20080994 Ver 1_Year 3 Monitoring Report_20120823

Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Monitoring Report — MY03
Harnett County, NC
wwg� Submitted to:
DENK - 51 1 � ER Sp A404
04
T
WE aNOS AND r F w ED
0 stem MAR 1 6 2012
Ea ement NC ECOSYSTEM
PROGRAM ENHANCEMENT PROGR�
NCEEP, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652
December 2011

KCI
ASSOCIATES OF NC
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project Manager: Tim Morris
Email: [e-mail]
KCI Project No: 12065438
Farrar Dairy Srream and Weiland KCI Associates ojNorth Carolina
Restoration Site 1011- MY03

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND ......................................................... ..............................1
1 1 Project Structure, Restoration Type, and Approach 1
1 1 1 Project Streams 1
1 12 Project Wetlands 2
12 Location and Setting 3
13 Project History and Background 6
2.0 PROJECT CONDITIONS AND MONITORING RESULTS ... ..............................9
21 Vegetation Assessment 9
22 Stream Assessment 9
2 2 1 Bankfull Events 10
222 Quantitative Measures Summary Tables 11
23 Wetland Assessment 25
3.0 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................... .............................26
4.0 MAINTENANCE .......................................................................... .............................26
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1
Project Restoration Components
6
Table 2
Project Activity and Reporting History
7
Table 3
Project Contact Table
7
Table 4
Project Background Table
8
Table 5
Hydrological ( Bankfull) Verifications
10
Table 6
Baseline Stream Summary
11
Table 7
Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
20
Table 8
Hydrologic Monitoring Results
25
Table 9
Hydropenod History
25
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
Figure 2 Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Map
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KC/ Associates ojNorth Carolina
Restoration Site 2011- MY03
4
5

APPENDIX A — VEGETATION DATA
Vegetation Data Tables
Stream and Wetland Vegetation Plot Photos
APPENDIX B — STREAM AND WETLAND PHOTOS
APPENDIX C — GEOMORPHOLOGIC AND HYDROLOGIC DATA
Stream Cross - Sections
Stream Longitudinal Profiles
Stream Pebble Counts
Stream and Wetland Hydrographs
Precipitation 30 -70 Percentile Graph
APPENDIX D — CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KCI Associates ojNorth Carolina
Restoration Site 2011- MY03
28
32

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland Restoration Site is a full - delivery project that was developed for the North
Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) Construction was completed in March 2009 on the North
Prong of Anderson Creek (NPAC), its tributaries, and an associated Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp wetland
community The project is located within the USGS 8 -digit HUC 03030004 and the NCDWQ Sub -basin 03 -06-
14 in the Cape Fear River Basin The project restored, enhanced and preserved 13,044 linear feet of channel using
a combination of Priority 1 and 2 Approaches, along with Enhancement 11, and 112 0 acres of Coastal Plain Small
Stream Swamp wetland community, generating 11,881 stream mitigation units and 64 0 wetland mitigation units
The stream design addressed vertical instability problems and a lack of bed variability by stabilizing stream
banks, installing in -stream structures, adjusting stream planform, reconnecting the stream to the historic
floodplam and replanting the riparian areas with native vegetation The wetlands were restored by filling ditches,
creating microtopography, and planting native trees and shrubs This report describes the findings from the third
year of monitoring that took place in 2011
The riparian buffer and the restored wetlands were planted with bare root trees and shrubs, and the stream banks
were planted with live stakes Vegetation monitoring plots were established during the as -bwlt survey and
included 15 monitoring plots placed throughout the stream buffer and 30 momtonng plots installed in the restored
wetland Vegetation must meet a minimum average density of 260 stemstacre after five years The third -year
monitoring counted an average of 480 stems/acre in the stream plots and 451 stems/acre in the wetland plots
After the third -year monitoring, the vegetation component of the project is on track to meeting the success
criterion
The stream assessment completed during third -year monitoring found the stream to be stable and functioning
properly Channel dimensions have not changed significantly from previous monitoring Small portions of
localized bank erosion have been noted Beavers have also created a series of beaver dams on the site These areas
have been documented in the Current Condition Plan View The on -site stream gauges did not record any bankfull
events during the third year of momtonng
During the 2011 monitoring year, wetland hydrology was achieved at six of the seven groundwater monitoring
gauges in the restoration area and at the reference gauge The gauge that did not meet the success criterion in 2011
met the wetland hydrology criterion during the 2010 growing season To meet the hydrology success criterion, the
water table of the restored wetlands must be within 12" of the soil surface continuously for at least 5% (12 5 days)
of the 251 -day growing season during a year experiencing average rainfall
The daily rainfall data depicted on the gauge data graphs were obtained from the on -site precipitation gauge The
precipitation gauge was installed at the site after the completion of construction The daily rainfall data obtained
from a local weather station show that the area had average rainfall during the 2011 growing season
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KCl Associates of North Carolina
Restoration Site 2011- MY03

1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
Protect Goals and Objectives
The goals and objectives of the restoration project are as follows
Restoration Goals
• Restore the site's riparian buffers and forested wetlands
• Create a stable stream and wetland complex through an interconnected floodplam
corridor
Restoration Objectives
• Connect the new stream planform to its original floodplam
• Fill and plug ditches in the drained hydric soils to restore saturated hydrologic
conditions to the upper soil horizons
• Plant a functional Coastal Plain Small Swamp Stream community to create an effective
riparian buffer and wetland complex
• Exclude livestock from the riparian and wetland areas with fencing
1.1 Project Structure, Restoration Type, and Approach
The pre- restoration channel of NPAC had been moved and channelized to maximize the
use of an agricultural field adjacent to Powell Farm Road The other significant hydrologic
alterations to the site included ditched wetlands and straightened tributaries that helped
convey water through the property Due to the clearing of the riparian areas, the streams
were experiencing significant bank erosion prior to restoration In addition to the ditching
that drained the historic wetlands, ponds were also built to attract migratory waterfowl The
project restored, enhanced and preserved 13,044 linear feet of channel using a combination
of Priority 1 and 2 Approaches and Enhancement II, and restored, enhanced, and preserved
111 9 acres of Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp wetland community, generating 11,881
stream mitigation units and 64 0 wetland mitigation units (Table 1)
1.1.1 Protect Streams
The three design reaches of NPAC (Stations 10+00 to 76 +00) were restored to C5
channels Following a Priority 1 approach, the channel was relocated to its historic
location and the bed elevation was brought up, reconnecting the stream to the
original floodplam At Station 10+00, the restored channel begins online at the
culvert under Powell Farm Road At Station 21 +00, the channel leaves the pre-
restoration location and was returned to the adjacent forest in the location of its
historic channel The new channel comes back online at the end of the project at
Station 76+00
TI 1 and TI 2 (Stations 80+00 to 88 +25 and Stations 90+00 to 99+80,
respectively) were both restored to C5/135c headwater channels At the confluence
of these two channels, T1 begins T1 (Stations 100+00 to 108 +84) was restored
using the same approach as T 1 and Tl 2 A 31' -wide easement exception occurs
at Station 101 +00, where a ford crossing was installed for the landowner The
restoration created a new planform, profile, and dimension and increased the
sinuosity of these previously straightened channels with a combination of Priority 1
and 2 approaches Grade control structures such as log sills and step pools were
installed along the new channels to create a stable profile This restoration also
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wedand KCI Associates of North Carolina
Restoration Site 2011- MY03

created a bankfull bench in entrenched sections and reconnected the stream to the
existing floodplain in others
T2 was divided into two reaches based on the changing slope of the tributary T2A
(Stations 110+00 to 115+00) was restored to a C5/135c stream and 7213 (Stations
115+00 to 120+22) was restored to an E5 stream type The hydrologic source for
the channel is a seep at the top of T2A The restoration created a new planform,
profile, and dimension and increased the sinuosity of the previously straightened
channel with a combination of Priority 1 and 2 approaches Grade control
structures such as log sills and step pools were installed along the new channels to
create a stable profile This restoration created a bankfull bench in some places and
reconnected the stream to the existing floodplain in others
T3 (Stations 130+00 to 141 +67) is comprised of a single reach that was restored to
a C5 channel This channel was restored using a Priority 1 approach, with a new
planform, profile, and dimension being reconnected to the original floodplain Two
drainage ditches that were adjacent to T3 were filled as part of the wetland
restoration, reestablishing T3 as the primary hydrologic feature in this area
T4 is separated into two reaches The first reach (Stations 150+00 to 151 +80) was
enhanced (Ell) by planting portions of the easement that had been logged and by
removing significant amounts of logging debris that had accumulated in the
channel, creating unstable conditions The second reach (Stations 151 +80 to
164 +20) was preserved Near Station 162+00, the stream flows out of the easement
for approximately 100 feet, but then comes back into the easement The stationing
continues from where the stream left the easement
1.1.2 Project Wetlands
Wetland Area 1 preserves approximately 46 acres of well - vegetated palustrine
forested, scrub -shrub and emergent wetlands that are along the floodplain of the
NPAC The preservation area is dominated by various wetland sedges, rushes and
persistent emergent vegetation, but also contains large scrub -shrub alder thickets
that are permanently inundated
Starting from the west and continuing to the east, Wetland Area 2 is located in the
general vicinity of Tributary 1 Portions of this area, which is comprised of six
wetlands separated by the restored stream, were historically cleared as part of the
site's agricultural operations This area was enhanced through the planting of bare
root material This wetland also borders the restored NPAC channel, and because
NPAC has been reconnected to its floodplain, overbank flooding inundates the
adjacent wetlands
Enhancement in Wetland Area 3 took place in the central portion of the site The
wetland includes a shallow pond and adjacent overbank areas of NPAC Wetland
Area 3 is located adjacent to a section of NPAC where overbank flows will have
regular access to the floodplain, thus increasing hydrology to the wetlands This
area was planted with wetland trees and shrubs and graded to eliminate the man-
made berms that impounded excess surface water
Wetland Area 4 is located in an area that was heavily manipulated by the
landowner to create a series of shallow impoundments intended to attract migratory
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KC/ Associates of North Carolina
Restoration Site 2011- MY03

waterfowl Water control structures allowed the landowner to manipulate water
levels within the impoundments These impoundments were regraded to create a
mosaic of vegetated wet hummocks throughout the wetland Wetland W4 serves as
a transitional area between the ponded features and the wetland preservation area
This area was planted with bare root seedlings and treated to control invasive
species
Wetland Area 5 includes all of the site's restored wetlands These areas are within
the floodplam of the NPAC and its tributaries, which had historically been
hydrologically altered to allow for agricultural production Four main construction
techniques were utilized to restore these wetland areas
1 Raising the elevation of the NPAC and its tributaries to re- establish an active
floodplam connected to the adjacent wetlands
2 Filling existing ditches and removing the drains to discourage rapid
groundwater discharge to surface water receptors
3 Scarifying the top 0 5'of organic surface soil to re- establish soil structure and
allow for increased surface storage (microtopography) This material was not
removed from the site, but simply re- worked to maximize the ability of the
surface soils to retain surface and groundwater hydrology
4 Planting native species of wetland plants and shrubs
Table 1 below provides a summary of the mitigation actions and units generated
from this project
1.2 Location and Setting
The Farrar Dairy Site is located off of Farrar Dairy Road in southern Harnett County, North
Carolina, and is approximately 8 5 miles southwest of Lillmgton, North Carolina (Figure
1) To reach the site from Raleigh, drive south out of Raleigh on US 401 toward Fuquay-
Varma, continuing south from Fuquay -Varna on US4011US -421 toward Lillmgton Turn
right onto NC -210 and continue south through Lillmgton for approximately 6 5 miles to
Darroch Road Turn right onto Darroch Road and continue approximately 3 miles to Powell
Farm Road Turn left onto Powell Farm Road, drive approximately 15 miles and the
entrance to the site will be on the left through the driveway of the red ranch style home
Farrar Dairy Stream and Weiland KCI Associates ojNorth Carolina
Restoration Site 2011- MY03

Harnett County, North Carolina
od
Upper Lirue
D d
K
a
O
aq a`
4
3m
(0 Up /ej a0
HARNETT
COUNTY
CHATHAM WAKE
LEE JOHNSTON
eR�Jet HARNETT
;�`
het MOORE
Spring
UMBE LAND CUMBERLAND SAMPSON
—rl � COUN Y /HOKE7
mmmmmr`
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Project Site Location
Major Roads KCI
Other Roads w�E ASSCXIATFS OF NC
�� Major Rivers
K C I 1:126,720
Municipalities 1 inch equals 2 miles
TECHNOLOGIES 0 County Boundaries z 1 0 2ntiles � ,,.� TEO.,aoGws 04

13 Project History and Background
Table 1 Project Restoration Components
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Project Streams
o
`
e m �
°�
Project Segment /
° ••
o,
a
o
Stream Mitigation
Reach ID
ad ca.
°
0ta1100m
Units SMU
PAC
4,565
R
P1
6,746
1 10+00 -77 +46
6,714'
11
864
R
P1/2
825
1 80+00 -88 +25
825
1 2
995
R
P1/2
980
90+00 -99+80
980
1
818
R
P1/2
884
100+00 - 108 +84
853'
977
R
P1 /2
500
110+00 - 115 +00
500
B
R
P1/2
522
115+00- 120+22
522
3
1,335
R
P1
1,167
130+00-141+67
1,167
4 1
180
E11
-
180
150+00- 151 +80
72
4 2
1,240
P
-
1,240
1151+80-164+201
248
TOTAL
13,044
11,881
= Restoration P 1 = Priority I
= Enhancement 11 P2 = Priority 2
— Preservation
Easement exceptions for landowner ford crossings were excluded for these calculations
Project Wetlands
m
e
�
Project
n
`
a
Wetland Mitigation Um
Segment
'
At
U E-
(WMU)
Coastal atn
Area 1
P
4593
Small Stream
919
Swam
Coastal ain
Area 2
E
688
Small Stream
344
Swam
Coastal Plain
Area 3
E
257
Small Stream
129
Swam
Coastal atn
Area 4
E
1267
Small Stream
634
Swam
Coastal ain
Area 5
R
438
Small Stream
438
Swarrin
----A
TOTAL
111851
94-06
i
Fame Dairy Stream and Weiland KCI Associates oJNorth Carolina
Restoration Site 2011- MY03

Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland Restoration
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
2007
Mav 08
Final Design
2007
May 08
Construction
N/A
Mar 09
Planting
N/A
Jan 09
Mitigation Plan / As -Built Year 0 Monitoring - Baseline
May 09
Jun 09
Year 1 Monitoring
Dec 09
Dec 09
Year 2 Monitoring
Dec 10
Dec 10
Year 3 Monitoring
Oct 11
Dec 11
Table 3 Project Contact Table
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland Restoration
Design Firm
KCI Associates of North Carolina
Landmark Center 11, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Rd
Raleigh, NC 27609
Contact Mr Tim Moms
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Construction Contractor
Land Mechanics, Inc
126 Circle G Lane
Willow Springs, NC 27592
Contact Mr Lloyd Glover
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Planting Contractor
Bruton Nurseries and Landscapes
PO Box 1197
Freemont, NC 27830
Contact Mr Charlie Bruton
Phone [phone]
Monitoring Performers
MY -00 - MY -05
KCI Associates of North Carolina
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Rd
Raleigh, NC 27609
Contact Mr Adam Speller
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KC/ Associates ojNorth Carolina
Restoration Site 2011- MY03

Table 4 Project Background Table
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Project County
Harnett County
Physiographic Region
Coastal Plain
Ecore ion
Sand Hills
Pro ect River Basin
Cape Fear
USGS HUC for Project and Reference
03030004110010 Anderson Creek
03030004150050 Little Rockfish Creek - reference
03030002050100 T to Wilkinson Creek - reference
NCDWQ Sub -basin for Project and Reference
03 -06-14 Anderson Creek
034)6-15 Little Rockfish Creek - reference
03 -06-04 UT to Wilkinson Creek - reference
Drainage Area
5 7 sq mi
Stream Order
First and Second Order
Watershed Type Rural, Urban, Developing, etc
Rural
Watershed LULC Distribution Urban
Ag -Row Crop
Ag- Livestock
Forested
Water/Wedands
<1%
21 %
1%
72%
6%
Watershed impervious cover %
3%
Rosgen Classification of As -built (Stream)
CS PAC
C5/135c TI I T1 2, T1, T2A, T213, T3, T4)
NCDWQ Classification for Project
Class C Anderson Creek)
Within EEP Watershed Plan9
No
Any portion of the project segment upstream of a 303d
listed segment?
No
Reasons for 303d Listing or Stressor
N/A
Total project acreage of easement
166 9 Acres
Total planted acreage
93 0 Acres
WRC Class Warm Cool Cold)
Warm
Species of concern, endangered etc
None
Pre- construction Beaver activity9
Yes
Dominant Soil Types
Wehadkee loam and Gilead sandy loam
% of Project Easement Fenced
85%
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KCl Associates ojNorth Carolina
Restoration Site 1011 - MY03

2.0 PROJECT CONDITIONS AND MONITORING RESULTS
2.1 Vegetation Assessment
The planted vegetation on the site is growing well The low base flow throughout the summer
months allowed vegetation to become established in the stream channels on T1 1, T1 2, T1, T2, and
T3
There are scattered populations of invasive species at the site, and maintenance actions in 2011
included herbicide treatment
The monitored vegetation plots revealed that the planted vegetation is growing well with 475 and
445 stems/acre within the stream buffer and wetlands, respectively There are seven monitoring
plots that have calculated planted stem densities less than 260 stems/acre, two in the stream buffer
(Plot 3 and H) and three in the restored wetland (Plot 32, 38, and 45) This is not seen as
problematic given the high potential for desirable volunteers to become established in the plots and
across the site Like natural vegetative communities, some areas will have slightly higher densities
than others, but the data from the vegetation monitoring plots reveal that the site has an adequate
average stem density To ensure continued vegetative success, the site received supplemental
planting in early 2011 The overall vegetation assessment found the site to be on track to meeting
the vegetative success criterion
The vegetative monitoring results are displayed in Appendix A, and the Current Condition Plan
View (CCPV) See Section 4 0 for additional maintenance details concerning invasive control and
additional planting
2.2 Stream Assessment
During the 2011 growing season, the tributaries experienced low flow throughout the summer This
allowed vegetation to grow in the channels as described above Overall, this vegetation is
contributing to stream stability by trapping fine materials and rooting into the erosive silt and clay
bottom in these charnels Vegetated headwater channels are typical of small stream swamp
communities without developed canopies It is expected that as the channel receive more shade, the
herbaceous vegetation in the channel will decrease
The stream assessment found the protect streams to be stable T1 1 and T1 had experienced isolated
bed degradation during the first year of monitoring, but no further migration has been shown since
The additional log sills installed in 2010 in T1 are intact and holding grade During the third -year
site assessment a few of these structures were found to be piping This is not seen as problematic
due to the low flow during the assessment and the short duration that the structures, have been in
place With additional vegetation growing around the channel and the accumulation of fine
materials in the pore space of the structures the piping should eventually stop On NPAC, there are
isolated areas of bank erosion, which are depicted in the CCPV All of these stream features will
continue to be monitored to make sure that any observed changes are within the range of vanability
found in stable stream systems
The stream monitoring data are described in Appendix B The stream maintenance from 2011 is
described in Section 4 0 and shown in the CCPV
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KCl Associates of North Carolina
Restoration Site 2011- MY03

2.2.1 Bankfull Events
Table 5 Hydrological Bankfull Verifications
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Date of Data
Date of Occurrence
Method
Photo Number
Collection
automated
3/5/2010
1/21/2010
N/A
stream gauge
automated
F 3/5/2010
2/6/2010
N/A
stream gauge
Farrar Dairy Stream and Weiland
Restoration Site
10
KCI Associates of North Carolina
2011- MY03

2.2.2 Quantitative Measures Summary Tables
able 6a NPAC -1 Baseline Stream Summary
rar Day Site
mme ter
Pre- Existin Condition
Reference Reach es Data
Desi
As -built
Ra
nension - Riffle
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Max
Min
Mean
Max
n
Banldull Width ft)
139
169
148
243
4
195
203
210
2
190
184
196
207
4
Flood prone Width2L
20
32
24
60
4
300
2
>60
>60
>60
>60
4
Bankfull Mean Depth ft)
12
19
2 1
22
4
23
2
16
14
1 5
16
4
Banldull Max Depth (ft)
25
27
27
30
4
30
33
35
2
24
23
25
27
4
Bankf ill Cross - Sectional Area ftZ
300
302
1 302
1 302
1 4
1 454
473
1 1
491
1 21
300
1
265
29 1
322
4
Width/Depth Ratio
64
101
73
196
1 4
1 84
1 88
91
1 21
120
1
124
132
144
4
Entrenchment Ratio
1 3
23
18
43
1 4
1 143
1 149
1
1 154
1 21
>3 0
>3 0
>3 0
>3 0
4
Bank Height Ratio
10
19
2 1
25
1 4
1
1
1 10
1
1 21
10
1
10
1 0
10
4
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
'
25
36
35
60
35
60
Radius of Curvature ft)
•
22
36
20
35
20
35
Rc Bankf ill width 11/11
•
10
18
1 1
1 8
10
18
Meander Wavelength ft)
•
119
325
95
150
95
150
Meander Width Ratio
'
1 2
18
1 8
32
1 8
3 1
Profile
Riffle Len (ft)
11
24
38
20
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
70-03-0
0 0010
00034
00059
00007
00034
00098
20
Pool Len ft)
8
E971
27
gI
20
40
9
30
37
20
Pool Spacing ft
60
68
65
95
62
7 9
99
20
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC % /Sa° /u /G % /C % /B % /Be% 0%/ 100 % /0% /0 % /O % /0% 6%/81%/15%/0%/0%/0% 7%/57%/32%/3%/0%/1%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95 mm 00/018/025/18/90 012/028/042/11/45
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length ft
2,179
620
4,541
4,528
Drainage Area (SM)
392
1648
392
392
Ros en Classification
C/E5
E5
C5
C5
Sinuosity
100
130
130
139
Water Surface Slope ft/ft
00040
00020
00020
00020
'There was no defined pattern for the NPAC due to the stream being channelized
-The As -built Dimension is from the monitored riffle cross - sections on this reach
-The As -built Pattern and Profile data were calculated from the monitored longitudinal profile for NPAC, which contains parts of both NPAC 1 and 2
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wedand KCI Associates ojNorth Carolina
Restoration Site 2011 - MY03

Table 6b NPAC -2 Baseline Stream Summary
Farrar Day Site
Parameter
Pre- Existm Condition
Reference Reach es Data
Design
As -built
Dimension - Riffle
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Mm
Max
Min
Mean
Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
132
1
195
203
210
2
196
195
21 1
226
2
Flood prone Width (ft
>75
1
300
2
>60
>60
>60
>60
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
24
1
1
23
2
16
16
17
1 8
2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
39
1
30
33
35
2
24
27
3 1
34
2
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
1 31 2
1
1
454
473
49 1
2
32 0
35 8
35 9
359
2
Width/Depth Ratio
56
1
1
84
88
91
1 21
120
106
125
143
2
Entrenchment Ratio
5 7
1
143
149
154
2
>3 0
>3 0
>3 0
>3 0
2
Bank Height Ratio
10
1
10
121
10
1 0
10
1 0
2
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
•
25
36
35
60
35
60
Radius of Curvature (ft)
22
36
20
35
20
35
Rc Bankfull width ft/ft
•
10
18
10
1 8
10
1 7
Meander Wavelength ft
•
119
325
95
150
95
150
Meander Width Ratio
•
12
18
18
3 1
17
28
Profile
Riffle Len (ft)
7
22
29
7
Riffle Slope ft/ft
0 0030
0 0210
0 0010
0 0080
0 0037
0 0075
0 0007
00099
00236
7
Pool Len (ft)
8
42
27
81
20
40
14
23
41
8
Pool Spacing ft
60
97
68
123
50
80
61
74
93
8
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC % /Sa % /G% /C % /B % /Be% 0% /100% /0 % /0 % /0% /0%
6 %/8l %/15 % /0 % /0 % /0%
21 %/45 %/31 %/2 % /0 %/0%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95 mm
00/018/025/18/90
0062/011/032/17 /35
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length ft
985
620
1185
1,212
Drainage Area (SM )
465
1648
465
465
Ros en Classification
C/E5
E5
C5
C5
Sinuosity
100
130
1 30
125
Water Surface Slope ft/ft
00040
1 00020
1 00030
1 00039
'There was no defined pattern for the NPAC due to the stream being channelized
-The As -built Dimension is from the monitored riffle cross - sections on this reach
-The As -built Pattern and Profile data were calculated from the monitored longitudinal profile for NPAC, which contains parts of both NPAC 1 and 2
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wedand
Restoration Site
12
KCI Associates of North Carolina
2011 - MY03

Table 6c NPAC -3 Baseline Stream Summary
Farrar Dat a Site
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach es Data Design As -built
Dimension - Riffle
Min
Mean
Med
I Max
n
Mm
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Max
Min
Mean
Max
n
Bankfull Width ft
132
1
195
203
210
2
210
242
1
Flood prone Width ft
>75
1
300
2
>60
1
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
24
1
23
2
1 7
1
Bankfull Max Depth ft
39
1
30
33
35
2
26
1
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
312
1
454
473
491
2
367
UI>
1
Width/Depth Ratio
56
1
84
88
91
2
120
1
Entrenchment Ratio
5 7
1
143
149
154
2
>3 0
1
Bank Height Rati o
1 10
1
1
10
2
1 10
1
1
10
1
1
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth ft
'
25
36
35
60
35
60
Radius of Curvature ft
`
22
36
20
35
22
36
Rc Bankf ill width 11/11
'
10
18
10
17
09
1 5
Meander Wavelength 11
'
119
325
105
265
105
265
Meander Width Ratio
•
12
18
17
29
14
25
Profile
Riffle Len ft
Riffle Slo ft/ft
00030
00210
00010
00080
00040
00054
Pool Len ft
8
42
27
81
10
40
Pool Spacing ft
60
97
68
123
85
145
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC % /Sa % /G % /C % /B % /Be% 0 %/ 100% /0 %/0%/0%/0% 6 %/81 %/ 15 % /0% /0 % /0% 21 %/45 %/31 %/2 % /0 % /0%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95 nun 00/018/025/18/90 0062/011/032/17 /35
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length ft 880
620
998
1,006
Drainage Area (SM) 482
1648
482
482
Ros en Classification C/E5
E5
C5
C5
Sinuosity 100
1 30
130
109
Water Surface Slope ft/ft 00040
00020
00030
- i nere was no aennea panern for ine NrAC aue to the stream tieing cnannenzea
-The As -built Dimension is from the monitored riffle cross - sections on this reach
-The As -built survey was completed on NPAC -3, but the monitored detailed longitudinal profile for NPAC does not run through NPAC -3
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland
Restoration Site
13
KCI Associates of North Carolina
1011- MY03

Table 6d Tnb 1 1 Baseline Stream Summary
Farrar Dairy Site
Parameter
Pre-Existing Condition
Reference Reach (es) Data
Des
As -built
Dimension - Riffle
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Max
Min
Mean
Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
35
43
50
2
77
79
77
83
3
45
59
64
69
2
Flood prone Width (ft)
6
11
15
2
13
14
13
16
3
>9
16
23
29
2
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
04
05
06
2
07
08
08
09
3
05
03
04
04
2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
09
10
1 1
2
1 1
1 3
13
14
3
07
06
07
07
2
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area ft2
20
20
20
1 2
6 1
1 64
1 62
1 70
1 3
1 20
1
23
24
24
2
Width/Depth Ratio
62
94
125
1 2
85
1 98
1 96
1 114
1 3
1 100
1
15 1
175
198
2
Entrenchment Ratio
1 7
74
130
2
1 6
1 19
1 2 1
2 1
3
>2
23
36
49
2
Bank Height Ratio
17
3 1
44
2
1 0
3
10
1 0
10
1 0
2
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
10
21
22
13
17
13
17
Radius of Curvature ft
6
13
11
23
8
13
8
13
Re Bankfull width ( ft/ft)
07
25
10
30
18
29
13
20
Meander Wavelength ft
42
44
49
59
30
45
30
45
Meander Width Ratio
1 1
41
20
29
29
38
20
27
Riffle Len ft)
#
8
14
21
22
Riffle Slo a ft/ft
#
00120
0 0280
0 0170
00180
0
00144
00380
22
Pool Len ft
#
5
9
2
5
2
5
7
21
Pool S acm ft
#
15
30
19
25
31
21
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC % /Sa % /G % /C % /B % /Be%
0% /100 % /09/./0% /0 % /0% 0 %/100%/0%/0 % /0 % /0% 13 %/64 %/23 %/0 %/0 % /0%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95 mm
007/014/029/86/15
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length ft
864
204
827
825
Drainage Area (SM)
002
0 15
002
002
Ros en Classification
G5
Bile
C5/B5c
C5
Sinuosity
1 12
120
1 13
1 12
Water Surface Slope ft/ft
00240
1 00120
1 00140
1 00131
# No flow during survey, therefore these dimensions were not recorded
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland
Restoration Site
14
KCI Associates of North Carolina
1011 - MY03

Table 6e Tnb 12 Baseline Stream Summary
Farrar Dairy Site
Parameter
Pre-Existing Condition
Reference Reach (es) Data
Des
As -built
Dimension - Riffle
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Max
Min
Mean
Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
36
50
64
2
77
79
77
83
3
76
69
76
83
2
Flood prone Width ft
7
34
60
2
13
14
13
16
3
>15 2
26
36
46
2
Bank-full Mean Depth (ft)
09
13
16
2
07
08
08
09
3
08
07
08
08
2
Bankfull Max Depth ft
2 1
22
22
2
1 1
13
13
14
3
12
1 2
12
12
2
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
58
58
58
2
61
64
62
70
3
58
52
55
57
2
Width/Depth Ratio
22
47
71
2
1
98
96
114
3
100
92
107
12 1
2
Entrenchment Ratio
20
57
94
2
16
19
2 1
2 l
3
>2
38
47
55
2
Bank Height Ratio
1 1
16
20
2
10
3
10
1 0
10
10
2
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
22
34
22
17
26
17
26
Radius of Curvature ft
8
11
11
23
13
20
13
20
Rc Bankfull width ft/ft
14
37
10
30
17
26
17
26
Meander Wavelength ft
54
74
49
59
54
75
54
75
Meander Width Ratio
39
113
20
29
22
34
22
34
Profile
Riffle Length_TL
#
21
25
35
14
Riffle Slope ft/ft
#
0 0120
00280
0 0150
00180
00115
00178
00234
14
Pool Length (ft)
#
5
9
4
9
3
6
13
14
Pool Spacing ft
#
20
40
29
37
50
14
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC % /Sa % /G% /C% /B % /Be% 0% /100 % /0% /0% /0 % /7P7!00%/00/0/0%/ 0%/ 0% 22 %/76 %/3 % /0% /0% /0%
dl6/d35/d50/d84/d95 mm 0062/0079/01/022 /044
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length ft
1,006
620
986
980
Drainage Area (SM)
010
1648
010
0 10
Ros en Classification
G5
E5
C51B5c
C5B5c
Sinuosity
1 10
130
1 14
1 14
Water Surface Slope ft/ft)
00130
1 00020
1 00130
00142
tt No flow during survey, therefore these dimensions were not recorded
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland
Restoration Site
15
KCI Associates ojNorth Carolina
2011 - MY03

Table 617 Tnb 1 Baseline Stream Summary
Farrar Dairy Site
Parameter
Pre-Existing Condition
Reference Reach (es) Data
Des
As -built
Dimension - Riffle
Mm
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Max
Min
Mean
Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft
^
77
79
77
83
3
100
86
95
103
2
Flood nine Width ft)
^
13
14
13
16
3
>20
>60
>60
>60
2
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
07
08
08
09
3
10
09
10
10
2
Bankfull Max Depth 11
1 1
13
13
14
3
16
1 7
1 8
19
2
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area 112
^
1
6 1
64
62
70
3
100
82
90
97
2
Width/Depth Ratio
^
85
9 8
96
1 1 4
3
100
90
100
109
2
Entrenchment Ratio
A
l 6
19
2 1
2 1
3
>2
>3 0
>3 0
>3 0
1 2
Bank Height Ratio
^
l 0
3
10
10
10
10
2
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth ft
8
16
22
23
40
23
40
Radius of Curvature ft
6
20
11
23
15
25
15
25
Rc Bankfull width ft/ft)
A
10
30
1 5
25
16
26
Meander Wavelength ft
22
50
49
59
55
90
55
90
Meander Width Ratio
^
20
29
23
40
24
42
Profile
Riffle Len ft
^
6
24
37
12
Riffle Slope ft/ft
00120
70-28-0
0 0150
00180
00077
00184
00350
12
Pool Len ft
5
9
5
12
3
9
21
9
Pool Spacing ft
^
35
55
37
46
59
9
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC % /Sa % /G % /C % /B % /Be%
0% /100 % /0% /0% /0 % /0% 0% /100 % /0 % /0 % /0 % /0%
22 %/76 %/3 % /0 % /0% /0%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95 mm
0062/0079/0 1/0 22/044
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length ft
370
620
881
884
Drainage Area (SM )
0 18
1648
018
018
Ros en Classification
DA5
E5
C51B5c
C5B5c
Sinuosity
1 19
1 30
1 22
121
Water Surface Slope ft/ft
00100
00020
1 00110
1 00112
^ These existing conditions data were not collected on T1
Farrar Dairy Stream and Welland
Restoration Site
16
KCI Associates of North Carolina
2011 - MY03

i
Table 6g Tnb 2A Baseline Stream Summary
Farrar Dairy Site
Parameter
Pre-Existing Condition
Reference Reach es Data
Design
As -built
Dimension - Riffle
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Max
Min
Mean
Max
n
Bankfill Width (ft)
36
1
77
79
77
83
3
50
57
1
Flood prone Width (ft
4
1
13
14
13
16
3
>10
30
1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
07
1
07
08
08
09
3
05
05
1
Bankfull Max Depth ft
10
1
1 1
1 3
13
14
3
08
08
1
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area ft
25
1
6 1
6 4
6 2
7 0
3
25
28
1
Width/Depth Ratio
52
1
8 5
9 8
9 6
114
3
100
1 1 6
1
Entrenchment Ratio
1 1
1
1 6
1 9
2 1
2 1
3
>2
53
1
Bank Height Ratio
35
1
1 0
3
10
10
1
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
'
22
11
17
11
17
Radius of Curvature ft
'
11
23
8
10
8
10
Rc Bankfull width ft/ft)
'
10
30
16
20
14
1 8
Meander Wavelength ft
'
49
59
35
45
35
45
Meander Width Ratio
'
20
29
22
34
19
30
Profile
Riffle Len (ft)
#
8
15
28
17
Riffle Slope ft/ft
#
0 012
0 028
0 016
0 018
#
#
#
#
Pool Len ft
#
5
9
2
6
2
7
28
17
Pool Spacing ft
#
15
25
14
31
70
17
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC % /Sa % /G % /C % /B % /Be% 0% /100% /0% /0% /0 %/0% 0% /100 % /00/0/0 % /0 % /0% 22 %/76 %/3 % /0 % /0% /0%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95 mm 0062/0079/0 1/0 22/044
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length (ft)
423
620
500
500
Drainage Area S
004
1648
004
004
Ros en Classification
G5
E5
C5B5c
C5B5c
Sinuosity
100
1 30
1 16
1 13
Water Surface Slope ft/ft
00260
00020
00180
#
# No How during survey, therefore these dimensions were not recorded
'There was no defined pattern for T2 due to the stream being channelized
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland
Restoration Site
17
KCI Associates ojNorth Carolina
1011- MY03

Table 6h Trib 2B Baseline Stream Summary
Farrar Dairy Site
Parameter
Pre-Existing Condition
Reference Reach es Data
Design
As -built
Dimension - Riffle
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Max
Min
Mean
Max
n
Bankfull Width ft
45
1
67
72
7 1
79
3
53
52
1
Flood prone Width ft
8
1
34
63
68
88
3
>25
>60
1
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
06
1
07
09
09
10
3
05
05
1
Bankfull Max Depth ft
09
1
1 1
12
1 1
13
3
08
08
1
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area ftZ
25
1
57
61
58
67
1 3
26
25
1
Width/Depth Ratio
8 1
1
74
89
80
113
3
110
108
1
Entrenchment Ratio
1 8
1
49
88
86
13
3
>2 4
>3 0
1
Bank Height Ratio
32
1
10
3
10
10
1
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
'
15
48
23
40
23
40
Radius of Curvature ft
'
21
47
15
20
15
20
Rc Bankf ill width 11/11)
'
27
70
28
38
29
38
Meander Wavelength ft
'
43
84
70
90
70
90
Meander Width Ratio
'
19
72
43
75
44
77
Profile
Riffle Len ft)
#
8
l5
28
17
Riffle Slope 11/11
#
00090
00170
#
#
#
#
Pool Len ft
#
10
30
2
7
28
17
Pool Spacing ft
#
45
30
40
14
31
70
17
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC % /Sa % /G % /C % /B % /Be% 0% /100 % /0 % /0% /0 % /0% 0% /100 % /0 % /0 % /0 % /0%
22 %/76 %/3 % /0 % /0 % /0%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95 mm 028/037/044/082 /097
0062/0079/0 1/0 22/044
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length ft)
554
529
509
522
Drainage Area (SM)
004
035
004
004
Ros en Classification
G5
E5
E5
E5
Sinuosity
122
130
122
123
Water Surface Slope 11/11
00080
1 00070
1 00080
1 #
*There was no defined pattern for T2 due to the stream being channelized
# No flow during survey, therefore these dimensions were not recorded
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland
Restoration Site
18
KCI Associates of North Carolina
2011- MY03

Table 61 Trib 3 Baseline Stream Summary
Farrar Dairy Site
Parameter
Pre-Existing Condition
Reference Reach es Data
Design
As -built
Dimension - Riffle
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Mm
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Max
Min
Mean
Max
n
BankfillWidth ft
123
159
195
2
195
203
210
2
155
149
167
184
2
Flood prone Width ft
50
>70
2
300
2
>31
>60
>60
>60
2
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
10
13
16
2
23
2
1 3
1 2
12
12
2
Bankfull Max Depth ft
23
28
32
2
30
33
35
2
20
19
19
19
2
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
200
201
20 1
2
1 454
473
49 1
2
200
184
1 199
1 214
2
Width/Depth Ratio
76
133
189
2
84
88
91
2
120
121
140
158
2
Entrenchment Ratio
36
39
41
2
143
149
154
2
>2
>3
>3
>3
2
Bank Hei t Ratio
1 0
1 2
14
2
10
2
10
10
10
1 0
2
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
"
25
36
35
45
35
45
Radius of Curvature ft
•
22
36
20
28
20
28
Rc Bankfull width 11111)
•
10
18
13
18
12
17
Meander Wavelength ft
•
119
325
80
125
80
125
Meander Width Ratio
•
1 2
1 8
23
29
2 1
27
Profile
Riffle Len ft
#
12
21
35
11
Ritlle Slope ft/ft
#
0 0130
00280
0 0020
00050
00000
00023
00058
11
Pool Len (ft)
#
3
25
12
20
3
13
21
9
Pool Spacing ft
#
30
59
45
70
45
64
115
9
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC % /Sa % /G% /C% 13 % /Be% 0% /100 % /0% /0 % /0 % /0% 6%/81 % /15 % /0 % /0 % /0% 22 %/76 %/3 % /0 % /0% /0%
dl6/d35/d50/d84/d95 mm 00/018/025/18/90 0062/0079/01/022 /044
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length ft
1,335
620
1,151
1,167
Drainage Area (SM)
039
1648
039
039
Ros en Classification
C5/E5
E5
C5
C5
Sinuosity
100
130
1 17
1 17
Water Surface Slope ft/ft
00020
00020
00030
00211
' i nere was no aerinea pattern for 13 due to the stream being channehZed
# No flow during survey, therefore these dimensions were not recorded
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland
Restoration Site
19
KCI Associates offorth Carolina
201 / - MY03

Table 7a Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Farrar Dairy Site
Parameter
Cross - Section 1
NPAC 1
Cross - Section 2
NPAC 1
Cross - Section 3
NPAC 1
Dimension
MYO
MY 1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MY I
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MY I
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Bankfull Width (ft)
196
200
185
192
209
239
248
223
196
160
160
189
Floodprone Width (ft)
>60
>60
>60
>60
-
-
-
-
>60
>60
>60
>60
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
310
31 7
316
324
292
288
329
31 1
266
199
199
234
Bankf ill Mean Depth (ft)
16
1 6
17
17
1 4
12
1 3
14
14
12
12
1 3
Bankfull Maximum Depth (ft)
24
27
29
32
3 3
32
33
33
25
20
23
23
Width/Depth Ratio
124
126
108
114
-
-
-
-
144
129
129
15 3
Entrenchment Ratio
>3 0
>3 0
>3 0
>3 0
-
-
-
-
>3 0
>3 0
>3 0
>3 0
Bank Height Ratio
10
1 0
10
10
-
-
-
-
10
10
10
10
Wetted Perimeter (ft)
205
209
19
M:0:4::-
22 3
250
268
207
205
169
179
21 7
y rau is pus ()
15
15
16
1 16
1 3
12
12
14
13
12
12
12
Substrate
d50 (mm)l
007
1 006
1 006
1 006
1
1
1009
1 014
1 028
1 006
1
1 1 0 12
1 006
1 018
100621
006
d84 mm
(mm)j
022
1 0 l l
I 0 l l
1 010
1
1
1 065
1 049
1 37
1 026
1
1
1 oil
1 044
1 009 11
006
Table 7b Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Farrar Dairy Site
Parameter
Cross - Section 4
NPAC i
Cross - Section 5
NPAC 1
Cross - Section 6
NPAC l
Dimension
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5.
Bankfull Width (ft)
189
185
186
183
184
180
180
179
204
186
204
211
Floodprone Width (ft)
-
-
-
-
>60
>60
>60
>60
-
-
-
-
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area ft2
247
267
287
245
265
246
246
267
266
25 1
28 1
272
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
13
14
15
13
14
14
14
15
13
15
14
13
Bankfull Maximum Depth (ft)
28
32
30
2 7
23
23
29
27
30
31
35
33
Width/Depth Ratio
-
-
-
-
128
13 1
13 1
120
-
-
-
-
Entrenchment Ratio
-
-
-
-
>3 0
>3 0
>3 0
>3 0
-
-
-
-
Bank Height Ratio
-
-
-
-
10
10
10
10
-
-
-
-
Wetted Perimeter (ft)
209
20 1
20 8
19 6
19 2
22 2
22 0
17 7
22 0
19 9
22 1
227
Hydraulic Radius ft
12
1 13
14
1 13
14
11
11
13
12
1 13
1 13
12
Substrate
d50 (mm)j
054
1 Oil
1 010
1 Oil
I
1
1 009
1 009
1 021
1 020
1
1 1 0 12
1 0 07
10 073
1 006
d84 mm
082
1 040
1 034
1 036
1
1
1 037
1 038
1 038
1 037
1
1 1 0 29
1 0 26
1 0 14
1 006
Farrar Dairy Stream and Welland
Restoration Site
20
KCI Associates ojNorth Carolina
2011 - MY03

Table 7c Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Farrar Dairy Site
Parameter
Cross - Section 7
NPAC -1
*Cross- Section 8
NPAC -2
Cross - Section 9
NPAC -2
Dimension
MYO
MY
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Bankfull Width (ft)
207
200
209
203
195
189
192
212
229
222
247
233
Floodprone Width (ft)
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
-
-
-
-
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft'l
322
307
336
33 5
359
350
360
280
360
343
367
31 9
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
16
1 5
16
1 7
18
19
19
13
16
15
1 5
14
Bankfull Maximum Depth (ft)
27
29
32
34
34
36
39
27
34
32
42
36
Width/Depth Ratio
13 3
130
130
123
106
102
102
161
-
-
-
-
Entrenchment Ratio
>3 0
>3 0
>3 0
>3 0
>3 0
>3 0
>3 0
>3 0
-
-
-
-
Bank Height Ratio
10
10
10
10
1 0
10
10
1 0
-
-
-
-
Wetted Perimeter (ft4
21 5
210
22 1
216
249,
206
209
220
245
239
27 1
25 1
Hydraulic Radius A
1 5
1 1 5
1 1 5
1 16
1
14
1 7
17
13
15
1 14
14
1 13
Substrate
d50 (mm)l
0061 0061
006
1 0061
0 06
10 06
1 0 06 1 57
1 0 11 1 029
1 0171 1 20
j
d84 (mO
0 101 0101
006
1 0061
0 07
10 10
10 09 1 110
1
1 1 0661 069
1023 1 180 1
in 20 i, a consiructeu nine was mstaned at nSa due to stream maintenance issues
Table 7d Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Farrar Dairy Site
Parameter
Cross - Section 10
NPAC -2
Cross - Section 11
NPAC -3
Cross - Section 12
NPAC -3
Dimension
MYO
MY 1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MY 1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MY I
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Bankfull Width (ft)
226
210
202
197
242
216
239
239
223
210
228
227
Floodprone Width (ft)
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>00
-
-
-
-
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
35 8
340
31 3
280
558
53 1
598
549
420
380
509
490
Bankf ill Mean Depth (ft)
16
16
15
14
23
22
25
23
19
18
22
22
Bankfull Maximum Depth (ft)
27
28
27
26
36
35
40
36
32
35
45
44
Width/Depth Ratio
143
130
130
139
105
87
96
104
-
-
-
-
Entrenchment Ratio
>3 0
>3 0
>3 0
>3 0
>3 0
>3 0
>3 0
>3 0
-
-
-
-
Bank Height Ratio
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
1 0
-
-
-
-
Wetted Perimeter (ft)
237
220
214
207
235
23 1
258
25 5
239
230
253
249
H draulic Radius ft
15
1 5
1 5
1 4
23
23
23
2 1
18
1 7
20
1 20
Substrate
d50 (mm)l
0061 04
1 035 1032 071 029 1 015 007 1 1401 023 1 009 1008
d84 mm
3 101 9601
1801 8901 0 90 0441 021 1 0121 3001 0401 0 l l I 0 l l
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland
Restoration Site
21
KCI Associates of North Carolina
2011 - MY03

Table 7e Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Farrar Dairy Site
Parameter
Cross - Section 13
TI 1
Cross - Section 14
TI 1
Cross - Section 15
TI 1
Dimension
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Bankfull Width (ft)
69
80
72
74
71
69
73
76
59
58
65
60
Floodprone Width (ft)
16
16
16
16
-
-
-
-
29
30
30
30
Bankf ill Cross - Sectional Area 42
24
28
28
28
5 1
52
55
54
23
25
22
2 1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
03
04
04
04
07
07
08
07
04
04
03
04
Bankfull Maximum Depth (ft)
07
07
08
07
13
13
1 5
13
06
07
06
06
Width/Depth Ratio
198
229
18 5
196
-
-
-
-
15 1
132
132
171
Entrenchment Ratio
23
20
22
22
-
-
-
-
49
52
52
5 1
Bank Height Ratio
-
10
1 0
10
-
-
-
-
1 0
10
1 1
1 1
Wetted Perimeter (ft)
—10
7 1
82
73
76
77
76
83
82
6 1
60
60
62
Hydraulic Radius ft)
03
03
04
04
07
07
07
07
04
04
04
03
Substrate
d50 (mm 0 06
006
006
006
006
006
006
006
1 006
006 006
006
006
1
006
d84 mm 0 07
1 006
1 006
1 006 1 1
1 006
1 3700
1 006
1 006
1
1 1 009 1 1100
1 048
1 050
1 008
1 4400
Table 7f Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Farrar Dairy Site
Parameter
Cross- Section 16
TI 2
Cross- Section 17
TI 2
Cross- Section 18
TI 2
Dimension
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY31
MY4
MY5
Bankfull Width (ft)
89
92
93
90
83
85
85
82
69
69
70
69
Floodprone Width (ft)
-
-
-
-
46
46
46
46
26
26
26
26
Banldull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
64
68
68
64
57
58
57
54
52
5 1
56
5 1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
07
07
1 07
07
07
07
07
07
08
07
08
07
Bankfull Maximum Depth (ft)
16
14
15
14
12
1 2
13
1 1
1 2
12
13
1 2
Width/Depth Ratio
-
-
-
-
121
125
127
125
92
93
88
93
Entrenchment Ratio
-
-
-
-
55
54
54
56
38
3 8
37
38
Bank Height Ratio
-
-
-
-
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Wetted Perimeter (ft)
95
97
109
95
87
89
89
86
75
75
77
75
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
07
07
07
07
06
07
06
06
07
07
07
07
Substrate
d50 (mm)l
031
1 0 12 1030
10311
1
1 006
1 006
1 006
1 006
1
1
006
1 025
1 028 1
026
d84 (mrn)j
048
1 035 1042
1 043
1
1
1 008
1 4400
1 042
1 037
1 1
1 0 10
1 065
1 042 1
041
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland
Restoration Site
22
KC/ Associates ojNorth Carolina
2011 - MY03

Table 7g Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Farrar Dairy Site
Parameter
Cross - Section 19
TI
Cross - Section 20
TI
Cross - Section 21
TI
Dimension
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Bankfill Width (ft)
95
105
93
106
103
91
89
89
86
101
101
113
Floodprone Width (fl)
-
-
-
_
1 >60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area ()
109
120
108
117
97
83
85
8 1
82
99
103
88
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1 1
1 1
12
09
09
09
10
09
10
10
10
08
Bankfull Maximum Depth (ft)
24
25
23
21
19
18
19
18
17
18
18
16
WiddvDepth Ratio
-
-
-
-
109
101
120
98
90
103
99
145
Entrenchment Ratio
-
-
-
-
>3 0
>3 0
>3 0
>3 0
>3 0
>30
>30
>30
Bank Height Ratio
-
-
-
-
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Wetted Perimeter (ft)_
10 7
118,
105
153
14908
60
100
117
109
95
109
10 9
141
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
10
10
10
08
05
0 4
08
08
0 9
0 9
01
08
Substrate
d50 (mm4 006
1 006
1 033
1 033
1
1
100621006
006
1 006
1 006
1
1
1053
1 006
1 03
1 006
1 006
(mm)j 0121
0061
044
1 044
1
1
1010
10061
033
1 006
1
1
1 20
1 73
1 0441
021
1 0061
006
Table 7h Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Farrar Dairy Site
Parameter
Cross - Section 22
T2
Cross - Section 23
T2
Cross - Section 24
T2
Dimension
MYO
MY
MY2
MY31
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Bankfull Width (ft )
75
75
89
85
57
59
60
68
71
65
77
69
Flood prone Width (ft )
-
-
-
-
30
31
31
31
-
-
-
-
Bankf ill Cross - Sectional Area (ft
5 1
50
5 5
56
28
28
29
34
42
39
45
4 1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
07
07
06
07
05
05
05
05
06
06
06
06
Bankfull Maximum Depth (ft)
I I
1 1
1 1
1 1
08
08
08
09
1 1
10
1 1
10
WiddvDe th Ratio
-
-
-
-
116
128
132
136
-
-
-
-
Entrenchment Ratio
-
-
-
-
53
52
40
44
-
-
-
-
Bank Height Rati
-
-
-
-
10
10
10
10
-
-
-
-
Wetted Perimeter (ft)
79
79
92
98
60
62
63
7 1
75
69
82
74
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
07
06
06
0 6
05
0 4
0 5
05
0 6
06
05
06
Substrate
d50 (mm)j
0061
0061
006
1 0061
006
1 006
1 0061
006
1
1
1 006
1 006
1 006
1 006
mm
006
1 0061
006
1 0061
16
1 52
1 0191
170
1
1
1 0061
006
1 0061
006
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland
Restoration Site
23
KCl Associates of North Carolina
1011 MY03

Table 71 Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Farrar Dairy Site
Parameter
Cross - Section 25
T2
Cross - Section 26
13
Cross - Section 27
T3
Dimension
MYO
MY]
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Bankfull Width (ft)
52
56
67
59
Floodprone Width (ft)
184
176
176
179
192
189
212
191
Floodprone Width (ft)
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
-
-
-
-
09
Bankf ill Cross - Sectional Area (ft )
25
27
29
27
214
20 1
15 8
147
14
242
22 l
183
179
17
Bankf ill Mean Depth (ft )
05
05
04
05
-
12
l 1
09
08
138
13
12
09
09
-
-
Bankfull Maximum Depth (ft)
08
08
08
08
>3 0
19
18
13
13
-
-
25
23
16
16
10
10
Width/Depth Ratio
108
117
15 5
129
25 1
284
15 8
15 5
1961
218
159
153
-
-
-
-
12
1 10
Entrenchment Ratio
>3 0
>3 0
>3 0
>3 0
1 1
10
>3 0
>3 0
>3 0
>3 0
006
006
-
-
-
-
1 0061
0061
Bank Height Ratio
10
10
10
10
006
1 006
1 0
10
10
10
1 006
1 006
-
-
-
-
Wetted Perimeter (ft)
5 5
59
70
61
18 9
181
181
207
182
196
239
196
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
05
05
04
04
I I
1 1
r09
ro 9
13
1 1
09
1 09
Substrate
d50 (mm)j
006
1 0061
006
1 006
1
1
1006
1 009
1014
1006
1
1
1 006
1 006
1 007
1 006
8 (mm)j
006
1 0061
006
1 0061
0 09
1 0 18
1021
1010
1
1
1 0101
008
1 0 10
1 009
Table 7j Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Farrar Dairy Site
Parameter
Cross - Section 28
T3
Cross - Section 29
T3
Dimension
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Bankfull Width (ft)
233
233
235
238
149
154
153
148
Floodprone Width (ft)
-
-
-
-
>60
>60
>60
>60
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
29 1
294
225
219
184
194
182
159
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
12
13
10
09
12
13
12
1 1
Bankfull Maximum Depth (ft)
26
27
14
14
19
20
19
17
Width/Depth Ratio
-
-
-
-
12 l
122
129
138
Entrenchment Ratio
-
-
-
-
>3 0
>3 0
>3 0
>3 0
Bank Height Ratio
-
-
-
-
10
10
10
10
Wetted Perimeter (ft)
239
24 1
25 1
284
156
161
159
153
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
12
12
1 10
08
12
12
1 1
10
Substrate
d50 (mm)l
006
006
1 008
1 007
1
1
1 0061
0061
0061
006
d8 (mm)l
006
1 006
1 O l l
1 0 10
1
1
1 006
1 006
1 0461
008
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland
Restoration Site
24
KC/ Associates ojNorth Carolina
2011 - MY03

23 Wetland Assessment
The maximum number of consecutive days that the groundwater was within 12 inches of the surface was
determined for each groundwater gauge This number was converted into a percentage of the 251 -day growing
season (March 11 to November 16) Table 8 presents the hydrological monitoring results for 2011 The wetland
gauges used to monitor site hydrology were installed in March 2009 During the third year of monitoring,
wetland hydrology was achieved at all of the gauges on the site except for gauge 6 (Table 8) Based on these
data, the majority of the site has exceeded the minimum duration of 12 5 consecutive days (5% of the growing
season) with the water table within 12 inches of the soil surface for the 2011 growing season (Appendix C)
Climatic data for the 2011 growing season were analyzed in comparison to historical data to determine whether
2011 was a normal year in terms of climatic conditions The historical data were collected from the NRCS,
Water and Climate Center, "Climate Analysis for Wetlands by County" website This evaluation concluded that
2011 was a normal year for rainfall Rainfall was within the 30th to 70th percentiles for the months of March,
April, May, September, and November Rainfall was less than the 30`h percentile threshold in January,
February, June, July, October, and December, and was greater than the 70 percentile threshold in August
(Appendix C)
Table 8 Hydrologic Monitoring Results
Farrar Dai Site
Gau e #
Hydro nod
Dates Meeting Success
<5%
5% - 8%
8% -125%
>12 5%
Max No of
Consecutive Days /
Exact Hydropenod
Percentage
1
>1257/7
>125%
>12 5%
X
1 60/24%
March 11- May 9
2
8 °/6-12 5%
<5%
>12 5%
X
148/59%
June 21 - Nov 16
3
8 °/6-12 5%
X
5°/6-8%
14/6%
March 13 - April 12
4
8 °/6-12 5%
X
5 °/6-8%
15/6%
March 26 - April 13
5
8 °/6-12 5%
>12 5%
>12 5%
X
52/21-/o
March 11 - May 1
6
X
>12 5%
<5%
None
7
7
8 °/6-12 5%
>12 5%
X
19/8%
March 26 - April 13
Ref
>12 5
>12 5%
>12 5%
X
251/100%
March 11 - Nov 16
Table 9 Hydropenod History
Farrar Dairy Site
Gauge #
Pre - Restoration
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
1
<5%
>1257/7
>125%
>12 5%
2
<5%
8 °/6-12 5%
<5%
>12 5%
3
<5%
8 °/6-12 5%
8 °/6-12 5%
5°/6-8%
4
<5%
8 °/6-12 5%
<5%
5 °/6-8%
5
<5%
8 °/6-12 5%
>12 5%
>12 5%
6
<5%
5 °/6-8%
>12 5%
<5%
7
<5%
8 °/6-12 5%
>12 5%
8 °/6-12 5%
Ref
>12 5%
>12 5
>12 5%
>12 5%
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KCI Associates of North Carolina
Restoration Site 25 2011- MY03

3.0 CONCLUSIONS
The stream is functioning as designed and has not developed any significant problems The monitored cross -
sections and profiles indicate some changes over the course of monitoring, but the stream in these areas is not
trending towards instability Any feature changes will be tracked to see if the stream is moving beyond its
expected variability There were not any bankfull events in the third monitoring year
The hydrology data in Section 2 3 indicate that only one gauge did not demonstrate wetland hydrology in 2011
This gauge did attain wetland hydrology in the previous monitoring year Future monitoring will determine if
these areas are having consistent hydrologic deficiencies or if 2011 was not a typical hydrologic year for this
part of the site
The planted vegetation has been doing well, with some plots experiencing more mortality than others This
mortality can be attributed to normal losses after the initial planting as well as aggressive growth from the site's
herbaceous vegetation The site also has vigorous volunteers, which will increase the overall vegetation success
of the site The vegetation is on track to meeting the success criteria in the steam and wetland for the third year
of monitoring
4.0 MAINTENANCE
Stream and vegetation maintenance actions were completed in 2011 The stream maintenance addressed areas
of bed degradation and bank erosion as discussed in the Monitoring Year 2 report Constructed riffles were
installed at Stations 57 +58, 58 +47, 59 +13, 59+84, and 60+50 and bank grading and matting installation
occurred at Stations 55 +30, 56 +80, 60+60, and 61 +60 These maintenance areas have exhibited stability
throughout the growing season The bank repairs have not shown any signs of erosion, and the constructed
riffles are functioning, with native material washing into the riffle and a stable riffle slope
The vegetation maintenance included planting additional 5,900 bare -root trees in various locations throughout
the site that were found to have low densities of planted trees Invasive control was conducted with herbicide
application targeting smartweed (Polygonum sp ), curly doc (Rumex crispus), and cockle burs (Xanthium
strumarium) Future monitoring will determine if additional planting and invasive control is needed
The presence of beaver dams at the site has also been a persistent maintenance action item In 2011 numerous
beaver dams were removed from the site The dams will continue to be removed as they are built
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KC! Associates of North Carolina
Restoration Site 26 2011- MY03

Appendix A
Vegetation Data
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KCl Associates ojNorth Carolina
Restoration Site 27 2011 - MY03

Table Al Stream Riparian Buffer Stem Density and Species Count by Plot
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland Restoration
Species
Plot #
°
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
stmtna trtloba
1
1
Betula nigra
3
1
4
2
3
5
10
2
6
6
4
46
Celtts laevt ata
2
1
1
1
3
8
Ce halanthus occtdentalts
1
4
2
1
4
5
17
Cornus amomum
11
4
3
7
3
1
3
2
34
Dios os vtr ntana
1
1
3
2
1
8
Fraxtnus pennsylvanica
4
1
4
2
4
5
2
2
1
25
vtr tntana
1
l
latanus occtdentahs
3
3
ercus alba
6
6
ercus laurt olta
1
2
1
4
IMagnolia
ercus l ata
1
1
ercus mtchauxtt
1
1
ercus lustrts
2
2
Saltx nt a
1
2
3
Sahx sertcea
1
6
5
3
15
Sambucus canadensts
1
1
U own
1
1
2
Total (Year 3)
18
12
6
11
13
11
17
13
14
12
5
8
12
12
12
176
vera a Density (Stems/Acre)
172014801240
440
560
440
680
520
560
480
2001
320
480
480
520
1 a -1 _ - _
Total Density (Stenn/Acre)
475
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KCl Associates of North Carolina
Restoration Site 28 2011- MY03

Table A2. Wetland Stem Density and Species Count by Plot
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland Restoration
Species
Plot #
L
r~
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
etula nigra
1
I
Callicarpa americana
I
I
Ce halanthus occidentalts
0
Cornus amornum
l
1
1
2
2
2
l
5
1
1 6
1 3
1
26
Diospyros virgintana
7
3
1
11
Fraxinus,pennsvivanica
1
3
5
1
6
4
l
4
2
4
8
4
4
1
7
3
7
2
3
2
3
75
Quercus sp
1
l
1
1
4
uercus alcata
1
I
1
1
1
3
2
2
1
13
Quercus lauri oha
4
2
1 3
3
1 1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 3
1 4
5
28
Quercus lyrata
1
2
3
1
3
1
1
11
Quercus michauxrr
1
1
1
4
2
2
2
7
6
3
1
3
1
3
2
2
4
5
2
52
Quercus pagoda
3
6
2
2
5
5
2
3
1
1
30
Quercus palustris
1
5
2
1
3
3
3
4
2
1
1
1
1
3
31
Quercus phellos
5
5
2
1
1
8
4
1
6
1 2 1
1
1 3
1
1
4
1
3
4
1
50
Unknown
I
I I
I
I
I
Total (Year 3)
9
13
10
24
13
12
21
19
10
11
13
10
9
10
11
9
6
10
7
7
15
10
4
9
14
11
14
10
11
2
334
Average Density
(Stems/Acre)
360
520
400
960
520
480
840
760
400
440
520
400
360
400
440
360
240
400
280
280
600
400
160
360
560
440
560
400
440
80
Total Dense (St !Ms/) cre)
445
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland 29 KCl Associates ojNorth Carolina
Restoration Site 2011- MY03

Table A3 Riparian Buffer Vegetation History (stems/acre)
Farrar Dairy Site
Plot
Number
MY-00
MY -01
MY -02
MY -03
MY-04
MY -05
planted
planted
planted
total
planted
total
planted
total
planted
total
1
880
840
840
840
720
1 578
2
720
560
520
1 000
486
1,133
3
320
400
440
5,720
243
2,226
4
840
400
520
3,960
445
1983
5
760
640
680
2 240
567
890
6
560
440
440
480
445
445
7
840
720
680
840
688
1,174
8
560
560
1 560
560
526
607
9
600
600
600
600
567
647
10
520
520
480
560
486
567
11
680
360
240
440
202
1,214
12
520
240
320
320
324
364
13
720
480
480
600
486
1295
14
520
480
480
680
486
769
15
560
520
520
520
526
607
Buffer
Average
640
517
520
1,291
480
1,033
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland 30 KCl Associates ojNorth Carolina
Restoration Site 2011- MY03

Table A4 Wetland Vegetation History (stems/acre)
Farrar Dairy Site
Plot Number
MY -00
MY -01
MY -02
MY -03
MY -04
MY -05
planted
plantcd
planted
total
planted
total
planted
total
planted
total
16
400
400
360
400
364
890
17
560
520
520
520
526
809
18
400
400
400
480
405
890
19
1000
960
920
1040
971
1 012
20
520
520
480
480
526
1 012
21
520
480
480
6080
486
4,168
22
840
840
880
6280
850
8,134
23
920
800
760
3320
769
5,949
24
520
480
400
480
405
567
25
440
440
440
680
445
890
26
520
520
520
560
526
668
27
480
480
480
920
405
647
28
480
400
400
800
364
688
29
520
560
440
920
405
850
30
440
440
440
480
445
931
31
440
400
360
480
364
526
32
400
400
400
400
243
364
33
440
400
400
400
405
486
34
480
360
320
360
283
324
35
400
360
280
320
283
324
36
640
640
640
640
607
607
37
480
440
400
560
405
567
38
520
280
280
280
162
283
39
520
440
440
440
364
486
40
600
600
560
600
567
607
41
600
440
440
440
445
526
42
680
560
560
560
567
567
43
480
400
400
400
405
688
44
560
400
480
480
445
445
45
480
320
120
160
81
81
Wetland
Avera e
543
489
467
999
451
1,166
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland 31 KCI Associates of North Carolina
Restoration Site 2011 - MY03

Stream and Wetland Veizetation Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 1 — MY -03 — 6/14/11
Vegetation Plot 3 — MY -03 — 6/14/11
Vegetation Plot 5 — MY -03 — 6/24/11
Vegetation Plot 2 — MY -03 — 6/14/11
Vegetation Plot 4 — MY -03 — 6/23/11
Vegetation Plot 6 — MY -03 — 6/15/11
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KCl Associates of North Carolina
Restoration Site 2011— MY03

Vegetation Plot 7 — MY -03 — 6/24/11
Vegetation Plot 9 — MY -03 — 6/22/11
Vegetation Plot 11 — MY -03 — 6/14/11
Vegetation Plot 8 — MY -03 — 6/15/11
Vegetation Plot 10 — MY -03 — 6/14/11
Vegetation Plot 12 — MY -03 — 6/23/11
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KCI Associates of North Carolina
Restoration Site 2011— MY03

Vegetation Plot 13 — MY -03 — 6/15/11
Vegetation Plot 15 — MY -03 — 6/15/11
Vegetation Plot 17 — MY -03 — 6/14/11
Vegetation Plot 14 — MY -03 — 6/23/11
Vegetation Plot 16 — MY -03 — 6/14/11
Vegetation Plot 18 — MY -03 — 6/14/11
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KCI Associates ojNorth Carolina
Restoration Site 2011— MY03

lo> -
Nr
All"
qqobl

Vegetation Plot 25 — MY -03 — 6/22/11
Vegetation Plot 27 — MY -03 — 6/22/11
Vegetation Plot 29 — MY -03 — 6/22/11
Vegetation Plot 26 — MY -03 — 6/22/11
Vegetation Plot 28 — MY -03 — 6/22/11
Vegetation Plot 30 — MY -03 — 6/22/11
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KCI Associates ojNorth Carolina
Restoration Site 2011 - MY03

Vegetation Plot 31 — MY -03 — 6/22/11
Vegetation Plot 33 — MY -03 — 6/24/11
Vegetation Plot 35 — MY -03 — 6/24/11
Vegetation Plot 32 — MY -03 — 6/22/11
Vegetation Plot 34 — MY -03 — 6/24/11
Vegetation Plot 36 — MY -03 — 6/24/11
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KCI Associates ojNorth Carolina
Restoration Site 2011- MY03

Vegetation Plot 37 — MY -03 — 6/23/11
Vegetation Plot 39 — MY -03 — 6/15/11
Vegetation Plot 41 — MY -03 — 6/15/11
Vegetation Plot 38 — MY -03 — 6/23/11
Vegetation Plot 40 — MY -03 — 6/15/11
Vegetation Plot 42 — MY -03 — 6/15/11
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KCI Associates ojNorth Carolina
Restoration Site 2011- W03

Vegetation Plot 43 — MY -03 — 6/15/11
Vegetation Plot 45 — MY -03 — 6/15/11
Vegetation Plot 44 — MY -03 — 6/15/11
Farrar Dotty Stream and Wetland KCI Associates ojNorth Carolina
Restoration Site 2011— MY03

Appendix B
Stream and Wetland Photos
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KCI Associates of North Carolina
Restoration Site 2011 - MY03

A rN
PP%
y'
4 s.
s, t. s.
a
i A t

PP 7 - MY -03 - 12/20/11
PP 9 - MY -03 - 12/20/11
PP 11 - MY -03 - 12/20/11
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland
Restoration Site
PP 8 - MY -03 - 12/20/11
PP 10 - MY -03 - 12/20/11
PP 12 - MY -03 - 12/20/11
KCl Associates of North Carolina
2011 - MY03

PP 13 - MY -03 - 12/20/11
PP 15 - MY -03 - 12/20/11
PP 17 - MY -03 - 12/20/11
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland
Restoration Site
PP 14 - MY -03 - 12/20/11
PP 16 - MY -03 - 12/20/11
PP 18 - MY -03 - 12/20/11
KCI Associates of North Carolina
2011 - MY03

PP 19 - MY -03 - 12/20/11 PP 20 - MY -03 - 12/20/11
PP 21 - MY -03 - 12/20/11 PP 22 - MY -03 - 12/20/11
PP 23 - MY -03 - 12/20/11 PP 24 - MY -03 - 12/20/11
Farrar Dairy Stream and Weiland KC/ Associates ojNorth Carolina
Restoration Site 2011 - MY03

i F
f
r }
Alf
I AN

PP 31 - MY -03 - 12/20/11 PP 32 - MY -03 - 12/20/11
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KCI Associates of North Carolina
Restoration Site 2011 - MY03

Appendix C
Geomorphologic and Hydrologic Data
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KC1 Associates ojNorth Carolina
Restoration Site 2011- MY03

River Basin:
Cape Fear
Watershed:
Farrar Dairy
XS ID
XS -1, Riffle, NPAC -1
Drains a Area (sq mi):
3.92
Date:
10/5/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, M. Koss
Station
Elevation
0.0
201.43
0.2
201.20
3.3
201.33
6.1
201.50
9.2
201.34
12.5
201.10
15.3
201.24
17.4
201.17
18.9
201.22
20.4
200.79
21.5
200.33
23.5
199.49
24.5
198.99
25.5
198.89
26.6
198.73
27.6
198.50
28.5
198.17
29.0
197.92
29.8
198.24
31.6
198.66
32.7
199.17
33.6
199.18
34.8
199.77
36.5
200.38
37.8
200.89
38.7
201.21
42.1
201.14
45.3
201.23
48.4
201.03
51.4
200.94
54.6
200.95
57.2
201.08
57.3
201.40
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
201.1
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
32.4
Bankfull Width:
19.2
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
204.3
Flood Prone Width:
>60
Max Depth at Bankfull:
3.2
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.7
W / D Ratio:
11.4
Entrenchment Ratio:
>3.0
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
205
203
d
5
a
° 201
W
199
197
Stream Type CS
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -1, Riffle, NPAC -1
----------------------
-- - - - - -- - --
- ----rwoamb A-
0 10 20
30 40
Station (feet)
50 60

River Basin:
Elevation
Cape Fear
200.28
2.9
200.51
Watershed:
200.20
Farrar Dairy
Field Crew:
A. French, A. Helms
XS ID
200.15
XS -2, Pool, NPAC -1
200.20
23.2
199.42
Drainage Area (s mi):
3.92
25.0
198.41
25.5
Date:
25.8
10/24/2011
27.5
196.78
28.7
196.76
29.8
197.08
30.8
197.46
32.4
198.01
33.7
198.63
35.4
199.16
37.8
199.52
41.4
200.03
44.7
200.03
48.6
200.17
52.5
200.23
55.7
200.10
58.0
200.28
58.1
200.68
Stream Type CS
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -2, Pool, NPAC -1
202
200 - �__�_����
- - - --
------------- - - -- -- -
--
-
y
o01i
5
0
198
- --
- - - - -�
�B.ft 473M
ur -0. ano9
196
t uroawe�u
0 10
20
30 40 50
60
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
0.0
200.28
2.9
200.51
5.8
200.20
10.4
Field Crew:
A. French, A. Helms
Station
Elevation
0.0
200.28
2.9
200.51
5.8
200.20
10.4
200.10
15.3
200.27
19.3
200.15
22.3
200.20
23.2
199.42
24.3
198.85
25.0
198.41
25.5
198.12
25.8
197.03
27.5
196.78
28.7
196.76
29.8
197.08
30.8
197.46
32.4
198.01
33.7
198.63
35.4
199.16
37.8
199.52
41.4
200.03
44.7
200.03
48.6
200.17
52.5
200.23
55.7
200.10
58.0
200.28
58.1
200.68
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
200.1
Bankfull Cross - Sectional .Area:
31.1
Bankfull Width:
22.3
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
-
Flood Prone Width:
-
Max Depth at Bankfull:
3.3
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.4
W / D Ratio:
-
Entrenchment Ratio:
-
Bank Height Ratio:
-

River Basin:
Elevation
Cape Fear
199.33
0.3
Watershed:
Area (s mi):
Farrar Dairy
Date:
10/24/2011
XS ID
A. French, A. Helms
XS -3, Riffle, NPAC -1
198.30
w
Drainage
18.8
198.11
20.0
197.67
21.4
197.22
22.9
196.95
25.0
196.64
25.3
196.43
26.1
196.09
27.1
195.88
28.6
195.69
29.8
195.95
30.8
196.13
32.3
196.23
33.2
196.47
33.9
197.05
35.4
197.49
37.5
197.94
39.4
198.16
42.4
198.23
46.4
198.27
50.2
198.13
52.7
198.06
53.0
198.56
Stream- CS
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -3, Riffle, NPAC -1
204
202
- -- -- - - -
200 ---------------------------------------------------------
-
- - - -- -
5
0
g198
W
- - -- - B -kl'WI
--- -- Pbwl Rom Nca
196
A�BW li, 43tl� W
uva�. INMIO
194
t wynI WII
0 10
20 30 40
50
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
0.0
199.33
0.3
198.71
Area (s mi):
3.92
Date:
10/24/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, A. Helms
Station
Elevation
0.0
199.33
0.3
198.71
2.3
198.67
6.0
198.60
10.8
198.25
14.7
198.30
17.0
198.30
18.8
198.11
20.0
197.67
21.4
197.22
22.9
196.95
25.0
196.64
25.3
196.43
26.1
196.09
27.1
195.88
28.6
195.69
29.8
195.95
30.8
196.13
32.3
196.23
33.2
196.47
33.9
197.05
35.4
197.49
37.5
197.94
39.4
198.16
42.4
198.23
46.4
198.27
50.2
198.13
52.7
198.06
53.0
198.56
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
198.0
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
23.4
Bankfull Width:
18.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
200.3
Flood Prone Width:
>60
Max Depth at Bankfull:
2.3
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.2
W / D Ratio:
15.3
Entrenchment Ratio:
>3.0
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

River Basin:
Elevation
Cape Fear
196.91
0.5
�.
Watershed:
196.56
Farrar Dairy
196.69
13.2
196.81
XS ID
196.85
XS -4, Pool, NPAC -1
196.94
19.5
196.59
Drainage Area s mi :
4.10
21.0
is
21.8
Date:
23.2
10/26/2011
23.8
194.81
24.6
Field Crew:
25.9
A. French, A. Helms
27.2
194.88
28.2
Station
29.5
195.51
30.9
195.99
32.0
196.03
33.5
196.25
34.7
196.45
36.6
196.97
38.4
197.27
40.8
197.32
43.9
197.41
47.9
197.41
51.2
197.18
54.2
197.43
56.8
197.47
58.9
197.63
59.1
197.87
Stream Type C5
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -4, Pool, NPAC -1
200
198
�� ��
-------------
- -���� --------------------------
c 196
0
W
194
------ -
-.k.-
�rc -01. 10.
nNa2. unvlo
192
�- nrca+, lorzuu
0 10
20
30 40
50 60
Station (feet)
Elevation
0.0
196.91
0.5
196.52
4.9
196.56
9.1
196.69
13.2
196.81
16.2
196.85
18.1
196.94
19.5
196.59
20.5
196.19
21.0
195.33
21.8
194.78
23.2
194.83
23.8
194.81
24.6
194.53
25.9
194.29
27.2
194.88
28.2
195.08
29.5
195.51
30.9
195.99
32.0
196.03
33.5
196.25
34.7
196.45
36.6
196.97
38.4
197.27
40.8
197.32
43.9
197.41
47.9
197.41
51.2
197.18
54.2
197.43
56.8
197.47
58.9
197.63
59.1
197.87
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
196.9
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
24.5
Bankfull Width:
18.3
Flood Prone Area Elevafion:
-
Flood Prune Width:
-
Max Depth at Bankfull:
2.7
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.3
W / D Ratio:
-
Entrenchment Ratio:
-
Bank Height Ratio:
-

River Basin:
Elevation
Cape Fear
196.18
0.8
` --
Watershed:
4.10
Farrar Dai ry
10/26/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, A. Helms
XS ID
195.63
XS -5, Riffle, NPAC -1
195.58
15.8
195.09
Drainage
194.62
18.2
194.49
19.0
194.07
20.2
193.51
21.7
193.22
22.7
193.02
23.9
192.78
24.8
192.88
25.4
193.27
26.7
193.57
28.2
193.96
29.7
194.43
31.3
194.96
33.2
195.68
35.2
195.89
38.5
195.94
41.9
196.14
45.5
195.99
49.1
196.17
52.6
196.04
56.0
195.79
Stream Type
CS
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -5, Riffle, NPAC -1
200
198 ----------------------
-
--------------_----------------------------
v
5
c 196 -
-
- - --
- - - -
W
- - - -- �I�
194
- - - - -Fk dFrvrc Arcs
.oewu, ixe:w
MS -01. IWSF/o9
192
M' -0 ;11 /i)llo
-� MY.1Imwu
0 10
20
30
40 50 60
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
0.0
196.18
0.8
195.51
Area s mi):
4.10
Date:
10/26/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, A. Helms
Station
Elevation
0.0
196.18
0.8
195.51
3.5
195.29
6.6
195.57
9.7
195.43
12.1
195.63
14.7
195.58
15.8
195.09
16.9
194.62
18.2
194.49
19.0
194.07
20.2
193.51
21.7
193.22
22.7
193.02
23.9
192.78
24.8
192.88
25.4
193.27
26.7
193.57
28.2
193.96
29.7
194.43
31.3
194.96
33.2
195.68
35.2
195.89
38.5
195.94
41.9
196.14
45.5
195.99
49.1
196.17
52.6
196.04
56.0
195.79
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
195.5
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
26.7
Bankfull Width:
17.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
198.2
Flood Prone Width:
>60
Max Depth at Bankfull:
2.7
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.5
W / D Ratio:
12.0
Entrenchment Ratio:
>3.0
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

River Basin:
Elevation S
Cape Fear
Watershed:
Area (s mi):
Farrar Dairy
Date:
10/5/2011
XS ID
A. French, M. Koss
XS -6, Pool, NPAC -1
Drainage
V
.. :i.
!;
{:7
.:.
196
----
---
��- - -����
194 - - -- --
- - -- - -
i g
W- - -
- -
- - - --- B.
MBuiY, LVU9
190
-.- nI
0 10
20 30 40 50
60 70
Station (feet)
Station E
Elevation S
Area (s mi):
4.1
Date:
10/5/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, M. Koss
Station E
Elevation S
Max Depth at Bankfull: 3.3
17.4 194.78 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1 3
21.1 194.67 W / U Ratio: -
24.4 194.59 Entrenchment Ratio:
26.0 194.51 Bank Height Ratio:
Flood Prone Width: -
-
-

River Basin:
Elevation
Cape Fear
193.55
0.4
Watershed:
Area (s n►i):
Farrar Dai ry
Date:
i _. ..
XS ID
A. French, M. Koss
XS -7, Riffle, NPAC -1
193.38
18.1
Drainage
22.0
192.30
23.4
191.94
25.0
191.75
26.3
191.30
27.9
190.86
29.3
189.95
30.4
190.11
32.0
190.57
33.6
191.48
34.9
191.91
36.2
192.56
37.7
193.13
38.9
193.49
41.6
193.56
44.7
193.57
47.5
193.60
50.6
193.61
53.4
193.57
57.0
193.55
58.3
193.63
58.5
194.12
Stream Type CS
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS-7, Riffle, NPAC -1
197 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
195
d
-- - - - - --
---------------
- - -- -- - - --
193
--- --
----- FImJ fiam .4ca
191
�• -0i. uamv
189
�n••ox � v�sno
--._ NY -03. M511I
0 10
20
30 40 50 60
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
0.00
193.55
0.4
193.00
Area (s n►i):
4.1
Date:
10/5/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, M. Koss
Station
Elevation
0.00
193.55
0.4
193.00
4.2
192.81
7.7
193.17
10.8
193.36
15.0
193.38
18.1
193.43
22.0
192.30
23.4
191.94
25.0
191.75
26.3
191.30
27.9
190.86
29.3
189.95
30.4
190.11
32.0
190.57
33.6
191.48
34.9
191.91
36.2
192.56
37.7
193.13
38.9
193.49
41.6
193.56
44.7
193.57
47.5
193.60
50.6
193.61
53.4
193.57
57.0
193.55
58.3
193.63
58.5
194.12
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
193.4
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
33.5
Bankfull Width:
20.3
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
196.8
Flood Prone Width:
>60
Max Depth at Bankfull:
3.4
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.7
W / D Ratio:
12.3
Entrenchment Ratio:
>3.0
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

River Basin:
Elevation
Cape Fear
192.02
0.1
Watershed:
Area (s mi):
Farrar Dairy
Date:
10/5/2011
XS ID
A. French, M. Koss
X5 -8, Riffle, NPAC -2
191.56
16.4
Drainage
19.6
191.54
22.8
191.41
24.4
190.74
25.4
190.31
26.4
189.83
27.6
189.43
28.6
189.08
30.3
188.44
31.3
188.48
32.3
188.53
33.4
188.53
34.4
188.39
36.3
189.22
37.4
190.10
38.4
190.49
39.4
190.79
42.3
191.01
46.2
191.16
49.6
190.94
52.7
191.09
54.4
191.25
54.6
191.64
Stream Type CS
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -8, Riffle, NPAC -2
196
194 -----------------------------------------------------------------------
192
- -
`� _
- -
- ---------
--- ---- - - - --= --------------- - - - - --
-
190
- - -
-- --
--- -- emu,
W
---- -gimme -A-
188
�5�
uvo1.11w
MY-4 11,1*10
186
-�- MY." WWII
0 10
20 30 40
50
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
0.0
192.02
0.1
191.65
Area (s mi):
4.1
Date:
10/5/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, M. Koss
Station
Elevation
0.0
192.02
0.1
191.65
3.6
191.19
7.1
19L64
10.3
191.68
13.2
191.56
16.4
191.40
19.6
191.54
22.8
191.41
24.4
190.74
25.4
190.31
26.4
189.83
27.6
189.43
28.6
189.08
30.3
188.44
31.3
188.48
32.3
188.53
33.4
188.53
34.4
188.39
36.3
189.22
37.4
190.10
38.4
190.49
39.4
190.79
42.3
191.01
46.2
191.16
49.6
190.94
52.7
191.09
54.4
191.25
54.6
191.64
SLiMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
191.1
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
28.0
Bankfull Width:
21.2
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
193.8
Flood Prone Width:
>60
Max Depth at Bankfull:
2.7
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
L3
W / D Ratio:
16.1
Entrenchment Ratio:
>3.0
Bank Height Ratio:
LO

River Basin:
Fear
Cape
Farrar Da
XS 1D
XS -9, Pool, NPAC -2
Drains a Area (s mi :
4.65
Date:
10/5/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, M. Koss
3.6
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.4
W / D Ratio:
-
Entrenchment Ratio:
-
Bank Height Ratio:
-
Station
Elevation
0.0
189.83
0.2
189.32
5.6
189.52
8.9
189.46
13.1
189.52
15.9
189.57
18.9
189.49
20.0
189.26
20.9
189.10
22.0
189.04
23.0
188.90
24.1
188.82
Stream Type CS
26.0
188.70
27.0
188.72
27.9
188.55
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -9, Pool, NPAC -2
29.1
188.16
192
30.0
188.01
31.0
187.67
31.9
187.08
32.8
186.75
190
33.9
186.04
-- ---------------
-
- - - - -- �� ---------------
- --
34.8
185.97
35.6
186.11
36.9
186.73
c 188 -
- -
38.1
188.08
39.0
188.74
40.1
189.34
w
40.8
189.88
186
43.8
189.89
e.M1 u.
46.9
189.88
MY -01. 11/1'09
49.8
189.95
NYIA 11,2311.
53.2
189.84
184
55.9
189.78
0 10
20
30 40 50
60
59.0
189.79
Station (feet)
]E:::4
189.75
f
60.7
190.08
SUMMARY DATA
Fear
Watershed:
Farrar Da
XS 1D
XS -9, Pool, NPAC -2
Drains a Area (s mi :
4.65
Date:
10/5/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, M. Koss
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
189.5
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
31.9
Bankfull Width:
23.3
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
-
Flood Prone Width:
-
Max Depth at Bankfull:
3.6
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.4
W / D Ratio:
-
Entrenchment Ratio:
-
Bank Height Ratio:
-

River Basin:
Cape Fear
Watershed:
Farrar Dairy
XS ID
XS -10, Riffle, NPAC -2
Drainage Area (sq mi):
4.65
Date:
10/4/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, M. Koss
Station
Elevation
0.0
190.69
0.2
190.27
3.6
190.11
6.8
190.00
9.7
189.72
12.7
189.65
15.7
189.72
18.7
189.62
21.8
189.51
24.6
189.38
27.8
189.23
28.8
189.05
29.6
188.88
30.7
188.59
31.7
188.48
32.8
188.23
33.7
188.06
34.7
187.36
35.7
187.04
36.7
186.82
37.7
186.68
38.8
186.50
39.6
186.80
40.6
186.90
41.7
186.91
42.8
187.10
43.7
187.16
44.9
187.95
45.8
188.22
46.8
188.59
48.0
189.08
49.6
189.42
52.9
189.46
55.5
189.32
58.7
189.25
*Other shots not included due to
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
189.1
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
28.0
Bankfull Width:
19.7
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
191.7
Flood Prone Width:
>60
Max Depth at Bankfull:
2.6
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.4
W / D Ratio:
13.9
Entrenchment Ratio:
>3.0
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
194
192
v
r 190
0
W
188
186 +
0
10
Stream Type CS
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -10, Riffle, NPAC -2
20
30 40
Station (feet)
-- --- 6�
----- PImJ Rme.kes
n.�eWn. venro
arc -0LIwm9
X14' -03. 11�33�10
31Y -03. Wall
50 60 70

River Basin:
Cape Fear
Watershed:
Farrar Dairy
XS ID
XS -11, Riffle, NPAC -3
Drainage Area (sq mi):
4.82
Date:
10/4/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, M. Koss
Station
Elevation
0.0
189.19
0.0
189.14
0.2
188.88
3.9
188.97
6.9
188.63
10.4
188.68
13.6
188.64
16.7
188.91
20.1
189.01
23.4
188.79
26.7
189.06
28.3
188.54
29.8
187.98
31.7
187.33
33.1
186.76
34.3
186.21
35.2
185.69
36.1
185.36
37.1
185.39
38.1
185.32
39.2
185.45
40.1
185.47
41.2
185.45
42.2
185.47
43.1
185.42
44.1
185.37
45.4
186.37
47.1
187.15
48.2
187.50
49.1
187.98
50.1
188.38
51.0
188.96
53.8
189.08
56.7
189.08
59.8
189.07
included due to
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
188.9
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
54.9
Bankfull Width:
23.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
192.6
Flood Prone Width:
>60
Max Depth at Bankfull:
3.6
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
2.3
W / D Ratio:
10.4
Entrenchment Ratio:
>3.0
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
194
192
V
190
0
188
186
Stream Type CS
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -11, Riffle, NPAC -3
r----------------------------------------------------------------- -- -- --
184 +
0
- - - -- PWuJ Prom Ane
VIM
Afl' -01. 1"M9
w -01 unvlo
�� lariu, IaaI1
10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Station (feet)

River Basin:
Elevation
Cape Fear
Watershed:
Farrar Dairy
Field Crew:
A. French, M. Koss
�..
I
XS ID
XS -12, Pool NPAC -3
Drainage Area s mi :
4.82
Date:
10/4/2011
Stream Type C'>
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -12, Pool, NPAC -3
190
188 ------------- - -
- - -- ----------------
- - - - -- -�
- - --
5
186
W
- -- -- BSI
184
VV
A.BWk IVIS"
MY -04 117roO
MY."IVIVIO
182
�� wva>, lave l
0 10
20
30 40 50
60
Station (Feet)
Other shots not included due to space
Station E
Elevation
Field Crew:
A. French, M. Koss
Station E
Elevation
SMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation: 188.1
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area: 49.0
Bankfull Width: 22.7
Flood Prone Area Elevation: -
Flood Prone Width: -
Max Depth at Bankfull: 4.4
Mean Depth at Bankfull: 2.2
W / D Ratio: -
Entrenchment Ratio: -
Bank Height Ratio: -

River Basin:
Cape Fear
Watershed:
Farrar Dairy
XS ID
XS -13, Riffle, Tl.l
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.02
Date:
9/16/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, J. Anders
Station
Elevation
0.0
221.84
2.9
221.12
4.0
220.94
6.4
220.58
8.2
220.19
10.0
219.80
11.8
219.15
13.2
218.85
14.6
218.87
15.1
218.54
16.1
218.40
16.7
218.21
17.1
218.13
17.8
218.10
18.4
218.19
19.2
218.41
20.5
218.59
22.3
218.83
24.4
218.97
26.4
219.40
28.4
219.79
30.2
220.14
32.2
220.46
35.1
220.68
37.7
220.92
40.6
220.96
42.8
221.10
43.1
221.42
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
218.8
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
2.8
Bankfull Width:
7.4
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
219.5
Flood Prone Width:
16
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.7
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.4
W / D Ratio:
19.6
Entrenchment Ratio:
2.2
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
222
221
0 220
5
0
219
W
218
217
0
Stream Type CS
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -13, Riffle, T1.1
---------------- pw�------------------------- fon -------------------- - - - - --
----------- -- - ----- - - - -- - - - - -- - - - --
- - - --
�rc -0i�wsno
10
20
Station (feet)
30
40

River Basin:
Cape Fear
Watershed:
Farrar Dairy
XS ID
XS -14, Pool, Tl.I
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.02
Date:
9/16/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, J. Anders
Station
Elevation
0.0
216.95
0.4
216.47
4.5
216.39
7.7
216.26
11.0
216.30
13.2
216.21
15.2
216.01
16.2
215.75
17.6
215.71
18.6
215.44
19.5
215.22
20.5
214.78
21.2
214.34
22.4
214.29
23.1
214.33
23.6
214.55
24.2
215.11
25.2
215.51
26.0
215.69
28.5
215.76
30.0
216.11
32.0
216.70
34.6
216.96
37.0
217.13
39.8
217.19
43.0
217.23
45.5
217.27
45.7
217.78
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
215.6
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
5.4
Bankfull Width:
7.6
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
-
Flood Prone Width:
-
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.3
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.7
W / D Ratio:
-
Entrenchment Ratio:
-
Bank Height Ratio:
218
217
d 216
5
e
0
215
214
213 +
0
Stream Type I CS
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -14, Pool, T1.1
;�� ---------------------------
10 20 30
Station (feet)
A.�BUil4 Y1YNY
EIV41. IW2 &IN
lIY�R, 11 /IS�II1
�� I11Y�II1. 9:1311
40 50

River Basin:
Cape Fear
Watershed:
Farrar Dairy
XS ID
XS -15, Riffle, Tl.I
Drainage Area (sq mi :
0.02
Date:
9/19/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, J. Anders
Station
Elevation
0.0
214.22
0.2
213.84
3.5
214.03
7.6
213.81
10.8
213.94
13.0
214.31
14.5
214.24
15.6
213.89
17.1
213.83
18.0
213.79
18.6
213.57
19.1
213.42
19.7
213.20
20.1
213.08
20.7
213.09
21.5
213.11
22.1
213.20
22.7
213.25
23.2
213.40
24.3
213.63
25.7
213.77
27.6
213.95
29.7
214.32
31.1
214.65
32.2
214.67
35.2
214.99
38.4
215.30
42.5
215.45
46.4
215.31
48.7
215.27
48.9
215.63
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
213.8
Bankfull Cross - Sectional .Area:
1.9
Bankfull Width:
6.1
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
214.5
Flood Prone Width:
30
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.7
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.3
W / D Ratio:
19.6
Entrenchment Ratio:
5.0
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
216
215
Y
5
Q 214
W
213
212
0
10
Stream Type C5
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -15, Riffle, T1.1
20 30
Slanon (feet)
40
A.S.X 4129W
NY"IWL9W
19Y-0]. 11 /IS /19
NY 43, 9/19/11
50

River Basin:
Elevation
Cape Fear
220.83
4.3
Watershed:
7.8
Farrar Dairy
11.5
XS ID
A. French, J. Anders
XS -16, Pool, T1.2
220.08
20.0
Drainage Area (s mi):
0.10
219.50
22.9
Date:
24.2
9/15/2011
25.4
218.46
26.2
218.25
26.9
218.31
27.7
218.77
28.5
219.08
29.6
219.65
30.5
219.89
32.3
220.04
34.3
220.39
36.3
220.78
38.8
220.92
42.5
221.01
45.4
221.18
49.1
221.18
51.1
221.12
51.3
221.63
Stream Type C5
Cape Fear River
Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -16, Pool, T1.2
222
221
- - - -
220
------------------------
-- - - - - -- ---------------------------
219
W
218
� *wm
�naz wean
217
0 10
20
30 40 50
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
0.0
220.83
4.3
220.48
7.8
220.36
11.5
Field Crew:
A. French, J. Anders
Station
Elevation
0.0
220.83
4.3
220.48
7.8
220.36
11.5
220.37
15.0
220.26
17.7
220.08
20.0
219.73
21.6
219.50
22.9
219.07
24.2
218.79
25.4
218.46
26.2
218.25
26.9
218.31
27.7
218.77
28.5
219.08
29.6
219.65
30.5
219.89
32.3
220.04
34.3
220.39
36.3
220.78
38.8
220.92
42.5
221.01
45.4
221.18
49.1
221.18
51.1
221.12
51.3
221.63
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
219.7
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
6.4
Bankfull Width:
9.0
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
-
Flood Prone Width:
-
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.4
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.7
W / U Ratio:
-
Entrenchment Ratio:
-
Bank Height Ratio:
-

River Basin:
Cape Fear
Watershed:
Farrar Dairy
XS ID
XS -17, Riffle, T1.2
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.10
Date:
9/15/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, J. Anders
Station
Elevation
0.0
218.84
0.5
218.43
3.2
218.25
5.6
217.93
8.1
217.38
11.0
216.88
13.4
216.68
14.9
216.57
15.8
216.39
17.0
216.03
18.0
215.65
18.3
215.35
19.0
215.28
19.9
215.26
20.7
215.51
21.4
215.56
23.1
216.15
24.5
216.57
25.9
216.70
28.4
216.72
32.9
217.10
37.0
216.92
41.0
217.23
46.3
217.38
48.0
217.47
51.8
217.47
52.7
217.51
53.0
217.98
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
216.4
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
5.4
Bankfull Width:
8.2
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
217.6
Flood Prone Width:
46
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.1
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.7
W / D Ratio:
12.5
Entrenchment Ratio:
5.6
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
220
219
218
5
0
3 217
W
216
Stream C5
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -17, Riffle, T1.2
215
0
----------- ------ - - -- - - -Flw P-Aro.
\IY., I.
- - -- NY411 II /IHIB
\IY 43, WIS/I I
10 20 30
Station (feet)
40
50

River Basin:
Cape Fear
Watershed:
Farrar Dairy
XS ID
XS -18, Riffle, T1.2
Drainage Area (sq mi ):
0.10
Date:
9/16/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, J. Anders
Station
Elevation
0.0
215.41
0.2
214.93
2.4
214.70
4.0
214.20
5.8
213.84
8.0
213.36
10.5
212.74
12.2
212.31
13.8
212.27
15.3
211.95
16.3
211.46
16.8
211.14
17.0
210.97
17.8
210.93
18.8
210.86
19.8
210.96
20.6
211.53
21.4
211.79
22.3
212.28
23.7
212.24
26.5
212.39
28.3
212.86
30.9
213.06
33.7
213.22
38.3
213.47
38.5
213.86
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
212.0
Bankfull Cross- Sectional z%rea:
5.1
Bankfull Width:
6.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
213.2
Flood Prone Width:
26
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.2
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.7
W / D Ratio:
9.3
Entrenchment Ratio:
3.8
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
216
215
214
d
5
c 213
0
212
211
210
Stream Type I ES
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -18, Riffle, T1.2
- ---- 91wd Pw Am
An&". V39ro9
- - - - - - - - MY 41..391
MY -01 I V2]/10
MY419/16111
0
10
20
Station (feet)
30
40

River Basin:
Elevation
Cape Fear
I`
-
Watershed:
Area s mi :
Farrar Dairy
Date:
10/26/2011
XS ID
A. French, A. Helms
XS -19, Pool, TI
C :, d
18.7
Drainage
21.9
t.
24.6
203.33
26.3
202.90
27.3
202.21
28.1
201.88
28.7
201.31
l�
201.12
30.0
201.05
31.6
201.82
32.3
202.20
33.4
202.50
34.7
203.07
37.4
203.24
40.7
203.44
44.3
203.26
47.8
203.59
50.8
203.41
53.3
203.55
54.0
204.14
Stream ES
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -19, Pool, TI
205
204 - -
- -
------------------
203 - -
- ----- ------ - - - - -- --
- - - -- - - -
-------- - - - - -•
--
5
r
0
202 - -
-- - -- -
W
201
MY' -01. 1on9ros
200
b1Y -0; 11122'10
� Ml' -01.101411
0 10
20 30 40
50
-
- Station (feet) - -
-
Station
Elevation
0.0
204.41
0.4
203.93
Area s mi :
0.18
Date:
10/26/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, A. Helms
Station
Elevation
0.0
204.41
0.4
203.93
3.0
203.74
5.6
203.49
9.7
203.41
14.6
203.45
18.7
203.27
21.9
203.32
24.6
203.33
26.3
202.90
27.3
202.21
28.1
201.88
28.7
201.31
29.3
201.12
30.0
201.05
31.6
201.82
32.3
202.20
33.4
202.50
34.7
203.07
37.4
203.24
40.7
203.44
44.3
203.26
47.8
203.59
50.8
203.41
53.3
203.55
54.0
204.14
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
203.2
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
10.6
Bankfull Width:
11.7
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
-
Flood Prone Width:
-
Max Depth at Bankfull:
2.1
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.9
W' / D Ratio:
-
Entrenchment Ratio:
-
Bank Height Ratio:
-

River Basin:
Cape Fear
Watershed:
Farrar Dairy
XS ID
XS -20, Riffle, TI
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.18
Date:
10/26/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, A. Helms
Station
Elevation
0.0
202.02
0.7
201.56
4.9
201.61
9.3
201.49
13.5
201.17
16.7
200.99
18.1
200.61
19.2
200.26
19.7
199.69
20.8
199.25
21.5
199.06
22.4
199.27
23.2
199.58
23.8
200.19
24.7
200.46
26.0
200.92
29.3
201.31
32.4
201.32
36.5
201.23
39.8
201.13
43.2
201.43
43.6
201.99
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
200.9
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
8.1
Bankfull Width:
8.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
202.7
Flood Prone Width:
>60
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.8
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.9
W / D Ratio:
9.8
Entrenchment Ratio:
>3.0
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
203
202
201
c
.o
200
94
199
198
0
Stream Type E5
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -20, Riffle, T1
---------------------------------------------------------------------
z�
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - -- ----------------------------
----- 8.UwJ
- - - -- eew P- Arz.
A Bhwk V00 /00
YY 41. M9,09
WY &112].'10
MY43, Muni
10
20
Station (feet)
90
40

River Basin:
Elevation
Cape Fear
198.77
Watershed:
198.64
Farrar Dairy
0.18
XS ID
10/26/2011
XS -21, Riffle, TI
A. French, A. HeLns
Drainage
198.60
16.8 1
198.41
17.7 1
197.95
18.6 1
197.68
19.2 1
197.37
Stream Type FS
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -21, Riffle, T1
201
200
199
'e
------ - - - - -- - -------------------
198
197
.�:..
u'o. awo
196
MY4Z IV221IU
-� wv -0x wwii
0
10 20 30 40
Station (feet)
Station E
Elevation
0.0 1
198.77
0.9 1
198.64
Area (s mi):
0.18
Date:
10/26/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, A. HeLns
Station E
Elevation
0.0 1
198.77
0.9 1
198.64
5.3 1
198.66
8.9 1
198.66
13.2 1
198.70
16.1 1
198.60
16.8 1
198.41
17.7 1
197.95
18.6 1
197.68
19.2 1
197.37
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation: 198.4
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area: 8.8
Bankfull Width: 11.3
Flood Prone Area Elevation: 200.0
Flood Prone Width: >60
Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.6
Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.8
W / D Ratio: 14.5
Entrenchment Ratio: >3.0
Bank eight Ratio: 1.0

River Basin:
Cape Fear
Watershed:
Farrar Dairy
XS ID
XS -22, Pool, T2A
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.04
Date:
10/4/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, M. Koss
Station
Elevation
0.0
203.97
0.3
203.46
2.2
203.62
4.4
203.39
6.4
203.44
8.1
203.25
9.0
202.93
9.7
202.54
10.6
202.21
11.6
202.20
12.2
202.21
13.3
202.33
14.1
202.63
14.8
202.89
15.7
203.21
16.5
203.36
18.4
203.50
20.4
203.52
22.5
203.51
24.5
203.55
26.3
203.60
27.8
203.68
27.9
204.11
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
203.3
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
5.6
Bankfull Width:
8.5
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
-
Flood Prone Width:
-
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.1
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.7
W / D Ratio:
-
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
-
205
204
m
5
r
0
b
W 203
202 L--
0
Stream Type CS
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -22, Pool, T2A
10 20
Station (feet)
.W\ "W
\IYi111VIlilU �
30

River Basin:
Elevation
Cape Fear
200.16
0.2
199.78
Watershed:
199.63
Farrar Dairy
Field Crew:
A. French, M. Koss
XS ID
199.28
XS -23, Riffle, T2A
199.11
13.0
199.06
Drainage Area
s mi):
0.04
198.48
15.1
198.29
Date:
198.23
10/4/2011
198.19
16.9
198.22
17.4
198.38
17.9
198.41
18.5
198.77
19.2
199.03
20.3
199.10
21.5
199.29
22.5
199.73
24.8
199.76
26.9
199.73
29.2
199.56
31.0
199.55
31.1
200.01
}
lj
Stream
CS
Cape Fear River
Basin, Farrar
Dairy, XS -23, Riffle, T2A
201
200
--
-
-
--- ------------------
- - - - -
5
e
,�0
W199 - ------------ - -
- - --
----- - - - -
-- -------------------
-----
----- ema e- ..
n..a:u vvo9
198
wyA, I IRI09
carat wnno
my-. lw' ll
0 5
10
15
20 25 30 35
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
0.0
200.16
0.2
199.78
2.3
199.63
4.7
Field Crew:
A. French, M. Koss
Station
Elevation
0.0
200.16
0.2
199.78
2.3
199.63
4.7
199.63
6.8
199.47
9.0
199.28
11.0
199.11
13.0
199.06
14.2
198.62
14.6
198.48
15.1
198.29
15.5
198.23
16.1
198.19
16.9
198.22
17.4
198.38
17.9
198.41
18.5
198.77
19.2
199.03
20.3
199.10
21.5
199.29
22.5
199.73
24.8
199.76
26.9
199.73
29.2
199.56
31.0
199.55
31.1
200.01
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
199.1
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
3.4
Bankfull Width:
6.8
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
199.9
Flood Prone Width:
30
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.9
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.5
W / D Ratio:
13.6
Entrenchment Ratio:
4.4
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

River Basin:
Elevation
Cape Fear
193.41
lr
193.11
Area (s mi :
Watershed:
Date:
Farrar Dairy
Field Crew:
A. French, M. Koss
/�
193.20
XS ID
193.05
XS -24, Pool, T2B
192.81
16.1
192.69
LT1 P
Drainage
17.3
192.33
18.0
192.09
1
192.10
19.2
192.02
19.8
191.99
20.5
192.36
21.0
192.73
21.5
193.01
24.7
192.99
27.8
193.11
31.0
193.12
34.2
193.21
37.4
193.32
40.5
193.55
44.2
193.51
44.3
193.91
n .
�'.
S e
C5
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -24, Pool, T2B
194
193
- -- -
-----------------------
5
192
MY -0I.IIRAO
191
MAZ 11,17110
--F� \K -0I. IVYII
0
10
20
30
40
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
0.0
193.41
0.2
193.11
Area (s mi :
0.04
Date:
10/4/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, M. Koss
Station
Elevation
0.0
193.41
0.2
193.11
2.4
192.95
5.5
193.17
8.5
193.18
11.4
193.20
14.4
193.05
15.5
192.81
16.1
192.69
16.6
192.42
17.3
192.33
18.0
192.09
18.5
192.10
19.2
192.02
19.8
191.99
20.5
192.36
21.0
192.73
21.5
193.01
24.7
192.99
27.8
193.11
31.0
193.12
34.2
193.21
37.4
193.32
40.5
193.55
44.2
193.51
44.3
193.91
SUM11111;1RY DAT:+.
Bankfull Elevation:
193.0
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
4.1
Bankfull Width:
6.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
-
Flwd Prone Width:
-
Max Depth at Bankfull:
I.0
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.6
W / D Ratio:
-
Entrenchment Ratio:
-
Bank Height Ratio:
-

River Basin:
Elevation
Cape Fear
193.08
0.2 1
192.78
Watershed:
0.04
Farrar Dairy
10/3/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, M. Koss
12.6 1
192.75
15.7 1
192.89
19.0 1
192.81
XS ID
192.45
XS -25, Riffle, T213
192.20
21.4 1
192.02
Drainage
192.07
Stream Type C
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -25, Riffle, T2B
194
193
y
W
192
_____
FI dP-Nu
NB.dk 5'"
MY -01, 11 /2N
191
NY -0111 /19 /lu
-�� edY-0P. IWdlll
0
10
20 30
40
Station (feet)
Station E
Elevation
0.0 1
193.08
0.2 1
192.78
Area (s mi):
0.04
Date:
10/3/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, M. Koss
Station E
Elevation
0.0 1
193.08
0.2 1
192.78
3.2 1
192.71
6.3 1
192.75
9.3 1
192.71
12.6 1
192.75
15.7 1
192.89
19.0 1
192.81
20.0 1
192.45
20.6 1
192.20
21.4 1
192.02
22.3 1
192.07
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation: 192.8
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area: 2.7
Bankfull Width: 5.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation: 193.6
Flood Prone Width: >40
Max Depth at Bankfull: 0.8
Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.5
W / D Ratio: 12.9
Entrenchment Ratio: 6.8
Bank Height Ratio: 1.0

River Basin:
Elevation
Cape Fear
191.61
0.1
191.37
Watershed:
191.23
Farrar Dairy
191.35
A. French, M. Koss
XS ID
191.08
XS -26, Riffle, T3
190.82
17.7
190.49
Drainage Area s mi):
0.39
21.6
190.58
22.6
Date:
23.7
10/3/2011
24.6
189.70
25.7
Field Crew:
26.7
189.58
27.9
189.26
29.1
189.54
30.7
189.19
32.1
189.15
33.4
189.41
34.7
189.23
35.7
189.47
36.8
189.42
37.7
189.69
38.8
190.00
40.1
190.31
41.5
190.58
44.9
190.80
48.4
190.60
51.6
190.71
56.3
190.52
56.4
190.87
Stream Type Ci
Cape Fear River
Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -26, Riffle, T3
192
-------------------------------------------------------------------
191
-
-------------------
- - - - --
-------------- - - - - -- -----------------
190
189
'I°"°" A-
AFBi t SAM
MY., 111sm
ear4s uuaIu
188 -
0--
0' 10
20
30 40
50 60
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
0.0
191.61
0.1
191.37
2.7
191.23
5.6
191.35
A. French, M. Koss
Station
Elevation
0.0
191.61
0.1
191.37
2.7
191.23
5.6
191.35
8.8
19L13
11.5
191.08
14.6
190.82
17.7
190.49
20.7
190.59
21.6
190.58
22.6
190.42
23.7
190.17
24.6
189.70
25.7
189.59
26.7
189.58
27.9
189.26
29.1
189.54
30.7
189.19
32.1
189.15
33.4
189.41
34.7
189.23
35.7
189.47
36.8
189.42
37.7
189.69
38.8
190.00
40.1
190.31
41.5
190.58
44.9
190.80
48.4
190.60
51.6
190.71
56.3
190.52
56.4
190.87
SLiM111ARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
190.4
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
14.7
Bankfull Width:
17.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
191.7
Flood Prone Width:
>60
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.3
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.8
W / D Ratio:
21.8
Entrenchment Ratio:
>3.0
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

River Basin:
Elevation S
Cape Fear
Watershed:
Area (s mi):
Farrar Dairy
Date:
9/16/2011
XS ID
A. French, J. Anders
XS -27, Pool, T3
Drainage
_y�q'ss
/ D Ratio:
m Type CS
- -
- -
191
190
����
-
-------
m
0
r
W
188
A.B ft V&"
p 7
my -07.91111
0 10
20
30 40 50 60
Station E
Elevation S
Area (s mi):
0.39
Date:
9/16/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, J. Anders
Station E
Elevation S
Bankfull Width: 19.1
6.7 189.77 Flood Prone Area Elevation: -
9.9 189.86 Flood Prone Width:
13.2 189.84 Max Depth at Bankfull: L6
16.1 189.55 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.9
19.2 189.93 V1'
21.4 189.69 Entrenchment Ratio:
22.7 189.40 Bank Height Ratio:
Station (feet) -
-
-
-

River Basin:
Cape Fear
Watershed:
Farrar Dairy
Area (s mi):
0.39
XS ID
XS -28, Pool, T3
Field Crew:
A. French, J. Anders
Drainage
lrt o
�•
s
190
189
0
W
�. as sreros
uv -01.11 /]�Il
0 10
20 30 40
50 60
Station (feet)
*Other shots not included due to space
Station E
Elevation S
Area (s mi):
0.39
Date:
9/16/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, J. Anders
Station E
Elevation S
Flood Prone Width: -
15.2 1 89.44 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.4
Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.9
16.2 189.24 W / D Ratio: -
17.3 189.04 Entrenchment Ratio:
18.3 188.75 Bank Height Ratio:
-
-
-

River Basin:
Cape Fear
Watershed:
Farrar Dairy
XS ID
XS -29, Riffle, T3
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.39
Date:
9/16/2011
Field Crew:
A. French, J. Anders
Station
Elevation
0.0
189.32
0.2
189.02
3.6
189.22
6.6
189.23
9.6
189.30
11.6
189.22
12.6
188.88
13.7
188.57
14.6
188.30
15.7
188.01
16.7
187.87
17.6
187.79
18.6
187.67
19.5
187.55
20.5
187.57
21.5
187.69
22.9
187.78
24.1
188.24
25.4
188.86
26.9
189.40
30.3
189.69
33.3
189.59
35.0
189.46
35.1
190.01
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
189.2
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
15.9
Bankfull Width:
14.8
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
190.9
Flood Prone Width:
>60
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.7
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.1
W / D Ratio:
13.8
Entrenchment Ratio:
>3.0
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
192
191
190
5
c
0
189
188
187
0
Stream Type I C>
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -29, Riffle, T3
10
Station (feet)
20
30
- - - -- Bdtdl
- - - -- F9W 9rvm Ans
A Budk 5'VO9
M\' -01. 1115/m
my.2, IVIVIO
MY 43, 9/16111

■
■
■
-
Farrar Dairy Longitudinal Profile
NPAC -1 MY-03
Stations 15 +75 - 31 +75
--------.-- - - - - - - - - - ----. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
193
1500 1600
1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200
Station (ft)
As- Built, 4/28/09 MY -01, 10/28/09 MY-02,11/23/10 t MY-03,10/24/11 ■ Bankfull — — — Water Surface
203
201
199
^ 1
0
0
w
ca
a
W
197
195
Farrar Dairy Longitudinal Profile
NPAC -1 MY-03
Stations 15 +75 - 31 +75
--------.-- - - - - - - - - - ----. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
193
1500 1600
1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200
Station (ft)
As- Built, 4/28/09 MY -01, 10/28/09 MY-02,11/23/10 t MY-03,10/24/11 ■ Bankfull — — — Water Surface

w
C
O
CC
6�
W
192
190
188
186
Farrar Dairy Longitudinal Profile
NPAC -2 MY-03
Stations 57 +55 - 63 +77
■
Beaverdamn ■
------------------ - - - - -- ■
— —. ------ — — -----------
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
184
5750
5800 5850 5900 5950 6000 6050 6100 6150 6200 6250 6300 6350 6400
Station (ft)
As- Built, 5 /8/09 MV -01, 11/4/09 MY -029 11/19/10 — MV-03,10/25/11 ■ Ba■kfull — — — Water Surface

224
222
220
w
C
218
0
w
ca
W
216
214
212
Farrar Dairy Longitudinal Profile
Tributary 1.1 MY-03
Stations 80 +25 - 85 +75
r
r
r
8000 8050 8100 8150 8200 8250 8300 8350 8400 8450 8500 8550
Station (ft)
As- Built, 4/29/09 MY -01, 1027/09 MY -02, 11/15/10 -MY-03,9/19/11 r Bankfull
*No WS due to no flow in channel during survey.
8600
r
•
r
•
V,
V
r
i
r
r
r
r
•
r
•
r
r
r
8000 8050 8100 8150 8200 8250 8300 8350 8400 8450 8500 8550
Station (ft)
As- Built, 4/29/09 MY -01, 1027/09 MY -02, 11/15/10 -MY-03,9/19/11 r Bankfull
*No WS due to no flow in channel during survey.
8600

222
220
218
w
�C
O
216
w
214
212
210
9145
Farrar Dairy Longitudinal Profile
Tributary 1.2 MY-03
Stations 91 +45 - 96 +70
1
9195 9245 9295 9345 9395 9445
Station (ft)
9495 9545 1 9595 9645
1
I
I
I
I
As- Built, 4/29/09, MY -01, 10/29/09 —MV-02,11/16/10 MY-03,9/16/11 ■ Bankfull
"No WS due to no flow in channel during survey y
■
i
■
I
I
■
9195 9245 9295 9345 9395 9445
Station (ft)
9495 9545 1 9595 9645
1
I
I
I
I
As- Built, 4/29/09, MY -01, 10/29/09 —MV-02,11/16/10 MY-03,9/16/11 ■ Bankfull
"No WS due to no flow in channel during survey y

206
204
202
a
200
0
R
w
198
196
194
Farrar Dairy Longitudinal Profile
Tributary 1 MY-03
Stations 103 +50 - 108 +77
Grade Control Structures installed in 2010
■
■
■
192
10350
10400 10450 10500 10550 10600
Station (ft)
10650 10700 10750 10800 10850
As- Built, 4/30/09 MY -0l, 10/29/09 MY -02, 11/22/10 MY-03,10/26/11 ■ Benkfull
*No WS due to no flow in channel during survey.

202
200
198
w
C
O
196
w
194
192
190
MIN
■
Farrar Dairy Longitudinal Profile
Tributary 2 MY-03
Stations 112 +80 - 118 +37
11250 11300 11350 11400 11450 11500
11550
Station (ft)
11600 11650 11700 11750 11800 11850
- As- Built, 5 /8/09 MY -01, 11/2/09 - MY -02, 11/17/10 -MY-03,10/4/11 ■ Bankfull
*No WS due to no flow in channel during survey.

w
C
R
W
193
192
191
190
189
188
187
186
185
Farrar Dairy Longitudinal Profile
Tributary 3 MY-03
Stations 133 +85 - 139 +73
13350 13400 13450 13500 13550 13600 13650 13700 13750 13800
Station (ft)
As- Built, 5 /8/09 MY -01, 11/5/09 - MV-02,11/18/10 t MY -03, 10/5/11 ■ Bankfull
*No WS due to no flow in channel during survey.
13850 13900 13950 14000
...........
I�j
V
13350 13400 13450 13500 13550 13600 13650 13700 13750 13800
Station (ft)
As- Built, 5 /8/09 MY -01, 11/5/09 - MV-02,11/18/10 t MY -03, 10/5/11 ■ Bankfull
*No WS due to no flow in channel during survey.
13850 13900 13950 14000

Cross
- Section 1 Riffle
- MY -03
Particle Size Distribution
Farrar Dairy
XS 1 Rime
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
<0.062
S/C
70
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-.125
.125-.25
.25-.50
.50- 1
1 - 2
S
A
N
D
S
21
100%
: 80%
—
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2-4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8- 11.3
11.3- 16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
1
60%
'
-
2
3
p
F
f As Bodt
my -ot
- a - W-02
3
0 40%
w
20%
t MY -03
–
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90-128
128-180
180-256
C
O
B
L
Small
Small
Medium
Lr - Very Lrg
256-362
362-512
512- 1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
Size (mm)
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.099
8.9
Size Distribution
mean 0.1
dispersion 1.3
skewness 0.23
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
70%
21%
9%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
100
Note:

Cross-
Section 2 Pool
- MY -03
Particle Size Distribution
Farrar Dairy
XS 2 Pool
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
49
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-.125
.125-.25
.25-.50
.50 - 1
1 1 - 2
S
A
N
D
S
31
3
17
w
E
v
100%
80%
60%
--
- -- -
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2-4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8 - 11.3
11.3 - 16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
z
-
Built
+ "tY -01
0
- t -MV-oi
MV -03
20%
0%
0.01 0.1
I 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90-128
128- 180
180-256
C
O
B
L
Small
Small
Medium
Lr - Very Lrg
256-362
362-512
512- 1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
Size (mm)
0.062
0.062
0.063
0.089
0.26
0.41
Size Distribution
mean 0.1
dispersion 2.6
skewness 0.39
TvDe
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
49%
51%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
IF—To—ta—I
100
Note:

Cross-
Section 3 Riffle
- MV -03
Particle Size Distribution
Farrar Dairy
XS 3 Riffle
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
97
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-.125
.125-.25
.25-.50
.50- 1
1 - 2
S
A
N
D
S
3
100".
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2-4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8- 11.3
11.3- 16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
e
=
60%
A
L
As Built
-� MY 01
-{U °-
e
201-
--0-- MY-02
-- + —MY -03
o
0.01
0.1
1 10 too
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90- 128
128- 180
180-256
C
O
B
L
Small
Small
Medium
Lr - Very Lr
256-362
362-512
512- 1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
Size
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
(mm)
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.062
Size Distribution
mean 0.1
dispersion 1.0
skewness -
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
97%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
100
Note:

Cross
- Section 4 Pool
-MY -03
Particle size Distribution
Farrar Dairy
XS 4 Pool
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
12
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-.125
.125-.25
.25-.50
.50- 1
1 - 2
S
A
N
D
S
50
6
30
a
100%
2
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2-4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8- 1 1 . 3
11.3- 16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
e
u
80%
60%
°
s
-
�AsBuilt
—� MY -0 i
°
�
- ♦ -MY -02
— �"'Y -0'
20%
0%
0.01
0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90-128
128-180
180-256
C
O
B
L
Small
Small
Medium
Lr - Very Lrg
256-362
362-512
512-1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
Size
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
(mm)
0.066
0.086
0.11
0.18
0.36
0.47
Size Distribution
mean 0.2
dispersion 2.5
skewness 0.17
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
12%
88%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
100
Note:

Cross
- Section 5 Riffle
- MV -03
1000/0
80%
Particle Size Distribution
Farrar Dairy
XS 5 Riffle
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Cla
< 0.062
S/C
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-.125
.125-.25
.25-.50
.50 - 1
1 - 2
S
A
N
D
S
10
58
29
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2-4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8- 11.3
11.3 - 16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
3
E
u
60%
As Built
-nn of
401X'
o
20%
— t –nn -02
— 4—XfY -03
0%
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90-128
128- 180
180-256
C
O
B
L
001
0 1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Small
Small
Medium
Lr - Very Lrg
256-362
362-512
512- 1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
1316
D35
D50
D65
D84
ID95
Size (mm)
0.13
0.17
0.20
0.24
0.37
0.48
Size Distribution
mean 0.2
dispersion 1.7
skewness 0.06
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood /det
artificial
0%
97%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Bedrock
>2048
B D_R_K__j
JF
Total
f 100
Note:

Cross
- Section 6 Pool
-MY -03
Particle Size Distribution
Farrar Dai
XS 6 Pool
Particle
Millimeter
P:s7
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
88
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-.125
.125-.25
.25-.50
.50- 1
1 1 - 2
S
A
N
D
1 S
12
S
100%
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2-4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8 -11.3
11.3- 16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
E
v
80%
60%
40%
As Built
+ MY -0 1
p
e
—�— MY -02
+MY-03
20%
0%
0.01
0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90- 128
128- 180
180-256
C
O
B
L
Small
Small
Medium
Lr - Very Lrg
256-362
362-512
512-1024
1024 - 2048
B
L
D
R
Size
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
(mm)
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.093
Size Distribution
mean 0.1
dispersion 1.0
skewness -
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
88%
12%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
100
Note:

Cross
- Section 7 Riffle
- MV -03
Particle size Distribution
Farrar Dairy
XS 7 Rime
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
98
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-.125
.125-.25
.25-.50
.50- 1
1 - 2
S
A
N
D
S
2
;
E
u
10f11'°
80%
60%
i
f
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2-4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8 - 11.3
1 L3 - 16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
40%
As Built
— + —MV -oi
°
'w
:
�— MY-02
+MY-03
20%
0%
0.01
0 1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90- 128
128- 180
180-256
C
O
B
L
Small
Small
Medium
Lr - Very Lrg
256-362
362-512
512- 1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
Size
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
(mm)
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.062
Size Distribution
mean 0.1
dispersion 1.0
skewness - --
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
98%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
100
Note:

Cross
- Section 8 Riffle
-MY -03
Particle Size Distribution
Farrar Dairy
XS 8 Riffle
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
12
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-.125
.125 - .25
.25-.50
.50 - 1
1 1 - 2
S
A
N
D
S
2
100%
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2-4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8- 11.3
11.3- 16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
6
v
80%
60%
6
n5 Built
t MY -01
° 40%
i>;
:
t MY -02
t MY -03
15
20%
26
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90- 128
128- 180
180-256
C
O
B
L
19
0%
0.01
0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
15
6
2
Small
Small
Medium
Lrg- Very Lrg
256-362
362-512
512- 1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
Size
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
(mm)
20
47
57
73
110
150
Size Distribution
mean 46.9
dispersion 2.4
skewness -0.10
Type
Silt/Clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
12%
2%
44%
42%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
100
Note:

Cross
- Section 9 Pool
- MY -03
Particle Size Distribution
Farrar Dairy
XS 9 Pool
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-.125
.125-.25
.25-.50
.50- 1
1 -2
S
A
N
D
S
4
16
100%
80%
17
60
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2-4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8 -11.3
11.3- 16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
1
E
u
60%
I
a
F
40 °%
—+ —As Built
+MY-01
1
1
° 0
i
20%
—�— MY -02
t MY -03
2
0%
0.01
0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
1
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90-128
128- 180
180-256
C
O
B
L
Small
Small
Medium
Lr - Very Lr =
256-362
362-512
512-1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
Size
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
(mm)
0.43
0.98
1.2
1.4
1.8
10
Size Distribution
mean 0.9
dispersion 2.1
skewness -0.17
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood /det
artificial
0%
93%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
104
Note:

Cross
- Section 10 Riffle
- MY -03
Particle Size Distribution
Farrar Dairy
XS 10 Riffle
Particle
Millimeter
F:S;c
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-.125
.125-.25
.25-.50
.50- 1
1 - 2
S
A
N
D
S
33
8
24
2
S
100%
80%
60%
7
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2-4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8- 11.3
11.3- 16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
1
2
6
3
e
e 6
—'— As Built
– +–MY -0I
4
8
40%
r;
e
f MY -02
—*-- MY -03
2
20%
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90-128
128- 180
180-256
C
O
B
L
Small
Small
Medium
Lr - Very Lr >
256-362
362-512
512-1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
Size (mm)
0.087
0.15
0.32
0.5
8.9
20
Size Distribution
mean 0.9
dispersion 15.7
skewness 0.31
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood /det
artificial
0%
74%
26%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
100
Note:

Cross
- Section 11 Riffle
- MV -03
Particle Size Distribution
Fa Dairy
a a 11 Ritir
iry
Particle
Millimeter
Count
< 0.062
S/C
37
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-.125
.125 - .25
.25-.50
.50-1
1 1 -2
S
A
N
D
1 S
50
13
a
W
100%
80%
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2 - 4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8- 11.3
11.3 - 16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
E
60%
a
a
H
40%
As av;ic
t MY -0I
e
w
20%
t MY -02
t MY -03
0%
0.01 o.I
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90- 128
128- 180
180-256
C
O
B
L
Small
Small
Medium
Lr - Very Lr g
256-362
362-512
512- 1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
Size (mm)
0.062
0.062
0.074
0.092
0.12
0.19
Size Distribution
mean 0.1
dispersion 1.4
skewness 0.12
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
37%
63%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
100
Note:

Cross
- Section 12 Pool
- MY -03
Particle Size Distribution
Farrar Dairy
XS 12 Pool
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
23
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-.125
.125-.25
.25-.50
.50- 1
1 - 2
S
A
N
D
S
77
S
100%
80%
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2 - 4
4 -5.7
5.7-8
8- 11.3
1 l.3 - 16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
B
u
60%
�
6
t As Built
+MY-01
p 40%
:
t MY -02
-+MY-03
20%
0%
0.01
0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90-128
128- 180
180-256
C
O
B
L
Small
Small
Medium
Lr - Very Lr g
256-362
362-512
512-1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
Size
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
mm
0.062
0.069
0.079
0.091
0.11
0.12
Size Distribution
mean 0.1
dispersion 1.3
skewness 0.04
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
23%
77%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
Ir 100
Note:

Cross
- Section 13 Riffle
- MY -03
Particle Size Distribution
Farrar Dairy
XS 13 Rink
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
100
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-.125
.125-.25
.25-.50
.50- 1
1 1 -2
S
A
N
D
S
100%
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2-4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8- 11.3
11.3- 16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
E
40%
As Built
+MY -0I
°
:
�— MY -02
--4— MY -03
20%
0° /Y
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90-128
128- 180
180-256
C
O
B
L
Small
Small
Medium
Lr - Very Lrg
256-362
362-512
512- 1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
Size (mm)
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.062
Size Distribution
mean 0.1
dispersion 1.0
skewness - --
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
100
Note:

Cross
- Section 14 Pool
- MV -03
Particle Size Distribution
Farrar Dairy
XS 14 Pool
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
92
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-.125
.125-.25
.25-.50
.50-1
1 - 2
S
A
N
D
S
a
E
100%
ao°
60%
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2-4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8- 11.3
11.3- 16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
L
p 40%
i
-- -- - - --
~ —As Built
+MY-0 I
---W— MY-02
+MY-03
3
2
20%
0%
0.01
0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
3
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90- 128
128- 180
180-256
C
O
B
L
Small
Small
Medium
Lrg- Very Lr ,
256-362
362-512
512- 1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
Size
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
(mm)
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.062
32
Size Distribution
mean 0.1
dispersion 1.0
skewness - --
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
92%
0%
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Bedrock
1 >2048
BDRK
Total
100
Note:

Cross
- Section 15 Riffle
- MY -03
Particle Size Distribution
Farrar Dairy
XS 15 Riffle
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
74
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-.125
.125-.25
.25-.50
.50- 1
1 - 2
S
A
N
D
S
2
8
100%
80%
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2 - 4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8 - 11.3
11.3 - 16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
u
60%
7
jog
F
As -Built
t MY -0 1
I
a 40%
W.
i
20%
t MY -02
t MY -03
2
3
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
3
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90-128
128- 180
180-256
C
O
B
L
Small
Small
Medium
Lr - Very Lr
256-362
362-512
512- 1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
Size (mm)
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.5
36
Size Distribution
mean 0.2
dispersion 4.5
skewness 0.48
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood /det
artificial
74%
10%
16%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
100
Note:

Cross
- Section 16
Pool -MY -03
Particle Size Distribution
Farrar Dairy
XS 16 Pool
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-.125
.125-.25
.25-.50
.50- 1
1 - 2
S
A
N
D
S
27
73
��'��°
-
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2-4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8- 11.3
1 l.3 - 16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
r
40%
As-Built
t MY -01
A! p
e
t MY -02
MY -03
20%
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100 1000
Particle Size - Millimeters
10000
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90- 128
128- 180
180-256
C
O
B
L
Small
Small
Medium
Lr - Very Lrg
256-362
362-512
512- 1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
Size (mm)
D16 0.19
D35 0.27
D50 0.31
D65 0.36
D84 0.43
D95 0.48
Size Distribution
mean 0.3
dispersion 1.5
skewness -0.06
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood /det
artificial
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
100
Note:

Cross-
Section 17 Riffle
- MV -03
9
l00%
80%
Particle Size Distribution
Farrar Dairy
XS 17 Riffle
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
74
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-.125
.125-.25
.25-.50
.50-1
1 -2
S
A
N
D
S
7
7
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2-4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8- 11.3
11.3- 16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
E
u
o
60 /o
As Built
— . —MY -0I
e
40%
tMY -0?
t MY -03
e
20%
8
3
0%
0.01
0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90- 128
128- 180
180-256
C
O
B
L
Small
Small
Medium
Lr - Very Lrg
256-362
362-512
512- 1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
Size
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
(mm)
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.37
29
Size Distribution
mean 0.2
dispersion 3.5
skewness 0.44
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
73%
14%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
101
Note:

Cross
- Section 18 Riffle
- MV -03
Particle Size Distribution
Farrar Dairy
XS 18 Riffle
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
<0.062
S/C
32
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-.125
.125-.25
.25-.50
.50-1
1 -2
S
A
N
D
S
15
51
e
r
c
100%
As Built
tMY -01
- —MY -03
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2-4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8- 11.3
11.3- 16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
1
I
0%
0.01
0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90- 128
128- 180
180-256
C
O
B
L
Small
Small
Medium
Lrg- Very Lr =
256-362
362-512
512- 1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
Size
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
(mm)
0.062
0.14
0.26
0.32
0.41
0.48
Size Distribution
mean 0.2
dispersion 2.9
skewness -023
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
32%
66%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
100
Note:

Cross
- Section 19 Pool
- MY -03
100%
soy.
Particle Size Distribution
Farrar Dairy
XS 19 Pool
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
15
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-.125
.125-.25
.25-.50
.50-1
1 1 -2
S
A
N
D
S
85
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2 - 4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8- 11.3
11.3- 16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
E
v
s
tAs-Built
– + –MY -01
40%
0
t MY -02
— 4 —MY -03
20%
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90-128
128- 180
180-256
C
O
B
L
Small
Small
Medium
Lr g- Very Lrg
256-362
362-512
512- 1024
1024-2048
B
1_
D
R
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
Size (mm)
0.25
0.29
0.33
0.38
0.44
0.48
Size Distribution
mean 0.3
dispersion 1.3
skewness 0.00
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
15%
85%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
700
Note:

Cross
- Section 20 Riffle
- MY -03
Particle Size Distribution
Farrar Dairy
XS 20 Riffle
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
88
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-.125
.125-.25
.25-.50
.50- 1
1 1 -2
S
A
N
D
S
12
e
L
F
100%
—'— As -Built
— + —MY -0 I
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2-4
4-5.7
5.7 -8
8- 11.3
11.3- 16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E,
L
S
p 40%
:
t MY -02
+MY-03
20%
0%
0.01
0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90- 128
128- 180
180-256
C
O
B
L
Small
Small
Medium
Lr - Very Lrg
256-362
362-512
512- 1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
Size
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
(mm)
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.37
Size Distribution
mean 0.1
dispersion 1.0
skewness - --
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
88%
12%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
100
Note:

Cross
- Section 21 Riffle
- MY -03
100%
: gp%
Particle Size Distribution
Farrar Dairy
XS 21 Riffle
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
63
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-.125
.125-.25
.25-.50
.50- 1
1 -2
S
A
N
D
S
13
11
6
7
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2-4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8- 11.3
11.3- 16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
e
E
°
v
60%
As Built
MY -01
° 40%
:
20%
t MY -02
+MY-03
p%
0.01 0.1
1 to 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90-128
128-180
180-256
C
O
B
L
Small
Small
Medium
Lr J- Very Lrg
256-362
362-512
512-1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
Size (mm)
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.069
0.21
0.61
Size Distribution
mean 0.1
dispersion 2.2
skewness 0.36
Type
silt/clay 63%
sand 37%
gravel 0%
cobble 0%
boulder 0%
bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%
Bedrock
?2048
BDRK
Total
100
Note:

Cross
- Section 22 Pool
- MY -03
Particle Size Distribution
Farrar Dairy
XS 22 Pool
Particle
Millimeter
Count
SildCla
I < 0 062
S/C
100
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
062- 125
125- 25
25- 50
50-1
1 -2
S
A
N
D
S
100%
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2-4
4 -57
5 7- 8
8- 113
11 3-16
16-226
226-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
S S0%
e
u
60%
F
40%
�- As &uI`
MY -0I
°
e
t MY -02
t MY -03
20%
00/0
001 01 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size - Millimeters
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90-128
128- 180
180-256
C
O
B
L
Small
Small
Medium
Lr - Very Lrg,
256-362
362-512
512-1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
Size mm Size Distribution
D16 0 062 mean 01
D35 0 062 dispersion 10
D50 0 062 skewness --
D65 0 062
D84 0 062
1395 0 062
Type
silt/clay 100%
sand 0%
gravel 0%
cobble 0%
boulder 0%
bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
100
Note

Cross
- Section 23 Riffle
- MY -03
Particle Size Distribution
Farrar Dairy
XS 23 Riffle
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
72
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-.125
.125-.25
.25-.50
.50-1
1 - 2
S
A
N
D
S
a
u
a
110%
80%
60%
■
f
• —�
AL
�
' IL A A•• •'
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2-4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8 - 11.3
11.3 - 16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
7
1
1
r
e
40 °% °
20%
a
—
a As Built
A— MY -01
— t - MY -0'-
MY -03
3
5
1
4
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
3
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90- 128
128-180
180-256
C
O
B
L
4
Small
Small
Medium
Lr - Very Lr =
256-362
362-512
512- 1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
Size (mm)
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.062
17
57
Size Distribution
mean 1.0
dispersion 137.6
skewness 0.78
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
71%
0%
25%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
101
Note:

Cross
- Section 24 Pool
- MY-03
1000/0
Particle Size Distribution
Farrar Dairy
XS 24 Pool
Particle
Millimeter
Count
St C a
< 0 062
S C
100
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
062- 125
125- 25
25- 50
50- 1
1 1 - 2
S
A
N
D
S
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2-4
4-57
5 7 - 8
8- 113
11 3 - 16
16-226
226-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
6
80%
°
� �0
o
40x°
---r— As Built
+MY -0I
°
0
20%
—F MY-02
+MY -03
00%
001
01
l 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90-128
128- 180
180-256
C
O
B
L
Small
Small
Medium
Lr - Very Lrg
256-362
362-512
512- 1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
Size
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
mm
0 062
0 062
0 062
0 062
0 062
0 062
Size Distribution
mean 0 1
dispersion 10
skewness --
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
100
Note

Cross
- Section 25 Riffle
- MY-03
Particle Sue Distribution
Farrar Dairy
XS 25 Rime
1000/0
80%
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0 062
S C
100
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
062- 125
125- 25
25- 50
50- 1
1 - 2
S
A
N
D
S
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2-4
4-57
57-8
8- 113
11 3 - 16
16-226
226-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
e
60%
e
F-
40%
As Bwlt
—� MY -0 I
8
o
t MY -02
t MY -03
20%
A.
001 01 1 10 loo 1000 10000
Particle Size - Millimeters
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90-128
128-180
180-256
C
O
B
L
Small
Small
Medium
Lr - Very Lrg
256-362
362-512
512 - 1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
Size mm Size Distribution
D16 0 062 mean 01
D35 0 062 dispersion 10
D50 0 062 skewness --
D65 0 062
D84 0 062
D95 0 062
Type
silt/clay 100%
sand 0%
gravel 0%
cobble 0%
boulder 0%
bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
100
Note

Cross
- Section 26 Riffle
- MV -03
:
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Farrar Dairy
XS 26 Riffle
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
53
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-.125
.125-.25
.25-.50
.50- 1
1 - 2
S
A
N
D
S
47
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2 - 4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8 - 11.3
11.3 - 16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
0
v
80%
60%
e
40%
�— ^s Built
+MY-01
0
X
0
t MY -02
—r— MY -03
20 °% °
0%
0.01
0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90- 128
128- 180
180-256
C
O
B
L
Small
Small
Medium
Lr - Very Lr g
256-362
362-512
512-1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
Size
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
(mm)
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.074
0.098
0.12
Size Distribution
mean 0.1
dispersion 1.3
skewness 0.22
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
53%
47%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
I00
Note:

Cross
- Section 27 Pool
- MY -03
Particle Size Distribution
Farrar Dairy
XS 27 Pool
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
69
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-.125
.125-.25
.25-.50
.50- 1
1 - 2
S
A
N
D
S
31
a
100%
80%
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2-4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8- 11.3
11.3- 16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
E
v
60%
°
E-
L
40%
As Built
+MY -01
°
ii
e
t MY -02
+MY-03
20%
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90-128
128- 180
180-256
C
O
B
L
Small
Small
Medium
Lr - Very Lr g
256-362
362-512
512-1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
Size (mm)
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.087
0.11
Size Distribution
mean 0.1
dispersion 1.2
skewness 0.19
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
69%
31%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
IF—Tota—I
100
Note:

Cross
- Section 28 Pool
- MV -03
Particle Size Distribution
Farrar Dairy
XS 28 Pool
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
42
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-.125
.125-.25
.25-.50
.50- 1
1 1 - 2
S
A
N
D
S
58
a
100%
80%
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2-4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8- 11.3
11.3- 16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
6o�ia
F-
40%
As MY -0-01 1
t
e
�,
t MY -02
t MY -03
20%
0%
0.01
0.1
1 10 too
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90- 128
128- 180
180-256
C
O
B
L
Small
Small
Medium
Lr - Very Lr =
256-362
362-512
512-1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
Size
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
mm
0.062
0.062
0.068
0.082
0.1
0.12
Size Distribution
mean 0.1
dispersion 1.3
skewness 0.14
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
42%
58%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
100
Note:

Cross
- Section 29 Riffle
- MV -03
Particle Size Distribution
Farrar Dairy
XS 29 Riffle
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
79
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-.125
.125-.25
.25-.50
.50- 1
1 -2
S
A
N
D
S
12
a
E
=
1001,'°
so%
60°i°
_
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2-4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8- 11.3
11.3 - 16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
7
2
i
40 °%
^sBW�`
° °
t My oz
+ os
MY
20%
o%
Small
Small
Large
Lame
64-90
90- 128
128- 180
180-256
C
O
B
L
0.01
0.1
1 to 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Small
Small
Medium
Lr - Very Lrg
256-362
362-512
512- 1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
Size
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
(mm)
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.083
3
Size Distribution
mean 0.1
dispersion 1.2
skewness 0.18
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
79%
12%
9%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
100
Note:

205
—
203
201
Ground Surface
a
w 199
12" Below Surface
W
L
d
197
Sensor Depth
�o
a
o
I
C7 195
193
Begin Growing Season
3/11/2011
Farrar Dairy Restoration Site
Hydrograph
Wetland Gauge 1
t
- - - - -- 4
End Growing Season
11/16/2011
3.5
3
--t1 2.5
191 —T=ry- 1' N ,— sly —P a 1 1 . 11 -P'-- ■ L -1 1 , 1. 0. It E
a s rw' c` c` c c c c a Y O O o z z ro
a?
= = :. = .. t
Date
Rainfall Groundwater Depth — Ground Surface 12 Inches Below Ground Surface — Sensor Depth
2 'o'
m
e
1.5 "
0.5
0

198
196
194
c
192
w
L
V
a 190
3
�v
C
7
O
L
U 188
186
184
Farrar Dairy Restoration Site
Hydrograph
Wetland Gauge 2
Begin Growing Season End Growing Season
3/11/2011 11/16/2011
I
Ground Surface j
12" Below Surface
C 99
148 Days
Sensor Depth I
N W N N N N N W N W N W �O N 00 N 00 N J N J
N N -+ + r - ► -+ O O O O O O 'D P r r r Ir J J
3 a a O z. , o
Q b Y a w c c` c` = c` c` c a s co rn n O O o Z Z ro
Date
Rainfall Groundwater Depth Ground Surface 12 Inches Below Ground Surface Sensor Depth
4
3.5
3
2.5
2 _.
>i
a'
I.5
I
0.5
0

Farrar Dairy Restoration Site
Hydrograph
Wetland Gauge 3
197
196
195
0
194
0
a
193
W
w
192
a
0
L
V 191
190
189
188
- N N N ~ -
•�+�
t
i b 'p w.
:.. 7 7 7
C C C
C � a a
C C 'U fD (D
O O o c c
7
~ w v�o b
Date
� Rainfall Groundwater Depth
—Ground Surface
12 Inches Below Ground Surface
— Sensor Depth
4
3.5
3
2.5
m
2
o'
0
1.5
1
0.5
0

196
194
192
190
w
c
0
R
> 188
W
L
d
�0 186
a
0
0
L
V
184
[NA
Farrar Dairy Restoration Site
Hydrograph
Wetland Gauge 4
Begin Growing Season End Growing Season
3/11/2011 11/16/2011
Ground Surface 14 Days
12" Below Surface
'vti n n n„ A f"1 .n n r-,
Sensor Depth I
LLL_
a a O z o
�• �, �• coo b % a w `" `" c` c _c`_ e` c a
oa c c 0 m rn rn n O O o o o z 0 co
v co ro � � °» < �
Date
Rainfall Groundwater Depth Ground Surface 12 Inches Below Ground Surface — Sensor Depth
4
3.5
3
2.5
0
2 in
0
1.5
0.5
0

195
194
193
192
a
d
W
190
3
189
V
188
187
186
Begin Growing Season
3/11/2011
Ground Surface
112" Below Surface i 52
Farrar Dairy Restoration Site
Hydrograph
Wetland Gauge 5
17 Days
End Growing Season
11/16/2011
4
&W,
3
2.5
2 m
1z
F
1.5 ..
I
Gauge Malfunction
I I 0.5
jam_
185 , �
1 ■ 1m 1_ 1 L a 11
, ,— �--- r- -,=,
a 1 ■ 1 _ ra J
—, ,-- --r
1 L 1 ■ ■ L ■W
—� � —. ,--�
■ 41 :, J'1
�
N W
,� •.-• •• •• O
N N N N
O k N N .. r
N W N W
.... 7 v Q O O O
N W — N 00
O O P ? � 00 r
N J r N J
r r -ZI 11
r- e o coo rD
O O o c c cS
Date
Rainfall
Groundwater Depth
— Ground Surface
12 Inches Below Ground Surface
— Sensor Depth
0

Farrar Dairy Restoration Site
Hydrograph
Wetland Gauge 6
207
206
205
204
203
202
201
0
0
200
d
W 199
L
d
�r
3 198
a
0 197
V
196
195
194
3.5
3
2.5
2 :7
E.
d
1.5
1
0.5
0
N W
N N N N
N W N W
�-
N W �O N 00 N 00
N J N -1
IITI
a a w
3 c
c` c c v a w w
0 0 o z z N
Date
Sensor Depth
Rainfall
Groundwater Depth
Ground Surface
12 Inches Below Ground Surface

212
211
210
209
a
208
W
207
s
206
L
V
205
204
203
Farrar Dairy Restoration Site
Hydrograph
Wetland Gauge 7
Begin Growing Season End Growing Season
3/11/2011 11/16/2011
19 Days
Ground Surface 12 Days
12" Below Surface
.4 111 N `vim
V
Sensor Dept I I I
3.5
3
2.5
2
0
m
1.5 0
0.5
0
� 00 00 O
b
a a ;�
0 0 z z
o
Date
Rainfall Groundwater Depth
— Ground Surface
12 Inches Below Ground Surface
— Sensor Depth
3.5
3
2.5
2
0
m
1.5 0
0.5
0

193
192
n
191
0
w
L
d
3 190
C
7
L
�i
U
189
188
Farrar Dairy Restoration Site
Hydrograph
Reference Gauge
Begin Growing Season !
3/11/2011 End Growing Season:
11/16/2011
i
i
i
I
I
I
i
i
1
Ground Surfacec
Sensor Dept
i
12" Below urface 251 Days
I . I >
i ..I �11 I Ap.
Ky 1" > > > > O O z Z cc
c v CD ro n < o o q
Date
Rainfall Groundwater Depth Ground Surface 12 Inches Below Ground Surface — Sensor Depth
4
3.5
3
2.5
z
m
2
o'
7
1.5
0.5
0

C7
e
O 17
O
tb
40 � e>D
A
v
(7r
(ol) IIB;UIow
tn
en en
h tn
-
s
F
7- Dec -11
27- Nov -11
17- Nov -11
7 -Nov -11
28- Oct -11
18 -Oct-11
8 -Oct -11
28- Sep-II
18- Sep-I1
8- Sep -11
29 -Aug -I1
19 -Aug -11
9- Aug -11
30- Jul -11
20- Jul -11
10- Jul -11
30- Jun -11
20- Jun -11
A
10 -Jun -11
31 -May -I 1
21 -May -1 I
11 -May -11
1 -May -1 I
21 -Apr -1 I
11- Apr -11
1- Apr -11
22 -Mar -11
12- Mar -11
2 -Mar -11
20- Feb-II
10- Feb-II
31 -Jan -I 1
21 -Jan -11
I I -Jan -I I
1- Jan -11
0 0 CD 00
N N N — —
(Ij) UOIIBA013 OSBIS
as
C
m

8
fI
6
5
C
4
C
k'
3
2
1
0
Farrar 30 -70 Percentile Graph 2010 -2011
Lillington, NC Monthly Rainfall
z° s w ¢ 2 ti in ° D
a z
Date
==32010 Rainfall 0 2011 Rainfall t 30% Less Than t 300A Greater Than

Appendix D
Current Condition Plan View
Farrar Dairy Stream and Weiland KC1 Associates of North Carolina
Restoration Site 2011 - MY03

SHEET 7 LEGEND
SHEET 8 s $ CROSS SECTION
k
AS -BUILT STATIONED PHOTO POINT �� a
LOG SILL � VEGETATION PLOT
j LOG DROP Q GAUGE LOCATION 0
N
STONE TOE STABILIZATION ROCK STABILIZATION Q
STEP POOL BANK EROSION
j SEEP DEVELOPMENT BEAVER DAM
_ f
SHEET 9 �a
k ti
N 0
Z �
V OZ
3
L\ SHEET 3 N N�
0
a
az
� a=
Z a
s C6 0 0
T
E <
fn O
wz
g v
w
Z z
�\ nm DEC 2011
- 200 -100 0 200 400
CURRENT
GRAPHIC SCALE N CONDITION
f PLAN VIEW
T 1 OF 11

LEGEND
S CROSS SECTION �--- -♦ d
s
AS -BUILT STATIONED PHOTO POINT FO
LOG SILL VEGETATION PLOT
BEGN NPAC LOG DROP Q GAUGE LOCATION 0
STONE TOE STABILIZATION ROCK STABILIZATION
6E 66
X S
STEP POOL BANK EROSION
SEEP DEVELOPMENT BEAVER DAM
00 ob
�r
PP61 VEG PLOT 1
12 +00
VEG PLOT 3
p % ^a
"9e E
Q ;
0 EEG PLOT 16
1 I I i� O � i�vr �_.rrr•►�
1
WETLAND 00 -
_ -
VEG PLOT 17 GAUGE 1
WETLAND O /
GAUGE 98 r QO +�z / r PPY5
14.'00
VEG PLOT 1e
x o
Lw4 w
RAIN
, O�
GAUGE XSECTION 02
15 +00
ov op
+ '+��i Z z
PP92 OO O J
Ix
. oo O Z
cl) ac
} W 0
START OF PROFILE NPAGI \ /�.,__ % I - _ ; ir_ }Z f�
lb
o
X-SECTIONpt �I % 41 Q Z Z H
oA g 0 g
PPS, 0
C� Ry4 PP03 Q Z 0
�N LL x F
�SF4F'1'T Q Q
VEG PLOT 2 d
ar Z Z
80 -•� c)
N J
-40 -20 0 40 80
nm DEC 2011
GRAPHIC SCALE
CURRENT
veG PLOT 1e CONDITION
vEO PLOT 2o PLAN VIEW
PMT 2 OF 11

SEE SHEETS 7 B FOR T7 1 T1 2 AND T1
a
xsECTION 121
�� nQ
1 VEG PLOT 1 Ox
SE�P PPf28 ('1' •• / in;
,al END OF PROFLE NPAC 1 END OF I >
CY PROFILE f I
T1
PPOS
- [L
BEAVER_DAAAy BEAVER DAM
SECTION 93
i VEG PLOT 21 '
' ddd %SECTION44
`jr , VEG PLOT 22
i,
♦♦ --------
C � O
VIED PLOT 23
` w
u
a
h
V 000
PP1B w ¢�
0
ROCK FORD x
t CROSSING a viz
'9 o z
l �x
n N vV
W
a
� w
-40 -20 0 40 80 `a , Z Q
GRAPHIC SCALE J
Lo
�T p L) °v
U) z z
0
BANK EROSION } W
z F
y
0 Z z O
0
U
LEGEND VEG PLOT 5 F-
8 $ CROSS SECTION -- LQL I IJ t O
LL D x F-
AS-BUILT STATIONED PHOTO POINT ZQ = Q
H
Z rA
LOG SILL VEGETATION PLOT Q Q
Q' Z Z
LOG DROP Q GAUGE LOCATION 0 N J
STONE TOE STABILIZATION =o=-:tz ROCK STABILIZATION
am DEC 2011
scut. 1'�BO'
STEP POOL BANK EROSION
CURRENT
SEEP DEVELOPMENT BEAVER DAM ® CONDITION
PLAN VIEW
T 3 OF 11

c0 L
a
1/1
Z
In
IZ
W'
R
VEG PLOT 25 tl
40 +00 _-
� r 1
m kOQ
--------
VEG PLOT 24 �
WETLAND 02 /-�VEG PLOT 27
BEAVER DAM , VEO PLOT 211
Q j
o � y � W—a
VEG PLOT 25
XSECTION 15
00 - QQ <
+ ; BEAVER DAM XSrCT10N/7 )k _ BREACHED
N
- h BEAVER DAM
Q - ' Q Q VEG PLOT 7
O N g,
BE{ VER DAM XSECTION AS _ Q -'+. -- b' w N
BEAVER DAM
PP/1D Q� BEAVER DAM DO - - _ -
410 Q CC),
- S G), �i 0
PP011 _ 2 �Ox 11LL�I �I I INf a x IX
Jr Iljllll
BEAVER s w
o w
PP1113� _ Q u z
PPA74
BANK EROSION VEG PLOT 44
Z
'rs! BANKSCOUR ` k 2
AROUNDLOG J
BANK EROSION DROP
to
VEG PLOTS Q 4.
�� V
C VEG PLOT 45 �I BEAVER DAM O Z
-40 -20 0 40 80 q�H - -� X- SECTION 025 z
GRAPHIC SCALE tir 0Ox 0 Z z o
i 8
i U C
OF k
LEGEND o PROFILE T2 < z o
CROSS SECTION • -- n Z Q
z v~i
AS -BUILT STATIONED PHOTO POINT F� �� xsecnONSZa O
U
LOG SILL VEGETATION PLOT ' � �, � Z
J
oo >~ I N J
LOG DROP 4 GAUGE LOCATION O
mm DEC 2011
STONE TOE STABILIZATION ROCK STABILIZATION PPM
STEP POOL BANK EROSION ® r CURRENT
�Ox � s' CONDITION
SEEP DEVELOPMENTS BEAVER DAM r� PLAN VIEW
®
T 4 OF 11
SEE SHEET 10 FOR T2

FVEG
VEG PLOT ZD
w
t
9�
�C
VEG PLOT 30
LEGEND
s
8
AS -BUILT STATIONED
—�
LOG SILL
LOG DROP
4
STONE TOE STABILIZATION
11
} W Z
}
STEP POOL
l%
SEEP DEVELOPMENT
O
CROSS SECTION
O
PHOTO POINT
FO
VEGETATION PLOT
GAUGE LOCATION
O
N4HF WO
�= x
VEG PLOT 92 J_-__-
VEG PLOT B
BANK EROSION
[REPAIRED IN 2011
WETLAND
GAU
0°E #4 ROCK STABILIZATION O
a OX
PP018 8 - �
m - 6xOO O BANK EROSION ® �O DO 9 BEAVER DAM C~J
BEAVER DAM ® 9
PROFILE NPAC 2 -
- _ _ _ � � ` ♦ ♦
rx-SECTION08 i O O X
IFEI O
RIFFLE INSTALLED x IN 2011
1 �
-
©Q� X9 PP07 -_ -_
- BEAVER DAM
x r — pp+ 4b
`, ` 8a.O0 PP015 BANK EROSION
BANK EROSION _ •f�. O� 21311 PROFILE IN PP018
REPAIRED IN 2071 `1i � x / I' �� END OF w N
O� � (// 7�0. - PROFlLE NPAG2
`11 ;ter` ♦ k�O O r ^ �z
'- i1 (OIL � �' N
00 VEG PLOT 35 P N o
k G ¢
1' rI � c x
CONSTRUCTED i ' �.` _ �I�' %SECTION010 /�t � m 00
RIFFLES INSTALLED - - l` I P END OF
IN 2017 ¢ STREAM GAUGE 02 L_ PROFILE T3 t �, ¢ Pw
CONSTRUCTED
VEG PLOT 43 VEG PLOT 41 RIFFLES INSTALLED _
IN 2011 w
• `,
-------- `• W UGE#5
SOX G-TLAND
%SECTION OB SO 6� ' 1 O
VEG PLOT 8 I+ PROW 0
WETLAND
GAUGE 03 F" 0
0 It U N
Q =
01
XSECT KMI 028
1,
0�
~
Z
Z
O
VEG PLOT 42
11
} W Z
}
l%
Z
O
,
Z
o
+
VEG PLOT 16 j
U
VEG PLOT 40
%SECTK)N 028
4t
�,
Q Z
C1
Lf)
0
(/
LL K
Z
H
00X`` ;?
-40 -20 0 40 80
O
%
0
a
GRAPHIC SCALE
z
z
v
F
'
VEG PLOT 39 / XSECTION 027
J
J
J
FyF
y
DEC 2071
' PPX11 y p�
)
xun 1'80
_ `
CURRENT
' Qb1+
-
CONDITION
VEG PLOT 36
PLAN VIEW
'
T S OF
11
SEE SHEET 11 FOR T3

C
MATCHLDIE SEESHM5
I�sC); aj
O
N
O
C1
D O
2
n
N
(� A
D O
r
m
0
.-
DItlO 711
v 0 o
z o z
5=1m
O i
Z
P
FARRAR DAIRY
STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION
HARNETT COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
� KC I
ENGINEERS PLANNERSa SCIENTISTS
4601SIX FORKS ROAD
RALEIGH NORTH CAROLINA 27609
.-
em
11 111 elliclli
B
REVISED MAIN CHBRUMDODINO PROFILE
„�
,,�
MIX
NPAC - STATION 69 +61 TO STATION 77+46
REVISIONS

LEGEND
8 8 CROSS SECTION �♦ e
�L S
AS-BUILT STATIONED `�—� PHOTO POINT t�
LOG SILL VEGETATION PLOT
--'--�
LOG DROP Q GAUGE LOCATION O
.,oz VI
Z
O
STONE TOE STABILIZATION c=ook ROCK STABILIZATION L^
-40 -20 0 40 80 1
STEP POOL [ BANK EROSION ® y
�NSFRVA77ONEAS GRAPHIC SCALE SEEP DEVELOPMENT ohs BEAVER DAM
L
- - y a0
F - - °O Co�sEav
ATIO(yEA1f x
gz
' _ _-
v PP019 -- -- St cW
STMT OF PROFILE T1 1 i i ?` - spa PPM _
gl. L5
XSECTION013 00 ' - - -----
Of Lf)
VEG PLOT 10 - - - - - Q %
-OZZ �Yf..y - _ - -O - __ -- O 0 2
O Z
r -- 001,z­-, o f
st _ __o o It w Z
LL
x- SECnoN Y1a �` 1 -�}' In --
PP021� DO 0 - W Q Z Z Q
END OF PROFILE T7 1 1 , O w
O O
XSECTION 015 U O
- - -- Q Z Z
O
Ox& _ -Ole 00 t~i)
6
Q F
SEE SHEET B FOR T1 2 LLI Z F
7
N J
nm DEC 2011
. -.•r. 1'80'
CURRENT
CONDITION
PLAN VIEW
T 7 OF tt

m
r
r
V a m o
y c
Li
0 iO
m
m
Z
0
v
m m
z
o
0
O
z
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
�
I
i
;i-n
Hn
x,00
0
z
0
3
a
O
x
m m
0
D O
O
to
m
O
S2
O
Z
0
Z
z
O�
O
Z
O
X
M
C)
L......
/m
N
/
/
ON
I �
�
1
O
N
-
O
p
nyy O
OD
m
m
1
0
=
1
�
v
Fj
yqv y
1
m -
M1 �
O
GI
m
+
A
21
0
n
A
I
zo
G)m
O
SEE SHEET 9 FOR T7
-000
z Z
o
FARRAR DAIRY
KCI
.-
STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION
5 v m
ENGINEERS
PLANNERS • SCIENTISTS
p Z
Z 1
LILUNGTON
HARNETT COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
4601SIX FORKS ROAD
RALEIGH NORTH CAROLINA 27609
em
L11 I'll elliclit
sn
usariu
na
srwam
T1 2 - STATION 90+00 TO STATION 99 +80
REVISIONS
-

LEGEND
-
-- --- - - - -
-- --
8
CROSS SECTION
41.�°
8
BEGIN
AS -BUILT STATIONED
1 P
PHOTO POINT
FO
LOG SILL
°
VEGETATION PLOT
VEG PLOT 21
_O
-40 -20 0 40 80
LOG DROP
4
GAUGE LOCATION
O
O
+
O
O _
VE6 PLOT 12
GRAPHIC SCALE
STONE TOE STABILIZATION
ROCK STABILIZATION
STEP POOL
BANK EROSION
MI
f-
END OF
'
LaSEEP DEVELOPMENT BEAVER DAM
00 +4£ )101
rr
VEG PLOT22
`-----
-
-- --- - - - -
-- --
BEGIN
X
1 P
-
T1
END OF O�
PROFILE T1 „
BEAVER DAN
VEG PLOT 21
_O
,
0
O
+
O
O _
VE6 PLOT 12
END OF
'
00"
PROFILE NPAG7
-
++0 0
• XSECTION #19
PP02�
V
1
F
°
p
OOZ
^ - 00
OOX90
O
rye,
XSECTION 021
00+
LC
r
O
�
_
°
Z
X- SECTION AI
�
;C
ROCKFORD
PW25
XSECT10N 020
,CROSSING
103+0(!r-,
EASEMENT
N
O
-
rk
X6lt,
- -
�
O
I
__
--
START OF
PROFILE T1
\
PP621
EROSION -
AROUND
LOG SILL
00 +4£ )101
rr
VEG PLOT22
`-----
r-
t �P
o
Z N
V °
4 NO
a x�
U ¢
W
Z a
O Z
a
O U o
2
N O O
w Z Q
F
�g o °
F
� U
W 8
LL 0 ¢ O
Z = F
Q
Q O v�
z
J
J
CURRENT
CONDITION
PLAN VIEW
VEG PLOT 4� • ,
•Cv�
X
1 P
END OF O�
PROFILE T1 „
BEAVER DAN
VEG PLOT 21
,
0
,-
END OF
'
00"
PROFILE NPAG7
• XSECTION #19
J*
1
p
OOZ
OOX90
O
rye,
XSECTION 021
00+
LC
r
X- SECTION AI
;C
STREAM GAUGE RI
PW25
XSECT10N 020
PP#6�
EASEMENT
O
CONSERVATION
X6lt,
r-
t �P
o
Z N
V °
4 NO
a x�
U ¢
W
Z a
O Z
a
O U o
2
N O O
w Z Q
F
�g o °
F
� U
W 8
LL 0 ¢ O
Z = F
Q
Q O v�
z
J
J
CURRENT
CONDITION
PLAN VIEW

00
WETLAND x
GAUaE 07 O
0
- O
O
+
BEGIN T2
COs
VEG PLOT 13•
�Bo
-40 -20 0 40 80
GRAPHIC SCALE
XSECTION 822
N _ CONSERVATIk EASEMENT
-PP827 - O
O
1 , .100 XSECTKIN 823 O� , O�
4
1
s
START OF, y
,PROFILE T2 i ♦ �I''�A!
PP823
LEGEND
CROSS SECTION
O
8
AS -BUILT STATIONED
PHOTO POINT
"*_0
LOG SILL
D
VEGETATION PLOT
L....J
LOG DROP
4
GAUGE LOCATION
O
STONE TOE STABILIZATION
ROCK STABILIZATION
STEP POOL
BANK EROSION
SEEP DEVELOPMENT
v
BEAVER DAM
SEE SHEET FOR NPAC
O 0
+ C
BEAVER DAM
a'
WETLAND
OAUGE82
O
----------
BEAVER DAM
BEAVER
LODGE
BANK EROSION '
51 +0
VEG PLOT 27
52 +00
G
xSECTION 07
J
���.• REMNANT
BREACHED
�O X�O BEAVER DAM F •=
�P
VEO PLOT 44
0
PP812 =
I u yl W N
V 2-
54 +00 l� ou
z =
a x
O a PU
OZ
N �
+ W
w
w r PP813
v 0) PP814 , Z
q
VIED PLOT 28 0
1 - ; VEG PLOT 7 4 Q N
LL U
♦ ~ Q z
BEAVER DAM TOE EROSION W O O
END OF F
PROFILE T2 Q O !p
XSECTION 825 VEG PLOT 43 0' 56'x00 w O O
'1' F
XSECTION 824 C O
s �
oo L o c z
�X Z 1 F
Q z
g O
SEE SHEET 5 FOR NPAC ' uJ Ci N
J
CURRENT
CONDITION
PLAN VIEW

LEGEND
8 $ CROSS SECTION
AS-BUILT STATIONED �-
PHOTO POINT a
L06 SILL VEGETATION PLOT
J
LOG DROP 4 GAUGE LOCATION 0
V1
STONE TOE STABILIZATION ROCK STABILIZATION
Q
STEP POOL BANK EROSION
-40 -20 0 40 80
SEEP DEVELOPMENT BEAVER DAM
GRAPHIC SCALE
SEE SHEET 5 FOR NPAC
+
VEG PLOT 15 VEG PLOT 12� [
PP91B O ♦1 _
FNn OF
0
_ pp
O _ -�``� "`.J Imo' `� , PROFILE T3
Q^
PP931 ♦ / r _ _
-_____ %+SECTION i28
r V
% -SECTION 92B i
%-SECTION 927
W QQ (1 � - - - - -- -- ^ W y� N O
O XSi( r/ ♦
VEG PLOT 38 /r ,,7 °aa
GQ+ VEG PLOT 35
°
w
� PP936
II�jI
w w
START OF e
z �
PROFILE T3 X90 %-SECTION925
D
GAUGE
� AUGE96
O
QQ +��` ZO z
VEG PLOT 37 J
O < +
o a
t _ r
r
W Z F
00 Z z N
^• = O
VEG PLOT 36 ~ C7 pp+
S♦ W t+I
Z 1 F
VEG PLOT 34 Q Q
X _ VEG PLOT 14 Q N
per! O m
ar Z H
J
N J
CONSERVATION EASEAAENT nm DEC 2011
BEGIN T3
CURRENT
CONDITION
PLAN VIEW
T 11 OF I