20030557 Ver 1_Year 7 Monitoring Report_20120823

Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland
Restoration RECEIVED
EEP Project No. 333
2011 Monitoring Report: Year 7
Construction Completed: 2004
Submission Date: May 2012
Submitted to: NCDENR -EEP
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
h
1� 1�temif ICENR
reoc.wn+
A rx
JUL -- 3 2012
NC ECOSYSTEM'
ENHANCEMENT PRO

Table of Contents
SECTION 1 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 1 Project Background and Overall Site Monitoring History
1 -1
1 2 Goals and Objectives
1 -1
1 3 Vegetation Assessment
1 -2
1 4 Stream Assessment
1 -3
1 5 Wetland Assessment
1 -5
1 6 Annual Monitoring Summary
1 -5
SECTION 2 - METHODOLOGY
2 1 Methodology 2 -1
SECTION 3 - REFERENCES
SECTION 4 - APPENDICES
List of Appendices
Appendix A — Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Figure 1
Project Vicinity Map and Directions
Table 1
Project Restoration Components
Table 2
Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3
Project Contacts Table
Table 4
Project Attribute Table
Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2 Current Condition Plan View (CPV)
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Photos Stream Station Photos
Photos Vegetation Plot Photos
Appendix C — Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7 Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Shepherds Tree Stream and May 2012
Wetland Restoration Monitoring Year 7
EEP Project No 333

SECTION 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1 Project Background and Overall Site Monitoring History
The Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration Project (Site) was developed as
a North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) project and is located in Iredell
County, southeast of Statesville between Triplett Road (SR 2362) and Knox Farm Road
(SR 2363) (Appendix A) The Shepherds Tree main channel and its tributary are first
order tributaries of Third Creek, located within the Yadkin River watershed (HUC
03040102) The site drains approximately 1 06 square miles, occupying approximately
160 acres within the 2, 10, and 100 year floodplain of Third Creek The stream and
wetland enhancement/restoration was designed by KCI Associates of North Carolina,
PA Construction activities were completed in 2004 Monitoring has been conducted
annually from 2005 to present
Beaver have been plentiful and persistent in making use of the channel since 2006 Per
EEP, the USDA wildlife control contractor that works this region has indicated that the
Third Creek corridor that runs along the Southern project border and its associated
tributaries is heavily populated with beaver As per EEP, the United States Department
of Agriculture (USDA- APHIS) has removed many beaver and dams from the site and
was directed to engage in a minimum of monthly monitoring of the site since late 2009
with visits based on reports from monitoring personnel prior to that The size of the site,
heavy vegetation, abundant surrounding beaver population, and the small nature of the
project channels combine to permit rapid re- colonization and dam construction, making
the site particularly challenging to control for beaver The area immediately surrounding
the confluence of the project main stem and the tributary in the lower third of the project
has seen the most activity, although beaver began constructing dams closer to the top
as well entering the third creek tributary from the other west side of Triplett road The
combination of extreme drought conditions and beaver precluded measurement of
channel cross - sections (required by 1 of the 7 project permits) in 2007 and 2008 to
permit measurement under fluvial conditions However, 4 cross - section overlays are
available for 2006, 2009, 2010, and 2011, spanning 6 years of elapsed time Beaver re-
colonized sections of the project again in 2011 in- between control /removal efforts, but
no dams were evident in site visits conducted by EEP in early 2012, although beaver
activity was evident
1.2 Goals and Objectives
Historically, the Site was utilized for agricultural activities and improvement projects
through the Civilian Conservation Corps, resulting in the re- alignment, ditching and
berming of Third Creek Adjacent floodplains and streams were also cleared, drained,
and ditched These activities are thought to have inhibited stream and wetland function
within the Site, resulting in a degraded riparian community
Shepherds Tree Stream and May 2012
Wetland Restoration Monitoring Year 7
EEP Project No 333

Page 1 -2
Executive Summary
The main goal of the project was to re- establish an integrated wetland - stream complex
that likely existed on the Site before its historic disturbance This wetland- stream
complex was proposed to restore ecosystem processes, structure, and composition to
mitigate for wetland functions and values that have been lost as a result of human
induced disturbances in the Yadkin River Basin The proposed mitigation plan included
stream, wetland, and riparian restoration components
The project consisted of restoring approximately 10,704 linear feet of stream, 91 acres
of forested wetland, and 5 acres of emergent wetland The stream restoration
component consisted of restoring approximately 9,904 linear feet of perennial stream
and 800 linear feet of intermittent stream A sinuous, stable pattern, with nffle -pool bed
features was constructed In- stream structures were installed to provide bank
stabilization, habitat, and maintain grade control Wetland restoration consisted of
plugging and filling agricultural ditches and planting native vegetation Riparian areas
were planted with native bare root seedlings and herbaceous cover to enhance the
riparian areas, improve habitat, and stabilize streambanks
Appendix A provides detailed project activity, history, contact information, and
watershed /site background information for this project
1.3 Vegetation Assessment
Vegetation Plots
The 2011 (year 7) vegetative assessment and vegetative plot analysis was conducted in
June 2011 Vegetation assessments were conducted following the NCEEP 2004 Stem
Counting Protocol, which consists of counting woody stems within the established
vegetation plots Approximately 91 acres were planted with various native hardwood
tree and shrub species for the Site Previous monitoring reports indicate that ten 50 ft
by 50 ft (0 057 acres) monitoring plots were established by NCDOT for this project
During the 2006 monitoring year, four additional vegetation monitoring plots were
established and included as additional vegetation plots to be monitored during
subsequent monitoring events
Success criteria established for Site vegetation plots required that the planted woody
stem count must meet a minimum density of 320 stems /acre after three years, 290
stems /acre after four years, and 260 stems /acre after five years The 2011 vegetation
monitoring results indicate that the Site is meeting vegetative success criteria All
vegetation plots excluding Plot 10 (246 stems /acre) met the success criteria individually
Average site density is approximately 491 planted stems per acre with an average of 28
live planted stems per plot A review of the total stem count, including natural recruits,
indicated an increase in the average site density to approximately 1,351 stems per acre
with an average of 77 total stems per plot The number of native woody species per
plot ranged from 7 -13, indicating good diversity as well
Shepherds Tree Stream and May 2012
Wetland Restoration Monitoring Year 7
EEP Project No 333

Page 1 -3
Executive Summary
These averages did not include vegetation data from Plots 2 or 7 due to the high density
of woody species and the anticipated lack in count accuracy (> 5000 stems per acre)
This would have skewed the site average, but needless to say the density of Plots 2 and
7 far exceed regulatory requirements Plot 2 was composed of a very dense with woody
vegetation population and was dominated by red maple (Acer rubrum), river birch
(Betula n►gra), green ash (Fraxrnus pennsylvanica), sweet gum (Liqu►dambar
styraciflua), American sycamore (Platanus occidentals), willow oak (Quercus phellos),
black willow (Salix nigra), and winged elm (Ulmus alata) Plot 7 was comparatively
dense and composed of similar woody species identified within Plot 2, however, species
within this plot were dominated by American sycamore Stem counts estimates for both
plots would have increased the current year average for identified woody stems per plot
and acre and potentially species diversity, however, data within these plots were not
collected and estimates of the increase in average stem and species counts cannot be
quantified Please refer to Appendix B for representative vegetation plot photographs
and Appendix C, Tables 6 through 9 for detailed information regarding the 2011
vegetation current conditions and monitoring data results
Overall Vegetation Assessment
Some loss of streambank vegetation was evident in previous monitoring years and is
again present as a result of recent beaver activity near the confluence area with the
unnamed tributary However, this is a small proportion of the site and the overall growth
of the riparian buffer is good and appears to have improved in most portions of the Site
Increases in vegetation along the streambank and in some historically affected areas
are most likely due to the resprouting of suspected dead saplings and new volunteer
species Black willow stakes have developed into trees that are providing significant
bank protection along the project corridor In many areas, willow trees appear to be
reducing the cross sectional areas of the restoration reach, but low flow conditions have
precluded erosion around the willows and the occurrence of debris dams
Autumn olive (Elaeagnus umbellate), Nepalese browntop (MIcrosteglum vimmeum),
Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), kudzu (Puerana lobata) and blackberry (Rubus sp )
were observed within the floodplain Kudzu is most apparent where it is encroaching
into the easement area along the easement fencing (primarily along Triplett Road) and
streambanks (approximate stationing 38 +00 through 46 +00) The area along the
streambanks appears to be consistent with last year's assessment, although it may be
advancing further upstream, away from the stream channel, and expanding into the
floodplain areas NCEEP contracted invasives control treatments in 2010 and 2011 to
primarily control the Kudzu making inroads from Triplett Road and from the berm on
Third Creek Please refer to Appendix B for areas that were the subject of treatment
1.4 Stream Assessment
Morphological measurements for the 2011 monitoring year consisted of a cross - section
re -survey and a general stability assessment to comply with the scope of monitoring
specified in the permit conditions As per EEP, channel dimension was not measured in
2007 and 2008 due to very low flow from drought conditions and areas of beaver
Shepherds Tree Stream and May 2012
Wetland Restoration Monitoring Year 7
EEP Project No 333

Page 1-4
Executive Summary
impoundment In lieu of a complete morphological survey, the main channel and its
tributary were visually assessed from the upstream point of the project (approximately
285 If upstream of Triplett Road) to the confluence with Third Creek in 2007 and 2008
In 2009, the cross - sectional surveys were resumed Certain areas have been impacted
from prior beaver inundation, which has contributed to deposition in certain areas In
addition to the beaver, the drought conditions of 2006 -2008 promoted in- channel growth
of vegetation, which was noted in many small Piedmont channels during that time The
modest valley and channel slopes make for a low energy condition, indicating it may
take some time to evacuate deposited sediments
Average bankfull width (12 06 ft) of the surveyed cross - sections is higher than the
proposed 10 20 ft However, examination of the overall vertical extent of the cross
section in each of the overlays (with the exception of XS4) indicates channel widening
was not a concern as no widening was evident when comparing the 2006 and 2011
measurements Over this same period however, some channel deposition (— mean 0 5
feet) and general decrease in cross - sectional area was noted primarily in the upper
portion of the project (XS 1,2,5,6,7) with some cross - sections demonstrating
remobilization of this sediment between the 2010 and 2011 observations (e g XS 3,7)
Although beaver frequented the area near the confluence with the tributary towards the
bottom of the project, there were dams put in place further up the valley as well The
associated backwater conditions, the migration of vegetation to the channel during the
drought, modest slopes and lesser hydrology near the top of the project are likely
contributing factors to the observed channel deposition A few of the cross - sections (4,
5 and 14) have illustrated an increase in sediment deposition from the previous
monitoring year Other cross - sections that were previously experiencing aggradation
have either scoured out (7) or have exhibited scour through all monitoring events (3)
Most of these changes can be attributed to current and historical beaver activity within
the Site
Overall, the restored channels are in fair condition, however, portions of the Site were
affected by beaver activity resulting in inundated or backwater conditions in some areas
of the mainstem and tributary The following general observations were made during the
2011 monitoring efforts
• Beaver rebuilt two dams at station 29 +00 and 78 +50 with the resulting backwater
making assessment of bed condition in these areas difficult As per EEP, the
APHIS control contractor subsequently removed the beaver and the associated
dams
Beaver related vegetation removal and impoundment have limited the
establishment of vegetation along the banks of both the main channel (74 +00 to
78 +50) and the unnamed tributary (5 +00 to 8 +00) at their confluence However,
this represents a small proportion of the project and the cross sections
surrounding these areas have either exhibited stability, narrowing and /or
floodplain deposition when compared to earlier measurements Banks have been
stable with little to no erosion noted (see cross - section overlays and Table 5)
Shepherds Tree Stream and May 2012
Wetland Restoration Monitoring Year 7
EEP Project No 333

Page 1 -5
Executive Summary
• Emergent vegetation, including broad - leaved cattail (Typha latifoha) and soft rush
(Juncus effuses), continues to grow in portions of the channel where reduced
flow velocities and previous sedimentation has occurred Primarily, this in- stream
vegetation growth is occurring between stationing 31 +00 to 32 +50, and is similar
in extent to previous years
1.5 Wetland Assessment
Seventeen automated groundwater monitoring gauges and four surface water gauges
are located on Site The monitoring gauges are programmed to record water levels
daily and were downloaded monthly in order to capture hydrologic data during the
growing season The target wetland hydrology success criterion is saturation or
inundation for at least 8 percent (15 days) of the growing season in the lower landscape
(floodplain) locations To achieve the stated hydrologic success criterion, groundwater
levels need to be within 12- inches of the ground surface for 15 consecutive days of the
April 14 to October 24 growing season
Groundwater monitoring results from the 2011 monitoring year indicated that twelve of
the seventeen groundwater gauges (1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 16) achieved
the wetland success criteria of saturation for 15 consecutive days (8 %) during the
growing season Gauges 5, 15, 10, 17, and 18 did not meet the wetland success
criteria The primary source of these gauge failures is the proximity of Third Creek and
the associated draw down with localized topographic constraints in the other areas
Within the wetland zones, hydrophytic vegetation and hydrology indicators have
developed Hydrophytic vegetation consists of a thick herbaceous layer of sedge
species (Carex spp ), rush species (Juncus spp ), and bulrush species (Scirpus spp )
and cattail in wetter areas Please refer to Appendix E for wetland plots and a summary
of wetland criteria attainment
Four surface gauges are located within the Shepherds Tree project site (three on the
main channel and one on the tributary) More than one bankfull or greater event was
recorded on the main channel and its tributary during the 2011 monitoring year
Additionally, visual assessments, such as wrack lines, were used to verify that a
bankfull or greater event occurred along the restored reaches Please refer to Appendix
D for detailed stream data tables and plots and Appendix B for the location of the
monitoring features and current conditions for the 2011 monitoring year
1.6 Annual Monitoring Summary
Overall, the Site is meeting mitigation goals in the majority of the proposed areas and
continues to mature Some zones are exhibiting lower vegetation densities and some
gauges are not meeting the wetland hydrologic thresholds
The background information provided in this report is referenced from the NCDOT
mitigation plan (prepared by KCI) and the previous monitoring report prepared by Soil
Shepherds Tree Stream and May 2012
Wetland Restoration Monitoring Year 7
EEP Project No 333

Page 1 -6
Executive Summary
and Environmental Consultants Summary information /data related to the occurrence of
items such as beaver or encroachment and statistics related to performance of various
project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and figures in the report
appendices Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in these
reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly Mitigation Plan) and in
the Mitigation Plan (formerly the Restoration Plan) documents available on EEP's
website All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices is available
from EEP upon request
Shepherds Tree Stream and May 2012
Wetland Restoration Monitoring Year 7
EEP Project No 333

eoo,— i
ow
SECTION 2
METHODOLOGY

SECTION 2
METHODOLOGY
21 Methodology
Methods employed for the Site were a combination of those established by standard
regulatory guidance and procedures documents (see below), the Shepherds Tree
Mitigation Plan (state project no 6 769001t) submitted by the NCDOT (prepared by
KCI) and the Soil and Environmental Consultants monitoring reports Vegetation
assessments were conducted following the NCDOT protocol which consists of counting
woody stems within the established vegetation plots JJG used the Flora of the
Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, and surrounding areas by Alan S Weakley as the
taxonomic standard for vegetation nomenclature for this report Precipitation data for
the hydrographs was obtained from an off -site resource in Statesville, NC weather
station (the nearest station offering daily precipitation data) through the Weather
Underground website
Shepherds Tree Stream and May 2012
Wetland Restoration Monitoring Year 7
EEP Project No 333

m"
MM
SECTION 3
REFERENCES

SECTION 3
REFERENCES
Martin, W and Nunnally, N 2001 Air and Water An Introduction to the Atmosphere
and the Hydrosphere Kendall /Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, Iowa
NCDOT 2001 Shepherds Tree Mitigation Plan (state project no 6 769001t) Raleigh,
NC
Rosgen, D L (1996) Applied River Mo►phology Wildland Hydrology Books, Pagosa
Springs, CO
Soil and Environmental Consultants, PA 2006 Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland
Restoration 2005 Annual Monitoring Report (Year 1) Raleigh, NC
State Climate Office of North Carolina (SCONC) 2007 Data retrieval from Statesville
for 1948 -01 -01 through 2007 -01 -01 NC CRONOS Database, Raleigh, North Carolina
USACOE (2003) Stream Mitigation Guidelines USACOE, USEPA, NCWRC,
NCDENR -DWQ
USACOE (1987) Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual Tech report Y -87-
1 AD /A176
Weakley, A S 2008 Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, Northern Florida, and
Surrounding Areas (Draft April 2008) University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel
Hill, NC
Shepherds Tree Stream and May 2012
Wetland Restoration Monitoring Year 7
EEP Project No 333

SECTION 4
APPENDICES
Appendix A — Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
Appendix C — Vegetation Plot Data
Appendix D — Stream Survey Data
Appendix E — Hydrologic Data
Shepherds Tree Stream and May 2012
Wetland Restoration Monitoring Year 7
EEP Project No 333

�d
APPENDIX A
PROJECT VICINITY MAP AND BACKGROUND
TABLES
Figure 1 Project Vicinity Map and Directions
Table 1 Project Restoration Components
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 Project Contacts Table
Table 4 Project Attribute Table
Shepherds Tree Stream and May 2012
Wetland Restoration Monitoring Year 7
EEP Project No 333

i;l v = f N
1 1)
t-r t ! � '� �� �l I , `�. .�.. � .p: � �;, � N •E r^�,_1 •`%f -^y � w.
�p/�on`^ i i - ��.1� "'�f�� l ��?i v1. � �V j-� � � /i•J (,�, ,j :�i; �� ' fr. � {ti ,
, ,
SrNlghlyY 1 ~' • ` ~- "'!
1 i j
I, IT f .. l�� /%'•% r. ` 1 �eL�,, r ,n,esto „rN ''- - ,-• ,• •l 1� _ — �.^
i ..I .•, 'r. -�% f r�.� cLn_ 1��:,ty �. •. .. .
s � .4<—
j',`� r r e�`S „� `l '; ,•fit. ! • .` \"�J .;,v%. i l t _�� �S1`i "��,{` ``\ �' at4�..r `i,%^ it-
IT +y %�
•^ ( ; G .i (x>ki `'� ` . ) `, 1 i ` rf ;e `"6+ }j i r j i'�o ; / �,, .-t: , , 4 e'i . `'��,: - t `• s..
t � � v� t, .. /'t \ � t 5 1 � ? t , 1 .� 1 • � ~��1
_ ,\ �,. \.'j � t s�j �l '�' � /°'' +`. 1..�(+"' % /_ ` ' `Ji t �, ��1 _.• J ! I i`�• I .i � ❑u f ; - -i M ` •�'� . -.
i� t`�i •,f v�i V � '�r. � �•,
r l a �+. rI3Mt
i,i J �� gEA1'a is 14� +1E
., a -d I t
i�t ,j Jkj`i •s • --) _ c
KS” ``- , � � +� �! �\tI ^ � �IIt ' �•'1`I ;j � f % Tt l r b
r.� �JC Ro a':w.° •;`t - ,�t,4 J.. f �(� ' � 5�.y r, 1 r A
±�p. ��� ti _._ (�. 1 J '_'�� ,• � \�.� I �1 ��!`.i �'��lIJI, li �� :� �4cFr'' ¢s it '. M r !�( /r
/ � 1; , '•�..� i' J f r• 1 ' i^ N •,i' l � '� lii `. ���4, s' �..j r.
.'�\, F`� ';_ i`x �'� �' +If ✓�` f 11 � i � l,is� \..i ir, � 1 , 6 `,• `\ /�. `�+I�. ,�} 1 t5.
�/i ,� \1'� •.i '"`i x..17' �11� �i I`.-� / '1•y ; �1, J. ..i (+��'. l,�'' �.
�\! ,:I��i} +•�`lt"�`•�._ ^� � \rJ �,('I •I^ �•�;1� /` re f ^� •,1 r � f��`f_� }\ I
f i�,l�i�4'x S`i�!•�13j�,t si . \;i'S� �`�i•,` �1.-, �tt,t�, •.P`'�"A�'� `/' .�t'�„�.,
rfl ', '✓ s 1 r=•. J' >r / t i If M U�� li �`1, s 13.' �'' ;'' `' fi Pro eCt Site f...s, �: �� y� , -j���,
l J'i,1 :h J
6-
!a
lt'` f�..,,1�_`�i/ 'r � .� %.•! i�l I{!to ,�1;t�
,• 4 \IJ f 1 S �l l i,C>! r= ti 'J�i � _ � !° `` '' �\����'— : =,``. �' ' w'I! I 1 /I '/ ;
,5
�`q
^ \\� ; ! _f} ( err ..s ✓'� l s�5,( r Jy r ��" i ..�-- I ski. ��- ��qyr� � R! • l��
�•1r �� � {,k �(�rf. -lti !'�. T7t - ..'�.- � ;�Ilf ��'P�- 1 1 _ ���.� ./-� �.�i f ``_"' � i��` � �• ,��' - -_ i•
��� J 1 1 r''` `� 1 rl J!` 1 r �j,, v lff /`... �! �'1 ft..�"l� ��• � -�� i' /r •✓ •ti,= !�!r_� - ``_
/i t ' 1 YJJJJ�rJ� - ;,.abpl j
l C_ d236
•__ oa State o 14r,�'��' ! .. � •r w' yam.,` r +/• s� / ,. r�`� �, f.
li''r�i} ��.. ,`v1f, 4•'�lh'1!'1 l��� —_ `R rf\� �, t�`W'R'.- -ice_' .1�'� .�x+Y , /•�5 _,'�.
• i. ' i r . � :u '� � .A� ; -r . �1.. -�� )�\ r � � r-� '✓ 11 '1 ��.�`. -t /- ���y � —.__; ,'.•f� i .,,� 1 �f; 5 (r'��fr_'
w� q _
K1�• ".�� ` roll ;lr`r �5r
���C:\, v 1.r•c f�� i� .✓j ' ' } t� ''a` Yii ./ � I G4_ t !� � J`. k\
/ / f i�, J t�-'� - •y,,�^� -- �� ^� � .i (i �� \5s �tl
1 1 ` } •- // - °t \ -_ t, y i spa
3 '\ , -i -� ' 4't % �� `ti✓ nom' 1
�" -��� fr .,�'(. �S .`•�/ �♦ / k *.» ��. %` �' ' �r �\r�; - 1� \a r %l. i�t} ^ % fi .1 �C� f "Z�i s`' %':t �p J�•�
'J, t? .l`. "�t /�••,rJ+,;. \\C� ^� l ��)� /� / `"fi'it .�l ~ l� ,/�,: \_- �.:,:�'7 �a /f %'_•.' Jr
Legend 1— r f � •��ti .� ax l fr,— Conservation Easement
VSGSSou: NCDOTGIS , 1� �' , l i { �� \ ; i
�(r l elj1 Restoration
yf t1}��C }
Directions to the site: i t`�l 1 r „ `�'� : ,J r 1 f(',' _ v-dor-11 y
Fmm Charlotte, NC take I -77 north to Statesville. Take exit 49A and go t
eastonUS70. Follow US 70 approximately six miles toTri Triplett I /i 2,000 1,000 0 2.0(x1
aPP Y P t �/ ! /` t 1 � t.
right. Travel for 1.5 miles, site is on the left. , , Pit t
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
.� Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
rJi Iredell County, NC
1',nfi'Me l e1D, IV Monitoring Year 7
Submittal Date: May 2012

Appendix A Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Table 1 Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project #333
Monitoring Year 7
Mitigation Credits
Stream
Riparian
Wetland
Non - riparian
Wetland
Buffer
Nitrogen
Nutrient Offset
Phosphorous
Nutrient Offset
Type
R, PI
R, C P
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
10 988 If
95 61 ac
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Project Components
Project Component/Reach ID
Stationing (ft)
Existing
Footage/
Acreage
Approach
Restoration or
Restoration
Equivalent
Restoration
Footage or
Acres
Mitigation Ratio
Perennial Mainstem Reach
0+0099+04
U
PI
Restoration
9 904 If
I I
Intermittent Tributary
0+008+00
U
PI
Restoration
800117
1 1
Piedmont/Mountam Bottomland
Hardwood Forest
N/A
U
Restoration
48 56 acres
1 I
U
Creation
37 71 acres
3 1
Piedmont/Mountain Swamp
Hardwood Forest
N/A
U
Restoration
5 acres
1 1
Low Elevation Seep
N/A
U
Preservation
4 54 acres
5 1
Phase III
N/A
U
PI
Restoration
284 If
l I
Component Summations
Restoration Level
Stream (linear
feet)
Riparian Wetland (acres)
Non - npanan
Wetland (acres)
Buffer (square
feet)
Upland (acres)
Rivenne
Non - Riverine
Restoration (R)
10,988
5356
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Enhancement (E)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
EnahncementI(E)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Enhancement 11 (E)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Creation (C)
N/A
3771
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Preservation (P)
N/A
454
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
HQ Preservation (P)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
10,988
9561
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
BMP Elements
Element
Location
Purpose /Funchon
Notes
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
BMP Elements
BR = Bioretention Cell SF = Sand Filter, SW = Stormwater Wetland, WDP = Wet Detention Pond DDP Dry Detention Pond FS = Filter Strip, S = Grassed Swale, LS =
Level Spreader NI = Natural Infiltration Area, FB = Forested Buffer
*Enhancement and Preservation reaches were not stationed
Appendix A - Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Report
Year 7

Appendix A Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project 333
Monitoring Year 7
Elapsed Time Since Grading Complete 7+ Years
Elapsed Time Since Planting Complete Unknown
Number of Reporting Years 7
Activity or Report
Data Collection Completed
Actual Completion or Delivery
Restoration Plan
N/A
Jun -01
Final Design-90%
N/A
N/A
Construction
N/A
2004
Temporary S &E mix applied to entire project
area*
Fall 2001
Fall 2001
Permanent seed mix applied to reach
Spring 2002
Spring 2002
Mitigation Plan/ As -Built (Year 0 Monitoring)
Jun - 01/2004
Jun- 01/2004
Year 1 Monitoring **
2005
Feb -06
Year 2 Monitoring **
2006
Jan -07
Year 3 Monitoring **
2007
Nov -07
Year 4 Monitoring **
2008
Dec -08
Year 5 Monitoring**
2009
Jan -10
Year 6 Monitoring **
2010
Dec -10
Year 7 Monitoring **
2011
Feb -12
*Seed and mulch is added as each section of construction is completed
* *Data is collected throughout the monitoring year
Appendix A - Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Report
Year 7

Appendix A Protect Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Table 3 Project Contacts Table
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project 333
Monitoring Year 7
Designer
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
Suite 200 Landmark Center I
4601 Six Forks Rd
Raleigh, NC 27609
Contractor's Name (Phase 1
NCDOT Highway Maintenance
Contractor's Name (Phase I
Northstate Environmental
Contractor's Name (Phase III)
NCDOT Bridge and Highway Maintenance
Planting Contractor
Unknown
Seeding Contractor
Unknown
Monitoring Performers
Jordan, Jones and Goulding
309 E Morehead Street, Suite 110
Charlotte NC 28202
Stream Monitoring, POC
Alison Nichols, 770455 -8555
lVegetation Monitoring, POC
Wetland Monitoring, POC
Appendix A - Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Report
Year 7

Appendix A Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Table 4 Project Attribute Table
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoratlon/EEP Project #333
Monitoring Year 7
— Wetland mntpuon wits not included !or this rcetmatwn project
"N /A items do not apply / aems arc unavailable / U" items arc unknown
Appendix A - Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Report
Year 7

APPENDIX 6
VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA
Figure 2 Current Condition Plan View (CCPV)
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Photos Stream Station Photos
Photos Vegetation Plot Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and May 2012
Wetland Restoration Monitoring Year 7
EEP Project No 333

( ' y
FIGURE 2 OF f
�'� NOTES:
1. GENERAL SITE DATA PROVIDED BY NCEEP.
&osysteni, 2. ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.
l'"lll lill ellicli
. _. m a lit:,.
EEP PROJECT NO. 333
IREDELL COUNTY,
NORTH CAROLINA
MONITORING YEAR 7
B
r'-
4
A 0
4 X
m
NC ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM DATE APRIL 2011
SHEPHERDS TREE STREAM & WETLAND RESTORATION SCALE 1 " -600'
JOB NO.: JJX31100
CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW
FIGURE KEY
lk
i l
,w.
. _. m a lit:,.
EEP PROJECT NO. 333
IREDELL COUNTY,
NORTH CAROLINA
MONITORING YEAR 7
B
r'-
4
A 0
4 X
m
NC ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM DATE APRIL 2011
SHEPHERDS TREE STREAM & WETLAND RESTORATION SCALE 1 " -600'
JOB NO.: JJX31100
CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW
FIGURE KEY

GAUGE 10 A�0
pR
c� Bo�NO PRY
00 GAUGE 2 /
\ CV -- 8 +00 GAUGE 6
8 , -- 0
oo
- k xoo CV -6 —.
CV -3 4 8
2 N 3
CORNFLOWER ROAD (SR 2360) x
1 0
LEGEND
GROUNDWATER GAUGE
--- - -- - -- CHANNEL CENTERLINE
SURFACE GAUGE
BANKFULL ❑ /j
RAIN GAUGE `I--
�# PHOTO POINT
2011 CURRENT CONDITION
CROSS VANE (CV) IN- STREAM VEGETATION \ u J�
J -HOOK VANE (JV) \�
STEP POOL (SSP) INVASIVE SPECIES -KUDZU NCDOT- SHEP -2 FTrRogo GAUGE 30
ROOT WAD SURFACE GAUGE - FAILED N = 726,169.91 E = 1,472,847.50 (SR 23 GRAPHIC ALE
ELEV. = 737.21 62)
® BEAVER VEGETATION PLOT BANK SCOUR - SEVERE 100 0 s0 100 200 400
DAM
( FEET )
1 i h = 100 ft.
NOTES:
EEP PROJECT NO. 333 NC ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM DATE APRIL 2011
1. GENERAL SITE DATA PROVIDED BY NCEEP. IREDELL COUNTY, SHEPHERDS TREE STREAM & WETLAND RESTORATION SCALE 1" =100'
}�'�, t�Ill 2. ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. NORTH CAROLINA JOB NO.: JJX31100
I;tiicnlca MONITORING YEAR 7 CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW
n��µ FIGURE 1 OF 6

0 5
ON N P 6 10 GAUGE 8 (Not Pictured)
S Q� O is 487' due north of STA 25 +00
O
�GN Gv� JV -3 +
co co
cv
LL
1V -4 Q O
®GAUGE 4 �" '� 0
w
14
11 CV -10 - �� XO GAUEC4 ---. px�o �
�� z
Q ULL_
GRAPHIC SCALE CV -12 °° JV -5 Q w
w
C
100 0 50 100 200 400 L V
( IN FEET )
\ 1 inch = 100 ft.
�O LEGEND
va 00 GROUNDWATER GAUGE
CHANNEL CENTERLINE
SURFACE GAUGE
BANKFULL 11 RAIN GAUGE
## PHOTO POINT
CROSS VANE (CV) 2011 CURRENT CONDITION
0o GAUGE 5 IN- STREAM VEGETATION
J -HOOK VANE (JV)
STEP POOL (SSP) INVASIVE SPECIES -KUDZU
ROOT WAD O SURFACE GAUGE - FAILED
RI VEGETATION PLOT BANK SCOUR - SEVERE
BEAVER DAM
�`-
EEP PROJECT NO. 333 NC ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM DATE APRIL 2011
NOTES:
SHEPHERDS TREE STREAM &WETLAND RESTORATION SCALE 1" -100'
1. GENERAL SITE DATA PROVIDED BY NCEEP. IREDELL COUNTY,
2. ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. NORTH CAROLINA JOB NO.: JJX31100
MONITORING YEAR 7
Ell "IcWlsclllci'' CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW �' FIGURE 2 OF 6

GAUGE 11 O
/ Q
LEGEND 0 y v-
CHANNEL CENTERLINE / / GAUGE 12 JV -9
BANKFULL , , 8 +O JV - ?0
A# PHOTO POINT o 19 CV --17
CROSS VANE (CV)
J -HOOK VANE (JV) 32 +00
STEP POOL (SSP)
CV -15'^ — 17
ROOT WAD
( CV -16 k°v
® VEGETATION PLOT a 16
JV -6 ,°
O GROUNDWATER GAUGE V-14
SURFACE GAUGE
RAIN GAUGE
j 15 JV -7
011 CURRENT CONDITION
IN- STREAM VEGETATION
INVASIVE SPECIES -KUDZU
SURFACE GAUGE - FAILED Q
GRAPHIC SCALE
BANK SCOUR — SEVERE :(� OGAUGE 7 100 0 50 100 200 400
BEAVER DAM Q
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 100 ft.
NOTES:
EEP PROJECT NO. 333 NC ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM DATE APRIL 2011
1. GENERAL SITE DATA PROVIDED BY NCEEP. IREDELL COUNTY, SHEPHERDS TREE STREAM & WETLAND RESTORATION SCALE 1" =100'
2. ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. NORTH CAROLINA JOB NO.: JJX31100
It ��li clIni� MONITORING YEAR 7 CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW
npb4kM1
FIGURE 3 OF 6

Vol
O
V)
W
ry
r�
v
LL
W
W
()
Q
w
_Z
U
Q
LEGEND
JV -11 O
N�5
CV -18
CHANNEL CENTERLINE
BANKFULL
APHOTO POINT
CROSS VANE (CV)
J -HOOK VANE (JV)
STEP POOL (SSP)
ROOT WAD
® VEGETATION PLOT
�CV-19
1!1 A, q.k00
OGAUGE 10
b
2011
GROUNDWATER GAUGE
SURFACE GAUGE
RAIN GAUGE
CURRENT CONDITION
IN- STREAM VEGETATION
INVASIVE SPECIES-KUDZ#
' ■��iGii'��
BANK
BEAVER DAM
JV -12
21 \u.
CV -20 I/" o
/111 0
�A
X
50 +00
JV713
SURFACE
13
A4 60Ar0
CV -22
.� CV-23 -
JV -J14 JV -15
' 9
00�
oN
v
GRAPHIC SCALE
O
L0
I
100 0 50 100 200
400
CV
(O
( IN FEET )
CO
ILL.
O
GAUGE 14
O
EEP PROJECT NO. 333
IREDELL COUNTY,
NORTH CAROLINA
MONITORING YEAR 7
NC ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
SHEPHERDS TREE STREAM & WETLAND RESTORATION
DATE
SCALE
JOB NO.:
APRIL 2011
1" -100'
JJX31100
CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW
Ld
Ld
of
4 OF 6
Z
:D
J
CD
U
~
LLI
GAUGE 13
Q
LLJ
0
:2
07
�A
X
50 +00
JV713
SURFACE
13
A4 60Ar0
CV -22
.� CV-23 -
JV -J14 JV -15
' 9
00�
oN
v
GRAPHIC SCALE
GAUGE 1
I
100 0 50 100 200
400
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 100 ft.
tem
�'l ldI 'CIllliif
NOTES:
1. GENERAL SITE DATA PROVIDED BY NCEEP.
2. ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.
EEP PROJECT NO. 333
IREDELL COUNTY,
NORTH CAROLINA
MONITORING YEAR 7
NC ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
SHEPHERDS TREE STREAM & WETLAND RESTORATION
DATE
SCALE
JOB NO.:
APRIL 2011
1" -100'
JJX31100
CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW
FIGURE
4 OF 6

I LEGEND
CHANNEL CENTERLINE
BANKFULL
APHOTO POINT
CROSS VANE (CV)
J -HOOK VANE (JV)
STEP POOL (SSP)
ROOT WAD
O GROUNDWATER GAUGE
SURFACE GAUGE
RAIN GAUGE
2011 CURRENT CONDITION
IN- STREAM VEGETATION
INVASIVE SPECIES -KUDZU
SURFACE GAUGE - FAILED
® VEGETATION PLOT BANK SCOUR - SEVERE
BEAVER DAM
O \
n Q0
Q O
W W
Z ry
J
U
w
Q W
:2 (n
x
0
SSP -1
33
SSP- 2
ko•�SSP -3
0
��. SS - 4
XS 12
k o SURFACE
GAUGE 2
V)
x 3
--
SSP - 7
Bg -tin„ S0P -6 kv
00
O "
CV -28
CV -27 J_:i -9.
00 74 +00 30
cn
x --_
11
( IN FEET ) JV -18
1 inch = 100 ft.
0GAUGE 15
v�o
-o
oN
v
82 +00
CV -30 �'
8 ''
A
Oxon /
o
JV -20
CV -29
I--,
O
L0
N CU
Q O
Ld Ld
J (D
U LL_
~ W
Q W
EEP PROJECT NO. 333 NC ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM DATE APRIL 2011
NOTES: IREDELL COUNTY, SHEPHERDS TREE STREAM & WETLAND RESTORATION SCALE 1" =100'
1. GENERAL SITE DATA PROVIDED BY NCEEP.
NORTH CAROLINA JOB NO.: JJX31100
2. ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.
E i l7I eilliC MONITORING YEAR 7 CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW
r" *_ FIGURE 5 OF 6

Q
No
a
a
Q
�Q
�X
QJ
�J
I LEGEND
CHANNEL CENTERLINE
BANKFULL
APHOTO POINT
CROSS VANE (CV)
J -HOOK VANE (JV)
STEP POOL (SSP)
ROOT WAD
R I VEGETATION PLOT
SURFACE 10
GAUGE 3
r x ' CV -31
`off -T, 36 CV -32
JV -21 / CP
✓ 4 +00
GAUGE 17
GRAPHIC SCALE
100 0 50 100 200 400
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 100 ft.
NOTES:
1. GENERAL SITE DATA PROVIDED BY NCEEP.
2. ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.
00 GROUNDWATER GAUGE
SURFACE GAUGE
RAIN GAUGE
2011 CURRENT CONDITION
IN- STREAM VEGETATION
INVASIVE SPECIES -KUDZU
SURFACE GAUGE - FAILED
' I
ENM BEAVER DAM
GAUGE 18
0
'JV -23
CV -33
Ut
NCDOT- SHEP -5
N = 725, 309.72
E = 1, 479, 717.81
ELEV. = 731.86 ,
\
0
$k0 JV -2
\" l90
A
0
DOUBLE
STEP POOL_
EEP PROJECT NO. 333
IREDELL COUNTY,
NORTH CAROLINA
MONITORING YEAR 7
NC ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM DATE APRIL 2011
SHEPHERDS TREE STREAM & WETLAND RESTORATION SCALE 1" =100'
JOB NO.: JJX31100
CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW
FIGURE 6 OF 6

Appendix B Visual Assessment Data
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Main Channel (9,904 131f)
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project #333
Monitoring Year 7
u unxnown
*Several structures have been buned with sedunent and therefore a majority of the structures could not be assessed
Adjust %
Number
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
FFot
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Category
Sub-Category
Metric
as Intended
As -Built
Segments
as Intended
V etation
V etation
Ve etation
1 Bed
1 Vertical Stability
Aggradanon
2
84%
Degradation
0
100%
(Riffle and Run umts)
2 Riffle Condition
Tcxture/Substrate
0
U
0%
3 Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
U
150
U
Condition
length Appropriate
U
150
U
Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
U
150
U
4 Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide)
j U
j 150
U
2 Bank
I Scoured/Eroded
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour
and erosion
2
115
99%
2
115
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely
2 Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
providing habitat
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totals
2
115
97%
2
115
100%
3 Engineered
Structures*
1 Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
U
57
U
2 Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
U
57
U
29 Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms
U
57
U
3 Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%
57
57
100%
4 Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining —Max Pool Depth Bankfull Depth >_ 16
RootwadsAo providing some cover at baseflow
U
57
U
u unxnown
*Several structures have been buned with sedunent and therefore a majority of the structures could not be assessed

Appendix B Visual Assessment Data
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Tributary (8001f)
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restorahon/EEP Project #333
Monitoring Year 7
u unKnown
Adjust %
Number
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Category
Sub-Category
Metric
as Intended
As -Built
Se ments
Footage
as Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
I Bed
1 Vertical Stability
Aggradation
1
800
0%
Degradation
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2 Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
0
U
0%
3 Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
U
7
U
Condition
Length Appropriate
U
7
U
7lialweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
7
7
100%
4 Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide)
7
7
100%
2 Bank
I Scoured/Eroded
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour
and erosion
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undereut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely
2 Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
providing habitat
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totals
0
0
1000/0
0
0
1000/.
3 Engineered
Structures
I Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
U
7
U `
2 Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
U
7
U
2a Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms
U
7
U -
3 Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%
7
7
100%
r4 Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining -Max Pool Depth Bankfull Depth ? 1 6
iRootwads/lo_gs providing some cover at base0ow
U
7
U
u unKnown

Appendix B Visual Assessment Data
Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restorahon/EEP Protect #333
Monitoring Year 7
Planted Acreage 91
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
(acres)
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of
Planted
Acreage
Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material
01
0
0
0%
Low Stem Density Areas
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 4 or 5 stem count criteria
0 1
0
0
0%
Total
0
0
0%
Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small given the momtormg year
025
0
0
10%
Easement Acreage 1649
Mapping
% of
Threshold
Number of
Combined
Planted
Vegetation Category
Definitions
S
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale)
1000
3
U
U
Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale)
none
Various
U
U
Locations

Photo Point 1- Vegetation Plot
(MY 2 — 9/2006)
Photo Point 1- Vegetation Plot
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Photo Point 2 -View Upstream Photo Point 2 -View Upstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 9/2006) Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/BEP Project No. 333
I?n jai einent Monitoring Year 7 im
Submittal Date: May 2012

Photo Point 2 -View Downstream
(MY 2 — 9/2006)
Photo Point 3 -View Upstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 9/2006)
Photo Point 2 -View Downstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Photo Point 3 -View Upstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/BEP Project No. 333
II,n �� � meat Monitoring Year 7
Submittal Date: May 2012

Photo Point 3 -View Downstream
(MY 2 — 9/2006)
Photo Point 4 -View Upstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 9/2006)
Photo Point 3 -View Downstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Photo Point 4 -View Upstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
.. Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
JShepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
Monitoring Year 7 ig
Submittal Date: May 2012

Photo Point 4 -View Downstream
(MY 2 — 9/2006)
Photo Point 5 -View Upstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 9/2006)
Photo Point 4 -View Downstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Photo Point 5 -View Upstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
rJ Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
Monitoring Year 7
Submittal Date: May 2012

Photo Point 5 -View Downstream
(MY 2 — 9/2006)
Photo Point 5 -View Downstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Photo Point 6 -View Upstream Photo Point 6 -View Upstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 9/2006) Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
I';►� jai c�ncnl Monitoring Year 7 im
Submittal Date: May 2012

Photo Point 6 -View Downstream
(MY 2 — 9/2006)
Photo Point 7 -View Upstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 9/2006)
Photo Point 6 -View Downstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Photo Point 7 -View Upstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
�7 Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/BEP Project No. 333
F11 za► meat Monitoring Year 7
Submittal Date: May 2012

Photo Point 7 -View Downstream
(MY 2 — 9/2006)
Photo Point 8 -View Upstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 9/2006)
Photo Point 7 -View Downstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Photo Point 8 -View Upstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
�`' Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restomtion/EEP Project No. 333
I n �< < ,1 efll Monitoring Year 7 IR
Submittal Date: May 2012

Photo Point 8 -View Downstream
(MY 2 — 9/2006)
Photo Point 9 -View Upstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 9/2006)
Photo Point 8 -View Downstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Photo Point 9 -View Upstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
r. `' Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/BEP Project No. 333
I,n is meat Monitoring Year 7 PR
Submittal Date: May 2012

Photo Point 9 -View Downstream
(MY 2 — 9/2006)
Photo Point 10 -View Upstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 9/2006)
Photo Point 9 -View Downstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Photo Point 10 -View Upstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
feShepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
j'A1 1.11 ei>>c»t Monitoring Year 7 ig
�W Submittal Date: May 2012

Photo Point 10 -View Downstream
(MY 2 — 9/2006)
Photo Point 11 -View Upstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 9/2006)
Photo Point 10 -View Downstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Photo Point 11 -View Upstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
r.— Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
EII Iai lit Monitoring Year 7 19
Submittal Date: May 2012

Photo Point 11 -View Downstream
(MY 2 — 9/2006)
Photo Point 12 -View Upstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 9/2006)
Photo Point 11 -View Downstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Photo Point 12 -View Upstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 8/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
�7 Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
En Iai moment Monitoring Year 7 im
Submittal Date: May 2012

Photo Point 12 -View Downstream
(MY 2 — 9/2006)
Photo Point 13 -View Upstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 9/2006)
Photo Point 12 -View Downstream
(MY 7 — 8/2011)
Photo Point 13 -View Upstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
�7 Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
I' ;n �a� meat Monitoring Year 7 Irle
Submittal Date: May 2012

Photo Point 13 -View Downstream
(MY 2 — 9/2006)
Photo Point 14 -View Upstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 9/2006)
Photo Point 13 -View Downstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Photo Point 14 -View Upstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
41161i Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
L n Monitoring Year 7
Submittal Date: May 2012

Photo Point 14 -View Downstream
(MY 2 — 9/2006)
Photo Point 15 -View Upstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 9/2006)
Photo Point 14 -View Downstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Photo Point 15 -View Upstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
110Ament '' Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
l,), )� Monitoring Year 7
Submittal Date: May 2012

Photo Point 15 -View Downstream
(MY 2 — 9/2006)
Photo Point 16 -View Upstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 9/2006)
Photo Point 15 -View Downstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Photo Point 16 -View Upstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
�fem Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
I';n paint Monitoring Year 7
Submittal Date: May 2012

Photo Point 16 -View Downstream
(MY 2 — 9/2006)
Photo Point 17 -View Upstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 9/2006)
Photo Point 16 -View Downstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Photo Point 17 -View Upstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
�7 Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
Fat tai CiilCllt Monitoring Year 7
Submittal Date: May 2012

Photo Point 17 -View Downstream
(MY 2 — 9/2006)
Photo Point 18- Vegetation Plot
Main Channel (MY 2 - 9/2006)
Photo Point 17 -View Downstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Photo Point 18- Vegetation Plot
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
I';t� saiinenl Monitoring Year 7 ig
.�.W Submittal Date: May 2012

Photo Point 19 -View Upstream
(MY 2 — 9/2006)
Photo Point 19 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 9/2006)
Photo Point 19 -View Upstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Photo Point 19 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
�7 Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
Ln t menf Monitoring Year 7
Submittal Date: May 2012

Photo Point 20 -View Upstream
(MY 2 — 9/2006)
Photo Point 20 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 9/2006)
Photo Point 20 -View Upstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Photo Point 20 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
Lii �JI nt Monitoring Year 7 ;PC
Submittal Date: May 2012

Photo Point 21 -View Upstream
(MY 2 — 9/2006)
Photo Point 21 -View Upstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Photo Point 21 -View Downstream Photo Point 21 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 9/2006) Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
i
Monitoring Year 7
Submittal Date: May 2012

Photo Point 22 -View Upstream
(MY 2 — 9/2006)
Photo Point 22 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 9/2006)
Photo Point 22 -View Upstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Photo Point 22 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
I§n mai ,; nent Monitoring Year 7 im
Submittal Date: May 2012

Photo Point 23 -View Upstream
(MY 2 — 9/2006)
Photo Point 23 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 9/2006)
Photo Point 23 -View Upstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Photo Point 23 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
Monitoring Year 7
Submittal Date: May 2012

Photo Point 24 -View Upstream
(MY 2 — 9/2006)
Photo Point 24 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 9/2006)
Photo Point 24 -View Upstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Photo Point 24 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
�fem Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
1';n 4az Xu1cut Monitoring Year 7
Submittal Date: May 2012

Photo Point 25 -View Upstream
(MY 2 — 9/2006)
Photo Point 25 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 3/2006)
Photo Point 25 -View Upstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Photo Point 25 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
` Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
hn jai �r�� Monitoring Year 7
Submittal Date: May 2012

Photo Point 26 -View Upstream
(MY 2 — 9/2006)
Photo Point 26 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 9/2006)
Photo Point 26 -View Upstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Photo Point 26 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
Monitoring Year 7
Submittal Date: May 2012

Photo Point 27 -View Upstream
(MY 2 — 3/2006)
Photo Point 27 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 3/2006)
Photo Point 27 -View Upstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Photo Point 27 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
EJR1 nient Monitoring Year 7
Submittal Date: May 2012

Photo Point 28 -View Upstream
(MY 2 — 3/2006)
Photo Point 28 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 3/2006)
Photo Point 28 -View Upstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Photo Point 28 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
�ei Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
Monitoring Year 7
Submittal Date: May 2012

Photo Point 30 -View Upstream
(MY 2 — 3/2006)
Photo Point 30 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 3/2006)
Photo Point 30 -View Upstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Photo Point 30 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
` Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
I +41111clk - Monitoring Year 7 PC
Submittal Date: May 2012

Photo Point 31 -View Upstream
(MY 2 — 9/2006)
Photo Point 31 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 9/2006)
Photo Point 31 -View Upstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Photo Point 31 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
tJ Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
Monitoring Year 7
Submittal Date: May 2012

Photo Point 32 -View Upstream
(MY 2 — 9/2006)
Photo Point 32 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 9/2006)
Photo Point 32 -View Upstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Photo Point 32 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
r` Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
'I'll ,C nt Monitoring Year 7 Fir
Submittal Date: May 2012

Photo Point 33 -View Upstream
(MY 2 — 9/2006)
Photo Point 33 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 9/2006)
Photo Point 33 -View Upstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Photo Point 33 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
�7 Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland RestoratioWEEP Project No. 333
An ENEMA ,Went Monitoring Year 7 IN
Submittal Date: May 2012

Photo Point 34 -View Upstream
(MY 2 — 9/2006)
Photo Point 34 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 9/2006)
Photo Point 34 -View Upstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Photo Point 34 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
�7 Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
Monitoring Year 7
Submittal Date: May 2012

Photo Point 35 -View Upstream
(MY 2 — 9/2006)
Photo Point 35 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 9/2006)
Photo Point 35 -View Upstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Photo Point 35 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
Fcmfein .
1':n jaiLS;t Monitoring Year 7
Submittal Date: May 2012

Photo Point 36 -View Upstream
(MY 2 — 9/2006)
Photo Point 36 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 9/2006)
Photo Point 36 -View Upstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Photo Point 36 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
r` Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
,n nt Monitoring Year 7
Submittal Date: May 2012

Photo Point 37 -View Upstream
(MY 2 — 9/2006)
Photo Point 37 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 9/2006)
Photo Point 37 -View Upstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Photo Point 37 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
4111niu, -- Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
L. iL Monitoring Year 7 PR
Submittal Date: May 2012

Photo Point 38 -View Upstream
(MY 2 — 9/2006)
Photo Point 38 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 9/2006)
Photo Point 38 -View Upstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Photo Point 38 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/BEP Project No. 333
I�.n It i men Monitoring Year 7
Submittal Date: May 2012 01

Photo Point 39 -View Upstream
(MY 2 — 3/2006)
Photo Point 39 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 9/2006)
Photo Point 39 -View Upstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Photo Point 39 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
I' jai anent Monitoring Year 7 81
Submittal Date: May 2012

Cross Section 1 -View Upstream
(MY 2 — 1/2007)
Cross Section 1 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 1/2007)
Cross Section 1 -View Upstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Cross Section 1 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Y Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
[al fai =,c Monitoring Year 7
Submittal Date: May 2012

Cross Section 2 -View Upstream
(MY 2 — 1/2007)
Cross Section 2 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 1/2007)
Cross Section 2 -View Upstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Cross Section 2 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
�tcm Monitoring Year 7
Submittal Date: May 2012

Cross Section 3 -View Upstream
(MY 2 — 1/2007)
Cross Section 3 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 1/2007)
Cross Section 3 -View Upstream
(MY 7 — 8/2011)
Cross Section 3 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 8/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
EI lai cent Monitoring Year 7 Fir
Submittal Date: May 2012

Cross Section 4 -View Upstream
(MY 2 — 1/2007)
Cross Section 4 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 1/2007)
Cross Section 4 -View Upstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Cross Section 4 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
�7 Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
[?tl jai i_itic>»( Monitoring Year 7
Submittal Date: May 2012

Cross Section 5 -View Upstream
(MY 2 — 1/2007)
Cross Section 5 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 1/2007)
Cross Section 5 -View Upstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Cross Section 5 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
Monitoring Year 7
�.w Submittal Date: May 2012

Cross Section 6 -View Upstream
(MY 2 — 1/2007)
Cross Section 6 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 1/2007)
Cross Section 6 -View Upstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Cross Section 6 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
I,,, ,�,� ttem� Monitoring Year 7
Submittal Date: May 2012

Cross Section 7 -View Upstream
(MY 2 — 1/2007)
Cross Section 7 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 1/2007)
Cross Section 7 -View Upstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Cross Section 7 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
It'll I'll '(1111 1t Monitoring Year 7
Submittal Date: May 2012 im

Cross Section 8 -View Upstream
(MY 2 — 1/2007)
Cross Section 8 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 1/2007)
^FOF
3%lw :f�•�:
_ Y
Cross Section 8 -View Upstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Cross Section 8 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
�7 Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
f ,n inu�;t Monitoring Year 7
�W Submittal Date: May 2012

Cross Section 9 -View Upstream
(MY 2 - 1/2007)
Cross Section 9 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 1/2007)
Cross Section 9 -View Upstream
(MY 7 - 6/2011)
Cross Section 9 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B - Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
r- - Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
L' n is ment Monitoring Year 7
Submittal Date: May 2012

Cross Section 10 -View Upstream
(MY 2 — 1/2007)
Cross Section 10 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 1/2007)
Cross Section 10 -View Upstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Cross Section 10 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
Ln M s rent Monitoring Year 7
Submittal Date: May 2012

Cross Section 11 -View Upstream
(MY 2 — 1/2007)
Cross Section 11 -View Upstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Cross Section 11 -View Downstream Cross Section 11 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 1/2007) Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
�7 Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/BEP Project No. 333
( ±;n fafflement Monitoring Year 7 Fir
Submittal Date: May 2012

Cross Section 12 -View Upstream
(MY 2 — 9/2006)
Cross Section 12 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 9/2006)
Cross Section 12 -View Upstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Cross Section 12 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
Mil,# Monitoring Year 7
Submittal Date: May 2012

Cross Section 13 -View Upstream
(MY 2 — 9/2006)
Cross Section 13 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 9/2006)
Cross Section 13 -View Upstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Cross Section 13 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
�7 Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
14,1111 al 21Iac,ll Monitoring Year 7
.�. Submittal Date: May 2012 ig

Cross Section 14 -View Upstream
(MY 2 — 9/2006)
Cross Section 14 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 9/2006)
Cross Section 14 -View Upstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Cross Section 14 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
Ell Iai c1nellt Monitoring Year 7
Submittal Date: May 2012

Cross Section 15 -View Upstream
(MY 2 — 9/2006)
Cross Section 15 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 9/2006)
Cross Section 15 -View Upstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Cross Section 15 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
1 n �< 1 11 ent Monitoring Year 7 opt
Submittal Date: May 2012

Cross Section 16 -View Upstream
(MY 2 — 1/2007)
Cross Section 16 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 2 - 1/2007)
Cross Section 16 -View Upstream
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Cross Section 16 -View Downstream
Main Channel (MY 7 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
l . , �a c in 1. Monitoring Year 7
Submittal Date: May 2012

Vegetation Plot 1
(MY 2 - 5/2006)
Vegetation Plot 2
(MY 2 — 5/2006)
Vegetation Plot 1
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Vegetation Plot 2 — Photo 1
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Vegetation Plot Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
' Monitoring Year 7
t a� 'll �enl Submittal Date: May 2012

Vegetation Plot 2 — Photo 2
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Vegetation Plot 2 — Photo 3
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Vegetation Plot 2 — Photo 4
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Vegetation Plot Photos
�' Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
111"f, em Monitoring Year 7
i :n rcincnf Submittal Date: May 2012

Vegetation Plot 3
(MY 2 - 5/2006)
Vegetation Plot 4
(MY 2 — 5/2006)
Vegetation Plot 3
(MY 7 - 6/2011)
Vegetation Plot 4
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Vegetation Plot Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
l ain nil Monitoring Year 7 riv
Submittal Date: May 2012

Vegetation Plot 5
(MY 2 - 5/2006)
Vegetation Plot 6
(MY 2 — 5/2006)
Vegetation Plot 5
(MY 7 - 6/2011)
Vegetation Plot 6
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Vegetation Plot Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
ein Monitoring Year 7
Submittal Date: May 2012

Vegetation Plot 7
(MY 2 - 5/2006)
Vegetation Plot 8
(MY 2 — 5/2006)
Vegetation Plot 7
(MY 7 - 6/2011)
Vegetation Plot 8
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Vegetation Plot Photos
�, Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
Lill Monitoring Year 7
"U.- Submittal Date: May 2012

Vegetation Plot 9
(MY 2 - 5/2006)
Vegetation Plot 10
(MY 2 — 5/2006)
Vegetation Plot 9
(MY 7 - 6/2011)
Vegetation Plot 10
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Vegetation Plot Photos
r, Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project No. 333
E'tit Monitoring Year 7
}'�� �`�� c�33`, °�} Submittal Date: May 2012

Vegetation Plot 11
(MY 2 - 5/2006)
Vegetation Plot 12
(MY 2 — 5/2006)
Vegetation Plot l 1
(MY 7 - 6/2011)
Vegetation Plot 12
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Vegetation Plot Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project No. 333
' Ctn Monitoring Year 7
`° cmci }I Submittal Date: May 2012

Vegetation Plot 13
(MY 2 - 5/2006)
Vegetation Plot 14
(MY 2 — 5/2006)
Vegetation Plot 13
(MY 7 - 6/2011)
Vegetation Plot 14
(MY 7 — 6/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix B Visual Assessment Data Prepared By:
Vegetation Plot Photos
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 333
1;��►system Monitoring Year 7
" Submittal Date: May 2012

JJG
APPENDIX C
VEGETATION PLOT DATA
Table 7 Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Table 8 Not Included — Shepherds Tree is monitored on the 2004
NCEEP Stem Count Protocol
Table 9 Stem Count Total and Planted by Plat and Species
Shepherds Tree Stream and May 2012
Wetland Restoration Monitoring Year 7
EEP Project No 333

Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7 Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project #333
Monitoring Year 7
Vegetation Plot ID
Vegetation Survival Threshold
Met (Y/N)
Plot 1
Y
Plot 2
Y
Plot 3
Y
Plot 4
Y
Plot 5
Y
Plot 6
Y
Plot 7
Y
Plot 8
Y
Plot 9
Y
Plot 10
Y
Plot 11
Y
Plot 12
Y
Plot 13
Y
Plot 14
Y
Appendix C - Vegetation Plot Data
Shepherd's Tree Monitoring Report
Year 7

Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data
Table 9 Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project #333
Monitoring Year 7
Species
Common Notre
Tv pe
Current Data (MY7 2011)
Annual Mean
Plot 1
Plot 2•
Plot 3
Plot 4
Plot 5
Plot 6
Plot 7•
Plot 8
Plot 9
Plot 10
Plot 11
Plot 12
Plot 13
Plot 14
Current Mean
MY1 2005
MY2 2006
MY3 -2007
MY4 -2008
MY5 2009
MY6 2010
P
T
P T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
Acernegundo
hoxelder
T
I
1
1
1
1
3
14
1
8
4
32
6
12
2
4
4
9
2
2
7
7
7
8
5
13
5
7
5
8
car rubtitm
red maple
T
17
4
2
1
4
4
13
3
6
15
I
2
3
25
1
24
2
12
N/A
WA
N/A
N/A
N/A
13
N/A
13
N/A
10
N/A
10
Alnus semdara
tag alder
T/S
2
7
1
2
2
5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
6
N/A
4
N/A
4
N/A
4
Betula nm
riverbvch
T
1
2
I
2
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
N/A
WA
N/A
N/A
N/A
7
N/A
5
N/A
3
N/A
3
Ce halanthtrs orrtdenfalrs
button bush
T/S
2
7
3
8
8
5
6
3
3
2
2
2
3
2
5
2
2
2
2
Corns amotnum
smlky dogwood
S
I
1
1
1
1
6
7
1
3
3
N/A
VA
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2
N/A
2
N/A
2
Fraatnuspennsylvamrn
green ash
T
2
4
11
16
2
2
2
2
1
1
3
7
10
17
6
12
4
14
7
10
7
IS
6
9
6
11
6
6
9
9
9
12
7
14
7
10
6
10
Juntperus t trgmmna
eastern red cedar
T
I
N/A
1
N/A
VA
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Lt mrrdambarst)mct na
sweet gum
T
1
2
4
4
1
4
1
2
N/A
2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
8
N/A
4
N/A
4
N/A
3
Lrnodendmn ndtpmjera
tulip poplar
T
1
1
2
I
1
1
2
5
5
5
5
5
6
5
7
1
2
1
2
Nyssas hattca
black gum
T
I
1
1
1
N/A
I
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3
N/A
4
N/A
4
N/A
4
Platanus occrdenralts
Sycamore
T
7
10
3
61
3
11
8
13
4
9
16
11
15
10
19
1
9
7
12
6
6
10
10
10
11
10
20
10
21
9
20
Poptdus deltoides
cottonwood
T
1
1
1
I
1
I
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
I
N/A
1
N/A
1
Finns faeda
loblolly one
T
I
1
N/A
I
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
ercus hrota
overcup oak
T
2
4
8
10
4
8
2
I
1
2
2
6
6
4
4
10
10
5
5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Qrerrus mmehauau
swamp chestnut oak
T
2
2
8
9
3
3
1
2
2
2
1
1
3
6
7
2
8
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
8
5
9
6
6
4
5
Q ercus m ra
water oak
T
1
7
3
4
3
3
8
10
3
6
4
5
5
3
5
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
5
2
5
2
4
ercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
T
16
16
3
6
1
1
2
4
3
7
7
6
5
5
5
5
5
6
5
8
5
6
5
6
Q ereus phellos
willow oak
T
3
3
1
I
3
6
1
1
8
9
5
6
12
16
4
6
1
2
6
2
4
5
2
2
4
4
3
5
4
9
4
6
4
6
Salta m ra
black willow
T
2
6
5
2
1
1
3
4
2
6
1
22
2
7
6
6
4
4
4
6
4
11
4
6
4
7
Salraserreea
silky willow
T
7
9
N/A
8
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Sambucrts canadensrs
elderberry
S
1
I
1
9
1
5
N/A
N!A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Ulmus alara
winged elm
T
5
I
45
3
4
3
14
4
26
4
l4
N/A
N!A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2
N/A
1
N/A
1
N/A
3
Plot Area acres
0 057
Species Count
11
7
13
10
12
9
11
7
13
8
13
8
12
4
10
6
7
9
11
8
13
8
11
8
11
5
5
5
8
5
7
10
18
10
18
Stem Count
�25
66
2 2
57
30
46
26
45
29
113
20
101
41
76
14
40
22
78
48
69
33
113
26
120
28
77
19
29
29
64
26
45
46
101
42
99
Stems per Acre
439
1158
386
1 1000
526
807
456
1 789
509
1982
351
1772
1 719
1333
246
1 702 1
386
1 1368 1
842
1211
579
1 1982
456
2105
1 491
1351
340
528
524
1174
482
831
470
1242
1 436
1 1321
Type =Shrub or Tree
Appendix C - Vegetation Plot Data
Shepherds Tree Monnoting Report
Year 7

RMERREEMM
APPENDIX D
STREAM SURVEY DATA
Figure 3a -3p Cross - sections with Annual Overlays
Figure 4 N/A
Figure 5 N/A
Tables 10a, b Baseline Stream Data Summary Tables
Table 11a Morphologic and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Table 11 b Stream Reach Data Summary
Shepherds Tree Stream and May 2012
Wetland Restoration Monitoring Year 7
EEP Project No 333

Appendix D. Stream Survey Data
Figure 3a: Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project #333
Main Channel
Monitoring Year 7
Project Name
She herds Tree
EEP Project Number
333
Cross - Section ID
XS- I, RiMe
Survey Date
6/2011
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
99.29
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft=)
7.78
Bankfull Width ft
7.21
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
100.91
Flood Prone Width ft
>100
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.08
Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.62
W/D Ratio
1 6.68
Entrenchment Ratio
i >i .2
Bank Height Ratio
1.00
Station
Elevation
Notes
-3
98.93
xl
-3
98.87
xl
0
98.90
xl
3
98.91
x1
6
98.85
xl
9
98.85
x1
12
98.85
x1
15
99.06
x1
18
99.25
x1
21
99.29
xl
21.8
98.32
xl
23
98.04
xi
24
97.84
xl
25
97.67
xl
26
97.97
xl
27.2
98.39
X1
28.1
99.36
xl
29
99.29
xl
32
99.58
X1
35
99.06
X1
38
99.01
xl
41
98.97
x]
44
98.82
x I
47
98.70
xl
50
98.83
xl
53.2
98.68
x1
53.2
98.72
xl
XS-1: View Downstream
Shepherds Tree (Main Channel) -MY7
Cross - Section 1- Riffle
100
99.5
�d 98.5
it
d
o
98
w
97.5
97
96.5
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0
station (ft)
-MY1 -9/2006 - Mr5-1 /2010 � MY6- 11/2010 -MY7.6r2011 ....... B.,kfhu

Appendix D. Stream Survey Data
Figure 3b: Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Shepherds Tree•Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project #333
Main Channel
Monitoring Year 7
Project Name
Shepherds Tree
EEP Project Number
333
Cross - Section ID
XS -2, Pool
Survey Date
6/2011
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
100.11
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft')
4.93
Bankfull Width ft
7.64
Flood Prone Area Elevation f[
101.43
Flood Prone Width ft
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.64
Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.32
W/D Ratio
11.94
Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
Bank Height Ratio
1.15
Station
Elevation
Notes
0
99.88
x2
0
99.865
x2
0.9
99.94
x2
3.9
100.05
x2
6.9
100.1
x2
9.9
100.24
x2
12.9 1
100.22
x2
15.9
100.33
x2
18.9
100.33
x2
19.9
100.21
x2
20.9
99.93
x2
21.9
99.65
x2
22.6
99.65
x2
22.9
99.23
x2
23.9
99.115
x2
24.9
98.79
x2
25.9
99.015
x2
26.4
99.66
x2
27.9
100.11
x2
28.9
100.3
x2
29.9
100.27
x2
30.9
100.22
x2
33.9
100.07
x2
36.9
1 99.89
x2
39.9
99.89
x2
42.9
99.88
x2
45.9
99.97
x2
48.9
99.96
x2
49.1
99.96
x2
49.1
100.1
x2
XS-2: View Upstream
XS-2: View Downstream
Shepherds Tree (Main Channel) -MY7
Cross- Section 2 -Pool
101
100.5
100
.. ...... ...................... ................... .. ....... ....... ..
99.5
S
•a
i 99
'm
98.5
98
97.5
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0
Station (ft)
�MYI42006 -MYS -12010 --o-MY6- 11/2010 -MY7 -62011 ......• Bankfull

Appendix D. Stream Survey Data
Figure 3c: Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project #333
Main Channel
Monitoring Year 7
Project Name
Shepherds Tree
EEP Project Number
333
Cross- Section ID
XS -3, Riffle
Survey Date
6/2011
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
99.81
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
7.59
Bankfull Width ft
10.87
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
101.44
Flood Prone Width ft
>100
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.70
Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.63
W/D Ratio
15.53
Entrenchment Ratio
4.52
Bank Height Ratio
1.00
Station
Elevation`
' rNotes
4
99.69
x3
4
99.68
x3
7
99.52
x3
10
99.41
0
13
99.62
x3
16
99.89
x3
19
99.88
0
22
99.75
x3
22.3
99.71
x3
23
99.46
x3
24
99.27
x3
25
98.73
x3
26
98.32
x3
27
98.18
0
28
98.75
x3
29
99.18
x3
30
99.29
0
31
99.46
0
313
99.76
0
32
99.95
0
35
100
x3
38
100
0
41
100.09
0
44
99.97
0
47
100.05
0
50
100.08
0
53
100.03
0
53.1
100
0
XS -3: View Upstream
XS-3: View Downstream
Shepherds Tree (Main Channel) - MY7
Cross - Section 3- Riffle
100.5
100
_
99.5
..... ..... ....................... ... ................. ............... ....._
a
c
.p
99
w
98.5
98
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00
Station (ft)
_MY1 -9/2006 - 1.1Y5 -1aolo --O--ntYbnnolo - ntv7-rmn ....... Bankfull

Appendix D. Stream Survey Data
Figure 3d: Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project #333
Main Channel
Monitoring Year 7
Project Name
Shepherds Tree
EEP Project Number
333
Cross - Section ID
XS4, Riffle
Survey Date
6/2011
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
94.10
Bankroll Cross - Sectional Area (ft')
19.60
Bankfull Width ft
11.54
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
96.74
Flood Prone Width ft
>100
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.70
Bankfull Max Depth ft
2.64
W/D Ratio
1 6.79
Entrenchment Ratio
3.85
Bank Height Ratio
1.06
Station
Elevation
Notes.::
-4
94.29
x4
-4
94.185
x4
-1
94.09
x4
2
94.08
x4
5
94.31
x4
8
94.18
x4
11
94.21
x4
14
94.38
x4
15
94.36
x4
16
92.65
x4
17
92.46
x4
17.5
91.97
x4
18
91.6
x4
19
91.46
x4
20
92.01
x4
21
92.52
x4
22
92.54
x4
23
92.04
x4
24
92.29
x4
24.9
92.54
x4
26
93.12
x4
26.8
94.26
x4
28
94.38
x4
31
94.19
x4
34
94.22
x4
37
94.14
x4
40.4
94.39
x4
40.4
94.64
x4
XS4: View Upstream
XS4: View Downstream
Shepherds Tree (Main Channel) - MY7
Cross - Section 4- Riffle
95
94.5
.. ............................... .. ............................... ................. ...............................
94
E
93.5
c
c 93
L
u
92.5
92
91.5
91
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00
Station (ft)
�MY1.9 /2006 -MYS- 1/2010 �MY6- 11/2010 MY7 -6 12011 ......• Bankhll

Appendix D. Stream Survey Data
Figure 3e: Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project #333
Main Channel
Monitoring Year 7
Project Name
Shepherds Tree
F.EP Project Number
333
Cross - Section ID
XS -5, Pool
Survey Date
6/2011
SUA1MARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
94.72
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft C)
11.87
Bankfull Width ft
10.28
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
96.61
Flood Prone Width ft
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.15
Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.89
W/D Ratio
8.94
Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
Bank Height Ratio
1.03
Station
Elevation
Notes -
0
95.02
x4
0
94.77
x4
2
94.6
x4
5
94.78
x4
8
94.69
x4
11
94.64
x4
14
94.73
x4
17
94.72
x4
20
94.92
x4
21.3
94.77
x4
22
94.48
x4
22.4
94.26
x4
23
93.7
x4
24
93.41
x4
25
93.09
x4
26
93.03
x4
27
92.83
x4
28
93.14
x4
29
93.45
x4
30
93.54
x4
30.7
94.24
x4
31
94.57
x4
32.4
94.78
x4
33
94.77
x4
36
94.82
x4
39
94.88
x4
42
94.86
x4
45
94.77
x4
46.5
94.77
x4
46.5
1 94.76
x4
XS-5: View Upstream
XS-5: View Downstream
Shepherds Tree (Main Channel) - MY7
Cross - Section 5 -Pool
95.5
95
-
94.5
94
a
e 93.5
0
'A
_L
W4 93
92.5
92
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00
Station (ft)
- MYI.9/t006 - Mr5 -Irzoto - -s-MV64M2010 -Mw7 -612011 .......Bankfuu

Appendix D. Stream Survey Data
Figure 3f: Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project #333
Main Channel
Monitoring Year 7
Project Name
Shepherds Tree
EEP Project Number
333
Cross - Section ID
XS-6, Riffle
Sury ey Date
6/2011
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation f[
94.38
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft')
2.19
Bankfull Width ft
4.35
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
95.11
Flood Prone Width ft
>100
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.50
Bankfull Max Depth ft
0.73
W/D Ratio
8.70
Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
Bank Height Ratio
1.42
Station
Elevation
Notes
0
94.44
x6
0
94.36
x6
3
94.47
x6
6
94.53
x6
9
94.58
x6
12
94.68
x6
15
1 94.66
x6
18
94.71
x6
19.2
94.73
x6
21.2
94.35
x6
22
93.97
x6
23
93.69
x6
24
93.77
0
25
93.65
x6
25.4
94.40
x6
27
94.78
0
30
94.79
0
33
94.62
x6
36
94.62
x6
39
94.45
x6
42
94.57
x6
45
94.49
x6
V2
94.48
x6
XS4: View Upstream
XS-6: View Downstream
Shepherds Tree (Main Channel) - MY7
Cross - Section 6-Run
95
94.5
93.5
°o
a
93
92.5
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00
Station (ft)
�MY]-912006 -MY5.12010 --*-MY6. 112010 -MY7- 0011 ......•Bankfull

Appendix D. Stream Survey Data
Figure 3g: Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project #333
Main Channel
Monitoring Year 7
Project Name
Shepherds Tree
EEP Project Number
333
Cross- Section ID
XS-7, Pool
Survey Date
6/2011
SUMMARY DATA
Ban1dall Elevation ft
94.33
Bankfa6 Cross- Sectioeal Area (ft =)
14.78
Bankfa6 Width ft
10.06
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
96.70
Flood Prone Width ft
N/A
Bankfu6 Mean Depth ft
1.47
Bankfu6 Max Depth ft
237
W/D Ratio
6.84
Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
Bank Height Ratio
1.10
Station
.Elevation
Notes =
-5
94.41
x7
0
94.41
0
0
94.32
0
3
94.43
0
6
94.59
0
9
94.57
0
12
1 94.6
0
15
94.67
0
17.5
94.58
0
18
94.06
0
19
93.51
0
19.7
93.24
0
20
93.02
0
21
92.21
0
22
91.96
0
23
91.97
0
24
92.09
0
25
92.42
x7
25.4
93.21
0
26
93.25
0
27
93.59
0
28
94.52
0
28.5
94.82
0
29
94.86
0
30
94.81
0
31
94.76
0
34
94.79
0
37
94.87
x7
40
94.93
0
43
94.82
x7
45.6
94.74
0
45.6
1 94.94
x7
XS-7: View Upstream
X4&-7: View Downstream
Shepherds Tree (Main Channel) - MY7
Cross - Section 7 -Pool
95.5
95
94.5
................. .... ............................... ..... ........
94
93.5
93
B
•a
92.5
'm
92
91.5
91
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00
Station (ft)
- MYI.91 -MY5 -1/2010 - MY74rz011 ......• BankfWl

Appendix D. Stream Survey Data
Figure 3h: Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project #333
Main Channel
Monitoring Year 7
Shepherds Tree (Main Channel) - MY 7
Cross- Section 8 -Pool
95.5
Project Name Shepherds Tree
EEP Project Number 1333 i r ty
Cross - Section ID I XS-8, Pool'd
Survey Datc 6/2011
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft 94.73
BankfuB Cross - Sectional Area (ft) 44.35
BanitfuB Width R 24.92 t1
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft 98.22
Flood Prone Width ft N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth ft 1.78
Bankfull Max Depth ft 3.49
W/D Ratio 14.00 r
Entrenchment Ratio N/A
Bank Hei ht Ratio 1.00 XS -8: View Upstream
t 1
r
XS-8: View Downstream
943
94
Station
Elevation
Notes
0
94.89
x8
0
94.8
x8
3
94.715
x8
6
94.68
x8
9
94.66
x8
12
94.64
x8
15 1
94.62
x8
16
94.52
x8
17
94.345
x8
18
93.96
x8
19
93.84
x8
20
93.74
x8
21
9355
x8
22
9328
x8
23
92.985
x8
24.4
92.41
x8
25
92.05
x8
26
91.57
x8
27
91.54
x8
28
91.24
x8
29
91.52
x8
30
91.53
x8
31
91.66
x8
32
91.56
x8
33.4
92.31
x8
34
92.535
x8
35
92.93
x8
36
93.45
x8
37
93.85
x8
38
94.27
x8
39
94.58
x8
40
94.73
x8
43
94.77
x8
46
94.89
x8
49
94.85
x6
52
94.81
x8
55
94.79
x8
56.4
94.75
x8
56.4
94.91
x8
Shepherds Tree (Main Channel) - MY 7
Cross- Section 8 -Pool
95.5
95
943
94
93.5
93
a
0 92.5
w 92
91.5
91
90.5
0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00
Station (R)
- ttYt -9rzao6 - Ntvs•tnolo - +- t,�tY6 -unolo - hm•6notl .......a.axan

Appendix D. Stream Survey Data
Figure 3i: Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project #333
Main Channel
Monitoring Year 7
Project Name
Sh herds Tree
EEP Project Number
333
Cross - Section ID
XS- 9,Riffle
16/2011
Survey Date
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
94.30
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft=)
32.90
Bankfull Width ft
18.94
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
97.60
Flood Prone Width ft
>100
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.74
Bankfull Max Depth ft
3.30
W/D Ratio
10.89
Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
Bank Height Ratio
1.00
Station
Elevation
Notes
-6
95.02
s9
-6
95.02
x9
-3
95.11
x9
0
94.905
x9
3
94.99
x9
h
95.05
x9
9
94.97
x9
12
94.75
x9
13
94.56
x9
14
94.32
x9
15
94
x9
16
93.55
x9
17
93.14
x9
17.6
92.76
x9
1
2.37
x9
1
91.97--
x9
--TI-67-
x9
1
1.56
x9
22
91.39
x9
23
91
x9
X9
X9
26
91.61
x9
27
92.24
x9
28.2
92.765
x9
29
93.24
x9
30
93.57
x9
31
93.915
x9
32
94.14
x9
33
94.3
x9
34
94.44
x9
35
93.76
x9
38
94.71
x9
41
94.715
x9
44
9436
x9
47
95.06
x9
50.6
95.07
x9
50.6
95.11
x9
XS-9: View Upstream
XS-9: View Downstream
Shepherds Tree (Main Channel) - MY 6
Cross - Section 9 - Riffle
95.5
95
94.5
... ............................... ..... .......................... ............................... ...... ........... ...............................
93.5
c
c
93
v
w
92.5
92
91.5
91
90.5
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00
Station (it)
- MY1 -912006 -- ^--MY5 -1/2010 -0-MY611n010 MY7N2011 ......• Beafull

Appendix D. Stream Survey Data
Figure 3j: Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project #333
Main Channel
Monitoring Year 7
Project Name
She berds Tree
EEP Project Number
333
Cross - Section ID
XS-10, Pool
Survey Date
6/2011
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
95.17
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft')
25.03
Bankfull Width f[
14.20
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
98.18
Flood Prone Width ft
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.76
Bankfull Max Depth ft
3.01
'D R atio
8.07
Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
Bank Height Ratio
1.00
Station
Elevation
Notes
1.5
95.11
x10
1.5
95.06
x10
4.5
95.32
x10
7.5
94.88
x10
10.5
95.13
x10
13.5
94.93
x10
16.5
94.79
x10
19.5
95.12
x10
22.5
95.02
X10
23.5
95.005
X10
24.5
94.315
X10
25.5
93.58
X10
26.5
93.42
X10
27.8
93.085
X10
28.5
92.6
x10
29.5
92.365
x10
30.5
92.18
x10
31.5
92.16+
x10
32.5
92.33
x10
33.8
93.08
x10
35.5
94.54
X10
36.5
95.155
X10
39.5
95.14
X10
42.5
95.23
X10
45.5
95.15
X10
48.5
95.01
X10
51.5
95.07
X10
54.5
95.125
XIO
57.5
95.19
X10
60.8
95.23
X10
60.8
1 95.26
1 x I O
XS -10: View Upstream
XS -10: View Downstream
Shepherds Tree (Main Channel) -MY6
Cross - Section 10 -Pool
96
95.5
95
........ ...........................
94.5
b
c 94
c
0
93.5
m
93
92.5
92
91.5
0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00
Station (ft)
MY] -9/2006 -- -- - -MY5- 1/2010 - MY6- 11/2010 -MY7 -62011 •••••.. Bankfull

Appendix D. Stream Survey Data
Figure 3k: Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project #333
Main Channel
Monitoring Year 7
Project Name She herds Tree
EEP Project Number 333
Cross- Section ID X8-11, Pool
Survey
Bankfull Elevation ft
99.04
XS-11: View Upstream
35 '
,.
.c
XS -11: View Downstream
Bankfull Width ft
Date
6/2011
102.81
Main Channel
Cross - Section 1 I - Pool
95.5
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.94
Bankfull Max Depth ft
3.17
W/D Ratio
6.75
Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
Bank Height Ratio
95
94.5
94
-
- - - --
-
xll
9.2
93.36
xll
10
92.99
xll
II
92.74
xll
12
92.44
x I 1
93.5
92.21
xll
13.8
92.82
X11
15
93.06
m 93
16
93.54
xll
17
94.41
xll
18.3
A
xll
20
94.98
xll
23.2
92.5
w
92
xIl
23.2
94.92
xll
91.5
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00
Station (B)
20.00 25.00 30.00
�MYI -92006 -MYS- 1/2010 - MY6. 11/2010
�MY7- 6/2011 ....... Bankfull
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
99.04
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft')
25.43
Bankfull Width ft
Date
6/2011
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
99.04
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft')
25.43
Bankfull Width ft
13.10
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
102.81
Flood Prone Width ft
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.94
Bankfull Max Depth ft
3.17
W/D Ratio
6.75
Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
Bank Height Ratio
1.00
Station
Elevation
Notes
0
95.03
xll
0
94.86
x I 1
3
94.98
x11
5.1
94.98
x I 1
6
94.57
x I I
7
93.95
x11
R
93.58
xll
9.2
93.36
xll
10
92.99
xll
II
92.74
xll
12
92.44
x I 1
13
92.21
xll
13.8
92.82
X11
15
93.06
xll
16
93.54
xll
17
94.41
xll
18.3
94.81
xll
20
94.98
xll
23.2
95.07
xIl
23.2
94.92
xll

Appendix D. Stream Survey Data
Figure 31: Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project #333
Main Channel
Monitoring Year 7
Project Name She herds Tree
EEP Project
XS -12: View Upstream
a?;
1
k✓
XS -12: View Downstream
Number
333
Cross- Section ID
XS -12 Riffle
Survev Date.
6/2011
102.59
Flood Prone Width ft
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.94
Bankfull Max Depth ft
3.06
W/D Ratio
6.39
Entrenchment Ratio
4.52
Bank Height Ratio
L00
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
Number
333
Cross- Section ID
XS -12 Riffle
Survev Date.
6/2011
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
99.53
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
24.05
Bankfull Width ft
12.39
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
102.59
Flood Prone Width ft
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.94
Bankfull Max Depth ft
3.06
W/D Ratio
6.39
Entrenchment Ratio
4.52
Bank Height Ratio
L00
iStation -
- :Elevation:: -
- Notes -
0 9
99.92 x
x12
0 9
99.76 x
x12
3 9
99.86 x
x12
6 9
99.83 x
x12
9 9
99.81 x
x12
Cross - Section 12- Riffle
18 99.57 x12 101
100
.................... ....................... ......... ......... ...............................
99.5 ... ................
;�
m
a
0
97.5
'w
96.5 -
96
0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00
tdYl- 9/2006 MYS- 1/2010 tb1Y6- 112010 MY7 -hR011 ••••••• 6ankfull

Appendix D. Stream Survey Data
Figure 3m: Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project #333
Main Channel
Monitoring Year 7
Project Name
Shepherds Tree
EEP Project Number
333
Cross - Section ID
XS-13, Pool
Survey Date
6/2011
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
98.52
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
31.97
Bankfull Width ft
15000
Flood Prone Area Elevation 11
101096
Flood Prone Width ft
N/A
Bankfu6 Mean Depth ft
2.13
Bankfull! Max Depth ft
3.44
W/D Ratio
7.04
Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
Bank Height Ratio
1.00
Station
Elevation
Notes
0
99.89
x13
0
99.81
x13
3
99.82
x13
6
99.54
x13
9
99525
x13
12
99.19
x13
15
98.91
x13
18
98.8
x13
21
98.58
x13
22
98.46
x13
23.3
96.83
x13'
24
95.72
x13
25
95.37
x13
26
95.355
x13
27
95.39
x13
28
95.08
x13
29
95.25
x13
30
95.505
x13
31
95.695
x13
32
96.05
x13
33
96.83
x13
34
97.465
x 13
35
97.945
x13
36
98.45
x13
39
98.61
x13
42
98.53
x13
45
98.68
x13
48
98.6
x13
51.5
98.545
x13
51-5
98.545
x13
XS-13: View Upstream
XS-13: View Downstream
Shepherds Tree (Main Channel) - MY7
Cross - Section 13- Pool
101
100
�d 98
..................... ............................... . ............................... .00007 ...
ae
0
0
97
m
96
95
94
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Station (ft)
- MY1 -9aoo6 - nnrstrzao - 0- nav641/2010 -M"- &2011 ....... twk%ll

Appendix D. Stream Survey Data
Figure 3n: Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project #333
Main Channel
Monitoring Year 7
Project Name
She herds Tree
EEP Project Number
333
Cross - Section ID
XS -14 Riffle
Survey Date
6/2011
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
102.22
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
20.97
Bankfull Width ft
11.06
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
105.39
Flood Prone Width ft
>200
Bankfull Mean De th ft
1.90
Bankfull Max Depth ft
3.16
W/D Ratio
5.82
Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
Bank Height Ratio
1.10
Station
Elevation
- Notes
0.5
103.32
x14
3.5
103.3
x14
6.5
103.29
x14
9.5
103.36
x14
12.5
103.32
x14
15.5
103.325
x14
18.5
103.2
x14
21.5
103.125
x14
24.5
102.96
x14
27.5
102.81
x14
30.5
102.75
x14
33.5
102.55
x14
36.5
102.66
x14
37.5
101.86
x14
38.5
101.22
x14
39.5
100.59
x14
40.4
99.93
x14
41.5
99.58
x14
42.5
99.21
x14
43.5
99.055
x14
44.5
99.27
x14
45.6
99.96
x14
46.5
100.85
x14
47.5
101.89
x14
48.7
102.54
x14
49.5
102.605
x14
52.5
102.97
x14
55.5
102.83
x14
58.5
102.67
x14
61.5
102.9
x14
64
103.05
x14
64
1 103.03
x14
XS -14: View Upstream
XS -14: View Downstream
Shepherds Tree (Main Channel) - MY7
Cross- Section 14 - Riffle
104
103
102
........................................ ............................... ..................... ............................ ...............................
z
101
0
w
-
100
99
98
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Station (ft)
MYI -9/2006 MY5. 1/2010 -*--MY6- 11/2010 MY7.6/2011 ....... Bankfull

Appendix D. Stream Survey Data
Figure 3o: Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project #333
Main Channel
Monitoring Year 7
Project Name
Shepherds Tree
EEP Project Number <
333
Cross - Section ID-
XS-15, Pool
Survey Date
6/2011
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
99.87
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft')
18.64
Bankfull Width ft
10.35
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
101.61
Flood Prone Width ft
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.80
Bankfull Max Depth ft
2.84
!W/D R atio
5.75
Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
Bank Hei ht Ratio
1.17
Station
Elevation
:- Notes
26
100
x15
26
99.95
x15
29
99.95
x15
32
99.62
x15
35
99.84
x15
38
99.75
x15
40.4
99.56
x15
41
99.25
x15
42
98.5
x15
43
97.73
x15
43.8
97.48
x15
43.9
97.045
x15
43.9
96.72
x15
45
96.2
x15
46
95.93
x15
47
1 96.03
x15
48
96.085
x15
49
96.47
x15
50
97.06
x15
51
98.01
x15
52
98.78
x15
52.9
99.26
x15
54
99.39
x15
57
99.74
x15
60
99.75
x15
63
99.95
x15
66
100.01
x15
69
100.32
x15
69.6
100.32
x15
69.6
100.34
x15
XS -15: View Upstream
XS -15: View Downstream
Shepherds Tree (Main Channel) - MY7
Cross - Section 15 - Pool
101
100
-
98
c
0
97
'w
96
95
0
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Station ft
-WI- 9/2006 -MY5 -1/2010 - MY6- 11/2010 ....... B-00 - MY7.0011

Appendix D. Stream Survey Data
Figure 3p: Cross-Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project #333
Tributary
Monitoring Year 7
Project Name She herds'Pree
EEP Project Number 333
Cross - Section ID XS -16 Riffle
Survey Date 6/2011
I Station 1 Elevation I Notes I
x16
36
94.15
1 x16
39
94.53
x16
42
94.72
x16
45
94.67
x16
48
94.77
x16
49.1
94980
x16
49.1
94.84
x16
XS-16: View Upstream
XS -16: View Downstream
Shepherds Tree (Tributary) - MY 7
Cross- Section 16 - Riffle
96
95.5
95
94.5
C
o
•a
m
'w 93.5
93
92.5
92
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Station (ft)
AMY I- 9/2006 —MYS -12010 --m—MY6. 11/2010 —MY7. 6/2011 ....... BenkPoll

Table 10a Baseline Stream Data Summary
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Protect #333
Monitoring Year 7
Parameter
I Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre - Existing Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline*
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
LL
UL
En
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Med
Max
Mm
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width ft
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
71
-
-
-
-
_
102
-
-
-
-
-
-
Flood prone Width ft
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
>100
-
-
-
-
-
>100
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
-
-
-
185
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Bankfull Max Depth ft
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
171
-
-
-
-
_
27
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Bankf ill Cross - Sectional Area 112)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
93
-
-
-
-
-
187
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Width/De th Ratio
-
Entrenchment Ratio
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
>10
-
Bank Height Ratio
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Pattern LL
Channel Beltwidth ft
-
-
-
51
-
-
92
-
-
-
85
-
-
-
-
-
-
Radius of Curvature ft
-
-
-
-
-
-
131
-
-
223
-
-
195
-
306
-
-
-
-
-
-
Rc Bankfull width ft/ft
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Meander Wavelength ft
-
-
-
-
-
-
77
-
-
1007
-
-
114
-
138
-
-
-
-
-
-
Meander Width Ratio
-
-
-
-
-
-
52
-
-
125
-
-
42
-
-
-
-
-
-
Profile _ A
Riffle Length ft
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Riffle Slope ft/ft
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 006
-
002
-
-
0 006
-
002
-
PoolLen h 11
-
-
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
22
-
-
20
_
29
Pool Max Depth 11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Pool Spacing 11
-
-
-
-
-
-
26
-
-
65
-
-
57
-
69
-
-
-
-
-
-
Trans ort Parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib /ft2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Max part size mm mobilized at bankful
Stream Power (transport capacity) W /mZ
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Additional Reach Parameters
Ros en Classification
E5
E5
Bankful Velocity s
Bankful Discharge cfs
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
_
Valley Length (ft)
-
-
-
-
Channel Tbalweg Length ft
-
-
-
-
Smuosi ft
-
136
14
-
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
-
-
0 0049-0 0064
* *0 0015 -0 0017/0 004
-
BF slope ft/ft
-
-
-
- I�
_
Bankful Flood lam Area
(acres)
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metnc
-
-
-
_
Biological or Other
-
-
-
_
*Baseline monitoring dada was not completed due to the lack of an as-built survey (per KCI Associates and EEP)

Appendix D. Stream Survey Data
Table 10b. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Protect #333
Monitoring Year 7
1
Parameter
Pre - Existing Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
As- builtBasehne
Rl % /Ru %/P % /G % /S%
-
-
-
-I
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
-
-
-
-
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm)
-
-
-
-
Entrenchment Class <1 5/15-199/2 0-4 9/5 0-
9 9>10
-
-
-
-
Incision Class <1 2/12-149/1 5 -1 99/ >2 0
-
-
-
-

Appendix D Stream Survey Data
Table lla Morphologic and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoratlon/EEP Project #333
Monitoring Year 7
PARAMETER
Cross - Section 1 Riffle
Cross - Section
2 Pool
Cross - Section
3 Riffle
Cross - Section 4 Riffle
DIMENSION
MY2 -2006
MY5 -2009
MY6 -2010
MY7 -2011
MY2 -2006
MY5 -2009
MY6 -2010
MY7 -2011
MY2 -2006
MY5 -2009
MY6 -2010
MY7 -2011
MY2 -2006
MY5 -2009
MY6 -2010
MY7 -2011
Bankfull Width ft
80
65
69
72
919
92
79
76
904
134
103
125
1042
103
96
115
Flood prone Width ft
>100
>100
>100
>100
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
Bankfull Mean Depth
120
1 5
12
1 1
131
08
07
06
076
08
07
07
205
19
1 8
17
Bankfull Max Depth ft
243
19
16
16
264
1 6
13
13
1 45
14
13
1 7
292
28
26
26
Bank-full Cross - sectional Area (ft)
96
97
106
78
1207
74
5 1
49
686
113
74
83
2141
196
176
196
Bankfull Width/ Depth Ratio
663
44
57
66
702
115
122
1 1 9
1189
159
145
189
508
54
53
68
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2 2
>2 2
>2 2
>2 2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>2 2
>2 2
>2 2
>2 2
>2 2
>2 2
>2 2
>2 2
Bankfull Bankhei ht Ratio
•
10
10
10
•
10
10
10
•
10
10
10
•
10
10
1 1
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft)
*
300
1 180
80
1 124
97
86
*
162
84
1 178
•
244
304
290
d50 (nun)l
0 050
Silt
Silt
Silt
0 030
Silt
Silt
Silt
0 030
Silt
Silt
Silt
0 400
Silt
Silt
Silt
PARAMETER
Cross - Section 5 Pool
Cross - Section 6 Riffle
Cross-Section
7 Pool
Cross - Section
8 Pool
DIMENSION
MY2 -2006
MY5 -2009
MY6 -2010
MY7 -2011
MY2 -2006
MY5 -2009
MY6 -2010
MY7 -2011
MY2 -2006
MY5 -2009
MY6 -2010
MY7 -2011
MY2 -2006
MY5 -2009
MY6 -2010
MY7 -2011
Bankfull Width ft
886
86
89
103
78
62
58
44
11 17
115
160
101
2596
265
276
249
Flood prone Width ft
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>100
>100
>100
>100
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankf ill Mean Depth
175
1 3
89
12
095
06
05
05
161
16
09
15
1 8
1 5
1 7
18
Bankfull Max Depth ft
242
20
23
19
159
09
08
07
265
28
21
24
39
32
36
35
Bankfull Cross - sectional Area (ft)
155
1 1 4
132
119
744
36
28
22
1804
188
137
148
4662
410
472
444
Bankfull Widt thRatio
506
65
60
89
821
106
120
87
694
71
186
68
1442
172
162
140
Bankf ill Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>2 20
>2 20
>2 20
>2 2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bankhei ht Ratio
*
10
10
10
•
10
10
10
*
10
10
1 1
•
10
10
1 0
Cross Sectional Area between end pins ftZ
•
175
1 252
140
1 80
126
30
•
265
162
247
•
517
516
486
d50 (mm)
0 040
Silt
Silt
Silt
0 040
Silt
Silt
Silt
0 040
Silt
Silt
Silt
0 060
Silt
Silt
Silt
PARAMETER
Cross - Section 9 Riffle
Cross -Section 10 Pool
Cross - Section 11 Pool
Cross - Section 12 Riffle
DIMENSION
MY2 -2006
MY5 -2009
MY6 -2010
MY7 -2011
MY2 -2006
MY5 -2009
MY6 -2010
MY7 -2011
MY2 -2006
MY5 -2009
MY6 -2010
MY7 -2011
MY2 -2006
MY5 -2009
MY6 -2010
MY7 -2011
Bankfull Width ft
2262
181
217
189
1573
155
163
142
1296
129
132
144
125
128
130
131
Flood prone Width ft
>100
>100
>100
>100
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>200
>200
>200
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth
17
18
17
17
143
15
15
18
157
1 5
15
15
21
2 1
20
19
Bankfull Max Depth ft
356
33
35
33
312
28
31
30
294
26
28
28
31
32
32
32
Bankfull Cross - sectional Area ftZ
3846
333
37 1
329
2252
239
248
250
2039
194
191
208
258
268
261
254
Bankfull Width/Depth Rati o
1331
98
128
109
1 11
101
107
8 1
825
86
91
99
61
61
65
68
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2 2
>2 2
>2 2
>2 2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>2 2
>2 2
>2 2
>2 2
Bankfull Bankheight Ratio
•
10
1 1
10
*
10
10
10
•
10
10
10
*
10
10
10
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft2)1
1 617
1 509
563
1 41 6
345
323
*
184
187
223
*
644
509
459
d50 (mm)
0 050
Silt
Silt
Silt
0 060
Silt
Silt
Silt
0 060
Silt
Silt
Silt
0 060
Silt
Silt
Silt
PARAMETER
Cross - Section 13 Pool
Cross - Section 14 Riffle
Cross - Section 15 Pool
Cross- Sechon 16 Riffle
DIMENSION
MY2 -2006
MY5 -2009
MY6 -2010
MY7 -2011
MY2 -2006
MY5 -2009
MY6 -2010
MY7 -2011
MY2 -2006
MY5 -2009
MY6 -2010
MY7 -2011
MY2 -2006
MY5 -2009
MY6 -2010
MY7 -2011
Bankfull Width ft
1400
166
216
150
116
139
136
11 1
110
129
110
104
140
69
84
75
Flood prone Width ft
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>200
>200
>200
>200
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>200
>200
>200
>200
Bankfull Mean Dept
231
19
15
2 1
1 7
14
19
19
20
16
20
18
05
04
06
08
Bankfull Max Depth ft
360
33
34
34
34
37
35
32
32
32
32
28
11
12
13
12
Bankfull Cross - sectional Area ft2
3240
318
326
320
202
200
261
210
22 1
201
21 7
186
67
3 l
52
58
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
606
86
143
70
67
97
7 1
58
55
83
56
58
292
178
135
97
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>2 2
>2 2
>2 2
>2 2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>2 2
>2 2
>2 2
>2 2
Bankfull Bankhei ht Ratio
*
10
10
10
•
10
10
1 1
•
10
10
10
*
10
10
10
Cross Sectional Area between end ins ftZ
*
1019
86 5
809
•
803
475
634
•
855
628
533
*
569
545
462
d50 (mm)
0 050
Silt
Silt
Silt
0 040
Silt
Silt
Silt
0 060
Silt
Silt
Silt 1
0 060
Silt
Silt
Slit
Vats was not provided

Appendix D Stream Survey Data
Table llb Stream Reach Data Summary
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project #333
Monitoring Year 7
1
Parameter
Baseline'
MY 2 2006
MY 2 2009*•
DIMENSION
Mtn
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Mtn
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width ft
90
1 1 4
1 1 6
140
22
16
62
126
128
265
5 1
16
Flood rune Width ft
>I00
>100
>100
>100
n/a
16
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
16
Bankfull Mean Depth fl
05
16
19
2 1
07
16
04
14
1 5
2 l
05
16
Bankfull Max Depth ft
1 1
27
32
34
1 1
16
09
25
28
37
09
16
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area R2
67
169
202
258
83
16
3 1
188
19 5
410
109
16
Wid th Ratio
55
118
64
292
116
16
44
98
9 1
178
41
16
Entrenchment Ratio
>2 2
>2 2
>2 2
>2 2
n/a
16
>2 2
>2 2
>2 2
—72-2—
n/a
16
Bank Height Ratio
1 0
10
10
10
00
16
Bankfull Velocity'
PROFILE
Riffle Length ft
185
233
280
Riffle Slope ft/ft
00038
00126
002214
Pool Len R
8 2
766
174 l
Pool Max depth
Pool S R
279
14
5
PATTERN
Channel Beltwidth ft
400
450
600
Radius of Curvature fl
190
300
500
Meander Wavelength ft
900
'22-0
1 L40 0
Meander Width Ratio
71
94
1 1 0
ADDITIONAL REACH PARAMETERS
Rosgen Classification
E6
Channel nalweg lei fl
1718
Sinuosity fl
140
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0 027
BF slope ft/ft
00026
Rt %/Ru° /dP%/G %✓S%
SC%/Sa %/G° /JC° /a/B %/Be%
d 16 / d35 / d50 I d84 / d95
% of reach vnth eroding banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Parameter
MY 6 2010••
MY 7 2011'•
DIMENSION
Min
Men
Med
Max
SD
n
Mm
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
58
132
120
276
61
16
44
121
1 1 3
249
49
16
Floodprone Width (ft)
>100
>100
>100
>100
n/a
16
>100
>100
>100
>100
n/a
16
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
05
18
15
89
20
16
05
14
16
21
05
16
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
08
25
27
36
10
16
07
24
27
35
09
16
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fl2)
28
194
184
472
125
16
22
185
191
444
117
16
Wid"cpth Ratio
53
106
1 1 4
186
43
16
1 58
1 92
1 84
1 189
1 35
16
Entrenchment Ratio
>2 2
>2 2
>2 2
>2 2
n/a
16
>22
>2 2
>2 2
>2 2
n/a
16
Bank Height Ratio
10
l 0
1 0
l 1
001
16
10
1 0
10
11
004
16
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
PROFILE
Riffle Length (ft)
Riffle Slope (ft/fl)
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Max depth
Pool Spacing (ft)
PATTERN
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (it)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
-
ADDITIONAL REACH PARAMETERS
Rosgen Classification
Chancel Tbalweg length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (fVfl)
BF slope (ft/ft)
Rt %/Ru ° /a/P° /dG %/S%
SC%/Sa %/G %/C%/B %/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95
% of reach with eroding banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
`L%aselme momtonng aaaa was not compietea oue to me tack of an as bunt survey (per tart associates ana t:tt•)
**Longitudinal profile was not surveyed

01-
APPENDIX E
HYDROLOGIC DATA
Table 12 Verification of Bankfull Events
Figure 6 Monthly Rainfall Data
Figure 7a -7r Precipitation and Water Level Plots
Table 13 Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment
Shepherds Tree Stream and May 2012
Wetland Restoration Monitoring Year 7
EEP Project No 333

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
Table 12 Verification of Bankfull Events
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project #333
Monitoring Year 7
Date of
Collection
Date of
Occurrence
Method
Photo # (if
available)
N/A
Jun -05
Visual Assessment
N/A
N/A
Aug-05
Surface Gauge 1 and 3 -MC
N/A
N/A
Oct -05
Surface Gauge 1 -MC
N/A
N/A
Dec -05
Surface Gauge 1 -MC
N/A
N/A
Nov -06
Surface Gauge 3 -MC
N/A
N/A
Dec -06
Surface Gauge 3 -MC
N/A
N/A
Jan -07
Surface Gauge 3 -MC
N/A
N/A
Mar -07
Surface Gauge 3 -MC
N/A
N/A
Aug-08
Surface Gauge 3 -MC
N/A
N/A
Sep-08
Surface Gauge 3 -MC
N/A
N/A
Apr-09
Surface Gauge 2 -Tnb
N/A
N/A
Mar -09
Surface Gauge 3 -MC
N/A
N/A
Apr-09
Surface Gauge 3 -MC
N/A
N/A
Jun -09
Surface Gauge 3 -MC
N/A
N/A
Apr-09
Surface Gauge 2 -Tnb
N/A
N/A
Jun -09
Surface Gauge 2 -Tnb
N/A
N/A
Aug-09
Surface Gauge 2 -Tnb
N/A
N/A
Sep-09
Surface Gauge 2 -Tnb
N/A
N/A
Apr- 10
Surface Gauge 3 -MC
N/A
N/A
May-10
Surface Gauge 1, 3 and 4 -MC
N/A
N/A
Jun -10
Surface Gauge 1, 3 and 4 -MC
N/A
N/A
Jul -10
Surface Gauge 4 -MC
N/A
N/A
Aug-10
Surface Gauge 1, 3 and 4 -MC
N/A
N/A
Sep- 10
Surface Gauge 3 and 4 -MC
N/A
N/A
Oct -10
Surface Gauge 1, 3 and 4 -MC
N/A
N/A
Vanous -2011
Surface Gauge 1, 2, 3 and 4 -MC
N/A

Appendix E. Hydrologic Data
Figure 6: Shepherds Tree 30 -70 Percentile Graph for Rainfall in 2011
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project #333
Monitoring Year 7
*Historical rainfall data referenced from NC Cronos Database Divisonal Data for the Southern Piedmont of North Carloina (Station ID: 318292)
Data Period January 2011 through December 2011
7
6
5
d
O
E
4
d
C
O
.5
3
a
2
1
0
Jan -11 Feb -11 Mar -11 Apr -11 May -11 Jun -11 Jul -11 Aug -11 Sep -11 Oct -11 Nov -11 Dec -11
monthly SUM of 2m Daily Precipitation (in) 30% Percentile 70% Percentile
*Historical rainfall data referenced from NC Cronos Database Divisonal Data for the Southern Piedmont of North Carloina (Station ID: 318292)
Data Period January 2011 through December 2011

Figure 7a: Precipitation and Water Level Plots for Gauges
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project #333
Monitoring Year 7
Growing Season: April 14- October 24
5
0
Shepherds Tree Hydrology Monitoring -MY7
Groundwater Gauge 1
1.8
-5
1.6
1.4
__10
1.2
c
c
a
d
3 -15
1
N
M
v
0'
E
3
18 Consecutive
Q
o -20
Days
0.8
c
.2
o
a -25
0.6
.°-
a
a
p
a
-30
0.4
-35
0.2
-40
I � �. I I �I I
I
I.
II
0
N
"1
-1 "1 "4 -4 1-1 �_4 "1 -4
­1
�_4
0
N
0
N
0
N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N
0
N
0
N
0
N
\
14
\
00
\
N
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
t0 01 M t� r-1 Cf W .--i
\
\
01
\
M
i-i
r4
N
a--I
L!
N \ N \ N \ N \
Ln t.0 ^ n 0000
i--I
H
0)
N
00)
N
O
Date
� 2m Daily Precipitation (in) Groundwater Gauge 1
Required Depth

Figure 7b: Precipitation and Water Level Plots for Gauges
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project #333
Monitoring Year 7
Growing Season: April 14- October 24
10
5
0
Shepherds Tree Hydrology Monitoring -MY7
Groundwater Gauge 2
1.8
1.6
1.4
-5
c
1.2
—
c
U -10
3
1
'0
c -15
a
43 Consecutive
0.8
c
-20
Days
c
r
(U -25
0.6
a
p
a
-30
0.4
-35
I
0.2
-40
it
I I �� 1 I� ��. I I �II
I
I.
ill
0
0
0
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0
0
N
\
�
N
\
00
N
\
N
N N N N N N N N
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
t0 01 M I- 00 ei
N
\
U1
N
\
01
N
\
M
Ln
Ln 1O L ^ r- 00 000 O1
rn
rn
0
Date
14
2m Daily Precipitation (in) Groundwater Gauge 2
Required Depth

Figure 7c: Precipitation and Water Level Plots for Gauges
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project #333
Monitoring Year 7
Growing Season: April 14- October 24
5.00
0.00
Shepherds Tree Hydrology Monitoring -MY7
Groundwater Gauge 3
1.8
1.6
-5.00
1.4
0.00
1.2
c
41
Y
R
3
1
0
X5.00
E
3
V�
0.8
a
c
r
-20.00
f0
t
16 Consecuti
e
0 6
q�
-9 5.00
Days
a
a
0.4
-30.00
0.2
-35.00
it
.
I I I I� �. I 1 I �I
I.
i
0
-4 -4
0
N
0
N
0
N
0 0 0 0 o O o 0
N N N N N N N N
0
N
o
N
O
N
\
Cf
\
00
\
N
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
tD Ol M I, r1
\
Ln
\
\
M
1'
Ln
\ N -1
N \ r-1 \
LO 00 0)
Ln W ^ n 00
i--I
01
N N
0)
i--1
O
Date
2m Daily Precipitation (in) Groundwater Gauge 3
Required
Depth

Figure 7d: Precipitation and Water Level Plots for Gauges
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project #333
Monitoring Year 7
Growing Season: April 14- October 24
10.00
5.00
0.00
Shepherds Tree Hydrology Monitoring -MY7
Groundwater Gauge 4
1.8
1.6
1.4
-5.00
1.2
..
:#0.00
L
5
d
Y
0 0
C
51 Consecutive
-90.00
Days
0.8
Q
0
C9
},
15.00
a
CL
0.6
110.00
a
0.4
-35.00
-40.00
I
0.2
-45.00
it . I
( I I� �. 1 I �I
I
I.
i II
0
0
N
0 0
N N
0 o O o 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N
0
N
0
N
0
N
\
\ \
00 N
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
l0 01 M 1� ri 00 a-i
\
L!1
\
01
\
M
�T In
N \ N \ N \ ci \
M 1.0 ^ n 00
a-i
Ch
N
0)
e-I
O
Date
2m Daily Precipitation (in) Groundwater Gauge 4
Required Depth

Figure 7e: Precipitation and Water Level Plots for Gauges
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project #333
Monitoring Year 7
Growing Season: April 14- October 24
0.00
Shepherds Tree Hydrology Monitoring -MY7
Groundwater Gauge 5
0 Consecutive Days
1.8
-5.00
1.6
-10.00
1.4
a- 5.00
1.2
L
W
N
R
3
M
X0.00
0
E
0.8
a
c
M
-35.00
f°
M
r
«�
CL
0.6
a
'u
-30.00
a
0.4
-35.00
0.2
-40.00
it
. I
I I� �. 1 I �I I
( (. i
II
p
0
N
0
N
0
N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N
0 0
N N
0
N
\
\
00
\
N
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
l0 01 M I, 00 i--I
\ \
V1 O1
\
M
a
v
Ln
rIJ
N \ ci \
Ln 1O 00 0000 °1
t--1
rn rn
0
Date
2m Daily Precipitation (in) Groundwater Gauge 5
Required Depth

Figure 7f: Precipitation and Water Level Plots for Gauges
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland RestoratioNEEP Project #333
Monitoring Year 7
Growing Season: April 14- October 24
10.00
5.00
0.00
J10"
Shepherds Tree Hydrology Monitoring -MY7
55 Consecutive Groundwater Gauge 6
Days
Kris A K Irv\
1.8
1.6
1.4
q
1.2
. .
_�-- -5.00
L
d
3
1
V
0
c 10.00
a
3
0.8
c
Y
15.00
Y
0.6
,°
CL
ar
p
-20.00
a
0.4
-25.00
0.2
-30.00
it
. I ( I I� �. I I �I
(
I. i
II
p
O
N
O
N
o o O O O o O O O
N N N N N N N N N
O
N
O
N
O
N
\
cl
\
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
N Q1 I� � CO N
\
\
Ol
\
M
e-1
N
N
�-1 N \ N \
N N N N
^
LD -1 0
N
t--I
to Ln kDD 00
0)
0)
O
Date
r-1
2m Daily Precipitation (in) Groundwater Gauge 6
Required Depth

Figure 7g: Precipitation and Water Level Plots for Gauges
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project #333
Monitoring Year 7
Growing Season: April 14- October 24
0
Shepherds Tree Hydrology Monitoring -MY7
Groundwater Gauge 7
16 Consecutive
1.8
Days
-5
1.6
-10
.4
1
c -15
1.2
..
W
3
1
c
'o
-20
ac
0.8
c
Q
-25
&
c
a
0.6
Q-
'u
p
-30
a
0.4
-35
0.2
-40
it
I I I� �. I I �I I
I
(.
i II
0
o
N
O
N
O
N
o O O o O O o O
N N N N N N N N
O
N
o
N
O
N
\
\
00
\
N
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
lD 01 M N i--1 Cf 00 a--I
\
111
\
O1
\
M
ei
N
r-I
Ln
N \ N \ N 0
to t\D ^ 00
01
01
ei
O
Date
2m
Daily Precipitation (in) Groundwater Gauge 7
Required
Depth

Figure 7h: Precipitation and Water Level Plots for Gauges
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project #333
Monitoring Year 7
Growing Season: April 14- October 24
10.00
5.00
0.00
Shepherds Tree Hydrology Monitoring -MY7
Groundwater Gauge 8
1.8
1.6
.x.00
1.4
1.2
5
52 Consecutive
5
Days
30.00
1
0
o
c
£
a
4,5.00
0.8
c
(D
«.
o
i+
m
M
C20.00 0.00
0.6
'u
W
p
a
-25.00
0.4
-30.00
0.2
-35.00
it
I I I I� �. I I �I I
(
I.
(I
0
O
N
O
N
o
N
o O O O o o O O
N N N N N N N N
o
N
O
N
O
N
\
zr
\
00
\
N
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
0) M r1
\
\
0N 1
\
i--1
N
N N -1
^ 0
Ln
r-I
�-Y
-I
t
tD 00
0)
0)
O
Date
r-i
� 2m
Daily Precipitation (in) Groundwater Gauge 8
Required Depth

Figure 7j: Precipitation and Water Level Plots for Gauges
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project #333
Monitoring Year 7
Growing Season: April 14- October 24
Shepherds Tree Hydrology Monitoring -MY7
Groundwater Gauge 10
60
1.8
1.6
40
1.4
20
5 Consecut ve
1.2
—
i
Days
-_
1
3
1
IA
o '
0
C
C
3
a
0.8
c
(7
;,
o
M
a
-20
0.6
,a
d
0
a
a
0.4
-40
0.2
60
it
I
I I l� I I II (
I
I. ill
0
0
N
0
N
0
N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N
0
N
0
N
0
N
\
0
N
\ \ \ \ \ \ 0 \
\
\
\
\V
V
1f
N \ N \ "1 \
L ko ^ n 0000
e-I
Q\1
N
O\1
`--�
0
Date
r-1
2m Daily Precipitation (in) Groundwater Gauge 10
Required Depth

Figure 7k: Precipitation and Water Level Plots for Gauges
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project #333
Monitoring Year 7
Growing Season: April 14- October 24
10.00
5.00
0.00
Shepherds Tree Hydrology Monitoring -MY7
Groundwater Gauge 11
1.8
1.6
1.4
IV
1.2
.-.
c
c
138 Consecutive
qA
X5.00
Days
1
3
0
a
C
E
a
3
0.8
c
0.00
o
�
,c
0.6
a
'u
CL
ig5.00
a
0.4
-20.00
0.2
-25.00
it
. I ( 1 I� �. 1 I �I I
(
I.
i (I I
0
H
­4
N
O
N
0
N
0
N
0 0 0 O 0 0 o O
N N N N N N N N
O
N
0
N
O
N
\
\
00
\
N
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
1.0 01 M I� � 00 a-I
\
U1
\
01
\
M
�-1
N
N
r-1
N \ N \ N
N
^
1.0 00
Ln
Ln lD n 00
01
01
O
Date
2m Daily Precipitation (in) Groundwater Gauge it
Required Depth

Figure 71: Precipitation and Water Level Plots for Gauges
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project #333
Monitoring Year 7
Growing Season: April 14- October 24
20.00
10.00
0.00
Shepherds Tree Hydrology Monitoring -MY7
96 Consecutive Groundwater Gauge 12
Days
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
..
c
c
°40.00
1
N
3
3
c
E
a
0.8
c
90.00
o
0.6
CL
d
`
0.00
a
0.4
-40.00
0.2
-50.00
50.00
. �. 1 I (I I
(
I. i
II I
0
0
N
0
N
0
N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N
0
N
0
N
0
N
\
00
N N
N
\ l0 \ \ \ 1� \ \ 00 00 \
e-i a--1
\
\
Ol
\
M
ri
N
N
a--I
\ N \ N 00 \
N N r_4 -I
LO ^
N
"I
N
e--I
Ln
LLn t\D n 0000
0\1
0\1
O
Date
2m Daily Precipitation (in) Groundwater Gauge'Gauge 12'!
Required Depth

Figure 7m: Precipitation and Water Level Plots for Gauges
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project #333
Monitoring Year 7
Growing Season: April 14- October 24
10
5
0
Shepherds Tree Hydrology Monitoring -MY7
Groundwater Gauge 13
1.8
1.6
1.4
-5
1.2
1E
E -10
5
3 -15
51 Cons
utive
1
M
C
Da
a
o' -20
0.8
c
l7
;,
o
-25
�_
•"
M
Q.
0.6
C1
W -30
a`
0.4
-35
-40
0.2
-45
( 11
I I �� I I� ��. I 1 I 1II
11111.1
i
0
v -4
11
1-1
-4
­4 i1 ­1 ,—+ a—I c-I ,1 -4
ci -1 -1 r_1 1-1
-4
-4
r-I
a1
i1
ci
O
N
O
N
O O O O O O O O
N N N N N N N N
O
N
O
N
O
N
\
I�
\
\ 0 N \ \ \ \ \
V1 00 N l0 M 1,
\
�'
00
0
\
N
N
"I
ri
LO
N \ N \ N \ c-1 M
N M
Ln tD ^ n 0000 0000
0\1
O\l
O
Date
e—I
2m Daily Precipitation (in) Groundwater Gauge 13
Required Depth

Figure 7n: Precipitation and Water Level Plots for Gauges
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project #333
Monitoring Year 7
Growing Season: April 14- October 24
5
0
Shepherds Tree Hydrology Monitoring -MY7
Groundwater Gauge 14
1.8
1.6
1.4
.. -5
1.2
.-.
c
C
L
1
N
C
'o
3
-10
58 Conse tiv
Days
E
0.8
a
c
c7
;;
o
M
�
a -15
0.6
'a
U
N
L
p
a
0.4
-20
0.2
-25
rl
I I l� �. I �I I
I I,
ill
0
/•'� 1"r
a"I
r'r rl ri !� N a-i �-1 a-i
e-I c-I
!�
O
N
O
N
O O O O O O O O
N N N N N N N N
O O
N N
O
N
\
r`
\
a-i
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
00 N lD O �Y1
\ \
� 00
\
N
N
V\
a-i
t!
N H M
N \ N \ N \ .--1 ('I)
Ln l\D ^ n 0000 0000
r-I N
N
O\1 0)
ei
O
Date
2m Daily Precipitation (in) Groundwater Gauge 14
Required Depth

Figure 7o: Precipitation and Water Level Plots for Gauges
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project #333
Monitoring Year 7
Growing Season: April 14- October 24
0
Shepherds Tree Hydrology Monitoring -MY7
Groundwater Gauge 15
12 Consecutive
1.s
-5
Days
1.6
-10
1.4
-15
1.2
�a
M
1
(A
c
�
C 20
a
0.8
c
2
(7
-25
r
0.6
a
'u
CL
C
-30
a
0.4
-35
0.2
-40
it
. I
I I I� �. I ( �I
(
I.
i II
0
O
O
O O O O O O O O
O
O
O
0 N
\
N
\
N N N N N N N N
\ 0 N \ \ \ \ \
00 N l0 tY1 I" r-1
N
\
H
N
00
00
N
\
N
N
N
d'
11
�-I
Ln
N
N \ N \ N \ i--I fA
N
Ln l\0 ^ n 00 0000
ri
0)
N
N
0)
c-1
O
Date
2m Daily Precipitation (in) Groundwater Gauge 15
Required Depth

Figure 7p: Precipitation and Water Level Plots for Gauges
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project #333
Monitoring Year 7
Growing Season: April 14- October 24
10
5
0
Shepherds Tree Hydrology Monitoring -MY7
Groundwater Gauge 16
1.8
1.6
1.4
-5
5 -10
1.2
.►
5
N
+:
3 -15
70 Consecutive
1
c
0
Days
a
3
C -20
0.8
c
(7
.2
+' -25
`
r
0.6
a
'u
CL
W -30
a�
a`
0.4
-35
-40
I
I
0.2
-45
it
. I I I I) �. I �I
I I.
i (I
0
M
O
0 N
O O O 0 0 O 0 O O
N N N N N N N N N
0 0
N N
0
N
\
I,
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
V1 00 N k.0 O
\ \
00
\
N
N
eq N -1 M
-1 LO 00
Ln Ln W ^ n 00 1- 0000
i-1 N
0\1 0\1
a--I
O
Date
e-I
r 2m Daily Precipitation (in) Groundwater Gauge 16
Required Depth

Figure 7q: Precipitation and Water Level Plots for Gauges
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project #333
Monitoring Year 7
Growing Season: April 14- October 24
5
0
Shepherds Tree Hydrology Monitoring -MY7
Groundwater Gauge 17
4 Consecutive
Days
1.8
1.6
1.4
-5
c
1.2
..
c
L
-10
1
N
3
a
E
3
a
-15
0 8
0
o
M
N
a
0.6
.a
m
o -20
a`
0.4
-25
0.2
-30 J
it
. I
I I I� �. I ( (I
(.
i II
0
.1
0
.1
0
.-1 -4 .1 .1 ,1 ,1 .1 .1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
14
0
0
0
0 N
\
I�
N
\
e-�
N N N N N N N N
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
00 N l0 M I�
N
\
N
\
00
N
\
N
N
a
a-i
Ln
N
N \ N \ N \ i--I (Y1
N M
Ln 1D � 00 00 00
e•7
rn
N
M
N
o
Date
2m
Daily Precipitation (in) Groundwater Gauge 17
Required
Depth

Figure 7r: Precipitation and Water Level Plots for Gauges
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project #333
Monitoring Year 7
Growing Season: April 14- October 24
Shepherds Tree Hydrology Monitoring -MY7
80
Groundwater Gauge 18
1.8
1.6
60
1.4
40
5 Consecutive
1.2
—.
Days
20
1
3
3
�a
E
C
3
Q
°
0
0.8
c
Q
o
�
u
CL
0.6
y
Ow
-20
a`
0.4
-40
11.
0.2
-60
11
I I � �. 1 I
. i
p
O1 ,1
M
.-4
0
N
0
N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N
0 0
N N
0
N
\
\
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
00 N l0 O fY1 1�
\ \
V 00
\
N
N
ei
Ln
rI4
N \ N \ N 0 e-1 M
M
Ln t\D ^ N 0000 0000
O\i 0\1
O
Date
2m Daily Precipitation (in) Groundwater Gauge 18
Required Depth

Figure 7r: Precipitation and Water Level Plots for Gauges
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project #333
Monitoring Year 7
0
Shepherds Tree Hydrology Monitoring -MY7
Surfacewater Gauge 1
-5
1.8
1.6
-10
1.4
-15
1.2
a''
-20
c
f0
c
0
5 -25
0.8
E
c
a
o
�
-30
0.6
a
W
U
a
�V
-35
0.4
a`
-40
0.2
-45
it
I
I
I
l� I I II I
I
I.
ill
0
-4
-4
H
H
H 14
14
11
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
o O
N N
O o O O O
N N N N N
o
N
o
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
\
:31
\
00
\
N
\
lD
\ \
O1 M
\ \ \ \ \
1� �--i e-I
\
\
\
M
\
�
\
O
rl
\
�
N
N
\
V
rl
\
Ln
N
\
Ln
\ N
to \
�D
-4
\ N \ �--1 \
I� \ 00 \ 01
n 00
i--I
-4
\
01
N
N
\
01
c-I
\
N
\
r-1
\
Date
a--I
r-1
ri
2m Daily Precipitation (in)
Surfacewater Gauge 1
Bankfull Elevation

Figure 7t: Precipitation and Water Level Plots for Gauges
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project #333
Monitoring Year 7
0
Shepherds Tree Hydrology Monitoring -MY7
Surfacewater Gauge 2
-5
18
1.6
-10
1.4
1.2
„
-15
c
-20
M
3
f0
C
pp
as
0
E
°
-25
a
0
0.6
a
W
-30
a
v
0.4
a`
-35
0.2
- 40
I.,
I I
I I 1
.I
.II 111 I I I
1 II I
I
(.
1.11
0
o
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
o
N
o
N
O o O O
N N N N
O
N
o
N
O
N
o O
N N
\
\
00
\
N
\
\
O1
\
M
\ \ \ \
r, r-I 00
\
c-I
\
ul
\
Ol
\ \
tYl N
\
\
\
V1
IN
N
\
V1
\
lD
N
lD
00 \
00
01
\
01
\
01
\ \
O O
Date
2m Daily Precipitation (in)
Surfacewater Gauge 1
Bankfull Elevation

Figure 7u: Precipitation and Water Level Plots for Gauges
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project #333
Monitoring Year 7
0
Shepherds Tree Hydrology Monitoring -MY7
Surfacewater Gauge 3
-5
18
1.6
-10
1.4
1.2
--15
m
Y
1
c
—
•IA
f0
-20
V
7
C
p
0.8
O
a
C
°—
-25
0
0.6
0
>
a
W
-30
a
0.4
a`
-35
0.2
-40
it
(
I
I I� �. 1 I III I I.
i (I
p
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
o O o O o O o o
N N N N N N N N
O
N
O O
N N
\
\
00
\
N
\
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
01 M I, ri r 1 V1
\
\ \
M
a--1
-I
\
cF
N
\
�
r-I
\
V1
N
N
\
ill
\ N \ N \ i--I \ N
-4
lD \ \ 00 \ 01 \
l0 00 01
N
N
\
01
i--1 N
N
\ \
O O
Date
r-1 r-I
® 2m Daily Precipitation (in) Surfacewater Gauge 1 Bankfull
Elevation

Figure 7v: Precipitation and Water Level Plots for Gauges
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project #333
Monitoring Year 7
0
Shepherds Tree Hydrology Monitoring -MY7
Surfacewater Gauge 4
-5
18
1.6
1.4
-10
1.2
i
1
C
•N
-20
a+
3
IF
'
0.8
0
E
�
-25
a
0
M
0.6
v
W
-30
c
0.4
a`
-35
0.2
-40
�I
I
(
I I� , ,. I I II I I I.
i II
0
O
N
o
N
o
N
O
N
O o 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N
0
N
0 0
N N
\
4
\
W
\
N
\
LO
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
Q1 M r-I a1
\
Ol
\ \
M P
I
N
V1
N
"i \ -4
00 01 \
tD n 00 01
\
01
N
\ \
O O
Date
ei a--I
2m Daily Precipitation (in) Surfacewater Gauge 1 Bankfull Elevation

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
Table 13 Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment
Shepherds Tree Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Protect #333
Monitoring Year 7
Summary of Groundwater Gauge Results for Years 1 through 7
Success Criteria Achieved/Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season (Percentage %)
Gauge
Year 1 (2005)*
Year 2 (2006)
Year 3 (2007)
Year 4 (2008)
Year 5 (2009)
Year 6 (2010)
Year 7 (2011)
Yes /35 Days
Yes/ 17 Days
Yes/ 18 Days
Yes /17 Days
Yes/24 Days
Yes/ 18 Days
GW1
Yes
44 %)
9%
25%
30%
(38% )
(9%
No /1 Days
Yes/194 Days
Yes /29 Days
Yes/36 Days
Yes /43 Days
GW2
No
1 /0
(1%)
o
Days (0 %)
100%
35%
52%
22%
Yes /20 Days
Yes/ 16 Days
No /9 Days
Yes /16 Days
GW3
No
**
No /8 Days (4 %)
29%
24%
18%
8%
Yes /25 Days
No /11 Days
Yes /46 Days
Yes/49 Days
Yes /37 Days
Yes/51 Days
GW4
Yes
37%
6%
37%
51%
50%
26%
No /O Days
No /O Days
No /O Days
No /O Days
GW5
No
No /O Days (0 %)
No /O Days (0 %)
0%
0%
0%
0%
Yes /76 Days
Yes/76 Days
Yes/59 Days
Yes /111 Days
Yes /79 Days
Yes /55 Day
GW6
No
72%
74%
83%
94 %)
84 %)
28%
Yes /22 Days
No /] ] Days
No /5 Days
Yes/ 15 Days
No /10 Days
Yes/ 16 Days
GW7
No
32%
6%
12%
21%
23%
8%
Yes/54 Days
Yes /33 Days
Yes/46 Days
Yes/81 Days
Yes /74 Days
Yes /52 Days
GW8
Yes
(78% )
(30%
66%
70 %)
79%
27%
GW IO
Yes
Yes/109 Days
o
No /4 Days (2%)
No /5 Days
No /4 Days
No /O Days
No /5 Days
86%
8%
7%
(0%)**
3%
Yes /194 Days
Yes /150 Days
Yes/ 194 Days
Yes /194 Days
Yes/219 Days
Yes /138 Days
GW 11
Yes
100%
77%
100%
100%
100%
71
Yes /94 Days
Yes /61 Days
Yes/61 Days
Yes /87 Days
Yes /200 Days
Yes/96 Days
GW 12
Yes
88%
49%
(85%)-
86%
93%
49%
Yes/ 194 Days
Yes/47 Days
Yes/80 Days
Yes /81 Days
Yes /53 Days
Yes /51 Days
GW 13
No
100%
45%
90%
70%
(76%)**
(26%
Yes/ 194 Days
Yes/46 Days
Yes /67 Days
Yes /80 Days
Yes /53 Days
Yes /58 Days
GW 14
Yes
100%
44%
89%
60%
(75%)**
30%
GW15
No
Yes /194 Days
No /9 ( Days 5% )
Yes/] 61 Days
No /12 Days
Yes /11 Days
No /12 Days
100%
87%
16%
16%
6%
Yes/ 194 Days
Yes/] 60 Days
Yes /21 Days
Yes /71 Days
Yes /70 Days
GW 16
No
100%
o
No /3 Days (3 /o )
86%
42%
68%
36%
No /5 Days
Yes/ 19 Days
Yes /21 Days
No /4 Days
GW 17
N/A
No /4 Days (8 %)
No /3 Days (2 %)
8%
18%
16%
2%
No /1 ] Days
No/ 13 Days
No /9 Days
No /5 Days
No /5 Days
GW 18
N/A
18%
o
No /8 Days (4 /o )
16%
16%
(3%)—
3%
*Raw data was not provided, results from 2005 monitoring report
* *Gauge malfunctioned and was not replaced until after the growing season and beaver removal
^Gauge mailfanctioned 10/7/2008, replaced 11/2008
* *Gauge mailfunctioned prior to monitoring beginning (date of failure unknown- unable to download gauge), replaced 6/2010
^^Gauge mailfunctioned prior to monitoring starting date, malfunction or incorrect calibration occurred after first visit (date of failure unknown -
unable to download gauge), replaced 9/2010