20041646 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Report_20120823

A
X/6'
t6
UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation)
Stream Enhancement Project
EEP Project No. 92709
2011 Monitoring Report: Year 3
Construction Completed: February 2005
Submission Date: April 2012
Submitted to: NCDENR -EEP
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
r�
lP' Mtem '�111C11t
neoaanM
9@@90VI21
AUG232012
UENh . WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS 4 STORM4Yi�TM gMNM
NCDEhIR

SECTION 1 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 1 Goals and Objectives
1 2 Vegetative Assessment
1 3 Stream Assessment
1 4 Annual Monitoring Summary
SECTION 2 - METHODOLOGY
SECTION 3 - REFERENCES
SECTION 4 - APPENDICES
List of Appendices
Table of Contents
Appendix A — Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Figure 1
Project Vicinity Map and Directions
Table 1
Project Restoration Components
Table 2
Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3
Project Contacts Table
Table 4
Project Attribute Table
Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2
Current Condition Plan View (CCPV)
Table 5
Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Table 6
Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Photos
Stream Station Photos
Photos
Vegetation Plot Photos
Appendix C — Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7 Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Table 9 Stem Count Total and Planted by Plat and Species
1 -1
1 -2
1 -2
1 -3
UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) Monitoring Report April 2012
EEP Project No 92709 Monitoring Year 3

rage ii
Table of Contents
Appendix D — Stream Survey Data
Figures 3a -3d Cross - sections with annual overlays
Figure 4 Longitudinal Profiles with Annual Overlays
Figures 5a -5d Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays
Table 10a Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 10b Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 11a Monitoring — Cross - Section Morphology Data Table
Table 11 b Monitoring — Stream Reach Morphology Data Table
Appendix E — Hydrologic Data
Table 12 Verification of Bankfull Events
Figure 6 Monthly Rainfall Data
UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) Monitoring Report April 2012
EEP Project No 92709 Monitoring Year 3

SECTION 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

SECTION 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) Stream Enhancement Project (Site) is located
in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina dust south of the Town of Mint Hill (Appendix A)
The Site is located within the Southern Outer Piedmont Physiographic Region of the
Yadkin River Basin (HUC 3040105) and has an approximate watershed of 3 15 square
miles upstream from its confluence with the Rocky River The Site enhancement
components consisted of bank stabilization and habitat enhancement along 783 linear
feet of UT Goose Creek This project was conducted as a partial fulfillment of the off-
site stream mitigation agreement between North Carolina Department of Transportation
(NCDOT) and North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission (NCWRC) for the 1-485
outer loop project The Site was constructed in February 2005 and transferred to EEP
in 2007 for monitoring Monitoring of the site was initiated in 2009 This report serves
as the third year and final year of monitoring for the Site
1.1 Goals and Objectives
The Site passes through forested areas, and residential and commercial developments
The construction of 1-485 has resulted in a shift within the Site's watershed from a rural
to an urbanized environment Poor riparian zone management such as clearcutting,
channelization, and impervious surface expansion within the watershed has had an
adverse effect on the stability of the Site's streambanks, in- stream habitat, and water
quality The Goose Creek watershed is one of two remaining North Carolina habitats of
the federally endangered Carolina Heelsplitter mussel (Lasmigona decorate) Due to the
federal protected status this species, the entire Rocky River watershed was designated
as a priority area for conservation and protection
The following goals were established for the Site
1 Enhance 783 linear feet of UT Goose Creek by grading banks, planting a riparian
buffer, and reducing bank erosion
2 Enhance the riparian zone adjacent to the stream with native forest species
3 Restore degraded in- stream habitat via in- stream structures such as log and rock
vanes
Streambanks and riparian areas were stabilized using bare -root plantings and
temporary and permanent seed mixes Areas within the Site subject to construction
grading and the overall understory were planted with native vegetation Enhancement of
the stream segments will help to improve streambank stability, water quality, and
increase vegetation biodiversity Appendix A provides detailed project activity, history,
contact information, and watershed /site background for this project
UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) Monitoring Report April 2012
EEP Project No 92709 Monitoring Year 3

Page 1 -2
Executive Summary
1.2 Vegetative Assessment
Due to the lapse in time between construction and the first monitoring year (2009), the
vegetation plots established in 2005 were unable to be located In 2009, JJG
established three new vegetation monitoring plots in the approximate vicinity of the
original plots established by NCWRC Two 5m x 20m and one 10m x 10m plots were
located within the enhancement areas Woody vegetation within the established plots
were assessed as planted or volunteer species in 2009 Largest specimens were
recorded as planted relative to the smaller stems, which were recorded as natural
recruited specimens Vegetation assessments were conducted following the NCEEP
2004 Stem Counting Protocol which consists of counting woody stems within the
established vegetation plots The vegetation success criteria stated in the mitigation
plan calls for a total of 256 stems per acre at the end of year three based on
approximately 0 8 acres of land that was disturbed during construction However,
success criteria are based on planted stems per acre (USACE, 2003) due to the
approximate size of the re- established vegetation plots (0 0247 acres) as follows
320 stems per acre years 1 through 3
288 stems per acre year 4
260 stems per acre year 5
All the vegetation plots met the vegetation success threshold for the 2011 monitoring
year (MY -3) The 2011 vegetation monitoring indicated an average survivability of 864
planted stems per acre with a mean of 3,617 stems per acre when including volunteers
The number of planted and naturally recruited species ranged from six (Plot 2) to 11
(Plot 3) and eight (Plot 2) to 22 (Plot 3), respectively The 2011 monitoring effort was the
third year of monitoring for the planted vegetation, however, the Site was planted in
2005, therefore the site is in the sixth growing season The monitoring data indicates an
average of 21 planted stems per plot In conclusion, the riparian restoration project
meets the requirements per the success criterion for the 2011 monitoring year Please
refer to Appendices B and C for vegetation plot photos and raw data tables
1.3 Stream Assessment
Results from the 2011 stream monitoring effort indicate that stream pattern, profile, and
dimension of Goose Creek is maintaining vertical and lateral stability with minimal
problem areas Areas along the stream enhancement reach noted with bare banks
appear to be stabilized by the roots of larger trees established on the banks
Stream dimension, pattern, profile, and substrate were evaluated within 688 linear feet
of the Site The average bankfull width (34 26 ft) of the surveyed cross - sections is within
the range of the as -built widths reported (32-44 ft), and the average surveyed mean
bankfull depth is 3 19 ft compared to the as -built typical (2 9 ft) The surveyed bankfull
widths and depths lead to a mean Width /Depth ratio of 11 39 The upper section of the
enhancement project was classified as a 134c and the lower section of the project was
classified as a C4e The channel's profile appears to be stable and was characterized
UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) Monitoring Report April 2012
EEP Project No 92709 Monitoring Year 3

Page 1 -3
Executive Summary
by well- defined We and pool features The average water surface slope and average
bankfull slope were determined to be 0 0070 ft/ft and 0 0060 ft/ft, respectively There
was significant decline in the d50 particle size of each cross section between 2011 and
previous monitoring years This suggests the particle distribution has shifted towards
one of more fine sand and silt substrate material, although there was no evidence of
increased aggradation from previous years Further, the cross sectional areas of each
cross section are consistent with previous monitoring events and show no notable
decreases in area due to aggradation Therefore, the discrepancy in particle
distributions is likely due to derivation from the sampling protocol and /or the sampler's
technique in collecting and assessing particles
Near station 4 +00 feet (ft), a debris dam has formed and has temporanly affected the
profile This profile adjustment is most likely temporary It is anticipated that the debris
dam and accumulated sediment will be flushed from the system during future rain
events Other areas that are of some concern include a stressed boulder toe with
dislodged boulders and a failing vane structure at the end of the project that is no longer
providing adequate bank protection This structure has become dislodged and is
redirecting flow from the thalweg to the outside meander bend The change in flow
vector is resulting in bank erosion, which is compromising bank stability The structure
may need to be adjusted to regain proper functionality or be removed
A crest gauge is not located on -site, therefore, JJG referenced a local USGS gauge
(station 0212467451) located on another tributary downstream of the Site with a similar
drainage area (8 5 sq mi ) to determine bankfull event occurrences within the Goose
Creek watershed According to the USGS gauge, one bankfull event or greater was
recorded within the Goose Creek watershed during the 2011 monitoring year Other
indicators such as old wrack lines and staining were observed at the bankfull and
greater elevations within the Site
Overall, the Site appears to be maintaining vertical and lateral stability with minimal
bank erosion and has met the success criteria for MY -2011 Please refer to Appendix D
for detailed stream data tables and plots and Appendix B for the location of the
longitudinal profile stations, cross - section stations, vegetation plots, photo points, and
gauges
1.4 Annual Monitoring Summary
In summary, the Site has met the stream and vegetation mitigation goals for monitoring
year three The 2011 vegetation plot monitoring results indicate that the planted and
naturally recruited vegetation is doing well at the site The pattern, profile, and
dimension of the enhancement channel appear to be maintaining vertical and lateral
stability with minimal bank erosion A few problem areas were observed, such as poor
streambank cover, minor structure instability, and debris dams However, these areas do
not appear to be advancing and are benefiting from deep rooted vegetation along the
banks that are providing stability
UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) Monitoring Report April 2012
EEP Project No 92709 Monitoring Year 3

Page 1-4
Executive Summary
The background information provided in this report is referenced from the mitigation
plan prepared by NCWRC (2005) Summary information /data related to the occurrence
of items such as beaver or encroachment and statistics related to performance of
various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and figures in the
report appendices Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in
these reports can be found in the mitigation and restoration plan documents available
on EEP's website All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices is
available from EEP upon request
UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) Monitoring Report April 2012
EEP Project No 92709 Monitoring Year 3

JJG
SECTION 2
METHODOLOGY

SECTION 2
METHODOLOGY
21 Methodology
Methods employed for the Site were a combination of those established by standard
regulatory guidance and procedures documents as well as previous monitoring reports
completed by NCWRC Survey data collected was performed via total station to
establish the current longitudinal profile and cross - section elevations Data recorded
during this monitoring event were georeferenced using historically established positions
to evaluate annual progress Longitudinal stationing for the stream profile, cross -
sectional surveys, and additional geomorphic assessments were performed following
guidelines outlined in the Stream Channel Reference Sites An Illustrated Guide to Field
Techniques (Harrelson et al , 1994) and in the Stream Restoration a Natural Channel
Design Handbook (Doll et al, 2003) Substrate analysis and particle size distribution
were established using a modified Wolman pebble count (Rosgen 1996) at each cross -
section location
Vegetation monitoring for Year 3 was conducted following the NCEEP 2004 Stem
Counting Protocol which consists of counting woody stems within the established
vegetation plots Plot locations are consistent with previous monitoring years and plot
sizes consist of two 5m x 20m and one 10m x 10m The taxonomic standard for
vegetation follows Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, and surrounding areas
(Weakley, 2007) Off -site bankfull events were documented using the USGS station
0212467451, Goose Creek at SR 1524 near Indian Trail, NC
UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) Monitoring Report April 2012
EEP Project No 92709 Monitoring Year 3

M, -
SECTION 3
REFERENCES

L
SECTION 3
REFERENCES
Doll, B A , Grabow, G L , Hall, K A , Halley, J , Harman, W A , Jennings, G D , and
Wise, D E, 2003 Stream Restoration A Natural Channel Design Handbook
Harrelson, Cheryl C, Rawlins, C L, Potyondy, John P 1994 Stream Channel
Reference Sites An Illustrated Guide to Field Technique Gen Tech Rep RM -245
Fort Collins, CO U S Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain
Forest and Range Experiment Station 61 p
North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission 2005 As -Built Report for the Greene
Mitigation on Goose Creek Mecklenburg County Raleigh, NC
Rosgen, D L 1996 Applied River Morphology Wildland Hydrology Books, Pagosa
Springs,
CO
US Army Corps of Engineers - Wilmington District, US Environmental Protection Agency,
NC Wildlife Resource Commission, and NC Division of Water Quality 2003 Stream
Mitigation Guidelines Wilmington, NC
Weakley, A S 2008 Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, Northern Florida, and
Surrounding Areas (Draft April 2008) University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel
Hill, NC
UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) Monitoring Report April 2012
EEP Project No 92709 Monitoring Year 3

SECTION 4
APPENDICES
Appendix A — Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
Appendix C — Vegetation Plot Data
Appendix D — Stream Survey Data
Appendix E — Hydrologic Data

APPENDIX A
PROJECT VICINITY MAP AND BACKGROUND
TABLES
Figure 1 Project Vicinity Map and Directions
Table 1 Project Restoration Components
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 Project Contacts Table
Table 4 Project Attribute Table
UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) Monitoring Report April 2012
EEP Project No 92709 Monitoring Year 3

PROJECT SITE DETAIL
'2 \.7 �� STONEBRIDGE <� '�, ,'1 'fgtl ' •�I r'
— .t ° ¢mss! ',1 � F } � �t {r1 r , r � 'Sr%F< <•�,
J4'
�!n � ,3 '�PLi�� .rte,•') � ar'i " ^0 �` � ' �,r
Yn`_ 1, );;ilT\ ' \f 1
Aerial Source: 1007 MecklenburgCarMyG6
kv, !S z SEO
'gdPyss, e AL'EX[S .r �r � �`-`' r '�� Ey_ Art+2•ys
t< 1 71�\ � :3 JI � I � � (• 1_ .! , r �,�- t ' i }C '`Cy_"_. � � !8'
y
3` /x OOO� �Ir �� f +`� •• � l? 1�.�,,r ���•. �'2� ��t i S (/: '� /1 OHO' .:;(��rC'l/f\ �°- f ty \'� ! _,�,' � � r .- C;tj
RlVFN OCF,�.) , �,y`�'c. • �� �cP .. � • � _ (l � "f •! �f i fr` ._ �� `� .�'�� d 1, � �� , �� j ` • i1'' /' � :.
Dt�r. , \��•:�.. ( li \ \ \- ..r,l(i" j }'i �lsG = =t)��d 'r:E M ON CREEK
Ic
V-1
``5 m �� etc 21t
n r r 1 ( ,f • % r I z m a I ) i J 1 �S J . r� ` L°• � t � (p S 17TrON'E I { �IIIJNkER
-
`war~ G11 J tir.A lA_'f{ �J 1 `i+' l iGlt�F
/ m < J
C {\ r C 1 (_: ' f � �
�� 41 � � 4'`rt � � '�, r tt•,�• ol,�y�;._ s- Ec, 1
i - �y•�F `'C1� ti,.J. ``':� I z I m , tf� f�l' % I �l� f � % /r' , � � { 1 � f 'r gg�•.�� C :tee t � �r� I �. '� RG Lls ��\ \�74
' '{ `, �` � . Q�` 6FA +� � �_ 1 \ ¢ t{k ? ,9 Rc<,y'�. i I i }� � _ �� } � t 1 � > • �L` •7,_ � 'u � � ,.` 1 1 11 . � _ +l ' r�fl 1` t
IJ �P �'/�r T� 5 ��• , yi `� C aty r:.�� r ti/r''�'i` "s
Sty' � `' A �'}'T X11 f iI•UC 4th � I' 'f� FCp``i� CRE; Sr��' G,y � �� •;l\ y` _
�I•� 2� � c it^�1!oL 1q� {' tl) �.'� ,:�> >` qRk OR �L�Jr. �L-;��ke:,�r s'On,F- TTY, In
` �. j.2j.. ?UR/CE -•-. 1r EV L - ,.. r , C ! ' r k-." - lr' O° l.. e '
pia F 4 U
Y' OA
'fit i(1 �, i ���•.,,� ` r ' } 1 -�h` ^\ a- t -1�yr /, ,.�� „•OP' '1
-'�I , } 1 �t (�)5{�(l�t PC i
nO VIEWi,'�'1 ;
J
r•� /��1MILLWRI�IGHT
r.
Project Site
J l(' ,�l $' - _.� _ A• `' _ Stallings
CSC
b d d!� ♦s .� Jl +'��:t�n < 'fiO ,Yj}.,.�• -�..e ;`, '. `” 7. 1 t`)i� .4yQ•S - ��,/ �I t. x'.'.. jL �.,p J,
XW �` i % \�lr�;'C"'� � 13 { � _ r .''.� ,;•`•9a�`�. �� $,<<v ?0,' 4�,�w -� / T� ?i�;•r J �1!� -
HOO ( r SHANNAMARA� -) t
r e ;` e'•.• o¢ �, ICS , I �� --
` �S . � � r'`� w , � ! •' � ' 1 t `gO�t • 1L'y ey✓•.�'' ` l i SP �� _p \> tl'~ ' � ',
C¢7 nt ��t f..• ♦A$ � - �O ':L ¢' Z�r� `C��• •� r 1:- 11�� Cr- � ~i •� n . l � <.''�.'+;
,m . � � r.. S !O Pp U J .., 1 _ r c tr � ; � Iii, t •� •, � c J =,�G'/ "4 }� I `,�.> ! ' � i r
.�,'9 t t�` ' ✓• �Oo�Y °} 1 S�`tt. � { � )1 t! � tt�5 - <., 4 .- _��
(1SCiSSource: NCDOTGIS
Directions to the site: • _ Jt i r °, . \ `g�P� t F� r y Stream Enhancement
From downtown Charlotte, NC take US 74 East to the y tJ Indian • Q
Albemarle Road exit. Tun right onto Lawyers Road t r i 1 ` ;. 9 I/!) Conservation Easement
Travel southeast on Lawyers Road for approximately 8 miles 0�
to Country Woods Drive and turn right. The project site y(I �4 >. GgNT ; ` �" 3,000 1,500 I 0 3,000
is approximately 0.3 miles on the left side of the J. rlQ, ,- FRy r Feet
4.
�+
Figure 1 - Vicinity Map
r~ UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation Site)/EEP Project No. 92709
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
��ei eat Monitoring Year 3
Submittal Date: April 2012

Appendix A Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Table 1 Project Components and Mitigation Credits
UT Goose Creek (Greene Mttigation)/EEP Project No 92709
Monitoring Year 3
Mitigation Credits
Stream
Riparian
Wetland
Non - riparian
Wetland
Buffer
Nitrogen
Nutrient
Offset
O
Phosphorous
Nutrient Offset
T e
Ell
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
261 0 SMU
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Project Components
Project
Component/Reach ID
Stationing (ft)
Existing
Footage/
Acreage
Approach
Restoration or
Restoration
Equivalent
Restoration
Footage or
Acres
Mitigation Ratio
Reach I -UT Goose
0+00 -7 +83
7831f
Ell
Enhancement
7831f
3 1
Component Summations
Restoration Level
Stream (linear
feet)
Riparian Wetland (acres)
Non - riparian
Wetland (acres)
Buffer (square
feet)
Upland (acres)
Rrvenne
Non- Rtvenne
Restoration (R)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Enhancement (E)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Enahncement I (E)
783
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Enhancement II (E)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Creation (C)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Preservation (P)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
HQ Preservation (P)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
783
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
BMP Elements
Element
Location
Purpose/Function
Notes
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
BMP Elements
BR = Bioretention Cell SF = Sand Filter SW = Storinwater Wetland WDP = Wet Detention Pond DDP Dry Detention Pond FS = Filter Strip S =
Grassed Swale LS = Level Spreader, N1= Natural Infiltration Area FB = Forested Buffer, SMU = Stream Mitigation Units
*Enhancement and Preservation reaches were not stationed
Appendix A - Background Tables
UT Goose Creek Monitoring Report
Year 3

Appendix A Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation)/EEP Project No 92709
Monitoring Year 3
Elapsed Time Since Grading Complete 6 Years l l Months
Elapsed Time Since Planting Complete 6 Years I I Months
Number of Reporting Years 3
`
or Rqpoft
)Data cougtIIOII
compided
Actual,
Co mpletlon
'or Deftv
Restoration Plan
N/A
2003
Final Design-90%
N/A
N/A
Construction
N/A
Feb -05
Temporary S &E mix applied to entire
project area*
N/A
Feb -05
Permanent seed mix applied to reach
N/A
Feb -05
Mitigation Plan/ As -Built (Year 0
Monitonn
N/A
Mar -05
Year 1 Monitoring
Nov -09
Dec -09
Year 2 Monitoring
Apr-2010 and Sept-2010
Dec -10
Year 3 Monitoring
Jim -11
Jan -12
Year 4 Monitoring
N/A
N/A
Year 5 Monitoring
N/A
N/A
*Seed and mulch are added as each section of construction is completed
Appendix A - Background Tables
UT Goose Creek Monitoring Report
Year 3

Appendix A Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Table 3 Protect Contacts Table
UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) /EEP Protect No 92709
Monitoring Year 3
Appendix A - Background Tables
UT Goose Creek Monttonng Report
Year 3
NCWRC - Division of Inland Fisheries
Designer
1721 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Todd Hodges Construction
Contractor's Name
Patterson NC
Planting Contractor
Unknown
Seeding Contractor
Unknown
Jordan, Jones and Goulding
Monitoring Performers
6801 Governor's Lake Pkwy
Norcross GA 30071
Stream Monitoring, POC
Alison Nichols 704 - 301 -7563
Vegetation Monitoring, POC
Appendix A - Background Tables
UT Goose Creek Monttonng Report
Year 3

Appendix A Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Table 4 Project Baseline Information and Attributes
UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation)IEEP Project No 92709
Monitoring Year 3
Pro Info
Pro ect Name
UT Goose Creek Greene Mitigation)
Protect County
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Protect Area acres
4 4 acres
Project Coordinates
35a 8 40 96'N 80° 38 10 77 W
Projecit Waftrdked Strimimury ]etarmatyou
Physiographic Region
Piedmont
River Basin
Yadkin
USGS HUC for Prot ect 8 digit)
03040105
USGS HUC for Protect 14 digit)
03040105030020
DINO Sub -basin
03 -07 -12
Pro ect Drainage Area acres
2,016
Protect Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area'
10%
CGIA Land Use Classification
1 01 01 03
Reach Smanneary iArematYoo
pmwnebers
Read t
Ranh 2
Reach 3
Length of reach (linear feet)
783
N/A
N/A
Valley classification
11
N/A
N/A
Drainage area acres
2,016
N/A
N/A
NCDWQ stream identification score
N/A
N/A
N/A
NCDWQ Water Q"rty Classification
C
N/A
N/A
Morphological Description stream a
Perennial
N/A
N/A
Evolutional trend
F4 /G4 to F4/114c to C4/E4
N/A
N/A
Underlying mapped soils
Monacan Lignum gravelly silt
loam Georgeville silt loam
N/A
N/A
Drainage Class
spd, spd, wd
N/A
N/A
Soil Hydric status
h dnc h dnc non -h dric
N/A
N/A
Slope
0 008
N/A
N/A
FEMA classification
100 year fl lain
N/A
N/A
Native vegetation community
bottomland hardwood
N/A
N/A
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
U
N/A
N/A
WgilloadSummuiry Iniormatioti••
Parameters
We>bnd 1
W nd2
Wef nd-3
Size of Wetland acres
Wetland Type (non riparian riparian nvenne or riparian non
nvenne
Mapped Sod Series
Drainage class
Sod Hydric Status
Source of Hydrology
Hydrologic im rment
Native vegetation community
Percent compositio n of exotic invasive vegetation
Waters of the United States Section 404
Yes
Yes
NWP 27 82004
Waters of the United States Section 401
No
N/A
N/A
Endan eyed Species Act
No
N/A
N/A
Historic Preservation Act
No
N/A
N/A
Costal Zone Mans emetn Act CZMA Costal Area
No
N/A
N/A
FEMA Flood lain Compliance
Yes
U
N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
N/A
N/A
*At the time of project completion
•• Wetland mitigation as not included for this restoration project
"N /A items do not appls / items are unmiulable / U penis are unknoxn
spd = somewhat poorly drained wd = well drained
Appendix A - Background Tables
UT Goose Creek Monitoring Document
Year 3

N�-
APPENDIX B
VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA
Figure 2 Current Condition Plan View (CCPV)
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Photos Stream Station Photos
Photos Vegetation Plot Photos
UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) Monitoring Report April 2012
EEP Project No 92709 Monitoring Year 3

Stan Longitudinal
2011 CURRENT CONDITIONS
In-Stream Structure Condition
aIE Failing
Stressed
� Stable
LEGEND Bank/Bed Condition
— Cross - Section (XS) — Bare Bank
Fhd of Longitudinal Profile Vegetation Plots a Bank Scour
Structures Boulder Toe Condition
■.■■ Boulder Toe
■■■■ Failing
USGS Bluetine Stream "" Stressed
so a o so ,ao 2'Contour
■■■■ Stable
F.9
�� NC ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
EEP PROJECT NO. 92709 GOOSE CREEK (GREENE MITIGATION SITE) APRIL 2011
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 1 " =50'
a went MONITORING YEAR 3 CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW
Figure 2B

Appendix B Visual Assessment Data
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Main Channel (783 If)
UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation)/EEP Project No 92709
Monitoring Year 3
Major
Channel
Category
Channel
Sub-Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total
Number In
As -Built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
rf Stable
Performing as
Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Why
V etatfon
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust % for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
I Bed
1 Vertical Stability
Aggred anon
0
0
100 %
Degradation
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2 Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
9
8
113%
3 Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
6
6
100%
Condition
Lenth Appropriate
6
6
100%
Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
4
6
67%
4 Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide)
6
6
100%
2 Bank
l Scoured/Eroded
Bank lacking vegetative cover resuhmg simply from poor growth and/or scour
and erosion
2
94
94%
I
2
98%
Banks underaut/ovcrhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely
2 Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are modest appear sustainable and are
0
0
100%
0
0
1000/0
pro"ding habitat
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calvmg or collapse
0
0
1000/0
0
0
1000/0
Teftk
2
94
94%
1
2
1 99%
3 Engineered
Structures
l Overall Integrity
ty
Structures physically intact with no dilod ed boulders or
P lg ty B Bs
7
8
88%
2 Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
8
8
1000/0
22 Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms
8
8
100%
3 Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of mfluence does not exceed 15%
7
8
88%
4 Habitat
Pool forming structures mamtammg —Max Pool Depth Banldull Depth ? 1 6
Rootwads/lo rovidra some cover at basefow
8
8
100%
Appendix B Visual Assessment Data
UT Goose Creek Monitoring Report
Year 3

Appendix B
Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation)/EEP Project No 92709
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Planted Acreage
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
acres
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of
Planted
Acreage
Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material
01
0
0
0%
Low Stem Density Areas
Woody stem densities clearly below tart levels based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count cntena
0
0
0
0g %r
• 11p.
i otal
0
0
0%0-
Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small given the monitoring year
0
0
0
0%
Easement Acreage 4 4 ac
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
S
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of
Planted
Acreage
Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale)
1000
0
0
0%
Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale)
none
0
0
0%
Appendix B - Visual Assessment Data
UT Goose Creek Monitoring Report
Year 3 of 5

Photo Point 1: View Downstream Left Bank
(MY 1 - 11/2009)
Photo Point 1: View Downstream Right Bank
(MY 1 - 11/2009)
Photo Point 1: View Downstream Left Bank
(MY 3 - 6/2011)
Photo Point 1: View Downstream Right Bank
(MY 3 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Prepared B
P Y:
Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
ARem UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) Stream Enhancement/EEP Project No. 92709
M et Monitoring Year 3

Photo Point 2: View Upstream
(MY 1 - 11/2009)
Photo Point 2: View Downstream
(MY 1 - 11/2009)
Photo Point 2: View Upstream
(MY 3 - 6/2011)
Photo Point 2: View Downstream
(MY 3 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Prepared By:
F Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
rStream Station & Cross Section Photos
j UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) Stream Enhancement /EEP Project No. 92709
I ...— Monitoring Year 3 IR

Photo Point 3: View Upstream
(MY I - 11/2009)
Photo Point 3: View Downstream
(MY 1 - 11/2009)
Photo Point 3: View Upstream
(MY 3 - 6/2011)
Photo Point 3: View Downstream
(MY 3 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Prepared By:
Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
Fr em UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) Stream Enhancement/EEP Proj6ct No. 92709
E lan Nat Monitoring Year 3

Photo Point 4: View Upstream
(MY 1 - 11/2009)
Photo Point 4: View Downstream
(MY 1 - 11/2009)
Photo Point 4: View Upstream
(MY 3 - 6/2011)
Photo Point 4: View Downstream
(MY 3 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Prepared By:
Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
rStream Station & Cross Section Photos
tem UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) Stream Enhancement/EEP Project No. 92709
Offit Monitoring Year 3 iR

Photo Point 5: View Upstream
(MY 1 - 11/2009)
Photo Point 5: View Downstream
(MY I - 11/2009)
Photo Point 5: View Upstream
(MY 3 - 6/2011)
Photo Point 5: View Downstream
(MY 3 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Prepared By:
Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
to UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) Stream Enhancement /EEP Project No. 92709
t ht Monitoring Year 3
IR

Photo Point 6: View Upstream
(MY 1 - 11/2009)
Photo Point 6: View Downstream
(MY I - 11/2009)
Prepared For:
Photo Point 6: View Upstream
(MY 3 - 6/2011)
Photo Point 6: View Downstream
(MY 3 - 6/2011)
Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) Stream Enhancement /EEP Project No. 92709
�Eent Monitoring Year 3
Prepared By:

Photo Point 7: View Upstream
(MY 1 - 11/2009)
Photo Point 7: View Downstream
(MY I - 11/2009)
Photo Point 7: View Upstream
(MY 3 - 6/2011)
Photo Point 7: View Downstream
(MY 3 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Prepared By:
Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
hi'F� � UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) Stream Enhancement/EEP Project No. 92709
i mment Monitoring Year 3 81

Photo Point 8: View Upstream
(MY 1 - 11/2009)
Photo Point 8: View Downstream
(MY 1 - 11/2009)
Prepared For:
Photo Point 8: View Upstream
(MY 3 - 6/2011)
Photo Point 8: View Downstream
(MY 3 - 6/2011)
Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
rStream Station & Cross Section Photos
tein UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) Stream Enhancement/EEP Project No. 92709
O it Monitoring Year 3
Prepared By:

Cross Section 1: View Upstream
(MY 1 - 11/2009)
Cross Section 1: View Downstream
(MY 1 - 11/2009)
Prepared For:
Cross Section 1: View Upstream
(MY 3 - 6/2011)
Cross Section 1: View Downstream
(MY 3 - 6/2011)
F Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) Stream Enhancement/EEP Project No. 92709
�ent Monitoring Year 3
Prepared By:
0

Cross Section 2: View Upstream
(MY 1 - 11/2009)
Cross Section 2: View Downstream
(MY 1 - 11/2009)
Prepared For:
Cross Section 2: View Upstream
(MY 3 - 6/2011)
Cross Section 2: View Downstream
(MY 3 - 6/2011)
Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
rStream Station & Cross Section Photos
to UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) Stream Enhancement /EEP Project No. 92709
meet Monitoring Year 3
Prepared By:
iR

Cross Section 3: View Upstream
(MY 1 - 11/2009)
Cross Section 3: View Downstream
(MY 1 - 11/2009)
Prepared For:
Cross Section 3: View Upstream
(MY 3 - 6/2011)
Cross Section 3: View Downstream
(MY 3 - 6/2011)
Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
�cosstem UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) Stream Enhancement /EEP Project No. 92709
!',n ru cinenf Monitoring Year 3
Prepared By:

Cross Section 4: View Upstream
(MY 1 - 11/2009)
Cross Section 4: View Downstream
(MY 1 - 11/2009)
Prepared For:
Cross Section 4: View Upstream
(MY 3 - 6/2011)
Cross Section 4: View Downstream
(MY 3 - 6/2011)
F Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
Stream Station & Cross Section Photos
UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) Stream Enhancement/EEP Project No. 92709
ent Monitoring Year 3
Prepared By:

Vegetation Plot 1
(MY 1 - 10/2009)
Vegetation Plot 1
(MY 1 - 10/2009)
Vegetation Plot 1
(MY 3 - 6/2011)
Vegetation Plot 1
(MY 3 - 6/2011)
Prepared For: Prepared By:
Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
r' Vegetation Plot Photos
RIN-
L t UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) Stream Enhancement/EEP Project No. 92709
•�•� Monitoring Year 3 is

Vegetation Plot 2
(MY 1 - 10/2009)
Vegetation Plot 2
(MY 1 - 10/2009)
Vegetation Plot 2
(MY 3 - 6/2011)
Vegetation Plot 2
(MY 3- 6/2011)
Prepared For: Prepared By.
Appendix B —Visual Assessment Data
Ffr, Vegetation Plot Photos
, "ian ne t UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) Stream Enhancement /EEP Project No. 92709
Monitoring Year 3 19

Vegetation Plot 3
(MY 1 - 10/2009)
Vegetation Plot 3
(MY 1- 10/2009)
Prepared For:
Vegetation Plot 3
(MY 3 - 6/2011)
Vegetation Plot 3
(MY 3 - 6/2011)
Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
C' Vegetation Plot Photos
�� me 1 UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) Stream Enhancement/EEP Project No. 92709
Monitoring Year 3
Prepared By:

APPENDIX C
VEGETATION PLOT DATA
Table 7 Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Table 8 Not Included - UT Goose Creek is monitored on the 2004
NCEEP Stem Count Protocol
Table 9 Stem Count Total and Planted by Plat and Species
UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) Monitoring Report April 2012
EEP Project No 92709 Monitoring Year 3

Appendix C
Table 7 Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success
UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation)/EEP Project No 92709
Monitoring Year 3
Vegetation Plot ID
Vegetation Survival
Threshold Met
(Y/N)
Plot 1
Y
Plot 2
Y
Plot 3
Y
Appendix B - Visual Assessment Data
UT Goose Creek Monitoring Report
Year 3

Appendix C
Table 9 Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species
UT Goose Creek (Greene Mtbgabon)/EEP Project No 92709
Monttorine Year 3 of 5
1 ype =bnMb Or 1 fee
P – Planted
T = Total
*Data was collected by another momtonng firm no volunteer stems were included in data
"Plot sires vaned from 0 017 acre to 0 040 acre
Appendix B - Visual Assessment Data
UT Goose Creek Monitoring Report
Year 3 of 5
Current Data (MY3 -2011)
Annual Means
Species
Common Name
Type
Plot 1
Plot 2
Plot 3
Current Mean
MYO.2005•
MYI -2009
MV I -2010
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
Acernegundo
boxelder
T
4
1
1
1
3
1
3
1
2
Acer rubrum
red maple
T
1
5
1
2
1
4
3
3
2
3
2
4
Anus semilata
tag alder
T
7
9
9
8
9
27
27
10
12
10
11
Baccharts hallmlfolla
groundscl tree
T
N/A
N/A
1
Betula niRra
river birch
T
N/A
N/A
1
I
Carpinus carollniana
amencan hornbeam
T
1
12
1
6
3
12
2
10
2
2
6
28
6
35
Carya ovata
shagbark hickory
T
I
N/A
I
1
Ce halanthus occldentalls
buttonbush
S
2
2
1
2
6
6
Cerris canadensls
eastern redbud
T
1
3
N/A
2
Corms amomum
silky dogwood
S
I
N/A
1
43
43
2
2
2
2
ElaeaRnus umbellata
autumn olive
S
8
10
10
N/A
9
Fagusgrandifolia
amencan beech
T
N/A
N/A
9
9
Frax/nus pennsylvaruca
green ash
T
1
2
1
1
2
2
3
2
5
Ju lans 111
black walnut
T
NIA
N/A
25
25
June ros vi Imam
eastern red cedar
T
1
2
1
1
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
4
vu! `•*
common privet
S
12
4
N/A
8
Llndera benzorn
spiccbush
S
3
5
N/A
4
5
Llrodendron tuli lfera
tulip poplar
T
3
1
4
4
10
3
6
3
3
6
5
Li uidambar styraciflua
sweet Rum
T
3
35
36
N/A
25
20
24
Monts rubra
red mulberry
T
4
N/A
4
4
Platanus ocddentalis
sycamore
T
1
3
7
1
1
3
2
6
8
6
8
Pinus taeda
loblolly the
T
2
N/A
2
10
8
Pinus 5p
pine species
T
N/A
N/A
7
7
Primus serohna
black cherry
T
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
ercus albs
white oak
T
I
N/A
1
1
7
1
7
ercus lyrara
overcup oak
T
I
1
I
1
2
2
2
1 2
ercus lustris
pm oak
T
N/A
N/A
1
1
ercus phellcis
willow oak
T
I
1
l
1
2
3
ercus sp
oak species
T
N/A
N/A
2
2
Rhus labra
smooth sumac
S
2
N/A
2
1
Salix nWa
black willow
S
6
12
1
1
4
7
l
1
15
15
10
12
SalixseHcea
silkywillow
S
3
8
1
N/A
4
54
54
4
4
Sambucus canadensls
elderberry
S
2
3
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
Ulmus alata
winged elm
T
N/A
N/A
5
Unknown
N/A
I N/A
4
4
1
1
Plot Area acres
00247
—
Species Count
6
17
6
6
I1
22
8
15
17
10
18
10
Stem Count
11
78
18
65
27
110
19
84
1"
41
125
39
4131
Stems r Acre
4453
3158
728 7
2632
1093
4453
756
3414
2324
1673
5074
1592
1 ype =bnMb Or 1 fee
P – Planted
T = Total
*Data was collected by another momtonng firm no volunteer stems were included in data
"Plot sires vaned from 0 017 acre to 0 040 acre
Appendix B - Visual Assessment Data
UT Goose Creek Monitoring Report
Year 3 of 5

N1,
APPENDIX D
STREAM SURVEY DATA
Figures 3a -3d Cross - sections with Annual Overlays
Figure 4 Longitudinal Profiles with Annual Overlays
Figures 5a -5d Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays
Tables 10a,b Baseline — Stream Data Summary Tables
Table 11a Monitoring — Cross - Section Morphology Data Table
Table 11 b Monitoring — Stream Reach Morphology Data Table
*Raw data tables have been provided electronically
UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) Monitoring Report April 2012
EEP Project No 92709 Monitoring Year 3

Appendix D. Stream Survey Data
Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) -MY3
Cross- Section 1 -Riffle
lOt
Figure 3a: Cross - Section Plots and Raw
Data
-
Ratio
2.00
100
- - - - -
- --
UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation)/EEP Project
No.92709
99
Monitoring Year 3
98
-
2;
97
-
!ro Nattse Goose Creek
h
G
REP Pro'ect Number 92709
O
95
Cross - Section ID XS -1, Riffle, 0 +51
94
93
Date 6/2011
92
91
DATA
0 10 20
30 40 50
60 70 80 90
Station (ft)
a
Bankfull Elevation ft
95.80
- -MYI- 11/2009
--- 0- - MY3 - 6/2011 -
•••WaterSurface ••�• °••••Bankfull
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (it')
108.98
Bankfull Width ft
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
44.22
99.79
Flood Prone Width ft
74.39
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
2.46
Bankfull Max Depth ft
3.99
W/D Ratio
17.98
Entrenchment Ratio
1.68
Bank Height
XS -1: View Upstream
XS -1:
View Downstream
Sbdbm
Eleve isa
Nets
12.8
97.77
xsI -1 t
13.07
97.72
xs -1
14.23
97.77
XS-1
15.71
97.62
XS-1
17.06
97.21
xs -1
18.62
96.67
xs -I
20.07
95.78
xs -1
21.18
95.03
xs -1
22.46
94.57
xs -1
23.66
94.15
xs -1
25.15
93.74
xs -1
26.16
92.48
xs -1
27.29
92.42
xs -1
28.35
92.36
XS-1
29.38
92.44
xs -1
30.4
92.57
XS-1
31.4
92.76
xs -1
32.5
92.74
xs -1
34.53
91.93
xsI -lew
36.99
91.93
xs -1
38.09
91.81
XS-1
39.23
91.93
XS-1
40.44
91.9
xs -1
41.46
91.87
xs -1
41.84
92.02
ws
On"
No"
Negs
42.79
91.86
xs -1
50.49
93.97
xs -1
60.8
95.1
xs -1
68.42
96.15
xs -1
74.32
98.37
XS-1
44.29
91.84
XS-1
51.78
93.92
XS-1
62.27
95.41
xs -1
69.26
96.23
xs -1
75.41
98.44
XS-1
45.23
91.83
Xs-1
53.07
94.17
xs -1
63.47
95.66
xs -1
70.26
96.51
xs -1
78.07
98.55
xs -1
46.63
91.92
xsI -rew
54.43
94.13
xs -1
65.04
95.94
xs -1
71.49
97.12
XS-1
81.42
98.4
xs -1
47.72
93.07
xs -1
55.58
94.23
xs -1
66.4
96.05
xs -1
72.41
97.7
XS-1
84.37
98.13
xs -1
48.87
93.77
xs -1
58.36
94.82
M -1
66.4
96.05
xs -1
72.41
97.7
M -1
87.19
98.05
xsl - [
59.45
94.97
xs -1
67.48
96.11
xs -1
73.45
98.2
xS -I
Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) -MY3
Cross- Section 1 -Riffle
lOt
-
Ratio
2.00
Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) -MY3
Cross- Section 1 -Riffle
lOt
-
100
- - - - -
- --
99
98
-
2;
97
-
h
G
O
95
w
94
93
92
91
0 10 20
30 40 50
60 70 80 90
Station (ft)
- -MYI- 11/2009
--- 0- - MY3 - 6/2011 -
•••WaterSurface ••�• °••••Bankfull

Appendix D. Stream Survey Data
Bankfull Elevation ft
95.73
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (tt2)
106.24
Bankfull Width (ft)
6/2011
Figure 3b: Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data
Flood Prone Width (ft)
>100
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
3.29
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
4.93
UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) /EEP
Project
No.92709
1.44
Bank Height Ratio
2.00
Monitoring Year 3
Project Name Goose Creek
97
EEP Project Number 92709
Cross- Section ID XS-2, Riffle, I +95
�
Survey Date
g
9a
r
•a
93
'w
92
91
90
-.
0 5 10 IS
20 25 30
35 40 45 50
A
Station (ft)
- MYI -I (/2009
�MY2 -0/2010 - MY3 - 6/2011 - ���••W�IV
XS-2: View Upstream
XS-2: View Downstream
Bud"
Eleealbs
N"N
0.00
97.96
notes
1.10
97.93
xs2 -1 t
2.50
97.45
xs -2
3.56
96.73
xs -2
4.81
96.11
xs -2
5.92
95.43
xs -2
7.08
94.87
xs -2
8.40
94.36
xs -2
9.70
93.85
xs -2
13.36
92.21
xs -2
14.67
91.59
xs -2
15.98
91.22
xs -2
17.55
91.18
xs -2
18.84
91.13
xs2 -lew
20.00
90.94
xs -2
21.58
90.91
xs -2
23.15
90.80
xs -2
24.65
90.92
xs -2
26.31
91.01
xs -2
27.40
91.10
xs -2
28.66
91.32
xs2 -rew
29.85
91.8
xs -2
sbdm
Not"
31.15
92.42
xs -2
39.34
96.80
xs -2
32.34
92.95
xs -2
40.33
97.46
xs -2
33.27
93.45
xs -2
41.23
97.96
xs -2
34.35
93.74
xs -2
43.51
98.00
xs -2
35.27
94.2
xs -2
46.19
97.95
xs -2
36.36
94.78
xs -2
46.47
97.95
xs -2
37.54
95.53
xs -2
46.49
97.93
xs2- t
38.44
96.03
xs -2
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
95.73
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (tt2)
106.24
Bankfull Width (ft)
6/2011
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
95.73
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (tt2)
106.24
Bankfull Width (ft)
32.32
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
100.66
Flood Prone Width (ft)
>100
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
3.29
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
4.93
W/D Ratio
9.82
Entrenchment Ratio
1.44
Bank Height Ratio
2.00
Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) -MY3
Cross - Section 2 -Riffle
99
98
97
�
95
g
9a
•a
93
'w
92
91
90
0 5 10 IS
20 25 30
35 40 45 50
Station (ft)
- MYI -I (/2009
�MY2 -0/2010 - MY3 - 6/2011 - ���••W�IV
$utfice ••••••••••g�oldall

Appendix D. Stream Survey Data
Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) -MY3
Cross - Section 1- Ritile
IUl
Figure 3a: Cross - Section Plots and Raw
Data
- -
Ratio
2.00
100
-
-
UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation)/EEP Project
No.92709
99
Monitoring Year 3
98
_
97
Project Name Goose Creek
REP Project Number 92709
a
0
�
95
,�. .
Cross - Section [D XS -1, Riffle, 0+51
5urve Date 6/2011
u
w
,�
'a
SUMMARY
93
Bankfull Elevation ft
95.80
91
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft =)
108.98
0 10 20
30 40 50
60 70 80 90
Bankfull Width ft
44.22
MYI- 11/2009
tMY2- 4/2010 MY3.6/2011 .........
Water Surface ••••••••••nankfull
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
99.79
Flood Prone Width ft
74.39
Bankfull Mean Depth tt
2.46
Bankfull Max Depth ft
3.99
W/D Ratio
17.98
Entrenchment Ratio
1.68
Bank Height
XS-1: View Upstream
XS -1:
View Downstream
Stadon
Elevadois
Notes
12.8
97.77
xsl -1 t
13.07
97.72
XS-1
14.23
97.77
xs -1
15.71
97.62
XS-1
17.06
97.21
xs -1
18.62
96.67
XS-1
20.07
95.78
xs -1
21.18
95.03
xs -1
22.46
94.57
xs -1
23.66
94.15
xs -1
25.15
93.74
xs -1
26.16
92.48
xs -1
27.29
92.42
xs -1
28.35
92.36
xs -I
29.38
92.44
xs -1
30.4
92.57
xs -1
31.4
92.76
xs -1
32.5
92.74
xs -1
34.53
91.93
xsl -lew
36.99
91.93
xs -1
38.09
91.81
xs -1
39.23
91.93
xs -1
40.44
91.9
xs -1
41.46
91.87
Xs- 1
41.84
92.02
ws
Statlu
Ek adea
Nobx
Sb d"
NORM
Non
ftwi t
)lil atdal
Nan
42.79
91.86
xs -1
50.49
93.97
Xs- 1
60.8
95.1
Xs- 1
68.42
96.15
Xs- 1
74.32
98.37
Xs- 1
44.29
91.84
Xs- 1
51.78
93.92
Xs- 1
62.27
95.41
Xs- 1
69.26
96.23
Xs- 1
75.41
98.44
XS- 1
45.23
91.83
XS-1
53.07
94.17
Xs- 1
63.47
95.66
Xs- 1
70.26
96.51
Xs- 1
78.07
98.55
Xs- 1
46.63
91.92
xsI -rew
54.43
94.13
xs -I
65.04
95.94
Xs- 1
71.49
97.12
Xs- 1
81.42
98.4
xs -1
47.72
93.07
XS- 1
55.58
94.23
xs -1
66.4
96.05
Xs- 1
72.41
97.7
XS-1
84.37
98.13
XS-1
48.87
93.77
xs -1
58.36
94.82
xs -t
66.4
96.05
xs-1
72.41
97.7
xs -1
87.19
98.05
xsl- t
59.45
94.97
xs -1
67.48
96.11
xs -I
73.45
98.2
xs-I
Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) -MY3
Cross - Section 1- Ritile
IUl
- -
Ratio
2.00
Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) -MY3
Cross - Section 1- Ritile
IUl
- -
-
100
-
-
-
99
98
_
97
a
0
�
95
u
w
,�
93
92
91
0 10 20
30 40 50
60 70 80 90
Station (ft)
MYI- 11/2009
tMY2- 4/2010 MY3.6/2011 .........
Water Surface ••••••••••nankfull

iendix D. Stream Survey Data
ire 3c: Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data
Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) /EEP Project No.92709
iitorine Year 3
Project Name
Goose Creek
EEP Pro'ect Number
92709
Cross - Section ID
XS -3 Pool, 3+95
Sury Date
6/2011
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation 11
94.14
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
101.01
Bankfull Width ft
33.15
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
99.03
Flood Prone Width ft
N/A
Bankful] Mean Depth 11
3.05
Bankfull Max Depth ft
4.89
W/D Ratio
10.87
Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
Bank Height Ratio
2.00
7.16
1 97.06
xs -3
8.67
96.86
xs -3
9.50
96.76
xs -3
10.44
95.26
xs -3
11.63
94.00
xs -3
12.59
93.21
xs -3
13.55
93.16
1 xs -3
14.40
93.31
1 xs -3
15.43
93.44
1 xs -3
16.55
1 93.46
1 xs -3
19.25
1 93.34
xs -3
20.22
93.00
xs -3
21.24
92.68
xs -3
22.40
92.36
xs -3
23.22
92.02
xs -3
24.39
91.25
xs -3
25.61
90.2
xs -3
26.72
90.03
xs3 -lew
28.31
89.87
xs -3
29.96
89.54
xs -3
31.33
89.37
xs -3
32.75
89.25
xs -3
33.91
89.3 1
xs -3
XS -3: View Upstream
XS -3: View Downstream
98
Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) - MY3
Cross - Section 3 -Pool
97
96
95
Wool
_
94
......................................................................
...............................
... ...............................
93
a
g
92
91
'w
90
......
.. ..................
...............................
........................
.. ...
....... . ..... .....
.. ... ...
...... .... ........
89
88
-IVAN
0
IO
-
20 30
Station (ft)
- MYI- 11/2009 -+-- MY242010 - MY3.62011
40
- - - Water Surface ..........
50 60
nkfull
Ste"
gloved"
NOWT
S1011on
111evallem
N
PJeragw
Nate
35.14
89.25
xs -3
41.67
89.47
xs -3
46.71
95.29
xs -3
54.55
97.34
xs -3
36.36
897
xs -3
42.73
90.06
xs3 -rew
47.63
95.89
xs -3
5635
9732
xs3-rpt
37.62
89.33
xs -3
43.10
90.43
xs -3
48.67
96.41
xs -3
38.74
89.56
xs -3
43.87
93.26
xs -3
49.65
96.82
xs -3
40.05
89.57
xs -3
44.67
93.70
xs -3
50.76
97.02
xs -3
40.91
1 89.59
xs -3
1 45.51
94.71
xs -3
52.80
97.44
xs -3

tix D. Stream Survey Data
3d: Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data
Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation)/EEP Project No.92709
iitoring Year 3
Pro ect Nam
Goose Creek
EEP Pro ect Number
92709
Cross- Section ID
XS 4, Pool, 5 +39
Survey Date
6/2011
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
94.23
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
108.26
Bankfull Width ft
27.34
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
100.08
Flood Prone Width ft
43.72
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
3.96
Bankfull Max Depth ft
5.85
W/D Ratio
6.90
Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
Bank Height Ratio
2.00
SUNS"
BAevad"
N"M
0.00
96.22
xs4 -1 t
0.16
96.11
xs-4
2.40
96.12
xs-4
4.05
96.08
xs-4
6.18
95.91
xs-4
7.19
95.18
xs-4
9.30
92.80
xs-4
10.64
91.81
xs4
11.39
91.22
xs-4
12.36
90.38
xs-4
13.68
89.40
xs-4
14.97
89.07
xs-4
16.25
88.89
xs4
17.50
88.79
xs4
18.52
88.54
xs4
19.99
88.41
xs4
20.46
88.38
xs4
21.26
88.42
xs -4
22.52
88.48
xs4
23.51
88.89
xs-4
24.67
89.08
xs4 -rew
26.05
89.22
xs -4
27.53
89.28
xs4
28.41
89.95
xs4
29.37
90.58
xs-4
30.62
91.34
xs4
31.86
1 92.32
xs4
XS-4: View Upstream
XS4: View Downstream
Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) - MY3
Cross - Section 4 -Pool
100
98
96
- -
b
94
0
92
90
-
88
86
0
5
10
15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Station (ft)
MYIA 1 /2009 - MY24 /2010 - MY3- 6/2011 - Water Surface -- ........ Bankfull
33.13
92064
xs -4
40.09
97.47
xs4
33.96
93.25
xs -4
41.92
97.84
xs-4
35.31
94.07
xs4
43.05
98.27
xs-4
36.32
94.95
xs -4
43.72
98.5
xs4-rpt
37.11
95.75
xs -4
38.42
96.61
1 xs -4

Appendix D
Figure 4. Longitudinal Profiles with Annual Overlays
UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) /EEP Project No.92709
2011 Monitoring Year
Monitoring Year 3
100.00
98.00
%.00
♦ ♦
94.00
a
`a
♦
C
O
a 92.00
....
90.00
- — - ... ......
88.00
86.00
0.00 100.00 200.00 300.00 400.00 500.00 600.00 700.00
Station (ft)
TW- 11/2009 TW- 11/2010 TW- 6/2011 • • • • • • • WS- 6/2011 • BKF- 6/2011 O Cross - Section
Appendix D - Stream Survey Data
UT Goose Creek Monitoring Report
Year 3

Appendix D. Stream Survey Data
Figure 5a: Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays
UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation)/EEP Project No.92709
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Project Name
Goose Creek
EEP Project Number
92709
Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) - MY2
Cross - Section 1 - Cumulative Percent
Cross - Section ID XS -1 Riffle 0+51
Surve • Date 6 /2011
Description
Material
Size mm
Total #
Item %
Cum %
100%
90^/°
Silt /Clay
silt/clay
0.062
3
3%
3%
80%
1 .417111
Sand
very fine sand
fine sand
medium sand
coarse sand
very coarse sand
very fine gravel
0.125
0.250
0.50
1.00
2.0
4.0
5
8
2
5
9
6
5%
8%
2%
5%
90/0
60/a
8%
16%
18%
23%
32%
38%
_
70%
1;
60%
a
m 50°/.
W
40" /°
§
30%
Ci 20%
10%
fine gravel
5.7
18
18%
56%
0%
fine gravel 8.0 6 6% 62%
medium gravel
11.3
6
6%
68%
0� �o `� p
Gravel
medium gravel
16.0
13
13%
81%
Opt
Particle Size (mm)
course gravel
22.3
9
9%
90%
-MYI- 11/2009 -MY2 -42010 -MY3 -62011
course gravel
32.0
8
8%
98%
very coarse gravel
45
2
2%
1000/0
very coarse gravel
64
0
0a /o
1000/0
Cobble
small cobble
medium cobble
large cobble
very large cobble
90
128
180
256
0
0
0
0
0%
00/0
0%
00/0
100%
100 %
100%
1000/0
1990%
Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) - W2
Cross- Section 1 - Individual Class Percent
80%
0
70%
60%
Boulder
small boulder
small boulder
medium boulder
362
512
1024
0
0
0
0%
0%
0%
1000/.
100%
1000/0
v
50°/a
40
-
large boulder
Bedrock bedrock
TO'T'AL % of whole count
2048
40096
0
0
100
00/0
0%
100%
1000/0
1000/0
100%
30%
20%
10%
_
0%
Summary
U p
Data 5.13
OCi°LO1y5 oy5 05 ♦ L D �� ,`5 1b tiy? �1 A5 ki `14 `�O �5b �bti S1y`0� >��g��b
us4
18.10
Particle- Size mm
D95
2 8.36
■MYI- 11/2009 ■MY24/2010 ■MY3-6/2011

Appendix D. Stream Survey Data
Figure 5b: Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays
UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation)/EEP Project No.92709
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Goose
o»nu
ection ID
XS -2, Riffle, 1 +95
Date
6/2011
0.125
)escri tion
Material
Silt /Clav
silt/clay
Sand
very fine sand
fine sand
medium sand
coarse sand
very coarse sand
Gravel
very fine gravel
fine gravel
fine gravel
medium gravel
medium gravel
course gravel
course gravel
very coarse grave .
very coarse grave
Cobble
small cobble
medium cobble
large cobble
very large cobble
Boulder
small boulder
small boulder
medium boulder
large boulder
Bedrock
bedrock
TOTAL % of whole count
7%
Summary Data
D50
8.94
D94
57.67
D95
1 115.33
0.062
4
4%
1 4%
0.125
1
1%
5%
0.250
2
2%
70/a
0.50
6
6%
13%
1.00
6
6%
190/0
2.0
13
13%
32%
4.0
6
6%
38%
5.7
3
3%
41%
8.0
7
7%
48%
11.3
7
7%
55%
16.0
8
8%
63%
22.3
8
8%
71%
32.0
3
3%
74%
45
6
6%
80%
64
6
60/6
86%
90
7
7%
93%
128
3
3%
96%
180
1
1%
97%
256
3
3%
1000/0
362
0
0%
1000/0
512
0
0%
1000/0
1024
0
0%
100%
2048
0
0%
1000/0
40096
0
0%
100%
100
100%
1008%
Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) - MY2
Cross - Section 2 - Individual Class Percent
100%
90%
80%
° 70%
a 60%
50%
40%
30%
$ 20%
10%
M
O�'LO ♦yh O1°f 05 ♦ 'L b �!� 4 ♦ ♦^f ♦�°,,�,'h 'y1' Ati �' �J ♦'L4 ♦�O ry5b �b'L � ♦'L ♦O.yb ry�b�b
Particle Size (nun)
�,,
■ ■■ 111111 ■ ■■ 11111 ■■ ■111111 ■ ■ ■IIII!!��■
■
■■
111111
■
____.
.,,,
■■
111111
■■
■111111
■
■
■I�il!��iiiiini
■
■■
111111
■
■■
111111
,,
■■
■111111
■�'.1:��II
■■
■111111
■
■■
111111
■
■■
111111
■■
■111111
/�i�
/1111
■■
■111111
,
oil11111
■■
■11111
■
■
■Il�ill
�r
■111111
■■
■111111
,
■
■■
111111
■
■
■111111����!%!:i�■
■111111
■■
■111111
■
■■
111111
■
■
■1!�w►��
►�■�1111
■■
■11110
■■
■111111
■■■111111��!!!:iil�_
.
■111111
■■
■111111
■■
■111111
■ ■ ■11::::= ■11111 ■■ ■111111 ■■ ■111111
,.
- ■■��Illr■
Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) - MY2
Cross - Section 2 - Individual Class Percent
100%
90%
80%
° 70%
a 60%
50%
40%
30%
$ 20%
10%
M
O�'LO ♦yh O1°f 05 ♦ 'L b �!� 4 ♦ ♦^f ♦�°,,�,'h 'y1' Ati �' �J ♦'L4 ♦�O ry5b �b'L � ♦'L ♦O.yb ry�b�b
Particle Size (nun)

Appendix D. Stream Survey Data
Figure 5c: Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays
UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation)/EEP Project No.92709
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Cross - Section ID XS -3, Pool, 3 +95
;u ;;;v Date 6/2011
Sand
very fine sand
fine sand
medium sand
coarse sand
very coarse sand
Gravel
very fine gravel
fine gravel
fine gravel
medium gravel
medium gravel
course gravel
course gravel
very coarse gravel
very coarse gravel
Cobble
small cobble
medium cobble
large cobble
very large cobble
Boulder
small boulder
small boulder
medium boulder
large boulder
Bedrock
bedrock
TOTAL % of whole count
4
Summary Data
D50
0.77
D84
11.30
D95
51,33
0.062
18
18%
18%
0.125
0
00/0
18%
0.250
5
5%
23%
0.50
14
14%
37%
1.00
24
24%
61%
2.0
10
10%
71%
4.0
5
5%
76%
5.7
4
4%
800/6
8.0
2
2%
82%
11.3
2
2%
84%
16.0
1
1%
85%
22.3
3
3%
88%
32.0
3
3%
91%
45
3
3%
94%
64
3
3%
97%
90
0
00/0
97%
128
1
1%
980/0
180
0
0%
98%
256
2
2%
1000
362
0
0%
1000/0
512
0
00/0
1000/0
1024
0
00/0
1000 /0
2048
0
00/0
1000/0
40096
0
00/0
1000/0
100
100%
100%
Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) - MY2
Cross - Section 3 - Cumulative Percent
100
90%
80%
70%
60%
0.
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0°/
Op♦ 01 ♦
Particle Size (mm)
-MY1- 11/2009 - MY24/2010 -MY3- 6/2011
Goose Creek (Greene Mitigatoin) - MY2
Cross - Section 3 - Individual Class Percent
100%
90%
80% -
�' 70%
a 60%
50%
40%
>_ 30%
20%
100/. JL
0%
cjo o, -5 oye o5 ♦ -,. a 5 `l) ♦b titi? ;ti 0 ,cP a° ♦tip X55° ti`''° �bti hltilotiati�p�a�a°
Particle Size (mm)
■MYI- 11/2009 ■MY24/2010 ■MY3fi/20t1

Appendix D. Stream Survey Data
Figure 5d: Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays
UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation)/EEP Project No.92709
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Project Name
Goose Creek
■
■■
EEP Project Number
92709
Cross - Section ID
XS4, Pool, 5 +39
111111
■
■■
Survey Date
6/2011
■■
■111111
■
■
■11111!!��
Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) - MY2
■
■■
111111
Cross-Section 4 - Cumulative Percent
Description
Material
Sin alal
TNN # Itm %
Cpl %
■■
■111111
■
■
■�
%�!;!-■
Silt /Clav
silUclay
0.062
21
21%
21%
■
■■
111111
■
111111
■■
■
■
■111111��:■i1111
■■
■111111
■
very fine sand 0.125 13 13% 34%
■■
fine sand
0.250
9
9%
43%
,
■111111
■■
■111111
■■
■111111
■
■
■1�1
"'
������I�
"l■
■111111
■■
■111111
Sand
medium sand
coarse sand
0.50
1.00
8
4
8%
4%
51%
55%
-
■
■■
111111
■�r1111i1
■
■
■I�::il
■■
■111111
■■
■111111
■■
■111111
�
■
■IIIIII���111111
■■
■111111
■■
■111111
°
■
■
■11!:il
■
■
■I:iill■
■111111
■■
■111111
■■
■111111
very coarse sand
2.0
3
3%
58%
■_
■I�IIIII
very fine gravel
4.0
1
1%
59%
■■
■11111
■■
■111111
■ ■ ■Iluuiii�i ■111■■ ■111111■■ ■11111 ■■ ■111111
.
fine gravel
5.7
2
2%
61%
fine gravel
8.0
0
0%
61%
,
111
medium gravel
11.3
3
3%
64%
Gravel
medium gravel
16.0
7
7%
71%
110
Q� NIP op
course gravel
22.3
3
3%
74%
Particle Size (mm)
course gravel
32.0
4
4%
78%
very coarse gravel
45
4
4%
82%
very coarse gravel
64
5
5%
87%
Cobble
small cobble
medium cobble
large cobble
90
128
180
4
3
l
4%
3%
1%
91%
94%
95%
100%
Cross-Section 4 - Individual Class Percent
very large cobble
small boulder
256
362
4
l
4%
1%
99%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
medium boulder
512
1024
0
0
0%
0%
100%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
Bedrock bedrock
TOTAL % of whole count
40096
0
100
0%
100%
100%
]00%
D50
D84
0.47
52.60
D95
180.00
Particle Size (min)
■
■■
■■nn
111111
■
■■
111111
■■
■111111
■
■
■11111!!��
■
■■
111111
■■
■111111
■■
■111111
■
■
■�
%�!;!-■
■111111
■
■■
111111
■
111111
■■
■
■
■111111��:■i1111
■■
■111111
■
111111
■■
■■
■111111
■��111��1%/I
■111111
■■
■111111
■■
■111111
■
■
■1�1
"'
������I�
"l■
■111111
■■
■111111
■
■■
111111
■�r1111i1
■
■
■I�::il
■■
■111111
■■
■111111
■■
■111111
�
■
■IIIIII���111111
■■
■111111
■■
■111111
°
■
■
■11!:il
■
■
■I:iill■
■111111
■■
■111111
■■
■111111
■■
■111111
■_
■I�IIIII
■■
■111111
■■
■11111
■■
■111111
■ ■ ■Iluuiii�i ■111■■ ■111111■■ ■11111 ■■ ■111111

Tthl{1 Bafe146
vrfl.o.ecreekcan..a regeeriq
Parameter
Pre - Existing
Condition
Reference Reach Date
Design
Baseline
Dimension and Substrate Riffle
Min
Mean
Mcd
Max
SI)
__jL_
Min
Mean
Mcd
SD
n
Mm
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width ft
226
252
236
295
3 7
3
200
23 9
23 8
—Max
280
34
4
200
230
280
339
32 3
431
65
4
Flood rone Width ft
240
327
370
370
75
3
240
500
390
1000
340
4
1000
1000
464
65 8
65 8
852
274
2
Bankfull Mean th R
3
16
20
2 1
2 1
02
4
20
20
24
32
3 2
38
06
4
BankfullMaz th ft
24
30
33
34
05
3
22
26
26
31
04
4
23
23
39
49
49
59
08
4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft-
47 1
515
532
542
39
3
403
466
462
535
55
4
460
500
1009
1049
105 7
1072
29
4
Width/Depth Ran
103
125
108
164
34
3
100
124
112
172
33
4
120
>12
73
113
100
178
45
4
Entrenchment Rau
11
1 3
1 3
16
03
3
1 1
23
1 5
22
1 8
4
2 2
>2 2
1 5
1 7
1 7
20
04
2
Bank Her t Rau
3
1 3
I S
1 0
l 0
1 3
I S
I S
1 7
02
4
Riffle Len ft
180
544
755
1330
Riffle Slo ft/fl
04
1 1
15
2 3
Pool Len ft
80
560
580
108 0
Pool Max th ft
Pool Sp in ft
410
937
1 1050
1690
Channel Bcltwtdth it
Radius of Curvature ft
Rc Bankfull width ft/fi
Meander Wavclen ft
Meander Width Rah
Reach Shear Stress co ten lb/
Max part sin (mm) mobilized at b
Stream Power trans rt ca ci W /mr
Rosgen Classificatio
E4
F4
Bankful Velocity
/
44 1 41
2-0-7 19 19 19 01 4
Bankful Discharge cfa
203
203
1 203
1 203
N/A
N/A
Valley Len (ft
632
Channel Thalwelt Len ft
783
Sinuosity ft
l l
12
14
12
Water Surface Slope Channel ft/fl
0 0100
00080
BF %I ft/fl
Bankful Flood lam Area acres
% of Reach with Erodm B
Channel Stability or Habitat Metn
Bioloocal or
Appendix D Stream Survey Data
UT Goose Creek Monitoring Report
Year 3

1, /A nrn do m apply / dam ue w wImblc / "U ttrnu R wk—
Appendix D Stream Survey Data
UT Goose Creek Monitoring Report
Year 3
'r�mc od eu�efhte�aalrttlmlea
(.e�.aWclttNH
olrlttttmeStlrDtRefbaqur)
ur
LYalc
GreNO
NOV"
Male ammel In
Parameter
Pre-E xisting Condition
Reference Reach Data
Der
As- built/Baseline
RI %/Ru %/P %/G %/S%
U
I U
49%
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
SCl/ / SA. /G% /CIA /B % /Be%
1%
25%
46%
18%
21/o
91 /I
3%
23%
591/0
12%
d 16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm
1 0487
3 249
82953
9717
20447
0 705
369
104
559
146 4
Entrenchment Class<I 5/1 5 1 99/2 0A 9/5 0 9 9h1
125
15
> 22
Incision Class <I 2/I 2 1 49/1 5 1 99h2 01
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
1, /A nrn do m apply / dam ue w wImblc / "U ttrnu R wk—
Appendix D Stream Survey Data
UT Goose Creek Monitoring Report
Year 3

Jim
11TH �C (h
moo Clnitd cmuft
PARAMETER
Cross- Sectloo 1 Kittle
Cross- Section
2 Pool
DIMENSION
Baseline
MY2 -2010
MY3 2011
MY4 -2012
MYS -2013
MY2 2010
MY3 -2011
MY4 -2012
MYS 2013
Bankfull Width ft
43 1
43 8
442
31 9
32 3
Fl rone W idth ft
85 2
85 2
74 4
R32
46 4
46 5
Bankfull Mean th
2 4
2 5
2 5
3 3
3 3
Bankfull Max th ft
3 9
4 1
4 0
5 0
4 9
Bankfull Cross sectional Area ft
104 5
108 0
109 0
1052
1062
Bankfull Width/Depth
17 8
178
180
97
97
98
Banldull Entrenchm
20
1 9
1 7
1 5
1 5
14
Bankfull Bankhei
1 7
2 0
2 0
1 4
2 0
2 0
Cross Sectional Area between end
410 3
228 5
185 3
186 7
d
17 1
226
5 1
206
160
89
PARAMETER
Cross-Section 3 Pool
Cross- Seetlon
4 Ille
DIMENSION
Baseline
MY2 2010
MY3 2011
MY4 -2012
MY5-2013
Baseline
MY2 2010
MY3 -2011
MY4 -2012
MY5-2013
Bankfull Width ft
323
33 3
33 2
280
273
273
Flood prone Width ft
567
497
441
437
Bankfull Mean Depth
31
32
31
38
3 8
40
Bankfull Max Depth ft
49
51
49
59
59
59
Bankfvll Cross sectional Area ft=
1009
1067
1010
1072
1045
1083
Bankf iI I W idt Ratio
104
104
109
73
71
69
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
17
15
1 its
I 1 6
Bankfull Bankheight Ratio
17
20
20
13
20
20
Cross Sectional Ares between end 2ML t
2254
221 5
2564
2605
d50 (mm)
264
43
08
904
98
05
WA hems do m apply / items art omvaikbk / U nam ere vok-
Appendix D - Stream Survey Data
UT Goose Creek Monitoring Report
Year 3

vT cmae caak (Rrtsu >l+yaq tvs
MttY
Parameter
Baseline
MY 2 2010
MY 3 2011
DIMENSION
Msft i.
Uipd I
U-
W10019
%d
Vu
ID
f
Bankfull Width fl
27%
3391
3227
43 12
647
4
2727
3408
3261
4382
699
4
2734
3426
3274
4422
7 12
4
Floodpronc Width fl
4641
6582
6592
85 22
2
4641
6582
6582
8522
2
4649
6044
6044
7439
1973
4
Bankfull Mean ft
242
3 17
322
383
058
4
246
320
325
3 83
056
4
246
3 19
3 17
3%
062
4
Banldull Max fl
394
493
494
589
080
4
4 11
501
503
5 88
073
4
399
492
491
5 85
076
4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area 112
100 89
10495
10568
107 15
289
4
1 10453
10610
10595
10795
153
4
10101
106 12
10725
10998
360
4
Width/Depth Ratio
730
1130
1005
1782
454
4
7 12
1125
1004
1781
459
4
690
1139
1035
1798
470
4
Entrenchment Ratio
145
1 72
172
198
2
146
1 70
1 70
194
2
144
156
1 56
168
017
4
Bank Height Ratio
131
1 52
154
1
017
4
200
000
200
00
PROFILE
yaiN
-f
Riffle Len fl
901
2562
753
2185
5500
693
34 12
73 12
Riffle Slope IUft
000
00152
0 0068
00166
00403
0 0099
002829
0079175
Pool Length fl
3884
41 10
V62
48 97
60 27
98 70
12 31
30 98
53 88
Pool Max
Pool S acm ft
45 6
8 57
7459
132 9
19739
1078
4567
130 0
PATTERN
a
f)
n
Med
y�
Channel Beltwidth ft
Radius of Curvature fl
Meander Wavelength ft
Meander Width Rati
ADDITIONAL REACH PARAMETERS
Mad
I Max
I SD
a
Mm
yd
wo
I
a
yin
I bim
tot
SD
■
Rositen Classiftcati
B4c/C4
B4c/C4
64c/C4
Channel Thalweit Irn fl
783
783
783
Sinuosity ft
123
123
123
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
00065
0 006
0 007
BF slope ft/ft
0 0069
0 006
0 006
RiYa/Ru9b/P'/a/G %/S'
SC° /JSa%/G%/CY✓BY✓Bcl/
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95
% of reach with croding banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Bioloxical or Oth
'WA nnaa do oot appty / - art imawtable /'U --k-
Appendix unk-
Appendix D Stream Survey Data
UT Goose Creek Monitoring Report
Year 3

APPENDIX E
HYDROLOGIC DATA
Table 12 Verification of Bankfull Events
Figure 6 Monthly Rainfall Data
UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) Monitoring Report April 2012
EEP Project No 92709 Monitoring Year 3

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
Table 12 Appendix E Verification of Bankfull Events
UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) /EEP Project No 92709
Monitoring Year 3
Date of Collection
Date of Oedwftaee
Method
Photo # (if available)
11/18/09
11/11/2009 - 11/12/2009
VisuaVUSGS
N/A
9/2010
8/2010
VisuaWSGS
N/A
8/2011
8/5/2011
VisuaVUSGS Data
N/A
Appendix E - Hydrologic Data
UT Goose Creek Monitoring Report
Year 3

Appendix E. Hydrologic Data
Figure 6: Monthly Rainfall Data
UT Goose Creek (Greene Mitigation) /EEP Project No.92709
Monitoring Year 3
i
6.00 - - - - -- -- - - - —
5.00 - -- - - -- - -
s 4.00 - — -- - -
u
C
Monthly Precipitation (Site)
0 3.00 -- - - -- - — -
6 30th Percentile (Region)
Q 70th Percentile (Region)
'u
L 2.00 - —
a
1.00 — - —
0.00 —
'b, titi ti~ titi titi titi
V.9
*Regional rainfall data referenced from NC Cronos Database Divisonal Data for the Southern Piedmont of North Carolina - Data Period January 2011 through December 2011.
Monthly precipitation referenced from the USGS 351218080331345 CRN -29 rain gage Real -Time daily data, January 2011 through December 2011.
Appendix E - Hydrologic Data
UT Goose Creek
Year 3