20201664 Ver 2_Draft UMBI and Draft BPDP_20210318

Mitigation Project Information Upload
Type of Mitigation Project:* r Stream r Wetlands p Buffer p Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Is this a Prospectus,Technical Proposal or New r Yes F No
Site?*
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:* Raymond Holz Email Address:* [e-mail]
Project Information
Existing 20201664 Existing 1
(DWR)ID#:* (numbers only...rpdash) Version:* (nurrbersonly)
Project Name:* Bells Bridge
Project Type:* f DMS O Mitigation Bank
County:* Halifax
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:* Mitigation Bank Instrument
File Upload: Draft-RS White Farms UMBI and DWR ID No.2020-1664 Draft Bells Bridge
30.9MB
BPDP_03.18.2021.pdf
Please upload only one FIT of the corrplete file that needs to be subnitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Raymond Holz
Signature:*
A`;4/
Date 03/18/2021

AGREEMENT TO ESTABLISH THE RESTORATION SYSTEMS' WHITE FARMS
UMBRELLA MITIGATION BANKING INSTRUMENT IN THE TAR-PAMLICO
RIVER BASIN FOR NUTRIENT OFFSET AND RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION
CREDITS PURSUANT TO THE TAR-PAMLICO NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT
STRATEGY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. PREAMBLE 2
II. LOCATION AND GEOGRAPHIC SERVICE AREA 2
III. AUTHORITIES 3
IV. ESTABLISHMENT OF BANK PARCEL 3
V. BANK PARCEL DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE 5
VI. POST CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTATION FOR THE BANK PARCEL 7
VII. CALCULATION OF CREDITS FOR THE BANK PARCEL 9
VIII. CREDIT RELEASE SCHEDULE 10
IX. PROCEDURE FOR DEBITING AND CREDITING 11
X. BANK PARCEL CLOSURE 13
XI. GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR THE BANK PARCEL 14

ATTACHMENTS &REFERENCES
A—Division of Water Resources Authority Document
B —NCDWR- Methodology& Calculations for Nutrient Reductions on the Bank Parcel
C—Ledger Templates
D—White Farm Bank Parcel Development Package
E—Bells Bridge Bank Parcel Development Package
1

I. PREAMBLE
This Restoration Systems White Farms Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument
("Instrument") regarding the establishment, use, operation, and maintenance of the White
Farms and Bells Bridge Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcels ("Bank Parcels"),
further identified in Section II, is to provide Tar-Pamlico Riparian Buffer mitigation credits
("Riparian Buffer Credits") and Tar-Pamlico Nutrient Strategy nutrient load reduction credits
("Nutrient Offset Credits"), is made and entered into by and among Restoration Systems,LLC
(RS) as the Bank Sponsor ("Sponsor"), and the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality—Division of Water Resources ("DWR"). This Instrument is in accordance with 15A
NCAC 02B .0703 and 15A NCAC 02B .0295, see references.
The purpose of the Bank Parcels is:
A. To restore and preserve riparian vegetation adjacent to streams and agricultural ditches
with the intent to improve water quality within the Tar-Pamlico River Basin.
B. To convert agricultural land uses within riparian areas adjacent to streams and agricultural
ditches into a dense, hardwood vegetated state with the intent to significantly reduce
nutrient loadings associated with agricultural practices into streams and ditches.
C. To provide mitigation and sell any resulting Riparian Buffer Credits and Nutrient Offset
Credits to third parties in the Tar-Pamlico River Basin, for development(both existing and
proposed), or to offset NPDES permitted wastewater nutrient sources requiring such
mitigation or offset, and or permit obligations requiring such mitigation.
II. LOCATION AND GEOGRAPHIC SERVICE AREA
A. The Geographic Service Area ("GSA") is the designated area wherein a Bank can
reasonably be expected to sell Riparian Buffer Credits and Nutrient Offset Credits for
impacts requiring such mitigation or offset.
B. The GSA for this instrument is limited to the Tar-Pamlico River Basin in the State of North
Carolina, United States Geological Survey ("USGS") 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code
("HUC") 03020103.
C. Sale or transfer of Riparian Buffer Credits shall be limited to the 8-digit HUC 03020103 in
the Tar-Pamlico River Basin, unless otherwise authorized by the DWR or delegated local
government in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0295.
D. Sale or transfer of Nutrient Offset Credits shall be limited to the 8-digit HUC 03020103 in
the Tar-Pamlico River Basin, in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0703,unless otherwise
authorized by the DWR in accordance with Session Law 2019-86.
E. Table 1 provides site-specific details of the Bank Parcels proposed under this Instrument.
2

Table 1.0—Site-specific Details
8-Digit USGS Named
Bank Parcel Project Primary Land
County Hydrologic DWR ID# Receiving
Name Use/s
Unit Code Location Stream
White Farm Halifax 03020102 2020-1665 Hobgood Deep Creek Agricultural Crops
Bells Bridge Halifax 03020102 2020-1664 Hobgood Deep Creek Agricultural Crops
III.AUTHORITIES
A. The Bank will be used to provide Riparian Buffer Credit and Nutrient Offset Credit in
accordance with the requirements in the DWR Authority document referenced herein as
"Attachment A" and attached to this Instrument.
B. Projects eligible for utilization of the credits are those requiring authorization under the
requirements of Attachment A and any new approved North Carolina General Statutes
(NCGS) and rules for the Tar-Pamlico Nutrient Management Strategy.
C. The selling of credits generated from the Bank Parcel approved under this Instrument, shall
be consistent with approved North Carolina("State")statutes and rules for the Tar-Pamlico
Nutrient Management Strategy.
D. Mitigation activities proposed under this Instrument and corresponding Bank Parcel
Development Package (BPDP) to generate Riparian Buffer Credits and Nutrient Offset
Credits shall be consistent with North Carolina ("State") statutes and rules for the Tar-
Pamlico Management Strategy that are in place at the time a complete BPDP is submitted
to DWR.
IV.ESTABLISHMENT OF BANK PARCEL
A. In accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0295 and 15A NCAC 02B .0703, DWR has provided
a "Site Viability Letter" for the Bank Parcel proposed under this Instrument. The site
viability letter is not an approval of the site to generate Riparian Buffer Credits and Nutrient
Offset Credits, but is a preliminary review of the Bank Parcel that details and confirms
existing land-use conditions, defines the riparian sites (Enhancement, Preservation, or
Restoration),and identifies features(streams,ditches,ponds,etc.)that meet general criteria
to be suitable to generate Riparian Buffer Credits and Nutrient Offset Credits. Table 2.0
below outlines when the Site Viability Letters were issued by NCDWR:
3

Table 2.0—Site Viability Letter Details
Bank Parcel NC DWR Site Visit Viability Letter Viability Letter
Received Expiration Date
White Farm November 3,2020 February 9,2021 February 9,2023
Bells Bridge November 3,2020 February 16,2021 February 16,2023
B. A valid Site Viability Letter is required prior to submittal of the BPDP. Site Viability
Letters will either expire on the dates listed above or upon the submittal of an individual
As-Built Report to the DWR,whichever comes first. If a Site Viability Letter expires prior
to submittal of a complete BPDP as described in Section V to DWR,then the Sponsor must
submit a formal request to DWR for a new Site Viability Letter for that Bank Parcel.
C. The Bank Parcels proposed for inclusion under this Instrument shall require a BPDP be
submitted to, and approved by, the DWR prior to use of the Bank Parcel for mitigation
purposes or sale or transfer of any associated credits. The contents of the BPDP are
provided in Section V.
D. The BPDPs submitted under this instrument will be placed on public notice and made
available for public commenting for 15 calendar days.
E. In general, the Bank Sponsor expects all Riparian Buffer Credits and Nutrient Offset
Credits to be generated through either riparian restoration or riparian preservation.Riparian
Buffer Credits are only attainable if the width of the riparian area is at least 20 feet from
top of bank.
F. The Bank Parcel is intended to provide Riparian Buffer Credit as follows:
1. Planting hardwood trees or trees and shrubs on a Restoration Site as defined in 15A
NCAC 02B .0295 (b) adjacent to streams and primary ditches where agriculture has
been determined to be the predominant land-use.
2. Diffused flow will be maintained onsite to the maximum extent practicable. The Buffer
Interpretation/Clarification Memo #2008-019 may be applied where maintenance of
diffuse flow onsite is unattainable.
3. Maintaining a Preservation Site as defined in 15A NCAC 02B .0295(b) by placing a
perpetual conservation easement around riparian areas.
G. Nutrient Offset Credit may be achieved on the Bank Parcels through restoration of the
riparian areas where agriculture is the predominant land use. Nutrient Offset Credits are
only attainable if the width of the restored riparian areas are at least fifty (50) feet as
measured perpendicular from tops of stream and ditch banks. The width of the restoration
area begins at the most landward limit of the top of bank or the rooted herbaceous
vegetation and extends landward a minimum of 50 feet and a maximum of 200 feet on all
sides of the surface waters.
4

H. The Bank Parcels are expected to provide Nutrient Offset Credits in accordance with 15A
NCAC 02B .0703and is expected to provide Nutrient Offset Credit as follows:
1. Converting agricultural land uses within riparian areas to non-agricultural land
uses.
2. Planting hardwood trees or trees and shrubs on a Restoration Site as defined in 15A
NCAC 02B .0295 (b) adjacent to streams and primary ditches where agriculture
has been determined to be the predominant land-use.
F. The Bank Parcels submitted for review under this Instrument are anticipated to begin
construction of proposed riparian activities after approval of this Instrument and
corresponding BPDP.
V. BANK PARCEL DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE
A. The BPDPs submitted under this Instrument shall be submitted to DWR for review and
must be approved by DWR prior to any construction on the Bank Parcels. The BPDPs will
describe specifics related to any phasing of the Bank Parcel. The BPDP must describe any
changes that have occurred to the site between the date of the Site Viability Letter and the
date the BPDP is submitted to DWR. The BPDP shall include detailed information
consistent with the sections below concerning; 1) site location (8-digit HUC is required);
2) existing conditions with current photos; 3) proposed buffer mitigation and nutrient
offset activities including a detailed vegetation plan; 4)monitoring and maintenance plans;
5) financial assurances; 6) associated buffer/nutrient credit calculations, which shall
include credit generation, service area, and accounting as appropriate for each regulatory
authority; 7)stream determination letter from DWR;8) Site Viability Letter from DWR, 9)
service area figure for each mitigation type; and 10) all pertinent information regarding
permitting, bank stabilization, culvert removal, and installation of utilities indirectly or
directly affecting the Bank Parcel.
B. The Sponsor will obtain all applicable federal, state, and local documentation, permits, or
authorizations needed to construct and maintain the Bank Parcel. This Instrument does not
qualify as, or substitute for, such documentation,permit, or authorization.
C. Any restoration activities or proposed construction within the riparian buffers and other
riparian areas on the Bank Parcel to produce Riparian Buffer Credit and/or Nutrient Offset
Credit must be approved by DWR in writing prior to implementation. The failure of the
Sponsor to comply with this requirement may result in a revised or reduced credit release
schedule for the Bank Parcel.
D. Requests for deviation from the approved BPDPs must be submitted to DWR in writing.
Written approval from the DWR must be received prior to implementing any deviation
from the approved BPDPs.
5

Property Disposition& Long-Term Management for the Bank Parcel
E. Prior to the release of any credits, the Sponsor shall record permanent conservation
easements at the Edgecombe County Register of Deed's office that is sufficient to ensure
protection, operation and maintenance of restored riparian buffers and other riparian areas
in perpetuity.
F. The form of the conservation easement shall be consistent with the standards employed by
the State of North Carolina in the protection of restored riparian buffers and riparian areas
and shall be approved by the DWR prior to the release of any credits.
G. The Sponsor shall not grant additional easements, right of ways, or any other property
interest in or to the project areas, without prior approval from the DWR.
H. The Sponsor agrees to transfer or assign the conservation easement and its interests in
perpetuity to a qualified holder under NC General Statute("GS") 121-34 et seq. and 170(h)
of the Internal Revenue Code prior to the submittal of the Year 4 Monitoring Report. The
holder shall be a land trust or stewardship program that will hold and enforce the
conservation easement and the interests in perpetuity. The Sponsor shall choose a land trust
or stewardship program that is accredited by the Land Trust Accreditation Commission
and/or has been approved by DWR prior to the end of the fourth year monitoring period.
A land trust must be certified under 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.
I. In the event the Sponsor is also the owner of the underlying fee interest in the property,the
conveyance of the conservation easement to a land trust or stewardship fund must be
arranged at the outset of the approved BPDP.
Financial Assurances for the Bank Parcel
J. Following approval of the BPDPs, the Sponsor shall provide a Performance/Maintenance
Bond from a surety company that is rated no less than an "A-" as rated by A.M. Best, to
construct the Bank Parcel, in its entirety, including all phases according to the approved
BPDP. If necessary, RS may elect to acquire a separate bond for each phase of the Bank
Parcel as described in the BPDP. It is the Sponsor's responsibility to confirm that the
surety company is rated no less than an"A-"with each annual bond renewal.
K. The amount of the Performance Bond/s shall be 100% of the estimated cost for
implementation of the riparian mitigation activities and construction of the Bank Parcel as
described in the approved BPDP. No bond shall be less than $150,000.00 to cover
construction costs.
L. Alternatively, in lieu of posting Performance Bonds, the Sponsor may elect to construct
the Bank Parcel, in its entirety, including all phases prior to the first credit release.
M. Once DWR has released all credits for completion of all the items listed below for each of
the Bank Parcels,then the Bank Sponsor will be released from its performance obligations
under the performance bond/s required in Item J and K of this section:
6

1. Instrument and BPDP Approved by DWR, Conservation Easement Recorded,
Financial Assurance Posted;
2. Site Earthwork, Planting and Installation of Monitoring Devices Completed;
3. As-Built Report as described in Section VI has been received by DWR; and
4. DWR has submitted a written approval of the As-Built Report
N. To comply with this section, DWR must be the Obligee on all performance bonds.
VI.POST CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTATION FOR THE BANK PARCEL
As-Built Report
A. The Sponsor agrees to perform all necessary work, in accordance with the provisions of
this Instrument and corresponding BPDPs, to establish, maintain, and monitor Riparian
Buffers or other riparian areas until Item B (1) and(2) of Section X have been satisfied.
B. When all riparian mitigation activities and construction have been completed for a Bank
Parcel, the Sponsor will submit an as-built plan and report for the Bank Parcel within 30
calendar days after completing the establishment of the riparian buffer and nutrient offset
areas. The As-built Reports will be submitted to DWR and describe any deviation from the
approved BPDPs and will document the following:
1. Riparian restoration and planting details, invasive species control, confirmation of
fence installation if applicable, cattle exclusions if applicable, monitoring device
locations, vegetation plot locations, and photo point locations, as appropriate.
2. Boundary Survey of the conservation easement area, signed and sealed by a
licensed surveyor,including an inventory of the final riparian buffer mitigation and
nutrient offset areas in both square feet and acres.
3. As-built map of the mitigated areas showing where riparian restoration and
preservation were performed and any deviations to the Bank Parcel from what was
approved in the BPDP.
4. Aerial map of the restoration and preservation areas approved in the BPDP.
Financial Assurance for the Bank Parcel
C. After completion of the riparian mitigation activities and construction on the Bank Parcel,
in its entirety, including all phases, a separate Performance/Maintenance Bond/s will be
secured for 100% of the estimated cost to implement the monitoring and maintenance plan
as described in the approved BPDP and As-Built Report for the site. The Bond/s must be
from a surety company that is rated no less than an "A-" as rated by A.M. Best, and it is
7

the Sponsor's responsibility to confirm that the surety company is rated no less than an"A-
"with annual bond renewal.
D. Each Performance/Maintenance Bond shall be secured each year for a minimum of five
years, and until DWR has released all Riparian Buffer Credits and Nutrient Offset Credits
to the Bank Sponsor. Upon DWR approval, the bond/s may be lowered each year based on
the adjusted cost to complete the monitoring.No bond shall be less than$100,000 to cover
monitoring and maintenance costs.
E. Once DWR has released 100% of all credits for completion of all Bank Parcel milestones
described in Table 3 of Section VIII and in the corresponding BPDP, the Bank Sponsor
will be released from its performance obligations under the performance bond/s required
in "C-D" of this Section.
F. To comply with this section, DWR must be the Obligee on all performance bonds.
Monitoring and Maintenance Reports
G. The Sponsor shall monitor the Bank Parcel,in its entirety,including all phases as described
in the BPDP until such time as DWR determines that the performance standards described
below have been met. The monitoring period shall be a minimum of five consecutive years
for each phase of the Bank Parcel.
H. Performance Standards for Vegetation: Native hardwood trees or native hardwood tree
and shrub species should be planted at a density sufficient to provide 260 stems per acre
after five years. A minimum of four(4)native hardwood trees or four(4)native hardwood
tree and shrub species must be planted. No one species shall be greater than 50% of the
planted stems. A list of species for planting will be detailed in the BPDP for approval.
Native hardwood tree volunteer species may be included to meet performance standards as
determined by the DWR.
I. A "stem" means a woody seedling, sapling, shrub or tree, no less than 10 centimeters in
height.
J. If the performance standards of the vegetation are not met, supplemental plantings may be
required. Supplemental plantings will be utilized until the required densities have been
achieved and maintained for five years. Bank Parcel maintenance, such as ensuring diffuse
flow, managing invasive species, and pest control will be included in the BPDP.
K. Monitoring Reports for Riparian Buffer Credit and/or Nutrient Offset Credit:
Reporting criteria of the vegetation shall be based on the Carolina Vegetation Survey
(CVS) — EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation Level 2 Plot Sampling only version 4.0
or any updated versions of this protocol in place at the date of acceptance of the BPDP.
The Sponsor shall submit an annual monitoring report no later than December 31 of each
year for a minimum of five consecutive years after the first full growing season. This report
will describe the conditions of the Bank Parcel,including an evaluation of the performance
8

standards of the vegetation contained within the approved BPDP. Reports shall contain
the following:
1. A U.S. Geological Survey map showing location of the Bank Parcel;
2. A detailed narrative with supporting photos summarizing the condition of the Bank
Parcel along with any maintenance or remediation performed that year; and
3. A map, survey, or other figure showing locations of sampling plots, permanent
photo points, location of transects, etc.; and
4. Monitoring data, including specific vegetative counts showing that the trees or tree
and shrub species planted are meeting performance standards and updated
photographs; and
5. A copy of the most recent Bank credit/debit ledgers; and
6. Corresponding verification letters from designated local governments upon request;
and
7. Corresponding Mitigation Transfer Certificates upon request.
8. Proof of performance bond renewal to cover the next monitoring year (if
applicable)
Contingency Plans/Remedial Actions
L. In the event the Bank Parcel fails to achieve the performance criteria described in this
Instrument and the approved BPDP,the Bank Sponsor shall develop necessary contingency
plans in coordination with the DWR and implement appropriate remedial actions for the
Bank Parcel and the Bank.Depending on the degree of remedial actions required,the DWR
may modify the monitoring period.
VII. CALCULATION OF CREDITS FOR THE BANK PARCEL
Riparian Buffer Credits
A. All Riparian Buffer Credits shall be determined based on the ratios and percentages
provided in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (m) and(n).
B. Riparian buffer restoration on the Bank Parcel, as described in 15A NCAC 02B. 0295 (n),
and defined in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (b)that is performed on agriculture lands within the
Bank Parcel, may be used for either Riparian Buffer Credit or nutrient offset Credit, but
not both.
C. Riparian buffer preservation on the Bank Parcel, as described in 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(o), and defined in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (b) can only be used for Riparian Buffer Credit.
9

D. Riparian Buffer Credit is defined as one (1) buffer credit per one square foot or 43,560
buffer credits per one acre.
E. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (1)(6)(B), "Buffer mitigation credit shall not be
generated within wetlands that provide mitigation credit required by 15A NCAC 02H
.0506".
Nutrient Offset Credits
F. The acreage of Nutrient Offset Credits on the Bank Parcel submitted under this Instrument
is determined by applying the applicable ratio as provided in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (m)
for a Restoration Site. All riparian areas proposed for Nutrient Offset Credits must be a
minimum of fifty (50) feet from the top of the bank along streams and ditches adjacent to
land noted in the Site Viability Letter as agriculture.
G. Nutrient Offset Credits cannot be achieved through the preservation activities performed
on the Bank Parcel.
H. Nutrient Abatement of Restored Riparian Area/Buffers on Agricultural lands: The Sponsor
and DWR agree to the following:
The pounds of nitrogen offset per acre of restored riparian areas/buffers shall be
2,273.02 pounds per acre,
The pounds of phosphorus offset per acre of restored riparian areas/buffers shall be
146.40 pounds per acre,
I. The Sponsor and DWR agree that the methodology and calculations for determining
nitrogen and total phosphorus reduction, associated with restoration of riparian areas on
this Bank Parcel shall be fixed as part of the approval of this Instrument, with the fixed
amount not changing during the Bank Parcel Development or credit release schedule for
the Bank Parcel. The approved method and calculations for determining nutrient
reductions associated with the riparian restoration on this Bank Parcel is provided in further
detail in Attachment B.
VIII. CREDIT RELEASE SCHEDULE
A. Upon submittal of all appropriate documentation by the Sponsor, and subsequent approval
by DWR, it is agreed that Riparian Buffer Credits and Nutrient Offset Credits associated
with the Bank Parcel,in its entirety and including all phases,will become available for sale
or transfer to a third party in accordance with the Credit Release Schedule in Table 3.0.
B. If necessary, RS may elect to have a separate Credit Release Schedule for each phase of
the Bank Parcel. All phases will be subject to the same schedule as provided in Table 3.0
below:
10

Table 3.0-Credit Release Schedule for Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Credits
%Credit
Task Project Milestone Available for
Sale
Instrument and BPDP Approved by DWR,Conservation Easement Recorded*,
1 Financial Assurance Posted,and all utilities installed and in compliance with 20
state issued permits/authorizations where applicable
2 Site Earthwork,Planting and Installation of Monitoring Devices Completed 20
and all applicable permits obtained
3 Monitoring Financial Assurance Posted and Approval of As-Built Report 10
4 Monitoring Report#1:Approved by the DWR** &financial assurances 10
renewed
5 Monitoring Report#2:Approved by the DWR** &financial assurances 10
renewed
6 Monitoring Report#3:Approved by the DWR** &financial assurances 10
renewed
Item B(1)of Section X in this Instrument has been completed and approved 5
by DWR.
No remaining credits will be released until the conservation easement has
been assigned to an approved land trust or stewardship
8 Monitoring Report#4:Approved by the DWR** &financial assurances 5
renewed
9 Monitoring Report#5:Approved by the DWR** and final site visit by DWR 10
has been conducted
Total 100%
* For specification,please see Section V in this Instrument
** DWR Approval provided upon a determination that the site is meeting success criteria contained within the
approved BPDP
C. DWR may modify the credit release schedule based on the information submitted or the
order in which required information is received. DWR will notify the Sponsor of any
modification to the credit release schedule.
IX.PROCEDURE FOR DEBITING AND CREDITING
Credit Ledgers
A. The Bank Sponsor shall maintain a credit ledger for each mitigation type for each phase of
the Bank Parcel under this Instrument: Credit ledgers shall provide the accounting for
Riparian Buffer Credits in square feet and acres, and Nutrient Offset Credits in pounds and
acres.
B. Each credit ledger shall be submitted on a separate 8 '/2-in X 11-in spreadsheet with legible
font style and font size. All ledgers shall be submitted using the templates provided in
Attachments D of this Instrument or any updated versions to these templates as provided
by DWR.
11

Credit Processing
C. Riparian Buffer Credits generated on this Bank Parcel will be used to provide mitigation
for authorized buffer impacts within the Tar-Pamlico River Basin according to 15A NCAC
02B .0295 (f) and (g).
D. Nutrient Offset Credits generated on this Bank Parcel will be used to offset nitrogen and
phosphorus nutrient loads within the 8-digit HUC 03020103 of the Tar-Pamlico River
Basin in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
E. Available Riparian Buffer Credits(credits that have been released by DWR but not sold by
the Sponsor) that meet criteria for nutrient offset credits as outlined in Section VII of this
Instrument, the Site Viability Letter and the corresponding BPDP can be converted and
transferred from Riparian Buffer Credits to Nutrient Offset Credits upon written approval
from DWR. Once a credit has been converted to another credit type, the transaction is
permanent and the credit cannot be converted again.
F. Available Nutrient Offset Credits (credits that have been released by DWR but not sold by
the Sponsor) that are generated within 0- 100' from tops of banks and meet criteria for
riparian buffer credits as outlined in Section VII of this Instrument,the Site Viability Letter,
15A NCAC 02B .0295 and the corresponding BPDP can be converted from Nutrient Offset
Credits to Riparian Buffer Credits upon written approval from DWR. Once a credit has
been converted to another credit type,the transaction is permanent and the credit cannot be
converted again.
G. The Bank Sponsor shall obtain written verification of nutrient offset need from a designated
local government within the 8-digit HUC 03020103 of the Tar-Pamlico River Basin, or
from DWR through an approved NPDES permit for wastewater nutrient sources, prior to
debiting Nutrient Offset Credits from the Bank Parcel.
H. The Bank Sponsor shall obtain written verification of buffer mitigation required from the
delegated local government in the Tar-Pamlico River Basin or DWR prior to debiting
Riparian Buffer Credits from the Bank Parcel.
I. All credit and debit transactions for the Bank Parcel under this Instrument shall be
accurately depicted in the credit ledgers. The Sponsor shall provide DWR up-to-date credit
ledgers for the Bank Parcel by the tenth (10th) of each month. At a minimum and upon
request, DWR shall receive a hard copy of updated credit ledgers along with the
corresponding Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificates("Certificate")and all corresponding
letters from the designated local governments or DWR where applicable, once a year.
Notification of all credit sales shall be provided to DWR until all credits that have been
released have been sold.
12

Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificates
J. All credit sales will include a Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate ("Certificate") that is
required to be provided to the buyer of Riparian Buffer and/or Nutrient Offset credits, that
will include, at a minimum, the following information:
1. Bank Details: (1) Bank Sponsor Name, (2) bank parcel as it appears in this
Instrument, (3) DWR project number for the BPDP as it appears in Table 1.0
2. Credit Details: (1) date of receipt, (2) identify if full or partial payment, (3-when
applicable)amount of nitrogen Nutrient Offset Credits purchased in pounds and
confirmation from the designated local government or DWR of the amount
required, and (4-when applicable) amount of phosphorus Nutrient Offset Credits
purchased in pounds and confirmation from the designated local government or
DWR of the amount required, (5) amount of Riparian Buffer Credits purchased in
square feet and the confirmation from DWR or the local government of the amount
required.
3. Permitted Project Details: (1) project name as it appears on DWR or local
government permits and/or certifications, (2) 8-digit HUC, (3) river basin, (4)
nutrient strategy applicable to the project, (5 —when applicable) designated local
government or DWR requiring Nutrient Offset Credits, and/or (6 — when
applicable) DWR authorization number or delegated local government requiring
Riparian Buffer Credits for this project
K. If the DWR determines that the Bank is operating at a deficit(e.g. the Sponsor is utilizing,
selling, leasing or transferring credits that are not available), or the Bank is out of
compliance with statutes,rules or this Agreement,the sale/transfer will immediately cease,
and the DWR, in consultation with the Sponsor, will determine what remedial actions are
necessary.
X. BANK PARCEL CLOSURE
A. Bank Parcel Closure shall be identified as the event when the Sponsor is relieved of all of
its responsibilities to the Bank Parcel and there are no Riparian Buffer Credits or Nutrient
Offset Credits left to sell.
B. Bank Parcel Closure shall commence only after all of the following events have occurred:
1. Transfer or assign the conservation easement and all of its interests, in perpetuity,
to a land trust or stewardship program as described in Section V of this Instrument.
2. All five years of monitoring completed and all monitoring reports submitted and
approved by DWR.
13

3. All credits have been released and debited and updated ledgers showing zero credit
balances have been submitted and approved by DWR.
XI.GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR THE BANK PARCEL
A. Upon the presentation of proper credentials,and during normal business hours,the Sponsor
and the landowner shall grant permission to the Director of DWR, and/or an authorized
representative of the Director of DWR, to enter the property containing the Bank Parcel.
B. Amendments: This Banking Instrument may be amended or modified only with written
approval of all signatory parties.
C. Any transfer of the Sponsor's rights or obligations outlined in this Instrument or any other
agreement referenced in this Instrument to a third party must be approved by DWR prior
to the transfer.
D. Force Majeure: After 100% of all of the credits have been released according to the credit
release schedule in Section VIII and confirmation has been received by the DWR that the
Conservation Easement has been successfully assigned in compliance with Item H of
Section V, the Sponsor will not be responsible for Bank failure that is attributed to natural
catastrophes including but not limited to flood, drought, disease, regional pest infestation,
etc. that are beyond the control of the Sponsor.
E. However, if an event occurs before 100% of all of the credits have been released according to
the credit release schedule in Section VIII, the Sponsor shall take remedial action to restore
the property to its condition prior to the event, in a manner sufficient to provide adequate
offset and mitigation to cover credits that were sold prior to the occurrence of the event.
Such remedial action shall be taken by the Sponsor only to the extent necessary and
appropriate, as determined by DWR and the Sponsor.
DWR must concur in writing that a force majeure event has occurred for this provision to apply.
F. Oversight: Actions taken by DWR may include, but are not limited to, the following:
1. Site visits,
2. Mitigation determinations/mitigation viability assessments
3. Issuance of Site Viability Letters,
4. BPDP review and approval of items listed in Section V of this Instrument,
5. As-Built Report review and approval of items listed in Section VI of this
Instrument,
14

6. Monitoring Report review and approval of items listed in Section VI of this
Instrument,
7. Credit Ledger review and approval of items listed in Section IX of this Instrument,
8. Certificate review of items listed in Section IX of this Instrument and cross analysis
to credit ledgers and,
9. Information requests, file reviews and audits
Reports, ledgers, files and other information shall be made available to DWR upon request,unless
otherwise specified in this or any other document.
G. Validity of the Banking Instrument: This Instrument will become valid on the date of the
last party's signature.
H. Specific Language of Banking Instrument Shall Be Controlling: To the extent that specific
language in this document changes, modifies, or deletes terms and conditions contained in
those documents that are incorporated into the Instrument by reference, and that are not
legally binding, the specific language within the Instrument shall be controlling.
I. Any disputes over decisions regarding this Instrument, shall be referred to the Director of
DWR for a decision. The Director's decision is subject to review as provided in Articles
3 and 4 of G.S. 150B.
J. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties and is entered into knowingly,
intelligently, and voluntarily.
K. Notices: All notices and other communications which may be or are required to be given
or made by any party to the other shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been
properly given and received on the date delivered in person, received via electronic mail,
or deposited in the United States mail, registered or certified, return receipt requested, to
the addresses set out below, or at such other addresses as specified by written notice
delivered in accordance herewith.
If to Bank Sponsor: Restoration Systems
Attn: Barrett Jenkins
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh,NC 27605
If to DWR: NC Division of Water Resources—401 &Buffer Permitting Branch
Attn: Nutrient Offset Banking Coordinator
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,NC 27699-1617
L. Applicable Law: This Agreement shall be construed under the laws of the State of North
Carolina.
15

RESTORATION SYSTEMS, LLC
By: (Print)
(Signature)
Title:
Date:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY-DIVISION OF
WATER RESOURCES
By: (Print)
(Signature)
Title:
Date:
16

ATTACHMENT
A—Division of Water Resources Authority Document
1. Nutrient Offset Payment Rule:
http://reports.oah.state.nc.us/ncac/title%2015 a%20-%20environmental%20quality/chapter%2002%20-
%20environmental%20management/subchapter%20b/15 a%20ncac%2002b%20.0703.pdf
2. Riparian Buffer Mitigation Rule:
http://reports.oah.state.nc.us/ncac/title%2015 a%20-%20environmental%20quality/chapter%2002%20-
%20environmental%20management/subchapter%20b/15 a%20ncac%2002b%20.0295.pdf
3. NC Session Law 2019-86 "Nutrient Offset Credits":
https://ncleg.gov/EnactedLegislation/SessionLaws/HTML/2019-2020/SL2019-86.html
4. Buffer Interpretation/Clarification#2008-019 for diffuse flow:
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Water%20Quality/Surface%20Water%20Protection/401/Buffer%20Clarificati
on%20Memos/Diffuse-Flow-for-Buffer-Mitigation-Sites-Buffer-Clarification-Memo-20080819.pdf

ATTACHMENT
B—NCDWR- Methodology& Calculations for Nutrient Reductions on the Bank Parcel

NC Division of Water Quality - Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer Establishment
Nitrogen Water Quality Benefits for Riparian Buffer Restoration
1). Benefit of Land Use Change
2). Benefit of Nutrient Removal from Nonpoint Source Runoff
3). Benefit of Nutrient Removal from Periodic Overbank Flood
Nitrogen General Assumptions:
1. Life expectancy of Riparian Buffer is assumed to be 30 years. (Life expectancy for stormwater detention pond is 20- 30 yrs)
2. Restored Riparian Buffer is assumed to be natural.
Effectiveness of Annual Effectiveness Annual Effectiveness Effectiveness in 30 yrs
Riparian Buffer (kg/ha/yr) (Ib/ac/yr) (lb/ac)
Benefit(1) 11.08 9.89 296.6
Benefit(2) 70.09 62.54 1876.1
Benefit (3) 3.75 3.35 100.4
Total 84.92 75.77 2273.0
Nitrogen Benefit Descriptions and Assumptions:
1) Benefit is due to change land use.
Assume existing land use export coefficient is a composite export coefficient with a value of 12.98 kg/ha (agriculture and urban).
Wetland export coefficient is 1.9 kg/ha.
The annual nutrient output is decreased by 11.08 kg/ha annually by land use changing.
2) Benefit is due to nitrogen removal from nonpoint source runoff.
Nutrient contribution/buffer treatment area ratio is approximately 10.8 (based on studies examined by Gannon 1997).
In flow loading is calculated by nutrient contribution area x composite export coefficient.
In flow loading is 10.8 ha x 12.98 kg/ha = 140 kg/ha/yr.
Nutrient removal due to this benefit is calculated by in flow loading x removal efficiency
*Gannon, Richard. 1997. Effectiveness of Wetland Riparian Areas for Treatment of Agricultural Pollution Sources: A Literature Review. (Draft)
The nitrogen removal efficiency is 50% based on various literature.
* Kadlec, Robert H. and Robert L. Knight. 1996. Treatment Wetland
* Moshiri, Gerald A.1993. Constructed Wetlands for Water Quality Improvement. Lewis Publi.
* Mitsch, William J. 1994. Global Wetlands: Old world and New. Elsevier
3) Benefit is due to nitrogen removal from overbank flooding
Nitrogen concentration is assumed to be 2.5 mg/L. Assume overboard is 1 ft. Flood frequency is assumed to be once every year.
Nutrient removal due to this benefit is estimated by in flow concentration x area (1 ha)x overboard height x removal efficiency.
Formula for Calculating Nitrogen Offset Reductions on Riparian Buffer Restoration Sites:
Size (Acres) *75.77(Ibs/Acre/Year) *30 Years = Total Pounds of Nitorgen Removed from Riparian Buffer Project
1

Phosphorus Water Quality Benefits for Riparian Buffer Restoration
1). Benefit of Land Use Change
2). Benefit of Nutrient Removal from Nonpoint Source Runoff
Phosphorus General Assumptions:
1. Life expectancy of Riparian Buffer is assumed to be 30 years.
Annual
Effectiveness of Effectiveness Effectiveness in 30
Riparian Buffer (Ib/ac/yr) yrs (Ib/ac)
Benefit(1) 1.73 51.90
Benefit(2) 3.15 94.50
Total 4.88 146.40
Phosphorus Benefit Descriptions and Assumptions:
1) Benefit is due to change land use''2
Export coefficient for agricultural land is 2.15 (Ib/ac/yr).
Export coefficient for riparian buffer is 0.42 (Ib/ac/yr).
The annual total phosphorus (TP)output is decreased by 1.73 lb/ac annually by land use changing.
2) Benefit is due to TP removal from nonpoint source runoff 3,4
Mass load for TP reductions for buffer is estimated to be 3.15 lb/ac/yr.
Assumptions:
Riparian buffer restorations only occur on agricultural lands.
Width of restored riparian buffer is 50 feet, and with mixture of grass and forest.
References:
1 NC Division of Water Quality memo 'Export Coefficients Revisited' (1996)
2 Comparison of Selected TP Loading Coefficients (Jim Blose, 2001)
3 Cost-Effectiveness Study of Selected Agricultural Best Management Practices in the Neuse and Tar-Pamlico River Basins
(Todd Kennedy, 2001)
4 A Review of the Scientific Literature on Riparian Buffer Width, Extent and Vegetation. (Seth Wenger, 1999)
Formula for Calculating Phosphorus Offset Reductions on Riparian Buffer Restoration Sites:
Size (Acres) *4.88(lbs/Acre/Year) *30 Years = Total Pounds of Total Phosphorus Removed from Riparian Buffer Project
Page 2

ATTACHMENT
C—Ledger Templates

Restoration Systems, LLC-White Farm Mitigation Banking Instrument(MBI)
White Farms Bank Parcel/Tar-Pamlico 03020102 Riparian Buffer Restoration Credit Ledger
Date Last Updated: 00/00/0000
DWR#2020-1665
Total Credits Released to Date:
Credits Released/Available to Credits Debited/Sold from Buffer Credit Balance
Date Paid Purchaser or UMBI Task Project w/HUC# Bank Bank Local Gov't
Completed
Square Feet Acres Square Feet Acres Square Feet Acres
00/00/0000
00/00/0000

Restoration Systems,LLC-White Farms Mitigation Banking Instrument(MBI)
White Farm Bank Parcel/Tar-Pamlico 03020102 Nitrogen Offset Credit Ledger
Date Last Updated:00/00/0000
DWR#2020-1665
Total Credits Released to Date:
Credits Released/Available to Credits Debited/Sold from
Nutrient Credit Balance
Date Paid Purchaser or UMBI Task Completed Project w/HUC# Bank Bank Local Gov't
Pounds of Pounds of Pounds of
Nitrogen Acres Nitrogen Acres Acres
Nitrogen
00/00/0000 0.00 0.00 0.00

Restoration Systems,LLC-White Farms Mitigation Banking Instrument(MBI)
White Farm Bank Parcel/Tar-Pamlico 03020102 Phosphorus Offset Credit Ledger
Date Last Updated:00/00/0000
DWR#2020-1665
Total Credits Released to Date:
Credits Released/Available to Credits Debited/Sold from Bank Nutrient Credit Balance
Date Paid Purchaser or UMBI Task Completed Project w/HUC# Bank Local Gov't
Pounds of Acres Pounds of Acres Pounds of Acres
Phosphorus Phosphorus Phosphorus
00/00/0000 0.00 0.00 0.00

Restoration Systems, LLC-White Farms Mitigation Banking Instrument(MBI)
Bells Bridge Bank Parcel/Tar-Pamlico 03020102 Riparian Buffer Restoration Credit Ledger
Date Last Updated: 00/00/0000
DWR#2020-1664
Total Credits Released to Date:
Credits Released/Available to Credits Debited/Sold from Buffer Credit Balance
Date Paid Purchaser or UMBI Task Project w/HUC# Bank Bank Local Gov't
Completed
Square Feet Acres Square Feet Acres Square Feet Acres
00/00/0000
00/00/0000

Restoration Systems, LLC-White Farms Mitigation Banking Instrument(MBI)
Bells Bridge Bank Parcel/Tar-Pamlico 03020102 Riparian Buffer Preservation Credit Ledger
Date Last Updated: 00/00/0000
DWR#2020-1664
Total Credits Released to Date:
Credits Released/Available to Credits Debited/Sold from Buffer Credit Balance
Date Paid Purchaser or UMBI Task Project w/HUC# Bank Bank Local Gov't
Completed
Square Feet Acres Square Feet Acres Square Feet Acres
00/00/0000
00/00/0000

Restoration Systems,LLC-White Farms Mitigation Banking Instrument(MBI)
Bells Bridge Bank Parcel/Tar-Pamlico 03020102 Phosphorus Offset Credit Ledger
Date Last Updated:00/00/0000
DWR#2020-1664
Total Credits Released to Date:
Credits Released/Available to Credits Debited/Sold from Bank Nutrient Credit Balance
Date Paid Purchaser or UMBI Task Completed Project w/HUC# Bank Local Gov't
Pounds of Acres Pounds of Acres Pounds of Acres
Phosphorus Phosphorus Phosphorus
00/00/0000 0.00 0.00 0.00

Restoration Systems,LLC-White Farms Mitigation Banking Instrument(MBI)
Bells Bridge Bank Parcel/Tar-Pamlico 03020102 Nitrogen Offset Credit Ledger
Date Last Updated:00/00/0000
DWR#2020-1664
Total Credits Released to Date:
Credits Released/Available to Credits Debited/Sold from
Nutrient Credit Balance
Date Paid Purchaser or UMBI Task Completed Project w/HUC# Bank Bank Local Gov't
Pounds of Pounds of Pounds of
Nitrogen Acres Nitrogen Acres Acres
Nitrogen
00/00/0000 0.00 0.00 0.00

ATTACHMENT
D —White Farm Bank Parcel Development Package

BANK PARCEL DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE
WHITE FARM NUTRIENT OFFSET AND BUFFER MITIGATION BANK PARCEL
A BANK PARCEL
TAR-PAMLICO RIVER BASIN
DWR ID#: 2020-1665
. , I . . _ .
.. _ _ _ _
,,,..,...,,,, ,_:....;„4,_......,...:7,,,,......:..,.. r.: _:,....../,--!,-5:71....4rr'41.,*•,. - ., ' .
•
_____ a ....._....
'-' h _ a-
�y .
.:a '.ivy.:&i(. C. ~Ai:I .: ..S•
''.. t..•i- . . < ..
ri
%,s..:',';:ia ( ,,1 t:��,�' a �i �.= :r - -. ,mid
- :,'-'•• e.: t .,- .I r�. may ��• .
�:.� Hest_ ..� :I;r'�:- .-+�j ��.� t�r - ,�.�� -
...,!,:.;.: .. ;,,,,.Zi,r4...;,..: .,. ..4,41,,v).;411,10'.0/iz-.. -.x-
° '! ��i'.�.: yr " .�',_ ° .I :vt it: tiC;L- :•ti- f.i ail'. P ° •:..`� yys, 'a i,, ,--�'-...ti• '*p,'
Bank Parcel Sponsor
ElRestoration Systems, LLC
POC: Raymond Holz ([e-mail])
Ph: 919-755-9490
RF•-. --RATION 1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
SIS LMSILL,,.' Raleigh, North Carolina 27604

BANK PARCEL DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE
WHITE FARM NUTRIENT OFFSET AND BUFFER MITIGATION BANK PARCEL
A BANK PARCEL
March 18, 2021
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction 1
2.0 Mitigation Project Summary 1
2.1 Project Goals 1
2.2 Existing Parcel Conditions 2
2.3 Watershed Characterization 3
2.4 Soils 3
2.5 Geology 4
2.6 Existing Vegetative Communities 4
2.7 Threatened and Endangered Species 4
2.8 Cultural Resources and Significant Natural Heritage Areas 4
2.9 FEMA Floodplain Compliance 4
2.10 Parcel Location, Parcel Constraints, and Access 5
2.11 Other Environmental Conditions 5
3.0 Site Protection Instrument 5
4.0 Mitigation Work Plan 5
4.1 Parcel Preparation 5
4.2 Riparian Area Restoration Activities 5
5.0 Monitoring and Maintenance Plan 6
5.1 Monitoring Protocol 6
5.2 Parcel Maintenance 7
6.0 Financial Assurances and Long-Term Management 7
6.1 Financial Assurances 7
6.2 Long Term Management Plan 7
7.0 Mitigation Potential 8
8.0 Credit Release 8
9.0 References 9
White Farm Bank Parcel Development Plan(DWR ID#:2020-1665)
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020103 Table of Contents pg.i

TABLES
Table 1—Ecological and Water Quality Goals
Table 2—Project Attributes&Timeline
Table 3—Project Features
Table 4—Project Soil Types and Descriptions
Table 5—Bank Parcel Fee Simple Ownership
Table 6—Proposed Hardwood Bare Root Planting Plan by Species
Table 7—Summary of Mitigation Credits
Table 8—Credit Release Table
FIGURES, EXISTING CONDITION PHOTOS, DWR MITIGATION CREDIT TABLE
Figure 1—Vicinity Map
Figure 2—Service Area
Figure 3—Site Map
Figure 4—USGS Map
Figure 5—NRCS Map
Figures 6, 6A, 6B, 6C—Credit and Monitoring Map
Historic Arial Imagery— EDR
Parcel Photos—Existing Conditions
DWR Mitigation Credit Table
APPENDICES
DWR Correspondence
NRCS Web Soil Survey Report
Environmental Records
USFWS—Species Report
SHPO Letter
FEMA Map
White Farm Bank Parcel Development Plan(DWR ID#:2020-1665)
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020103 Table of Contents pg.ii

Bank Parcel Development Package
White Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
Halifax County, NC—Tar-Pamlico River Basin
1.0 Introduction
The White Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel ("Parcel" or "Site") is proposed under
the terms and conditions of the White Farms Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Banking Instrument,
made and entered into on by Restoration Systems, LLC (RS), acting as Bank Sponsor
(Sponsor), and the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ), Division of Water
Resources (DWR). The Parcel shall be planned and designed according to the MBI, 15A NCAC 02B .0731,
15A NCAC 02B .0703, and the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295.
Located in Halifax County North Carolina, the project encompasses 96.38 acres of land utilized for row
crop production. The project will restore riparian areas along four (4) unnamed tributaries and three (3)
surface water conveyances (ditches) with hydrologic connection to the Tar River.The primary purpose of
the Parcel is to provide nutrient offset credits for stormwater and wastewater requirements within the
United States Geological Survey(USGS) Cataloging Unit 03020102.
The Parcel is located approximately 2.5 miles northwest of the town of Hobgood in Halifax County, NC
(Figure 1). The Janet and Mary Pat White along with their spouses are the current fee-simple owners of
single tract of land associated with the Bank Parcel, which has been historically and is currently used as
agricultural fields. The Parcel is within the Tar-Pamlico River Basin 14-digit USGS Cataloging Unit
03020102070030 of the Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain (North Carolina Division of Water Quality [NCDWQ]
Sub-basin Number 03-03-04) (Figure 1).
DWR representatives conducted an onsite determination for parcel applicability and suitability on
December 2, 2020. A Stream Determination letter for the Parcel was provided on January 22, 2021 and a
Site Viability for Buffer & Nutrient Offset letter was provided by the Division on February 9, 2021
(Appendices).
2.0 Mitigation Project Summary
2.1 Project Goals
The major goals of the proposed nutrient offset project are to provide ecological and water quality
enhancements to the Tar-Pamlico River Basin by restoring the riparian area to create a functional riparian
corridor. Specific enhancements to water quality and ecological processes are outlined in Table 1.
Table 1: Ecological and Water Quality Goals
Goal Objective
Nutrient input will be decreased by filtering runoff from the agricultural fields
Decrease nutrient levels through restored native buffer zones.The off-site nutrient input will also be
absorbed on-site by filtering flood flows through restored floodplain areas,
where flood flows can disperse through native vegetation.
Decrease sediment input Sediment from off-site sources will be captured by deposition on restored
floodplain areas where native vegetation will slow overland flow velocities.
White Farm Bank Parcel Development Plan(DWR ID#:2020-1665)
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020103 pg.1

Table 1: Ecological and Water Quality Goals (Continued)
Goal Objective
Decrease water temperature Planted riparian trees will shade the streams as they mature reducing thermal
and increase dissolved oxygen
concentrations pollution.
Create appropriate terrestrial Buffer areas will be restored by planting native vegetation.
habitat
Permanently protect the project A conservation easement will be recorded on the Parcel.
Parcel from harmful uses
2.2 Existing Parcel Conditions
The proposed buffer restoration and nutrient offset project includes approximately 96.38 acres of open
agricultural fields along unnamed tributaries to Deep Creek. The agricultural fields are currently being
used for row crop production including cotton, corn, and peanuts.The farmer regularly applies fertilizers
and herbicides to the fields. Streams and ditches on the Parcel have no existing riparian buffer(Figure 3).
Site features predominantly originate on site and all drain to Deep Creek less than 1 mile downstream.
Review of historic aerials show the property has been historically and consistently utilized for row crop
production.
Table 2: Project Attributes and Timeline
Project Name White Farm Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site
Hydrologic Unit Code 03020102
River Basin Tar Pamlico
Geographic Location(Lat, Long) 36.059133,-77.421170
Site Protection Instrument(DB,PG) To be recorded
Total Credits 90.337 Ac.
Types of Credits Nitrogen and Phosphorous Nutrient Offset Credits
BPDP Date December 2021
Initial Planting Date February 2022
Baseline Report Date March 2022
MY1 Report Date December 2022
MY2 Report Date December 2023
MY3 Report Date December 2024
MY4 Report Date December 2025
MY5 Report Date December 2026
DWR performed an onsite visit of the Parcel to determine applicability to the Tar-Pamlico Buffer Rules
(15A NCAC 02B.0734)and viability to provide nutrient offset credits on December 2,2020.A copy of both
the "On-Site Origin Determination for Applicability to the Tar-Pamlico Buffer Rules" and "Site Viability for
Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset" are provided in the attached appendices. A Summary of their
determinations is show in Table 3,correlate with stream segments as labelled in Figure 3.There have been
no changes to land use in the project area since DWR's site visit.
White Farm Bank Parcel Development Plan(DWR ID#:2020-1665)
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020103 pg.2

Table 3: Project Features
Feature Name Feature Type Buffer Credit Viable Nutrient Offset Credit Viable
la Stream Yes Yes
1 Ditch>3'depth No Yes
2 Stream Yes Yes
2a Stream Yes Yes
2b Ditch>3'depth No Yes
2c Ditch>3'depth No Yes
2d Ditch>3'depth No Yes
2e Ditch>3'depth No Yes
3 Stream Yes Yes
3a Ditch>3'depth No Yes
4 Stream Yes Yes
4a Ditch>3'depth No Yes
4b Ditch>3'depth No Yes
4c Ditch>3'depth No Yes
2.3 Watershed Characterization
The Parcel is located within USGS HUC 03020102 and DWR Subbasin 03-03-04. Features drain to Deep
Creek which is classified as C and NSW by DWR. Class C waters are designated for recreational use,
agriculture,fishing and fish consumption,and the maintenance of biological integrity for wildlife.The NSW
designation applies to surface waters that are experiencing excessive growths of microscopic or
macroscopic vegetation.
The Parcel topography,as indicated on the Hobgood, NC USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,shows
gently sloped areas throughout the Parcel (Figure 4). Land uses draining to the project reaches are
primarily agriculture with some forested and residential use.
2.4 Soils
The Parcel is mapped by the Halifax County Soil Survey. Project soils are described below in Table 4. An
image of the paper copy of the 2006 Soil Survey of Halifax County is provided in Figure 5. A custom soil
report is provided in the attached appendices.
Table 4: Project Soil Types and Descriptions
Soil Name Description
EmB Emporia fine sandy loam,2 to 6 percent slopes
GoA Goldsboro fine sandy loam,0 to 2 percent slopes
GrA Grantham loam,0 to 1 percent slopes
LyA Lynchburg fine sandy loam,0 to 2 percent slopes,Southern Coastal Plain
NoA Noboco fine sandy loam,0 to 2 percent slopes
RaA Rains fine sandy loam
Source:https://websoilsurvev.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm
White Farm Bank Parcel Development Plan(DWR ID#:2020-1665)
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020103 pg.3

2.5 Geology
The Parcel is in the Inner Coastal Plain physiographic province.The landscape is characterized by flat lands
to gently rolling hills and valleys. Parcel elevations range from 86 to 92 feet above sea level. The Coastal
Plain largely consists of marine sedimentary rocks comprised of sand, clay, and limestone that formed
through the deposition of estuarine and marine sediments within the last 140 million years.According to
the Geologic Map of North Carolina (1985), the underlying geology of the proposed mitigation site is
mapped as the Yorktown and Duplin Formations. The Yorktown Formation is described as fossiliferous
clay with varying amounts of fine-grained sand, bluish gray shell material commonly concentrated in
lenses, mainly in areas north of the Neuse River.The Duplin Formation is shelly, medium to coarse grained
sand and sandy marl.
2.6 Existing Vegetative Communities
Existing vegetation within the Parcel is primarily comprised of active row crop fields of cotton with narrow
streamside thickets as show in the attached site photos.
2.7 Threatened and Endangered Species
The NC Natural Heritage Program (NHP) database and the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) database
were searched for federally listed threatened and endangered plant and animal species in Halifax County,
NC. Five species,the Neuse River Waterdog,Carolina Madtom,Atlantic Pigtoe,Tar River Spinymussel,and
Yellow Lance are listed or proposed for listing as federally endangered or threatened species. Restoration
Systems performed pedestrian surveys of the Parcel in December 2020 and determined there was no
suitable habitat for the species. The USFWS Self-Certification Letter and USFWS concurrence is included
in the appendix.
The presence of conditions or characteristics that have the potential to hinder restoration activities on
the Parcel were evaluated. The evaluation focused primarily on the presence of hazardous materials,
utilities and restrictive easements, rare/threatened/endangered species or critical habitats,the potential
for hydrologic trespass, and existing utility easements. Existing information regarding Parcel constraints
was acquired and reviewed including an Environmental Records Report developed by Environmental Data
Resources Inc. which located no evidence of environmental risk associated with the Parcel (Appendices).
In addition, any Parcel conditions that have the potential to restrict the restoration and implementation
were documented during the field investigation. As a result of our review and field surveys, no known
Parcel constraints exist that may hinder proposed restoration activities. Potential constraints reviewed
include the following;
2.8 Cultural Resources and Significant Natural Heritage Areas
There are no existing structures in the project area. The larger parcel contains the ZO: HX0436: James A
White House, however this structure is not in the proposed conservation easement footprint. The
farmhouse will not be impacted nor disturbed during our project, and a buffer around the structure will
be implemented in the field during the planting process.SHPO was contacted with request for review and
comment on February 25, 2021.All communication with SHPO is included in the appendix.
2.9 FEMA Floodplain Compliance
No grading activities are proposed in the floodplain, so a floodplain development permit will not be
required. No hydraulic modeling is proposed for this project.
White Farm Bank Parcel Development Plan(DWR ID#:2020-1665)
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020103 pg.4

2.10 Parcel Location, Parcel Constraints, and Access
The Parcel is in rural Halifax County, near the town of Hobgood (Figure 2). The Parcel is accessible for
construction, monitoring,and long-term stewardship from NC Highway 125 (Figure 3).An access road and
associated access easement will be detailed in the final conservation easement survey and recorded at
the Halifax County Register of Deeds. DOT right of ways, powerlines, and associated easements will be
excluded from the conservation easement.
2.11 Other Environmental Conditions
An Environmental Data Resources, Inc(EDR) Radius Map Report with Geocheck was ordered for the Parcel
on February 25, 2021. Neither the target property not the adjacent properties were listed in any of the
Federal, State, or Tribal environmental data bases searched by EDR. The executive summary of the EDR
report is included in the appendix.
3.0 Site Protection Instrument
The land required for planting, management, and stewardship of the mitigation project includes portions
of the larger tract of land listed in Table 5. The Parcel will remain in private ownership, protected in its
entirety bay an approved DWR long term steward and will be managed under the terms detailed in an
approved DWR conservation easement. Per the Site Viability Letter, the conservation easement will be
transferred to the DWR approved long term steward prior to the first credit release.
Table 5: Bank Parcel Fee Simple Ownership
Owner Name Parcel Number NC PIN# Acreage
Janet White Leggett and Mary Pat
Brady and spouses 0801997 4749-68-0128-00 267.15
4.0 Mitigation Work Plan
The project will restore agriculturally impacted land in the Parcel footprint to a forested riparian corridor,
protected in perpetuity, improving the ecological function of the area.The project design will ensure that
no adverse impacts to wetlands or existing riparian buffers occur. Figure 6, 6A, 6B, and 6C illustrate the
conceptual design for the Parcel.
4.1 Parcel Preparation
The land use within 200 feet from the top of bank of the project features is maintained as cleared land for
crops.Areas slated for restoration will require little site preparation because the land has been maintained
in agriculture.Site preparation will include select herbicide treatments and/or limited mechanical clearing
to remove undesirable vegetation. Where needed, invasive species will be selectively removed and/or
spot treated by a licensed pesticide applicator. Any drain tiles found in the conservation easement area
during survey and/or planting of the project will be sealed.
4.2 Riparian Area Restoration Activities
Riparian area restoration will involve planting appropriate native tree species along the riparian corridor.
Vegetation management and herbicide applications may be needed over the first few years of tree
establishment in the riparian restoration areas to prevent encroachment of undesirable species that may
out-compete the planted native vegetation. Tree species planted across the riparian areas of the Parcel
will include a mixture of the species listed in Table 6.
White Farm Bank Parcel Development Plan(DWR ID#:2020-1665)
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020103 pg.5

Table 6: Proposed Hardwood Bare Root Planting Plan by Species*
Common Name Scientific Name %of Total Planted Trees
River birch Betula nigra 10%
Persimmon Diospyros virginiana 10%
Tulip poplar Liriodendron tulipifera 10%
Red mulberry Morus rubra 10%
Black Gum Nyssa sylvatica 10%
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis 10%
Pecan Carya illinoinensis 10%
Swamp chestnut oak Quercus michauxii 10%
Water oak Quercus nigra 10%
American elm Ulmus americana 10%
*Note:Species availability may result in the substitution of regionally appropriate native species.
Trees will be planted at a density sufficient to meet the performance standards outlined in the Rule 15A
NCAC 02B .0295 of 260 planted trees per acre at the end of five years of monitoring. No one tree species
will be greater than 50%of the established stems.An appropriate seed mix will also be applied to provide
temporary and permanent ground cover for soil stabilization and reduction of sediment loss during rain
events in areas without existing herbaceous cover. Planting is tentatively scheduled for February 2022.
5.0 Monitoring and Maintenance Plan
5.1 Monitoring Protocol
Permanent vegetation monitoring plots will be installed and evaluated within the riparian buffer
restoration and nutrient offset areas to measure the survival of the planted trees. The plots will be
randomly placed throughout the planted riparian areas. A total of 74 plots will be established within the
riparian restoration areas (Figures 6, 6A, 6B, and 6C). The size of individual quadrants will be 100 square
meters.
Vegetation assessments will be conducted and follow the Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) Level 2
Protocol for Recording Vegetation (2008).A reference photo will be taken from the southwestern corner
of each of the 74 plots. Photos will be taken from all photo points each monitoring year and provided in
the annual reports.All planted stems will be marked with flagging tape and recorded.
Planting is scheduled for February 2022. The first annual monitoring activities will commence at the end
of the first growing season,at least five months after planting has been completed and no earlier than the
fall season. Species composition, height, and survival rates will be evaluated on an annual basis by plot.
The total number of volunteer woody stems will also be documented and reported. The measure of
vegetative success for the parcel will be the survival of at least four native hardwood tree species, where
no one species is greater than 50%of the established planted stems,and an established density of at least
260 planted trees per acre at the end of monitoring year five.Appropriate and desirable native volunteer
species may be included in the Parcel's density to meet the performance standards with DWR approval.
Restoration Systems shall submit the annual monitoring report to DWR by December 315Y of each year for
five consecutive years and will follow the terms and conditions of the White Farms Mitigation Banking
Instrument(MBI).
White Farm Bank Parcel Development Plan(DWR ID#:2020-1665)
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020103 pg.6

5.2 Parcel Maintenance
If the Parcel or a specific component of the Parcel fails to achieve the success criteria outlined in Section
5.1, adaptive measures will be developed and/or appropriate remedial actions will be implemented. Site
maintenance will be performed to correct any identified problems on the Parcel that have a high likelihood
of affecting the project success. Such items include, but are not limited to, fire, flooding, drought, or
insects that cause excess tree mortality.Any actions implemented will be designed to achieve the success
criteria and will include a work schedule and updated monitoring criteria. Any parcel maintenance
performed will be included in the monitoring report for that year.A rigorous herbicide schedule may need
to be implemented in the first few years of tree establishment in the restoration areas to prevent
establishment of invasive species that may out-compete the planted native vegetation. The only
herbicides used on the Parcel will be aquatic approved herbicides that will be applied in accordance with
North Carolina Department of Agriculture rules and regulations.
The easement boundary will be checked annually as part of monitoring activities. Easement boundary
conditions as well as any maintenance performed will be reported in the annual monitoring reports to
DWR. If mowing is deemed necessary by the Sponsor during the monitoring period, the Sponsor must
receive approval from DWR prior to conducting any mowing activities within Tar-Pamlico Buffer Zones 1
and 2 to ensure that no buffer violations have occurred.
6.0 Financial Assurances and Long-Term Management
6.1 Financial Assurances
Following approval of the White Farm Mitigation Site Bank Parcel Development Package,the Sponsor shall
provide a Performance Bond from a surety that is rated no less than an "A-" as rated by A. M. Best. The
performance bond amount shall be 100% of the estimated cost for implementation of the project as
described in the Bank Parcel Development Package, but not less than $150,000. In lieu of posting the
performance bond,the Sponsor may elect to construct the project prior to the first credit release. In that
case no performance bond will be necessary.
After completion of the restoration/construction, a separate performance/maintenance bond will be
secured for 100% of the estimated cost to implement the monitoring and maintenance plan but not less
than$100,000.The performance/maintenance bond shall apply at the inception of the monitoring period
for a term of one year and be extended annually for a minimum of five years. Upon DWR approval, this
may be lowered each year based on the adjusted cost to complete the monitoring.
Performance bonds for monitoring shall be renewed at least annually to cover the next years monitoring
period, with confirmation of renewal provided to DWR with each annual monitoring report when
applicable. DWR reserves the right to alter the credit release schedule if monitoring reports are submitted
without proof of bond renewals when applicable.
6.2 Long Term Management Plan
The Parcel will remain in private ownership, protected in its entirety by an approved DWR long term
steward,and will be managed under the terms detailed in an approved DWR conservation easement.The
long-term manager will be responsible for periodic inspection of the Parcel to ensure that the restrictions
documented in the recorded easement are upheld in perpetuity.
White Farm Bank Parcel Development Plan(DWR ID#:2020-1665)
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020103 pg.7

7.0 Mitigation Potential
Of the Parcel's 96.38 acres protected under the conservation easement, 90.337 acres or 3,935,079.72
square feet are anticipated provide riparian restoration credit, Riparian Buffer or Nutrient Offset Credits
(Figure 6, 6A, 6B, and 6C). Riparian restoration from the top bank of Parcel Streams out 100 feet will
generate Riparian Buffer Credits, but will be transferable to Nutrient Offset Credits. Riparian area
restoration from the top of bank on Parcel ditches out 200-feet and from 101-200 feet from Parcel
Streams will general Nutrient Offset Credits, and will not be transferable to Riparian Buffer Credit. The
mitigation credit calculation was derived based on Restoration Systems' conceptual design for maximum
ecological uplift. The management objectives, mitigation type, and proposed amount of credits are
presented in Table 7.
Table 7:Summary of Mitigation Credits
TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION(TABM)
Mitigation Totals Square Feet Credits
Restoration: 1,392,810 1,392,810.000
Enhancement: 0 0.000
Preservation: 0 0.000
Total Riparian Buffer: 1,392,810 1,392,810.000
TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION
Mitigation Totals Square Feet Credits
Nutrient Nitrogen: 132,659.150
2,542,272
Offset:
Phosphorus: 8,544.275
8.0 Credit Release
Upon submittal of the appropriate documentation by the Sponsor and subsequent approval by DWR,the
mitigation credits associated with the White Farm Mitigation Site will be released as described in Table 8.
Table 8:White Farm Credit Release Schedule
Task Project Milestone %Credit Available
for Sale
1 Instrument and BPDP Approved by DWR,Conservation Easement Recorded,Financial Assurance Posted, 20
and all utilities installed and in compliance with state issued permits/authorizations where applicable
2 Site Earthwork,Planting and Installation of Monitoring Devices Completed and all applicable permits 20
obtained
3 Monitoring Financial Assurance Posted and Approval of As-Built Report 10
4 Monitoring Report#1:Approved by the DWR*&financial assurances renewed 10
5 Monitoring Report#2:Approved by the DWR*&financial assurances renewed 10
6 Monitoring Report#3:Approved by the DWR*&financial assurances renewed 10
7 MBI Item B(1)of Section X has been completed and approved by DWR. 5
No remaining credits will be released until the conservation easement has been assigned to an approved land trust
or stewardship
8 Monitoring Report#4:Approved by the DWR*&financial assurances renewed 5
9 Monitoring Report#5:Approved by the DWR*and final site visit by DWR has been conducted 10
Total 100%
*DWR Approval provided upon a determination that the site is meeting success criteria contained within the approved BPDP
White Farm Bank Parcel Development Plan(DWR ID#:2020-1665)
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020103 pg.8

9.0 References
Schafale, M. P. and Weakley, 2012.A Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth
Approximation.
North Carolina Geological Survey, 1985, Geologic map of North Carolina:North Carolina Geological Survey,
General Geologic Map, scale 1:500000. https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-land-
resources/north-carolina-geological-survey/ncgs-maps/1985-geologic-map-of-nc
White Farm Bank Parcel Development Plan(DWR ID#:2020-1665)
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020103 pg.9

FIGURES, EXISTING CONDITION PHOTOS, DWR MITIGATION CREDIT TABLE
Figure 1—Vicinity Map
Figure 2—Service Area
Figure 3—Site Map
Figure 4—USGS Map
Figure 5—NRCS Map
Figures 6, 6A, 6B, and 6C—Credit and Monitoring Map
Historic Arial Imagery— EDR
Parcel Photos—Existing Conditions
DWR Mitigation Credit Table
White Farm Bank Parcel Development Plan(DWR ID#:2020-1665)
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020102 Figures

3y
ad •
Old 775 Rd
W
l .-: N,,,
Prepared for:
NC DEQ
. t Division of
JO Water Resources
401 & Isolated
Wetlands/Waters
Program & 401
Stormwater
Project:
Illi . .
• eihvi 0,,,,..0-
WHITE FARM
NUTRIENT OFFSET
AND BUFFER
s MITIGATION BANK
Deep Creek Q• PARCEL
z
41ain.S n
t
` Halifax County, NC
, Title:
•
1r ..ram
Qom
VICINITY MAP
,
l -
4
Stamper SKI rng Rd H
y = - a
0
' a
lan
. 0
a
CapamS Rd
♦
;� �gj Drawn by:
�ti,,' °"R
• RJH
Q
% �, 1' Date:
x;, �,* MARCH 2021
_ aa
White Farm Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel Scale:
4225 ua° 1:50,000
USGS 8-Digit HUC: 03020102 %o
USGS 14-Digit HUC: 03020102070030 Project No.: 21-003
NC DWR Sub-Basin: 03-03-04 �-
. $a 1�
36.059133, -77.421170
r rii, ,
FIGURE
3
•h'b6Yer,?a 4,,V, =
4 f" RT,4+
. e
• n y�
,• c, 4r
. o syY LS
—r---
\ 3R

t _ _
F; k,_
�+ `�Roa�r Lake 'I
. :
I �; 75& South
I Rosemarf '; in,72
Wildlife Refuge+,
ti Litt . '�
- ::
:'lveldc n
-..._:
t ,ns, I.
RESTORATION
t -- _ Roanoke RI,.4
I Natonal SYSTEMS I LLC
Middleb • -Narrenton ticl:-,•n
I %— O • I
, I a� ���k� Prepared for:
r NC DEQ
, 'tea�1sltingC r �sw A �� /
--
•
7/ } R° 1 !. Division of
t r r Water Resources
Henderson •'., 401 & Isolated
w, t f - Wetlands/Waters
r rQhf4g Cie `di .Z ¢ N.
-' , Program 8c 401
et,* ay �F a 44ALIPX Stormwater
j Sh°r •
cO Grq.� / y of Project:
° / tr 1
Medoc I
- WARR - - WHITE FARM
` r / Hn Ifs ter MSrate+n �� ;
r ti4_�l Ha.ima Park n 1 NUTRIENT OFFSET
• s.�n ° AND BUFFER
/ sdtsa
+ yn� — / tn� MITIGATION BANK
"� / a''ta PARCEL
a.
° centerv. -� �/ �1\ \�\ }- Enfield Halifax County, NC
` .' l )
/ Title:
•
/
NASH -I1 i LA.�..w,`^ oN • .cotlard Neck SERVICE AREA
Ie4 , MAP
/ •R„ TAR-PAM 02
/ - 'Jhitak "iti
Louisburg / ‘.1'r,,, r�
h
y /
-5 - - _ ` Castalia 5w,itGroek. -
f f
/I 4s F � .
• s 3attlebvro ::::
• / •/ ed Oak /
/OOrrnrs MARCH 2021
Scale:
/, Ir \, 1:275,000
ilk_ Bank Parcel Location �.l_.ed Project No.:
z c rNash•; 36.059348°, -77.420946° 21-003
kunr .htameyer 1
Service Layer Credits: Sources:Esri,HERE, .- •rruia Hope Rocky�MountN.
DeLorme,Interma p,increment P Corp., GEBCO,
• USGS,FAO,NPS,NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN,Kadaster • s •
NL,Ordnance Survey,Esri Japan,METI,Esri China °"y ` FIGURE
(Hong Kong),swisstopo,Mapmylndia,© �"rk
Tarboro - J 1
c�
r Co- 2
Legend '�
ey Swamp I u�=euille
N
0
Miles
Tar-Pamlico USGS 8-Digit HUC Boundary, 03020102, Service Area for Nutrient Offset Credits
• S arpsburg 0 5 10

,. � 90 92 �
Legends
O White Farm -Subject Fee Simple Parcel • Feature 1
Subject at culvert located on �'- �;.
a 2 p, n.` northern project boundary o 1 x ,-
O 6
, 92.
White Farm - Proposed Easement: 96.38 Ac - - ..
�, a
Powerline ROW . �� , RESTORATION
- _._ . 86 ' �,f' SYSTEMS I LLC
O NC DWR Stream Determinations
8
re-yam.
Featu 8 �-..
2-Foot Contours '�, ,� = �� � Prepared for:
White Farm Features aka' ' NC DEQ
-- r, ::k,, - ' Division of
Stream • ,,. Water Resources
Ditch :' ::.:,
-. — :it . . -� 401 8� Isolated
Swale
Wetlands/Waters
4:
's s•40 :: . ,' ' '''' ''' '
a2 3 ; :`: v Program & 401
a4p, : s v
Stormwater
i.,.__,...,,.,,,,,,,y,,_7_
' g Project:
Feature 2 n
88
� . 1) - • WHITE FARM
. � 4. T NUTRIENT OFFSET
�� � ` d, co
AND BUFFER
MITIGATION BANK
tr S ' d, PARCEL
Feature 2a1
Subject at confluence A
of 2b&2c eet
etc Halifax County, NC
1`l- F rl, I Title:
al eater ��
G%r/ e a 4C�rtt .
CV
N Feature 2 SITE MAP
Subject at northern
, project boundary
94 a
oi, .« it
Feature 4b - Z
c Existing Soil Path
il
To-Be Removed from Topographic breakcP N
�,D) Easement Area Drawn by:
O
g - r % RJH
A/
Date:
V - ,.Swale ` MARCH 2021
d� % \ Scale:
Q a Feature-3
-r'y 1:5,000
Feature 4 6
0 • 1
Project No.:
—N 21-003
eft,
1 92
I, -• 4�e 4a 1 Existing Soil Path Subject tat n92 theastern FIGURE
,,, To Be Removed from �� project bounuary
Easement Area a�
Feature 4 • 3
'''' ?
Subject at Feet
�� ',..,•:ii
confluence of 4b
0 200 400 800 1,200 1,600
.. z
82 A.

�ii /r, - _ yr ! ', \\ k IF . ii. 4„.........._41:
- Legends r� k PE L kl ,/ '
�' II -�
V kO White Farm -Subject Fee Simple Parcel `I� ,V IF I y — I
1
ip-
1 O White Farm - Proposed Easement: 96.38 Ac. IV } ` 1 • r :_\,, — f, -.
+ �___� f.:�',
fI.
O NC DWR Stream Determinations } Dees Cr , ' l � RESTORATION
IV _ '111, ir SYSTEMS I LLC
.---------- ' kh 1 IF t. ii...._-
I
11
} �; } 4 i - 111% 0i7t ! f.) Prepared for:
{: k , '\ JO
}� j iID \ I er
Division of
i } 1 I `,., Water Resources
VIii,k ) i C1
k , 62 v� 3 401 & Isolated
IV • VJ
k r Wetlands/Waters
k , • Feature 1 fpi� ,r� Program & 401
rr_ 1 Subject at culvert located on
} IF ,., northern project boundary + Stormwater
V t r I It:
f! _ '�. r' Project:
_,...i.,_ I _ ,..6.kiv kk k , kl ( ( . Ctiiii WHITE FARM
'rilF T---7- 1.V a, c )+ Subject a • •• • •• NUTRIENT OFFSET
+ ., Subject at northern
.• AND BUFFER
k
•f� • project boundary MITIGATION BANK
I k & l _ q PARCEL
I� t+ _ Y Y 4 ' -
VI:. . -
, \-..!.., .
-----,-,_
J ...._. :ri -
~` ', .1� ,, 1 - } ��a1` . - A
4 k 0 \ Halifax County, NC
,----- _
_ \ - if--
•
G_,,,,,_______
. , r----
/ 1 Title:
,_ ___ _____),„ \
11111k.\ .1- \\
USGS MAP
�, Feature 2a•
Subject at confluence 2019 Hobgood, NC
i of 2b&2c
.__ 0 ••-"'••07) (.......--;-.T.---_-- -- • • „ I
(:, \-I- ------ 111111100...... ‘illa, C:..)
ce. Pi v\I\ _.,
�3 _ f} Y3•• i Iw Drawn by:
CD
Feature 3
Subject at northeastern RJH
' Feature 4 project boundary , k
c) eicw • Subject at Date: MARCH 2021
4 confluence of 4b
.1 n
Li .
IScale:
_ 1:12,000
•• Project No.:
} k t 1
21-003
k _
,-/----- ' ----------„- r � FIGURE
'44
\ c\\ 1 . '
•
t ,-,- 4
-4 `II Feet
( .., 1 h 0 480 960 1,920 2,880 3,840

1 "16.. Id—s 1
Legend . 13:11 t
White Farm -Subject Fee Simple Parcel • ' r` °
White Farm Proposed Easement: 96.38 Ac. 1?lei..1=14t.-- A
O NC DWR Stream Determinationsii11100.. RESTORATION
. . . fill . SYSTEMS I LLC
�,
r ` � t . Prepared for:
1., III . - NC DEQ
• Itihilir1‘'
r r i• •- `: -i' Ft!! _ 4. N� 4 Division of
y r . i s1 ill
WaterResourcesI)'4'i 1 1 rt I �'. "-�� 401 8� Isolated
T - .tip! . • 1 ', . ,• �11 Y `" W. Y ' Feature 1
• .s 6 . J .,•yr s i,' �. • ... .;_ ems' ' may] r. {. Program $c 401
` a I � r _� ,�" + • _ S ub j e ct at culvert located on `
f . . . 11,, ,i F r • , "iti .y NO northern project boundary Stormwater
ii ,�`+ - 'sof�� . I ` �' t.T.„. ' • pi Project:
4
f t4gaa Mrs 1- � � 1� • 4,5. o
� - .
� - + _ r' �. r: 1�i` WHITE FARM
' •,. 'L.j " y:5 .= J,, •. try ' i• 4, r- NUTRIENT OFFSET
l l t ~ - * 43 Subject a �1 AND BUFFER
tJ►` ' `�+'- ` �'i r Subject at northern �•
iF . '1, . ' r'Llip
sI 7-.�i_ ' :+ ,' .. -t . iLikori � project boundary � - MITIGATION BANK
a J.t+� 1 ., + 'F _ PARCEL
) 4 . - 7' Aft)*
..,- 1 ill C.Iierillirf :e Illi
ral
iiiiltin s4 \r„.
�*1 • 1111941rV {• Halifax County, NC
•t . 4, • ' . .
) A.
Title:
;i
'• tillioillier USGS MAP
__ _ % '''Al' Feature 2a
•
Subject at confluence613 2006 Halifax County
.• IT IL of 2b&2c •L Soil Survey
-• � ;:
.' �. Sheet 21
1
.. ' MI i _ ;kf W
• r
41
r Drawn by:
I Feature 3 Prtil
Subject at northeastern re
' • RJH
lin \iii e _apt i 1 Feature 4 project boundary Date:
ighibm
Subject at MARCH 2O21
1 - confluence of 4b
Scale:
11411. ,
1:12,000
- t*
,. - .r
4 r Project No.:46
21 003
lit ...
IV
_ — FIGURE
lel, V lig ..
•
Jr
— j\s_ Z
Feet
0 5
I 3. .
:c.....„..., ,
rild---9N1 500 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000
Iit 14111
Y E N III % r ti z

Legend
Or *r
White Farm-Subject Fee Simple Parcel ` JI TOB 20 Feet
O
White Farm- Proposed Easement: 96.38 Ac. TOB -30 Feet Figure C -„NOW
, ' ~ .
White Farm Monitoring Plots (74 Total -2%of the , 1 TOB -50 Feet / + y ~`' - _ RESTORATION
restoration credit generating area) — T w ,.+�� _ _ _ + ❑ SYSTEMS LLC
_� TOB 100 Feet . +� Fiat ' �� -r` �-
C3 — -
NC DEQ
White Farm Parcel Features,Top of Bank , _ a Y y_ ure`� - �-- % 4
TOB -200 Feet - ❑ + I = % 1 +% �` I Prepared for:
White Farm -Credits: 90.337
X Less than 20-Feet, No Credit - __. , I Division of
�'`J� ' Water Resources
al No Credit(DWR Memo#2008-019, Diffuse Flow) s ^
c 401 & Isolated
20-30 Feet, 75% Credit Wetlands/Waters
TOB-100 Feet °' Program & 401
"_� - 1 ❑ Stormwater
101-200 Feet ' _
1 ' ^ 111`� y ❑ ' + ^ ` Project:
+ '■ Feature�2 . n
` ~ ❑ ` \ ❑ t ❑% 1��v`1 WHITE FARM
,� „ - ` ❑ `t `� ti`\ ` `❑ `% 1 , %li % `I % NUTRIENT OFFSET
r - lit* �°'r\` ` 111 �► 4 1 AND BUFFER
,, , ,
N
ki,,,,,,,,,
.,' ( I/ l ,� ` - ��t��`1 `� ❑ I I MITIGATION BANK
•4\ :i A❑d di,�, + El _`f, ' ' PARCEL
Figure CCU ,- . •
ti .4 , + '�❑ _ - -
i, r 1 p e _-- -_ - El 1,
Halifax County, NC
�L ;� ,� n ti . _ _ - r _ . 1 Title:
\ � � \� _ CREDIT AND
ND
, � �❑ ',
- - ' �� \ % MONITORING
11 MAPdv y%
\ \ ``
co I
1 I I III 1
m 4 I III I I.
I� III 1
' 1 ► Drawn by:
- " 1� �� ❑ RJH
- . . _ _ - _ � - . •
� ' a ` .. 3,* Date:
f ❑ r a .% % . ,, `,���� - - - ❑ - ::R:
iii :
51 11i C % �,� ` `=dt�r.`�+ + `❑ O+_ R:� lu + -�•- .;,5,..
ti.t ,-1 b`�:. �.1 _ Figure CO -: FIGURE
6
b . .._ ,
\ • - — , '. ...
Feet
0 200 400 800 1,200 1,600
---z

3 �� f•.
Legend ^ a `
O -; Rs
White Farm - Subject Fee Simple Parcel Ji TOB -20 Feet Feature 1
- - Subject at culvert located on
Ej White Farm - Proposed Easement: 96.38 Ac. , TOB -30 Feet
. northern project boundary y-•-- --
:T: A►'�,
White Farm MonitoringPlots (74 Total 2% of the ' E RESTORATION
, _, TOB 50 Feet —' -
restoration credit generating area) _ ' _ - ` + SYSTEMS LLC
1 l TOB - 100 Feet - ` - 1
O NC DWR Stream Determinations —_ I ( fla� - - 1- - , ` •
TOB -200 Feet - ` `❑ \ Prepared for:
White Farm Parcel Features,Top of Bank • -�� �eatUre _ �� ? ,-- 1_"t r'= - ' NC DEQ
Powerline ROW 1 — r - *< tt Division of
White Farm -Credits: 90.337 • ❑` ` - ' 11� — �.— 1 i Water Resources
Less than 20 Feet, No Credit ,
- /
` - t +}_: - - ' 401 & Isolated
No Credit(DWR Memo#2008 019, Diffuse Flow) j ., 12(0 l t ,11 , 1t % ti - �' Wetlands/Waters
70. ' ` } Program & 401
20-30 Feet, 75% Credit4i:: �' gr�a� ' n _ ,. ' '
�C - - v ' `' • Stormwater
TOB-100 Feet
yy % `~—m`
t` f/ , Project:
101-200 Feet \ ` e '
\ '
` •
. . WHITE FARM
- - - - - NUTRIENT OFFSET
AND BUFFER
MITIGATION BANK
Feature 2 PARCEL
Eli �. Subject at northern
project boundary
- ` ; ❑ Halifax County, NC
�� _ ` - �._ ` -�► _ 'i `` �/ `` Title:
❑ �� ~ - �`�„�`�,_ _; , , ^' -
- ` -❑- ` ' --I ti _�C ��0 t `t eatUre=2 ❑ I 1 ` CREDIT AND
\ ,,„%_.- ` ( I I( f T 1 ` ti MONITORING
i -'` ���1-- \V t LI t ti %I v 1l 111
�'� i MAP
%
/ \444, \t t \ ,t F' �]! tt �� ❑,` - , r Drawn by:
\t tt ` �C ` � - mot � ' ' tt \�\I I \ ` � _ _ - - - - " �, � .. �'
\ \ •� Feature 2a / r y y
N t ` ` Subject at confluence • , , . sl `y ` _ C ❑ Date: MARCH 2O21
` `t,\ �;� -t of2b&2c •/• y II,y\ . jryN — - - .
` r t \ \, , ' r / l "` I - - - ❑ - ` t , Scale:
•t r , \ t\ - , y t /• _, `� ,t - - - _ -r � � t 1:2,800
tt ��f t) I + t e2b— �'� ,`~� ``,a _ Feature2 )J Project No.:
� fur i ` , I `t jFe��t � '_+ c = - � �v��`—= � - r - - � � �� 21-003
/( Ye l .1 `,t\\4,\'` t _ _ - ' - FIGURE
\ % \ \` \' t
•
t l It
� ` \t 6A
_ _ - 1 t t13, 1t Feet
t t 1'V;t,t t i 0 100 200 400 600 800
t 1 t
t z

i + t r N .. II-
• - 126 ., , ❑ \ ` ',� I \ Legend
ra`1 \ •tRS
1 sk\g(r , ',, _ O White Farm -Subject Fee Simple Parcel J TOB -20 Feet
', `� \ \\\ , 1 \ / O White Farm- Proposed Easement: 96.38 Ac. , TOB -30 Feet
` +1 \ . A [ ° ' —N RESTORATION
' ` \` `� , White Farm Monitoring Plots (74 Total -2%of the , , TOB -50 Feet
���\ ' — SYSTEMS I LLC
` ` ,\\ �,� _ - , , restoration credit generating area) _
• • + ` , 1 TOB - 100 Feet
\ \ \ , \ , it, .\1 O NC DWR Stream Determinations
. \ . Prepared for:
�' TOB 200 Feet P
`, / , ` �� �,, `` , f� White Farm- Parcel Features,Top of Bank NC DEQ
,, +\,,-; , 1 �` - - - Soil Path Division of
' / `,xx, kJ \+I\ ❑ t r ( �/. White Farm -Credits: 90.337
. , 1` >Mtf �. >ti �. + + I, . ,� Less than 20-Feet, No Credit Water Resources
,' % 1 Y. / < �� ` \ 401 8c Isolated
�''` ' ` No Credit(DWR Memo#2008-019, Diffuse Flow)
c . ,� ' /�"Si ,i 1 - - Wetlands/Waters
f Y � ��' , i 1�. �t \ 20-30 Feet, 75% Credit Program & 401
,1 ( 1V.�/ \ `\ _ Stormwater
-+_ \\. \\ ` \ TOB-100 Feet
\ + .` \' ` Project:
' �.,' +`\N 1\ ' 101 200 Feet
/ ' IN }A % \ WHITE FARM
- - - 1 , ,\ ' 1 1 , NUTRIENT OFFSET
1 % , , AND BUFFER
I I' ti ti ` ` ` MITIGATION BANK
\ • `\ \'\% �` PARCEL
+ `�1
+ 1 i
iII. i C
� Halifax County, NC
1
1 I II 1 1 I Title:
4(l ll I' I 1 I ' Existing Soil Path
' , To-Be Removed from
1 'I 11 ' 1 Easement Area CREDIT AND
'` I� 1 yy `� t MONITORING
` •t 1 11 i •
, \ I ` Feature 3 MAP
❑ \ ►,\\ \\` , 1 Subject at northeastern
\ • 1 project boundary
+ `\ \. . , 1
` � \ - - - - - - ❑ _ ► Drawn by:
` \• ` _ r - _ - - � - � �rx.s RJH
,�. \\ �� ` ~ - ❑ - _ _ �. ,f. �` , f� ` k1.1• A • ' ' i Date:
— _ - _ .ea."... _ r10 4..,t r. `,:'. MARCH 2021
Feature=3 _ o.
_ „- ' ' Scale:
_ _ ' � '_ � _ 1:2,800
` , _ - =• - Project No.:
•
4 - r
=eat `� ` , ❑ -_ / FIGURE
�� -�4as, . ,. LJ Existing Soil Path ,e
�.., ��1, To-Be Removed from .
.� -" .. E11 1 Easement Area f
A 6 B
....,
�-- - _!` + - Feet
, - - ,r 0 100 200 400 600 800
L- z
ti

_ (
r�
•
Legend In°"`ser1 1, ` 't\ \` `�
/` l ��` `
White Farm - Subject Fee Simple Parcel J A 4.161 ils
r _ I TOB -20 Feet ��`� \ ` . '` e N. ` \\�\� t� t . ',..
White Farm - Proposed Easement: 96.38 Ac. 1 ) TOB -30 Feet ` \ \�. ` ` `
• t `
r 1 White Farm Monitoring Plots (74 Total -2% of the , 1 TOB -50 Feet \� ��` ~ ` ` . rr t'\ , �;\ \t� \t RESTORATION
l ) restoration credit generating area) _ \ , Fiat ' `` \ ` .........
t r ' ` '—�,,` t SYSTEMS LLC
1 _� TOB - 100Feet , . Ore4a� \~ ' . \ ' )t yam..., ; t �,
O NC DWR Stream Determinations , _ , ` �.. "' ` . \ `1 \ 1 ��I r `.,N '\� 1 Prepared for:
I TOB -200 Feet \ -'i; ,t w �� p
White Farm Parcel Features,Top of Bank ,` ` ` := �� ,� �, r `, , �,� �* `' ` �J NC DEQ
Powerline ROW ,� • . :fig' , r
White Farm -Credits: 90.337 �� . . .
,� , + \ , m`�; \r \+ r 1 Division of
` ` �'� , �� �;, +1 4.. �`',� Water Resources
59.5 Less than 20-Feet, No Credit Soil Path \ t
ip No Credit(DWR Memo#2008-019, Diffuse Flow) �- r �- ,'_ `� \ . , 401 & Isolated
` ` -� �� , ` . ` 1 - \t t Wetlands/Waters
20-30 Feet, 75% Credit �_- .__ - ,I .- 'v �\ 1 H , Program & 401
. 4 4 / ` 1 \,�1 1, Stormwater
t °�o. A
TOB-100 Feet �- 1
1.
Project:
101-200 Feet ` t` \ '
Nutrient Offset Credit (NOC) t 1 '
1 ,\ ,t \ WHITE FARM
' `\ ` NUTRIENT OFFSET
TOB to 20-29'qualifies for 75% Nutrient Offset Credit `. '�`\ '• }', AND BUFFER
tl 'TOB-200 ft. = Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a minimum 1 i 41 II MITIGATION BANK
I PARCEL
of 30 ft.from the TOB and a maximum of 200 ft. from the TOB, 1 ,l 11
and qualifies for 100% Nutrient Offset Credit. ' 1 1I I'I
' 1
,,/ II 11 , Halifax County, NC
I ,
ti5 1 �1 11 I Title:
.4a� I} :.f'‘.\
\1
�9r - cP 1 '11 1`
Gv\
�� ~ ` �d0 - , ❑ 5�a\e �', ,�t\ CREDIT AND
- �� , MONITORING
, N � - - - - ` \ - - - 1 \ ." \ MAP
r
f 1 , I f It l� 1
r '7.
❑ ' - �1 \, t \ ' - + i t _ r 'tit} } 1 Existing Soil Path
f ' ` / 2 / - \ t 1} } ti To-Be Removed from
. \ ►� ,\\ 1\t ..' r '� -ku, �/ ' - - - 1 1 1 I I 4 Easement Area Drawn by:
' AZ
eature---- ! Sr d :' -, - //— 4 1 t Date:
El ' ' ly ,} `. }1 1 MARCH 2O21
I 11 ; , `�1 - =r, � � � � ~ 1 1 t }�1 ` � _ ❑ 1
' I ❑s `` yi ;II �1' 7 ` �� ` }\ L ` ` 1 Insert'1 Scale:
� 1 1 ` 1:2,800
' I 'I 1 ti 1 ` = `�� ` ` II. Project No.:
� , 1 1 1_ 21 003
n — 1
' i �}, l� 4❑1 Feature m� ` ` � err FIGURE
1 1 Subject at m _. - i _
i i �1 ' confluence of 4b r
1 i ,� of ,�.... — -
1 �1 � � 6C
t ,. E. , r Feet
A ' 0 100 200 400 600 800
. e / —:-`-z

orai-wa
. N..-
--0•4. • _f, i•-•. -"".-, •.•.., '
.—-• —
-. . .
• ,.. • - , •
7". • • .„.....r.-
a - - -. .
,
.,-.m.......ioniudedi 60..............is.........i. .
.4 •
ink. .r../
...,.
AL
..'-',....
..
-- —
..•lilW
••
•1
L • -,.. ,... „
1 •
I 1
1 .
'...
4.11r.' -J..'
iko—ok
•
'1
.:.
•1.-.
...
7.1-104
11111.111)1
% •+. ,,
, .
i
•
..„- ., • - ,
..... _..
. , ic- . ,,,F ' ' IA .
... -- -.•
-••
•
' L- • ,_.
‘ ' 0 • 1111 '''' .
(
S . .
.i.
N \
.' • ,.1IL • ....--••••.--
Itak I
. ,
•
Illk
414
-Immeiwn
. i•.g., .
•:-: . Alt
.. N
pi4 ' ,ellk '
.-1•;,..4 ,-e'''''. t .0
-
'
.
.
fNQU1RY#:6408551.3 ii, N • . -.
YEAR: 2016
C=500' EDR
.aillti. ite '.

• -
. - ' .4' , i-,.'..• - ..• - .•-_-_:!.. .--.-.• -,,,,-..;'..'-,-0--.--;:, -
, -
I i..
, .
1.
1..1-11 MO 1.6......1,4k..,ik--.W....!...a....lt-e--1...1 Sabi:t-e..C.Alia ti...•
."MP
f
. .., .
..t---
•.
I :
, I
•
. ,.. 1
i •
1I
•
. i
. , .
q_.. .• -
,c,....t..;•,,4 k._ . 7
-f,...,-,,,,•• glor
... • i-.1
- ...-. f
- •Z.
/' , ........ ,..-.. ' .-
,- ' ' , •-ii 41.. I
• ....".j....77) 5,
.4.• '
ii:- k- • yr, /
k' •"org ,"4 .
1 dr
4- ..:k - • * ( A k IL f-'6-4 — - • 1
...,• s ... .,- .-.4-.7,*.... :
‘ 0 A
. .• - ...I,5 1. ' fi. ;i . ., ;
•
.. V ,, c .,. • • k 1`. • 1._' '
'
.• ? 44', , . -- • . . .
.-,or• .. . - . / _- _.i : i . ,'• . •-•-_ . . .
•• .. • ,... _ . .. _
.:. . ..c ... •• ,,.
_ : , ., ,,.,1? ,...i._ . ••••••• ''. .y i... . . -.••• :' 5-....f.• . j••' t..
. .. .., :,.... ;: SI dr •
'';K;414:)e, ' '.,'20... 1/ / -1.I f .:,,..•.,': •....-: -:;.•::: . : ',- .1
...„,.,1_,..... %P.A. • -r• ' A ,.-■'-' . _ .
i'3.Yi4 '.':.'..:if:4-7 '.3t. •s'•1 ''' ' ..
\#
eir , •.
-3 ; / I!L _'.; . 1. ', -,''. .,•,?
.--r>• ' - ' - ''.e --.),.‘4V v:,1%.,-..! 4.j.1 iii
-.:41' . Te.1:4j.:'..:'1,11'.: r eje. !I.sp'.,,,;' ,.;!;• k
i . N ! ,. :,-1:1"-V•P"H. -''7:,-.—' ',: "- ,
::. Vd,/,i71.0‘. .: ,', !A, ied ,L• .. dt "- - ' ''.
..:,,r-t,ifi:. :i.-?..-.!l'i t,•47:: .. I . . .
\ .
- . ' 7' L•'+I. , 1
. ' . .
...... ,'
•
'-- ' 1 ' 4 '- 't 'fr. • L-.
, 1
. I
- 7 ', :,' ' \ N • .,. . . !
. . , .,
. • . ..\ ...
. .
. . _
. , .
- • . _.,,,-)e < .
, .
. i I
. ...."/
#NQU1RY#:6408551.3 N
I
YEAR: 2012 i
i
CE DR \ t ':
=500' \ .
., 1

1111
:..-§..A.-kef7.f,Ar
i
1
{
.ci I
. Ihirp.''. -
.."Ac -• .....-. . 4(
tr
tillti"- ...-- - _ .. r ;4. 1
\...
41/4
�r
visit - -
'\ °' ,'y- ,d
INQUIRY#:6408551.3 /l y '
YEAR: 2009 `,II , . -
I =500' EDR . ' . `_•. .

•
le '
rtk.. . . .. .. ... , .. , . .-
- - 4 t4
.'.. "
' Ow'
eir.i...40-.. , -.th.1.-.r....*-1 - -0 _ .. .. ..i-iLLI;LIa...L.te-t...5". Arak....z-,. .,r_....dimak.. ..IS-3—..-A.-1-4.A-._-.:ri_.— _
-', '.; .,. ' ... '.4/.1...5. L*. •-..., L.,t.%..ki.
. .
i .
If
1. .
•-r
. . - ..•-_..... - _ ,.
'-4-it,, ;-4 ,....1.,; .;1•%;...y.,,,,'- :, -
_._.
' -. 41..• .. ''• 'f- ,'
4
.9
- .1.- +4 - g
.
. . • ill ..
• 1
# s. • ,, i
r . .
4
- ..
. .
. . _.. .
. ,
t
. .
• I
i
I. .;11 --1 ., . ', , .. ...,
' .
// . , •• '; ki, • 1 ;'' ,
• ..i . -i'. I
r, „...- i I t
:7. Is(1
4.414 . t
,.. ...._ • 6 1,.. •.0
.
-
"...lbw -.4 • . r' -7!;if ' ;•4
1 ' ...-t: .K., • 1 'Tr 1 44 t.
• .. 1. %.\ 31 ... I V
.11. .#'9 \ 'Ai, 4 44 ''-. • 7,
NI :
_., • ' 441
.•. - .... .,,
I 11P.' ' : i; •••• •..,
a • ' t ,, • i
. •-• . . - .
• .. . I•,
. . ,
041116411116•S-".
-
-.•
'' I, • r •,, '
1 - ••••---1-
t .00 i411. .-._.. -*
' aleerm. • . .4. ,..
I'.\.... .. ',• . 1 ,.
.
'- i
. - I A% it. •• - ..
, • .r:
L .
-14 i.
. .- .
ii'• . ,
:. .
1..• er,
. .
'
• • • .:
I
1:614milik
. 0 - • •N .
. T ' • yr
. 46 .
.
‘I. III .
r.4P:14. •4.•1 . cr.
RP` I
. , • ..• Ilire .: . .
. ..
Lill f
. • - iwt- 4i'
,
t N
YEAR: 2006 ' \ •
=500'
CE DR . .4
. .,,,.
ft_ •
,:... . .'• • ..‘ANkt. A.,- ‘4.• .

... -
. ' . .
•r:_•• • ; • -
, , •-.
-..04•"%wry.",
• . -.91 • •• . .. 1161001,! :*-1,41N.,
r.. ..•4.- • ..
. . r - - - • if ' .'' 'FP
1 .14.%I.IL.... .'..., .'.,M.•'.:%.....-•'r•Yi.a'':.- . '
.. % •• .......-- ,...
":" .," . , --- ' - ..
; . . .
•'. .,. .
. .. . -,..
. . • .,
01 1 Ii• .. . - •, - •
. • . • . . . _ ._ -,. . .- P- • ' :••- - . .,
, . p . •
. . , .. ., . •. ,
.
:p .
' *Air-244w
.ttl
.
,-.,...„... . •
- ''...
•
.1•-: - - . • '
.
.. I . ..1 1• • • -
I • •
•
.. .. • ., .
.
. . .
_ - r --
•'
-. ''-ltdi, • '.„, , .
. .. . . -_,..
. .
;:'‘..'.
., ., ..
•• - .
A
,,' 0,.• 1. , ... .?1,1%11/
0 dr•. lofr—••
,P 4 t . ;otast.• • O.'.
11111111 •
111111111111111b )
•
i '111:
•1661111- • i.. i•4.if,..i:
.•
.• ••• A
r "\
t.., „AA....;..., r•.-.. .,,i .. i
. , .
ti /....''../rb.•-••' . '.•.41a.,.':
. •
$ .
iitly .,-•.. .
. ...
. .„,.•
. ,;. ,P,. i,.. .46.• it •
:
-, . __ • t • .
4,1, . • i-'', •
I ,
I.?e-r1 ,- i•Nt. ip ...i
it • -, - - : 9.,.. .0
Iv%j
..:... "I'? •
II, %
..." . -N .or' 41114•‘,141141- . ' A . P'.:,!
I. i„....
.. , ,_ ,wo 11. ' • , 1
4 '11
1,, "tt••
f .. vort OP
_, , ' •
.T ..A.:4.. • '9 ' Ni,w•
' ...
' • 'in!? 4n
i'',.A:• 'rly ..1- '1•10 i.
/ -
4 f'•.• ' •. • . f , •
. •
.. ti°1%•• ,,,sr ,
\ kilf":: 4,i`.‘rileI
NI
., r.,.1‘%•.. , ...., A.
\.... '
IL
. ..
..b.;
iftl .
• a. •
r • ,'
',-
INQUIRY#:6408551.3
i N . P
\
YEAR: 1998 , i.
t Ilk
CEDR • ii... .
I =500'

• , •... . ... ...-....-•,,..,-,-..,.,.• • ,.... •• •••• ,:-•';'••••• •-•-••••.....„.•Ac:--*!".4trtIgN r,t'...-: .,,'''..•'''''''.'VIVI'.4:''';,.' 'L.---,'..,''.''. 4.,:,-,-.""It'.‘'el.,-1,44-• .*''.ti::-.',t,-4,•;•*,,,.i--t'-i'e'-':.-1..,•^'•‘-''' - .'
:f4-17c.-,., „..-.,;,:-•-,,._-..,,_,•,,,-., '-'.:'4-k.':%:-.4.-.•',.,‘,-:,.A...,,,,,`,04,-.4t..2.''''..:,.-N„,.,-;•,,,:'!';.,,,....:-• .,..;:.':‘'' ''-.:M-;''.. P5--, --"'t.-..-4-4::).'''.2-'-'".-tl'• -.'.-•-41-0.,.4.-'-'''',-- -..-.1,;,•.AL-',',,s.,,,,,,,,,-.,.:.:.,r- ---:-.F.--..,.--.- - • ---•--- .--
,._4*.•-,:,,,I., ':,.-'...'",:',:..-.-isiintoJ..----_,,- ,-,,,-!-,t441-70--,...kia. :,-,.:.:,.L. -..•.•...-„it..,,,!,:).:,• ,-,.-;,.:.-.4._•-.. ,.*;,;•,4,..„-,,,:F..-L,t.,-.:-.,--.•,i,..._ ,-,i......7...:L.;', . -11,-.! '.,,,,--.,,,-. ..... _,-.......-,. -;,,,,,,,,,-.,.„---,%:-.,„-,---,...7..,-- - ,'-`7.- '..•'''''..•• .
• •'-, ., 4'.',''-',14.-.g. 4 -":-.' ..,-,' .1 ., .0, -;:' Ei,-;-•, .). ',''."`tt-OWV4;,!--'t ,.'..-.!•-",--- , ..--'-....V-3.-:,?:
4:. ,-,';••-• •0•C-•''.1,-..'', -•t..4.4W.,-•','-.‘t. -2,1- ':-. ..4.... ', •:•...''-,,,_ •'-;,,,r, ;':' -",t;t'a 4 ' .,, .---7. •- : .:-, , ',--'.',.,- .. ..., .-1-"0`,
0 Al -'! •- ' ",-Vv,"':-.;.-''.-** ,,;-'-'' ',4,-,7--.-'"'t'.,'•...,•,!*-Asi•;4'>• v‘:•5,;,• ••,':'',.'':•-f-kt';''.-;-.- :;'- ,- ,,.-0;-it'6‘...„,`: 1 •`',..-_..... ,. •...,•-, ;,•,,.... .e.. ;,• „. ,. ..,,.•,..-.- ',;., ,,..-
It
:.,,,.,,.:.,..;:,. ....,,..,......, :,... ,..,,..,._,,......,..,,,,f,...._,.„...„4.. . ,.,'..'-,"'".-..'X".8i•it.., ,•''''''' • .-5-.:r. kr.`f,-7-7;,-, ,-, =_,..--,,,.#,,.,,/.,',..- - . , ',., ,:'.--4.!*,;".,_,.,,;;:, ' ,. ..'„,t4-..ig. ,;,,r4ro! ,,_-,
- ,"...**:._ '-..-•*.r1-4,:,'-'''...'";';,0:-'7,.._:c,:".';',.:,,,':-,:-..-':-.A-:°•,'.,,,,,;-.....f,=;;;::: ,,...14,11- :=i'lr ; ",'41":'''...-.,=-" i,•;...'.'.. .--i, ..;-',i-74-rii:-';', l''-' ' •,, ' ''''-,`-:'''-'-''-''''''.-.- • .--- -1/- *1-7:f.' .' ---,'
/ , . -•,./ ,-,.. .,,.4.41.,,,,-,, ,...,,,. . fk;.',.,,,%?.;•:.,4-.4.4.,-.;-:1.,'_,•,;--.,...-:,:;;,..'--,4%, ,•;.,....,,;•..- , ''..,.:1,,V. ,...;.,- i-'14t : •'.',":',07,k,..*-:•';'-.. •• _- '-'-' " 'r '" " ': ''"'''S:''''--'''..".••" - -"-,-5:Vr'-::::...,'" s''''''''''
c....•,-.,,,1",;,...t ,,,,.-,,{, ,:O.,:„;.',,,""!4,,,-..,,,,,,.:--,.c.-.!•_.,',..^:'..i,.'_..'-;- , ,,!,:-,,,,--,.,,,,',...5,'..:!.'• ,•-.._-•. --': •''','. .•!, et , - -"'''' . , ;.,...",'7, .-.,..•, -•- -
',11 -'-''-', '',.12,."-•,- -, '_ '„ii Pt,' ''' • : ', " ' -'.`,1,,-,"...V);;;;;-,S,,,,,Ivr,',-.."'-,.?,i,.7,,,!,.,';,:, : ',-:,-",;,x-.,."..,';'-1"..;::'"--:.• -,.r.., -• ,,''" ,4 , „.- ....-
1.f
---• .7 "f: - . .• , ' ' --'-• • ' -,, . . • , 1i;,'... "-R.Z:-;', :::.-.•-...,,e,v,K-4 . .-.-4.....-,::!:.vQv.-.--_!--„'_..--
,.. T. - ...` # ,_, ,...:.., :,;.... ,... , ..*, • ,-_,‘,.. 4.-.__.:,.,...;t• ..,. ,. .,. , ...... . :-..:"'',-.10.',:leci,_ 4'€5;..'-,.,,•.„?.;it,!•,.,',.; ••°.-.„,-,,,--.'.,_.,;:.: ',,.,.-.....;--1,..:•
4., ',
' ' '. - .:.". :;,.-'.;',.:-=4`..- -..,"....
:1,.`•-.',. :,". - /
. . ,...•-: -;,:-•:1 '::-:-.4'""..•,.'-'- ,- '. , .:- • - -". , .' .,"j
,i1..-:. ;:•.-:.
'. 2 " .- -'7.7,"-,',.•--:!.'„'•-•'-.1;3-i.. .'.,,, .. • .-_ ., .,- -.„ .
,
44A.-';';: •;„:,--,_'..- .
.--•At-- ...----.• -. .,.:,,,,..
- •.-. -.- - , ...,-;.••'. .'••."..... ',
I
i
.,':-•-•$•-::,..,'!„,.:,-...:.
.'4 -Y.-,:r:;,4....•
,._,,, . '...-` --..s•1-i'"-LIAA-'.'''"4:7'• ''',..--....'.' ' .1 • -' '' '':-,,•-:,'-'..".•iiC:iir'..' - .-.'---'-', '-'1-. '; . -' - '
d... -•-''t..-k-t',..-..'-. Ari,,..-• ', ', *. •
- ,
' 'L':-.',.--;.-.4;-'••-
,,..
• .,:-.,-..,-,,.. t,, „,..,. ,,.,.,
. ".•,7.1';''t...1.-:.',....-.1 :_. .
. -..'' -.
._ . ., . - . • ..
. - .
. ,•-,
. .„.
, ;-- •
'/;;''' . .
i
. /
f• ,
. .'
, . .
• . , ' •
.. . . ••-•:.'. ..'
''• .; . _
...,. ,•/ .
. ' •,•;",".. • .
'-
41114 '-\'', _-----" ,,,„.,,
, ,._,.,.:*-;..,,,,,,.:.,,..,, - -,-.:.-,7-,,,,--.. ,-:,-.:.,,,,:,=.2....:,,.,,,,.41:-fl /
. _, , . ,.^,Vp.,,, ;, '=_L• ,,ti' ",-t.,•I'V.,' -,-;
...-, 4,0 r" .. ' '''''t,.-•\. ,, • ' . ' 1 I ''- '''''s.*,..;,."'''''.).;''.;
.N.,.
.,...,.
, .
• S-vf,i A vki....,,,_.„,-.....,„-,..1
/ ,.„,..
..„...,-,
__. .,
,,..
, ... -
.. ,.
lat-•;/..- '''.'-11., -if"'. .,:,'-'%.':,,-,,,,
' _, =•••••,!•,••• ...,14-•- • •.1%.,
-'4:.,-, ., -,•,,•.,,.,.41., , . • ,
•'
v.,. .1 J •
1
• .',4, • \ . ____. -
.-,,,,,,,,,.4i O.-, ,,,„- •
. ,
i' . • ..,.,- ,
i .. .
•, ---
-;.'....1,:,.‘,,•,.....47).,ti,...-:4,,...• „..
r . c.,4. IV"• •• .# ' •
,1,•,*::.,..4.-:1,•••••zik.,,_..4...., ,..1,,,:,,,....1.:...,,,,,•,...._.v.•.'.4.4!.,,, ,!..:„.ii,.‘„. ,
\ '• .
.
.s.
,
"\ :;. ..
•f• ...'. a
, .
•'''SL: -,•,-
-._,..•_.„..,•--
/ei
4,it-'.e..',,.•,-'--',-•.•,• •.,,•t,
; 4 ,i - 7 .,.,..;1_t,1,,,,•-t•c.a.;14.,.....14-.',--...,..,„ ,..-
.-•
N ,,V.--:.: ., ..k, •. •
.••,•-•'.1,:-:-.-- • • ..r.-,c"'' . ti '." 1,- .
-frxt. -'"•, .....-- . 'i"''''',1, "
_-....._• ... „. - .. .. .. A -,_ ,--., 1. .. •
''. ' ''
..• -,
''. ..-‘-':,..'•:.;, -14ice--- ;- • .
- .'r',4#'..`'Wf!"'., - •\ .• , •
..•''-4: "At. I. t ,,,- -.
- . _ - ..•,-.'.•"", •• •'. •it„1.V.I.
-1
• .- , ;;;0.7,'.,'" :14 , - ,,,,, , , \
. .-
,.-
. .'7-f
".
,f 4 ...)
;+';•:17.1,,i4":''.- ' •A , • ... 1
. ,, , .--., 'LI--'',..;•••''''t ..`''.1:-'•' •-.-!- .... .0,' .',,,;
.. , . . ..
-,',.,
' ;4-:-A-, - •• ,., : ••:- '-li•''..i:1-3
:? ••3`. • "...,
4,-.-;. - .
Az ,
W.-'C-. ''-'
1''I-P. : •- ...;„ -<, - ,' ' •,•, :/' : .-4.•*kr,
....
. ,...
, .-- s ,„:•-..-:,..'-,•,:-•••..;.`,;',:ti,'-'__'•1_
7 ..... ,.,.
,.., .... .a. _,,. .......,, .....„...7Y.:1.....:
••,,.
..•••,..f'..41,'' ' ..,.1.,:,:t•- •_••,`•••, '
•
•.'--.•-'•'•' :*• Ak•. ',... ..- - , ••-,,,.,-.
' ' A e.tv-o.#•. *-
.4,,,d. ',•
.,•''t ,14.$4 r.''.-.C• .,..' . .•rk"..',.'.' .
. ...
a;'..'.."'....-':•
,• , .
.f.
.2p.-,-1-,•,-,._..-1 - !g. . - L,'.,.-,-.• -.••.' -:. ---'' elk .4 -
:.... .;',..!....;•-;,•„ . .,,,,...i,,• ..7•:--4, , • , .o,'..i,-
. .
- ., -`' ',-..' -
' 'N'' iL •
vi,#'•' . . --'",.' '
' "' 1 •.•
• . .
, .
. . •t• •!,• .•-•,..',... ....;. .-1! '''','
:-
..
1-..- ., . •'-•;•.. .- ::..''' --'•,''-'•:-.'4Z':-.... . ,
.. ..."'.-.. '-a• -ir, .., ..,
4',...,. „...,. .„-.... • .-..,..
... ,
. '5., -.:•• .
. •';-..
..,-'''-': .....•"1-* --V)--/".T..‘Nt.';‘);:l'it-',-;-:.•-,;..:,.'Y.••••S2.f.T.-...' ,-,-'t , , \**4 ‘ . ...-jp. .
. ,-.r-,,...-,::.1-A...-,4,;..,-,.mo....,..-...,.:.t,••• .....,-,...,-..••,•••,,,..k_.:•4..,
, .
• .. ...
- ' . ' .. •-•-. .*•%.,•:-'4,'-}' .,-..-,‘-`'•-'.:',.,•:..•..- ,,.• ,1
i.;-• ..",--;:;,, ,,.,,.',,,Z` , ''' ': ,•,,, ,. .. '•-•"' '••- - * ' ',. ..` •' ''-•Ni".•,-- ,••••,;•,„,--A,, ',!•-,'''-' 41,*' -' . ',' \''-''''''''' ' s;' • ' ..,.
. .
• ., . 1-_,,r -
.:' • --,•;n., . , . ,-.--, _.,..k.,.... • -.,,... -,,,-..--. ,., - .......,, •-,7,--:.-----• ,._
-•.-..,-„,... „,,,,. :,...,. , ....
..- --%4I.---..-.- -..-4:,. .-,-.,_,._.„,- t,L, 1\,,,,....'s,--_, .,-,..--..,i,.=-• ....---.,_,:, ,- .
.
.--. -',.., ',,,c--, :.-'........;,7,,L7,- .,,- -,...,..-- -,-,-.L,-"L''''. A: ;'.'4:,'''',.'.. ' '..'''' . .. ::::
, .. ';:t'
INQUIRY#:6408551.3 i N ..,. , .if.,-,-;,....4=:,..-,,,,,.•;i4:,...,:. \,'. . • ,, ,, ,. .
. , . .-;-.,..,.‘ -' ,,,$.--.\-1 .,.•
."....:A,v .;•.,,,,...-,-,:'', ..-,-,
, . %-`-i ..-•• : :
.. ,:.
YEAR: 1993
-••", ---'1.4-'-•,,'='.'..••-••••'-'i:'••• •.• - '.'N.,•••••',;•_. ''''t"-•-''"'• ','S',:•;,.. •• . , ,.. '.'''-
, .x.,„•5-;-,..z.„...,,•• ;„.„.•,.-,.,..,-,.. ..,..., .. . .
, - •-...
C :- •- ,..•':4?!. - •v"' •5••
- V.. :','...,,,:o...,, \:, •-..'--,-. -: ,. . , ,„
=500' EDR •-•
'‘.,-•'•''.',;:-' - • - ,.

1111- Rh
11."
_ '
�y r 1 f
i # ! - VIP - i '
CO
' r - 4
ii.._
_ 2410
` 11111
■` .I. IAA
■ '
4 6 . . .4 ti
I
_. •
..
• F.
-
1 k ! 1 � ,
•
I
...wir 41.
• ,
11 1
di 1
.. i
z
r r 1 _
1 ' - ,
impii ii.66111 .
1 1 '
i
411111c V-
A.y t •
4-
r t
OW
Ile
II Si II-I- • 1
4
I *IP ..
.•
•.
• i ii - .
.'- r
4 f 1 Ask 10
•I. _ •
_ -
INQUIRY#:6408551.3 /•
YEAR: 1982 ",jJr le•
= 1000' EDR � ' I

_ . . _. ......
1 .6_•. ' :•• ".•1 . .... .
••-..•.•.-• .....". ,....• ...i, i.P...7' ...)....• •,ic _.'1 pf.-."••••,"<,. .,.. ... .4...c.A
. ( ..'• . ..''',...'or•V-:(,f,4_6---•••••••.1...rei,7.*.74:-..11F.T-:s. - fe'-.- C41-1,;‘,...04.....0,-',4'..7F 0...%.1•%1/4W ' ':',.'4', • .4- - .... . ' i?'41Ke....
1. •••••;;LAtri.;Cri.i AI; • Vilitg'''''-Jf`.1.• Lir-::I'l ' .it-L'It' .4. i ... -;4:4;;`...1.1 ' "'..i.r;'. IT. +.P•I''_.k:_. ..'ir4I1'..41h•Ir.- ....1'14.(p-' .-A '‘teoloi''-
• . '.': .• --,-,..c. ,.-. r.. ..)';,..- 1.- ...p.i: -. 04' , sza.v1..,,_ ., - --4 ii, . . ih 1-.1
'1•.•*;nt...111.9,e.. ' '1.. ...,Cr :LL.' C .rlr ti... '''' f . _1. ...r 'Uri° • • ...lt. -
. 4.
.......:-:f." •;.W.14iirt.,..%tlie'll . Tr..0...1.1 rle. . 4%. .0'.1. .I_...e.e .- 4:4" .7.c. .7 7 1,01-cr, • i-dp . • '...,.,4'1•;;
P-'4-41. . . . •.g
. L•A' " .. •.R...!•C' ..I Zig U. .....! ...A.r.r41,.. ...4..j......la rai!: )...1...§1....l.I.I.:..1..•-• " .•4: .I.S . ..r .... 10 • • .. ...Z..... .
•1• -"
....:‘ r-) -•..'...1.1-#.C.2 -. 4.:.:(.........,- ....S...1.1.0 „..s._-..-.kl...4"1.j 4' '12-i•-•.',. :i'L'.. - .-'F44,...'..I/V... ..N.. .. •. ''' .l' ... .• ; ...- ''.4.-. 1471::
. ., _ 11_ • . • . 44, . •• ..VZ •41.'.. -0-I,
deo „
•.':5....7:Tr.. .rez, •&• ',:..)."-ec *1. pi., ;i,,...: . - ' ' :g.....:.i. •_ -. ••••..• '''_,.4_c&f.6. -... xim..-172,, .:.•_ov--.I, • .......t.
... .• .. . ...0.:.....-1, ..,... ...-...•••.,..e/WiLti1.4.% .„.:....,.....?...F •''''•:.;?`''.-,. 1::,,.t...6......_ .. .4'3;7.• ,..V. ''.7'r .7;7. Vt-,4'..4.,_,.-.•:,
. : .• ., . . . ,
. rrir..,, .....:,, 4.:;0.,.,10,..,1'. r-.,.: . 5...11-.... 0.1-Jr . -.Y. 44'. •.•-••6„.:•- _411:"24c7 4572.'"deiliAr.:-..7.'
.. „
1 •-.11, IL."'l',-t‘l."'''f.:...-.'''. • - .1 '. .. I.114.:ir • :44 l' Q.IL .L.04.
• . •' •'. .•• • " ' .•• •=15'•'•,.-.a...,•,', .A.el .10,4( lko,!ir -1,. ••46:61. '' -
• :. -•
.-1,-i' Ir. • 4 .i'..44.-.44 4?.-...-.1-4,13.1% . - , ..... .
• . _
... .
3 . ..
, •
.'....7.-•?,..-.••..•.'si-...•, It..4.-:•11,:•;•411,..--- , Asat.
. ..
.. ....... . ..II .1 ii or 711.• ....".,..e.
-) .. • :• 95 .r i• ••• ;'FI.7-''r"'d iN.
' . .. • ._ . • ....k... • . .el.,•;':1' •
.. ..' 1"..':: ''IN.',:. ' ;'. 4' e• :' ,-.4-_*',.1.--IS.1 .
V;,-.. .Vi•14'• •:;.". ....!:. '.' 4, L jr.i.5,„•sk ..if I
':-
- ._-.: ,-.. -..-.4_. . . -.1.,..4,-. -L.:L•ri.vm• .. ....,-
.... - • -. ••••4;:.; 4.--41.__ 1 • ..j.; .tzte
.,•.4'7
. '•d- - I',11! ,• !V
• '••_;111,• .......
• 1 e...,,-Ed
• . . . .
:•••• • ..
• - -
. y• . . ..,,, ,
•
r r 4• •
. •
-..L....-
. _
. •
., . . • --• •
. I 11P
- 17`
. . .
•
•
•
L• •I 1,1..;.• ".- _
• .
•
: .
-. - . - . . - - 'W...TOZ:. '7( •
• • ••• - ••'- - -...._•
• ..r •
' 3 ••,. '.
. .. .
•• ' ....0 . • -,.._ .i +- ,'...-
• • .
. _
•. • • - r o.. g -
• . - . 3-:• '-
. -
•
.,.'
. -
•.e......i: ' • -
' . .. .. -. .
•
' .
• -•...
' ' . '..•
•
•
•
.. .1*
..'-
' . .
' •
• •
. .
-.
• • .
. ."
.,0.
•
- - .
• . .111171Z•f-• . .• • ' . •r
. . .M11.•• ':Ce... .L .
. ,
•
.r. . r• ..t, - • ' . . ..,
•
• ./.•
. • .
•• Lc`.. • . ,
4:
.•
' • _
. ..•. .. r
. I . .• E. , r •..i . .
. • •
..1 • ... r .IF
.. . ,. _.
..'.'llj' •'''.. . _ ._ .
. -
• •
%qv.: ' ..• - . - .. -
..• .
.I 1,
•
.. . . .. . ..
. • . •
. . . .
• ..... ..4411.......:"1. ' l'' •
: ' .• , . . .
• • .
• :•
•.
•
. .
'..
-,..• ... ..n.a._..:...
....
•
• ..
• .. .
...
. . .
. .
4.-; -...2.2. A.'. ..
. .
•
.
.
I NOLPRY;I.6408551 3
i N , •
• .
YEAR: 1977
•...--e. ..
• . .
•
CEDR • -
•
.
I =500' • .

- •
.L. .
. , •
. .
.Fr
• - -
•.
-_- a
• •
• ?
• • •
„, •
f ti., •
...-r.•••••., . . 5,,,...p.-.4 .;•....., • • . ..
• •
•,.:1 :. ,'•'.& .;1:: :-.....;:j - • .....' ' •'0'..• . '
,r5,:tt.,:---_,- —.....•f..... . •••• 4,r-IL: A: %
r ..1::.,5...,*?...);.: '.1...kr.guf.4.-I—:1';:'. .• •• ' '•L? '• .;• . . . .. .
•
1 ,t•kr.. . • -- 4111-,'-.'..'• • •:: .-... .25" • At' .. • . ' •• • . .—. J.C.V....4.Yr' ,...... • - . . -
. •,'.- ..ni& , . 1.. -7,7..‘r7.5.:..s.453•:.....q77 -•••:' -:" ..e-;--•.- . .• . z•!•::... . . '. ' -..:•.0±..:;1.::! •.:• .r.....V.t.4..!:. . •;.- .
ri, ..5.-iP. . .. :.-...'• `.F'l- . .1' ._: :. .•. .. r e ••..: 14,;#.•1..;.
• •••:'•• . . .i.:: • FF
- e:,11.Z.:5Th.,..,-..:T. ....I..... - •
.•:'.....-:--:•':•:.';-:--c•••
--. T- ' ...''•..1:i':'::.r.r..-:'.: :' •-.S'41-:..L-'''L'i .40, '
' 1 -
•
r
...
• • .
•1 •
' •
. . 4 . ..,...,..1,.
• ',,_ .6.i,... . .._.11;:o , , .. .
.. ......L.43 i .
.7-1-440., .• •
1 r• • .
ibilfreiir 'ri
•
•.
:-..... -
41!.•.- ._ • .
. • :... . In% . . _
• 7-• It:,leil-11.0 .
• ...•• •:
. ••
• •
li
.._ . . .. . •
7"—
•
. .
.. • • • 1:
.
. •.•
. -'.
.. ..r _
. . .
. • -. ,._. .
. .„.
. .. '11,.1- . •
. _
. ,
, i •
..i.l..?. . ... , . :;.;
-......•-• .w... .;,-,• . f ...
. : . •
.. ....-
. • •s
• .
. '
.....,• ,
... . ... .. . .. ..
..•:.
- . - -
, •._, I. _ . . .,
1. P• - •••••411. .
4 ,
' , ' •
• •. .. .. •
• . . _ . -.
. • . .
• • j
, -
• -' ' . ' I,, .
. •- J
•
• •
• • • • - `.511
•
.. :. ...
. .. e ... _•.- . ,
1110°11111111011r 1101111111- ._. . --..:. - 1
. • • ..•
. .: .
INQUIRY#.6408551 3
. • _
YEAR: 1974 i N •,•. . ..:.
...
CEDR .. . ....,
1 -500' •
e• ..

• .• • . . :....,...•.......••.::•.--•.. ''.-,. '••-. .,•••._;•---.::..,..:....6•4':17. II;.--'',r1F• -lif.:40.0,-%A.','.7. ..":---;,,•0'iltrili$ ''::-"•--VrATAkr,::'4-,VriA_.!,1t,......i -r,:-.9-e-'.::;;44':rAP
. ..
•:t • :• .. ,. • . .....:..,•••.......•.......,7,1-....-..-•••: ...,.-.4,,.....7,f..........;.;...!:'.'21%.:'1,:r17:140...I. ZO.....g.....10441.:10:tir 4.41.51.4-'1.7.4iaie: ..1 13.1.414.,!ii:::...1:':"'Art ;4.06';.. .- . (0.44.•
2 • . :-..;',..-...;_(;.•.1,11:7-V-!.. ..... ...t'.• •..•-L.:.i.:,•-.)•:,':.-V!.1..!•:!.,..;11' r"?'*"...•;A'...-ink!--1--_,•1,-..-41"Fill.r.,.14- .4i4t:i:ii,:g:dre ..-r:'i,•'•*..2.-.7.:::,-4-.Z."4•Yity"(m.F.'4 .5 ' k, . le'''
1 =:` .. •:'- -• . .: .:.::.'!..,,g-ri...'.::i..•.:':.'''-„-.,-, .'] '-'''.!'Y'4'i..:.."!-4-.;;..1.,..!f-..' ..,'Lk.'.;%!il-.;;:-,6,3".'.? ':'5•.'•L;•:'..I.L.rti'..r..4Y.14:kik-35,6,.EVUT.Eki':?'„•.,,i;115fr.,. .w PrNIV.:`,.'!:•-.,..1.
• . ....: . ....::::••:':-•...,..';T.-',.-• i'..•:'.-...''':7--. -7.• - ',Wg4=.if'14:r1r -"'•1;WOr•Pi••nvf•seqrp.1',V,4•11•451±,!ei:, • :. •,- ..4•00 • goV,':•!F
.• • ..•-•;:'•••••..•••-.;;;.•, • . .... -•r 6,4 '4i 4, ..:-..- .. .I .. '4:i.X47046.04,1,1P2e ,Z V/'0."Ff'.4#1/4'•'''r.44 .L... /23*.4,:tv.,.- • •"..."-- ..!-........14,--.4,...--4, .C.'-'0"-t+ •!'••••:'' .1-tfl4i31••=V:: ...•1 i j Li'•6?':=5.49:::02'',: .:d.• ' .4. fliDe-,-....ft:,: -...c..
. . . •.• • .. . . ._
. . . .. - •. .• •- - . " '• -.. ••••••- ..--• ,,---:.:,-:7 '.".'.•..f...4..lf.-..,.....1.4 i- .. ,"'•l L'.-f,..f.'1=',-'},'.-.r.11.2.,..:- ..i.f.i..,....1..,1.1.•-.E.;;."..:::::t••••••,-23::,..:t...?,:•-•••••••=
. , . ..., . . .
" ' +' •. .
• s :•• •:.t•%_....5..".: ' . - . :' - i. • J • . - • 1..•••••''..-.;.:' .......:..::::'•: -_--4.,:•.,• - :•1.. ..,...r..-•.:: .••••: ••-•'-• , 4_,.. .....:'.-..1'......-.•!i.::::, '''..-4:',?-;i0-'*Eilli- ,..'.'-`.4".-',L:
41r4......4
•. . .
. ... . • . .. ._ . ..
. . • 4: .4-
. .. ..• • 4-..., ...:•-•...., . •:-:'!•'. ••.:::.4. - :::- .:.; -'C'.4,4::.:•“......-.4''.... • .. - •'' :14'..IA: • :'..;''.,•,- ...:.4..:,....• ..2Z_'-'4.,.._) •
•‘ -,' ' • .•.. ..'..,. : •t...'.J.' :- • ' . •:::" ".. •.:.,.:.4-, .A: •,• 1 ,. k.,.1'7;•;',..,'. - .:••• . •':''. 12 2....a...:.:••••1::,...: •,--‹....-5. .•L-0i5k.a?-4.
1.•
. .. •
... .. . ., . •,i.,........:... - .... .., ..- .. .....:....-,,:-.....-....z..•••• •,•••'...- •
r • 4. 11 r . . . .
...,.::....:,-.7.-....1::: ....:f•-•.:.'...;'•;.:.-2-.;::','i• :.;•••• !::-::-.L:.'?i•A.--1..t.t.
'0 • 4'.":. . . .-:-
- ... - :
-- _- . . ...•..._ . ...: ....-•.-
r-
. -..•
.. F 1.._war-• -.--•'-•.-.---'-
) .. . •
• •'..'•
1 .1 : - .!..• ....-,i....:••...! •- •:.• • . -:. •:7!,..: • '...•:• •.".':'.'•-.:',.- . --• .. •:
.;::: ) ., .. • •
t.
. • '
. •
• . .
'.'...:.::".; .. • ... • ..:.
.. . •-•' :..:41,.."a4.,,IL''..1.•:4 .........-.A....16- .• .•-3/,..-........,-...... .7.. -., ........,.Of ?.
. ..K.A:=.'..i.'. -.';$. - ...._ 1- . ' .:.7574. --jr•"!-•-•.••••! :P-::-.-‘.':..,:.:•,b..-111:•:•.%:
. . • •
• • . •...V,''',..--:5; ti'...:•.1• '.1..-,; .3. 4•.:..-.--.....i';•-':•".:VI".:CI!:.7.c..•-l'i'illi,';:t.7-4i
.
.:• 1 •
• .
'. . • ..;.••••;%N;;••,•,'" • --ug,,,.2,...-,.•,:71,4.....'7, j;..0.:...:....:••:-.,k::1"..!"-..---,-..;?-..
•
' .
.••
.. • . .•- • ••: ' • .1. : -
..-
..../
•""•.•-r,.
... .
. A'-..-••. •••-•'••..,I.1:!.'. I ..• .- '. "...-''''C.-.2•1-4,
• • . . .
• • .. . • •
. . .. .
.. .
••
'."• 4•• \ . .•
\
.. . '':'''. '''- . . . • "-.' .• .. . - .'-. . '.•A.F.
.. i . .
.Ilk ..: • •••• . .. ..
. . • • ' 4
-..:
• •• -
. • ' .
. . . • 4.......!.,...
•
•:
. .
•"" v- • ' .
. ,.. .
.:: ....1(.! • •Si• '' •
1-.r._ •• . '
..,.•-.. - . ••-- • ' ••••• ‘ ''''
qt'*• '':''' . . .. , ... • •
' . .. •.'.
'''' '' '''::.1.-- - ''1.. • .
.•. ..
.• -...
-;.' . .11:.•:1: ';..:•.:. , ' ..
•:..--', .. ' ....• r 7 :'
•
. ...!.: • ' .•'.....'..?.' •••'• n'fr-1 ,1 ''''':::.' . , .
•/ ..•
• . . •
.. •
. . ' . .. • . .. .:
• .'
.:'4......‘-',,.:>i. ?:5:••,'• • . ...
•
, •
, -
.•' '••IP. .;'el . . • .,. •. . •.-. . .
• • , '
.. •, .
• •
• .
.. .'
. .... .., .
. .2
. .
4 ... . .. .
"..
. .
. •.:o:.'I'.'• .:..:::.:...-.. ...,. : ::,, -: . :.....,J.: .. .
• .
. .
' .
. •.
i):..21A 6.-.:'• .',' .%2...—7T1*.:j.••IigiO .
-er
. . . .
...... . • .
':, ''''' L*4''.././ I,& ..'•,:•.',- ... . Ig. ...: :...:. . . . .
•
• .
..
. .
• •
.•••!'... . •. •• ,.•.•.
..,:v... -
.1.4r . •
. •
• .
: . .
.1.t•
• • •:4-':••4. ..:
.•
:25::;: .jj2j.''T d• . Z.4.4.5•F 7.. c 1. ,4...4
' ••
• • •
.
.. . .. • •.. •- :
' -=:"....-- )..,..-,'.....'.:::::::.,.: ,....:..• •
. . • - . . . ..
. . r......r.,,,,s,:_ •-...,- :,.•...,...,... , • . .•
•• •f•:)..:. . , -..i..,...-.;..yr• • .
l . , . ..:.... ,•'-.-' •• •
.._. • .•.. --;:-••4'''''4:er,:•--•: . •_.:::. )5.'..e.0„•:-.'. . . ' • •1111100
..:....ii: . . ,.:•.,-
. AkIk• , •,.•
..,
. ..-
• .
••
. .•
. •
.• ' '.,. ig,..., - ..
..• *or. - , ,• e!‘ •-.. •
- ..
• . :,,N'le'
•- • • ..•': . . . :
. .•?:'.rl'.1 .1.Y.••••.•' ;: • ••• :••••-i
••V:iiii, Li•.• ::'' -;,,.-•
.•' . . . .
. . ... ..• : ....1 ZAig..-*...'.4,:....;j,_..i.'..
• ..,...-•,i.r.131 :
. ..... ........ .• ...,:"...:.7.......;i::,...........:...;:q.,,?...
...., ' \ •• a r,. .I.- , '. '
.: ..
. .•• ' '. Lit•4'.-':.-:: . . .:• ' .'....' .- : 'VA
^..,c,:-r'`..'• .07!:., !..v..., .
. .
r.
' " ..:S'...'.!..•'..;•.. . :..... .'44.e.....: ",!...
'7'i.::•*'L I.
....-i ...,..-......•1.,).. 'I:-::...;:••r:•14•. . f....
.....:.-.•.-- -.,.,-T.:•';...:-3 4'-• ' '. • .7' :%.,. .• ; l .i
' - .• .' :..- ..:••••••.:-
. .-.--•:' • ' ',:::-',-.`7.'1,.-..... ' •• . .!..,-,:•:-'-7. . 4.1. . .
. . • • • .•.: .....]:'..-,-;:-....'_.• •• •
• . _ - . . . .
• • . . .• . . ••• ' . ". !:::....A..4,T}L.5::•-17. 1
• -' • '.. 'I-. -
. . .-• • •"•-.'•,:!:'1 ''.: ' .
•
•.
• • .
1 ...4:.C.'.•,'.-!
• - ` . •..- •
•
.. .'..°54.::. .• . . . •.
.- _ .. '-.:. • . . . ,,
,p-,‘ . .
• !:••••••-•:..].........,... . '
•
fNQU1RY# 6408551.3
YEAR: 1961
. •
' ''' • :•• i•
. .
. - ..
,,,.•-•:,.••••
;..-., -....:.
=500 EDR' ,• ..oe°el ._1-4V;•,..'.-.. sr .:
-. -: ••I

•
a'
. . .. .:' asp •— •• ` % _, .+-• • 3- 3 # of
itt
: ''• ' � I! ' f* _ �� 1' r. I`' ; �. +.err f. .+ 5 µ _.
•
•
•
•
•
. -- .. N.-2-A. J (J i a' t $�r•. -'
•
'lf ,111-'• — i. '_ •J +I J' S �l Fit 7
. .. • •• . ..''.'_ • ..../5"lp l'''....i- . 4'.-04: ''.."7,4ii.v''. ALI,- r
•
•
•
r.. . . i 1-
•
• Fi ' _ .. r 4 'rsy .
`
" h' *,
yr& 1 • yK
•
• .
•
•
•
*# ti
ar.
4 .z
•
•
•
•
.. • sr
•
i 4 • '�i. •
+5
INQUIRY#:6408551.3 /� I N ,..,,.,. ••
�iJr
• .. 2, ,
YEAR: 1959 . • .
I =500' EDR • •
. Jr"! F

•
•
i�r '. : y , r j� +
tr
•
Yi! -
'�" ''•
'' '' IS .
'04.
•
L.
•
r ,
r
T•
•
•
lam' ; - �"T # _ tii I,,
4 'I{I. �tr l{'.
•
•
.r Y. • ? ..
INQUIRYkip _ .... - \
6408551.3 i ''ti....._ ,. ' :_ 1 ' _ ?i
YEAR: 1950 •. 4;':.�s• V., '..qP,•
CEDR . ..._ ._ _ . .
'
1

1 `.^^ i µ.., --e
e9 � a
{ � t�
.pfi j `[ ":"-L1 t''' _ ./ I '. i� fi q� s p
N ,
:�-.«1, gyEi R. �."fi F J �f '� .. •
Photo 1-Feature 4, downstream extent looking upstream
_- _
Photo 2-Feature 2, downstream extent looking upstream
White Farm Bank Parcel Development Plan(DWR ID#:2020-1665)
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020103 Photo Log

Photo 3—Feature 2 &Confluence of 2a, 2b,and 2c
_.. __.` J
Photo 4—Feature 3, downstream extent
White Farm Bank Parcel Development Plan(DWR ID#:2020-1665)
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020103 Photo Log

re-
Photo 5—Feature 3, looking upstream
a-_
' "f-
•
r � �s . pia 3 af4 3 4 c r'. -
"rw)t�� JSC
`�� • .z
\ k � r js
•i 0
Z4fi9 `a,�4
VAAA*No.W.., .4: ',,9.:_,t ,,_?:.
,,, „,...„:„.„,... .....,..„:. _, ..._.
�; ,, ,, ,., ,...,_
� ` '. d
ma t ~. 'c •-1
ice . .',, J ;:`.
Photo 6—Feature 1, downstream extent looking upstream
White Farm Bank Parcel Development Plan(DWR ID#:2020-1665)
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020103 Photo Log

Table 1.WHITE FARM,2020-1665,Project Credits
Tar-Pamlico 03020102 Project Area
19.16394 N Credit Conversion Ratio(ft2/pound)
297.54099 P Credit Conversion Ratio(ft'/pound)
Subject?(enter Total(Creditable) Convertible to Delivered Delivered
NO if Min-Max Buffer Initial Credit Final Credit Riparian Buffer Convertible to
Credit Type Location
ephemeral or Feature Type Mitigation Activity
Width(ft) Feature Name Total Area(ft)2 Area of Buffer
2 Ratio(x:l) %Full Credit
Ratio(x:1) Riparian
Credits Nutrient Offset? Nutrient Nutrient
ditch') Mitigation(ft) Buffer? Offset:N(Ibs) Offset:P(Ibs)
—
Buffer Rural Yes I/P Restoration 0-100 1,2,2a,3,4 1,392,810 1,392,810 1 100% 1.00000 N/A 1,392,810.000 Yes 72,678.687 4,681.069
Nutrient Offset Rural Yes I/P Restoration 101-200 1,2,2a,3,4 1,217,729 0 1 33% No — Yes 63,542.727 4,092.643
Nutrient Offset Rural No Ditch Restoration 20-29 4a 721 0 1 75% No — Yes 37.623 2.423
Nutrient Offset Rural No Ditch Restoration 0-100 la,2b,2c,2e,3a,4a,4b 579,649 0 1 100% No — Yes 30,246.859 1,948.132
Nutrient Offset Rural No Ditch Restoration 101-200 la,2b,2c,2e,3a,4a,4b 744,173 0 1 33% No — Yes 38,831.942 2,501.077
Totals(ft2): 3,935,082 1,392,810 1,392,810.000 205,337.838 13,225.344
Total Buffer(ft2): 1,392,810 1,392,810
Total Nutrient Offset(ft2): 2,542,272 N/A
Total Ephemeral Area(ft2)for Credit: 0 0
Total Eligible Ephemeral Area(ft2): 348,203 0.0% Ephemeral Reaches as%TABM
Enter Preservation Credits Below Total Eligible for Preservation(ft2):1 464,270 0.0% Preservation as%TABM
Total(Creditable)
Min-Max Buffer Initial Credit Final Credit Riparian
Credit Type Location Subject? Feature Type Mitigation Activity Feature Name Total Area(sf) Area for Buffer %Full Credit
Width(ft) 2 Ratio(x:l) Ratio(x:1) Buffer Credits
Mitigation(ft-)
Preservation Area Subtotals(ft): 0 0
TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION(TABM)
Mitigation Totals Square Feet Credits
Restoration: 1,392,810 1,392,810.000
Enhancement: 0 0.000
Preservation: 0 0.000
Total Riparian Buffer: 1,392,810 1,392,810.000
TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION
Mitigation Totals Square Feet Credits
Nutrient Offset: Nitrogen: 2,542,272
132,659.150
Phosphorus: 8,544.275
1.The Randleman Lake buffer rules allow some ditches to be classified as subject according to 15A NCAC 02B.0250(5)(a).
last updated 08/03/2020

APPENDICES
DWR Correspondence
NRCS Web Soil Survey Report
Environmental Records
USFWS—Species Report
SHPO Letter
FEMA Map
White Farm Bank Parcel Development Plan(DWR ID#:2020-1665)
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020102 Appendices

DocuSign Envelope ID:75DE5EAA-DF96-4401-B173-62A81EBD3E7B
STATE„„<--.'
n
ROY COOPER
:s
Governor _ !
MICHAEL S.REGAN . i ter.
Secretary x`p+a+"'°.*
S.DANIEL SMITH NORTH CAROLINA
Ofrecror Environmental Quality
January 22, 2021
DWR Project#2020-1665 (*replaces letter dated 12/22/20*)
Halifax County
Janet White Leggett
3609 Woodlawn Road
Rocky Mount, NC 27804
Mary Pat White Brady
162 Pine Branches Close
Winterville, NC 28590
Barrett Jenkins, Restoration Systems, LLC (via email at [e-mail])
Subject: On-Site Determination for Applicability to the Tar-Pamlico Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 02B
.0734)
Project Name: White Farm 125
Address/ Location: 31714 NC-125, Hobgood, NC
Determination Date: December 2, 2020 Staff: Rick Trone, Ernie Hahn
Mr. Jenkins,
On December 2, 2020, Rick Trone and Ernie Hahn of the Division of Water Resources conducted an
on-site review of features located on the subject property at the request of Restoration Systems,
LLC to determine the applicability to the Tar-Pamlico Riparian Area Protection Rules (15A NCAC 02B
.0734).
The enclosed map(s) depict the feature(s) evaluated. This information is also summarized in the
table below. Streams that are considered "Subject" have been located on the most recently
published NRCS Soil Survey of Halifax County and/or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic
(at 1:24,000 scale) map(s), have been located on the ground at the site, and possess characteristics
that qualify them to be at least intermittent streams. Features that are considered "Not Subject"
have been determined to not be at least intermittent or not present on the property or not
depicted on the required maps.
ANorth Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
�J��IIn 5l2 North Salisbury Street 11617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh.North caroling 27699-1617
Otpinm rr_-.::yin•.. t .
oepvu.�enter e,�.i�me„r.i WMr\ r 919,707.9004

DocuSign Envelope ID:75DE5EAA-DF96-4401-B173-62A81 EBD3E7B
DWR#2020-1665
Halifax County
Page 2 of 4
This determination only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any
activity within buffers or within waters of the state. There may be other streams or features
located on the property that do not appear on the maps referenced above. Any of the features
on the site may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and
subject to the Clean Water Act.

DocuSign Envelope ID:75DE5EAA-DF96-4401-B173-62A81EBD3E7B
DWR#2020-1665
Halifax County
Page 3 of 4
Subject Depicted
Feature Depicted on
E/I/P/Other* to Buffer Start @ Stop @ on
ID Rules Soil Survey USGS Topo
Culvert located on
1 I Yes northern project Highway 125 X
boundary
2 I Yes Northern project Highway 125 X
boundary
2-A I No Confluence of 2-B&2-C Feature 2
3 I Yes Northeastern project Highway 125 X
boundary
Confluence of ditch at
4 I Yes approximately 36.054918 Highway 125 X
—77.415055
(I)E=Ephemeral,I=Intermittent,P=Perennial,NP=Not Present,NE=Not Evaluated,NA=Not Applicable
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or
affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWR may request a determination by
the Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) calendar days of the date of this
letter to the Director in writing.
If sending via U.S. Postal Service: If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.)
DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Supervisor Supervisor
1617 Mail Service Center 512 N Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Raleigh, NC 27604
This determination is final and binding as detailed above unless an appeal is requested within sixty
(60) calendar days.
This letter only addresses the features on the subject property and within the proposed project
easement and does not approve any activity within buffers or within waters of the state. If you
have any additional questions or require additional information, please contact Rick Trone at (919)
707-3631 or [e-mail]. This determination is subject to review as provided in Articles
3 &4 of G.S. 150B.
Sincerely,
LDocuSigned by:
'Peztti
949D91BA53EF4E0...
Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Enclosures: USGS Topographical Map, NRCS Soil Survey, Site Map
cc: 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch files

DocuSign Envelope ID:75DE5EAA-DF96-4401-B173-62A81EBD3E7B
DWR#2020-1665
Halifax County
�-� Page 4 of 4
Legend e a -
• • Map 1. Provided by "y,,,.: , - 5.�` .{;.
. CI Subject Fee-Simple Parcel �,:� %F::'•:, ns. 4 " ' � ..
[� F Restoration Systems, LLC '" Ipi .` .,, Y�
Conservation Easement Site +f-T30 Acres � .'' �p
White Farm Features • '�, —_
Dimon A - .ma_ lk r d
Swale „ ..
.', r� ;
..ti : `f''} _ .,_4-....‘‘'.4 - r .�'�Jci _ r
Contour _ ,Ty - ,
y 1-Foot OL2 LiDAR •
Y k. _
tY� FWlilla[
iiffr
•
f yyQ 8{ _ 4_ - .
71. • I - __. \ • • ...,±:(
•. , . -• .. — \ % atZiEt - .r; .1.0!z
p .
y
iike. ':''r
• } neurasy. • ;— � '� '
• ra
\'
({{-[}y °ten„°
Y J
-air. — �w '`
•
.. it "� -_'• _ _ ..._'•.RESTORATION SYSTEMS,LLC '=°1E '•-n...i — c White Ferm
- v),tri,.78cn T a r
nTE2.. I 13-Zrio Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site
rxE¢nnew
F{iCFE •1an5.a.m EVIE wr+rF.rro Post-Viability Site Visit Overview
•
_ cu 4w 755I& 2
Lci wniria inci.:03acr.-.201.10 _r.T..ri
- C ri d.6 as .x •w.

DocuSign Envelope ID:75DE5EAA-DF96-4401-B173-62A81 EBD3E7B
White Farm 125
Halifax County, NC-DWR Project # 20-1665
'ix? R ail
iF____4i. , --......4
oA
, GoA Go +
_
GoA LyA A,
.,�. RaA
i it
.P.s NoA
Go}
120
1
No A
fa of., w
NoA GoA No stream features depicted
•
4 on this map
9:0k ir,-
totir
~ A01111101111:11: EyNoA
GrA
O
..N% '4 Alli
e
B" 00 LyA
ill • Esc,
11
GnA _ •
NoA oA J ESA NaA
RaA Go 4
GI o A
C5\\.._
G.o NSA LyA NaA
BaAA
GoA 4 i
ir NoA oA
:ill
181
•
NRCS Soil Survey Sheet 21 am_ y ;
Halifax Co NC 2006p '
���I 4':-4'
:� _�� ::Locations are approximate
Legend: =-
and are provided for refer-
4 , .A ence only:: RIt
-project boundary r— I : r r

DocuSign Envelope ID:75DE5EAA-DF96-4401-B173-62A81EBD3E7B
White Farm 125
Halifax County, NC-DWR Project # 20-1665
1:Subject @ culvert located on northern
':-.,::s. .b. 1\ 4 project boundary to Highway 125 /—______-_
J'.
2:Subject @ northern project
boundary to Highway 125
2-A: Intermittent @ confluence of 2-B
&2-C to Feature 2 (see Map 1)
1,,,/,„„F/7- fl 1.''\\''' — -5 1 I\\ =
0 1
3:Subject @northeastern project
7------ 1- , Th!.., - boundary to Highway 125
I CI
1
Y
---------,..\\._51!
.
1 i
•—)ALL 41,_
r — -- —
C\--)
S,
, \\''----')
c
4:Subject @ confluence of ditch at approximately
I
36.054918—77.415055 „ __
R I
�
J . I 5
11/7/
\ f
[JiGS Topographical Map
Hobgood Quadrangle 2019 b � p '
'4?. i 1! ::Locations are approximate
s and are provided for refer-
Legend: sliii ence only:: t
-Project boundary

DocuSign Envelope ID:AE3834E3-908A-49FD-B4D3-CC7E42E6B2FE
::- STf+7f.:u��
ROY COOPER 14 - "'
{; .
Governor � .
MICHAEL S.REGAN .-
ri- iz 0.l+-
Secretary ` +"19�I
S.DANIEL SMITH NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
February 9, 2021
Barrett Jenkins DWR#2020-1665
Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St, Suite 211
Raleigh,NC 27604
(via electronic mail: [e-mail])
Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation&Nutrient Offset—White Farm 125 Site
Near 31714 NC-125
Lat., Long. 36.059133, -77.421170
Tar-Pamlico 03020102
Dear Mr. Jenkins,
On November 3, 2020, Katie Merritt, with the Division of Water Resources (DWR), received a
request from you on behalf of Restoration Systems, LLC (RS) for a site visit near the above-
referenced site in the Tar-Pamlico River Basin within the 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code 03020102.
The site visit was to determine the potential for riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offset within a
proposed Easement Boundary, which is more accurately shown in the attached maps labeled"White
Farm 125 Overview"prepared by RS and edited by DWR. On December 2, 2020, Ms. Merritt
performed a site assessment of the subject site. Staff with RS were also present.
Ms. Merritt's evaluation of the features onsite and their associated mitigation determination for the
riparian areas are provided in the table below. This evaluation was made from Top of Bank(TOB)
and landward 200' from each feature for buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(effective November 1, 2015) and for nutrient offset credits pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
Feature Classification 1Subject 6Riparian Land uses Buffer 'Nutrient 4'5Miti¢ation Type Determination w/in
onsite to adjacent to Feature Credit Offset riparian areas
Buffer (0-200') Viable Viable
Rule
1 Stream Yes Non-forested agricultural Yes Yes Non-forested fields-Restoration Site per
fields with downstream See note See note 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
partially within a DOT
R.O.W Note:No credits are allowed within the
DOT R.O.W
la Ditch No Non-forested agricultural No Yes Non-forested fields-Restoration Site per
>3'depth fields 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
2 Stream Yes Non-forested agricultural Yes Yes Non-forested fields-Restoration Site per
fields with downstream See note See note 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
partially within a DOT
R.O.W Note:No credits are allowed within the
DOT R.O.W
r -4 North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
`J) 512 North Salisbury Street 11611 Mail Service Center I Raleigh.North Carolina 27699-1611
r:r�i,�r era iN..
oepv, E&E,nn�mewi m.aag 919,707.9000

DocuSign Envelope ID:AE3834E3-908A-49FD-B4D3-CC7E42E6B2FE White Farm 125 Site
Restoration Systems,LLC
February 9,2021
Feature Classification 1Subject 'Riparian Land uses Buffer 'Nutrient 4'5Miti¢ation Type Determination w/in
onsite to adjacent to Feature Credit Offset riparian areas
Buffer (0-200') Viable Viable
Rule
2a Stream No Non-forested agricultural Yes Yes Non-forested fields-Restoration Site per
fields 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
2b Ditch No Non-forested agricultural No Yes Non-forested fields-Restoration Site per
>3'depth fields 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
2c Ditch No Non-forested agricultural No Yes Non-forested fields-Restoration Site per
>3'depth fields 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
2d Ditch No Non-forested agricultural No Yes Non-forested fields-Restoration Site per
>3'depth fields 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
2e Ditch No Non-forested agricultural No Yes Non-forested fields-Restoration Site per
>3'depth fields 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
3 Stream Yes Non-forested agricultural Yes Yes Non-forested fields-Restoration Site per
fields with downstream See note See note 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
partially within a DOT
R.O.W Note:No credits are allowed within the
DOT R.O.W
3a Ditch No Non-forested agricultural No Yes Non-forested fields-Restoration Site per
>3'depth fields 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
4 Stream Yes Non-forested agricultural Yes Yes Non-forested fields-Restoration Site per
fields with downstream See note See note 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
partially within a DOT
R.O.W Note:No credits are allowed within the
DOT R.O.W
4a Ditch No Non-forested agricultural No Yes Non-forested fields-Restoration Site per
>3'depth fields 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
4b Ditch No Non-forested agricultural No Yes Non-forested fields-Restoration Site per
>3'depth fields 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
4c Ditch No Non-forested agricultural No Yes Non-forested fields-Restoration Site per
>3'depth fields 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
Swales Swales No Non-forested agricultural No No none of the swales assessed were creating
fields non-diffused flow
'Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondence dated January 22,2021 using the 1:24,000 scale
quadrangle topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent printed version of the soil survey map prepared by the NRCS.
2The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent(25%)of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 0295(o)(5)and 15A NCAC 0295(o)(4). Site cannot be a Preservation Only site to comply with this rule.
3NC Division of Water Resources-Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer
Establishment
4 Determinations made for this Site are determined based on the proposal provided in maps and figures submitted with the request.
5 All features proposed for buffer mitigation or nutrient offset,must have a conservation easement established that includes the tops of
channel banks when being measured perpendicular and landward from the banks,even if no credit is viable within that riparian area.
6The area of the mitigation site on ephemeral channels shall comprise no more than 25 percent(25%)of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(7).
Page 2 of 3

DocuSign Envelope ID:AE3834E3-908A-49FD-B4D3-CC7E42E6B2FE White Farm 125 Site
Restoration Systems,LLC
February 9,2021
Determinations provided in the table above were made using a proposed easement boundary showing
proposed mitigation areas shown in the map attached. Maps representing the proposal for the site are
attached to this letter and are initialed by Ms. Merritt on February 9, 2021. Substantial changes to the
proposed easement boundary could affect the Site's potential to generate buffer and nutrient offset
credits.
This letter does not constitute an approval of this Site to generate buffer and nutrient offset credits.
Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295, a mitigation proposal and a mitigation plan shall be submitted to
DWR for written approval prior to conducting any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or
surface waters for buffer mitigation credit. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703, a proposal regarding a
proposed nutrient load-reducing measure for nutrient offset credit shall be submitted to DWR for
approval prior to any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters.
All vegetative plantings,performance criteria and other mitigation requirements for riparian
restoration, enhancement and preservation must follow the requirements in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to
be eligible for buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation credits. For any areas depicted as not being
viable for nutrient offset credit above, one could propose a different measure, along with supporting
calculations and sufficient detail to support estimates of load reduction, for review by the DWR to
determine viability for nutrient offset in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
This viability assessment will expire on February 9,2023 or upon approval of a mitigation plan
by the DWR,whichever comes first. This letter should be provided in any nutrient offset,
buffer, stream or wetland mitigation plan for this Site.
Please contact Katie Merritt at(919) 707-3637 if you have any questions regarding this
correspondence.
Sincerely,
DocuSigned by:
Pie Woipaki,
949D91 BA53EF4E0...
Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
PW/kym
Attachments: White Farm 125 Overview Map
cc: File Copy(Katie Merritt)
Page 3 of 3

DocuSign Envelope ID:AE3834E3-908A-49FD-B4D3-CC7E42E6B2FE
_ Legend .# ,,`4,
' •
f co
��
o � TM
White Farm Features
dos , ', . - Feature 1
-41,1 � -'t k. , lk .., 4� '' �: .. fib, ;,4`� i`: It
lk
2�9�2021 C. :, _.�y. \1 y � I?in -:.^ "` _ , _i -4)114- 3:1 ;,:+.w h 04,; � .,A r
t''''' ' ' . '4 ' '''.. _,..,,,,,,,,lit.,, ...;.e.. ,:,,,,,.,,,,i.. ,-„4,,,;is.,-..,.,„ ,,,
3,,,,,
Contour `x u „ 41. • r •
$ isr•
- ' _ s
"t' : �" "aa '°� f -�'.ti �` *a "` ,qs �, 2,
n
7.,-,,,'---'-':' • ,,N.--4.,_•,c4i4,,,,-rA=t*-. -"k--..w.:-1-,•#,';-,6.4.`,-..., h.-.-.-,4,.-1,-,k'''"fr`''''''..' - , , ., .
'
,z a:: 4 * F
e
t'
a ' ,4 v
x � 'Nit ys � i ' aid
glaDM
•
Feature 2
-C. ---" .,,it. . . , .,'0:::fri:;::-.1.-...:! ti.d.,_;;..,
R
.. . :. - _ - -
,rc
•
-� :.
•
4.,. - w Swale w
Ogii
. ,,,:: .Feat
Tire
\" 8 '''' ‘`-,',8-v-44.,\2.'-40144',.
5 Feature 4 o
re 3
111
Fe
.. _ N at4�e "' �'.•�. r p ; Er.'Lr .Y;,y,•
; 4lE
. s A .p
5
,. '-,..'1a ?-6' �
R RESTORATION SYSTEMS, LLC —�--Z White Farm 125
i� Overview
RESTORA11OV` , ? SYSTEMS I LLG
° °I V,, ^ . v A . , *r" .- . .._.. ' .,- :a r: _ ' ' ia _ s

Ray Holz
From: Ray Holz
Sent: Friday,December 11,2020 2:42 PM
To: Katie Merritt-NC DENR-DWR([e-mail])
Cc: Trone,Rick V; Barrett Jenkins;Josh Merritt
Subject: White Farm-Additional Data
Attachments: White Farm_Feature 2_2-C_and 2-E Topo Detail_.pdf;White Farm_Overview_.pdf
Katie—Following up on our White Farm viability site visit last week, I have attached a revised overview map and a
detailed topo figure for the upper portion of Feature 2, including ditches 2-C and 2-E. Please do not hesitate to give me a
call to discuss.
Best,
Raymond Holz
Raymond J. Holz 1 Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St. Suite 211 1 Raleigh, NC 27604
tel: [phone] cell: 919.604.9314 1 fax: [phone]
email: [e-mail]
1

�. : -,- am.-,•,- , o� - .df - 'r., .-., :r- c,r. ;:, . 5✓'.:c pJ ., '- ,a' . wr. ... ' ..:... S .'+rk..>4 '3 - - yG �v -:fi.ea-
6.
Legend =, . ;�g `6. � .;� ; ; e ,a•Y k $ --.
ro m. .
a
`t'•'��:> .: ^B'.-.`;: ..'�i. . 'a ib"Alti ''... '� vey•ib, vs['. -�� �^-r�'MCA t. d,8 - 7��' v��c - ��� ... .. __
'ir,,44 ,
4.
�- .-..,
White Farm Features �. . .:... �.. r
:,, 1,: �;. f: t " ;=' Feature
y01
;,i'i` • - ::' '�aaj,ti `rIP*Yy:•' - rgr. '7c •.< y'{,.s,._.,.'.vy `-
44.
,v � .e Cam:: ,.} .� •
4.:F , ' ;: ;.;` ! G`� -• - ,a '.3da yy n'c�. .<-:,-::-,F..s �. ;' r•: c� "� ;':mom.
•
.-e�-. t' }T�_,.-•'.' re: .'Y ,�vk.'I:-'At'',#�;��.33rri,,.-.E:«,- V• .•r .: '`;"Y� •
t
�'i}d. ' 'Jvr 4T
\filorip
.. .�•. :; ' _ " �'� .�? .moo`.
„ 3,i ---, ,.."Oi,7',.'':''i..'','',,...',4-,"''-';-..,'t',"?''.''.Yo,-,'4P.,"1,.&.'N.,,,4-*1",,..-,,A,,,V.7,4.1.,,,,-.,'4.4-1--.1,-'.'r.o4---...r,....44:i.,,f.,.,...„.'.,,Pi,..,.-•-'-.:1,:,m‘",-f,-t-,_-:_',„;.-.#"..,',."-'.'i..'',,,z•.i•-',f...-.,:,,•-.„t;.,',z,-a,---,;.',.-,'N.•.•„-•'.,-r',.-.I,-t.,....4..4i„o:1I
x,
,•• ' •.r: ... r s r,,rr - b , ,wry b Feature 2 .4 9 ;<
rat :" n h. a ° ' p
,.. I 1 iir.kkHi,., _.'..,•••••,,' ,....-:,':
t9',..%,-•:-•,...0"'''2" -01k ..•.` •:
ml
9
Ali
•,„ Feature 2 rsir',,a---., it.
0 MOO-, r'2'7,-.., ,r0-41-z.L'-',..;:-',L,_.J.;
,�•' '�":,' Wes"
"lc**w- , .16
k
•� . ', ', .
r � ,r.fir
Y <: ;;; 11
,4
�.,..< -.
. 1. tt•l ,
di
swale
Ly
. „ am .
s. .: e -.�,k., ... .,N. ...�':; 8
. , ,
Feature 3
y
.,....,-7.2,,,,;:.4c-ee 'Pp"
...
Feature' M1'.
: r . ', .''Z''''''' ."IttktrAt;')If"•P'''.. ' :i*'
,. -,• --.r--•-, r•:��`> � . at4Pe ', :' x",n 4 �.�`,' „. ''�} _ •4 r'�;' lY;�=yr
4,4
-„-ci _ _
6'
-N .,r s,, • �_ y:�r. - _ - °�`,,
:y. �'C • ,.:3�^i„�' _ -.•y'�'�-•^� sda•.n...w��,:to ism:@ +army:....:et'r3`:.,>ta.![i:..___3K,'iC�aS'?I"�r.:..^.e-_!� N:'.W1p1�.ZL4:_,es.: --gym - W - _
F.. RESTORATION SYSTEMS, LLC —,z White Farm
g
Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site
• I
Post-Viability Site Visit Overview
Y` .i RESTORATION
>, I- .:, -- --- ...-."---'----. ..---- SYSTEMS I LLG
Y -_ 'yam -mot[• +'�.�,�g�
�'t.. "�,�y z�r , h` "'�H' �„' - ."��£ .q f."X1: i 'fi ,,,..

Legend ° i ,,.r 91-5 • t o
• 1• 0 . . . ' 92 fP 4 Q •,a
1 ° ° • o+a
Y f\ o ° a . '
47 O • b a • I 1 O, ,, .e• • :f.'�:O qeV.p • ,., o!°QD of(
• o In
White Farm Features ° •� 1 • ` o e °, o e e ' • 11a o•i
i Q 92.0 I�- • b• sQe . a1
• . Ail
•
' fd' as .• •.• .tr A • ..
0
• f •r 6• t •4 v 000°� v -
It
p: e: b.
• ff
1 0
QL2-Lidar_D05_37_20486402_20141231.asc • ° o • � �
Value ° c . li 5,• , • b o
Milk • I� ? \ - V
92.5
-�- `' f 'V`` v-i.5 :?torA '„,k 1 ; •gyp �" •� •'' �'
••r �O . •
90 O 1 • V" I p • �ls
r • p• O Q A. �•
91:0 • 1,'n b ` 4 ° ° Y" ° 0 0
lir rolplip.r-
•
CO•
V C/ • ' p:Feature
92.5 �ll'�� •�1 ° •r '• e• 92.0° NI• qQ• 1 oo B p C�F a rp D�,. — ° - 91.5 0 � ;m92.5' '° ;�e•c•a r ,of• Oa d
47 0
�' • 2 �� CV.. ' ~ill°• �o• cc _ '
. •-IA * 91:5 if -.
) I t( . • • I: CO
ro
•
I C 4;.ii: b•-0.-''"."'"...14 f?•?ZfV (4'' '' ..*• • ••
• J
•o ►9 a5
�? 92.0 o�° v '
►°920
n �
°t o 91.0 92.0 1° • .
1 d q.: 91.5 , 'Cp _ • I • - ao-
l‘t i) . _ V 0 ''‘,›
-0 0e9
•
92.0 �� [[ 1
t+ ,, 'e r 0 • ;�^' fL ` •' • o 1 ° , b° o• A b o ��re„ 0'V•p
_ . 1 1 9'2.51.v° ; 4 . m 0 . 1 o I • ,fc., .1-.-: O.
'�F1n ' -C �• A o p f P p d 9
st:
o 41:4.
92:5p eature 2 °R 1:-..:0:
rrtoo '„• • - F - a • ' ' _ 4�D• °® As oq,A1, b ' f 92�0 91.5 '+ ._- p '� •'fZ�. vopf•0 ° •o ' °�' ��. -aO•P, F 93.03.0 ° o tier �� • a '! 1 0 ▪ 4f7•.
. 1 ...a,
. , •
' eat4 9 " . 92 0o aI 93.0 _ w
�� fP o
°itrAl‘
,sy
7\\\t)1
° °4Qifa 92.5 :•,00:•
A sn• 1 4 ' 1, P �i ° Q C' • 0 • •
d• 'DO k ,YY. • • 0,�,93.0. N.�^ -r o_ _o 9 4 �o
e ' 1 ' , , • 1/ �° `v�f • • p , ° r.4. ° 0 �1 '1. 1`d O 0 � oo D
0.
•
• f s 1
•
4, .•. .101:
•
i93:0 f •o, P • a •� AP' 108 • ' • 6 93a5 .;• S• �f •
.i -°• •° o •
-
•
'° is d °� 1. ' ° 1 ° 1 ' 1 f ♦-• y
r�•. pp �j a
• O e �; ° , , +, �' p 1 �1 e' ' • • '0•4.a 0 ° f ° ' i Q • • bS't `n°0O� ' ,▪ o
(� •
RESTORATION SYSTEMS, LLC -z White Farm • b°t.•,i lb 4;• • • • .t 0o •
•
litij Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site 1
Feature 2, 2-C, & 2-E Detailed Topo 1 '�'0 •ojo '1 I 9 I
:: A. p Q •_.o • 0
O °I
RESTORATION 4' , °4g IA ,94' - b a o o '
SYSTEM'.I LE - , 1 1 , ? b•llin r V • ' °
L\ •1 hh 3 ITitlUO •1• /• y1 l° •� 4 � ' /" 'c J- /•• • f •
fa 4 'p ,a be A° 1'. °� 1 �1• a�°�� a 4 f o

United States
Department of
Agriculture
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Halifax County,
North Carolina
White Farm Soil Report
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
March 9, 2021
Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs)or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist(http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nrcs142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
2

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone] (voice)or(202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
3

Contents
Preface 2
How Soil Surveys Are Made 5
Soil Map 8
Soil Map 9
Legend 10
Map Unit Legend 11
Map Unit Descriptions 11
Halifax County, North Carolina 13
EmB—Emporia fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes 13
GoA—Goldsboro fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 14
GrA—Grantham loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes 15
LyA—Lynchburg fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Southern
Coastal Plain 16
NoA—Noboco fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 18
RaA—Rains fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Southern Coastal
Plain 19
References 22
4

How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil
5

Custom Soil Resource Report
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
6

Custom Soil Resource Report
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.
7

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
8

Custom Soil Resource Report
a Soil Map
281300 281500 281700 281900 282100 282300 282500 282700 282900
36°4'6"N k 36°4'6"N
8 �' FS
�� L�qA -- ,. �RaA
GoA
tr
®Ca, ra
''� G rA 1
r
a GoA I � ,
— GoA '
3 Y �r^
��•�/• ,
ci
c)
1. / r —a
O. V
g
N
Rua
1
•
�'
4 RaA --, �--
•
' I 101' -§
•
.41.4
1 . ,
_ .\.
8 i0 G ap� 1M��'bQ da0od as i-Guoos ale._ ., ;,o' - -
36°2'54"N • 1 I
...
PI 4 ` 36°2'54"N
281300 281500 281700 281900 282100 282330 282500 2Ft2/10
3 3
�1 Map Scale:1:10,800 if printed on A portrait(8.5"x 11")sheet. �
N Meters N
0 150 300 600 900
Feet
0 500 1000 2000 3000
Map projection:Web Mercator Corner aoorrlinates:WGS84 Edge tics:UTM Zone 18N WGS84
9

Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest(AOI) j Spoil Area The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
Area of Interest(AOI) Stony Spot 1:24,000.
SoilstiTi Very Stony Spot
0 Soil Map Unit Polygons Warning:Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Wet Spot
P. 0 Soil Map Unit Lines Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
6. Other misunderstandingof the detail of mapping and accuracyof soil
• Soil Map Unit Points pp 9
Special Line Features line placement.The maps do not show the small areas of
Special Point Features contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
Blowout Water Features scale.
Streams and Canals
14 Borrow Pit
Transportation Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
Clay Spot Rails measurements.
1--1--F
• Closed Depression
O.10 Interstate Highways
Gravel Pit Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
w rap US Routes Web Soil Survey URL:
4 Gravelly Spot Major Roads Coordinate System: Web Mercator(EPSG:3857)
•
• Landfill Local Roads Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
Lava Flow Background projection,which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area.A projection that preserves area,such as the
Ada Marsh or swamp 1. Aerial Photography Albers equal-area conic projection,should be used if more
• Mine or Quarry accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
• Miscellaneous Water This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
• Perennial Water of the version date(s)listed below.
Rock Outcrop Soil Survey Area: Halifax County,North Carolina
▪ Saline Spot Survey Area Data: Version 23,Jun 4,2020
Sandy Spot Soil map units are labeled(as space allows)for map scales
Severely Eroded Spot 1:50,000 or larger.
40, Sinkhole Date(s)aerial images were photographed: Mar 15,2016—Oct
Slide or Slip 26,2017
• Sodic Spot The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps.As a result,some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
10

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
EmB Emporia fine sandy loam,2 to 6 16.1 6.2%
percent slopes
GoA Goldsboro fine sandy loam,0 to 61.6 23.7%
2 percent slopes
GrA Grantham loam,0 to 1 percent 51.1 19.6%
slopes
LyA Lynchburg fine sandy loam,0 to 32.6 12.5%
2 percent slopes,Southern
Coastal Plain
NoA Noboco fine sandy loam,0 to 2 74.2 28.5%
percent slopes
RaA Rains fine sandy loam,0 to 2 24.6 9.5%
percent slopes,Southern
Coastal Plain
Totals for Area of Interest 260.2 100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
Halifax County, North Carolina
EmB—Emporia fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3sm7
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Emporia and similar soils: 88 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Emporia
Setting
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, ridges on marine
terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder, summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap- 0 to 10 inches: fine sandy loam
E- 10 to 17 inches: fine sandy loam
Bt1 - 17 to 43 inches: sandy clay loam
Bt2-43 to 58 inches: clay loam
C- 58 to 80 inches: clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 36 to 54 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 8.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
GoA—Goldsboro fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2v751
Elevation: 130 to 270 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Goldsboro and similar soils: 83 percent
Minor components: 17 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Goldsboro
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional):Talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap- 0 to 7 inches: fine sandy loam
E- 7 to 12 inches: fine sandy loam
Bt- 12 to 54 inches: sandy clay loam
Btg-54 to 82 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Moderately well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 24 to 36 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 8.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Norfolk
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
Landform position (three-dimensional):Talf
Down-slope shape: Convex, linear
Across-slope shape: Convex, linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Lynchburg
Percent of map unit: 7 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional):Talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
GrA—Grantham loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3smg
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Grantham, drained, and similar soils: 80 percent
Grantham, undrained, and similar soils: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Grantham, Drained
Setting
Landform: Broad interstream divides on depressions, broad interstream divides on
flats
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Concave, linear
Parent material: Loamy and silty marine deposits
Typical profile
A -0 to 6 inches: loam
Eg- 6 to 11 inches: loam
Btg- 11 to 77 inches: loam
Cg- 77 to 110 inches: loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high (0.20
to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 to 12 inches
15

Custom Soil Resource Report
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: High (about 10.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Grantham, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Broad interstream divides on depressions, broad interstream divides on
flats
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Concave, linear
Parent material: Loamy and silty marine deposits
Typical profile
A -0 to 6 inches: loam
Eg- 6 to 11 inches: loam
Btg- 11 to 77 inches: loam
Cg- 77 to 110 inches: loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high (0.20
to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: High (about 10.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
LyA—Lynchburg fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Southern
Coastal Plain
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2vx8m
Elevation: 20 to 200 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 64 to 70 degrees F
16

Custom Soil Resource Report
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Lynchburg and similar soils: 82 percent
Minor components: 18 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Lynchburg
Setting
Landform: Marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional):Tread
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap- 0 to 8 inches: fine sandy loam
Bt- 8 to 50 inches: sandy clay loam
Btg-50 to 68 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 6 to 18 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Low(about 4.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Goldsboro
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional):Talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Rains, drained
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Carolina bays on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces, broad
interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip, talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
17

Custom Soil Resource Report
Rains, undrained
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Carolina bays on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine
terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip, talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
NoA—Noboco fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3smw
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Noboco and similar soils: 90 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Noboco
Setting
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap- 0 to 10 inches: loamy sand
E- 10 to 13 inches: loamy sand
Bt- 13 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 30 to 40 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 7.1 inches)
18

Custom Soil Resource Report
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 1
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
RaA—Rains fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Southern Coastal
Plain
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2v75b
Elevation: 30 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Rains, undrained, and similar soils: 70 percent
Rains, drained, and similar soils: 16 percent
Minor components: 14 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Rains, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, carolina bays on marine terraces, broad
interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip, talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
A -0 to 8 inches: fine sandy loam
Eg- 8 to 13 inches: fine sandy loam
Btg- 13 to 72 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: High (about 9.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
19

Custom Soil Resource Report
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Rains, Drained
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, carolina bays on marine terraces, broad
interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip, talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap- 0 to 8 inches: fine sandy loam
Eg- 8 to 13 inches: fine sandy loam
Btg- 13 to 72 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 24 to 36 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: High (about 9.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Minor Components
Lynchburg
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional):Talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Pantego, ponded
Percent of map unit: 6 percent
Landform: Flats, broad interstream divides
Landform position (three-dimensional):Talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Concave
Hydric soil rating: Yes
20

Custom Soil Resource Report
21

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres 142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nres142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/
detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084
22

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nres142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nres142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.nres.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nres142p2_052290.pdf
23

White Farm
HWY 125
Hobgood, NC 27843
Inquiry Number: 6381184.4
February 25, 2021
EDR Historical Togo Map Report
with QuadMatchTM
6 Armstrong Road,4th floor
CEDIT Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com

EDR Historical Topo Map Report 02/25/21
Site Name: Client Name:
White Farm Restoration Systems, LLC
HWY 125 1101 Haynes Street CEDR
Hobgood, NC 27843 Raleigh, NC 27604
EDR Inquiry# 6381184.4 Contact: JD Hamby
EDR Topographic Map Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by
Restoration Systems, LLC were identified for the years listed below. EDR's Historical Topo Map Report is designed to assist
professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDRs Historical Topo Map
Report includes a search of a collection of public and private color historical topographic maps, dating back to the late
1800s.
Search Results: Coordinates:
P.O.# Barrett Jenkins Latitude: 36.060911 36° 3' 39" North
Project: White Farm Longitude: -77.418023 -77° 25' 5"West
UTM Zone: Zone 18 North
UTM X Meters: 282217.03
UTM Y Meters: 3993410.45
Elevation: 94.00' above sea level
Maps Provided:
2013
2000
1962
Disclaimer-Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources,Inc.It cannot
be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources.NO WARRANTY
EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED,IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT.ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES,INC.SPECIFICALLY
DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES,INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE
OR PURPOSE.ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER.IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES,INC.BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,
WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS,NEGLIGENCE,ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE,FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE,INCLUDING,
WITHOUT LIMITATION,SPECIAL,INCIDENTAL,CONSEQUENTIAL,OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES.ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES,INC.IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT.Purchaser accepts this Report"AS IS".Any
analyses,estimates,ratings,environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only,and are not intended to
provide,nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding,or prediction or forecast of,any environmental risk for any property.Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.
Additionally,the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2021 by Environmental Data Resources,Inc.All rights reserved.Reproduction in any media or format,in whole or in part,of any report or map of
Environmental Data Resources,Inc.,or its affiliates,is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos(including Sanborn and Sanborn Map)are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources,Inc.or its affiliates.All other trademarks used herein
are the property of their respective owners.
6381184 - 4 page 2

Topo Sheet Key
This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets.
2013 Source Sheets
Hobgood
2013
7.5-minute,24000
2000 Source Sheets
Hobgood
2000
7.5-minute,24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1954
1962 Source Sheets
:; --1;.'',,,- . il
' IT
Hobgood
1962
7.5-minute,24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1954
6381184 - 4 page 3

Historical Topo Map 2013
1
r .,,,� , ) �� c; ,, , �- n Bras
_ / ,�
p) ,,,,_ _,..----,,, ; r/ ( —44_____
Leggett 1 ® �% ``
l House Gem„__, ''-___)/ / ,_ _, -,\,,. , L�� A _ �
�/ /
�`-� izeu C m� 'Th �, 1 �,
i
) ) ! / r
•, .. „
1 , , ._ , _.) ,„... •_.,
1 / ,--1 7 „•_••,,
-/---- \ „
1, , ..., „ ..,
_ __(_ _„. ,„..
i r ,
S
/ ! \ . , ...,„
\ „
, • i ( �5�,,, , . , , , ,
., , i-, / / l 1 )
I J 1 ���\�c �� ,
�� �
a
-'=;`
:��_ ,� L� �� i' . , � �/
f L C.
� ✓ I �v-. ,) ��, , y, I
--\,./
l � (C �� � ,t1RR �
' — V\N _�, �5 \ // A ,.
l
J \`\\I\\ ,��l._4- Ja•
mes Cem JR � /
V — %
(/'''.„)
/ I '\- — .',1 Tj7r--) ( V
., I ''') 1 \ I \c / (
II \ // 1
—� \__. ( � 5 � Hagan
z: ,
) \, \\_
. .___%,')
This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
NW N NE
TP,Hobgood,2013,7.5-minute SITE NAME: White Farm
ADDRESS: HWY 125
W E Hobgood, NC 27843 1
CLIENT: Restoration Systems, LLC
-.N.
SW S SE 6381184 - 4 page 4

Historical Topo Map 2000
1
_� - fl
J U u /
- { 1 lzs / I u /
A hill?. v-PP-? 7 ...,
v`�
, fig V,
— l� 1,
.._./kgrovionor __. _ _ _
` Mi ,.
e11111Y"lily
I� ? .
_ �;� Cam �=j \ I Y
illAm../::
i___, . ____„
,_ ,
- 4_ , ____ , ___,
c ' illthill- -.- .41t.14ii ."/ '
...- - i' / 4. ______.. .6\ 1 ___,
u 1
Iti
11
_ . _. ___
, =- _--- 0
AI
rii isr& . (.)175 4. 7.,\ /
iti
IRIW--—-
L..„----,-__N,.......4\----07:94?
h� Ili:\
}
I \ 9 qr
,.
)16
~ _� � te-s a -'\ \.",�� ��/ : -- --- ---.
_ . /i _ . lui
Tr
'' I s
(--Nly,,.7.,____._-4,7:._7.,,--,-4' :: _
\ \ , /gy ,-
/ ____U
j,p 7..---%-,- -4---- i-g- , ...,R i,_ _1::„\___.., 94
4) Qtr- _______71.‘i .
\\\''\--7 _ .75 .,i
it )'="---'It';'' -thl --' ,....% i N-'(-j_17---7' \ , j71 . ___.. 1 c.
No, . 1-.--_--- ---- mr. - , ..........L__. ,,,,,.„
,_, , _.,„_-_..-- _---_ mir ----- . . 4 a mes•.--------- ',' ; ' '''''''''i-....)) -----"
-r4 yc
C -ter 1 4- 7-1 -- -- i,,\ AVc '
.1!
,:It I
''--\ -4'
III ,:‘: 6_
i _ -+L- _ I . ) -
;1 I'16 ft1..4.1..1 4.N.,10
I-)IhI„Ij.._kI,.2..
'-go'.--i,-)m)-4-A-•),,..,\-.?"_5A--l\i
11(14
1,.!V..... ----= ..... 1%," -'"-- -'- ""
(------) P -.7,,,,._-..- -4.... .41 : 0,,;,.. 1
grvir ciw .----
-- .:'\----- ''''\ -(jj
.-7,0,,il Ls., ,),, , j J.._ 14y- -±,_. — -0- , iii 7'51 .,_ L---\.__,,,..
,1 ,,, 4 /(....--, \ ,-- --.._ -.--_- Fr I e
, hi, „.. \ •._:// i
This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
NW N NE
TP,Hobgood,2000,7.5-minute SITE NAME: White Farm
ADDRESS: HWY 125
W E Hobgood, NC 27843
CLIENT: Restoration Systems, LLC
-.N.
SW S SE 6381184 - 4 page 5

Historical Topo Map 1962
1
. _._Lr.
f LV .•95j\ �1 .. �i .,/,
. 14. ,..
, „(:)___.., /
pli., ...„.___
ti______..
,I .
y ` —�, -_... .
;.
..
,,.,, ..$
_ ,
, .
_..,. . .,
. _,,
. 4..illi
— e I f , I fl
Leggett House ' +�
— 7 D
. - •--;) ----7,t,„,
A ., , __
.•01.-
t
l
111
- c.
) 4 , i
-°�- 0 _ .9 ` ✓�
11
1 ..
- / \ �
Wr
/ —a' .�
li
((('
_ _ .. /y'g�
/ 171'1' 0 (": i\i't,'"
Ott
; ---\ -51r
- :., /-
1 H. \_4. .t .
ilt,--) , .: ,___1'
' f -,) --.7- -'-__:.- ,•_' - 7..11 -, . ,�1a mes. 93—`
,. C. ,y/ _ C e 71 \ • '--
,--,---,- :-_...._ IV'•' -, , k , ..
\ ,.. s;.„, _- _,...._\-,-„,_ ,f...:,-_.„_ ._._.,._._,___
_„;
, r, '''-'-. ' -., •.•-•-1.-.- 4.-
1_--,,._--.=,-.--=''.----''------''--.''..,..)' .)I 6.:4_,,..-...1.1''.-__ -•::-•6 6---a.7-..-26.-,.,,. _,,,,.— ! i
1 • tia I
.. _ n II -. - C 'I; •j
._ s II
l II ..- "r -ram .x - i t
A
A
This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
NW N NE
TP, Hobgood, 1962,7.5-minute SITE NAME: White Farm
ADDRESS: HWY 125
W E Hobgood, NC 27843
CLIENT: Restoration Systems, LLC 11
-.N.
SW S SE 6381184 - 4 page 6

FiSei
United States Department of the Interior #�
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh,NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To: February 15, 2021
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2021-SLI-0677
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01460
Project Name: White Farm
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act(Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information.An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally-listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally-protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or

02/15/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01460 2
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally-listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally-protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act(16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/
eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy
guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and
bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://
www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/
towers/comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].

02/15/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01460 3
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List

02/15/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01460 1
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

02/15/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01460 2
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2021-SLI-0677
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01460
Project Name: White Farm
Project Type: LAND - RESTORATION/ENHANCEMENT
Project Description: Nutrient Offset Project
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/@36.07426035,-77.4521585630457,14z
"y5r�
Io bae•r
Counties: Halifax County, North Carolina

02/15/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01460 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 5 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheries1, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Amphibians
NAME STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi Proposed
There is proposed critical habitat for this species.The location of the critical habitat is not Threatened
available.
Species profile:http5://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Fishes
NAME STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus Proposed
There is proposed critical habitat for this species.The location of the critical habitat is not Endangered
available.
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528

02/15/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01460 4
Clams
NAME STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni Proposed
There is proposed critical habitat for this species.The location of the critical habitat is not Threatened
available.
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Tar River Spinymussel Elliptio steinstansana Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1392
Yellow Lance Elliptio lanceolata Threatened
There is proposed critical habitat for this species.The location of the critical habitat is not
available.
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4511
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

:.r
RESTORATION
SYSTEMS I LLC
February 25, 2021
Renee Gledhill-Earley,
Environmental Review Coordinator
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
109 East Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Sent electronically to [e-mail]
Re: White Farm Mitigation Project, Edgecombe County, NC
Dear Renee,
The purpose of this letter is to request written concurrence from the State Historic Preservation Office
(SHPO) for the Elm Grove Mitigation Project in Edgecombe County, a Nutrient Off-set Mitigation Bank
servicing the Tar-Pamlico River Basin. Please review and comment on any possible issues that might emerge
with respect to SHPO from a potential stream restoration project depicted on the attached mapping.
Project Name: White Farm Mitigation Project
Project Location: 31714 NC-125, Hobgood, NC
Project Contact: JD Hamby, Restoration Systems LLC, 1101 Haynes St. Suite 211,
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project Description: The project has been identified for the purpose of providing in-kind mitigation for
unavoidable nutrient loading impacts. Permits from the NC DWR will be obtained to restore riparian buffer
areas that drain into waters of the US. Soil and erosion control permits will also be obtained. The project
encompasses 96.38 acres of agricultural fields,currently used for row crops.All 96.38 acres of riparian buffer
area will be replanted in native hardwoods.
The term "cultural resources" refers to prehistoric or historic archaeological sites, structures, or artifact
deposits over 50 years old. "Significant" cultural resources are those that are eligible or potentially
eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. Evaluations of site significance are made
with reference to the eligibility criteria of the National Register(36 CFR 60) and in consultation with the
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO).
Field visits were conducted in the fall of 2020 to conduct evaluations for presence of structures or
features that may be eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. One structure was identified
within the parcel boundaries, but not withing the proposed conservation easement boundaries, that
may be eligible for the National Register, SO:HX0436:James A. White House.This farmhouse will not be
impacted nor disturbed during the course of our project, and a buffer around the structure will be

implemented in the field during the planting process. In addition to field reviews for historically relevant
structures, a records search was conducted at the SHPO office to determine if documented occurrences
of historic structures or artifacts occur within, or adjacent to the Site. The SHPO records identify the
James A. White house feature within the parcel boundaries and five features within a 1.0-mile radius of
the Site.
• SLD: HX0437: W. King White House (Gone)
• SO: HX0435: White-Savage House
• SD: HX0439: E.A. Walston Tenant House (Gone?)
• SO: HX0438: White School
• SO: HX0475: Roadside Housing Development
Typical SHPO coordination will occur prior to construction activities to determine if any significant
cultural resources are present; however, no constraints are expected at this time. We thank you in
advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please feel free to contact me with any questions
that you may have concerning the extent of site disturbance associated with this project.
Yours truly,
RESTORATION SYSTEMS, LLC
1/7/
JD Hamby
Project Manager
[e-mail]
919-755-9490
Attachments—USGS Map, Existing Conditions

\\., k 1E: ii. r
Legend 31 / k t kiy,
c--.....75‘- II k/.-_��
I V
k r
\ White Farm -Subject Fee Simple Parcel `I� ,v k + y — t
f =���—
•
OWhite Farm Proposed Easement: 96.38 Ac. }V l ` r _ fI h
Fr %
O NC DWR Stream Determinations , ' 1} I' RESTORATION
, P _ •-.11.4, 1 , �i, .
SYSTEMS LLC
,,,,,,„/ -
'------ ---------' - '' l ' LI IF t.
„-----------,
- . - - '41.i. f.) ,, Pre ared for:
y---\\::
, . ,1
, c .
• k , . - D \, 1 Division o f
- t- 4 -irl 4 4 —
4: 1 II `� , \i Water Resources
• I i V y k
i' 9" J 1 401 8� Isolated
.„.„,
k ri iv IV . 'V ' k f Wetlands/VVaters
L. t k 1162 Feature 1 fp;� , Program & 401
�{ rr4 l Subject at culvert located on ��_ `
t - 1 northern project boundary ` r + Stormwater
V t r1 kl 10; r SIT �`- �N ' C, r' Project:
k iv k k k , i , ,
sv
..- oo- —qui! r-M,
—�`� ,3. '+ WHITE FARM
l+' Feature 2 ,, " `• NUTRIENT OFFSET
+ � ., Subject at northern
(Av''I ---1 --- ---k—I
144._ � f�i . project boundary MITIGATION BANK
k k I •h I . t ---- ',.) ! • ' ~••��' • - ,1 fr PARCEL
+
r/ • /yam-.. /r _
J_4` I{ ---F,�rl �,i f,_LI i �-4
4 -( ti `
-V---- — \ — /— ) ;1 \ 0 Halifax County, NC
�� •
+, i ; — — _ �jG� 1
,. \:\ Title:
L Feature 4b
Topographic break 1
USGS MAP
�. Feature 2a
•
Subject at confluence 2019 Hobgood, NC
Q :L_____._____ . .. of 2b&2c
C . . •••••••'''''''' rd.—,\ I _ _ Ai& .
1\ CN)
j ms-
3ce
i '`
Feature 3 Drawn by:
Subject at northeastern RJH
Q12) eN ji c \\\. r "00,, Feature 4 6 1 project boundary
Jç2 Subject atV C Date: MARCH 2O21
•
? confluence of 4b
Li .
Scale:
�—.• • •• �� 1:12,000
N
P1 Project No.:
".".. ....1-....------- —i 1 ..IN. _ . Illir
1 k
1`7:1
21-003-1
__.„..--------- „,.., .,_ ,4 .4„,
FIGURE
. '1"1.-4,-,,
1
, fill '
(1:1' x.,-,/ 4
— „ V ` Feet
--/------n v ` 1 0 480 960 1,920 2,880 3,840

Legend co'‘o�
O Y c
1-
5RESTORATION SYSTEMS, LLC - z
White Farm - Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site
'� Easement Review
RESTORATION
SYSTEMS I LLC

National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette FEMA Legend
77°25'44"W 36°4'7"N SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT
W
+ tql:F , wig Without Base Flood Elevation(BFE)
4 + ` il + ■ i•+3 + f+ - Zone A.V,A99
SPECIAL FLOOD With BFE or Depth Zone AE,AO,AH,VE,AR
r ■ III tal
..
y f #44, 111! HAZARD AREAS Regulatory Floodway
1 , , _S _ f',,
ftli
• OF
■ fi • 0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard,Areas
- ' ' } . f• • r r )11,11.
of 1%annual chance flood with average
I it • depth less than one foot or with drainage
• areas of less than one square mile zone x
i +� 1 1 Future Conditions 1%Annual
Chance Flood Hazard zone x
" Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to
OTHER AREAS OF Levee.See Notes.Zone X
M. • FLOOD HAZARD �� Area with Flood Risk due to Leveezone D
NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard zonex
or l
r ..rl
' Effective LOMRs
OTHER AREAS Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard Zone D
i ' _ _ m y GENERAL ---—- Channel,Culvert,or Storm Sewer
■ STRUCTURES I I I 1 I I I Levee,Dike,or Floodwall
0 20.2 Cross Sections with 1%Annual Chance
tZ•s Water Surface Elevation
HALIFAX COUNTY AREA OF MINIMAL FLOOD HAZARD 8— — — Coastal Transect
2.1.
+
370327 �' « ,��ww.. Elevation Line(BFE)
Limit of Study
Jurisdiction Boundary
- --- Coastal Transect Baseline
- _ w 4 N. 17C�1 F}al0 � OTHER _ — Profile Baseline
FEATURES Hydrographic Feature
\ , t'1t- ,/i/'011)
* Digital Data Available N
No Digital Data Available
IL
MAP PPAANELS Unmapped
* .
The pin displayed on the map is an approximate
point selected by the user and does not represent
an authoritative property location.
lir 1r,
11
- it 4 This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of
1 • " a digital flood maps if it is not void as described below.
9111' The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap
ilk .9
accuracy standards
■ The flood hazard information is derived directly from the
It authoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA.This map
bt y i * Fillir was exported on 3/18/2021 at 3:05 PM and does not
• reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and
•
time.The NFHL and effective information may change or
•
become superseded by new data over time.
r.
- This map image is void if the one or more of the following map
111 yl * "' elements do not appear:basemap imagery,flood zone labels,
'+ legend,scale bar,map creation date,community identifiers,
i FIRM panel number,and FIRM effective date.Map images for
Feet 1:6,000 77°25'6"W 36°3'38"N unmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used for
0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 regulatory purposes.
Basemap:USGS National Map:Orthoimagery:Data refreshed October,2020

National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette FEMA Legend
77°25'18"W 36°3'37"N SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT
I Without Base Flood Elevation(BFE)
• - 1* Zone A,V,A99
With BFE or Depth Zone AE,AD,AH,VE,AR
F SPECIAL FLOOD
�, HAZARD AREAS Regulatory Floodway
k, _
,- 0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard,Areas
of 1%annual chance flood with average
+ depth less than one foot or with drainage
ow- . areas of less than one square mile zone x
%
w ChanceFuture FloodConditions Hazard1 zoneAnnual x
• F" Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to
IP , T OTHER AREAS OF Levee.See Notes.zone x
- ,, . e FLOOD HAZARD �� Area with Flood Risk due to Leveezone D
.P.
NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard zonex
• Effective LOMRs
OTHER AREAS Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard Zone D
GENERAL ---—- Channel,Culvert,or Storm Sewer
STRUCTURES 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Levee,Dike,or Floodwall
1
w 4 1
.4
5 20 2 Cross Sections with 1%Annual Chance
1Z s Water Surface Elevation
•
I .� Oy AREI F Nl I NI N1AL FLOOD HAZARD a— — — Coastal 2.1.•'1[ + ro Base Flood Elevation Line(BFE)
Limit of Study
I Jurisdiction Boundary
+ --- Coastal Transect Baseline
OTHER _ — Profile Baseline
FEATURES Hydrographic Feature
L'It- 7/312001 i 1
* I
mseilien#F
II I
Digital Data Available N
H
No Digital Data Available
MAP PANELS
9 Unmapped The pin displayed on the map is an approximate
point selected by the user and does not represent
an authoritative property location.
t This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of
digital flood maps if it is not void as described below.
lir
! The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap
1111 accuracy standards
•
The flood hazard information is derived directly from the
authoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA.This map
was exported on 3/18/2021 at 3:06 PM and does not
�' !it
reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and
time.The NFHL and effective information may change or
become superseded by new data over time.
This map image is void if the one or more of the following map
elements do not appear:basemap imagery,flood zone labels,
legend,scale bar,map creation date,community identifiers,
77°24'40"W 36°3'8"N FIRM panel number,and FIRM effective date.Map images for
Feet 1:6 000 unmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used for
0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 regulatory purposes.
Basemap:USGS National Map:Orthoimagery:Data refreshed October,2020

ATTACHMENT
E—Bells Bridge Bank Parcel Development Package

BANK PARCEL DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE
BELLS BRIDGE NUTRIENT OFFSET AND BUFFER MITIGATION BANK PARCEL
A BANK PARCEL
TAR—PAMLICO RIVER BASIN
DWR ID#: 2020-1664
}� —
�__ . _ _a..
ii
_ aG': _ Y-..1''}:, "max-. ��•yF . - ::r'._-"-.r"if . .._ ._ * __
yyy+ - .
. . . ,._
. ._.
'•.fir el'`.'"�.� •y./ _ . . ..
• •
1.
^'..`°�� -mot.i" :ir :;t•� .., :;..fi'' 7�� • ...
6.
0
am�'�aa,, .._ - t ". _ • '1 .Vl 9'• •, _ •�-0 • .z' ' �
`�' Ham'rl - I9.. '!�' .-- - 4y, - `:%}• ' eke _ = v 1. .1r'._. :gip« _a cw, } t:°
S, [i_ •,'.. .yam _ `rti il,.A'.) ^Y„ e Y :`' -? _ -r'Y' 1
•
;c,.r Imo 31..'! dti .� .' ��• pr• ,- .' •.. • y _k..
s.i. a-i!5i.e, .r. __+.. n3_ =4:. L. y:�.��•, r�Y `�' i• tin Y, ,!f-,—
i >t' .c .'`.GC1'i :: a'•�'.�•:o:..' .'.7:3"^.',F� '.sYS":..• -. r fa• <•:. f 6,•i, ...
Bank Parcel Sponsor
Restoration Systems, LLC
12POCr�
: Raymond Holz ([e-mail])
Ph: 919-755-9490
RF.STOR,1Tle?ti 1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
sra1LMSILLC Raleigh, North Carolina 27604

BANK PARCEL DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE
BELLS BRIDGE NUTRIENT OFFSET AND BUFFER MITIGATION BANK PARCEL
A BANK PARCEL
March 18, 2021
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction 1
2.0 Mitigation Project Summary 1
2.1 Project Goals 1
2.2 Existing Parcel Conditions 2
2.3 Watershed Characterization 3
2.4 Soils 3
2.5 Geology 3
2.6 Existing Vegetative Communities 4
2.7 Threatened and Endangered Species 4
2.8 Cultural Resources and Significant Natural Heritage Areas 4
2.9 FEMA Floodplain Compliance 4
2.10 Parcel Location, Parcel Constraints, and Access 4
2.11 Other Environmental Conditions 5
3.0 Site Protection Instrument 5
4.0 Mitigation Work Plan 5
4.1 Parcel Preparation 5
4.2 Riparian Area Restoration Activities 5
5.0 Monitoring and Maintenance Plan 6
5.1 Monitoring Protocol 6
5.2 Parcel Maintenance 7
6.0 Financial Assurances and Long-Term Management 7
6.1 Financial Assurances 7
6.2 Long Term Management Plan 7
7.0 Mitigation Potential 8
8.0 Credit Release 8
9.0 References 8
Bells Bridge Bank Parcel Development Plan(DWR ID#:2020-1664) Table of Contents pg.i
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020102

TABLES
Table 1—Ecological and Water Quality Goals
Table 2—Project Attributes &Timeline
Table 3—Project Features
Table 4—Project Soil Types and Descriptions
Table 5—Bank Parcel Fee Simple Ownership
Table 6—Proposed Hardwood Bare Root Planting Plan by Species
Table 7—Summary of Mitigation Credits
Table 8—Credit Release Table
FIGURES, EXISTING CONDITION PHOTOS, DWR MITIGATION CREDIT TABLE
Figure 1—Vicinity Map
Figure 2—Service Area
Figure 3—Site Map
Figure 4—USGS Map
Figure 5—NRCS Map
Figures 6, 6A, 6B—Credit and Monitoring Map
Historic Arial Imagery— EDR
Parcel Photos—Existing Conditions
DWR Mitigation Credit Table
APPENDICES
DWR Correspondence
NRCS Web Soil Survey Report
Environmental Records
USFWS—Species Report
SHPO Letter
FEMA Map
Bells Bridge Bank Parcel Development Plan(DWR ID#:2020-1664) Table of Contents pg.ii
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020102

Bank Parcel Development Package
Bells Bridge Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
Halifax County, NC—Tar-Pamlico River Basin
1.0 Introduction
The Bells Bridge Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel ("Parcel" or "Site") is proposed under
the terms and conditions of the White Farms Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Banking Instrument,
made and entered into on by Restoration Systems, LLC (RS), acting as Bank Sponsor
(Sponsor), and the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ), Division of Water
Resources (DWR). The Parcel shall be planned and designed according to the MBI, 15A NCAC 02B .0731,
15A NCAC 02B .0703, and the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295.
Located in Halifax County North Carolina,the project encompasses 45.35 acres of existing riparian buffer
and land utilized for row crop production. The project will restore the riparian areas along two (2)
unnamed tributaries and one (1) surface water conveyance (ditch) with hydrologic connection to the Tar
River. The primary purpose of the Parcel is to provide nutrient offset credits for stormwater and
wastewater requirements within the United States Geological Survey(USGS) Cataloging Unit 03020102.
The Parcel is located between Scotland Neck and Hobgood, approximately 1.5 miles east of the town of
Roseneath in Halifax County, NC (Figure 1). Two sisters, whose maiden names are Janet and Mary Pat
White along with their spouses are the current fee-simple owners of a single tract of land associated with
the Bank Parcel,which has been historically and is currently used as agricultural fields with minimal areas
currently existing as forested wetlands and riparian buffers. The Parcel is within the Tar-Pamlico River
Basin 14-digit USGS Cataloging Unit 03020102070030 of the Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain (North Carolina
Division of Water Quality [NCDWQ] Sub-basin Number 03-03-04) (Figure 1).
DWR representatives conducted an onsite determination for parcel applicability and suitability on
December 2, 2020. A Stream Determination letter for the Parcel was provided on January 22, 2021 and a
Site Viability for Buffer & Nutrient Offset letter was provided by the Division on February 16, 2021. Both
letters are provided in the attached appendix.
2.0 Mitigation Project Summary
2.1 Project Goals
The major goals of the proposed nutrient offset project are to provide ecological and water quality
enhancements to the Tar-Pamlico River Basin by restoring the riparian area to create a functional riparian
corridor. Specific enhancements to water quality and ecological processes are outlined below in Table 1.
Table 1: Ecological and Water Quality Goals
Goal Objective
Nutrient input will be decreased by filtering runoff from the agricultural fields
Decrease nutrient levels through restored native buffer zones.The off-site nutrient input will also be
absorbed on-site by filtering flood flows through restored floodplain areas,
where flood flows can disperse through native vegetation.
Bells Bridge Bank Parcel Development Plan(DWR ID#:2020-1664) Pg.1
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020102

Table 1: Ecological and Water Quality Goals (Continued)
Goal Objective
Sediment from off-site sources will be captured by deposition on restored
Decrease sediment input floodplain areas where native vegetation will slow overland flow velocities.
Decrease water temperature Planted riparian trees will shade the streams as they mature reducing thermal
and increase dissolved
pollution.
oxygen concentrations
Create appropriate Buffer areas will be restored by planting native vegetation.
terrestrial habitat
Permanently protect the
project Parcel from harmful A conservation easement will be recorded on the Parcel.
uses
2.2 Existing Parcel Conditions
The proposed buffer restoration and nutrient offset project includes approximately 45.35 acres of open
agricultural fields along unnamed tributaries to Deep Creek. The agricultural fields are currently being
used for row crop production including cotton, corn, and peanuts.The farmer regularly applies fertilizers
and herbicides to the fields (Figure 3).
Site features predominantly originate on site and all drain to Deep Creek less than 1 mile downstream.
Review of historic aerials show the property has been historically and consistently utilized for row crop
production.
Table 2: Project Attributes&Timeline
Project Name Bells Bridge Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site
Hydrologic Unit Code 03020102
River Basin Tar Pamlico
Geographic Location(Lat, Long) 36.073328°,-77.453896°
Site Protection Instrument(DB,PG) To be recorded
Total Credits 42.345 Acres
Types of Credits Riparian Buffer, Nitrogen,and Phosphorous Offset Credits
BPDP Date December 2021
Initial Planting Date February 2022
Baseline Report Date March 2022
MY1 Report Date December 2022
MY2 Report Date December 2023
MY3 Report Date December 2024
MY4 Report Date December 2025
MY5 Report Date December 2026
DWR performed an onsite visit of the Parcel to determine applicability to the Tar-Pamlico Buffer Rules
(15A NCAC 02B .0734)and viability to provide nutrient offset credits on December 2,2020.A copy of both
the "On-Site Origin Determination for Applicability to the Tar-Pamlico Buffer Rules" and "Site Viability for
Bells Bridge Bank Parcel Development Plan(DWR ID#:2020-1664) Pg.2
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020102

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset" are provided in the attached appendices. A Summary of their
determinations, specific to Parcel Features, is show in Table 3, and correlated with stream segments as
labelled in Figure 3.There have been no changes to land use in the project area since DWR's site visit.
Table 3: Project Features
Feature Name Feature Type Buffer Credit Viable Nutrient Offset Credit Viable
A Stream Yes Yes
D Stream Yes Yes
Ea Ditch>3'depth No Yes
Eb(at DWR point) Stream Yes Yes
2.3 Watershed Characterization
The Parcel is located within USGS HUC 03020102 and DWR Subbasin 03-03-04. Features drain to Deep
Creek which is classified as C and NSW by DWR. Class C waters are designated for recreational use,
agriculture,fishing and fish consumption,and the maintenance of biological integrity for wildlife.The NSW
designation applies to surface waters that are experiencing excessive growths of microscopic or
macroscopic vegetation.
The Parcel topography,as indicated on the Hobgood, NC USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,shows
gently sloped areas throughout the Parcel (Figure 4). Land uses draining to the project reaches are
primarily agriculture with some forested use.
2.4 Soils
The Parcel is mapped by the Halifax County Soil Survey. Project soils are described below in Table 4. An
image of the paper copy of the 2006 Soil Survey of Halifax County is provided in Figure 5. A custom soil
report is provided in the appendix.
Table 4: Project Soil Types and Descriptions
Soil Name Description
BoB Bonneau loamy fine sand,0 to 4 percent slopes
CbA Chastain and Bibb soils,0 to 1 percent slopes,frequently flooded
EmB Emporia fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
GoA Goldsboro fine sandy loam,0 to 2 percent slopes
LyA Lynchburg fine sandy loam,0 to 2 percent slopes,Southern Coastal Plain
NoA Noboco fine sandy loam,0 to 2 percent slopes
RaA Rains fine sandy loam,0 to 2 percent slopes,Southern Coastal Plain
Ud Udorthents, loamy
Source:https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm
2.5 Geology
The Parcel is in the Inner Coastal Plain physiographic province.The landscape is characterized by flat lands
to gently rolling hills and valleys. Parcel elevations range from 74 to 96 feet above sea level. The Coastal
Plain largely consists of marine sedimentary rocks comprised of sand, clay, and limestone that formed
through the deposition of estuarine and marine sediments within the last 140 million years. According to
Bells Bridge Bank Parcel Development Plan(DWR ID#:2020-1664) Pg.3
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020102

the Geologic Map of North Carolina (1985), the underlying geology of the proposed mitigation site is
mapped as the Yorktown and Duplin Formations. The Yorktown Formation is described as fossiliferous
clay with varying amounts of fine-grained sand, bluish gray shell material commonly concentrated in
lenses, mainly in areas north of the Neuse River.The Duplin Formation is shelly, medium to coarse grained
sand and sandy marl.
2.6 Existing Vegetative Communities
Existing vegetation within the Parcel is primarily comprised of active row crop fields of cotton with narrow
streamside thickets as show in the attached site photos.
2.7 Threatened and Endangered Species
The NC Natural Heritage Program (NHP) database and the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) database
were searched for federally listed threatened and endangered plant and animal species in Halifax County,
NC. Five species,the Neuse River Waterdog,Carolina Madtom,Atlantic Pigtoe,Tar River Spinymussel,and
Yellow Lance are listed or proposed for listing as federally endangered or threatened species. Restoration
Systems performed pedestrian surveys of the Parcel in December 2020 and determined there was no
suitable habitat for the species. The USFWS Self-Certification Letter and USFWS concurrence is included
in the appendix.
The presence of conditions or characteristics that have the potential to hinder restoration activities on
the Parcel were evaluated. The evaluation focused primarily on the presence of hazardous materials,
utilities and restrictive easements, rare/threatened/endangered species or critical habitats,the potential
for hydrologic trespass, and existing utility easements. Existing information regarding Parcel constraints
was acquired and reviewed including an Environmental Records Report developed by Environmental Data
Resources Inc. which located no evidence of environmental risk associated with the Parcel (Appendices).
In addition, any Parcel conditions that have the potential to restrict the restoration and implementation
were documented during the field investigation. As a result of our review and field surveys, no known
Parcel constraints exist that may hinder proposed restoration activities. Potential constraints reviewed
include the following;
2.8 Cultural Resources and Significant Natural Heritage Areas
There are no existing structures in the project area or on the larger tract of land.SHPO was contacted with
request for review and comment on February 25, 2021. All communication with SHPO is included in the
appendix.
2.9 FEMA Floodplain Compliance
No grading activities are proposed in the floodplain, so a floodplain development permit will not be
required. No hydraulic modeling is proposed for this project.
2.10 Parcel Location, Parcel Constraints, and Access
The Parcel is in rural Halifax County, near the town of Hobgood (Figure 2). The Parcel is accessible for
construction, monitoring, and long-term stewardship from Bells Bridge Road (Figure 3). An access road
and associated access easement will be detailed in the final conservation easement survey and recorded
at the Halifax County Register of Deeds. DOT right of ways, powerlines, and associated easements will be
excluded from the conservation easement.
Bells Bridge Bank Parcel Development Plan(DWR ID#:2020-1664) Pg.4
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020102

2.11 Other Environmental Conditions
An Environmental Data Resources, Inc(EDR) Radius Map Report with Geocheck was ordered for the Parcel
on February 25, 2021. Neither the target property not the adjacent properties were listed in any of the
Federal, State, or Tribal environmental data bases searched by EDR. The executive summary of the EDR
report is included in the appendix.
3.0 Site Protection Instrument
The land required for planting, management, and stewardship of the mitigation project includes portions
of the larger tract of land listed in Table 5. The Parcel will remain in private ownership, protected in its
entirety bay an approved DWR long term steward and will be managed under the terms detailed in an
approved DWR conservation easement. Per the Site Viability Letter, the conservation easement will be
transferred to the DWR approved long term steward prior to the first credit release.
Table 5: Bank Parcel Fee Simple Ownership
Owner Name Parcel Number NC PIN# Acreage
Janet White Leggett and Mary Pat
Brady and spouses 1000405 4854-00-79-1252 360.95
4.0 Mitigation Work Plan
The project will restore agriculturally impacted land in the Parcel footprint to a forested riparian corridor,
protected in perpetuity, improving the ecological function of the area.The project design will ensure that
no adverse impacts to wetlands or existing riparian buffers occur. Figure 6 illustrates the conceptual
design for the Parcel.
4.1 Parcel Preparation
The land use within 200 feet from the top of bank of the project features is either forested and will not
be impacted or has been maintained as cleared for crops. Areas slated for restoration will require little
site preparation because the land has been maintained in agriculture. Site preparation will include select
herbicide treatments and/or limited mechanical clearing to remove undesirable vegetation. Where
needed, invasive species will be selectively removed and/or spot treated by a licensed pesticide
applicator. Any drain tiles found in the conservation easement area during survey and/or planting of the
project will be sealed.
4.2 Riparian Area Restoration Activities
Riparian area restoration will involve planting appropriate native tree species along the riparian corridor.
Vegetation management and herbicide applications may be needed over the first few years of tree
establishment in the riparian restoration areas to prevent encroachment of undesirable species that may
out-compete the planted native vegetation. Tree species planted across the riparian areas of the Parcel
will include a mixture of the species listed in Table 6.
Bells Bridge Bank Parcel Development Plan(DWR ID#:2020-1664) Pg.5
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020102

Table 6: Proposed Hardwood Bare Root Planting Plan by Species*
Common Name Scientific Name %of Total Planted Trees
River birch Betula nigra 10%
Persimmon Diospyros virginiana 10%
Tulip poplar Liriodendron tulipifera 10%
Red mulberry Morus rubra 10%
Black Gum Nyssa sylvatica 10%
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis 10%
Pecan Carya illinoinensis 10%
Swamp chestnut oak Quercus michauxii 10%
Water oak Quercus nigra 10%
American elm Ulmus americana 10%
*Note:Species availability may result in the substitution of regionally appropriate native species.
Trees will be planted at a density sufficient to meet the performance standards outlined in the Rule 15A
NCAC 02B .0295 of 260 planted trees per acre at the end of five years of monitoring. No one tree species
will be greater than 50%of the established stems.An appropriate seed mix will also be applied to provide
temporary and permanent ground cover for soil stabilization and reduction of sediment loss during rain
events in areas without existing herbaceous cover. Planting is tentatively scheduled for February 2022.
5.0 Monitoring and Maintenance Plan
5.1 Monitoring Protocol
Permanent vegetation monitoring plots will be installed and evaluated within the riparian buffer
restoration and nutrient offset areas to measure the survival of the planted trees. The plots will be
randomly placed throughout the planted riparian areas. A total of 29 plots (2% of the restoration credit
generating area) will be established within the riparian restoration areas (Figure 6, 6A, and 6B). The size
of individual quadrants will be 100 square meters.
Vegetation assessments will be conducted and follow the Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) Level 2
Protocol for Recording Vegetation (2008). A reference photo will be taken from the southwestern corner
of each of the 29 plots. Photos will be taken from all photo points each monitoring year and provided in
the annual reports.All planted stems will be marked with flagging tape and recorded.
Planting is scheduled for February 2022. The first annual monitoring activities will commence at the end
of the first growing season,at least five months after planting has been completed and no earlier than the
fall season. Species composition, height, and survival rates will be evaluated on an annual basis by plot.
The total number of volunteer woody stems will also be documented and reported. The measure of
vegetative success for the parcel will be the survival of at least four native hardwood tree species, where
no one species is greater than 50%of the established planted stems,and an established density of at least
260 planted trees per acre at the end of monitoring year five.Appropriate and desirable native volunteer
species may be included in the Parcel's density to meet the performance standards with DWR approval.
Restoration Systems shall submit the annual monitoring report to DWR by December 315Y of each year for
five consecutive years and will follow the terms and conditions of the White Farms Mitigation Banking
Instrument(MBI).
Bells Bridge Bank Parcel Development Plan(DWR ID#:2020-1664) Pg.6
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020102

5.2 Parcel Maintenance
If the Parcel or a specific component of the Parcel fails to achieve the success criteria outlined in Section
5.1, adaptive measures will be developed and/or appropriate remedial actions will be implemented. Site
maintenance will be performed to correct any identified problems on the Parcel that have a high likelihood
of affecting the project success. Such items include, but are not limited to, fire, flooding, drought, or
insects that cause excess tree mortality.Any actions implemented will be designed to achieve the success
criteria and will include a work schedule and updated monitoring criteria. Any parcel maintenance
performed will be included in the monitoring report for that year.A rigorous herbicide schedule may need
to be implemented in the first few years of tree establishment in the restoration areas to prevent
establishment of invasive species that may out-compete the planted native vegetation. The only
herbicides used on the Parcel will be aquatic approved herbicides that will be applied in accordance with
North Carolina Department of Agriculture rules and regulations.
The easement boundary will be checked annually as part of monitoring activities. Easement boundary
conditions as well as any maintenance performed will be reported in the annual monitoring reports to
DWR. If mowing is deemed necessary by the Sponsor during the monitoring period, the Sponsor must
receive approval from DWR prior to conducting any mowing activities within Tar-Pamlico Buffer Zones 1
and 2 to ensure that no buffer violations have occurred.
6.0 Financial Assurances and Long-Term Management
6.1 Financial Assurances
Following approval of the White Farm Mitigation Site Bank Parcel Development Package,the Sponsor shall
provide a Performance Bond from a surety that is rated no less than an "A-" as rated by A. M. Best. The
performance bond amount shall be 100% of the estimated cost for implementation of the project as
described in the Bank Parcel Development Package, but not less than $150,000. In lieu of posting the
performance bond,the Sponsor may elect to construct the project prior to the first credit release. In that
case no performance bond will be necessary.
After completion of the restoration/construction, a separate performance/maintenance bond will be
secured for 100% of the estimated cost to implement the monitoring and maintenance plan but not less
than$100,000.The performance/maintenance bond shall apply at the inception of the monitoring period
for a term of one year and be extended annually for a minimum of five years. Upon DWR approval, this
may be lowered each year based on the adjusted cost to complete the monitoring.
Performance bonds for monitoring shall be renewed at least annually to cover the next years monitoring
period, with confirmation of renewal provided to DWR with each annual monitoring report when
applicable. DWR reserves the right to alter the credit release schedule if monitoring reports are submitted
without proof of bond renewals when applicable.
6.2 Long Term Management Plan
The Parcel will remain in private ownership, protected in its entirety by an approved DWR long term
steward,and will be managed under the terms detailed in an approved DWR conservation easement.The
long-term manager will be responsible for periodic inspection of the Parcel to ensure that the restrictions
documented in the recorded easement are upheld in perpetuity.
Bells Bridge Bank Parcel Development Plan(DWR ID#:2020-1664) Pg.7
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020102

7.0 Mitigation Potential
Of the approximately 45.35 acres protected under the conservation easement, 35.649 acres or 1,552,870
square feet are anticipated to provide riparian restoration credit, Riparian Buffer or Nutrient Offset Credits
(Figure 6, 6A, and 6B). Riparian restoration from the top bank of Parcel Streams out 100 feet and existing
riparian forest areas will generate Riparian Buffer Credits, but will be transferable to Nutrient Offset
Credits, except for Riparian Buffer Preservation Credit. Riparian area restoration from the top of bank on
Parcel ditches out 200-feet and from 101-200 feet from Parcel Streams will general Nutrient Offset Credit,
and will not be transferable to Riparian Buffer Credit.The mitigation credit calculation was derived based
on Restoration Systems' conceptual design for maximum ecological uplift. The management objectives,
mitigation type, and proposed credits are presented in Table 7. A complete DWR Mitigation Credit Table
is attached to this report.
Table 7:Summary of Mitigation Credits
TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION(TABM)
Mitigation Totals Square Feet Credits
Restoration: 487,213 487,213.000
Enhancement: 0 0.000
Preservation: 162,404 16,240.400
Total Riparian Buffer: 649,617 503,453.400
TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION
Mitigation Totals Square Feet Credits
Nutrient Nitrogen: 55,611.894
1,065,743
Offset:
Phosphorus: 3,581.836
8.0 Credit Release
Upon submittal of the appropriate documentation by the Sponsor and subsequent approval by DWR,the
mitigation credits associated with the White Farm Mitigation Site will be released as described in Table 8
below.
Table 8: Credit Release Schedule
Task Project Milestone %Credit Available
for Sale
1 Instrument and BPDP Approved by DWR,Conservation Easement Recorded,Financial Assurance Posted, 20
and all utilities installed and in compliance with state issued permits/authorizations where applicable
2 Site Earthwork,Planting and Installation of Monitoring Devices Completed and all applicable permits 20
obtained
3 Monitoring Financial Assurance Posted and Approval of As-Built Report 10
4 Monitoring Report#1:Approved by the DWR*&financial assurances renewed 10
5 Monitoring Report#2:Approved by the DWR*&financial assurances renewed 10
6 Monitoring Report#3:Approved by the DWR*&financial assurances renewed 10
7 MBI Item B(1)of Section X has been completed and approved by DWR. 5
No remaining credits will be released until the conservation easement has been assigned to an approved land trust
or stewardship
8 Monitoring Report#4:Approved by the DWR*&financial assurances renewed 5
9 Monitoring Report#5:Approved by the DWR*and final site visit by DWR has been conducted 10
Total 100%
*DWR Approval provided upon a determination that the site is meeting success criteria contained within the approved BPDP
Bells Bridge Bank Parcel Development Plan(DWR ID#:2020-1664) Pg.8
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020102

9.0 References
Schafale, M. P. and Weakley, 2012.A Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth
Approximation.
North Carolina Geological Survey, 1985, Geologic map of North Carolina:North Carolina Geological Survey,
General Geologic Map, scale 1:500000. https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-land-
resources/north-carolina-geological-survey/ncgs-maps/1985-geologic-map-of-nc
Bells Bridge Bank Parcel Development Plan(DWR ID#:2020-1664) Pg.9
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020102

FIGURES, EXISTING CONDITION PHOTOS, DWR MITIGATION CREDIT TABLE
Figure 1—Vicinity Map
Figure 2—Service Area
Figure 3—Site Map
Figure 4— USGS Map
Figure S— NRCS Map
Figures 6, 6A, and 6B—Credit and Monitoring Map
Historic Arial Imagery— EDR
Parcel Photos— Existing Conditions
DWR Mitigation Credit Table
Bells Bridge Bank Parcel Development Plan(DWR ID#:2020-1664)
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020102 Figures

Cow Haul Swamp Bells Bridge Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel
Rs
,,,,, .., USGS 8-Digit HUC: 03020102
N. USGS 14-Digit HUC: 03020102070030
\go N., h t NC DWR Sub-Basin: 03-03-04
Beech Swamp RESTORATION
36.073328°, -77.453896° SYSTEMS I LLC
/ % ,, Prepared for:
�'p. NC DEQ
Division of
Water Resources
g 401 & Isolated
•
s =:/v:a4t;Ji;s
- °
yStormwater
0
N.
Project:
BELLS BRIDGE
NUTRIENT OFFSET
! kill AND BUFFER
Deep Creek MITIGATION BANK
PARCEL
Fishing Creek Halifax County, NC
Poor Rd
w ,
v, Title:
wwe'
, ,�P ,re- VICINITY MAP
,
4 swamp ❑e,or ura Rd Drawn by:
Farah swamp Nobgood - RJH
ee
Hoo,.,r„r R° F /
F°J�cv� ".sr�� ! cp �,� ,a. Date: MARCH 2O21
BB A4,F i
Marsh Swamp qh. -,'
Scale:
._ },7 1:50,000
92 O a,
Legend
Y°femR e 2 �a Project No.:
° ?`p 21-002
..."11
OBells Bridge- Proposed Easement: 45.35 Acres
O Bells Bridge-Subject Fee-Simple Parcel Indian Branch
Mayo Form Rd
Bells Bridge- Parcel Features,Top of Bank FIGURE
c6
Frher,dpe swamp
Tar-Pam 02 - Named Streams
O Tar-Pamlico 02 USGS 14-Digit HUCs Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri,HERE,
DeLorme, Intermap,increment P Corp.,GEBCO,
N
OUSGS,FAO,NPS,NRCAN, GeoBase,IGN,Kadaster Miles
Tar-Pamlico USGS 8-Digit HUC Boundary, 03020102 NL,Ordnance Survey,Esri Japan,METI,Esri China I
I (Hong Kong),swisstopo,IV�apmylndia,© J 2

I Roar oM1teT�.,, . - F',:. k l.'
`� " Lake FaF+d
I
�; 75& Solilh R
Rosemarf ';
•
I
:'
. - _ .,„,
JJ/91 h5brflokFfwy -
'ti -_ _ Litt �. '� ,
:'lveldc n
•
t ,ns, 1' RESTORATION
t -- _ Roanoke River
1 Natonal SYSTEMS I LLC
—`- - ,wildlife Refuge',
Middleb • • •titarrenton Jackson
t I % O • I
4 a� �a. ! Prepared for:
r I NC DEQ
t `� 'tea E1sltingC r �sw A �� /
} R� 1 Division of
r r` Water Resources
�` t
' " 401 & Isolated
He nde'rso n t r —
w, � t / - y Wetlands/Waters
( '
PrQhf4g Cie `di .Z ¢ ` ' , Program & 401
°fi a- �F a :PAM:A: Stormwater
�"-
/ ., �� ,
i
'r' Shpeco Gre } r y of Project:
o / tr - 1
•WARRE• Medoc
• ` r / Ho litter Msaat +n 8` BELLS BRIDGE
_ r ti -,l Ha. Park n 1 NUTRIENT OFFSET
• s.�n 0 AND BUFFER
/ Sdtsa
r<yn� — - / tn� MITIGATION BANK
"� / _ a''ta PARCEL
r f 3�'� L....-_ ,�f��*''r?y}1.tilL / 'Y}�
Center,/ / ,jam \�\ } �\ Enfield Halifax County, NC
/ tiJ/ - )
/ Title:
•
it,- " — �� _J _ } I t
// NASH -1 i �t"-A,,`^ oNO cre • •cotbnd Neck SERVICE AREA
Ie„f , MAP
•
/ ••r„ TAR-PAM 02
/ - 'Jhitak --i-
Louisburg ; 1fr,. ti
y /
-'5c - - _ / Castalla �,ri,lt Cr,,, , r {"� -
/ f
v
4a + / ..
s F.:c,kb,l„ . Drawn by:
/ •
/ :
Red Oak I) ' RJH
/ EDGECOMBE Hobgood..
'-- Date:
• ,' Dort:his Bank Parcel Location ` -` MARCH 2021
•
/ 36.073328°, -77.453896° ` _\ - Scale:
/ , \ 1:275,000
/ z
Nash•;ilk_ .speed Project No.:
z,c r� 0 \ 21-002
unt .h1ameyer J 1
Service Layer Credits: Sources:Vsn,HERE,
DeLorme, Intermap,increment P Corp.,GEBCO, - Rocky,Mount - N.
USGS,FAO,NPS,NRCAN, GeoBase,IGN,Kadaster rrr� Hope
.NL,Ordnance Survey,Esri Japan,METI,Esri China S o \ FIGURE
(Hong Kong),swisstopo,Mapmylndia,© ny C, I • r 0,
irk _ - w
Tarboro J
f 2
Legend .' / Coif c� y'
ey Swamp r•Princeaille
N
•
0
, Miles
Tar-Pamlico •
USGS 8-Digit HUC Boundary, 03020102, Service Area for Nutrient Offset Credits _ i i�
• SI irpsburg 1 0 5 10
'-64

92
jj II
r I �2._A �OZ
Feature Fb Start w r' 1 Feature D Start �`� Rs
36.077480°,-77.450600 90 dr' . 1\ 1 36.076570°,-77.450470° "'
, ;� I RESTORATION
SYSTEMS LL .
Feature Not Evaluated ' ` ` \ wo \ C
co
Feature G Start �..;-
7° 36.076606° -77.456907° , .....----) (S3 asbi—
• :\ 0=9 Prepared for:
( ,8 ur r' NC DEQ
- .. V 11A , ' . Fea\oe Fa . . g \ Division of
� �� . . ® ,.. , eQ' '... [ Water Resources
; 1:0:1)Sex'V
at. iz tip
®S Feature G Fe k., :�iA '
�� ' � �c ?� X �‘ �c / ao- �y 401 8� Isolated
f: e ��, �,: Wetlands/Waters
too. *L \ - _ � • �I eO �a. ._. _ Program & 40• P 1
}/ -v J�° ' • �� %t, Stormwater
4 or
_ _ _ _�� ;,�
�04 ' ~F at , � � Project:
,....,.s.i
e Ure
0, I 1 •
�s ,q , BELLS BRIDGE
ti
. s • \ __ -. e ,� NUTRIENT OFFSET
''r _ �., .� AND BUFFER
p �( goo too rna �� j�'L-_.'� f 17 MITIGATION BANK
Feature Eb Start ' l._ PARCEL
oti I Ends at Confluence with D
— ,--' - --\,...,_,,
..4 36.075130°,-77.448590° • . '
-� Halifax County, NC
I d� Existing Soil Path •
G
�-- To-Be Removed from Title:
r Easement Area
�e f f p E
00 ^off,-. re xi Q f r
r, •�. _ - _ '` % 92_ 4 - SITE MAP
�� , �k:1 • LL` ir� .„.•^''ter" !''� .
r /. ®. :. Pa - �� r .0, e 2017 NC One Map
�0 Q� c' F • Feature Cb Start o Imagery
A
m`. T Culvek s,;rt at Bells Brc,-,‹-idge Road 1 C
�� Feature Ac W • <CZ
o s ao
`` . s2, Legend
P it 4111Itli
= �: Feature Hb Start
' r' 36.070720°,-77.454670° Drawn by:
Bells Bridge-Subject Fee-Simple Parcel RJH
Feature A - O `-;�
Subject Throughout Project Area i O Bells Bridge- Proposed Easement: 45.35 Acres '. Date:
MARCH 2021
104 , O
NC DWR Stream Determinations
9Q :
Scale:
__,D------`"------ 17
Bridge R�d �� 90 94 92 Bells Bridge Existing or Historical Forest , 1:6,500
._ ;
_ : - .a 2-Foot Contours a Project No.:
21-002
— — — Soil Path
•.., c Bells Bridge Features ,
Swale FIGURE
-yr Ditch
` � Stream £ 3
i i".. c-1___.\�.4, s N
(7
_.. Feet
j--
R-N_ . y Feature Not Evaluated
.---- \\ c ço 200 400 800 1,200 1,600

I i'''---- 4415 i ., , L._Ai.r. -11.4--
1 ? ( . .
' '\,. \ : \\\\"\-"\ -\\ -11 "'"1-h-'\\''''-'\\
iil
•4 RESTORATION
\ ,, \\
,.\\
• .
,,,,...,,,,,_ ._ ,
,,....
�!i SYSTEMS LLC
rla 1
Sid. _.,r c�
vi Aii f. 7 I�, 4 I ,
ip Prepared for:
Feature Fb Start
:•. \,_,,.
36.077480°, 77.450600° '• '� NC DEQ
am ,
,=i._ 4- ``° Division of
.,� - \\ L_,,, `aszA �' ^lr ` - i� Water Resources
/ . _,,,,,i,„
y �I ,r-t y�� - U11,1��11 1r7��1 J. 1I4 I , /`
IV 7, Feature G Start � � I �d� .L� Q�� 401 & Isolated
� . - eCl �� . +!, Wetlands/Waters
36.076606°, 77.456907° Q ``u• 1 Program 8c 401
\_.
Feature D Start J- House C g
) - ,,.tir ?_____ jril\jr.. } / ' fs. �` 36.076570°,-77.450470° _ Stormwater
- —�: /�- �� Ltd, _ILL Project:
-141 z:r.,(H) \ -'''' 1
•
- 1 zH. ,I,.. BELLS BRIDGE
Cl t�! __, W. _ NUTRIENT OFFSET
AND BUFFER
�, — , , �.. — -- __ z MITIGATION BANK
j, — � PARCEL
,..4..„,,..--.444,0010-.
•
_lie..
� ' - (r
f Halifax County, NC
•-4- __\\•••-_ ' • • i • 01111111S' 1141( . . .1.1-
40 ~` '- / 1 ,. Feature Eb Start e. > . • . Title:
l c13o
°,-77.448590° J
e _ilr fir
CIUSGS MAP
11'
147
...all. , 2019 Hobgood, NC
Feature A �� 1114 Feature Cb Start I Imo'
Subject Throughout Project Area .�� Culvert at Bells Bridge Road . .
�'�: ) '-------\ Feature Hb Start - ril l l�
' BELLS BRIDGES RD 36.070720°, 77.454670° I
��- + 4- - ' * — , rf Drawn by:
4 _ , i.100D , \"\: _ lli _ Date:
N. j '• , I 1 _ L MARCH 2021
31-,dy _ , - I �Z Scale:
ti — \ r\I P 1 wit II Project No.: 21-002
------; if / / '11641/4c......"---- 7
/7)_----------/---- \\„. . ...> / _.u..d-
\\`, )
__ � `� FIGURE
' — L f-'_ _s 7 0.. '-� Legend
i � � _ ___,..2 pip�L
I � . _„,. �11- yJ �-- _.._ _,...., _ - 0 Bells Bridge-Subject Fee-Simple Parcel
___—=! ___ - ,� f` 7j+`] 1 - - �� , I O Bells Bridge- Proposed Easement: 45.35 Acres
I
4
' 1 - r 'II
, i j` Feet N
' " r— - - ' I �b O NC DWR Stream Determinations
- — ___ , ,i``' 11 \ 1 0 400 800 1,600 2,400 3,200 '1

11111\5 . : - .. . . ,
• + - _
jallinbt
VS , ...'11 -4 oak )1. .,OOP ibilk ?,,„...) Mt . : .
s • 5�1 -' 4 RESTORATION
.. . lkil.:6 - • -' MIA
, - SYSTEMS LLC
V .
- )-". \Nit", .
11111.‘
# i Feature Fb Star - 4, _ _- Prepared for:
Iii
- •
• �a� 1p. ° *IA 'OWL' 36.077480 , 77.450600° I ••' - .0 " NC DEQ
-•�` �`°r =' liti • 7. Division of
.., � _, r Water Resources
401 & Isolated
kiP7 yr
`' • ' Feature G Start u ■7_ V r is Wetlandsol aters
• _ 36.076606°, 77.456907° I 1 .�
twilit. 4110P Feature D Start
Program 8, 401
'j• 1.1° . Featur570°,-77.450470° Stormwater
• —Alf 1 � Project:
y 1 ir 11. likik BELLS BRIDGE
. oillipt iii. , .
- r . -, NUTRIENT OFFSET
' - _ illio''..4N4 ,''. . , %1H1111:11 )1
AND BUFFER
EM1 - 1) • : N 0 11�� MITIGATION BANK
s' � .. •4 r t'! PARCEL
r'I. . •
a 1 r;.1 4
_ - Halifax County, NC
z r ... �� � OA � _r � 1110.,��� � � Title:
Feature Eb Start _r �' 1,
) - 1-101- - 60,
36.075130°, 77.448590°
illillk
_.
iO.
x it iikk: le
_ ii: ``a al IL Ilk
. ,,.,,, *A
USGS MAP
SCA
' Nil i 2006 Halifax County
Feature A 00 ir', • '�- Feature Cb Start SOII Survey
Subject Throughout Project Area niii" _ . NW r -,
Culvert at Bells Bridge Road Sheet 21
' oad �� Feature Hb Start �r
Bells Bridge goad
. .. 36.070720°,-77.454670° j _ r'.1
l
;• r, Drawn by:
. , Ti., , , . . gliirilrir . -
RJH
Date: MARCH 2O21
Sall
J kit A . .15ti .,._• ..
'r =L 5 Scale:
• . 1:12,000
4
T Project No.: 21 002
4011141: . rids
'.1_- •9
BO
,seidio. . .
Fla •• , 1-1111 .
Legend FIGURE
N 1.W.
' Bells Bridge-Subject Fee-Simple Parcel
0 5
Bells Bridge Proposed Easement: 45.35 Acres N
�� • (rtçI\ Oc8OO Feet
`•, •"�" NC DWR Stream Determinations
:�. 0 1,600 2,400 3,200 O

*• � � Feature D Start
� lir 36.076570°,-77.450470°
RESTORATION
�7��ji .4 Figure 6B • SYSTEMS LTC',
►. _ �.� � ` ik. Prepared for:
� ' #. ♦ � NC DEQ
1Yuu1
40.
`� ` `\� FeaeD ,' ` \ ��,,q' d _ Stormwater
t•411 �1S. _ _ �_ • ;� r ��'�~oli - - Project:
,:
.�/ • - - - L. _ _ ' o- 4��- • �$ � BELLS BRIDGE
7`- �� �� �� NUTRIENT OFFSET
F'igutre'.:6A' Feature Ea *.��� ,.� -:.�� AND BUFFER
_ , • '> MITIGATION BANK
��� Featur130°S77t448590° �- PARCEL
r •
' > - _ Halifax County, NC
- ��``.�. Title:
Y `` ` `-.„.
.• ‘N_ ‘\ El •• ,,. , ., ,..... '. - ;�, CREDIT AND
A., 't 1 MONITORING
� � �r
i `.\ goad MAP
♦�+4 . ▪. 1+
A
• ` ❑ Bridge
11� 1 Belts
♦ Nam ` ❑
� - / \\~� Drawn by:
;-•f:---- Feature A ., , , RJH
Subject Throughout Project Area ` L- ' Legend
Date:
♦ ` - ' MARCH 2021
%, O Bells Bridge-Subject Fee-Simple Parcel i_ TOB -30 Feet
— Scale:
Bells Bridge Proposed Easement: 45.35 Acres i TOB 50 Feet 1:6,500
' O NC DWR Stream Determinations l ) TOB - 100 Feet Project No.:
21-002
M Bells Bridge - Existing or Historical Forest I_j TOB -200 Feet
' Bells Bridge- Parcel Features,Top of Bank Bells Bridge -Credit Area: 42.345 Ac.
'•
V ,t' Bells Bridge-Vegitation Monitoring Plots (29 Total Preservation, TOB- 100-Feet FIGURE
.
[
-2% of the restoration credit generating area)
Preservation, 101 -200-Feet
` N
Restoration,TOB - 100-Feet 6
j
.., ... i.:,,,:_ ,....„._,::: _,..,;
Restoration, 101 -200 Feet
' 1,600 1

imil
�♦�����.���♦� RESTORATION
�.:.♦:. 4 SYSTEMS I LLC
..•�•.•�•.4
�,4 Feature A
Prepared for:
•�•� ♦ ❑ NC DEQ
♦ ..�� - - Existing Hardwood Forest Division of
. ���! - _ 6.23 Ac.within the easement bounday Water Resources
�O//�-_-1- k` r '� . _ No credit
.e��: , II _ - - ❑ 401 & Isolated
_c r Wetlands/Waters
r ��?. ! _ � `�:``'t Program & 401
�..�.�`- - - ` Stormwater
` ' - _ . Nc-c... \` 1 Swale
, e A J _,`' = :` 1 ` Project:
A — \� _ \% . BELLS BRIDGE
�.� \ - • `\ N, ❑ NUTRIENT OFFSET
1���..�♦�, - ` %%. , AND BUFFER
��♦��.�.�������: \ �. `\ , MITIGATION BANK
, i l , k ` PARCEL
* l
Halifax County, NC
�����♦���������♦�, ` " •ti\ 11` t Title:
.•• . ••�•�♦���� / , `'+ 1` +\1 L Swale
Swale �1
Legend ��:��:A. 1 ti ;, \ti CREDIT
�����♦��� t . z oad AND MONITORING
O Bells Bridge-Subject Fee-Simple Parcel ♦�..�` ❑ .` s ti `�.~ ~ Bells Bridge R MAP
1 O Bells Bridge- Proposed Easement: 45.35 ..♦�..A % , ~ . ❑
'������
Bells Bridge - Existingor Historical Forest ������� ` ,�. ,� ``t �ti -
l�����1 � \ - r . • ;i
Bells Bridge- Parcel Features,Top of Bank ����.1 ~• % � f.. aj" x
Bells Bridge-Vegitation Monitoring Plots (29 Total ��♦ A ,
. ' + ' Drawn by:
-2% of the restoration credit generating area) '��♦���A . i► ,' RJH
� ` .���.♦`` \` Date: MARCH 2O21
TOB -30 Feet %,��♦ s r
V, . fi,rn: a.}.t 40.-^ 4, ..4.4 V,.i-:: . ` 'f- - `.:.., Scale:
_, TOB -50 Feet : 1:3,000
1 TOB - 100 Feet A Project No.:
21-002
TOB -200 Feet
Bells Bridge -Credit Area: 42.345
Preservation, TOB- 100-Feet FIGURE
Preservation, 101 -200-Feet
Restoration,TOB - 100-Feet 6A
N
Feet
Restoration, 101 -200 Feet
0 100 200 400 600 800

4114,,
imil
,,,... . ........_ 1,
..., 4.A. ... .
3
,,,r _..... v.
r. ......
�•������ 'iIi,♦�•�•���•��•���. N
RESTORATION
�A� .��.♦.� ..♦. ` SYSTEMS LLC
- , ,
'V - Feature D Start �� ., :� �N,
` 36.076570°, 77.450470° .*� , Prepared for:
I.�������.�`���.� NC DEQ
❑ #� ��♦ Division of
r - ������ ���5 Nov Water Resources
. ^ , ` . ������ ����.� 401 & Isolated
' ' ..��A, 41,, ���������� Wetlands/Waters
0 ` \ , ������� Program & 401
\ 41
Existin Hardwood Forest �..♦♦� Stormwater
.. \ . �� lo
�\ t` ` . 1.89 Ac.within the easement bounday
` . ` : N.` No credit ..�.�'` Project:
` ` Feature D
b .����♦�. BELLS BRIDGE
` ❑ ` * , �` ' ` ,l� ��t NUTRIENT OFFSET
• �' = �` - _ _ N' .\* \. ., ❑ _ ��:�`♦�♦���.�, �:���:��` AND BUFFER
I El ' - _ ` \� _ ❑ r ~ l•������,',•�•�� �•�•�•���♦�♦ MITIGATIONPARCELBANK
- ---1
-,- Halifax County, NC
~ ` - - - - - - - - ` �❑- - - - ` 1111r- . � � Title:
Feature Ea - 4������♦��e��•��� ��♦�•��� ��♦�•� •����•• �•
. 41. �������������������� CREDIT
-
� ••���♦�����•,•�����•�,�•�����•�,�•�����•�,�•�•� AND MONITORING
�����������������������������. MAP
Feature Eb Start .. AIL
..�♦�..� ..
36.075130°,-77.448590° .141,
.��������.���.���.�
A. Drawn by:
RJH
COPoad
[ R Date: MARCH 2021
Scale:
1:6,500
Legend
Project No.:
•O21-002
Bells Bridge-Subject Fee-Simple Parcel , TOB -30 Feet Bells Bridge -Credit Area: 42.345 Ac.
OBells Bridge- Proposed Easement: 45.35 Acres , 1 TOB -50 Feet Preservation, TOB- 100-Feet
0 NC DWR Stream Determinations , TOB - 100 Feet . Preservation, 101 -200-Feet • k t FIGURE
M Bells Bridge - Existing or Historical Forest , TOB -200 Feet Restoration,TOB - 100-Feet i. t S fi ' Y` k',
6BBells Bridge-Vegitation Monitoring Plots (29 Total Restoration, 101 -200 Feet s i. • - , ' �, ,
2% of the restoration credit generatingarea) e': , N
Feet
arm h � ���: �fr.
.4:'N " 0 100 200 400 600 800 S

ommineamio„....x.,44
`J
•
-
•
•
•
•
•
A
•
•
I
J �
- f
INOLJ RY#:6408543.3
YEAR: 2016 ��Jr
=500' EDR

II. . '...
. . ,
•
,.
t•
•
• • . ....
. -4•'
..• -_ - •
. ... . .. _
... .
. .
• — . , ,- • .,. .. _. ..,,
, .
, •
1 !
. . . .
. . , .., ,. ..,.
. ..
•
y.
. , . .
. .
.. .
. . . ,
. .. . .
. . ,. .., . .
. .
... . . ..
.. ,. .
,„
. . ,
. .
- .
. .. . . . , . . . ,
. .. ..
• . r . -
. -...
ro-
. .
-----„.„
. ._.
, .. -....,
. _ .
. . , . . .
. . .
. . .
.,.,
i
_ . . .. .. _ . . .
. - --
. --'-..-•:‘... . e. \
. .
. .
------
. ,..
, . .
. '•
' •
ilk
---7-- - -
•
- -_..-
,. . ... •_.._.... . . .-_ _ ,
. .'
I /1
/ •
•
/
/7 -;.••••M''''- -. -, .-
' . ...
. • '
•
.
1. .
‘1111.11011.•
\ - •iik' °L 1
..p. a ..)..yvi.i.,‹ ,i.....it.
.,..A.
e ,
_ , *
...._. ,
...._---- 411, .. ..• .:. • virifr ...'
.
- -
._ . . . . L. jiL,11t,.., .4,4•QN.-L.,
. .
1/411 1 &
ti.34i ki:X314V4le::10!•M''k,), .*: Ifs-6.1:`•,,,.
YEAR: 202
Vii',A10,‘ ;,; •iite.k.'$'45q-,.t i'V y
. --wt... • it .. ,,. ' , '.e AI • ,., 7 :.
CEDR --• --604,-r. -,$,,,.. ' •- - r.4-.44,- .-•
. „... . ,„, , . ,,,,,,...rd21•.,...g, .4,

•
0'7 • 1.11141111 k
- "
)-1
"..04
\ - -
\l‘ne-v
a.4.4
-
\1141).„---•
#NQUIRY#:6408543.3 A N
YEAR: 2009 LI
C=500' E DR

....
, .
„L.._ ..,.. ., ,,,,,,,,;. • 4,....•
,....?. , ,-.. .... •0,. , ,,j,
4.'•14b1,%t "i: `i!. ' '., ''.,
.. ..4,110,1', P • •::, . 4.'•P'
'. ' . .; ',• ... •01.6.
pf-.V ,'
•
.. 4
. .
_ e A .. •• •• "Irk '.'" '''. tik, . i:. '...174-:- 1 z;
, , _ w- . .. i.,.. _J.,P.,....; v.*. ;1; '. , -,, .-, if,.• .
1°4( .-.' '41 • 1-.• 4)• ‘ 2 ' -4-, . 4_
'•4...•. .,,L. 2-.3 I.i'•''N i ,+-.• . '..'.' 4 '
:I ',..'f;'4.i?.',•''S'''0;e:/"4".-- ' .,' . i'
•I's• •I 144.14re•I I ii.•5 -r,..•- . .- ' .• „AO': 4 .. 4i4 'V ..,...5.
f• P —
... .., • •
' ••7 1 ,—
*
.... 4
•
• .00" .
., r,,,"•-• 4511P ,7-s0
. .. .
"-V, *•-:'.-4- ',.... -4. . 4..:.-- .
...--- .
1.•
3.
' -
• P N.,.
IP
7
il7
' .
Olif° • • .:: Virt , ..' • ‘'.111;4'711,Ifri''1:1"-...-'-•
i
• t''. . ". . • Af4aftioll( r. -
.,.. ...
-i. • . ..
,,•' 4. . : -+r:-7,4 -3,- L ' 4.' ':4.-•: i,; • • .fr
r - • • •``44 •. . 'i_.'4..if.-t-:,.. -
• II
4 ,
Ae• 1 ' . .. IA'
lor...,, ' 'L ,)' -. ' •.--*, ' -• 'k,•
\ T.
pi
..-- • _
e _es
I .:.e',,,_ ,• ,,Lv,.,_.
. .., .
.. ...,
- ..... :4 ...
•••••4.
. • ,
11 Ar ...•. .
, , • tx
.• Ie.'
t• -. ‘14.44
1
/ , ,iii. ...',:p/....::....... ......1,01.••....". -...;.t...4...::....Spf.,....,..,.„.4....*•..- — -.,
4.-
i .
r i:
. _
....
.. ' 4. ..
•
r .
. •
•• .
*1!
r 4 I &
I.*.
't....• -..t".4'.(ijuly051.', ..i. Yle#64 IV. -•'.1..- • ',1 ' '.
"...irr •4,
. ..
• .
.,....
. .-.N.7 '1. , t: •
. • hr.I NO L11 RV#:6408543.3 11, N .,
a ,
YEAR: 2006
=500'
C -
EDR ,...-, ...w:. .. .....0_.&..... _
/ — -

, , i
.-.1 011•"4- -4 •".•'..f. I
, p .i '••-•-:- • ' 1 ''. 't i
t r yr• •
# . .. -`
4
. Al r1
•
ir
►i '
s
. I, . lik
•
yy
,i
aa
! •'
4/111164-' '...‘'llitiNiir ,Nijohailio.. f s
•
�.: }i_ t 4� - y-
•
'N i ,‘ .tt.:::,...,',..:r,4. .._..--11-
/ \ ' .;....t.i,\V ....__
R
IIIPPIIIIIjllIljhilfr' . ::: ' .- '-.- : .
pit
._ ..4_,..,h i ,.
.. H 4S4kA i.t at
L,\,'.:1, ,.,I:..i'1,1,
i ,li- y ,,;,;1 1:,.1.,T,
157`l 4l + S 1 ``{ `
. li _ Sw - !'. ql i .'` it.li 1II'I��: l�'I � �` ',I .+ • .l i.1 ` 1.
I • \\
I, ." ii$ i,')..: ,1 ..'. i' ..,• i fr't 1Wiii\\ I I, 1\ii ',\\$)
#NQU1RY#:6408543.3 /1 N
r wal
YEAR: 1998 �jJr
=500' EDR ' :0

r•7: ...„
* a ' a' 4 ;
r ....
it _. 4 -4/11 a.A- . - r"....
R
D Allthr .
■ P ' ht I
OM I r. r• . - r
ign-
f liok _ , I ^ ,ram
a . = L.PI r
i` T . .i t .
•
r _ -
F
,11 r F
•
11111Ek' . _ ,,,i
F *
L-. .
- 4 I
f
n ill
1 •I --
i
4
lip
f'
g
INQUIRY#:6408543.3 iYEAR: 1993
I =750' EDR

•
Lir
yt
•
K- `!
•
•
•
{
7
-
•
•
INQUIRY#:6408543.3 fir;
YEAR: 1993 ",LI
=500' 'EDR

iller % .
. t L
•
I
in g
-L AI — '
J
•
ilt -_411111 _
ir
■ 7 he
-1 dn' I • .• % • I
1
I
. 0110'. %- iiii, . I
i
ik� ill
I J
r
1
4
-tirr. k
INQUIRY#:6408543.3
i N )1
YEAR: 1982 I_ dib. i
= 1000' CEDR P . "I' P

' ••••-
- •. .
- •-• .
. ' ' . _ •
• _
•
•
-- _ , •
. - -- ,-;. • • - •
. ...•• . 1.. '•
. .
•
• •
•
•
. _ •
' •
•
•. • •. .. .• .• . -
•- _
-- •
•
. _ .
. .
• .
••
' • :. . • .
• -
. .
•
•
•
•
••. •
+4
•• • .
• - _
•
. . •
. -
. ;
• .
•- .
••'- 14.a•
"*. •; 4.1 • - ••• • • • • • ••
• • •
•
•
..
•
.•
' . •
INQUIRY#:6408543.3 ' .•• 4..F4.449.:::fLF:tkift$ 7
-7• J.
YEAR: 1977 . • r
._. •
-500 CEDR
'

ti.-- .4.p-.:;, ... si .• • .. ..,.. .
.- . . .- • AO• -
-•
• . . .
• ,i ...,.• .
• • . :•E‘..§-e54.7=.....;...
• ... • - -.. ..
. . .. • " .
[:. ••-)' •
••••.. .:: ... kar• .?' '•:'!S,:.. •
::-......,:i
. .
. .
.. 7 . . .....••._ :. . ..r..• . .•
. .
ILA, • •••••.._. . •••• • • .
... .... .. .• • - •;4;;••,i,v-- - !:•:•••-••`0%-•• • -T-.• -...
, e•.=:..:...-.:, • -•••••• • •••
, • • .
• • • ••
. ..v.. . • .
- — • - . •••• •.-- •
• •
• ..,,. . .
P •
.I'•:'• . ..0;'.. ':.. . •
. .
.g, •
• •'J...J.
"4::...
. 1110
0.'"•54•2• . •r . .
. • .,_. . ... . -.... .-.,•, • ..•
•
• . ,....
••..• . • . - ..-
.• . . - •
..:•- 11._ . . .
• •
. .
;• • .•
. .....
ofOgga-- • . . `
.,• •.
•
...,
• . •
:•. • .
'• • .•••, :,‘.....,-••1..•: .• •.2.''.1:-A- k:-•--•••-' ••-• --•"!-•-••-•'•• . '.....',;•2.:. ::'•'. ...I:T.-..,. •'- . •• ''' -.•-
. •.• .
• •
. -. .
• • • ••
. . .
. . .
• • •
. •
•' . .
• ';.. .1.,4'.:•'.• .
• . .;....,.14..'t27,:•!V 4.t_'.r• 'f:' -;:i-6
• • . '::..::`•:11••11•'+:::1;'.•-.C.1,;c: ft.: -..':,1i).L.*!:'•
• •. .
. •
• . •q.'AO'• .•'...i•....:-•';•••;". ...1d4;.:!•.;:fir"t•ijirr:':!5..- :A;\:-''=•. '',FA:
• • .::-.4r •-•".•:••••'...'-'7:;.::-..:41.--.":;r-/:...7.r.:'..--..''..7!:[-•'.!!....,..•• .._P2.. •.'; -.e.•.'
•
' •••••:,..:..:...;-,,:..:•,::8,...,,,,,,.1.ii..;.;,.::•.,.......,11---90:-.,:- •,,,71,..
. ..
. • .. • :-.,:,4•.....-t,-Tii.e...-.:,....:R: . _ ...._7•-• ....,••
. . _-lc . • . . . .,. _ ... ... . .
• ,__..---,-,v,--,]4:-.to:1-..,.•:. r.-: •',-.-.:•:-,•::,-• -'.,.',:,.....,: •:•:,.,.._,...,. .. .
•..,... . . . , .
f- •
. • %'i.-
• •
.• • • ...'
.: •
•
. —•'-..• • • •. .. ..
J .• .
• •. . . '
•
. •• . .
• • .••••• ( • • • '._ .
.
...:• '.k., • • . •I • •. ..'. . .
. -... ,_
- ,.%.,
44.
7111k1
• -•,... . ..0.•':
• • '::•'..':::•:•..- ••>ag:•••• '4. lt:..4* • . . .
.. •, .
.; .
. .
• • • I... • . . .•'. ' .:••• • • •
•
ti. ..
...
•
•,- . .:. •..... •. ..
.f
• • . _• . .
. •
. . •-z,•. . ..:...i_ .'e.:......ir::... i--,...:.,.:3„:„....:.. .. . :,•pilli . •
. • • - - • - ,
• ,_
. . •
• . .
• .• • . • ..•
. .
. • ,. .,
. .
• . .• •
• •
• . • ..••
• • . . •
• .
•• • .
. .
• . • • •. • . • . . •
. .
• . .
•• • •
. . .. . • .
. •
• • • .
• • •• •
a.,... . .•
,:„....i.1/4.:-.,.„,..,:r!.:.. : • • • . • ''- ••s•:. 4•• , . •
. --. • • .ji•27i ••••.• •
._ ,••ry.,x.,011.,,,
... . - - - --- ...'-j.. l''''.F.• •: •
l - •
• 2.7••-.1.1:• e.-•;:•14-•;51.'•.. i • '..• i •••' • • l'.;— . ._:......_ • ...:••••,•,..‘•:;-••••-.--•r .r•'••• '.4101t.•
• r ,
•
. --.•-••
• -•• ."-'-".•• • J •• • 11.• d -,''
:1':' : • -:: .. •
ir • •1".. .77.7-.....,'"'"- _,.. ,-- •-.. -
..007'.. 7-:--.' 440000k:.:.•.-•• -• ..,..'..- ..: •, ....••-•'••.•.-..'-old'-•--.:•.: ::9.`--7.,:....: . .
•
..,.re.coPrft lt•-.-,:` ..
• -
__,„1„.r710-,..p.,:aion- •. ,
,:.=.- ...L::•-• ........• . .
__.;,.,Icaigm '• ...
..0,35•=r . . . •.
• •
. • • :. .•.•:'•:•-. . , •' -
• ---•••••-•,-:it:';'47 J:•-..: -•• - . ., , _ ,•. . .
• - - -• - • • •• ••• •
;,,•-1.'‘.."• • -••••• •
• ' - • • • • - -- .•
• • •• .
• .
. • •
. • •L W.'.. . . • ' '''''1).• . ..--J'• .
. .
• • .
• .... ., , .• .
• . . . . .. . ...
• .. . . . . ... ..
INOLPRY#:6408543.3
i N . .
. . .
. .......
. . ....
. .. . • •
• •
YEAR: 1961 . .
.. .
• • .::::.:. .1 -500 CE DR \ - e..-'' .7 .._,,' 4 •
' • r.

r
k I. 3 #:
•. 1
•
. — ++
•
•
•
•
•
!},
•
•
' f'r—
•
.Yy,} .
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
'.. L. �� .T..:. ..
,'.•
•
,_v YI . .a, .
+le {�{�^i' x"'w', •i .. .. .. 1 }
4 sE ' t5= .
INQU4RY#:6408543.3 -. ' • L .
YEAR: i N
w! 5 ',.'t' '' + •'Yk#'*"': '. C'el.,'.
1959 '^4, k 4 x ,4 •5_',, -,x�.,.' + }s ..,.'

-:.,...-K. -.;- •• ' • w . . ,
•-
.
..11.,' .
• 1,•• : - - •-
-.,
.--,... .... .s......L:ri..- - . ':•,. ..•• .i,..:-,.
- i
. ... ....,... .
...._ •. . ,. .
• ..._...._
—.... r_. . .
__. ,:....,:-..,.-„„r. ,4...• . • • . . •• - - . . , . . . - ..°NI'-.
• ... • • •• •-
- '• , .:..,
• .0'•••!..;-.!•, • ''. • - '•'•i'..•-:
•
. •
• • • ..•
•'•-14'••••; 6. . . _
- ' - •• •
.. , •_... ..
A'''''• 7• •
.. .. . .4.0./.._ ,.
. ..
. ; ' • ' . - ... .. .• "le
• ' •'''
0.•':. -•
• .11L'ir, ,.•-,
r . -. . 7 7. •
N... :
i4...' .• • - . . ! . . .....
_ . ••
...,,.
,iivi.' •
• .- , .
f•iiryk;•
•
• :Ik'n*.
.r.1
• ... .
•
.....
.-•
. . .._. -
..,. -'
._ .
•. -1 .
..17 .
.0 ..
•
1...: __... , .,.. ...
'11-6••. ..
. •5. '' : .--,:1-+ - .'- • Ali iiiih-;. ":
. '''' •
...1>.... .• •• , ' '''.....• ''''' '•r..., '''''J 41'6 016-41'15.•
-'''. ' .•-' ?•11;.' .'`..ht;; '• •''''r L"--.. ;'•'•'... 1,- -
. r :•
0
• •
yr-';'',.• T •• ' -r.:. ! •..... , .
. - ..•.• , •
. .,. -'FL,..-!...I•-•••. ,-.1.;
' .6..,•-:':•Sil - '-.. •
--
I, ' • '..'''''• ow-
....•-• ..
• .
. .
•40-• •A.
• •. • • '1'11
i jornli it: '. : . , •
.. . .,,....... - •
• .., .,
" •• I-b e'
ie.','..;' ••qi •: .
. .L, ..„.
• •- !ir
, ........
•• 5 51 •
• ,•7, --• • •••• '-';'‘.. A 6 •
'.. ..d,•.:e;!•7:i.: .6 d .
. .0..
4' .- • .4. - .AT• •
. .
....• „..
14 .o.— • . •
•
' .,...
. . .
lif .
• .:-
• dil a': , •
•
• iwippor'1"6 jcilizil,- ---•.' . • •..d••
.. . ...,...
•
• 4.114111"iii"1111*.
....:
.•:—.'.'.5' , • :. ' 4, 6• .4..• .%1...
I Jr • ..'
IIIIIA . . • • :74 I.% .
• •
•. . ... .
•
i, ' ti • 4-
. . • . .
-...5 . -;'-•1 ' •
. '
NI it.-.1t .; Olt
. •a-s m.,
...41...r.41
Nit • •• ;!• — .c.!..a. , —1.?•1. .
iti -. • • A • • ••• di,— . ccIr I
.._ • . .A,:,..!..,,,,, . •. .... _, ...,...........,.. .
fNQUIRY#:6408543.3
N ,."1,..,,, •r I- '. wi-, r :
YEAR: 1950 --...,•0.1w
'--.'::1-.'7.- . • . •"."..... . •-.- -
C
=500' EDR
...: .:'-..'•

� ^"es -ei
s s
,,_.
710
??-*zl.gto -- i,I6:, -,!t4t4,:zov-
_� bac
`�'Y w <J , � .,a a� ' �,� J} "`�' r'� t "III„�
::;'L,' itp,5g,-;',..:.:Ii:.•v*itc-':';',:•'4' --
Photo 1—Feature D,origin looking downstream
ems. z�� a , a I §xa �
� z Y < P
,.y_ wz � -� �tlit ""` ': m':.' �'';,sue M .a- ��
•� 'M k' d t,'S Yz 9 s '"'j v -F am { 6
%I' ? t ax+
:a. f= 7 „ i 3�—� 'R , 111 i ,J.' a ` ad ,�r' r ,�. -u .-.7
Y Gr_fi 3, �+�Y. iS..lLt- iS.F�;.. A a' - ... _ ';a., .-.zx�*aFw j-�., ..
Photo 2—Feature D, looking at confluence of Eb
Bells Bridge Bank Parcel Development Plan)DWR ID#:2020-1664)
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020102 Photo Log

,_
_ , .
..
c,,...,,,,,t_ ,, Fa PI
_ _.
_ _. _ _ ._
bq,f ,l ; � �1
� "h ems- _. "'�' , . : .�'
,�d"i.�r� 1 �s b � � y'
�* ,a ti. o i,
P1 . s x $r E.I. -F^ ? ' : >a M as '',,Ar I,•'& "'�h fi. '°`�}'" �" .rr
fl
:uI
' ''r � g l`;k w> }d ,; Y i S
�n� k �, 1LT f
- ' ,.: �' W� ten. ,.,.,..D .n� P r,,r h�.: >,n M�aF.NJ n
Photo 3—Feature D,downstream of confluence with Eb, looking downstream
�r
fi'sr+. 5"? d by r s�, E7ta+'. ,� ,. < t a k7
_�, s ? a<, gyetT tn �,- ''' -- ,-a't' ' R,�{ mac f�� ,m Y �� + Y, ��a 1: � V,� e Sa f
itV- �rj
*;ii-ye -°:°1-4,-.. - , ,`,..":--We4 '' ,.`,'''''',..,"°.: i'ir'`r.1-',,- -Y',°':1:'I:. -. °i`°Zit:4,4''::
l Y
,,,,t0,01,t 1
t. ,. 4
•�� A n c� IN daJ,' Y t rr�
Photo 4—Feature Eb transition to Ea
Bells Bridge Bank Parcel Development Plan(DWR ID#:2020-1664)
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020102 Photo Log

Table 1.BELLS BRIDGE,2020-1664,Project Credits
Tar-Pamlico 03020102 Project Area
19.16394 N Credit Conversion Ratio(ft2/pound)
297.54099 P Credit Conversion Ratio(ft'/pound)
Subject?(enter
Total(Creditable) Convertible to Delivered Delivered
NO if Min-Max Buffer i Initial Credit Final Credit Riparian Buffer Convertible to
Credit Type Location Feature Type Mitigation Activity Feature Name Total Area(ft) Area of Buffer %Full Credit Riparian Nutrient Nutrient
ephemeral or Width(ft) i Ratio(x:1) Ratio(x:1) Buffer? Credits Nutrient Offset? Offset:N Ibs Offset:P Ibs
ditch'1 Mitigation(ft) ( 1 1 )
Buffer Rural Yes I/P Restoration 0-100 A,D,and Eb 487,213 487,213 1 100% 1.00000 Yes 487,213.000 Yes 25,423.425 1,637.465
Nutrient Offset Rural Yes I/P Restoration 101-200 A,D,and Eb 718,977 0 1 33% No — Yes 37,517.181 2,416.396
Nutrient Offset Rural No Ditch Restoration 0-100 Ea 169,891 0 1 100% No — Yes 8,865.139 570.984
Nutrient Offset Rural No Ditch Restoration 101-200 Ea 176,875 0 1 33% No — Yes 9,229.574 594.456
Totals(ft2): 1,552,956 487,213 487,213.000 81,035.319 5,219.301
Total Buffer(ft2): 487,213 487,213
Total Nutrient Offset(ft2): 1,065,743 N/A
Total Ephemeral Area(ft)for Credit: 0 - 0
—
Total Eligible Ephemeral Area(ft2): 162,404 0.0% Ephemeral Reaches as%TABM
—
Enter Preservation Credits Below Total Eligible for Preservation(ft2): 162,404 25.0% Preservation as%TABM
Total(Creditable)
Min-Max Buffer Initial Credit Final Credit Riparian
Credit Type Location Subject? Feature Type Mitigation Activity Feature Name Total Area(sf) Area for Buffer %Full Credit
Width(ft) i Ratio(x:1) Ratio(x:1) Buffer Credits
Mitigation(ft)
Rural Yes I/P 0-100 A and D 271,553 162,404 10 100% 10.00000 ' 16,240.400
Rural Yes I/P 101-200 A and D 20,154 0 10 33% —
Preservation Area Subtotals(ft): 291,707 162,404
TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION(TABM)
Mitigation Totals Square Feet Credits
Restoration: 487,213 487,213.000
Enhancement: 0 0.000
Preservation: 162,404 16,240.400
Total Riparian Buffer: 649,617 503,453.400
TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION
Mitigation Totals Square eft Credits
Nutrient Offset:— Nitrogen: 1,065,743 55,611.894
Phosphorus: 3,581.836
1.The Randleman Lake buffer rules allow some ditches to be classified as subject according to 15A NCAC 02B.0250(5)(4
last updated 08/03/2020

APPENDICES
DWR Correspondence
NRCS Web Soil Survey Report
Environmental Records
USFWS—Species Report
SHPO Letter
FEMA Map
Bells Bridge Bank Parcel Development Plan(DWR ID#:2020-1664)
Tar-Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020102 Appendices

DocuSign Envelope ID:25B5AE28-8FB6-4DAF-9573-6AADF3538673
STATE,h,�..
ROY COOPER '6 n
I • - '
Governor
6 .y =
2>
MICHAEL S.REGAN ia.i �-
Secretary - -'I-°--*
S.DANIEL SMITH NORTH CAROLINA
Ofrecror Environmental Quality
December 22, 2020
DWR Project#2020-1664
Halifax County
Janet White Leggett
3609 Woodlawn Road
Rocky Mount, NC 27804
Mary Pat White Brady
162 Pine Branches Close
Winterville, NC 28590
Barrett Jenkins, Restoration Systems, LLC (via email at [e-mail])
Subject: On-Site Determination for Applicability to the Tar-Pamlico Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 02B
.0734)
Project Name: Bells Bridge
Address/ Location: Bells Bridge Road Near Scotland Neck, NC (36.070288 -77.452140
Determination Date: December 2, 2020 Staff: Rick Trone, Ernie Hahn
Mr. Jenkins,
On December 2, 2020, Rick Trone and Ernie Hahn of the Division of Water Resources conducted an
on-site review of features located on the subject property at the request of Restoration Systems,
LLC to determine the applicability to the Tar-Pamlico Riparian Area Protection Rules (15A NCAC 02B
.0734).
The enclosed map(s) depict the feature(s) evaluated. This information is also summarized in the
table below. Streams that are considered "Subject" have been located on the most recently
published NRCS Soil Survey of Halifax County and/or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic
(at 1:24,000 scale) map(s), have been located on the ground at the site, and possess characteristics
that qualify them to be at least intermittent streams. Features that are considered "Not Subject"
have been determined to not be at least intermittent or not present on the property or not
depicted on the required maps.
This determination only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any
activity within buffers or within waters of the state. There may be other streams or features
located on the property that do not appear on the maps referenced above. Any of the features
on the site may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and
subject to the Clean Water Act.
ANorthCarolinaDepartment ofEnvironmental Quality I Divisionof WaterResources
��II 5l2 North Salisbury Street 11617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh.North Carolina 27699-1617
Otpanm rr_-.::yin•.. t .
oepvu.�enter e,�.i�me„r.i WMr\yr 919,707.9004

DocuSign Envelope ID:25B5AE28-8FB6-4DAF-9573-6AADF3538673
DWR#2020-1664
Halifax County
Page 2 of 3
Subject Depicted
Feature E/I/P/Other* to Buffer Start @ Stop @ on Depicted on
ID I Rules Soil Survey USGS Topo
A P Yes Subject throughout project area X X
C I Yes Culvert at Bells Bridges Outside project area X
Road
D I Yes Approximately 36.07657 Feature G X X
-77.45047
E I Yes Headcut approximately Feature D X
36.07513 -77.44859
F I Yes Approximately 36.07748 Feature G X
-77.45060
Approximately 36.076606
G I/P Yes 77.456907 Outside project area X X
H* I No Approximately 36.07072 Outside project area
-77.45467
(1) E=Ephemeral,I=Intermittent,P=Perennial,NP=Not Present,NE=Not Evaluated,NA=Not Applicable
(2) *Feature H is not subject to the Tar-Pamlico Buffer rules as it is not mapped.The feature was evaluated at the request of Restoration Systems,LLC.
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or
affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWR may request a determination by
the Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) calendar days of the date of this
letter to the Director in writing.
If sending via U.S. Postal Service: If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.)
DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Supervisor Supervisor
1617 Mail Service Center 512 N Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Raleigh, NC 27604
This determination is final and binding as detailed above unless an appeal is requested within sixty
(60) calendar days.
This letter only addresses the features on the subject property and within the proposed project
easement and does not approve any activity within buffers or within waters of the state. If you
have any additional questions or require additional information, please contact Rick Trone at (919)
707-3631 or [e-mail]. This determination is subject to review as provided in Articles
3 &4 of G.S. 150B.
Sincerely,
DocuSignn�e/d by:
P.1 Woi
949D91BA53EF4E0...
Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Enclosures: USGS Topographical Map, NRCS Soil Survey, Site Map
cc: 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch files

DocuSign Envelope ID:25B5AE28-8FB6-4DAF-9573-6AADF3538673
DWR#2020-1664
Halifax County
Page 3 of 3
___t •- — Map provided by Restoration
• Systems, LLC
411,1
i ' ./I
/.."
y _mar
04
Bells Bridge
RS
Feature Map 0 320 640 1,280 1,920 2 5CO
TiE";'A Lr Halifax County, NC Feet

DocuSign Envelope ID:25B5AE28-8FB6-4DAF-9573-6AADF3538673
Bells Bridge
Halifax County, NC-DWR Project # 20-1664
/ - .....--r,,,„ik. _,,,,...._..z N„...i
NoA E Fri B
pp3rnrtiocaoim1T
n WI W
here @ 36.076606,
—77.456907 ;O
tii>/sili -- (...NoA - NoA
• •r:
. d ' F':aA E1.l)� \\tr./0\....i
5I
#. , • k�
a F:Subject @ approximately
* * oA
' �1J 36.07748 -77.45060
. 1r AIL
,1')
E:Subject @ headcut approximately • D:Subject @ approximately H
ly I iy 36.07513 -77.44859 36.07657 -77.45047
IY Y4 NoA NOA
4
a1i NoA
NoA GoAdi . '
i "."--------,\ i
C.Subject @ culvert C bP
BOA ..� A ,
A:Subject throughout
project H*:@ approximately
36.07072 -77.45467(not
- subject to buffers)
RaA NoA GIB
•
GIB
htillirli-
EmBJ.
NoA .... EmB I wp
# ,
NRCS Soil Survey Sheet 21
S
v.starter,,
�,y Tl.�
Halifax Co NC 2006 , ' `lti ::Locations are approximate
Legend:
i E
f- and are provided for refer-
-project boundary r— I s' � .R , rrence only:: R-1

DocuSign Envelope ID:25B5AE28-8FB6-4DAF-9573-6AADF3538673
Bells Bridge
Halifax County, NC-DWR Project # 20-1664
/!/ (/` ,..,„_-, ( \\,...7-)yr ..__.,.,.:6., _._ \--,,-----) ,„\‘ .,,.II
C.. \ \,_ I I -
Approximate start location 1C111
'
here @ 36.076606, C. \100 .(//)
El
-77.456907
1-1 . -
li/1 . i -..... h_ .
121
MI
0 _ .,
______ .
_ ii,,,
12
i . ..„-------- 1
,...____, ..,___ _. ._
,5
_ 1 ,
c„.) _, ,,,,.
y • ,
BaLs 6 --'
D:Subject @ approximatelyiiK
1 s 36.07657 -77.45047 r
' 1 7
'/7\--7)
-'i _
\ 4 4`
\D _.---
i All'
1 ..1: ..1.4.1.
A:Subject throughout
project -
./ ‘Ii----. _livl -"'N'N...\\\\) -,a1- 43-
-
-
•
._
„2/TS — .•___...
\ - ,_--
_,,,,_
\ , 51! i4
USGS Topographical Map -- STy ;,
Speed Quadrangle 2019 ;r ::Locations are approximate
s and are provided for refer-
TAt
ence only::
-Project boundary

DocuSign Envelope ID:4935E7E3-A051-4ED0-9561-274E5277875F __
>':;.5TA7f l:k�•..
ROY COOPER 6i - "`,
6' �-a� .1 Governor sh
MICHAEL S.RECAN • '- n
Secretary +""'�'
S.DANIEL SMITH NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
February 16, 2021
Barrett Jenkins DWR#2020-1664
Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St, Suite 211
Raleigh,NC 27604
(via electronic mail: [e-mail])
Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation&Nutrient Offset—Bells Bridge Site
Bells Bridge Road Near Scotland Neck, NC
Lat., Long. 36.070288 -77.452140
Tar-Pamlico 03020102
Dear Mr. Jenkins,
On November 3, 2020, Katie Merritt, with the Division of Water Resources (DWR), received a
request from you on behalf of Restoration Systems, LLC (RS) for a site visit near the above-
referenced site in the Tar-Pamlico River Basin within the 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code 03020102.
The site visit was to determine the potential for riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offset within a
proposed Easement Boundary, which is more accurately shown in the attached maps labeled"Bells
Bridge Overview"(Figure 1)prepared by RS and edited by DWR. On December 2, 2020, Ms.
Merritt performed a site assessment of the subject site. Staff with RS were also present.
Ms. Merritt's evaluation of the features onsite and their associated mitigation determination for the
riparian areas are provided in the table below. This evaluation was made from Top of Bank(TOB)
and landward 200' from each feature for buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(effective November 1, 2015) and for nutrient offset credits pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
Feature Classification 1Subject 6Riparian Land uses Buffer 'Nutrient 4'5Miti¢ation Type Determination w/in
onsite to adjacent to Feature Credit Offset riparian areas
Buffer (0-200') Viable Viable
Rule
A Stream Yes Non-forested agricultural 2Yes Yes(fields Non-forested fields-Restoration Site per
fields with downstream See note only) 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
partially within a DOT See note
R.O.W Forested Areas—Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(5)
Note:No credits are allowed within the
DOT R.O.W
Ca Ditch No Non-forested agricultural No Yes Non-forested fields-Restoration Site per
>3'depth fields See note 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
Note: viable for nutrient offset if a
conservation easement is secured to the
confluence with Cb
r -4 North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality 1 Division of Water Resources
`J���III,� 512 North Salisbury Street 11611 Mail Service Center I Raleigh.North Carolina 27699-1611
r:r�i,�r era iN..
oepvene-E' E.�,n�m�e.i m. r 919.707.9000

DocuSign Envelope ID:4935E7E3-A051-4ED0-9561-274E5277875F Bells Bridge Site
Restoration Systems,LLC
February 16,2021
Feature Classification 1Subject 6Riparian Land uses Buffer 3Nutrient 4'5Miti¢ation Type Determination w/in
onsite to adjacent to Feature Credit Offset riparian areas
Buffer (0-200') Viable Viable
Rule
Cb Stream Yes Non-forested agricultural Yes Yes Non-forested fields-Restoration Site per
(at culvert) fields and within a DOT See note See note 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
R.O.W
Note:No credits are allowed within the
DOT R.O.W
D Stream Yes Non-forested agricultural 2Yes Yes(fields Non-forested fields-Restoration Site per
fields with mature forest only) 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
downstream
Forested Areas—Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(5)
Ea Ditch No Non-forested agricultural No Yes Non-forested fields-Restoration Site per
>3'depth fields 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
Eb Stream Yes Non-forested agricultural Yes Yes Non-forested fields-Restoration Site per
(at DWR fields 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
point)
Fa Ditch No Non-forested agricultural No Yes Non-forested fields-Restoration Site per
>3'depth fields 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
Fb Stream Yes Non-forested agricultural 2Yes Yes(fields Non-forested fields-Restoration Site per
(at DWR fields with mature forest only) 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
point) downstream
Forested Areas—Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(5)
G Stream Yes Mostly mature forest 2Yes Yes(fields Non-forested fields-Restoration Site per
(at DWR adjacent to agricultural only) 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
point) fields
Forested Areas—Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(5)
Ha Ditch No Non-forested agricultural No Yes Non-forested fields-Restoration Site per
>3'depth fields 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
Hb Stream No Non-forested agricultural Yes Yes Non-forested fields-Restoration Site per
(at DWR fields and partially within a See Note See Note 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(3)
point) DOT R.O.W
Note:No credits are allowed within the
DOT R.O.W
I Not Present No N/A N/A N/A N/A
J Ditch No Non-forested agricultural No Yes(fields Non-forested fields-Restoration Site per
(see map) >3'depth fields with mature forest only) 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
downstream
K Ditch No Non-forested agricultural No Yes(fields Non-forested fields-Restoration Site per
>3'depth fields with mature forest only) 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
downstream
Page 2 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID:4935E7E3-A051-4ED0-9561-274E5277875F Bells Bridge Site
Restoration Systems,LLC
February 16,2021
Feature Classification 1Subject Riparian Land uses Buffer 3Nutrient 4'5Miti¢ation Type Determination w/in
onsite to adjacent to Feature Credit Offset riparian areas
Buffer (0-200') Viable Viable
Rule
Aa,Ab,Ac, Swales No Non-forested agricultural No No none of the swales assessed were creating
B, fields non-diffused flow
'Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondence dated December 22,2020 using the 1:24,000 scale
quadrangle topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent printed version of the soil survey map prepared by the NRCS.
2The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent(25%)of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 0295(o)(5)and 15A NCAC 0295(o)(4). Site cannot be a Preservation Only site to comply with this rule.
3NC Division of Water Resources-Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer
Establishment
4 Determinations made for this Site are determined based on the proposal provided in maps and figures submitted with the request.
5 All features proposed for buffer mitigation or nutrient offset,must have a conservation easement established that includes the tops of
channel banks when being measured perpendicular and landward from the banks,even if no credit is viable within that riparian area.
6The area of the mitigation site on ephemeral channels shall comprise no more than 25 percent(25%)of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(7).
Determinations provided in the table above were made using a proposed easement boundary showing
proposed mitigation areas shown in Figure 1. Maps representing the proposal for the site are
attached to this letter and are initialed by Ms. Merritt on February 16, 2021. Substantial changes to
the proposed easement boundary could affect the Site's potential to generate buffer and nutrient
offset credits.
This letter does not constitute an approval of this Site to generate buffer and nutrient offset credits.
Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295, a mitigation proposal and a mitigation plan shall be submitted to
DWR for written approval prior to conducting any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or
surface waters for buffer mitigation credit. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703, a proposal regarding a
proposed nutrient load-reducing measure for nutrient offset credit shall be submitted to DWR for
approval prior to any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters.
All vegetative plantings,performance criteria and other mitigation requirements for riparian
restoration, enhancement and preservation must follow the requirements in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to
be eligible for buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation credits. For any areas depicted as not being
viable for nutrient offset credit above, one could propose a different measure, along with supporting
calculations and sufficient detail to support estimates of load reduction, for review by the DWR to
determine viability for nutrient offset in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
This viability assessment will expire on February 16, 2023 or upon approval of a mitigation
plan by the DWR,whichever comes first. This letter should be provided in any nutrient offset,
buffer, stream or wetland mitigation plan for this Site.
Page 3 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID:4935E7E3-A051-4ED0-9561-274E5277875F Bells Bridge Site
Restoration Systems,LLC
February 16,2021
Please contact Katie Merritt at(919) 707-3637 if you have any questions regarding this
correspondence.
Sincerely,
DocuSigned�/by:
Gesee
949D91 BA53EF4E0...
Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
PW/kym
Attachments: "Bells Bridge Overview"(Figure 1)
cc: File Copy(Katie Merritt)
Page 4 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID:4935E7E3-A051-4ED0-9561-274E5277875F
Legend _ _ 'r
::4 .q fit,;' �r
0 Proposed Easement Boundary
ti
Feature Type � 3 , a
DITCH
W x :--,� l.,'•
STREAM 1 ,, - - - f.,
` - y}p. _ by k, % .ur3 �
SWALE a ,; mTM " ,
a
�I {
l �`''Vie' ry`P '£ .3t
, yy
19�° v _ firer ..ir .•; J'' a-'"., , '� --,. .�, , ` '.,i - ��
aY
t t.. GV ,,,s �` �S r. 1, '�u.�• _ - ,�y1P, -ate v •sa_
h„
..-*v.. ,..,) -
, T,
` ,. 0:� . ' . __ sin ,
�, }A X Y a6S Y. r,{ -,` dam, Y. - _- -
.. Y- '
- sue,y'_ --{/ I
- ,,,,
-� � - s -- t gar :.-
AtAktet.
°
•y �
'I...-''',:-,,,n , wiA' r r +. 4 : <
-
•
jf.k
•
3
II
Alqb tid
Co
10.. .....
... mow'' ..;
I £.
'lc b F
r.:
.per
RESTORATION SYSTEMS1E21 [74,-„,.
,LLC N
Bells Bridge Site Overview
DS
ir
RE S TORATI ON 2/16/2021
P .6', Mtn_
din 1 -3,�:�P4ii11 t "rf.'-'... f di / :a � 47.*.' ".,..9n O �,.

USDA United States A product of the National Custom Soil Resource
Department of Cooperative Soil Survey,
Agriculture a joint effort of the United Report for
\ . CS States Department of
Agriculture and other Halifax County
Federal agencies, State
Naturalagencies including the North Carolina
Resources Agricultural Experiment
Conservation Stations, and local
Service participants
•
r .. ...,.,.,.,,,,,,,,,,- . .,).,_ ....,t_. -- . . . .•
•
•
•
•
•
•
?` - r
' itilijr" ' C 14' ...
. i
.. . - 1„.i:. .,. f. . . _t. . 4
li-:. _ i twa•
:.• 7.. .- • ::. / -
. . * 1
I\ i
y . t
../. 7
0 2.000 ft id 1
March 10, 2021

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs)or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist(http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nrcs142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
2

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone] (voice)or(202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
3

Contents
Preface 2
Soil Map 5
Soil Map 6
Legend 7
Map Unit Legend 8
Map Unit Descriptions 8
Halifax County, North Carolina 10
BoB—Bonneau loamy fine sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes 10
CbA—Chastain and Bibb soils, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently flooded 11
EmB—Emporia fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes 12
GoA—Goldsboro fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 13
LyA—Lynchburg fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Southern
Coastal Plain 14
NoA—Noboco fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 16
RaA—Rains fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Southern Coastal
Plain 17
Ud—Udorthents, loamy 19
References 20
4

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
5

Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
N
n
2/8dW 2R,030 278400 278600 278800 279000 279200 279400 279600 279800 280000 2802W 2804W
36°4'54"N •_ j 36°4'54"N
M
J M
1 /4/fAlf *
'EmB a
RaA GoA -•-ligOn EmB
i V
w. "
ill.
RaA -
a
8
GoA GoA
. li). ? Ud
e„ RaA `�
.} GoA
§ - -. ' . el„.,
EmB CbA1 _
,,,,,,p,,,,
RaA NoA ° . GoA. - ; _8
a GoA - =
g
1/11411111% ■r NoA -'
ee*
•
GOAD, ' - 0
e
29
s 5
�000 Gap EiTa��� o daDod aG�o���a�Qo
f --
36°4'1"N 36°4'1"N
1/881) 278200 278400 278600 278800 279000 279200 279400 279600 279800 28000 280200 280400
3 3
En
N Map Scale:1:11,500 if printed on A landscape(11"x 8.5")sheet.
Meters
N 0 150 300 600 900 P
Feet
0 500 1000 �vu0 3000
Map projedion:Web Mercator Comer coordinates:WGS84 Edge tics:UTM Zone 18N WGS84
6

Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest(AOI) j Spoil Area The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
Area of Interest(AOI) Stony Spot 1:24,000.
SoilstiTi Very Stony Spot
0 Soil Map Unit Polygons Warning:Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Wet Spot
P. 0 Soil Map Unit Lines Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
6. Other misunderstandingof the detail of mapping and accuracyof soil
• Soil Map Unit Points pp 9
Special Line Features line placement.The maps do not show the small areas of
Special Point Features contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
Blowout Water Features scale.
Streams and Canals
14 Borrow Pit
Transportation Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
Clay Spot Rails measurements.
1--1--F
• Closed Depression
O.10 Interstate Highways
Gravel Pit Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
w rap US Routes Web Soil Survey URL:
4 Gravelly Spot Major Roads Coordinate System: Web Mercator(EPSG:3857)
•
• Landfill Local Roads Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
Lava Flow Background projection,which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area.A projection that preserves area,such as the
Ada Marsh or swamp 1. Aerial Photography Albers equal-area conic projection,should be used if more
• Mine or Quarry accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
• Miscellaneous Water This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
• Perennial Water of the version date(s)listed below.
Rock Outcrop Soil Survey Area: Halifax County,North Carolina
▪ Saline Spot Survey Area Data: Version 23,Jun 4,2020
Sandy Spot Soil map units are labeled(as space allows)for map scales
Severely Eroded Spot 1:50,000 or larger.
40, Sinkhole Date(s)aerial images were photographed: Mar 15,2016—Oct
Slide or Slip 26,2017
• Sodic Spot The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps.As a result,some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
7

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
BoB Bonneau loamy fine sand,0 to 6.6 1.9%
4 percent slopes
CbA Chastain and Bibb soils,0 to 1 3.0 0.9%
percent slopes,frequently
flooded
EmB Emporia fine sandy loam,2 to 6 27.2 8.1%
percent slopes
GoA Goldsboro fine sandy loam,0 to 136.6 40.4%
2 percent slopes
LyA Lynchburg fine sandy loam,0 to 23.7 7.0%
2 percent slopes,Southern
Coastal Plain
NoA Noboco fine sandy loam,0 to 2 87.0 25.7%
percent slopes
RaA Rains fine sandy loam,0 to 2 53.0 15.7%
percent slopes,Southern
Coastal Plain
Ud Udorthents, loamy 1.0 0.3%
Totals for Area of Interest 338.1 100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
8

Custom Soil Resource Report
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
9

Custom Soil Resource Report
Halifax County, North Carolina
BoB—Bonneau loamy fine sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3sly
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Bonneau and similar soils: 87 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Bonneau
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, ridges on marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder, summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap- 0 to 9 inches: loamy sand
E-9 to 24 inches: loamy sand
Bt1 -24 to 35 inches: sandy clay loam
Bt2-35 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 36 to 60 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 6.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2s
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
10

Custom Soil Resource Report
CbA—Chastain and Bibb soils, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently flooded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3sm0
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Chastain, undrained, and similar soils: 50 percent
Bibb, undrained, and similar soils: 30 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Chastain, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Slackwater areas on flood plains
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Silty and clayey alluvium
Typical profile
A -0 to 5 inches: clay loam
Bg-5 to 52 inches: silty clay
2Cg- 52 to 80 inches: sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Negligible
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: FrequentNone
Frequency of ponding: Frequent
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 6.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Bibb, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
Parent material: Loamy alluvium
Typical profile
A -0 to 6 inches: loamy sand
Cg1 - 6 to 60 inches: sandy loam
Cg2- 60 to 80 inches: loamy sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Very high
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: FrequentNone
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 7.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 5w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
EmB—Emporia fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3sm7
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Emporia and similar soils: 88 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Emporia
Setting
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, ridges on marine
terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder, summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
Typical profile
Ap- 0 to 10 inches: fine sandy loam
E- 10 to 17 inches: fine sandy loam
Bt1 - 17 to 43 inches: sandy clay loam
Bt2-43 to 58 inches: clay loam
C- 58 to 80 inches: clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 36 to 54 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 8.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
GoA—Goldsboro fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2v751
Elevation: 130 to 270 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Goldsboro and similar soils: 83 percent
Minor components: 17 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Goldsboro
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional):Talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap- 0 to 7 inches: fine sandy loam
E- 7 to 12 inches: fine sandy loam
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
Bt- 12 to 54 inches: sandy clay loam
Btg-54 to 82 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Moderately well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 24 to 36 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 8.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Norfolk
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional):Talf
Down-slope shape: Convex, linear
Across-slope shape: Convex, linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Lynchburg
Percent of map unit: 7 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional):Talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
LyA—Lynchburg fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Southern
Coastal Plain
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2vx8m
Elevation: 20 to 200 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 64 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Lynchburg and similar soils: 82 percent
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
Minor components: 18 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Lynchburg
Setting
Landform: Marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional):Tread
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap- 0 to 8 inches: fine sandy loam
Bt- 8 to 50 inches: sandy clay loam
Btg-50 to 68 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 6 to 18 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Low(about 4.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Goldsboro
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional):Talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Rains, drained
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Carolina bays on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces, broad
interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip, talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Rains, undrained
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Carolina bays on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine
terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip, talf
15

Custom Soil Resource Report
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
NoA—Noboco fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3smw
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Noboco and similar soils: 90 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Noboco
Setting
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap- 0 to 10 inches: loamy sand
E- 10 to 13 inches: loamy sand
Bt- 13 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 30 to 40 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 7.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 1
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
16

Custom Soil Resource Report
RaA—Rains fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Southern Coastal
Plain
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2v75b
Elevation: 30 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Rains, undrained, and similar soils: 70 percent
Rains, drained, and similar soils: 16 percent
Minor components: 14 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Rains, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, carolina bays on marine terraces, broad
interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip, talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
A -0 to 8 inches: fine sandy loam
Eg- 8 to 13 inches: fine sandy loam
Btg- 13 to 72 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: High (about 9.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
17

Custom Soil Resource Report
Description of Rains, Drained
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, carolina bays on marine terraces, broad
interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip, talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap- 0 to 8 inches: fine sandy loam
Eg- 8 to 13 inches: fine sandy loam
Btg- 13 to 72 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 24 to 36 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: High (about 9.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Minor Components
Lynchburg
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional):Talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Pantego, ponded
Percent of map unit: 6 percent
Landform: Flats, broad interstream divides
Landform position (three-dimensional):Talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Concave
Hydric soil rating: Yes
18

Custom Soil Resource Report
Ud—Udorthents, loamy
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3snc
Elevation: 20 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Udorthents and similar soils: 100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Udorthents
Setting
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy mine spoil or earthy fill
Typical profile
C- 0 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat):Very low to high (0.00
to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 8.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
19

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres 142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nres142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/
detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084
20

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nres142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nres142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.nres.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nres142p2_052290.pdf
21

Bells Bridge
BELLS BRIDGES RD
Scotland Neck, NC 27874
Inquiry Number: 6381185.2s
February 25, 2021
The EDR Radius Map TM Report with GeoCheck®
6 Armstrong Road,4th floor
Shelton,CT 06484
EDRr Toll Free:800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
FORM-LBD-CCA

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
Executive Summary _ ES1
Overview Map 2
Detail Map 3
Map Findings Summary _ 4
Map Findings 8
Orphan Summary 9
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary_ A-2
Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map_ _ A-5
Physical Setting Source Map_ A-12
Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-14
Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer-Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources.NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED,IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT.ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES,INC.SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES,INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE.ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER.IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES,INC.BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS,NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE,FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE,INCLUDING,WITHOUT LIMITATION,SPECIAL,INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL,OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES.ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES,INC.IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT.Purchaser accepts this Report"AS IS".Any analyses,estimates,ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only,and are not intended to provide,nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding,or prediction or forecast of,any environmental risk for any property.Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property.Additionally,the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc.All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format,in whole
or in part,of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc.,or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos(including Sanborn and Sanborn Map)are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc.or its affiliates.All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TC6381185.2s Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc(EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited
Environmental Due Diligence:Transaction Screen Process(E 1528-14)or custom requirements developed
for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
BELLS BRIDGES RD
SCOTLAND NECK, NC 27874
COORDINATES
Latitude(North): 36.0743040-36°4'27.49"
Longitude (West): 77.4540650-77°27' 14.63"
Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 18
UTM X(Meters): 279002.5
UTM Y(Meters): 3994777.0
Elevation: 99 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map: 5945851 HOBGOOD, NC
Version Date: 2013
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
Portions of Photo from: 20140706, 20140618
Source: USDA
TC6381185.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
BELLS BRIDGES RD
SCOTLAND NECK, NC 27874
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP RELATIVE DIST(ft. &mi.)
ID SITE NAME ADDRESS DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTION
NO MAPPED SITES FOUND
6381185.2s Page 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL National Priority List
Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing
SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS Corrective Action Report
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF RCRA-Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG RCRA- Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-SQG RCRA-Small Quantity Generators
RCRA-VSQG RCRA-Very Small Quantity Generators(Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity
Generators)
Federal institutional controls/engineering controls registries
LUCIS Land Use Control Information System
TC6381185.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
US ENG CONTROLS . Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROLS Institutional Controls Sites List
Federal ERNS list
ERNS Emergency Response Notification System
State-and tribal-equivalent NPL
NC HSDS Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
State-and tribal-equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS . Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF List of Solid Waste Facilities
DEBRIS Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
OLI Old Landfill Inventory
LCID Land-Clearing and Inert Debris(LCID)Landfill Notifications
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LAST Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
LUST . Regional UST Database
INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUST TRUST State Trust Fund Database
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing
UST Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
AST AST Database
INDIAN UST . Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal institutional control/engineering control registries
INST CONTROL . No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
VCP Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS Brownfields Projects Inventory
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites
TC6381185.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Local Lists of Landfill/Solid Waste Disposal Sites
HIST LF Solid Waste Facility Listing
SWRCY Recycling Center Listing
INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
DEBRIS REGION 9 .Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
ODI Open Dump Inventory
IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land
Local Lists of Hazardous waste/Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register
US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register
Local Land Records
LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
SPILLS Spills Incident Listing
IMD Incident Management Database
SPILLS 90 .SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
SPILLS 80 .SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen/NLR . RCRA- Non Generators/No Longer Regulated
FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites
DOD Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
US FIN ASSUR . Financial Assurance Information
EPA WATCH LIST . EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION .2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA_ Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems
ROD Records Of Decision
RMP Risk Management Plans
RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS PCB Activity Database System
ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System
FITS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System- FIFRA(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, &Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA(Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA_ Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data
CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA)Consent Decrees
TC6381185.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations
FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA_ Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites
US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem
US MINES Mines Master Index File
ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines
FINDS . Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites
ECHO Enforcement&Compliance History Information
DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
AIRS Air Quality Permit Listing
ASBESTOS ASBESTOS
COAL ASH Coal Ash Disposal Sites
DRYCLEANERS Drycleaning Sites
Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing
NPDES . NPDES Facility Location Listing
UIC Underground Injection Wells Listing
AOP .Animal Operation Permits Listing
PCSRP . Petroleum-Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
SEPT HAULERS Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
MINES MRDS Mineral Resources Data System
CCB .Coal Ash Structural Fills(CCB)Listing
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR Hist Cleaner . EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt.Archives
RGA HWS . Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
SURROUNDING SITES:SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were not identified.
Unmappable(orphan)sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
TC6381185.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Due to poor or inadequate address information,the following sites were not mapped.Count:2 records.
Site Name Database(s)
BRIDGE#66 OVER DEEP CREEK ASBESTOS
BRIDGE#65 OVER DEEP CREEK ASBESTOS
TC6381185.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7

OVERVIEW MAP - 6381185.2S
jib' _ }4, . 1
\J
inir
kir , '- •'.
'4744r-
6. A'r. - -- • i 1
4.4
` 1_ u. f,, ..
./ , : .
rirAt
- irim ..,, ..
. ''''' ,.-..,, iii. . 10
/7 7- L - tot wig
rml
v
f , .
IN rillf
•
,
lltilir .
' w `z1 �.a
ii
i
r a
111 ti.......„... ..----"-- . , A' .N'i .:1'w1
•
///e .
}
. d
IPA
, ...,_ f
riff, "A, lilt ' 44.1fe-j.liz'Piz '.;- .,
1 m a 0 0r", ilif(PI/4/4str
171
bi;am illibiltr I
_1111111111r � ',1 1/ZrlIZA A
�
Target Property 0 1i4 1/2 Miles
A Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property - -- Indian Reservations BIA 1 Hazardous Substance
-
• Sites at elevations lower than a Special Flood Hazard Area(1%)
Disposal Sites
the target property
A Manufactured Gas Plants // 0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
National Priority List Sites � National Wetland Inventory
Dept.Defense Sites • State Wetlands
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information.The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Bells Bridge CLIENT: Restoration Systems, LLC
ADDRESS: BELLS BRIDGES RD CONTACT: JD Hamby
Scotland Neck NC 27874 INQUIRY#: 6381185.2s
LAT/LONG: 36.074304/77.454065 DATE: February 25,2021 10:04 am
Copyright cg 2021 EDR,Inc.c0>2015 TomTom Rel.2015.

DETAIL MAP - 6381185.2S
...40:11 • :1,..,,
.._ lic t 44,.4 1 i)1
,— • i
. r \IIIINiiiiiiiiir
41r, .
y' li.,
, . *it . ,
k
r "., .. .imi
• 'r I
, ./ • •
40
.'Il�. ti
•
\ ill ,
* 1/4/4: Y 1111
r+ -- ji,,,
r
I
1 —- ..•
\ e 1
Target Property 0 1/16 1/8 1/4 Mks
A Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property - Indian Reservations BIA Hazardous Substance
• Sites at elevations lower than National Wetland Inventory
Disposal Sites
the target property
I Manufactured Gas Plants State Wetlands
r Sensitive Receptors
I National Priority List Sites
I Dept.Defense Sites
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information.The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Bells Bridge CLIENT: Restoration Systems, LLC
ADDRESS: BELLS BRIDGES RD CONTACT: JD Hamby
Scotland Neck NC 27874 INQUIRY#: 6381185.2s
LAT/LONG: 36.074304/77.454065 DATE: February 25,2021 10:05 am
Copyright m 2021 EDR,Inc.(c,2015 TomTom Rel.2015.

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8- 1/4 1/4- 1/2 1/2- 1 > 1 Plotted
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Proposed NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
NPL LIENS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
SEMS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
RCRA-SQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
RCRA-VSQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
Federal institutional controls/
engineering controls registries
LUCIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
US ENG CONTROLS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
US INST CONTROLS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Federal ERNS list
ERNS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
State-and tribal-equivalent NPL
NC HSDS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
State-and tribal-equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
State and tribal landfill and/or
solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
DEBRIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
OLI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
LCID 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
TC6381185.2s Page 4

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8- 1/4 1/4- 1/2 1/2- 1 > 1 Plotted
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LAST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
LUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
INDIAN LUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
LUST TRUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
AST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
INDIAN UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
State and tribal institutional
control/engineering control registries
INST CONTROL 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
State and tribal Brown fields sites
BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Local Lists of Landfill/Solid
Waste Disposal Sites
HIST LF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
SWRCY 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
INDIAN ODI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
DEBRIS REGION 9 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
ODI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
IHS OPEN DUMPS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Local Lists of Hazardous waste/
Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
US CDL TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
Local Land Records
LIENS 2 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
SPILLS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
IMD 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
TC6381185.2s Page 5

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8- 1/4 1/4- 1/2 1/2- 1 > 1 Plotted
SPILLS 90 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
SPILLS 80 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen/NLR 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
FUDS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
DOD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
US FIN ASSUR TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
EPA WATCH LIST TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
2020 COR ACTION 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
TSCA TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
TRIS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
SSTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
ROD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
RMP TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
RAATS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
PRP TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
PADS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
ICIS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
FTTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
MLTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
COAL ASH DOE TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
COAL ASH EPA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
PCB TRANSFORMER TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
RADINFO TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
HIST FTTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
DOT OPS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
CONSENT 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
INDIAN RESERV 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
FUSRAP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
UMTRA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
LEAD SMELTERS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
US AIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
US MINES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
ABANDONED MINES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
FINDS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
UXO 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
ECHO TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
DOCKET HWC TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
FUELS PROGRAM 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
AIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
ASBESTOS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
COAL ASH 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
DRYCLEANERS 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
Financial Assurance TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
NPDES TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
UIC TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
AOP TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
PCSRP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
SEPT HAULERS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
TC6381185.2s Page 6

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8- 1/4 1/4- 1/2 1/2- 1 > 1 Plotted
MINES MRDS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
CCB 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
EDR Hist Auto 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0
EDR Hist Cleaner 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt.Archives
RGA HWS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
RGA LF TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
RGA LUST TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
-Totals-- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NOTES:
TP =Target Property
NR= Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
TC6381185.2s Page 7

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
NO SITES FOUND
TC6381185.2s Page 8

Count:2 records. ORPHAN SUMMARY
City EDR ID Site Name Site Address Zip Database(s)
SCOTLAND NECK S122425298 BRIDGE#66 OVER DEEP CREEK BELLS BRIDGE ROAD ASBESTOS
SCOTLAND NECK S122425296 BRIDGE#65 OVER DEEP CREEK BELLS BRIDGE ROAD ASBESTOS
TC6381185.2s Page 9

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency
on a monthly or quarterly basis,as required.
Number of Days to Update:Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days
from the date the government agency made the information available to the public.
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL: National Priority List
National Priorities List(Superfund).The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority
cleanup under the Superfund Program.NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas.As such,EDR provides polygon
coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center
(EPIC)and regional EPA offices.
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/14/2021 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports:02/09/2021 Last EDR Contact:01/14/2021
Number of Days to Update:26 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
NPL Site Boundaries
Sources:
EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center(EPIC)
Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6
Telephone [phone] Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7
Telephone [phone] Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8
Telephone [phone] Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9
Telephone [phone] Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 10
Telephone [phone]
Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites
A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule
in the Federal Register.EPA then accepts public comments on the site,responds to the comments,and places on
the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing.
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/14/2021 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports:02/09/2021 Last EDR Contact:01/14/2021
Number of Days to Update:26 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Superfund Liens.Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980,the USEPA has the authority
to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner
received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens.
TC6381185.2s Page GR-1

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/02/1994 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:03/30/1994 Last EDR Contact:08/15/2011
Number of Days to Update:56 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions
The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan(NCP)establishes the criteria that the
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e),sites may be deleted from the
NPL where no further response is appropriate.
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/14/2021 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports:02/09/2021 Last EDR Contact:01/14/2021
Number of Days to Update:26 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing
A listing of National Priority List(NPL)and Base Realignment and Closure(BRAC)sites found in the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,Compensation and Liability Information System(CERCLIS)Database where EPA Federal Facilities
Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities.
Date of Government Version:04/03/2019 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/05/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:05/14/2019 Last EDR Contact: 12/23/2020
Number of Days to Update:39 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System
SEMS(Superfund Enterprise Management System)tracks hazardous waste sites,potentially hazardous waste sites,
and remedial activities performed in support of EPA's Superfund Program across the United States.The list was
formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015.The list contains data on potentially hazardous
waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities,private companies and private persons,
pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,Compensation,and Liability Act(CERCLA).
This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List(NPL)and the
sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/14/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/18/2021 Last EDR Contact:01/14/2021
Number of Days to Update:35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/26/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
TC6381185.2s Page GR-2

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SEMS-ARCHIVE(Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive)tracks sites that have no further interest under
the Federal Superfund Program based on available information.The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP,
renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while
it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available.Archived sites have been removed
and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites.Archived status indicates that,to the best of EPA's knowledge,
assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the
site on the National Priorities List(NPL),unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or
other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time.The decision does not necessarily mean
that there is no hazard associated with a given site;it only means that.based upon available information,the
location is not judged to be potential NPL site.
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/14/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/18/2021 Last EDR Contact:01/14/2021
Number of Days to Update:35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/26/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report
CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020
Number of Days to Update:5 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF: RCRA-Treatment,Storage and Disposal
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system,providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act(RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA)of 1984.The database
includes selective information on sites which generate,transport,store,treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA).Transporters are individuals or entities that
move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle,treat,store,or dispose of the
waste.TSDFs treat,store,or dispose of the waste.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020
Number of Days to Update:5 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG: RCRA-Large Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system,providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act(RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA)of 1984.The database
includes selective information on sites which generate,transport,store,treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA).Large quantity generators(LQGs)generate
over 1,000 kilograms(kg)of hazardous waste,or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020
Number of Days to Update:5 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
TC6381185.2s Page GR-3

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
RCRA-SQG: RCRA-Small Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act(RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA)of 1984.The database
includes selective information on sites which generate,transport,store,treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA).Small quantity generators(SQGs)generate
between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020
Number of Days to Update:5 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
RCRA-VSQG: RCRA-Very Small Quantity Generators(Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators)
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act(RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA)of 1984.The database
includes selective information on sites which generate,transport,store,treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA).Very small quantity generators(VSQGs)generate
less than 100 kg of hazardous waste,or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020
Number of Days to Update:5 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
Federal institutional controls/engineering controls registries
LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System
LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure
properties.
Date of Government Version: 11/11/2020 Source: Department of the Navy
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/17/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/09/2021 Last EDR Contact:02/08/2021
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/24/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps,building
foundations,liners,and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental
media or effect human health.
Date of Government Version: 10/28/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/18/2020 Last EDR Contact:02/23/2021
Number of Days to Update: 13 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:06/06/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
US INST CONTROLS: Institutional Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures,
such as groundwater use restrictions,construction restrictions,property use restrictions,and post remediation
care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally
required as part of the institutional controls.
Date of Government Version: 10/28/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/18/2020 Last EDR Contact:02/23/2021
Number of Days to Update: 13 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:06/06/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
TC6381185.2s Page GR-4

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Federal ERNS list
ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System
Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous
substances.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/15/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/15/2020
Number of Days to Update:7 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
State-and tribal-equivalent NPL
HSDS: Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
Locations of uncontrolled and unregulated hazardous waste sites.The file includes sites on the National Priority
List as well as those on the state priority list.
Date of Government Version:08/09/2011 Source: North Carolina Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/08/2011 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/05/2011 Last EDR Contact:01/19/2021
Number of Days to Update:27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
State-and tribal-equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS: Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State Hazardous Waste Sites.State hazardous waste site records are the states'equivalent to CERCLIS.These sites
may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds
(state equivalent of Superfund)are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially
responsible parties.Available information varies by state.
Date of Government Version: 11/02/2020 Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/23/2021 Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2020
Number of Days to Update:77 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF: List of Solid Waste Facilities
Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites.SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal
facilities or landfills in a particular state.Depending on the state,these may be active or inactive facilities
or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal
sites.
Date of Government Version:09/10/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/23/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/23/2020
Number of Days to Update:82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
DEBRIS: Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
NCDEQ Division of Waste Management Solid Waste Section Temporary Disaster Debris Staging Site(TDDSS)Locations
which are available to be activated in a disaster or emergency..Disaster Debris Sites can only be used for temporary
disaster debris storage if the site's responsible party activates the site for use by notifying the NCDEQ DWM
Solid Waste Section staff during an emergency
Date of Government Version:09/02/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/16/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/08/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/14/2020
Number of Days to Update:83 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/29/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
TC6381185.2s Page GR-5

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
OLI: Old Landfill Inventory
Old landfill inventory location information.(Does not include no further action sites and other agency lead
sites).
Date of Government Version:09/11/2020 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/09/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2020 Last EDR Contact:01/08/2021
Number of Days to Update:82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
LCID: Land-Clearing and Inert Debris(LCID)Landfill Notifications
A list all of the Land-Clearing and Inert Debris(LCID)Landfill Notification facilities(under 2 acres in
size)in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version:04/30/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/09/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/23/2020 Last EDR Contact:01/08/2021
Number of Days to Update:76 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LAST: Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
A listing of leaking aboveground storage tank site locations.
Date of Government Version: 10/30/2020 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/03/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/22/2021 Last EDR Contact:02/03/2021
Number of Days to Update:80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/17/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
LUST: Regional UST Database
This database contains information obtained from the Regional Offices. It provides a more detailed explanation
of current and historic activity for individual sites,as well as what was previously found in the Incident Management
Database.Sites in this database with Incident Numbers are considered LUSTs.
Date of Government Version: 10/30/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/03/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/18/2020 Last EDR Contact:02/03/2021
Number of Days to Update: 15 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/17/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho,Oregon and Washington.
Date of Government Version:04/14/2020 Source: EPA Region 10
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Florida,Mississippi and North Carolina.
Date of Government Version:04/14/2020 Source: EPA Region 4
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/26/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Number of Days to Update:78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
TC6381185.2s Page GR-6

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version:04/14/2020 Source: EPA, Region 5
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas,and Nebraska
Date of Government Version:04/15/2020 Source: EPA Region 7
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land.
Date of Government Version:04/29/2020 Source: EPA Region 1
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma.
Date of Government Version:04/08/2020 Source: EPA Region 6
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota,South Dakota,Utah and Wyoming.
Date of Government Version:04/14/2020 Source: EPA Region 8
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona,California, New Mexico and Nevada
Date of Government Version:04/08/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
LUST TRUST: State Trust Fund Database
This database contains information about claims against the State Trust Funds for reimbursements for expenses
incurred while remediating Leaking USTs.
Date of Government Version: 10/02/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/07/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/31/2020 Last EDR Contact:01/06/2021
Number of Days to Update:85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
TC6381185.2s Page GR-7

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing
A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks.
Date of Government Version:07/21/2020 Source: FEMA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/03/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/25/2020 Last EDR Contact:01/04/2021
Number of Days to Update:83 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
UST: Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
Registered Underground Storage Tanks.UST's are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act(RCRA)and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program.Available
information varies by state program.
Date of Government Version: 10/30/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/04/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/31/2020 Last EDR Contact:02/03/2021
Number of Days to Update:57 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/17/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
AST: AST Database
Facilities with aboveground storage tanks that have a capacity greater than 21,000 gallons.
Date of Government Version:08/12/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/15/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/07/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2020
Number of Days to Update:83 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/29/2021
Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually
INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 10(Alaska, Idaho,Oregon,Washington,and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version:04/14/2020 Source: EPA Region 10
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/15/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 6(Louisiana,Arkansas,Oklahoma,New Mexico,Texas and 65 Tribes).
Date of Government Version:04/08/2020 Source: EPA Region 6
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 7(Iowa, Kansas, Missouri,Nebraska,and 9 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version:04/03/2020 Source: EPA Region 7
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
TC6381185.2s Page GR-8

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire,Rhode Island,Vermont and ten Tribal
Nations).
Date of Government Version:04/29/2020 Source: EPA, Region 1
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 8(Colorado, Montana, North Dakota,South Dakota, Utah,Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version:04/14/2020 Source: EPA Region 8
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/13/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Number of Days to Update:85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 9(Arizona,California, Hawaii,Nevada,the Pacific Islands,and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version:04/08/2020 Source: EPA Region 9
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 4(Alabama, Florida,Georgia, Kentucky,Mississippi, North Carolina,South Carolina,Tennessee
and Tribal Nations)
Date of Government Version:04/14/2020 Source: EPA Region 4
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/26/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Number of Days to Update:78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 5(Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version:04/14/2020 Source: EPA Region 5
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
State and tribal institutional control/engineering control registries
INST CONTROL: No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
A land use restricted site is a property where there are limits or requirements on future use of the property
due to varying levels of cleanup possible,practical,or necessary at the site.
Date of Government Version:09/04/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/09/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/03/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/11/2020
Number of Days to Update:85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
TC6381185.2s Page GR-9

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7.
Date of Government Version:03/20/2008 Source: EPA, Region 7
Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/22/2008 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:05/19/2008 Last EDR Contact:04/20/2009
Number of Days to Update:27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/20/2009
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1.
Date of Government Version:07/27/2015 Source: EPA, Region 1
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/29/2015 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/18/2016 Last EDR Contact: 12/15/2020
Number of Days to Update: 142 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
VCP: Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
Responsible Party Voluntary Action site locations.
Date of Government Version: 11/02/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/23/2021 Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2020
Number of Days to Update:77 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Projects Inventory
A brownfield site is an abandoned,idled,or underused property where the threat of environmental contamination
has hindered its redevelopment.All of the sites in the inventory are working toward a brownfield agreement for
cleanup and liabitliy control.
Date of Government Version: 12/01/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/09/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2020
Number of Days to Update: 1 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Brownfields are real property,the expansion,redevelopment,or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence
or potential presence of a hazardous substance,pollutant,or contaminant.Cleaning up and reinvesting in these
properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped,open land,and both improves and protects the environment.
Assessment,Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System(ACRES)stores information reported by EPA Brownfields
grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on
Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions.A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from
Cleanups in My Community.Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information
is reported back to EPA,as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs.
Date of Government Version:09/14/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/15/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/10/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/11/2020
Number of Days to Update:86 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/29/2021
Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually
TC6381185.2s Page GR-10

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Local Lists of Landfill/Solid Waste Disposal Sites
HIST LF: Solid Waste Facility Listing
A listing of solid waste facilities.
Date of Government Version: 11/06/2006 Source: Department of Environment& Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/13/2007 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:03/02/2007 Last EDR Contact:01/19/2009
Number of Days to Update: 17 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
SWRCY: Recycling Center Listing
A listing of recycling center locations.
Date of Government Version:09/16/2020 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/17/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/09/2020 Last EDR Contact:01/25/2021
Number of Days to Update:83 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/10/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
Location of open dumps on Indian land.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/24/2008 Last EDR Contact:01/25/2021
Number of Days to Update:52 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/10/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside
County and northern Imperial County,California.
Date of Government Version:01/12/2009 Source: EPA, Region 9
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/07/2009 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/21/2009 Last EDR Contact:01/19/2021
Number of Days to Update: 137 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
ODI: Open Dump Inventory
An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258
Subtitle D Criteria.
Date of Government Version:06/30/1985 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/09/2004 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/17/2004 Last EDR Contact:06/09/2004
Number of Days to Update:39 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land
A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States.
Date of Government Version:04/01/2014 Source: Department of Health&Human Serivces, Indian Health Service
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/06/2014 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/29/2015 Last EDR Contact:01/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 176 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/10/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
Local Lists of Hazardous waste/Contaminated Sites
TC6381185.2s Page GR-11

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory
Register.
Date of Government Version:03/18/2020 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/19/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:06/09/2020 Last EDR Contact:02/22/2021
Number of Days to Update:82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:06/06/2021
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations.The U.S.Department of Justice("the Department")provides this
web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported
they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites.
In most cases,the source of the entries is not the Department,and the Department has not verified the entry
and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by,for example,
contacting local law enforcement and local health departments.
Date of Government Version:03/18/2020 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/19/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:06/09/2020 Last EDR Contact:02/22/2021
Number of Days to Update:82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:06/06/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
Local Land Records
LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information
A Federal CERCLA('Superfund')lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent
Superfund monies.These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination.
CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties.
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/14/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/18/2021 Last EDR Contact:01/14/2021
Number of Days to Update:35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT.
Date of Government Version:09/20/2020 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/22/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020
Number of Days to Update:83 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
SPILLS: Spills Incident Listing
A listing spills,hazardous material releases,sanitary sewer overflows,wastewater treatment plant bypasses and
upsets,citizen complaints,and any other environmental emergency calls reported to the agency.
Date of Government Version: 10/09/2020 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/22/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/14/2021 Last EDR Contact:01/11/2021
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
IMD: Incident Management Database
Groundwater and/or soil contamination incidents
TC6381185.2s Page GR-12

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/30/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/03/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/21/2021 Last EDR Contact:02/03/2021
Number of Days to Update:79 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/17/2021
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch
Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases.Typically,
they may include chemical,oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are
already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90.
Date of Government Version:09/27/2012 Source: FirstSearch
Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/03/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports:03/06/2013 Last EDR Contact:01/03/2013
Number of Days to Update:62 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
SPILLS 80: SPILLS80 data from FirstSearch
Spills 80 includes those spill and release records available from FirstSearch databases prior to 1990.Typically,
they may include chemical,oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded before 1990.Duplicate records that
are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 80.
Date of Government Version:06/14/2001 Source: FirstSearch
Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/03/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports:03/06/2013 Last EDR Contact:01/03/2013
Number of Days to Update:62 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen/NLR: RCRA-Non Generators/No Longer Regulated
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act(RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA)of 1984.The database
includes selective information on sites which generate,transport,store,treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous
waste.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020
Number of Days to Update:5 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites
The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers
is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions.
Date of Government Version:09/29/2020 Source: U.S.Army Corps of Engineers
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/17/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/25/2021 Last EDR Contact:02/17/2021
Number of Days to Update:69 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/31/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
DOD: Department of Defense Sites
This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands,administered by the Department of Defense,that
have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico,and the U.S.Virgin Islands.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Source: USGS
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/11/2007 Last EDR Contact:01/15/2021
Number of Days to Update:62 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/26/2021
Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually
TC6381185.2s Page GR-13

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands
Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States.Lands included are administrated by:Army Corps
of Engineers,Bureau of Reclamation,National Wild and Scenic River,National Wildlife Refuge,Public Domain Land,
Wilderness,Wilderness Study Area,Wildlife Management Area,Bureau of Indian Affairs,Bureau of Land Management,
Department of Justice, Forest Service,Fish and Wildlife Service,National Park Service.
Date of Government Version:04/02/2018 Source: U.S.Geological Survey
Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/11/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2019 Last EDR Contact:01/07/2021
Number of Days to Update:574 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency:N/A
SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998,with support from the U.S.EPA Office
of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation.It is comprised of representatives of states with established
drycleaner remediation programs.Currently the member states are Alabama,Connecticut,Florida, Illinois,Kansas,
Minnesota,Missouri, North Carolina,Oregon,South Carolina,Tennessee,Texas,and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version:01/01/2017 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/03/2017 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:04/07/2017 Last EDR Contact:02/09/2021
Number of Days to Update:63 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/24/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information
All owners and operators of facilities that treat,store,or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide
proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up,closure,and post-closure care of their facilities.
Date of Government Version:09/21/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/22/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020
Number of Days to Update:83 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST
EPA maintains a"Watch List"to facilitate dialogue between EPA,state and local environmental agencies on enforcement
matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority.Being
on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by
EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation
has in fact occurred.Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged
violations that were detected,but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA,state and
local agencies-primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved.
Date of Government Version:08/30/2013 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/21/2014 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:06/17/2014 Last EDR Contact:02/02/2021
Number of Days to Update:88 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/17/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List
The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action
Universe.This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action.The 2020 universe
contains a wide variety of sites.Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but
have since been cleaned up.Still others have not been fully investigated yet,and may require little or no remediation.
Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations.
Date of Government Version:09/30/2017 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/08/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:07/20/2018 Last EDR Contact:02/05/2021
Number of Days to Update:73 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/17/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
TC6381185.2s Page GR-14

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act
Toxic Substances Control Act.TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the
TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant
site.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/17/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/10/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/18/2020
Number of Days to Update:85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/29/2021
Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years
TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
Toxic Release Inventory System.IRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air,water and
land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/14/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/04/2020 Last EDR Contact:02/02/2021
Number of Days to Update:82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/31/2021
Data Release Frequency:Annually
SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems
Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act,as amended(92 Stat.829)requires all
registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March
1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides,active ingredients and devices
being produced,and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2020 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/04/2021 Last EDR Contact:01/21/2021
Number of Days to Update:77 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Annually
ROD: Records Of Decision
Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL(Superfund)site containing technical
and health information to aid in the cleanup.
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/14/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/18/2021 Last EDR Contact:01/14/2021
Number of Days to Update:35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/15/2021
Data Release Frequency:Annually
RMP: Risk Management Plans
TC6381185.2s Page GR-15

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance
for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances.The Risk Management Program
Rule(RMP Rule)was written to implement Section 112(r)of these amendments.The rule,which built upon existing
industry codes and standards,requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances
to develop a Risk Management Program,which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects
of an accidental release,an accident history of the last five years,and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative
accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance,monitoring,and employee
training measures;and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care,employee training measures
and procedures for informing the public and response agencies(e.g the fire department)should an accident occur.
Date of Government Version: 11/02/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/12/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/25/2021 Last EDR Contact:01/19/2021
Number of Days to Update:74 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
RCRA Administration Action Tracking System.RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA
pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA.For administration
actions after September 30, 1995,data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued.EPA will retain a copy of
the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources
made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database.
Date of Government Version:04/17/1995 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/03/1995 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/07/1995 Last EDR Contact:06/02/2008
Number of Days to Update:35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/01/2008
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties
A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties
Date of Government Version:04/27/2020 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/06/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:06/09/2020 Last EDR Contact:01/14/2021
Number of Days to Update:34 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/17/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
PADS: PCB Activity Database System
PCB Activity Database.PADS Identifies generators,transporters,commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers
of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities.
Date of Government Version: 10/09/2019 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/11/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/20/2019 Last EDR Contact:01/08/2021
Number of Days to Update:70 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency:Annually
ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System
The Integrated Compliance Information System(ICIS)supports the information needs of the national enforcement
and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)
program.
Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/10/2017 Last EDR Contact: 12/30/2020
Number of Days to Update:79 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
TC6381185.2s Page GR-16

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System-FIFRA(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,&Rodenticide Act)/TSCA(Toxic Substances Control Act)
FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA,
TSCA and EPCRA(Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act).To maintain currency, EDR contacts the
Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version:04/09/2009 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/16/2009 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:05/11/2009 Last EDR Contact:08/18/2017
Number of Days to Update:25 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System-FIFRA(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,&Rodenticide Act)/TSCA(Toxic Substances Control Act)
A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System(FTTS)inspections and enforcements.
Date of Government Version:04/09/2009 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/16/2009 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:05/11/2009 Last EDR Contact:08/18/2017
Number of Days to Update:25 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System
MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which
possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements.To maintain currency,
EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version:08/05/2020 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/10/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/08/2020 Last EDR Contact:01/19/2021
Number of Days to Update:59 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019 Source: Department of Energy
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/09/2021 Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2020
Number of Days to Update:70 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/15/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings.
Date of Government Version:01/12/2017 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/05/2019 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2019 Last EDR Contact: 11/30/2020
Number of Days to Update:251 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/15/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database
The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals.
Date of Government Version:09/13/2019 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/10/2020 Last EDR Contact:02/05/2021
Number of Days to Update:96 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/17/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
RADINFO: Radiation Information Database
The Radiation Information Database(RADINFO)contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)regulations for radiation and radioactivity.
TC6381185.2s Page GR-17

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version:07/01/2019 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/01/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/23/2019 Last EDR Contact:01/08/2021
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System(FTTS)for all ten EPA regions.The
information was obtained from the National Compliance Database(NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA
(Federal Insecticide,Fungicide,and Rodenticide Act)and TSCA(Toxic Substances Control Act).Some EPA regions
are now closing out records. Because of that,and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters
with updated records,it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included
in the newer FTTS database updates.This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/01/2007 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:04/10/2007 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007
Number of Days to Update:40 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection&Enforcement Case Listing
A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System(FTTS)for all ten EPA
regions.The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database(NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation
of FIFRA(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,and Rodenticide Act)and TSCA(Toxic Substances Control Act).Some
EPA regions are now closing out records.Because of that,and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing
EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that
may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates.This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/01/2007 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:04/10/2007 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008
Number of Days to Update:40 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data
Department of Transporation,Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data.
Date of Government Version:01/02/2020 Source: Department of Transporation,Office of Pipeline Safety
Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/28/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:04/17/2020 Last EDR Contact:01/27/2021
Number of Days to Update:80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/10/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
CONSENT: Superfund(CERCLA)Consent Decrees
Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL(Superfund)sites. Released
periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters.
Date of Government Version:09/30/2020 Source: Department of Justice,Consent Decree Library
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/08/2020 Telephone: Varies
Date Made Active in Reports:01/04/2021 Last EDR Contact:01/04/2021
Number of Days to Update:88 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
BRS: Biennial Reporting System
The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation
and management of hazardous waste.BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators(LQG)
and Treatment,Storage,and Disposal Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017 Source: EPA/NTIS
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/22/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/20/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/23/2020
Number of Days to Update: 151 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency:Biennially
TC6381185.2s Page GR-18

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations
This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater
than 640 acres.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Source: USGS
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/14/2015 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/10/2017 Last EDR Contact:01/08/2021
Number of Days to Update:546 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually
FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program(FUSRAP)in 1974 to remediate sites where
radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S.Atomic Energy Commission(AEC)operations.
Date of Government Version:08/08/2017 Source: Department of Energy
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/11/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/14/2018 Last EDR Contact:02/02/2021
Number of Days to Update:3 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/17/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs.When the mills
shut down,large piles of the sand-like material(mill tailings)remain after uranium has been extracted from
the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however,in some cases tailings
were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized.
Date of Government Version:08/30/2019 Source: Department of Energy
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/28/2020 Last EDR Contact:02/18/2021
Number of Days to Update:74 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/31/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites
A listing of former lead smelter site locations.
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/14/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/09/2021 Last EDR Contact:01/14/2021
Number of Days to Update:26 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites
A list of several hundred sites in the U.S.where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964.These sites
may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust
Date of Government Version:04/05/2001 Source: American Journal of Public Health
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009
Number of Days to Update:36 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
US AIRS(AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem(AFS)
The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System(AIRS).AFS contains compliance data
on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies.This
information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution,such as electric power plants,
steel mills,factories,and universities,and provides information about the air pollutants they produce.Action,
air program,air program pollutant,and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance
data from industrial plants.
TC6381185.2s Page GR-19

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/03/2017 Last EDR Contact:09/26/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency:Annually
US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data
A listing of minor source facilities.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/03/2017 Last EDR Contact:09/26/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency:Annually
MINES VIOLATIONS: MSHA Violation Assessment Data
Mines violation and assessment information. Department of Labor,Mine Safety&Health Administration.
Date of Government Version: 11/24/2020 Source: DOL, Mine Safety&Health Admi
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/25/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/24/2020
Number of Days to Update:56 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/15/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
US MINES: Mines Master Index File
Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971.The data also includes
violation information.
Date of Government Version: 11/03/2020 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/25/2021 Last EDR Contact:02/24/2021
Number of Days to Update:63 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:06/06/2021
Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually
US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing
This map layer includes ferrous(ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals,such as iron
ore or molybdenum)and nonferrous(Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals,such
as gold,silver,copper,zinc,and lead)metal mines in the United States.
Date of Government Version:05/06/2020 Source: USGS
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/27/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/13/2020 Last EDR Contact: 11/25/2020
Number of Days to Update:78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/08/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
US MINES 3: Active Mines&Mineral Plants Database Listing
Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team
of the USGS.
Date of Government Version:04/14/2011 Source: USGS
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/08/2011 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/13/2011 Last EDR Contact: 11/25/2020
Number of Days to Update:97 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/08/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines
An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining(primarily coal mining)is maintained by OSMRE to provide
information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977(SMCRA).The inventory
contains information on the location,type,and extent of AML impacts,as well as,information on the cost associated
with the reclamation of those problems.The inventory is based upon field surveys by State,Tribal,and OSMRE
program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing
problems are reclaimed.
TC6381185.2s Page GR-20

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version:09/16/2020 Source: Department of Interior
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/17/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/10/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/10/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
Facility Index System.FINDS contains both facility information and'pointers'to other sources that contain more
detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS(Permit Compliance System),AIRS(Aerometric
Information Retrieval System),DOCKET(Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial
enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS(Federal Underground Injection Control),C-DOCKET(Criminal
Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS(Federal Facilities
Information System),STATE(State Environmental Laws and Statutes),and PADS(PCB Activity Data System).
Date of Government Version: 11/04/2020 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/25/2021 Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2020
Number of Days to Update:55 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/15/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 11/03/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/17/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/09/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/17/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/08/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
ECHO: Enforcement&Compliance History Information
ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide.
Date of Government Version: 10/03/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/06/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/04/2021 Last EDR Contact:01/08/2021
Number of Days to Update:90 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites
A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Source: Department of Defense
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/02/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/17/2020 Last EDR Contact:01/15/2021
Number of Days to Update:77 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/26/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80(Code of Federal Regulations)EPA Fuels
Programs.All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations.
Date of Government Version: 11/13/2020 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/13/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/25/2021 Last EDR Contact:02/17/2021
Number of Days to Update:73 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/31/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
AIRS: Air Quality Permit Listing
A listing of facilities with air quality permits.
TC6381185.2s Page GR-21

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 12/07/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/23/2021 Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2020
Number of Days to Update:77 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
ASBESTOS: ASBESTOS
Asbestos notification sites
Date of Government Version: 10/30/2020 Source: Department of Health&Human Services
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/08/2021 Last EDR Contact:01/19/2021
Number of Days to Update:77 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
COAL ASH: Coal Ash Disposal Sites
A listing of coal combustion products distribution permits issued by the Division for the treatment,storage,
transportation,use and disposal of coal combustion products.
Date of Government Version:09/10/2020 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/23/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/23/2020
Number of Days to Update:82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaning Sites
Potential and known drycleaning sites,active and abandoned,that the Drycleaning Solvent Cleanup Program has
knowledge of and entered into this database.
Date of Government Version:09/08/2020 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/16/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/08/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/18/2020
Number of Days to Update:83 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/29/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing
A listing of financial assurance information for underground storage tank facilities. Financial assurance is intended
to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care,and corrective measures
if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 10/30/2020 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/04/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/31/2020 Last EDR Contact:02/03/2021
Number of Days to Update:57 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/17/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing
Information for solid waste facilities.Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available
to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care,and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated
facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 10/02/2012 Source: Department of Environmental&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2012 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/26/2012 Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Number of Days to Update:23 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
Financial Assurance 3: Financial Assurance Information
Hazardous waste financial assurance information.
TC6381185.2s Page GR-22

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 12/02/2020 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/18/2021 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2020
Number of Days to Update:77 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
NPDES: NPDES Facility Location Listing
General information regarding NPDES(National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System)permits.
Date of Government Version: 10/01/2020 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/15/2021 Last EDR Contact:01/27/2021
Number of Days to Update:80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/10/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
UIC: Underground Injection Wells Listing
A listing of uncerground injection wells locations.
Date of Government Version: 10/26/2020 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/07/2020 Last EDR Contact: 11/25/2020
Number of Days to Update:7 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/15/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
AOP: Animal Operation Permits Listing
This listing includes animal operations that are required to be permitted by the state.
Date of Government Version:04/01/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/26/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:05/27/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/11/2020
Number of Days to Update: 1 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
CCB: Coal Ash Structural Fills(CCB)Listing
These are not permitted Coal Ash landfills A list all of the now closed Coal Ash Structural Fills(CCB)in North
Carolina,in point data form.The purpose is to provide the public and other government entities a visual overview
of coal ash structural fills throughout the state and increase public awareness of their current locations.
Date of Government Version:02/27/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/07/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/23/2020 Last EDR Contact:01/08/2021
Number of Days to Update:78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
MINES MRDS: Mineral Resources Data System
Mineral Resources Data System
Date of Government Version:04/06/2018 Source: USGS
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/21/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/24/2019 Last EDR Contact: 11/25/2020
Number of Days to Update:3 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/08/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
SEPT HAULERS: Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
This list of all active and permitted Septage Land Application Site(SLAS)and Septage Detention and Treatment
Facility(SDTF)sites in North Carolina.The purpose of this map is to provide the public and government entities
a visual overview of the businesses that manage septage and septage facilities throughout the state.
Date of Government Version:05/13/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/07/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/23/2020 Last EDR Contact:01/08/2021
Number of Days to Update:78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
TC6381185.2s Page GR-23

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
PCSRP: Petroleum-Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
To treat petroleum-contaminated soil in order to protect North Carolinaa??s environment and the health of the
citizens of North Carolina.
Date of Government Version:07/06/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/07/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/23/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/30/2020
Number of Days to Update:78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/18/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
PCS: Permit Compliance System
PCS is a computerized management information system that contains data on National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System(NPDES)permit holding facilities.PCS tracks the permit,compliance,and enforcement status of NPDES
facilities.
Date of Government Version:07/14/2011 Source: EPA,Office of Water
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/05/2011 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/29/2011 Last EDR Contact:01/04/2021
Number of Days to Update:55 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually
PCS INACTIVE: Listing of Inactive PCS Permits
An inactive permit is a facility that has shut down or is no longer discharging.
Date of Government Version: 11/05/2014 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/06/2015 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:05/06/2015 Last EDR Contact:01/04/2021
Number of Days to Update: 120 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually
PCS ENF: Enforcement data
No description is available for this data
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/05/2015 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:03/06/2015 Last EDR Contact: 12/30/2020
Number of Days to Update:29 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants(manufactured gas plants)
compiled by EDR's researchers.Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800's to 1950's
to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel.These plants used whale oil,rosin,coal,or a mixture
of coal,oil,and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production,
such as coal tar(oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals),sludges,oils and other compounds
are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment.The byproduct from this process was frequently
disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly,serving as a continuous source of soil
and groundwater contamination.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc.
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited
to those categories of sources that might,in EDR's opinion,include gas station/filling station/service station
establishments.The categories reviewed included,but were not limited to gas,gas station,gasoline station,
filling station,auto,automobile repair,auto service station,service station,etc.This database falls within
a category of information EDR classifies as"High Risk Historical Records",or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents
unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns,
but may not show up in current government records searches.
TC6381185.2s Page GR-24

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc.
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency:Varies
EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers.EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources
that might,in EDR's opinion,include dry cleaning establishments.The categories reviewed included,but were
not limited to dry cleaners,cleaners,laundry,laundromat,cleaning/laundry,wash&dry etc.This database falls
within a category of information EDR classifies as"High Risk Historical Records",or HRHR.EDR's HRHR effort
presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental
concerns,but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc.
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency:Varies
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt.Archives
RGA HWS: Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste database provides a list of SHWS incidents derived
from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists.Compiled
from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment,Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/24/2013 Last EDR Contact:06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 176 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency:Varies
RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases
and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists.Compiled from Records formerly available
from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports:01/13/2014 Last EDR Contact:06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 196 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency:Varies
RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents
derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists.
Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment,Health and Natural Resources in North
Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/20/2013 Last EDR Contact:06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 172 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency:Varies
TC6381185.2s Page GR-25