20100691 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Report_20120823

ID 001
ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
YEAR 2 (2011)
HEATH RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE
CRAVEN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
(EEP Contract No. 002280)
Prepared for:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
AUG 232012
DENR - WATER QUALITY
vETL,•!•!DS AND STORSM!'.TER BRANCH
r-'V-
sv
Enilvlamement
PROGRAM
Prepared by:
Restoration Systems, L.L.C.
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
And
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
October 2011
Axiom Environmental, Inc.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Restoration Systems, LLC completed riparian buffer restoration at the Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation
Site (hereafter referred to as the "Site ") through the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(NCEEP) Full Delivery Process (RFP 16- 001383) to provide 59.45 Riparian Buffer Mitigation Units.
The Site is located approximately 3.4 miles southeast of Dover in Craven County within. United States
Geological Survey Hydrologic Unit and Targeted Local Watershed 03020202080010 (North Carolina
Division of Water Quality Subbasin 03- 04 -08) of the Neuse River Basin. Site streams drain to Core
Creek (Stream Index 27 -90), which is included on the draft 2008 303(d) list for impaired biological
integrity and low dissolved oxygen resulting from agricultural crop production.
Prior to construction, the Site was characterized by ditched agricultural land used for row crop
production. Land use practices including the maintenance and removal of vegetation, regular plowing,
and use of agricultural chemicals had resulted in degraded water quality.
The goals and objectives of this project focused on improving local water quality, enhancing flood
attenuation, and restoring aquatic and riparian habitat. These goals were accomplished by the following.
1. Removing nonpoint sources of pollution associated with agriculture production by a) ceasing the
application of agricultural herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers, and other agricultural materials into
and adjacent to Site ditches and open waterways and b) providing a vegetative buffer adjacent to
ditches and waterways to treat surface runoff that may be laden with sediment and/or agricultural
pollutants.
2. Reducing sedimentation/siltation within on -Site and downstream receiving waters by a)
increasing retention time for surface waters entering and leaving the Site, b) reducing erosion
associated with vegetation maintenance and agricultural plowing to Site ditches, and c) planting a
forested vegetative buffer adjacent to Site ditches and waterways.
3. Promoting floodwater attenuation by ripping compacted soils and revegetating the Site to increase
frictional resistance on floodwaters crossing the Site.
4. Providing terrestrial wildlife habitat including a forested riparian corridor within an area that was
previously cleared and highly dissected by agricultural land use.
This project was constructed in late winter /early spring 2010. Planting of the entire 60.632 -acre Site
resulted in 59.45 Riparian Buffer Mitigation Units. The Site will be protected by a permanent
conservation easement. As a whole, the densities of vegetation plots across the Site were above the
required 320 stems per acre with an average of 837 planted stems per acre in the Second Monitoring Year
(2011). In addition, each individual plot met success criteria based on planted stems alone.
Annual Monitoring Report Executive Summary
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)

TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i
10
INTRODUCTION I
1 1
Location and Setting 1
1 2
Project Goals and Objectives 1
1 3
Project Structure, Restoration Type, and Approach 1
20
MONITORING PLAN 2
2 1
Vegetation Success Criteria 2
22
Maintenance and Contingency 2
23
Vegetation Sampling Results and Comparison to Success Criteria 2
30
CONCLUSIONS 2
Summary of Planted Stem Vegetation Plot Results 3
40
REFERENCES 4
APPENDICES
Appendix A Figures
Figure 1
Site Location
Figure 2
Monitoring Plan View
Appendix B General
Tables
Table 1
Site Restoration Structures and Objectives
Table 2
Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3
Project Contacts Table
Table 4
Project Attributes Table
Appendix C Vegetation Data
Table 5
Planted Woody Species
Vegetation Survey Data Tables
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photographs
Annual Monitoring Report Table of Contents
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)

10 INTRODUCTION
11 Location and Setting
Restoration Systems, LLC has completed riparian buffer restoration at the Heath Riparian Buffer
Mitigation Site (hereafter referred to as the "Site ") through the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP) Full Delivery Process (RFP 16- 001383) to provide 59 45 Riparian Buffer Mitigation
Units The Site is located approximately 3 4 miles southeast of Dover in Craven County (Figure 1,
Appendix A) The Site is located in United States Geological Survey Hydrologic Unit and Targeted Local
Watershed 03020202080010 (North Carolina Division of Water Quality Subbasin 03 -04 -08) of the Neuse
River Basin (USGS 1974)
Directions to the Site from Kinston, North Carolina
➢ Take 70 East for approximately 8 miles
➢ Take the Dover exit and follow Old 70/Wilson Street for approximately 4 3 miles east
Turn right over the railroad tracks to wire gate
➢ Site coordinates
o Latitude 35 19627N, Longitude 77 38060 °W (NAD83 /WGS84)
12 Protect Goals and Objectives
The goals and objectives of this project focused on improving local water quality, enhancing flood
attenuation, and restoring aquatic and riparian habitat These goals were accomplished by the following
I Removing nonpoint sources of pollution associated with agriculture production by a) ceasing the
application of agricultural herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers, and other agricultural materials into
and adjacent to Site ditches and open waterways and b) providing a vegetative buffer adjacent to
ditches and waterways to treat surface runoff that may be laden with sediment and/or agricultural
pollutants
2 Reducing sedimentation/siltation within on -Site and downstream receiving waters by a) increasing
retention time for surface waters entering and leaving the Site, b) reducing erosion associated with
vegetation maintenance and agricultural plowing to Site ditches, and c) planting a forested
vegetative buffer adjacent to Site ditches and waterways
3 Promoting floodwater attenuation by ripping compacted soils and revegetating the Site to increase
frictional resistance on floodwaters crossing the Site
4 Providing terrestrial wildlife habitat including a forested riparian corridor within an area that was
previously cleared and highly dissected by agricultural land use
13 Project Structure, Restoration Type, and Approach
Prior to construction, the Site was characterized by ditched agricultural land used for row crop production
Land use practices including the maintenance and removal of vegetation, regular plowing, and use of
agricultural chemicals had resulted in degraded water quality
As constructed, Site activities restored histonc nparian buffer functions by planting the entire 60 632 -acre
Site with native ripanan vegetation This resulted in 59 45 Ripanan Buffer Mitigation Units (Table 1,
Appendix B and Figure 2, Appendix A) Approximately 0 632 acres of the Site is surface water associated
with Site ditches and 0 55 acres of the Site received no credit due to diffuse flow requirements These areas
were planted, however, the area is not eligible to provide credit The target natural community consisted of
Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwood Forest (Schafale and Weakley 1990) Table 5 (Appendix C) outlines
Annual Monitoring Report Pagel
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)

woody species planted within the Site Completed project activities, reporting history, completion dates,
project contacts, and background information are summarized in Tables 24 (Appendix B)
20 MONITORING PLAN
Monitoring of Site restoration efforts will be performed for vegetation components of the Site for five years
or until success criteria are fulfilled After planting was completed, an initial evaluation was performed to
verify planting methods were successful and to determine imtial species composition and density Twenty-
nine sample vegetation plots (10 -meter by 10- meter) were installed within the Site as per guidelines
established in CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4 0 (Lee et al 2006) In each sample
plot, vegetation parameters to be monitored include species composition and species density Visual
observations of the percent cover of shrub and herbaceous species will also be documented by photograph
21 Vegetation Success Cnteria
Characteristic Tree Species include woody tree and shrub species planted at the Site (Table 5, Appendix C)
or outlined for the appropriate plant community in Schafale and Weakley (1990) An average density of
320 stems per acre of Characteristic Tree Species must be surviving after year 5 monitoring
22 Maintenance and Contingency
In the event that success criteria are not fulfilled, a mechanism for contingency will be implemented If
vegetation success criteria are not achieved based on average density calculations from combined plots
over the entire restoration area, supplemental planting may be performed with tree species approved by
regulatory agencies Supplemental planting will be performed as needed until achievement of vegetation
success criteria
23 Vegetation Sampling Results and Comparison to Success Criteria
Quantitative sampling of vegetation was conducted in August 2011 Results are provided in Appendix C
Vegetation success criteria for year 2 (320 stems per acre) were exceeded for the 2011 annual monitoring
year with an average density of 837 planted stems per acre across the Site In addition, each individual plot
met success criteria based on planted stems alone Average densities of planted stems went up in year 2 in
several plots including Plots 1, 3 -5, 8, and 10 -11 During year 1, browse by deer and rodents on young
planted stems was abundant throughout the Site Several stems within these plots were not counted, or
counted as missing in year 1, however, many survived and were doing well in year 2 In addition, several
stems that were thought to be dead dunng year 1 monitoring resprouted from the base and were counted
during year 2 monitoring Deer browse was prevalent again during year 2 monitoring
30 CONCLUSIONS
As a whole, the densities of vegetation plots across the Site were above the required 320 stems per acre in
year 1 -2 (2010 -2011) In addition, each individual plot met success criteria based on planted stems alone
Annual Monitoring Report Page 2
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)

Summary of Planted Stem Veaetation Plot Results
Plot
Planted Stems/Acre
Year 1
2010
Year 2
2011
Year 3
2012
Year 4
2013
Year 5
2014
1
890
1052
2
971
971
3
850
1012
4
1012
1052
-
_-
5
931
1012
6
850
850
7
1012
971
8
688
769
9
850
850
10
1012
1053
11
931
1093
12
850
809
13
728
728
14
890
890
15
850
850
16
728
728
17
931
850
18
728
728
19
728
647
20
1052
1012
21
1052
1052
22
931
931
23
1012
971
24
971
971
25
486
445
26
486
486
27
486
486
28
445
445
29
607
567
Average Plots 1 -29
826
837
-
-
-
Annual Monitoring Report Page 3
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)

40 REFERENCES
Lee, M T , R K Peet, S D Roberts, and T R Wentworth 2006 CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation Version 4 0 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Raleigh, North Carolina
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) 2007 Redbook, Surface Waters and Wetlands
Standards North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water
Quality Raleigh, North Carolina
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) 2008a Draft North Carolina Water Quality
Assessment and Impaired Waters List (2008 Integrated 305(b) and 303(d) Report) (online)
Available http //h2o enr state nc us /tmdl /documents/B Draft2008303dList pdf [November 10,
2008] North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North
Carolina
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) 2008b Draft Basinwide Planning Program Neuse
River Basinwide Water Quality Plan-June 2008 North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality Raleigh, North Carolina
Schafale, M P and A S Weakley 1990 Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina
Third Approximation North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation,
North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources Raleigh, North
Carolina
United States Geological Survey (USGS) 1974 Hydrologic Unit Map - 1974 State of North Carolina
Annual Monitoring Report Page 4
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)

Appendix A
Figures
Figure 1 Site Location
Figure 2 Monitoring Plan View
Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)

Dwn. by. FIGURE
20 Enterprise Street MONITORING PLAN VIEW CLF
Suite HEATH Date
Raleigh, NC 27607 Aug 2010
(919) 215 -1693 RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE 2
Craven County, North Carolina °le
/ iom Environmental. inc. 10 -001

Restoration Systems, LLC
Figure 1: Heath Riparian Buffer
1101 Haynes St. Suite 211 P
Raleigh, NC 27604 Site Mitigation Site 1:24,000 N
0 - - tel: [phone] Location Craven County, NC 0 47D 940 1.880 2.820 3.7e•]
F -t

Appendix B
General Tables
Table 1 Site Restoration Structures and Objectives
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 Project Contacts Table
Table 4 Project Attributes Table
Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)

Table 1 Site Restoration Structures and Objectives
Component Summation
Restoration Level
Riparian buffer mitigation was completed by planting the entire 60 -acre Site
with native forest vegetation credit was received for 59 45 acres of the Site
Riparian Buffer Restoration
59 45 Buffer Mitigation Units
Table 2 Protect Activitv and Renortint=_ History
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Completion
or Delivery
Final Restoration Plan
--
Aril 2010
Site Planting
--
Late winter /early
spring 2010
Mitigation Plan
Aril 2010
August 2010
Year 1 Monitoring
September 2010
October 2010
Year 2 Monitoring
August 2011
August 2011
Table 3 Protect Contacts Table
Designer
Restoration Systems, LLC
Physiographic Region
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Ecoregion
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Project River Basin
919 755 -9490
Planting Contractor
Carolina Silvics
NCDWQ Subbasin
908 Indian Trail Road
Within EEP Watershed Plan Extent9
Edenton, North Carolina 27932
WRC Class
Dwight McKinney 252 482 -8491
Monitoring Performer
Axiom Environmental, Inc
Beaver activity observed during design phase
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Grant Lewis (919 ) 215 -1693
Table 4 Protect Attribute Table
Project County
Craven County, North Carolina
Physiographic Region
Coastal Plain
Ecoregion
Carolina Flatwoods and Mid - Atlantic Floodplams/Low
Terrace
Project River Basin
Neuse
USGS 14-digit HUC
03020202080010
NCDWQ Subbasin
03 -04 -08
Within EEP Watershed Plan Extent9
Yes-Targeted Local Watershed
WRC Class
Warm
% of project easement fenced
1 0%
Beaver activity observed during design phase
I No
Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)

Appendix C
Vegetation Data
Table 5 Planted Woody Species
Vegetation Survey Data Tables
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photographs
Annual Monitoring Report I Appendices
Heath Riparian Bufter Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)

Table 5 Planted Woody Vegetation
Species
Quantity
American elm Ulmus amerrcana
6300
Black gum N ssa s lvatrca)
3200
Green ash (Fraxinus enns lvanrca )
9500
Ironwood Car rnus carohnrana
3200
Mockemut hickory (Ca rya tomentosa)
6300
Su arbe Celtrs laevr ata
3200
Swamp chestnut oak uercus mrcharrxrr
9500
Sweetbay magnolia (Magnolia vrr iniana)
3200
Water oak ercus nr ra
6300
Willow oak uercus hellos)
9500
TOTAL
60,200
CVS Database Output
Living planted stems, excluding live stakes, per acre Negative (red)
numbers indicate the protect failed to reach requirements in a particular
year
Project Code
Project Name
River Basin
Year 1
Year 2
Heath
Heath
Neuse
82612
83868
Total stems, including planted stems of all kinds (including live stakes) and
natural/volunteer stems
Project Code
Project Name
River Basin
Year 1
I Year 2
Heath
Heath
Neuse
909 8449629
1 1024 273317
Vigor
Vigor
I Count
Percent
0
13
2
1
0
0
2
6
09
3
335
51 1
4
260
397
Damage
Damage
Count
Percent Of Stems
no damage)
582
889
Insects
6
09
Deer
63
96
Unknown
2
03
Human Tram led
2
03
Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)

Vieor by SDecles
Species
CommonName
4
3
2
1
0
Missing
Unknown
Betula nigra
River birch
1
1
Ca rya ovata
shagbark hickory
1
Celtis laevi ata
sugarberry
7
8
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
39
66
1
7
N ssa s lvatica
black um
11
36
2
2
2
Persea alustris
swamp bay
1
uercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
76
66
2
6
ercus nigra
water oak
30
33
4
uereus phellos
willow oak
50
52
5
Car mus carohniana
American hornbeam
4
4
1
ercus
oak
8
9
3
4
Ca rya
hickory
5
1
Magnoha vtr iniana
sweetbay
7
3
1
3
N ssa
tupelo
1
2
2
1
Platanus occidentahs
American
1
Ulmus
elm
2
3
1
Ulmus americana
American elm
23
44
1
7
Unknown
1
1
2
18
17
260
335
6
13
41
Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)

Damne by Svecies
Species
CommonName
W
Betula nigra
river birch
0
2
Car rnus carohnrana
American hombeam
1
8
1
Ca rya
hickory
3
3
3
Ca rya ovata
mockernut hickory
0
1
Celtrs laevr ata
sugarberry
3
13
2
1
Fraxrnus pennsylvanica
green ash
24
89
24
Magnolia vrr tnrana
sweetbay
0
14
N ssa
tupelo
2
4
1
1
N ssa s lvatrca
black um
14
39
12
1
1
Persea alustrrs
swamp bay
0
1
Platanus occrdentahs
American sycamore
0
1
ercus
oak
1
23
1
ercus mrchauxrr
swamp chestnut oak
8
142
4
4
uercus nigra
water oak
3
64
2
1
ercus phellos
willow oak
3
104
2
1
Ulmus
elm
1
5
1
Ulmus amerrcana
American elm
10
65
10
Unknown
0
4
18
17
73
582
63
2
6
2
Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)

Damage by Plot
lot
U AU
d
°
A
xEL-
°
~'
4
Heath - AXE -0001 - ear 2
2
26
1
1
Heath-AXE-0002-year 2
1
28
l
Heath - AXE -0003- ear 2
2
24
2
Heath-AXE-0004-year 2
2
25
2
Heath-AXE-0005-year 2
1
27
1
Heath-AXE-0006-year 2
3
23
2
1
Heath-AXE-0007-year 2
5
20
3
1
1
Heath-AXE-0008-year 2
5
15
3
1
1
Heath-AXE-0009-year 2
3
20
3
Heath - AXE -0010- ear 2
1
29
1
Heath - AXE -0011- ear 2
2
25
1
1
Heath - AXE -0012- ear 2
2
20
2
Heath - AXE -0013- ear 2
1
21
1
Heath-AXE-0014-year 2
1
24
1
Heath - AXE -0015- ear 2
4
17
4
Heath - AXE -0016- ear 2
0
19
Heath - AXE -0017- ear 2
4
19
4
Heath - AXE -0018- ear 2
0
20
Heath - AXE -0019- ear 2
2
18
1
1
Heath-AXE-0020-year 2
4
22
4
Heath - AXE -0021- ear 2
3
23
3
Heath-AXE-0022-year 2
4
20
4
Heath - AXE -0023- ear 2
3
26
3
Heath-AXE-0024-year 2
1
26
1
Heath-AXE-0025-year 2
3
9
3
Heath-AXE-0026-year 2
7
5
7
Heath-AXE-0027-year 2
2
10
2
Heath-AXE-0028-year 2
2
9
2
Heath-AXE-0029-year 2
3
12
3
29
73
582
63
2
6
2
Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)

Plot Information
Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)
y U
0001
2
2
26
26
2
4
30
30
1052
1052
162
1214
1214
7
0002
2
2
24
24
5
26
50
50
971
971
1052
2023
2023
6
0003
2
2
25
25
1
1
26
26
1012
1012
40
1052
1052
6
0004
2
2
26
26
1
5
31
31
1052
1052
202
1255
1255
6
0005
2
2
25
25
3
7
32
32
1012
1012
283
1295
1295
6
0006
2
2
21
21
5
5
26
26
850
850
202
1052
1052
7
0007
2
2
24
24
1
4
28
28
971
971
162
1133
1133
10
0008
2
2
19
19
1
1
20
20
769
769
40
809
809
6
0009
2
2
21
21
2
2
23
23
850
850
81
931
931
7
0010
2
2
27
27
3
0
27
27
1093
1093
0
1093
1093
5
0011
2
2
27
27
0
0
27
27
1093
1093
0
1093
1093
4
0012
2
2
20
20
2
5
25
25
809
809
202
1012
1012
7
0013
2
2
18
18
4
13
31
31
728
728
526
1255
1255
6
0014
2
2
22
22
3
2
24
24
890
890
81
971
971
6
0015
2
2
21
21
0
3
24
24
850
850
121
971
971
6
0016
2
2
18
18
1
3
21
21
728
728
121
850
850
6
0017
2
2
21
21
2
0
21
21
850
850
0
850
850
6
0018
2
2
18
18
2
0
18
18
728
728
0
728
728
6
0019
2
2
16
16
4
5
21
21
647
647
202
850
850
4
0020
2
2
25
25
1
9
34
34
1012
1012
364
1376
1376
7
0021
2
2
26
26
0
3
29
29
1052
1052
121
1174
1174
5
0023
2
F2
23
23
1
0
23
23
931
931
0
931
931
7
0023
2 1
2
24
24
5
0
24
24
971
971
0
971
971
6
Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)

Plot Information (continued)
Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)
occ�i
Vi 6>
61
In
d
Z
"a
y
y q
a 8 a
V
V
Z
a
y Al
Mj
>
Y
L
PC
Q%
7
Q
4
RBI ~r te
��
z
aa�
8
0,
z cw
aa.
go 1:64
yv R
HWr%]
0024
2
2
24
24
3
12
36
36
971
971
486
1457
1457
6
0025
2
2
11
11
1
8
19
19
445
445
324
769
769
5
0026
2
2
12
12
0
6
18
18
486
486
243
728
728
4
0027
2
2
12
12
0
7
19
19
486
486
283
769
769
6
0028
2
2
11
11
0
2
13
13
445
445
81
526
526
3
0029
1 2
1 2
1 14
14
1
0
14
14
567
567
0
567
567
7
Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)

Planted Stems by Plot
Amual Momumng Repon
Huth Rtpmtmt Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Conlrac! Number 002280)
11��
shagbark hickory
�mm�oo
©v
©v
©v
©moo
©o�aoo©
©mom
©voo
©©
�mmm000m00000
©©
©nom
©vvo
©oomo�o��
�m�
©oo
©�oa
©ommoomo
©�
©voo
©o
©�
©o�©
mm�mmmm
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
©mmmmmmm
Amual Momumng Repon
Huth Rtpmtmt Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Conlrac! Number 002280)

Total Stems by Plot (Includes Planted and Natural Recruit Stems)
Annual Momton g Repm Ica
uun Buffer Mnipum S
Hcmh Ripnc (E.EP Cowed Numbcr 0022x0) Appc
Common Name
,,
mm�n000mnn
©
©
©
©
©
©oom
©oo
©
©no
®n�n��
�m�
©no
©no
©nommnom
©
©nnnonon
©n
©nn©
no��mnn
©nnnnnnnnnnnnn
©nnnnn
©nnnn
nm�
©m
©onnnnnnnnonnnnn
©vv
©nn
©v
©nn
�m�omm®
®mmm
©omm
®mmmmm
©mmm
®ommmmm
Annual Momton g Repm Ica
uun Buffer Mnipum S
Hcmh Ripnc (E.EP Cowed Numbcr 0022x0) Appc

Heath
Year 2 (2011)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Taken August 2011
P W
PD hA 0
P W
FM C
fwlINWAinl
Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280 )

Heath
Year 2 (2011)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Taken August 2011
(continued)
Plot 11
p0o� �lg
Annual Monitoring Report
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)
NO %
Appendices

Heath
Year 2 (2011)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Taken August 2011
(continued)
P1,o;t 19
PH %
Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)

Heath
Year 2 (2011)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Taken August 2011
(continued)
PIot2�5
PIot2�9
Annual Monitoring Report Appendices
Heath Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002280)