20070931 Ver 1_401 Application_20070507

At
2 0 0 7 0 9 3 1
ROBIN MAYCOCK LITTLE
5409 New Rebel Court, Youngsville, NC 27596
[phone]
May 24, 2007
Mr. Monty Matthews
Regulatory Field Officer
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27615

??

U,
. ??ht?Y ??` 'ZUOI

Subject: Preconstruction application for proposed expansion of the "Raleigh Quarry" by Hanson
Aggregates East, Inc. Located adjacent to and north of existing Raleigh Quarry on west
side of US 1, Wake Forest, in northern Wake County. PIN 1739-36-0203.
Dear Monty:
Enclosed is a completed preconstruction notification (PCN) application package for the proposed
expansion of the existing Raleigh Quarry (also known as the Nello Teer quarry), located two
miles north of where U.S. 1 (Capitol Boulevard) crosses the Neuse River, on the west side of U.S.
1, north of Raleigh. By copy of this letter, we also submit seven copies of this PCN to the North
Carolina Department of Natural Resources (NCDENR) Division of Water Quality (DWQ) for
review, approval, and written permit concurrence.
The proposed area in question is approximately 44 acres, and is located adjacent to and
immediately to the north of the existing Raleigh Quarry (approximately 200 acres). The property
boundaries of the existing property and the proposed expansion are shown on the enclosed USGS
topographic Quadrangle map (Figure 1), aerial photograph (Figure 2) and USDA NRCS Soil
Survey maps (Figure 3). I have also included the proposed site plan, which shows the locations of
the proposed temporary access and haul roads with proposed culvert locations at stream
crossings, stormwater detention basins, wetland and stream impacts and the proposed area of
excavation.
Field evaluations were conducted by Ms. Robin-Maycock Little, a Ecensed seal s%,aerai st and
experienced environmental scientist, starting in October 2004, through November 2005.
Wetlands were delineated in May 2005, according to United States Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) guidelines and the 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual. The stream channels were
determined to be jurisdictional using the DWQ stream determination checklists and the USACE
Stream Assessment Method form USACE wetland data forms, DWQ stream determination
checklists and USACE stream assessment forms are included in this application package.

On March 21a1, 2006, we met onsite with you in order to conduct a preapplication field review of
the proposed impacts. As a result of our findings, I was able to confirm and document that the
jurisdictional wetlands were in fact isolated from the jurisdictional stream channel located
upstream on April 2, 2006. Accordingly, we anticipate that no USACE Nationwide Permit
(NWP) written concurrence will be required as the wetland impacts are to be less than 0.1 acre,
and are isolated from the stream channel. You determined that the stream channel upstream did
not have important aquatic functions and was not considered to be jurisdictional by the USACE.
Hence, we are providing you with a copy ofthis preconstrucxion notification as a courtesy, for
your files.
On April 21, 2006, Eric Kulz of DWQ visited the subject site, and stated that 295 linear feet of
the approximately 2150 linear feet of upland stormwater conveyance and stream channel was
jurisdictional. This length of jurisdictional stream channel and subsequently 29500 square feet of
riparian buffer will be permanently impacted by excavation for the proposed mining operation.
Upon completion of the project, the resultant 21-acre lake will have approximately 3825 linear
feet of riparian buffer established around its perimeter. This will result in a net gain of riparian
buffer on the subject property of 3530 linear feet or 353,000 square fret.
After redesign to maximize avoidance and minimization of stream, buffer, and wetland impacts,
185 linear feet of stream impacts on two separate stream crossings are proposed in order to place
culverts and outlet protection under the temporary access and haul roads. Most of these impacts
should not require compensatory mitigation as they fall within the thresholds under the
Nationwide Permit #44 and Water Quality Certification #3362 and under the "allowable"
category of the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules. Also, only 0.099 acres of non-riparian
wetland impacts are proposed. These impacts are indicated on the PCN form and documented by
the enclosed data forms and stream determination forms.
In September 2006, the survey of the revised jurisdictional wetland and stream impacts was
initiated and was the final site plan showing the revised design and impacts was completed in
April 2007. The jurisdictional stream is shown on the site plan/survey as "start a" to "end a" and
was measured as actually being 291.38 (292) feet in length. The jurisdictional wetland area is
also shown on the site plan/survey as 7B through 22A, with 2A through 21A showing the wetland
impact area affected by construction of the revised haul road. (See attached Site Plan and
Specification Sheet.)
On September 15, 2005, an In-Lieu Fee Request form was sent to the North Carolina Ecosystem
Enhancement Program (NCEEP) to determine the availability of the appropriate stream, buffer
and wetland mitigation. On September 16, 2005, the NCEEP responded with an acceptance letter
to provide the necessary mitigation for the subject property. The acceptance has expired on
March 16, 2006, but another request was faxed to NCEEP on May 8, 2007, requesting in-lieu fee
acceptance for 477 linear feet of stream impacts and 69,932 square feet of buffer impacts. On
May 16, 2007, an acceptance letter was issued by the NCEEP to Hanson Aggregates for 242
linear feet of warm stream impacts, 43,560 square feet of Zone 1 and 14,520 square feet of Zone
2 buffer impacts, and 0.099-acres of:r-lon- ' in4mcts. -T1i e4n order to
show the availability of in-lieu fee mitigation for the proposed impacts, but hopefully will not be
necessary, as we are of the opinion that the stream and buffer impacts will be adequately
compensated for by the creation of 21 acres of open water and the corresponding 3530 linear feet
of 100 foot wide riparian buffer. Loss of wetland functions will be mitigated on-site by the
proposed stormwater detention basins and perimeter shallow water habitat around the proposed
lake.

A Natural Resource Report is also included to show that no federally or state listed plant or
animal species or their critical habitats have been observed within 1 mile of the subject property.
The report and the NHP database maps and attribute descriptions are also included. The increase
in open water habitat should also provide critical habitat for the listed species discussed in the
report.
Please do not hesitate to contact Robin Maycock Little at [phone] or Rob Snyder at (919)
380-2746, if you have any questions on this application.
Sincerely,
coc? Y
Robin Maycock Little
CC: Rob Snyder, Hanson Aggregates East, Inc.
Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
Patrick T. Shillington, PE
r-;j
r
j,?? ?a ?eme,:f
PROGRAM
May 16, 2007
Robert Snyder
Hansen Aggregates East, Inc.
2300 Gateway Centre Blvd.
Morrisville, NC 27560
Project: Hansen Aggregates East Raleigh Quarry Expansion County: Wake
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Pkase note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a copy of
the issued 404 Permit/401 Certi6cation/CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance wIIl expire. It is the
applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice
will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized
work. The amount of the In Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and
policies listed at www.nceep.net.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
followine table.
Neuse
03020201 Stream (feet) Wetlands (acres) Buffer I
(Sq. Ft.) Buffer II
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool Warm Riparian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh
Impacts 0 0 242 0 0.099 0 43,560 14,520
Credits 0 0 484 0 0.198 0 130,680 21,780
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. If the regulatory agencies
require mitigation credits greater than indicated above, and the applicant wants NCEEP to be responsible for the additional
mitigation, the applicant will need to submit a mitigation request to NCEEP for approval prior to permit issuance. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
Sincerely, ((?? ( A
Q. ? di.Jt•Q
William . Gilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, NCDWQ Wedands/401 Unit
Monte Matthews, USACE-Raleigh
Eric Kutz, NCDWQ-Raleigh
Robin Little, agent
File
Restor&I tg... EAAA"... Pro" our Stag

North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 1 www.nceep.net
PA
2007931
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or -N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NW 44, WQC 3362 (3402)
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Informations
l
!4'? Rn? ? s r1 U v l'
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Hanson Aggregates Inc. a ,J
Mailing Address: 2300 Gateway Centre Boulevard"'''` "
Sp you
Morrisville NC 27560
c% Robert Snyder
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: Robert.Snyder(a?hansonamerica.com
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Robin Mayeock Little
Company Affiliation: Soil and Environmental Systems
Mailing Address: 5409 New Rebel Court
Youngsville NC 27596
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: environmental solutionsphotmail.com
Page 5 of 13
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the snaps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Hanson Agates East Inc. Raleigh Quarry Expansion
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 1739360203
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Wake Forest
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): US 1 north to Quarry on
left approx 2 miles north of Neuse River bridge on west side of US 1. Follow entrance road
to left to main office to sign in Subject site is on he north side of property, behind rock
crushing plant.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.9331 ON 78.5485 °W
6. Property size (acres): Total acreage = approx 250 ac expansion area = 44.7 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: UT to Richland Creek (WS- V)
8. River Basin: Neuse River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/mgps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Existing active quarry asphalt plant haul roads and some
wooded areas with mixed pine and hardwood stands. Surrounding land use is mixed
residential azriculture and commercial properties
Page 6 of 13
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Heavy
equipment will be used for haul and temporary access road construction excavation for
mining and reclamation Site will be mined using phased excavation and temporary access
roads Sediment retention basins and storm water treatment will be installed as excavation
progresses.
I1. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed project is to
expand existing kranite quarry to mine an area of an isolated deposit of?'ranite bedrock for
aggregate and other uses.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued pennits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. NA
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 13
Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Mechanical clearin?,_of
approximately 40 acres of vegetation construction o temporary haul and access roads with
two 100 foot long culverts for stream crossings excavate 291 linear feet of intermittent
stream and fill of 0.099 acres of wetland in order to construct proposed haul road,
maintainin100 foot buffer adjacent to stream and dispose of spoil in upland disposal area.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Located within Distance to Area of
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland 100-year Nearest Impact
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, Floodplain Stream (acres)
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) (yes/no) (linear feet)
2A - 21A Fill Forested No >200 feet 0.099
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.099
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 2 acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
(indicate on map) Before Impact (linear feet) (acres)
Start a - end a UT Excavation Intermittent
2'
291
0.013
Culvert #1 UT to UT to 24 in. Culvert Intermittent 1.5 88 0.003
Richland Creek
Outlet Protection UT to UT to
Riprap
Perennial 1.5'
12
0.0004
#1 Richland Creek

Culvert #2 UT to UT to
30 in. Culvert
Perennial 1.2'
74
0.002
Richland Creek
Outlet Protection UT to UT to
Riprap
Perennial 1.2
12
0.0003
#2 Richland Creek
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 477 0.019
Page 8 of 13
6. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0
7. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.019
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.099
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.12
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 477
Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ® Yes ? No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been detennined to be isolated by the USACE.
0.099 acres of isolated wetlands will be impacted by fill in order to construct the haul road.
The streams feeding the wetland area disappear beneath the ground surface, of ectivelY
isolating the wetland area from upstream jurisdictional channels but contributin to the
wetland hydrology beneath the surface through coarse substrate/soils. Determined to be
isolated on April 2, 2006 by Month Matthews, USACE Regulatory Field Officer.
9. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ® stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): Embankment/excavation
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stonnwater requirement, etc.): Mining/stormwater
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: undeveloped forested land
Size of watershed draining to pond: 0.14 sq. mi. Expected pond surface area: 25 ac.
Page 9 of 13
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Original site plan impacted over 0 1 acres of wetland so haul road was relocated to
minimize wetland impacts Topography and location of materials to be mined dictated haul and
access road location Impacts to existing stream and adjacent buffers avoided by maintaining
undisturbed forested buffer to stream Haul road must conform to safe design standards in terms
of slope width and curves Phased stormwater installation will minimize stormwater impacts to
water duality.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/newetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
Page 10 of 13
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Payment to NCEEP In-Lieu Fee Program
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 142
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 24,200
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 213.0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B.0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
Page 11 of 13
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify-P Yes ® No ?
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Impact Required
F Zone* Multiplier ;
1 14,520 3 (2 for Catawba) 43,560
2 9680 1.5 14,5200
Total 24,200 58,080
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 213 .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
Payment into the Rparian Buffer Restoration Fund or on-site restoration.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
NA
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
Page 12 of 13
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
C'?? 4 s,a
A plicant/Agent's Signature ate
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 13 of 13
•? (, , y l 1 -,'? ° > .: J r? pp?jjL? / ?t ; sf .. " r,, Y : r ?'} I ,,,
`
A 40

???'' ,?,? f } I I';• J F
r -? h

. / (+p ?'? ' G ? '

??,? , j ??, r? III

? f? ?`° ` .
i
l
? ``

L
r
? `• f ?? J h 1? .
1
i
1
?
...
R - i . i ?. 1 y7
?f ?-
?
? ?ti.'? !
, ? ??
U/I t1 [r } y t
?
f
? ?
? ^xc: l` j.a
r
• l
?
'
_
r
t?r?_
I ',?1:?5 f
7
..) 5
1 ti '
?`t ?f?'\ !
' _/ f?l ? I'
11 : ?}??" ? J!'? 1tt
i
-
? `?
?``_ }-
'? rr r` ?? I
I rf=r ++ k(? _
`I I - l.'
I`t ?C?"?. `.'-:- \
: ?? r,?? [?jr :
- i..
•,?'
?,
/
IJ rr• Jti? \ I
? f ??-f??i ,rf:' 17 y
C
???I, +I frt +r
- .? I'? t ! Y l
,? -_- • J,?/ ? I '?1b' ?
__

f
M21
z

ir'' r+
,,? + qq r
1 ?L _

_
--
I \

,; `',

7 r
? f

f?
? •
?
w .-tip f. ,,
?•:t' ??? ??_? i
?.l?,.i.r
y,, f r ?. ??p?c:,
•-.,
f`;'r/ ? ?^tif 11 ?F t
?
t ???yti? f ? ?TX _
?'YRk-.-??-? `?.? /
;
?"r•
' : ? ' 1?? f L???
t. -
-
( ' -`?f' ? IJ J I J + S' I r f, 1. / . t r
?iJi {1? ,1 i
"f ? J ;i7?^11%x`• W.I. A.'t IJ
K I? 4(`??vri

t
SITE .? .?- t I??€ •. _

,- ? ? ++?1?9` '?

tl?1 '?

f?
i ?? }
I J
ji?
• '
..rr' fi'r' ?. a l?'
'? ? . I J i?,k l ;,,r??)?? 54,E II
?
N'
•? ?`?
r f
ICJ
N
' .?_--•ti ?r ,-_ , --
a ??
1 !,• ?--?..
? ? ,? ? ?
_. ?` ?, ?
I
} ? ?, .• ,_
? r' I : _ I ? ?,? / ??
-,, ,'
? , -,? ,? ?_..!?r •,
.? I .
t ,
,
t
I:
?
I
vJ?
f I, r` ++ I I?/? 5? VIII+?'?
, ti4Y S ? r J,`?.` ? t? r ?
,
?' ?p
`. ?. } 1.= ?..?. '? t
";,.: ._-?.
,
} . 4 fJ?+•'\: ,
?? ,`. I i - -?`'?. ? C •_ i -
-- _ ? I Y• _
) ? I ?0?1??3i ??`5` 5
i ? J ° ?,r"? ?l '..

"vv
7????
({ ?
r7`JrJ
'

'
' I ? I rte-

+ ?'f ?`'-,
??i?-

115 ?„'-?- ]r ',A

%^?'??f :' fl?? I?i l

-
,
i
•
+' ` ^ ?'? ? ? ?' '`^ 1 .
,
r.J ? ?- Jl ? ?
?- ? 1 S I ;??` ? .
'? may' ?n '- `?r-u• IJ??' .
+'??'1 II ' • y ? `'? ?5 `C• '
r ?? ??
, ?
? J
_ t J rr r
?-- _.•`l \
?', 5 ? f
- T
r'?
?
`` I 1
?
!
II/ /
l
??"' f
J /..' "•?
?
?? t i/ r ?
' '?!4 `..
,1
.
; 5•t'
I
~
J,1
`v l
\. •
` ?
.1
r
f I ? 7!S 1r
- {
?
s ,
1
?I

\
.?,`t1 ,' L?
? }
?
r
1??` - f ^•?- j \
r' {..?! f??? ? `. f.r e'z
I -
d
-
I?
-?'},? •i
,i
.
'
r
I 'Y'?}•Y
?r__JJ.-? _
J.• J
r s _????-• 1 I to ',l?I?? Jf r? I
? ? _i
( •-' ? ? ti 1 ti?°?---? .

?`? 1 ??'' l
','
?
)i
i..?? ; I ??i ?/ _
.,
•
- ). \'y• _ }._`•?r
^
'
? ? h III .? ? --
?.-'"?
? •? ?_
I I ..
? •
??1
/ rr(/_? -
'• I n
f n i?¦?_ -'t,
C -?,1r1L. .
_
\
?9. ,? -? ??,.
• ` ?
l
t
1
? I ? ?? ? S
ItiY4
t { ? •'j ! J?ti - ???I? / '? II
f I I-'? '+ .
?
l ,
777
/
. ,
,
1 / ?
` •+
1+/ 1 +• ?? r I• ? -f '?1
I T,
'?1 _`'_ , I 1'' ?? Li ! Y- ,. `?• - . i.1 -'.s ??
'r' r r
1 S 0
.r

f -1700 f[ U* 1 :-1008 Dewd 134 D.mun WT;,SB-1
WAKE FOREST, NC Soil & Environmental Systems
p 1994 7.5 QUADRANGLE
FIGURE 1: USGS QUADRANGLE MAP
Z
RALEIGH QUARRY EXPANSION
CAPITAL BOULEVARD
WAKE FOREST, NORTH CAROLINA
Sa. r i
r` -.ti .q r1O � � r, •. .t.- s., lr p;. .h .
•YTS. I` {} �.r: y Y L`- ��' ��` ' { i, .5i,�
''}t a.�"',+,�'' .,,�44 4•; 1'�,�j. +� �'����7^''lC. jy�11 }., �$GIAtF _�s.�f�y'+9w , .�^'.�)s;4 1 �..
� ?. `•� �ir�' - . � r i �. � 'fin .
_ _,may t• � �, - t1' y* V+i�r! • � iuw +t, -.
> s- y� �� as -y . •,�`, Y�lr i.. :*} r a:; „ �%Y a s,-
:
.4U a
d '
yr
1 -
711
lit
• 'k r.
1 . !'
1�4
Apt
1 �
• ' I�' � .':' � '••+ - des ,,1 �
if �•
r'
1 1. -kms `Isr f «a'i.;... ti.'

WAKE COUNTY SHEET 14/21
O
z
SCALE 1:6789

07.0931
NATURAL RESOURCE REPORT May 21.2007
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This Natural Resource Technical Report was prepared to identify any federally
threatened or endangered plant or animal species on or near the subject property.
The subject property is referred to as the Raleigh Quarry Expansion, and is owned
by Hanson Aggregates East, Inc., who is actively mining the existing quarry
(known as the Nello Teer Quarry) on the 200 acres adjacent to the subject
property. The entire tract consists of approximately 250 acres of forested, mined
and industrially developed land, and the subject property is about 44 acres. A
general description of the aquatic, biotic and terrestrial resources and subsequent
jurisdictional issues and protected species are discussed in this report.
1.1 Project Description
In order to meet all federal and state permit requirements for the proposed mine
expansion, Hanson Aggregates East, Inc. contracted with experienced
environmental scientist and licensed soil scientist, Robin Maycock Little, to
identify and delineate all jurisdictional waters (streams and wetlands) on the
subject property. A preliminary review of the Parks and Recreation Department,
Natural Heritage Program (NHP) element occurrence database was also
conducted on May 21, 2007. The subject property has been outlined on the
United States Geological Survey Topographic Quadrangle 7.5 Minute map
(USGS Topo) on the Wake Forest quadrangle on Figure 1 in the attached pre-
construction notification package. It is also shown on an aerial photograph and
USDA Soil Conservation Service Soil Survey maps. (See Figures 2 and 3.)
The subject property consists of approximately 44 acres, and is located
approximately 2 miles north of the Neuse River, from its' intersection with US 1.
The subject site is located on the Wake Forest USGS Topographic Quadrangle
Map, at arnnroximately 35.9331 ° latitude and 78.5485° longitude. Existing
conditions are of a relatively undisturbed mature mixed hardwood and pine forest,
with several small, unnamed ephemeral and intermittent tributaries draining to a
small floodplain to Richland Creek. Richland Creek then drains immediately into
the Neuse River. A small area of wetland was identified at the base of the slope,
formed by subsurface recharge from the stream channels, but not hydrologically
connected at the ground surface.
The proposed project includes _xhe cons?uctio - of aWDximately 0.7 mile of
temporary access and haul roads, several stormwater detention basins built to
retain and treat any runoff from a ten year storm event, and the excavation of
approximately 20 acres in order to mine the underlying granitic bedrock. See the
final proposed site plan in the attached application package.
,I
After avoidance and minimization, wetland impacts will not exceed 0.099 acres,
with 477 linear feet of stream channel impacts and 29,500 square feet of riparian
buffer impacts. The 21 acre lake that will result from the excavation will be
replanted during site reclamation to provide approximately 3825 linear feet or
382,500 square feet of riparian buffer, for a net gain of 3530 linear feet or 353,000
square feet of riparian buffer.
1.2 Definitions
The areas described in this report are specific to the property boundaries and
distances from the perimeter of the property. Project Study Area denotes the area
bounded by the property boundaries. Project Vicinity describes an area extending
approximately 0.5 miles on all sides of the project study area and Project Region
is roughly equivalent to the area represented by a 7.5 minute USGS quadrangle
map.
2.0 WATER RESOURCES
The perennial or intermittent nature of jurisdictional surface waters were
determined using the North Carolina Department of Natural Resources
(NCDENR) Division of Water Quality (DWQ) guidelines. All jurisdictional
wetlands were located within the project study area, and have been delineated
according to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) 1987 Wetland
Delineation Manual. On March 21, 2006, Monty Matthews (USACE), confirmed
that the stream segments were not jurisdictional and were isolated from the
wetland area. On April 21, 2006, field review by Eric Kulz of DWQ resulted in
295 linear feet of jurisdictional stream channel being identified as jurisdictional
and subject to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules. These jurisdictional
features are shown on the attached site plan, and the appropriate wetland data
forms, stream determination forms and stream assessment forms are included in
the preconstruction notification package.
3.0 BIOTIC RESOURCES
The Project Study Area is covered primarily in mature mixed pine and hardwoods
on the sideslopes, and bottomland hardwood forest in the lower, more level areas.
The Project Vicinity contains several biotic communities; primarily mature mesic
Oak- Hickory forest on the uplands and some mixed hardwood - pine forest, with
bottomland hardwoods adjacent to the larger streams and in the floodplain of the
Neuse River.
4.0 SOILS AND GEOLOGY
According to the USDA Soil Conservation Service Soil Survey published in 1970,
(Sheet 14/21) the subject project area is generally mapped as a Cecil- Appling soil
series association. The site has gently sloping to steep topography, with deep,
2
well-drained soils that have firm clay loam to clay subsoil and which are derived
mainly from granite, gneiss and schist. The lower tributaries to Richland Creek
and the Neuse River are mapped as having Appling, Louisburg, Worsham,
Wilkes, Wake and Wehadke soil series. Of those listed, the USDA list only
Wehadke as an "A" list hydric soil and Worsham is listed on the "B" list as it can
have hydric inclusions within the map unit. A small area of a Wehadke/Worsham
soil association was identified in conjunction with the wetland delineation.
The North Carolina Geological survey map shows the project study area as
located within the Raleigh Belt, within an isolated area of intrusive rock,
surrounded by metamorphic rock. Hanson Aggregates is currently mining the
foliated to massive granitic rock within this area, and proposes to expand the
permit area to include the remainder of this high quality granitic deposit.
Metamorphic biotite gneiss and schist intruded by numerous sills and dykes of
granite surround the granitic deposit, along with pegmatite and aptite mixed with
hornblende gneiss. According to the NCGS map, there does not appear to be any
other adjacent area underlain by suitable granitic material that is not already
developed as residential or commercial properties.
5.0 REGULATORY ISSUES
This section provides descriptions, inventories and impact analysis pertinent to
two regulated issues - waters of the U.S. and North Carolina, and federally
threatened or endangered plant or animal species. The documentation of this
information should help to facilitate permit review and approval for the proposed
access and haul road construction, stream crossings, and mining of granitic
deposits in the subject property area
5.1 Surface Waters and Wetlands
Surface waters and jurisdictional wetlands fall under the broad category of
"Waters of the United States" a.,, find in Section 33 of the Code -Gf the-Federal
Register (CFR), Part 328.3, Wetlands. They are defined in 33 CFR 328.3 as those
areas that are "inundated or saturated by ground or surface water at a frequency
and duration sufficient to support, and under normal circumstances do support, a
prevalence of vegetation typically adapted to life in saturated soil conditions".
Any action that proposes to place fill material into these areas falls under the
regulatory jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) under
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 U.S.C. 1344). Waters of the state
of North Carolina are-also regulated and-generally-haw the same r uvments as
the USACE Nationwide permits, as required by Section 401 of the CWA. The
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) regulates waters of the state, and upon review,
will issue Water Quality Certifications that correspond with the USACE
Nationwide Permits.
3
The accepted criteria used to determine the presence of jurisdictional wetlands
include evidence of hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology.
Jurisdictional surface waters and wetlands were identified within the project study
area and the proposed mine excavation will not adversely impact them beyond
what is unavoidable or impractical. Impacts to surface waters and wetlands have
been minimized to the greatest extent feasible and practicable.
As the subject property is located within the Neuse River Basin, DWQ Riparian
Area Buffer rules for Nutrient Sensitive Waters will apply to 292 linear feet of
jurisdictional streams in the project study area. Removal of vegetation and soil
disturbance during proposed construction and excavation could result in soil
erosion. Sediment and erosion best management practices will be followed in
order to minimize impacts to water resources downstream of the proposed project.
5.2 Rare and Protected Species
Some populations of fauna and flora have been in, or are in, the process of decline
either to natural causes, or their inability to coexist with human activities. Federal
law, under the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended,
requires that any action likely to adversely affect a species classified as federally-
protected, may be subject to review by the USFWS. Other species may receive
additional protection under separate state laws.
5.3 Federally Protected Species
Plants and animals with federal classifications of federally Endangered,
Threatened, or Proposed Endangered and Proposed Threatened are protected
under provisions of Sections 7 and 9 of the Endangered Species Act. As of May
10, 2007, four species were listed as federally threatened or endangered for Wake
County: the Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), Red-cockaded woodpecker
(Picoides borealis) and dwarf wedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterodon, and
Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii). Nine plant and animal species are also listed
as current Federal Species of Concern, and seven are shown as historic, obscure
or potential listings. The relative locations of the identified species are shown on
the GIS map generated by the NHP and listed on the USFWS listing for Wake
County, in the attached application package.
A review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program database of rare species
and unique habitats on May 21, 2007 did not reveal any populations of Bald
Eagle, Red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW), dwarf wedgemussel or Michaux's
sumac within two miles of the subject property.
Suitable nesting habitat for the RCW was not observed in the project study area-
A review of the NCNHP database did not reveal any documented populations of
RCWs within two miles of the project study area- Therefore, it is not likely that
the proposed project will adversely affect any populations of RCW.
4
Federal species of concern are those plant or animal species that may or may not
be listed in the future. They are not afforded federal protection and were not
investigated for this report. No documented records were seen in the NCNHP
database within the project study area Three State listed Species of Concern
were observed in the past within one mile of the subject property, but not on it,
and would not be adversely impacted by the proposed mine expansion. They are
listed by the NHP as a colonial wading bird colony of Blue Herons, four-toed
salamander (Hemidactylium scutatum), and Loggerhead shrike (Lanius
ludovicianus).
6.0 REFERENCES
Amoroso, James L., 1999. "Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Plant
Species of North Carolina", Raleigh: North Carolina Natural Heritage Program.
LeGrand, Jr., H. E. and S. P. Hall, 1999. "Natural Heritage Program List of the
Rare Animal Species of North Carolina". Raleigh: North Carolina Natural
Heritage Program.
United States Forest Service, Ecological Services website, Listing of Endangered
Species, Threatened Species, Federal Species of Concern and Candidate Species
for Wake County, North Carolina. http://www.fws.gov/nc-es/cntylist/wake.html
North Carolina Geological Survey, Geologic Map of North Carolina, 1985.
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Wake
County Soil Survey, 1970.
North Carolina Department of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program,
Element Occurrence Database as of May 21, 2007.
5
Wake County Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Concern, and Candidate S... Page 1 of 2
Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Concern,
and Candidate Species,
Wale County, North Carolina
Updated: 05-10-2007
Common Name Scientific name Federal Record Status
Status
Vertebrate:
American eel Anguilla rostrata FSC Current
Bachman's sparrow Aimophila aestivalis FSC Historic
Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus "T Current
Carolina darter Etheostoma collis lepidinion FSC Probable/potential
Carolina madtom Noturus furiosus FSC Current
Pinewoods shiner Lythrurus matutinus FSC Current
Red-cockaded woodpecker Picoides borealis E Historic
Roanoke bass Ambloplites cavifrons FSC Obscure
Southeastern myotis Myotis austroriparius FSC Historic
Southern hognose snake Heterodon simus FSC Obscure
Invertebrate:
Atlantic pigtoe Fusconaia masoni FSC Current
Diana fritillary (butterfly) Speyeria diana FSC Obscure
Dwarf wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon E Current
Green floater Lasmigona subviridis FSC Current
Yellow lance Elliptio lanceolata FSC Current
Vascular Plant:
Bog spicebush Lindera subcoriacea FSC Current
Grassleaf arrowhead Sagittaria weatherbiana FSC Current
Michaux's sumac Rhus michauxii E Current
Sweet pinesap Monotropsis odorata FSC Historic
Virginia least trillium Trillium pusillum var. virginianum FSC Current
Nonvascular plant:
Lichen:
http://www.fws.gov/ne-es/es/cntylist/wakc.html 5/21/2007
Wake County Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Concern, and Candidate 5... Page Z of2
Definitions of Federal Status Codes:
E = endangered. A taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range."
T = threatened. A taxon "likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant
portion of its range."
P = proposed. A taxon proposed for official listing as endangered or threatened.
C = candidate. A taxon under consideration for official listing for which there is sufficient information to support
listing. (Formerly "C l" candidate species.)
FSC = federal species of concern. A species under consideration for listing, for which there is insufficient
information to support listing at this time. These species may or may not be listed in the future, and many of these
species were formerly recognized as "C2" candidate species.
T(S/A) = threatened due to similarity of appearance. A species that is threatened due to similarity of appearance
with other rare species and is listed for its protection. These species are not biologically endangered or threatened
and are not subject to Section 7 consultation.
EXP = experimental population. A taxon listed as experimental (either essential or nonessential). Experimental,
nonessential populations of endangered species (e.g., red wolf) are treated as threatened species on public land, for
consultation purposes, and as species proposed for listing on private land.
Definitions of "Record Status" qualifiers:
Current - the species has been observed in the county within the last 50 years.
Historic - the species was last observed in the county more than 50 years ago.
Obscure - the date and/or location of observation is uncertain.
Incidental/migrant - the species was observed outside of its normal range or habitat.
Probable/potential - the species is considered likely to occur in this county based on the proximity of known records
(in adjacent counties), the presence of potentially suitable habitat, or both.
http://www.fws.gov/nc-esles/Cntylist/wake.html 5/21/2007
o'
U
N
O
O
J
N
A
110
:E CO
rD _
(D (D
X ll -I D -I 3 3 m (n m m m m O (n
.. (D C O O rD O o _. D _.
¦ (. n o fli o Z(D v^) (D D a O O O 3 (D Q C:
c frD
O '° W _- t0 rn rn Q. Ln L n c c c 1G
W c d ?> > a rD j n n n f7 r?D 7
cr a r0 ., a a (r D D rr rD m rD O a a U3 -I
O O a rD (D r r rD rD z 'v r v ? rn m
(n CD a) (A (D w 0 0 C:
¦ in in vii LA (n (D
i° m v rD m
(U o, O >
(n r)
to O
to
O ( {
ON .b { r?i ?^.lll-?\ jJ J ?frJy Vti
- ?'?i \ i f r l 1? ,ti`?1 I ` J 11• +?-+,, l? •. -' i.1-?r+ f?
¦ 3 'fi'r .);r2
•? ? ? /-` -J- ?_( . ti ???;, - ? III @ r :-? k - }?
-O r C /Ifj - ?(( FL F* , rte-' > '1 ? ? ? , -l1`I F.
?f "F1 ??' j(ry III ll raj flr l
0)
¦ -? ? ?? t y ? ? I r ? 1.+Jl 7 r
0 4h,
i 7v ?,v
10
rn _
JIJ
2 ?_ ..JE ?-'?`? •?'„ i ` ti, .I . ?- , rt'^- r ZMi ,r C:' I ?I -4:,
° ?'r? .-`r:1o.> _t .?,?.?.?_'!4'1 tw ? I. [ti 1•?i1larS' ti"(' 5
3

n ,O
rD
OL
(D
7

°

C cn
(
D
D
m tD O
3
n
r'r T p
0 D
_ d
n ? o o
O O
? I N
-.-
z
0
S
n
w
o_
w
z
x
b
s
O
r?
y
N
El
"d
7
o'
N
N
O
O
J
N
00
00
It
G m

fD W CD
w o
a m
a M N 3 0

r
a d to =
n M W A
O Vf
n rt
O C
-s

0
E

FA
n fu

c y

DI

C
of 3 O n O CD
C d z N

CD
ul
C
a
3
y ,.
7
`?
O 1D fD
CD-
o+ Zm
c0

u? r cn n

o
c y a
t m
?3
fD? do

3 m o
O
d as
.
a c
r
W %D i
cr O
t0
01 ID
0 rt U, H
fD fD rt
O
A fD
o a

m A ;a m
a0

X

Im ~ m
C frtD A
to n
rt
0

do?D
c m ?
?nny
rt .
O
3
W W ?
?
W
W r
j r
p
7 ?
? 7C fD
W
Z
A G) 6) X A
as vl Z Of O
X O cr
X Df
A O O A O

nc
r
o
°1

r A f+ m
0
%D
a V
w r
w O
t0 t0
N
CD
n
4
0
N
N
0
0
N
J
rb
m a g n0 = m p m r n m U1 G7
3 a ° 3? c o ? A111 0 l 3 Z c
rt 7 ry rt m , y C 3 cr 0 3
a 3 O r+ Z v 7r y 3 a X
3 u0i < d z
-? 3 n 3 d .a a 3 3
't O 3 fD
3 3 a
v
H mm
w Z 3r m to w O o
? a 3 3 c to (A 0 ?4
m (A to O N
m 7o m
0 or
m M A
a a M
t4om N a
V ?p
O m r to
z 0 O o0
a M O0 a
o v n o
z z 3
D
A g
rn
Z
v v
o
?.. N ?I
o ° v
p n z
V r?r Z
r <
m m O
z z a
m p
a
o
m
m Z
-?
? M
r z
m a
m
Z M
m m
;a a
O m
Z X
O
Z O
a z
M v
M
M
r
r
to
to
to
m
r
v
pm
D
z
v
rn
(D
(D
v
0
n
C
(D
O
19
O
7
51
0
a
o?
'-n
N
N
O
O
J
N
J?
J
rb
p M a o 3 m 0 0 m0 v m0 r n m to 0 m
d o 0 A
a 3 3 ° 3 p 3 z o a
rp 3 co z '* w O 3 c o 3 _? CD
0 d y 0 y d a y ?D Z c n m
3 3 d ?? m n
3 3 a
n > > > f
? '* rr (D
H y p
C7
w m r0 (n m to o N w cD
m 3
w m < 4) co
> 001 3 (A -,
n vz x o O
v O m
x m X 0
T 3
ax
ra
3 ,n
a
Z 0
v c
rn z
?v
?i
mm
n?
M?
mm
? n
D
-i m
iD
m?
(n x
m?
aM
(A
m
?H
mZ
r ?
. x
m
3
M
v
r
10
O
.p
m
p
x
D
V
w
z
r
tp
x
m
x
a
0
c
z
v
Ol A
7 =
a r*
f
cC
3
0
K
0 0
?-n
?n
N
N
O
O
J
N
0
m a d -01 O O G O y c O ^ ? F
_r or co n 0 3 C rt
to n 3 cD rt
c
o a 3 rt ° o 3 z O a 3
z
c c
o. 3 c?
cD 3 0 3 ? rr v ?°
n 3 3 n ffDD
O ,+ O ,? O v
7 `^ 3
v fD CCD
y ?
O
ta m a to ' a
X to
ip m m m H r r.?
O
V? On (D
X c a c
(A z <
W n
? s
m of
m X
z m
O
W
m
m
v
M
z
x
M
n
O
c
z
v
c
X
M
z
x
m
z
m
M
z
m
a
O
z
r
?o
co
0
r
?o
?o
O
rr
H
z _
r
O
O
b
a
r USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
a , MEAM QUALM ASM T AAW
Provide the following In brmatlon for the stream reach under assessment: U
1. Applicant's name• d h o qaA+ SC 1 &(- 2. Evaluator's name: ??04 W 1 T(t L
3. Date of evaluation: 10I 30 0 . 12/ 1 I D 4. Time of evaluation: 10: DO e1-44ti
S. Name of stream: f -jo i R C.,rC99K- 6. River basin: Nt:K?%P,
7. Approximate drainage area: 9& c0e. 13, Strewn order: Z&J-
9. Length of reach evaiwtem "?` t >t - m Couuty?: W A
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 11 Subdivision name (if any): N A
Latitude (ex 34.sr1?t2k: 3:9315 ° Al Longitude c« -77.556611): 78.5519° /i1
Medved location determined (circle): (23) opo rtho Aerial) Photo/GIS cgg? Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location): N o rf
6f &X-14`-e4 aarrv IKJ ajlaUcrl.+ --to &C Akal+ ply'. on ri,o-f side: of accts rcrad.
14, Proposed channel work (if any): Xkxe?V 2 ?-i Ot t,' nha J L-? witk s1cTrmwa t-r &f c- 4-i on
15. Recent weather conditions. - '-
16. Site conditions at time of visit:- WO Dd Ed, V fW !bLuwbb-j
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water supply watershed -?L(I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? tfR NO If yes, estimate the water surface arm -!L ' 1. 2G
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map. ? NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: eO %Residential
30 % Forested
22. Bankf ill width: 3 f+.
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? ® NO
iD % Commercial % Industrial _Yo Agricultural
Clewed / Logged °r6 Other ( )
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): -2 S fi •
24. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 40/*) ? Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>IO%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight ? Occasional bends -Frequent meander Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksbeet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
charm0eristic cwma- be to ske-ter weNfiff condidwas-ader () ie thr scadng bnxsind p=p sa_explaoation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Evaluator's Signature Date 16 31 Lo
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and n ental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06103. To Comment; please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREW -A >ASSESSMENT WIMKSHEET-: :r-- -

#
C3 COREG IO ROMT .RANGE
.
:C8"W..7 F> ledmon °* ,Moantai SCORE
I Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream

no now or saturation - 0., strong flow = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-5
3
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5

extensive alteration = 0• no alteration = max ints '
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0 - 5

-
-
no
bufferAL;eudgamkvWe*A1= am-Vein--)
-

, . ,..
4
4 Evidence of antrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4 -
0-4 -
3
extensive discharges = 0• no discharges = max points)
„a
5 Groundwater discharge
0- 3
0- 4
0- 4
d no discharge = 0; springs, weps, wetlands etc. = max points)
?V+
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
0 - 4
0 - 4
0 - 2
no fl lain = 0• extensive fl lain = max points
a 7 Entrenchment / floodplain access 0- 5 0- 4 0- 2
o
(deeply entrenched = 0 uent flooding = max points)
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 0-6 0-4 0-2
0
no wetlands =
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 3
extensive channelizadon = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4
3
extensive deposition= 0• little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0-4 0-5
fine homogenous = 0• large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5
?j
-
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points) 1
13 Presence of major bank failures 0-5 0-5 0-5
04 severe erosion = 0• no erosion stable banks = max oints
04
d
14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
E„ no visible roots = 0• dense roots throughout = max points)

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production 0-5 0-4 0-5
I
substantial impact =0• no evidence = max points)
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6
3
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0• well-developed = max points)
d
17
Habitat complexity

0-6

0-6
I
0-6
3
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
j
Q
13 Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-i
x no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)

19 embeddedness
Substrate
l
NA*
0-4
0-4
oose structure = max)
(deeply embedded = 0•
?0 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0-4 0-5 0-5
no evidence = 0; common, numerous t?Ws = max points) _ t
21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4
O no evidence = 0; common numerous types = max points)
(
(?
0 22 Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4

d
no evidence = 0• common numerous types = max points)
ildlif
f

23 w
e use
Evidence o
0-6
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) S?p
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

Project Name: River Basin: County: Evaluator- }--?/t?t/(-
PWQ Project Number. Nearest Named Stream: ) Latitude: 3!;V5; If2ISignature:&.?
Date: t??J'-- f USGSQUAD: R: e?tla? Lo ?jT.32137"w?tton/D
- Al
PI'' f : !f evaluator and landowner agree that tits feature is a man-mode uditch. then use of fhb form is noinats t necmay.
Also, if in Me best pmfeuional Judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modYled natural strea.4ais.
rating system Aould not 4e used*
PRIMARY FIELD INDICATORS: (Circle One Number Per Line)
A. Geomdroholdry Absent Weak Moderate Str n
(I) !s there a Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 I 3
Is the USDA texture in Streambed
(3)
Are natural Levees present? 03 A
(
4) Is the Chaitnel'Sinuous? 0
/ (5) Is there ad active (or relic)
(6) Is the channel Braided? In
(7) Are recent -alluvial deposits present? 711 3
(8)
(9)
NQ -- Be & Bank ,,ause.. By Ditchin .,...... ITHOU Sinuosity Then Score-u-
(10) Is a 2*d order or greater channel (as indicated on Topo map and/or in field) present? Yes-3 -0
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: -_
I. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Stron
(1) Is there a groundwater flow/discharge
Present? - - 0 ( I) 2 3
PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
11. Biology
(I) Are fibrous roots present in streambedT_
(2) Are rooted plants present in streambed7_
(3) Is periphyton present? Algae on rocks
under water? _
(4) Are bivalves presentT_
PRIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR 1`011
SECONDARY FIELD INDICATORS: (Circle one number per line)
B. Geomorphology Absent We2k Moderate Stron
(1) Is there a head'cut present in channel? 0 .5 1 1
5
(2) Is there a grade control point in channel?- 0
1 .
IS
(3) Does topography indicate a natural
drainage way? 0 .5 ?- I 1
5
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY POINTS: .
I. Hydrology Abent Weak Moderate Stron
(1) Is this year's (or last's) Ieaflitter
Present in streambed? 1.5 1 .5 0
(2) Is sediment on plants (or debris) present? 0 .5 I 1.5
(3) Are wrack lines present? 0 .5 I
1.5
(4) Is water in channel and>48 hrs. since 0 1 15
Last known rain? ('Note: Ifditch indicate- 49 above skip this step and M5 below')
(5) Is there water in channel during dry 0) 5 1 5
conditions OR in growing season? _
(6) - , )? dcs- i .: Na=Ct
SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 1_
II. Biology Absent Weak Moderate
(1) Are fish present? 110 Stron
1
W Are amphibians present?
5 1 1.5
.
(3) Are aquatic turtles present? .5 I 1.5

1
5
(4) Are crayfish present? M-2 .5 1 .
1
5
(5) Are Macrobenthos present?_ 107 - 1 .
1
5
(6) Are iron oxidizing bacteriatfungus presentT 5 I .
1
5
(7) Is filamentous algae present?_ 0 I .
15
(8) Are wetland plants in sireambed? S V Mostly OBL Mostly FACW ostly FAC Mostly FACU
' Mostly UPI,
NOTE: iftotal absence of aU plants in streambed is noted above skip this step UNL resent;
2 i .75 S 0
SECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: _I 0
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary)=L-I (Ifgreater than or equal to 19 points the stream is at least
intermittent).
TJ
0
l
Gate: 0 3 D
Evaluator,
Total Points:
Steam is at least
intermittent if z 19
DRAFT - For Review and Comments
Project: ?? r' Latitude: 35 05 5 .. L
Site: Q N?v? Longitude:' i X3711
' Other
County: e.g. Quad Name: ??r•
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal=
1. Continuous bed and bank

2. Sinuosity

ol sequence_
iffl Absent
0

0
13 -Weak
1

1 Mod ate

/
- - - Strong
3
3
e-po
3. In-channel structure: r
-- - - 2 3
4. Soil texture
f
2
3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0

b
0 2 3
ench
6. Bankfull 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 2 3
9. Natural Levees 5 1
1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0
0 0.5 1 1.5
11..Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley and drainageway Yes = 3
13. Second or greater order channel on eAstin No Written docume ntation in Notes is
USGS or NRCS map or other documented required for s coring 3 points.
4vi?lancw
B. N drol0 5uoto[ai =
2
3
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 0
15. Leaflitter 1.5 0.5 1 .5 1.5
16. Sediment on plants 1 1
5
17. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 .
Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain.
18 0.5 1 1.5
.
Water in channel - dry or growing season
19 0 0.5 1 1.5
.
20. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes = 1.5
to. t310109y.,?uyw'F- -_ i
21. Fibrous roots in channel
nel
i
h
3
3
_ 2 -
2 0

0
an
n c
22. Rooted plants
- - -
- - -_- -
1
5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 .
24. Bivalves 0
1
5
1

25. Fish 0. 0.5
1
.
1
5
26. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 .
1
5
Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
27 O.v .
.
28. Filamentous algae; periphyton
1
3 1.5
1
29. Iron oxidizing bacterialfungus. 0
5
FAC 0 5
,
FACW = 0.75 1
OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2
30. Plants in streambed .
- l JnGaaw ?.
Notes: i G C a ?G?- Yn
Y_
16
I'S
0 S-1
0MC
Evaluator. Site: r Longitude: 7 y 3 Z ?, 01
Total Points: ^ I t_r i. IGb Other F n
Stream is at least County: Iry e.g. Quad Name: !r
intermittent if z 19
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = ) Absent Weak _
__ IMAo- Strong

1. Continuous bed and bank _
0
1 L
??
T
3
I -Siwrosit,, 0 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
4. Soil texture ----- 0
0 1
1 -2
2 3
- 3 --
5. Active/relic fklodplain 0 1 =
_ 22
3
6. Bankfull bench _
0 1 _
2 3
7. Braided channel _
- 0 _
1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
9. Natural Levees
10. Headcuts 0
0 - 1?
L.jJ? 2
2 3
3
11..Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Ma{eral valley artd drainageway --- - --. 1-- -v S _- s s
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0 Yes = 3
Written documentation in Notes is
required for scoring 3 points.
Q 1.1...4...1.. 11..116-0 i - I
DRAFT For Review and Comments
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 _ 1 3
15- Leaflitter 1.5 1. 0.5 0
16. Sediment on plants 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0. 1 1.5
18. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain. 0 .5 1.5
19. Water in channel - dry or growing season 0 0.5 1 1.5
20. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? o = 0 Yes = 1.5

21. Fibrous roots in channel --- - 3 - 2 1 0
22. Rooted plants in channel 1 0
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
25. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Amphibians 0 5 1 1.5
27. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 1 1.5
28. Filamentous algae: periphyton 0.5 1 1.5
29. Iron oxidizing bacterialfungus. 1 1.5
30. Plants in streambed FAC - 0. FACW = 0.75 OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0
// ?? JRCl1.1 I.
Notes: ;?(r"??„ l ?•/j(`/ --
f
{O'S
j -?
5-
_.L
Project Name: /f" River Basin: t"S& County: /y?kk Evaluator. Ra & k )*le
PWQ Project Number: Nearest Named Sit if J..4 Latitude: 3.r S5 S2/1lSignature:
Date ?L> . 30 USGS QIfAD: got ?
-U3 7 ems;
PLEASE , TE: ljsvalualor and landowner agree that the feature is a ratan-made ditch then use of this form is not necessary.
Also. if in the best profenlonai judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a mod yled natural stream-this
rating system ihould not oe used'
PRIMARY FIELD INDICATORS: (Circle One Number Per Line)
A. CeomdrphoWry Absent W Moderate tron
(1) is there a Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0
Is the USDA texture in Streambed
different ffom surrounding terrain? 0 2
(3) Are natural Levees present?
(4) is the Channel'Sinuous? 0 1
(5) Is them an Actius ix-lic)
Floodplain Present? 0 I F -- 3
(6) is the channel Braided? 1 3
(7) Are recent alluvial deposits present? 0 I 3
(8) is there a bankful bench presnet? 0
(9) Is a continuous Bed dt Bank present? 0 I 3
NOTE. If Bed di Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT SinuosityThen Scare-0 •
(10) Is a 2~ order or greater channel (as indicated on Topo map and/or in field) present? Yes-3 No-0
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: in
1. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
(1) Is there a groundwater flow/discharge ?
Present? _ 0 1 i 2/ 3
PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
If. Biology
(1) Are fibrous roots present in streambed?
(2) Are rooted plants present in streambed?_
(3) Is periphyton present? Algae on rocks
under water? _
(4) Are bivalves present?_
PRIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POI
SECONDARY FIELD INDICATORS: (Circle one number per line)
B. Geomorphology Absent W k Moderate Stron
(1) Is there a head'cut present in channel?_ 0 -? 1 J-3
(2) Is there a grade control point in channel? 0 5 I 1
(3) Does topography indicate a natural
drainage way? 0 .5 15
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY POINTS: 0
1. Hydrology Abent Weak Moderate Stron
(1) Is this year's (or last's) leaflitter
Present in streambed? 1.5 .5 0
(2) Is sediment on plants (or debris) present? 0 I 1.5
(3) Are wrack lines present? 0 I 15
(4) is water in channel and>48 hrs. since 0 1.5
Last known rain? ('Note: if ditch indicated in N9 above skip this step and H5 below) 1
(5) Is there water in channel during dry 0 .5 I ) 15
conditions OR ingrowing seasan?
(6) Are hydric soils present in sides of channetjor in heabcut)? Yes-1:5 0=0
SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
11. Biology Absent Weak Moderate Stron
(1) Are fish present? 0 1 1.5
(2) Are amphibians present? 1 I
(3) Are aquatic turtles present? rgi .5 1 1.5
(4) Are crayfish present? ru .5 1 1.5
(5) Are Macrobenthos present?_ 0 .5 1 1.5
(6) Are iron oxidizing bacteriatfungus present? .5 1 1.5
(7) Is filamentous.algae present?_ 5 1 1.5
(8) Are wetland plants in sireambed? S Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPI,
'NOTE. If natal absence4zill plants in streambed is ow-d-6-s- skip this step UNLESS resent.
2 1 .75 ( .5 J 0 0
SECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:

TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Seeonttlary)=.2-2Z,5 (If greater than or equal to 19 points llte stream is at least
intermittent)
F2.
q- I
a
DRAFT - For Review and Comments
Dice: o P*C ' b F F72
1 1l ?d ie3?3 s .? Jt?
Evaluator, fG'r6 ?? site: #O-W4" Longitude: '7 ,31, ' ?' W
Total Points: Other 1l
Stream's at least l (j, -r 3 County: f l(J C.6C e.g. Quad Name•
intermittent if? 19 ll
-..
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = ' 3 Absent W Moderate Strong
1. Continuous bed and bank 0 2 3
2. -wanwilty -- ^ 3-
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 1 2 3
4. Soil texture 0 2 3-
5. Active/relic fkoodplain 1 2 3
6. Bankfull bench 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
9. Natural Levees 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 3
11-Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.
12. Natural valley and drainageway
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
iCCJL No = 0
??,C Sgv+v"? Yes = 3
Written documentation in Notes is
required for scoring 3 points.
R U Arnld% /C.,kfM.1 = r? J 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 2 3
15. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
16. Sediment on plants
1 0.5 1 1.5
17. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) (-W 0.5 1 1.5
18. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain. 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Water in channel - dry or growing season cfr 0.5 1 1.5
20. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? o = Yes = 1.5
L.
21. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Bivalves
25. Fish - - 1
0.5 2
1 3
1.5
Amphibians r A ' S 1 1.5
27. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 1 1.5
28. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0.5 1 1.5
29. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. - _
0.5 _
1 1.5
30. Plants in streambed AC = 0. FACW = 0.75 OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0
JKe[cn:
Notes:
< M vL4?
bid r?? ? h?G? w ??S - ????Ir-li?, ?j?=-P?i?'??w-nc,
w? ??? 0-6 k kone Srvcj l?
Ig
DRAFT - For Review and Comments
Bate:
Evaluator.
Total Points: .
Stream is at least
intermittent if 2 19
V?- 101
Project: Cap i h j ,?/Ird
Site: 44!ftezr ?
County: AJA kC
Latitude: ,jam'' S-- x•1.11/
Longitude: Y•3 2 3 ???,_ J
Other 1 ?? w
e.g. Quad Name:

A. Geomorphology Subtotal = ?' s Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2
2. fly '. .2
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
4. Soil texture 0
0
1 2 3
3
5. Active/relic floodplain 1 2 3
6. Bankfull bench
---- --- 0
- ..._ -- - 2 3
7. Braided channel 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 1 2 3
9. Natural Levees 1 _2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 3
11-Grade controls 0 1 1.5
12. Natural valley and drainageway 0 0.5 V 1:5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0 Yes = 3
Written documentation in Notes is
required for scoring 3 points.
i
R Mvrlminnv IR„htntal = 315
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Leaflitter 1.5 1Q 0.5 0
16. Sediment on plants CID 0.5 1 1.5
17. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0.5 1 1.5
18. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain. 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Water in channel - dry or growing season 0 0. 1 1.5
20. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = Yes = 1.5
C_ Rinlnnv fRuhtntal = 1
21. Fibrous roots in channel 2
-
22. Rooted plants in channel 3 ( 1 0
23. Crayfish _
0 _
_
0.5 1 1.5
24. Bivalves
25. Fish 1
0.5 2
1 3
1.5
26. Amphibians u ' 0. 1 1.5
27. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 (LSD 1 1.5
28. Filamentous algae; periphyton
29. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5
0.5 1
1 1.5
1.5
30. Plants in streambed AC = 0. FACW = 0.75 OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0
-)Kean:
Notes:
%h ?Zr?w/ i ?'l?x.
I l?
DRAFT - For Review and Comments
Date: Ot. I I - Project: &V Latitude: 31SS rw L
Evaluator. ?h?e Site: Longitude: 79 32 37
Total Points: Coun Other
Stream is at least 1? H: A)A Ki5 e.g. Quad Name:
intemlittent if 2 19 30

A. Geomor holo Subtotal = q' 7 Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sitter 3 1 2 t?
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2-
-- 3
4. Soil texture 0 1 - 3
5. Activelrelic floodplain 0 -1 2 3
6. Bankfull bench 0 1
-- 2
-- - 3
7. Braided channel - 0 - - -- 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 1 2 3
9. Natural Levees
-
-- 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1-5
12. Natural valley and drainageway 0 0.5 1
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0
. Yes =
Written documentation in Notes is
.._,required for scoring 3 points.
R U4 rfr^l^nv IG i.1n1?1 = / 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
16. Sediment on plants 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0 1 1.5
18. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain. 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Water in channel - dry or growing season 0 0.5 1 1.5
20. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? o = Yes = 1.5
r Rininnv /CiihtM.I = G ` l 1
21. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 0
22. Rooted plants in channel _
3 _
2 1 0
23. Crayfish ?0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Bivalves
25. Fish 0
COD 1
0.5 2
1 3
1.5
26. Amphibians u 0.5 CD 1.5
27. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 1 1.5
28. Filamentous algae; periphyton
29. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5
0.5
1 1.5
1.5
30. Plants in streambed = 0. FACW = 0.75 OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0
SKeMn:
Notes: I
1`
DRAFT - For Review and Comments

Date: 1 Z. Project: A A K SNti Latitude: 3T S.! S'2
Evaluator. Site: C Longitude: 7y 3 y ;?
Total Points: Other
Stream is at least a t 2 County: e.g. Quad Name: ' °?
intermittent t iI2 19 ? v v
A. Geomorphology Subtotal =_I -5 Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Smash" Id i j
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1
_.. 2 3
-
4. Soil texture 0 1 L23 3
4
5. Activelrelic f oodplain 0 2 3
6. Bankfull bench _ 0
7. Braided channel 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits ® 1 2 3
9. Natural Levees 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11-Grade controls 9 0.5 1 -
12. Natural valley and drainageway 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on exi ling
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
C f1EE No= 0
-t--I - 3, Yes -= 3
Written documentation in Notes is
-- required for scoring 3 points.
i
R- Hvdrnlnav fSuhtntai = 3' S t
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Leaflitter 1.5 Q 0.5 0
16. Sediment on plants CT) 0.5 1 1.5
17. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain. 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Water in channel - dry or growing season 0 .5 1 1.5
20. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? o = Yes = 1.5
C. BioloaV (Subtotal = 7 7,-.>)
21. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Rooted plants in channel 1 0
23. Crayfish ® 0.5 1 1.5
24. Bivalves 1 2 3
25. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Amphibians 0 5 1 1.5
27. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 1 1.5
28. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 0.5 1 1.5
29. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 1 1.5
30. Plants in streambed FAC = 0.5 -FAC-W = 0.75 BL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0
SKetcn:
Notes: 1 - paw
DATA FORM
SOUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION.
(1987 COE -
roject /Site: N n so H r? a 3 a 8 ?, l cc? Dab: `f 2 0
pplicant i Owner f Csaaty. LAI KE
vestigator: R rat l : e-
! 8tate• Nc

normal almumstances exist on the sib? Yes ? No
Do Community ?:.?_
JAtimkol t)? vop _ mo ! Tmnsect ID.
_
Is the area a potential problem area? Yee
(explain on reverse N needed)
VFGFTATIONI
Dominant Plant Species
1.4 ui g(awbzw s Stratum
rx c. 0 h1dicstor _
FAG Dominant Plant Specks Stralurn, hyscator
9. ?T.2ig oar i Ca- Se-. V t4 iL-
2. rvl c +` s
3. S a wt -ei !yx Lam. U UP L- 11.
1 , / 12
5-Arundin* ?' i
6, WS 5 N
H FACW
FACkv - 13.
14. _
7. i c ro sf? ? u rvt N is.
8. - C& (-- 3 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 6, 7
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks):
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Other
No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water. (in.)
-Depth to Face Water In Pit: (ip.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: ('m.)
1 Remarks:
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Prim.,, i? . efiet2 nz•
lrroraieed
Saturated in Upper 12"
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
_ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators:
? Oxldtzed Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Water-Stained Loaves
FAC-Neutral Test
_ Otter (Explain in Remarks)
SOILS

LiAni.SaAf /J')-
Map Unit Name
e?Rtt?ipe)1 .? - 'dies;
Tuonon l (Subgroup): - Cwdhr.MaPPK7VW Yee No_
Yatlle cdore Now* :Tea m% Concro n ,
y- /v e s 2-, 1 L/z. /o a ,?t 4-s;
love s/2 s/ `fj,Z toe ttic..
lZ -l4 1Tr7?,?/r S
ly -IG /byre/ 617- S
/D e G 2 G 3;? 7 cos, sated
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Hiatle Epipedon _ Hi Organic Conlant in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ SuMdlc Odor Organic Sheaidng in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime L.lsted On Local Hydrkc Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions LisW on National Hydric Soils Last
? Glsyed or Low-Chrome Colors Odw (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: E? f'S t'G 8
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ? No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ? No
Hydric Soils Punt? Yes ? No
Remarks:
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes No
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION.
(1w COEYfeftn ftn-Vo -
b: 14ANS D Al i Dab: O
Owner: - Conaty: $left
:
r. R M L I TILE -
FL
n the sib? Yee .v No
circumstarimuktondwske? Conla unity ID:
sin)? Yee No Trarse ct ID•
a potential problem aria? Tes na
(explain on reverse K needed)
54171
tbmire nt Plane Soeahe nill= Indialar _
1. 1 e?,ln.nt vent soeciee S&dwm, kum:dw
19.
2. `
3. 11.
4.
1 12, ..
5. 13.
6. 14.
T. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-).
Remarks:
S 2'+q E c- dc'
`l
HYDROLOGY
- Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_
_-Pate Primary hWicators:
r
Other -
Saturabd in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available - Water Marks
- Drift Lines
- Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: - Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water. (in.) Seconds Indicators:
? Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free ]Hater in Pit: (in.) - Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) ? FAC-Neutral Test
- Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Nam
(ft%* and Phaae):
TUNIG y ("Mup): Conllnn•Mappl47YPa? Yes No
Proab Daaellellcn• `
Deplh Wb'bc Colors Yotile Colon mom "re dum COnamlom
(InClUal Horbw .??- 1Yuned Now
G /b v /D r f/ /b 14ft_
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosoi - Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon - High organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Solis
_ SuHidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandia Solis _Usftd On Local Hydric _ Aquic Moisture Regime L.isbd on National HydricdSaih List
? Reducing Conditions
/Gleyed or Low-Chroma Cocoa Otitisr (Explain in Remarks)
11N? wi.
36 an day-ci : rK40? 3 / F 7
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ? No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes L/ No Within a Wetland? Yes &," No
+fvdric S p_ Yes ? No
Remarks:

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION.
(1987 COE V iEa ? - ---A
Project 1 sib: 14A iV S o AJ ? Dab:
AWIcant / Owner. - County: wit k E
Invatlgator °N? L t r/ [_C" _ Stab: NC
Do nomaf circunatenas exist on ttte sib? Yes Z No Community ID:
01 af'as-- A o •n: Trained '
Is the area a potential problem area? Yea Nom
(explain on rwerse it needed) I
wrwrwnr i
oamtesft not aosed.s Son

1
[

tAG
U20aVMWn"ftwSoecW ?Inftor

,
2. A g I
3. Behu/A, it, r t I-L
-
FAC -
11.
4. ir+ C 12. ...
S. A?r?M r ?raH. ?C.&i 13.
6. eprf&d iU ?//K NM??- */?Gt 14.
T. ?OE4FT 2 s FAGa
-
15
16
8. .
qq
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). <a
Remarks:
wynRCH _MY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks):
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Other
? No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water. (io-)
-Depth to free Water in Pit: (in.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primarv spada??:
-Saturated in Upper 12"
Water Marks
Drift Uses
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators:
-sue Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
1SLttscInsd Laves
FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
9AA/5Ow3Q
No ImltNaln*
j9e1'NsTandhaeel: '

Taxonomw (Sainfoup): .y
ConAnn.MePP?d7?IPe? Yes No_
000 ' Odtrbc Coto, Madlec
unwa
d dos Moule 'textws. COMWOM
StMMAM dc.
ti
_
issL
lIn
o-2r A 10yr 3/3? X24' X020"

G A IS Z /b ? `??Z / o ?..K-
A63 r
8
le)-12- IUA !D Y`??2 S/Z. sahc/y /oaw.
-7
17--16 s 2xdw 1 "-?

Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Hbboeol
Hlstic Epipedon - ConcratiO^e
- High organic Coniant in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_
- SuMdlc Odor
AquIc Moisture Regime Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
cd
-
Reducing Conditions ona ns
?
j/ Gisyed or Low-Chrome Colors Soils Ust
Usisd on National Hydri
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: F
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ? No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland HydrolM Present? Yes ? No Within a Wetland? Yes-!!L/ No
Hydric ant? Yes ? No c
Remarks:

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987COEl Ofti -a-
Project / sib: N k W S O N Dab.: 'V f2- f 06
Applicant / Owner. " County: ?Ak -_
Investigator: W( r 7l/ c Slab: iIIG
Do normal cimunatanc s exist on the alts? Yes__ No Co nntunity ID:_
situation)? Yr No Transact I
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes no ?- _
(explain on reverse K needed) '
VCf_CTATtAY
Dmkmt Vl.rk so.d.s Won kidledor

1.
lo?i.Pfaetso.d.s
120
2.
3.

11.
4. 12,
1
S. 13.
6. 14a
7.
.
15
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-).
Remarks: V61
S ?? ? a S l?l
uvnQnr nnv
- Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
-
- PrlaWey ladicatom
Other
- - WmadVAM
-Saturated in Upper 12"
?No Recorded Data Available - Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: Patterns in Wetlands
-
Depth of Surface Water. (te•) Secondpry Indicators:
-
.?/ Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12
Depth to F-rae.Water in Pit: Cm.) - 1Alatsc lned Laves
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
H,q A/S o N.ri
ame
Phase):

(Subgrwp): .y ,
ConAnn.MaPPId?YPe? Yes No

Ilollle c
?
H
d
F ledws. CorAvedono,
anoe Now*
??• ?-
o
zon A ?S/ 102M
A ?' -g
G- 7 A 1 G ye-E? .`?/2 f 5/t / o a m
-7-/0 T /O r d l l0
/b - /Z -!d r s alJL y /oa M
/Z -/ !? / ?
79A G yr `/? !o na
,??? ? lOyr Pi,7i3 loar>?
Hydric Soil Indicators: ..
_ Hiss
Histic EpIpedon - Concretions
- High Organic Conbnt in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils;
_
Sutiidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime Organic Streaking in Sandi) Salle
Usted On Local Hyddc Soils List
-
_ Reducing Conditions
y/ Gleyed or Low-Chrome Colors Lisbd an National Hydric Solis List
Other (Explan in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ? No is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ? No Within a Wetland? Yes ?No_
Hydric Soils-Present? Yes ,L No
Remarks:
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION. -Dibmn
(19'7 COE We buMonlAwn.ol)
Project i Sits: 14A N50-1V
Applicant / Owner:
Investigator: ?I L /TT Lf? -
Do nomlal circurratancN sxist on file site? Yes No
she algipiftaody 4wftu lad kai situation)? Ye. H0-!::::L
Is the area a potential problem area? Yee >W
(explain on reverse It needed)
VCf2CTATInU
Conte: &VAAAE
Stab: /VG
Community ID:
Transact ID:
Domkmnt Plane soecles son huftow
1. Domino t Pint 308210 ?. 1 .
9.
2. -j
3. t
11.
4. 12,
1
s. 13.
6. 14.
7. is'-
S.- 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAG).
Remarks: r,a o &.ej P I h,?'S I w G!!+ a n n?-?, < i i1 i Ef C?i?
uvnI?nl (11[.v
- Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerisi p-bol-oAgral-Mm Primary ladicators:
Other
- - i"Ormand
-Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available
- - Water Marks
Drift Unes
- Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: - Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water. (in.) Secondary Indicators:
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) WaterStelned Laves
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) _ FAC-Neutral Test
- Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
1aAA)50N A9 Map unit Name

is ate: • .

Tuonony (Subgroup): ,y
ConAnn.Mappl4'W Yes No
• IYMx Colors Yoft
W floun
11 N Cdors Uwe 'imam CanwMl wo.
NllUolstl aerue0ae atr-
O
nnctm),_ . Nortm _ 1Y?e?
D _ /0 r `?/2 S I So? n!K%z /0.0 wt

14 '712
Hydric Soil Indicators:

Histnol
Hladc Epipedon Concretions
- High Organic Conbnt In Surface Layer In Sandy Soils
_
SuMdlc Odor O WU* S&mmng in Sandy Soils
-
kluic MoWture Regime - Uslad C" Local
?d

Reducing Conditions Hydric Soils LJst
Usbd on National
Gbyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain In Remarks)
Remarks: /V d r H yD K I C-
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophydc Vegetation Present? Yes No ? Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ? Within a Wetland? Yes- No ?
Hydric Soils Present? Yes . No
Remarks:

1 DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(19 ands
PrGject / Sib: HAM54,Al
Applicant! Owner.
Imres"ator: RAI L I MLE
NEMNM?
Do normal circunatanas exist on the sib? Y"--!::::L No
As"
d JAVplcal situation)? yes_ No ?
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No '?
(explain on rwemse it needed)

Dab: 1?/z/o G
County: tVAAX
Stab: n/L
Community ID:
Transect
Ilk-
pomkwt Plane species IndkAtor
1. QgMI ane Plene species
9.
3. 11.
4. S.
1 13-
6.
7. 14,_
1S.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-).
Remarks:
L• Vn12n1 t 1[:Y
- Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
- -P-
Primary Indicators:
Other
- -
-Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available - Water Marks
Drift Unes
-Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: - Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (?•) Secondary Indicators:
Oxidized Roots Channels in upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: WaterStalned Lava
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) - FAC-Neutral Test
- Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
PANSoAI
. 4
Map Unit Name
Taxonomy (Subgroup): ConMn.N"*Klvw Yee No
Pn Ak DMe?lellon
owe •
11a1rtx t:otore Pottle Calws mom
m
."'M now 0111111101 Irortl -te1m CanCl? wo,
swam GIL
Qrd9wel
Haflz .
_
m
y ?^ 3?2 /0.9m

v-4 Q r s/3 bj3 <'/
V -s -3 YLd (ways
?y 7/?f. 7/3 ?S S.
el., f jlr ?oa?sE sand

Hydric Soli Indkators:
_ Histosol - ConcnWons
_ Hlstic Epipsdon - High Organic Conbnt in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
SuMdic Odor Organic StrsaNng In Sandy Soils
- Aquic Mohnure Regime Hyd-U*W On Local Llsbd on ? Hydric Sons List
Reducing Conditlons n in Rsmarke)
Csieysd or Low-Chrome Colors Other (Expial
Remarks: /V O % fa yD K / C•
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophyttc Vegetation Present? Yes No ? Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Within a Wetland? Yes- No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Remarks:
' DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION,
Project / She: N A NS 0 N Dale: &//Z /06
Applicant / Owner.
Invest4dor. rK L 7T/,.L? Std wok E
Stab: NG
uq-
oft?
Do normal circunatanasexist
?
?
? un? ID.
'b•d
?
!to
ai situation)? Ye
ypic
jAt
Is the sib slgnalcantl?l T ?
Is the area a pobwft problem "? -fires ?r
(explain on reverse K needed)
VEGETATION
oomimnc Plane So.cl.. AMM WNW 11 D- -- Plant SoWJft MINE 1111160K
1. A r aAAA2-Yi j i -Al, ?r-?- a•
Ab- L; s - Q - - -
A. t?i
3. rWi- Co FA 11--
4. 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 1S.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). /Da •
Remarks:
uvf%oe%i [V:v
_ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_
_ Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other
-
-Saturabsd in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
- Drift Lines
- Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: - Drainage Patbms in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (b•) Secondary Indicators:
"
? Oxidized Roots Channels In Upper 12
Depth to Free Water in Pit: Water-Stained Laves
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) ? FAC-Neutral Test
- Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
PA 0A1 n-7-
, f
Map Unit Name
(Seriee and
Taxononq (SubprouPl: C"" Mappod Tipp Yes No
O? Motl
'irubm Cormworw
lsC0wMo1N
NWN d?lo !l?cit?tL- use. dL
finchmal _ 100
IM
) Go.3 rsE 5.2 Xw
8'- a4 DA / Ve &

Hydric Soil indicators: -
_ Hiss
Histlc Eptpedon _ ConcnWons
- High organic Conbnt in Surface Layer In Sandy Soils
_
Sul}Idic Odor Organic Streaking In Sandy Soils
_
Aquic Moisture Regime
Rad
Reducing Conditions
Hyddc Soils List
d
Listed on National
_
Gieyed or Low-Chroms Colors _ Ottw (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: tw C-0:5
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ? No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Within a Wetland? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Remarks:
.-,"M p
Rpr 12 07 05:03p Gary W. Keyes 9107936015 p.1
07.0831
WETLAND POINTS1.tXt
Hanson Aggregates
Raleigh Quarry
NC state Plane
NAD 83
PT NORTHING FASTING DESCRIPTION
2696 794380.6947 2132916.5174 "18a"
2697 794385.2017 2132903.1463 "17a"
2698 794396.7934 2132921.7043 "16a"
2699 794391.0201 2132937.3688 "15a"
2700 794390.1668 2132942.5801 "14a"
2701 794397.1814 2132935.8930 "13a"
2702 794414.5767 2132933.0424 "12a"
2703 794442.0831 2132925.1442 "11a"
2704 794451.2191 2132926.5697 "10A"
2705 794440.4932 2132913.7147 "9a"
2706 794442.2718 2132889.1912 "8a"
2707 794443.7038 2132885.4372 "7a"
2708 794486.1914 2132890.2571 "3A"
2709 794475.7420 2132878.6472 "4A"
2710 794490.2560 2132869.4915 "2a"
2711 794486.1636 2132818.3816 "la"
2712 794489.1482 2132767.9542 "7b"
2713 794499.4540 2132781.8799 "9b"
2714 794486.7250 2132744.9759 "newforreference"
2715 794594.7291 2133419.7120 "end.a"
2716 794789.3533 2133604.1231 "start.a"
2717 794360.9947 2132872.0094 "19A"
2718 794381.9004 2132851.0840 "20A"
2719 794389.5025 2132830.1586 "21A"
2720 794369.8638 2132753.4321 "22A"
WZ{- f,- PQ:_?s 5vrzv 4? A?
?M£k Q"Wvt,? b (a 2 1 ,?+
?pri1 f2, 2?
Page 1
r
MAY
'Wr ,n.
saenz ~a~~usx+w.a' 9NBdL ~P~3wY1"~41N64~VMd aoi~ew~o~u~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s 5 8d '1
Jl1Nf10~ 3~IdM ` '~'N HJI3lb~ Sd'1
d
uosu~Hooo ~~~dn~ H~i~~~ ~ ??o NOI~J~?J 1Sd~QIW UO,~
0
~3 auiW ~e~aua~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
1Sb~~ S~1b~J~2~JJfd NOSNdH uolSUC~dX~
~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~8~~~~~~~ .3O :ON A311
0 ~ ,~,r J ? Y
offs", A.
d• . U) _ z - W - = C.D
i ese J 1- x ~ II i ~ ; O~ kr V
~ ~ \ r 0
/111
M ~
O t
(h o O
ti ~ 'PM81~3lde~ a~ ~
o ~
a- Z ~ x eZ o -E-+
x eru ~ ~I
9'OLL
ti
e
Z a a~
Z
V _ X
o t x x
e,~
~ ~Q,
~m ~ ~
s,~0 ~ Ad's ~ 0
~ ~ ~ o
~ ~ s~~x
~~iey Z o~~
's ~ e~~~ W
~ ~ ~
L~% ~
~ ~ ~ m_ ~ a
~ Z ~ ~ ~ ~ N C C ~ C ~U ~ a ~ ~
m cv~ E- tS ~ av j / \ ~ A ~G~
i f` o i ~k
F3 ~ ~~~4 ~ m~ .~~~~4~~ ~s~~~~~ t
v
c c ~ , / ~ I~~ ~ ~ jw~ I
N ~ ~ ~ ~ a Q~~~~ e
~ ~a z
~ ~ ~ ~ W o~ ~ ~ ~
= es~~~ ~ ~ g. c c~ a c a c % 1 % % I ~ „ ~
O r t'~I c'7 ~ ~C 1~ oD Of ° r r ~V
a
~ `1 i
~
~ ~ I ? ? ~ i I/
O ~
~ ~ evi~ , ~ ~~oi
1 ~~X ~ ~s %
~ ~ a / /
~
8b 0 ~ ; i v~ o ? / / / ~
~
, ' i / ~ i
Sx / ~ / ~ \ ~
~ ~ /
X ~ ~ ~ ? / , ; ~ / ' ~ ~
~j
. ,
~
/ ~ D
a ; x o. ~ a~
~ J ~ x ~ cee~ ~
/
1
~ ~•~r " ~ y
zxn"
O x ~

~ ~ x ~ C
i
BOYZx ~
6'141 x~.~y ~
x E
0 W x ~
c
gp'49Z o~
x 3M
b9 £QZ. ~c 3
~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ~x O
-Fr'?___ - - o O ~ X y ,.e~
J 0
f+
N I` F- ~ r
C to
fA L C
~ f W f~' L C
czae ~ , ~-~1 r ~ ~ ~ co .
a c Eg
a C € .Q c
o ~ O ~ s' cc

~ ~ ~aP ~ ~ z E .r
' ~ ~ 2 ~ some*
12 JE
r fi moo"
o W z
~a ~ x
~•~oz
c
C e~a~tiX
2p
Z - ' _ _ _ _ _ 0-tax
U
m
- a c_ J
o ~ ~ c
M ~ ~ ~ ~ tL' -
a w~d ~ ! ~ _ J ~
~ ~ m E
a ~ a ~ ' o • E E
o c ~ y J ~ ~ c~ ~
'co w ~ c
y 1 i 't
~ ~ O ' ~ 1 1 I i
Z ~ 1A ~ 1A 3 i 1
gx i ~ ~ i 1 1
i ~ m ~ 7B ~ 78 1 1 #
i ~ 1 1 !
~ ~ ~
as v s E
a V ~.:va~.:: ~ ~e i
x ~~j e~~ ~02~ ~ ~ O
:r, _ .J _ M O
? 0" 5 ? mE° it
sco~c _ _ - -
3M _ i ~
AD
i u `1~Q
ll 3 1 I ~ co

saoac w!«~ ww- ~ ~ ~ 3 84w - LMO 149 d •i O
O
l~1Nf10~ 3NdM' '~'N H~JI3"ItRJ O
O
UOS~~H Jl2i2idflD HJI3lbRi s~ie~ad u 0 0 o NOI J3211Sd301 W ~ uoisuedx3 auiW ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O
Q ~S~ O
1St/3 S31`dJ3bJJ`d NOSN~dH WJS3a :ON n3H
~a 3 ~ ~ :31tl0 ~NOISV3tl i0 NOLLdM~B3~
W
-U-cn < w LU 114"
0 ~..R.
i i
- ~
ry°
~o
A ~
g L
c~~d m~ 1 ~ y
B $
N H N~ N v~ ti ~ ~ ~a oo~n~a~o ai c p ~ o0
1*51
H ~
~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~y ~ ~ s e
OU ~ 5 ~~FCfvQ 8
N LL o ~ ° n- d ~ fn o U
~ ~!I~ ~~~iii-~ ~a
g ~ ~ ~ M
$ _ =iiii'ii~
v
~ ~ i i iiri ~
f
do
i= ~ ~
~ z
I ~ p g a,
c ~ ~ ~ c I III I I= a F a x
' yob
N
S
N ~ ~ N W v WI N III ~ ~ v
a
~--i{ s ~ Olt % Slow
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ } ~ 'a ~ ~ III ~
o ~ o N ~ ~ ~ - ~
F ~
~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i~,
N II_ ~ ~ N ~
W ~ GQ a oa od
h ~~i.
N ~ ~ ~
Q ~ c - ~
,o g ~ T
r y Z ~ ~
1
fa ~ ~ S
_ N ~ ~ N
N ~N„i ~ ~4f V
~ ~
O

x ~o v~ ~ M A o ~ ~ ~~.d a
~ a ~ x ~
~ ~ C N
~ ~ ~ ~ N
N

O ~ ~ b
~ ~ ~ N V~ ~ N O
Q 0 ~ c o in T
y g N ~ N
O ~ N ~a ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ o - II
V~ to 1 ~ ~ 0
N ~ Rf N o s
~r~ e'H
~ ~ 8 ~ ~
y ~ _ ~ r/ eV III
v A~~°
' q t~ O OO
~ O O a ~ - 111111 ~ ~
z Q ~ of ~ Z' OQ
~~N gill III
M ~j
N
~~maa r .
N
~ ~
O ~,y h N
~ «n. ~ f r N
J
~O
1
~ ~ *"y a C~y G9 a
x • 0 %d Q
4~ ~
N
. . N b
Qh Q
o a
rri ~ ~ - - 1.., au •
cv N
to M ~ ~
r~~~~ ~~~r ~
err r~Jf J
~ ~ d,
~~I / ~~I ~ ~ N ~h N
LO
'J / J / a ~ ~i' ' ~ ~
~ ~ r~~~r r/ N N
O / p ~t;
Q II , r~l~ ~ N ~d ~ vy
3 ~ ~ r~ f ~ ~ rn ~1
~ N
~ ~ r
~
A, r ~ rrr 0 Z
~ r ~ ~ ,t r •r
. ~ r ~ ~ ~ i ~r ~ r~ pry it J T s
r ~r r ~ r ~ . ~r :Y, ~ r d 4• W ,v Y ti
~ rrx~r r~r rfi ?~~j~ rff ~ ~ r. Y . ~ . ~ w + ~ 'e ,
'M
f~ ~i ~
,Y, Y a' r ~ ~ a, y.. ° ~ ' iA
r yr ~ ~ ~'.:Y .Y , . a ~ / ~ ti ~ Y„ , ~ 'r r ~ s i ~
~ Y V ~ .r n r
~rr~ , ~i rr
CL L4. 6 b r `v dy y . f
• l~ M, ~Y r Y

W
AR t/ N C4