820530_Inspection_20210204

Facility Number
370
Division of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: G-eriMpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Arrival Time:
/D`/13-
G�a,1�- -tEifif /
Owner Name: %
liar 15cAS
Departure Time:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: �� Yy r�' /A) 9r-,-
/,r lV
Owner Email:
Phone:
County:
Region:
Onsite Representative: j.,.�.
Title:
Certified Operator: `17�2-y i 5
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
L
Integrator:
Phone:
Certification Number: /D e),2„3
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Swine
Other
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Other
Design Current
et` Poultry Capacity Pop,
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
Ya aci Po r.
1
Cattle
Design Curren
Capacity Pop.'
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1 Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑Yes I 10 0 NA ❑NE
0 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 0 NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 0 Yes No ❑ NA 0 NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes Er -No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 6' - ,
Date of Inspection: 97— 11---f
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? n Yes El 1V ❑ NA 0 NE
n Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 0 NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: `� /,, r
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): . / L,/
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
9
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ' 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 0No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑'<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require Etes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 0No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 12K ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
D Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): r: "i»'1/i i , /'s--J
i r
r :1
13. Soil Type(s): y on-- Fb ! I< k1 cJ5 -- j�(,�r� �- v b(% 3
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ago ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? n Yes [ jNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [f 1 o 0 NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA 0 NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design D Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
n Yes [io ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Ergo ❑NA ONE
❑ Yes Erg-0 ❑ NA 0 NE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Q o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes lv U ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes la<o ❑ NA 0 NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: f2-- - 53 I)
Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
E o
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field
❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes Er< ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes bNo ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes [Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 124 ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
12-1(0 ❑NA ❑NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
r>5( A teas 1200/r3/ eto.y4t-e91--c12;r7L-74-3
WO rk d
.�
GI 4 e9
nwiyt )0 'rot) TWOL-7--
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
7 - Phone: 9:42Y---3 i)3—e)/5 7
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: &—L/
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015