20090751 Ver 1_Monitoring Report_20120823

J?- m5/
BEAMON' S RUN BUFFER AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
(BARNHILL FARM)
MONITORING REPORT (2011)
Greene County, North Carolina
EEP Project No. 24
Prepared for:
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652
AUG 232012
DENR - WATER QUAL'TY o stem
A-ETL4NDS AND SToRWXTER Bwwc++ Ekamemeht
PROGRAM
Status of Plan: Final
Project Planted: 2000
Data Collected: 2011
Submission Date: November 2011
RECEIVED
APR 1 0 2012
N CEMENT PROGRAM
ENHAN

Monitoring Firm:
L l
Stantec
Stantec Consulting Services Inc
801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300
Raleigh, NC 27606

Table of Contents
Executive Summary 1
10 Methodology 3
20 References 4
Figures
Figure 1 — Vicinity Map
A3
Figure 2 — Current Condition Plan View (4 sheets)
All
Figure 3 — Asset Map
A19
Tables
Table 1 — Project Restoration Components
A5
Table 2 — Project Activity and Reporting History
A6
Table 3 — Contacts
A7
Table 4 — Project Attribute Table
A8
Table 6 — Vegetation Condition Assessment
A21
Table 7 — Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
A29
Table 8 — CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
A30
Table 9 — CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species
A31
Appendices
Appendix A Protect Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Appendix B Visual Assessment Data
Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project (EEP Project No 24) Page i
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2011) — Final November 2011

This page intentionally left blank for two -sided printing
A
Beamon s Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project (EEP Project No 24) Page u
Stantec — Momtonng Report (2011) — Final November 2011

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of Beamon's Run Riparian Wetland and Buffer Restoration project is to improve water
quality by providmg a more ecologically effective and efficient riparian buffer The establishment and
protection of a vegetated buffer along the floodplain of any stream provides a number of benefits, which
include streambank stability from mature root systems, in- stream shade from the overhanging leaf
canopy, organic detntus that fuels food chains, habitat and travel comdors for native wildlife species, and
filtering of sediments and other potential pollutants from surface and subsurface flow (NCSRI, 2003) The
natural riparian buffer along the project's section of Beamon's Run had been disturbed by past
agricultural practices and portions of it had been used as a tire dump The tires and associated debris were
removed and the buffer was planted with native wetland species to restore functionality to the buffer The
primary objective of the project was to protect and improve water quality by removing and transforming
pollutants with buffers and wetlands
The goals as listed m the NC Wetlands Restoration Program (WRP) Project Summary were to
1 Restore agricultural land to riparian buffer to increase removal of nutrients
2 Improve wildlife habitat
The conservation easement of the project is made up of two tracts Tract A encompasses 47 53 acres
along the right bank of Beamon's Run (including a 2 11 acre`open pit area), Tract B encompasses 32 38
acres along the left bank of Contentnea Creek Beamon's Run is a warm water stream in the Neuse River
Basin of the Coastal Plain region in Greene County, North Carolina Site investigation and design
services were provided by PBS &J, Inc The records available at this time indicated that construction and
the bulk of the plantmg at the site occurred over the winter of 2000 Usmg the 2000 as -built plan, areas
that did -not appear to contain any of the planted species, were outside the 200' buffer limit, or exhibited a
much older mature plant community were excluded from the monitoring effort Based on the revised
areas, the project consists of 10 001 acres of Neuse River riparian buffer restoration, 195 feet of
streambank stabilization, and 0 15 acres of wetland restoration
No monitoring plan was originally prepared for this site and no monitoring program began at this site
when construction was completed NCSU staff from the Biological and Agricultural Engmeenng
Department and the Water Resburces Research Institute made an initial monitoring visit on October 14,
2003 They compiled the first monitoring report submitted m March of 2004 In 2009, Stantec began
monitoring the site's vegetation Monitoring in 2011 revealed that 6 of the 12 plots (50 %) of plots meet
planted success requirements, however, 83% of the plots have >320 planted and volunteer native
hardwood stems per acre It is difficult to discern the exact reasons for poor planted species survival m the
vegetation plots and elsewhere on the site smce it has been 11 years since vegetation installation
During the initial assessment conducted in March 2011, several beaver dams were observed on -site near
vegetation plots 3, 8A, and 12A Despite the presence of the beaver dams no recent signs of beaver
activity were observed in the vegetation plots It was also noted during the initial assessment that
vegetation m areas that had been previously mowed and/or damaged by beavers appears to be
regenerating Plants that were resprouting from stumps as well as numerous small saplmgs of desired
species were observed
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project (EEP Project No 24) Page 1
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2011) — Final November 2011

The annual vegetation monitoring occurred on August 18'' and 19'', 2011 and found that little change has
occurred over the past year at Beamon's Run The beaver dams are still in place near vegetation plots 3,
8A, and 12A with no recent beaver damage in the vegetation plots There was some minor damage to
vegetation outside the vegetation plots that occurred from strong winds This wind damage occurred near
vegetation plots 7, 8A, 9, and 10, however the only vegetation plot impacted was vegetation plot 7
Vegetation plot 7 had a tree (outside the plot) fall into the plot and on top of two planted stems, both
stems are still alive and should recover without incident (see Photo 7) Areas that were previously mowed
continue to regenerate, except for a small strip (-1 in wide) parallel to the farm path and inside the
easement that extends approximately from vegetation plot 8A to vegetation plot 10 This area appears to
have been sprayed with some type of herbicide, but did not negatively impact any vegetation plots or
planted areas Common invasives onsite still include Lespedeza and Japanese honeysuckle but have not
expanded since 2010 and do not seem to be a major concern for desirable vegetation establishment
Lespedeza occurs along the field edges while Japanese honeysuckle is prevalent across the entire site A
few areas, particularly in the eastern portions of the site, the honeysuckle is dense and could cause
problems in the future Currently the mvasives are not affecting planted woody vegetation It is
recommended that the mvasives continued to be monitored for potential issues in the future
Credit is not being sought for the stream stabilization or wetland restoration conducted for the project
Therefore, as per NCEEP, no stream assessment or hydrologic monitoring took place at the Beamon's
Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Site
Summary mformation/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and
statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and
figures in the report appendices Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in
these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly Mitigation Plan) and in the
Mitigation Plan (formerly Restoration Plan) documents available on NCEEP's website All raw data
supporting the tables and figures in the appendices is available from NCEEP upon request
F-I
; L
0
0
0
0
D
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project (EEP Project No 24) Page 2
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2011) — Final November 2011 !�
I

0
Ll
L�
LI
0
0
i�
1.0 Methodology
Vegetation onsite was first visually assessed to determine the general areas of viable planted vegetation
Using the 2000 as -built plan, areas that did not appear to contain any of the planted species, were outside
the 200' buffer limit, or exhibited a much older mature plant community were excluded from the
monitoring effort These areas are shown on the maps in Appendix B The 200' buffer was taken from the
normal edge of the surface water
Twelve vegetative sample plots were randomly selected using GIS and established within the project
easement in 2009 The plots were quantitatively monitored during the 2011 growing season on August
180' and 19`h, 2011 Species composition, density, and survival were observed during the site visit The
Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS, 2008) methodology was utilized for vegetative monitoring Level 2
(planted and natural stems) methodology was completed on all monitored plots It must be noted that due
to the age of the planted species, in some plots, it was difficult to distinguish planted species from
volunteers during the 2009 monitoring effort However, best professional judgment along with knowledge
of project planting zones by species enabled vegetation data to be collected The planted vegetation zones
included oak mix, longleaf pine, river birch, and cypress
The vegetative success criteria are based on the North Carolina rule 15A NCAC 213 0242 Neuse River
Basin Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy Mitigation Program for Protection and
Maintenance of Existing Riparian Buffers (2000) The final vegetative success criteria will be the survival
of 320 planted native hardwood stems per acre after 5 years As per NCEEP, the cypress wetland area was
only monitored for vegetation within the 200' riparian buffer, and not wetland hydrology Streams were
also not monitored as part of this project
Beamon s Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project (EEP Project No 24) Page 3
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2011) - Final November 2011

2.0 References
Lee, Michael T , R K Peet, S D Roberts, and T R Wentworth 2008 CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, Version 4 2 (http //cvs bio unc edu/methods htm)
NCEEP 2010 Procedural Guidance and Content Requirements for EEP Monitoring Reports North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement Program Raleigh,
NC Version 13 January 15, 2010
NCSRI 2003 Stream Restoration — A Natural Channel Design Handbook North Carolina Stream
Restoration Institute Raleigh, NC
NC Administrative Code 15A NCAC 2B 0242, Neuse River Basin Nutrient Sensitive Waters
Management Strategy Mitigation Program for Protection and Maintenance of Existing Riparian Buffers,
Raleigh, NC 2000
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project (EEP Project No 24) Page 4
Stantec — Morutormg Report (2011) - Final November 2011

Appendix A. . Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Projects (EEP Project No 24) Page Al
Stantec — Momtormg Report (2011) — Final November 2011
LI

This page intentionally left blank for two -sided printing
e
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Projects (EEP Project No 24) Page A2
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2011) — Final November 2011

Table la Project Components
Beamon's
Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Site/EE P Project
No 24
Ri anan Wetland Ac
Non-Riparian Ac
Upland Ac
A
(Ac)BMP
°
=
Non- Riverine
Restoration
Reach ID
w
a
Stationing
Comment
Enhancement I
Cypress community near
Enhancement II
Contentnea Creek Credit not
Riverme Wetland
Prepare and plant
being sought for wetland
Restoration ac
015
R
wetland areas
015
HQ Preservation
restoration c
Neuse Riparian
Within 200' buffer along both
Buffer Restoration
Prepare and plant
Totals
Beamon's Run and Contentnea
1
1000
R
buffers
10
1 1
1000
Creek
1000
'
Construction and
= Non - Applicable
installation of
In three areas along both
brush mattresses
Beamon's Run and Contentnea
Streambank
for bank
Creek Credit not being sought
Stabilization 1
195
S
stabilization
195
for stream stabilization
R = Restoration
S = Stabilization
Table lb Component Summations
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Site/EEP Project No 24
Restoration Level
Stream 1
Ri anan Wetland Ac
Non-Riparian Ac
Upland Ac
Buffer
(Ac)BMP
Riverme
Non- Riverine
Restoration
1000
Enhancement
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
Creation
Preservation
HQ Preservation
Totals
1000
BMP Count
MU Totals
1000
= Non - Applicable
N
Beamon's Run Buffer and Weiland Restoration Projects (EEP Project No 24) Page A3
-- , Stantec — Momtonng Report (201 1) — Final November 2011

Table 2 Project Activity and Repprting thstory
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Site /EEP Project No 24
Activity or Deliverable
Data
Collection
Complete
Completion
or DeIrwry
Restoration Plan
unknown
unknown
Final Design - 90%
unknown
unknown
Construction
2000
2000
Temporary S&E mix applied to entire ro ect area
2000
2000
Permanent seed mix applied to entire project area
2000
2000
Bare Root Seedling Installation
2000
2000
Mitigation Plan / As -built ear 0 Monitoring - baseline
May, 2000
May, 2000
Final Report
unknown
unknown
Monitoring Report CSU
Mar, 2004
Mar, 2004
Monitoring Report Stantec 2009
Dec, 2009
Dec, 2009
Monitors Report Stantec 2010
Oct, 2010
Nov 2010
Monitonn Report Stantec 2011
Aug, 2011
Nov 2011
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Projects (EEP Project No 24) . Page A4
Stantec — Momtonng Report (2011) — Final November 2011
A

J
�i
_J
L
I
I (�
i
� I
Q
Table 3 Project Contacts Table
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Slte/E P Project No. 24
Designer
PBS&J
1616 East Mdlbrook Road
Suite 310
Raleigh, NC 27609
Construction Contractor
unknown
Planting Contractor
unknown
Seedling Contractor
unknown
Seed Mix Sources
unknown
Nursery Stock Suppiders
Denton's Nursery (longlea
3535 NC 42 West
W &on, NC 27893
NC I)lylsion of Forest Resources (bare roots)
762 Clandge Nursery Road
Goldsboro, NC 27530
Monitoring Performers (2003)
NCSU BAE Dept & Water Quality Group
Campus Box 7637
Raleigh NC 27695
919 515 -8240
Monitoring Performers (2009 -
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc
2010)
801 Jones Franklin Road, Ste 300
Ralen h, NC 27606
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Larry Hobbs (919 )851-6866
Amber Coleman [phone]
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Projects (EEP Project No 24) Page A5
i
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2011) — Final November 2011
i

Table 4 . Project Attribute Table
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Srte/EEP Project No. 24
Project County
Greene
Ph sio ra htc Region
Coastal Plain
Ecore ton
Southeastern Flood latns and Low Terraces
Project River Basin
Neuse
USGS HUC for Pro ect 14 digit)
03020203050010
NCDW Sub -basin for Project
03 -04-07
Wrthm Extent ofEEP Watershed Plans
No
WRCClass (Warrp, Cool, Cold
Warm
% of project easetnt fenced or demarcated
Fteld edges demarcated
Beaver activity observed durmg design phase9
I U
Restoration Component Attribute Table
Buffer, Wetland, and Stream
Drama a Area
85sq nu
Stream Order
3rd order
Restored length feet
N/A
Perennial or lntetmrttent
Perennial
Watershed type Rural, Urban, Develo to etc
Rural
NCDW AU /Indexnurnber
27 -86-13
NCDWQ Classification
C SW NSW
303d bsted9
No
Upstream of a 303d listed se ment9
No
Reasons for 303d kstmg or stressor
N/A
Total acrea a of easement
79 9
Total vegetated acreage within the easement
79 9
Total planted acreage as part of the restoration
24 5
Ros en classtficatton of re-existin g
WA
Ros en classification of As -built
N/A
Valle a
N/A
Valley sloe
N/A
Valley side slope range
N/A
Valley toe slope ran a
N/A
Cowardm Classification
PFOIA - Palustrtne, Forested, Broad- leaved
deciduous, temp flooded (donunant
classification
Trout waters designation
N/A
Species ofconcem endangered etc
U
Domutant soil series characteristics
Series
Kenansvtlle fine sand
Depth
>72 inches
Clay %
7
K
0 1
T
5 tons/acre/year
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Projects (EEP Project No 24) Page A6
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2011) — Final November 2011
tl
r�
0
17
J
i
r
J
r -�

Appendix B. Visual Assessment
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Projects (EEP Project No 24) Page A7
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2011) — Final November 2011

This page intentionally left blank for two -sided printing
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Projects (EEP Project No 24)
Stantec — Monitoring Report (201 l) — Final
,J L
Page A8
November 2011
fJ

0
I-, ♦ 1
H/
c
0
C
�v
UJ
•
7
C�
to
N
Rd
w
•
as
Q
t entD"'i
M
a
Oil's Farm Rd
d
�O
L
a
0�-77-1
I
1
LIq
Ty c >
w
'r a.� m (D cw
�a�0) g
E:�..9 w
O 0.0 U) CL
� N
cnQ)8 8,- Z.2 m m 3
Z.2 o 0
� E
CL v) .O E 3 j 'C
0 �0 y 0 r; y 0
E U— 2-=:.E
Q t O
3 y E O C O
OQ
N C
r-
ag O• N f` > O C C y "'
C f6 N L�5 y O.g f0 « t O
fC a O E C_ L y C D.
.y W 9 C t .. E2 N C N N
T 3 C O t0 Q
0:1600m�3y ,v_.�
p_ Z N C y N M47 L y 2 Q
O w to m 0 jp C y C 0 0
U Z U O.- -p U N� N O N
3 > 12-6
7 w72 C D. c 4) 'C d CL O' y
N O V O f`°A y C (p C .7
0 t5
y m N O) U.•0 E U. a.8 m
2.1
N
N
cu
C
o
Q m a?
cu c
Q �, o
70 O U
cu
a
O
LO
C)
Lo
:3 c A N m
O -0
m cc a� m .a
3 m- c'Xw�
0 3 3 � O m v,
..o rnU) QCL -
��zs 2) E
w U Z 3 c
CU
o : C
CD ow >m
LO CNCOt O c m
0U °
dui
�U c co. -:rsN
3 z ° — cn Lo p F-
O O c
N 0 N N c
O U cl it fn
..
rnrnCJ c Eo
N'
LO 0 0 -'d m m tangy
75 'IT ON!n U
�p 0) W N c N
O C E 'C r CC E 7
ca),)
Ui m x w 75
U- m O
rn2cm- 0) =
My OL0 m c00 O
Q C
O x m M t o N
j O N CO m •M y o L
NY mom N O CL c
�9 .5 mcn E m
.I-.
U
a)
O
L-
a
O
c'3
O
cc
N N
a)Z
o�
O- Cl
m
m Z
N
0
J
O
C U U
(Q .O C
O
C �
C O
Z
rL L-
2
lz
>
> W
C
N
C
O
E
ca
N
m
2.1
N
N
cu
C
o
Q m a?
cu c
Q �, o
70 O U
cu
a
O
LO
C)
Lo
:3 c A N m
O -0
m cc a� m .a
3 m- c'Xw�
0 3 3 � O m v,
..o rnU) QCL -
��zs 2) E
w U Z 3 c
CU
o : C
CD ow >m
LO CNCOt O c m
0U °
dui
�U c co. -:rsN
3 z ° — cn Lo p F-
O O c
N 0 N N c
O U cl it fn
..
rnrnCJ c Eo
N'
LO 0 0 -'d m m tangy
75 'IT ON!n U
�p 0) W N c N
O C E 'C r CC E 7
ca),)
Ui m x w 75
U- m O
rn2cm- 0) =
My OL0 m c00 O
Q C
O x m M t o N
j O N CO m •M y o L
NY mom N O CL c
�9 .5 mcn E m

U
Ln
M
r-4
00
TT
Ln
Il
a-4
Ln
N
m
Ln
00
N
tD
m
I-
N
n
Ln
Ln
tD
I-
00
f0
.-
M
O
N
.
00
O
r-1
mt
N
00
r�
tMtp
ri
I-
,
I-
Ln
N
Ql
n
n
fY)
tppDpp
pppp
N Ln
y
0
t�D
O
r�1
n
0
O
0
0
0
0
0
N
O
a
0
0
0
C
0
0
0
0
LI1
O
cV
O O
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
0 a
U
avi
U
aa�aaaaa"
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
_O
a-
a ICT
N
cu
to
N
>
c6
C
O 0 O O
CD
4-
0
C7
C7
C7
C7
C7
C7
C7
l7
p
Z Z C-4
Q
m
3
L)
v
c
avvvvv
c
c
c
c
c
c
a
c
_
N
O U
d
CD
ra
ca
ca
ro
�o
co
co
ro
M
N
C L
(n
C
'
c
D
O
cn
M
LIB
N
C
L:
m
L:
m
L.
m
L:
m
L:
ro
L:
m
L:
m
ti
ca
N
d cam
of W 0)
c
v
0
0
0
0
0
m
O
L W U v
0 � UJ
o
:
a
a
a
a
d
a
a
d
0ti
0
E�
m
m
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
co
c
(6
N
to
"
J
/N�/� m N nM^,
W L O W
nM^` 0
W
lOZ
y)
c
a
Q
0)
C
T
}
C7
}
Gl
}
GJ
}
2
}
Gl
}
�
}
W
}
° (n
fn a
0
z
U
J
-h
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
J
C.1
x
3
7
S
3
7
7
3
r
3
7
°
C
W
41
O
L
U
Y
0
L
U
Y
0
L
U
Y
0
L
U
Y
0
L
U
Y
0
L
U
J
0
L
U
Y
0
L
U
Y
0
O
= QQ1
O
N
V
N
V
N
V
N
V
N
V
41
41
41
�
41
41
41
41
m
m
m
m
m
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
v
0
a
a`
a`
a`
a`
m
o
0
0
m
o
o
m
v
a
a
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
_
+�+
ate+
41
41
4.te1
L
L
L
L00000000
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y-h
Y
Y'
to
c
c
c
c
c
m
co
m
ar
a
v
w
w
a
w
w
t-
,n
rl
P
N
N
M
M
ri
Ln
Ln
%
t D
T

Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Site/EEP Project No 24
Planted acreage
169
Vegetation Category
Definitions
CCPV De action
Number of
Pol ns
Combined
Acreage
% of
Planted
Acreage
1 Bare Areas (sprayed areas
Very limited cover of woody material
Magenta polygon
1
006
04%
2 Low Stem Density
Woody stem densities below target levels for stem
count success cntena
Orange hatched
polygons
5
2 52
149%
Total
61
2 58
153%
3 Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vi or
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are
obviously small oven the morutonng year
Pink hatched
polygons
2
0271
16%
Total
81
2851
169%
Easement acreage
79 9
Vegetation Category
Definitions
CCPV Depiction
/
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% Of
Planted
Acrea
4 Invasive areas of concern
None
0
0
0
N
5 Encroachment areas
Mowed areas or to 2009
Bei e I ons
4
164
9
0
LI
_ Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Projects (EEP Project No 24) Page A21
iStantec — Monitoring Report (2011) — Final November 2011

Vegetation Plot Photos
Photo Station 1— Vegetation Plot 1B
Photo Station 2 — Vegetation Plot 2
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Projects (EEP Project No. 24) Page A22
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2011) — Final November 2011

\•;.«� \,.. �
%
Photo Salon 3 — Vegetation /m 3
Photo Station 4 — Vegetation /m 4
B_on's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Projects (EE Project No. 2) Gp A23
Stantec — Monitoring Report (011)— Final November 2011

Photo Station 5 — Vegetation Plot 5
Photo Station 6 — Vegetation Plot 6
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Projects (EEP Project No. 24) Page A24
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2011) — Final November 2011

Photo Station 7 — Vegetation Plot 7
Photo Station 8 — Vegetation Plot 8A
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Projects (EEP Project No. 24) Page A25
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2011) — Final November 2011

Photo Station 9 — Vegetation Plot 9
Photo Station 10 — Vegetation Plot 10
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Projects (EEP Project No. 24) Page A26
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2011) — Final November 2011

Photo Station 11— Vegetation Plot 11A
Photo Station 12 — Vegetation Plot 12A
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Projects (EEP Project No. 24) Page A27
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2011) — Final November 2011

This page mtentlonally left blank
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Projects (EEP Project No 24) - Page A28
Stantec — Momtormg Report (2011) — Final November 2011

-� Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7. Veg Plot Criteria Attainment
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Site /FFP Project No. 24
Vegetation Plot ID
Vegetation Survival
Threshold Met9
Tract Mean
VP1B
Y 688
50010
VP2
Y 405
VP3
N 202
VP4
N 0
VP5
Y 445
VP6
Y 56
(337 stems /acre)
VP7
N 81
VP8A
Y 5
VP9
N 0
VPIO
N 162
VP11A
N 81
VP12A
Y(728)
0
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Projects (EEP Project No 24)
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2011) — Final
Page A29
November 2011

Table 8 CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Site /EEP Project No. 24
Report Prepared By
Alex Baldwin
Date Prepared
10/10/2011 11 15
database name
Stantec Beamon2011 A MTLF=d mdb
database location
U \ 175613003 \Beason \project \site_data \cvs
computer name
BALDW INA
file size
34480128
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSIBUM IN
THE DOCUMENT
Nktadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a
summary ofproject(s) and project data
Prol, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for
each year This excludes live stakes
Proj, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each
year This includes hve stakes, all planted stems, and all
natural/volunteer stems
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live
stems, dead stems, missing, etc )
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots
Vigor by Slip
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of
occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species
for each plot, dead and missing stems are excluded
ALL Stems by Plot ands W
A matrix of the count of total livmg stems of each species
(planted and natural volunteers combined) for each plot, dead
and missing stems are excluded
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code
BR
project Name
Beamon's Run Restoration Project
Description
River Basin
Neuse
length(R)
stream -to -edge vwdth (ft)
area (sq m)
Required Plots (calculated)
Sampled Plots
To-
F1
J
i
19
0
EI
FJ
II�
lJ
0
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Projects (EEP Project No 24) Page A30
Stantec — Momtonng Report (2011) — Final November 2011 n

'Only includes native hardwood trees
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Projects (EEP Project No. 24) Page A31
Stantec — Monitoring Report (201 1) — Final November 2011
Tab I e 9. CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species
Current Plot Da. 2011)
nnual Means
EEC
EEE
EEE
EEE
EEEEE�
SEE
EEEEEE
EEE
EEE
SEE
EEE
EEE
EEE
ii
EEE
EEE
EEE
EEE
EEE
EEE
EEE
EEE
EEE
EEE
EEE
�EE�i
EEE
EE�i•
EEE
EEE�EEEEEE
EEE
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE®
- _
�EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEriEEEEEE�EEEEE
€E
®IEEE®
IEEE
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
EEEEEE
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
--
IEEE
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
EEE�EEEEE
®EEE
-•-
EEEEEEEEE
EEEEEEEEEEEE
EEEEEEEEE
EEE
EEEEEEEEEEEE
EEEEEE
EEEEEE
EEEEEEEEEEEE
EEEEEEEEE
EEEEEEEEEEEE
oneseed hawthorn
IEEE
EEEEEEEEE
EE
©EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
EEE
EEE
IEEE
EEEIEEE
©
©EEEEEEEEEEEE
©EEEEEEEEEEEEEEE€
EEE
E
®®
�EEEEEEEEE
EEEEE
©EEEEEEL•'EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
EEE
EEE
EEE
EEEI
EEE
EEE
EEE
EEE
EEEI
EEE
EEE
EEE
EEE
EEE
EEE;
EEE
EEE
EEEEEEEEEEEE
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
EEE
EEE
EEEEEE
EEEEE©
Liquiclarnbarstyraciflua
EEE
EEE
EE
®EEE
EEE
EEE
EEE
EEE
EEE
EEE
EEE
EE
®EEE
EEE
EEE
�EEEEEEEEE
EEEEEEEEEEEE
EEEEEEEEEEEE
EEEEEEEE
©EEE
�EEEEEEEEE
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
EEEEEEEEEEEE
Morellacenfera
SEE
©EEE
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
EEEEEE
EEE
EEEEE
©EE
©EE©
�EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
EEEEEEEEEEEE
EEE
EEEEEEEEEEE©
�EEEEEEEEE
EEE
EEEEEE
EEEEEEEEEEEE
EEE
EEEEEEEEEEEE
�EEEEEE
EEE
EEE
EEEE
©
©EEEEEEEEEEEE
©
©E
EEEEEEEEEEEE
�EEEEEE
EEE
EEE
EEEEEE
EE
©EE
®EEEEEEEEEIEE
©EEEEEEEEE
•
IEEE
EEE
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE�EEE
•-
-
�
©EEEEEEEEEEE
©
©EEEE
EEE
EEEEEE
©E
©EEEEE
©EEEiiEEEEEE
•-
-
�EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
EEEEEEEEE
EEEEEE
EEEEEEEEEEEE
•-
�EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
EEEEEE
EEEEEEEEEEEE'
Quercus michau.
�EEEEEE
EEEEEE
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE�EEEEEEEEEEEE
•
IEEE
EEE
EEEEEE
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
EEEEEEEEEEEE
•
IEEE
EEE
EEEEEE�EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
©
©E
®
®E
®
®
®EE®
•
EEE
EEE
E
©E
EEE
©©
©EEE
©
©E
©
©E
EEE
EEE
EEE
E
©E
EEEi
EEEL
EEE
•
�EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE�EEE
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEiL
�EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
EEEEEE
EEE
EEEEEEEEEEE©
�EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
EEEEEEEEEEE
••
�EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
EEEEE
©EEEEEE'�
-
�EEEEE
©EEEEEEEEEEEE
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
EEEEEEEEE
EEE
•
EEE�EEE
®
®EEEEE©
EEE
®
®
®EEEE.•
'•'EEE
©EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE�ri''�
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
EEE
©
©E
EEE
©
©E
©
©©
EEE
©
©EEEEEEEEEEEEE
©EEEEE�•'.EEEEEE�
��EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE�EEEEEEEE
®
®E�EEEEEE�
'Only includes native hardwood trees
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Projects (EEP Project No. 24) Page A31
Stantec — Monitoring Report (201 1) — Final November 2011

Appendix E. Hydrology Data
No hydrologic monitoring took place at the Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Site
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project (EEP Project No 24) Page A34
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2011) — Final November 2011

Appendix D. Stream Survey Data
No stream assessment took place at the Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Site
N
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Projects (EEP Project No 24) Page A33
Stantec — Momtoring Report (2011) — Final November 2011
i
�
LI
L1