WI0300146_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2018

MCDEMEZ
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H, Sullins
Governor Director
November 17, 2011
Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC
Attn: Jerry McMurray
485 Cedar Springs Road, Unit A
Salisbury, NC 28147
Ref: Issuance of Injection Permit WI0300146
Akzo Nobel (former National Starch and Chemical Company) Site
Salisbury, Rowan County, North Carolina.
Dear Mr. McMurray:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
In accordance with the application for permit modification dated October 7, 2011 and received on October 17, 2011, we
are forwarding herewith modified permit number WI0300146. This permit allows a construction modification for
Injection Well IWB-1 and the construction of two additional monitor wells to monitor its performance. This permit is to
inject a molasses and soybean oil emulsion (Newman Zone) solution to remediate groundwater contaminated with
chlorinated ethenes and ethanes at the facility referenced above. This permit shall be effective from the date of
issuance until October 31, 2012, and shall be subject to the conditions and limitations stated therein, including the
requirement to submit a fmal project evaluation as stated in PART VII — MONITORING AND REPORTING
REQUIREMENTS. Please note that some of the monitoring requirements have changed from your application. Please
read the entire permit to ensure that you are aware of all compliance requirements of the permit.
You will need to notify this office by telephone 48 hours prior to initiation of operation of the facility. In order to
continue uninterrupted legal use of the injection facility for the stated purpose, you must submit an application to renew
the permit 120 days prior to its expiration date. Please contact me at [phone]. or at [e-mail] if
you have any questions about your permit.
cc:
Best Regards,
David Goodrich
Hydrogeologist
tndrew IFitx�eg, i' oo�`4resvl' e canal Offce.
Elizabeth Rhine, Project Manager, Arcadis, 30 Patewood Drive, Suite 155, Greenville, SC 29615
Dave Mattison, NCDENR DWM Superfund Section
WI0300146 Permit File
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] \ FAX 1: 919-715-0588; FAX 2: 919-715-6048 \ Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwateraualitv.oro
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer
One,
NoIth Carolina
'`milk

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A WELL FOR INJECTION
In accordance with the provisions of Article 7, Chapter 87; Article 21, Chapter 143, and other
applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
AkzoNobel Surface Chemistry, LLC
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF 4 TYPE 5I INJECTION WELLS, defined
in Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 2C .0209(e)(3)(C), to inject a Molasses and a
Soybean Oil Emulsion (Newman Zone) solution for the enhancement of bioremediation of
chlorinated ethanes and ethenes. Permission is also granted for the construction of two deep
bedrock monitor wells at this site. These injection points and monitor wells will be located at the
AkzoNobel Surface Chemistry, LLC Site, 485 Cedar Spring Road, Salisbury, Rowan County,
North Carolina, and will be operated in accordance with the application submitted March 26,
2010, in conformity with the specifications and supporting data submitted August 5, 2010, and in
conformity with the application request to install two monitor wells and to perform exclusive
modifications to the proposed construction of Injection Well IWB-1 dated October 7, 2011, all of
which are filed with the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and are considered a
part of this permit.
This permit is for Construction and Operation only, and does not waive any provisions of the
Water Use Act or any other applicable Laws, Rules, or Regulations. Operation and use of an
injection well shall be in compliance with Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 2C
.0100 and .0200, and any other Laws, Rules, and Regulations pertaining to well construction and
use.
This permit shall be effective, unless revoked, from the date of its issuance until October 31,
2012, and shall be subject to the specified conditions and limitations set forth in Parts I through
X hereof.
Permit issued this the 17th day of November, 2011.
or Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission.
Permit No. WI0300146 PAGE 1 OF 7
ver.8/07 AP/UIC-6

PART I - WELL CONSTRUCTION GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. The Permittee must comply with all conditions of this permit and with the standards and
criteria specified in Criteria and Standards Applicable to Injection Wells (15A NCAC 2C
.0200) for the construction of the injection wells, as well as the standards and criteria
specified in Criteria and Standards Applicable to Water Supply and Certain Other Wells
(15A NCAC 2C .0100) for the construction of the two deep bedrock monitor wells. Any
noncompliance with conditions of this permit constitutes a violation of the North Carolina
Well Construction Act and is grounds for enforcement action as provided for in N.C.G.S. 87-
94.
2. This permit shall become voidable unless the facility is constructed in accordance with the
conditions of this permit, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting data.
3. This permit is valid only for construction of the number of injection wells described in the
application and other supporting data, including the application for the exclusive construction
modification of Injection Well IWB-1. Well IWB-1 shall be the only well constructed with
the modifications proposed in the application dated October 7, 2011. Construction of
additional injection wells must be approved in advance by the Aquifer Protection Section.
4. Each injection well and monitor well shall not hydraulically connect separate aquifers.
5. Each injection well and monitor well shall be constructed in such a manner that water from
land surface cannot migrate into the gravel pack or well screen.
6. Each injection well and monitor well shall be secured to reasonably insure against
unauthorized access and use. Each well shall be permanently labeled with a warning that it is
for injection purposes and the entrance to each well must be secured with a locking cap.
7. Each injection well and monitor well shall be afforded reasonable protection against damage
during construction and use.
8. Each injection well and monitor well shall have permanently affixed an identification plate.
9. Within 30 days of completion of well construction, a completed Well Construction Record
(Form GW-1) must be submitted for each injection well and monitor well to:
Aquifer Protection Section-UIC Staff
DENR-Division of Water Quality
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
PART II - WELL CONSTRUCTION SPECIAL CONDITIONS
At least forty-eight (48) hours prior to constructing each injection well or monitor well, the
Permittee shall notify the Aquifer Protection Section -Underground Injection Control (UIC)
Central Office staff, telephone number [phone] and the Mooresville Regional Office
Aquifer Protection Section Staff, telephone number [phone].
Permit No. WI0300146 PAGE 2 OF 7
ver.8/07 AP/UIC-6

PART III - OPERATION AND USE GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. This permit is effective only with respect to the nature, volume of materials, rate of injection,
and number of injection wells as described in the application and other supporting data.
2. This permit is not transferable without prior notice to, and approval by, the Director of the
Division of Water Quality (Director). In the event there is a desire for the facility to change
ownership, or there is a name change of the Permittee, a formal permit amendment request
must be submitted to the Director, including any supporting materials as may be appropriate,
at least 30 days prior to the date of the change.
3. The issuance of this permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility of complying
with any and all statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances which may be imposed by other
local, state, and federal agencies which have jurisdiction. Furthermore, the issuance of this
permit does not imply that all regulatory requirements have been met.
PART IV - PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
1. The injection facility shall be effectively maintained and operated at all times so that there is
no contamination of groundwater which will render it unsatisfactory for normal use. In the
event that the facility fails to perform satisfactorily, including the creation of nuisance
conditions or failure of the injection zone to adequately assimilate the injected fluid, the
Permittee shall take immediate corrective actions including those actions that may be
required by the Division of Water Quality such as the repair, modification, or abandonment
of the injection facility.
2. The Permittee shall be required to comply with the terms and conditions of this permit even
if compliance requires a reduction or elimination of the permitted activity.
3. The issuance of this permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility for damages to
surface or groundwater resulting from the operation of this facility.
PART V - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
1. The injection facility shall be properly maintained and operated at all times.
2. The Permittee must notify the Division and receive prior written approval from the Director
of any planned physical alterations or additions in the permitted facility or activity not
specifically authorized by the permit.
3. At least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the initiation of the operation of the facility for
injection, the Permittee must notify by telephone the Aquifer Protection Section-UIC, Central
Office staff, telephone number [phone]. Notification is required so that Division staff
can inspect or otherwise review the injection facility and determine if it is in compliance with
permit conditions.
Permit No. WI0300146 PAGE 3 OF 7
ver.8/07 AP/UIC-6

PART VI - INSPECTIONS
1. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of Water Quality
may, upon presentation of credentials, enter and inspect any property, premises, or place on
or related to the injection facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining
compliance with this permit, may inspect or copy any records that must be maintained under
the ,terms and conditions of this permit, and may obtain samples of groundwater, surface
water, or injection fluids.
2. Department representatives shall have reasonable access for purposes of inspection,
observation, and sampling associated with injection and any related facilities as provided for
in N.C.G.S. 87-90.
3. Provisions shall be made for collecting any necessary and appropriate samples associated
with the injection facility activities.
PART VII - MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
1. The proposed monitoring plan included in the application shall be followed, with the
following modification. Analysis for total Chromium and Thallium shall be added to the
Baseline, Mid -Pilot, and End -Pilot sampling events. All sample results shall be submitted
to the Aquifer Protection Section's Mooresville Regional Office and the Raleigh Central
Office. Any monitoring (including groundwater, surface water, or soil sampling) deemed
necessary by the Division of Water Quality to insure surface and ground water protection,
will be established and an acceptable sampling reporting schedule shall be followed.
2. The Permittee shall submit an Injection Event Record within 30 days of completing each
injection.
3. The Permittee shall produce a final project evaluation within 9 months after completing all
injection -related activity associated with this permit or produce a project interim evaluation
before submitting a renewal application for this permit. This document shall assess the
injection projects findings in a written summary. The final project evaluation shall also
contain monitoring well sampling data, contaminant plume maps and potentiometric surface
maps.
4. The monitoring results and the final project evaluation shall be submitted to:
Aquifer Protection Section-UIC Staff
DENR-Division of Water Quality
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
and to:
Permit No. WI0300146 PAGE 4 OF 7
ver.8/07 AP/UIC-6

Aquifer Protection Section
DENR-DWQ Mooresville Regional Office
610 East Center Ave. Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
5. The Permittee shall report by telephone, within 48 hours of the occurrence or first knowledge
of the occurrence, to the Mooresville Regional Office, telephone number [phone], any
of the following:
(A) Any occurrence at the injection facility which results in any unusual operating
circumstances;
(B) Any failure due to known or unknown reasons, that renders the facility incapable of
proper injection operations, such as mechanical or electrical failures.
6. Where the Permittee becomes aware of an omission of any relevant facts in a permit
application, or of any incorrect information submitted in said application or in any report to
the Director, the relevant and correct facts or information shall be promptly submitted to the
Director by the Permittee.
7. In the event that the permitted facility fails to perform satisfactorily, the Permittee shall take
such immediate action as may be required by the Director.
PART VIII - PERMIT RENEWAL
In order to continue uninterrupted legal use of the injection facility for the stated purpose, the
Permittee must submit an application to renew the permit 120 days prior to its expiration date.
PART IX - CHANGE OF WELL STATUS
1. The Permittee shall provide written notification within 15 days of any change of status of an
injection well. Such a change would include the discontinued use of a well for injection. If a
well is taken completely out of service temporarily, the Permittee must install a sanitary seal.
If a well is not to be used for any purpose that well must be permanently abandoned
according to 15A NCAC 2C .0113, Well Construction Standards.
2. When operations have ceased at the facility and a well will no longer be used for any
purpose, the Permittee shall abandon that injection well in accordance with the procedures
specified in 15A NCAC 2C .0113(b), including but not limited to the following:
(A) All casing and screen materials may be removed prior to initiation of abandonment
procedures if such removal will not cause or contribute to contamination of the
groundwaters.
(B) The entire depth of each well shall be sounded before it is sealed to insure freedom
from obstructions that may interfere with sealing operations.
Permit No. WI0300146 PAGE 5 OF 7
ver.8/07 AP/UIC-6

(C) The well shall be thoroughly disinfected, priorto sealing, if the Director determines
that failure to do so could lead to the contamination of an underground source of
drinking water.
(D) Drilled wells shall be completely filled with cement grout, or bentonite grout which
shall be introduced into the well through a pipe which extends to the bottom of the
well and is raised as the well is filled.
(E) In the case of gravel -packed wells in which the casing and screens have not been
removed, neat -cement, or bentonite grout shall be injected into the well completely
filling it from the bottom of the casing to the top.
(F) In those cases when, as a result of the injection operations, a subsurface cavity has
been created, each well shall be abandoned in such a manner that will prevent the
movement of fluids into or between underground sources of drinking water and in
accordance with the terms and conditions of the permit.
(G) The Permittee shall submit a Well Abandonment Record (Form GW-30) as specified
in 15A NCAC 2C .0213(h)(1) within 30 days of completion of abandonment.
3. The written documentation required in Part IX (1) and (2) (G) shall be submitted to:
Aquifer Protection Section-UIC Staff
DENR-Division of Water Quality
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
PART X — WORKER PRECAUTIONS DURING APPLICATION
1. Some effects reported to be associated with the product proposed to be used are as follows:
eye, skin, nose, throat, lungs and gastrointestinal irritation or burns. If the product is released
into the environment in a way that could result in a suspension of fine solid or liquid particles.
(e.g., grinding, blending, vigorous shaking or mixing), then proper personal protective
equipment should be used. The application process should be reviewed by an industrial
hygienist to ensure that the most appropriate personal protective equipment is used.
2. Persons working with these products should wear goggles or a face shield, gloves, and
protective clothing. Face and body protection should be used for anticipated splashes or
sprays.
3. Eating, drinking, smoking, handling contact lenses, and applying cosmetics should not be
permitted in the application area during or immediately following application.
4. Site access should be limited to worker's involved in the injection of the solution. Safety
controls should be in place to ensure that the check valve and the pressure delivery systems
are working properly.
Permit No. WI0300146 . PAGE 6 OF 7
ver.8/07 AP/UIC-6

5. The Material Safety Data Sheets should be followed to prevent incompatible or adverse
reactions and injuries.
Permit No. WI0300146 PAGE 7 OF 7
ver.8/07 AP/UIC-6

Pitner, Andrew
From: Pitner, Andrew
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 2:54 PM
To: Goodrich, David
Cc: Schutte, Maria
Subject: UIC WI0300146 modification
Hi David,
As we discussed on the phone, the gist of this modification is to the construction of the injection well. Though there's a
permit condition noting that the `injection well shall not hydraulically connect separate aquifers', I think their actions to
grout the lowest portion of the core hole and to leave open the possibility of using this well for recovery are well
reasoned and appropriate given the contamination at the site and its distribution vertically in the borehole. Given
apparent time constraints mentioned in the report, please let this email serve as the MRO staff report in support of
allowing the permit modification. If you have any questions/concerns, let me know. Thanks,
Andrew
Andrew Pitner, [e-mail]
Division of Water Quality - Aquifer Protection Section
Mooresville Regional Office (MRO)
North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115
MR0 Main Phone: [phone]
Direct Office Phone: [phone]
MRO Fax: [phone]
DWQ website: www.ncwaterqualitv.org
NOTICE: Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulation.
1

AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
APPLICATION REVIEW REQUEST FORM
Date: November 3, 2011
To: ❑ Landon Davidson, ARO-APS
❑ Art Barnhardt, FRO-APS
X Andrew Pitner, MRO-APS
❑ Jay Zimmerman, RRO-APS
From: David Goodrich , Land Application Unit
Telephone: [phone]
E-Mail: david.goodrichAncdenr.gov
ts,
it Li t 4"'
NOV - 3 2011 k`
3 LJ[..FIR.
y`5 ; `�t A�luifat co?cction
❑ David May, WaQ A --
❑ Charlie Stehman, WiRO-APS
❑ Sherri. Knight, 'WSRO-APS
Fax: [phone]
A. Permit Number: WI0300146
B. Owner: Akzonobel Surface Chemistry LLC
C. Facility/Operation: AkzoNobel Cedar Springs Road Plant
❑ Proposed X Existing X Facility
X Operation
D. Application:
1. Permit Type: ❑ Animal ❑ Surface Irrigation ❑ Reuse ❑ H-R Infiltration
❑ Recycle
❑ I/E Lagoon X GW Remediation (ND)5I Injection
❑ UIC - (5A7) open loop geothermal
For Residuals: ❑ Land App. ❑ D&M ❑ Surface Disposal
❑ 503 ❑ 503 Exempt ❑ Animal
2. Project Type: ❑ New X Major Mod. n Minor Mod. ❑ Renewal n Renewal w/ Mod.
E. Comments/Other Information: n I would like to accompany you on a site visit.
Attached, you will fmd all information submitted in support of the above -referenced application for your
review, comment, and/or action. Within 30 calendar days, please take the following actions:
X Return a Completed APSARR Form. - Please comment
❑ Attach Well Construction Data Sheet.
❑ Attach Attachment B for Certification by the LAPCU.
❑ Issue an Attachment B Certification from the RO.*
* Remember that you will be responsible for coordinating site visits and reviews, as well as additional
information requests with other RO-APS representatives in order to prepare a complete Attachment B for
certification. Refer to the RPP SOP for additional detail.
When you receive this request form, please write your name and dates in the spaces below, make a copy
of this sheet, and return it to the appropriate Central Office -Aquifer Protection Section contact person
listed above.
RO-APS Reviewer: Date:
FORM: APSARR 07/06 Page 1 of 1

Permit Number WI0300146
Central Files: APS SWP
11/02/11
Permit Tracking Slip
Program Category
Ground Water
Status Project Type
In review Major modification
Permit Type Version Permit Classification
Injection In situ Groundwater Remediation Well (51) Individual
Primary Reviewer
david.goodrich
Coastal SW Rule
Permitted Flow
Facility
Permit.Contact Affiliation
Elizabeth Rhine
Manager Project
30 Patewood Dr Ste 155
Greenville SC 29615
Facility Name Major/Minor Region
Akzo Nobel Minor Mooresville
Location Address County
485 Cedar Spring Rowan
Salisbury NC 28147
Owner
Facility Contact Affiliation
Owner Name
Akzonobel Surface Chemistry LLC
Dates/Events
Owner Type
Non -Government
Owner Affiliation
Jerry McMurray
485 Cedar Springs Rd
Salisbury
NC 28147
Orig Issue
11/29/10
App Received Draft Initiated
10/17/11
Regulated Activities
Groundwater remediation
Outfall NULL
Scheduled
Issuance
Public Notice Issue
Effective Expiration
Reauested/Received Events
RO staff report received
RO staff report requested
Waterbody Name Stream Index Number Current Class Subbasin

CD
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
November 2, 2011
Robert M. Asselin — Vice President
AkzoNobel Surface Chemistry LLC
485 Cedar Springs Rd., Unit A
Salisbury, NC 28147
Dear Mr. Asselin:
Subject: Acknowledgement of
Application No. WI0300146
AkzoNobel
Injection In situ Groundwater
Remediation Well (5I) System
Rowan County
The Aquifer Protection Section acknowledges receipt of your permit application and supporting
documentation received on 10/17/2011. Your application package has been assigned the number listed
above, and the primary reviewer is David Goodrich.
Central and Mooresville Regional Office staff will perform a detailed review of the provided
application, and may contact you with 'a request for additional information. To ensure maximum
efficiency in processing permit applications, the Aquifer Protection Section requests your assistance in
providing a timely and complete response to any additional information requests.
Please note that processing standard review permit applications may take as long as 60 to 90 days
after receipt of a complete application. If you have any questions, please contact
David Goodrich at [phone] or [e-mail].
Sincerely,
for Debra J. Watts
Groundwater Protection Unit Supervisor
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Elizabeth Rhine (ARCADIS — 30 Patewood Dr., Ste. 155, Greenville, SC 29615)
Permit File WI0300146
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] i.FAX 1.: 919-715-0588; FAX 2: 919-715-6048 \ Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet; www.ncwateraualitv.orq
One
NOrtnCaro. ina
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

iSl ARCADIS
Infrastructurg-•Water.Enviranment: Buildings;
UIC Program
NCDENR — DWQ
Aquifer Protection Section
2728 Capital Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
Subject:
Amendment Request for Underground Injection Control Permit WI0300146
National Starch and Chemical Company Superfund Site
Salisbury, Rowan County, North Carolina
To Whom It May Concern:
On behalf of AkzoNobel, ARCADIS is providing this update on the status of activities
related to Underground Injection Control (UIC) Permit WI0300146 and to request a
variance for construction of injection well IWB-1. The pilot study described in the
Work Plan for Enhanced Reductive Dechlorination (ERD) Pilot Study (ARCADIS,
August 3, 2011) is currently on hold pending approval of your approval of this
variance. An updated permit application requesting a modification of the existing
permit is included as Attachment 1.
The deep bedrock injection well, IWB-1, was installed using a combination of hollow
stem auger and air rotary drilling techniques. Hollow stem augers were used drill
through the saprolite. Once auger refusal was encountered, the boring was
advanced 10 feet into competent bedrock using air rotary. As proposed in the work
plan, a steel surface casing was sealed in place using neat Portland Type 1 cement.
The boring was originally proposed to be advanced via air rotary to a depth of
approximately 200 feet below ground surface (bgs), then packer tested at the
completion of drilling to determine the mass distribution and transmissive properties
of the bedrock. However, a different drilling plan was initiated on December 7, 2010
to provide more information about the bedrock. The rock was cored using HQ core
barrel (3.78 inch diameter) at 20-foot intervals. The core was examined for fractures
and logged in the field. Each 20-foot interval was packer tested, and a groundwater
sample was collected from each interval and submitted to the on -site laboratory for
screening and to TestAmerica for laboratory analysis. The boring log and a summary
of the vertical distribution of 1,2-dicholorethane are provided in Attachment 2. Well
construction details are summarized in Attachment 3.
Imagine the result
g:lenv\national starch\ou3_ord pilot study_lagoon area\ulc permit\permit mod_10042011\cover letter_100011_finel.doc
ARCADIS U.S., Inc.
30 Patewood Drive
Suite 155
Greenville
South Carolina 29615
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
www.arcadis-us.com
ENVIRONMENTAL
Date:
October 7, 2011
Contact:
Elizabeth Rhine
Phone:
864.987.3906
Email:
Elizabeth.Rhine@arcadis-
us.com
Our ref:
B0060013.0006.00005
RECEIVED / DENR 1 DWO
AQUIFFP PPOTrri!nM .S C i ION
OCT 17 2011

ARCADIS
As anticipated, fairly low concentrations of 1,2-dichloroethane (DCA) were detected
in the upper fractures, where the existing groundwater extraction system was
successful in removing mass from the shallow bedrock. In the interval 154 to 174 feet
bgs, 1,2-DCA was observed at 36,000 micrograms per liter (pg/L). 1,2-DCA was
detected at 21 milligrams per liter (mg/L) in the subsequent interval 174 to 200 feet
bgs. Due to the high concentrations at the target depth, ARCADIS believed it was
necessary to continue coring to delineate the vertical extent of contamination. Coring
resumed on August 22 and packer tests were conducted at 20-foot intervals to a total
depth of 320 feet bgs using flourescein dye to identify core water introduced into the
hole from aquifer water, and the ColorTec method was used to screen the
groundwater samples. The ColorTec method indicated the two deepest intervals
contained 15 parts per billion (ppb) of chlorinated solvents. However, the
confirmatory laboratory sample results indicated 430 pg/L in the 280-300 foot interval
and 560 pg/L in the 300-320 foot interval. After conversations with Jon Bornholm with
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), it was agreed that IWB-1,
being a remediation injection well, should be grouted up to protect these lower
fractures from the much higher impacts found at the 240-260 foot interval (10,000
pg/L). Neat Portland cement was tremied to the bottom of the well and the core hole
was grouted to 260 feet bgs.
On September 27, borehole geophysical logging was completed on IWB-1. The
bottom of the core hole was tagged at 230 feet, and the caliper indicated the core
hole had been washed to greater than six inches in diameter in areas from the
bottom of the surface casing at 60 feet bgs to 73 feet bgs. The original well
construction was anticipated to have a 40-foot screened interval. However,
construction of an injection well that could also serve as an extraction well that
intercepts all of the water -bearing fractures would be beneficial. Based on current
conditions, it is necessary to use air rotary to ream the core hole to 6-inch diameter
to a terminal depth of 260 feet to intercept the mass -bearing fractures identified
within the 240-260 core interval. While completing the well as an open hole bedrock
well would provide the most versatility, the weathered interval from 60 to 73 feet bgs
prohibits completing the well in this manner. For these reasons, a variance is
requested to construct the well using a 4-inch diameter, 0.060-inch slotted polyvinyl
chloride (PVC) screen from 60 to 260 feet and a 4-inch Sch 40 PVC riser to ground
surface. The annular space around the screen will be filled with # 4 filter sand to a
depth of approximately 59 feet bgs. An additional 1 foot of #2 filter sand will be added
from 59 to 58 feet bgs. A 2-foot bentonite seal will be added from 56 to 58 feet bgs.
The remaining annular space will be filled with neat Portland Type 1 cement to
surface. A schematic detailing the well completion for IWB-1 is included in
UIC Permit WI0300146
October 7, 2011
Page:
2/4

D1s.
Attachment 4. Such construction would simulate an open -hole injection well while
preventing further collapse of the softer rock at the base of the surface casing. While
a 2-inch well could be constructed at IWB-1 without this variance, a 2-inch well would
limit the use of groundwater extraction. Since the Record of Decision (ROD) specifies
groundwater extraction as the remedy for the site, and USEPA has requested that
groundwater extraction remain an option in conjunction with this ERD pilot study.
To monitor injections in IWB-1, it is necessary to install two additional deep bedrock
wells to monitor performance of the ERD pilot study at the intervals of 172-225 feet
bgs and 270-320 feet bgs. Using the borehole geophysics to determine the fracture
orientation (north -south) and the dip (generally east), these wells are proposed at the
location shown on Attachment 5.
All other injection and observation wells proposed in the Work Plan have been
installed. OWB-1 has an obstruction that will be removed when it is reamed to the
target diameter of 6 inches. Per USEPA's request, OWB-1 and OWS-1 were
proposed to serve as observation wells, or if needed, as injection wells. Based on the
analytical data for these two wells summarized on Attachment 6, it is unlikely that
these wells will be needed for injection.
Baseline sampling was conducted for all wells included in the ERD pilot study
monitoring plan. 1,2-DCA was detected in saprolite well IWS-1 a 380,000 pg/L. This
concentration is much higher than previously observed in the existing saprolite
monitoring wells. For this reason, four additional saprolite wells are proposed as
shown on Attachment 5 to delineate groundwater impacts in the Lagoon Area. These
wells will be incorporated into the revised monitoring plan for the pilot study.
Availability of the Schramm drill rig is limited, and this work has been scheduled 6
months in advance. The rig will be on site starting October 17 for three weeks.
Therefore, expedited review of the well construction variance is requested. Once the
wells are installed, ARCADIS will submit a separate UIC permit modification to cover
changes in the volume of molasses/Newman Zone to be injected into IWB-1 as a
result of the deeper well. A revised sampling and analysis plan that incorporates the
new site wells will be submitted at that time.
We appreciate an expedited review of this request for variance to construct IWB-1 so
we can meet our drilling schedule on October 17' 2011. This project has been altered
to provide our client with the best options for handling the environmental conditions
UIC Permit WI0300146
October 7, 2011
Page:
3/4

ARCADIS
currently observed at the site. We appreciate the UIC department's cooperation and
patience as we strive to make this a successful project.
Sincerely,
ARCADIS U.S., Inc.
Elizabeth Rhine
Project Coordinator
Copies:
Jerry McMurray — AkzoNobel
Angela Dohl — AkzoNobel
Jon Bornholm — USEPA
David Mattison — NCDENR
Enclosures:
Attachment 1
Attachment 2
Attachment 3
Attachment 4
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
— Modified Permit Application
— Boring Log and Vertical Distribution of 1,2-DCA in IWB-1
— Well Construction Details
— Proposed Well Completion Diagrams
— Proposed Well Locations
— Recent Groundwater Analytical Results
RECEIVED / DENR / DWQ
AQUIFF.R PPnTl=rT!r 'EC T ION
OCT 1 7 2011
UIC Permit WI0300146
October 7, 2011
Page:
4/4

ARCADIS
Attachment 1
Modified Permit Application

r
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 5I Wells — In Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
• Do not use this form for remediation systems that extract contaminated groundwater, treat it, and reinject the treated groundwater.
• Submit TWO copies of the completed application and all attachments to the address on the last page of this form.
• Any changes made to this form will result in the application package being returned.
Application Number (to be completed by DWQ):
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Applicant's Name (generally the responsible party): AkzoNobel Surface Chemistry LLC
2. Signing Official's Name*: Robert M. Asselin Title: Vice President
* Signing Official must be in accordance with instructions in part VI on page 7.
3. Mailing address of applicant: Attn: Jerry McMurray
485 Cedar Springs Road, Unit A
City: Salisbury State: NC Zip: 28147
Telephone number: 704-431-6002 Fax number: 704-638-0179
4. Property Owner's Name (if different from Applicant): AkzoNobel Surface Chemistry LLC
5. Property Owner's mailing address: Attn: Jerry McMurray
City:
485 Cedar Springs Road, Unit A
Salisbury State: NC Zip: 28147
6. Name and address of contact person who can answer questions about the proposed injection project:
Name: Elizabeth Rhine Title: Project Manager
Company: ARCADIS
Address: 30 Patewood Drive, Suite 155
City: Greenville State: SC Zip: 29615
Telephone number: [phone]
Fax number: [phone]
Email Address: Elizabeth.Rhinena,ARCADIS-US.com
II. PERMIT INFORMATION:
• Project is: ) New § Modification of existing permit ) Renewal of existing permit without modification
Renewal of existing permit with modification
1. If this application is being submitted for renewal or modification to an existing permit, provide:
existing permit number WI0300146 and the issuance date November 29, 2010
For renewal without modifications, fill out sections I & II only, sign the certification on the last page of this
form, and obtain the property owner's signature to indicate consent (if the applicant is not the owner).
For all renewals, submit a status report including monitoring results of all injection activities to date.
Revised 6/09
UIC-SUST Page 1 of 8
RECEIVED /DEAR WQ
AQUIIF P•PROTFCTII?n1SECTION
OCT 172011

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 5I Wells —In Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
III. INCIDENT & FACILITY DATA
A. FACILITY INFORMATION
1. Facility name: AkzoNobel
2. Complete physical address of the facility: 485 Cedar Spring Road
City: Salisbury
County:Rowan State: NC Zip: 28147
B. INCIDENT DESCRIPTION
1. Describe the source of the contamination: The area of proposed injection is referred to as Operable
Unit 3 (0U3). The source of the groundwater impacts in OU3 are attributed to the formerly unlined
wastewater treatment lagoons and abandoned process waste water sewers that ran from the plan to the
treatment lagoons.
2. List all contaminants present in soils or groundwater at the site (contaminants may be listed in groups, e.g.,
gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, fuel oil, chlorinated ethenes, chlorinated ethanes, metals, pesticides/herbicides, etc):
BTEX, Metals, Chlorinated Ethenes, Chlorinated Ethanes, Semi -Volatile Organic Compounds (4-
Nitrophenol, Bis(2-chloroethvl)ether, Bis(2-ethvlhexyl)phthalate
3. Has LNAPL or DNAPL ever been observed at the site (even if outside the injection zone)?
Yes If yes, list maximum measured separate phase thickness feet
§ No If no, list maximum concentration of total VOCs observed at site: 630,000 ppb
4. Agency managing the contamination incident:
UST Section § Superfund Section (including REC Program and DSCA sites)
DWQ Aquifer Protection Section ) Solid Waste Section
§ Hazardous Waste Section § Other: US Environmental Protection Agency Region 4
5. Incident managers name: Jon Bornholm (US EPA) and phone number [phone]
Incident managers name: Dave Mattison (NC DENR Superfund Section) and phone number [phone]
Incident managers name: Carl Utterback (NC DENR Hazardous Waste Section) and phone number (919)508-
8567
Incident number or other site number assigned by the agency managing the contamination incident:
EPA ID: NCD991278953
C. PERMITS
List all permits or construction approvals that have been issued for the facility or incident, including those not
directly related to the proposed injection operation:
1. Hazardous Waste Management program permits under RCRA: RCRA Compliance Order #94-344
2. DWQ Non -Discharge or NPDES permits: Stormwater NCS000259; POTW NC0023884-Permit 002
3. County or DEH subsurface wastewater disposal permits:
4. Other environmental permits required by state or federal law: Title V - 09900T06
Revised 6/09 UIC-51/5T Page 2 of 8

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 5I Wells —In Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
IV. INJECTION DATA
A. INJECTION FLUID DATA
1. List all proposed injectants.
NOTE: Any substance to be injected as a tracer or to promote in situ remediation must be reviewed by the
Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Section (OEES) of the Division of Public Health, Department of
Health and Human Services. Review the list of approved injectants or contact the UIC Program to determine if
the injectants you are proposing have been reviewed by OEES.
Injectant:: Molasses
Concentration at point of injection: —50 to 100 g/L
Percent if in a mixture with other injectants: 1 to 2 % (mixed with water)
Injectant:: Emulsified Vegetable Oil (Newman Zone)
Concentration at point of injection: —50 to 100 g/L
Percent if in a mixture with other injectants: 2 to 4 % (mixed with water)
2. Source of fluids used to dilute or chase the injectants listed above:
None
§ Municipal water supply
Groundwater from private well or any well within '/a mile of injection site
)Air
Other:
3. If any well within 'A mile of injection site, a private well, or surface water is to be used as the fluid source, supply
the following information:
a. Location/ID number of source: None
b. Depth of source:
c. Formation:
d. Rock/Sediment type:
e. In Attachment C, provide a current, complete chemical analysis of the water from the source well, including
analyses for all contaminants suspected or historically recognized in soil or groundwater on the site.
NOTE: If contaminated groundwater is to be used as the dilution or chase fluid, this is not the proper permit
application form. You must apply for a closed -loop groundwater remediation permit using application form
GWRS.
Revised 6/09 UIC-5I/5T Page 3 of 8

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 5I Wells — In Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
B. PROPOSED OPERATING PARAMETERS
1. Duration of Injection: January 2012 — May 2013
a. Maximum number of separate injection events: 3 estimated, 6 maximum
b. Expected duration of each injection event: 1 to 3 weeks
c. Expected duration between events (if more than one event): 7 to 8 weeks
2. Injection rate per well: 1-2 (saprolite) / 4-8 (bedrock) gallons per minute (gpm)
3. Total Injection volume: Will be updated based on permitted screened interval for the bedrock
injection well gallons per well; TBD gallons per event (if separate events)
4. Injection pressure: <5 pounds/square inch (psi)
5. Temperature at point of injection: ambient atmospheric °F
6. Briefly describe how the above parameters will be measured and controlled:
- Injection rate will be controlled by the capacity of the well. It will be monitored at the well using a flow meter
- Injection volume will be monitored by totalizer (included with flow meter)
- Injection pressure will be monitored by pressure gauge at the well head. If pressure exceeds 5psi, the flow will
be reduced using a ball valve at the well head.
7. Estimated hydraulic capacity of the well: Saprolite — 2, Bedrock - 8 gpm
C. INJECTION WELL CONSTRUCTION DATA
1. Injection will be via:
Existing well(s) proposed for use as an injection well. Provide the data in (2) through (6) below to the best of
your knowledge.
§ Proposed well(s) to be constructed for use as an injection well. Provide the data in (2) through (6) below as
proposed construction specifications.
2. Well Drilling Contractor's Name: _AE Drilling Services LLC
NC Well Contractor Certification number: Tommy Burnette (#2277) or Abel McGuire (#3571)
3. Date to be constructed: October 2011 Number of borings: 2
Approximate depth of each boring (feet):IWB-1 — 260 feet bgs (injection) / OWB-1 — 200 feet bgs (monitoring)
4. Screened interval/Injection interval of injection wells:
IWB-1 — screened 60 to 260 feet bgs (4-inch, Sch 40 PVC, 0.06-inch slot)
OWB-1 — screened 140 to 200 feet bgs (2-inch, 304 SS, 0.01-inch vee-wire)
*Note: Please refer to the cover letter for specifics on the proposed well completions.
Revised 6/09 UIC-5I/5T Page 4 of 8

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 51 Wells —In Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
5. Well casing (N/A if injection is through direct push rods):
Type: § PVC
Stainless steel ) Other:
Casing depth: IWB-1 0 to 60 ft./ OWB-1 0 to 140 ft (bedrock wells)
6. Grout (N/A if injection is through direct push rods):
Type: § Cement
Bentonite ) Other:
Grout depth: IWB-1 0 to 56 ft / OWB-1 0 to 136 ft. (for bedrock wells)
Revised 6/09 UIC-5I/5T Page 5 of 8

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 5I Wells — In Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
ATTACHMENTS
Provide the following items as separate attachments with the given headings:
A. SITE HISTORY
Provide a brief description of the site history including:
(1) site usage historically and present,
(2) origin of the contamination,
(3) previous remedial action(s).
NOTE: G.S. 89E-18 requires that any geologic plans, reports, or documents in which the performance is related to the
public welfare or safeguarding of the environment be prepared by a licensed geologist or subordinate under their
direction. G.S. 89E-13 requires that all drawings, reports, or documents involving geologic work prepared or approved
by a licensed geologist, or a subordinate under their direction, be signed and sealed by the licensed geologist.
B. HYDROGEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION
Provide a hydrogeologic description, soils description, and cross section of the subsurface to a depth that includes the
known or projected depth of contamination. The hydrogeologic description shall include:
(1) the regional geologic setting;
(2) significant changes in lithology;
(3) the hydraulic conductivity, transmissivity, and specific yield of the aquifer to be used for injection, including a
description of the test(s) used to determine these parameters; and
(4) the depth to the mean seasonal high water table.
C. INJECTION FLUID COMPOSITION
Describe the chemical, physical, biological and radiological characteristics of each injectant. Attach the Material Safety
Data Sheet (MSDS) for each injectant. If a private well or a well within 'A mile of the injection site is used as the source
well, include chemical analysis of source fluid here.
D. INJECTION RATIONALE
Attach a brief description of the rationale for selecting the injectants and concentrations proposed for injection, including:
(1) goals of the injection project;
(2) explanation and/or calculations of how the proposed injectant volume and concentration were determined;
(3) a description of the reactions between the injectants and the contaminants present including specific breakdown
products or intermediate compounds that may be formed by the injection; and
(4) summary results of modeling or testing performed to investigate the injectant's potential or susceptibility to change
(biological, chemical or physical) in the subsurface.
E. INJECTION PROCEDURE AND EQUIPMENT
Provide a detailed description of all planned activities related to the proposed injection including but not limited to:
(1) construction plans and materials;
(2) operation procedures;
(3) a detailed diagram of the surface and subsurface portions of the system; and
(4) a planned injection schedule.
Revised 6/09 UIC-5I/5T Page 6 of 8

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 5I Wells — In Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
F. MONITORING PLAN
Provide a plan for monitoring the results of the injection, including:
(1) a list of existing and proposed monitoring wells to be used;
(2) a list of monitoring parameters and analytical methods to be used; and
(3) a schedule for sampling to monitor the proposed injection.
NOTE: The selected monitoring wells must be located so as to detect any movement of injection fluids, process by-
products, or formation fluids outside the injection area or zone. The monitoring parameters should include the target
contaminants as well as secondary or intermediate contaminants which may result from the injection and other
parameters which may serve to indicate the progress of the intended reactions, such as pH, ORP, dissolved oxygen, and
other electron acceptors and donors. The monitoring schedule should be consistent with the pace of the anticipated
reactions and rate of transport of the injectants and contaminants.
G. WELL DATA
Provide a tabulation of data on all existing or abandoned wells within '/a mile of the injection well(s) which penetrate the
proposed injection zone, including, but not limited to, monitoring wells and wells proposed for use as injection wells.
Such data shall include a description of each well's use (water supply, monitoring, etc), total depth, screened or open
borehole depth interval, and well construction or abandonment record, if available.
H. MAPS
Attach the following scaled, site -specific maps:
(1) Area map based on the most recent USGS 7.5' topographic map of the area, at a scale of 1:24,000 and
showing the location of the proposed injection site.
(2) Site map including:
a. all property boundaries;
b. all buildings within the property boundary;
c. existing and proposed injection wells or well field(s)
d. any existing sources of potential or known groundwater contamination, including waste storage,
treatment or disposal systems within '/ mile of the injection well or well system;
e. all surface water bodies within '/a mile of the injection well or well system; and
f. all existing or abandoned wells within 'A mile of the injection well(s) which penetrate the proposed
injection zone, including, but not limited to, monitoring and wells proposed for use as injection wells.
(3) Potentiometric surface map(s) including:
a. direction of groundwater movement
b. existing and proposed monitoring wells
c. existing and proposed injection wells
(4) Contaminant plume map(s) including:
a. the horizontal extent of the contaminant plume, including isoconcentration lines
b. existing and proposed monitoring wells
c. existing and proposed injection wells
(5) Cross-section(s) to the known or projected depth of contamination, including:
a. horizontal and vertical extent of the contaminant plume, including isoconcentration lines
b. major changes in lithology
c. existing and proposed monitoring wells
d. existing and proposed injection wells
I. Work Plan
The work plan for Enhanced Reductive Dechlorination Pilot Study is included as Attachment I
Revised 6/09 UIC-51/5T Page 7 of 8

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 5I Wells — In Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
CERTIFICATION (to be signed as required below or by that person's authorized agent)
NCAC 15A 2C .0211(b) requires that all permit applications shall be signed as follows:
1. for a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer
2. for a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor, respectively
3. for a municipality or a state, federal, or other public agency: by either a principal executive officer or
ranking publicly elected official
4. for all others: by the well owner.
If an authorized agent is signing on behalf of the applicant, then supply a letter signed by the applicant that
names and authorizes their agent.
I hereby certify under penalty of law that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information
submitted in this document and all attachments therein, and that, based on my inquiry of those individuals
immediately responsible for obtaining said information, I believe that the information is true, accurate, and
complete. I am aware that there are penalties, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment, for submitting
false information. I agree to construct, operate, maintain, repair, and if applicable, abandon the injection well(s)
and all related appurtenances in accordance with the approved specifications and conditions of the Permit.
Printed Name pd-Title: K bert M. Asselin, Vice President, AkzoNobel Surface Chemistry LLC
t
Signature: ' Date: 2//
V. CONSENT OF PROPERTY OWNER (if the property is not owned by the applicant)
("Owner" means any person who holds the fee or other property rights in the well being constructed. A well is
real property and its construction on land shall be deemed to vest ownership in the land owner, in the absence of
contrary agreement in writing.)
As owner of the property on which the injection well(s) are to be constructed and operated, I hereby consent to
allow the applicant to construct each injection well as outlined in this application and agree that it shall be the
responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the injection well(s) conform to the Well Construction Standards
(Title 15A NCAC 2C .0200).
Printed Name and Title:
Signature: Date:
Submit TWO copies of the completed application package, including all attachments, to:
UIC Program
Aquifer Protection Section
North Carolina DENR-DWQ
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Telephone [phone]
RECEIVED / DEAR / DWQ
AQUIFFR.ppnTECTIO`! SECTION
OCT 17 2011
Revised 6/09 UIC-05T Page 8 of 8

ARCADIS
Attachment 2
Boring Log and Vertical
Distribution of 1,2-DCA in IWB-1

BORING LOG
Page 1 of 6
Boring/Well Number:
IWB-1
Site Name:
AKZONOBEL-NSCC-NATIONAL STARCH CHEMICAL CO.
Project Number: B0060013.0006.00005
Project Manager: Elizabeth Rhine
Client Name
AKZO NOBEL
Borehole Start Date: 12/07/10
End Date: 08/25/11
Borehole Start Time: 0735
End Time: 1630
Drilling Company:
AE DRILLING SERVICES, LLC
Geologist's Name:
Michael Bone, James E. Cooper, Robby Shealy
Environmental Technician's Name:
NA
Driller: Randy Phillips, Tommy
Burnette, Abel Mcguire, Dan
Bergman
Driller's Helper: J.Gorman, B.Burnett,
T.Bregman, C.Sloan, R.Phillips, A.Mcguire
Borehole Diameter (inches):
10.25" ID (HSA), 10" OD Air Rotary,
3.78" OD (HQ Core)
Borehole Depth (ft. bgs):
320'
_
Drilling Method(s):
Air Knife, HSA, Air Rotary, &
HQ -Core
Apparent Borehole DTW (in feet
from soil moisture content): NM
Me sured Well DTW (in feet after
water recharges in well): NM
OVA (list model and check type):
MiniRAE 3000 11.7 PID METER
Disposition of Drill Cuttings [check method(s)]: @Containers ed Soli O Backfill
(describe if other or multiple items ore checked):
Borehole Completion (check one): O Bedrock Injection Well OSaprolite Monitoring Well
0 Flush Mount ® Stick-up
Sample Type
t y
oSample
E y
Sample Recovery
(%)
SPT Blows
(per six inches)
E
tatother
Depth (ft. hgs)
Description
(Include grain sue based on USCS, odors, staining, and
remarks)
o
E
on
PI
Malsture Content
73
. 6.o.
d —6a
'i u
Air
Knife
0'-5'
Utilities were cleared to 5 ft using an air knife.
HSA
0%
5'-38'
No Recovery
HSA
0.0
47.2 @ 44'
38'-44'
Clay with trace fine sand, trace silt, wet, grey, slight odor
wet
AR
44'-62'
Air Rotary Drilling (12/7/10 1115 - 1320)
Set 6" galvanized steel casing at 60'bgs.
Sample Type Codes: HSA= Hollow Stem Auger; HA= Hand Auger; SS =Split Spoon; ST = Shelby Tube; DP = Direct Push; AR = Air Rotary; DC= Drill Cuttings
Moisture Content Code: D = Dry; M = Moist; W = Wet; S=Saturated

BORING LOG
Page 2 of 6
Boring/Well Numbe : IWB-1
Logged by: Michael Bone
u
3
Sample Depth -
Interval (feet)
Sample Recovery
(%)
c
�'
Core Recovery
(feet)
Concentration
of 1,2 DCA
Depth (ft. bgs)
Sample Description
(include grain size based on USCS, odors, staining, and other remarks)
RC
0%
NM
62'-72'
No lithology, No recovery, rock core could not function in this interval, rock too soft
RC
100%
1
1.0'
72'-73'
Hard to very hard, slight to very slight weathering, predominantly light minerals (white, grey)
with minor dark minerals (black, brown), fine to medium grained, GRANITE, unfractured,
mechanically broken, sound, RQD=55%, mainly quartz and feldspar with minor biotite crystals.
RC
94%
2
9.4'
3300
73'-83'
Hard to very hard, slight to very slight weathering, dark minerals (black, green) and light
minerals (white, grey), unfractured, mechanical breaks, sound, RQD=95.7%. In the first 5 feet,
the core is about 1/2 light and 1/2 dark minerals. The separation appears to be a felsic dike
that runs vertically. The rest of the core is >90% felsic/light minerals, quartz, feldspar, biotite:
GRANITE & BIOTITE GNEISS, fine to medium grained.
RC
89%
3
9.8'
83'-94'
Very Hard, fresh and unweathered, a mixture of felsic minerals (white, grey) with dark minerals
(black, green, brown), fine to medium grained, GRANITE & GNEISS, unfractured, sound, very
thin to thin foliation oriented at a moderate to high angle (-35°-551, RQD=98.9%. Rock shows
a gneissic banding with alternating bands of felsics (Q, feldspar) and ferromagnesians (biotite,
pyrite, green, & black minerals).
RC
100%
4
10
420
94'-104'
Very hard to hard, fresh with very slight to slight weathering of one fracture/joint. Black with
very few white veins and minor light minerals. Fine-grained, GNEISS. Fracture/joint zone at
approx. 101.2'-101.6' hgs, zone shows discoloration, slight weathering, no odor, fracture zone
is closely spaced and attitude is between 0° & 15° (horizontal to shallow angle), 2 more
fractures, one. at 99' bgs and another at 100.7' hgs, both are single fractures, rough, tight,
horizontal to low angle, rock continuity is sound, RQD=97.5% Biotite Gneiss with
quartz/feldspar veins. Gneiss is of ferramagnesian origin.
RC
88%
5
8.8
104'-114'
Very Hard, fresh to very slight weathering except in fracture zones which are more stained,
black and grey with white veins, fine to medium grained, GNEISS and GRANITE, few fractures in
the core. Major fracture at 112.2' hgs, fracture is smooth and open with heavy brown staining,
fracture attitude is horizontal to low angle, rock continuity is sound, RQD=100%, black and
white rock, mainly biotite and other dark minerals with quartz, feldspar, and other light
minerals included in the veins.
RC
98.5%
6
9.85'
92
114'424'
Hard to very hard, generally fresh with very slight staining in joints/fractures, black and grey
with green minerals, white and grey in the veins, generally fine grained with some medium
grained crystals in veins, GNEISS, joints and fractures present, smooth, tight, joints/fractures
stained possible iron oxide, brown/yellow discoloration. 1. Fracture `115.3' hgs, closely
spaced, shallow/low angle 2. Fracture zone-115.6'-116.2' hgs, close, steep/high angle 3.
Fracture —116.3' bgs close, shallow, low angle 4. Fracture `118.4' bgs, moderately close, low
angle to moderately dipping 5. Fracture —120.5' hgs, close, shallow to low angle, rock core is
sound, RQ13=100%
RC
100%
7
10.2'
124'-134'
Hard to very hard, fresh, black, grey, and olive-green minerals, white, grey, and black minerals
in veins, generally fine grained with medium grained crystals in veins, GNEISS, joints present,
joints are smooth,tight, slight iron oxide staining, brown -yellow color
1. Fracture-125.3' bgs, spacing close, moderate dip-35°
2. Fracture -128.95' hgs, spacing close, moderate dip, —45°
3. Fracture -130.30' hgs, spacing close, shallow/low angle "15°, core is sound, RQ0=100%.
Sample Type Codes: HSA= Hollow Stem Auger; HA= Hand Auger; SS=Split Spoon; ST=Shelby Tube; DP= Direct Push; AR=Air Rotary; DC= Drill Cuttings
Moisture Content Code: D=Dry; M = Moist; W = Wet; 5=Saturated

BORING LOG
Page 3 of 6
Boring/Well Number: IWB-1
Logged by: Michael Bone
0
n
1-
Eg
in
Sample Depth
Interval (feet)
Sample Recovery
(%)
Core Recovery
(feet)
Concentration
of 1,2 DCA
(Pg/L)
Depth (ft. bgs)
Sample Description
[include grain size based on USCS, odors, staining, and other remarks)
RC
100%
8
10.9'
71
134'-144'
Hard to very hard, fresh to very slight weathering, black grey, and olive-green primary
minerals,white,grey,yellow, and black minerals in veins, generally fine grained with medium
to coarse grains in veins, GNEISS, joints present, smooth, tight, slight iron oxide staining,
staining is brown -yellow color
1. Fracture zone `134.0'-134.3' bgs, two dose fractures (-1.5" apart), dose spacing,
shallow/low angle, both -30'
2. Fracture zone-143.7'-143.9' bgs, high -density fracture zone, entire interval is gravel -sized
grains, horizontal to moderately dipping "20'-35'
3. Facture-144.6'-144.8' bgs, close spacing, steep or high angle "60'
4. Fracture -136.2' bgs, two close X-shaped fractures, close spacing, moderately dipping -50',
steep-85'
5. Fracture -137.3' bgs, close spacing, shallow/low angle -20'
6. Fracture -138.0' bgs, close spacing, shallow/low angle -15'
7. Fracture-138.3'-138.4' bgs, two close fractures (-L5" apart), close spacing, shallow or low
angle (both fractures) "15'
8. Fracture -139.9' bgs, close spacing, shallow/low angle "15' 9. Fracture-142.3'-142.8' bgs,
high -density fracture zone (-4 fractures), close spacing, all are shallow/low angle-10°-30'
RC
91.4%
9
9.14'
144'-154'
Hard to very hard, fresh to very slight weathering, black, grey, and olive-green primary
minerals,white,grey,yellow, and black minerals in veins, generally fine grained with medium
to coarse grains in veins, GNEISS, joints present, smooth to rough, some tight, some open,
slight iron oxide staining, staining is brown -yellow color
1. Fracture -144.95' bgs, spacing -2-3mm, shallow/low angle -15'
2. Fracture -145.20' bgs, spacing wedge-shaped from -25mm-5mm, wedge angle -35', wedge
tilted "20'
3. Fracture-146.07' bgs, spacing '.2mm, shallow/low angle "10'
4. Fracture -146.55' bgs, spacing wedge-shaped from `25mm-10mm, wedge angle `40',
wedge tilited "'5'
5. Fracture -148.43' bgs, spacing -1-2mm, shallow/low angle -20'
6. Fracture -149.13' bgs, spacing -2mm, shallow/low angle -15'
7. Fracture -152.00' bgs, spacing `2mm, low angle/horizontal `5', continuity is sound,
RQD=97%
RC
100%
10
10.05'
36000
154'-164'
Same rock type as above (144'-154' bgs)
1. Fracture -155.30' bgs, spacing - 2mm, low angle/horizontal "5'
2. Fracture -156.10' bgs, spacing -2mm, shallow/low angle -10'
3. Fracture -157.35' bgs, spacing "2mm, shallow/low angle-15'
4. Fracture -158.64' bgs, spacing -2-3mm, horizontal "0-5', this fracture has cracking above
(`5mm) and below (-3mm)
5. Fracture -159.59' bgs, spacing -l0mm, shallow/low angle ^10'
6. Fracture -160.66' bgs, spacing is wedge-shaped from -15mm-2mm, wedge angle "10%
wedge tilted "10°
7. Fracture -161.01' bgs, spacing "lmm, moderately dipping -45'
8. Fracture -161.46' bgs, spacing wedge-shaped from-13mm-1mm, wedge angle "10', wedge
tilted "10'
9. Fracture `162.91' bgs, spacing wedge-shaped from -18mm-lmm, wedge angle-30', wedge
tilted-1.-
10. Fracture -163.36' bgs, spacing-8-10mm, nearly horizontal -5', continuity is sound,
RQD=100%
RC
100%
11
10
164'-174'
Same rock type as above (154.-164' bgs)
1.Fracture-164.30'bgs,spacing-3mm, shallow/low angle-25'
2. Fracture-166.45' bgs, spacing "1-2mm, shallow/low angle -30'
3. Fracture -167.36' bgs, spacing "1-2mm, shallow/low angle `15'
4. Fracture -168.90' bgs, spacing "1-2mm, shallow/low angle-10-
5. Fracture -169.26' bgs, spacing -1-2mm, nearly horizontal "5'
6. Fracture-169.43' bgs, spacing-1-9mm, shallow/low angle "10'
7. Fracture -171.13' bgs, spacing -1mm, shallow/low angle -10'
8. Fracture -172.03' bgs, spacing "5-15mm, shallow/low angle "20', continuity is sound,
RQD=95%
Sample Type Codes: HSA= Hollow Stem Auger; HA = Hand Auger; 55=5p1it5poon;ST=Shelby Tube; DP = Direct Push; AR=Air Rotary; DC= Drill Cuttings
Moisture Content Codes: D = Dry; M = Moist; W = Wet; 5 =Saturated

BORING LOG
Page 4 of 6
Boring/Well Number: IWB-1
Logged by: Michael Bone
Sample Type
Sample Depth
Interval (feet)
Sample Recovery
(%)
Run R
Core Recovery
(feet)
Concentration
of 1,2 DCA
(Fig/L)
Depth (ft. bgs)
Sample Description
(include grain sue based on USCS, odors, staining, and other remarks)
RC
92%
12
9.2
21000
174'-184'
Same rock type as above (164'-174' bgs)
1. Fracture-175.50' bgs, spacing "1-4mm, nearly horizontal-5-
2. Fracture `175.60' hgs, spacing'1-5mm, nearly horizontal-5'
3. Fracture -175.77' hgs, spacing-1-3mm, shallow/low angle -10'
4. Fracture -176.08' bgs, spacing "1-3mm, shallow/low angle -15'
5. Fracture-176.65' bgs, spacing "1-3mm, moderately dipping-35'
6. Fracture-176.75' bgs, spacing 1-6mm, shallow/low angle-15'
7. Fracture-176.97' bgs, spacing 1-20mm, interval contains gravel and sand -sized particles,
shallow/low angle -15'
8. Fracture `181.45' bgs, spacing-1-2mm, moderately dipping -50'
9. Fracture-181.82' bgs, spacing 1-4mm, moderately dipping-40'
10. Fracture -182.30' bgs, spacing "1-9mm, shallow/low angle `20' continuity is sound,
RQD=90%
RC
RC
100%
100%
13
14
10.24'
6.15'
184'-194'
194'-200'
Same rock type as above (174'-184' hgs)
1. Fracture-188.69' bgs, spacing-1mm, shallow/low angle-10'.
2. Fracture -189.67' bgs, spacing -1-4mm, shallow/low angle "25'
3. Fracture -191.36' bgs, spacing -3-9mm, nearly horizontal -5'
4. Fracture-191.44' bgs, spacing `lmm, nearly horizontal-5'
5. Fracture -192.74' bgs, spacing "2-8mm, nearly horizontal "5' continuity is sound, RQD=99%
Same rock type as above (184'-194' bgs)
1. Fracture `196.87' bgs, spacing"1-9mm, shallow/low angle -10'
2. Fracture -197.25' hgs, spacing-3-12mm, shallow/low angle "10'
3. Fracture -198.68' bgs, spacing-1-7mm, shallow/low angle-20' continuity is sound,
RQD=100%
Sample Type Codes: HSA = Hollow Stem Auger; HA= Hand Auger; 55=Split Spoon; ST=Shelby Tube; DP = Direct Push; AR = Air Rotary; DC= Drill Cuttings
Moisture Conte t Code: D = Dry; M = Moist; W = Wet; 5 = Saturated

BORING LOG
Page 5 of 6
Boring/Well Number: IWB-1
Logged by: Michael Bone
Caring continued on 06/28/2011 a 200 ft-bgs and terminated on 6/30/2011 at 260 ft-bgs, to complete vertical delination of the borehole. Drilling performed using ATV Rig, HQ
Caring methods. Drille : Abel McGuire, Helper. Chuck Sloan
Sample Type
Sample Depth
Interval (feet)
Sample Recovery
(%)
Run #
Core Recovery
(feet)
Concentration
of 1,2 DCA
(Itg/L)
Depth (ft. bgs)
Sample Description
(include grain size based on USCS, odors, staining, and other remarks)
RC
97%
15
9.7'
13000
200-210
Moderately hard to hard, fresh to very slight weathering. Primarily dark minerals (black, grey,
green) with a low percentage of light minerals (white, light grey, silver, golden). Fine to
medium grained. GNEISS. RQD=81%
1. Fracture -200.-205.4' hgs, joint set. Interval is highly fractured, difficult to distinguish
between fractures and mechanical breaks in the rock. Fractures are generally rough, tight,
open, staining nonexistent for the majority, but very slight staining in a few fractures. Fracture
spacing is close and orientation is horizontal to low angle. (0-35 degrees)
2. Joint-207.2' bgs, rough, tight, dose, very slight staining, low angle, 20 degrees. 3. Two
joints, -208.2' to 208.3' hgs, rough, open, very slight staining, low angle (-5-20 degrees).
RC
100%
16
10'
210-220
Rock description same as 200' to 210' hgs. GNEISS. RQD=100%
' 1. Fracture 212.3bgs, angle( degrees)
g ,joint, rough, open "2mm, no staining, wide, law 35 " de rees
2. Fracture 214' bgs, joint, rough, open "2 mm, very slight staining, moderately close,
moderate angle ("45 degrees) 3. Fracture
215.75' bgs, joint, rough, open "2 mm, no staining, moderately close, low angle (-10 degrees)
4. Fracture 217.25' bgs, joint, rough, open -1 mm, no staining, moderately close, low angle
("15 degrees) 5. Fracture 218.55' bgs,
joint, rough, open `2 mm, very slight staining, moderately close, low angle (-15 degrees)
6. Fracture 219.7' bgs, joint, rough, open -2 mm, very slight staining, moderately close,
moderately dipping ("45 degrees)
RC
100%
17
10'
NM - No
Sample
220-230
Rock description same as 210' to 220' bgs. GNEISS. RQD=91% Rock core is sound.
Unfractured throughout the run.
RC
99%
18
9.9'
230-240
Rock description same as 220' to 230' hgs. GNEISS. RQD=91%
1. Fracture 232'hgs, joint, rough, open `2mm, very slight staining, moderately close spacing,
low angle (-15 degrees) 2. 233.5' bgs, joint, rough,
open "1.5 mm, no staining, moderately close, low angle (`15 degrees)
3.233.7' bgs, joint, rough, open "1 mm, no staining, very close, low angle (-20 degrees)
4. 235.2' hgs, joint, rough, open "1 mm, no staining, moderately close, low angle ("25 degrees)
5. 235.7' hgs, joint, rough, open -2 mm, no staining, close, low angle ("25 degrees)
6.236.2' to 236.7' bgs, joint set, highly fractured, difficult to distinguish between fractures and
mechanical breaks, fractures are rough, open -1-3 mm, majority of fractures unstained, a few
show very slight staining. All fractures are close, a few fractures are low angle (-20 degrees)
and most fractures are high angle ("00 degrees)
7.237' bgs, joint, rough, open "1.5 mm, very slight staining, close, low angle ("30 degrees)
8. 238.8' hgs, joint, rough, open -1 min, very slight staining, moderately close, low angle (-25
degrees)
RC
100%
19
10.3'
10000
240-250
Rock Description same as 230' to 240' bgs. GNEISS. RQD=100%
1. Fracture 242.5' bgs, joint, rough, open -1.5mm, very slight staining, moderately close, low
angle "15 degrees
2. Fracture 242.75' bgs, joint, rough, open "1.5 mm, no staining, close, low angle "25 degrees.
3. Fracture 243.55' bgs, joint, rough, open -1 mm, no staining, close, low angle "25 degrees.
4. Fracture 244.4' bgs, joint, rough, open "1 mm, two fractures at this location, very slight
staining, close, fracture 1 is low angle "20 degrees, fracture 2 is high angle-80 degrees.
5. Fracture 245.4' hgs, joint, rough, open -1.5 mm, very slight staining, moderately close, low
angle "1 mm.
6. Fracture 247.85' bgs, joint, rough, open "1 mm, no staining, moderately close, low angle '-10
degrees.
7. Fracture 249.0' bgs, joint, rough, open "0.5 mm, no staining, moderately close, low angle
`10 degrees.
RC
100%
20
10.05'
250-260
Rock Description same as 240' to 250' hgs. GNEISS. RQD=100%
1. Fracture 256.1' bgs, joint, rough, open -4.5 mm, very slight staining, wide, low angle -30
degrees.
2. Fracture 257.65' hgs, joint, rough, open "1 mm, no staining, moderately close, low angle "30
degrees.
3. Fracture 258.1' bgs, joint, rough, open `1.5 mm, very slight staining, close, low angle -10
degrees.
4. Fracture 259.4' hgs, joint, rough, open -2 mm, no staining, moderately close, nearly
horizontal "5 degrees.
Sample Type Codes: HSA= Hollow Stem Auger; HA= Hand Auger; SS = Split Spoon; ST = Shelby Tube; DP= Direct Push; AR=Air Rotary; DC= Drill Cuttings
Moisture Content Code: D = Dry; M = Moist; W = Wet; S=Saturated

BORING LOG
Page 6 of 6
Boring/Well Number: IWB-1
Logged by: Michael Bone
Coring continued on 08/23/2011 at 260 ft-hgs and terminated on 8/25/2011 at320 ft-bgs, to complete vertical delination of the borehole. Drilling performed using ATV Rig, HQ
Coring methods. Driller. Dan Bergman, Helper. Randy Phillips, Abel Mcguire
Sample Type
Sample Depth Interval (feet)
14
Core Recovery (feet)
Concentration of 1,2 DCA
(µg/L)
Depth (ft. bgs)
Z
g
.
Sample Description
z
(Include grain size based on USCS, odors, staining, and other remarks)
E
6
RC
92%
21
4.6
260.8-265.4
Rock Description: Hard, Fresh to very slight weathering in one fracture. Fine to medium
grained, mostly dark minerals(dark grey, black, green) with minor light minerals(white light
grey). 5' run, GNEISS. RQ0=100%
1. Fracture -264.8' hgs, joint, rough, open, very slight staining, slight discoloration of crystal
faces, orientation/attitude=-50 degrees, moderately dipping, sound core.
NM - No
RC
100%
22
10
Sample
265.4-275.4
Description same as run 821. 10' run, GNEISS. RQD=97.5%
1. Fracture -267.5' hgs, joint, smooth,open, very slight weathering, attitude -40 degrees,
moderately dipping, sound core.
RC
90%
23
4.5
275.4-279.9
Description same as run 922. 5' run, GNEISS. RQD=100%
Unfractured Core with mechanical breaks. No fractures observed.
RC
100%
24
5.6
279.9-285.5
Rock Description same as run 6 23. 5' run, GNEISS. RQD=100%
1. Possible Fracture 285' hgs, Joint, smooth, open, very slight weathering, attitude=-40
degrees, moderately dipping.
RC
100%
25
10.3
285.5-295.8
Rock Description same as run 824. 10' run, GNEISS. RQD=95%
1. Fractures 287.8' hgs to 287.9' hgs, joint set, rough, two possible fractures, open, closely
spaced, no visible weathering, attitude="25 degrees, shallow to low angle.
430
2. Fractures 294.7' hgs to 295.1' hgs, joint set, rough, four possible fractures in zone, open,
closely spaced, no visible weathering, attitude=-20 degrees, shallow to low angle.
RC
8056
26
4.0
295.8-299.8
Rock Description same as run R 25. 5' run, GNEISS. RQD=96%
1. Fractures 298' hgs to 298.15' bgs, two possible fractures, rough, open, closely spaced,
unweathered, one oriented at horizontal <5 degrees, one oriented at low angle-30 degrees.
RC
98%
27
5.9
299.8-305.7
Rock Description same as run It 26. 6' run, GNEISS. RQD=100%
No fractures observed, sound core, (6) mechanical breaks.
RC
98%
28
9.8
305.7-315.5
Rock Description same as run N 27. 10' run, GNEISS. RQD=100%
1. Fracture 311.0' hgs, joint, smooth, open, very slight weathering, attitude= 30 degrees, low
angle.
560
RC
92%
29
4.6
315.5-320.1
Rock Description same as run k28. 5' run, GNEISS. RQD=100%
1. Possible Fracture 318.5' bgs, joint, smooth, open, very slight weathering, attitude=-25
degrees.
2. Fracture 319.0' bgs, joint, smooth, open, very slight weathering, attitude=`20 degrees, low
angle.
Sample Type Codes: HSA= Hollow Stem Auger; HA= Hand Auger; SS =Split Spoon; ST =Shelby Tube; DP = Direct Push; AR =Air Rotary; DC= Drill Cuttings
Moisture Content Code : D=Dry; M=Moist; W = Wet; S=Saturated

0 ft bgs
60 ft bgs
" Surface Casing
HQ Core
73 ft bgs
3.78"
Hole
80 -
94 ft bgs
100 -
114 ft bgs
120 -
134 ft bgs
140 -
154 ft bgs
160 -
174 ft bgs
180 -
200 ft bgs
200 -
220 ft bgs
220 -
240 ft bgs
240 -
260 ft bgs
260 -
280 ft bgs
280 -
300 ft bgs
300 -
320 ft bgs
Notes:
ft bgs = feet below ground surface
mg/L = milligrams per liter
NA = Not Analyzed
6" ID Surface Casing
ft bgs
1,2-DCA pg/L
C
(62-73)
NA
(73-94)
3,300
(94-114)
420
(114-134)
92
(134-154)
71
(154-174)
36,000
(174-200)
21,000
(200-220)
13,000
(220-240)
ec
(No Recharge)
(240-260)
10,000
(260-280)
NA
(No Recharge)
(280-300)
430
(300-320)
560

ARCADIS
Attachment 3
Well Construction Details

Attachment 3
ERD Pilot Study Well Construction Summary
AkzoNobel Chemical Company - Salisbury, North Carolina
Well ID
Aquifer Unit
TOC
Elevation
(ftatnsl)
-
Well Diameter
(inches)
` Total•Depth
(ftbgs) �
Suface Casing
Depth
(ft bgs)
Screened:Interval
(ft bgs)
Top .
Bottom
NS-13
Saprolite
762.22
2
14.5
NA
4.4
14.4
NS-14
Saprolite
764.86
2
16.3
NA
6.3
16.3
NS-33
Saprolite
776.36
2
59
NA
49
59
NS-34
Shallow Bedrock
776.27
2
79
56
63.84
78.84
NS-39
Saprolite
769.43
2
40.8
NA
30.8
40.8
NS-40
Shallow Bedrock
768.85
2
94.3
41.9
74.3
94.3
NS-41
Deep Bedrock
765.55
2
138
118
122
138
NS-42
Shallow Bedrock
765.32
2
80
NA
60
80
NS-49
Shallow Bedrock
766.18
2
113.6
8
44.5
113.6
NS-50
Deep Bedrock
765.30
2
150
NA
140
150
NS-51
Shallow Bedrock
764.46
2
117.5
8
43.5
117.5
NS-52
Deep Bedrock
763.66
2
140.8
120.8
120.8
140.8
NS-53
Shallow Bedrock
769.70
2
115
47.3
47.3
115
NS-54
Deep Bedrock
769.52
2
182.3
132.3
132.3
182.3
NS-62
Saprolite
766.84
2
60.3
NA
50
60
NS-63
Shallow Bedrock
766.67
2
95
72.5
Open hole 72.5 to 95
NS-64
Saprolite
766.99
2
38.3
NA
18
38
IWS-1
Saprolite
767.60
2
36.3
NA
16
36
IWB-1
Shallow/Deep Bedorck
-
4
260
60
60
260
OWS-1
Saprolite
767.87
2
41
NA
20
40
OWB-1
Deep Bedrock
-
2
200
42
140
200
NS-65
Saprolite
-
2
50
NA
40
50
NS-66
Saprolite
--
2
50
NA
40
50
NS-67
Saprolite
--
2
50
NA
40
50
NS-68
Saprolite
--
2
50
NA
40
50
NS-69
Deep Bedrock
--
4
225
174
Open hole 175 to 225
NS-70
Deep Bedrock
--
4
320
279
Open hole 270 to 320
NOTES:
TOC - top of casing
ft bgs - feet below ground surface
ft amsl - feet above mean sea level
NA - Not Available
NS - Not Surveyed
BOLD - Proposed well completion
Page 1 of 1

ARCADIS
Attachment 4
Proposed Well Completion
Diagrams

Ground Surface
Attachment 4
Proposed Well Construction Detail - IWB-I
AkzoNobel Chemical Company - Salisbury, North Carolina
Saprolite
V
A
p(Surface Completion to be determined based on design on inejction system
Shallow Bedrock
V
n
Deep Bedrock
V
10-inch diameter
drilled hole
Surface casing,
6-inch diameter, Steel
Grout (Portland Type 1)
Base of surface casing set at 60 ft bgs
- screened interval from 60 to 260 feet bgs
- Well screen material: 4-inch Sch 40 PVC, 0.06 slot screen
- #4 filter sand from 260 to 59 feet bgs
- #2 filter sand from 59 to 58 feet bgs
- bentonite seal from 58 to 56 feet bgs
- neat Portland Type I cement to surface
6-inch bedrock borehole
*Total depth 260 ft bgs

Ground Surface
Attachment 4
Proposed Well Construction Detail - OWB-1
AkzoNobel Chemical Company - Salisbury, North Carolina
Saprolite
Shallow Bedrock
Deep Bedrock
(Surface Completion to be determined based on design on inejction system
C
10-inch diameter
drilled hole
Surface casing,
6-inch diameter, Steel
Grout (Portland Type 1)
Base of surface casing set at 42 ft bgs
- screened interval from 140 to 200 feet bgs
- Well screen material: 1-inch, 304 stainless steel, 0.01 vee-wire
- # 1 filter sand from 200 to 137 feet bgs
- bentonite seal from 135 to 137 feet bgs
- neat Portland Type 1 cement to surface
6-inch bedrock borehole
*Total depth 200 ft bgs

ARCADIS
Attachment 5
Proposed Well Locations

TM:T. DARBY TR:
PM: E. RHINE
Legend
e MW, Saprolite
Abandoned Process Water Lines
O MW, Shallow Bedrock +— I Railroads
® MW, Deep Bedrock Streams
Parcels
O MW, Proposed Saprolite
• MW, Proposed Shallow Bedrock
• MW, Proposed Deep Bedrock
•
NATIONAL STARCH CHEMICAL COMPANY
CEDAR SPRINGS ROAD PLANT
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
PROPOSED WELL LOCATIONS
� ARCADJS
ATTACHMENT
5

ARCADIS
Attachment 6
Recent Groundwater Analytical
Results

Attachment 6
Recent Groundwater Data
AkzoNobel Chemical Company - Salisbury, NC
Chemical Name -
Location ID
Sample ID
Sample Date
NS-33
NS-33 (090811)
9/8/2011
NS-34
NS-34 (090811)
9/8/2011
NS-39
NS-39 (090711)
9/7/2011 ''
NS-40
NS-40 (090711)
9/7/2011
NS-41
NS-41 (090811)
9/8/2011`
NS-42
NS-42 (090811)
9/8/2011
NS-50
NS-50 (090811)
9/8/2011
Unit
VOCs EPA Method SW8260
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
pg/L
< 1
< 1
< 1
< 1
< 1
< 1
< 1
1,1-Dichloroethene
pg/L
< 1
< 1
3.4
1.1
< 1
1.3
1.8
1,2-Dichloroethane
pg/L
< 1
< 1
5.3
71
< 1
< 1
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
pg/L
< 1
< 1
< 1
< 1
< 1
< 1
< 1
Acetone
pg/L
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
Chloroethane
pg/L
< 1
< 1
45
4.8
1.1
40
11
Chloroform
pg/L
<1
<1
<1
2
<1
<1
<1
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
pg/L
< 1
< 1
< 1
0.96 J
< 1
10
3.6
Methylene chloride
pg/L
< 5
< 5
7.6
< 5
< 5
< 5
< 5
Tetrachloroethene
pg/L
< 1
< 1
< 1
1.1
< .1
< 1
< 1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethen
pg/L
< 1
< 1
< 1
< 1
< 1
< 1
< 1
Trichloroethene
pg/L
< 0.5
< 0.5
18
6.3
1.3
8.2
6.5
Vinyl chloride
pg/L
< 0.5
< 0.5
7.8
24
< 0.5
4.7
11
Metals EPA Method SW6010C
Chromium
pg/L
11
7.0 J
5.1 J
1.7 J
3.7 J
6.7 J
< 10
Manganese
pg/L
44
14
12000
8300
530
10000
3000
Thallium
pg/L
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
Iron
pg/L
740
380
4800
3700
530
4100
19000
TOC Method SW9060
TOC
pg/L
880JB
700 JB
14000 B
8900 B
1400 B
13000 B
11000 B
Sulfate, Nitrate Method E300
Sulfate
pg/L
1400
1700
110000
92000
6100
1500
26000
Nitrate
pg/L
940 B
830 B
< 1000
< 1000
780 B
< 1000
< 1000
NOTES:
J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.
B Compound was found in the blank and sample.
1 of 2

Attachment 6
Recent Groundwater Data
AkzoNobel Chemical Company - Salisbury, NC
Chemical Name
Location ID
Sample ID
Sample Date
NS-54
NS-54 (090711)
9/7/2011
NS-64
NS-64 (090711)
9/7/2011
IWB-01
IWB-1 (090711)
9/7/2011
IWS-01
IWS-1 (090711)
9/7/2011
OWB-01
OWB-1 (090711)
9/7/2011
OWS-01
OWS-1 (090711)
9/7/2011
Unit
VOCs EPA Method SW8260
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
pg/L
< 2
< 50
< 1
< 500
< 1
< 1
1,1-Dichloroethene
pg/L
< 2
< 50
< 1
< 500
< 1
< 1
1,2-Dichloroethane
pg/L
1700
41000
1200
380000
180
35
1,2-Dichloropropane
pg/L
< 2
< 50
< 1
< 500
< 1
< 1
Acetone
pg/L
< 10
< 250
6
< 2500
< 5
< 5
Chloroethane
pg/L
1.6 J
< 50
< 1
< 500
< 1
< 1
Chloroform
pg/L
4.3
< 50
4.4
< 500
6.3
3.6
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
pg/L
< 2
< 50
< 1
< 500
< 1
< 1
Methylene chloride
pg/L
11
290
8.2
2900
8.9
<5
Tetrachloroethene
pg/L
< 2
< 50
2.1
< 500
0.73 J
1
trans-1,2-Dichioroethen
pg/L
< 2
< 50
< 1
< 500
< 1
< 1
Trichloroethene
pg/L
3.9
< 25
2.1
< 250
2.2
5.1
Vinyl chloride
pg/L
26
140
< 0.5
280
4.4
2
Metals EPA Method SW6010C
Chromium
pg/L
1.5 J
4.8 J
5.1 J
3.9 J
< 10
17
Manganese
pg/L
4600
16000
5500
16000
710
4600
Thallium
pg/L
<10
< 10
<10
< 10
<10
< 10
Iron
pg/L
2000
13000
740
970
49 J
890
TOC Method SW9060
TOC
pg/L
6000 B
30000 B
6900 B
62000 B
4700 B
7200 B
Sulfate, Nitrate Method E300
Sulfate
pg/L
53000
230000
60000
240000
73000
58000
Nitrate
pg/L
< 100
< 1000
260
< 1000
2000
1800
NOTES:
J Result is less than the RL but greater
B Compound was found in the blank al
2 of 2

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural ResourResources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
ary
Director
Governor �.�� �_ w
November 29, 2010
Alm) Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC
Attn: Jeny McMurray
485 Cedar Springs Road, Unit A
Salisbury, NC 28147
Ref: Issuance of Injection Permit WI0300146
Akzo Nobel (former National Starch and Chemical Company) Site
Salisbury, Rowan County, North Carolina.
NC.QE F,i :MR0. ;
iB
Dear Mr. McMurray:
In accordance with the application received on March 26, 2010 and subsequent information received August 5, 2010, we
are forwarding permit number WI0300146. This permit is to inject a molasses and soybean oil emulsion (Newman
Zone) solution to remediate groundwater contaminated with chlorinated ethenes and ethanes at the facility referenced
above. This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 31, 2012, and shall be subject to the
conditions and limitations stated therein, including the requirement to submit a final project evaluation as stated in PART
VII — MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. Please note that some of the monitoring requirements
have changed from your application. Please read the entire permit to ensure that you are aware of all compliance
requirements of the permit.
You will need to notify this office by telephone 48 hours prior to initiation of operation of the facility. In order to
continue uninterrupted legal use of the injection facility for the stated purpose, you must submit an application to renew
the permit 120 days prior to its expiration date. Please contact me at [phone] or at [e-mail] if you
have any questions about your permit.
cc:
ore
vtlle egtcana!l r fi
Elizabeth Rhine, Project Manager, real is
Dave Mattison, NCDENR DWM Superfund Section
WI0300146 Permit File
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636.
Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard. Raleigh. North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX 1: 919-715-0588; FAX 2: 919-715-6048 \ Customer Service: 1-877-523-6748
Internet: www.ncwateruualitv.orq
An Eaual Opportunity Affirmative Acton Employe -
Best Regards,
i(i ;' %�
t—�%/ry 'l -
John R. McCay
Enviromnental Specialist
One
T\orthCaroima
Natit"4f

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A WELL FOR INJECTION
In accordance with the provisions of Article 7, Chapter 87; Article 21, Chapter 143, and other
applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
AkzoNobel Surface Chemistry, LLC
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF 4 TYPE 5I INJECTION WELLS, defined in
Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 2C .0209(e)(3)(C), to inject a Molasses and a
Soybean Oil Emulsion (Newman Zone) solution for the enhancement of bioremediation of
chlorinated ethanes and ethenes. These injection points will be located at the AkzoNobel Surface
Chemistry, LLC Site, 485 Cedar Spring Road, Salisbury, Rowan County, North Carolina, and will be
operated in accordance with the application submitted March 26, 2010, and in conformity with the
specifications and supporting data submitted August 5, 2010, all of which are filed with the
Depaituient of Environment and Natural Resources and are considered a part of this permit.
This permit is for Construction and Operation only, and does not waive any provisions of the Water
Use Act or any other applicable Laws, Rules, or Regulations. Operation and use of an injection well
shall be in compliance with Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 2C .0100 and .0200, and
any other Laws, Rules, and Regulations pertaining to well construction and use.
This permit shall be effective, unless revoked, from the date of its issuance until October 31, 2012,
and shall be subject to the specified conditions and limitations set forth in Parts I through X hereof.
Perniit issued this the day of AX.9V-ernlo-'--r" , 2010
r ° `-Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission.
Permit No. WI0300146
ver.8/07 AP/UIC-6
PAGE 1 OF 7

PART I - WELL CONSTRUCTION GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. The Permittee must comply with all conditions of this permit and with the standards and criteria
specified in Criteria and Standards Applicable to Injection Wells (15A NCAC 2C .0200). Any
noncompliance with conditions of this permit constitutes a violation of the North Carolina Well
Construction Act and is grounds for enforcement action as provided for in N.C.G.S. 87-94.
2. This permit shall become voidable unless the facility is constructed in accordance with the
conditions of this permit, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting data.
3. This permit is valid only for construction of the number of injection wells described in the
application and other supporting data. Construction of additional injection wells must be
approved in advance by the Aquifer Protection Section.
4. Each injection well shall not hydraulically connect separate aquifers.
5. Each injection well shall be constructed in such a manner that water from land surface cannot
migrate into the gravel pack or well screen.
6. Each injection well shall be secured to reasonably insure against unauthorized access and use.
Each well shall be permanently labeled with a warning that it is for injection purposes and the
entrance to each well must be secured with a locking cap.
7. Each injection well shall be afforded reasonable protection against damage during construction
and use.
8. Each injection well shall have permanently affixed an identification plate.
9. Within 30 days of completion of well construction, a completed Well Construction Record
(Form GW-1) must be submitted for each injection well to:
Aquifer Protection Section-UIC Staff
DENR-Division of Water Quality
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
PART II - WELL CONSTRUCTION SPECIAL CONDITIONS
At least forty-eight (48) hours prior to constructing each injection well, the Permittee shall notify the
Aquifer Protection Section -Underground Injection Control (UIC) Central Office staff, telephone
number [phone] and the Mooresville Regional Office Aquifer Protection Section Staff,
telephone number [phone].
Permit No. WI0300146 PAGE 2 OF 7
ver.8/07 AP/UIC-6

PART III = OPERATION AND USE GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. This permit is effective only with respect to the nature, volume of materials, rate of injection, and
number of injection wells as described in the application and other supporting data.
2. This permit is not transferable without prior notice to, and approval by, the Director of the
Division of Water Quality (Director). In the event there is a desire for the facility to change
ownership, or there is a name change of the Permittee, a formal permit amendment request must
be submitted to the Director, including any supporting materials as may be appropriate, at least
30 days prior to the date of the change.
3. The issuance of this permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility of complying with
any and all statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances which may be imposed by other local, state,
and federal agencies which have jurisdiction. Furthermore, the issuance of this permit does not
imply that all regulatory requirements have been met.
PART IV - PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
1. The injection facility shall be effectively maintained and operated at all times so that there is no
contamination of groundwater which will render it unsatisfactory for normal use. In the event
that the facility fails to perform satisfactorily, including the creation of nuisance conditions or
failure of the injection zone to adequately assimilate the injected fluid, the Permittee shall take
immediate corrective actions including those actions that may be required by the Division of
Water Quality such as the repair, modification, or abandonment of the injection facility.
2. The Permittee shall be required to comply with the terms and conditions of this permit even if
compliance requires a reductionor elimination of the permitted activity.
3. The issuance of this permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility for damages to
surface or groundwater resulting from the operation of this facility.
PART V - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
1. The injection facility shall be properly maintained and operated at all times.
2. The Permittee must notify the Division and receive prior written approval from the Director of
any planned physical alterations or additions in the permitted facility or activity not specifically
authorized by the permit.
3. At least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the initiation of the operation of the facility for injection,
the Permittee must notify by telephone the Aquifer Protection Section-UIC, Central Office staff,
telephone number [phone]. Notification is required so that Division staff can inspect or
otherwise review the injection facility and determine if it is in compliance with permit
conditions.
Permit No. WI0300146 PAGE 3 OF 7
ver.8/07 AP/UIC-6

PART VI - INSPECTIONS
1. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of Water Quality may,
upon presentation of credentials, enter and inspect any property, premises, or place on or related
to the injection facility at any reasonable time for the purpose -of determining compliance with
this permit, may inspect or copy any records that must be maintained under the terms and
conditions of this permit, and may obtain samples of groundwater, surface water, or injection
fluids.
2. Department representatives shall have reasonable access for purposes of inspection, observation,
and sampling associated with injection and any related facilities as provided for in N.C.G. S. 87-
90.
3. Provisions shall be made for collecting any necessary and appropriate samples associated with
the injection facility activities.
PART VII - MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
1. The proposed monitoring plan included in the application shall be followed, with the following
modification. Analysis for total Chromium and Thallium shall be added to the Baseline,
Mid -Pilot, and End -Pilot sampling events. All sample results shall be submitted to the
Aquifer Protection Section's Mooresville Regional Office and the Raleigh Central Office. Any
monitoring (including groundwater, surface water, or soil sampling) deemed necessary by the
Division of Water Quality to insure surface and ground water protection, will be established and
an acceptable sampling reporting schedule shall be followed.
2. The Permittee shall submit an Injection Event Record within 30 days of completing each
injection.
3. The Permittee shall produce a final project evaluation within 9 months after completing all
injection -related activity associated with this permit or produce a project interim evaluation
before submitting a renewal application for this permit. This document shall assess the injection
projects findings in a written summary. The final project evaluation shall also contain
monitoring well sampling data, contaminant plume maps and potentiometric surface maps.
4. The monitoring results and the final project evaluation shall be submitted to:
Aquifer Protection Section-UIC Staff
DENR-Division of Water Quality
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
and to:
Permit No. WI0300146 PAGE 4 OF 7
ver.8/07 AP/UIC-6

Aquifer Protection Section
DENR-DWQ Mooresville Regional Office
610 East Center Ave. Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
5. The Permittee shall report by telephone, within 48 hours of the occurrence or first knowledge of
the occurrence, to the Mooresville Regional Office, telephone number [phone], any of the
following:
(A) Any occurrence at the inj ection facility which results in any unusual operating
circumstances;
(B) Any failure due to known or unknown reasons, that renders the facility incapable of
proper injection operations, such as mechanical or electrical failures.
6. Where the Permittee becomes aware of an omission of any relevant facts in a permit application,
or of any incorrect information submitted in said application or in any report to the Director, the
relevant and correct facts or information shall be promptly submitted to the Director by the
Permittee.
7. In the event that the permitted facility fails to perform satisfactorily, the Permittee shall take such
immediate action as may be required by the Director.
PART VIII - PERMIT RENEWAL
In order to continue uninterrupted legal use of the injection facility for the stated purpose, the
Permittee must submit an application to renew the permit 120 days prior to its expiration date.
PART IX - CHANGE OF WELL STATUS
1. The Permittee shall provide written notification within 15 days of any change of status of an
injection well. Such a change would include the discontinued use of a well for injection. If a
well is taken completely out of service temporarily, the Permittee must install a sanitary seal. If a
well is not to be used for any purpose that well must be permanently abandoned according to
15A NCAC 2C .0113, Well Construction Standards.
2.
When operations have ceased at the facility and a well will no longer be used for any purpose,
the Permittee shall abandon that injection well in accordance with the procedures specified in
15A NCAC 2C .0113(b), including but not limited to the following:
(A) All casing and screen materials may be removed prior to initiation of abandonment
procedures if such removal will not cause or contribute to contamination of the
groundwaters.
(B) The entire depth of each well shall be sounded before it is sealed to insure freedom from
Permit No. WI0300146 PAGE 5 OF 7
ver.8/07 AP/UIC-6

obstructions that may interfere with sealing operations.
(C) The well shall be thoroughly disinfected, prior to sealing, if the Director determines that
failure to do so could lead to the contamination of an underground source of drinking
water.
(D) Drilled wells shall be completely filled with cement grout, or bentonite grout which shall
be introduced into the well through a pipe which extends to the bottom of the well and is
raised as the well is filled.
(E) In the case of gravel -packed wells in which the casing and screens have not been
removed, neat -cement, or bentonite grout shall be injected into the well completely filling
it from the bottom of the casing to the top.
(F) In those cases when, as a result of the injection operations, a subsurface cavity has been
created, each well shall be abandoned in such a manner that will prevent the movement
of fluids into or between underground sources of drinking water and in accordance with
the terms and conditions of the permit.
(G) The Permittee shall submit a Well Abandonment Record (Form GW-30) as specified in
15A NCAC 2C .0213(h)(1) within 30 days of completion of abandonment.
3. The written documentation required in Part IX (1) and (2) (G) shall be submitted to:
Aquifer Protection Section-UIC Staff
DENR-Division of Water Quality
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
PART X — WORKER PRECAUTIONS DURING APPLICATION
1. Some effects reported to be associated with the product proposed to be used are as follows: eye,
skin, nose, throat, lungs and gastrointestinal irritation or burns. If the product is released into the
environment in a way that could result in a suspension of fine solid or liquid particles (e.g.,
grinding, blending, vigorous shaking or mixing), then proper personal protective equipment
should be used. The application process should be reviewed by an industrial hygienist to ensure
that the most appropriate personal protective equipment is used.
2.
Persons working with these products should wear goggles or a face shield, gloves, and protective
clothing. Face and body protection should be used for anticipated splashes or sprays.
3. Eating, drinking, smoking, handling contact lenses, and applying cosmetics should not be
permitted in the application area during or immediately following application.
4. Site access should be limited to worker's involved in the injection of the solution. Safety
controls should be in place to ensure that the check valve and the pressure delivery systems are
Permit No. WI0300146 PAGE 6 OF 7
ver.8/07 AP/UIC-6

working properly.
5. The Material Safety Data Sheets should be followed to prevent incompatible or adverse reactions
and injuries.
Permit No. WI0300146 PAGE 7 OF 7
ver.8/07 AP/UIC-6

EMR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Attn: Jerry McMurray
Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC
485 Cedar Springs Road, Unit A
Salisbury, NC 28147
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Director Secretary
July 9, 2010
Ref: Additional Information Request
Injection Well Permit Application No. WI0300146
AkzoNobel
Rowan County
Dear Mr. McMurray:
ECEOWIE
J U L 1 3 2010
.._- NC DENR MRO
DWQ - Aquifer Protection
11
The Aquifer Protection Section is currently reviewing the above referenced Permit Application received
March 26, 2010 and has identified an item that needs additional information. Address the following
issue as required:
• -Please provide a map showing -the extent of the contaminant plume as well as showing the
limits of the contaminant plume in cross-section.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact me at [phone] or email me at
john.mccrav(ncmail.net. Thank you in advance for your cooperation and timely response.
Sincere,
/0.-•
John McCra
Environmental Specialist
Cc: Elizabeth Rhine, Arcadis
Jon Bornholm, USEPA
Carl Utterback, NCDENR, Hazardous Waste Section
Dave Mattison, NCDENR, Superfund Section
ermit Fi e G300 4
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] \ FAX 1: 919-715-0588; FAX 2: 919-715-6048 \ Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterqualitv.orq
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
One
North Carolina
aurally

r ..
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION.
APPLICATION REVIEW REQUEST=FORM
Date: April 7, 2010
To: ❑ Landon Davidson, ARO-APS
❑ Art Barnhardt, FRO-APS
® Andrew Pitner, MRO-APS
❑ Jay Zimmerman, RRO-APS
From: John McCray , Groundwater Protection Unit
Telephone: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
❑ David May, WaRO-
CharlieStehman, Wi
❑ Sherri Knight, WSR
Fax: [phone] .
A. Permit Number: WI0300146
B. Owner: AkzoNobel Surface Chemistry LLC
C. Facility/Operation: AkzoNobel
® Proposed ❑ Existing
A°° 2 0
❑ Facility ❑ .Operation
D. Application:
1. Permit Type: ❑ Animal n Surface Irrigation I I Reuse ❑ H-R Infiltration
❑ Recycle ❑ I/E Lagoon
❑ GW Remediation (ND)
® UIC - (51) in -situ groundwater remediation
For Residuals: ❑ Land App. ❑ D&M ❑ Surface Disposal
❑ 503 ❑ 503 Exempt ❑ Animal
2. Project Type: ® New ❑ Major Mod. ❑ Minor Mod. ❑ Renewal ❑ Renewal w/ Mod.
E. Comments/Other Information: n I would like to accompany you on a site visit.
Attached, you will find all information submitted in support of the above -referenced application for your
review, comment, and/or action. Within 30 calendar days, please take the following actions:
® Return a Completed Form APSSRR.
❑ Attach Well Construction Data Sheet.
❑ Attach Attachment B for Certification by the LAPCU.
❑ Issue an Attachment B Certification from the RO*.
* Remember that you will be responsible for coordinating site visits, reviews, as well as additional
information requests with other RO-APS representatives in order to prepare a complete Attachment B for
certification. Refer to the RPP SOP for additional detail.
When you receive this request form, please write your name and dates in the spaces below, make a copy
of this sheet, and return it to the appropriate Central Office -Aquifer Protection Section contact person
listed above.
RO-APS Reviewer: Date:
FORM: APSARR 02/06 Page 1 of 1

Schutte, Maria
From: Rhine, Elizabeth [Elizabeth. [e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 2:34 PM
To: Schutte, Maria
Subject: FW: WI0300146 Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC
Maria,
Jerry McMurray (AkzoNobel) and Tom Darby (ARCADIS) will expect you at the site on Thursday, April 29 at 10 am.
Jerry's contact information is below. Tom can be reached at 304.685.7739 should you need to contact him. The best
way to reach me is at my cell number below.
Regards,
Elizabeth
Elizabeth Rhine I Senior Project Manager I elizabethshinenarcadis-us.com
ARCADIS U.S., Inc. 30 Patewood Drive, Suite 155 I Greenville, SC, 29615
T. 864.987.39061M. 864-982-9890 I F. 864.987.1609
www.arcadis-us.com
ARCADIS, Imagine the result
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
From: McMurray, Jerry [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 2:14 PM
To: Rhine, Elizabeth
Subject: RE: WI0300146 Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC
Should be fine with me. Thanks for moving it from next week.
r L. McMurray
Global Personal Care HSES Manager
Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC
485 Cedar Springs Road, Unit A
Salisbury, NC 28147
Phone: [phone]
Cell: 704-450-7910
Email: lerry.mcmurray(a�akzonobel.com
Confidentiality Notice
This message is intended exclusively for the individual(s) or entity(ies) to which it is addressed. This communication may
contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential, or otherwise legally limited in disclosure. If you are not the
named addressee(s), you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, or disseminate this message or any part of it. If
you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by phone [phone]), or by
responding to this email and then deleting all copies received in error.
THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT!!! Thank you for your support to protect our environment for the future generation.
1

Pr:
r‘j 0C3c-i(

AkzoNobel
GLOBAL PERSONAL CARE:
SALISBURY SITE
RULES & REASONS: VISITORS
& TRUCK DRIVERS
The following policies apply to all visitors and truck drivers to our site. If you have need for
special assistance, contact the main gate at extension 6263.
ARRIVAL AND DEPARTURE
• Smoking is prohibited on the site except for approved smoking facilities.
• All visitors and drivers must provide valid picture ID and sign the login sheet each
day. Signing of the login sheet acknowledges that the visitor/driver has
read, understood, and will follow the basic safety rules.
• Shipping hours are 7:OOam-3:30pm during the weekend, and closed on the weekend.
No shipments or deliveries without special approval provided by plant personnel.
• Stay in your car/truck the security guard will contact your host.
• You will be provided a badge and proper safety equipment.
• Wearing your safety equipment and badge is required at all times.
• Return badges, hard hats and safety glasses, when exiting the site
EMERGENCY/ ALARMS
• Call 5555 to trigger the emergency alarm for any emergency. Dial 76 to announce the
emergency.
• Evacuation alarms have an unmistakable tone.
• Follow your host to the designated evacuation waiting area.
• Designated Site Personnel will conduct area checks to ensure all employees, visitors
and drivers have been accounted for.
• Do not re-enter until notified by Evacuation Deputies.
Truck Drivers
• The guard will log the driver name, company, arrival and departure times for each truck.
• Driver must check in with the shipping supervisor.
• Drivers are not allowed in the plant and must stay with his/her vehicle.
• The guard will instruct driver whether to go (map included on the back of this brochure).
• For off -shift deliveries, the guards must be notified by appropriate plant personnel in
advance to arrange special unloading.
POLICY STATEMENT: HEALTH, SAFETY, ENVIRONMENT, AND
SECURITY: Mission: Every employee and contractor is entitled to a safe and healthy
place to work — a place where activities are conducted in a manner which do not adversely
impact our customers, neighbors, or the environment. Safety, Health, Environmental, and
Security issues are priority in the management of the business. Continuous Improvement in
our HSES performance will be targeted to achieve and maintain world -class performance.
In addition to the stated HSES Mission, all visitors and drivers shall;
• Take responsibility for their own safety, and that of their coworkers
• Comply with all laws, regulatory requirements and Site policies
• Wear proper PPE and follow proper permitting procedures for line breaking, LOTO,
confined space, hot works, etc
• Not knowingly bypass or compromise critical safety systems or interlocks
• Practice Pollution Prevention by not releasing any chemical to the air, ground. Properly
handle and dispose of any wastes generated.
• Emeraencv Alarm: Dial 5555

t ]a
00
REA 4
WASTE
TREATMENT r(
(OFF LIMITS)L-
AREA 3
IN
dik
C
o❑,
LAB
15
51d1312
14.13
DOCK
LAGOON AREA
E.
AREA 2
WARE—
HOUSE
.4 Ji
AREA 1��•
L_
COMING
GGCK
11
QTRUCK DOCKS
® DIKES
STRUCTURE
RESTROOMS &
BREAK AREAS
® ROADS / FENCES
EMERGENCY
ASSEMBLY AREAS
N
01116
EMPLOYEE
PARKING
0 CEDAR SPRINGS ROAD
GUARD SHACK
Emergency Alarm: Dial 555.

Page 1 of 1
AP°°* UESfi
Trip to 485 Cedar Springs Rd
Salisbury, NC 28147-9249
18.73 miles - about 26 minutes
Notes
610 E Center Ave, Mooresville, NC 28115-2578
1. Start out going WEST on E CENTER AVE toward E
STATESVILLE AVE.
2. Turn RIGHT onto E STATESVILLE AVE.
3. Turn RIGHT onto N MAIN ST / NC-152 1 LANDIS HWY.
Continue to follow NC-162 W 1 LANDIS HWY.
4. Turn SLIGHT LEFT onto NC-150 / OAK RIDGE FARM
HWY. Continue to follow NC-150.
5. Turn RIGHT onto AIRPORT RD.
6. Turn LEFT to stay on AIRPORT RD.
7. Turn RIGHT onto CEDAR SPRINGS RD.
8.485 CEDAR SPRINGS RD is on the RIGHT.
485 Cedar Springs Rd, Salisbury, NC 28147-9249
Total Travel Estimate : 18.73 miles - about 26 minutes
Route Map wog.
MAFQNfST.
All_rghts_eserYed,yse_sue.Lexi to_Lisense.LGopyright I Map_Le.gen_d.
go 0.0 mi
go0.5mi
go2.5mi
go 12.7 mi
go 0.7 mi
go1.8mi
go 0.5 mi
go 0.0 mi
Izoo ft,
e2610,MapQ1.lest; Portions!
Directions and maps are informational only. We make no warranties on the accuracy of their content, road conditions or route usability or
expeditiousness. You assume at risk of use. MapQuest and its suppliers shall not be liable to you for any loss or delay resulting from
your use of MapQuest. Your use of MapQuest means you agree to our'1'epps of Use
�J u
f`Q� t
�� 0
(7'1'1 Iv)
(tAl
http://www.mapquest.com/print
4/28/2010

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
April 1, 2010
Robert M. Asselin, Vice President
Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry, LLC
485 Cedar Springs Road
Unit A
Salisbury, NC 28147
Subject: Acknowledgement of Application No. WI0300146
Akzo Nobel
Injection In situ Groundwater Remediation Well (5I)
Rowan
Dear Mr. Asselin:
APR - 8 2010
NC DENR tviRO
DWQ - Aquifer Protection
The Aquifer Protection Section of the Division of Water Quality (Division) acknowledges receipt of your permit application and
supporting materials on March 26, 2010. This application package has been assigned the number listed above and will be reviewed by
John McCray.
The reviewer will perform a detailed review and contact you with a request for additional information if necessary. To ensure the
maximum efficiency in processing permit applications, the Division requests your assistance in providing a timely and complete
response to any additional information requests.
Please be aware that the Division's Regional Office, copied below, must provide recommendations prior to final action by the
Division. Please also note at this time, processing permit applications can take as long as 60 - 90 days after receipt of a complete
application.
If you have any questions, please contact John McCray at 919-715-6168, or via e-mail at [e-mail]. If the reviewer is
unavailable, you may leave a message, and they will respond promptly. Also note that the Division has reorganized. To review our
new organizational chart, go to httpi/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/documents/dwq orgchart.pdf.
PLEASE REFER TO THE ABOVE APPLICATION NUMBER WHEN MAKING INQUIRIES ON THIS PROJECT.
Sincerely,
for Debra J. Watts
Supervisor
cc: liMb_c"'�- ;"s`v_�ill gSio ➢i0i'W'e A qui e s�l:zai:ecctiMf,' t`IA
Elizabeth Rhine (Arcadis) 30 Patewood Drive, Suite 155, Greenville, SC 29615
Permit Application File WI0300146
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX 1: 919-715-0588; FAX 2: 919-715-60481 Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwateraualitv.orq
One
iN
ors,,► Ir��I
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Acton Employer

ARCADIS
Infrastructure, environment, buildings
UIC Program
NCDENR - DWQ
Aquifer Protection Section
2728 Capital Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
RECEIVED I DENR / DWQ
AQUIFFR'PRnTFCTION SECTION
MAR 26 2010
Subject:
Application for Permit to Construct and Operate Wells for Injection — Type 51 Wells
National Starch & Chemical Company Superfund Site
Salisbury, Rowan County, North Carolina
To Whom It May Concern:
On behalf of AkzoNobel SPG LLC, ARCADIS is please to provide two copies of the
following Application for Permit to Construct and Operate Wells for Injection — Type
51 Wells for the former National Starch & Chemical Company Superfund Site located
on Cedar Springs Road in Salisbury, North Carolina.
Should you have any further comments regarding this permit, please contact me at
864.987.3906 or 864.982.9890.
Sincerely,
ARCADIS
AdAM-e
Elizabeth Rhine
Project Coordinator
Copies:
File
ARCADIS
30 Patewood Drive
Suite 155
Greenville
South Carolina 29615
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
www.arcadis-us.com
ENVIRONMENTAL
Date:
25 March 2010
Contact:
Elizabeth L. Rhine
Phone:
864.987.3906
Email:
Elizabeth.rhine@arcadi
s-us.com
Our ref:
B0060013.0006.000004
APR-82010
fC DENR MRO
DWQ - A utter protection
Imagine the result

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources MAR ; 2010.
Division of Water Quality
RECEIVED / DENR / DWQ
AQUIFFR.PR17TFrTION SECTfON
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A Witt(S) FOR INJECTION. ,
Type 51 Wells — Irr Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
• Do not use this form for remediation systems that extract contaminated groundwater, treat it, and reinject the treated groundwater.
• Submit TWO copies of the completed application and all attachments to the address on the last page of this form.
• Any changes made to this form will result in the application package being returned.
Application Number (to be completed by DWQ):
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Applicant's Name (generally the responsible party): Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC
2. Signing Official's Name*: Robert M. Asselin Title: Vice President
* Signing Official must be in accordance with instructions in part VI on page 7.
3. Mailing address of applicant: Attn: Jerry McMurray - 485 Cedar Springs Road, Unit A
City: Salisbury State: NC Zip: 28147
Telephone number: 704-431-6002 Fax number: 704-638-0179
4. Property Owner's Name (if different from Applicant): AkzoNobel Surface Chemistry LLC
5. Property Owner's mailing address: Attn: Jerry McMurray
City:
485 Cedar Springs Road, Unit A
Salisbury State: NC Zip: 28147
6. Name and address of contact person who can answer questions about the proposed injection project:
Name: Elizabetlt Rhine Title: Project Manager
Company: ARCADIS
Address: 30 Patewood Drive, Suite 155
City: Greenville State: SC Zip: 29615
Telephone number: [phone]
Fax number: [phone]
Email Address: Elizabeth.Rhine ARCADIS-US.com
II. PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. Project is: © New ( Modification of existing permit ( Renewal of existing permit without modification
( Renewal of existing permit with modification
2. If this application is being submitted for renewal or modification to an existing permit, provide:
existing permit number and the issuance date
For renewal without modifications, fill out sections I & II only, sign the etti i fat' v o1. thw 1"s a e
j rye' k
form, and obtain the property owner's signature to indicate consent (if tl $ ia1�il�Iiittrt �s..r ot..af e r.:)-
For all renewals, submit a status report including monitoring results of a jtjciction activities to date.
Revised 6/09 UIC-5I/5T
APR ' 8 2010
Page
NC DEN!R MRO
WQ - A • oiler Protection
ii"t\,t is

0
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 5I Wells — Irr Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
III. INCIDENT & FACILITY DATA
A. FACILITY INFORMATION
1. Facility name: AkzoNobel
2. Complete physical address of the facility: 485 Cedar Spring Road
City: Salisbury
County:Rowan State: NC Zip: 28147
B. INCIDENT DESCRIPTION
1. Describe the source of the contamination: The area of proposed injection is referred to as Operable
Unit 3 (0U3). The source of the groundwater impacts in OU3 are attributed to the formerly unlined
wastewater treatment lagoons and abandoned process waste water sewers that ran from the plan to the
treatment lagoons.
2. List all contaminants present in soils or groundwater at the site (contaminants may be listed in groups, e.g.,
gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, fuel oil, chlorinated ethenes, chlorinated ethanes, metals, pesticides/herbicides, etc):
BTEX, Metals, Chlorinated Ethenes, Chlorinated Ethanes, Semi -Volatile Organic Compounds (4-
Nitrophenol, Bis{2-chloroethyl)ether, Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
3. Has LNAPL or DNAPL ever been observed at the site (even if outside the injection zone)?
( Yes If yes, list maximum measured separate phase thickness feet
y © No If no, list maximum concentration of total VOCs observed at site: 630,000 ppb
4. Agency managing the contamination incident:
( UST Section
( DWQ Aquifer Protection Section
© Hazardous Waste Section
© Superfund Section (including REC Program and DSCA sites)
( Solid Waste Section
© Other: US Environmental Protection Agency Region 4
5. Incident managers name: Jon Bornholm (US EPA) and phone number [phone]
Incident managers name: Dave Mattison (NC DENR Superfund Section) and phone number [phone]
Incident managers name: Carl Utterback (NC DENR Hazardous Waste Section) and phone number (919)508-
8567
Incident number or other site number assigned by the agency managing the contamination incident:
EPA ID: NCD991278953
C. PERMITS
List all permits or construction approvals that have been issued for the facility or incident, including those not
directly related to the proposed injection operation:
1. Hazardous Waste Management program pertnits under RCRA: RCRA Compliance Order #94-344
2. DWQ Non -Discharge or NPDES permits: Stormwater NCS0002S9; POTW NC0023884-Permit 002
3. County or DEH subsurface wastewater disposal permits:
4. Other envirorunental permits required by state or federal law: Title V-09900T06
Revised 6/09 UIC-5I/5T Page 2 of 7

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 51 Wells - Lt Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells - Tracer Injection
IV. INJECTION DATA
A. INJECTION FLUID DATA
I. List all proposed injectants.
NOTE: Any substance 10 be in jetted as a tracer or to promote in situ rennediation must be reviewed by the
Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Section (OEES) of the Division of Public Health, Department of
Health and Human Services. Review the list of approved injectants or contact the UIC Program to determine if
the injectants you are proposing have been reviewed by OEES.
Injectant:: Molasses
Concentration at point of injection: -50 to 100 g/L
Percent if in a mixture with other injectants: 1 to 2 % (mixed with water)
Injectant:: Emulsified Vegetable Oil (Newman Zone)
Concentration at point of injection: -50 to 100 g/L
Percent if in a mixture with other injectants: 2 to 4 % (mixed with water)
2. Source of fluids used to dilute or chase the injectants listed above:
( None
© Municipal water supply
( Groundwater from private well or any well within % mile of injection site
( Air
( Other:
3. If any well within'/a mile of injection site, a private well, or surface water is to be used as the fluid source, supply
the following information:
a. Location/ID number of source: None
b. Depth of source:
c. Formation:
d. Rock/Sediment type:
e. In Attachment C, provide a current, complete chemical analysis of the water from the source well, including
analyses for all contaminants suspected or historically recognized in soil or groundwater on the site.
NOTE: If contaminated groundwater is to be used as the dilution or chase fluid, this is not the proper permit
application fo-'m. You must apply for a closed -loop groundwater remediation permit using application form
GiVRS.
Revised 6/09 UIC-5U5T Page 3 of 7

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 5I Wells —In Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
B. PROPOSED OPERATING PARAMETERS
1. Duration of Injection: May 2010 — May 2011
a. Maximum number of separate injection events: 3 estimated, 6 maximum
b. Expected duration of each injection event: 1 to 3 weeks
c. Expected duration between events (if more than one event): 7 to 8 weeks
2. Injection rate per well: 1-2 (saprolite) / 4-8 (bedrock) gallons per minute (gpm)
3. Total Injection volume: 38,000 (max) gallons per well; 140,200 gallons per event (if separate events)
4. Injection pressure: <5 pounds/square inch (psi)
5. Temperature at point of injection: ambient atmospheric °F
6. Briefly describe how the above parameters will be measured and controlled:
-Injection rate will be controlled by the capacity of the well. It will be monitored at the well using a flow
meter, - Injection volume will be monitored by totalizer (included with flow meter)
-Infection pressure will be monitored by pressure gauge at the well head. If pressure exceeds 5psi, the flow
will be reduced using a ball valve at the well head.
7. Estimated hydraulic capacity of the well: Saprolite — 2, Bedrock - 8 gpm
C. INJECTION WELL CONSTRUCTION DATA
1. Injection will be via:
( Existing well(s) proposed for use as an injection well. Provide the data in (2) through (6) below to the best of
your knowledge.
© Proposed well(s) to be constructed for use as an injection well. Provide the data in (2) through (6) below as
proposed construction specifications.
2. Well Drilling Contractor's Name: AE Drilling Services LLC
NC Well Contractor Certification number: Tommy Burnette (#2277) or Abel McGuire (#3571)
3. Date to be constructed: April 2010 Number of borings: 4
Approximate depth of each boring (feet): two —50 feet, two —200 feet
4. Screened interval/Injection interval of injection wells:
Depth: 30 to 200 feet below ground surface (if multiple intervals, indicate shallowest and deepest depth).
*Note: Please refer to Work Plan for Enhanced Reductive Declrlorination Pilot Study for specific well details.
5. Well casing (N/A if injection is through direct push rods):
Type: © PVC ( Stainless steel( Other:
Casing depth: 0 to 70 ft. (bedrock wells)
6. Grout (N/A if injection is through direct push rods):
Type: © Cement ( Bentonite
Grout depth: 0 to 160 ft. (for bedrock wells)
( Other:_
Revised 6/09 UIC-5I/5T Page 4 of 7

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 51 Wells —In Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
ATTACHMENTS
Provide the following items as separate attachments with the given headings:
A. SITE HISTORY
Provide a brief description of the site history including:
(I)
(2)
(3)
site usage historically and present,
origin of the contamination,
previous remedial action(s).
NOTE: G.S. 89E-18 requires that any geologic plans, reports, or documents in which the peformance is related to the
public welfare or safeguarding of the environment be prepared by a licensed geologist or subordinate wider their
direction. G.S. 89E-13 requires that all drawings, reports, or docwnents involving geologic work prepared or approved
by a licensed geologist, or a subordinate under their direction, be signed and sealed by the licensed geologist.
B. HYDROGEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION
Provide a hydrogeologic description, soils description, and cross section of the subsurface to a depth that includes the
known or projected depth of contamination. The hydrogeologic description shall include:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
the regional geologic setting;
significant changes in lithology;
the hydraulic conductivity, transmissivity, and specific yield of the aquifer to be used for injection, including a
description of the test(s) used to determine these parameters; and
the depth to the mean seasonal high water table.
C. INJECTION FLUID COMPOSITION
Describe the chemical, physical, biological and radiological characteristics death injectant. Attach the Material Safety
Data Sheet (MSDS) for each injectant. If a private well or a well within '/ mile of the injection site is used as the source
well, include chemical analysis of source fluid here.
D. INJECTION RATIONALE
Attach a brief description of the rationale for selecting the injectants and concentrations proposed for injection, including:
(I)
(2)
(3)
(4)
goals of the injection project;
explanation and/or calculations of how the proposed injectant volume and concentration were determined;
a description of the reactions between the injectants and the contaminants present including specific breakdown
products or intermediate compounds that may be formed by the injection; and
summary results of modeling or testing performed to investigate the injectant's potential or susceptibility to change
(biological, chemical or physical) in the subsurface.
E. 1NJECTION PROCEDURE AND EQUIPMENT
Provide a detailed description of all planned activities related to the proposed injection including but not limited to:
(1) construction plans and materials;
(2) operation procedures;
(3) a detailed diagram of the surface and subsurface portions of the system; and
(4) a planned injection schedule.
Revised 6/09 UIC-51/5T Page 5 of 7

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 51 Wells —In Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
F. MONITORING PLAN
Provide a plan for monitoring the results of the injection, including:
(I) a list of existing and proposed monitoring wells to be used;
(2) a list of monitoring parameters and analytical methods to be used; and
(3) a schedule for sampling to monitor the proposed injection.
NOTE: The selected monitoring wells must be located so as to detect any movement of injection fluids, process by-
products, or formation fluids outside the injection area or zone. The monitoring parameters should include the target
contaminants as well as secondary or intermediate contaminants which may result from the injection and other
parameters which may .serve to indicate the progress of the intended reactions, such as pH, ORP, dissolved oxygen, and
other electron acceptors and donors. The monitoring schedule should be consistent with the pace of the anticipated
reactions and rate of transport of the injeclanls and contaminants.
G. WELL DATA
Provide a tabulation of data on all existing or abandoned wells within 'A mile of the injection well(s) which penetrate the
proposed injection zone, including, but not limited to, monitoring wells and wells proposed for use as injection wells.
Such data shall include a description of each well's use (water supply, monitoring, etc), total depth, screened or open
borehole depth interval, and well construction or abandonment record, if available.
H. MAPS
Attach the following scaled, site -specific maps:
(1) Area map based on the most recent USGS 7.5' topographic map of the area, at a scale of 1:24,000 and
showing the location of the proposed injection site.
(2) Site map including:
a. all property boundaries;
b. all buildings within the property boundary;
c. existing and proposed injection wells or well field(s)
d. any existing sources of potential or known groundwater contamination, including waste storage,
treatment or disposal systems within ''/ mile of the injection well or well system;
e. all surface water bodies within `/ mile of the injection well or well system; and
f. all existing or abandoned wells within '/ mile of the injection well(s) which penetrate the proposed
injection zone, including, but not limited to, monitoring wells and wells proposed for use as injection
wells.
(3) Potentiometric surface map(s) including:
a. direction of groundwater movement
b. existing and proposed monitoring wells
c. existing and proposed injection wells
(4) Contaminant plume map(s) including:
a. the horizontal extent of the contaminant plume, including isoconcentration lines
b. existing and proposed monitoring wells
c. existing and proposed injection wells
(5) Cross-section(s) to the known or projected depth of contamination, including:
a. horizontal and vertical extent of the contaminant plume, including isoconcentration lines
b. major changes in lithology
c. existing and proposed monitoring wells
d. existing and proposed injection wells
1. Work Plan
The work plan for Enhanced Reductive Dechiorination Pilot Study is included as Attachment I
Revised 6/09 UIC-51/5T Page 6 of 7

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 51 Wells — Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
V. CERTIFICATION (to be signed as required below or by that person's authorized agent)
NCAC 15A 2C .0211(b) requires that all permit applications shall be signed as follows:
I. for a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer
2. for a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor, respectively
3. for a municipality or a state, federal, or other public agency: by either a principal executive officer or
ranking publicly elected official
4. for all others: by the well owner.
If an authorized agent is signing on behalf of the applicant, then supply a letter signed by the applicant that
names and authorizes their agent.
I hereby certify under penalty of law that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information
submitted in this document and all attachments therein, and that, based on my inquiry of those individuals
immediately responsible for obtaining said information, I believe that the information is true, accurate, and
complete. 1 am aware that there are penalties, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment, for submitting
false information. I agree to construct, operate, maintain, repair, and if applicable, abandon the injection well(s)
and all related appurtenances in accordance with the approved specifications and conditions of the Permit.
Printed Name i 'itle. Robert M. Asselin, Vice President, Alczo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC
Signature:
Date: 2 1Z9��� C/� / U
VI. CONSENT OF PROPERTY OWNER (if the property is not owned by the applicant)
("Owner" means any person who holds the fee or other property rights in the well being constructed. A well is
real properly and its construction on land shall be deemed to vest ownership in the land owner, in the absence of
contrary agreement in writing.)
As owner of the property on which the injection well(s) are to be constructed and operated, I hereby consent to
allow the applicant to construct each injection well as outlined in this application and agree that it shall be the
responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the injection well(s) conform to the Well Construction Standards
(Title 15A NCAC 2C .0200).
Printed Name and Title:
RECEIVED I DENR I DWQ
AQUIITR'PROTPrTInN SECTION
MAR 26 ZU10.
Signature: Date:
.446
Submit TWO copes of the completed application package, including all attachments, to:
UIC Program
Aquifer Protection Section
North Carolina DENR-DWQ
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Telephone [phone]
Revised 6/09 U1C-51/5T Page 7 of 7

Attachment A - Site History
Site Usage
The AkzoNobel Site (formerly National Starch and Chemical Company) is located on Cedar Springs Road
in Salisbury, Rowan County, North Carolina, approximately five miles south of the city of Salisbury and
approximately 40 miles northeast of Charlotte (Figure 1). The Site is situated on a 500-acre parcel and
includes operating laboratory and manufacturing facilities (Production Area) in the southeast portion of the
Site.
Commercial, industrial, and residential developments surround the Site. Grants Creek forms the western
property boundary. Two separate tributaries of Grants Creek, the Unnamed Tributary and the Northeast
Tributary, are located in the southwest and northeast portions of the Site, respectively. Figure 2 presents the
layout of the site along with the monitoring well network for the facility.
Construction of the Cedar Springs Road Plant began in 1970 and included the production facility and three
wastewater lagoons located in the southeast portion of the site. The plant produces textile -finishing
chemicals and custom specialty chemicals, and chemical production takes place on a batch basis and varies
depending on demand. Volatile and semivolatile chemicals are used in the manufacturing process, and acid
and alkaline solutions are used in both the manufacturing and cleaning processes.
From 1971 to 1978, approximately 350,000 gallons of reaction vessel wash waters were disposed of in
trenches constructed in a 5-acre tract of land located west of the production area of the Site. The liquid
waste included salt brines, sulfuric acid solution, and sulfonating fats and oils containing trace quantities of
organic constituents. The trenches measured approximately 200 to 300 feet long and 8 feet deep and ran
both east to west and north to south. During this time, effluent was pumped from the plant to the
easternmost pretreatment lagoon and subsequently pumped to an active trench in the Trench Area. Each
trench was used until liquid no longer readily percolated into the ground. When this occurred, the trench
was backfilled and seeded, and a new trench was constructed. Environmental conditions resulting from
Trench Area activities led to inclusion of the site on the National Priorities List (NPL) under the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA).
The site consists of four Operable Units (OUs) which address soil or groundwater impacts at different
locations at the Site. The four OUs are as follows:
• OU 1: groundwater impacts attributed to historic use of wastewater effluent trenches (Trench Area)
on the western portion of the Site within the drainage basin of the Unnamed Tributary of Grants
Creek.
• OU2: soil impacts in the Trench Area.
• OU3: groundwater impacts attributed to former unlined wastewater treatment lagoons, underground
terra-cotta sewerage within the Production Area and the Lagoon Area, and miscellaneous spills
within the drainage basin of the Northeast Tributary.
1
1

• OU4: soil impacts in the vicinity of OU3.
Origin of Contamination
OU3 (groundwater) and OU4 (soil) are located to the east of the drainage divide in the watershed for the
unnamed creek to the east of the facility. The proposed injection activities will be conducted in the Lagoon
Area of OU3. The source of the groundwater impacts in OU3 are attributed to the formerly unlined
wastewater treatment lagoons (designated Lagoons #1, 2, and 4 as shown on Figure 2) and abandoned
process waste water sewers in the southern portion of OU3 (Lagoon Area). In the northern portion of OU4
(Northern Production Area, also known as Area 2), impacts to OU3 groundwater are attributed to
underground terra-cotta waste water lines, the process water trench leading to Sump #2 and possibly spills
adjacent to the tank farm where above ground storage tanks holding 1,2-DCA are filled. The abandoned
process lines and potential source areas are shown on Figure 1. The lagoons have since been drained, lined,
and returned to service.
The groundwater impacts in the southern portion of OU3 are distributed throughout the three hydrogeologic
units, with the highest concentrations detected in saprolite and deep bedrock. This portion of the OU3
plume has been subjected to groundwater extraction from shallow bedrock wells NS-49 and NS-51. Based
on the distribution of the contaminants at this location, it appears that the downward migration can be
attributed to the groundwater extraction system because the vertical hydraulic gradients under non -pumping
conditions indicate a limited upward hydraulic gradient.
Previous Remedial Actions
The approved remedial alternative for addressing the dissolved phased groundwater impacts at OU3 is
groundwater extraction with on -site pre-treatment and discharge to the publicly owned treatment works
(POTW). A groundwater interception trench is located in a low-lying area in the northeastern part of the
site (Northern Production Area). Water is pumped from the eastern edge of the trench to the onsite
treatment area. Two extraction wells (NS-49 and NS-51) are located in the southern portion of OU3, in
the vicinity of the wastewater lagoons (Lagoon Area). Groundwater extracted from the collection trench
and extraction wells is treated in the combined OU1 and OU3 pre-treatment system prior to discharge to
Lagoon #3 and ultimately to the POTW.
The extraction wells operated throughout 2008 until October 24. The OU3 groundwater extraction system
was shut down along with the OU1 system on October 17, 2008 after a fire damaged the groundwater
treatment system. The OU1 extraction system is being rebuilt to optimize mass removal through
groundwater extraction. However, the shutdown of the groundwater extraction system has led to a
reevaluation of the remedial alternative selected (groundwater extraction and treatment) in the Lagoon Area.
NS-49 and NS-51 were very effective at removing mass in the Lagoon Area with 1,2-DCA concentrations
decreasing from 34,000 to 0.76 µg/L and 410,000 to 0.82 µg/L, respectively. The wells currently used for
groundwater extraction no longer exhibit the highest concentrations. The majority of the contaminant mass
remaining is west of the extraction wells. As a result, an in -situ remedial alternative is being evaluated.
2

Attachment B - Hydrogeologic Description / Conceptual Site Model
Topography
Topography in the region is characterized by undulating hills and valleys. The landscape is dissected by
small perennial streams, referred to as the Northeast Tributary and the Unnamed Tributary, which form
the majority of the valleys in the region. The topography of the 500-acre parcel is composed of a ridge
oriented in a northwest — southeast direction, which crosses the site along the eastern edge of the Trench
Area. The elevation along the ridge ranges from approximately 780 to more than 790 feet above mean
sea level (ft AMSL). Elevation decreases to the east and the west of the Trench Area toward the surface
water features located along the perimeter of the facility. The elevation along the Northeast Tributary
along the eastern side the site ranges in elevation from 760 ft AMSL near its headwaters to 700 ft AMSL
where it exits the property to the north. Grants Creek and its tributaries, including the Unnamed
Tributary, are located along the south/southwestern boundary of the property. The elevation along these
surface water features are similar to the elevations noted for the Northeast Tributary.
Regional Geology
The site lies within the Charlotte belt of the central Piedmont physiographic province which is generally
characterized by relatively thick regolith over fractured igneous and metamorphosed igneous and
sedimentary bedrock. The land surface in the Piedmont is underlain by clay -rich, unconsolidated material
derived from in -situ weathering of the underlying bedrock. The unconsolidated material, which averages
between about 30 and 60 feet thick and may be as much as 300 feet thick in some areas, is referred to as
saprolite, which retains the relic texture and structure of the parent bedrock. In the valleys of many larger
streams, the flood plains are underlain by relatively thin, moderately well sorted alluvium deposited by
the streams (Heath, 1984). A transition zone between saprolite and competent bedrock comprised of
saprolite (thoroughly weathered rock), partially weathered rock (PWR) and competent rock fragments to
boulders is typical in the Piedmont. The transition zone represents a zone of greater weathering than the
competent bedrock, but lesser weathering than the saprolite. Bedrock in the Piedmont ranges from
Precambrian to Paleozoic age. The bedrock of the Charlotte belt is commonly composed of mafic
gneisses, amphibolites, metagabbros, and metavolcanic rocks with lesser amounts of biotite gneiss, mica
schist, quartzite and ultramafic rocks (Butler and Secor, 1991, Heath, 1984).
The site is located just southeast of a northeast -trending contact between metamorphosed quartz diorite
and tonalite to the northwest and metavolcanics to the southeast. Near the site, Grants Creek exists along
this contact. Rock in the vicinity of the site has been metamorphosed to the amphibolite facies (medium to
high-grade). According to the Geologic Map of North Carolina, the unit beneath the site is described as
"Metavolcanic Rock — Interbedded felsic to mafic tuffs and flowrock" (North Carolina Geological
Survey, 1985).
Bedrock fractures and lineaments within the region tend to be vertical to near vertical with one dominant
strike orientation set ranging from north 10 degrees east to north 70 degrees east (Groves, 1976). In
general, fracture frequency will decrease with depth. The nearest mapped major fault to the site is the
Silver Hill fault associated with the Gold Hill shear zone located about 11 to 12 miles east of the site
representing the boundary between the Charlotte belt and the Carolina slate belt. Recent work conducted
1

by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has identified a northeast trending shear zone that apparently
intersects the site. Based on previous classification, there is evidence of the shear zone on the site near
the OU4 Lagoons; however, no additional information is available as to the exact location and
characteristics of the shear zone.
Site Specific Geology
Previous characterizations of the site by RMT used a three unit system with the uppermost unit being the
saprolite, the middle unit was the transition zone and the deep unit was characterized as bedrock. The
classification criteria previously used was not well understood. ARCADIS has reviewed all of the
historic boring logs and based on a review of the boring logs and bedrock characteristics, the geologic
units have been reclassified. In general, the logs suggest that none of the wells are screened solely within
the transition zone, but instead are in the shallow bedrock or screened across multiple zones. Attachment
G of the UIC Permit Application summarizes the well construction with respect to each of these three
units: saprolite, shallow bedrock, and deep bedrock. A cross section has been prepared for the proposed
pilot study area. It is included as Figure 5 in Attachment H of the UIC Permit Application.
The saprolite across the site ranges in thickness from approximately 60 feet in the trench area to
approximately 10 feet toward the Unnamed Tributary to Grants Creek to the west and the Northeast
Tributary to the east. The saprolite is characterized as mixed silt and clay at shallow depths and grades to
sandier soil and eventually partially weathered bedrock with depth. The weathering profile in the
saprolite at the site is consistent with typical Piedmont weathering profile. The base of the saprolite unit
is characterized as drilling refusal with hollow stem augers. Note that the transition zone typically
described in the boring logs is thin to non-existent. Where present, the transition zone is included within
the saprolite zone for the purpose of describing geologic units.
Underlying the saprolite is the shallow bedrock unit. The shallow bedrock is composed of a combination
of metamorphosed intrusive mafic rock (meta-gabbro and diorite) or mafic lava flows (meta -basalt).
Generally speaking, the shallow bedrock is characterized with close fracture spacing (2-inch to 1-foot
spacing) in the upper portion of the shallow bedrock. The fracture attitude is characterized as steep or
high angle, which range from 55 to 85 degrees from horizontal. In general, the fracture spacing increases
to a wide spacing (3 feet to 10 feet). This is consistent with the Rock Quality Designation (RQD), where
the RQD of the upper portion of the bedrock ranges from 60 to 80 percent. With depth, the RQD
increases to 90 to 100 percent. The fracture attitude remains consistent throughout the shallow bedrock.
The depth of the transition from highly fractured to less fractured bedrock generally occurs from 50 to
100 feet in to the bedrock.
The final unit is the deep bedrock. The deep bedrock is a continuation of the shallow bedrock unit. There
is not a distinct contact between the shallow and deep bedrock units. The change from shallow to deep
bedrock is characterized by the decrease in fracture density, wherein the deep bedrock has considerably
less fractures. As previously stated, the fracture density decreases with depth, and at a depth of
approximately 100 feet below ground surface, the rock is relatively unfractured. For simplicity, deep
bedrock has been classified as any well completed at depths greater than 100 feet into bedrock.
2

Regional Hydrogeology
The regional conceptual hydraulic model of groundwater flow for the site is the LeGrand Model
(LeGrand, 2004) for flow in the Piedmont geophysical province. The LeGrand Model indicates that
groundwater is not laterally extensive and mimics surface water drainage. Topographic highs (the upland
ridges) act as the principal areas of groundwater recharge. Perennial streams represent discharge
boundaries where groundwater flows to the surface, as diffuse seepage or from springs. Groundwater in
the Piedmont flows from hilltop areas to the nearest streams, marshes, or wetlands. The path of natural
groundwater flow is relatively short and is almost invariably restricted to the saprolite and shallow
bedrock underlying the slope. Each upland ridge bounded by permanent streams is a separate
groundwater flow system that is a "hydraulic island."
Perennial Piedmont streams are discharge barriers that capture all local groundwater based on three lines
of evidence. First, the streams gain flow downstream (Piedmont streams do not recharge groundwater
under normal flow conditions). Second, groundwater flows to the stream from both sides of the valley.
Third, there is an upward hydraulic gradient into the streams, further illustrating that the streams capture
the deeper groundwater from both sides of the valley. Each perennial stream acts as a drain for all
groundwater from the two adjacent hydraulic islands.
Site Specific Hydrogeology
As discussed in Section 2.3, the Trench Area is located near a topographic high for the site. The
topographic ridge, located to the east of the Trench Area, acts as a drainage divide and recharge area for
surface runoff and groundwater. The groundwater flows radially from the ridge toward the surface water
features to the east and west. The potentiometric maps for the three hydrogeologic units are included as
Figures 3, 3a and 3b of Attachment H of the UIC Permit Application. These data represent non -pumping
conditions. The Unnamed Tributary to the west and the Northeast Tributary to the east of the site act as
the discharge boundaries for groundwater, which is consistent with the LeGrand Model.
The monitoring well pairs across the site were evaluated to confirm the LeGrand Model for flow and
evaluate the creeks as discharge boundaries. The well pairs were distributed across the site to represent
the areas of recharge and discharge. At the monitoring well pair of NS-28 and NS-57, the groundwater
elevation in the shallow well (NS-28) was 1.03 feet higher than the elevation in the deep well. This
difference is indicative of the downward gradient expected in the recharge area. Near the Northeast
Tributary to the east of the site the groundwater elevations are higher in the deeper wells compared to the
shallow wells paired with them. This is illustrated by monitoring wells NS-35 (shallow) and NS-36
(deep), where the groundwater elevation is 0.51 feet higher in the deeper interval compared to the shallow
well. The difference in groundwater elevations is consistent with the LeGrand Model and shows the
upland area acts as a recharge area and the valleys acts as a discharge area. Near the Unnamed Tributary,
three bedrock wells currently exhibit artesian conditions, indicating groundwater within the bedrock
aquifer discharges to the surface water body. On the west bank of the Unnamed Tributary, deep bedrock
well NS-31 is screened from 180-200 feet bls. The groundwater elevation is approximately 8 feet bls,
indicating a similar upward vertical gradient is present on both sides of the Unnamed Tributary.
The potentiometric map for the saprolite hydrogeologic unit (Figure 9) shows groundwater flow is
uniform in all directions away from the recharge area, with the exception being the area occupied by the
plant. In the plant area the hydraulic gradient decreases, which is caused by decreased recharge due to the
3

presence of the buildings and concrete. The average hydraulic gradient across the saprolite aquifer is
0.021 ft/ft. Similar horizontal hydraulic gradients are observed for the shallow bedrock and deep bedrock
aquifers with average gradients of 0.023 ft/ft and 0.034 ft/ft, respectively.
Previous work completed at the site has focused on quantifying the hydrogeologic characteristics of the
aquifer. Based on an evaluation of this data, average hydraulic conductivity (K) values have been
calculated for each of the hydrogeologic units present at the site. The average hydraulic conductivity for
the saprolite unit is 2.41 ft/day. The shallow bedrock unit had an average K of 9.44 ft/day and the deep
bedrock had an average K of 0.46 ft/day. These values are consistent with the anticipated flow conditions
in each unit, where the K for the deep bedrock will be considerably less than the value observed in the
shallow bedrock.
The groundwater velocities for each hydrogeologic unit were calculated based on the site specific
hydrogeologic data available. The groundwater velocity for the saprolite aquifer was calculated at 0.50
ft/day (184 ft/year), which assumes an effective porosity of 10 percent. The calculated groundwater
velocity for the shallow bedrock unit is 2.17 ft/day (792 ft/year). For the shallow bedrock aquifer, the
effective porosity was assumed at 10 percent. This is near the upper limits of the porosity of fractured
crystalline rock based on the close fracture spacing in the upper section of the shallow bedrock. The
effective porosity assumed for the deep bedrock was 2.5 percent, which is in the mid -range for crystalline
rock. The calculated groundwater velocity for the deep bedrock is 0.62 ft/day (228 ft/year). The
hydrogeologic properties used to calculate groundwater velocity are presented below.
Hydrogeologic
Unit
K (ft/day)
Hydraulic
Gradient (ft/ft)
Estimated
Effective Porosity
(Fetter, 2001)
Average Seepage
Velocity (ft/year)
Saprolite
2.41
0.021
0.1
184
Shallow Bedrock
9.44
0.023
0.1
792
Deep Bedrock
0.46
0.034
0.025
228
Site Groundwater Levels
The groundwater levels across the site fluctuate, on average, three to four feet throughout the year with
the water in the saprolite unit being most susceptible to larger fluctuations because of its proximity to land
surface. The water levels across the site vary with surface topography and are deeper in higher elevations
(average of 40 ft bgs near EX-05 and EX-07) and shallower near the streams (6.5 ft bgs at NS-13, near the
Northeast Tributary). The pilot study area is located close to the Northeast tributary but at a higher
elevation than noted at NS-13. Based on the available water level data for the site the mean seasonal high
water table is approximately 12 ft bgs at NS-39, which is immediately downgradient of the proposed
injection area.
4

Attachment C - Injection Fluid Description
Molasses
Physical Characteristics:
• Dark brown syrupy liquid in bulk form
• Derived from sugar cane
• Bulk molasses has an average of 25 percent organic carbon and 47 percent sugar
• Specific gravity is 1.45
• Water soluble, at 2 percent solution, has properties of water
Biological Characteristics: None
Radiological Characteristics: None
Emulsified Vegetable Oil
Physical Characteristics:
• Milky white liquid
• Soluble in water
• Contains 50 to 70 percent food grade edible oil
• Contains 30 to 50 percent water
• pH=6to8
• Specific gravity of 0.95 to 0.98 g/ml
Biological Characteristics: None
Radiological Characteristics: None
***MSDS Sheets for both proposed injectants are included.

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
MOLASSES/MOLASSES BLENDS/BINDERS
1. CHEMICAL PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION
Chemical Name
N/A
Chemical Formula Molecular Weight
Mixture of liquid No data
Agricultural commodities
Trade Name - Molasses/Molasses Blends
Synonyms: DOT Identification No.
Liquid animal supplement: N/A
Company Identification:
Westway Trading Corporation
365 Canal Street, Suite 2900
New Orleans, Louisiana 70130
[phone]
2. COMPOSITION, INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS
Component(s), CAS Registry No. %(Approx.) ACGIH TLV-TWA
Chemical Name
Proprietary NA No data No data
See ingredient tag
3. HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION
Emergency Overview
This material should be stored in a vented tank designed to contain a material
with a specific gravity of 1.3 or greater. Material can ferment if excessive
moisture contamination is allowed. Fermentation can yield carbon dioxide with
possible traces of ethanol or volatile fatty acids (e.g. acetic, propionic,
lactic, or butyric) and if exposed to a spark or flame may result in an
explosion. These conditions should be avoided. If maintenance of tank requires
entry by personnel, OSHA's Confined Space standard (29CFR1910.146) shall be
complied with. If welding is to be performed, the tank should be gas freed and
only certified welders shall perform welding operations.
Potential Health Effects
Eyes - Mild irritant
Skin - None
Inhalation - Insufficient oxygen may be present in vessels containing the
product due to the generation of carbon monoxide during fermentation
1

4. FIRST AID MEASURES
Eyes: Flush eyes for 15 minutes.
Skin: Wash with soap and water.
Ingestion: No data
5. FIRE FIGHTING MEASURES
Flashpoint (Method used) Flammable Limits in Air
Non-flammable Non-flammable
Non-combustible Non-combustible
Extinguishing Agents - NA
Unusual Fire and Explosion Hazards - Fermentation occurs when diluted with
water and is accelerated by heat. During fermentation, carbon monoxide with
possible traces of ethanol or volatile fatty acids (e.g., acetic, propionic,
lactic, or butyric) is given off, which produces inhalation hazards and
possible explosion hazards.
6. ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES
Steps to be Taken in Case Material is Released or Spilled
Small spills - Stop the source of the spill. Recover as much product as
possible for reuse. Absorb remaining spill and dispose solids in waste
container.
Large spills - Stop the source of the spill. Create diversionary structures to
minimize the extent of the release. Prevent the release from entering a
waterway or sewer. Recover useable product. Absorb remaining spill and dispose
of at an approved facility such as a municipal landfill or land application
site.
7. HANDLING AND STORAGE
This material should be stored in a vented tank designed to contain a material
with a specific gravity of 1.3 or greater. Material can ferment if excessive
moisture contamination is allowed.
8. EXPOSURE CONTROLS, PERSONAL PROTECTION
Respiratory Protection - None
Ventilation - Provide adequate ventilation to prevent accumulation of vapors.
Skin Protection - Rubber gloves
Eye Protection - Safety glasses
Hygiene - Wash any exposed area promptly with soap and water. Launder
contaminated clothing.
2

Other Control Measures - None
9. PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
Appearance
Dark brown syrupy liquid
Odor
Sweet
Physical State Specific Gravity
Liquid 1.45
Boiling Point Freezing/Melting Point
Very high Varies
Vapor Pressure % Volatile, by Volume
Low No data
Evaporation Rate Vapor Density in Air
No data Water vapor only
Solubility in Water pH
Soluble 2.25 to 6.0
10. STABILITY AND REACTIVITY
Chemical Stability - Stable
Conditions to Avoid - Excess moisture or heat. Unventilated containers.
Incompatibility with Other Materials - Reacts with concentrated nitric acid or
concentrated Sulphuric acid. Ferments when diluted with water.
Hazard Decomposition Products - Carbon monoxide, alcohol or fatty acid vapors
Hazardous Polymerization - NA
11. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION
Prevent releases to land or water. Results in high Biological Oxygen Demand
(BOD) and potential oxygen depletion of aquatic systems.
12. DISPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS
Dispose of waste material at an approved municipal landfill or land
application site.
13. TRANSPORT INFORMATION
Hazardous Materials Description/ Proper Shipping Name - NA
DOT Hazard Class - NA
DOT Identification Number - NA
X This product is not a DOT hazardous material.
3

14. REGULATORY INFORMATION
Discharges to a water of the U.S. are regulated by the Environmental
Protection Agency.
15. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
Date of Preparation: 3/15/96 REVISED: 10/12/01
Prepared by: Jane Besch, Director - HSE
Disclaimer:
WESTWAY FEED PRODUCTS provides the information contained herein in good faith
but makes no representation as to its comprehensiveness or accuracy. This
document is intended only as a guide to the appropriate precautionary handling
of the material by a properly trained person using this product. Individuals
receiving the information must exercise their independent judgment in
determining its appropriateness for a particular purpose. WESTWAY FEED
PRODUCTS makes no representations or warranties, either express or implied,
including without limitation any warranties of merchantability, fitness for a
particular purpose with respect to the information set forth herein or the
product to which the information refers. Accordingly, WESTWAY FEED PRODUCTS
will not be responsible for damages resulting from use of or reliance upon
this information.
4

r \ 7 Nre
tec mologies nc
innovative solutions for
groundwater treatment
H60 Emulsified Vegetable Oil Substrate (EVOS)TM
Effective Date: 10/26/05
I. Product Identification
Synonyms: Slow Release Substrate ± (SRS Tm)
CAS No.: Mixture
Molecular Weight: Not applicable.
Chemical Formula: Not applicable.
2. Composition/Information on Ingredients
Ingredient CAS # Percent Hazardous
Food grade edible oil Mixture 50-70 No
& emulsifiers
Sodium Lactate 72-17-3 <5 Yes
Yeast Extract 8013-01-2 <1 No
Sodium Bicarbonate 144-55-8 <1 No
Ammonium Phosphate 7783-28-0 <1 No
Dibasic
Water
7732-18-5 30-50 No
3. Hazards Identification
Emergency Overview
CAUTION! .MAY CAUSE EVE IRRITATION.
Health Rating: 1 - Slight
Flammability Rating: 1 - Slight
Reactivity Rating: 1 - Slight
Contact Rating: 1 - Slight
Lab Protective Equip: GOGGLES; LAB COAT; PROPER GLOVES
Storage Color Code: Green (General Storage)

innovative solutions for
groundwater treatment
I nologies inc
Potential Health Effects
Inhalation:
Not expected to be a health hazard. If heated, may produce vapors or mists that irritate
the mucous membranes and cause irritation, dizziness, and nausea. Remove to fresh air.
Ingestion:
Not expected to be a health hazard via ingestion. Large doses may produce abdominal
spasms. diarrhea.
Skin Contact:
No adverse effects expected. -May cause irritation or sensitization in sensitive individuals.
Eye Contact:
May cause mild irritation, possible reddening.
Chronic Exposu re:
No information found.
Aggravation of Pre-existing Conditions:
No in'formation found.
4. First Aid Measures
Inhalation:
Not expected to require first aid measures. Remove to fresh air. Get medical attention for
any breathing difficulty.
Ingestion:
If large amounts were swallowed, give water to drink and get 'medical advice.
Skin Contact:
Not expected to require first aid measures. Wash exposed area with soap and water. Get
medical advice if irritation develops.
Eye Contact:
Immediately flush eyes with plenty of water for at least 1.5 minutes, lifting upper and
lower eyelids occasionally. Get medical attention if irritation persists.
5. Fire Fighting Measures
Fire:
Flash point: >200 °C.; (>392 "F)
Not considered to be a fire hazard.
Explosion:
Not considered to be an explosion hazard.
Fire Extinguishing Media:
Use any means suitable for extinguishing surrounding fire.
Special Information:
in the event of a fire, wear full protective clothing and MOSH-approved self-contained
breathing apparatus with full faeepiece operated in the pressure demand or other positive
pressure mode.

innovative solutions for
groundwater treatment
6. Accidental Release Measures
Clean-up personnel may require protective clothing. Absorb in sand, paper towels, "Oil
Dry", or other inert material. Scoop up and containerize for disposal. }lush trace residues
to sewer with soap and NV ater. Containerized waste may be sent to an approved waste
disposal facility.
7. Handling and Storage
Keep in a tightly closed container, stored in a cool, dry, ventilated area. Protect against
physical damage. Containers of this material are not hazardous when empty since they do
vapors or harmful substances; observe all warnings and precautions listed for the product.
8. Exposure Controls/Personal Protection
Airborne Exposure Limits:
None established.
Ventilation System:
Not expected to require any special ventilation.
Personal Respirators (NIOSH Approved):
Not expected to require personal respirator usage.
Skin Protection:
Wear protective gloves and clean body -covering clothing.
Eye Protection:
Use chemical safety goggles and/or a full face shield where splashing is possible.
9. Physical and. Chemical Properties
Appearance:
White liquid.
Odor:
Vegetable oil.
Solubility:
Soluble in water.
Specific Gravity:
0.95-0.98 glmL
pH:
6-8 (60% aqueous solution)
% Volatiles by volume 21C (70F):
Negligible.
Boiling Point:

technologies Inc
> I 00C (> 2 I 2F)
Melting Point:
No information found.
Vapor Density (Air=1):
No information found.
Vapor Pressure (nm
< 1.0 @ 20C (68F)
Evaporation Rate (Buti.c=1):
No information found.
innovative solutions for
groundwater treatment
10. Stability and :Reactivity
Stability:
Stable under ordinary conditions of use and storage.
Hazardous Decomposition Products:
Carbon dioxide and carbon Monoxide may fbrm vhen heated to decomposition.
Hazardous Polymerization:
Will not occur.
Incompatibilities:
Strong oxidizers, acids.
Conditions to Avoid:
Incompatibles.
11. Toxicological Information
Sodium Lactate. Oral rat LD50: 2.000 mg/kg. 100 mg caused mild irritation to rabbit
eye in Draize test.
Sodium Bicarbonate. Oral rat LDS() unknown.
12. Ecological Information
Environmental Fate:
No information fbund.
Environmental Toxicity:
No information found.
13. Disposal Considerations
Whatever cannot be saved for recovery or recycling should be managed in an appropriate
and approved waste disposal facility. Processing, use or contamination of this product
may change the waste management options. State and local disposal regulations may

innovative solutions for
groundwater treatment
teconologics iic
differ from federal disposal regulations. Dispose of container and unused contents in
accordance with federal, state and local requirements.
14. Transport Information
Not regulated.
15. Regulatory Information
OSHA STATUS: This product is not hazardous under the criteria ofthe Federal OSHA hazard Communication
Standard 29 CFR 1910.1200. However, thermal processing and decomposition fumes from this product may be
hazardous as noted in Section 10.
TSCA STATUS: No component of this product is listed on the TSCA inventory.
CERCLA (Comprehensive Response Compensation, and Liability Act): Not reportable.
SARA TITLE 111 (Superlimd Amendments and Reauthorization Act)
Section 312 Extremely Hazardous Substances: None
Section 311/312 Hazard Categories: Non -hazardous Under Section 311/312
Section 313 Toxic Chemicals: None
RCRA sTATUS: If discarded in its purchased tbrin. this product would not be a hazardous waste either by
listing or by characteristic, However, under RCRA. it is the responsibility of the product user to determine at the
time ofdisposal, N-vhether a material containing the product or derived from the product should he classified as a
hazardous waste. ('10 CFR 261.20-24)
CALIFORNIA PROPOSITION 65: The following statement is made in order to comply with the California
safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986. The product contains no chemicals known to the
State of California to cause cancer.
16. Other Information
NFPA Ratings: Health: 1 Flammability: 1 Reactivity: 0
Revision Information:
MSDS Section(s) changed since last revision of document include: None.
Disclaimer:
************************************************************************
********************m*

Attachment D - Injection Rationale
The objective of the injection program, estimates of injection volume, breakdown of contaminants, and
anticipated changes of conditions to the hydrostratigraphic units are included in the Work Plan for
Enhanced Reductive Dechlorination Pilot Study, which is included as Attachment I.

Attachment E - Injection Procedures and Equipment
1) Construction Plans and Materials
a. A clean 2,500-gallon tank will be utilized for storage of raw molasses during injection
events.
b. A 6,500-gallon water tank (or alternate size) will be provided by a vendor. This tank will
provide water storage from the municipal supply.
c. A 2-inch trash pump will be dedicated to provide the water through the system.
Alternatively, if a 50 gpm water supply is readily available at the site, the storage tank
and trash pump will not be necessary.
d. A Moyno pump will be used to deliver the raw molasses to the process.
e. Two static mixers will be utilized in parallel for the purpose of mixing raw molasses and
water into solution.
f. A skid mounted bag filter will be constructed or rented depending on the associated costs.
The filter socks will be 100 micron to remove particulates from the molasses.
g. Two-inch Hayward (or equal) ball and check valves will be purchased and installed
where specified on the piping and instrumentation diagram (P&ID).
h. Wellhead manifold assemblies will be constructed as depicted on the P&ID with 1-inch
materials. The flow meter and pressure gauge will be critical for analyzing the field
monitoring parameters of the injections.
2) Operation Procedures
a. The 2,500 gallon molasses tank and the 6,500-gallon water tank will be set up in a work
zone between the two injection areas.
b. The water supply tank will begin filling during setup of the remaining injection
equipment.
c. Molasses will be delivered by tanker to fill the 2,500-gallon tank once it is located in the
proper place.
d. Drop pipes will be installed and secured at each injection well. The well head will be
fitted with a specialized cap, which will seal the well and also allow a drop pipe to be
connected to deliver the reagent to the top of the screened interval of the well.
e. The pumps, piping, static mixer, pressure gauge, and bag filter will be connected in -line
as shown on the P&ID.
f. Once the equipment is set up, the injections will begin. The injections will be completed
by the following procedures:
i. The valve on the water tank will be opened and the trash pump will be started.
ii. The initial startup should be water only. This will allow the injection rates of
each well to be established.
iii. Once the injection rate has been established, the Moyno pump will be stated.
The pump will be adjusted so that the volume of molasses entering the static
mixer is 2 percent by weight.
1

g.
iv. The injections should occur under gravity -feed conditions. In the event pressure
injection is required to achieve flow in the saprolite, the injection pressure should
not exceed 5 psi to avoid damaging the formation or creating preferential flow
paths.
v. This injection procedure will continue until the target volumes have been reached
or until the plant established working limits have ended for the day.
Upon conclusion of the event a fresh water injection will need to be conducted. This will
flush the reagent from all equipment and piping, which will reduce problems with
corrosion in future events.
3) Detailed Diagram of the surface and subsurface portions of the system
a. A P&ID for the Pilot Study Implementation is included with this Attachment.
4) Planned Injection Schedule
a. A schedule for the pilot study implementation is included as Appendix B of the Work
Plan for Enhanced Reductive Dechlorination Pilot Study, which is included as
Attachment I.
2

r
21101201011:01 PM BY: MCLAUGHLIN, CHASE
ARCADIS(NEWTOWN)(SIZE A-B).0
FROM CITY
WATER FEED
WATER TANK
T-101
6,500 GAL; 2 INCH
FITTINGS
PROJECTNAME: -
2' TRASH PUMP
P-102 BV-200
BV-202
INJECTION SOLUTION MIXING
2"
2"-1"
STATIC
MIXERS
•.
••
BF
200
100 um
BV-201
BF
100
100 um
BV-204
BV-111
BV-111
2" HOSE
2' —1'
1" DIGITAL
VISCOUS 3-30
GPM
1/4" GLYCERIN
FILLED 0-30 PSI
01 "-1 /4"
D
—101
1" 3—T0 GPM
MOYNO
PROGRESSIVE
CAVITY PUMP
BV-205 1" HOSE TO
EACH WELL
2"-1" BV-206
2" HOSE 2"-1'
BV-207
2"-1" BV-20B
1" HOSE TO
EACH WELL
MOLASSES TANK
T-100
2,500 GAL; 2 INCH
FITTINGS
NOTES:
1) T-100 ONSITE
2) T-101 PROVIDED BY RAIN FOR RENT
3) 100% BULK MOLASSES DELIVERY VIA TRAILER FROM WESTWAY
4) P-101 PROVIDED BY MAPLE LEAF: 10 GPM MAX 1
HORSEPOWER 3 PHASE
5) P-102 PURCHASED 2" TRASH PUMP
NATIONAL STARCH CHEMICAL COMPANY
CEDAR SPRINGS ROAD PLANT
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
PROCESS AND INSTRUMENTATION
DIAGRAM FOR PILOT STUDY
IMPLEMENTATION
ARCAD1S
FIGURE
1

Attachment F - Monitoring Plan
The monitoring plan for the ERD Pilot Study is detailed in the Section 3 of the Work Plan for Enhanced
Reductive Dechlorination Pilot Study, which is included as Attachment I.

Attachment G
Monitoring Well Construction Details
AkzoNobel Chemical Company - Salisbury, North Carolina
Well ID
Hydrostratigraphic
Unit
Well Purpose
TOC Elevation
(ft MSL)
Total Depth
(ft bgs)
Suface Casing
Depth (ft bgs)
Screened Interval
(ft bgs)
Top I Bottom
OUl/OU2 Plume Periphery Wells
NS-05
Saprolite
Monitoring
770.13
21.8
NA
11.8
21.8
OUI/OU2 Trench Area Wells
EX-08
Shallow Bedrock
Monitoring
789.19
96
NA
56
96
EX-10
Shallow Bedrock
Monitoring
775.92
105
37
37
105
NS 02
Saprolitc
Monitor-ing
787.01
/17.5
NA
37.2
417.2
NS-03
Saprolite
Monitoring
744.28
18
NA
8
18
NS-04
Saprolite
Monitoring
781.76
28
NA
18
28
NS-11
Saprolite
Monitoring
777.81
27
NA
16.7
26.7
NS-12
Saprolite
Monitoring
777.34
20.2
NA
10.2
20.2
OU3
NS-13
Saprolite
Monitoring
762.67
14.5
NA
4.4
14.4
NS-14
Saprolite
Monitoring
765.36
16.3
NA
6.3
16.3
NS 21
Monitoring
758.32
75.1
40
55.1
75.1
NS-33
Saprolite
Monitoring
776.36
59
NA
49
59
NS-34
Shallow Bedrock
Monitoring
776.27
79
56
63.84
78.84
NS-35
Saprolite
Monitoring
746.11
11.5
NA
6.5
11.5
NS-36
Shallow Bedrock
Monitoring
745.59
40.8
13
25.8
40.8
NS-39
Saprolite
Monitoring
769.91
40.8
NA
30.8
40.8
NS-40
Shallow Bedrock
Monitoring
769.34
94.3
41.9
74.3
94.3
NS-41
Deep Bedrock
Monitoring
766.03
138
118
122
138
NS-42
Shallow Bedrock
Monitoring
766.16
80
NA
60
80
NS-43
Saprolite
Monitoring
759.38
48.5
NA
38.5
48.5
NS-44
Shallow Bedrock
Monitoring
759.3
61.8
47.3
51.75
61.75
NS-45
Shallow Bedrock
Monitoring
754.85
55.3
10
15.8
55.3
NS-46
Shallow Bedrock
Monitoring
768.99
163.7
143.8
143.8
163.7
NS 17
Saprolite
Monitoring
769.62
44,6
8,3
11.7
11.6
NS-48
Deep Bedrock
Monitoring
770.22
172
51.6
162
172
NS-49
Shallow Bedrock
Monitoring
766.98
113.6
8
44.5
113.6
NS-50
Shallow Bedrock
Monitoring
766.08
150
NA
140
150
NS-51
Shallow Bedrock
Monitoring
764.98
117.5
8
43.5
117.5
NS-52
Deep Bedrock
Monitoring
764.67
140.8
120.8
120.8
140.8
NS-53
Shallow Bedrock
Monitoring
770.13
115
47.3
47.3
115
NS-54
Deep Bedrock
Monitoring
770.28
182.3
132.3
132.3
182.3
NS-59
Saprolite
Monitoring
765.86
27
NA
17
27
NS-60
Shallow Bedrock
Monitoring
765.86
61.2
27.5
27.5
61.2
NS-61
Shallow Bedrock
Monitoring
766.3
60
25
39.8
59.8
CT-1-C
UNK
Extraction Trench
744.65
NA
NA
NA
NA
NOTES:
NA - Not Available
CT - Collection Trench
NS 17 Abandoned
Page 1 of 1

C_
co
(0
U
0
0
T z
(0 -
78 a 0)
C � i
E Q
L (0
co —O E
co-
0
-0 U
c o
0 co
L
U
N
ou1
EX-08
EX-08DL(121400;
12/14/2000
7 7❑ 7 7 7 7 7 7 0 0 DDD
7❑ 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 o O 03 o 0 0
a a a a a g a g o a g a a a 0 0 0 a a a a a a a g a a a g a, Q a 0 a a 0 0 0
7,z z z z z 0 z 0 g z 0 Z z z o 0 o z z z z z z z o z z z 0 z oo z z 10 z z cc 0
V 0 N .- .- C0 0 •-- T' a-
V V V V V V V V o0 V V V
Ou1
EX-08
EX-08(121400;
12/14/2000
7 Dui ❑ 7 7 7 7 7 ❑ 0 7 7❑
Dui o o o 0 o O o m o o n
o a a a a a O a o g a o a a a o 0 o a a a a a a a o Q a a o a n a Q g a a o 0 0
)O N. Z Z Z ZZ o Z o o Z o Z Z Z co 0 o Z ZZZ Z Z Z o Z Z Z o Z o Z Z o Z Z o 0 0
V et N N O w V N N N N 0 ,o N N 00
V V N V V V V VCO N V V T"
OU1
EX-08
EX-08(021500)
2/15/2000
00 0
0 o Q a Q a Q O Q 7 O Q o Q Q Q O 7 7 Q Q Q Q a Q Q 7 Q Q Q O 0 N 0 Q O Q Q h O Q
o N Z Z Z ZZ N V V Z ZZ Z ZZ Z . Z Z Z p0) N a O Z 0 Z Z 07 y Z
N UJV T N
V V
ou1
EX-08
EX-08(1998Q1)
1/1/1998
7 D 7❑ -3 ❑ m 7 7 7 7 7
0 7 7
0 0 Q. o 0 0 0 0 0 on
0 o a a a a s o a o o a o a a a o 0 o a a a a a a a o a a a 0 a o Q Q. a a o 0 0
o Z Z Z Z Z 1n Z 1n 0 z 0 Z Z z o 1n 1n z Z Z Z z z z 1n Z Z Z 1n Z 1n Z Z a Z Z 1n 1n (0
N,- N N O CV O N N N N N N N N (o
V V V N 0 V V V V V V V
Ou1
EX-08
EX-08(1997Q4)
10/1/1997
7 7 70 ' ODD 7 7 7 0 DDD
0 0 a a a a a 0 a 0 0 a o a a a 0 0 0 a a a a a a a 0 a a Q 0 a 0 a a o a a 0 0 0
N 1a z z z z z o Z o to in o Z o Z Z Z g 0 0 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z o Z Z Z 0 Z o Z Z 0 Z Z o 0 0
V N
V V N N V V V V V V V V
M
0
r
co pmj 001
O X _
W 0 r
i-2
7 7 70 7 0300 7 7 7 7 7 7
0 N 0 0 0 Q Q 0 Q O O Q 0 a Q a 0 0 0 a Q Q Q Q Q a 0 a Q Q 0 Q 0 a Q O Q a 0 0 0
^' O Z Z Z Z Z O Z O O Z O Z Z Z o 0 o Z Z Z Z Z Z Z O Z Z Z 0 Z O Z Z V1 Z Z 0 0 0
10 0 0 10 F. N 1n V) 10 1n N 1n 1n In
V V V V O V V V v v V V V
ou1
EX-08
EX-08(1997Q2)
4/1/1997
cn
7 7 7❑ 7 a 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
0 0 Q Q a a Q g a g 0 a g a a a o g g a Q a a a a Q g a a a 0 a 0 a a° a a 0 g o
N M Z Z Z ZZ 0 0 o Z Z Z Z Z Z Z o Z Z Z O Z O Z Z y Z Z 0 0 0
co 1O O co 0 0) 10 1() 1n 1n (y 1n 10 1n
V V V N V O V V V V V V V V
Ou1
EX-08
EX-08(1997Q 1)
1/1/1997
7 DO 7 o 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
1n°aaa as0a00a0aaa800aaaaaaa0aaa0a0<Qoaa000
N N Z Z Z Z Z o Z O O Z o Z Z Z 0 0 0 Z Z Z Z Z z Z O Z Z Z O Z o Z Z a Z Z 0 0 0
V 1n 1n 0 1n O 1n 10 1n 10 10 , 1O 10 tO
V V t") V N V V V V V V V V
v
co.
co
Q W Q,-
O
X
W
DD DO 7 7 7 7 7 DDD
00aaa aaaQ0oa0aaag00aaaaQaa0aaa0Qoaaoa0000
0 N Z Z Z Z Z Z Z O o Z 0 Z Z Z 0 0 0 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z O Z Z Z O Z 0 Z Z N Z Z O 0 0
V V V 0 V V V V V V V V
of
ado m
soma
0:N
><
w
Do D DD 7 00 D 7 D DDD
0O<Qa as0a00<o«<,g00aaaaaaa0aQa0a0aQoQa000
O Z Z Z Z Z o Z o 10 Z O Z Z Z,- 0 0 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z la O Z Z Z 0 Z O Z Z N Z Z 0 0 0
V v v v v v v v v v v V V V
out
EX-08
EX-08(1996Q2)
4/1/1996
OU1 Performance Standard
7 7❑ 0 7 D 0 7 7
NN Z Z Z Z Z N Z N g ZZZ o; N z Z Z Z Z z Z N z Z Z`r Z D Z Z o Z Z N N N
V V N N V V 10 V V
Location Group
Location ID
Sample ID
Sample Date
o
o tO co co co w co 1p (0 n to CO 0J V1 CO CO 0 CO (0 (0 CO CO V) V) (0 CO (0 0 CO (0 (0 co (0 to N 0
co Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z LO Z Z Z N Z Z (.)
Ts
N
0
.275
1pi1
F y
❑
Z Z z z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z Z Z Z Z z z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z Z Z z Z Z
C
7
0 0) 01 0) 0) 0) 0) 01 0) 0) 01 O! CO 0) 0) 0) O) 0) O) O) 0 0 O) CO 0) 0) 0) 0) CO 0) 01 01 0) 0) CO CO O) 0) 0) 0) 01 O)
= = = = = = = o. S 1 = 1 = = S = S = O. = 0 S = 0 0 m. S S . = = = 0 . 0 S 0. = = = 1 0
Chemical Name
.o_.
o• 2 >( 0C oE 0 03o 0o o CW o d 0
o E. N =0 y v0)C o N « O
=
OE. O
0L 6.N N CO O
O O Ln0Co C C 0 0 L N O "O N L O -.P. `O N oU o COO O o L No -FL OUOOLO`O Ul Om aON `o `O E 'o ' .0 .5 N O E L o 00T o o0V .0 •ofy
NOm.' .0 N.ULO OO O%o0 EO EU0aff` O UO =OL0 o oLL`L oN)oOOOrLOt❑L o L O❑❑OTC
Z L T ~ F0❑ Vp.TQn7p a 0UO0 Oo >. ONO -LCy
4()LCC 'N °N" o m OA a L (-)L N E W E L ...: cn U >,
vW .. N N N EmV 00.O N N 7H X
yN❑❑ N ❑ 2 1- C C
:o iN HO m m
.0 — -

Attachment G
Groundwater Analytical Data
AkzoNobel Chemical Company - Salisbury, North Carolina
Chemical Name
Unit
Total/
,Dissolved
Location Group
Location ID
Sample ID
Sample Date
OU1
EX-08
EX-08(1996Q2)EX-08(1996Q3)EX-08(1996Q4)EX-08(1997Q1)EX-08(1997Q2EX-08(1997Q3)EX-08(1997Q4)EX-08(1998Q1`EX-08(021500)EX-08(121400
4/1/1996
OU1
EX-08
7/1/1996
OU1
EX-08
10/1/1996
OU1
EX-08
1/1/1997
OU1
EX-08
4/1/1997
OU1
EX-08
7/1/1997
OU1
EX-08
10/1/1997
OU1
EX-08
1/1/1998
OU1
EX-08
2/15/2000
OU1
EX-08
12/14/2000
OU1
EX-08
X-08DL(121400
12/14/2000
OU1 Performance Standard
Inorganics
pg/I
Antimony
pg/I
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
<5 U
NA
NA
Arsenic
pg/1
T
10
<22U
<2U
<2U
<7U
<7U
<7U
9B
<6U
7
NA
<2U
Barium
pg/1
T
1000
26 B
29 B
29 B
21 B
23 B
26 B
26 B
21 B
16
NA
18 B
Beryllium
pg/1
T
17.5
34
23
21
18
15
14
13
14
8
NA
7
Cadmium
pg/I
T
10
44
19
16
13
<3 U
7
4 B
13
4
NA
2 B
Chromium
pg/I
T
50
80
85
80
20
13
10 B
NA
< 4 U
12
< U
31
Cobalt
pg/I
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2730
NA
NA
Copper
pg/I
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1010
NA
NA
Cyanide, Total
pg/I
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Iron
pg/1
D
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Iron
pg/I
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
9950
NA
NA
Lead
pg/I
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
9
NA
NA
Magnesium
pg/I
T
NS
516000
393000
NA
352000
232000
231000
203000
271000
233000
NA
188000
Manganese
pg/I
T
7700
NA
NA
332000
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
134000
210
100000
Manganese
pg/I
D
7700
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Mercury
pg/I
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
< U
NA
NA
Nickel
pg/I
T
350
1990
1440
1350
1270
1140
1120
989
1020
567
1
575
Phosphorus (total)
pg/I
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Potassium
pg/I
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
8990
NA
NA
Selenium
pg/I
T
10
< 8 U
< 2 U
< 5 U
171
60
59
118
104
47
NA
49
Sodium
pg/I
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2390000
NA
NA
Thallium
pg/I
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
145
NA
NA
Vanadium
pg/I
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
< 15 U
NA
NA
Vannadium Oxide
pg/1
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Zinc
pg/1
T
7350
3200
1820
1690
1860
1510
1400
1250
1320
686
1
598
Notes:
Cells exceeding the OU1 performance standard are boldfaced
NS- No Standard
NA -Not Analyzed
U- Not Detected
J- Estimated Value
B- Blank Contamination
D- Dilluted Sample
E- Exceeds Calibration
2of14

i'ff O () . A •� N y E.6 VI 3 „'i K tJ N N O N O N 0 [7 N
X< .� T N m o. 0 N 0 Q N° 3 W n N N is.,-N)
j j fn A
'< A fwf 3 iv ? O_ S iJ N 9? o o o 50.
0° c o m, o 0 0 0 3 g. g g a 3 3 o W m r� d d B.3 0 0 0?'d? < •`- "- m a o<
^ O N O c J 3 F t1• N O » O S J O. Ol fn tD ' 0 0 N>> O 0 0 0 0 O B-O C) a 4 O
o_ o 0 tD as tD 3 0 4 3 3 3 3 B. F_ 59,g m m>>> o C <° rn m 3 0 3 0 s �c 0 0
N 0 3 N O� 0 m N tD > N 0 0 a> tD D) tD CD t tD N N N S O S N N S .•... 0
ID m (D CD a (D tD N =O 0 > J J 0 �D 0) d 0 �. (D
o tD tD 0 0 0= 0 N 0 5
�= m0 m CD a.).. to; to d0
N - D tp
Chemical Name
t t = 0 0 = t = t 0 = 0 = = t = = = t t t t t t t t t t t t t t = t t =
CO CO CO CO CO CO tQ tQ 0 CO 0 t0 01 01 01 01 t0 _ t00 CO 0 0 01 01 CO CO CO 0 CO CO CO CO 0 CO t0 0
'C L= 0 = 0
0 t0 0 t0 01 t0
C
0
Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
Z Z Z Z Z
0
O
N
a
N 0 Z Z O ZZ� ZOIZZ Z 0 Z Z ZZZ Z Z N LA OWi Z Z Z p Z 0 J Z N Z Z
p fn fn 0 (n CO m U) CI) CI) fn fn Cn 0 (n (n C0 0 (n (n CI) cn Cn Cn cn
Z Z Z bq
(0 A) Cn p
Location Group
Location ID
Sample ID
Sample Date
OU1 Performance Standard
A A A _ A A A A A A A
CCOO m N Z Z Al Z Z-, Z tT Z Z Z N Z Z Z Z Z Z Z N Z Z Z O Z o N Z t.J Z Z
0 0 0 D D o D D 0 D 0 D D D 0 D D D D D D D o 0 o D D D 0 D o 0 D 0 D D
C C C 0 C C C C C 0 t_
(nc c
Z Z Z Ot
D D D o 0
C
OU1
EX-08
EX-08(030602)
3/6/2002
A A A A A A A A A A
DAD 0 0 Z Z W Z Z CO Z A Z Z Z A Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 0) 0 0 Z Z Z 0 Z 0 0 Z N Z Z
0 0 0 D D o D D 0 D 0 D D D 0 D D D D D D D 0 0 o D D D` D 0 0 D 0 D D
CCC C C C CC 0 C C
Z Z ZZZ
D D D D D
OU1
EX-08
EX-08_2(030602)
3/6/2002
A A A A A A A A A
t^' O O Z Z tAO Z Z p Z y Z Z Z N Z Z ZZZZ Z p p O Z Z Z p Z QVi o Z p Z Z
000 D D 0 D D 0 D, D D D,_ D D D D D D D 0 0 0 D D D 0 D o o D o D D
C C 0 C CC c C C C
A
Z Z Z Oa tD)
D D D t- r0
OU1
EX-08
EX-08-T (121407:
12/14/2007
th n A A A A A A A A
w p Z Z At0ZZZp ZZZN ZZZZZZZ O ZZZZJ) Z Z Z
0p p pp p op
0 o D D 0 D D o D , D D D._ D D D D D D D 0 0 0 D D D o D o o D o D D
cc C c c c C C C
A
Z Z Z W tr
D D D, C
OU1
EX-08
EX-08(121407'
12/14/2007
A A A N A A A A, A A
N N N Z Z Z Z O Z W Z Z Z v Z Z Z Z Z Z Z W p Z Z Z N Z Z COpZ Z
0 0 0 D D 0 D D 0 D o D D D 0 D D DDD D D o 0 o D D D o D 0 0 D o D D
C C C 0 C C C c o c o C C
C
A A
Z Z Z° W
D D D o •0
C C
X
to
J Z X 0
r:) o
00 NCO
OD
0
m
0
L.' o a D D, D D �' D �' D D D D D D D D D D N D D D D is D D D
c C c, c... c c c
D D D D D
OU1
EX-08
EX-08-61_(070609'
7/6/2009
A A A A A A A A A A A A
OLa A
0 0 o D D 0 ZZ o D .01D D D o ZZ D D ZZ D 0 0 0 D D D 0 D o 0 D o ZZ
CCC C C C CC C C C
D D D D D
OU1
EX-08
EX-08-76_(0706091
7/6/2009
A A A j A A A A A A N A A
P
0 .00 ZZ o D D 0 D 0 D D D 0 D D D D D D D 0 0 0 D D D 0 D o =c.D 0 D D
C C C ,_ c c C C C C c 0 c c
D DDD D
OU1
EX-08
EX-0B-91_(070609;
7/6/2009
A j A A m N A A
O N N Z Z Z Z EPEE A Z A Z Z Z N Z Z Z CA
Z Z Z Z N 0 0 Z Z Z p Z p' Z '' Z Z
0 L o D D p D D, D 0 D D D o D D D D D D D o r_ 0 D D D 0 D o o D o D D
o C o c c 0 0 o C c
W A
Z Z Z 0 0
D D D 0 0
o c
OU1
EX-10
EX-10(1996Q2
4/1/1996
A A m A A A Oa A A
JZ Z N Z Z CO Z A Z Z Z v Z Z Z Z Z Z Z v v N Z Z Z p Z v v N r J Z J Z Z
0 0 0 D D o D D C D 0 D D D o D D DDD D D 0 0 o D D D 0 D 0 0 D o D D
C C L. C c c 0 CC c
A
Z Z Z ti'
D D D o 0
c
OU1
EX-10
�EX-10(199603'
7/1/1996
N
0
Z
0
m
C-)
CD 0
n• O
m =
n
367=
CD 0
3
CD
a) 6
ED G%
Cn —
O o
C
N
0
O
n
N
O
fU

OU1
EX-10
EX-10(1996Q3`
7/1/1996
0
Z Z Z Z Z Z Zo, Z Z Z Z Z Z Z ZNONnN Zh v M
V V) V N
OU1
EX-10
EX-10(1996Q2)
4/1/1996 _
O
o z j m v) tM v z z z z z z O z z z W Z Q 7 z z 2 z co
Z F rn N F v Z Z Z Z Z Z 00 Z Z Z e Z aD Z Z Z Z N
m V CO
OU1
EX-08
EX-08-91_(070609
7/6/2009
< < < < Z Z Z Z < < < < Z Z Z < < Z Z < < Z Z Z Z
OU1
EX-08
EX-08-762070609'
7/6/2009
< < < < < < < < Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
OU1
EX-08
EX-08-61_(070609
7/6/2009
Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
OU1
EX-08
EX-08-N(121708;
12/17/2008
7
Q 7 03 a0 m N Q Q<< Q Q< O 2 2<'q < Z Q Q N-
Z "• srr3 0 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z co Q Q Z Z N Z V. Z Z Z C9
c.;O - 1
v
OU1
EX-08
EX-08(121407
12/14/2007
D 0
Z•- N v o m Z Z Z Z Z Z Z M Z Z' Z Z° Z Z Z Z N
OU1
EX-08
EX-08-T (121407;
12/14/2007
< O m m m m Q Q Q Q Q Q Q m Q Q m Q Q,,¢ Q<< N
Z.,-- co v o z Z Z Z Z Z 2 M Z Z v Z Z V z Z Z z N
OU1
EX-08
EX-08_2(030602
3/6/2002
Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z Z Z Z Z z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
OU1
EX-08
EX-08(030602(
3/6/2002
0
< CO 0 -7 -, (0 < Q Q Q Q Q S O Q Q..<< N<< S¢ g
Z 1� N N LO,OZZ Z Z Z Z Z m Z 2 n Z Z h Z Z Z Z 0
Location Group
Location ID
Sample ID
Sample Date
OU1 Performance Standard
0(n O O • O 0 (n (n (n (n (/) (n (n O O VJ O (/) CO O CO CO CO CO LC)
Z
V
j
I' V1
0
'
7
or o rn rn 0 rn CO o, 03 03 03 0) 01 01 01 03 O) 01 01 0) 01 of rn rn of rn
a a a a. a. a. a. a a. a s a. z a. a_ a. z a a. a. a a. a. a. a.
Chemical Name
m Q)
:° v
ui c u E E E E_ `m ? a�i a�i Z— > j E E Ox
m E aci 2-= 'E E a a ai " m 2 m m c5i s t y 'c 2 2 f, E c
Ol •- ` m 2` v O 0 o P- Q1 c rn rn y V o a1 1) o a) C 'O N
c Q a m m U U U V m - J m m m 2 2 I. a° (n m H> c
U m 2 2 0 c
0. >

0U1
EX-10
EX-10_2(030602;
3/6/2002
7 7 7 o 0 0 7 7 7 7 DD
ooaaaaaoaooaoaaa000aaaaaaaoaaaoaoaaoaao0o
ZZ Z Z Z d. Z ,O a Z Z Z Z .p ,� „ 1 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z �. Z Z Z, Z 1,.1 Z Z M Z Z co 1D N
OU1
EX-10
EX-10DL(121400:
12/14/2000
7o ❑ Q
0 o Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
.-- O
V ..-.
0U1
EX-10
EX-10(121400)
12/14/2000
0 ❑ 7 7 ❑ ❑ 7 7❑
o a a a a s 0 a o o a o a a a 0 0 0 a a a a a a a 0 a a a o a m a a o a a 0 0 0
,n o Z Z Z ZZZZZZ
,p N N O 1+1 N N (0 V' o N N N P1
V. V V 1 0 V V V VIO
n V V
OU1
EX-10
EX-10(021500)
2/15/2000
7
0 0 7 7 0 77 7 7 7 7 7 7
o O Z Z Z Z Z v Z p01 Z 0 Z Z Z N V Z Z Z Z Z Z Z V Z Z Z N V V Z N Z Z v 4" Z
V
0U1
EX-10
EX-10(090898)
9/8/1998
a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a
ZZZZZ z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z
OU1
EX-10
EX-10(199801)
1/1/1998
03
7❑ 7 7❑ 0 00 7 7 7 7
0 o a a a a a O a O o a o a a a o 0 0 a a a a a Z Z 0 a a a o a o a a o a a 0' o
N O Z Z Z Z Z o Z o o Z O Z Z Z o0 0 LO Z Z Z Z Z 1c01 2 Z Z 0 Z N Z Z o Z Z 1� Lo P1
v. v v a a N v V v V
OU1
EX-10
EX-10(199704:
10/1/1997
7❑ 7 7 LUDD 7 7 7 7
0 o a a a a a o a o o a o a a a o 0 o a a a a a a a o a a a 0 a o a a 0 a a o 88
N O z z z Z z O z 0 a1 z ,O Z Z Z 0 0 0 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z O Z Z Z 0 Z O Z Z o Z Z O an
V N N H1 n 0 N N N N N � N N O
V V N V V V V V V
OU1
EX-10
EX-10(199703)
7/1/1997
7❑ 7 7 7 7 DD
o o 0 go 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 o a a a a a 0a0aa a a aaaaa a aa aaaa a0a a
OOZZZ ZZOZ0.ZoZZZ00022ZZZZZOZZZ0ZOZZ1,ZZ00M
0 N N N ,y G1 N N N r, N , N N O
V t') V V a V V V V V V
OU1
EX-10
EX-10(1997Q2)
4/1/1997
7 7 7 m 7 7 7 7 7 7
0 g a a a a a 0 a 0 g a g a a a a o o a a a a a a a o a a a 0 a o a a S a a o 0 0
el v0 Z Z Z Z Z o Z p Z 10p Z Z Z o 0 0 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z O Z Z Z 010 Z O Z Z ,0y Z Z 0 0 0
Lam N N N N N r, N L- N N N
v v v U) v v v v V V
p
CI
o rn rn
co co
X
W 0^
X
W
7❑ 7 7 0 0 pp 7 7 7 ' 7 O 7 7
o o a a a a a 0 a 0 o a o a a a o 0 0 a a a a a a a o a a a 0 a o a a o a a o 0 0
go' ZZ Z Z Z O Z O Z as Z Z Zoo O Z Z Z Z Z Z Z O Z Z Z 1V Z O Z Z 10 Z Z O 0 0
V CO N N ,,, ,G O N N N N N N N O
V V 0 V V V V V V
OU1
EX-10
EX-10(199604)
10/1/1996
7❑ 7 DD 7 DD
o 0 o o o0o 0aa 0 0 0 0aaa aasa CD aa
IO o Z Z Z Z z z z 10 1() z o Z Z Z ,,, o o Z Z Z Z Z Z Z o Z Z Z 4 Z r- Z Z ,0 Z Z o o A
a) n r
v N v v v v N e- v v
Location Group
Location ID
Sample 10
Sample Date
10U1 Performance Standard
l00 N co co V) CO U) ,O CO ,� N CO O U) U) U) O N N U) U) CO U) U) U) U) 10 U) U) U) O CO 10 CO U) O CO CO N N 00
1•) Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z el L. 2 Z Z N Z Z 1.1
a
0
o y
I- w
ZZZZZ ZZ ZZZZZZZZ ZZZZZZZZZ ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
C
7
0 01 0 0 o) 0) 01 0 0) 0) 01 01 01 0) 01 0) 01 01 0) 0) 0) 01 0 0) 0) CO 01 0) 0) 0) 0) 0 0 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0 01 01
= 0 S S = = 1 = = S a = Z = . = = 1 1 3 = = 1 1 = S = = S = S = = = = S = S Z = 3 =
Chemical Name
0 a) .-. 2
ws aI N al f0 a) c c a) 0 c 0 a)
r,.c N _0 m.- a) c c c �O c O a) a1 '2 m aJ ) .g•a) .cli; O 0
TI-
a) 7 >d L.c 0 0 O a) d N m O` c c C 0 0 E @ L_ o 0 0 N a) E L O E o c 0 a).-2 O O a) = .o
8 a 0 x` n Ln o 0 U O O O O d O` A a) 0) O N O O O 'o '0- 0 0 F- 0 0 0 2 c O O 0 E N L O W O O
0 O'2 a` o O U ; U L L L O` L O N N U a) U 0 0 0 -= L O` 0 0 O` U U , a c "' L O❑ 0 0 U c
z-c L a O F F0 F❑❑❑ o U 0 = a m -0 m O` 0 („) O-7o O❑ O L °2 O ,` ~ N U c N
4 N w C C 1y N.1,1 N U 0 N E m (1) .0 U V U N O w E O N 7 `" > X
to .N... ❑ ❑ �- N - .- ❑ O U N d I- C
C
2 Vl - N•- `r m U❑ E m
a r-

paoe;ploq ale
o; a, n-o m 0- Z z 0 0(0 r_ 3 C) n s d m m D= o
0 3 a C C C N. y N 0 d= N• a 0 0 0 N E. C C C a O 7
0 3 3 E.3 3 0— R m m 3 0 •' E.
3 3 3°• m
(0 p1 m
Chemical Name
t = t t t t t t t t t = t t t t t t t = = = t t 0
(0 (0 (0 (0 (O (0 (0 CO (0 (0 (0 (O (0 0 (0 0 (0 (O CO (O (O (O (O CO 0
t
(0
C
0
H -I -I 1 -I 1 -I 1 -I H O -I H 1 -I O -1 ...I -I -I -1 --I-I -I -I
0
EH
0
o aai
0 g.
0.
W Z Z Z Z Z Z(0 Z -1 v Z ZZZ Z ZZ v O" Z
0O V) CO y CI) 0 (n fn p fn 00 00 CD CI) 0) CI) CI) U) (n 0 0 zn 00 O o
Location Group
Location ID
Sample ID
Sample Date
OU1 Performance Standard
Z Z Z Z W Z Z p Z Z CO Z Z Z Z Z Z Z A (n .N-. N Z
o D D D D C D D v( D D o D D D D D D D 0 C 0 0 C D
0
OU1
EX-10
EX-10(1996Q41
10/1/1996
o ZZZZ m Z Z t Z Z Z rn Z Z Z Z Z Z -+ A H m v Z
o D D D D 0 D D A D D D o D D D D D D 0 m o+ p,C D
0
OU1
EX-10
EX-10(1997Q1,
1/1/1997
0 A A
W Z Z Z ZNZZ m Z ZZ( Z Z ZZ ZZ -+ W .-•m v Z
o D D D D m D D 0 D D D o D D D D D D 0 C N COC D
0
OU1
EX-10
EX-10(1997Q2)
4/1/1997
W Z Z Z ZWZZ Z ZZ N ZZZZ Z Z AW (p v Z
o D D D D W D D D D D o D D D D D D N C A m C D
0
X
M X c
(n 0 0 C
to (0 0
0
C.
N Z Z Z Z o Z Z itZ Z Z W Z Z Z Z Z Z Z -N 'N o Z
o D D D D ADD 0 D D D o D D D D D D D m A o,W D
0
OU1
EX-10
EX-10(1997Q4'
10/1/1997
o D D D D W D D A D D D a D D D D D D C °'cn W c D
0
OU1
EX-10
EX-10(1998Q1)
1/1/1998
N Z` a0 o N Z j Z m .V y Z Z O N N p A A
Ot
A D 0 0-10 D c D 0 0 0 D D 0 o A N L C
0 0 p O
0 o
m
" ^O x C
(o m _'. C
(0 0 0 ''
m CO
(0
CO
Z Z ZZZ Z Z Z Z Z N Z Z Z Z Z Z Z A Z Z Z Z Z
' D D D D D D D D D D o D D D D D D D C D D D D D
OU1
EX-10
EX-10(021500)
2/15/2000
Z Z Z Z AZ Z V Z Z AN Z Z Z Z Z Z N A -+ A N Z
o D D D D N D D 0 D D 0 0 D D D D D D C. CO03 COD
0 0
OU1
EX-10
EX-10(121400)
12/14/2000
ZZZZ ZZZ Z Z ZZZZ ZZ ZZ ZZZ Z ZZZZ
D D D D D D.D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
OU1
EX-10
EX-10DL(121400;
12/14/2000
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
OU1
EX-10
EX-10_2(030602'
3/6/2002

Out
EX-10
EX-10-100_(070609;
7/6/2009
ZZZZZ
7 7 0 no 7 ' 7 , 7 7
ZZ0Z0oZaZZZm8�zzzzzzzszzzNZ,ozzOzzgo9a
V V V V V V N V V
OU1
EX-10
EX-10-55_(070609'
7/6/2009
Q Q Q Q Q
ZZZZZ
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
0
Q Q o< o 0 a O Q Q a O o o Q a Q Q Q Q Q o Q Q Q o Q O Q Q O Q Q o 0 0
Z Z )n Z.) o Z a Z Z h u) )n z ZZZZ Z z u) ZZZ )n Z o• z Z, Z z un co un
en
v v v v v v v v v v v
Out
EX-10
EX-10-70_(070609'
7/6/2009
Z Z Z Z Z
7 Da 77 7 7 7 7
Z Z 0 Z 0 o Z n Z Z Z o m 2, Z Z Z Z Z Z Z m Z Z Z o Z m Z Z o Z Z m 09v
V V N co
v V v V N V r V V V
Gut
EX-10
EX-10-85_(070609:
7/6/2009
ZZZZZ
7 7 Q 0 77 7 7 7 -, 77
Z Z 0 Z 0 m Z N Z Z o 0 0 z Z Z Z z Z Z m Z z Z 0 Z o z Z p. Z Z m 0 m
V v N v v v v v - V V
OU1
EX-10
EX-10-N(121808;
12/18/2008
7
w° Q Q Q
co 0 Z Z z
v
7 7 0 0 77 7 m 7 0
Q Q O) Q c0 O Q. 0 0 0 O co Q Q Q Q Q Q Q c0 Q Q Q M Q '" Q Q° Q Q a' o
Z Z r) Z )n 0 Z O z z Z 0Lc, v )Z Z z z z Z z v z Z Z ti z at z Z m Z z u-� N
v v v v v to v
OU1
EX-10
EX-10-T (121407:
12/14/2007
7 W
0o<00
N co 0 Z z Z
V"
7 7 7 7 7 7 7
0QoQooQ.QQQo00QQQQQQ<0<<<°<0<<°<<on.
Z Z° Z p N Z h Z Z Z N - Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z N Z Z Z Z. 8 o
V V V v V V V
OU1
EX-10
EX-10-T_2(121407;
12/14/2007
7
o 0 0 0 0
o m Z Z z
v
Q Q Q Q Q Q a Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
z Z z Z Z Z Z Z z Z Z Z z z Z z Z Z z Z z z z z z z z z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z
OU1
EX-10
EX-10(121407;
12/14/2007
7
0 o Q Q a
N a) Z Z Z
V'
7 7 77 7 7 7
Q a g a o o Q N Q Q< o g g Q Q Q Q Q Q Q g Q Q Q Q Q g Q Q C Q Q g
Z Z° Z D N Z' Z Z Z N_ Z Z Z Z Z Z Z C' Z Z Z r4 Z N Z Z Z Z C' o ,y
V V V V V V V
N
0
_ 000
7•-O N
p X
w M
W
7 W
t0 O Q Q Q
(0 • Z Z Z
V V
7 7 W W W 7 7 7 0 7 o 7 -1 o
Q Q V Q g Q o Q Q Q p O O Q Q Q Q Q Q Q O) Q Q Q O< 0 Q Q O Q Q CO O O
ZZZZ co.* 0
v v y c..) V v v v N v `-
Location Group
Location ID
Sample ID
Sample Date
A
0
0
m
0
0
N
E
0 0.
a
0
, V) co u) (A
Z z z
CO en co n Cl) O ❑ CO CO O V7 CO CO CO CO CO U CO CO ❑ o CO CO cn o cn CO i0 N o
z z z z Z z z z z z z z z z Z z z z z z N z z co
o °
❑
ZZZZZ
Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
• C
7
C C- c- C C C G C C C C- C C- C C C C- C 0 c 0-- C C C- C C- C C C- C C C
O) O O) O) O) O) on on O) O) O) O) O) O) O) O) O) O) O) O) O) O) O) O) O) 0) O) O) O) on 0) O) 0) O) on 0 O) O) 0) to, on O)
1 0. 1 0. s 0. 3 1 a= 3==== 1 3=== c. =. S o. 3 1==== 1 3 1 1 s. = s. Z 1 o.= 1
U)
NC
Z
0
E
0
V
2
O r 2
U) n 0 t0
j. O- Z L
U .L > L L
O O. o x' a O. O
N O L?.>
Z U t.0 O
7 N W C C
d N
a
0 y 0
N 0 N0t.
C« C N N 0 . C 0 0 :O aa) 0 N 0 W O.
0 N 0 C C C ... 0 C N N 0 0 .0 .0 a 0 O 0
N `O N r-tL-• C O C C co O E 0 N C E 0 O O C 0 O O a N .0.
O` L `O 2 D O 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 N V a 0 O t.. `O 15 O N 0 U C 0 C O O` t_. `O O
O O O O O O 0 O` 0 0 a r0 N 0 O O V N 0 co O O O C T N E N L L O L 0
U y U U U U_ `O . m 0 N O W U O O 0- L E O 0 0 0 U T 0. 0 t 0❑ 0 O T=
•H F F❑❑❑.2 0 N N Q cn 5 m O a O U 0 L L 0❑ O L °a T O `~ N 0 N
.- N N �! Q N 2 E o V N U V U 0,- O W E 0 N y r" F> T.
N V m O❑ E N
.- 1

0
N
E
L
co
U)
CO
O
0
T
co
E
0
m
U
E
a)
0
m
0
0
N
Y
0
0
0
O
n 0
0 0 0
j , I N
020,1 o
O r
X
w
a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a Q a a a a a a
Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
0u1
EX-1 0
EX-10-55_(070609;
7/6/2009
a Q
Z z Z Q Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
0U1
EX-10
EX-10-70_(070609
7/6/2009
ZZZZZZZZZZZz2Zz22ZZZZ22zz
0U1
EX-10
EX-10-85_(070609`
7/6/2009
2 z 2 2 z z 2 2 z z z 2 z 2 z z z z z z z z z z z
0U1
EX-10
EX-10-N(121808;
12/18/2008
2m,,o,.zzzzzzzmzz.zzLq ,zzzzw
t7 O V v
0U1
EX-10
EX-10-T (121407;
12/14/2007
2 o m m a a a a a a a O a a• a a a a a a m
�p t0u"Nr Z Z Z Z Z Z Z o Z Z Z Z N Z Z Z Z
V L-. • V H V .-
0U1
EX-10
EX-10-T_2(121407;
12/14/2007
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
0U1
EX-10
EX-10(121407;
12/14/2007
❑ m m❑ 0 r ❑ m
a O N 7 a a a a a a a o a a a s t(1 a a a a
Z V 6 O v Z Z Z Z Z Z Z N Z Z LL] Z Z 1 Z ZZZ CI
0U1
EX-10
EX-10(030602)
3/6/2002
0
Z m'TN m el Z Z Z Z Z Z Z O Z Z N Z Z M Z Z Z Z
Location Group
Location ID
Sample ID
Sample Date
OU1 Performance Standard
CO O 0 N O O CO CO CO CO 0) CO 0) O O V) 0 (n CO o CO CO CO CO 8
Z '- o n .- )n Z Z Z Z Z Z Z F F Z Fi Z Z •- Z Z Z Z n
v
m
o w
F- a
❑
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , , , ❑ , , , , ❑ , , , F- F- F- I- I- I- I-
C
0)
o.
0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) C) 0) 0) C) 0) 01 01 0) 0) 0) 0) C) 01 0) 01
m. m. 0. 3 0. 3 0 0. 0 3 0. a S 0. S 0 o 1 1 1 1 3 3==
Chemical Name
'c
a
y0 'oO
To E E E>- `m g ' a a Z.0 y> E E E go
o -E ,. . m n c c m .w m m u T. 2 E .2 0= 'v E c)
E y .0 Z` 9 0 0 0 v 0 0 m rn 9 o m o 2 c v—
Q a m m co V U U m — J m m m 2 Z D. o w i_ m m
v 2 2 2 H a > c
0
a >
tandard are

Attachment G
Groundwater Analytical Data
AkzoNobel Chemical Company - Salisbury, North Carolina
Chemical Name
Unit
Total/
Dissolved
Location Group
Location ID
Sample ID
Sample Date
OU1
EX-10
EX-10-40_(070609'NS-11(1993Q2)NS-11(1993Q3)NS-11(1993Q4)NS-11(1994Q1)NS-11(1994Q2)NS-11(1994Q3)NS-11(1994Q4)NS-11(1995Q1)NS-11(1995Q2)NS-11(1995Q3)
7/6/2009
OU1
NS-11
4/4/1993
OU1
NS-11
7/1/1993
OU1
NS-11
10/1/1993
OU1
NS-11
1/1/1994
OU1
NS-11
4/1/1994
OU1
NS-11
7/1/1994
OU1
NS-11
10/1/1994
OU1
NS-11
1/1/1995
OU1
NS-11
4/1/1995
OU1
NS-11
7/1/1995
OU1 Performance Standara
SVOC
Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z ZZZZ Z Z Z Z ZZZZZZZZZ Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z ZZZ
4-Nitrophenol
pg/I
350
NA
< 56 U
< 26 U
< 26 U
< 26 U
< 27 U
< 27 U
< 26 U
< 26 U
< 27 U
< 28 U
bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether
pg/I
5
NA
< 11 U
< 10 U
<10 U
< 10 U
< 11 U
< 5 U
< 5 U
< 5 U
< 5 U
< 6 U
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate
pg/1
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NIA
NA
NA
NA
Di-n-butyl phthalate
pg/I
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Di-n-octyl phthalate
VOC
pg/I
pg/I
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
pg/I
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
pg/l
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
pg/I
5
<2000 U
< 5 U
< 10 U
<25 U
<500 U
<5 U
<5 U
<5 U
<5 U
<5 U
<5 U
1,1-Dichloroethane
pg/I
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1,1-Dichloroethene
pg/I
7
<2000U
<5U
<10U
<25U
<5000
< 7 U
< 7 U
< 7 U
< 7 U
< 7 U
< 7 U
1,2-Dichloroethane
pg/I
5
44000
< 5 U
100
< 25 U
< 500 U
8
< 5 U
< 5 U
< 5 U
< 5 U
6
1,2-Dichloroethene (total)
pg/1
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1,2-Dichloropropane
pg/I
6
340 J
<5U
<10 U
<25U
<5000
< 6 U
< 6 U
< 6 U
< 6 U
< 6 U
< 6 U
2-Butanone
pg/I
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2-Hexanone
pg/I
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
4-Methy1-2-pentanone
pg/I
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Acetone
pg/I
3500
< 20000 U
< 10 U
15
130
4100
44 B
29
54
21
< 10 U
< 10 U
Benzene
pg/I
5
<2000U
<5U
<10U
<25U
<5000
<5U
<5U
<5U
<5U
<5U
<5U
Bromodichloromethane
pg/I
5
<2000U
<5U
< 10 U
<25U
<5000
<5U
<5U
<5U
<5U
<5U
<5U
Bromoform
pg/I
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Bromomethane
pg/I
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Carbon disulfide
pg/I
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Carbon tetrachloride
pg/I
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chloride
pg/I
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chlorobenzene
pg/I
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chloroethane
pg/I
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chloroform
pg/I
5
<2000U
<5U
<10U
<25U
<5000
<5U
<5U
<5U
<5U
<5U
<5U
Chloromethane
pg/I
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
pg/I
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Dibromochloromethane
pg/I
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Ethylbenzene
pg/I
3500
< 2000 U
95
140
300
< 500 U
< 10 U
91
40
120
76
98
m&p xylene
pg/I
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Methylene chloride
pg/I
5
< 4000 U
1 J
4 BJ
NR
NR
< 5 U
8 B
< 5 U
2 BJ
7 B
< 5 U
o-xylene
pg/I
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Tetrachloroethene
pg/I
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Toluene
pg/I
2000
1700 J
61
59
120
< 500 U
7 J
13
6 J
23
11
15
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
pg/I
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NIA
NA
NA
NA
NA
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
pg/I
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Trichloroethene
pg/I
5
<2000U
<5U
<10 U
<25U
<5000
<5U
<5U
<5U
<5U
<5U
<5U
Vinyl chloride
pg/l
2
<2000U
<10U
<10U
<25U
<5000
<2U
<2U
<2U
<2U
<2U
<2U
Xylenes (total)
pg/I
350
<6000 U
150
220
560
<500 U
100
110
50
120
44
66
9of14

OU1
NS-11
NS-11(1995Q3)
7/1/1995
Q m. � m m Q Q Q Q Q Q c0 Q Q Q 4) Q Q m Q Q Q Q
Z N N y V) Z Z Z Z Z Z N Z Z Z N Z Z sj Z Z Z Z`T
OU1
NS-11
NS-11(1995Q2)
4/1/1995
Q 07 » Q Q Q Q Q Q co Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q m
Z v v m v v Z Z z Z Z Z (o Z Z z z z v z z z z co
Q
0
LO co
UJ
Z
ch
Z
Z m top V N V Z Z Z Z Z Z Z" Z Z 40 Z 2 v Z Z Z Z M
OU1
NS-11
NS-11(1994Q4)
10/1/1994
Q" o v m Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 40 Q Q m Q Q"' Q Q Q Q 40
Z cp v v v Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 03Z Z o Z Z v Z Z Z Z N
Out
NS-11
NS-11(1994Q3)
7/1/1994
Z NVm v v v v 7 N N Z Z Z Z Z Z cp Z Z Z v Z Z v Z Z Z Z m
—
OU1
NS-11
NS-11(1994Q2)
4/1/1994
Q m>= < < < Q Q Q < r- Q Q m Q Q= Q Q Q Q COz co v ZZZZZZZVZZcoZZ v ZZZZco
' OU1
NS-11
INS-11(1994Q 1)
1 /1 /1994
Q m 2 a,Q Q¢ 0 0 0 N Q Q Q O Q Q= Q Q Q Q Ca
Z V^ v v v Z Z Z Z Z Z r Z Z Z — Z Z v Z Z Z Z N-
V
OU1
NS-11
NS-11(1993Q4)
10/1/1993
Q m> n Q Q Q Q Q Q o Q Q Q m Q Q= Q Q Q Q m
Z v cov v" Z Z Z Z Z Z co Z Z Z u) Z Z" Z Z Z Z Lo
OU1
NS-11
NS-11(1993Q3)
7/1/1993
Z N rn N vco Z Z Z Z Z Z Z m Z Z 0 Z Z V Z Z Z Z M
OU1
NS-11
NS-11(1993Q2)
4/4/1993
DCODD> >
z N"'`-0 o Z Z Z Z Z Z Z(0 Z Z N Z Z N Z Z z Z m
v v v v v v
OU1
EX-10
X-10-40_(070609;
7/6/2009
Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
Location Group
Location ID
Sample ID
Sample Date
OU1 Performance Standard
... u'• O O cn (n co (n (n <n v) o o V) O co (n o v) 47 v) v) co
Z,- o r-,- �n Z Z Z Z Z Z Z n Z Z Z '- Z Z Z Z co
a
7
y
12
0
F_ F. F. F_ F_ F_ F_ F. F- ❑ F. F_ F- F. ❑ F. F. F. F. F, F- F_ F. F. F.
2
o) m rn a) a) a) 3) a) a) rn rn rn o) rn rn rn a) a) rn o) rn rn o) 3) as o)
= = = = s = = = s = 4 4 = 0 = = = = 0 0 s 0 0- = s =
Chemical Name
m m v
y N N O ••X
u E
a E a) P= E E O O" d g O 40) o O) m V U D y 'c 4' O N; C
O C Q m N m L U (0 C ` J N N m g Z d g 4) (n L ,92
N N
Q m U V U 2 2 2 D a m F> c
o
a >c
a
4,
a
m
41
a
C
0
0
O
E
`o
O
0
a
C
0
m
y y
O O
z

Attachment G
Groundwater Analytical Data
AkzoNobel Chemical Company - Salisbury, North Carolina
Chemical Name
Unit
Total/
Dissolved
Location Group
Location ID
Sample ID
Sample Date
OU1
NS-11
NS-11(1995Q4)NS-11(1996Q1)NS-11(1996Q2)NS-11(1996Q3)NS-11(1996Q4)NS-11(1997Q1)NS-11(1997Q2)NS-11(1997Q3)NS-11(1997Q4)NS-11(1998Q1)NS-11(090898)
10/1/1995
OU1
NS-11
1/1/1996
OU1
NS-11
4/1/1996
OU1
NS-11
7/1/1996
OU1
NS-11
10/1/1996
OU1
NS-11
1/1/1997
OU1
NS-11
4/1/1997
0U1
NS-11
7/1/1997
OU1
NS-11
10/1/1997
OU1
NS-11
1/1/1998
OU1
NS-11
9/8/1998
OU1 Performance Standard
SVOC
4-Nitrophenol
pg/I
N
350
< 25 U
< 25 U
< 120 U
< 25 U
< 25 U
< 26 U
< 25 U
< 26 U
< 26 U
< 26 U
NA
bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether
pg/I
N
5
< 5 U
< 10 U
< 50 U
<10 U
< 10 U
< 10 U
<10 U
<10 U
< 11 U
<10 U
NA
bis(2-Ethythexyl) phthalate
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Di-n-butyl phthalate
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Di-n-octyl phthalate
VOC
pg/I
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
pg/I
N
5
< 5 U
< 5 U
< 5 U
<10 U
NA
< 10 U
<10 U
<10U
<10 U
<10U
NA
1,1-Dichloroethane
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1,1-Dichloroethene
pg/I
N
7
< 7 U
<5U
<5U
<10U
<10U
<10U
<10U
<10 U
<10U
<10U
NA
1,2-Dichloroethane
pg/I
N
5
5
9
<5 U
11
34
400 D
3 J
170 D
260 D
24
NA
1,2-Dichloroethene (total)
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1,2-Dichloropropane
pg/I
N
6
< 6 U
<5U
<5U
<10U
<10U
<10U
<10U
<10U
<10U
<10U
NA
2-Butanone
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2-Hexanone
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Acetone
pg/I
N
3500
17
<10U
<10U
7J
<10U
6BJ
22B
32DBJ
14
<10U
NA
Benzene
pg/I
N
5
<5U
<5U
<5U
<10U
<10U
<10U
<10U
<10U
<10U
<10U
NA
Bromodichloromethane
pg/I
N
5
<5U
<5U
<5U
<10U
<10U
<10U
<10U
<10U
<10U
<10 U
NA
Bromoform
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Bromomethane
pgl1
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Carbon disulfide
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Carbon tetrachloride
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chloride
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chlorobenzene
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chloroethane
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chloroform
pg/I
N
5
<5U
<5U
<5U
<10U
<10U
<10U
<1DU
<10U
2J
<10U
NA
Chloromethane
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Dibromochloromethane
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Ethylbenzene
pg/I
N
3500
57
62
81
100
92
140
20
5 J
22
54
NA
m&p xylene
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Methylene chloride
pg/I
N
5
< 5 U
2 BJ
< 5 U
<10 U
< 10 U
<10 U
<10 U
<10 U
< 10 U
<10U
NA
o-xylene
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Tetrachloroethene
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Toluene
pg/I
N
2000
6 J
6
11
12
19
28
5 J
7 J
29
9 J
NA
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Trichloroethene
pg/I
N
5
< 5 U
< 5 U
< 5 U
<10 U
<10 U
< 10 U
< 10 U
< 10 U
<10U
< 10 U
NA
Vinyl chloride
pg/I
N
2
<2U
<10U
<10U
<10U
<10U
<10U
<10U
<10U
<10U
<10U
NA
Xylenes (total)
pg/I
N
350
22
21
46
50
140
180
35
4 J
42
110
NA
11 of 14

Attachment G
Groundwater Analytical Data
AkzoNobel Chemical Company - Salisbury, North Carolina
Chemical Name
Unit
Total/
Dissolved
Location Group
Location ID
Sample ID
Sample Date
OU1
NS-11
NS-11(1995Q4)NS-11(1996Q1)NS-11(1996Q2)NS-11(1996Q3)NS-11(1996Q4)NS-11(1997Q1)NS-11(1997Q2)NS-11(1997Q3)NS-11(1997Q4)NS-11(1998Q1)NS-11(090898)
10/1/1995
OU1
NS-11
1/1/1996
OU1
NS-11
4/1/1996
OU1
NS-11
7/1/1996
OU1
NS-11
10/1/1996
OU1
NS-11
1/1/1997
OU1
NS-11
4/1/1997
OU1
NS-11
7/1/1997
OU1
NS-11
10/1/1997
OU1
NS-11
1/1/1998
OW
NS-11
9/8/1998
OU1 Performance Standard
Inorganics
Ng/I
Antimony
pg/I
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
< 5 U
Arsenic
pg/I
T
10
<2U
<1U
<1U
<1U
<1U
<7U
<7U
<7U
<6U
<6U
<5U
Barium
pg/I
T
1000
99 B
156 B
136 B
144 B
301
124 B
199 B
576
178 B
178 B
113
Beryllium
pg/I
T
17.5
< U
< U
< U
< U
1B
<2U
<2U
<2U
<1U
<1U
<3U
Cadmium
pg/I
T
10
<2U
<5U
<5U
<5U
<5U
< U
<3U
<3U
<4U
<4U
< U
Chromium
pg/I
T
50
<2U
7B
<5U
<5U
34
<5U
8B
57
NA
<4U
<10U
Cobalt
pg/I
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
< 25 U
Copper
pg/I
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
< 20 U
Cyanide, Total
pg/I
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Iron
pg/I
D
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Iron
Ng/I
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2820
Lead
pg/I
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
<3 U
Magnesium
pg/I
T
NS
38
32
48
NA
841
67
NA
366
NA
132
4130
Manganese
pg/I
T
7700
NA
NA
NA
44
NA
NA
889
NA
136
NA
43
Manganese
pg/I
D
7700
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Mercury
pg/I
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
< U
Nickel
pg/I
T
350
<9U
<15U
<15U
<15U
41
<20U
22B
64
16B
<16U
<40U
Phosphorus (total)
pg/I
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NIA
NA
NA
Potassium
pg/I
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
945 J
Selenium
pg/l
T
10
<1U
<2U
<1U
<1U
<1U
5
<5U
<5U
<5U
<5U
<5U
Sodium
pg/I
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
61100
Thallium
pg/I
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
< 10 U
Vanadium
pg/I
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
< 15 U
Vannadium Oxide
pg/I
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Zinc
pg/I
T
7350
< 5 U
8 B
10 8
4 B
65
12 B
22
127
31
30
5 J
Notes:
Cells exceeding the OU1 performance standard are boldfaced
NS- No Standard
NA -Not Analyzed
U- Not Detected
J- Estimated Value
B- Blank Contamination
D- Dilluted Sample
E- Exceeds Calibration
12 of 14

Attachment G
Groundwater Analytical Data
AkzoNobel Chemical Company - Salisbury, North Carolina
Chemical Name
Unit
Total/
Dissolved
Location Group
Location ID
Sample ID
Sample Date
OU1
NS-11
NS-11(122099)NS-11(121400)NS-11(031802)NS-11(121107
12/20/1999
OU1
NS-11
12/14/2000
OU1
NS-11
3/18/2002
OU1
NS-11
12/11/2007
OU1
NS-11
NS-11-S (121107)NS-11-N(121108
12/11/2007
OU1
NS-11
12/11/2008
OU1 Performance Standard
SVOC
4-Nitrophenol
pg/I
N
350
<50U
<51U
< 2 U
<.55 U
<55U
<3.9U
bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether
pg/l
N
5
< 10 U
< 10 U
< 1 U
0.93 J
0.93 J
< 0.26 U
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate
pg/I
N
• NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Ng/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Di-n-octyl phthalate
VOC
pg/I
nil
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ug/I
N
5
< 1 U
< 2 U
< U
< 1 U
< 1 U
< 0.2 U
1,1-Dichloroethane
{rg/1
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1,1-Dichloroethene
pg/I
N
7
< 1 U
< 2 U
< 1 U
< 1 U
< 1 U
< 0.28 U
1,2-Dichloroethane
pg/1
N
5
< 1 U
< 2 U
< U
< 1 U
< 1 U
< 0.21 U
1,2-Dichloroethene (total)
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1,2-Dichloropropane
Ng/I
N
6
< 1 U
< 2 U
< U
< 1 U
< 1 U
< 0.18 U
2-Butanone
Ng/1
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2-Hexanone
Ng/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Acetone
pg/I
N
3500
16
< 4 U
< 2 U
<10 U
< 10 U
< 2.5 U
Benzene
pg/I
N
5
< 1 U
< 2 U
< U
< 1 U
< 1 U
<0.27U
Bromodichloromethane
N4/1
N
5
< 1 U
< 2 U
< U
< 1 U
< 1 U
< 0.2 U
Bromoform
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Bromomethane
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Carbon disulfide
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Carbon tetrachloride
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chloride
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chlorobenzene
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chloroethane
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chloroform
pg/I
N
5
< 1 U
< 2 U
< U
< 1 U
< 1 U
< 0.24 U
Chloromethane
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Dibromochloromethane
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Ethylbenzene
(4/1
N
3500
6
8 D
2
0.13 J
0.13 J
< 0.18 U
m&p xylene
pg/I
N
NS
19
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Methylene chloride
pg/I
N
5
< 1 U
1 JBD
< U
< 2 U
< 2 U
< 0.32 U
o-xylene
pg/I
N
NS
4
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Tetrachloroethene
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Toluene
pg/I
N
2000
3
6 D
1
< 1 U
< 1 U
< 0.23 U
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
pg/I
N
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Trichloroethene
pg/1
N
5
< 1 U
< 2 U
< U
< 1 U
< 1 U
< 0.29 U
Vinyl chloride
pg/l
N
2
< 1 U
< 2 U
< 1 U
< 1 U
< 1 U
< 0.29 U
Xylenes (total)
pg/I
N
350
NA
35 D
9
0.33 J
0.33 J
< 0.62 U
13 of 14

Attachment G
Groundwater Analytical Data
AkzoNobel Chemical Company - Salisbury, North Carolina
Chemical Name
Unit
Total/
Dissolved
Location Group
Location ID
Sample ID
Sample Date
OU1
NS-11
NS-11(122099)NS-11(121400)NS-11(031802)NS-11(121107)NS-11-S
12/20/1999
OU1
NS-11
12/14/2000
OU1
NS-11
3/18/2002
OU1
NS-11
12/11/2007
OW
NS-11
(121107)NS-11-N(121108)
12/11/2007
OU1
NS-11
12/11/2008
OU1 Performance Standard
Inorganics
pg/I
Antimony
pg/I
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Arsenic
pg/I
T
10
< U
< 2 U
3 B
< 10 U
< 10 U
< 2 U
Barium
pg/I
T
1000
NA
80 B
73 B
239
239
185 BJ
Beryllium
pg/I
T
17.5
< U
< U
< U
0.42 JB
0.42 B J
0.68 BJ
Cadmium
pg/I
T
10
< U
< U
< U
< 5 U
< 5 U
< 0.21 U
Chromium
pg/I
T
50
NA
< 1 U
1 B
< 5 U
< 5 U
< 1.1 U
Cobalt
pg/I
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Copper
pg/I
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Cyanide, Total
pg/I
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Iron
pg/I
D
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Iron
pg/I
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Lead
pg/I
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Magnesium
pg/I
T
NS
NA
3010
NA
NA
NA
NA
Manganese
pg/I
T
7700
NA
91
117
151
151
185
Manganese
pg/I
D
7700
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Mercury
pg/I
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Nickel
pg/I
T
350
NA
2 B
< 2 U
4.5 B
4.5 B
4.8 B
Phosphorus (total)
pg/I
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Potassium
pg/I
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Selenium
pg/I
T
10
< U
< 2 U
< 3 U
< 5 U
< 5 U
<2.9U
Sodium
pg/I
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Thallium
pg/I
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Vanadium
pg/I
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Vannadium Oxide
pg/l
T
NS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Zinc
pg/I
T
7350
NA
< 9 U
< 4 U
< 20 U
< 20 U
4.7 BJ
Notes:
Cells exceeding the OU1 performance standard are boldfaced
NS- No Standard
NA -Not Analyzed
U- Not Detected
J- Estimated Value
B- Blank Contamination
D- Dilluted Sample
E- Exceeds Calibration
14 of14

IMAGE SOURCE:
1:24,000 USGS
TOPO QUADRANGLE
www.ncdot.gov/data distributior
NATIONAL STARCH CHEMICAL COMPANY
CEDAR SPRINGS ROAD PLANT
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
� ARcADiS
FIGURE
1

JS-Or
Lagoon 3
Lagoon 1
agoon 4.
Legend
X Abandoned Wells
• Proposed Bedrock Injection Location
• Proposed Saprolite Injection Location
MW, Saprolite
e MW, Shallow Bedrock
MW, Deep Bedrock
EW, Shallow Bedrock
EW, Deep Bedrock
• Sediment
A Surface Water
♦ Stream Gauge
1/4 Mile from Injection Locations —+— Railroads
- OU1
- OU3
Streams
Henkel Boundary
Parcels
0
400 800
J I Feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
NATIONAL STARCH CHEMICAL COMPANY
CEDAR SPRINGS ROAD PLANT
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
SITE PLAN
ARCAD1S
FIGURE
2

Proposed Bedrock Injection Location
Proposed Saprolite Injection Location
EW, Bedrock
EW, S Bedrock
MW, Bedrock
MW, S Bedrock
MW, Saprolite
Sediment
Stream Gauge
Surface Water
Saprolite Potentometric Contours
Saprolite Potentometric Contours (Inferred)
Groundwater Flow Direction
74176. `x
:=1EY S -1F
-1 NS..10P
K . '‘7448.56;
•
/. S
NS'-08 i,, :`
7 6.179`
NS-07 ;y / SB-4
741-.69, / NS 11'
7521.1.67:;
S>82•+
•
NS-39%- •- kW.11
749%6, "-
NS-5D
r p'C a NS'
NS-4 N
NATIONAL STARCH CHEMICAL COMPANY
CEDAR SPRINGS ROAD PLANT
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
Potentiometric Surface
of the Saprolite Aquifer
December 2005
ARCADIS
FIGURE
3

Legend
• Proposed Bedrock Injection Location
• Proposed Saprolite Injection Location
• MW, Saprolite
• MW, Shallow Bedrock
8 MW, Deep Bedrock
♦ EW, Shallow Bedrock
EW, Deep Bedrock
• Sediment
A Surface Water
• Stream Gauge
Shallow Bedrock Potentometric Contours
— — Shallow Bedrock Potentometric Contours (Inferred)
Groundwater Flow Direction
Air
w
7404
B-1G
B-1 o SB-2
SB-1J
:u10
‘EX-09
• J7,48A4
-08
EX 10
750.6
Cialg•tNS-03
750.06
•
rd
NATIONAL STARCH CHEMICAL COMPANY
CEDAR SPRINGS ROAD PLANT
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
Potentiometric Surface
of the Shallow Bedrock Aquifer
December 2 2008
ARCAD1S
FIGURE
3a
�'i►ii44^a

Legend
• Proposed Bedrock Injection Location
• Proposed Saprolite Injection Location
e MW, Saprolite
MW, Shallow Bedrock
e MW, Deep Bedrock
- EW, Shallow Bedrock
EW, Deep Bedrock
▪ Sediment
A Surface Water
• Stream Gauge
Deep Bedrock Potentometric Contours
— — Deep Bedrock Potentometric Contours (Inferred)
Railroads
Streams
Parcels
1-0" GW Flow Direction
EX=01�
7,044 .
EX-09 /
8-08 /
EA-10
4bNS=11
NSji8
'1749.4
NS -4,1 /"
752.98
NS-52
7, 53�52
GRAPHIC-SC"ATC
NATIONAL STARCH CHEMICAL COMPANY
CEDAR SPRINGS ROAD PLANT
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
Potentiometric Surface
of the Deep Bedrock Aquifer
December 2, 2008
ARCADJS I sti`

PIC: PM: TM: TR:
h
4
•r
1
! I
1\`
'
NS-09
12/11/2008
Chemical Name
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Methylene Chloride
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether
Manganese
OU1 SC
7
5
5
2000
5
2
5
7700
pg/L
<21 U
<16U
26 J
2400
<22U
97
<0.25U
17400
NS-10
12/11/2008
Chemical Name
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Methylene Chloride
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether
Manganese
trse
- t
OU1 SC
7
5
5
2000
5
2
5
7700
NS-11
pg/L
<0.28U
1.4
<0.32U
<0.23U
0.43 J
<0.29U
<0.26U
4900
12/11/2008
Chemical Name
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Methylene Chloride
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether
Manganese
OU1 SC
7
5
5
2000
5
2
5
7700
pg/L
<0.28U
< 0.21 U
<0.32U
<0.23U
<0.29U
<0.29U
<0.26U
185
Legend
• Proposed Bedrock Injection Location 0
• Proposed Saprolite Injection Location 0
• Stream Gauge Location
■ Sediment Sample Location 'a
A Surface Water Sample Location
__ _
NS-37
12/9/2008
Chemical Name
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Methylene Chloride
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
bis(2-Chloroethyl ether
Manganese
Thallium
Monitoring Well,
Monitoring Well,
Extraction Well,
Monitoring Well,
Extraction Well,
I Jos
OU3 SC
7
5
2.8
5
50
2
Saprolite
Shallow Bedroc
Shallow Bedrock
Bedrock
Bedrock
pg/L
<0.28U
< 0.21 U
< 0.32 U
<0.29U
<0.29U
<0.25U
2410
<2.8U
•
NS-39
12/3/2008
Chemical Name
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Methylene Chloride
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether
Manganese
Thallium
— 1
OU3 SC
7
5
2.8
5
50
2
0 250 500
pg/L
7.7 J
230
12
34
79
25
13600
< 2.8 U
1,000
Feet
NS-47
12/10/2008
Chemical Name
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Methylene Chloride
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
bis 2-Chloroethyl) ether
Manganese
Thallium
Chemical Name
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Methylene Chloride
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
bis 2-Chloroethyl) ether
Manganese
Thallium
MN
OU3 SC
7
5
2.8
5
50
2
NS-14
12/5/2008
OU3 SC
7
5
2.8
5
50
2
< 5600 U
320000
< 6400 U
< 5900 U
< 5800 U
<0.26U
2070
<2.8U
pg/L
< 0.28 U
< 0.21 U
< 0.32 U
< 0.29 U
< 0.29 U
< 0.26 U
15.2
<2.8U
-r
NS-43
Chemical Name
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Methylene Chloride
Trichloroethene
bis 2-Chloroethyl) ether
Manganese
Thallium
12/8/2008
OU3 SC
7
5
2.8
1
5
50
2
pg/L
<0.28U
< 0.21 U
<0.32U
< 0.29 U
<0.29U
<0.27U
8.7 B
<2.8U
NS-35
12/8/2008
Chemical Name
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Methylene Chloride
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether
Man.anese
Thallium
OU3 SC
7
5
2.8
5
50
2
pg/L
<11 U
5800
<13U
<12U
85
<0.27U
15600
<2.8U
NS-13
12/5/2008
Chemical Name
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Methylene Chloride
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether
Manganese
Thallium
OU3 SC
7
5
2.8
5
50
2
<0.28U
< 0.21 U
<0.32U
<0.29U
<0.29U
<0.26U
64.3
<2.8U
NS-33
Chemical Name
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Methylene Chloride
Trichloroethene
bis 2-Chloroethyl) ether
Man.anese
Thallium
12/3/2008
OU3 SC
7
5
2.8
5
50
2
pg/L
< 0.28 U
< 0.21 U
< 0.32 U
< 0.29 U
< 0.29 U
< 0.27 U
3.4 B
4.3 BJ
NATIONAL STARCH CHEMICAL COMPANY
CEDAR SPRINGS ROAD PLANT
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
ROD standard exceedances
in Saprolite Aquifer
�- •ii•- 11:
ARCAD1S
FIGURE
4

0 <360U I - `. --
ErlI1 ate.
InEr 2000 29000 I.
EIMMIMEM=©fir
©ml•
Vin chloride
bis 2-Chlorooth elhe
MEMO
1000
13.6 B
41900
1112 >.
�CEIMINEMIII4
12/112008
brc/arm
1 1-D, hloroe0 nne
1.2-Dichloroethene
35000
© 30000
®©
E' I• -©1321
bis 2.Chbroe ether
Acetono
Chloroform
1 1-Dichloroetnone
1 2-Dichlooethano
12-Dbhloro•ro.ene
>_i,
©MICEM
Ii
0=MEM
© 82000
0.CIECHIM1I
521
©1MEIDIEM
�I�� 1Y1fY1008
®� 83000J ,
© I ' Chl dorm
2800 U 1 1-D(c8loroelhene 0
Chloroform
1,1-Dichloroethene
1 2-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dlchloro•ro.ano
Moth lane Chloride
REMC
®'
MMITEIM©
Qt0IMEnan ,I I'- • 'M311=1 6200 U I IQ •-'�'
bis 2-Chbraelh elhe ©� Ibis 2-Chtaronlh elhe ©� I bis 2 Chbroel I Mho©�
MMEM
CEIM 1000� 1000 ��_I 1000
122121 IC=MiHrEErlimon 7700 ®" 1 Imo' =
�0®�®®�' 11IMEZI Win WA
®.• 52000 i '
0M
©=MEM
Chloroform
1 1-Dichloroethene
1 2-Dichloroethene
1 2-Dichloro•ro•one
IIMMITI=TMIMEI 1000J I
2000 =MI=1;
111==12M111©
bis 2-Chloroeth elhe , < .
CELERI 1000 501
ErE=11.1.1.0 i3/== 91700
IZE2 i2:11MIMEIMMEI ,
rzu�__,
<590U
12/18/2008
INDIUM:MO
V:MI©®
Chbroforn
1 1-D chloroothene
1 2 0 chloroothane
12-Dchloro•ro•. no
Chloroform
1 1-Dichlooethene
1 2-Dichloroethene
1 2-DIchbro • ro.. ne
Meth ene Chloride
1000
13000
7900 J
43000
33000
13000
21000
11800
�.S
0®1.
©=MEW
owl.
©=CHEM: I
•I
� ,7 'I: 'Sr
maiimmEIMIEO MEI3311=1'... I ©=CUM;.OMZIIIBM
•
•
2000
2000
2000
©�I
OO.
©�I. ©�I''.,
MIRO 1 � O' J
���' L'Q'0�
Chloroform
12/18/2008
200000 1 12-Dinhlooethene ©�
0 1800 U .1 2-Dichloro• ...no IMIIIIIIIIEEME
©1.210:31.1 j� ©�
2000 25000 '' 2000
1=3111=ME©IIEEIECHIM
< 2900 U
< 2900 U
Von chloride
Vin chloride
bis 2-Chlorooth elhe
Legend
•
•
•
■
A
xt
1000
1 1-Dichloroethene
1 2-Dichloroothane
1 2-Dichloro • ro•one
Meth Ione Chloride
Trichbroothene
Vin chlorido
bis 2-Chtoroet I elhe
2000
1000
*th. 1 h
Proposed Bedrock Injection Location
Proposed Saprolite Injection Location
Stream Gauge Location
Sediment Sample Location
Surface Water Sample Location
a
Monitoring Well, Saprolite
Monitoring Well, Shallow Bedroc
Extraction Well, Shallow Bedrock''`
Monitoring Well, Bedrock
Extraction Well, Bedrock
12/172008
---
12/92008
MMEI �� �®
© ©�
0 0 MMIRIM
0�ii.
©�
©�I
Chloroform
1 1-Olchloroelhene
1 2-Dlchloroelhane
1 2-Dichloro• ro. one
®000 O
2©�
MMINI
11©0
.DMIENN
Tnchloroolhene
-72:1
12/152008
' e'
O !MINI
0=
© =ZEE= "`F`a
1iGnENLO 2000
©_
- bis 2-Chloroet I mhoho ©®"
® 1000
.MUME00I''
_ om.
1,2-Dichloroethane
IME 11©MREMMII
0=MEW,
f
n'4)1
1'
t
T�ye 3 y .F ! V-4
Acetone
Chloroform
1 1-DIchloroothene
1 2-DIchloroothane
1 2-Dichloro • ro • one
Moth one Chloride
!i
'.y3-7n
I ,
0,
122/2008
IEMEGMEMDEEFIENIO
Chloroform
Tnchloroethene
12/4/2008
O
IMMIMME
Chloroform
Chloroform
1 1-Orchloroelhene
2000
Trichloroethene
Vin chloride
i
OECIMEM
ommEalmiNJ
MIME INIZEIIM
©INECIDNINI
©�1
'1E1===IMINO®,
I elhe
Chloroform
1 1-Dichloroethene
1 2-Dichloroethene
Moth lone C.hforide
bis 2-Chloroot
Chloroform
EMINIMMEMEMI
jIMEEIMI
Met Jena Chloride IMMIZMZIEMM
his 2-Chlorool elhe
Chloroform
MEIN
his 2-Chloroolh elhe
NMMENO
OMMIEIIM
OIMMEM
Chloroform
12/92008
IEMMMXIMIE
InMMEIBEEM
IMMIMMMEMEI
maimmummur
WIESEN
mommuomame
Moth ono Chloride
12/4/2008
Chloroform
Tnchloroolhono
12/10/2008
MEMOTIM
6.
Acelono
Chloroform
Vin !chloride
bis 2-Chloroelh I elhe
Chloroform
2-Chbrool elhe
EREEIE
mmmmigmilTimmo
Chloroform
12/10/2008
36000
NECHIM
O MUM.
WIERMITEOI MEM= r
Acetono
Chloroform
Tnchforoothene
bis 2-Chloroel I elhe
Chloroform
Von chloride
bis 2-Chloroe I elhe
NATIONAL STARCH CHEMICAL COMPANY
CEDAR SPRINGS ROAD PLANT
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
ROD standard exceedances
in Shallow Bedrock Aquifer
ARCAD1S
FIGURE

-:,iP,�•T3.:n :.
P-02 P"
4-
12/12/2008
1,2-Dichloroethane
12-Dichloro.ro.ane
bis 2-Chloroeth I ether
Barium
2000 MMEEMk:
MMCMIMEIIMMI -,
©MEM=I
m®I,
1000 MEM=I
11 ®1
12/16/2008
I 12/12/2008 t` t,l
J • I ''xn j
' IMIIIME 11
1 2-Dichloroethane ©IMMEEMrl.
01.:1311=I,
IIMEMEEIMME
©fir
MEZEM
2000
350
M
IMIEMINEECEIMEMEIME
11
5
1 2-Dichlororoane
bis 2-Chloroeth I ether
1000
20.1 B
1,2-Dichloroethane
1 2-Dichloro.ro.ane
bis 2-Chloroeth I ether
12/16/2008
ECIE CHIME MJ!!LI Fi
UME MMM= =NUM
0®`,
MIEE 2000 MIE=
M=IEIMEEM :.
1
CEMIl 000 ®' *
ITrimm2 .w515im ioioo f
1,2-Dichloroethane
1 2-Dichloro.ro.ane
bis 2-Chloroeth I ether
12/16/2008
I • I 'IM'
11
© U
0
2000 M2a=
400
© 3400
1000
1 2-Dichloroethane
1 2-Dichloro.ro.ane
bis 2-Chloroeth I ether
Barium
14800
12/16/2008
WZBEIE3EZHE/1711XIINII=7
CZTIMIEMUMIMI
EMIMMEIZTEMMILMI
off.
2000 P
IMIE EINEM MEM=
© 88
1000 49.1 B *g
11 '®Ymiew
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloro.ro.ane
bis 2-Chloroeth I ether
Legend
• Proposed Bedrock Injection Location
• Proposed Saprolite Injection Location
fa MW, Saprolite
MW, Shallow Bedrock
O MW, Deep Bedrock
W Shall.w :e•r• k
-1"- EW, Deep Bedrock
▪ Sediment
A Surface Water
• Stream Gauge
hz'1'C aA1,'+ Q,
,''eia+l \!•'
- t
.. ; :.1144.31 Li
�•Lae
•' ,�7•t
12/15/2008
1 2-Dichloroethane
1 2-Dichloro.ro.ane
12/17/2008
Acetone
1 2-Dichloroethane
1 2-Dichlororo. ane
Toluene
X lenes total
bis 2-Chloroeth I ether
192 BJ
bis 2-Chloroeth I ether
Arsenic
Barium
Man.anese
14000
12/10/2008
Chemical Name
Acetone
OU3 STD
1,2-Dichloroethane
1 2-Dichloro.ro.ane
Meth lene Chloride
bis 2-Chloroeth I ether
Man.anese
< 0.18 U
< 0.32 U
12/9/2008
Chemical Name
OU3 STD
Acetone
1,2-Dichloroethane
1 2-Dichlororo. ane
Meth lene Chloride
bis 2-Chloroeth I ether
EX-04
12/17/2008
CHIMENIZEIZIEM
11
1 2-Dichloroethane
1 2-Dichloro. ro. ane
6
• 2000
- 350
©MENEll
bis 2-Chloroeth I ether
< 2.5 U
< 0.18 U
Arsenic
Barium
10
1000
50 B
2900
Man.anese
12/4/2008
Chemical Name
Acetone
1 2-Dichloroethane
1 2-Dichloro.ro.ane
Meth lene Chloride
bis 2-Chloroeth I ether
Man.anese
12/4/2008
Acetone
1 2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloro. ro . ane
Meth lene Chloride
bis 2-Chloroeth I ether
0 250 500
<0.18U
<0.32U
<0.26U
40000
1200 J
<0.27U
1,000
Feet
NATIONAL STARCH CHEMICAL COMPANY
CEDAR SPRINGS ROAD PLANT
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
ROD standard exceedances
in Deep Bedrock Aquifer
-11•- 11:
�i° ARCADJS 71.17

840
820
800
780
760
740
720
700
680
660
640
620
600
580
560
540
520
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Legend
Well Screen
Sample Location
Saprolite
Shallow Bedrock
Deep Bedrock
Feet
0 62.5 125 250
GRAPHIC SCALE
200
220
240
260
280
300
320
- - - - December 2009 Water Level
• 1,2-DCA Sample Results (July 2009)
44,000 1,2-DCA Sample Results (December 2009)
Line A - A' Sampling Locations
Cross Section Line
340
360
380
400
420
0 15 30 60 Feet
VERTICAL/HORIZONTAL SCALE
VERTICAL EXAGGERATION: 0.5
GRID 20' X 20'
NATIONAL STARCH CHECMICAL COMPANY
CEDAR SPRINGS ROAD PLANT
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
CROSS SECTION
LINE A -A°
ARCAD1S
FIGURE
5

infrastructure,- environment;; buildings
AkzoNobel
Work Plan for Enhanced Reductive
Dechlorination Pilot Study
AkzoNobel Surface Chemistry LLC
Cedar Springs Road Plant
Salisbury, North Carolina
March 17, 2010
Imagine the result

ARCADIS
I certify that, to the best of my knowledge, after thorough
investigation, the information contained in or
accompanying this certification is true, accurate, and complete.
Thomas Darby II, PG
Project Hydrogeologist
Jeff Burdick
Hydrogeologist/Associate Vice President
Adiege-7-%e
Elizabeth Rhine
Project Manager
Work Plan for Enhanced
Reductive Dechlorination Pilot
Study
AkzoNobel Surface Chemistry
LLC
Cedar Springs Road Plant
Salisbury, North Carolina
Prepared for.
AkzoNobel Surface Chemistry LLC
Prepared by:
ARCADIS U.S., Inc.
30 Patewood Drive
Suite 155
Greenville
South Carolina 29615
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
Our Ref.:
B0060013.0006.00004
Date:
March 17, 2010
This document is intended only for the use
of the individual or entity for which it was
prepared and may contain information that
is privileged, confidential and exempt from
disclosure under applicable law. Any
dissemination, distribution or copying of
this document is strictly prohibited.

ARCADIS
1. Introduction 1
2. In -Situ Enhanced Reductive Dechlorination 2
2.1 Technology Description 2
2.2 Applicability to Site 2
3. Pilot Study Setup 4
3.1 UIC Pemit 4
3.2 Injection Wells 4
3.3 Packer Test 5
3.4 Baseline Sampling 6
3.5 Injection Volume 6
4. Monitoring 9
4.1 Process Monitoring 9
4.2 Performance Monitoring 9
5. Reporting 11
6. Schedule 12
7. References 13
Table of Contents

ARCADIS
Tables
Table 1
Table 2
Figures
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Appendices
A Underground Injection Control Permit Application
B ERD Pilot Study Schedule
Monitoring Well Details
Pilot Study Sampling Plan
Site Location
Pilot Study Well Locations
Proposed Well Construction Detail — Saprolite Injection Wells
Proposed Well Construction Detail — Deep Bedrock Injection Wells
Table of Contents
ii

Work Plan for Enhanced
Reductive Dechlorination
Pilot Study
AkzoNobel Surface
Chemistry LLC
1. Introduction
ARCADIS U.S., Inc. (ARCADIS) was retained by AkzoNobel Surface Chemistry LLC to
design and conduct a pilot study in the saprolite and deep bedrock hydrostratigraphic
unit (HSU) in the Lagoon Area of Operable Unit (OU) 3. The purpose of this pilot study
is to evaluate the effectiveness of an enhanced anaerobic bioremediation method in
reducing the concentration of chlorinated volatile organic compounds (CVOCs) present
in groundwater in this area of the site. The location of the Cedar Springs Road Facility
is shown in Figure 1. Figure 2 shows the layout of the Lagoon Area.
This work plan describes the enhanced anaerobic bioremediation technology, the
installation and operation of the pilot -scale system, sampling and analytical
procedures, and the evaluation and reporting of the pilot test results. For a complete
summary of the background of the Lagoon Area (0U3) and the conceptual site model,
refer to the 2008 Site Monitoring Report, dated May 29, 2009 (ARCADIS, 2009).
Additional information is contained in the Underground Injection Control Permit
Application, which is attached as Appendix A.
1

S
2. In -Situ Enhanced Reductive Dechlorination
2.1 Technology Description
Reductive dechlorination is a microbiological process that destroys CVOCs through
dechlorination as a result of either microbial metabolism or co -metabolism. Reductive
dechlorination is enhanced by introducing a soluble carbon substrate (e.g., molasses) into
the subsurface to create a biological In -Situ Reactive Zone (IRZ). The carbon source is
injected into the subsurface to promote the consumption of natural electron acceptors
(e.g., oxygen, nitrate, ferric iron, manganese, sulfate, and carbon dioxide) by naturally -
occurring native bacteria within the aquifer matrix. The added microbial food source
stimulates microbial activity, driving the groundwater environment to anaerobic and
strongly reducing conditions, establishing an anaerobic IRZ.
Similar to other bioremediation processes, enhanced reductive dechlorination (ERD)
works on contaminants in the dissolved phase. ERD indirectly enhances residual source
mass removal via three mechanisms: 1) additional source mass, which is present in the
immobile porosity of the aquifer, is mobilized due to an increased concentration gradient
as degradation of mass in the mobile porosity is enhanced; 2) increase solubility of
degradation products relative to the parent compounds; and 3) increase in the effective
solubility of the contaminants related to decreases in interfacial tension at high electron
donor concentrations (ITRC, 2005). All three mechanisms can aid in desorbing mass
from the aquifer matrix, making it available and susceptible to biological treatment in the
dissolved phase.
2.2 Applicability to Site
The CVOCs present in the Lagoon Area groundwater have been significantly reduced
by the groundwater extraction system that was operated in this area until 2008. The
remaining CVOC mass is present upgradient of the groundwater extraction area, and is
distributed throughout all three hydrostratigraphic units in the Lagoon Area, with the
highest concentrations detected in the deep bedrock unit.
The objectives of this ERD pilot study in the Lagoon Area are to expedite the in -situ
mass reduction of site -related dissolved -phase CVOCs and their degradation products
to reduce the associated risks. The predominant VOC in groundwater in the OU3
Lagoon Area is 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA). Maximum concentrations of 1,2-DCA
detected in the most recent sampling event (December 2009) are 44,000 pg/L (NS-54)
and 800 pg/L (NS-39). In addition, concentrations of trichloroethene (TCE), vinyl
chloride (VC), 1,1-dichloroethene (1,1-DCE), methylene chloride and cis-1,2-
Work Plan for Enhanced
Reductive Dechlorination
Pilot Study
AkzoNobel Surface
Chemistry LLC
2

ARCADIS
dichloroethene (cis-1,2-DCE) have been detected Tess frequently and at much lower
concentrations.
The chlorinated ethanes (1,2-DCA) can have multiple transformation pathways,
including abiotic and biotic. The most common biologically mediated reduction occurs in
anaerobic environments as follows:
1,2-DCA 4 Chloroethane 4 Ethane
The degradation pathways for other chlorinated ethenes present in the Lagoon Area are
as follows:
TCE 4 cis-1,2-DCE -4 VC 4 Ethene
Based on the presence of anaerobic biological degradation products (e.g., cis-1,2-DCE,
VC, ethene, and ethane) reported in laboratory analytical data, anaerobic degradation of
VOCs at the site is already ongoing in localized areas of the saprolite, shallow bedrock
and deep bedrock hydrostratigraphic units. In most cases, the reaction rates are limited
by a lack of electron donor (i.e., food for the microbes in the form of organic carbon).
Anaerobic degradation of the CVOCs can be enhanced by creating a highly anaerobic
and TOC-rich environment through the injection of an easily biodegradable carbon source
such as molasses, whey and/or emulsified vegetable oil. The water-soluble carbohydrate
solution will provide organic carbon to bacteria that are already present in the aquifer,
resulting in increased bacterial activity and subsequent degradation of CVOCs either via
dehalorespiration or co -metabolic degradation.
In addition to the naturally occurring degradation ongoing at the site, the in -situ
remediation has applicability in the Piedmont geology due to the nature of the
interconnectivity of the hydrostratigraphic units. The Conceptual Site Model (CSM) for
the Lagoon Area is composed of three hydrostratigraphic units. These units, from
shallowest to deepest are saprolite, shallow bedrock and deep bedrock. In this area the
saprolite interval is from ground surface to approximately 50 feet below ground surface
(bgs). Underlying the saprolite is the shallow bedrock, which is generally present
between 50 and approximately 150 feet bgs. The deep bedrock unit is present at a
depth below 150 feet. Evaluation of historic aquifer testing data and groundwater
extraction performance for the Lagoon Area indicates that the fracture network is
interconnected, which will allow the reagent to be distributed throughout the bedrock. In
addition, the natural connection present between the three units will allow reagent to
directly target the saprolite unit, but will indirectly treat the shallow bedrock due to the
vertical hydraulic gradients in this area. In addition, data from packer testing of newly
installed bedrock injection wells will provide a refined model of interconnectivity of these
units (See Section 3.3).
Work Plan for Enhanced
Reductive Dechlorination
Pilot Study
AkzoNobel Surface
Chemistry LLC
3

ARCADIS,
3. Pilot Study Setup
3.1 UIC Pemit
Prior to initiating the pilot study activities, an Application for Permit to Construct and/or
use a Well(s) for Injection will be completed and submitted to the North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources' (NCDENR) Department of Water
Quality. A copy of this permit application and associated attachments are included as
Appendix A.
3.2 Injection Wells
The injection reagent will be delivered to the formation from four injection locations.
Two injection wells will be installed in the saprolite unit (IWS-1 and IWS-2) and two
wells will be installed in the deep bedrock unit (IWB-1, IWB-2). The injection well
locations were selected such that the existing monitoring wells would provide the
performance monitoring locations for the pilot study. The monitoring wells that will be
used for pilot study monitoring include NS-39, NS-40, NS-41, NS-42, NS-50 and NS-
54. The location of the proposed injection wells are illustrated on Figure 2. The
proposed construction details for the injection wells are summarized in Table 1.
Proposed well completion logs are included as Figures 3 and 4 for the saprolite and
deep bedrock injection wells, respectively.
The injection wells will be installed in accordance with the North Carolina well
construction standards (15A NCAC.0200.2C) by a licensed driller. The saprolite
injection wells will be installed using hollow stem auger drilling methodology. The
saprolite boreholes will be advanced using 6.25-inch inside diameter (ID) augers to a
target depth of 50 feet or auger refusal, whichever is encountered first. The injection
well will be constructed using a 20-foot, 4-inch diameter, 0.010-inch wire -wrapped,
stainless steel screen. The riser for the monitoring well will be composed of 4-inch
Schedule 40 PVC. A filter pack composed of silica sand sized at a 20/40 gradation will
be installed at least 1 foot above the top of the well screen. Overlying the filter sand
will be a one foot layer of very fine sand. The remaining annular space will be filled
with neat Portland Type 1 cement to ground surface. An appropriate well head
connection and water tight surface completion will be added to the well once it is
completed.
The deep bedrock well will be installed using a combination of hollow stem auger and
air rotary. Hollow stem augers (8.25-inch ID) will be used drill through the saprolite.
Once auger refusal is encountered, the methodology will switch to air rotary. The
boring will be advanced into competent bedrock at least 10 feet, at which time a PVC
Work Plan for Enhanced
Reductive Dechlorination
Pilot Study
AkzoNobel Surface
Chemistry LLC
4

ARCADIS
surface casing will be sealed in place using neat Portland Type 1 cement. Once the
surface casing cement has cured for a minimum of 12 hours, the boring will be
advanced via air rotary (6-inch diameter) to a depth of approximately 200 feet bgs.
The borehole will be packer tested at the completion of drilling to determine the mass
distribution and transmissive properties of the bedrock, as discussed in Section 3.3.
The placement of the well screen will be based on the results of the packer test. If the
base of the well screen is above the total depth of the borehole, the base of the
borehole will be abandoned with Portland Type 1 cement to an appropriate level, which
will allow the well to be completed. It is anticipated the deep bedrock wells will be
completed with 30-foot screened intervals at the interval with the highest mass and
greatest interconnectivity with the existing bedrock monitoring wells. The deep
bedrock wells will be constructed using a 2-inch diameter, 0.010-inch wire -wrapped
stainless steel screen with a 2-inch Schedule 40 PVC riser.
3.3 Packer Test
Once the bedrock wells have been drilled to a depth of 200 feet, a packer test will be
conducted in one of the open boreholes. The purpose of the packer test is to
determine the mass distribution within the bedrock unit, the hydrogeologicproperties of
the bedrock and the interconnectivity between the monitoring locations.
Prior to initiating the test, pressure transducers will be deployed in NS-40, NS-54, and
the bedrock injection well that is not included in the packer test. In addition,
transducers will be placed in the shallow bedrock wells NS-41, NS-42, NS-44, and NS-
50 to assess the interconnectivity between the zones. The transducers will be used to
evaluate the response of the monitoring wells during the test. The packer test will be
completed using a straddle packer setup, which will allow a 20-foot interval of the
borehole to be isolated during each test. Once the packers are in the appropriate
interval, a transducer and pump will be lowered into the isolated interval. The pump
will be started while flow rate and groundwater parameters are monitored at the
surface. Each test is anticipated to last approximately one hour under pumping
conditions.
Groundwater samples will be collected from each interval during the packer test to
evaluate the mass distribution in the bedrock. Once the groundwater parameters have
stabilized for three consecutive readings, a sample will be collected and submitted to
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. (North Carolina Certification #434) in Pittsburgh, PA
under appropriate chain -of -custody procedures. The samples will be analyzed for the
OU3 VOCs by Method 8260B and will be reported on an expedited turn -around.
Work Plan for Enhanced
Reductive Dechlorination
Pilot Study
AkzoNobel Surface
Chemistry LLC
5

ARCADIS
3.4 Baseline Sampling
Baseline monitoring data will be collected to primarily focus on optimizing the
application of the carbohydrate solution. The baseline event will consist of collecting
groundwater samples from overburden well NS-39, shallow bedrock wells NS-40 and
NS-42, and deep bedrock wells NS-41, NS-50, and NS-54. Background sampling will
include saprolite well NS-43 and shallow bedrock well NS-44 from the production area.
Baseline samples will be analyzed for the parameters listed in Table 2 and will include;
• Laboratory analysis of VOCs (0U3 analyte list plus chloroethane), total and
dissolved iron, manganese, sulfate, nitrate, total organic carbon (TOC), carbon
dioxide, ethane, ethane, and methane.
• Groundwater parameters collected in the field for dissolved oxygen (DO), pH,
oxidation reduction potential (ORP), specific conductivity, and temperature.
The sampling methodology used for the baseline sampling will be low -flow, consistent
with other site sampling events. The low -flow sampling will be completed using a
portable bladder pump, complete with disposable tubing and bladders. The
groundwater samples will be collected from the center of the screened interval, which
will be regulated by the pump placement in the well.
Groundwater samples will be collected directly from the outlet tubing from the pump
after disconnecting the flow -through cell. All sample containers will be prepreserved as
supplied by TestAmerica. Upon filling the containers, the samples will be immediately
placed in iced coolers. All samples will shipped to TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc.
(North Carolina Certification #434) in Pittsburgh, PA under appropriate chain -of -
custody procedures.
3.5 Injection Volume
The volume of solution required to achieve breakthrough at an assumed 15 to 45-foot
radius -of -influence (ROI) dose -response well in the saprolite and deep bedrock is
estimated using the following equation:
z (7.481 gal"
V,nj =ROl xn-xhxnm •x s
ft
where:
Vinj = volume of injection (gal)
Work Plan for Enhanced
Reductive Dechlorination
Pilot Study
AkzoNobel Surface
Chemistry LLC
6

ARCADIS
ROI = radius of injection (e.g., 10 feet)
h = height of injected fluid column (e.g., 15 feet)
nm = mobile porosity
The volume of solution required to achieve breakthrough at the 15 to 45-foot ROI
depends on the mobile porosity of the formation. The following table shows the
relationship between mobile porosity, injection volume, and amount of raw molasses
and water required to mix injection solution containing 2 percent by weight (50 g/L). A
range of 1 to 2 percent will be evaluated for pilot scale application so that areas of the
VOC plume can be adaptively targeted with appropriate dosing. It is anticipated that
after two injection events utilizing a molasses -based carbohydrate, the pilot will
transition to an emulsified vegetable oil (EVO) source of organic carbon. The initial use
of molasses based injections will allow for a more rapid creation of anaerobic
conditions (i.e.,.shorten the lag phase). The EVO has more longevity and will lessen
the requirements for maintenance dosing of the aquifer. Given the uncertainty related
to saprolite and bedrock fracture mobile porosity (nm), we have assumed a range of
values to provide sensitivity related to injection volumes, as follows:
OU3 Lagoon Area
Saprolite
nm=0.03 nm=0.08
Injection volume
(gallons)
Raw Molasses
(gallons)
14,280 38,100
504 1,346
OU3 Lagoon Area
Deep Bedrock
nm=0.01 = 0.03
Injection volume
(gallons)
Raw Molasses
(gallons)
10,723 32,168
379 1,136
The injection solution will be prepared in batches immediately prior to introducing into
the injection well. Potable water available at the plant will be used to partially fill a
2,500-gallon tank, where molasses can be added and fully mixed prior to injection.
The injection rate is anticipated to range from approximately 4 to 8 gpm under gravity -
Work Plan for Enhanced
Reductive Dechlorination
Pilot Study
AkzoNobel Surface
Chemistry LLC
7

ARCADIS
feed conditions in the bedrock. The gravity -feed injection rate achievable in the
saprolite unit is anticipated to be in the 1 to 2 gpm range. In the event that flow cannot
be achieved in the saprolite unit under gravity flow conditions, the system will be
designed in such a way that the reagent can be pressure injected into the formation. If
pressure injection is necessary, an operating pressure of 5 psi or less will be used to
avoid damaging the formation or creating preferential flow paths.
During the first injection event, a combination transducer and conductivity probe will be
placed in the monitoring wells closest to the injection wells. The transducer will record
data throughout to determine the breakthrough of the carbon, which will be signified by
an increase the conductivity in the groundwater. The transducers are expected to
remain in the wells from the first injection event until the first performance monitoring
event. The data from the initial injection will be utilized to verify the previously
estimated mobile porosity values used to determine injection volumes. The results of
the initial injections will be evaluated to refine injection volumes, strength or frequency
for the remainder of the pilot, if necessary.
Work Plan for Enhanced
Reductive Dechlorination
Pilot Study
AkzoNobel Surface
Chemistry LLC
8

ARCADIS
4. Monitoring
4.1 Process Monitoring
Groundwater sampling for process monitoring will be performed in injection wells and
associated wells down gradient of the treatment area. These wells will include one
shallow and one deep injection well, saprolite well NS-39, shallow bedrock well NS-40,
and deep bedrock well NS-54. Monitoring wells NS-41, NS-42, and NS-50 will be
added to the process monitoring once the breakthrough occurs in the wells nearest to
the injection zone. Groundwater monitoring parameters and sampling frequency are
detailed in Table 2.
The intent of the process monitoring is to determine breakthrough and post -
breakthrough of reagent in monitoring wells. Process monitoring allows for an
evaluation of reagent distribution and creation of anaerobic and reducing conditions.
Distribution of the carbohydrate and establishment of an anaerobic reactive zone will
be tracked primarily through field measurements of total organic carbon, pH and
specific conductivity. Movement of molasses will be utilized to confirm groundwater
flow rates and directions. This will support evaluation of carbohydrate migration and
anticipated trends in dissolved -phase concentrations downgradient of the treatment
area(s). Process monitoring samples will be collected using a bailer lowered to the
center of the screen. The data collected during the process monitoring events
includes:
• Laboratory analysis for TOC
• Groundwater parameters collected in the field for pH and specific conductivity.
The process monitoring will be conducted monthly for the first quarter of the pilot study.
The frequency of the monitoring and the wells to be monitored will be adjusted
throughout the pilot if necessary. These adjustments may be necessary to provide
enough resolution in the data to support decision making regarding the dosing of the
carbohydrate source.
4.2 Performance Monitoring
After the anaerobic reactive zone is established and confirmed via the process
monitoring events, groundwater sampling for performance monitoring will be performed
in the same wells as the baseline sampling using the same sampling methodology.
Work Plan for Enhanced
Reductive Dechlorination
Pilot Study
AkzoNobel Surface
Chemistry LLC
9

ARCADIS
Groundwater monitoring parameters and sampling frequency are detailed in Table 2.
Performance monitoring will include:
• Quarterly monitoring from select monitoring wells (3 wells). Sampling and
analyses at these locations will include VOCs, TOC, and dissolved gases (ethene,
ethane).
• One mid -pilot monitoring event (6 wells) for the expanded geochemical suite
(dissolved iron and manganese, nitrate, sulfate, sulfide, alkalinity, TOC, and
dissolved gases), to be tested again during the final monitoring event.
In addition to the laboratory analyses, field parameters will be collected at each
sampling event. Groundwater parameters will include DO, pH, ORP, specific
conductivity, and temperature. The most important field parameters that will be
collected are pH and specific conductivity. These parameters will allow the
development and distribution of the IRZ to be monitored in the field. In addition, the pH
can have adverse affects on the IRZ if it drops below 4 to 4.5 standard units because it
will retard the microbial activity. This can occur if the aquifer is overdosed with carbon
and excessive fermentation takes place. The collection of pH measurements will allow
the operating parameters to be evaluated to keep the pH in the desired range of 5 to 8
standard units.
Work Plan for Enhanced
Reductive Dechlorination
Pilot Study
AkzoNobel Surface
Chemistry LLC
10

ARCADIS
5. Reporting
Throughout the pilot -study process, the Agency will be updated on the progress in the
monthly progress reports. At the conclusion of the pilot study, a pilot study completion
report will be completed and submitted to the Agency. This repot will include:
• Overview of the ERD system installation and system operation;
• Summary of the biogeochemical conditions of the saprolite, shallow bedrock and
deep bedrock units before during and post pilot study;
• Tabulated analytical data;
• Performance monitoring plots; and
• Conclusions and Recommendations.
Work Plan for Enhanced
Reductive Dechlorination
Pilot Study
AkzoNobel Surface
Chemistry LLC
11

ARCADIS
6. Schedule
A schedule for implementation of the ERD Pilot Study is included as Appendix B.
Upon receipt of approval from the Agency and the UIC permit from NCDENR, it is
estimated to take 30 to 45 days to initiate the pilot study. The Agency will be updated
on the schedule and implementation of the pilot study as work progresses.
The ERD pilot study will be completed using a dynamic and adaptive remedial
approach, wherein data collected during injection, process monitoring and performance
monitoring events will be evaluated and potential adjustments will be made to optimize
the pilot study. The schedule included is based on the best estimate of current site
conditions and the ability to deliver reagent to the hydrostratigraphic units. At this time
it is anticipated each of the three injection events will occur at 3-month intervals, and
the duration of the pilot study will be one year. As data is collected, the schedule will
be updated and the Agency will be informed of these changes.
Work Plan for Enhanced
Reductive Dechlorination
Pilot Study
AkzoNobel Surface
Chemistry LLC
12

ARCADIS'
7. References
ARCADIS, 2009. 2008 Site Monitoring Report, AkzoNobel Chemical Company,
Salisbury, North Carolina. May 29, 2009.
ITRC, 2005. Overview of In Situ Bioremediation of Chlorinated Ethene DNAPL Source
Zones, Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council: Bioremediation of
DNAPLs Team, October 2005.
15A NCAC.0200.2C. Well Construction Standards: Criteria and Standards Applicable
to Injection Well. North Carolina Administrative Code. Title 15A. Subchapter
2C. Section .0200, October 1, 2009.
Work Plan for Enhanced
Reductive Dechlorination
Pilot Study
AkzoNobel Surface
Chemistry LLC
13

ARCADIS
Tables

Table 1
Monitoring Well Details
AkzoNobel Chemical Company - Salisbury, North Carolina
Well ID
Hydrostratigraphic
Unit
Well Diameter
(inches)
Total Depth
(ft bgs)
Screened Interval
(ft bgs)
IWS-1
Saprolite
4
50
30
to
50
IWB-1
Deep Bedrock
2
200
170
to
200
IWS-2
Saprolite
4
50
30
to
50
IWB-2
Deep Bedrock
2
200
170
to
200
NS-39
Saprolite
2
40.8
30.8
to
40.8
NS-40
Shallow Bedrock
2
94.3
74.3
to
94.3
NS-42
Shallow Bedrock
2
80
60
to
80
NS-41
Deep Bedrock
2
138
122
to
138
NS-50
Deep Bedrock
2
150
140
to
150
NS-54
Deep Bedrock
2
182.3
132.3
to
182.3
NS-33
Saprolite
2
59
49
to
59
NS-34
Shallow Bedrock
2
79
64
to
79
200 - Estimated value

Table 2
Pilot Study Sampling Plan
AkzoNobel Chemical Company - Salisbury, North Carolina
Well ID
Location
Baseline
Process
Monitoring/
Monthly
Quarter 1
Mid Pilot
Quarter 3
End Pilot
IWS-1
Saprolite
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6
4, 5
IWB-1
Deep Bedrock
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6
X
IWS-2
Saprolite
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6
X
IWB-2
Deep Bedrock
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6
4, 5
NS-39
Saprolite
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6
4, 5
1,
2,
4,
5
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6
1,
2,
4,
5
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6
NS-40
Shallow Bedrock
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6
4, 5
1,
2,
4,
5
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6
1,
2,
4,
5
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6
NS-42
Shallow Bedrock
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6
X
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6
NS-41
Deep Bedrock
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6
X
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6
NS-50
Deep Bedrock
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6
X
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6
NS-54
Deep Bedrock
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6
4, 5
1,
2,
4,
5
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6
1,
2,
4,
5
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6
NS-337
Saprolite
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6
NS-347
Shallow Bedrock
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6
1 -- VOCs by Method 8260E (0U3 analytes + chloroethane)
2 -- dissolved gases (methane, ethane, ethene)
3 -- alkalinity (total and bicarbonate)
4 -- total organic carbon (TOC)
5 -- field parameters (pH, specific conductivity)
6 -- biogeochemical parameters (total and dissolved iron and manganese, nitrate, sulfate, sulfide)
7 -- NS-33 and NS-34 represent background wells
X -- these wells may be added to the process monitoring schedule if necessary
TOC samples will be collected as grab samples from the center of the screened interval using a bailer.
The process monitoring frequency may be increased or decreased throughout the test, depending on results.

ARCADIS
Figures

U
a
0
J
0
a
of
0 15
a
c� a
Nch,%. „ /
Legend
X Abandoned Wells
EW, Shallow Bedrock
• Proposed Bedrock Injection Location -* EW, Deep Bedrock
• Proposed Saprolite Injection Location ■ Sediment
O MW, Saprolite A Surface Water
e MW, Shallow Bedrock • Stream Gauge
• MW, Deep Bedrock
Railroads
Streams
Henkel Boundary
Parcels
0
400 800
I Feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
NATIONAL STARCH CHEMICAL COMPANY
CEDAR SPRINGS ROAD PLANT
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
SITE PLAN
ARCAD1S
FIGURE
1

Legend
• Proposed Bedrock Injection Location a MW, Deep Bedrock
• Proposed Saprolite Injection Location + EW, Shallow Bedrock
MW, Saprolite #- EW, Deep Bedrock
ce MW, Shallow Bedrock ■ Sediment
•
0
Surface Water
Stream Gauge
Sample Locations
Process Water Lines
Abandoned Process Water Lines
Henkel Boundary
Pilot Study Area
Railroads
Streams
NATIONAL STARCH CHEMICAL COMPANY
CEDAR SPRINGS ROAD PLANT
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
PILOT STUDY WELL LOCATIONS
ARCAD1S
FIGURE
2

Figure 3
Proposed Well Construction Detail - Saprolite Injection Wells
AkzoNobel Chemical Company - Salisbury, North Carolina
Ground Surface Surface Completion to be determined based on design on inejction system
10 inch diameter drilled hole
4 inch diameter, Sch. 40 PVC riser
Saprolite
Grout (Portland Type 1)
1 foot very fine sand
1 foot of sand pack above top of screen
20' screened interval
4 inch diameter, 10-slot screen (stainless steel)
Sand Pack (#1 filter sand)
*Total depth is anticipated at 50 feet bgs

Ground Surface
Figure 4
Proposed Well Construction Detail - Deep Bedrock Injection Wells
AkzoNobel Chemical Company - Salisbury, North Carolina
b(Surface Completion to be determined based on design on inejction system
Saprolite
Shallow Bedrock
Deep Bedrock
I
1
10-inch diameter
drilled hole
Surface well casing,
6-inch diameter, PVC
Grout (Portland Type 1)
Base of surface casing set 10-feet into bedrock
-Borehole will be packer tested upon completion of drilling
-screened interval of the well will be determined based on
the results of the packer test
-screened interval is anticipated to be 30 feet in length
-well screen will be composed of
-riser will be composed of 2-inch Sch. 40 PVC
-base of borehole will be abandoned using neat Portland
Type 1 cement to specified interval prior to well completion
6-inch bedrock borehole
*Total depth anticipated at 200 ft bgs

ARCADIS'
Appendix A
Underground Injection Control Permit
Application

ARCADIS
Appendix B
ERD Pilot Study Schedule

Task Na
ERD Pil
Wo
EP
----._ Ins
-- Ba
_ Inj
—
'• Gr
Gr
Inj
Gr.
Gr
Inj
...._Gr
Gr
G
P:
Project: ER
Date: Wed'
lnfrastruct
OU 4 Activity Schedule
NSCC Superfund Site - Salisbury, NC
tall
ection
oundwater
oundwater
e
roundwater
round
clot
ne
%
Complete
Duration
Start
Finish
8
Qtr 1, 2009
Qtr 2, 2009 Qtr 3, 2009 Qtr 4, 2009
Qtr 1, 2010
Qtr 2, 2010
Qtr 3, 2010 Qtr 4, 2010 Qtr 1, 2011 Qtr 2, 2011
Qtr 3, 2011
Dec
Jan lFeb lMar
AprIMay'Jun Jul IAuglSep OctlNovlDec
Jan jFeblMar
AprIMaylJun
Jul !AuglSep OctINovlDec Jan IFebIMar Apr IMaylJun
Jul IAudISep
A Study
____._._.__.._.._...._..__._...___._..._.___.___.
rk Plan and UIC Permit
A and NCDENR approval
injection wells/packer test
-._...ne__._.--__.._-.._...._....._._._..._...._.._......_.
m lin
Event #1 -Molasses
sampling (TOC,
-----------ii OC,
sampling (TOC,
ction Event #2 Molasses
-- -- -
oundwater sampling (VOCs,
oundwater sampling (TOC,
ection Event #3 - EVO
-----.--_....._ ---- —.
oundwater sampling (VOCs,
•0
oundwater sampling (TOC,
sampling (TOC,
water sam ling (VOCs,
P
roundwater sampling (TOC,
roundwater sampling (TOC,
0 /°,
_.__._.._..-._ . 0%!
o
0 /o,f
391 days
30 days
—._.{._._......._._._._.__._.
30 da s1
Thu 1/28/10
Thu 1/28/10
Mon 3/15/10
Mon 5/10/101
Mon 5/24/10
Wed 6/9/10
Fri 7/29/11
Wed 3/10/10
Fri 4/23/10
=
4
—...—.__...._.._..---..._---...___...... I..... 0%I
_....:....._.........._. -. _.__._.__.._...t..._—___...__—._:._._..___-...._..._
+ 1 0%'
5 days;
............._..,
1 day!
Yl
5 days)
1 day;
Fri 5/14/10
Mon ___ __ _
Tue 6/1_10
_ __
Fri 7/9/10
Mon 8/9/10
Fri 8/20/10
_
-
1
0%
0 /°
0%!
0 /o;
pH) i
H) 1
pH)
1
Fri 7/9/101
Mon 8/9/101
Mon 8/16/10
i Mon 9/20/10
Thu 10/21/10
1 day,
5 days)
TOC, pH, geochemical, MEE)
pH)
0%!
0%
1 da
Y;
1 day,
5 days
1 day!
Y
Mon 9/20/10
Thu 10/21/10
- _._ _.ge ..... __.—_ — :. __..--- I
-
TOC, pH, geochemical, MEE)
OW
0%1
°
0%1
Wed 10/20/10
Fri 11/26/10,
Tue 10/26/10
Fri 11/26/10
PH)-......._._._.-.
PH) --------_.._... ________ ..... ..._..__._
1 da
1 dayj
:_._......
1 day!
1 day!
1 day;
1 day
! Mon 12/27/10
Mon 1/24/111
I Mon 12/27/10
Mon 1/24/11
Thu 2/24/11
Mon 3/21/11
TOC, pH, geochemical, MEE)
pH)
0%';
0 /°
1 0%!
0%1
0%j
Thu 2/24/11
Mon 3/21/11;
Thu 4/21/11
Mon 5/23/11
pH)
Thu 4/21/11
Found-IN--a-ter sampling (VOCs,
Study Report
TOC, pH, geochemical, MEE)
Mon 5/23/11
__ 7/29
0 days! Fri 7/29/111 Fri 7/29/11
D Pilot Study Schecule_12
3/17/10
Progress
Milestone
Deadline b
Task .,., ., , '°" "�""''" ` '
Summary
♦ Project
External Tasks - < F r - ''
Split 111111„1„1111111,1111111:11111111„
Extemal Milestone •
Summary -
RCA :S Page 1
Wed 3/17/10
,/e, environment bu/kfings
//�� be
AkzoNo el
Tor 0rrGws A er Today
`