20060404 Ver 1_Year 3 Monitoring Report_20120823

Ll
BEAVERDAM CREEK �� 1 jqoSTREAM RESTORATION PROJEC
ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT FOR 2010 - 2011 (YEAR 5)
Project Number: D05016 -1
Submitted to:
r~
,Ecl osystem
E, al 'elllent
PR�IGRAM
December, 2011
NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program
2728 Capital Blvd, Suite 1H 103
Raleigh, NC 27604
Prepared for: River Works, Incorporated
IVER
W
R,,.-
O R K S
8000 Regency Parkwa
Suite 200 B [2 i'_ R owl
Cary, NC 27518
AUG 2, 3 2012
W_�
Prepared by: Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
_ w
_,
5550 Seventy -Seven Center Dr., Ste. 320
Charlotte, NC 282 RECEIVED
JAN .1.32012
^i ER QUALITY
MIv-J-JX;,+NDSTORMWAT6tIWO NC ECOSYSTEM
ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM

TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE
TABLEOF CONTENTS ............................................................................... ............................... i
EXECUTIVESUMMARY ............................................................................ ..............................1
1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND .............................................................. ............................... 2
1.1 Project Location ................................................................................ ............................... 2
1.2 Mitigation Goals and Objectives ....................................................... ............................... 2
1.3 Project Description and Restoration Approach ................................. ...............................
1.4 Project History and Background ....................................................... ............................... 4 .
1.5 Project Plan ....................................................................................... ............................... 8
2.0 VEGETATION MONITORING ....................................................... ............................... 8
2.1 Soil Data ............................................................................................ ............................... 8
2.2 Description of Species and Monitoring Protocol .............................. ............................... 8
2.3 Vegetation Success Criteria .............................................................. ............................... 9
2.4 Results of Vegetative Monitoring ..................................................... ............................... 9
2.5 Vegetation Observations ................................................................. ......................:.1...... 13
2.6 Vegetation Problem Areas .............................................................. ............................... 13
2.7 Vegetation Conclusions ................................................................... ............................... 13
2.8 Vegetation Photos ........................................................................... ............................... 13
3.0 STREAM MONITORING ............................................................... ............................... 13
3.1 Description of Stream Monitoring .................................................. ............................... 13
3.2 Stream Restoration Success Criteria ............................................... ............................... 14
3.3 Bankfull Discharge Monitoring Results .......................................... ............................... 14
3.4 Stream Monitoring Data and Photos ............................................... ............................... 16
3.5 Stream Stability Assessment ........................................................... ............................... 16
3.6 Cross - section, Longitudinal Profile, and Bed Material Analysis Monitoring Results... 17
4.0 HYDROLOGY .................................................................................... .............................18
5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................ .............................19
6.0 WILDLIFE OBSERVATIONS ....................................................... ............................... 20
7.0 REFERENCES .................................................................................... .............................20
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
— Project Photo Log
APPENDIX B —
Stream Monitoring Data
APPENDIX C —
As -built Plan Sheets
APPENDIX D — Baseline Stream Summary for Restoration Reaches
APPENDIX E — Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary — Year 5 Monitoring
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1.
Project Mitigation Approach
Table 2.
Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3.
Project Contact
Table 4.
Project Background
Table 5.
Soil Data for Project
Table 6.
Tree Species Planted
Table 7.
Year 5 Planted Stem Counts for Each Species Arranged by Plot
Table 7A.
Volunteers within Monitoring Plots
Table 8.
Verification of Bankfull Events
Table 9.
Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Table 10.
Comparison of Historic Rainfall to Observed Rainfall
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1.
Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2.
Site Topographic Map
Figure 3.
Restoration Summary Map
Figure 4.
Stage Recorder Locations
Figure 5.
Historic Average vs. Observed Rainfall
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Final Annual Monitoring Report details the monitoring activities during the 2011 growing season on
the Beaverdam Creek Stream Restoration Site ( "Site "), as well as, those throughout the entire monitoring
phase (Years 1 — 5) of the Project. Construction of the Site, including planting of trees, was completed in
March 2007. In order to document project success, 24 vegetation monitoring plots, 18 permanent cross -
sections, 3,617 linear feet (LF) of longitudinal profile survey, and two automated stage recorders were
installed and assessed across the Site. The 2011 data represents results from the fifth year of vegetation
and hydrologic monitoring for streams.
Prior to restoration, stream and buffer functions on the Site were historically impaired as a result of heavy
land timbering and subsequent aggressive farming. More recently, some areas were reforested within the
project area, but it continued to be actively farmed, grazed or converted to medium density residential
developments. The restoration project restored/enhanced 13,203 LF of channelized stream on two
unnamed tributaries of Beaverdam Creek, UT1 and UT2, and preserved an additional 1,641 LF of
Beaverdam Creek and 962 LF of UT2 to total 15,806 LF of restored, enhanced, or preserved stream.
Weather station data from the for NRCS National Climate and Water Center (Charlotte WSO AP WETS
Station in Mecklenburg County — NC 1690) and the USGS Water Data for North Carolina (USGS
35090308100454 Withers Cove in Mecklenburg County, NC) were used to document precipitation
amounts. For the 2010 - 2011 growing season, the total recorded rainfall in inches was less than the
historical average totals.
Twenty-four monitoring plots that are 10 meters by 10 meters (0.025 acre) in size were used to assess
survivability of the woody vegetation planted on Site. They were randomly located to represent the
different zones within the project. The vegetation monitoring documented a survivability of range of 120
stems per acre to 680 stems per acre with an overall average of 470 planted stems per acre. The Site had
earlier met the initial vegetation survival criteria of 320 stems per acre after the third growing season and
has now met the final vegetation survival criteria of 260 stems per acre after the fifth growing season.
Over the five -year monitoring period, both cross - section and profile data shows a dynamic system that is
able to adjust its dimension, pattern, and profile while maintaining stability by accommodating for
fluctuations in inputs from the contributing drainage area. The Project successfully met its success
criteria for hydrology by Year 2. In 2011, the site experienced an additional two bankfull events during
the months of April and May of 2011. In general, dimension, pattern, profile and in- stream structures
continue to maintain stability and function as a stable "C/E" type channel.
In summary, the Site has successfully met all hydrologic/hydraulic, vegetative, and stream success criteria
specified in the Site's Restoration Plan.
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
The Beaverdam Creek Stream Restoration Site ( "Site ") is located within the extraterritorial jurisdiction
(ETJ) of the City of Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, and lies within the Catawba River Basin (Figure 1).
The Site lies within North Carolina Department of Water Quality (NCDWQ) sub -basin 03 -08 -34 and U.S.
Geologic Survey (USGS) hydrologic unit 03050101170040. The recent land use of the Site consists of
agriculture and medium density residential development.
The project involved the restoration, enhancement and preservation of 15,806 LF of stream along
Beaverdam Creek (the mainstem) and two unnamed tributaries (UT1 and UT2).
1.1 Project Location
The Site is located approximately 3 miles southwest of the Charlotte- Douglas International Airport. The
Site extends from the newly constructed I-485 corridor to Brown's Cove of Lake Wylie, an impounded
reservoir on the Catawba River. The Site can be accessed from Dixie River Road (UT1 to the north and
UT2 to the south) 1.5 miles northeast of the intersection with Steele Creek Road. See Figures 1 and 2 for
an overview of the project area.
1.2 Mitigation Goals and Objectives
The specific goals for the Beaverdam Creek Restoration Project were as follows:
• Preserve/Restore/Enhance 15,806 LF of stream channel.
• Create geomorphically stable stream channel and floodplain conditions along UT1, UT2 and their
associated tributaries within the Beaverdam Creek watershed.
• Improve the local hydrology through increased groundwater recharge, groundwater storage, and
hydrologic connectivity between the channel and the adjacent floodplain.
• Improve water quality in the Beaverdam Creek watershed by increasing dissolved oxygen
concentrations and reducing nutrient and sediment loads.
• Improve aquatic and riparian terrestrial habitat through improved hydraulic and biologic
diversity.
1.3 Project Description and Restoration Approach
For analysis and design purposes, Beaverdam Creek and the two unnamed tributaries (UT1 and UT2)
were subdivided into 15 individual reaches based on their hydrologic and geomorphic characteristics.
The mainstem of Beaverdam Creek consists of only 1 of the 15 design reaches, where only preservation
and no restoration activities were proposed. The remaining 14 reaches exist within UT 1 (8 reaches) and
UT2 (6 reaches). Among these 14 reaches, 12 were scheduled for restoration, the upstream reach of UT
was scheduled for enhancement and the downstream reach of UT2 was scheduled for preservation. All
reach locations are shown in Figure 3. The following describes the Site's preconstruction conditions.
The project extents on UT1 began at I-485 flowing from the northeast direction. UT1 was divided into 5
reaches starting in the upstream with Reach 1 and continuing downstream to Reach 5 and changing
designation at tributary confluences or at significant grade breaks. The three tributary confluences were
included within the design parameters on UT 1 and were identified as UT 1 B, UT 1 C, and UT 1 D from the
upstream confluence and continuing downstream.
The UT2 watershed abuts the southern boundary of UT1's watershed, is bordered by Dixie River Road,
and generally flows in the southwest direction. The mainstem of UT2 was divided into four reaches
starting upstream at Reach 1 and continuing downstream to Reach 4. One tributary confluence, UT2A,
was included within the design parameters of UT2. Reach UT2A, upstream of station 10+00, consisted
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

only of a non - disturbance area (not for credit). The downstream section of UT2A, from a headcut at
station 10 +00 to its confluence at the terminus of UT2 Reach 2, was 1,138 LF with a channel slope of 1.4
percent.
Preservation was proposed for reaches within the project area that were currently in stable, functioning
condition and did not warrant restoration. The two reaches proposed for preservation were along the
mainstem of Beaverdam and the downstream section of UT2. The reach along the mainstem of
Beaverdam Creek proposed for preservation had a reach length of 1,641 LF. It began at the confluence
with UT 1 and extended downstream to the confluence of UT2. The reach along the mainstem of UT2
proposed for preservation had a length of 962 LF. It began immediately downstream of UT2 Reach 4 and
ended at its confluence with Beaverdam Creek.
Throughout most of UT1, the restoration approach accelerated the existing evolutionary process and
established a natural, successionally stable, C/E -type stream channel. Additionally, soil bioengineering,
structural reinforcement, and revetments were applied to promote stability immediately following
construction when the stream was most vulnerable. Given the wide floodplain, relatively flat slopes,
generally stable nature of the soil, and favorable growing conditions at the Site, this restoration approach
was an achievable goal. Removal of the majority of invasive species and planting of native vegetative
species throughout the riparian buffer complemented the channel restoration and promoted the growth of
optimum native habitat.
Similar to UTl, the restoration approach throughout UT2 entailed establishing a C/E -type stream channel
while maintaining the ability to accommodate subsequent natural channel evolution towards an E -type
channel, as warranted by future influences to the discharge and sediment regime. This was accomplished
through application of a Priority 1 design throughout with short segments of Priority 2 design to tie into
the incised channels.
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

Table 1. Project Mitigation Approach
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D05016 -1
L
L
•fA
Project Segment
q
a7 'K
p
�+ � �
fk
=
or Reach ID
'°
°
°—
o
_
�°•
Comment
UTl (Reach 1)
542
E
El
567
1.5:1
373
10+00 - 15+67
Low slope, minimal meander and floodplain benching.
The beginning of channel utilizes the existing wide,
flat floodplain then narrows through the valley and
straightens through the Duke Power easement and
connects into the mainstem of Beaverdam through a
UTl each 2 -5
5796
R
P 1
6,310
1:1
6,310
1 15 +67 - 78 +77
wide, flat floodplain.
The valley is pinched so floodplain grading will create
UT1B
743
R
P2
778
1:1
1 778
10+00 -17 +78
adequate benchin .
Step -pool design dominated by log drops. The valley
UTl C
744
R
P 1
624
1:1
624
10+00 -16 +24
is narrow resulting minimal meander.
The channel will have the appropriate belt width
throughout the ample floodplain. A series of drop
UTID
323
R
P 1
1 338
1:1
338
10+00 -13 +38
structures at the end of the reach will tie into UTI.
Increase sinuosity, pool development, and reestablish
connection with the floodplain and construct in
channel step -pools in areas where the valley is
UT2
3130
R
P 1
3,448
1:1
3,448
10+00 - 44+48
confined and steep.
A step -pool channel will be constructed in the areas
where the valley is confined and steep. Transition
connections constructed between the constructed
UT2A
886
R
P 1 1
1,138
1:1
1,138
10+00 - 21 +38
channel and the existing channels.
Beaverdam Creek
1641
P
1,641
1:5
328
-
UT2
962
P
- --
962
1:5
192
Total linear ft of channel restored or
preserved: 15,806
Mitigation Unit Summation for Streams: 13,534
* R = Restoration ** PI = Priority I
E = Enhancement P2 = Priority II
P = Preservation P3 = Priority III
EI = Enhancement I
1.4 Project History and Background
The chronology of the Beaverdam Creek Restoration Project is presented in Table 2. The contact
information for all designers, contractors, and relevant suppliers is presented in Table 3. Relevant project
background information is presented in Table 4.
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D05016 -1
Scheduled Data Collection Actual
Activity or Report Completion Complete Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan Prepared
Nov -05
N/A
-
Restoration Plan Amended
Dec -05
N/A
-
Restoration Plan Approved
Dec -05
N/A
-
Final Design — (at least 90% complete)
Dec -05
N/A
-
Construction Begins
May -06
N/A
Jun -06
Temporary S &E mix applied to entire project area
N/A
N/A
Jan -07
Permanent seed mix applied to entire project area
Mar -06
N/A
Jan -07
Planting of live stakes
Nov -06
N/A
Jan -07
Planting of bare root trees
Nov -06
N/A
Jan -07
Survey of As -built conditions (Year 0 Monitoring-
baseline
Jan -07
Mar -07
Apr -07
Repair work
Year I Monitoring
Dec -07
Nov -07
Dec -07
Year 2 Monitoring
Dec -08
Nov -08
Dec -08
Year 3 Monitoring
Dec -09
Nov -09
Dec -09
Year 4 Monitoring
Dec -10
Oct -10
Nov -10
Year 5 Monitoring
Dec -11
Nov -11
Dec -11
i ame s. rroiect contact
I Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site: Proiect No. D05016 -1 I
Full Service Delivery Contractor
River Works, Incorporated
Designer
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200
Cary, NC 27518
Contact:
Will Pedersen, Tel. 919 - 459 -9001
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200
Cary, NC 27518
Contact:
Kevin Tweedy, Tel [phone]
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

Table 3. Project Contact
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D05016 -1
Construction Contractor
Mecklenburg County, NC
River Works, Inc.
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200
UTl (Reach 1)
Cary, NC 27518
UTl (Reach 2 -5)
Contact:
UT1B
Will Pedersen, Tel. [phone]
Planting Contractor
0.15mi2
River Works, Inc.
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200
UT2
Cary, NC 27518
U72A
Contact:
Estimated Drainage % Impervious Cover:
Will Pedersen, Tel. [phone]
Seeding Contractor
15%
River Works, Inc.
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200
UT1B
Cary, NC 27518
UT1 C
Contact:
UT1D
Will Pedersen, Tel. [phone]
Seed Mix Sources
Mellow Marsh Farm, 919 - 742 -1200
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Mellow Marsh Farm, 919 - 742 -1200
International Paper, 1- 888 - 888 -7159
Monitoring Performers
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
5550 Seventy-Seven Center Dr., Ste. 320
Charlotte, NC 28217
Stream Monitoring Point of Contact:
Ian Eckardt, Tel.[phone]
Vegetation Monitoring Point of Contact:
Ian Eckardt, Tel. 704 - 665 -2200
Table 4. Project Backiround
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D05016 -1
Project County:
Mecklenburg County, NC
Drainage Area:
UTl (Reach 1)
0.70 mil
UTl (Reach 2 -5)
1.73 mil
UT1B
0.34 mil
UTl C
0.15mi2
UT1D
0.16 mil
UT2
0.3 mil
U72A
0.1 mil
Estimated Drainage % Impervious Cover:
UTl (Reach 1)
15%
UTl (Reach 2 -5)
12%
UT1B
10%
UT1 C
5%
UT1D
21%
UT2
4%
UT2A
2%
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

Table 4. Proiect Backuound
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D05016 -1
Stream Order:
UTl (Reach 1)
1
UTl (Reach 2 -5)
2
UT1B
1
UT1C
1
UT1D
1
UT2
I
UT2A
1
Physiographic Region
Piedmont
Ecore 'on
Southern Outer Piedmont
Ros en Classification of As -Built
UTl each 1
C/E
UTl each 2 -5
C/E
UT 1 B
C/E
UT1C
C/E
UT I D
C/E
UT2
C/E
UT2A
C/E
Riverine, Upper Perennial,
Cowardin Classification
Unconsolidated Bottom, Cobble -
Gravel
Dominant Soil Types
UTl (Reach 1)
MO
UTl (Reach 2 -5)
MO, Dal), CeD2, PaE
UT1B
MO
UT1C
MO, PaE, CeD2
UT1D
MO, PaE, CeD2
UT2
MO, CeD2
UT2A
MO
Spencer Creek, UT to Spencer
Creek, McDowell Park, Latta
Plantation, McClintock Creek
Reference site ID
(McNair & Stockwood), UT to
Cleghom, UT to Lake Jeanette,
UT to Big Lost Cove
USGS HUC for Project and Reference sites
3050101170040
NCDW Sub -basin for Project and Reference
03 -08 -34
NCDWQ classification for Project and Reference
C
Any portion of any project segment 303d listed?
No
Any portion of any project segment upstream of a
No
303d listed segment?
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor?
N/A
% of project easement fenced
10%
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

1.5 Project Plan
Plans depicting the as -built conditions of the major project elements, location of permanent monitoring
cross - sections, and locations of permanent vegetation monitoring plots are presented in Appendix C of
this report.
2.0 VEGETATION MONITORING
2.1 Soil Data
The soil data for the Site are presented in Table 5.
Table 5. Soil Data for Proiect
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D05016 -1
% Clay on
Series Max Depth in Surface K T OM %
Cecil Sandy Clay Loam (CeD2)
80
20 -35
0.28
5
0.5 -1
Monacan Loam (MO)
80
7 -27
0.43
5
2 -3
Davidson sandy clay loam (DaD)
75
20 -35
0.28
5
0.5 -2
Pacolet sandy loam (PaE)
62
8 -20
0.2
5
0.5 -2
Pacolet sandy loam (PaF)
62
8 -20
0.2
5
0.5-2
(USDA, 2006. Official Soil Series Descriptions: httn: // soils. usda. eov/ technicaYclassification /osd/index.html)
General taxonomy of soils:
Cecil: The Cecil series consists of well - drained soils with moderate permeability on and near
floodplains. They formed in residuum weathered felsic igneous and metamorphic rock, such as granite.
Slopes range from 8 to 15 percent (USDA, 2006. "Soil Taxonomy ").
Monacan: Soils of the Monacan series are deep, moderately well and somewhat poorly drained with
moderate permeability. They formed in recent alluvial sediments of the Piedmont and Coastal Plain.
Slopes are commonly less than 2 percent (USDA, 2006. "Soil Taxonomy ").
Pacolet: The Pacolet series consists of very deep, well drained, moderately permeable soils that formed
in material weathered mostly from acid crystalline rocks of the Piedmont uplands. Slopes commonly are
15 to 25 percent but range up to 2 to 60 percent (USDA, 2006. "Soil Taxonomy ").
Davidson: The Davidson series consists of very deep, well drained moderately permeable soils that
formed in materials weathered from dark colored rocks high in ferromagnesian minerals. These soils are
on gently sloping to moderately steep uplands in the Piedmont. Slopes are commonly 2 to 15 percent but
range up to 25 percent (USDA, 2006. "Soil Taxonomy ").
2.2 Description of Species and Monitoring Protocol
The Site was planted in bottomland hardwood forest species in early — mid March of 2007. There were
24 vegetation - monitoring plots established throughout the planting areas. The following tree species were
planted in the restoration area:
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

Table 6. Tree Saecies Planted
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D05016
-1
ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
FAC Status
1
Alnus serrulata
Tag Alder
FACW+
2
Asimina triloba
Paw paw
FAC
3
Cercis canadensis
Redbud
FACU
4
Celtis laevigata
Sugarberry
FACW
5
Cephalanthus occidentalis
Buttonbush
OBL
6
Cornus amomum
Silky Dogwood
FACW+
7
Cornus florida
Flowering Dogwood
FACU
8
Diospyros virginiana
Persimmon
FAC
9
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
FACW
10
Juglan nigra
Black Walnut
FACU
11
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tulip Poplar
FACW
12
Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore
FACW -
13
Nyssa sylvatica
Blackgum
FAC
14
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
FACW -
15
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
FACW -
16
Quercus rubra
Red Oak
FACU
17
Sambucus candensis
Elderberry
FACW -
18
Viburnum dentatum
Arrow -wood Viburnum
FAC
(USDA, 2007: h_ptt : / /ylants.usda.Lzov)
The following monitoring protocol was designed to predict vegetative survivability. Twenty-four plots
were established throughout the Site. The number of plots was based on the species /area curve method
and their location was based on EEP monitoring guidance. The size of individual plots was 100 square
meters. The locations of the vegetation plots are shown on the as-built plan sheets in Appendix C.
Individual quadrant data provided includes density and coverage quantities. Relative values were
calculated, and importance values were determined. Individual seedlings were marked to ensure that they
can be found in succeeding monitoring years. Mortality was determined from the difference between the
previous year's living, planted seedlings and the current year's living, planted seedlings.
2.3 Vegetation Success Criteria
The interim measure of vegetative success for the Site will be the survival of at least 320 3 -year old
planted trees per acre at the end of year three of the monitoring period. The final vegetative success
criteria will be the survival of 260 5 -year old planted trees per acre at the end of year five of the
monitoring period.
2.4 Results of Vegetative Monitoring
The following table presents the planted stem counts for each of the monitoring plots. Each planted tree
species is identified down the left column, and each plot is identified across the top row. The numbers on
the top row correlate to the vegetation plot IDs. Trees are flagged in the field on an as- needed basis
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

before the flags degrade. Flags are utilized because they will not interfere with the growth of the tree.
Volunteer species are also flagged in this process.
During the initial counts of species totals during the as -built monitoring report, some tree species were
unidentifiable (no buds or leafs) and documented as Unknown Quercus in the stem plot counts or were
labeled incorrectly. During Year 1 vegetative monitoring, three of the four Unknown Quercus were
identified as Quercus michauxii and updated. Tree species that were labeled incorrectly have been
updated and coded within Table 7 to represent the correction.
The average stem count for planted stems per acre for Year 5 monitoring was 470 stems. The range of
planted stems throughout the 24 vegetative monitoring plots was from 120 — 680. The current
survivability rate for Year 5 is 75% based on the initial planting count of 625 stems per acre. The data
reflects that the Site overall has achieved the vegetative success criteria of 260 trees per acre by the end of
year five. The only monitoring plot not to meet success criteria was Plot 9 on UT1 whose Year 5 stems
per acre count is 120. Plot 9 is located in a utility easement. Several volunteer were noted and tagged in
Plot 9. When these volunteers are factored into the stem count for Plot 9 the average stem counts per acre
increases to 480.
Volunteer species were noted in many of the Site's vegetation plots and have been identified and flagged.
When volunteer species are added to the overall stems per acre assessment of the Site the average stem
count increases to 618 stems per acre.
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc. 10
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

Table 7. Year 5 Stem Counts for Each Species Arranged by Plot
Tree Species
Alnus serrulata
Asimina tuiloba
Beaverdam
Plots
Creek
Restoration
Site
: Project
No. D05016
-1
2 2 0 0 0 0 0.0
3
3
2
1
21
18
13
13
10
9
42.9
Cercis canadensis
3
3
1
1
0
0
0.0
Celtis laevigata
Cephalanthus occidentalis
1
1
2
6
3
3
4
4
4
66.7
1
1
1
1
1
0
0.0
Cornus amomum
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
0.0
Cornus Florida
Diospyros virginiana
2
3
0
0
0
0
0.0
1
1
1
3
3
2
2
2
2
66.7
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Juglans nigra
Liriodendron tulipiferra
Platanus occidentalis
4
6
1
1
1
3
3
3
6
5
3
13
2
8
6
1
77
76
75
76
74
75
97.4
1
4
1
1
6
3
2
31
28
21
20
23
21
67.7
1
1
3
1
2
3
2
3
2
1
1
1
1
2
36
29
21
20
22
21
58.3
2
4
4
_1
5
2
1
1
7
4
1
1
54
46
36
35
35
34
63.0
Nyssa sylvatica
Quercus michauxii
2
1
3
3
1
1
1
6
4
2
5
3
3
2
5
2
55
50
46
38
43
44
80.0
1
4
7
2
2
4
1
1
3
3
2
1
5
3
6
2
1
55
57
47
48
48
48
87.3
Quercus phellos
Quercus rubra
Sambucus candensis
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
20
1
20
1
18
3
18
1 2
18
2
19
2
95.0
200.0
I
1
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
Vibernum dentatum
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1 50.0
Ulmus alata
Unknown Ouercus
:,::: ;
0
0
0
0
0
1
100.0
4
1
1
0
0
0
0.0
Stems /plot Year 5
10
9
14
13
12
1 10
14
17
1 3
11
9
13
16
11
12
13
9
14
13
11
12
14
15
7
375
343
290
1 279
284
282
75.2
Stems /acre Year
400
360
560
520
480
400
560
680
120
440
360
520
640
440
480
520
360
560
520
440
480
560
600
280
470
Stems /acre Year
440
360
560
520
520
400
560
680
160
480
360
520
600
440
480
520
320
560
520
440
480
560
600
280
473
Stems /acre Year
440
400
520
520
560
400
480
760
160
480
360
440
640
480
480
560
320
520
520
440
520
560
560
280
475
Average
Stems /acre Year
480
400
600
520
480
400
520
640
280
480
320
520
680
440
480
560
320
520
520
440
520
560
640
280
483
Stems /acre Year1
520
440
520
600
560
480
600
1000
440
560
440
680
720
480
560
600
600
680
520
440
640
680
680
280
572
Average Stems per Acre Tree # 3 -7 was mislabelled as Platanus occidentalis in As -built Initial Counts
for Year 5: 470 Tree # 3 -16 was mislabelled as Liriodendron tulipifera in As -built Initial Counts
Tree # 7 -10 was mislabelled as Asimina tuiloba in As -built Initial Counts
Range of Stems per acre Tree # 7 -2, -3, -4 were mislabelled as Fraxinus pennsylvanica in As -built Initial Counts
for Year 5: 120 - 680 Tree # 14 -5, -8, -10 were labelled as unknown in As -built Initial Counts
Tree # 7 -21 was labelled as Liriodendron tulipifera in the field but was not added in the As -built Initial Counts
Tree # 7 -4 was mislabelled as Quercus michauxii in the Year 1 Monitoring Counts
Tree # 16 -6 was mislabelled as Nyssa sylvatica in the Year 1 Monitoring Counts
Tree # 9 -1 was incorrectly counted as Cercis canadensis instead of Cornus amomum in the Year 1 Monitoring Counts
Tree # 8 -10 was mislabelled as Quercus phellos in the As -built Initial Counts
v Tree # 1 -6 was mislabelled as Quercus phellos in the As -built Initial Counts
Tree 4 -2 and 4 -4 were mislabelled as Plantanus occidentalis and Fraxinus pennsylvanica respectively through Year 3 monitoring.
Tree 9 -5 was mislabelled as Cephalanthus occidentalis through Year 4 Monitoring
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

Table 7A depicts the woody volunteer species that were identified and flagged.
Table 7A. Volunteers within Monitoring Plots
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D05016 -1
Scientific Name
Common Name
Plot #
Stems Counted
UT1 Plots
Betula nigra
River Birch
11
3
Cornus amomum
Silky Dogwood
9
2
Liquidambar styraciva
Sweetgum
12
1
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tulip poplar
11
2
17
2
Nyssa sylvatica
Blackgum
14
2
Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore
12
1
13
6
14
3
17
7
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
11
1
Quercus rubra
Red Oak
12
1
Salix nigra
Black Willow
9
1
Ulmus alata
Winged Elm
9
6
UT2 Plots
Acer negundo
Box Elder
5
1
Betula nigra
River Birch
7
2
Liquidambar styraciva
Sweetgum
1
1
2
10
3
10
5
5
7
2
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tulip poplar
1
2
5
1
7
2
Nyssa sylvatica
Blackgum
3
1
Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore
2
1
4
1
5
3
6
1
7
1
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
3
1
7
1
Ulmus americana
American Elm
4
1
Pinus sp.
Unknown Pine
2
3
5
2
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc. 12
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

2.5 Vegetation Observations
Overall the stream -side and floodplain vegetation has continued to successfully establish throughout the
project area. Maintenance work conducted and documented during 2009 has remained stable. Vegetation
has reestablished within the sewer line that was installed by Mecklenburg County during the spring of
2009. The sewer line crosses UT1 at Station 76 +60. Additional plantings, using 3- gallon container
plants, were installed in early April 2011 within lower density areas of the project: Along the upstream
section of UT2A, the downstream section of UT2, and within the power line easement along UT
Volunteer species continue to become established within the easement area, many of which have been
documented within the monitoring plots and discussed in Section 2.4 and recorded in Table 7A.
2.6 Vegetation Problem Areas
Invasive species are present but minimal throughout the project area. Areas of Russian olive (Elaeagnus
augustifolia) are present along UT1 and UT2; but mostly occur in the tree save areas where existing
woody vegetation was preserved during construction. Invasive species treatment will be conducted in
early 2012 and will continue to be treated as needed through project close -out.
2.7 Vegetation Conclusions
The site was planted with native riparian vegetation in March 2007 within the designated areas of the
conservation easement as described in the project as-built record drawings. There were 24 vegetation
monitoring plots established throughout the restoration site. The data reflect that the overall site had
earlier met the minimum success interim criteria of 320 trees per acre by the end of Year 3 and has now
me the final success criteria of 260 trees per acre by the end of Year 5 as specified in the Mitigation Plan.
Additionally, some areas of established large canopy trees were preserved throughout the easement.
Invasive species, predominantly Russian olive, are present within the easement, but have had minimal
impact therefore allowing planted vegetation to become established.
2.8 Vegetation Photos
Photos of the project showing the on -site vegetation are included in Appendix A of this report.
3.0 STREAM MONITORING
3.1 Description of Stream Monitoring
To document the stated success criteria, the following monitoring program was instituted following
construction completion on the Site:
Bankfull Events: The occurrence of bankfull events within the monitoring period was documented by the
use of two automated stage recorders. The University of North Carolina (UNCC) installed and monitored
the readings from both stage recorders. Gauging station BD2 was installed on UT1 and gauging station
BD3 was installed on UT2. Each data logger recorded the watermark at 15 minute intervals at each
station and was checked at each Site visit to determine if a bankfull event had occurred. Photos of the
bankfull events were not available from UNCC. Figure 4 shows the locations of the stage recorders.
Cross - Sections: Two permanent cross - sections were installed per 1,000 LF of stream restoration work,
with one located at a riffle cross - section and one located at a pool cross - section. Twenty-four total cross -
sections were established. Each cross - section was marked on both banks with permanent pins to establish
the exact transect used. A common benchmark was used for cross - sections and consistently referenced to
facilitate comparison of year -to -year data. The annual cross - sectional survey included points measured at
all breaks in slope, including top of bank, bankfull, inner berm, edge of water, and thalweg, if the features
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc. 13
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

are present. Riffle cross - sections were classified using the Rosgen stream classification system ( Rosgen,
1994). Permanent cross - sections for 2011 (Year 5) were surveyed in October - November 2011.
Longitudinal Profiles: A representative longitudinal profile was surveyed for 2011 (Year 5). The initial
3,617 linear feet of profile was collected for the mainstem reach of UT1. Measurements included
thalweg, water surface, bankfull, and top of low bank. Each of these measurements was taken at the head
of each feature (e.g., riffle, pool, glide). In addition, maximum pool depth was recorded. All survey was
tied to a single permanent benchmark.
Bed Material Analysis: Pebble counts were conducted for the permanent cross - sections (100 counts per
cross - section) on the project reaches. Pebble count data was plotted on a semi -log graph and are included
in Appendix B.
Photo Reference Stations: Photographs were used to visually document restoration success. Fifty-one
(5 1) reference stations were established to document conditions at the constructed grade control structures
across the Site. These photos are provided in Appendix A. The GPS coordinates of each photo station
were noted as additional reference to ensure the same photo location was used throughout the monitoring
period. These stations are included in the As -built Plan Sheets in Appendix C. Reference photos were
taken once per year.
Each streambank was photographed at each permanent cross - section photo station. For each streambank
photo, the photo view line followed a survey tape placed across the channel, perpendicular to flow
(representing the cross - section line). The photograph was framed so that the survey tape is centered in the
photo (appears as a vertical line at the center of the photograph), keeping the channel water surface line
horizontal and near the lower edge of the frame. These photos are presented along with the cross - section
monitoring data in Appendix B.
3.2 Stream Restoration Success Criteria
The approved Mitigation Plan requires the following criteria be met to achieve stream restoration success:
• Bankfull Events: Two bankfull flow events must be documented within the five -year monitoring
period. The two bankfull events must occur in separate years.
• Cross - Sections: There should be little change in as -built cross - sections. If changes to channel cross -
section take place, they should be minor changes representing an increase in stability (e.g., settling,
vegetative changes, deposition along the banks, or decrease in width/depth ratio).
• Longitudinal Profiles: The longitudinal profiles should show that the bedform features are remaining
stable (not aggrading or degrading). The pools should remain deep with flat water surface slopes and
the riffles should remain steeper and shallower than the pools.
• Bed Material Analysis: Pebble counts should indicate maintenance of bed material.
• Photo Reference Stations: Photographs will be used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or
degradation, bank erosion, success of riparian vegetation and effectiveness of erosion control
measures. Photos should indicate the absence of developing bars within the channel, no excessive
bank erosion or increase in channel depth over time, and maturation of riparian vegetation.
3.3 Bankfull Discharge Monitoring Results
On -site data loggers documented the occurrence of two bankfull flow events at each monitoring station
during Year 5 (2011) of the post - construction monitoring period. Table 8 shows bankfull flows that were
documented during each of the five years of monitoring. Maximum stage heights of 6.56 ft and 1.75 ft
were recorded on 5/11/2011 and 4/9/2011 by the data loggers BD2 and BD3, respectively. See Table 8,
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc. 14
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

below, for all bankfull events during monitoring Years 1 — 5. Photos of the bankfull events were not
available for Years 1 — 5.
Table S. Verification of Bankful Events
Beaverdam Creek Restoration
Site: Project No. D05016 -1
Station Number
Date of Data
Collection
Date of Occurrence of
Bankfull Event
Method of Data
Collection
Gage Height
(feet)
BD1
N/A
2/13/2007
Datalogger
2.75
N/A
8/26/2008
Datalogger
5.92
N/A
1/6/2009
Datalogger
5.53
N/A
3/l/2009
Datalogger
6.5
N/A
3/28/2009
Datalogger
5.69
N/A
5/5/2009
Datalogger
6.3
N/A
N/A
5/26/2009
Datalogger
6.66
13132
6/5/2009
Datalogger
6.67
N/A
1/25/2010
Datalogger
7.18
N/A
2/5/2010
Datalogger
6.44
N/A
6/1/2010
Datalogger
6.35
N/A
4/9/2011
Datalogger
5.78
N/A
5/11/2011
Datalogger
6.56
N/A
2/14/2007
Datalogger
0.84
N/A
8/26/2008
Datalogger
0.86
N/A
1/4/2009
Datalogger
0.972
N/A
1/6/2009
Datalogger
1.496
N/A
2/28/2009
Datalogger
1.075
N/A
3/1/2009
Datalogger
1.759
N/A
3/9/2009
Datalogger
0.87
N/A
3/15/2009
Datalogger
1.128
N/A
3/28/2009
Datalogger
1.506
N/A
4/10/2009
Datalogger
1.021
B133
N/A
4/20/2009
Datalogger
0.9
N/A
5/5/2009
Datalogger
1.409
N/A
5/24/2009
Datalogger
1.453
N/A
5/26/2009
Datalogger
1.762
N/A
6/5/2009
Datalogger
1.828
N/A
9/20/2009
Datalogger
0.96
N/A
1/25/2010
Datalogger
2.66
N/A
2/5/2010
Datalogger
2.01
N/A
3/12/2010
Datalogger
1.76
N/A
6/1/2010
Datalogger
1.7
N/A
4/9/2011
Datalogger
1.75
N/A
5/11/2011
Datalogger
1.72
BD5
N/A
2/13/2007
Datalogger
2.54
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc. 15
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

3.4 Stream Monitoring Data and Photos
A photo log of the project showing each of the 51 permanent photo locations is included in Appendix A
of this report. Survey data and photos from each permanent cross - section are included in Appendix B of
this report.
3.5 Stream Stability Assessment
Table 9 presents a summary of the results obtained from the visual inspection of in- stream structures
performed during Year 5 of post - construction monitoring. The percentages noted are a general overall
field evaluation of how the features were performing at the time of the on -site visual stability assessment
on November 18, 2011. These percentages are solely based on the field evaluator's visual assessment at
the time of the site visit.
Visual observations of the various structures throughout Year 5 growing season indicated that structures
were functioning as designed and holding their elevation grade. Rootwads placed on the outside of
meander bends provided bank stability and in- stream cover for fish and other aquatic organisms. Cover
logs placed in meander pool areas allowed scour to keep pools deep and provide cover for fish. During
the Year 5 site visit, remnant scour was observed immediately underneath a few of the cover logs and
other log vane structures. The channel throughout the project has remained largely unchanged through
Year 5.
During the Year 5 assessment two beaver dams were observed for the first time in the project's history.
The dams were located at Stations 10 +20 and 15 +70 of UT1. Log sill structures at Stations 21 +70,
22 +15, 24 +60, and 25 +90 on UT1 had been bypassed either by scour under the structure or failure of the
fabric seal. In addition the right bank immediately below the log sills at 21 +70 and 24 +60 showed signs
of minor bank scour as did root wad structures at station 57 +50, 62 +60, and 68 +60 of UT1. Minor scour
was also observed at the root wad at Station 13 +00 on UT113. Fallen trees and limbs are also present
within some of the project channels. These observations are reflected in minor changes in the
performance scores.
A wildlife removal specialist has been contacted and is currently trapping any on -site beavers. Both dams
have been partially removed to encourage beaver activity and assist in trapping. Complete removal of the
dams will occur after the beavers have been removed from the site. Repairs to minor bank scour areas
along UT 1 will be made using hand tools, as needed. In general, coir logs will be used to help re -seal the
log sill structures and bio- engineering will be implemented at all minor bank erosion areas. Additionally,
any branches and/or trees that have fallen across the channel will be removed during the project's
maintenance activities.
Table 9. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D05016 -1
Performance Percenta e
Feature
Initial
MY -01
MY -02
MY -03
MY -04
MY -05
Riffles
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Pools
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Thalwe
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
1 100%
Meanders
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
1 99%
Bed General
100%
99%
99%
99%
99%
99%
Vanes / J Hooks etc.
100%
97%
95%
97%
98%
96%
Wads and Boulders
100%
100%
100%
100%
99%
97%
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc. 16
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

3.6 Cross - section, Longitudinal Profile, and Bed Material Analysis Monitoring Results
Cross Sections
Year 5 cross - section monitoring data for stream stability were collected during October and November
2011 and compared to as- built, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, and Year 4 conditions.
The 24 permanent cross - sections along the restored channels (12 located across riffles and 12 across
pools) were re- surveyed to document stream dimension at the end of the Year 5 monitoring period.
Cross - sections are provided in Appendix B, and data from the cross - sections are summarized in Appendix
E. Most cross - sections show that there has been minor adjustment to stream dimension within the last
year; with the exception of cross - sections 13 and 15.
Cross - section 13 is located across a pool that has experienced minor degradation during Year 5. This
cross - section has experienced a cyclic pattern of minor degradation and aggradation through the five
years of monitoring. These fluctuations in pool geometry are expected and have not resulted in any
observed channel instability.
Cross - section 15, a riffle, also experienced degradation and similar to X13 this cross - section has exhibited
a cyclic pattern of minor degradation and aggradation during post - construction monitoring. These minor
fluctuations in channel geometry are likely the result of a large in- stream boulder immediately upstream
of X15.
Cross - section 6 on UT2 displayed minor adjustment along the right bank. Field observations revealed no
observable instability.
In general the cross - section data, over the five -year monitoring period, continue to show a dynamic
system that is able to adjust its dimension and maintain stability while accommodating for fluctuations in
external environment inputs.
Longitudinal Profiles
The Year 5 longitudinal profile was conducted during November 2011. The initial 3,617 LF of channel
was surveyed along the mainstem of UTl. The longitudinal profile is included in Appendix B. A
summary of parameters measured are provided in Appendix D. Please note that this summary represents
only the portion of project that was surveyed.
The representative longitudinal profile along the restored channel was resurveyed to document stream
profile at the end of monitoring Year 5. Riffle slopes and pool -to -pool spacing were not calculated for
Reach 1 of UTI because the entire reach is experiencing backwater conditions resulting from a beaver
dam located at Station 15 +70 of UTL
Reaches 2 -5 riffle slopes range from 0.009ft/ft to 0.016 ft/ft are similar to their design values that range
from 0.005 to 0.018 ft/ft. The Year 5 pool -to -pool spacing for Reaches 2 -5 ranges from 61 to 152 ft with
a mean value of 105 ft. These values are similar to the design value range of 101 to 120 ft. Sinuosity for
Reach I of UT 1 was 1.04, which differs slightly from the Year 4 value of 1.05. The sinuosity of Reaches
2 -5 remained the same with a value of 1.3.
Profile remained largely unchanged with a few exceptions where pools had deepened due to scour or
slightly aggraded. Overall pattern shows little to no change.
Bed Material Analysis
Year 5 bed material samples were collected at each permanent cross - section during October and
November 2011. The pebble count data were plotted on a semi -log graph and have been compared
among Year 1 through Year 4 monitoring data. Data indicates maintenance of a coarse bed in constructed
riffles and a relative fining in the pools for the majority of cross - sections. One exception was Cross -
section 2 on UT I. This riffle has displayed an increase in fine bed material. Field observations document
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc. 17
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

a thin layer of fine mud overlying the coarser bed material installed during construction. The finer
sediment has accumulated in backwater conditions due to a beaver dam just downstream of Cross - section
2. The accumulation hasn't affected channel stability. All pebble count data are provided in Appendix B.
4.0 HYDROLOGY
Rainfall data were collected to document the hydrologic conditions throughout the project area in the
2011 growing season. Since no rain gauges were installed within the project boundaries, monthly rainfall
totals were calculated from data downloaded from the Withers Cove USGS gauge 35090308100454 in
Mecklenburg County, NC. Historical rainfall data were collected from the Charlotte WSO AP WETS
Station in Mecklenburg County (NC 1690) using NRCS National Water and Climate Data Center web -
site.
Total rainfall in inches for 2010 - 2011 was less than historical average totals. Monthly rainfall averages
from November and December of 2010 were recorded as below the 30 percentile mark. During the
growing season, rainfall monthly averages did not meet historical averages over 56% of the time. June,
July, November, and December recorded monthly averages below the 30 percentile mark. Hydrologic
monitoring results are shown in Table 10 and Figure 5.
Table 10. Comparison of Historic Rainfall to Observed Rainfall
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site: EEP Contract No. D05016 -1
Month
Average
30%
70%
Observed 2010 -11
Precipitation
January
4.00
3.21
5.15
0.84
February
3.55
2.34
4.42
3.22
March
4.39
3.01
5.54
4.84
April
2.95
1.98
3.73
3.80
May
3.66
2.33
4.29
3.39
June
3.42
2.43
4.68
3.96
July
3.79
2.49
4.76
1.81
August
3.72
2.34
4.57
1.74
September
3.83
2.00
4.68
5.65
October
3.66
1.80
4.49
2.97
November
3.36
2.51
4.24
1.28
December
3.18
2.11
3.81
1.08
Total Rainfall
43.51
28.55
54.36
34.58
(NRCS National Climate and Water Center, 2003 and USGS, 2011)
Monthly rainfall data was calculated based on rainfall data from 11/1/10 - 10/31/11 using the nearest USGS rain gauge
data (USGS 35090308100454 Withers Cove in Mecklenburg County) to the project site. (USGS, 2011)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc. 18
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

Figure 5. Historic Average vs. Observed Rainfall
Comparison of Historic.Averagevs. Observed Rainfall
6.00
y {.00 — —
u 4.00 —
3.00
'►. 2.00
a 1.00 —
0.00
�r �6 Jam:
4 IF 5�Q O
Month
5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Vegetation Monitoring
Average
70%
-30%
Observed 2010 -11
Precipitation
Vegetation monitoring efforts have documented that the average number of stems per acre on site to be
470, which is a survival rate of 75% based on the initial planting count of 625 stems per acre. The Site
has achieved the final vegetative success criteria of at least 260 stems per acre at Year 5. Russian olive
stands are present but have had minimal impact on vegetative establishment. Invasive species treatment
will be conducted in early 2012 and will continue to be treated as needed through project close -out.
Stream Monitoring
The total length of stream channel restored and/or preserved on the Site was 15,806 linear feet. This
entire length was inspected during Year 5 of the monitoring period (2011) to assess stream performance.
Based on the data collected, riffles, pools, and other constructed features along the restored channel are
stable and functioning as designed. Minor bed scour, the result of a large storm event shortly after
construction was complete, was noted at isolated pockets along UT but has changed little. A few log sill
structures should be resealed along UT1 to restore functionality and a few root wads should also be
repaired along UT 1 and UT 1 B.
Hand tools will be used to repair minor bank scour areas and re -seal log sill structures along UT1 by
install bio- engineering measures and coir logs. While the minor scour areas are not considered to have
resulted in any long term stability issues for the project, it is felt that it best to address these minor issues,
now during the dormant season when bio - engineering feasible, as opposed to waiting until next spring at
project close out when these measures would not be an available option. Any fallen trees or branches
lying across the stream channel are currently not affecting channel stability but will be removed so not to
cause future channel degradation and/or back up water.
Hydrologic Monitoring
Overall, the lack of problem areas along the length of the restored channel through five years of post -
construction monitoring supports the functionality of the design. It is expected that stability and in-
stream habitat of the system will continue to improve in the coming years as permanent vegetation
matures. The Site has achieved the stream stability success criteria specified in the Restoration Plan.
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc. 19
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

6.0 WILDLIFE OBSERVATIONS
During the Year 5 monitoring activities frogs, turtles, small fish, a red tail hawk, and the carcass of a full
grown bobcat were observed at the Site. Deer and raccoon tracks were also commonly observed. Two
dams at Stations 10 +20 and 15 +70 on UT1 indicate the presence of beavers. A wildlife removal
specialist is currently trapping any on -site beavers. Currently both dams have been partially removed to
encourage beaver activity and assist in trapping. Complete removal of the beaver dams will occur once
the beavers have been removed from the site. No beaver activity was documented prior to Year 5 of
monitoring.
7.0 REFERENCES
Rosgen, D.L. 1994. A Classification of Natural Rivers. Catena 22:169 -199.
Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Pagosa Springs, CO: Wildland Hydrology Books.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS).
2006. Soil Series Descriptions. hU: / /soils.usda.gov / technical /classification/osd/index.html
USDA. NRCS. 2006. Soil Taxonomy, A Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting
Soil Surveys. ftp : / /ftp- fc.sc.egov.usda.gov/NSSC /Soil Taxonomy /tax.pdf
USDA. NRCS. 2003. Climate Information for Mecklenburg County in the State of North Carolina (1971-
2000). TAPS Station: CHARLOTTE WSO AP, NC1690
fti)://ftp.wcc.nres.usda. og v/support/climate /taps /nc /37119.txt
USDA, NRCS. 2007. The PLANTS Database (28 November 2007). National Plant Data Center, Baton
Rouge, LA 70874 -4490 USA. ba: / /plants.usda.gov
U.S. Geological Service (USGS). 2011. Real -Time Data for North Carolina - Precipitation USGS Water -
Data Site Information for North Carolina. USGS 35090308100454 Withers Cove in Mecklenburg
County, NC. Retrieved on 2011 -11 -09 09:11:35 EST.
hgp://waterdata.usgs.gov/nc/nwis/current/?Wefprecip&Uomp key = county cd
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc. 20
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

FIGURES

CATAWBA 03 -08 -33
CAT
BA
a°
Project Site o
OM
Z'
YADKIN
03 -07 -04
Charlotte
N 03- 07-12
AWBA 03 -08 -38 i YADKIN 03rW-14
Map Vicinity
LEGEND EEP Contract No.: D05016 -1
Figure 1: Project Vicinity Map
Ei lal ment
vrasrtwr
-
Meddl bu gCounty, NC
O HQC ® Counties
DWQ Sub -basin
4 z o < �
December 2011 �
Beaverdam Creek
Year 5 Monitoring
Mecklenburg County, NC
�

The site can be accessed from
Dixie River Road (UT1 to the north
and UT2 to the south) 1.5 miles
northeast of the intersection with
Steele Creek Road.
0
NO
Bro n (� l)i \_L_ ✓� /tea`' (f r �; �.t �\� •• 9 �i },i �..
Ee
68 -�,'l�� 1' �� --�� �' /S \.Jf' - -�1 •yam ry ,' � ��_m ij\ � ��. w � "�l
,,!, f:i 1, -,, •� ��;. \� i :, �Sj` ,,P/��; >;
1 1
i6e 1 '"���,- %! A (�.�J .. /iii �" •1 i„
1 •e
0_ F' S Jan T /�.i � -�' � •� \ �,`` �� � r� 't' ��
Map Vicinity EEP Contract No.: D05016 -1 Figure 2: Site Topographic
t - - -- LEGEND Map
�^
[=Project Watershed Boundary - Creeks
Beaverdam Creek
- Project Reaches -Roads Year 5 Monitoring
Mecklenburg County, NC
eoo 1,600 3,200
PROGR<M Feet
A✓ M w Coun NC
December 2011

APPENDIX A
Photo Log

PHOTO LOG - UT1
UT1 - PID 1
UTI - PID 3
UTI - PID 5
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
UTI - PID 2
UT1 - PID 4
UT1 - PID 6

PHOTO LOG - UT1
UT1- PID 7
UT1 - PID 9
UT1- PID 11
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
UT1- PID 8
UT1 - PID 10
UT1- PID 12

PHOTO LOG - UT1
UT1 - PID 13
UT1 - PID 15
UT1 - PID 17
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
UT1- PID 14
UT1 - PID 16
UT1- PID 18

PHOTO LOG - UT1
UT1- PID 19
UT1 - PID 21
UT1- PID 23
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
UT1 - PID 20
UT1 - PID 22

PHOTO LOG - UT1B, UT1C, & UT1D
UT1B - PID 1
UT1B - PID 3
UT1B - PID 5
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
UT1B - PID 2
UT1B - PID 4
UT1C - PID 6

PHOTO LOG - UT1B, UT1C, & UT1D
UT1C - PID 7
UT1C - PID 9
UT1D - PID 11
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
UTIC - PID 8
UT1D - PID 10
UT1D - PID 12

PHOTO LOG - UT2 & UT2A
UT2 - PID 1
UT2 - PID 3
UT2 - PID 5
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
UT2 - PID 2
UT2 - PID 4
UT2 - PID 6

PHOTO LOG - UT2 & UT2A
UT2 - PID 7
UT2 - PID 9
UT2 - PID I 1
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
UT2 - PID 8
UT2 - PID 10
UT2 - PID 12

PHOTO LOG - UT2 & UT2A
UT2A - PID 1
UT2A - PID 3
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
UT2A - PID 2
UT2A - PID 4

VEG PLOT PHOTOS - UT1 & UT1B - UT1D
UT1 — Veg Plot 1
UT1 — Veg Plot 3
UT1— Veg Plot 5
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
UT1 — Veg Plot 2
UT — Veg Plot 4
UT — Veg Plot 6

VEG PLOT PHOTOS - UT1 & UT1B - UT1D
UT1 — Veg Plot 7
UT1— Veg Plot 9
UT1 — Veg Plot 11
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
UT1 — Veg Plot 8
UT1 — Veg Plot 10
UT1 — Veg Plot 12

VEG PLOT PHOTOS — UT1 & UT1B — UT1D
UT1— Veg Plot 13
UT1B — Veg Plot 15
UT11) — Veg Plot 17
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
UT1— Veg Plot 14
UT1C — Veg Plot 16

VEG PLOT PHOTOS — UT2 & UT2A
UT2A — Veg Plot 1
UT2 — Veg Plot 3
UT2 — Veg Plot 5
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
UT2A — Veg Plot 2
UT2 — Veg Plot 4
UT2 — Veg Plot 6

VEG PLOT PHOTOS — UT2 & UT2A
UT2 — Veg Plot 7
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

PHOTO LOG — Additional Site Photos
UT — Beaver dam at Station 10 +20
r9t"r�s t ;
i
UT1— Beaver dam at Station 15 +70
I"
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
UT'1 — Beaver lodge at 14 +10
UT1B — Red tail hawk at X4 Riffle

APPENDIX B
STREAM MONITORING DATA

UT1 Permanent Cross Section X1
(Year 5 Monitoring Data - collected October 2011)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
Stream
BKF
Max BKF
TOB
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
Depth
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
Elev
Pool
27.2
18.5
1.47
3.05
12.58
1
599.62
599.62
X1 Pool
605
603
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
601
a
0
- --
cc
> 599
W
597
595
-- o-- Bankfull
-- -- -Floodprone — —As Built
Year 1
Year 2
—)t —Year 3 -—Year 4
° Year 5
593
100
110
120 130 140 150
160 170
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

UT1 Permanent Cross Section X2
(Year 5 Monitoring Data - collected October 2011)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
Stream
BKF
BKF
Max BKF
TOB
Feature
Type
BKF Area
Width
Depth
Depth
WID I
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elcv
h.ICv
Riffle
C/E
18.8
13
1.45
2.16
8.96
1
5.7
598.94
598.94
X2 Riffle
602
601
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
600
599
—
a
0
598
w
597
596
-- --- Bankfull
--4- Floodprone As Built
—$--Year 1
595
—�t —Year 2
—X —Year
3 Year 4
--- Year 5
594
100
110
120
130
140 150
160 170
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

UT1B Permanent Cross Section X3
(Year 5 Monitoring Data - collected October 2011)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
Stream
BKF
Max BKF
TOB
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
Depth
Depth
_ W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
Elev
Pool
17.6
15.51
1.14
2.48
13.64
1
599.71
599.71
X3 Pool
603
602
601
600
Jf
599
ca
d
w
598
597
596
- &--Bankfull
Floodprone - As Built Year 1
595
—Year 2
--X—Year 3
Year 4 Year 5
594
100 110
120 130
140 150 160 170
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

UT1B Permanent Cross Section X4
(Year 5 Monitoring Data - collected October 2011)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
Stream
BKF
Max BKF
TOB
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
Depth
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
Elev
Riffle
C/E
14.5
10.86
1.34
2.5
8.13
1
6.9
599.67
599.67
X4 Riffle
603
602
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
601
600
-------- - - - - --
J✓
> 599
w
598
597
----- Bankfull
-- - --Floodprone — - -As Built
-- - -Year 1
596
— Year 2
--E —Year 3
— Year 4
Year 5
595
100 110
120 130
140 150
160 170
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

UTI Permanent Cross Section X5
(Year 5 Monitoring Data - collected October 2011)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Bcavcrdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
Stream
BKF
Max BKF
TOB
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
Depth
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
Elev
Riffle
C/E
22.2
15.33
1.45
2.06
10.6
1
4.9
597.92
597.92
X5 Riffle
601
600
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
599
c598
------------------------
0
'G
597
W
596
595
--�- Bankfull
-- - -- Floodprone – As Built
--*—Year 1
594
— N Year 2
--)4—Year 3
Year 4
- --Year 5
593
100 110
120 130
140 150
160 170
Station
Bcavcrdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

UT1 Permanent Cross Section X6
(Year 5 Monitoring Data - collected October 2011)
Looking; at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
Stream
BKF
Max BKF
TOB
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
Depth
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
Elev
Pool
45.9
24.47
1.88
3.97
13.04
1
597.09
597.09
X6 Pool
602
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
600
598
._
o
"
rr
596
,>,
w
594
I
I
592
- - -- Bankfull
--¢- Floodprone — e As Built
--*--Year 1
mot— Year 2
--)F Year 3
--#-- Year 4
Year 5
590
100 110
120 130
140 150
160 170
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

UT1C Permanent Cross Section X7
(Year 5 Monitoring Data - collected October 2011)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Stream BKF Max BKF I I TOB
Feature Type IBKFArea I BKF Width I Depth Depth WiD 113HRatiol ER I BKF Elev Elev
Riffle C 7.2 10.79 0.66 0.96 16.26 1 6.5 594.82 594.82
X7 Riffle
597.5
596.5
595.5
c
0
y
594.5
W
593.5
592.5
591.5
100 110 120
130 140 150 160 170
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

UT1C Permanent Cross Section X8
(Year 5 Monitoring Data - collected October 2011)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
Stream
BKF
Max BKF
TOB
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
Depth
Depth
W/D
B11 Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
Elev
Pool
30.4
13.42
2.26
2.79
5.93
1
593.37
593.37
X8 Pool
597
596
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
595
594
0 593
---------------------
d 592
w
591
590
589
-- - -- Bankfull
Floodprone - - As Built
--4 Year 1
588
—x-- Year 2
--F Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
587
100 110
120 130
140 150
160 170
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

UT1 Permanent Cross Section X9
(Year 5 Monitoring Data - collected October 2011)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
Stream
BKF
Max BKF
TOB
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
Depth
Depth
W/D
13H Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
Elev
Riffle
C
28.3
17.96
1.58
2.67
11.39
1
4.2
590.64
590.64
X9 Riffle
594
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -o
593
592
591
590
Gj 589
588
587
- -� Bankfull
-- - --Floodprone - - -* - As Built
Year 1
586_
Year 2
—X-- Year 3 --*—Year 4
—Year 5
585
100 110
120 130 140 150
160 170
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

UT1 Permanent Cross Section X10
(Year 5 Monitoring Data - collected October 2011)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
s: 1� MIN
w�
_. OW-
Pool
45.5 22.04 2.06 4.03 10.68 1 588.69 588.69
X10 Pool
595
593 - - - - - - - -- - - - -- - - -- - ------ --- - --- -- --- --- - - - -- -- ---- - - -- --- --- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - -- -- -
591
589
y -- -- ------- ---------------- - -- --- -
W 587
r
585
-- -9--- Bankfill Floodprone —x As Built --4 Year
583
— Year 2 -E —Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
581
100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

UT1D Permanent Cross Section X11
(Year 5 Monitoring Data - collected October 2011)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Stream BKF Max BKF I I TOB
Feature Type BKF Area I BKF Width I Depth Depth WID B ER I BKF Elev Elev
Pool 13.5 15.94 0.85 1.77 18.82 1 589.98 1 589.98
X11 Pool
593
592
591
590
0
0
589
W 588
587
586
585
584
-4 Bankfull
- --9 ---Floodprone
x As Built
—♦ —Year 1
— N Year 2
—44 —Year 3
tYear 4
Year 5
100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

UT I D Permanent Cross Section X12
(Year 5 Monitoring Data - collected October 2011)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
Stream
BKF
Max BKF
TOB
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width �
Depth
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio 1
ER
BKF Elev
Elev
Riffle
C
6
1098
0.55
0.89
19.93
1
6.9
589.01
589.01
X12 Riffle
590.5
590
0 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
e
589.5
-
589
-----------------
588.5
588
587.5
Bankfull
--- Floodprone —As Built
--*---Year 1
587
Year 2
--)+—Year 3 4 Year 4
Year 5
586.5
1
1
100
110
120 130 140 150
160 170
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

UT1 Permanent Cross Section X13
(Year 5 Monitoring Data - collected October 2011)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
Stream
1
BKF
Max BKF
TOB
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
Depth
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
Elev
Pool
82
28.36
2.89
7.16
9.81
1
586.76
586.76
X13 Pool
596
594
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
592
590
°0 588
-- - - ----
d 586i�
W
584
582
580
578
---9 ---
--- 0---Floodprone —X As Built
--I Year
-- Year 2
--E —Year 3
t Year 4
Year 5
576
100 110
120 130
140 150
160 170
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

UT1 Permanent Cross Section X14
(Year 5 Monitoring Data - collected October 2011)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
Stream
BKF
Max BKF
TOB
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
Depth
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
Elev
Riffle
C
42.7
21.56
1.98
3.73
10.87
1
3.5
585.26
585.26
X14 Riffle
591
- --
589
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- - - - -o
587
C
O
585
_d
W
583
581
__ Bankfull
-- --- Floodprone o As Built
—�-- Year 1
—Year 2
—>* —Year 3
tYear4
W°- -Year 5
579
100 110
120 130
140 150
160 170
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

UT1 Permanent Cross Section X15
(Year 5 Monitoring Data - collected October 2011)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Stream BKF Max BKF I I TOB
Feature Type BKF Area I BKF Width Depth Depth W/D JBHRatiol ER BKF Elev Elev
Riffle C 50.2 26.78 1.88 4.13 14.28 1 2.9 579.54 1 579.54
X15 Riffle
586
584
582
a
580
w
578
576
574
572
--�--Bankfull Floodprone —) —As Built Year 1
—a— Year 2 —X--Year 3 —4—Year 4 Year 5
100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

UT1 Permanent Cross Section X16
(Year 5 Monitoring Data - collected October 2011)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
Stream
BKF
Max BKF
TOB
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
Depth
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
Elev
Pool
46.6
23.88
1.95
3.78
12.24
1
577.06
577.06
X16 Pool
582
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- - - --o
580
578
-----------------------------------------
--- ---
v 576
W
574
572
Fl----Bankfull
-- - --Floodprone —x As Built
--*--Year 1
Year 2
--X—Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
570
100 110
120
130 140
150
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

UTl Permanent Cross Section X17
(Year 5 Monitoring Data - collected October 2011)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
Stream
BKF
Max BKF
TOB
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
Depth
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
Elev
Pool
22.1
21.07
1.05
2.91
20.08
1
573.74
573.74
X17 Pool
579
-- -- - --
577
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- - - --o
575
e
0
573
W
571
569
--4 -- Bankfull
- --e--- Floodprone — )E — As Built
—*--Year l
—*-- Year 2
--X— Year 3
--*—Year 4
Year 5
567
100 110
120 130
140 150
160
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

UT1 Permanent Cross Section X18
(Year 5 Monitoring Data - collected October 2011)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
Stream
BKF
Max BKF
TOB
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
Depth
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
Elev
Riffle
C
34
24.14
1.41
2.88
17.15
1
3.3
574.33
574.33
X18 Riffle
578
—
577
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
576
575
Nis
G 574
to.*4
-------------------------------
�a
W 573
572
571
- -4 -- Bankfull -- --- Floodprone — — As Built —*--Year 1
570
*— Year 2 --X—Year 3 --* —Year 4 —Year 5
569
100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

UT2A Permanent Cross Section X1
(Year 5 Monitoring Data - collected October 2011)
Looking at the Left Bank
Stream BKF Max BKF I TOB
Feature I Type 1BKFArea I BKF Width I Depth Depth I W/D IBHRatiol ER I BKF Elev Elev
Riffle C 9.4 12.44 0.75 1.11 16.53 1 3.2 1 612.75 612.75
X1 Riffle
615
614
°0 613
a
W
612
611
610 4-
100
--�- Bankfull Floodprone X- As Built ---*--Year l
— Year 2 Year 3 --+— Year 4 Year 5
105 110 115 120
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
125 130 135 140
i
•.
•1- _ -..:c ��" -mow.
Y i.+
Looking at the Right Bank
Stream BKF Max BKF I TOB
Feature I Type 1BKFArea I BKF Width I Depth Depth I W/D IBHRatiol ER I BKF Elev Elev
Riffle C 9.4 12.44 0.75 1.11 16.53 1 3.2 1 612.75 612.75
X1 Riffle
615
614
°0 613
a
W
612
611
610 4-
100
--�- Bankfull Floodprone X- As Built ---*--Year l
— Year 2 Year 3 --+— Year 4 Year 5
105 110 115 120
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
125 130 135 140

UT2A Permanent Cross Section X2
(Year 5 Monitoring Data - collected October 2011)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
Stream
BKF
Max BKF
TOB
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
Depth
Depth
W/D
Bl1 Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
Elev
Pool
19.3
19.99
0.96
1.84
20.72
1
611.59
611.59
X2 Pool
614
613
612
o'
ti------------------------------------------------------
- - -
---- �•� -
611
w
610
609
o- Bankfull
-- - --Floodprone — - As Built
Year 1
—Year 2
--)(--Year 3
tYear 4
Year 5
608
100 105
110 115
120 125 130 135
140
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

UT2 Permanent Cross Section X3
(Year 5 Monitoring Data - collected October 2011)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
Stream
BKF
Max BKF
BKF
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
Depth
Depth
D
BH Ratio
ER
Elev
TOB Elev
Riffle
C
11.6
17.43
0.67
1.07
!26.1
1
2.3
622.99
622.99
X3 Riffle
625
-- -
- - - - --
624
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
c
0
------------------------------------
-----------
,�, 623
w
622
- --- Bankfull
Floodprone - As Built --*—Year 1
— — Year 2
--E —Year 3
—♦ —Year 4 Year 5
621
100 105
I10 115
120
125 130 135 140
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

UT2 Permanent Cross Section X4
(Year 5 Monitoring Data - collected October 2011)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
Stream
BKF
Max BKF
BKF
TOB
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
Depth
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
Elev
Elev
Pool
20.4
18.91
1.08
2.15
17.57
1
619.1
619.1
X4 Pool
622
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
621
C
620
619
- -
-- ----------------------------- ----------------------- \r
,
W
618
617
-- -- Bankfull Floodprone - X As Built —*--Year 1
616
— Year 2 --)FYear 3 - 4 Year 4 Year 5
615
100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

UT2 Permanent Cross Section X5
(Year 5 Monitoring Data - collected October 2011)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
Stream
BKF
Max BKF
TOB
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
Depth
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
Elev
Riffle
C
22.6
16.89
1.34
1.98
12.63
1
2.4
585.92
585.92
X5 Riffle
588 i
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
587
586
-----------------------------------------------------
�
W
585
i'
584
t
- -� Bankfull
-- - -Floodprone
— —As Built
—0 Year 1
583
Year 2
--F Year 3 t Year 4
Year 5
582
100 105
110 115 120
125
130 135
140
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

UT2 Permanent Cross Section X6
(Year 5 Monitoring Data - collected October 2011)
Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
Stream
BKF
Max BKF
TOB
Feature
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
Depth
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev.
Elev
Pool
23.5
14.85
1.58
2.45
9.39
1
583.55
583.55
X6 Pool
588
587
586
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- - - -%
585
c
>
584
_ "' r--•.-------------------- _-- _----------- - - - - -- .0
W
583
582
581
-� Bankfull Floodprone - -- As Built
—4o-- Year 1
580
IN Year 2 --E —Year 3 —f —Year 4
Year 5
579
100 105 110 115 120 125
130 135 140
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

610
1 605
600
°0 595
W
590
585
580 4
0
Beaverdam Creek UTl Mainstem Profile (2011 Monitoring)
200 400 600 900 1000 1200 1400 1600 1900 2000
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, Baker EngineeringlRiver Works, Inc.
December 2011. Monitoring Year 5

600
595
590
0
v
W
585
580
Beaverdam Creek UTl Mainstem Profile (2011 Monitoring)
Year 5 Thalweg
■ LTB
-- - -- -- -- -- - -- - - - -- - -- -- _... - _. _.. -- -- ._.- - -..._
RTB
As -Built Thalwcg
- wSF
575 4-
2000
2200 2400 2600
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, Baker Engineering/Rivcr Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
2800 3000
Station
3200 3400 3600 3800 4000

PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: POOL 100 -COUNT
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT:
Beaverdam Creek 5th Year Monitoring
REACH /LOCATION:
UT1 X1 -Pool
DATE COLLECTED:
11/14/2011
FIELD COLLECTION BY:
KS & CT
IDATA ENTRY BY:
DN
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT
Summary
ATERIA PARTICLE
SIZE (mm)
Pool
Class %
% Cum
Silt / Clay
< .063
99
99%
99%
y Very Fine
Fine
s
A Medium
.063-125
99%
.125-.25
1
1 %
100%
.25-50
100%
N
D ti Coarse
.50 - 1.0
100%
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
100%
�^ Very Fine
Very Fine
Fine
G
R Fine
0 v Medium
E Medium
L
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2.0-2.8
100%
2.8-4.0
100%
4.0-5.6
100%
5.6-8.0
100%
8.0 - 11.0
100%
11.0 - 16.0
100%
16.0-22.6
100%
22.6-32
100%
32-45
100%
45-64
100%
OO Small
Small
64-90
100%
90- 128
128-180
100%
100%
Large
OQ Large
180-256
100%
Small
Small
256-362
100%
362-512
512-1024
100%
100%
Medium
Large -Very Large
1024-2048
100%
Bedrock
> 2048
100%
Total
100
100%
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
c
L
50%
fY
y
h
40%
U
30%
20%
10%
0%
UT1
XI-Pool
Pebble Count Size Class Distribution
■Pool Pebble Data
0.063 0.125 0.25 0.50 1.0 2.0 2.8 4.0 5.6 8.0 11.3 16.0 22.6 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048 5000
Particle Size Class (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
L
C
y 50%
c
u
L
Y
a 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01
UT1
X1-Pool
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
t Pool Data
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: RIFFLE 100 -COUNT
Largest particles:
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
140 mm
(riffle)
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT:
Beaverdam Creek 5th Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION:
UT1 X2 -Ride
DATE COLLECTED:
11/14/2011
FIELD COLLECTION BY:
KS & CT
IDATA ENTRY BY:
DN
Largest particles:
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
140 mm
(riffle)
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT
Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE
SIZE (mm)
Riffle
Class %
% Cum
Silt / Clay
< .063
84
84%
84%
Very Fine
.063-125
84%
Fine
S
.125 -.25
1
1%
85%
A Medium
N
D Coarse
Very Coarse
.25 -.50
85%
.50-1.0
85%
1.0-2.0
85%
Very Fine
0�Very Fine
Fine
G
R Fine
O V Medium
E Medium
L
S0 Coarse
CCoarse
Very Coarse
O Very Coarse
2.0-2.8
85%
2.8-4.0
85%
4.0-5.6
85%
5.6-8.0
85%
8.0-11.0
85%
11.0 - 16.0
85%
16.0-22.6
85%
22.6-32
85%
32-45
2
2%
87%
45-64
3
3%
90%
Small
64-90
5
5%
95%
Small
90-128
4
4%
99%
oQ
Large
128-180
1
1 %
100%
Large
180-256
100%
Small
256-362
100%
Small
362-512
100%
Medium
512-1024
100%
Large -Very Large
1024-2048
100%
Sam
Bedrock
> 2048
100%
Total
100
100%
Largest particles:
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
140 mm
(riffle)

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
u
50%
y
y
U 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
UT1
X2 -Riffle
Pebble Count Size Class Distribution
■Riffle Pebble Data
0.063 0.125 0.25 0.50 1.0 2.0 2.8 4.0 5.6 8.0 11.3 16.0 22.6 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048 5000
Particle Size Class (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
-+ -Riffle Data
90%
80%
70%
60%
L
u
C
LL
C 50%
C7
u
L
0* 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01
UT1
X2 -Riffle
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: POOL 100 -COUNT
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT:
Beaverdam Creek 5th Year Monitoring
REACH /LOCATION:
UT1B X3 -Pool
DATE COLLECTED:
11/14/2011
FIELD COLLECTION BY:
KS & CT
IDATA ENTRY BY:
DN
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT
Summary
ATERIA
PARTICLE
SIZE (mm)
Pool
Class
Silt / Clay
< .063
65
65%
65%
s y
A ti
Very Fine
.063-.125
7
7%
72%
Fine
.125 - .25
17
17%
89%
Medium
.25-.50
11
11%
100%
N
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
100%
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
100%
G
G
V
L
O
C
Very Fine
2.0-2.8
100%
Very Fine
2.8-4.0
100%
Fine
4.0-5.6
100%
Fine
5.6-8.0
100%
Medium
8.0 - 11.0
100%
Medium
11.0-16.0
100%
Coarse
16.0-22.6
100%
Coarse
22.6-32
100%
Very Coarse
32-45
100%
Very Coarse
45-64
100%
OO
Small
64-90
100%
Small
90-128
100%
OQ
Large
128-180
100%
Large
180-256
100%
Small
256-362
100%
Small
362-512
100%
Medium
512-1024
100%
Large -Very Large
1024-2048
100%
Bedrock
> 2048
100%
Total
100
100%
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
u
y 50%
a
h
y
U 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
UT1B
X3 -Pool
Pebble Count Size Class Distribution
■Pool Pebble Data
0.063 0.125 0.25 0.50 1.0 2.0 2.8 4.0 5.6 8.0 11.3 16.0 22.6 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048 5000
Particle Size Class (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
tPool Data
90%
80%
70%
60%
L
c
50%
C,
U
L
a- 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01
UT1B
X3 -Pool
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: RIFFLE 100 -COUNT
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT:
Beaverdam Creek 5th Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION:
UT1B X4 -Riffle
DATE COLLECTED:
11/14/2011
FIELD COLLECTION BY:
KS & CT
DATA ENTRY BY:
DN
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT
Summary
ATERIA
PARTICLE
SIZE (mm)
Riffle
Class
Silt / Clay
<.063
45
45%
1 45%
y
s
A y
Very Fine
.063-125
30
30%
75%
Fine
.125-.25
23
23%
98%
Medium
.25-.50
1
1%
99%
N
D
162
Coarse
.50 - 1.0
1
1%
100%
Very Coarse
1.0 - 2.0
100%
O
G
R
V
E
L
O
C
n O
Very Fine
2.0-2.8
100%
Very Fine
2.8-4.0
100%
Fine
4.0-5.6
100%
Fine
5.6-8.0
100%
Medium
8.0 - 11.0
100%
Medium
11.0 - 16.0
100%
Coarse
16.0-22.6
100%
Coarse
22.6-32
100%
Very Coarse
32-45
100%
Very Coarse
45-64
100%
00
Small
64-90
100%
Small
90- 128
100%
0�
Large
128- 180
100%
Large
180-256
100%
Small
256-362
100%
Small
362-512
100%
Medium
512-1024
100%
Large -Very Large
1024-2048
100%
Bedrock
> 2048
100%
Total
100
100%
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
u
50%
a
y
y
R
U 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
UT1B
X4 -Riffle
Pebble Count Size Class Distribution
I ■Riffle Pebble Data I
0.063 0.125 0.25 0.50 1.0 2.0 2.8 4.0 5.6 8.0 11.3 16.0 22.6 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048 5000
Particle Size Class (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
—� —Riffle Data
90%
80%
70%
60%
L
u
c
50%
U
L
a 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01
UT1 B
X4- Riffle
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: RIFFLE 100 -COUNT
Largest particles
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
190 mm
(riffle)
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT:
Beaverdam Creek 5th Year Monitoring
REACH /LOCATION:
UT1 X5 -Riffle
DATE COLLECTED:
11/14/2011
FIELD COLLECTION BY:
KS & CT
IDATA ENTRY BY:
DN
Largest particles
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
190 mm
(riffle)
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT
Summary
ATERIA PARTICLE
SIZE (mm)
Riffle
Class
Silt / Clay
< .063
22
22% 1
22%
« Very Fine
Fine
s
n Medium
N
D Coarse
.063-125
3
3%
25%
.125-25
4
4%
29%
.25-50
7
7%
36%
.50-1.0
5
5%
41%
M
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
r I
1%
42%
Very Fine
O
Very Fine
Fine
R 0 Fine
V Medium
E Medium
L
Coarse
O
C Coarse
Very Coarse
n 0 Very Coarse
2.0-2.8
42%
2.8-4.0
42%
4.0-5.6
42%
5.6-8.0
42%
8.0 - 11.0
1
1%
43%
11.0-16.0
43%
16.0-22.6
43%
22.6-32
3
3%
46%
32-45
8
8%
540
45-64
7
7%
61%
OO Small
Small
64-90
11
1 I %
72%
90- 128
24
24%
96%
Large
OQ Large
128-180
2
2%
98%
180-256
2
2%
100%
Small
Small
256-362
100%
362-512
100%
F�Medium
Large -Very Large
512-1024
100%
1024-2048
100%
Bedrock
> 2048
1000//0
Total
100
100%
Largest particles
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
190 mm
(riffle)

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
C
u
L
a 50%
H
y
CE
U 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
UTl
X5 -Riffle
Pebble Count Size Class Distribution
1 ■Riffle Pebble Data I
0.063 0.125 0.25 0.50 1.0 2.0 2.8 4.0 5.6 8.0 11.3 16.0 22.6 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048 5000
Particle Size Class (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
L
c_
50%
c
u
t,
y 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
UT1
X5- Riffle
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
—4 Riffle Data
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: POOL 100 -COUNT
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT:
Beaverdam Creek 5th Year Monitoring
REACH /LOCATION:
UT1 X6 -Pool
DATE COLLECTED:
11/14/2011
FIELD COLLECTION BY:
KS & CT
DATA ENTRY BY:
DN
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT
Summary
ATERIA PARTICLE
SIZE (mm)
Pool
Class %
% Cum
Silt / Clay
< .063
76
76%
76%
Very Fine
Fine
s
a Medium
.063-125
6
6%
82%
.125-25
16
16%
98%
.25-50
1
1%
99%
N
o
Coarse
.50-1.0
99%
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
1
1%
100%
Very Fine
�� Very Fine
Fine
G
R Fine
V Medium
E Medium
L
Coarse
OC Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2.0-2.8
2.8-4.0
100%
100%
4.0-5.6
100%
5.6-8.0
100%
8.0 - 11.0
100%
11.0 - 16.0
100%
16.0-22.6
100%
22.6-32
100%
32-45
100%
45-64
100%
00 Small
Small
64-90
100%
90- 128
100%
Large
oQ Large
128-180
100%
180-256
100%
Small
Small
256-362
100%
362-512
100%
F7Medium
Large -Very Large
512- 1024
100%
1024-2048
100%
Bedrock
> 2048
100%
Total
100
100%
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
y
C
u
a 50%
y
y
R
U 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
UT1
X6 -Pool
Pebble Count Size Class Distribution
I ■Pool Pebble Data I
0.063 0.125 0.25 0.50 1.0 2.0 2.8 4.0 5.6 8.0 11.3 16.0 22.6 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048 5000
Particle Size Class (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
—� —Pool Data
90%
80%
70%
60%
L
�L
50%
L
a" 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01
UTl
X6 -Pool
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: RIFFLE 100 -COUNT
Largest particles
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
190 mm
(riffle)
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT:
Beaverdam Creek 5th Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION:
UT1C X7 -Riffle
DATE COLLECTED:
11/14/2011
FIELD COLLECTION BY:
KS & CT
IDATA ENTRY BY:
DN
Largest particles
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
190 mm
(riffle)
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT
Summary
ATERIA PARTICLE
SIZE (mm)
Riffle
Class %
% Cum
Silt / Clay
< .063
36
36%
36%
Very Fine
s y Fine
ti
N ti Medium
.063-125
36%
.125-25
36%
.25-.50
36%
D Coarse
.50 - 1.0
36%
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
36%
�D Very Fine
Very Fine
Fine
G .
G Fine
Medium
V
E Medium
L
t Coarse
O
C Coarse
Very Coarse
0 Very Coarse
2.0-2.8
36%
2.8-4.0
36%
4.0-5.6
36%
5.6-8.0
36%
8.0-11.0
36%
11.0-16.0
36%
16.0-22.6
36%
22.6-32
36%
32-45
4
4%
40%
45-64
5
5%
45%
OO < Small
Small
64-90
15
15%
60%
90-128
128- 180
24
15
24%
15%
84%
99%
Large
OQ Large
180-256
1
1%
100%
Small
Small
256-362
100%
362-512
512- 1024
100%
100%
Medium
Large -Very Large
1024-2048
100%
All Bedrock
> 2048
100%
Total
100
100%
Largest particles
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
190 mm
(riffle)

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
C
u
y 50%
a
y
y
R
U 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
UT1C
X7 -Riffle
Pebble Count Size Class Distribution
I ■Riffle Pebble Data I
0.063 0.125 0.25 0.50 1.0 2.0 2.8 4.0 5.6 8.0 11.3 16.0 22.6 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048 5000
Particle Size Class (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
L
C!
C
50%
b+
v
u
L
a 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
UT1C
X7- Riffle
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
—4 Riffle Data
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: POOL 100 -COUNT
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT:
Beaverdam Creek 5th Year Monitoring
REACH /LOCATION:
UTIC X8 -Pool
DATE COLLECTED:
11/14/2011
FIELD COLLECTION BY:
KS & CT
DATA ENTRY BY:
DN
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT
Summary
ATERIA
PARTICLE
SIZE (mm)
Pool
Class %
% Cum
Silt / Clay
< .063
85
85%
85%
s
A
Very Fine
.063-.125
85%
Fine
.125-25
85%
Medium
.25-.50
85%
N
D
Coarse
.50 - 1.0
85%
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
r
85%
�
R 0
V
E
L
O
C
n
Very Fine
2.0-2.8
85%
Very Fine
2.8-4.0
85%
Fine
4.0-5.6
85%
Fine
5.6-8.0
85%
Medium
8.0 - 11.0
85%
Medium
11.0 - 16.0
85%
Coarse
16.0-22.6
85%
Coarse
22.6-32
85%
Very Coarse
32-45
2
2%
87%
Very Coarse
45-64
1
1%
88%
O
Small
64-90
5
5%
93%
Small
90- 128
4
4%
97%
OQ
Large
128- 180
3
3%
100%
Large
180-256
100%
Small
256-362
100%
Small
362-512
100%
Medium
512-1024
100%
Large -Very Large
1024-2048
100%
Bedrock
> 2048
100%
Total
100
100%
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
a
u
y 50%
y
h
R
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
UTIC
X8 -Pool
Pebble Count Size Class Distribution
■Pool Pebble Data
0.063 0.125 0.25 0.50 1.0 2.0 2.8 4.0 5.6 8.0 11.3 16.0 22.6 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048 5000
Particle Size Class (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
-
--�
--Pool
Data
90%
80%
70%
60%
L
C_
Gz. 50%
C
u
L
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01
UT1C
X8 -Pool
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: RIFFLE 100 -COUNT
Largest particles:
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
220 mm
(riffle)
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT:
Beaverdam Creek 5th Year Monitoring
REACH /LOCATION:
UT1 X9 -Riffle
DATE COLLECTED:
11/14/2011
FIELD COLLECTION BY:
KS & CT
IDATA ENTRY BY:
DN
Largest particles:
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
220 mm
(riffle)
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT
Summary
ATERIA
PARTICLE
SIZE (mm)
Riffle
Class %
% Cum
Silt / Clay
<.063
1
1%
1%
y
s
A y
N
D M
Very Fine
.063-125
1 %
Fine
.125-25
2
2%
3%
Medium
.25-50
4
4%
7%
Coarse
.50 - 1.0
2
2%
9%
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
3
3%
12%
G
G
V
E
L
C
C
n 0 r
Very Fine
2.0-2.8
12%
Very Fine
2.8-4.0
12%
Fine
4.0-5.6
1
1%
13%
Fine
5.6-8.0
13%
Medium
8.0-11.0
13%
Medium
11.0 - 16.0
1
1 %
14%
Coarse
16.0-22.6
14%
Coarse
22.6-32
14%
Very Coarse
32-45
9
9%
23%
Very Coarse
1 45-64
12
12%
35%
O C
Small
64-90
29
29%
64%
Small
90-128
19
19%
83%
OQ
Large
128-180
16
16%
99%
Large
180-256
1
1%
100%
Z:E�
Small
256-362
100%
Small
362-512
100%
Medium
512- 1024
100%
Large -Very Large
1024-2048
100%
Bedrock
> 2048
100%
Total
100
100%
Largest particles:
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
220 mm
(riffle)

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
a
50%
y
y
U 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
UTl
X9 -Riffle
Pebble Count Size Class Distribution
I ■Riffle Pebble Data I
0.063 0.125 0.25 0.50 1.0 2.0 2.8 4.0 5.6 8.0 11.3 16.0 22.6 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048 5000
Particle Size Class (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
L
C
50%
C
u
L
p; 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01
UT1
X9 -Riffle
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
t Riffle Data
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: POOL 100 -COUNT
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT:
Beaverdam Creek 5th Year Monitoring
REACH /LOCATION:
UTI X10 -Pool
DATE COLLECTED:
11/14/2011
FIELD COLLECTION BY:
KS & CT
IDATA ENTRY BY:
DN
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT
Summary
ATERIA PARTICLE
SIZE (mm)
Pool
Class %
% Cum
Silt / Clay
<.063
93
93%
93%
'+ Very Fine
Fine
s
n Medium
.063-125
3
3%
96%
.125-.25
96%
.25-.50
3
3%
99%
N
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
99%
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
1
1%
100%
G
G
V
E
L
1
C
Very Fine
Very Fine
2.0-2.8
2.8-4.0
100%
100%
Fine
4.0-5.6
100%
Fine
5.6-8.0
100%
Medium
8.0-11.0
100%
Medium
11.0 - 16.0
100%
Coarse
16.0-22.6
100%
Coarse
22.6-32
100%
Very Coarse
32-45
1
100%
Very Coarse
45-64
100%
00 Small
Small
Large
OQ Large
64-90
100%
90- 128
100%
128-180
100%
180-256
100%
Small
Small
256-362
100%
362-512
100%
Medium
Large -Very Large
512- 1024
100%
1024-2048
100%
Bedrock
> 2048
100%
Total
100
100%
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
y
a
y 50%
a
y
y
U 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
UTl
X10 -Pool
Pebble Count Size Class Distribution
■Pool Pebble Data
0.063 0.125 0.25 0.50 1.0 2.0 2.8 4.0 5.6 8.0 11.3 16.0 22.6 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048 5000
Particle Size Class (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
L
C
LL
+� 50%
C
u
L
6>
a' 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
UTI
XI O -Pool
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
*Pool Data
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: POOL 100 -COUNT
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT:
Beaverdam Creek 5th Year Monitoring
REACH /LOCATION:
UT1D X11 -Pool
DATE COLLECTED:
11/3/2011
FIELD COLLECTION BY:
CT & JS
IDATA ENTRY BY:
DN
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT
Summary
ATERIA PARTICLE
SIZE (mm)
Pool
Class %
% Cum
Silt / Clay
< .063
25
25%
25%
'+ Very Fine
Fine
s
n Medium
N
D Coarse
ti
.063-.125
25%
.125-25
15
15%
40%
.25-50
58
58%
98%
.50 - 1.0
2
2%
100%
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
100%
Very Fine
O
Very Fine
Fine
G
G Fine
V Medium
E Medium
L
Coarse
C
C Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2.0-2.8
100%
2.8-4.0
100%
4.0-5.6
100%
5.6-8.0
100%
8.0 - 11.0
100%
11.0 - 16.0
100%
16.0-22.6
100%
22.6-32
100%
32-45
1
1 100%
45-64
100%
O < Small
Small
64-90
100%
90-128
128-180
100%
100%
Large
OQ Large
180-256
100%
Small
Small
256-362
100%
362-512
512-1024
100%
100%
Medium
Large -Very Large
1024-2048
100%
Bedrock
> 2048
100%
Total
100
100%
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
6
x
L. 50%
y
U 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
UT1D
X11 -Pool
Pebble Count Size Class Distribution
I IS Pool Pebble Data I
0.063 0.125 0.25 0.50 1.0 2.0 2.8 4.0 5.6 8.0 11.3 16.0 22.6 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048 5000
Particle Size Class (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

UT1 D
X11 -Pool
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
100%
—
—Pool
Data
90%
80%
70%
60%
L
6J
C_
w 50%
U
L
a 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: RIFFLE 100 -COUNT
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT:
Beaverdam Creek 5th Year Monitoring
REACH /LOCATION:
UT1D X12 -Riffle
DATE COLLECTED:
11/3/2011
FIELD COLLECTION BY:
CT & JS
IDATA ENTRY BY:
DN
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT
Summary
ATERIA
PARTICLE
SIZE (mm)
Riffle
Class %
% Cum
Silt / Clay
< .063
19
19%
19%
'+
�y
s
A
N
D
Very Fine
.063-125 .125
3
3%
22%
Fine
.125-25
6
6%
28%
Medium
.25-.50
9
9%
37%
Coarse
.50 - 1.0
37%
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
37%
00
O�
0�
R 0
Q A
E
L
P
0 O C
n O
Very Fine
2.0-2.8
37%
Very Fine
2.8-4.0
37%
Fine
4.0-5.6
37%
Fine
5.6-8.0
37%
Medium
8.0 - 11.0
37%
Medium
11.0 - 16.0
37%
Coarse
16.0-22.6
37%
Coarse
22.6-32
10
10%
47%
Very Coarse
32-45
26
26%
73%
Very Coarse
45-64
20
20%
93%
OO
Small
64-90
5
5%
98%
Small
90-128
1
1%
99%
Large
128-180
1
1%
100%
OQ
Large
180-256
100%
Small
256-362
100%
Small
362-512
100%
Medium
512-1024
100%
Large -Very Large
1024-2048
100%
Bedrock
> 2048
100%
Total
100
100%
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
c
QO
s. 50%
a
U 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
UT1D
X12 -Riffle
Pebble Count Size Class Distribution
I ■Riffle Pebble Data I
0.063 0.125 0.25 0.50 1.0 2.0 2.8 4.0 5.6 8.0 11.3 16.0 22.6 32
Particle Size Class (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048 5000

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
L
v
C.
50%
b+
C.
u
L
a 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01
UT1D
X12 -Riffle
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
+Riffle Data
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: POOL 100 -COUNT
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
k
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT:
Beaverdam Creek 5th Year Monitoring
REACH /LOCATION:
UT1 X13 -Pool
DATE COLLECTED:
11/14/2011
FIELD COLLECTION BY:
KS & CT
IDATA ENTRY BY:
DN
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
k
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT
Summary
ATERIA
PARTICLE
SIZE (mm)
Pool
Class %
% Cum
Silt / Clay
< .063
25
25%
25%
't
S '1
~� A
D ~�
Very Fine
.063-125
23
23%
48%
Fine
.125 - .25
5
5%
53%
Medium
.25-50
16
16%
69%
Coarse
.50 - 1.0
13
13%
82%
.�
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
16
16%
98%
O
G
R
V
E
L
UO O
C
C
Very Fine
2.0-2.8
98%
Very Fine
2.8-4.0
98%
Fine
4.0-5.6
98%
Fine
5.6-8.0
98%
Medium
8.0 - 11.0
2
2%
100%
Medium
11.0 - 16.0
100%
Coarse
16.0-22.6
100%
Coarse
22.6-32
100%
Very Coarse
32-45
100%
Very Coarse
45-64
100%
OO
Small
64-90
100%
Small
90-128
100%
OQ
Large
128- 180
100%
Large
180-256
100%
Small
256-362
100%
Small
362-512
100%
Medium
512-1024
100%
Large -Very Large
1024-2048
100%
Bedrock
> 2048
100%
Total
100
100%
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
k

100%
90%
80`%)
70%
60%
c
U
a
50%
y
U 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
UT1
X13 -Pool
Pebble Count Size Class Distribution
I ■ Pool Pebble Data I
0.063 0.125 0.25 0.50 1.0 2.0 2.8 4.0 5.6 8.0 11.3 16.0 22.6 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048 5000
Particle Size Class (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
L
C
ii 50%
y
C
u
aLi 40%
0.
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01
UT1
X13 -Pool
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
+Pool Data
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: RIFFLE 100 -COUNT
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT:
Beaverdam Creek 5th Year Monitoring
REACH /LOCATION:
UT1 X14 -Riffle
DATE COLLECTED:
11/3/2011
FIELD COLLECTION BY:
CT & JS
IDATA ENTRY BY:
DN
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT
Summary
ATERIA PARTICLE
SIZE (mm)
Riffle
Class %
% Cum
Silt / Clay
< .063
32
32%
32%
Very Fine
« Fine
s
a Medium
N
D y Coarse
.063-.125
6
6%
38%
.125 - .25
2
2%
40%
.25 -.50
.50-1.0
1
1
1%
1%
41%
42%
« Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
r
42%
Very Fine
O
Very Fine
0 Fine
R 0 Fine
Q v Medium
E Medium
L
Coarse
O
C Coarse
Very Coarse
n 0 Very Coarse
2.0-2.8
42%
2.8-4.0
42%
4.0-5.6
42%
5.6-8.0
42%
8.0 - 11.0
42%
11.0 - 16.0
5
5%
47%
16.0-22.6
47%
22.6-32
4
4%
51%
32-45
12
12%
63%
45-64
13
13%
76%
OO < Small
Small
64-90
14
14%
90%
90- 128
128-180
7
3
7%
3%
97%
100%
Large
OQ Large
180-256
100%
Small
Small
256-362
100%
362-512
100%
Medium
44 Large -Very Large
512- 1024
100%
1024-2048
100%
Bedrock
> 2048
100%
Total
100
100%
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
a
L 50%
C6
y
y
RS
t j 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
UT1
X14 -Riffle
Pebble Count Size Class Distribution
I ■Riffle Pebble Data I
0.063 0.125 0.25 0.50 1.0 2.0 2.8 4.0 5.6 8.0 11.3 16.0 22.6 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048 5000
Particle Size Class (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
L
C
50%
c
u
L
y 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01
UT1
X14- Riffle
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
- 4 Riffle Data
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: RIFFLE 100 -COUNT
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT:
Beaverdam Creek 5th Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION:
UT1 X15 -Riffle
DATE COLLECTED:
11/3/2011
FIELD COLLECTION BY CT & JS
DATA ENTRY BY:
DN
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT
Summary
ATERIA
PARTICLE
SIZE mm
Riffle
Class %
% Cum
Silt / Clay
< .063
10
10%
10%
.ti yy
Very Fine
.063-.125
3
3%
13%
sy
A ti
N
p ti
Fine
.125-.25
20
20%
33%
Medium
.25-.50
26
26%
59%
Coarse
.50 - 1.0
18
°
18 /°
77%
Very Coarse
1 1.0-2.0
1 20
20%
97%
G
A
V
P E
U C L �C
n 0 h
Very Fine
2.0-2.8
97%
Very Fine
2.8-4.0
97%
Fine
4.0-5.6
97%
Fine
5.6-8.0
2
2%
99%
Medium
8.0 - 11.0
1
1%
100%
Medium
11.0 - 16.0
100%
Coarse
Coarse
16.0-22.6
22.6-32
100%
100%
Very Coarse
32-45
100%
Very Coarse
45-64
100%
Small
64-90
100%
Small
90-128
100%
Large
128-180
100%
Large
180-256
100%
Small
256-362
100%
Small
362-512
100%
BOULDER
Medium
irge-Very Lar
512-1024
1024-20481
100%
100%
Bedrock
> 2048 1
1
1 100%
Total 1
100 1
100%
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
L 50%
a
y
y
U 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
UTl
X15 -Riffle
Pebble Count Size Class Distribution
■Riffle Pebble Data
0.063 0.125 0.25 0.50 1.0 2.0 2.8 4.0 5.6 8.0 11.3 16.0 22.6 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048 5000
Particle Size Class (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

UT1
X15 -Riffle
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
100% -- —
90% +Riffle Data
80%
70%
60%
L
C
50%
C
u
L
w 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: POOL 100 -COUNT
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT:
Beaverdam Creek 5th Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION:
UT1 X16 -Pool
DATE COLLECTED:
11/3/2011
FIELD COLLECTION BY:
CT & JS
IDATA ENTRY BY:
DN
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT
Summary
ATERIA
PARTICLE
SIZE (mm)
Pool
Class %
% Cum
Silt / Clay
< .063
48
48%
48%
s
n
N
D
Very Fine
.063-125
6
6%
54%
Fine
.125-.25
4
4%
58%
Medium
.25-.50
14
14%
72%
Coarse
.50-1.0
g
8%
80%
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
18
18%
98%
O
G
G
V
E
L
UO O
C
Very Fine
2.0-2.8
98%
Very Fine
2.8-4.0
98%
Fine
4.0-5.6
98%
Fine
5.6-8.0
98%
Medium
8.0 - 11.0
2
2%
100%
Medium
11.0-16.0
100%
Coarse
16.0-22.6
100%
Coarse
22.6-32
100%
Very Coarse
32-45
100%
Very Coarse
45-64
100%
O
Small
64-90
100%
Small
90- 128
100%
OQ
Large
128-180
100%
Large
180-256
100%
Small
256-362
100%
Small
362-512
100%
Medium
512-1024
100%
Large -Very Large
1024-2048
100%
Bedrock
> 2048
100%
Total
100
100%
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
y
C
50%
pr
M
H
U 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
UT1
X16 -Pool
Pebble Count Size Class Distribution
1 ■ Pool Pebble Data I
0.063 0.125 0.25 0.50 1.0 2.0 2.8 4.0 5.6 8.0 11.3 16.0 22.6 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048 5000
Particle Size Class (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
—�
90% Pool Data
80%
70%
60%
L
C
k" 50%
y
C
u
L
o. 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01
UT1
X16 -Pool
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: POOL 100 -COUNT
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT:
Beaverdam Creek 5th Year Monitoring
REACH /LOCATION:
UT1 X17 -Pool
DATE COLLECTED:
11/3/2011
FIELD COLLECTION BY:
CT & JS
IDATA ENTRY BY:
DN
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT
Summary
ATERIA
PARTICLE
SIZE (mm)
Pool
Class %
% Cum
Silt / Clay
< .063
10
10%
10%
w
s
A
D y
«
Very Fine
.063-125
13
13%
23%
Fine
.125-25
5
5%
28%
Medium
.25-50
19
19%
47%
Coarse
Very Coarse
.50-1.0
1.0-2.0
9
20
9%
20%
56%
76%
00-
O� C
G
G 0
V
E
L
O
C
n
Very Fine
2.0-2.8
76%
Very Fine
2.8-4.0
76%
Fine
4.0-5.6
1
1%
77%
Fine
5.6-8.0
3
3%
80%
Medium
8.0 - 11.0
9
9%
89%
Medium
11.0 - 16.0
8
8%
97%
Coarse
16.0-22.6
1
1%
98%
Coarse
22.6-32
2
2%
100%
Very Coarse
32-45
100%
Very Coarse
45-64
100%
O
Small
64-90
100%
Small
90-128
100%
OQ
Large
128-180
100%
Large
180-256
100%
Small
256-362
100%
Small
362-512
100%
Medium
512-1024
100%
Large -Very Large
1024-2048
100%
Bedrock
> 2048
00
Total
100
100%
±10j
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
e
u
50%
a
y
H
R
U 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
UT1
X17 -Pool
Pebble Count Size Class Distribution
1 ■ Pool Pebble Data I
0.063 0.125 0.25 0.50 1.0 2.0 2.8 4.0 5.6 8.0 11.3 16.0 22.6 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048 5000
Particle Size Class (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
L
C,
Lz. 50%
C,
6J
V
L
a 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01
UT1
X17 -Pool
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
*Pool Data
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: RIFFLE 100 -COUNT
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT:
Beaverdam Creek 5th Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION:
UT1 X18 -Riffle
DATE COLLECTED:
11/3/2011
FIELD COLLECTION BY CT & JS
DATA ENTRY BY:
DN
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT
Summary
ATERIA
PARTICLE
SIZE mm
Riffle
Class %
% Cum
Silt/Clay
< .063
0%
.L
Very Fine
.063-.125
0%
Fine
.125-.25
1
1%
1%
n
Medium
.25-.50
13
13%
14%
N
Coarse
.50 - 1.0
22
22%
36%
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
11
11%
47%
G
R
V
E
L �C
n OD n
Very Fine
2.0-2.8
47%
Very Fine
2.8-4.0
2
2%
49%
Fine
4.0-5.6
3
3%
52%
Fine
5.6-8.0
3
3%
55%
Medium
8.0 - 11.0
1
1%
56%
Medium
11.0 - 16.0
3
3%
59%
Coarse
16.0-22.6
59%
Coarse
22.6-32
6
6%
65%
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
32-45
45-64
18
15
18%
15777_98%
83%
O
Small
64-90
2
2%
100%
Small
90-128
100%
Large
128- 180
100%
Large
180-256
100%
Small
256-362
100%
Small
362-512
100%
BOULDER
Medium
512-1024
100%
arge-Very Lar
1024-2048
100%
Bedrock
> 2048
100%
Total
1 100
100%
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
a
u
50%
a
y
h
CQ
U 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
UT1
X18 -Riffle
Pebble Count Size Class Distribution
I ■Riffle Pebble Data I
0.063 0.125 0.25 0.50 1.0 2.0 2.8 4.0 5.6 8.0 11.3 16.0 22.6 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048 5000
Particle Size Class (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
90% +Riffle Data
80%
70%
60%
L
V
C
50%
C
u
V
L
a 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01
UTI
X18-Riffle
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: RIFFLE 100 -COUNT
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT:
Beaverdam Creek 5th Year Monitoring
REACH /LOCATION:
UT2A X1 -Riffle
DATE COLLECTED:
11/3/2011
FIELD COLLECTION BY:
CT & JS
IDATA ENTRY BY:
DN
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT
Summary
MATERIA
PARTICLE
SIZE (mm)
Riffle
Class %
% Cum
Silt / Clay
< .063
30
30%
30%
S 7
a M
N
o y
Very Fine
.063-125
30%
Fine
.125-25
30%
Medium
.25-50
30%
Coarse
.50-1.0
30%
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
30%
G
G
V
E
L
C
Very Fine
2.0-2.8
30%
Very Fine
2.8-4.0
30%
Fine
4.0-5.6
30%
Fine
5.6-8.0
30%
Medium
8.0 - 11.0
30%
Medium
11.0 - 16.0
30%
Coarse
16.0-22.6
30%
Coarse
22.6-32
9
9%
39%
Very Coarse
32 - 45
19
19%
58%
Very Coarse
45 - 64
22
22%
80%
00
Small
64-90
6
6%
86%
Small
90-128
9
9%
95%
OQ
Large
128-180
5
5%
100%
Large
180-256
100%
ILE–
Small
256-362
100%
Small
362-512
100%
Medium
512- 1024
100%
Large -Very Large
1024-2048
100%
Bedrock
> 2048
100%
Total
100
100%
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
c
u
L
a 50%
y
y
Cd
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
UT2A
XI-Riffle
Pebble Count Size Class Distribution
1 ■ Riffle Pebble Data I
0.063 0.125 0.25 0.50 1.0 2.0 2.8 4.0 5.6 8.0 11.3 16.0 22.6 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048 5000
Particle Size Class (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
90% Riffle Data
80%
70%
L 60%
c
w
E 50%
L
V
a
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01
UT2A
X1 -Riffle
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: POOL 100 -COUNT
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT:
Beaverdam Creek 5th Year Monitoring
REACH /LOCATION:
UT2A X2 -Pool
DATE COLLECTED:
11/3/2011
FIELD COLLECTION BY:
CT & JS
IDATA ENTRY BY:
DN
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT
Summary
ATERIA
PARTICLE
SIZE (mm)
Pool
Class %
% Cum
Silt / Clay
< .063
100
100%
100%
;i
y
s
A
Very Fine
.063-125
100%
Fine
.125-.25
100%
Medium
.25-50 .50
100%
N
D
Coarse
.50 - 1.0
100%
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
100%
(D
G
G
V
E
L
�� O
C
Very Fine
Very Fine
2.0-2.8
2.8-4.0
100%
100%
Fine
4.0-5.6
100%
Fine
5.6-8.0
100%
Medium
8.0 - 11.0
100%
Medium
11.0 - 16.0
100%
Coarse
16.0-22.6
100%
Coarse
22.6-32
100%
Very Coarse
32-45
1
100%
Very Coarse
45-64
100%
OO
Small
64-90
100%
Small
90-128
100%
OQ
Large
128-180
100%
Large
180-256
100%
Small
256-362
100%
Small
362-512
100%
Medium
512- 1024
100%
Large -Very Large
1024-2048
100%
Bedrock
> 2048
100%
Total
100
100%
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
c
u
L
y" 50%
c
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
UT2A
X2 -Pool
Pebble Count Size Class Distribution
■Pool Pebble Data
0.063 0.125 0.25 0.50 1.0 2.0 2.8 4.0 5.6 8.0 11.3 16.0 22.6 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048 5000
Particle Size Class (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
90%
80%
70%
L 60%
c
c 50%
U
L
6�
Qr
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01
UT2A
X2 -Pool
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
+Pool Data
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: RIFFLE 100 -COUNT
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
Distribution
Plot Size (mm)
0.063
0.125
0.25
0.50
1.0
2.0
2.8
4.0
5.6
8.0
11.3
16.0
22.6
32
45
64
90
128
180
256
362
512
1024
2048
5000
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT:
Beaverdam Creek 5th Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION:
UT2 X3 -Riffle
DATE COLLECTED:
11/3/2011
FIELD COLLECTION BY:
CT & JS
DATA ENTRY BY:
DN
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
Distribution
Plot Size (mm)
0.063
0.125
0.25
0.50
1.0
2.0
2.8
4.0
5.6
8.0
11.3
16.0
22.6
32
45
64
90
128
180
256
362
512
1024
2048
5000
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT
Summary
ATERIA PARTICLE
SIZE (mm)
Riffle
Class %
% Cum
Silt / Clay
<.063
32
32%
32%
Very Fine
Fine
s
.063-125
32%
.125 - .25
32%
n .ft Medium
.25-50
32%
N
D Coarse
.50 - 1.0
32%
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
32%
OQ, �Very Fine
Very Fine
Fine
R Fine
R
Medium
V
E Medium
L
Coarse
O
C Coarse
Very Coarse
0 Very Coarse
2.0-2.8
32%
2.8-4.0
32%
4.0-5.6
32%
5.6-8.0
32%
8.0 - 11.0
32%
11.0-16.0
32%
16.0-22.6
32%
22.6-32
6
6%
38%
32-45
36
36%
74%
45-64
26
26%
100%
Small
64-90
100%
Small
90- 128
100%
OQ
Large
128-180
100%
Large
180-256
100%
�tff
Small
256-362
100%
Small
362-512
100%
7 M
Medium
512-1024
100%
Large -Very Large
1024-2048
100%
Bedrock
> 2048
100%
Total
100
100%
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
Distribution
Plot Size (mm)
0.063
0.125
0.25
0.50
1.0
2.0
2.8
4.0
5.6
8.0
11.3
16.0
22.6
32
45
64
90
128
180
256
362
512
1024
2048
5000

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
c
u
L
c. 50%
H
y
CC
U
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
UT2
X3 -Riffle
Pebble Count Size Class Distribution
I ■Riffle Pebble Data I
0.063 0.125 0.25 0.50 1.0 2.0 2.8 4.0 5.6 8.0 11.3 16.0 22.6 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048 5000
Particle Size Class (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
90% +Riffle Data
80%
70%
L 60%
w
E 50%
u
L
a
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01
UT2
X3 -Riffle
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: POOL 100 -COUNT
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT:
Beaverdam Creek 5th Year Monitoring
REACH /LOCATION:
UT2 X4 -Pool
DATE COLLECTED:
11/3/2011
FIELD COLLECTION BY:
CT & JS
IDATA ENTRY BY:
DN
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT
Summary
ATERIA
PARTICLE
SIZE (mm)
Pool
Class %
% Cum
Silt / Clay
<.063
99
99%
99%
Very Fine
.063-125
1
1 %
100%
Fine
.125 - .25
100%
Medium
.25-.50
100%
D y
Coarse
.50-1.0
100%
«
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
100%
0
G
G
V
E
L
80 O
C
(
C
Very Fine
2.0-2.8
100%
Very Fine
2.8-4.0
100%
Fine
4.0-5.6
100%
Fine
5.6-8.0
100%
Medium
8.0-11.0
100%
Medium
11.0-16.0
100%
Coarse
16.0-22.6
100%
Coarse
22.6-32
100%
Very Coarse
32-45
100%
Very Coarse
45-64
100%
OO <
Small
64-90
100%
Small
90- 128
100%
O\J
Large
128-180
100%
Large
180-256
100%
Small
256-362
100%
Small
362-512
100%
Medium
512-1024
100%
Large -Very Large
1024-2048
100%
Bedrock
> 2048
100%
Total
100
100%
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
c
u
L
a. 50%
H
y
CC
U 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
UT2
X4 -Pool
Pebble Count Size Class Distribution
1 ■ Pool Pebble Data I
0.0630.125 0.25 0.50 1.0 2.0 2.8 4.0 5.6 8.0 11.3 16.0 22.6 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048 5000
Particle Size Class (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
90%
80%
70%
L 60%
W.
E 50%
u
L
p.
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01
UT2
X4 -Pool
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
+Pool Data
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: RIFFLE 100 -COUNT
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT:
Beaverdam Creek 5th Year Monitoring
REACH /LOCATION:
UT2 X5 -Riffle
DATE COLLECTED:
11/3/2011
FIELD COLLECTION BY:
CT & JS
IDATA ENTRY BY:
DN
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT
Summary
ATERIA
PARTICLE
SIZE (mm)
Riffle
Class %
% Cum
Silt / Clay
< .063
2
2%
2%
,s
s
A
Very Fine
.063-125
2
2%
4%
Fine
.125 - .25
4%
Medium
.25-50 .50
2
2%
6%
N
D M
Coarse
.50 - 1.0
6%
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
6%
00
G
R
0 V
E
L
UO ��
CCoarse
C
Very Fine
2.0-2.8
6%
Very Fine
2.8-4.0
6%
Fine
4.0-5.6
6%
Fine
5.6-8.0
6%
Medium
8.0 - 11.0
6%
Medium
11.0 - 16.0
6%
Coarse
16.0-22.6
6%
22.6-32
16
16%
22%
Very Coarse
32-45
45
45%
67%
Very Coarse
45 - 64
19
19%
86%
O <
Small
64-90
86%
Small
90-121
12
12%
98%
Large
128- 180
2
2%
100%
OQ
Large
180-256
100%
Small
256-362
100%
Small
362-512
100%
Medium
512- 1024
100%
Large -Very Large
1024-2048
100%
Bedrock
> 2048
100%
Total
100
100%
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
C
u
L
a 50%
y
h
CE
U 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
UT2
X5- Riffle
Pebble Count Size Class Distribution
IS Riffle Pebble Data
0.063 0.125 0.25 0.50 1.0 2.0 2.8 4.0 5.6 8.0 11.3 16.0 22.6 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048 5000
Particle Size Class (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
90% ♦Riffle Data
TTTTTFF-
R0%
70%
L 60%
v
c
w
F. 50%
u
L
Cw
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01
UT2
X5 -Riffle
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: POOL 100 -COUNT
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT:
Beaverdam Creek 5th Year Monitoring
REACH /LOCATION:
UT2 X6 -Pool
DATE COLLECTED:
11/3/2011
FIELD COLLECTION BY:
CT & JS
IDATA ENTRY BY:
DN
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT
Summary
ATERIA
PARTICLE
SIZE (mm)
Pool
Class
Silt / Clay
< .063
80
80%
80%
s
A
Very Fine
.063-125
7
7%
87%
Fine
.125 - .25
13
13%
100%
Medium
.25-50
100%
N
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
100%
`
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
100%
O
G
R
V
E
L
O
C
G
Very Fine
2.0-2.8
100%
Very Fine
2.8-4.0
100%
Fine
4.0-5.6
100%
Fine
5.6-8.0
100%
Medium
8.0-11.0
100%
Medium
11.0 - 16.0
100%
Coarse
16.0-22.6
100%
Coarse
22.6-32
100%
Very Coarse
32-45
100%
Very Coarse
45-64
100%
00
Small
64-90
100%
Small
90- 128
100%
OQ
Large
128-180
100%
Large
180-256
100%
Small
256-362
100%
Small
362-512
100%
Medium
512- 1024
100%
Large -Very Large
1024-2048
100%
Bedrock
> 2048
100%
Total
100
100%
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
e
u
L
Q. 50%
h
h
Gd
U 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
UT2
X6 -Pool
Pebble Count Size Class Distribution
spool Pebble Data
0.0630.125 0.25 0.50 1.0 2.0 2.8 4.0 5.6 8.0 11.3 16.0 22.6 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048 5000
Particle Size Class (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

100%
t Pool Data
90%
80%
70%
L 60%
c
w
e 50%
E
u
L
a
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01
UT2
X6 -Pool
Pebble Count Particle Size Distribution
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016 -1, River Works, Inc.
December 2011, Monitoring Year 5

APPENDIX C
AS -BUILT PLAN SHEETS

r.
� If
r 1� �a
�' NORM
• 1
WE
DIXIE .
r '
•
~..' ` • 1
1
tz
cp
l p�
3I� '
0
• L q
Z
/1� L
s
7 � Y
Rpck -[ON
ROgO �qNO �
VICINITY MAP ►
SCALE (FT)
� 1►
P"a Remu c Mo I skeet Rm
1013528 1 T1
PRO=T CNQWM
KLT
BEAVERDAM CREEK W� °�
DATE
STREAM RESTORATION 1011/?Oo
AS -BUILT PLANS'`
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY vv `v NOT TO SCALE
INDEX OF SHEETS
TITLE SHEET
T1
LEGEND
T2
REFERENCE SHEET
R1 -R4
AS -QUILT PLANS
P1 -P23
CENTER OF PROJECT
LAT 35 -10 -21 7
LONG 80-59-085
UT1
PRE - PROJECT STREAM LENGTH
= 8,148 LF
AS -BUILT STREAM RESTORATION LENGTH
= 8,617 LF
UT2
PRE- PROJE-?CT STREAM LENGTH
= 4,016 LF
AS -BUILT STREAM RESTORATION LENGTH
= 4,377 LF BEAVERDAM CREEK
> PRESERVATION LENGTH
= 962 LF AS -BUILT WITH BMPS
BEAVERDAM CREEK
TITLE SHEET
_ PRESERVATION LENGTH
= 1,641 LF

L
I ,
4 6:b m d
CONVENTIONAL SYMBOLS
--_+ AS —BUILT THALWEG
- --- DESIGN THALWEG
--- soo - - -- EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR
- — — — — — — -
EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR
—E
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
— — — —
PROPERTY LINE
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
EXISTING TREE
LOG SILL
LOG VANE
FLOW DIRECTION
ROCK CROSS VANE
O O
BOULDER CLUSTER
®
PHOTO ID POINT
SURVEY CONTROL POINT
ROOT WAD
ROCK VANE

BEAVERDAM CREEK - UT1 'P° 4 'PO zoa
SCALE {FT) BEAVERDAM CREEK
eC� of ui T IAtlTLJ Dude

__ -- ---- _ i
BEAVERDAM CREEK - UT2
P20
- ---- „-_ _
�\
:
Ioo Q 10o Zoo
SCALE (FT)
SHEET NO
PROJECT EMMOA
KLT
APPRMD BY
WAH
OATL
10/11/2007
A
� v
BEAVERDAM CREEK
AS —BUILT WITH BMPS
REFERENCE SHEET
oo
,
'
y\,
1°17
j FLOW
P18
16K
,iO
U72 REACH
g0 �f ~~ j �,
1A
,
If
/
I If
/
:
`
if
/ r
i
1 a
j
LL':
�!
/
Q
1 r
i
o Q O i!
a
i
a-U i
r
__ -- ---- _ i
BEAVERDAM CREEK - UT2
P20
- ---- „-_ _
�\
:
Ioo Q 10o Zoo
SCALE (FT)
SHEET NO
PROJECT EMMOA
KLT
APPRMD BY
WAH
OATL
10/11/2007
A
� v
BEAVERDAM CREEK
AS —BUILT WITH BMPS
REFERENCE SHEET

PROPOSED BEREWICK
COMMONS pAR4CWAY , c
A
FLOW /U-i �� Ol
� i L
``. N 1
UT2A REACH t U12A REACH 2
BEAVERDAM CREEK - UT2 '1° 4 'Q° ?°0 �
SCALE (FT)

/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
AND JOHN L SHOEMAKER
/ TAX 14116194
00 10219 PG 764
GARRISON ROAD
/
/
/
T
\ MEpCOUNTY
\
REAL ESTATE TATE / / FINANCE DEPT
TAX 14117112
R
DB 14350 P(; 408
DDOE RIVER ROAD
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
AND JOHN L SHOEMAKER
TAX 14118164
UB 10214 PO 794
GARRISON ROAD \
11`
a
N Its
IV'
W
7� FHOTO POINT I Z
t �
\I
3
3+
3�- 3��
3 �„_ 3 I
3 - -- 3 �-- 3 �� 3 �� I
� ® f
VIIILUAM H. KELLEY M TA
TAX 14116102
D8 4669 PG 301
7' '� 10137 HORTON ROAD
E
I

la
g
MATCHLINE —
STA 14 +58 _
3 ; �
3�r
\ PHOTO PMT
(UTIB
*2651,;.23
(coo
1
+
-
I 1
LJ
I �P" TO PONT
A
PHOTO POINT
IJT1 J
I
3 -- 31
LECJQfiNBURC COUNTY
3
3
I
REAL ['STATE / FINANCE DEPT
TAX 14117112
�'
/ 3
08 14350 PG 408
D= R VER ROAD
3
a —� 3— 3 —
3 — 3 ^--
I
i
I
!

' 3 \
- MATCHLINE - SHEET P4 - STA 26 +81
r
n
I
z
a
�i
r
a
SCALE

MATCHLIPIE — SHEET P5 — STA 31 +14
M I ,
MECK ® COUNTY
REAL ESTATE 1X350 71 408 DEPT
DIXIE RIVER ROAD ,i 4
1 —
beq
'x'81
0�ee1>a
20�
3f�
3 �
3�
-f E)
FAS

U1
N
Ln
a
r
N
1
It
CL
W
z
J
Q
/3 \
3 \
3 \ REAL ESTATE / FKWCE DEPT
TAX
DD 08
004E RIVER ROAD
� 3 \
3 \
`� 3\
\ 3 �.
V6 3
3
O
tD
n
M
Q
r
w
I
m
a
r
W
W
W
Z
J
U
F-
Q

i
r
MATCHLINE - SHEET P15 - STA 12 +16
3 L
MECKLDWURG COUNTY
REAL ESTATE / FINANCE DEPT
1 ^
TAX 1411711 PO
DIXIE4RIVER R ROAD ,
PHOTO�PO'"
/ 3
IOD
a
\ \ / 8 r PHOTO PONT
z
�E
1
I
I

N, -- _ W
PHOTO`Ppe1f� IC
\\ _ UTI —f3 —E E .— .....,E [htOdam OWL
-- I
� E ,� E E E E- E
—E
/ \ I
_„ E `�—. E �� E �-- E
MWAM A. SHAW JR Er
TAX 14122103
D8 1766 PG 786
/
ADDRESS \

31`
REAL ESTATE / FINANCE DEPT
TAX
J
08 350 PC 402
ERM RIVER ROAD
� 3
�
3
3 — 3
3 -- 3 — 3
3
I
f
PH= PM
r
6pp0rT
I rn
/
in
tn
/ /
KG \ � \
PLOP 00
_/ �
w
� fZ
jj
W
\
-E —�E —E -� -E
E -__E
�_ E --�- E ---
E —
— E E —E
—E
£ -� E r
F,
1
� E ' E
r E
\
TAX 4129103
`
DB 1788 PC 1BB
I
AODRESS

r
r
r
r r
r
r
r r'
1 \
n �
t
1
Y
3
3\
d
3
n \rRwtau.roa \
d
MATCHLINE - SHEET P10 - STA 80+91 —
SCALE

loo
�� 9S \ DWE R A LAND
3 \ COMPANY LLC AND
3 3 \ PAPPAS�PRO11PERTIE5 LLC
3 �_ WX1E RIYFR LAND\ DB 12722 PG 642
® COMPANY LLC AND DIXIE RWER ROAD COUWtY PAPAAS PROPERTIES LLC
3 TAX 14117108 \
% REAL ES ATE% FWANCE DEPT ~1 3 `_. 3 �_ 3 3 , � �'-"- 3 3 �— 3 / DO 13089 PC 411 \
TAX 14117111 - --..,. / pIXK RIVER ROAD \
/ DO 143M PG 407
OWE RIVER ROAD
PHOTO POINT / \
llfT -1 /
PHOTO POINT \
UTI -YO_/
1 0//
Ile
/ --- E — E ---- E -- E
/ F
f
/
c PLO1 r7
/ \ 9400 \ i
i
F ♦ /
♦ /
—E —E —E —E —E —E —E —E —'— E
PM
BURINS HOLDING LLC
TAX 141105
OB 72002 PO 826
10877 GARRISON ROAD
E /
/
2O q i3O 4,0
SCALE (FT)
m
]I

/ \ WAH
3 3—_ 3� \
� 3 f / - - 3� 3 \ DDAM r 3 3 3
3 � / �- 3 3 ` 10/11/2D0
OWE RIVER LAND
IN
I PAPPAS PROPERTIES LLC 3'' 3 ., 3 �_
TAX 14117101
DIX[E RM ROAD I
I \
I
� \ I
I 9.G'°°' \
I
r
\ I
PHOTO POMI
PHOTO PwrNT
In
In
� I
n)
l0 / \ Wo PLOT p!
PHOTO POINT
Z 4 f
E �E _E
lo.
LLj
\ ~E E \ \ IN
B"S HOLDING LLC
TAX 14129105 \ E ' E .�� E w
03 IOS271GARRISON ROAD \ r �` f ~ f pcBA�t _�= 2002 PG 826 f" - E E n W398745 1 F
a
N E �_ f m
R
20 2 20 40
SCALE (FT)

ol
9
1 \
DOGE RIVER LAND \ Y
COMPANY U.0 AND
I PAPPAS PROPERY" uC \
TAX 14117101 \ \
OB 1 7 DME�RIWR ROAD \
' CENTER OF
PROJECT
Y \
\ i
{
1
1l
1
{
1
,
Y
1 PROJECT R m-
�
�I
I '
•
i
r`
j",
B
,l
\
I
`
I
,
1
of
a
+ �
w
1
AUT'OWITED
W
E STAG[ RECORDER
2
s
g
/ E
E
~- E
' CENTER OF
PROJECT
Y \
\ i
{
1
1l
1
{
1
,
Y
1 PROJECT R m-
�
�I
I '
•
i
r`
j",
B
,l

/ \
\ 4E VRC COUNTY
REAI ESTATE SYATE / nNANCE DEPT
3 l - TAK 1!117112 7112
3--_ D6 10350 PC 408
3 � 3 ~ OWE RFVER ROAD
3 � 3
/
/
/
/
/ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
/ AND JOHN L SHOEMAKER
TAX 10118164
OH 10210 PC 760
CARIHSON ROAD
J
v`
II
"'$iA j4 +5g

r
/
3 / /
/ V[6 PLO? n7 /ryO
�f
f ` PHOTO MNT�
F UTIO -12
E rE fE 1E
/
/
/
/
/
/
/

WATERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC
TAX 19924137
D8 12943 PO 842
DIXIE RIVER ROAD
r
r WATERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC
'TAX 14923107
oe +2829 Pc gee
f WLMDY OAP ROAD
r
�r
3 - -- —E E
3r
E —E —E —E _E _E
J
r
2 m POINT F
VPR
9 I0
3 �
iftoom
N 61171E t!
11C4
r
r
r WATERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC
'TAX 14923107
oe +2829 Pc gee
f WLMDY OAP ROAD
r
�r
3 - -- —E E
�1
3r
E —E —E —E _E _E
2 m POINT F
VPR
9 I0
3 �
iftoom
N 61171E t!
11C4
Q
i1
w
.�
VED PLOT 13
>,
.. da
a
w
w
w
W
Z
�
J
W
Q
PN01O ID POW
I
V12-1
W
w
3
I
3—
8 _� 9 —
3 _� 3
�1

1
AL
OWE R1VER LAND COMPANY
AMD PAPPAS PROPERTIES, LLC
TAX 19925114
08 13089 PC 911
O�
t
b
N
H
N
W
CL
L
w
w
E
1
w
z
J
a
,®l

/
/
/
E
E '�E �E -rE fE f f
I r
I IBM e _
r1 I
9tu.ASERA 9EREx1ac uc
e% TK011AS A SAM A
TAX 19525111
09 19271 PC 145
W"Y GAP ROAD
m
P1�LO 3099 PG 911 �
N
l
D9 26299 2PU SM 1
_ 32 in
n - "NOY GAP ROAD w St�6Uu
FWANY
_ �• C 1 103 WC. 1
F 1 PC 902 01
�`
` RIVER ROAD Q
1n I ��
W
W
J
3 ` 3 -` Pp*to m POW I
\
9
I �
MATCHUNE - SHEET P23 STA 19 +72 7o

PAOdCr REFERENCE NO I SKU NO
108928--- pig-
PROJECT ENCOM
KLT
APPRO%CO eY
WAH
DATE
10/11/ 2007
SaLASERA mac ltC w"
c/o THOMAS A SAIEED JR
TAX 19925111
08 18271 PO 145
'A7NDY CAP ROAD
I
�' E
r�E _E -E, -E -- ~E rE E _E __E �E E
E '�~ f I
E �
E
l
f E �~- E WOO
E �1 E
rj
+
EP11�WAti
7 PUDIC o PPON 1sc P m l6�
I
-- N
0.
I~
_ w
n s>,TS1 u I v►
CIV 3 .' f~ � W
T PHOTO DUT2 -T ter- 3 3 3-- Ca
t>,
3 3� � Ig
R 3 r
� 3
3 ^� 3 lr
!� f 3
f 3
z
� ` r
f
f
9 WATERS CONSTRU® COMPANY UaC, I
TAX 92S1o0
De 12612 8 PO 8e6
bm 33 PC 315
wm" CAP ROAD I
`--- -_ BEAVERDAM CREEK
1 � AS -BUILT WITH BMPS
20 20 40
LIT2 SITE PLAN
SCALE FT

R
1
,
1
I
~ E � E —E -�-
—E l
SELLASERA BEREV" LLC
F C/O THOMAS A SAWED JR
N f TAR 19925111
08 18271 PG 145
+ \ f _ E WNDY GAP ROAD
0. � � f
N
I
� f {
w a allsean (p1Q�At
LL)
21 3 A"w* 0 PM P /
~~ 3 Y1! 10
1 3 1 \
3� 3—_ 3 -� $ 1Rmo P
I �
i
I
1+
HATERS COHSTRUUM CONPANY� INC.
TAX 19925108
08 12829 PC 888
We 33 PC 513
WMOY GAP ROAD
MATCHUNE
Cf
CHARLOTTE LLC
TAX 19925112
DB I9186 PO 179
CLENOM LANE
a^
P
P
P
— STA 40+05

/ ,E � E E E E
E fJ E f \
E �E f
/ PHOTO i0 POINT
O-
a O
P
yA,
dl
Wi
Q �
y FF66
w
aEF
F��4�_
3 3
3 3 3 _3 -- ---3 ----- 3 —._. 3 ------ — 3---_� 3 i —
r l,i
/ z WATERS CONSTRUCTDN COMPANY MC
�y TAX 19925108
W DO 12629 PC 866
MS 33 PG 515
WLNDY CAP ROAD
i
MI XOMES OF
CHARLOTTE LLC
TAX 19923112
00 19188 PC 179
CLENSURN LANE
— E
E
� E
�E
E
r '
r
r� 3
� 3
� 3
� 3
ter. 3
3
l

WATERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC.
TAX 1992510.3
ON 12629 PC 902
OXIE RIVER ROAD
I
WATERS CONSTRUCl1DN COMPANY WC
TAX 19925103
DB 12629 PC 902
DIXE RMR ROAD
I
I
3 — f
r� —E
3
E —„ E E —E
3�
3— 3—
m
I
m
FEJM
n e22wa6G
g
+
.
N
�
1
\
PMDTO 40 PONT
l
UTL1 -t
�
N
4
n
W
Z
n
F
IU
`
a
E
_ E — E —E —r
— E —1 E '--- E
^ —�
I
WATERS CONSTRUCl1DN COMPANY WC
TAX 19925103
DB 12629 PC 902
DIXE RMR ROAD
I
I

A
WATERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC
TAX 1902510
OB 12828 PC 902
DOME RIVER ROAD
i
p 3- 3- 3- 3- 3- 3- 3--- 3- 3- 3 3 --- 3 - 3
p 3 3
F
N
N
N
a
h
w
w
I
w
z
a
l
1
t
1
_ F
I
I
I
I

APPENDIX D
BASELINE STREAM SUMMARY FOR
RESTORATION REACHES

Bemerdam Creek Restoration Site UTI each 1
Parameter
Dlmem_Im Ride _ _ _ _ _
Bankfull Width fl
Design
Mtn Mean Max
14 6
As -built
Mtn Mean M_ex
125
MY 1 (2007)
Min Mean Max
13 I
MY 2 (2008)
Min Mean Max
128
MY 3 (2009)
Mtn Mean_ Max
127
MY4 (2010)
Mtn Mean Max
130
MY 5 (2011)
Mtn Mean Max
130
FI eWtdth fl
450
746
746
747
746
748
746
Bankfull Mean Depth fl
1 5
—
—
1 4
—
—
1 4
—
—
14
—
--
1 3
—
—
14
--
—
1 5
—
Bankroll Max Depth fl
2 1
2 0
2 1
20
1 9
2 1
22
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
210
—
—
180
—
-
188
—
—
178
—
--
169
—
—
176
--
—
188
—
Wid th Ratio
100
—
—
87
—
—
92
—
—
91
—
--
96
—
—
97
- -
-
90
-
rn
Entrenchmt Ratio
3 1
6 0
5 7
5 9
5 9
5 7
5 7
Bank He.ght Ratio
10 1
10
1 0
1 0
10
1 0
1 0
_ Bankfull VeloctlX(fps)
Pattern - - - - --
- _Channel Beltwidth fl
—
- - -
_35_ --
- 0
— _
--
-_
—
—
—
—
—
_—
—
—
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
—
-
--
—
—
—
-
—
--
—
—
-
-
—
RadiusofCm ture fl
0
IS
—
--
—
—
—
--
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Meander Wavelength ft
0
29
Meander Width Ratio
Protlle - - - - —
- ILele Length It
—
-
0
—
-
—
—
-
—
-
—
—
-
—
—
—
-
—
—
—
- -
—
—
—
—
—
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
00067
—
0009
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
--
—
0014
—
—
001
— —
—
Pool Len n
*14
_Pool Spactng (n)
Substrate and Transport Parameters
d161d35/d50/d841d95
—
43 8
—
—
—
_ —
— — —
25/36/42/75/105
23 54
012/40/50/110/160
16 57
<063/05/59/110/140
97
26 64 104
015 /65/38/97/125
— _ —
<0063/�O063/ <0 0631<0063 J85
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ih/Q
Stream Power (transport cajm ty) W /m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length fl
—
—
—
555
—
—
-
567
—
—
—
568
_ -
—
—
563
— _
—
— _
562
—_
_-
_ _ —
570
—
564
Dramage Area (SM)
07
07
1 07
1
1 07
07
07
07
Ras rn Classiflcation
--
Be
—
—
—
—
—
C
—
—
C
—
—
C
—
—
C
—
—
C/C
—
Bankfwl Discharge cfs
75
Sinuosi
—
102
—
—
—
—
—
105
—
—
104
--
—
104
—
—
105
—
—
104
—
BF slope Nn
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site UTI (Reach 2 5)
Parameter
Dimension Rime _
Bankfull Width ft
Dnlgn
Min Mean Max
168 200
As -built
Mm Mean Max
154 230
MY 1 (2007)
Mm Mean Max
152 264
MY 2 (2008)
Mtn Mean Max
_ I5 3 _ -260
MY 3 (2009)
M Mean Max _ax
m
15 1 260
MY4 (2010)
_ Min _ _ _ Mean Max
149 27 7
MY 5 (2011)
M Mean Max
153 268
Flood r ®e Width ft
100 0
749
807
749
907
748
806
73 5
807
749
0 6
749
807
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1 7
20
1 7
2 1
1 5
22
1 5
24
1 5
2 1
14
2 0
14
20
Bankfull Max Depth fl
24
29
25
41
23
41
24
47
23
37
21
37
21
41
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area 112
280
400
256
268
1 23 8
597
23 6
624
228
540
219
468
222
502
Width/Depth Ratio
98
101
92
139
96
146
99
157
100
152
102
164
106
172
Entrenchment Ratio
50
60
34
49
29
49
30
49
30
50
28
50
29
49
Bank Height Ratio
10
1 0
1 0
1 0
10
1 0
10
_ Bankfidl Velocity (fps)
Patlern _
— - Channel Beltwidth ft
3 1
84
—
—
3 8_
100
— _
—
—
-
—
- -
—
—
—
—
_ _—
-
—
-
— _
—
_ —
- -
- — _
- -
— _
-
—
—
—
—
Radius of Curvature ft
Radius
34
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
WCuelrn ft
134
200
—
—
Meander Width Ratt
Proflle - - -
2
—
10
-
—
-
—
—
-
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
— —
—
—
—
Rime Slope (ft/ft)
OOOS
—
0012
—
--
—
— —
—
0008
0011
0019
0008 0011
0013
—
— —
0009
0014
0016
Pad Length fl
_ Pool�crng(R)
Subalrote and Transport Parameters
d]6/ d35 / d50 / d84 / d95
101
—
_ 120
_ _ —
—
—
— — —
0 17 25 10 75 37 / 30-45 / 70-85 / 110 120
72 108 - 144
0 1 32 10 26 -06 / 0 37 64 / 1 0 145/56 178
67 _ 114_ 146
<0 063 1 6 / 0 06337 / 0 26 70 / 0 55 140 / 1 4 -165
— _ — —
<0 063 25 / <0 06331 / <0 063 86 / 0 47 125 / 1 8 175
61 105 152
<0 063 35 / 0 0931 / 0 4 75 / 14 130 / 1 9 160
Reach Shear Stress cam trn Ib/Q
-
—
—
_ Strewn Power (transport capaoty) W /m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length 1
—
—
6155
—
_
5897 _
—
-
—
3021
-
—
-
3023
—
-
3000
— —
3065
—
--
-
3052
Drains Area (SM)
07
1 75
07
1 75
1 07
1 75
07
1 75
07
1 75
07
1 75
07
1 75
Rosgen Classification
C/E
C
C
C
C
C/C
Bankfull Discharge cfs
105
155
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Sinuosit
I I
1 2
13
1 3
� 3
13
13
BF slope Nft
0002
0 006
Beaverdam (7=1k EEP Cormact No 11050161 River Work; Inc
December 2011 Moanonng Year 5

Bemerdam Creek Restoration Site- UT1B
Parameter
Dimension RIMe
Bankfull Width ft
Design
Mm Mean Max
104
As built
Mtn Moen Max
111
MY 1 (2007)
Mm Mean Mu
118
MY 2 (2008)
[Nm _ Mean Max
111
MY 3 (2009)
Mtn Mean Max
108
MY4 (2010)
Mtn Mean Max
111
MY 5 (2011)
min Mean Max
109
Flood prone Width fl
1000
-
-
750
-
--
750
-
-
750
-
-
75 0
-
-
750
-
-
750
-
Bankfull Mean Depth R
1 1
14
14
14
1 3
1 3
1 3
Bankhdl Max Depth R
14
23
23
24
24
25
25
Bankfull Craw Sectional Area 112
110
15 3
165
15 6
141
148
145
Width/Depth Ratio
97
80
8 5
79
8 3
83
8 1
Entrenchment Ratio
96
68
63
68
69
68
69
Bank Height Ratio
10
10
10
1 0
1 0
10
10
_ Bankfull Velocity(fp_s
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth fl
52
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
adiusr
Rvaof Cur
Radius Curvature (T
21
31
-
-
-
-
- -
- -
-
- -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Wevekn h fl
83
104
Meander Width Ratio
ProDle
Riffle Length
-
(fl)-
5
-
- -
-
-
-
- -
-
-
- - -
- -
- - -
-
-
-
-
-
-
P, Me Slope NB
0 0104
0 0138
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
Pool Length fl
_ PoolSpacing(R)
Snbs_trale and Transport Parameters
dl6/ d35/ d50/ d841 d95
-
52
-
—
-
-
-_ - -
<0063/<0063/<0063/ 02/04 1
- -
0065/009/11/03/04
- - -
1 <0 063/<0063/<0063/ 013 /039
- -
<0063/019/ 032 /125/175
- - -
- 0063/<0 063/007/ 018/024
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/f2
Stream Power (transport capacity) W /m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length R
-
790
778
775
-
-
Drainage Area (SM)
034
034
034
034
034
034
034
Rosgen Classification
C/E
-
-
C
-
-
C/E
-
-
C
-
- C
-
-
C
-
-
UE
-
Bankfull Discharge tits
45
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
-
-
-
-
-
-
Sinuosj�y
I IS
1
-
-
I
-
-
-
-
- -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
BFsI NR)
005
0013
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site- UT1C
Parameter As built MY 1 (2007) MY 2 (2008) MY 3 (2009) MY-4 (2010) MY 5 (2011)
Dimenslo_o RiMe _ _ _ Mt_n _ Mean _ _ Max Mm Mean Max Mm Mean Max Min Mean M_ ax _Mm Mean Max Min Mean Max
-- - - -- -- -
Bankfull Width fl 116- 1 0 132 12 0 112 168 -
Flood rone Width fl
702
706
71 2
71 1
704
697
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
07
07
07
07
07
07
Bankfull Max Depth ft
1 0
-
-
1 1
-
--
1 1
-
-
I I
-
-
I I
-
-
10
-
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (U)
78
88
95
8 6
7 7
72
Wid th Ratio
156
165
184
169
165
163
Entrenchment Ratio
64
59
54
59
63
65
Bank Height Ratio
10
10
10
1 0
1 0
10
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
Pattern
Channel Beltmdlh fl
-
- -
-
-
-
-
-
- -
-
-
- - - -
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
- -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
-
-
- -
-
-
- -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
-
-
-
-
_
-
-
Radius of Curvettue fl
Radius
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
- --
-
Wavelrn fl
Meander Width Rau_
ProBle _
Riffle Len fl
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
-
Riffle Slope NR
--
Paol
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
-
-
-
-
- -
-
-
-
Pool Spacing (R)
Substrate and Tramport Parameters
d16/d35/d5O/d84/d95
26/37/42/75/100
36/50/64/110/130
033 /40/60/130/ 160
_
40/78/93/120/135
-
1 <0063/ �O 063/ 71/ 145/ 185
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2
Stream Power (transport capacity) W /m2
Additional Reach Parameters
- _ _ -- Channel length fl
616
615
--
-
-
- - -
- -
- -
-
-
- -- - - -- -
D mtoa Area (SM)
-
0 15
0 15
0 15
0 15
0 15
0 15
Ros Classificauoo
Lla
- C
-
-
C
-
-
C
-
-
C
-
-
C
-
-
C
-
Bankfull sr tits
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
sit
Sinuostt
I 1
-
-
I 1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
BF al (
0 013
Beamniam Creek EEP Colman No 0050161 River Works Im
Demnber 2011 Monitoring Yrnr 5

Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site UTID
Parameter
Dimension Riffle _
- - - Bankfull Width R
Design
_ Mm _ Mean Max_
104
As built
Mtn_ _ Mean Max
114 - -
MY 1 (2007)
Mm Mean _ Max
127
MY 2 (2008)
_ min _Mean_ _ _Max
114
MY 3 (2009)
_ Mtn _ Mean Max
131 - -
MY4 (2010)
Mtn Mean Max
- - - 120 -- - --
MY 5 (2011)
Mm Mean Max
-- - - 110- - -
Flood rove Width ft
-1000
75 5
75 5
75 5
753
75 5
755
Bankfull Mean Depth R
09
--
-
08
-
-
0 7
-
-
08
-
-
07
-
-
06
-
-
06
-
Bankfull Max Depth R
12
1 2
I l
I I
I 1
09
09
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area 02
100
90
92
90
96
7 1
60
Widlh/Deplh Ratio
112
144
175
144
199
203
199
Lntrenchmeat Ratio
96
66
60
66
5 8
63
69
Bank Height Ratio
1 0
10
1 0
1 0
1 0
10
1 0
Bankfull Velmty jfps)
Pattern
Channel Beliwidth R
29 -
52
--
--
--- -
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
- - ----
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- _
-
_ — -
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
Radius o(Curvemre R
21
31
Meander Wavelrn
(ft)-
_ -- Meander Width Ratio
- -- -
ProcN
RiNeLenhfl-
B
-- -
- --
-
- - -
- -- -
-
-
- - ----
-
- - - - -
-
-
-
-
-
- -
-
- - --
-
-
-
- - - -
- - ----
-
-
-
-
- -
- -
-
- --
-
- - --
- -- --
-
- - -
- - --
-
-
- --
-
— -
-- -
- -
- --
- --
--
-
-
-
- --
-
- - -
- - -
- -
-
- --
-
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
--
-
-
-
-
Pool Length
(fl)-
Pool Spacing (11)
S_ubstrate and Tntnpo_rt Parameters
dt6 /d35 1d50 /d84 /d95
-- - --
- - 52
- -
-
- - -
- -
- - -- - - --
32/38/43/85/120
25/33/38/60/88
- - -
- - --- -
012/019/26/50/68
- - --
022/045/35/80/125
-- - -- -
X063/042/33/55/75
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/R
Stream Power (uans art capacity) W /m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length R
- --
35 2
338
_
_ _334
-
- - - -
- - -
- -- _
- -
- --
- - -� - -
- - -_ - - -
- - -
Drainage Area S
016
016
016
016
016
016
016
Ros Classificautm
C/E
-
-
C
-
-
C
-
-
C
- -
-
C
-
-
C -
-
C
-
Bankfull Disc c6
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
-
-
-
Stnuosit
s.1
18
12
-
-
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
--
-- -
-
-
-
BF slope
0007
0 014
Beaverdsan C-ke EEP Comma No D050161 River Works Inc
D-ber 2011 Momwnng Ycm 5

Beaverdatn Creek Restoration Site UT2
Parameter
Dimension Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
Design
Mm Mean Max
102 156
As -built
Min Mean Max
168 169
MY 1 (2007)
Mm Mean Max
161 166
MY 2 (2008)
Min Mean Max
162 173
MY 3 (2009)
Mm M_ can Max
170 171
MY4 (2010)
Min Mean Max
165 170
MY S (2011)
Min Mean Max
169 174
rloodprone Width (R)
300
80
399
399
399
399
399
400
398
400
399
39 9
398
399
Bankfull Mean De R
092
1 5
07
1 4
07
1 4
07
1 3
07
14
07
1 4
07
13
Bankfull Max Depth ft
1 3
23
1 1
2 1
1 1
19
1 1
19
10
2 1
1 1
20
1 1
20
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area R2
99
23 9
122
234
109
226
112
21 4
112
234
112
23 3
116
226
Width/Depth Rati
102
126
121
234
122
239
123
266
124
259
124
245
126
261
Entrenchment Ratio
28
59
24
24
24
25
23
25
23
23
23
24
23
24
Bank Height Ratio
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 2
1 0
Bankfull Velon_ty (fps)
Pattern
Channel Beltvndth 11
47
20
—
54
75
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
_
—
—
--
—_
--
—
--
—
—
Radius of Curvatiue ft
Radius of
23
100
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
ft
100
300
Meander Width Ratio
ProNe
Riffle Lerwh fl
96
_ —
278
_
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Riffle Slope tVft
00122
—
00279
—
—
—
—
—
—
— —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Poolft
Pool Spacing (ft)
Substrate and Transport Parameters
d 16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95
40
_
—
105
_
26 27 / 35 / 39 39 / 53 59 / 95
_
0 13 25 / 26 35 / 36-00 / 60-64 / 115 140
26-27 / 33 34 / 38 / 45 58 / 65 90
_
063 / m 063 25 / <0 063 34/55 63
—
<0 063 28 / 28 35 / 36 39 / 51-60 / 60 125
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2
Stream Power (Irans;ort capacity) W /m2
ddltlowd Reach Parameters
Channel len R
— _
—
—
3290
— _
— _
—
3293
—
— —
3142
— —
—
— —
—
— — _
— —
—
Drains eArea (SM)
01
03
01
03
01
03
01
03
03
01
03
03
Ros Classificanon
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
BankfulI Discha cfs
48
120
—
—
ro
—
—
—
—
—
W01
—
—
Siauosit
103
121
13
13
BFsI a (ft/ft
0008
0019
00138
Be —rdam Crock EEP Coimact No D050161 River Worts Inc
December 2011 Momtonn8 Ycu 5

Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site UT2A
Parameter
Dimension Ruffle
Bankfull Width ft
Design
Mtn Mean Max
156
As built
Mtn Mean Max
13 3
MY 1 (2007)
min Mean Max
12 2
MY 2 (2008)
Mtn Mean_ Max
134- - -
MY 3 (2009)
Mm Mean Max
— 126
MY 4 (2010)
Mtn Mean Max
118
MY 5 (2011)
Mm Mean Max
124 --
FI rone Width ft
800
398
398
399
39 9
39 9
399
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1 0
—
—
08
—
—
08
—
—
08
- -
—
0 7
—
—
0 7
—
—
08
--
Bankroll Max Depth R
1 4
12
I 1
12
--
—
10
1 0
1 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Ama fl2
102
106
9 6
--
104
9 1
88
94
--
Widt th Ratio
102
166
155
172
174
159
165
Enitenchment Ratio
59
30
33
3 0
32
3 4
32
Bank Height Ratio
1 0
10
10
1 0
1 0
10
10
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
Pattern
Channel Beltwtdth ft
40
5 1
—
55
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radius of
Radius of curvature n
24 30
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
— —
—
—
—
— —
—
ft
100 120
— —
—
—
— —
Meander Wtdth Ran
Profile
Rile Len h fl
98 -77 11 8
_
—
—
—
—
--
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
— —
—
-
—
—
— —
—
—
Rtllle Slope ft/fl
6-0-2
—
0 0273
--
—
—
—
— —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Pool Len fl
Pool Spacing (R)
Substrate and Transport Parameters
d16/ d35/ d50/ d84/ d95
—
_
57
—
—
—
—
— — —
26/30/35/53/78
— — —
<0063/ 33/ 40/ 60/ 83
— — —
32/37/42/57/61
— — —
m063/< 0063 /<0063/<0063/ 55
— — —
<0063/25/39180/ 145
Reach Shear Stress ten IWO
rea
Stm Power (transport capacity) W /tn2
Additional Reach Parameters_
Channel length ft
— —
—
1099
—
—
—
1131
—
—
—
1121
—
— —
— —
—
_ —
-
—
—
--
-
—
—
Dmine Area SM
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
Ros en Chmification
GE
—
—
C
—
—
C
—
—
C
—
—
C —
—
C
—
--
C
—
Bankfull Dischar cfs
51
—
—
—
—
—
— —
—
—
—
—
—
—
Stnuosi
121
125
122
BF dope fl/ft)
0012
0015
Beeveidmi Cicck, EEP Comrect No D05016-1 R— W.H. lnc
Deccnber 2011 Momtonng Ymr 5

APPENDIX E
MORHOLOGY AND HYDRAULIC
MONITORING SUMMARY

Beaverdam Creek EEP Contract No D05016 I It— Works Inc
December 2011 Monttonng Year 5
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site Project No D05016 -1
y�
t
Besverdam Creek UTl (Bench I)
_
b_� ` FT
Cross Section l
Cross Section 2
1 Cross - Section Parameters
Pool
Riffle
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Dimension
BF Width (ft)
221
199
184 169
185
131
128
127
130
130
Floodprone Width (fl)
75 1
75 2
750 75 1
75 l
746
747
746
748
746
BF Cross Sectional Area (112 )
33 1
31 8
281 243
272
188
178
169
176
18 8
BF Mean Depth (ft)
1 5
1 6
1 5 14
1 5
14
14
1 3
14
1 5
BF Max Depth (fl)
3 1
29
29 28
3 1
2 1
20
1 9
2 1
22
Width/Depth Ratio
148
124
121 11 8
126
92
91
96
97
90
Entrenchment Ratio
-
57
59
59
57
57
Wetted Perimeter (ft)
25 1
23 1
21 5 197
214
160
156
154
157
159
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
1 3
14
1 3 12
13
12
l 1
1 1
1 1
1 2
Substrate
d50 (mm)
<0 063
01
0 097 <0 063
<0 063
42
50
59
38
<0 063
d84 (rum)
<0 063
03
033 0 36
<0 063
1 75
110
110
97
<0 063
MY 1
(2007)
MY 2
(2008)
MY 3 (2009)
MY-4 (2010)
MY 5 (2011)
11 Reachwide Parameters
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max Med
Min Max Med
Min Max Med
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Prorile
Riffle length (ft)
Riffle Slope ( ft/ft)
001
001
001 001
Pool Length (ft)
-
-
Pool Spacing (ft)
23
91
51
16
97 57
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length (ft)
540
540
540
540
540
Channel Length (ft)
568
563
562
570
564
Sinuosity
105
104
104
105
104
Water Surface Slope (f /ft)
-
BF Slope (ft/ft)
Rosgen Classification
C
C
C/E
C/E
C/E
Beaverdam Creek EEP Contract No D05016 I It— Works Inc
December 2011 Monttonng Year 5

Beaverdam Creek CEP Contract No D05016 I River Works Inc
December 2011 Montlonng Year 5
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site Project No D05016 -1
Reach Beaverdam Creek UTl (Reaches 2-5)
Cross Section 5
Cross Section 6
Cross Section 9
Cross Section 10
I Cross - Section Parameters
Riffle
Pool
Riffle
Pool
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4 MY5
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Dimension
BF Width (ft)
152
153
151
149
153
235
236
233
235
245
178
176
174
179
180
222
224
235
216
220
Floodprone Width (ft)
749
748
749
749
749
750
750
720
750
750
75 1
75 1
75 1
750
75 1
749
749
749
749
749
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft2 )
238
236
22 8
219
222
41 1
41 2
41 3
425
459
293
294
28 1
285
283
448
427
450
505
455
BF Mean Depth (ft)
1 6
1 5
15
1 5
1 5
1 8
1 7
1 8
1 8
19
16
1 7
1 6
1 6
1 6
20
1 9
1 9
23
2 1
BF Max Depth (ft)
23
24
23
21
21
35
34
36
39
40
27
28
28
29
27
33
34
36
45
40
Width/DepthRatio
97
99
100
102
106
134
136
132
130
130
108
106
108
112
114
110
118
123
92
107
Entrenchment Ratio
49
49
50
50
49
-
-
42
43
43
42
42
-
Wetted Perimeter (ft)
183
184
18 1
179
182
270
27 1
269
272
282
21 1
21 0
207
21 1
21 1
263
262
273
263
262
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
13
1 3
13
12
1 2
1 5
1 5
1 5
1 6
1 6
14
14
1 4
14
1 3
1 7
16
1 6
19
1 7
Substrate
d50 (mm)
45
64
70
86
39
02
<0 063 <0 063
<0 063
<0 063
36
40
63
80
75
<0 063
008
<0 063
<0 063
<0 063
d84 (mm)
85
145
140
125
110
045
024
03
02
0141
72
110
120
125
130
07
5
045
05
<0 063
11 Reachwide Parameters
MY l (2007 )
MY 2 (2008)
MY -3 (2009)
MY-4 (2010)
MY 5 (201 1)
Min Max Med
Min Max Med
Min Max Med
Min Max Med
Min Max Med
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Meander Wavelength (fl)
Meander Width Ratio
Profile
Riffle length (ft)
-
-
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
-
0 009
002
001
001
001
001
001
002
001
Pool Length (fl)
-
-
PoolSpacing(ft)
72
144
115
67
146
114
61
152
105
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length (ft)
2370
2370
2370
-
2370
2370
Channel Length (ft)
3021
3023
-
3000
3065
3052
Sinuosity
13
13
13
13
13
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
-
BF Slope ( ft/ft)
Rosgen Classification
C
C
CIE
CfE
C/E
Beaverdam Creek CEP Contract No D05016 I River Works Inc
December 2011 Montlonng Year 5

Beaverdam Creek CEP Contract No D05016 I River Works Inc
December 2011 Monitoring Year 5
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site
Project No D05016 -1
Reach Beaverdam Creek UT1 (Reaches 2 -5) cont'd
Cross Section 13
Cross Section 14
Cross Section 15
Cross Section 16
1 Cross - Section Parameters
Pool
Riffle
Riffle
Pool
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYI
MY2 MY3
MY4
MY5
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4 MY5
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Dimension
BF Width (11)
300
2864
270
276
284
191
202 21 4
214
216
269
260
260
277
268
209
21 6
226
236
239
Floodprone Width (ft)
909
909
909
908
909
75 2
752 73 5
752
75 2
779
780
777
780
778
52 1
52 1
479
52 1
52 1
BF Cross Sectional Area (112 )
71 7
7756
692
664
820
379
394 427
428
427
597
624
540
468
502
368
452
47 1
463
466
BF Mean Depth (ft)
24
27
26
24
29
20
20 20
20
20
22
24
21
17
19
18
21
21
20
20
BF Max Depth (ft)
53
66
61
60
72
31
33 35
37
37
41
47
27
31
41
34
37
38
38
38
Width/DepthRatio
126
1057
105
115
98
96
103 107
106
109
121
108
125
164
143
118
103
108
120
122
Entrenchment Ratio
39
3 7 34
37
3 5
29
30
30
3 1
29
Wetted Perimeter (ft)
348
34 1
32 1
324
34 1
23 l
241 254
254
255
31 3
308
30 1
31 1
305
244
258
268
275
278
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
2 1
23
22
20
24
1 6
1 6 1 7
1 7
1 7
19
20
1 8
1 5
16
1 5
1 8
1 8
1 7
1 7
Substrate
d50 (nun)
03
01
0 063
054
0 18
30
04 026
<0 063
30
04
033
0 125
04
<0 063
<0 063
<0 063
007
d84 (mm)
08
04
036
125
1 2
1 70
50 20
40
80
10
055
047
14
02
0 085
<0 063
1 2
Reach Beaverdam Creek UTl (Reaches 2 -5) cont'd
Cross Section 17
Cross Section 18
1 Cross - Section Parameters
Pool
Riffle
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYI
MY2 MY3
MY4
MY5
Dimension
BF Width (ft)
270
23 3
245
229
21 1
225
234 227
224
241
Floodprone Width (ft)
672
672
674
673
672
807
806 807
806
807
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft2 )
332
36 1
28 1
22 1
22 1
347
348 33 8
31 5
340
BF Mean Depth (ft)
12
1 6
1 2
10
1 1
1 5
1 5 1 5
14
14
BF Max Depth (ft)
25
44
31
30
29
27
27 28
27
29
Width/Depth Ratio
21 9
15 1
21 3
23 7
20 1
146
157 152
158
172
Entrenchment Ratio
36
3 5 36
36
33
Wetted Perimeter (ft)
295
264
268
248
23 2
256
264 257
252
270
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
11
14
1 0
09
10
14
1 3 1 3
1 3
1 3
Substrate
d50 (mm)
03
026
055
062
22 32
<0 063
4
d84 (mm)
-
08
057
095
93
1
45 45
40
46
Beaverdam Creek CEP Contract No D05016 I River Works Inc
December 2011 Monitoring Year 5

Buverdam Creek EEP Contract No D05016 1 River Works Inc
December 2011 Monaonng Ymr 5
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site Project No D0501_6 -1
Reach
Beaverdam Creek UTIB
Cross Section 3
Cross Section 4
1 Cross - Section Parameters
Pool
Riffle
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY[
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Dimension
BF Width (ft)
153
148
139
173
155
118
111
108
111
109
Floodprone Width (ft)
75 l
75 1
75 1
75 1
75 1
750
750
750
750
750
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft2 )
164
194
163
198
176
165
156
141
148
145
BF Mean Depth (ft)
11
1 3
1 2
1 1
1 1
14
1 4
13
1 3
1 3
BF Max Depth (ft)
23
30
27
26
25
23
24
24
25
25
Width/Depth Ratio
143
114
11 9
15 1
136
85
79
83
83
8 1
Entrenchment Ratio
63
68
69
68
69
Wetted Perimeter (ft)
175
174
162
196
178
146
139
134
138
13 5
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
09
1 1
10
10
10
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
Substrate
d50 (mm)
016
014
01
028
<0 063
<0 063
0 l l
<0 063
032
007
d94 (mm)
042
05
038
056
02
02
03
013
175
018
II Reachwide Parameters
MY 1 (2007 )
MY 2 (2008)
MY 3 (2009)
MY4 (2010)
MY 5 (2011)
Min Max Med
Min Max Med
Min
Max Med
Min Max Med
Min Max Med
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Profile
Riffle length (ft)
Riffle Slope ( ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length (ft)
680
Channel Length (ft)
775
Sinuosity
I 1
Water Surface Slope (ft/fl)
-
BF Slope (ft/ft)
Rosgen Classification
C
C
C/E
GE
C/E
Buverdam Creek EEP Contract No D05016 1 River Works Inc
December 2011 Monaonng Ymr 5

13 a�erdam Creek EEP Contract No D050161 River Works Inc
December 2011 Monitonng Year 5
Beaverdam_Creek Restoration Site Project No D05016 -1
Reach
Beaverdam Creek UT1C
Cross Section 7
Cross Section 8
1 Cross - Section Parameters
Riffle
Pool
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY[
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5
Dimension
BF Width (ft)
120
132
120
112
108
136
124
138 135
134
Floodprone Width (ft)
706
71 2
71 1
704
697
750
750
749 754
750
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft2 )
88
95
86
77
72
316
303
31 6 293
304
BF Mean Depth (ft)
07
07
07
07
07
23
24
23 22
23
BF Max Depth (ft)
I I
1 I
1 l
1 1
10
3 2
3 2
3 1 29
28
Width/Depth Ratio
165
184
169
165
163
59
5 1
60 62
59
Entrenchment Ratio
59
54
59
63
65
-
Wetted Perimeter (ft)
13 5
146
135
126
12 1
182
173
184 179
179
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
07
06
06
06
06
1 7
1 7
1 7 16
1 7
Substrate
d50 (mm)
42
64
60
93
71
<0 063
<0 063
0 08 <0 063
<0 063
d84 (mm)
75
110
130
120
145
0 23
0 17
022 0 5
<0 063
11 Reachwide Parameters
MY 1 (2007)
MY 2 (2008 )
MY 3 (2009 )
MY 4 (2010)
MY 5 (2011)
Mm Max Med
Min Max Med
Min
Max Med
Min Max Med
Min Max Med
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Prollle
Riffle length (ft)
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft
Pool Spacing (ft)
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length (ft)
544
Channel Length (ft)
615
Sinuosity
I1
Water Surface Slope (f /ft)
BF Slope (ft/ft)
Rosgen Classification
C
C
C
C
C
13 a�erdam Creek EEP Contract No D050161 River Works Inc
December 2011 Monitonng Year 5

Beaverdam Creek EEP Contract No D05016 1 River Works Inc
December 2011 Monitoring Year 5
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site Project No D05016 -1
Reach
Beaverdarn Creek UTl D
Cross Section I I
Cross Section 12
1 Cross - Section Parameters
Pool
Riffle
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Dimension
BF Width (ft)
153
1 5 I
20 1
184
159
127
114
1 3 1
120
1 1 0
Floodprone Width (ft)
75 7
756
752
75 7
756
755
75 5
753
755
75 5
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft2 )
209
189
161
15 5
13 5
92
90
86
7 1
60
BF Mean Depth (ft)
14
13
08
08
09
07
08
07
06
06
BF Max Depth (ft)
2 5
22
1 8
1 7
1 8
1 1
1 1
1 1
09
09
W idth/Depth Ratio
11 3
120
250
219
188
175
144
199
203
199
Entrenchment Ratio
-
60
66
58
63
69
Wetted Perimeter (ft)
180
176
21 7
20 1
176
141
130
144
132
12 1
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
12
1 1
07
08
08
07
07
06
05
05
Substrate
\6
d50 (trim)
<0 063
033
03
028
29
43
38
26
35
33
d84 (mm)
022
085
043
048
041 -1
45
60
50
80
55
MY 1
(2007 )
MY 2
8)
MY -3 (2009)
MY 4 (2010 )
MY 5 (2011)
11 Reachwide Parameters
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
ed
Min
Max Med
Min Max Med
Min Max Med
Pattern
Channel BeIrwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Profile
Riffle length (ft)
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length (ft)
300
Channel Length (ft)
334
Sinuosity
11
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
BF Slope (ft/ft)
Rosgen Classification
C
C
C
C
C
Beaverdam Creek EEP Contract No D05016 1 River Works Inc
December 2011 Monitoring Year 5

Beaverdam Creek EEP Contract No D05016 1 River Works Inc
December 2011 Momtonng Year 5
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site Project No D05016 -1
Reach Beaverdam Creek UT2A
Cross Section I
Cross Section 2
1 Cross - Section Parameters
Riffle
Pool
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
MYI
MY2 MY3
MY4
MY5
Dimension
BF Width (ft)
122
134
126
11 8
124
20 1
206 192
198
200
Floodprone Width (ft)
398
399
399
399
399
400
400 400
401
400
BF Cross Sectional Area (112 )
96
104
91
88
94
204
21 3 178
181
193
BF Mean Depth (ft)
08
08
07
07
08
10
10 09
09
10
BF Max Depth (ft)
1 1
1 2
1 0
10
1 1
1 9
22 1 8
1 9
1 8
Width/Depth Ratio
155
172
174
15 9
165
198
199 207
21 6
207
Entrenchment Ratio
33
30
32
34
32
-
Wetted Perimeter (ft)
137
150
140
13 3
139
22 1
227 21 1
216
219
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
07
07
06
07
07
09
09 08
08
09
Substrate
d50 (mm)
35
40
42
<0 063
39
<0 063
<0 063 <0 063
<0 063
<0 063
d84 (mm)
53
60
57
<0 063
80
<0 063
<0 063 <0 063
<0 063
<0 063
If Reachwide Parameters
MY-1 (2007)
MY 2 2008)
MY 3 (2009)
MY-4 (2010)
MY 5 (2011)
Min Max Med
Min Max Med
Min
Max Med
Min Max Med
Min Max Med
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Meander Wavelength (fl)
Meander Width Ratio
Profile
Riffle length (11)
Riffle Slope (ft/11)
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length (ft)
920
Channel Length (ft)
1121
Sinuosity
12
Water Surface Slope ( ft/ft)
-
BF Slope (ft/ft)
Rosgen Classification
C
C
C
C
C
Beaverdam Creek EEP Contract No D05016 1 River Works Inc
December 2011 Momtonng Year 5

�t-
l
G
_ [ _ i
neaverdam Creek EEP Contract No D05016 I Riv r Works Inc
Decembx 2011 Monnonng Year 5
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site Project No D05016 -1
3' Rach Beaverdam Creek UT:e.
Cross Section 3
Cross Section 4
Cross Section 5
Cross Section 6
1 Cross - Section Parameters
Riffle
Pool
Riffle
Pool
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYI
MY2 MY3
MY4
MY5
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4 MY5
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Dimension
BF Width (ft)
161
173
1705
165
174
209
208 198
189
189
166
162
170
170
169
140
144
147
152
149
Floodprone Width (ft)
400
400
3995
399
399
401
401 402
401
401
399
399
398
399
398
280
288
297
295
297
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft2 )
109
1 1 2
1 1 2
11 2
116
25 8
25 1 229
195
204
226
214
234
233
226
232
249
25 8
264
23 5
BF Mean Depth (ft)
07
07
07
07
07
1 2
1 2 1 2
10
1 1
14
1 3
14
14
1 3
1 7
1 7
1 8
1 7
1 6
BF Max Depth (ft)
I 1
I 1
10
I 1
11
25
25 23
22
22
19
19
21
20
20
26
26
27
26
25
Width/DepthRatio
239
266
259
245
261
169
173 171
182
176
122
123
124
124
126
85
84
84
88
94
Entrenchment Ratio
25
23
23
24
23
-
-
24
25
23
23
24
Wetted Perimeter (ft)
175
186
184
179
188
234
233 221
209
211
194
188
197
197
196
173
179
182
187
180
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
06
06
06
06
06
1 1
1 1 10
09
10
1 2
1 1
1 2
1 2
12
1 3
14
14
14
13
Substrate
d50 (mm)
39
40
38
<0 063
36
<0 063
<0 063 <0 063
<0 063
<0 063
38
36
38
34
39
<0 063
<0 063
0 063
<0 063
<0 063
d84 (mm)
59
64
58
42
51
<0 063
<0 063 <0 063
<0 063
<0 063
1 59
60
45
52
601<0
063
<0 063
016
<0 063
0 I
11 Reachwide Parameters
MY 1 (2007
MY -2 (2008)
MY 3 (2009
MY 4 (2010)
MY 5 (2011)
Min Max Med
Min Max Med
Min Max Med
Min Max Med
Min Max Med
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (fl)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Profile
Riffle length (ft)
Riffle Slope ( ft/ft)
Pool Length (fl)
Pool Spacing (ft)
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length (ft)
2470
Channel Length (ft)
3142
Sinuosity
13
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
BF Slope (ft/ft)
Rosgen Classification
C
I C
I C
C
C
neaverdam Creek EEP Contract No D05016 I Riv r Works Inc
Decembx 2011 Monnonng Year 5