20080358 Ver 1_Year 3 Monitoring Report_20120823

J
Cane Creek Tributary Stream Restoration Site
Monitoring Report MY03
Basin 03010104 / Contract # D06002
AL
=w=w4somm
AUG 2 3 7012
°E WA`tkW�TY os stem
KC 1 STOii MAJIM
a e n t
TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM
KCI Technologies, Inc.
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
January 2012
NCDENR -EEP
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652

K C I
TECHNOLOGIES
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project Manager: Gary Mryncza, P.E.
Email: gary.mryncza @kci.com
KCI Projeq$ No: 1205472501--

a
TABLE OF CONTENTS
10 PROJECT BACKGROUND .... 1
1 1 Location and Setting 1
1 2 Project Goals and Objectives 1
1 3 Project Structure, Restoration Type and Approach 1
14 Project History, Background, and Contact Information 5
20 PROJECT CONDITIONS AND MONITORING RESULTS 11
2 1 Vegetation Assessment 11
22 Stream Assessment 11
22 1 Bankfull Events 12
2 2 2 Quantitative Measures Summary Tables 13
FIGURES
Figure 1 Vicinity Map 2
Figure 2 As -Built Site Map 8
TABLES
Table I
Project Restoration Components
5
Table 2
Project Activity and Reporting History
9
Table 3
Project Contact Table
9
Table 4
PrQlect Background Table
10
Table 5
Verification of Bankfull Events
12
Table 6
Baseline Stream Summary
13 -22
Table 7
Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
23 -29
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site
Contract # D06002
APPENDICES
Vegetation Data and Photos
Geomorphologic Data
Stream Photos
Current Conditions Plan View
u
L
KCI Technologies Inc
2011 — MY03

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Cane Creek Tributary Site (CCTS) is located in the Piedmont physiographic province in
northwestern Person County, North Carolina The project will provide mitigation for stream impacts
within the 8 -digit hydrologic cataloging unit 03010104 in the Roanoke River Basin by restoring,
enhancing, and preserving 19,059 linear feet on the CCTS, generating 14,621 stream mitigation units
(SMU's ) The goals of the project include restoring the stream's riparian buffer and creating a stable
stream system In order to reach these goals, the project objectives included planting a functional
Piedmont Alluvial Forest floodplam community along with Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest to create an
effective riparian buffer, removing cattle from the riparian areas with fencing, removing relic spoil piles
that disrupt overland flowpaths, stopping bank erosion by developing the appropriate channel dimension,
arresting bed elevation lowering, and stabilizing seep outlets
The western portion of the project drains to the southeast and has a contributing drainage area of
approximately 0 70 square mile The eastern portion of the project also drains towards the southeast with
a contnbuting drainage area of approximately 0 62 square mile Each half of the project is made up of a
senes of headwater and first -order streams Both sides of the project drain to Cane Creek downstream of
the site The project watershed is rural and faces low development pressure from the surrounding area
The stream design and the restoration plan were completed in December 2007, construction began in May
2008, and the site was planted in December 2008
The site was planted with bare root trees, shrubs, and live stakes A total of 17 different species were
planted at the site Twenty vegetation monitoring plots were established during the as-built survey
Ripanan vegetation must meet a minimum survival success rate of 260 stems /acre after five years The
plots were monitored following the CVS -EEP monitoring Level 2 protocol and the third -year monitoring
counted an average of 415 planted stems /acre and 3,282 total stems /acre, including volunteers There are
some plots with low planted stem densities, including four plots with planted stem densities below 260
stems/acre plots 5, 8, 13, and 17 When including volunteers in these four plots, all plots are above the
260 total stems /acre density Supplemental planting was conducted at the site dunng the 2010/2011
dormant season Additional supplemental planting may be conducted in the future if it is deemed
necessary Considenng the plentiful volunteers and overall vegetative condition of the site, the third -year
monitoring found the vegetation component of the project to be on track to meeting the success criterion
The stream restoration included thirty-four separate reaches, which have been enhanced and restored
based on a combination of Priority 2 and 3 approaches Rock cross vanes, step pools, and nffle grade
controls were used to control grade throughout the profile The streams were restored to B4, 134 /1, 134c,
B4/lc, Bc /C4, C /134, and C/E4 stream types In addition to the restored and enhanced reaches, there are
nine preservation reaches These reaches are intermittent headwater streams that were identified as project
assets dunng the as-built stage The third year of monitonng found the majority of the project to be
functioning as designed Isolated areas of bank erosion and streambed degradation have been noted at the
site, but there are no systematic problems that indicate that the project streams are unstable or becoming
so In 2011, there was one bankfull event at the site The project is on track to meeting the success
criterion of at least two bankfull events in five years with each occurring in different years
The site will continue to be monitored through 2013 or until the success criteria are achieved Reports will
be submitted to the EEP each year The planted riparian buffer must meet the success criteria of 260
planted stems /acre at the end of the monitoring period Stream success will be assessed utilizing
measurements of stream dimension, pattern, and profile as well as through site photographs Two bankfull
events also must occur on the restored stream over the monitoring period in separate monitoring years
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KC1 Technologies Inc
Contract # D06002 ii 2011— MY03

10 PROJECT BACKGROUND
1 1 Location and Setting
The Cane Creek Tributary Site (CCTS) is spread over two separate drainage areas on two parcels
under the same ownership The site is located off of Cunningham Road in northwestern Person
County, North Carolina Specifically, the site is approximately 0 85 mile east of the intersection
of Cunningham Road and NC 119 (Figure 1) The project is centered at approximately 36 5038
degrees north and 79 1310 degrees west (WGS84) To reach the site from Raleigh, proceed west
on US -70 until it merges with 1- 85/US -15 south Continue on 1 -85 for approximately 1 5 miles
and then take exit 176B for Duke St/US -501 Bypass Take a right off of the exit and travel on
US -501 for 27 5 miles Within the town of Roxboro, turn left onto Court St/US -158 west Follow
US -158 west 0 4 mile and turn right onto NC -57, continuing northwest for another 12 3 miles
Once within the small community of Semora, turn right onto NC -119 and drive north 0 5 mile
Turn right onto Cunningham Road and continue east for 0 85 mile The CCTS is accessible
through a metal gate on the right
12 Protect Goals and Objectives
The goals and objectives of the project are as follows
Project Goals
■ Restore the stream's riparian buffer
■ Create a stable network of headwater streams
Project Objectives
■ Plant a functional Piedmont Alluvial Forest floodplain community along with a Mesic Mixed
Hardwood Forest to create an effective riparian buffer
■ Arrest bed elevation lowering and stabilize seep outlets
■ Stop bank erosion by developing the appropriate channel dimension and stabilizing with
vegetation
■ Remove relic spoil piles that disrupt overland flowpaths
■ Exclude livestock from the riparian areas with fencing
13 Project Structure, Restoration Type and Approach
The project streams had become degraded primarily through poor grazing management and
vegetation removal Historically, the two parcels were cleared and converted into pasture except
for narrow strips of riparian vegetation along the streams and intact forest in the southern portion
of the western parcel Prior to restoration, many of the project streams were experiencing severe
bank erosion Severe bed degradation was also evident throughout the different project reaches
All of the reaches exhibited areas of vertical instability Restoration, enhancement, and
preservation of 19,059 linear feet of channel was accomplished utilizing a combination of Priority
2 and 3 approaches (Table 1) Reaches T1 -T6 are on the western side of the project and reaches
T7 -T 10 are on the eastern side
All of T1 was built as a B4c channel with small sections of C channel in those areas without
constrictive valley walls T1 has been divided into five different reaches to reflect changes in
drainage area and the type of mitigation T1 -1 runs from Station 10 +00 to 17 +64 and stops at the
confluence with T3 A second reach, T1 -2, goes from this confluence with T3 at Station 17 +64
until Station 21 +50 Both T1 -1 and TI-2 were enhanced by grading back the existing eroding
banks, building a bankfull bench, and developing distinct riffles and pools (Enhancement 1)
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KCI Technologies Inc
Contract 9 D06002 I 2011— MY03

VIRGINIA
Y
N
d
U
119 �
0
b
G
CASW ELL
COUNTY
Semora
e Creek
VIRGINIA
CASWELL I PERSON
im
Parcnn Cniinfv Nnrth Carnlina
PERSON
COUNTY
Cane Creek
57
I
a
x
ALAMANCE
ORANGE
DURHAM
°o
GRANVILLE
F
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
K C I
Project Site Location
N
Major Roads
ASSOCIATES OF KC
Other Roads
w E
K
C I
�i Major Streams and Rivers
s
1:63,360
- Major Lakes and Reservoirs
1 inch equals 1 miles
TECHNOLOGIES
� county Boundaries ►
o.s 0
1
,
Milts
M w, D Co- c�.INC.

TI was restored from Station 21 +50 until it ends at the property boundary There are three
separate reaches in this section of T1 TI-3 from Station 21 +50 to 24 +76 where T4 enters, TI-4
from Station 24 +76 to 34 +85 where T6 flows into T1, and TI-5 from Station 34 +85 to 37 +67
These three lower reaches of TI were restored using a Pnority 3 approach Along this section of
T1, the restoration established riffle and pool features and a new stable planform, while also
utilizing existing bedrock as grade control
T2, a B4 stream, was divided into four separate reaches T2 -1 begins at Station 50 +00 and ends at
Station 53 +05 This reach was improved by fencing out the livestock, removing adjacent relic
spoil piles to restore natural drainage to the stream, and planting the riparian buffer with native
vegetation (Enhancement 11) Beginning at Station 53 +05 and ending at Station 55 +00, T2 -2 was
restored using a Pnority 3 approach This reach was relocated away from a severely eroding
valley wall and reconnected to the existing stream at Station 55 +00 The next reach, T2 -3, was
enhanced by sloping back the existing eroding banks, building a bankfull bench, removing the
adjacent relic spoil piles, and developing distinct riffles and pools (Enhancement 1) T24 begins
at Station 56 +50, and was restored using a Pnority 3 approach This bottom section of T2
connects to T1 at Station 58 +50 with a new stable pattern, dimension, and profile
T3 is the next tnbutary to loin TI, and is divided into two different reaches T3 -1 is a short
headwater reach that runs from Stations 60+00 to 60 +85 and was enhanced by shaping the
existing eroding banks and defining distinct riffles and pools (Enhancement l) T3 -2 was restored
with dimension, profile, and pattern adjustments using a Priority 3 approach, and runs from
Station 60 +85 to its confluence with TI at Station 76 +97
Similar to T3, T4 also flows into T1 and has been separated into two reaches The entire length of
T4 was restored as a B4 channel T4 -1 and T4 -2 run from Station 80 +00 to Station 82 +53 and
Station 82 +53 to Station 102 +81, respectively These two reaches, which are distinguished by
differences in slope, were restored with dimension, profile, and pattern adjustments using a
Priority 3 approach
T5 has two reaches and both are B4 channels T5 -1 runs from Stations 110+00 to 112 +64 and
was enhanced by fencing out the livestock and planting the riparian buffer with native vegetation
(Enhancement 11) T5 -2, which goes from Station 112 +64 to Station 113 +95 at its confluence
with TI, was restored with dimension, profile, and pattern adjustments using a Pnority 3
approach
T6 and its headwater tributaries consist of B4 channels At the top of this headwater system, there
are four intermittent headwater reaches These reaches, T613-1 (Stations 248 +38 to 250 +00),
T6C -I (Stations 117 +02 to 120 +00), T6C -2 (Stations 300 +00 to 300 +80), and T6C -3 (Stations
310 +00 to 310 +82) are stable streams surrounded by an established vegetated buffer and were
therefore preserved Two perennial headwater reaches, T6A (Stations 240 +00 to 240 +90) and
T613 (Stations 250 +00 to 251 +04), were improved with bank and seep stabilization (Enhancement
11) These two reaches come together to form T6AB from Station 240 +90 to 241 +21 W, from
Station 120+00 to 121 +75 at its confluence with T6AB, is another headwater tributary T6 begins
at Station 121 +75, the confluence of T6AB and W, and ends at Station 134 +25, where it meets
T1 T6AB, W, and T6 were all restored using a Priority 3 approach with dimension, profile, and
pattern adjustments
On the eastern side of the property, T7 was divided into ten different design reaches The
headwaters of T7 include two preservation reaches These two reaches, T7A -I (Stations 259 +38
to 260 +00) and T713 (Stations 320 +00 to 321 +25), are both stable channels bordered by a riparian
buffer T7 -1 begins at Station 140 +00 and continues until Station 145 +25 It is a B4 /C4 stream
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KCI Technologies Inc
Contract # D06002 3 201 l — MY03

type that was improved with isolated bank stabilization, seep stabilization at the beginning of the
reach, fencing out the livestock, and planting the riparian buffer with native vegetation
(Enhancement II) T7A (Stations 260+00 to 261 +36) and T7C (Stations 330 +00 to 330 +42) are
similar to T7 -1 and were also improved as a B4 /C4 channel with the same Enhancement II
methods T7 -2 (Stations 145 +25 to 148 +57) was improved to a B4 stream type by sloping back
the existing eroding banks and enhancing the existing riffle and pool features (Enhancement I)
T7 -3 begins at Station 148 +57 where T7 -2 and T8 loin together T7 -3 was restored as a 134c
channel using Priority 2 and 3 approaches with dimension, profile, and pattern adjustments T74
begins at Station 169 +86 where the stream enters a more confined valley with numerous bedrock
features The 134 /1 channel was improved by building an appropriate stream dimension and
enhancing distinct riffle and pool features that had been degraded by cattle and excess sediment
inputs (Enhancement 1)
T7 -5 is a short B4 reach that was restored with dimension, profile, and pattern adjustments from
Station 182 +28 to 183 +75 using a Priority 3 approach From Station 183 +75 to Station 191 +59,
T7 -6 has frequent bedrock in the streambed and was improved by building an appropriate stream
dimension and developing distinct riffle and pool features (Enhancement I), creating a 134/1
stream type T7 -7 begins at the confluence with T10 and continues until the stream enters Cane
Creek at Station 198 +13 This final reach along T7 was also modified as Enhancement I by
building an appropriate stream dimension and creating distinct riffle and pool features
There are three intermittent preservation reaches on the headwater system of T8 These include
T8 -1 (Stations 199 +06 to 200 +00), T813 (Stations 340 +00 to 340 +59), and T8A -1 (Stations
269 +75 to 270 +00), which are all stable streams with established riparian buffers The remaining
headwater reaches of T8 (Stations 200 +00 to 204 +38) and T8A (Stations 270 +00 to 271 +23)
were improved using Enhancement I (building an appropriate stream dimension and creating
distinct riffle and pool features) and Enhancement 11 (isolated bank stabilization, seep
stabilization at the beginning of the reach, fencing out the livestock, and planting the riparian
buffer with native vegetation), respectively Both reaches are B4 stream types T9 (Stations
210 +00 to 213 +68) is a similar headwater reach to T8 and received the same Enhancement I
improvements as T8
T10 runs along the eastern edge of the site and has been divided into two separate reaches T10 -1
is the longer reach and goes from Stations 220+00 to 233 +00 T10 -1 is a 134 /1 channel and was
improved with isolated bank stabilization, livestock exclusion, and riparian buffer plantings
(Enhancement ii) TIO -2 begins at 233 +00 and continues a short distance until the confluence
with T7 at Station 235 +94 This reach was improved using Enhancement I (building an
appropriate stream dimension and creating distinct rifFle and pool features) of the 134 /1 channel
Table 1 below provides the linear footage for existing and as-built stream length as well as the
total stream mitigation units by reach For this table, the existing linear footage was calculated
from the existing stream centerline In some instances, the linear footage is less for the as-built
conditions than for the existing conditions This situation can arise when the design changes the
exact location of tributary confluences In other locations, the pattern of the existing stream had
an unstable meandering centerline that may have been influenced by debris blockages and cattle
damage to the stream In the as-built stream, the pattern is stable and more clearly defined, but the
actual length may be shorter than the pre - restoration conditions Some of these lengths are also
slightly different than the designed lengths On the restored reaches, this is due to occasional field
changes to the pattern during construction For the enhancement reaches, this is generally a result
of the as-built survey being more detailed, and picking up a more accurate depiction of the pattern
than was recorded in the existing conditions topographic survey
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KCl Technologies Inc
Contract # D06002 4 2011 - MY03

14 Project Historv, Background, and Contact Information
Table l Project Restoration Components
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site
Project
Pre-
Stream
As -Built
As -Built
Segment /
Project
Mitigation Type
Approach
Mitigation
Comment
Footage
Stationing
Reach ID
Footage
Units
TI-1 and
Eroding banks were graded to a stable slope bankfull benches were built
TI-2
1 087
Enhancement 1
-
1,150
10+00 -21 +50
725 SMU*
distinct riffles and pools were created around the existing bedrock, the buffer
was planted, and cattle exclusion fencing was erected along the easement
T1 -3 TI-4
1,688
Restoration
P3
1,617
21 +50 -37 +67
1,617 SMU
Stable riffles and pools were established along a realigned stream planfonn, the
and TI-5
buffer was planted, and cattle exclusion fencing was erected along the easement
isolated eroding banks were graded to a stable slope relic spoil piles adjacent to
T2 -1
305
Enhancement 11
-
305
50+00 -53 +05
122 SMU
the stream were removed, the unvegetated portions of the buffer were planted,
and cattle exclusion fencing was erected along the easement
The stream was realigned away from an unstable valley wall, relic spoil piles
T2 -2
227
Restoration
P2
195
53 +05 -55 +00
195 SMU
adjacent to the stream were removed, the unvegetated portions of the buffer were
Planted, and cattle exclusion fencing was erected along the easement
Eroding banks were graded to a stable slope bankf ill benches were built
T2 -3
160
Enhancement 1
-
150
55 +00 -56 +50
100 SMU
distinct riffles and pools were created, relic spoil piles adjacent to the stream
were removed, the unvegetated portions of the buffer were planted, and cattle
exclusion fencing was erected along the easement
New nines and pools were established along a new stream planfonn the
T2-4
151
Restoration
P3
180
56 +50 -58 +50
180 SMU*
unvegetated portions of the buffer were planted, and cattle exclusion fencing was
erected along the easement
Eroding banks were graded to a stable slope, bankfull benches were built,
T3 -1
107
Enhancement I
-
85
60+00 -60 +85
57 SMU
distinct riffles and pools were created, the unvegetated portions of the buffer
were planted, cattle exclusion fencing was erected along the easement, and
entering seeps were stabilized
Stable riffles and pools were established along a realigned stream planform relic
T3 -2
1,457
Restoration
P3
1,592
60+85 -76 +97
1,592 SMU*
spoil piles adjacent to the stream were removed, the buffer was planted, and
cattle exclusion fencing was erected along the easement
T4 -1 and
Stable riffles and pools were established along a realigned stream planfonn, relic
1,979
Restoration
P3
2,281
80+00- 102 +81
2,261 SMU*
spoil piles adjacent to the stream were removed, the buffer was planted and
T4 -2
cattle exclusion fencing was erected along the easement
T5 -1
244
Enhancement II
-
242
110+00- 112 +64
97 SMU*
The unvegetated portions of the buffer were planted and cattle exclusion fencing
was erected along the easement
Stable nfiles and pools were established along a realigned stream planform
T5 -2
118
Restoration
P3
132
112 +64 - 113 +95
132 SMU
creating a stable confluence with TI, the buffer was planted and cattle exclusion
fencing was erected along the easement
Total
7 929
7 078 SMU*
P2 = Priority 2 P3 = Priority 3 * These SMUs have been calculated by excluding the easement exceptions, which include ford crossings for the landowner
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site
KCI Technologies Inc
Contract 4 D06002 5 2011 —W03

Table 1 Project Restoration Components, continued
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site
Project
Pre-
Stream
As -Built
As -Built
Segment /
Project
Mitigation Type
Approach
Mitigation
Comment
Reach ID
Foote a
Footage
Stationing
Units
Isolated eroding banks were graded to a stable slope, the seep where the stream
T6A
89
Enhancement 11
-
90
240+00- 240+90
36 SMU
originates was stabilized the unvegetated portions of the buffer were planted
and cattle exclusion fencinp was erected along the easement
T613-1
162
Preservation
-
162
248 +38 - 250+00
32 SMU
Installed cattle exclusion fencing along the easement
Isolated eroding banks were graded to a stable slope the seep where the str
T613
103
Enhancement II
-
104
250+00- 251 +04
42 SMU
originates was stabilized, the unvegetated portions of the buffer were planted,
and cattle exclusion fencing was erected along the easement
Grade control structures were used to stabilize the bed and maintain pools, the
T6AB
30
Restoration
P3
31
240+90- 241 +21
31 SMU
buffer was planted, and cattle exclusion fencing was erected along the
easement
T6C -I
297
Preservation
-
297
117 +02 - 120+00
59 SMU
Installed cattle exclusion fencing along the easement
T6C -2
80
Preservation
-
80
300+00 - 300+80
16 SMU
Installed cattle exclusion fencing along the easement
T6C -3
82
Preservation
-
82
310+00 - 310+82
16 SMU
Installed cattle exclusion fencing along the easement
New nflles and pools were established along a new stream planform, the
T6C and T6
1 455
Restoration
P3
1 425
120 +00 - 134 +25
1 405 SMU*
headcut at the top ofT6C was stabilized, the unvegetated portions of the buffet
were planted, and cattle exclusion fencing was erected along the easement
T7A -1
62
Preservation
-
62
259 +38 - 260 +00
12 SMU
Installed cattle exclusion fencing along the easement
Isolated eroding banks were graded to a stable slope a seep at the beginning of
T7A
136
Enhancement II
-
136
260+00- 261 +36
54 SMU
the reach was stabilized, the unvegetated portions of the buffer were planted,
and cattle exclusion fencing was erected along the easement
T713
125
Preservation
-
125
320+00- 321 +25
25 SMU
Installed cattle exclusion fencing along the easement
Removed a well house at the head of the reach, stabilized the seep, graded the
T7C
42
Enhancement 11
-
42
330+00- 330+42
17 SMU
banks to a stable slope the unvegetated portions of the buffer were planted,
and cattle exclusion fencing was erected along the easement
Isolated eroding banks were graded to a stable slope the seep where the stream
T7 -1
469
Enhancement II
-
525
140+00- 145 +25
210 SMU
originates was stabilized, the unvegetated portions of the buffer were planted
and cattle exclusion fencing was erected along the easement
Eroding banks were graded to a stable slope, bankfull benches were built,
T7 -2
331
Enhancement I
-
332
145 +25 - 148 +57
221 SMU
distinct miles and pools were created around the existing bedrock, the buffer
was planted, and cattle exclusion fencing was erected along the easement
New nfile and pool sequences were established along a realigned stream
T7 -3
2,023
Restoration
P2/3
2,109
148 +57 - 169 +86
2,109 SMU*
planfonn, the buffer was planted, and cattle exclusion fencing was erected
lalong the easement
Total
5,602
1
4,285 SMU*
P3 = Priority 3 P21P3 = Combination of Priorities 2 and 3
* These SMUs have been calculated by excluding the easement exceptions, which include ford crossings for the landowner
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KCI Technologies Inc
Contract # D06002 6 2011— MY03

Table 1 Project Restoration Components, continued
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site
Project
Pre-
Stream
As -Built
As -Built
Segment /
Project
Mitigation Type
Approach
Mitigation
Comment
Footage
Stationing
Reach ID
Foote a
Units
Eroding banks were graded to a stable slope bankfull benches were built,
T7-4
1,246
Enhancement 1
-
1,242
169+86- 182 +28
828 SMU
overwidened portions of stream were built to the appropriate cross - sectional area,
distinct raffles and pools were created around the existing bedrock, the buffer was
planted, and cattle exclusion fencing was erected along the easement
T7 -5
185
Restoration
P3
147
182 +28 - 183 +75
147 SMU
The stream was realigned away from an unstable valley wall, the buffer was planted,
and cattle exclusion fencing was erected along the easement
Eroding banks were graded to a stable slope, bankfull benches were built,
T7 -6 and
1,365
Enhancement I
-
1,438
183 +75 - 198 +13
945 SMU*
overwidened portions of stream were built to the appropriate cross - sectional area,
T7 -7
distinct riffles and pools were created around the existing bedrock, the buffer was
planted, and cattle exclusion fencing was erected along the easement
T8A -1
25
Preservation
-
25
269 +75 - 300+00
5 SMU
Installed cattle exclusion fencing along the easement
Isolated eroding banks were graded to a stable slope, a seep at the beginning of the
T8A
110
Enhancement II
-
123
270+00 - 271 +23
49 SMU
reach was stabilized, a log structure was added for grade control, the unvegetated
portions of the buffer were planted, and cattle exclusion fencing was erected along
the easement
TO
59
Preservation
-
59
340 +00 - 340+59
12 SMU
Installed cattle exclusion fencing along the easement
T8 -1
94
Preservation
-
94
199 +06 - 200+00
19 SMU
Installed cattle exclusion fencing along the easement
Eroding banks were graded to a stable slope, bankfull benches were built, distinct
T8
449
Enhancement I
-
438
200+00 - 204 +38
292 SMU
nfiles and pools were created with mstream structures the buffer was planted, and
cattle exclusion fencing was erected along the easement
Eroding banks were graded to a stable slope, bankfull benches were built, distinct
T9
369
Enhancement 1
-
368
210+00- 213 +68
245 SMU
riffles and pools were created with instream log structures, the buffer was planted,
and cattle exclusion fencing was erected along the easement
Isolated eroding banks were graded to a stable slope, an eroding drainage swale was
T IO -1
1300
Enhancement II
-
1,300
220+00- 233 +00
520 SMU
stabilized, the unvegetated portions of the buffer were planted, and cattle exclusion
fencinp, was erected along the easement
Eroding banks were graded to a stable slope, bankfull benches were built, distinct
T 10 -2
282
Enhancement 1
-
294
233 +00 - 235 +94
196 SMU
riffles and pools were created with instream structures, the buffer was planted, and
cattle exclusion fencing was erected aloe the easement
Total
5 528
3,258
Preservation Total
986
196 SMU*
Enhancement II Total
2,867
1,147
Enhancement I Total
5,497
3,609
Restoration Total
9 709
9,669
Total of All Reaches
19,059
wow
14,621
t'3 = Pnonty 3 ' Ihese SMUs have been calculated by excluding the easement exceptions, which include ford crossings for the landowner
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KCI Technologies Inc
Contract # D06002 7 2011 — MY03

Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
2007
Dec 07
Final Design
2007
Dec 07
Construction
N/A
Dec 08
Planting - Stream
N/A
Dec 08
Mitigation Plan / As -Built Year 0 Monitoring - Baseline
Jan 09
May 09
Monitoring Year 01
Dec 09
Dec 09
Monitoring Year 02
Jan 11
Jan 11
Monitoring Year 03
1 Nov 11
Jan 12
Table 3 Project Contact Table
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site
Design Firm
KCI Technologies, Inc
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Rd
Raleigh, NC 27609
Contact Mr Gary Mryncza
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Construction Contractors
Environmental Technologies and Construction
Landmark Center 11, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Rd
Raleigh, NC 27609
Contact Mr Ryan McDavitt
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Quartermaster Environmental
P O Drawer 400
Shelby, NC 28150
Contact Mr Brooks Cole
Phone [phone]
Planting Contractor
Bruton Nurseries & Landscapes
150 Black Creek Rd
Fremont, NC 27830
Contact Charles Bruton
Phone [phone]
Monitoring Performers
MY -00 - MY -05
KCI Technologies, Inc
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Rd
Raleigh, NC 27609
Contact Mr Adam Spiller
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KCI Technologies Inc
Contract # D06002 9 2011 — MY03

Table 4 Project Background Table
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site
Project County
Person County
Ph sio ra hic Region
Piedmont
Ecore ton
Northern Inner Piedmont
Project River Basin
Roanoke
USGS HUC for Project and Reference
03010104061040 UT to Cane Creek
03040101090010 UT Fisher River - reference
NCDWQ Sub -basin for Project and Reference
03 -02 -05 UT to Cane Creek
03 -07 -02 UT Fisher River - reference
Drainage Area
132 sq mi
Stream Order
First, Second, and Third Order
Watershed Type Rural, Urban, Developing, etc
Rural
Watershed LULC Distribution Urban
Ag -Row Crop
Ag- Livestock
Forested
Water/Wetlands
<1%
49%
12%
35%
1%
Watershed impervious cover %
<1%
Rosgen Classification of As -built (Stream)
134 T2 -3, T24 T3 -2 T4 -1 T4 -2, T5 -2, T6, T6c,
T7 -2, T8, T9
B4 /1 T74, T7 -6, T10 -2
B4c T7 -3
134c /1 T7 -7
134c /C4 T7 -5
CB4 (T 1)
C/E4 T3 -1
C/E4 T2 -2
NCDWQ Classification for Project
Class C Cane Creek
Within EEP Watershed Plan9
No
Any portion of the project segment upstream of a 303d
listed segment9
No
Reasons for 303d Listing or Stressor
N/A
Total ro ect acreage of easement
52 1 Acres
Total planted acreage
32 4 Acres
WRC Class Warm Cool, Cold
Warm
Species of concern, endangered etc
None
Pre - construction Beaver activity9
No
Dominant Soil Types
Chewacla, Wehadkee Wilkes and Wedowee
% of Project Easement Fenced
100%
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KCI Technologies Inc
Contract # D06002 10 201 / - MY03

20 PROJECT CONDITIONS AND MONITORING RESULTS
2.1 Vegetation Assessment
The planted vegetation on the site is growing well Due to the baseline vegetation monitoring
occurring while the plants had not yet leafed out, some of the plants could not be identified
initially and they were recorded as unknown Since the baseline monitoring most of these plants
were identified Some of the previously unknown plants were dead, damaged, or missing and
could still not be identified These plants were again recorded as unknown
The bankfull bench, stream banks, and npanan buffer have isolated areas with sparse vegetation,
but overall they are well vegetated Additional permanent seed was applied to areas of bare soil
this past year Some scattered populations of invasive species have been identified at the site
These include Chinese pnvet (Llgustrum slnense), multiflora rose (Rosa multlflora), tree -of-
heaven (Ailanthus altlsslma), and princess tree (Paulownla tomentosa) Most of the invasive
species are in areas where the existing vegetation was left intact These populations will continue
to be monitored
KCI used the Level 2 CVS -EEP vegetation monitoring protocol to quantify the number of planted
stems and volunteer woody stems dunng Monitoring Year 3 The monitored vegetation plots
revealed an average density of 415 planted stems /acre and 3,282 total stems /acre when including
volunteers There are four monitoring plots (Plots 5, 8, 13, and 17) that had calculated planted
stem densities less than 260 stems /acre This is not seen as problematic given the high potential
for desirable volunteers to become established in the plots and across the site Like natural
vegetative communities, some areas will have slightly higher densities than others, but the data
from the vegetation monitoring plots reveal that the site has an adequate average stem density in
the fourth year of monitoring KCi will continue to use the Level 2 CVS -EEP vegetation
monitoring protocol to quantify the number of volunteer woody stems Supplemental planting
was conducted at the site during the 2010/2011 dormant season Additional supplemental planting
may be conducted in the future if it is deemed necessary Considering the plentiful volunteers and
overall vegetative condition of the site, the third -year monitoring found the vegetation component
of the project to be on track to meeting the success cntenon The vegetative monitoring results
are displayed in Appendix A
22 Stream Assessment
During the 2011 growing season, the project streams have been functioning as designed There
are isolated areas of erosion on the streambanks and the side slopes, which have been noted on
the CCPV The on -site stream gauge recorded one bankfull event in 2011
The stream assessment found the stream to be stable overall There are some cross - sections that
show stream degradation since the previous monitoring year, but the profiles do not show
systematic degradation so these areas are isolated and not indicative of instability across the
reaches It is also important to note that all of the streams across the site have grade control from
in- stream structures, and in some instances significant bedrock Additional visual monitoring and
future surveying will determine if corrective actions are needed in these isolated erosion areas
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KCI Technologies Inc
Contract # D06002 1 1 2011 — MY03

2 2 1 Bankfull Events
Table 5 Verification of Bankfull Events
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site
Date of Data
Collection
Date of Occurrences
Method
Photo
Number
8/4/2009
5/28/2009
Stream Gauge
N/A
8/4/2009
6/5/2009
Stream Gauge
N/A
10/13/2009
9/21/2009
Stream Gauge
N/A
10/13/2009
9/28/2009
Stream Gauge
N/A
10/13/2009
10/9/2009
Stream Gauge
N/A
7/22/2010
3/22/2010
Stream Gauge
N/A
7/22/2010
5/28/2010
Stream Gauge
N/A
5/27/2011
4/16/2011
Stream Gauge
N/A
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KC/ Technologies Inc
Contract 9 D06002 12 201 / — MY03

2 2 2 Quantitative Measures Summary Tables
able 6a TI -3 Baseline Stream Summary
ane Creek Stream Restoration Site
arameter
Pre-Existmg Condition
Reference Reach es Data
Design
As -built'
Pffension - Riffle
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Mtn
Max
Min
Mean
Max
n
Bankfull Width ft
102
1
90
95
100
2
136
Flood prone Width (ft)
254
1
13
17
20
2
30
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1 3
1
1 1
12
1 2
2
12
Bankf ill Max Depth ft
19
1
1 3
14
1 5
2
19
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft')
12 9
1
104
106
107
2
164
Width/Depth Ratio
8 1
1
80
90
100
2
110
Entrenchment Ratio
2 5
1
l 3
1 8
23
2
22
Bank Height Ratio
1 8
1
10
2
10
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
21
45
40
70
40
54
70
3
Radius of Curvature ft
7
19
13
42
30
40
30
35
40
4
Rc Bankfull width ft/ft
07
19
1 3
44
22
30
Meander Wavelength (ft)
90
117
93
136
160
170
160
170
2
Meander Width Ratio
2 0
45
50
30
50
roftle
Riffle LengthlL
8
49
86
7
Riffle Slope 11/ft)
0 0138
0 0427
0 013
0 010
0 014
0 006
0 012
0 030
7
Pool Length ft
13
38
3
g25
10
20
16
19
26
6
Pools acin ft
21
49
30
75
100
56
94
152
5
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC % /Sa % /G % /C % /B % /Be% 0 %/13 %/87 % /0 % /0° /u/0% 0 %/15 %/78 %/7 % /0 % /0% 0 %/34 %/66% 0 %/0% 0%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95 mm 60/90/11/ 21/30 20/42/69/30/70 06/21/45/15/28
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length (ft)
313
297
324
326
Drainage Area (SM)
060
038
060
060
Ros en Classification
E4
B4c
C/B4
CB4
Sinuosity
1 10
1 20
1 10
1 10
Water Surface Slope ft/ft
00070
00130
00089
00089
- i nis is a snort restoration reach simuar to 1 1-4 and 1 I -:), and does not have any monitored cross - sections I heretore there is no as -built dimension data
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KCI Technologies Inc
Contract # D06002 13 2011— MY03

able 6b T14/TI-5 Baseline Stream Summary
ane Creek Stream Restoration Site
arsmeter
Pre-Existing Condition
Reference Reach es Data
Design
As -built
tmension - Riffle
Mm
Mean
Med
Max
n
Mtn
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Max
Min
Mean
Max
n
Bankfull Width ft
105
141
145
170
4
90
95
100
2
150
153
164
174
2
Flood prone Width (ft)
19
24
20
35
4
13
17
20
1
33
39
41
42
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
to
1 3
1 3
1 5
4
1 1
12
1 2
2
1 3
1 1
13
1 5
2
Bankfull Max Depth ft
12
18
1 8
23
4
1 3
14
15
2
20
19
20
21
2
Bankf ill Cross - Sectional Area ft'
153
173
1 168
20 1
4
104
106
107
1 21
200
189
206
222
2
Width/Depth Ratio
72
118
114
17 2
4
80
90
100
21
120
105
133
160
2
Entrenchment Ratio
1 2
1 8
1 4
3 3
4
1 3
1 8
23
l
22
22
25
27
2
Bank Height Ratio
14
20
2 1
2 3
4
10
21
10
10
10
10
2
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
25
51
45
25
60
25
60
Radius of Curvature ft
12
64
13
42
30
50
30
36
50
14
Rc Bankfull width ft/ft
07
5 1
1 3
44
20
33
1 8
22
30
Meander Wavelength ft
106
230
93
136
115
240
115
240
Meander Width Ratio
1 5
4 7
45
50
1 7
40
15
3 7
Profile
Bible Len (ft)
8
49
86
7
Riffle Slope (ft/ft
0 Ol 10
0 0407
0 013
0 005
0 013
0 006
0 012
0 030
7
Pool Len ft
11
30
3
g59
10
30
16
19
26
6
Pool Spacing ft
29
88
30
50
150
56
94
152
5
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC % /Sa % /G % /C % /B % /Be% 0 %/17 %/63 %/19 % /0 %/0% 0 %/15 %/78 % /7 % /0 % /0 °/u 0 %/7 %/86 %/4 %/0 %/3%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95 mm 16/13/22/73/130 20/42/69/30/70 69/14/19/41/62
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length (ft)
1,290
297
1,290
1,291
Drainage Area (SM)
080
038
080
080
Ros en Classification
B /G/F
B4c
CB4
CB4
Sinuosity
1 07- 133
1 20
1 10
1 10
Water Surface Slope ft/ft
0 0072 - 0 0090
00130
00080
00071
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KCI Technologies Inc
Contract # D06002 14 2011— MY03

able 6c T2 m
-2 Baseline Stream Summary
sne Creek Stream Restoration Site
ft!arameter
Pre-Existing Condition
Reference Reach es Data
Dest
As -built*
imension - Riffle
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Max
Min
Mean
Max
n
Bankf ill Width ft
4 4
1
90
95
100
2
74
77
1
Flood prone Width ft
>40
1
13
17
20
2
19
21
1
Bankfull Mean Depth ft)
0 8
1
1 1
12
12
2
08
07
1
Bankf ill Max Depth ft
0 9
1
13
1 4
1 3
12
1
Bankf ill Cross - Sectional Area ftZ
3 3
1
104
10 6
57
54
1
Width/Depth Ratio
5 9
1
80
9 0
A32
93
110
I
Entrenchment Ratio
>10
1
1 3
1 8
2 5
2 7
Bank Hei t Ratio
1
1
1 0
1 0
10
1
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft )
11
19
45
14
23
14
23
Radius of Curvature ft)
5
18
13
42
7
10
7
10
10
6
Rc Bankfull width (11/11)
1 1
4 1
1 3
44
1 0
14
1 0
1 3
Meander Wavelength (ft)
39
61
93
136
40
53
40
53
Meander Width Ratio
25
3 3
45
50
19
3 1
1 8
30
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC % /Sa % /G % /C % /B % /Be%
0 %/33 %/66 % /1 % /0 %/0%
0 %/15 %/78 %/7 % /0% /0%
0 %/23 %/76 %/1 % /0 % /0%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95 mm
05/25/50/31/48
20/42/69/30/70
13/45/10/30/44
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length ft
227
297
186
195
Drainage Area (SM)
Oil
038
Oil
Oil
Ros en Classification
E4
B4c
C/E4
C/E4
Sinuosity
1 70
1 20
1 40
1 50
Water Surface Slo ft/ft
00179
00130
00231
1 his is a short reach and does not have a monitored longitudinal prohle
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KCI Technologies Inc
Contract 4 D06001 15 1011— MY03

able 6d T3 -2 Baseline Stream Summary
ane Creek Stream Restoration Site
arameter
Pre-Existing Condition
Reference Reach es Data
Design
As -built
F ion - Riffle
Mm
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Mtn
Max
Min
Mean
Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
34
58
52
109
6
90
95
100
2
78
78
81
83
2
Flood prone Width ft
6
27
8
78
6
13
17
20
2
16
21
23
24
2
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
05
07
08
09
6
1 1
12
12
2
07
05
05
05
2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
10
12
1 1
1 3
6
1 3
1 4
1 5
2
1 1
09
09
09
2
Bankf ill Cross - Sectional Area ft2
25
39
1 4 1
5 1
6
104
106
1 107
1 21
56
1
39
4 1
42
2
Width/Depth Ratio
43
92
70
233
6
8 0
90
100
1 21
109
1
156
160
164
2
Entrenchment Ratio
1 1
65
16
163
6
1 3
18
23
1 21
2 1
1
27
28
29
2
Bank Height Ratio
10
19
20
32
6
10
1
21
10
1
10
1 0
10
2
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth ft
20
25
45
40
45
25
45
Radius of Curvature (ft)
8
30
13
42
10
30
10
30
Re Bankfull width ft/ft)
IT-
7 1
1 3
44
1 3
38
12
37
Meander Wavelength ft
80
420
93
136
48
130
45
130
Meander Width Ratio
34
6 0
4 5
50
5 1
58
3 1
56
Riffle Len ft
7
23
56
11
Riffle Slope ft/ft
00102
06
0 013
0 028
0 014
0 045
0 005
0 022
0 036
11
Pool Len ft
6
]ff6140
23
3
25
6
20
4
9
23
13
Pool Spacing ft
11
30
59
25
90
14
37
55
12
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC % /Sa % /G % /C % /B % /Be%
0 %/72 %/27 % /1 % /0 % /0%
0 %/15 %/78 %/7 % /0 % /0% 12 %/25 %/61 %/3 % /0 % /0%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95 mm
028/047/07/9/27
20/42/69/30/70 011/15/11/35/54
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length ft
1,457
297
1,554
1,592
Drainage Area (SM)
008
038
008
008
Ros en Classification
G4
B4c
134
134
Sinuosity
1 10
120
1 20
120
Water Surface Slope ft/ft
00202
00130
1 00215
1 00174
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KC1 Technologies Inc
Contract 9 D06002 16 2011- MY03

able 6e T44 Baseline Stream Summary
ane Creek Stream Restoration Site
arameter
Pre- Existm Condition
Reference Reach (es) Data
Design
As- built'
imension - Riffle
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Mm
Max
Mm
Mean
Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
45
54
5 1
67
3
90
95
100
2
62
85
1
Flood rove Width (ft)
6
8
8
10
3
13
17
20
2
12
24
l
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
l 1
12
1 1
14
3
1 1
1 2
12
2
05
05
1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
14
15
1 5
17
3
1 3
1 4
15
2
08
10
1
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area ft'
54
62
61
72
3
104
106
10 7
2
30
41
1
Width/Depth Ratio
33
48
48
62
3
8 0
9 0
l0 0
2
124
176
1
Entrenchment Ratio
15
15
15
16
3
13
1 8
2 3
2
20
28
1
Bank Height Ratio
3 1
38
41
42
3
10
2
1 0
10
1
attern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
l5
58
t
45
39
50
40
60
Radius of Curvature ft
7
26
42
15
20
15
16
20
5
Rc Bankfull width (ft/ft)
10
5 8
44
24
32
1 8
19
24
Meander Wavelength ft
35
290
L45
136
77
95
70
90
Meander Width Ratio
22
129
50
63
8 1
47
7 1
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC % /Sa % /G % /C % /B % /Be%
0 %/19
%/73 %/7 %/0 %/1%
0 %/15 %/78 %/7 % /0 % /0%
73 %/5 %/22 % /1 % /0 % /0%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95 mm
15/11/17/45/78
20/42/69/30/70
0 1/0 1/0 1/13/32
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length (ft)
190
297
266
253
Drama a Area (SM )
006
038
006
006
Ros en Classification
G4
B4c
134
134
Sinuosity
170
120
140
140
Water Surface Slo ft/ft
00179
00130
00231
i ne momtorea iongituainai protue for 14 is on 14-1
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KC1 Technologies Inc
Contract # D06002 17 2011— MY03

able 6f T4-2 Baseline Stream Summary
ane Creek Stream Restoration Site
arameter
Pre-Existing Condition
Reference Reach es Data
Design
As -built
imension - Riffle
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Max
Mm
Mean
Max
n
Bankf ill Width (ft)
45
54
5 1
67
3
90
95
100
2
92
86
89
91
2
Flood prone Width ft)
6
8
8
10
3
13
17
20
2
18
24
25
26
2
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1 1
1 2
1 1
14
3
1 1
12
12
2
08
06
08
09
2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
14
1 5
1 5
1 7
3
13
14
1 5
2
12
12
1 5
17
2
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
54
62
1 6 1
72
3
104
106
107
2
7 1
1
59
69
1 79
2
Width/Depth Ratio
3 3
48
48
62
1 3
80
90
100
2
115
94
11 7
140
2
Entrenchment Ratio
15
1 5
1 5
16
3
13
18
23
2
20
26
28
30
2
Bank Height Ratio
3 1
38
4 1
42
3
10
2
10
10
10
10
2
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth ft
15
58
45
25
60
20
65
Radius of Curvature (ft)
7
26
13
42
10
30
10
30
Rc Bankfull width (ft/ft )
1 0
58
1 3
44
1 1
33
1 1
34
Meander Wavelength (ft)
35
290
93
136
50
130
50
130
Meander Width Ratio
22
129
45
50
27
65
22
73
Profile
Riffle Len ft
5
23
56
15
Riffle Slope ft/ft
00134
00381
0 013
0 028
0 009
0 030
0 005
0 025
0 063
15
Pool Length (ft)
10
35
3
25
5
40
1
11
28
19
Pool Spacing ft
20
80
30
59
30
85
7
46
94
18
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC % /Sa % /G % /C % /B % /Be%
0 %/ 19%/73 % /7 % /0 %/ 1%
0%/15%/78%/7%/0%/0% 1%/47%/51%/1%/0%/0%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95 mm
15/11/17/45/78
20/42/69/30/70 04/11/24/30/52
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length ft
1,789
297
1,967
2,008
Drainage Area (SM)
010
038
010
0 10
Ros en Classification
G4
B4c
B4
B4
Sinuosity
1 10
120
120
120
Water Surface Slope ft/ft
00224
00130
00181
00141
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KCI Technologies Inc
Contract # D06002 18 2011- MY03

able 6g T5-2 Baseline Stream Summary
ane Creek Stream Restoration Site
arameter
Pre-Existing Condition
Reference Reach (es) Data
Design
As -built'
imension - Riffle
Mtn
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Mtn
Max
Mtn
Mean
Max
n
Bankfull Width ft
33
1
90
95
100
2
50
59
1
Flood prone Width ft
4
1
13
17
20
2
10
21
1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
07
1
1 1
12
12
2
05
04
1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
09
1
1 3
14
15
2
08
08
1
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
23
1
l0 4
10 6
107
2
2 5
24
1
Width/Depth Ratio
47
1
8 0
90
100
2
100
145
1
Entrenchment Ratio
1 3
1
1 3
1 8
23
2
20
36
1
Bank Height Ratio
27
1
1 0
2
1 0
10
1
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth ft
45
15
30
15
30
Radius of Curvature (ft)
13
42
15
15
Rc Bankfull width (ft/ft
13
4 4
30
25
Meander Wavelength ft
93
136
45
63
50
60
Meander Width Ratio
4 5
5 0
30
60
25
5 1
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
0%/15%/78%/ 7%/0%/0%
40%/71%/20%/0%/0%/0%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95 mm
20/42/69/30/70
01/01/02/42/98
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length (ft)
118
297
121
132
Drainage Area (SM)
002
038
002
002
Ros en Classification
G4
B4c
B4
B4
Sinuosity
1 10
120
120
120
Water Surface Slo ft/ft
00590
00130
00550
i ms is a snort reacn ana aces not nave a monitorea iongituamai pronie
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KC/ Technologies Inc
Contract # D06002 19 1011- MY03

able 6f T6 Baseline Stream Summary
ane Creek Stream Restoration Site
arameter
Pre-Existing Condition
Reference Reach es Data
Design
As -built
imension - Riffle
Mtn
Mean
Med
Max
n
Mtn
Mean
Med
Max
n
Mtn
Max
Mtn
Mean
Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
34
44
53
2
90
95
100
2
80
63
67
71
2
Flood prone Width ft)
4
6
8
2
13
17
20
2
16
167
172
186
2
Bankf ill Mean Depth ft
04
06
08
2
1 1
12
12
2
07
05
06
06
2
Bankf ill Max Depth (ft)
05
08
1 0
2
1 3
14
1 5
2
1 1
08
09
09
2
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
13
2 7
40
2
104
10 6
107
1 2
57
34
1 35
1 36
2
Width/Depth Ratio
70
7 9
87
2
8 0
9 0
100
2
114
1 1 0
129
148
2
Entrenchment Ratio
11
1 3
15
2
1 3
l 8
23
1 21
20
26
1 57
27
2
Bank Height Ratio
30
4 9
68
1 21
10
10
1 1 0
10
2
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth ft
16
36
45
36
40
30
40
Radius of Curvature (ft)
3
16
13
42
10
35
10
35
Re Bankfull width (ft/ft)
0 6
47
13
44
13
44
1 5
52
Meander Wavelength (ft)
14
116
93
136
72
120
50
120
Meander Width Ratio
2 6
34 1
45
50
45
50
45
60
Profile
Riffle Len ft
11
25
49
12
Riffle Slope ft/ft
0 009
0 030
0 013
0 028
0 013
0 025
0 010
0 024
0 040
12
Pool Len (ft)
9
13
3
25
6
15
2
6
14
14
Pool Spacing ft
26
48
30
59
25
70
5
36
68
13
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC % /Sa % /G % /C % /B % /Be% 0 %/52 %/45 % /1 % /1 % /1% 0 %/15 %/78 %/7 % /0 % /0% 1 %/14 %/81 %/3 % /0 % /0%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95 mm 05/09/17/11/20 20/42/69/30/70 56/34/40/56/63
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length ft
1,275
297
1,230
1,230
Drainage Area (SM )
007
038
007
007
Ros en Classification
G
B4c
134
B4
Sinuosity
120
1 20
120
1 20
Water Surface Slope ft/ft
00245
00130
00240
00301
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KC/ Technologies Inc
Contract 9 D06002 20 2011— MY03

able 6g T7 -3 Baseline Stream Summary
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site
arameter
Pre-Existing Condition
Reference Reach es Data
Design
As -built
imeusion - RiMe
Mtn
Mean
Med
Max
n
Mtn
Mean
Med
Max
n
Mtn
Max
Min
Mean
Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
50
6 1
65
69
3
90
95
100
2
82
90
91
9 1
2
Flood prone Width ft)
8
9
9
9
3
13
17
20
2
16
154
169
184
2
Bankfill Mean Depth ft
09
09
09
10
3
1 1
12
12
2
07
07
08
08
2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1 1
1 2
1 3
1 3
3
1 3
14
15
2
11
09
1 1
13
2
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area ft2
50
5 6
5 9
60
3
10 4
10 6
107
2
60
1
4
77
90
2
Width/D th Ratio
60
7 0
7 2
79
3
8 0
9 0
100
2
11 2
6
123
129
2
Entrenchment Ratio
12
l 3
1 3
14
3
1 3
1 8
23
2
20
7
Ell
19
20
2
Bank Height Ratio
28
3 3
3 2
38
3
l 0
2
10
0
10
10
2
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth ft
24
1
42
45
29
47
30
60
Radius of Curvature (ft)
22
58
13
42
15
35
15
35
Rc Bankfull width 11/11)
32
97
1 3
44
1 8
43
16
38
Meander Wavelength ft
52
115
93
136
55
106
50
110
Meander Width Ratio
35
7
45
50
35
57
33
E66
Profile
Riffle Length2L
15
26
40
15
Riffle Slope 11/11
0 007
]M42
0 013
0 020
0 030
0 002
0 018
0 035
15
Pool Len (ft)
6
3
g59
7
30
6
16
54
15
Pool Spacing ft
17
30
32
86
38
55
101
14
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC % /Sa % /G % /C % /B % /Be%
0 %/37 %/62 % /1 % /0 % /0%
0 %/15 %/78 %/7 % /0 % /0% 6 %/33 %/54 %/6 % /0 % /0%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95 mm
03/14/54/15/25
20/42/69/30/70 03/14/66/45/95
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length ft
2,023
297
2,088
2,109
Drainage Area (SM )
018
038
018
018
Ros en Classification
G4c
B4c
B4c
B4c
Sinuosity
l 10
120
1 10
1 15
Water Surface Slope ft/ft
00132
00130
00128
00211
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site
KC /Technologies Inc
Contract # D06002 21 2011— MY03

able 6h T7 -5 Baseline Stream Summary
Creek Stream Restoration Site
ter
Pre- Existm Condition
Reference Reach es Data
Desi
As -built'
O.men,
ion - R iffle
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Max
Min
Mean
Max
n
Bankfull Width ft
90
95
100
2
104
11 5
1
Flood prone Width ft
13
17
20
2
21
21
1
Bankf ill Mean Depth (ft)
11
12
12
2
09
09
1
Bankfull Max Depth ft
13
14
15
2
12
13
1
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area ftZ
104
1 106
1
1 107
1 2
90
107
1
Width/Depth Ratio
80
90
100
2
120
124
1
Entrenchment Ratio
1 3
1 8
23
2
20
1 9
1
Bank Heiaht Ratio
10
2
10
10
1
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth ft)
28
45
20
25
20
25
Radius of Curvature ft)
12
13
42
20
25
20
25
Rc Bankfidl width ft/ft
1 3
44
1 9
24
17
22
Meander Wavelength ft
62
93
136
64
68
60
70
Meander Width Ratio
45
50
2 0
25
17
22
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
0%/15%/78%/7%/0%/0%
0%/23%/63%/2%/0%/12%
dl6/d35/d50/d84/d95 mm
20/42/69/30/70
09/44/11/34/55
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length (ft )
185
297
154
147
Drainage Area (SM)
024
038
024
024
Ros en Classification
E4
134c
B4c/C4
B4c/C4
Sinuosity
120
1 20
108
105
Water Surface Slope ft/ft
00145
00130
00193
• This is a short reach and does not have a monitored longitudinal profile
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KCI Technologies Inc
Contract # D06002 22 2011— MY03

Table 7a Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site
Parameter
Cross - Section 1
Pool
Cross - Section 2
Riffle
Cross - Section 3
Pool
Reach
TO
Pool
TI-4
T1
T111
T2.2
Dimension
MYO
MY l
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MY I
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MY I
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Bankfull Width ft
126
122
134
149
150
175
174
178
188
180
75
67
142
144
132
126
135
Flood prone Width ft
-
-
-
-
37
37
39
42
42
41
21
21
-
-
-
-
-
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
16
17
24
24
15
12
1 1
1 1
12
10
06
06
1 5
14
16
09
1 1
Bankfill Max Depth ft
28
29
35
36
24
23
19
23
29
22
12
1 1
25
30
34
2 1
23
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft'
202
209
322
355
22 1
212
189
199
233
187
47
1 42
21 9
E23
19 7
20 5
11 0
13 3
Width/De th Ratio
-
Width/De th Ratio
10 5
10 2
14 4
16 0
15 9
11 0
12 0
10 7
-
Entrenchment Ratio
-
-
-
-
2 5
2 1
2 2
2 4
2 7
2 8
3 1
-
L133
Bank Hei t Ratio
-
-
-
-
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
-
-
-
-
-
ubstrate
d50 mm
4 50
1
1 1 70
1 1 90
1 1
15 00
800
1 8 00
123 00
180
1 890
1 890
290
d84 mm
15 00
1
115 00
134 00
1 1 140
00
143 00
143 00138
001 1
112 00
130 00
130 00
135 00
Table 7b Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site
Parameter
Cross - Section 4
Cross - Section 5
Cross - Section 6
Riffle
Riffle
Pool
Reach
T1
-3
T2.2
T3-2
Dimension
MYO
MY 1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MY 1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MY 1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Bankfull Width ft
153
150
175
156
77
75
67
65
123
126
135
123
Flood prone Width ft
42
37
37
45
21
21
21
21
-
-
-
-
Bankfull Mean Depth ft)
l 5
15
12
12
07
06
06
06
1 l
09
1 1
1 1
Bankfull Max Depth ft
2 1
24
23
23
12
12
1 1
10
22
2 1
23
23
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
222
22 1
212
188
54
47
1 42
42
11 0
13 3
12 9
Width/De th Ratio
10 5
10 2
14 4
12 9
11 0
12 0
10 7
10 1
Entrenchment Rati
2 7
2 5
2 1
2 9
2 7
2 8
3 1
3 2
L133
Bank Hei t Rati
l 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
-
-
-
Substrate
d50 mm
24 00
127 00
117 00
127 00 1
1
1 10 00
114 00
114 00
1 1 10
1 10
0 62
-0-0-6-l' 06
d84 mm
44 00
1 Bdrk
I Bdrk
159 00 1
1
130 00
13100
14100
1 12001
10 00
062
1 120
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KCI Technologies Inc
Contract # D06002 23 2011— MY03

Table 7c Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site
Parameter
Cross - Section 7
Cross - Section 8
Cross - Section 9
Riffle
Riffle
Riffle
Reach
T4-2
-2
T3.2
T4-1
Dimension
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MY]
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Bankfull Width ft
78
88
94
79
83
103
93
82
85
83
104
101
Flood prone Width ft
21
22
22
22
24
26
26
23
24
25
25
26
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
05
05
05
06
05
06
05
04
05
06
05
05
Bankfull Max Depth 11
09
09
09
09
09
10
10
09
10
1 1
13
12
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area ft2
39
44
47
45
42
58
47
36
41
46
53
49
Width/Depth Ratio
156
176
188
139
164
183
184
187
176
150
204
208
Entrenchment Rati
27
25
23
27
29
25
28
28
28
30
24
26
Bank Height Rati
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Substrate
d50 mm
030
1 130 1 130
1 033
1 1 126 00
118 001
1800116001
1 1 010
1 200
1 710
119 00
d84 mm
690
14100 14100
133 00
1 1 142 00
150 00150
00
158 001 1 1 1300135001
d84 mm
1700145001
143 00
Table 7d Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site
Parameter
Cross - Section 10
Cross - Section 11
Cross - Section 12
Riffle
Riffle
Pool
Reach
T4-2
T44
T5.2
Dimension
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MY]
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Bankfull Width ft
91
95
83
93
86
67
68
61
107
103
105
99
Flood prone Width ft
24
21
21
22
26
22
22
21
-
-
-
-
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
06
05
05
04
09
1 0
09
09
1 1
1 1
13
14
Bankfull Max Depth ft
12
08
08
08
17
14
16
12
25
25
28
28
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft2
59
43
41
39
79
64
64
57
123
11 2
136
134
Width/Depth Rat►
140
210
168
222
94
7 0
7 2
6 5
-
-
-
-
Entrenchment Ratio
26
22
26
23
30
3 3
3 2
3
-
Bank Height Ratio
10
10
10
10
10
10
1 0
1 1
-
-
-
-
d50 (mm)j
800
120 00
135 00
117 00
1
1
120
135 00
110 00
1 130
1
1
1 020
1 520
125 00
110 00
d84 mm
39 00
143 00
159 00
139 001
1
1 16 00
1 Bdrk
125 00
1 19001
0 80
122 00
143 00
14100
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KC1 Technologies Inc
Contract 4 D06002 24 2011— MY03

Table 7e Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site
Parameter
Cross - Section 13
Riffle
Cross - Section 14
Riffle
Cross - Section 15
Pool
Reach
T5
-2
T6
T6
Dimension
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Bankfull Width (ft)
59
60
69
59
69
7 1
74
77
69
101
41
60
50
5 1
81
Flood rove Width (ft)
21
23
23
27
19
19
26
26
38
-
-
-
-
-
19
BankfillMean Depth (
04
-04
04
03
06
05
06
08
08
17
08
07
07
07
09
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
08
07
09
09
12
1
08
14
18
1 8
26
12
14
14
14
17
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
24
24
26
1 8
44
34
47
59
58
173
3 1
39
36
37
74
Width/Depth Ratio
145
150
183
19 3
10 8
14 8
11 7
100
82
-
-
-
-
-
8 9
Entrenchment Ratio
36
3 8
33
4 6
2 7
2 6
35
34
5 5
-
-
-
-
-
2 3
Bank Height Ratio
10
10
10
1 0
] 0
1 0
10
10
10
-
-
-
-
-
1 0
Substrate
d50 (mm)l
020
068 1 280
1 130 144001
680
1 990
1 2 10 1 1 440
190
23 00
25 00
d84 mm
420
1 200 128 00
142 00 1 1. 157 00
130 00
126 00
1 17001 20 00
3500
144 00154
00
Table 7f Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site
Parameter
Cross - Section 16
Cross - Section 17
Cross - Section 18
Riffle
Pool
Riffle
Reach
T 6
T7 -3
Dimension
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Bankfull Width (ft)
63
60
74
69
73
88
98
101
90
92
82
81
Flood rove Width (ft)
17
18
18
19
-
-
-
-
18
19
19
19
BankfulI Mean Depth (ft)
06
07
07
06
1 1
12
14
17
08
08
09
09
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0 9
12
12
12
1
20
20
23
26
13
14
15
17
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft2 )
36
4 1
52
44
77
108
133
173
72
73
72
74
Width/Depth Ratio
110
88
-105
10 8
-
-
-
-
116
116
9 3
8 9
Entrenchment Ratio
27
30
24
2 7
-
-
-
-
20
20
2 3
2 3
Bank Height Ratio
I O
1 0
10
] 0
-
-
-
-
10
10
1 0
1 0
d50 (MM)l
35 00145
00
22001
19001
030
1 0 39
0 57
1 012
12100
1 32 00
1 7 30
1 0 56
d84 mm
56 00
1 Bdrk
145 00
1 52001
0 50
1 7 00
1 3 50
113 00
1
1
158 00
1100 00
163 00120
00
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site
KC1 Technologies Inc
Contract # D06002 25 2011 — MY03

Table A2 Stem Count by Plot and Species
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site -
y
E
N
M
V7
O
t—
go
ON
O
...i
N
++
V]
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
y
1
e
1
I
Q
1
I
Q
1
1
e
1
1
e
1
1
a
1
1
e<
1
1
I
1
Q
I
1
Q
I
1
Q
1
1
Q
1
1
Q
I
1
Q
1
1
e
1
I
e
1
1
Q
1
I
Q
1
1
e
1
1
Q
1
ry
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
y
C
a.
r
r
♦+
+
.+
r
o
_
Z
w
0
Z
0
w
0
a+
0
*6
0
*4
0
Z
0
-
0
0
0
0
c
a
a
a
Asimina triloba
4
1
4
4
Betula nigra
6
2
3
1
5
Callicar a americana
1
1
1
1
Ca rya ovata
5
3
2
2
2
1
Cornus amomum
60
13
5
1 2
1
3
4
1
5
1 7
1
7
1 5
1 2
1
14
3
2
5
Diospyros vii iniana
23
11
2
3
2
3
2
1
2
4
3
1
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
4
2
2
3
1
Ju lans nigra
18
9
2
2
1
2
5
1
3
1
2
1
briodendron tiili i era
6
5
1
1
1
2
1
1
Platanus occidentalis
8
5
1 2
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 2
ercus alcata
22
8
3
1
1
3
2
6
4
4
l
ercus michauxii
10
3
3
2
7
1
uercus pagoda
2
2
1
1
1
ercus phellos
9
3
3
1
3
5
Salix
1
I 1
1
I
1
Salix ni ra
2
2
1
1
1
1
Salix sericea
24
8
3
2
5
3
2
7
1
2
Total Year 3
205
17
13
9
13
16
6
12
16
4
12
E364
13
13
5
16
8
12
5
E283
L364
7
Average Dense Stems /acre
526
364
526
647
243
486
647
162
486
526
526
202
647
324
486
202
283
Total Dense
(Stems/Acre)415
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KCI Technologies Inc
Contract # D06002 2011 — MY03

Vegetation Plot 1: View looking toward plot center from origin corner. 6/29/11 — MY -03
Vegetation Plot 2: View looking toward plot center from origin corner. 6/29/11 — MY -03
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KCI Technologies, Inc.
Contract # D06002 2011— MY03

Vegetation Plot 3: View looking toward plot center from origin corner. 6/29/11 — MY -03
Vegetation Plot 4: View looking toward plot center from origin corner. 6/29/11 — MY -03
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KCI Technologies, Inc.
Contract # D06002 2011— MY03

Vegetation Plot 5: View looking toward plot center from origin corner. 6/29/11 — MY -03
Vegetation Plot 6: View looking toward plot center from origin corner. 6/29/11 — MY -03
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KCl Technologies, Inc.
Contract # D06002 2011— MY03

i
a
}�• r..'
Nii

Vegetation Plot 9: View looking toward plot center from origin comer. 6/30/ 11 — MY -03
Vegetation Plot 10: View looking toward plot center from origin comer. 6/30/11— MY -03
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KCI Technologies, Inc.
Contract # D06001 1011— W03

Vegetation Plot 11: View looking toward plot center from origin corner. 6/30/11 — MY -03
Vegetation Plot 12: View looking toward plot center from origin corner. 6/30/11 — MY -03
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KCI Technologies, Inc.
Contract # D06002 2011 — MY03

Vegetation Plot 13: View looking toward plot center from origin corner. 6/29/11 — MY -03
Vegetation Plot 14: View looking toward plot center from origin corner. 6/30/11 — MY -03
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KCI Technologies, Inc.
Contract 4 D06002 2011— MY03

Vegetation Plot 15: View looking toward plot center from origin corner. 6/30/11— MY -03
Vegetation Plot 16: View looking toward plot center from origin corner. 6/30/11 — MY -03
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KCI Technologies, Inc.
Contract # D06002 2011 — MY03

Vegetation Plot 17: View looking toward plot center from origin corner. 6/30/11 — MY -03
Vegetation Plot 18: View looking toward plot center from origin corner. 8/3/11 — MY -03
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KCI Technologies, Inc.
Contract # D06002 2011— MY03

Vegetation Plot 19: View looking toward plot center from origin corner. 8/3/11— MY -02
Vegetation Plot 20: View looking toward plot center from origin corner. 6/30/11 — MY -03
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KC1 Technologies, Inc.
Contract # D06002 2011— W03

Appendix B
Geomorphologic Data
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KCI Technologies Inc
Contract # D06002 2011— MY03

Cross - Section Plots
River Basin:
Roanoke
Watershed:
Cane Creek, MY -03
XS ID
XS -1, Pool, Tl -3
Drainage Area (s mi :
0.49
-
Date:
-
6/15/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, J. Anders
Station
Elevatim
SLfMMARY DATA
0.0
501.64
Bankfull Elevation:
499.4
0.3
501.39
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
35.5
3.2
501.13
Bankfull Width:
14.9
5.7
500.90
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
-
9.1
500.44
Flood Prone Width:
-
12.4
499.94
Max Depth at Bankfull:
3.6
16.2
499.61
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
2.4
19.2
499.49
W / D Ratio:
-
20.4
499.32
Entrenchment Ratio:
21.1
499.05
Bank Height Ratio:
21.6
498.09
21.9
497.73
C/B4
22.5
497.32
22.8
497.18
Roanoke River Basin, Cane Creek, MY-03, XS-1, Pool, TI-3
23.2
496.78
24.0
496.40
24.7
496.09
503 - -
-
25.6
495.93
27.3
495.77
28.8
496.10
29.8
496.27
501
31.0
496.44
31.9
496.86
---------- - - - -
-- ------
- - - - -- -
32.2
497.50
0 499 -
33.3
498.02
a
34.1
498.63
R
34.5
498.82
w
497
34.7
499.40
35.3
499.56
37.5
499.62
41.7
500.27
495
43.6
500.74
0 10
20
30 40 50 60
48.8
501.30
Station (feet)
54.6
501.44
- - -. Bankfull
- - As- Built, 1/22/09
MY-01, 12/16/09 MY -02, 8/11/10 MY-03,6/15/11
60.1
501.60
-
- - -
60.4
501.85
- -
-
-
-

River Basin:
Roanoke
Watershed:
Cane Creek, MY -03
XS tD
XS -2, Riffle, T14
Drainage Area (sq mi :
0.62
Date:
6/15/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, J. Anders
Station
Elevation
0.0
501.45
0.5
501.27
4.6
501.31
9.3
501.31
13.5
500.96
16.6
500.01
19.2
499.26
22.5
498.36
25.6
497.70
28.4
497.46
30.9
497.26
33.1
496.90
34.1
496.68
34.5
496.48
35.1
495.85
35.6
495.34
36.5
495.12
37.7
495.24
38.7
495.26
39.6
495.26
40.6
495.16
40.8
495.18
41.4
495.45
42.0
495.95
42.5
496.19
43.7
496.52
44.9
496.92
46.0
497.17
48.3
497.29
51.3
497.51
53.0
497.81
55.9
498.52
58.6
499.19
60.8
499.84
62.9
500.27
65.7
500.57
69.3
500.68
69.9
500.98
SUMMARY DATA
11 Elevation: 7W
497.3
Baald'ull Cross - Sectional Area:
18.7
Bankfull Width:
18.0
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
499.5
Flood Prone Width:
41.1
Max Depth at Bankfull:
2.2
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.0
W / D Ratio:
17.3
Entrenchment Ratio:
2.3
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
502 F-
i
500
a
498
t
0
w 496
C/B4
Roanoke River Basin, Cane Creek, MY -03, XS -2, Riffle, T1 -4
494 +
0
10 20
--- •Baokfall -- -- FloodproneArea
30 40 50 60 70
Station (feet)
As- Built, 1/19/09 MY -01,12/16/09 -MY-02,8111/10 -MY-03,6/15/11

River Basin:
Roanoke
Watershed:
0.62
Cane Creek, MY -03
6/15/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, J. Anders
XS ID
XS -3, Pool, Tl-4
Drainage
CB4
5 496
e
0
W
Station SUMMARY DATA
0.0 499.31 Elevation: 495.2
1.4 499.05
19.7 495.28
21.7 495.04 Stream Type
23.2 494.44
24.8 494.21
25.8 493.76
49.0 498.13
52.8 498.25 0 10 20 30 40 50 60
55.4 49833
55.6
IMAM Cross- Section rear 20.5
4.1 498.81 Bankfull Width: 13.2
6.9 498.36 Flood Prone Area Elevatioa
8.5 497.64 Flood Prone Width: -
10.1 497.10 Max Depth at Bankfull: 3.4
11.8 496.45 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.6
13.9 495.99 W / D Ratio:
15.5 495.73 Entrenchment Ratio:
17.6 495.56 Bank Height Ratio:
Elevation-, -
-
-
-
Roanoke River Basin, Cane Creek, MY-03, XS-3, Pool,
Station (feet)
- - -- Bankfull As- Built, 1/19/09 MY- 01,12/16/09 MY -02, 8/11/10 - MY -03, 6/15/11
Area s mi):
0.62
Date:
6/15/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, J. Anders
Station SUMMARY DATA
0.0 499.31 Elevation: 495.2
1.4 499.05
19.7 495.28
21.7 495.04 Stream Type
23.2 494.44
24.8 494.21
25.8 493.76
49.0 498.13
52.8 498.25 0 10 20 30 40 50 60
55.4 49833
55.6
IMAM Cross- Section rear 20.5
4.1 498.81 Bankfull Width: 13.2
6.9 498.36 Flood Prone Area Elevatioa
8.5 497.64 Flood Prone Width: -
10.1 497.10 Max Depth at Bankfull: 3.4
11.8 496.45 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.6
13.9 495.99 W / D Ratio:
15.5 495.73 Entrenchment Ratio:
17.6 495.56 Bank Height Ratio:
Elevation-, -
-
-
-
Roanoke River Basin, Cane Creek, MY-03, XS-3, Pool,
Station (feet)
- - -- Bankfull As- Built, 1/19/09 MY- 01,12/16/09 MY -02, 8/11/10 - MY -03, 6/15/11
IMAM Cross- Section rear 20.5
4.1 498.81 Bankfull Width: 13.2
6.9 498.36 Flood Prone Area Elevatioa
8.5 497.64 Flood Prone Width: -
10.1 497.10 Max Depth at Bankfull: 3.4
11.8 496.45 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.6
13.9 495.99 W / D Ratio:
15.5 495.73 Entrenchment Ratio:
17.6 495.56 Bank Height Ratio:
Elevation-, -
-
-
-
Roanoke River Basin, Cane Creek, MY-03, XS-3, Pool,
Station (feet)
- - -- Bankfull As- Built, 1/19/09 MY- 01,12/16/09 MY -02, 8/11/10 - MY -03, 6/15/11
Roanoke River Basin, Cane Creek, MY-03, XS-3, Pool,
Station (feet)
- - -- Bankfull As- Built, 1/19/09 MY- 01,12/16/09 MY -02, 8/11/10 - MY -03, 6/15/11

River Basin:
JRoanoke
Watershed: j
XS ID
Cane Creek, MY -03
JtS-4 Riffle TI-5
Drainage Area
0.70
Date:
Field Crew. '.
6/15/2011
A. French, J. Anders
Station
Elevation
0.0
493.61
0.0
493.27
2.9
493.14
4.7
492.95
6.3
492.36
10.4
491.28
14.6
490.05
18.7
489.78
21.6
489.47
24.0
488.74
26.9
488.59
29.0
488.50
30.2
488.01
30.9
487.64
31.6
487.61
32.2
487.36
32.9
487.31
33.2
487.37
33.6
487.79
34.2
488.20
34.8
488.38
36.1
488.54
36.9
488.63
37.2
489.62
38.1
489.65
40.6
489.70
43.5
490.32
45.6
491.00
46.8
491.22
48.7
491.58
51.6
491.74
53.9
491.98
SUMMARY DATA
Ba
BankfuD Cross - Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
489.6
18.8
15.6
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
491.9
Flood Prone Width:
44.7
Max Depth at Bankfull:
2.3
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.2
W / D Ratio:
12.9
Entrenchment Ratio:
2.9
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Stream T C/134
Roanoke River Basin, Cane Creek, MY -03, XS4, Riffle, T1 -5
494
492
---- - ------------------- ----------------- - - -_ --
5 490
a
va
488
486
0 10 20 30 40 50
Station (feet)
--- -BanWl - -- -Flood Prone Ares As- Built, 1 /16/09 MY -01,12/16/09 -MY-02,9/11/10 -MY-03,6/15/11

River Basin:
Roanoke
Watershed:
Cane Creek, MY -03
XS ID
XS -5, Riffle, T2 -2
Drainage Area (sq mi :
0.11
Date:
6/15/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, J. Anders
Station
Elevation
0.0
520.97
0.7
520.63
3.8
519.90
6.8
519.05
11.2
517.52
12.7
517.02
14.1
516.42
16.2
516.04
17.8
515.98
19.3
515.87
20.2
515.54
20.7
515.31
21.4
515.12
21.9
514.88
22.2
514.84
22.5
514.65
23.0
514.70
23.7
514.72
24.1
514.74
24.8
515.00
25.2
515.15
25.9
515.46
27.0
515.80
29.3
316.04
32.3
516.26
35.6
517.19
39.2
518.09
42.0
518.85
45.1
519.45
46.9
519.94
47.1
520.20
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
515.7
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
4.2
Bankfull Width:
6.5
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
516.7
Flood Prone Width:
20.7
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.0
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.6
%N'/ D Ratio:
10.1
Entrenchment Ratio:
3.2
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
522
520
518
e
,o
Y
516
514
C/E4
Roanoke River Basin, Cane Creek, MY-03, XS -5, Riffle, T2 -2
0 10
- - -- Bankfull - -- -Flood Prone Area
20 30
Station (feet)
As -Built, 1/19/09 MY -01, 12/16/09
40
MY-02,913/10 -MY-03,6/15/11
50

River Basin:
Roanoke
Watershed:
Cane Creek MY -03
XS ID
XS-6 Pool T3 -2
Drainage Area mi):
0.08
Date:
6/15/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, J. Anders
Station
B Elevation:
0 n
539.68
0.5
539.45
3.2
539.10
7.1
538.35
10.0
537.64
12.2
536.95
14.6
536.19
16.6
535.60
18.4
535.07
21.2
534.38
23.3
534.13
26.6
533.94
27.4
533.81
27.9
533.53
28.4
533.26
28.9
532.93
29.9
532.09
30.8
531.66
31.8
531.55
32.7
531.95
33.8
532.39
34.8
532.64
35.4
532.91
35.8
533.18
36.4
533.32
38.3
533.52
39.8
533.82
41.2
533.77
42.8
533.77
45.1
533.91
47.5
534.03
50.1
534.27
51.8
534.62
54.2
535.17
57.6
535.90
61.1
536.49
64.4
537.28
66.3
537.56
66.6
537.74
SUMMARY DATA
B Elevation:
533.8
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
12.9
Bankfull Width:
12.3
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
-
Max Depth at Bankfull:
2.3
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1 1
W / D Ratio:
-
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
541
539
y 537
r
0
e 535
533
531
Stream Type R4
Roanoke River Basin, Cane Creek, MY -03, XS -6, Pool, T3 -2
10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Station (feet)
---- Bankfull As- Built, 1/26/09 - MY-01, 12116/09 MY-02,9/31/10 MY-03, 6/15/11

River Basin:
Roanoke
Watershed:
Cane Creek, MY -03
XS ID
XS -7, Riffle, T3 -2
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.08
Date:
6/15/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, J. Anders
Station
Elevation
5.4
534.36
5.8
534.08
7.9
533.54
11.0
533.26
15.0
532.43
18.9
531.79
21.0
531.58
25.1
530.80
28.3
530.59
30.2
530.46
30.7
530.36
31.6
530.04
32.3
529.90
33.0
529.73
33.1
529.65
33.6
529.58
34.1
529.64
35.0
529.74
35.8
529.80
36.8
529.97
38.1
530.42
39.2
530.60
41.3
530.89
44.1
531.55
48.4
532.47
52.2
533.16
56.6
534.02
60.0
534.52
60.6
534.54
65.1
535.18
66.4
535.35
66.5
535.53
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
530.5
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
4.5
Bankfull Width:
7.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
531.4
Flood Prone Width:
21.7
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.9
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.6
W / D Ratio:
13.9
Entrenchment Ratio:
2.7
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
536
534
532
e
0
°>
w 530
528
Stream Type I B4
Roanoke River Basin, Cane Creek, MY-03, XS -7, Riffle, T3 -2
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Station (feet)
- -- -Bankfull --- -Flood Prone Area As- Built, 1/26/09 -MY-01,12/16/09 -MY-02,8/31/10 -MY-03.6/15/11
J
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Station (feet)
- -- -Bankfull --- -Flood Prone Area As- Built, 1/26/09 -MY-01,12/16/09 -MY-02,8/31/10 -MY-03.6/15/11

River Basin:
Roanoke
Watershed:
Cane Creek, MY -03
XS ID
XS -8, Riffle, T3 -2
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.08
Date:
6/15/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, J. Anders
Station
Elevation
OA
513.24
0.1
513.06
4.1
512.71
5.6
512.45
6.7
511.88
8.9
511.14
13.0
509.74
15.4
508.83
17.1
508.47
19.8
508.42
22.3
508.19
23.4
507.99
24.5
507.85
25.3
507.67
25.6
507.50
26.3
507.42
26.9
507.49
27.2
507.42
27.6
507.58
28.0
507.34
28.5
507.57
28.8
507.73
29.5
507.98
30.5
508.18
32.3
508.47
36.2
508.72
38.5
509.13
42.8
509.95
47.3
510.87
50.7
511.69
54.3
512.36
56.3
512.61
56.4
512.80
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
508.2
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
3.6
Bankfull Width:
8.2
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
509.1
Flood Prone Width:
23.3
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.9
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.4
W / D Ratio:
18.7
Entrenchment Ratio:
2.8
Bank Height Ratio:
1 0
514
512
510
0
a
508
506
Stream Type B4
Roanoke River Basin, Cane Creek, MV-03, XS -8, Riffle, T3 -2
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Station (feet)
- - -- Bankfull - -- -Flood Prone Area As -Built, 1/23/09 -MY-01,12/16/09 -MY-02,8/31/10 --e-MY-03,6/15/11

River Basin:
Roanoke
Watershed:
Cane Creek, MY -03
XS ID
XS -9, Riffle, T4 -1
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.10
Date:
6/15/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, J. Anders
Station
Elevation
U
539.70
0.4
539.57
3.3
539.20
8.7
538.85
10.7
538.33
12.4
537.95
14.7
537.35
17.6
536.63
20.3
536.37
22.8
536.22
23.3
535.94
23.8
535.76
24.5
535.52
24.9
535.35
25.3
535.30
25.8
535.23
26.4
535.27
26.8
535.34
27.3
535.64
27.9
535.87
28.5
536.19
29.7
536.40
31.7
536.41
34.0
536.46
36.6
536.99
38.8
537.28
41.7
537.98
46.0
538.36
46.3
538.44
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
536.4
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
4.9
Bankfull Width:
10.1
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
537.6
Flood Prone Width:
26.1
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.2
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.5
W / D Ratio:
20.8
Entrenchment Ratio:
2.6
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
542
540
538
r
0
a
536
534
' 134
Roanoke River Basin, Cane Creek, MY -03, XS-9, Riffle, T4-1
0 10 20 30 40 50
Station (feet)
­-Bankfull - -- -Flood Prone Area As -Built, 1/23/09 -MY-01,12116/09 MY -02,8/13/10 -MY -03,6/15/11

River Basin:
Roanoke
Watershed:
Cane Creek, MY -03
XS ID
XS -10. Riffle, T4 -2
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.10
Date:
6/15/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, J. Anders
Station
Elevation
0.0
528.92
0.6
528.57
4.3
528.07
7.9
527.34
10.9
526.64
13.3
525.79
15.9
524.95
19.1
523.65
22.3
522.50
26.6
521.92
29.4
521.68
29.4
521.65
30.0
521.46
30.6
521.29
31.1
520.98
31.6
520.96
32.1
520.95
32.8
520.92
33.4
520.82
33.9
520.93
34.7
521.11
35.4
521.26
36.8
521.50
38.8
521.67
42.2
521.73
43.5
522.33
45.1
522.94
47.8
523.92
51.2
525.13
55.9
526.38
59.8
526.64
60.2
526.87
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
521.7
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
3.9
Bankfull Width:
9.3
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
522.5
Flood Prone Width:
21.6
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.8
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.4
W/ D Ratio:
22.2
Entrenchment Ratio:
2.3
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
530
528
526
v
5
0 524
W
522
520
Stream TypeB4
Roanoke River Basin, Cane Creek, MY -03, XS-10, Riffle, T4 -2
I- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Station (feet)
- - -- Bankfull - -- -Flood Prone Area As- Built, 1/23/09 -MY-01,12/16/09 -MY-02,930/10 - MY -03, 6/15/11

River Basin:
Roanoke
Watershed:
Cane Creek, MY -03
XS ID
XS -11, Riffle, T4 -2
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.10
Date:
6/15/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, J. Anders
0.0
519.01
0.4
518.70
3.8
518.51
5.7
518.15
7.5
517.35
9.4
516.77
11.7
515.89
13.6
515.34
15.9
514.72
17.9
514.36
19.3
514.21
21.2
514.06
21.0
514.14
22.0
513.75
22.5
513.19
23.2
512.75
24.2
512.69
25.1
512.69
25.4
512.69
26.2
512.72
26.9
512.86
27.4
513.49
27.7
513.63
28.9
514.19
31.3
514.53
34.5
514.70
37.1
515.55
39.2
516.30
42.0
517.06
43.9
517.79
47.3
518.31
50.4
519.07
53.1
519.45
53.2
519.56
SUMMARY DATA
full Elevation:
aakfull Cross - Sectional Areal
513.9
5.7
Bankfull Width:
6.1
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
515.1
Flood Prone Width:
21.3
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.2
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.9
W / D Ratio:
6.5
Entrenchment Ratio:
3.5
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
520
518
516
e
0
w 514
Stream Type B4
Roanoke River Basin, Cane Creek, MY-03, XS-11, Riffle, T4-2
512 1 i i i i i
0 10 20 30 40 50
Station (feet)
F7Bankfull - - - - Flood Prone Area As- Built, 1/22/09 MY -01,12/16/09 -MY-02,8/30/10 ---*-- MY-03, 6/15/ 1 1

River Basin:
Roanoke
Watershed:
Cane Creek, MY -03
XS ID
XS -12, Pool, T4 -2
Drainage Area (sq mi :
0.10
Date:
6/15/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, J. Anders
Station
Elevation
0.0
508.07
0.2
507.79
3.8
507.25
7.9
506.64
11.5
505.91
15.1
505.03
18.5
504.34
22.6
503.74
25.1
503.25
28.4
503.23
30.4
503.19
31.6
503.02
33.0
502.58
33.9
502.30
34.7
502.08
34.9
501.58
35.6
501.01
36.4
500.65
36.8
500.39
37.5
500.24
38.1
500.36
38.9
500.69
39.3
501.54
39.6
501.91
40.0
502.22
40.6
502.59
41.6
503.10
43.1
503.18
45.6
503.19
47.3
503.53
49.9
504.32
53.1
505.28
56.3
506.01
59.6
506.19
59.8
506.41
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
503.0
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
13.4
Bankfull Width:
9.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
-
Flood Prone Width:
-
Max Depth at Bankfull:
2.8
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.4
W / D Ratio:
-
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
510
508
506
5
r
504
a
v
w
502
500 L
0
10
• Bankfull
Stream Type B4
Roanoke River Basin, Cane Creek, MY-03, XS -12, Pool, T4-2
20 30 40 50 60
Station (feet)
- As- Built, 1/22/09 MY -01, 12/16/09 MY-02,8/13/10 -.-- W-03,6115111

River Basin:
Roanoke
Watershed:
Cane Creek, MY -03
XS ID
XS -13, Riffle, T5 -2
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.02
Date:
6/15/2011
Fidd Crew:
A. French, J. Anders
Station
Elevatiolk
0.0
502.81
0.7
502.42
5.4
502.43
9.8
502.26
14.0
501.70
16.9
501.30
19.3
500.99
22.5
500.83
24.6
500.80
25.1
500.58
25.5
500.27
25.7
499.93
25.9
499.96
26.6
500.06
26.8
500.38
27.5
500.48
28.5
500.67
29.6
500.97
31.5
500.93
34.5
500.84
37.6
501.51
41.1
501.69
45.2
501.75
48.7
501.69
49.1
501.90
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
500.8
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
1.8
Bankfull Width:
5.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
501.7
Flood Prone Width:
26.9
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.9
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.3
W / D Ratio:
19.3
Entrenchment Ratio:
4.6
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
506
504
Y
502
e
0
R
Q 500
Roanoke River Basin, Cane Creek, MY-03, XS -13, Riffle, T5 -2
498 1
0 10
- - -- Bankftdl - - Flood Prone Area
20 30
Station (feet)
As- Built, 1/19/09 MY -01, 12/16/09
40
MY -02, 8/11/10 � MY -03, 6/15/11
50

River Basin:
Roanoke
Watershed:
Cane Creek, MY -03
XS ID
XS -14, Riffle, T6
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.07
Date:
6/15/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, J. Anders
Station
Elevation
0.0
522.87
4.1
522.20
9.1
521.62
15.3
520.77
19.5
519.86
22.8
519.18
24.6
518.77
26.9
518.30
29.4
517.98
30.4
517.57
31.4
517.18
31.6
516.17
32.4
516.18
33.1
516.19
33.7
516.61
34.5
517.52
35.2
517.83
36.3
517.94
39.0
518.11
42.1
518.62
46.4
519.20
50.8
519.32
53.3
519.42
58.0
519.84
62.2
520.31
66.9
520.99
67.0
521.27
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
518.0
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
5.8
Bankfull Width:
6.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
519.8
Flood Prone Width:
38.1
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.8
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.8
W / D Ratio:
8.2
Entrenchment Ratio:
5.5
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
524
522
Y
5 520
S
�p
w 519
B4
Roanoke River Basin, Cane Creek, MY-03, XS -14, Riffle, T6
516
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Station (feet)
-- • Bankfull - - - • Flood Prone Area As- Built, 1/16109 MY -01,12/16/09 -MY-02,8/9/10 ---*.--MY-03,6/15/11

River Basin:
Roanoke
Watershed:
Cane Creek, MY -03
XS ID
XS -15, Pool, T6
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.07
Date:
6/15/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, J. Anders
Station
Elevation
0.0
497.12
0.3
496.64
5.0
496.51
8.7
496.33
12.0
495.84
15.6
495.41
19.1
495.06
20.7
494.85
22.7
495.18
25.5
493.43
28.6
492.80
31.7
492.61
33.8
492.39
35.9
492.01
36.4
491.79
36.9
491.34
37.5
491.09
38.4
490.91
39.0
491.05
39.3
492.10
39.9
492.45
40.3
492.73
41.9
492.87
43.8
493.16
46.4
494.01
48.4
494.93
50.6
495.88
53.2
496.97
55.2
497.74
57.4
497.73
57.6
497.94
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
492.3
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
3.7
Bankfull Width:
5.1
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
-
Flood Prone Width:
-
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.4
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.7
W / D Ratio:
-
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
500
498
496
5
e
494
1
W
492
490
0 10
Stream Type I B4
Roanoke River Basin, Cane Creek, MV-03, XS -15, Pool, T6
20 30 40 50 60
Station (feet)
As- Built, 1/19/09 - MY -01, 12/16/09 MY-02,8/9/10 -.-- MY-03,6/15/11

River Basin:
Roanoke
Watershed:
Cane Creek, MY -03
XS ID
XS -16, Riffle, T6
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.07
Date:
6/15/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, J. Anders
Station
BaekfuB Elevation:
0.0
497.11
0.8
496.60
4.0
496.44
7.0
496.13
9.8
495.83
12.5
495.31
15.0
494.85
17.1
494.05
19.5
493.08
21.2
492.69
24.2
492.44
25.9
492.16
26.7
491.85
27.6
491.66
27.9
491.40
28.5
491.24
29.0
491.15
29.5
491.07
30.0
491.21
30.4
491.23
30.8
491.62
30.9
491.75
31.4
492.03
32.1
492.37
33.7
492.56
34.8
492.68
35.7
492.87
36.9
493.33
38.5
494.15
40.2
495.33
41.9
495.85
44.5
495.84
47.3
495.84
47.6
495.90
SUMMARY' DATA
BaekfuB Elevation:
492.3
Bankfull Cross- Seetional Area:
4.4
Bankfull Width:
6.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
493.5
Flood Prone Width:
18.9
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.2
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.6
W / D Ratio:
10.8
Entrenchment Ratio:
2.7
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
499
496
5
c 494
ti
492
490 +
0
Roanoke River Basin, Cane Creek, MY-03, XS-16, Riffle, T6
- ---- -
- - - - -- ----- - - - - -- - -- - - --
10 20 30 40 50
Station (feet)
- - -- Bankfull - -- -Flood Prone Area As- Built, 1/16/09 MY -01, 12/16/09 MY-02.8/`9/10 - MY -03, 6/15/11

R1ver sin:
Roanoke
Watershed:
Cane Creek, MY -03
XS W
XS -17, Pool, T7 -3
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.18
Date:
6/15/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, J. Anders
Station
Elevation
0.0
522.69
0.7
522.47
5.0
522.36
8.8
522.20
12.0
521.62
14.6
521.22
16.4
520.81
18.3
520.07
19.7
519.51
21.2
519.39
22.1
518.73
22.4
516.46
23.1
516.23
23.9
516.17
25.3
516.35
26.7
516.49
28.2
516.80
29.0
516.96
29.5
517.44
31.0
518.34
32.4
518.76
34.6
518.98
37.5
519.37
41.6
520.23
45.4
520.98
50.0
521.67
55.7
521.93
58.4
522.31
60.6
522.38
60.8
522.60
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
518.8
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
17.3
Bankfull Width:
10.1
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
-
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
2 r,
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
524
522
5 520
w 518
516
Stream Type B4c
Roanoke River Basin, Cane Creek, MY-03, XS -17, Pool, T7 -3
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Station (feet)
­-Bad" Aa- Built, UUM MY -01,12/16/09 - MY-02,9/2/10 - MY-03,6/14/11

River Basin:
Roanoke
Watershed:
Cane Creek, MY -03
XS ID
XS -18, Riffle, T7 -3
Drainage Area (sq mi :
0.18
Date:
6/15/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, J. Anders
Station
Elevation
0.0
518.78
0.3
518.55
4.1
518.52
6.3
518.42
9.7
518.09
12.6
517.88
13.7
517.63
15.5
516.85
17.2
516.03
18.8
515.41
20.5
515.33
21.4
514.88
22.2
514.53
22.4
514.39
22.7
514.09
23.2
513.73
23.8
513.63
24.3
513.48
25.0
513.61
25.6
513.79
26.5
513.99
27.2
514.58
28.0
514.85
29.0
515.03
30.9
515.39
32.1
515.67
33.4
516.16
35.2
516.66
37.2
517.29
38.9
517.75
41.9
517.77
45.3
518.05
48.2
518.21
48.4
518.38
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
515.1
Bankfull Cross- Sectional Area:
7.4
Bankfull Width:
8.1
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
516.8
Flood Prone Width:
18.6
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.7
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.9
W / D Ratio:
8.9
Entrenchment Ratio:
2.3
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
520
518
i
516
e
0
514
512 +
0
B4c
Roanoke River Basin, Cane Creek, MY-03, XS -18, Riffle, T7 -3
------------­-------
- - - - -- - -- - - -- -------------
10 20 30 40 50
Station (feet)
- - - - Bankfull - - - - Flood Prone Area As- Built, 1 /12/09 -MY-01,12/16/09 -MY-02,9/2/10

River Basin:
Roanoke
Watershed:
Cane Creek, MY -03
XS ID
XS -19, Riffle, T7 -3
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.18
Date:
6/15/2011
)FW Crew:
A. French, J. Anders
Stmba
smalion
0.0
512.51
0.5
512.26
6.2
512.02
7.1
311.96
9.5
512.09
13.1
512.01
16.4
511.86
18.4
51 1.65
19.5
511.15
20.6
510.62
21.8
509.96
23.0
509.22
24.3
508.49
25.4
508.07
26.7
507.86
28.1
507.57
29.5
507.42
30.6
506.98
31.4
506.97
32.4
506.72
33.3
506.44
34.0
506.60
35.0
507.07
36.0
507.59
38.2
508.12
40.9
509.06
43.1
510.39
44.9
511.39
46.9
512.21
50.2
512.43
54.2
512.44
58.4
512.37
60.9
512.57
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
507.8
Bankfull Cross- Sectional Area:
6.4
Bankfull Width:
9.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
509.2
Flood Prone Width:
17.9
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.4
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.6
W / D Ratio:
15.3
Entrenchment Ratio:
1.8
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
514
512
510
0
ti
w 508
Stream Type I B4c
Roanoke River Basin, Cane Creek, MY-03, XS-19, Riffle, T7 -3
------------------- ---------------------
t---------------------- - - -- -- --- - - - - -� -- --- ----------- ---- - - - - --
506 -L
0
10 20
----Bankfull --- •Flood Prone Area
30 40
Station (feet)
As -Built, 1/12/09 -MY-01,12/16/09
50 60
MY -02,9/3/10 --- *-MY -03,6/15!11

River Basin:
Roanoke
Watershed:
Cane Creek, MY -03
XS ID
XS -20, Riffle, T7 -5
Drainage Area (sq mi ):
0.26
Date:
6/15/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, J. Anders
Station
Elevation
0.0
478.60
0.2
478.28
4.5
478.18
11.8
477.58
19.4
477.55
24.3
476.80
27.3
475.77
29.3
474.66
31.1
474.03
34.7
473.87
36.6
473.17
38.8
473.17
41.0
472.80
42.0
472.55
42.5
472.16
43.6
472.10
44.4
472.15
45.2
472.28
46.1
472.91
47.6
473.43
49.2
473.85
50.5
474.64
51.5
475.84
53.9
476.11
56.7
476.02
58.5
476.07
58.7
476.18
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
473.6
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
8.3
Bankfull Width:
12.0
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
475.1
Flood Prone Width:
20.5
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.5
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.7
W / D Ratio:
17.3
Entrenchment Ratio:
1.7
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
480
478
5 476
r
0
474
134c/C4
Roanoke River Basin, Cane Creek, MY -03, XS -20, Riffle, T7 -5
472 ' i i 9s- i
0 10 20 30 40 50
Station (feet)
---- Bmkfidl --- -Flood Prone Area As-Buk l /12/09 -MY-01,12/16109 -MY-02,9/3/10 t MY -03, 6/15/11
60

su
sit
sl9
509
soa
c sw
506
so
594
sa+
ses
s91
s40
1150
Cane Creek Tributary Site
Longitudinal Profile
Tributary 1, MY-03
Stations 11 +70 - 19 +10
1200 1259 1340 1339 1400 1450 1500 1550 1600 1650 1709 1750 law 1150 1400 1950
Station (ft)
MY -01" MY -02 MY-03 • Bankfull - - - - Water Surface
-Profile added during MY -01

500
499
498
497
0
't
4%
W 495
494
493
Cane Creek Tributary Site
Longitudinal Profile 2
Tributary 1, MY 03
Stations 23 +18 - 28 +66
•
■
• •
vIr ------ -
i
I
492
2300
2550 Z40U 2450 2500
As Huilt - MY -01
2550 2600
stall- M)
MY -02 - MY -03
2650 2700 2750 2800 2850 2900
Bankfull - - - - Water Surface

Cane Creek Tributary Site
Longitudinal Profile
Tributary 3, MY-03
Stations 71 +15 - 76 +44
D./
516
•
515
•
■
514
513
--- '
-
512
- - -
- -
511
510
•
•
589
-
•
508
507
-
505
7100 7150 7200 7250 7300 7350 7400 7450 7500 7550 7600 7650 7700
station (ft)
- A -ft& - MY -01 - MY -02 - MY -03 . Rmbhn - - - - Water Surface

0
.q
c:
Cane Creek Tributary Site
Longitudinal Profile
Tributary 4, MY-03
Stations 93 +75 - 102 +33
512 —
•
511
510
509
509
•
506
SQS
■ ■
504
- I
-
503
—
A -
502 -
501
_
____ -__ ■_ ■
■
500
--
-- -•
� --- ---- ■
499
490
- - -
497
4%
4"
4%
9350 %50 9530 9650 9750 9050 9930 10050 10130 10250
3tad- (ti)
— ArBWk — MY -01 — MY -02 — MY-03 • B=kM - - - - Wafer sancme I

512
511
510
509
508
507
506
505
e
0
c
� 504
u
Lr]
503
502
501
500
499
498
497
4%
495
12550
Cane Creek Tributary Site
Longitudinal Profile
Tributary 6, W-03
Stations 125 +75 - 131 +28
12650 12750 12650 12950 1300 13150
station (ft)
AS-Built MY -01 - MY-02 MY -03 ■ Smith l - - - - water Sarfaee

Cane Creek Tributary Site
Longitudinal Profile
Tributary 7, MY-03
Stations 152+25 - 160+25
Jig
•
-------- --------------
SIB
517
516
SIS
514
513
512
15200 15300 15400 15500
15600 15700 15M 15900 16000
Station (ft)
As 't -- MY-01 - MY-02 - MY-03 . Bankfug ------- Water Surface

C
e
0
a
a
Y
Cane Creek Tributary Site
Longitudinal Profile 2
Tributary 7, MY 03
Stations 180+00 - 187 +37
483
- - - -- -
482
-
481
480
479
- - - - -- -
478
.
477
476
- - - -
475
- -- - -- -- — - - - - --
474
473
- -- - - - -
472
- -- -- -- - --
471
- . - -- - -
470
469
- - - ' -- - - - - - - - --
4"
467
-
- - -
466
465
464
18000 18100 18200 18300
MY -01• — MY -02
18400 18500 18600
Station (ft)
MY -03 • Bankfull - - - - Water Surface
'Profile added during MY -01
18700 18p0

Pebble Count Plots
Cross - Section
1 Pool
- MV03, Trib
1
Particle Size Distribution
Cane Creek
XS 1 Pool
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
4
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
4
Fine
.125 - .25
A
1
Medium
.25-.50
N
6
Coarse
.50 - l
D
21
100%
80%
Very Coarse
1 -2
S
18
Very Fine
2-4
10
'
E
v
60%
-
Fine
4-5.7
G
Fine
5.7-8
R
Medium
8- 11.3
A
4
C
go
I`
40%
As -Buin
—� MY -01
Medium
11.3 - 16
V
2
Coarse
16-22.6
E
6
C
_
LL
°e
t MY -02
MY -03
Coarse
22.6-32
L
12
Very Coarse
32-45
S
7
20%
0%
Very Coarse
45-64
7
Small
64-90
C
3
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Small
90- 128
O
Large
128- 180
B
Large
180-256
L
I
Small
256-362
B
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
Size (mm)
0.53
1
1.9
13
34
60
Size Distribution
mean 4.2
dispersion 10.7
skewness 0.26
T
pe
Small
362-512
L
silt/clay
3%
Medium
512- 1024
D
sand
42%
Lr - Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
gravel
40%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
13
cobble
3%
Total
119
boulder
0%
Note:
bedrock
11%
hardpan
0%
wood/det
0%
artificial
0%

Cross - Section
2 Riffle
- MY03, Trib
1
R
E
0
i-`
c
a
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
Particle Size Distribution
Cane Creek
XS 2 Riffle
-
- �- ruin
--*—MY -01
t MY -02
t MY -03
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
I
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
Fine
.125-.25
A
Medium
.25-.50
N
I
Coarse
.50- 1
D
2
Very Coarse
1 -2
S
2
Very Fine
2 - 4
15
Fine
4-5.7
G
Fine
5.7-8
R
Medium
8- 11.3
A
2
Medium
11.3- 16
V
8
Coarse
16-22.6
E
21
Coarse
22.6-32
L
30
Very Coarse
32-45
S
18
Very Coarse
45-64
7
Small
64-90
C
2
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Small
90- 128
O
Large
128- 180
B
Large
180-256
L
Small
256-362
B
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
ID95
Size (mm)
3.4
18
23
28
38
54
Size Distribution
mean 11.4
dispersion 4.2
skewness -0.30
T
e
Small
362-512
L
silt/clay
1%
Medium
512-1024
D
sand
5%
Lr - Very Lr
1024-2048
R
ravel
93%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
cobble
2%
Total
109
boulder
0%
Note:
bedrock
0%
hardpan
0%
wood/det
0%
artificial
0%

Cross - Section
3 Pool
- MY03, Trib
1
100%
80%
Particle Size Distribution
Cane Creek
XS 3 Pool
�-
- f
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
Fine
.125-.25
A
Medium
.25-.50
N
15
Coarse
.50 - 1
D
5
Very Coarse
1 -2
S
12
Very Fine
2 - 4
14
_
E
v
5 w
11
a
60%
40%
20%
0%
- --
—
-
� ^01n
tMY-01
t MY -02
�- MY -03
Fine
4-5.7
G
Fine
5.7-8
R
1
Medium
8- 11.3
A
3
Medium
11.3- 16
V
5
Coarse
16-22.6
E
7
Coarse
22.6-32
L
3
Very Coarse
32-45
S
5
Very Coarse
45-64
2
Small
64-90
C
2
Small
90-128
O
2
0.01
0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Large
128-180
B
Large
180-256
L
3
Small
256-362
B
D16
D35
D50
D65
ID84
ID95
Size (mm)
0.45
1.6
2.9
12
35
I I10
Size Distribution
mean 4.0
dispersion 9.3
skewness 0.10
Ty
e
Small
362-512
L
silt/clay
0%
Medium
512-1024
D
sand
31%
Lr - Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
gravel
39%
Bedrock
-2048
BDRK
23
cobble
7%
Total
102
boulder.
0%
Note:
bedrock
23%
hardpan
0%
wood/det
0%
artificial
0%

Cross - Section
4 Riffle
- MY03, Trib
1
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Cane Creek
XS 4 Riffle
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
Fine
.125-.25
A
Medium
.25-.50
N
2
Coarse
.50-1
D
2
Very Coarse
1 -2
S
6
Very Fine
2-4
14
w
v
I`
c
LL
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0.01
-
--
0.1
—
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
�- -As Buln
tMY -01
tMY-02
tMY-03
Fine
4-5.7
G
1
Fine
5.7-8
R
2
Medium
8- 11.3
A
2
Medium
11.3 - 16
V
6
Coarse
16-22.6
E
5
Coarse
22.6-32
L
14
Very Coarse
32-45
S
14
Very Coarse
45-64
16
Small
64-90
C
4
Small
90- 128
O
4
Large
128- 180
B
1
Laze
180-256
L
3
Small
256-362
B
1316
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
Size (mm)
2.6
15
27
39
59
120
Size Distribution
mean 12.4
dispersion 6.3
skewness -0.29
T
e
Small
362-512
L
1
silt/clay
0%
Medium
512- 1024
D
sand
10%
Lr - Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
gravel
73%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
5
cobble
12%
Total
101
boulder
0%
Note:
bedrock
5%
hardpan
0%
wood/det
0%
artificial
0%

Cross - Section
5 Riffle
- MY03, Trib
2
Particle Size Distribution
Cane Creek
XS 5 Riffle
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
9
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
16
Fine
.125-.25
A
10
Medium
.25-.50
N
10
A
'
E
v
C
H
c
LL
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
-
-
As-Built
tMY -01
—� MY -02
-MY -03
Coarse
.50 - 1
D
6
Very Coarse
1 -2
S
36
Very Fine
2-4
-
Fine
4-5.7
G
I
Fine
5.7-8
R
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
2
Medium
11.3- 16
V
3
Coarse
16-22.6
E
8
Coarse
22.6-32
L
5 i
Very Coarse
32-45
S
Very Coarse
45-64
1
Small
64-90
C
1
Small
90- 128
O
0.01
0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Large
128- 180
B
Large
180-256
L
Small
256-362
B
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
Size (mm)
0.089
0.3
1.1
1.4
12
25
Size Distribution
mean 1.0
dispersion 11.6
skewness -0.02
T
pe
Small
362-512
L
I
silt/clay
8%
Medium
512- 1024
D
sand
72%
Lr - Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
gravel
19%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
cobble
1%
Total
108
boulder
0%
Note:
bedrock
0%
hardpan
0%
wood/det
0%
artificial
0%

Cross - Section 6 Pool - MV03, Trib 3
P Particle Size Distribution
Particle Millimeter Count
Cane Creek
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 50 XS 6 Pool
Very Fine .062-.125 S 11
Fine .125-.25 A 1
Medium .25-.50 N 6
Coarse .50-1 D 15 100% - —
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 7
Very Fine 2-4 5 a 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G
E
Fine 5.7-8 R 1 v 60%
Medium 8- 11.3 A 1 As -euin
W
t t MY -01
40% - -- - - t MY -02
Cc
LL -� MY -03
0%
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size - Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B Size (mm) Size Distribution T e
Small 362-512 L D16 0.062 mean 0.3 Silt/clay 50%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 0.062 dispersion 9.9 sand 40%
Lr - Very Lr 1024-2048 R D50 0.064 skewness 0.56 ravel 11%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 0.38 cobble 0%
Total I (I l D84 1.2 boulder 0%
Note: D95 7.9 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%
Medium l 1.3 - 16 V
Coarse 16-22.6 E -1
Coarse 22.6-32 L
Very Coarse 32-45 S
Ve Coarse 45-64
Small 64-90
C
Small
90 - 128
O
Large
128 - 180
B

Cross - Section
7 Riffle
- MY03, Trib
3
100%
80%
-
Particle Size Distribution
Cane Creek
XS 7 Riffle
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
24
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
15
Fine
.125-.25
A
9
Medium
.25-.50
N
6
Coarse
.50 - 1
D
2
Very Coarse
1 -2
S
1
Very Fine
2 - 4
14
a
'
E
Co
i`
c
u-
60%
4 0%
20%
0%
-
— —
- -
tAs-Buie
AMY -01
t MY -02
- MY -03
Fine
4-5.7
G
Fine
5.7-8
R
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
Medium
11.3 - 16
V
2
Coarse
16-22.6
E
5
Coarse
22.6-32
L
6
Very Coarse
32-45
S
8
Very Coarse
45-64
9
Small
64-90
C
Small
90- 128
O
0.01
0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Large
128- 180
B
Large
180-256
L
Small
256-362
B
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
Size (mm)
0.062
0.11
0.33
3.1
33
53
Size Distribution
mean 1.4
dispersion 52.7
skewness 0.39
Ty
e
Small
362-512
L
silt/clay
24%
Medium
512-1024
D
sand
33%
Lr - Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
gravel
44%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
cobble
0%
Total
101
boulder
0%
Note:
bedrock
0%
hardpan
0%
wood/det
0%
artificial
0%

Cross - Section
8 R=e
- MY03, Trib
3
Particle Size Distribution
Cane Creek
XS 8 Riffle
Particle
Millimew
Count
Silt/Clay
<; 0.062
S/C
2
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
4
Fine
.125 - .25
A
5
Medium
.25-.50
N
2
Coarse
.50 - 1
D
5
T
>
100%
Very Coarse
1 - 2
S
18
Very Fine
2-4
E
V
80%
60%
Fine
4-5.7
G
1
Fine
5.7-8
R
1
C
c0
IE
40%
—� As -Bulk
t MY -01
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
7
Medium
11.3 - 16
V
I
Coarse
16-22.6
E
12
m
c
LL
20%
0%
�-
tMY-02
—� MY -03
Coarse
22.6-32
L
7
Very Coarse
32-45
S
8
Very Coarse
45-64
6
Small
64-90
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Large
128- 180
B
2
Large
180-256
L
Small
256-362
B
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
Size (mm)
0.63
1.7
16
24
58
88
Size Distribution
mean 6.0
dispersion 14.5
skewness -0.30
T
e
Small
362-512
L
silt/clay
2%
Medium
512-1024
D
sand
34%
Lr =- Very Lr
1024-2048
R
ravel
43%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
9
cobble
13%
Total
101
boulder
0%
Note:
bedrock
9%
hardpan
0%
wood/det
0%
artificial
0%
C
9
Small
90 - 128
O
2

Cross - Section
9 Riffle
- MY03, Trib
4
100%
80%
Particle Size Distribution
Cane Creek
XS 9 Riffle
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
Fine
.125 - .25
A
Medium
.25-.50
N
1
Coarse
so- 1
D
5
Very Coarse
1 -2
S
11
Very Fine
2-4
25
_�
E
v
60%
Fine
4-5.7
G
Fine
5.7-8
R
Medium
8- 11.3
A
1
�o
IE
40%
a Bain
MY-01
Medium
11.3-16
V
5
Coarse
16-22.6
E
17
m
C
"
t MY -02
t MY -03
Coarse
22.6-32
L
8
Very Coarse
32-45
S
20
20%
0%
Very Coarse
45-64
4
Small
64-90
C
1
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Small
90- 128
O
3
Large
128- 180
B
Large
180-256
L
Small
256-362
B
D16
D35
D50
D65
ID84
ID95
Size (mm)
2.4
9
19
30
45
1 63
Size Distribution
mean 8.6
dispersion 5.6
skewness -0.26
T
e
Small
362-512
L
silt/clay
0%
Medium
512- 1024
D
sand
17%
Lr - Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
gravel
79%
Bedrock
X2048
BDRK
cobble
4%
Total
101
boulder
0%
Note:
bedrock
0%
hardpan
0%
wood/det
0%
artificial
0%

Cross - Section
10 Riffle
- MY03, Trib
4
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Cane Creek
XS 10 Riffle
P
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S /('
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
Fine
.125 - .25
A
Medium
.25-.50
N
Coarse
.50 - 1
D
Very Coarse
1 -2
S
8
Very Fine
2-4
`'
%
E
v
m
U.
80%
60% -
40%
20 %
0%
0.01 0.1
-
- - -
-
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
-
- -
1000 10000
—• —As -Built
tMY-01
f MY -02
MY -03
Fine
4-5.7
G
2
Fine
5.7-8
R
Medium
8- 11.3
A
5
Medium
11.3- 16
V
5
Coarse
16-22.6
E
9
Coarse
22.6-32
L
13
Very Coarse
32-45
S
17
Very Coarse
45-64
29
Small
64-90
C
6
Small
90- 128
O
1
Large
128- 180
B
2
Large
180-256
L
Small
256-362
B
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
Size (mm)
1.9
3.3
17
23
39
58
Size Distribution
mean 23.3
dispersion 2.7
skewness 1 -020
T
pe
Small
362-512
L
silt/clay
8%
Medium
512-1024
D
sand
23%
Lr - Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
gravel
. 67%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
cobble
2%
Total
101
boulder
0%
Note:
bedrock
0%
hardpan
0%
wood/det
0%
artificial
0%

Cross - Section
11 Riffle
- MY03, Trib
4
100%
80%
Particle Size Distribution
Cane Creek
XS 11 Riffle
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
4
Fine
.125 - .25
A
Medium
.25-.50
N
11
Coarse
.50- 1
D
12
Very Coarse
1 -2
S
9
Very Fine
2 - 4
13
_R
E
E
v
C
,C� F
e
_
U.
60%
40%
20%
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100 1000
Particle Size - Millimeters
10000
— +— As -eutn
tMY-01
t MY-02
—` MY-M
Fine
4-5.7
G
-
Fine
5.7-8
R
2
Medium
8- 11.3
A
3
Medium
11.3- 16
V
2
Coarse
16-22.6
E
1
Coarse
22.6-32
L
5
Very Coarse
32-45
S
5
Very Coarse
45-64
1
Small
64-90
C
Small
90- 128
O
Large
128-180
B
1
Large
180-256
L
Small
256-362
B
D16
D35
D50
D65
ID84
I D95
Size (mm)
0.11
0.6
1.3
2.7
19
40
Size Distribution
mean 1.4
dis ersion 13.2
skewness 0.03
Ty
e
Small
362-512
L
silt/cla
8%
Medium
512-1024
D
sand
34%
Lr - Very Lr
1024-2048
R
gravel
30%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
28
cobble
1%
Total
106
boulder
0%
Note:
bedrock
26%
hardpan
0%
wood/det
0%
artificial
0%

Cross - Section
12 Pool
- MV03, Trib
4
100%
-
Particle Size Distribution
Cane Creek
XS 12 Pool
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
0.062
S/C
26
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
4
Fine
.125 - .25
A
Medium
.25-.50
N
9
Coarse
.50 - 1
D
2
Very Coarse
1 -2
S
7
Very Fine
2-4
2
'
E
0
e
A
U.
80%
60%
40%
—T
- -
- As -BuiR
MY -01
t MY -02
Fine
4 - 5.7
G
Fine
5.7-8
R
1
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
2
Medium
11.3 - 16
V
2
Coarse
16-22.6
E
9
Coarse
22.6-32
L
9
Very Coarse
32-45
S
21
20%
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Very Coarse
45-64
7
Small
64-90
C
2
Small
90- 128
O
2
Large
128- 180
B
Large
180-256
L
Small
256-362
B
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
Size (mm)
0.062
0.42
10
26
41
60
Size Distribution
mean 1.6
dispersion 82.7
skewness 1 -0.47
T
pe
Small
362-512
L
silt/clay
25%
Medium
512-1024
D
sand
21%
Lr - Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
gravel
50%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
cobble
4%
Total
I
boulder
0%
Note:
bedrock
0%
hardpan
0%
wood/det
0%
artificial
0%

Cross - Section
13 Riffle
- MY03, Trib
5
Count
19
4
5
8
12
9
12
1
1
3
4
11
12
1
I
4
E
ci
C
i`
Cc
U.
100%
80%
60%
40 °k
20%
0%
0.01 0.1
Particle Size Distribution
Cane Creek
XS 13 Riffle
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
As -Built
t MY -01
—F MY -02
t MY -03
Particle
Millimeter
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
Fine
125-.25
A
Medium
.25-.50
N
Coarse
.50 - 1
D
Very Coarse
1- 2
S
Very Fine
2 - 4
Fine
4-5.7
G
Fine
5.7-8
R
Medium
8- 11.3
A
Medium
11.3 - 16
V
Coarse
16-22.6
E
Coarse
22.6-32
L
Very Coarse
32-45
S
Very Coarse
45-64
Small
64-90
C
Small
90- 128
O
Laze
128- 180
B
Laze
180-256
L
Small
256-362
B
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
ID95
Size (mm)
0.062
0.5
1.3
3.6
42
1 58
Size Distribution
mean 1.6
dispersion 26.6
skewness 0.06
T
pe
Small
362-512
L
silt /cla
18%
Medium
512-1024
D
sand
37%
Lr - Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
gravel
43%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
cobble
2%
Total
103
boulder
0%
Note:
bedrock
0%
hardpan
0%
wood/det
0%
artificial
0%

Cross - Section
14 Riffle
- MY03, Trib
6
Particle Size Distribution
Cans Creek
XS 14 Me
Particle
Millimeter
Co.
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
12
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
5
Fine
.125 - .25
A
I
Medium
.25-.50
N
19
100%
Coarse
.50 - 1
D
4
Very Coarse
1 - 2
S
10
Very Fine
2-4
22
a
'
E
8
A
i`
LL
80%
60%
40%
20%
0% -
0.01 0.1
—
-
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
-
1000 10000
As-Built
tMY -01
t MY -02
MY -03
Fine
4-5.7
Fine
5.7-8
gA
7
Medium
8 - 11.3
2
Medium
11.3 - 16
V
6
Coarse
16-22.6
E
I
Coarse
22.6-32
L
2
Very Coarse
32-45
S
10
Very Coarse
45-64
4
Small
64-90
C
Small
90- 128
O
Large
128- 180
B
Large
180-256
L
Small
256-362
B
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
ID95
Size (mm)
0.12
0.5
2.1
3.4
17
1 41
Size Distribution
mean 1.4
dispersion 12.8
skewness -0.11
T
e
Small
362-512
L
silt/clay
11%
Medium
512-1024
D
sand
37%
Lr - Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
gravel
51%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
cobble
0%
Total
105
boulder
0%
Note:
bedrock
0%
hardpan
0%
wood/det
0%
artificial
0%

Cross - Section
15 Pool
- MY03, Trib
6
100%
80%
- -- - — -
Particle Size Distribution
Cane Creek
XS 15 Pool
- - - -- -- -
--
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
8
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
2
Fine
Medium
.125-.25
.25 - .50
A
N
1
Coarse
.50 - 1
D
1
Very Coarse
1 -2
S
4
Very Fine
2 - 4
6
W
E
v
c
a
60%
40%
20%
0%
-
- As -Bui@
-MY -01
t MY -02
t MY -03
Fine
4-5.7
G
Fine
5.7-8
R
2
Medium
8- 11.3
A
4
Medium
11.3- 16
V
5
Coarse
16-22.6
E
10
Coarse
22.6-32
L
13
Very Coarse
32-45
S
16
Very Coarse
45-64
14
Small
64-90
C
2
Small
90- 128
O
2
0.01
0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Large
128-180
B
1
Large
180-256
L
3
Small
256-362
B
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
Size (mm)
1.7
16
25
36
54
110
Size Distribution
mean 9.6
dispersion 8.4
skewness -0.34
T
pe
Small
362-512
L
silt/clay
8%
Medium
512-1024
D
sand
8%
Lr - Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
gravel
68%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
9
cobble
8%
Total
103
boulder
0%
Note:
bedrock
9%
hardpan
0%
wood/det
0%
artificial
0%

Cross - Section
16 Riffle
- MY03, Trib
6
Count
1
2
8
6
11
7
I
5
3
9
9
16
9
5
4
1
©
E
v
e—
a
m
c
a
- -- - - -- —
100%
80%
s0%
40%
20%
1
0%
0.01 0.1
Particle Size Distribution
Cane Creek
XS 16 Riffle
- - - -- - - - - -- - -
ir
-
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
As -Buin
— AMY -01
t MY -02
- MY -03
Particle
Millimeter
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
Fine
.125-.25
A
Medium
.25-.50
N
Coarse
.50 - 1
D
Very Coarse
1 -2
S
Very Fine
2-4
F ine
4-5.7
G
Fine
5.7-8
R
Medium
8- 11.3
A
Medium
11.3- 16
V
Coarse
16-22.6
E
Coarse
22.6-32
L
Very Coarse
32-45
S
Very Coarse
45-64
Small
64-90
C
Small
90-128
O
Large
128- 180
B
Large
180-256
L
Small
256-362
B
D16
D35
D50
D65
ID84
I D95
Size (mm)
0.84
3.6
19
33
52
1 91
Size Distribution
mean 6.6
dispersion 12.7
skewness -0.34
T
pe
Small
362-512
L
silt/cla
1%
Medium
512- 1024
D
sand
27%
Lr - Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
gravel
59%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
3
cobble
10%
Total
100
boulder
0%
Note:
bedrock
3%
hardpan
0%
wood/det
000
artificial
0%

Cross - Section
17 Pool
- MY03, Trib
7
Particle Size Distribution
Cane Creek
XS 17 Pool
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
25
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
32
Fine
.125 - .25
A
8
Medium
.25-.50
N
10
Coarse
.50- 1
D
7
m
100°6
80%
Very Coarse
1- 2
S
5
Very Fine
2-4
7
_
E
02
60%
Fine
Fine
4-5.7
5.7-8
G
R
Medium
8- 11.3
A
A
15-
40%
tng -euin
— AMY -01
Medium
11.3- 16
V
2
Coarse
16-22.6
E
8
e
"
20%
0%
_
- -
�— MY -02
t MY -03
Coarse
22.6-32
L
3
Very Coarse
32-45
S
2
Very Coarse
45-64
1
Small
64-90
C
2
Small
90- 128
O
0.01
0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Large
128- 180
B
1
Large
180-256
L
Small
256-362
B
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
ID95
Size (mm)
0.062
0.085
0.12
0.45
13
34 1
Size Distribution
mean 0.9
dispersion 55.1
skewness 0.57
T
pe
Small
362-512
L
silt/cla
22%
Medium
512- 1024
D
sand
54%
Lr - Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
gravel
20%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
1
cobble
3%
Total
114
boulder
0%
Note:
bedrock
1 %
hardpan
0%
wood/det
0%
artificial
0%

Cross - Section
18 Riffle
- MYO
Particle Size Distribution
Cane Creek
XS 18 Riffle
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
-- 0.062
S /('
11
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
17
Fine
.125-.25
A
5
Medium
.25-.50
N
16
Coarse
.50 - 1
D
6
100%
Very Coarse
1 - 2
S
3
Very Fine
2 - 4
13
4
E
�_
80%
60%
Fine
4-5.7
G
Fine
5.7-8
R
3
I`
40%
tn
MY-01
MY-01
Medium
8- 11.3
A
2
Medium
11.3- 16
V
5
Coarse
16-22.6
E
4
�
_�
U.
f MY -02
t MY -03
Coarse
22.6-32
L
1
Very Coarse
32-45
S
9
L
20%
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Very Coarse
45-64
1
Small
64-90
C
Small
90-128
O
2
Laze
128- 180
B
2
Large
180-256
L
Small
256-362
B
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
ID95
Size (mm)
0.076
0.27
0.56
2.9
20
45
Size Distribution
mean 1.2
dispersion 21.5
skewness 0.22
T
pe
Small
362-512
L
silt/clay
11%
Medium
512-1024
D
sand
46%
Lr - Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
gravel
37%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
3
cobble
4%
Total
103
boulder
0%
Note:
bedrock
3%
hardpan
0%
wood/det
0%
artificial
0%

Cross - Section
19 Riffle
- MY03, Trib
7
100%
80%
-
Particle Size Distribution
Cane Creek
XS 19 Riffle
- -
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
2
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
8
Fine
.125 - .25
A
1
Medium
.25-.50
N
3
Coarse
.50 - 1
D
2
Very Coarse
1 -2
S
11
Very Fine
2 - 4
8
m
E
0
r
�a
i`
C
LL
60 %
40%
20%
0%
- -
-
- -
-
—
--
-
As-Built
AMY -01
t MY -02
t MY -03
Fine
4-5.7
G
Fine
5.7-8
R
1
Medium
8- 11.3
A
1
Medium
11.3- 16
V
Coarse
16-22.6
E
5
Coarse
22.6-32
L
4
Very Coarse
32-45
S
9
Very Coarse
45-64
12
Small
64-90
C
2
Small
90- 128
O
4
0.01
0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Large
128- 180
B
1
Laze
180-256
L
I
Small
256-362
B
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
Size (mm)
0.062
0.27
1.9
20
51
99
Size Distribution
mean 1.8
dispersion 28.7
skewness -0.02
T
pe
Small
362-512
L
silt/clay
25%
Medium
512-1024
D
sand
25%
Lr - Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
gravel
40%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
3
cobble
8%
Total
101
boulder
0%
Note:
bedrock
3%
hardpan
0%
wood/det
0%
artificial
0%

Cross - Section 20 Riffle - MY03, Trib 7
Particle
Millimeter
D35
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
1
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
1
Fine
.125-.25
A
Medium
.25-.50
N
4
Coarse
.50 - 1
D
6
Very Coarse
1 - 2
S
5
Very Fine
2-4
2
Fine
4-5.7
G
2
Fine
5.7-8
R
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
I
Medium
11.3 - 16
V
I
Coarse
16-22.6
E
3
Coarse
22.6-32
L
9
Very Coarse
32-45
S
6
Very Coarse
45-64
9
Small
64-90
C
9
Small
90- 128
O
9
Large
128-180
B
7
Large
180 -256
L
1
Small
256-362
B
Small
362-512
L
Medium
512-1024
D
Lr - Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
28
Total
104
Note
100%
m
w Bulk
E
ct 60%
cc
cc
40%
m
c
U.
20%
0%
0.01
Particle Size Distribution
Cane Creek
XS 20 Riffle
0.1
Size (mm)
D16
I
D35
23
D50
38
D65
63
D84
110
D95
160
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
Size Distribution
mean 10.5
dispersion 20.4
skewness -0.39
1000 10000
t As -Built
t MY -01
t MY -02
—� MY -03
silt/clay 1%
sand 15%
ravel 32%
cobble 25%
boulder 0%
bedrock 27%
hardpan 0%
vood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Appendix C
Stream Photos
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KCl Technologies Inc
Contract # D06002 2011 — MY03

PP# 1 U - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP#2U - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP#3U - MY03 -1/10/12
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site
Contract # D06002
PP# 1 D - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP #2D - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP #3D - MY03 - 1/10/12
KCI Technologies, Inc.
2011 — MY03

PP #4U - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP #5U - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP#4D - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP #5D - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP #6U - MY03 - 1/10/12 PP#6D - MY03 - 1/10/12
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KCI Technologies, Inc.
Contract # D06001 2011 — MY03

PP#7 - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP #8D - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP #9D - MY03 - 1/10/12
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site
Contract # B06002
PP#8U - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP#9U - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP #l0U - MY03 - 1/10/12
KC1 Technologies, Inc.
2011 — MY03

PP #IOD - MY03 - 1/10/12 PP #11 - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP#12U - MY03 - 1/10/12 PP# 12D - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP# 13U - MY03 - 1/10/12 PP# 13D - MY03 -1/10/12
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KCI Technologies, Inc.
Contract # D06002 2011 — MY03

PP#14U - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP# 15 U - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP# 16U - MY03 - 1/10/12
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site
Contract # D06002
PP# 14D - MY03 -1/10/12
PP# 15D - MY03 -1/10/12
PP #16D - MY03 - 1/10/12
KCI Technologies, Inc.
2011— MY03

PP# 17U - MY03 -1 /10/12 PP# 17D - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP #18U - MY03 - 1 /10 /12 PP #18D - MY03 - 1 /10 /12
PP #19U - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP #19D - MY03 - 1/10/12
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KC1 Technologies, Inc.
Contract # D06002 2011 — MY03

PP#20U - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP#21 U - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP #22U - MY03 - 1/10/12
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site
Contract # D06002
PP #20D - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP #21D - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP #22D - MY03 - 1/10/12
KC/ Technologies, Inc.
2011— MY03

PP#23U - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP #24U - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP #25 - MY03 - 1/10/12
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site
Contract # D06002
PP #23D - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP #24D - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP #26U - MY03 - 1/10/12
KCI Technologies, Inc.
2011 — MY03

PP#26D - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP#27UR - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP #28U - MY03 - 1/10/12
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site
Contract # D06002
PP #27UL - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP #27D - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP #28D - MY03 - 1/10/12
KC! Technologies, Inc.
2011 — MY03

PP #29U - MY03 -1/10/12
PP #30UL - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP#30D - MY03 - 1/10/12
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site
Contract 9 D06002
PP#29D - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP #30UR - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP #31 U - MY03 -1/10/ 12
KCI Technologies, Inc.
2011 — MY03

PP #31D -MY03- 1/10/12
PP #32U - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP#32D - MY03 - 1/10/12 PP #33U - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP #33D - MY03 - 1/10/12 PP #34U - MY03 - 1/10/12
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KCI Technologies, Inc.
Contract # D06002 2011— MY03

PP #34D - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP #35D - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP#36D - MY03 - 1/10/12
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site
Contract # D06002
PP #35U - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP#36U - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP#37U - MY03 - 1/10/12
KCI Technologies, Inc.
2011 — MY03

PP #37DMY03 - 1/10/12
PP#38D - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP #39D - MY03 - 1/10/12
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site
Contract # D06002
PP #38U - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP #39U - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP #40U - MY03 - 1/10/12
KCI Technologies, Inc.
2011 — MY03

PP #40D - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP #41D - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP #42D - MY03 - 1/10/12
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site
Contract # D06002
PP #41 U - MY03 -1/10/12
PP #42U - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP #43U - MY03 - 1/10/12
KC/ Technologies, Inc.
2011 — MY03

PP#43D - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP#44D - MY03 -1/10/12
PP #45D - MY03 - 1/10/12
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site
Contract # D06002
PP #44U - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP #45U - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP#46 - MY03 - 1/10/12
KCI Technologies, Inc.
2011 — MY03

PP #47 - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP #48D - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP #49D - MY03 - 1/10/12
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site
Contract # D06002
PP #48U - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP #49U - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP #50U - MY03 - 1/10/12
KCI Technologies, Inc.
2011 — MY03

PP #50D - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP #51 U - MY03 - 1/10/12
PP #51 D - MY03 - 1/10/12
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site KCI Technologies, Inc.
Contract # D06002 2011 — MY03

Appendix D
Current Condition Plan View
Cane Creek Stream Restoration Site
Contract # D06001
KCl Technologies Inc
1011— MY03

N
U
�
O
V
N
O
U
S
00
`w
V
O
N
W
ti
V
a
NC GRID
NAD !3
V y
CANE CREEK
STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT
SEMORA PERSON COUNTY NORTH CAROUNA
KC I
EMLIEEI6 PLYa[M 5¢X1CT5
sm sa iaas RoEO
�
•
-
RuECx XSAix cWOEw nam
LI'117I C�1CIlt
RE'WSQNS

aN, I I
Q i
1�i Ill
/ I
A1+00
1 I1 1♦
`I 'III
i r11
11 173100 0 o
1
1
\\ \\ 1, 1\', ', I
I I I
I
1`
/
k5 I
' m I
Qi +00 `
\ ;
I
= -
s
Y = n
CANE CREEK
STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT
KCI
5 m
Q ^� _
SENORA PERSON COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
nr. E. I... scx Tr
4Wy< xy ,��
R.Iupl xonrx uxa.0 nro�
alp
.',1111 Il lll'111CI1t
a
T11 T72 T1J STATION 1WOO TO STATION 22 *57
REVIS*NS

, I I
' rrlll I
'I I
r
1 I nL
1 1 1 1 Ills 1 1 ��t/
I
I 1 1 W; `I ?
III 1j1 11 ___ I
\ \\ I 1 I
/ , 1 +a4
L II I
1 1
I /Ill I,I 1�1`
I I I I I YOU 16
w,wre eu elr•r. o
o
0
a �o
0
z n
s
CANE CREEK
STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT
SEMORA PERSON COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
MKCI
FwG1 — R�MLRS SRM161S
iysu �aasRwR
�•�R,x �,�. r,�
L� /J
�I tC�l
Li 1 u cnunf
W
• REVISIONS
T15 T14 T6 STA 22 57 TO 31 +26 AND STA 110+00 TO 113 +85
,
, I I
' rrlll I
'I I
r
1 I nL
1 1 1 1 Ills 1 1 ��t/
I
I 1 1 W; `I ?
III 1j1 11 ___ I
\ \\ I 1 I
/ , 1 +a4
L II I
1 1
I /Ill I,I 1�1`
I I I I I YOU 16
w,wre eu elr•r. o
o
0
a �o
0
z n
s
CANE CREEK
STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT
SEMORA PERSON COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
MKCI
FwG1 — R�MLRS SRM161S
iysu �aasRwR
�•�R,x �,�. r,�
L� /J
�I tC�l
Li 1 u cnunf
W
• REVISIONS
T15 T14 T6 STA 22 57 TO 31 +26 AND STA 110+00 TO 113 +85

1 \
I Ir �� ll�lll 1 1
- 11111 111 \ \ 1 1 1
111
II
\ 1 1 \ 1 \\ \ 1 1 1
, 11
„11 I r 1 1 1 1
I
111'lih II i \
1 11 1 a� +00 \ -
II'II
' I 111111
J
S
N
- � o
a+o u
m
0
y o CANE CREEK KC I
}Z z STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT O°°°`°
FKI[[RS PLIMI[RS —N—S
T SENORA PERSON COUNTY NORTHCAROLINA p�
T74 T1 5 STATION 31 +26 TO STATION 37.67 OAC4 iN MTft ll REVISIONS

i
0
1
6t
A
O
m
O
1 '111\
/pllll�'1'1 I
\11.
/ / /IIII III\
11 +1 1 +
// / // /I l I 1♦ _J\ _ // SY
xo
�; 111
j'/ /II1 1 I ♦ Q \' i i; ;
',III X11 ' /�jl /I
I/
1
f 1
P7+0p11
1
i �ii� �.`ll�lI IIII
` \ 11 `I
111111'
- 1
I \ll�l
�+
EASEMENT BOUNDARY O`
a�
T z
6
m
CANE CREEK
� KC I
1OL °1°`a
S m
G y
STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT
SEMORA PERSON COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
ENGIEEIS RWQAS -T-
•`° �' `"`5 "° "
I
L' i of
T2 7 T2 2 T2 3 T2� STATION 50W0 TO STATION 58+50
nuccx. ronTp unatw nws
I I ii ciiu
NEn510n5

I \
! I
Ili 1 1
/fl/ II I I
rrll 1 II , ,
I I II I I
! Ir I 1
lrll, rrI I
ylllll i 11 l I
Illll , OP
.I
III
�il`i riir \11
I / b
'll1 3 // „ 11111 m
I, ,I III/ 1111,1( y
11 , I I I I II 111111 �1( t6
, 11 11111 111111 \I
,l lull
Il((i/ lIlnl,
�, l;Yrrr , Il11
11 r j I A It I,
✓J i i ! I � � I IN .
t I I 1 \\ •` \
I 1\
I 1 Ills S;\;� _• \
I \ ,
1 WIORIME CCt d[ET/
O
1
O
O
FR
O to
m
O
CANE CREEK
z STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT a a Ml
CNGOE[16 RUI2R5 SRN151S
Q SEMORA PERSON COUNTY NORTN CAROLINA '
^� yea sn vacs �,Il ldl- IILCIC Cllf �°�
T3.1 TM STATION 60+00 TO STATION 88 +13 �� �a111x [mow 2'. REVISIONS

�Y(r
1 ;
I
1
I 1 ,
II 1 � ll'I
\ 1 ,111111 I I
/I/I ' 1111
III 1 1 1
111
,1 \IQy I
i0i �i l
r I /
U11��� 1 1 I
1j 1111111 ` \I �``I \11 j
III 1 1'1111 I II'lll 1 1 1
11 1 I I
I / \ ',Ilj l,ll 111111 I 1
f�5? +dog
✓/, I III / 'lll I i 1 \
I
w�1t'1 I\ '\ 'I I
"t, \ 1 1
uuI \ 1
It Inrl 1 I
I 18v .\.
IL
N
o
0
o dQ
'
e
CANE CREEK
Z KC I
Q z
STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT
EMGNEERS R�IIQ115 SC[MiR15
^� g
SEMORA PERSON COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
w Ed 0 5 xwd
1
�» cnt
TT3-2 STATION 66 13 TO STATION 76-98
MEW. Mp°" w fti 1T0'
II cn
arm
aEVlslor+s

1 1 111♦
I Op
111 _
1 _
1 ,
Iy� I fn
+qb
/ III ♦ � 11 I
/i I ll,l I oom
1 11111 I I C
/ IIII Illrl I
/
/ I
tli I' _
�I
i 1 4iy 7
1+
00
f
9+/001
i"If
O
! il)1C i3t alrvu.\w
1
O
O
EG�9
6
F�
CANE CREEK � KC I
gSTREAM RESTORATION PROJECT Pml'oll SEMORA PERSON COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA RkEI N%TXCARMHA2MI E
T41 T4P STATION BM00 TO STATION 91.49 REVISIONS

o
0
a
,1111 I 1
I
IN-
I 1
11 I \\ `il \
I
\I1 11
, 1 I I 11 /i
111'1
I\ 1
II I \I \ `1 1
'00
00
I
Ai
1
\ \
/t
Fp
`\\\111 `
1 1 1 1
! .um,lwl nu rc uaae nv
o B p
e c
pp
F�
CANE CREEK
STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT
M KC I
5
Q �J p_
2 ~
SEMORA PERSON
COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
ENC.ccrn
ftl nrs s¢msrs
4WW FMS
WV
1` em
��I'
•
�Er
x N CN s
TAI
T42 STATION 91-49 TO STATION 102 +B1
FEVIS10N5

''i
_
,00
300
2 CANE CREEK
- STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT
m SEMORA PERSON COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
118 +0
1 em
�Iil Lll illlCllf
'�
--�, / / � ' 11 `•_--------
�' ''III 1 1 I I 1
- I \
---- --- _ _
cos
REVGONS
1 \I
1
t!
;;/ , -/ x,1111 °a11
,
w
pypypy '✓' � j / 1111111/
1111 II
/I
/_,J
'j 111,�I1� I
/� , ♦\11111111 I
I/
♦\ \� \�
�' I' 1 gQf4 1 1 6 �
1111 I
/
1 1 1 I I /� /'' X111111111 I
I I r r '' r. 111171 1 1 1 I
I r l ' / /,' 11111j1 1i
r l , I ,11111 1
1 I 1 1 1 111111 1
�' l,
1 1 I I
i l
11111 11
/ II
1111 11
b
� Ill 1
l i ir/ 1 111�ryj+A..1 \t\
11 1I II \ \ \\
\ \
;\
;111
♦, ♦\
111 ♦ \�
♦
\\
♦\
'. // / I ,111
WiCHNE GEE 6nfflt
O
N
O
O
n
p 4
m
O
oz c
iil
3 8
� 5 0 =
2 z
2 CANE CREEK
- STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT
m SEMORA PERSON COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
� KC I
EWKENS PLYME115 5[EX11515
ME.d wl. E fA�eu°2,(A9
1 em
�Iil Lll illlCllf
TG, T7a T7B 1 T5C-1 T7C 2 TK4 TOM T7C T7 STA 300.00
TO30W80 STA310+00TO310 -82 STA24WOOTO241 21
STA 2r8 +38 TO 251 04 AND STA 117.02 TO 127 10
cos
REVGONS

II Mrd_
/
III I / � I 1111 �1UJ lII I I /
I/ III I �/lll 111111 I I / l
ll /ll I 1'111 l 11 I 1 I/
;1111
I/j;�111111 1111111 `\ `1 \111111111 i
1111 2
111111/11 1 \ 111x•1
1 1\ 1 1 1111111 1 \I I\ I 1 11, ; S o
1�
`11111111117! 111 >y 11 1 \2
4 �Iy\
\`"11111111111111 1
11111111111111111 \`1
\� r
Idl�iilliiiii \i,l \\ \1 \\ z
�
`11 \1111
li�liililnu 111 \ \ 111`1 \
\ \\
1 II 11 ull III 1 1 111 \
III j11j'i:" 1j1 1 1 11 \
ll / 1 11111111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1111111 \\ 1 1111
/ / / /// 11111 1\ \`1111111 1 1
// /1 \1l 1111111
/,' 111\ 1111111; 1 1
''
11
\
_ n
_ � I
13 +
\ 1 1 1 I \ \ \
m
o
,
y s
CANE CREEK
Z KC I
z?-
STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT
EKKEx5 'w[ S SM.'—
5
N S p y
22
SENORA PERSON COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
Kp$M FMS MAD
I
LI'1111
xW
TB STATION 177 +10 TO STATION 134.25
2
xLLEEil x0111x cwoEw nw5
ClllCfit
REVISIONS

\Aokoo
� n
00
+i
/ 1 /
+i
I I
1111431 OQ \\
\ \ I I J
IN
I I I f /,1iI
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 \ 1
1 1111 III 1
11111 `
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
11111 I 1'�p IY �+ 1\
1 1 111 I IIII 1 1 1 1 \
1 1 1 1 1111 11♦
1 1111❑ ` 1`
1
270 +pdI
1111111
j
fi
S
= z
5 S2 m
_ 2 O
11111 1,11 i /, \ I I ���— _ •, f, /
II `11 `.
KC I
Enc�EENS Nuw1ENS scufilsls
NLLFKK IWB7N CiaSaEw 77cos
1 111111 1 II 1 1 I \I ;\ 11 / /(W %
1111 1 1 1` ✓� 1 / / N i
/�/
I 111 11 1 1
REVIS"S
rill
I `
11 1
r
r
O \ ` \
O
\'
-- -- —_----- '-p6'.�a /i' /v / /\
1, 151+00
o
fi
S
= z
5 S2 m
_ 2 O
G g L-nnt �Iretn
STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT
SEMORA PERSON COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
y
T7A T7M1 TTB WC IT 1 T7.2 T7.3 TO TBA TW 761 T6B T9
STA 260-00 TO 261 OB STA 140 OD TO 151 57 STA 2M0 OTO 271 23
STA 200-OD TO NM 35 AND STA 210-00 TO 210-66
KC I
Enc�EENS Nuw1ENS scufilsls
NLLFKK IWB7N CiaSaEw 77cos
I1 Cm
,11111- 11iC111C11f
REVIS"S

nl "I - •\
I '
c \\ _ —'001
� 11
i fill I ��_` II II
4 +00
1 \1
♦ 11/ I I I \`` \
00
1
\
1 1 III 1,11 , 1 I O
1 ,
/ 1 I
158 +00 Si
1 \ \\ 1
1 I 1 ll I
1 1 I II �p
1 1
1 1 I `` 1\,1
,1 ` \
62+ \
o
0 �11 II11'1 `I 11 I��♦
00 / m
`��� 31Y101A
a E CANE CREEK KC I
z STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT
p cwc.crm nu.nls sawm,s
^SJ SEMORA PERSON COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA sws. rms mw �' CRj
2 T7-3 STATION 151.57 TO STATION 184 +50 w�Elw� woxlw cu - 21— 1,11 "1 1 wl1t • REV154N5

1
'``\ \ 11111 �-- ♦1' \`,111,
� \`
♦1111 \`al
\
1`` \111
\` \ \ \ \ \
\
I , 1 1 1111 / 1 1 111j11
S I I I I IIIII \ 1 1 ,1111
F21 1 1 1 1 r � 1`
1 11 11`111
1 1 1
/l 11 1
np, `,1111 _\ 1 1 ,1111
it
`` 1111" �� \ 1 111 1 111111
1 \ I 1 11 41
111, \','III /.- \\ j11111111111
, 1 1 1,111 I \\ 111111111,
1; i I II1, 111 r\ i r i 11„1111111
� 1 11111\` ` \ , ,1111111111
1 1 1 1 11'� 111111
,. 1\
I
1111 r111� /�11I '\ /IIIIIIIIIII
1
% /�� /illl� /I l / � — III1'1111111 jj111111111111
11
fry
/- ' /, %i� /1111 /III II 11 / 11111111
1111
I/ I/ I I // /// I +y 1 1 1, j IIIII Ill' 111I1111111I I I
I'i
�/ l l l 1 1 l 1 1/, l J/ I I1111�� /1� IIIIj11111111
1 111111111111
/, /�I/ / //1
/1ll l�l�� ,'1I111111111r
/ /// I/l /li /ll ��� /li/ 11 P1,1111 ii rilNlllUu
7
r,l I �lu�IlQ7rll Irrllrlrrlll
�� i� // l I / l � l l r 1 / \I r�llrll ll rUllllliill
1 ilu
„i, / I i �i ii it l a� I ' i ,'i %V�I�I hl ill 1111111
1/1111 1
1111 / /, / /� % /� / /ll lltil lll�l
/Ir
// /I
///1111
/i IICJc'll�ll11111111II
/ /�/j
,111111111111
/ /'/ //111111111] II /111111111111 111111'1
II
,' /i i /11111111 II 11 111111,11,1111111
/, / � I111�11 1 , 11 1111111111
111111
,i /� / /// / / / / /�11 `1 1 1111111111111111111
111111 /l /1 — / ^/ /'I I11111111jj11j 111
1111111 --
11111 111
i / 11111111
III 111 1 1 ,1LL 1EL111111111111 I
x'111 i 111`,111,1 1 \`1`11 /bl�111111,;111 11
'li /,; 11
i
1111 I 1 1 111'1 111,111 \1,, \, \` �1`
I
1 111 1 1 1 1 1 111111, 111 `, �` \` \,`` \ 1 \1`
r I I I I I \\\
II 1
1 1 1 §1111111, \ 16� \111,
`I
I , 1,11,,1,
1 `
_ CANE CREEK
� KC I
STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT
N J5 ffflllyl/l
"2
SEMORA PERSON COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
EEA PYEn S F 6��
ip,w rags Ill
-,"X 11mrx u. '7 1
1..I l 1 11 c A cnt
vex
T7 3 T7-4 STATION 18+50 TO STATION 177.28
REVISIONS

,f
AuvGNnoe 1113"35Y3
0
\ I 1
\ \j
\1111\ 11111\ I I I I I R -
1j111
I 1
11111 1 1111111�1� 1 I I> ` \+
11111 �I111 \1 I, -
1
111 I
111` /`
I I i `E`1 1 11111 185
I I 1 / 1111 1 I\`��♦
I �
11 1 II /'III I I �1
1 I I I I',I 111- �� IIII
\ I I I I \1\ 1111
186 + j1111'111
11 I ' 11 1 1�` `� 111111j11
I `�\ \o j1p11 II
11
I I r /ll
I I
' ' I
-I 1 rly
h
� o
S
S
o n t CANE CREEK M KC I
H a y MLI STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT °G° �~
5 �1 E M PI ft SElMlmis 9
z SEMORA PERSON COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA .�
T7I T7d T7-6 STATION 177.29 TO STATION 190.18 �uuoi°Ila�"nle CwOLN�:T609 L 11", 11Cllf REVISIONS

WTCNAE SEE SHEET 11
1111111111111 l 11 I I I / 1�M I II11111111111
11111`1111 11111 / II 11111111111111
111111111111I1i111 i i 11 / IY \\ 1 i 1 iiiuiiii u
111111 1111 1 1 1 1 /� 1 1 1 1 II 11111111111
1� \I ;'`11111 � I 1 � i 1 1' I ,1\ I l l l l 11111111111
1 1111111111 1111 I I I 1 1 /'� I N } [phone]
I I 1111 1 111 I I/ I I �IIIIIIIIIIII
Iliill1111111�1i i l / / \1 1 � lilunuuull�l
I V I I I 1 /_ ' r nnnwI11 1
II11111j1111j I \I \\ 11111 � 1 III1111111III lllljll
1j111 III 111 I � 1 1 1 II1111111111111 II
1 111 X1111 11j11 1 /' 1111111j 111111111II11 `; ;�� \ \1l1
1 ��I IIII Iljl� � „I 1� 11�1;111I1i11 ` \.\
1 � � I ��1111 11111111111 1j11 \.1\1j 11/11,111111 \ \ \ \`` \` ��
1 i 11111 1j11 j11j 11 11 \0\ \\\ \ \� \\ ` \1111111
/ / I I X111 III �IIIII /I `1i \1\ \ \ \\ \ \�� 11111111111
i � i 1111111 ii iii /iii /i 1 i1\ \\I \\`�\� \�\`+l ill ii11111 i�111'I
/ / / 1 111 111111 \ \ \ \11 \1 ` \ \ \11`11111111111111
/ r'� /1111111111 \I \I \ `\ \ \`1`1111jj11111j11111111
/ / / I111I I I I I I I I ` `I ` ` ` 1111111 1111111111111 X111111111111
' // II1 X111 III 1 \ 1 1 111 `` \11111 it lllli��lll 11 l�
'�''i/; 81111111 `14.31 �Q1
/e/ I X111111 \�\` \11
IIII I '11q nom`
1 I /
I
II 111
Ili �j 4i 234 +00
/ III I
/ 11 II
191
192 +00
111\` \\` \\1I\ijll�ingl 11\ 193 +00
\ 1 1 1 111111 1 1.
Ijl�l�l�l�lili \
1_1_1_ � \` \\• °���__;�� � `��,`
�_� -r_- '� .``\�111111X11illt111111'1i 111
\lil\N\1B\ \ 1 1P1P �11111\1\IJ``..
\
--
11 I _
\1
I
1\.
e-
S
a CANE CREEK KC I
z STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT
A ENGEEERS 0.�MICP3 SCEM1513
$ � SENORA, PERSON COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
�2J z T7-8 T7 7 AND T10 STA 190-18 TO 198«13 �6q 5d fg1[5 XWO t� �1 T u rm it AND STA 230+37 TO 235+91 �� liMl. Cu - 7Tw� • REVISIONS

? ?0 *00
1
1,1 I111111111I
1,1 1111111'1 /
I, I'11'III'I
0
1 I 111 II
;,1111111 \`\ 1
,111111'1
I I 1
111 1
11 11111 ! I
II 111111 — 1
111 111111 1 , \
1
,//'j111 \ \Itl 11
1
I l j 1 1 1 I , 111115
11 / 11111 r .11 I I
1111 11 1 I , yll 1
11„'�Il /l1 1 1 / j111, 111
II /1111 /I1I 1'! // ;111111/
I
lj ll,' 1�' l
I'�j'll�lll�llil,�l� II
�!
1 /I�l I 11 1 1 1 111111 11 1 it r
'' ' %I /I 5 111p1 Iii ri�Ji.71lII�, II, Ij 111111
At i
111 1'
1111111 1/, / / \\ \111 1 11 11 ISI
111,1„ , 1e1111, 11 1 111,1,
\lll \1 \1111 I I , 1 I 1 / / ' 1111111' 11 11
1 \,111111111111 / 111111,1111111,1,1111
111 111111 II 11 1 ('11111 111111 11
11,11 \111111 1111. ,Ill \\ \1 \, 11 \1111 X11
111 \1111111 11111,1 Ili / \\ \1,`,111 111111
111111111111 111 1,1 i 1, \11 ,1111\1111,
111 \1111',`1 \ \1l \tll l�l ' \IJ ,�/ \11111 \ \11
111 \\ \ \\1 \\ \11,,111 111 11 1 1 1 1 1111111
I" I1111111 Ij11 11111 \11111111,1 \1,11 \1111111111 \111
\ \ \ \\11 \111 \\ 1111111111��1111 x\111, 111111 11,1 \11111,1,111111,11
111111111111111111 11 \11111111\
11111111111 111111111\ \11\111
1111111 1111111 \1` \\ I �\ 111 I \111111 „ \ \ \\
1 I 1111 \ \ \1 \ \ \ \ \I
I111I I I I 111111111 \ \\ \ \ \\\ \
11111 1 1 11111111\ 1 \ \1 \ \\
111111111111111111 1 1 1 1 1111 1,1, \ 1 \,
1111,1111111111111111111 \11
11111111111 III111111 I I ljl 15 \ \\\
II „1111,1 111 I1111111��' \\ \
II „1111111 1111111111, ' 1;�
I,I11111111 1111111 \ 111
1 11111111111 111 1
111 11111 111 4 \ ♦L 1 \ \ \ \ `.
,11 I
, 111111111 1 1 1\ 1\\ 1 11 1 1 \
1111111 \1\ \\\lull I I \
1111,11\\\\ \ \11111 I 1 I I
11111\\\\\ \111111 \ 1 I I1
I „1111111 111 \1 \ \ \ \
1111111111 1111 \ \ 1 1,
1111111111 11 \1 \ \ 11,1
,1111111111111 \ 11 \
111111111 11 \ 1 1 \ \
11111111111111 \ 1 \ '
i
0
o
� o
0
S
�I 1\ ` \ `11111j11
`1 \ ♦I'lllll�ll
e4
6
n
i
5 i's
y
k CANE CREEK
J STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT
SENORA PERSON COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
� KC I
[xr+r[as rtu+mrs sr�xrrsls
� w races ao.o
xox\x cwo\w nsos
�' 1 111110 Clll
_ T10' STATION 220.00 TO STATION 2301+37
REVISIONS
REVISIONS