Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20100652 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Report_20120823r-�- - (D S)�' ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT YEAR 2 (2011) VICKI'S THICKET RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE CRAVEN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA (EEP Contract No. 002283) [DWQ Reference No. 10 -06521 ... Fa......,.. . NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA AUG E 3 2012 DENR . WATER OUAUTY WETtINDS AND STOMN►M' 5"" rY Ekaonc meat PROGRAM Prepared by: Restoration Systems, L.L.C. 1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 And Axiom Environmental, Inc. 218 Snow Avenue Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 October 2011 Axiom Environmental, Inc. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Restoration Systems, LLC has completed riparian buffer restoration at the Vicki's Thicket Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (hereafter referred to as the "Site ") through the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) Full Delivery Process (RFP 16- 001383) to provide 28.38 Riparian Buffer Mitigation Units. The Site is located approximately 3.5 miles southeast of Dover in Craven County. The Site is located in United States Geological Survey Hydrologic Unit and Targeted Local Watershed 03020202080010 (North Carolina Division of Water Quality Subbasin 03- 04 -08) of the Neuse River Basin. Site streams drain to Core Creek (Stream Index 27 -90), which is included on the draft 2008 303(d) list for impaired biological integrity and low dissolved oxygen resulting from agricultural crop production. Prior to construction, the Site was characterized by ditched agricultural land used for row crop production. Land use practices including the maintenance and removal of vegetation, regular plowing, and use of agricultural chemicals had resulted in degraded water quality. The goals and objectives of this project focused on improving local water quality, enhancing flood attenuation, and restoring aquatic and riparian habitat. These goals were accomplished by the following. 1. Removing nonpoint sources of pollution associated with agriculture production by a) ceasing the application of agricultural herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers, and other agricultural materials into and adjacent to Site ditches and open waterways and b) providing a vegetative buffer adjacent to ditches and waterways to treat surface runoff that may be laden with sediment and/or agricultural pollutants. 2. Reducing sedimentation/siltation within on -Site and downstream receiving waters by a) increasing retention time for surface waters entering and leaving the Site, b) reducing erosion associated with vegetation maintenance and agricultural plowing to Site ditches, and c) planting a forested vegetative buffer adjacent to Site ditches and waterways. 3. Promoting floodwater attenuation by ripping compacted soils and revegetating the Site to increase ; frictional resistance on floodwaters crossing the Site. 4. Providing terrestrial wildlife habitat including a forested riparian corridor within an area that was previously cleared and highly dissected by agricultural land use. This project was constructed in late winter /early spring 2010. Site restoration resulted in 28.38 Riparian Buffer Mitigation Units. As a whole, the densities of vegetation plots across the Site were above the required 320 stems per acre with an average of 651 planted stems per acre in the Second Monitoring Year (2011). In addition, each individual plot met success criteria based on planted stems alone. Annual Monitoring Report Executive Summary Vicki's Thicket Riaprian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002283) TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i 1 0 INTRODUCTION I 1 1 Location and Setting I 1 2 Project Goals and Objectives 1 1 3 Project Structure, Restoration Type, and Approach 1 20 MONITORING PLAN 2 2 1 Vegetation Success Criteria 2 22 Maintenance and Contingency 2 23 Vegetation Sampling Results and Comparison to Success Criteria 2 30 CONCLUSIONS 2 Summary of Planted Stem Vegetation Plot Results 3 40 REFERENCES 4 APPENDICES Appendix A Figures Figure I Site Location Figure 2 Monitoring Plan View Appendix B General Tables Table 1 Site Restoration Structures and Objectives Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History Table 3 Project Contacts Table Table 4 Project Attributes Table Appendix C Vegetation Data Table 5 Planted Woody Species Vegetation Survey Data Tables Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photographs Appendix D NCDWQ Verification Letter Annual Monitoring Report Table of Contents Vicki s Thicket Riapnan Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002283) 10 INTRODUCTION 1 1 Location and Setting Restoration Systems, LLC has completed riparian buffer restoration at the Vicki's Thicket Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (hereafter referred to as the "Site ") through the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) Full Delivery Process (RFP 16- 001383) to provide 28 38 Riparian Buffer Mitigation Units The Site is located approximately 3 5 miles southeast of Dover in Craven County (Figure 1, Appendix A) The Site is located in United States Geological Survey Hydrologic Unit and Targeted Local Watershed 03020202080010 (North Carolina Division of Water Quality Subbasin 03- 04 -08) of the Neuse River Basin (USGS 1974) Directions to the Site from Kinston, North Carolina ➢ Take 70 East for approximately 8 miles ➢ Take the Dover exit and follow Old 70 /Wilson Street for approximately 4 3 miles east ➢ Turn right over the railroad tracks to wire gate ➢ Site coordinates o Latitude 35 18812°'N, Longitude 77 38613 °W (NAD83 /WGS84) 12 Project Goals and Objectives The goals and objectives of this project focused on improving local water quality, enhancing flood attenuation, and restoring aquatic and riparian habitat These goals were accomplished by the following 1 Removing nonpoint sources of pollution associated with agriculture production by a) ceasing the application of agricultural herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers, and other agricultural materials into and adjacent to Site ditches and open waterways and b) providing a vegetative buffer adjacent to ditches and waterways to treat surface runoff that may be laden with sediment and/or agricultural pollutants 2 Reducing sedimentation/siltation within on -Site and downstream receiving waters by a) increasing retention time for surface waters entering and leaving the Site, b) reducing erosion associated with vegetation maintenance and agricultural plowing to Site ditches, and c) planting a forested vegetative buffer adjacent to Site ditches and waterways 3 Promoting floodwater attenuation by ripping compacted soils and revegetating the Site to increase frictional resistance on floodwaters crossing the Site 4 Providing terrestrial wildlife habitat including a forested riparian corridor within an area that was previously cleared and highly dissected by agricultural land use 13 Project Structure, Restoration Type, and Approach Prior to construction, the Site was characterized by ditched agricultural land used for row crop production Land use practices including the maintenance and removal of vegetation, regular plowing, and use of agricultural chemicals had resulted in degraded water quality As constructed, Site activities restored historic riparian buffer functions by planting the entire 31 35 -acre Site with native riparian vegetation This resulted in 28 38 Riparian Buffer Mitigation Umts (Table 1, Appendix B and Figure 2, Appendix A) Riparian Buffer Mitigation Units were verified by North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) representative Lia Myott Gilleski during a field visit conducted on June 17, 2010 A copy of the verification letter is included in Appendix D Approximately 2 97 acres of the Site exist outside of the 200 -foot buffer area These areas were planted, however, the area is not eligible to provide credit The target natural community consisted of a Coastal Plain Bottomland Annual Monitoring Report Page I Vicki s Thicket Riapnan Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002283) Hardwood Forest (Schafale and Weakley 1990) Table 5 (Appendix C) outlines woody species planted within the Site Completed project activities, reporting history, completion dates, project contacts, and background information are summarized in Tables 2-4 (Appendix 13) 20 MONITORING PLAN Monitoring of Site restoration efforts will be performed for vegetation components of the Site for five years or until success criteria are fulfilled After planting was completed, an initial evaluation was performed to verify planting methods were successful and to determine initial species composition and density Twenty - one sample vegetation plots (10 -meter by 10- meter) were installed within the Site as per guidelines established in CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4 0 (Lee et al 2006) In each sample plot, vegetation parameters to be monitored include species composition and species density Visual observations of the percent cover of shrub and herbaceous species will also be documented by photograph 21 Vegetation Success Cnteria Characteristic Tree Species include woody tree and shrub species planted at the Site (Table 5, Appendix C) or outlined for the appropriate plant community in Schafale and Weakley (1990) An average density of 320 stems per acre of Characteristic Tree Species must be surviving after year 5 monitoring 22 Maintenance and Contingency In the event that success criteria are not fulfilled, a mechanism for contingency will be implemented If vegetation success criteria are not achieved based on average density calculations from combined plots over the entire restoration area, supplemental planting may be performed with tree species approved by regulatory agencies Supplemental planting will be performed as needed until achievement of vegetation success criteria 23 Vegetation Sampling Results and Comparison to Success Cnteria Quantitative sampling of vegetation was conducted in July and August 2011 Results are provided in Appendix C Vegetation success criteria for year 2 (320 stems per acre) were exceeded for the 2011 annual monitoring year with an average density of 651 planted stems per acre across the Site In addition, each individual plot met success criteria based on planted stems alone Average densities of planted stems went up in year 2 in several plots including Plots 1, 3 -12, and 17 During year 1, browse by deer and rodents on young planted stems was abundant throughout the Site Several stems within these plots were not counted, or counted as missing in year 1, however, many survived and were doing well in year 2 In addition, several stems that were thought to be dead during year 1 monitoring resprouted from the base and were counted during year 2 monitoring Deer browse was prevalent again during year 2 monitoring 30 CONCLUSIONS As a whole, the densities of vegetation plots across the Site were above the required 320 stems per acre with an average of 651 planted stems per acre in the Second Monitoring Year (2011) In addition, each individual plot met success criteria based on planted stems alone The following table summarized planted stem data throughout the monitoring period Annual Monitoring Report Page 2 Vicki's Thicket Riapnan Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002283) Summary of Planted Stem Veaetation Plot Results Plot Planted Stems /Acre Year 1 2010 Year 2 2011 Year 3 2012 Year 4 2013 Year 5 2014 1 647 688 2 728 607 3 809 769 4 809 810 5 931 810 6 890 810 7 971 891 2 8 526 445 9 486 526 10 769 688 11 688 607 12 971 1012 13 850 769 14 1093 810 15 728 567 16 526 486 17 647 607 18 445 324 19 647 526 20 526 1 405 21 607 526 Average Plots 1 -21 728 651 Annual Monitoring Report Page 3 Vicki s Thicket Riapnan Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002283) 40 REFERENCES Lee, M T, R K Peet, S D Roberts, and T R Wentworth 2006 CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation Version 4 0 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement Program Raleigh, North Carolina North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) 2007 Redbook, Surface Waters and Wetlands Standards North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality Raleigh, North Carolina North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) 2008a Draft North Carolina Water Quality Assessment and Impaired Waters List (2008 Integrated 305(b) and 303(d) Report) (online) Available http //h2o enr state nc us /tmdUdocumentsB Draft2008303dList pdf [November 10, 2008] North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) 2008b Draft Basmwide Planning Program Neuse River Basinwide Water Quality Plan-June 2008 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality Raleigh, North Carolina Schafale, M P and A S Weakley 1990 Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina Third Approximation North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources Raleigh, North Carolina United States Geological Survey (USGS) 1974 Hydrologic Unit Map - 1974 State of North Carolina Annual Monitoring Report Page 4 Vicki s Thicket Riapnan Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002283) Appendix A Figures Figure 1 Site Location Figure 2 Monitoring Plan View Annual Monitoring Report Appendices Vicki s Thicket Riapnan Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002283) 20 Enterprise Street MONITORING PLAN VIEW D"". by, CAF FIGURE Suite? VICKI'S THICKET Date: Raleigh, NC 27607 Aug 2010 (919) 215 -1693 RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE 2 Craven County, North Carolina Pf0fed 10 -001 Appendix B General Tables Table 1 Site Restoration Structures and Objectives Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History Table 3 Project Contacts Table Table 4 Project Attributes Table Annual Monitoring Report Appendices Vicki s Thicket Riapnan Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002283) Table 1 Site Restoration Structures and Obiectives Component Summation Restoration Level Riparian buffer mitigation was completed by planting the entire 31 35 -acre Site with native forest vegetation, credit was received for 28 38 acres of the Site Riparian Buffer Restoration 28 38 Buffer Mitigation Units d Table 2 Proiect Actwity and Reporting History Activity or Report Data Collection Complete Completion or Delivery Final Restoration Plan -- July 2010 Site Planting -- Late winter /early spring 2010 Mitigation Plan Aril 2010 August 2010 Year I Monitoring Se tember 2010 October 2010 Year 2 Monitoring August 2011 August 2011 Table 3 Project Contacts Table Designer Restoration Systems, LLC Physiographic Region 1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211 Ecoregion Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Project River Basin (919) 755 -9490 Planting Contractor Carolina Silvics NCDWQ Subbasin 908 Indian Trail Road Within EEP Watershed Plan Extent9 Edenton, North Carolina 27932 WRC Class Dwight McKinney (252) 482 -8491 Monitoring Performer Axiom Environmental, Inc Beaver activity observed during design phase 218 Snow Avenue Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 Grant Lewis (919) 215 -1693 Table 4 Protect Attribute Table Project County Craven County, North Carolina Physiographic Region Coastal Plain Ecoregion Carolina Flatwoods and Mid - Atlantic Floodplains/Low Terrace Project River Basin Neuse USGS 14-digit RUC 03020202080010 NCDWQ Subbasin 03 -04 -08 Within EEP Watershed Plan Extent9 Yes-Targeted Local Watershed WRC Class Warm of project easement fenced 0 Beaver activity observed during design phase t No Annual Monitoring Report Appendices Vicki s Thicket Riapnan Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002283) Appendix C Vegetation Data Table 5 Planted Woody Species Vegetation Survey Data Tables Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photographs Annual Monitoring Report Appendices Vicki s Thicket Riapnan Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002283) Table 5 Planted Woody Vegetation Species Quantity American elm Ulmus americana) 4500 Black gum N ssa lvatica 1500 Elderberry Sambucus canadensis) 1500 Loblolly the Pinus taeda 4500 Northern red oak (Quercus rubra) 3000 River birch Betula m ra 1500 Su arbe Celtis laevi ata 1500 Swamp chestnut oak ( Quetcus michauxir) 4500 Sycamore Platanus occidentalts) 3000 Willow oak ercus hellos) 4500 TOTAL 30,000 CVS Database Output Living planted stems, excluding live stakes, per acre Negative (red) numbers indicate the project failed to reach requirements in a particular year Project Code Project Name River Bann Year 1 Year 2 VT Vickies Thicket Neuse 1 72843 790 10 Total stems, including planted stems of all kinds (including live stakes) and natural/volunteer stems Project Code Project Name River Bann Year 1 1 Year 2 VT Vickies Thicket Neuse 1111 921981 1 2133 271461 Vigor Vigor Count Percent 0 15 34 1 0 0 2 22 5 3 145 329 4 243 551 Missing 16 36 Damage Damage Count Percent Of Stems (no damage) 382 866 Deer 29 66 Insects 11 25 Unknown 9 2 (other damage) 4 09 Rodents 2 05 Human Trampled 2 05 Diseased 1 02 Cut 1 02 Annual Monitoring Report Appendices Vicki s Thicket Riapnan Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002283) Vigor by Species Species CommonName 4 3 2 1 0 Missing Unknown Betula nigra river birch 21 11 river birch 8 25 1 8 Celtis laevi ata sugarberry 1 6 Celtis laevi ata 2 3 N ssa s lvatica blackgurn 5 14 2 1 1 Pinus taeda loblolly vine 43 8 2 ercus michaum swamp chestnut oak 33 16 4 0 3 2 rcus nigra water oak I N ssa s lvatica blackgurn 3 ercus phellos willow oak 33 34 1 1 2 1 Sambucus canadensis Common Elderberry 8 6 7 8 2 Quercus oak 3 Americansycamore 4 1 1 Quercus rubra northern red oak 8 16 7 2 1 1 Magnolia vir iniana sweetbay 3 1 N ssa tupelo 1 1 2 1 2 Platanus occidentahs American sycamore 38 6 water oak 1 Ulmus americana American elm 49 22 1 uercus phellos 3 9 Unknown I 8 1 1 15 1 14 243 145 22 3 15 16 2 Damage by Soec>les Species CommonName U Z a - pp Betula nigra river birch 8 25 8 Celtis laevi ata sugarberry 3 6 2 1 Magnolia vir iniana sweetbay 0 4 N ssa tupelo 0 3 N ssa s lvatica blackgurn 3 20 1 1 1 Pinus taeda loblolly pine 0 53 Platanus occidentahs Americansycamore 4 40 4 ercus oak 1 4 1 uercus michauxit swamp chestnut oak 7 48 2 2 3 uercus nigra water oak 1 1 uercus phellos willow oak 9 61 8 1 uercus rubra northern red oak 11 23 3 1 2 4 1 Sambucus canadensis Common Elderberry 8 23 1 2 1 1 2 l Ulmus americana American elm 4 71 3 1 Unknown 0 1 15 14 59 382 1 29 1 2 11 2 9 4 Annual Monitoring Report Appendices Vicki s Thicket Riapnan Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002283) Damage by Plot lot U 0 U a ° U A A x E� ° OG � .°. •o 1 3 24 2 1 2 2 19 1 1 3 3 21 2 1 4 2 26 2 5 1 27 1 6 0 26 7 4 22 2 2 8 5 13 3 1 1 9 1 17 1 10 2 19 1 1 11 3 16 2 1 12 3 28 2 1 13 4 17 1 3 14 2 25 2 15 3 16 3 16 3 10 1 2 17 5 13 3 1 1 18 1 11 1 19 3 13 2 1 20 3 10 1 2 21 6 9 2 2 1 1 21 59 382 1 29 1 2 11 2 9 4 Annual Monitoring Report Appendices Vicki s Thicket Riapnan Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002283) Plot Information ++ a a �+ O ' a I PC O S �� a� d 07 �U1 a.�+ie� w S ;; 2 a O a O �aA a� �U1 OiC� .a a C S Rw E: �? O SUa a sxa 8Z �x e E�� O OW �a �OG OW Fa �aU �U W OX.4 Fwv� �• 1 2 2 23 j 23 4 5 j 28 28 j 931 931 202 1133 1133 7 2 2 2 18 18 3 5 23 23 728 728 202 931 931 6 3 2 2 23 23 1 3 26 26 931 931 121 1052 1052 6 4 2 2 22 22 6 7 29 29 890 890 283 1174 1174 7 5 2 2 28 28 0 11 39 39 1133 1133 445 1578 1578 8 6 2 2 26 26 0 7 33 33 1052 1052 283 1335 1335 7 7 2 2 26 26 0 17 43 43 1052 1052 688 1740 1740 7 8 2 2 16 16 2 30 46 46 647 647 1214 1862 1862 6 9 2 2 16 16 2 9 25 25 647 647 364 1012 1012 7 10 2 2 20 20 1 190 210 210 809 809 7689 8498 8498 9 11 2 2 19 19 0 104 123 123 769 769 4209 4978 4978 7 12 2 2 30 30 1 39 69 69 1214 1214 1578 2792 2792 9 13 2 2 20 20 1 15 35 35 809 809 607 1416 1416 7 14 2 2 26 26 1 99 125 125 1052 1052 4006 5059 5059 9 15 2 2 16 16 3 13 29 29 647 647 526 1174 1174 5 16 2 2 13 13 0 6 19 19 526 526 243 769 769 5 17 2 2 17 17 1 44 61 61 688 688 1781 2469 2469 6 18 2 2 9 9 3 40 49 49 364 364 1619 1983 1983 6 19 2 2 14 14 2 32 46 46 567 567 1295 1862 1862 5 20 2 2 13 13 0 18 31 31 526 526 728 1255 1255 5 21 2 2 15 15 0 1 3 1 18 18 607 607 121 728 728 6 Annual Monitoring Report Appendices Vicki s Thicket Riapnan Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002283) Planted Stems by Plot Annual Monitoring Report Appendices Vicki s Thicket Riaprian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002283) 0. Species Common Name c , c 0 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Betula nigra river birch 32 13 246 4 1 l 1 5 2 1 3 4 3 2 2 3 Celtis laevigata sugarberry 7 5 14 1 1 1 1 3 Magnolia vtr iraana sweetbay 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 Nyssa tupelo 2 2 1 1 1 Nyssa sylvatica blackgum 21 13 1 62 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 2 2 1 2 2 1 Pinus taeda loblolly pine 51 18 283 1 1 4 1 7 5 4 4 1 3 4 5 1 6 1 1 L-1 Platanus American occidentalis sycamore 44 15 293 1 5 3 2 1 4 2 1 3 4 2 2 7 1 6 Quercus oak 3 2 15 1 2 Quercus swamp mrchauxii chestnut oak 53 13 408 3 3 3 5 5 5 4 1 1 7 6 7 3 Quercus nigra water oak 1 1 1 1 Quercus willow oak hellos 68 15 1 4 53 3 4 6 1 4 4 1 6 1 4 5 6 1 3 9 3 3 7 Quercus rubra northern red oak 31 14 221 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 7 4 3 1 2 1 1 Sambucus Common canadensis Elderberry 21 12 175 5 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 Ulmus American americana elm 72 13 554 8 10 9 9 8 7 6 2 5 2 3 1 2 14 14 410 14 23 18 23 22 28 26 1 26 16 16 20 19 30 20 26 FW 13 17 9 14 13 15 Annual Monitoring Report Appendices Vicki s Thicket Riaprian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002283) All Stems by Plot (Planted & Natural Recruits) *Bolded species were planted Annual Monitoring Report Appendices Vicki s Thicket Riapnan Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002283) . c C 8 c W, Common = Species* Name* E" E * a °' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Baccharis eastern hahmi oha baccharis 59 16 369 2 1 3 5 4 1 4 2 2 1 11 2 2 1 9 9 Betula ni ra river birch 32 13 246 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 2 1 3 4 3 2 2 3 Celtis laevi ata sugarberry 7 5 14 1 1 1 1 3 Ilex o aca American holly 29 7 414 1 1 1 2 21 1 2 Lyraci r sweetgum 326 18 1811 1 1 1 3 2 8 2 130 2 22 1 45 3 4 5 2 3 1 s act ua ua Magnolia sweetbay 9 7 129 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 vir iniana N ssa tupelo 3 3 1 1 1 1 N ssa s lvatwa blackgum 22 13 169 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 2 2 1 3 2 1 Prnus taeda loblolly pine 315 20 1575 2 1 6 2 12 6 11 22 6 59 13 22 13 58 1 38 14 22 6 1 Platanus American 44 15 293 1 5 3 2 1 4 2 1 3 4 2 2 7 l 6 occidentalis sycamore Quercus oak 4 3 133 1 2 1 Quercus swamp 53 13 408 3 3 3 5 5 5 4 l 1 7 6 7 3 nuchauxrr chestnut oak Quercus ni ra water oak 1 1 1 1 Quercus willow oak 70 15 467 3 4 6 4 4 6 1 4 5 8 3 9 3 3 7 hellos hern red Quercus rubra oak 33 15 22 2 2 3 1 1 2 1 2 7 4 3 1 2 1 1 Rhus flameleaf 14 5 28 4 2 3 3 2 co alhnum sumac Sanrbucus Common 29 13 223 7 5 1 1 1 l 2 3 1 3 1 2 1 canadensis Elderberry Ubnus American elm 72 13 554 8 10 9 9 8 7 6 2 5 2 3 1 2 americana F 18 18 1122 18 30 26 26 30 39 33 43 47 25 210 123 70 35 126 32 19 62 50 47 31 18 *Bolded species were planted Annual Monitoring Report Appendices Vicki s Thicket Riapnan Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002283) Vickies Thicket Year 2 (2011) Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos Taken July and August 2011 PM � H O Plot 33 PP L0 H9 7 Annual Monitoring Report Vicki's Thicket Riaprian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002283) HA 4 w9 PH Appendices Vickies Thicket Year 2 (2011) Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos Taken July and August 2011 (continued) HA 9 HA�� Rd U Plot 15 FPj'I 77111 Annual Monitoring Report Appendices Vicki's Thicket Riaprian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002283) Vickies Thicket Year 2 (2011) Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos Taken July and August 2011 (continued) B5n, 6 N Annual Monitoring Report Appendices Vicki's Thicket Riaprian Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002283) Appendix D NCDWQ Venfication Letter Annual Monitoring Report Appendices Vicki s Thicket Riapnan Buffer Mitigation Site (EEP Contract Number 002283) NCDEENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman Governor Director Secretary August 13, 2010 Craven County DWQ #: 10 -0652 Mr. Tim Baumgartner EEP Full Delivery Section 1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27604 Re: Vicki's Thicket Preliminary Restoration Approval Dear Mr. Baumgartner: The Division of Water Quality received a final restoration plan for the Vicki's Thicket Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site on August 10, 2010. On June 17, 2010, Lia Myott Gilleski conducted a site visit to the above referenced site. By copy of this correspondence, DWQ approves the concept presented in the restoration plan and that it is expected to produce 28.38 acres of nutrient offset credit for Neuse 03020202. The As -built report will provide a more accurate credit accounting. Please copy DWQ with the As -built report and yearly monitoring reports, referencing the EEP Contract number (and DWQ number if applicable). Please feel free to contact Lia Myott Gilleski at (919) 733 -1786 if you have any questions regarding this correspondence. T Sinc ly, Ian McMillan, Acting Supervisor 401 Oversight/Express Review Program Cc (w /out encl.) File Copy (Lia M. Gilleski) Chris Pullinger — DWQ WaRO John Huisman — DWQ Nonpoint Source Planning Unit Cyndi Karoly — DWQ Wetlands and Stormwater Branch 401 Oversight/Express Review Perrnttting Unit 1650 Mal Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1650 Location: 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Phone: 919 - 733.17861 FAX: 919 - 733 -6693 Internet: http:// h2o.enr.state.nc.uslncwetlandst An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer NorthCarolina Naturally