
, M
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0,5
_
11. Second or greater order channel
N3 =0
Yes r^ 3� _
artiflclaFd7 itchos are not rated; see discussions in manual
ro q Subtotal
12, Presence of Baseflo
1
2
3
13, Iron oxidizing bacteria
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1,5
0.5
0
15. Sediment an plants or debris
0
1,5
_16 A7CrgaWl�e­brls lines or—plies
0
1.5
IT Suit-based evidence of high water table?
0 = tl
Yes 3
C. Biolo_qy (Subtotal
_
16. Fibrous roots In ATstreambed
2
0
19, Rooted upland plants in streantb©d
"3
2
1
0
20, Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
2
3
22, Fish
_C1
05
1
1,25
23. Crayfish
0—
05
1.5
. 24 1 Amphibians . ..... . .
77)
1
1.5
25, Algae
0Z
H,_Wetland piants in s_trwambed
FACW --- 015; OBL = 1,5
.perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods. See p, 35
Notes: V!
Sketch: Bankfull Height: 2.5'
Bankfull Width: 7'
Water Depth: Dry
Substrate: Sand, Gravel, Cobble
Amy Euliss of NC DWQ performed.a site visit
9/29/2012 and changed the stream score from
29.5 to 19.5.
)n

R -2597
S53b
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: [( // ' �_ J -/l
l J �� I d-
Projectl5ite: Iw
Latitude:
Evaluator: 1 rl. Urrt�'c c � ��"
County: >t
Longitude: -r r I
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent !i1 �'
Stream Deterinlnatipn -('
Ephemer�f' Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
rf? 19 or erennial if? 30'
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
A. Geomorphology ( Subtotal _)
Absent
Weak
Moderate .
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0
C 'D
2 2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
1
2
3'
6. Depositional bars or benches
C
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
24. Amphibians
2
3
9. Grade control
1 0
0.5
1
10. Natural valley
05
0.5
1
1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal
12. Presence of Basefiow
0
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
L075
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
". "1_
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or plies
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soikbased evidence of high water table?
Nes'= 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = �' 2 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
''3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
=" =t):
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
" Q` ,'
1
2
3
22. Fish
-r= 0-
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
_ " `0,5 ..: >
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
"- "1 `;; :
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FAGNI = 0.75; OBL
= 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other
methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bankfull Height: 0.5'
Bankfutl Width: 2'
Water Depth: 0 -3"
Substrate: Silt, Sand, Gravel
Velocity: Slow
Clarity: Clear
*Determined to be perennial by Amy Euliss (NCDWQ -WSRO) due to
biology on 10/1/12
1( S
` "i

NC IDWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: �` �r
Project/Site: '� f":
LatitudeC
Evaluator
County: Sri,., ; , , 1 (
Longitude:
0
1
( r)
Total Points:
Stream Determination i
Other 1_e l,/
� � � �� �
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or erennial if? 30`
0
/0.5')
*SEE NOTE BELOW
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
g
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
( r)
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
i ".r
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
/0.5')
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
(1'
2
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
1
t 2.
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
r 2)
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
"o),
0.5
1.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0'
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = i
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
27
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
(3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
(b,5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
/0.5')
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5: %'
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
%\ Yes = 3,'
C. Biology (Subtotal = `' )
E,
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3�`2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0.
1
2
3
21, Aquatic Mollusks
0 `;
1
2
3
22. Fish
0,
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0 }
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
i 0
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
('0 �,
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other
methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
VIC
Sketch: T" v
*Determined to be perennial by Amy Euliss (NCDWQ -WSRO) due to biology, on 10/1/12
„-

NU ll W V Stream lctentilication norm Version 4.11
Date: /h' f j //I I Project /Site:
Evaluator(
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if >_ 19 or perennial if > 30*
County: W bo
m Determination (circle one)
Ephemera ntermittent Perennial
I /P�
S65a
Latitude: 35.603113
Longitude: - 81.984281
Other C' P
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0'
1
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0")
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
(}
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
60 =°0
Yes = 3
° artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal = f ,'�> )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
COD
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
2
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
CNo °0
Yes = 3
C_ Riolonv (Suhtntal = `I 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
{
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
(0
0.5
1
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
I
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other =
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

Ix 6G✓� J�C Vt
NC DWO Stream identifientinn Fnrm Vt -rcinn A 11
Date: . , ; , . ,
Project/Site: S 6 'll
Latitude:- 35.604100
Evaluator: I (.�! i,:,,�,�ii.
County: 1,A � �,
Longitude:- 81.984850
"total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent t
Stream Deter_minatio - (circle one)
Other 4't, v t,i�rw)P
if >_ 19 or erennial if >_ 30"
E here 6rSfiermittent' Perennial
p �_.�
e. Quad Name:
g
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = Y/, � )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
LZ
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
C - -7
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0
c9;%
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
0.5
2
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
No = 0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
C1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5''
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
a .
Not ,
Yes = 3
anu wia, uuUnea aIC uvi Iarou, see wscusslons In manuai
R- Hvrlrnlonv (Silhtntal = j
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2'�
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5�,'}
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
Qc5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
f5wj
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = °3
U. OIUIUUV 111JUufufal = ./, i." 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
")
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0..,
1
2
3
22. Fish
(b
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0,)
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
n -'
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
(0-1,1-
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW =(p.75;1 OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p.
35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: �i ' t ,r�`�'Ii J, ��r?�, °r:n @ t(
t
s I;' ��rt., ( /��__,;,z. � -� �. }, Ri ,ti- ���t���-
> � ��
1 l,1�t° i i' f2 _> I i' I l } �ti✓ to ' i ,: f ,
Ef t � o,�e -° �'r � � G, .�
C,
-
,��i >; cat
,
0 I �
�� 11.4, Ai ,
S rt rOtCe �vaiv g (i���Cbla>s J3,� •4"k,� Gi�i�;X (� l _ b� S r;,�� a� po/, l` ,
5��� �I�Y�,'g r�rtii •�yv,�.� �9y,r�i 0'�I �f'E �-� �s,i,� k-r � t�o v� ', � y�-P� r
Jul �C �: �iL It V) G /WC 11 kJV0J,e`, i"Je I 1i
S'(a a' 3 s

E P-
S65a
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: lohla
Project/Site: r
Latitude: 35.603245 i
Evaluator: 1 CQJ A_ y'1
County: Mc
Longitude: _ 81.984327
Total Points:
Stream Determination (ci
Other �, Ce�+-�. 6 6
Stream is at least intermittent j
if >_ 19 or perennial if ? 30* 11
Ephemeral Intermittent
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ LL -12-)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
10 11.5
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1 _
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
1
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1'
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1 0.5
1
1 1'
11. Second or greater order channel
o
Yes = 3
° artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 91.� )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
43
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
(1)
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
10 11.5
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1 _
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
C. Biolociv (Subtotal = 19- )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
0
1.5
25. Algae
0
qM
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
ther~Ll 0)
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

R -2597
S72aa
NC DWQ Stream Identification Forin'Version 4.11
Date: I ��t 1 j ;
Project/Site: �� G�,� •
Latitude: 3
Evaluator: 1 ��
County: /��!t���
Longitude:
Total Points: f
Stream Is at least intermittent ? C
Stream Determination (circle ottq)
Other
IfZ 19 or erennlal if >_ 30* �' ^"
Ephemeral Interrnittert Pexorinl'at
e.g. Quad Name:
A, Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weals.
Moderate
Strong
18' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
1
3
3. in- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0
U
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
'2 `
3
5, Active /relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
3
7, Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
(?
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
(0'°
3
9. Grade control
0
s
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1`
1,5
11. Second or greater order channel
Yes = 3
artificlai ditches are not rated; see disc4sslons In manual
B. Hvdrolociv (Subtotal = <1 _ )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
%S
2
3
14. Leaf litter
115
20, Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1,5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
06,��
2
3
22. Fish
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes
3
C. Biolow (Subtotal = ",/ O )
18. Fibrous roots In streambed
3
CJ
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
%S
2
1
0
20, Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
(
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
t 1 ='
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
(66)
1
1.5
24, Amphibians
0
0 }_
1
{ _1.5)
25. Algae
(0'°
`0;5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 (Afher
*perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual,
Notes:
Sketch:�.:>
I °L (/ Rt., r���. I / l 1 `'Gtfli tj� r �bf L.(� .fit ' ( _'21ep - 4 -()
Ov

NC DWQ Stiream Identification Foi-m Veision 4.11
Project/Site: Latitude:
Evaluator; county: t- Longitude:
Total 'olnts: Stream Deter e) 0� t �he r
7it; circle �on
Stream Is at least intermittent Epherne Zter 1 t� '0.
Ii? i� 19 or verennial if;� 30*
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal,=
Absent
Weak
Moderate 8 t rAl
V, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
. 2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thaiweg
0
­­
71T
2
3, In channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-pool,
0
3
rlpp e:pRq! se
L
____q_qence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5, Acflvetr_efict floodplain
1
2
3
6''b-c-positional'bars or benches
tl
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
_3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No.,--2'0 -
Yes
a arlificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B . ro 0 fnfn =
12, Presence of Baseflow
0
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
M
0
15. Se liment on plants or debris
0
/0.5
1
1.5
16, Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1,5
17. Soil-based evidence of high "water table?­
0..)
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 6. �
18. Fibrous roots in strearnbed
3
0
19. Rooted upland plants in strearnbed
2
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
tf,j
1
2
3
21, Aquatic Mollusks
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1 1
1
23. Crayfish
k
E6
1
1.5
24. Amphibians-
j0,)
0.6
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5 1
Or
1.5
26. Wetland plants In streambed
FACW 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 tither
.perennial streams may also be identified using other m_O_th.ds. See p'. 35 of manual,
Notes:
Sketch:
k
............
....
Determined to be Perennial by
Amy
Euliss (DWQ-WSRO)
due
to biology on 1010112012
t.)

NC DWQ Stream _Identification Forn, Version 4.11
Date, Project/Site:
_Ulk
County.
evaluator: i Total Points: Stream Sete gnifi-D,—tio-n 1615.
stream is al least intermilleni
iL22perennial z 36�'__
S78b
Latitude:
Longitude: —c6 I T)
Other
0,g, Quad Name:
a artificial C[ilchos are not rated; see discussions In manual
1110
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
13. Iran oxidizing Njclana
14. leaf
1.5
15_.Sedlment on plants or debris
-0
16, Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
17, Soil-based evidence of high water table's
No 0
C, Blob Ubtota l
18, Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
19. Rooted upland plants In streambed
3
2
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
6
21, /Aquatic Mollusks
22, Fish
0)
:2Z
_23 Crayfish
0
0.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
25. Algae
26. Welland plants in streambed
W =5-
FAC ,03 ,
*peronniai streams may also be idenfified using other methods. See p. 36 of manual.
Notes:
I
2
1.5 other = 0
3
0
115
1.5
Determined to be Perennial by
Amy Euliss (DWQ-WSRO) due
to biology on 1010112012

l I �I� Ip R� i_i2 �I�'� f I�' hl�'� 1 �, 1 -«��►, �� t,.,ii =r,;�i�' i .:i�u i' ^^��i i�eitu
r x.
Project/Site: City/County: *' �'�J Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner. r = '� State: tir(, Sampling Point: t, ` . R . (
Investigator(s) �" Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): : � !' . „ ° �� Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): f Lat: '35.535901 Long: _-81.966652 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: (> ' Y NWI classification.
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ` No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site maps showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ;` No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
ce-
� 1
4
Z��
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
r'. Surface Water (All)
— True Aquatic Plants (614)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
— Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water- Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ! No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes %` No
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No
includes capillary fringe
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of giants,
Sampling Point:,
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. ` �. %< �,'
>� =
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: y (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species Aa
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
=Total Cover
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
OBL species x 1 =
1 _
FACW species x2=
2,
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x4=
3.
4•
UPL species x5=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
6.
7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
= Total Cover
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
1.:
s
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is _ <3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
2 .
3.
4
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5
_
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6.
7
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
- i
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 6
=Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
1. "` ' ° "�'����
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3, in.
-
A
2 °.1", r r ,
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
3.
QF
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
4
5•
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
6.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
7
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
8.
Herb —All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
9
10.
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
11
12.
= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
1.
2.
3.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
K
4.
5.
Present? Yes No
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Tvpe Loc
Texture Remarks
'Type: C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
— Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,
148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
— Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
— Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
— 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
lo
_ Very Shallow
h Dark Surface (TF12)
— Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other in in Remarks)
— Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
— Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,'
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
— Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
— Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version

' Z�^
^�
WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version
Project Name Nearest Road
County / Wetland area i"uucea Wetland width feet
Name n[ evaluator �� )
Wetland location
on pond orlake
on perennial stream
mn intermittent stream
within in1ccutznomndivide
Soil series: � /
predominantly orgauzc - numuu,rnucu,or
peat
predominantly mineral ' non-sandy
predominantly sandy
Hydraulic factors
X dzop topography
ditched orob000c\ized
total wetland vvidth>|O0feet
Wetland type (select one°
Bottoodaod hardwood forest
Headwater forest
Swamp forest
Wet flat
P000nin
Bog forest
Date 711,2-
Adjacent land use
Y2od|c upstream, upxlopo,orradius)
fhrootcd/natura}vcgotatiou Y6
agriculture, urban/suburban 96
impervious surface
Dominant vegetation
142
[D L
Y6
Flooding and wetness
semipermanently to permanently flooded or
inundated
seasonally flooded ocinundated
----
butcnodtood\v flooded or temporary surface water
no evidence of flooding or surface water
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bog/fen
---' -
Ephemeral wetland
----
Carolina bay
X Other:
~The rating system cannot bu applied msalt or brackish marshes m stream channels
R
Water storage
x4' 00=
'�
Buok/Bhocc|ioestubUizudoo
----��-----
��
�
x400~~
�
��e�um�
T
Pollutant rcmovaJ
-------
� ~~x
��00 =
rating
�
Wildlife habitat
/
x2.O0=
N
Aquatic life value
x4.00=
G
Recreation/Education
x|.00=
� **/\dd l
point ifiu sensitive watershed and >lO%uonpoizt
source disturbance
within
'/2 mile upstream, updope`orradius �

WETLAND DETERi! INATIOM DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: J' City /County: Sampling Date: o
Applicant/Owner:,/ t State: Sampling Point:
Investi ator s �) �' '
g O i ' 1 ,�� , ,� �- � Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): G Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): V °" Lat: °ma=r ,u'� Long : Datum:
Soil' Map Unit Name: % ? s NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ?° No
9s the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al) _
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (B1) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
— Water- Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont– Interim Version

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
kF
Sampling Point: ��' j "0 : " ", """ , /
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBIL, FACW, or FAC: (A1B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size
% Cover
Species? Status
x2=
FAC species
x 3 =
2.
x4=
4�
3.
Column Totals:
P�'
4.
5.
6.
7.
=Total Cover
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
kF
Sampling Point: ��' j "0 : " ", """ , /
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBIL, FACW, or FAC: (A1B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
0131- species
x I
FACW species
x2=
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x4=
UPIL species
X5=
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators:
Total Cover
Shrub Stratum (Plot size. 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
L/
4L
X 2 - Dominance Te st is >50%
2. 3 - Prevalence index is -<3.0'
3. 4
Ok Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
5. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
rl
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Remarks: (include photo numbers here or on a
Total Cover
irate sheet.)
Total Cover
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
ons of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3. in.
(7.6 cm) or larger In diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (I to 6 m) in height.
Herb -All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (I rn) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
=Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
f7-
2.
3. A '�,'
4.
5.
6.
7.
9.
10.
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Remarks: (include photo numbers here or on a
Total Cover
irate sheet.)
Total Cover
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
ons of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3. in.
(7.6 cm) or larger In diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (I to 6 m) in height.
Herb -All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (I rn) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

Sampling Point: if .i t` "
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type To-7—
Texture Remarks
lT e: C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
— Histosol (Al)
— Dark Surface (S7)
— 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,
148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
— Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
— Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
— 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
— Depleted Dark Surface (177)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,'
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
— Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
— Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

`I 7
-2597
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Vl/57b wet
Project/Site: L cr City /County: Sampling Date: ..
Applicant/Owner. State: fi C ,,' Sampling Point: �Al '0
Investigator(s):
Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): DA i 0-1—, Local relief (concave, convex, none): r -"J`e°­ Slope ( %):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRRP Lat: .. Long: 1, 1 `­79 -'� Datum:
,'
Soil Map Unit Name:0 (� e ,�; V t IAA r; — /� yard G t NWI classification: rent c,4
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes Y No
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes Y No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
— Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
— True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (61)
- Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (62)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
— Aquatic Fauna (613)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): q_
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): E i 1T, t-r C ,
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes—k— No
includes capillary fringe
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
E.l
J
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
R-2597
W57b Wet
Sampling Point: f
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size )
%Cover Species? Status
P,
Number of Dominant Species ,
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2. Ace-f- 00,,,1
3 tf 3 Pil x1b e t / ( rok J,,,,,°, # ri V, a
_
� �a -�
/ K "" / r
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species �,
5
That Are 013L, FACW, or FAC: v (AB)
6.
7
Prevalence Index worksheet:
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
OBL species x 1 =
1.
FACW species x2=
FAC species x3=
FACU species x4=
2.
3•
4,
UPL species x5=
5.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
= Total Cover
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
1
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
2
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is _53.01
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3.
4
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5
_
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6.
7
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
=Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Herb tratum (Plot size: )
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, .
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3.1n.
f l E� ; vir
2.`C1 f.t ' ` �` `� ` a t A :�_/ €,
f
-i=—
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
3.
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 0 (6 m) or more in height and less
4
5•
than 3 i c
6.
Shrub -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
7
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
9
10.
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
11
12•
= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
2.
3.
4
5.
= Total Cover
Remarks: (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
R-2597
Sampling Point: V wet
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc
Texture Remarks
°{f„7 V YC..• `7 c9 -. 2
'T e: C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_, 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
— Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,
148) _, Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
— Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (177)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,'
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (1713) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
— Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version

°-rlP , `l
-2597
WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version W57b
Project Name („S 2 l R V —"S gi % Nearest Road % , / -/9--
County P V V- b^�.- [,( Wetland area , 0 acres Wetland width ' feet
Name of evaluator
Wetland location
on pond or lake
X on perennial stream
on intermittent stream
within interstream divide
other:
Soil series: da, S vo ' ? m EPA'() V VI
predominantly organic - humus, muck, or
peat
V predominantly mineral - non -sandy
predominantly sandy
Hydraulic factors
steep topography
ditched or channelized
total wetland width > 100 feet
Wetland type (select one)*
Bottomland hardwood forest
Headwater forest
Swamp forest
Wet flat
Pocosin
Bog forest
Date /(,)////g
Adjacent land use
(within 1/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius)
forested /natural vegetation _1%
V, agriculture, urban/suburban q10 %
impervious surface
Flooding and wetness
semipermanently to permanently flooded or
inundated
_ seasonally flooded or inundated
intermittently flooded or temporary surface water
no evidence of flooding or surface water
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bog /fen
Ephemeral wetland
Carolina bay
Other:
The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
R
Water storage
I x 4.00
=
! A
Bank/Shoreline stabilization
1 x 4.00
=
Wetland
�
T
Pollutant removal
( x 5.00
=
rating
I
Wildlife habitat
x 2.00
=
N
Aquatic life value
x 4.00
=
G
Recreation/Education
x 1.00
= 0
*Add 1
point if in sensitive watershed and >I 0% nonpoint source disturbance within
'/2 mile upstream, upslope, or radius

-7 11D
R-2597
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Vl/57b up
Project/Site: > 1-11) � � '7 City /County: RAJ Sampling Date: ✓ '
Applicant/Owner: State: C, Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): 6_ jt (d,60,4 ( Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): i -. ; rr x - Local relief (concave, convex, none): C-tA W' Slope ( %):
t y err tt
Subregion (LRRor MLRA): Lat:a uc a Long: €. `J y 1 r « Datum:
Soif Map Unit Name: 0_3 k > ff to yfi rd, ; , ,, NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes T No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Yes
No
Is the Sampled Area
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes
No
within a Wetland? Yes
No - f
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
No
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (61) _
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (Al) _
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
— Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_
_ Saturation (A3) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (61) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
u Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron-Deposits (65)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water- Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont– Interim Version

Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3. Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total Cover Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: OBL species _ x 1
I FACW species x2=
2. FAG species x3=
3. FACU species x4=
4. UPL species X5=
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Total Cover
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: I - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
3. 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
4. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
5. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
7. be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Herb Stratum (Plot size.. =Total Cover - Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata.
I. - W lea—, in Pf� U,) Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2. UYVA
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3.1n.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
4. Sapling —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5. approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
7. approximately 3 to 20 it (I to 6 m) in height.
8.
9. Herb —All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
10. herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
12.— Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
2.
3.
4. Hydrophytic
Vegetation
5. Present? Yes No
Total Cover
Remarks: (include photo numbers here monaseparate sheet.)
Va Army Corps ofEngineers saotemMvuutainsuodPiedmon— |nmhmVomion
' R-2597
VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific n
names mfplants. S
Sampling Point: «5!b
up
Remarks: (include photo numbers here monaseparate sheet.)
Va Army Corps ofEngineers saotemMvuutainsuodPiedmon— |nmhmVomion

Ua Army Corps ofEngineers EuotemMounminoandPiedmon— IntehmVomion
-7/���
/ .. '-_' '
R-259
SOIL
Sampling Point: up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' To—cy—
Texture Remarks
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric SoiIS3:
— Histosol (Al)
— Dark Surface (S7)
— 2 ern Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
— Histic Epipedon (A2)
— Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
— Black Histic (A3)
— Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLIRA 147,148)
(MLRA 147,148)
— Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
— Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
— Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
— Stratified Layers (A5)
— Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136,147)
— 2 cm Muck (Al 0) (LRR N)
— Redox Dark Surface (176)
— Red Parent Material (TF2)
— Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Depleted Dark Surface (177)
— Very Shallow Dark Surface (TFI 2)
— Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
— Other (Explain in Remarks)
— Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl) (LRR N,
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,*
MLRA 147,148)
MLRA 136)
— Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136,122)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
— Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Ua Army Corps ofEngineers EuotemMounminoandPiedmon— IntehmVomion