20120901 Ver 1_401 Application_20120912

I
S -
20120901
Regency at the Palisades
Residential Project
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
Nationwide Permit PCN Submittal
Prepared For
George Leone
Toll Bros, Inc.
Director of Land Development
Toll Bros, Inc.
160 Cape May Avenue
Ponte Vedra, FL 32081
Prepared By:
RAFED
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC 4
Environmental Planning Consultant n
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, NC 28105
(704) 904 -2277
September 26, 2012
ERR 2 8 2012
.

\O�OF W A TF9OG
o <
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page I of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Appkant Information
1.
Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29, 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
® Yes
❑ No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Regency at the Palisades
2b. County:
Mecklenburg
2c
Nearest municipality / town:
Charlotte
2d.
Subdivision name:
Regency at the Palisades
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Standard Pacific of the Carolinas, LLC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
27458 -369
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Attn: Elliot Mann
3d.
Street address:
11525 Carmel Commons Boulevard, Suite 301
3e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28226
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page I of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

N i Carolina Secretary of State
is
North Carolina
Elaine F. Marshall DEPARTMENT OF THE
Secretary SECRETARY OF STATE
PO Box 29622 Ralegh, NC 27626-09-22 ;419>ti07 -2000
Date: 9/14/2012
Click here to:
View Document Filings I File an Annual Report
JPrint a pre - populated Annual Report Form I Amended A Previous Annual Report
Corporation Names
Name Name Type
NC TOLL BROS., INC. LEGAL
Business Corporation Information
SOSID:
0339865
Status:
Current- Active
Effective Date:
2/17/1994
Annual Report Due Date:
Citizenship:
FOREIGN
State of Inc.:
PA
Duration:
PERPETUAL
Annual Report Status:
CURRENT
Registered Agent
Agent Name:
Office Address:
Mailing Address:
Principal Office
CT CORPORATION SYSTEM
150 FAYETTEVILLE ST., BOX 1011
RALEIGH NC 27601
150 FAYETTEVILLE ST., BOX 1011
RALEIGH NC 27601
Office Address: 250 GIBRALTAR RD
HORSHAM PA 19044
Mailing Address: 250 GIBRALTAR RD
HORSHAM PA 19044
Officers
Title: GENERAL COUNSEL
Name: JOHN K MCDONALD
Business Address: 250 GIBRALTAR ROAD
HORSHAM PA 19044
Title: PRESIDENT
Name: RICHARD T HARTMAN
Business Address: 250 GIBRALTAR RD
HORSHAM PA 19044
Title: SECRETARY
Page 1 of 2
http :J /wwww.wcre.l dry. state .ne.us /corporations/Corp.aspx ". Pitemld= 4823821 9/14/2012

North Carolina Secretary of State
Page 1 of 1
Date: 9/26/2012
Click here to-
View Document Filings I File an Annual Report
JA Print a Pre - populated Annual Report Fillable PDF Form I Amended A Previous Annual Report
Corporation Names
Name Name Type
NC STANDARD PACIFIC OF THE LEGAL
CAROLINAS, LLC
NC WESTFIELD HOMES OF THE PREV LEGAL
CAROLINAS, LLC
Limited Liability Company Information
SOSID:
North Carolina
Status:
Elaine F. Marshall D EPARTM E SIT OF TI-t E
Effective Date:
SECRETARY OF STATE
^� f• r
Secretary
PO Box 29622 R�ilt.gp. NC 276264 >32? {�1t��1C�7.10i►0
Citizenship:
FOREIGN
Date: 9/26/2012
Click here to-
View Document Filings I File an Annual Report
JA Print a Pre - populated Annual Report Fillable PDF Form I Amended A Previous Annual Report
Corporation Names
Name Name Type
NC STANDARD PACIFIC OF THE LEGAL
CAROLINAS, LLC
NC WESTFIELD HOMES OF THE PREV LEGAL
CAROLINAS, LLC
Limited Liability Company Information
SOSID:
0665971
Status:
Current - Active
Effective Date:
3/4/2003
Annual Report Due Date:
Citizenship:
FOREIGN
State of Inc.:
DE
Duration:
PERPETUAL
Annual Report Status:
CURRENT
Registered Agent
Agent Name: NATIONAL REGISTERED AGENTS, INC.
Office Address: 120 PENMARC DR., STE. 118
RALEIGH NC 27603
Mailing Address: 120 PENMARC DR, STE 118
RALEIGH NC 27603
Principal Office
Office Address: 11525 CARMEL COMMONS BLVD, SUITE 301
CHARLOTTE NC 28226
Mailing Address:
Officers
15360 BARRANCA PARKWAY
IRVINE CA 92618
Title: MANAGER
Name: ELLIOT MANN
Business Address: 11525 CARMEL COMMONS BLVD, SUITE 301
CHARLOTTE NC 28226
This website is provided to the public as a part of the Secretary of State Knowledge Base (SOSKB) system Version.
3484
htty: / /www.secretary. state. nc. us / corporations /Corn.asox ?Pitemld= 5621692 9/26/2012

Mecklenburg County, NC Polaris
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
POLARIS
Parcel Ownership and GIS Summary
Date and Time: 912612012 12:19:24 PM
Parcel ID #: 21733101 GIS ID #: 21733101 FEMA Flood Information
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
ProF
Legal Desc.:
Land Area:
Fire District:
Special District:
Account Type:
Municipality.
Property Use:
Deed Refs
REAL PROPERTY HOLDING- FEMA Panel #: 710349900J
PALISADES NC LLC AND C/O FEMA Flood Zone: UT
PNC BANK AND 942000107 FEMA Panel Date: 3/02/2009
ATTN: HEMA RODRIGUEZ - Community Flood Informatio
ASSET Community UT
PO BOX 25999 1 Flood Zone:
MISSION, KS 66225 -5999
Characteristics
NA
73.9AC
24- STEELE CREEK #2
FIRE SERVICE A
NC CORP
0- MECKLENBURG COUNTY -
UNINCORPORATED
1NGLE -FAM
and Sales Price
26177 -935 (12/28/2010) $0 00
14573 -594 (12/20/2002) $0.00
14573 -594 (12/20/2002) $0.00
14573 -594 (12/20/2002) $0 00
14573 -560 (12/20/2002) $0.00
07606 -475 (12/28/1993) $0.00
Situs Addresses Tied to This Parcel
17006 YOUNGBLOOD RD
Site Location Information
Zoning Boundaries:
Contact Appropriate Planning
Department or See Map.
ETJ Area: CHARLOTTE
Charlotte Historic Districts: NO
Within Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area: NO
Census Tract #: 59.02
Parcel Falls Inside a Water Quality Buffer ?: YES
Post Construction District
Jurisdiction:
Charlotte
District:
West Catawba
Page 1 of 1
Regulated Watershed Information
Watershed Name: ILAKE WYLIE
Watershed Class: IPA AND CA
Building Photography
PHOTO #1
Location: 17006 YOUNGBLOOD RD
Information contained within this photo may be used as a visual aid
and to generally locate, identify, and inventory parcels in Mecklenburg
County, North Carolina There are inherent errors and limitations
associated with this type of electronic medium Mecklenburg County
cannot warrant or guarantee the information contained herein including
but not limited to its accuracy or completeness
Powered by
G
►y�
TM
l ehe information provided by this program is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded eeds, plats, tax maps, surveys, and other public records and data Users of this map data are hereby notified that the aforementioned public
nmary information sources should be consulted for verification of the information Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no
al responsibility for the information contained herein
http: // polaris. mecklenburgcountync .gov /Website/ redesign /ParcelDetailsPhotoReport.asp 9/26/2012

I
Mecklenburg County, NC Polaris
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
POLARIS
Parcel Ownership and GIS Summary
Date and Time: 9/26/2012 12:20:18 PM
Parcel ID #: 21733103 GIS ID #: 21733103 FEMA Flood Information
Owner Name: REAL PROPERTY HOLDING- FEMA Panel #: 3710349900J
PALISADES NC LLC AND C/O FEMA Flood Zone: OUT
PNC BANK AND 942000107 FEMA Panel Date: 03/02/2009
ATTN: HEMA RODRIGUEZ - Community Flood Information
ASSET Community UT
Mailing Address: PO BOX 25999 Flood Zone:
SHAWNEE
MISSION, KS 66225 -5999
Property Characteristics
Legal Desc.: M42 -863 &PT ABANDONED
IRD
Land Area: 132.258AC
Fire District: 24- STEELE CREEK #2
Special District: FIRE SERVICE A
Account Type: NC CORP
Municipality: 0- MECKLENBURG COUNTY -
UNINCORPORATED
Property Use: VACANT
Deed Reference(s) and Sales Price
26177 -935 (12/28/2010) $0.00
25689 -28 (6/15/2010) $860,500 00
21799 -558 (2/21/2007) $0 00
21267 -923 (10/27/2006) $0 00
18178 -551 (12/29/2004) $0 00
Situs Addresses Tied to This Parcel
GRAND PALISADES PY
Site Location Information
Zoning Boundaries:
Contact Appropriate Planning
Department or See Map
ETJ Area: CHARLOTTE
Charlotte Historic Districts: NO
Within Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area: NO
Census Tract #: 59.02
Parcel Falls Inside a Water Quality Buffer ?: YES
Post Construction District
Jurisdiction:
Charlotte
District:
West Catawba
Regulated Watershed Information
Watershed Name: LAKE WYLIE
Watershed Class: ACA
Powered by
G
TM
Page I of 1
The information provided by this program is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded
deeds, plats, tax maps, surveys, and other public records and data. Users of this map data are hereby notified that the aforementioned public
primary information sources should be consulted for verification of the information Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no
legal responsibility for the information contained herein.
http: // polaris. mecklenburgcountync .gov /website/ redesign /ParcelDetaiIsReport.asp , 9/26/2012

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Owners Representative
4b.
Name:
Mr. George Leone
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Toll Bros. Inc.
4d. Street address:
160 Cape May Ave
4e.
City, state, zip:
Ponte Vedra, FL 32081
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name: I
Leonard S. Rindner
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC
5c.
Street address:
3714 Spokeshave Lane
5d.
City, state, zip:
Matthews, NC 28105
5e. Telephone no.:
704- 904 -2277
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
Irindner @carolina.rr.com
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
21733101;21733103
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.3329 Longitude: - 80.7537
(DD DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
+/- 106.15 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
UT of Lake Wylie 03050101
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Water Classification C (Lower Lake Wylie)
2c. River basin:
Catawba
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site consist mature woodland area in mid succession with some mature pockets. The site is adjacent to existing and
developing residential subdivisions and a thoroughfare.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property.
Approximately 9.0 acres of wetlands and streams
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
approximately 5,200 linear feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Road crossings and minor wetland impacts to prepare lots and construct utilities.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project is a single family residential subdivision. Project includes lots, roads, utilities, landscaping, and required
stormwater management features. Impacts are limited to 300 linear feet of stream for road crossings and .39 acres of
wetland impacts (.25 permanent). Heavy construction machinery will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: expired - required a updated delineation
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
El Preliminary ®Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company: Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC
Name (if known): Leonard S. Rmdner /Pat Kealy
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Wetlands and streams were field verified by Steve Kichefski of the USACE (4/4/12) and Alan Johnson of NCDENR
(11/28/11).
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
one existing road crossing was installed by previous landowner (140 linear feet) based on previously issued permit.
Mitigatation is provided for this impact based on cumulative impacts.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
Project has been determined to be single and complete by the USACE
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ®P ❑ T
Detail A - NWP
29
PFO1A
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
® DWQ
.06
W2 ®P ®T
Detail B - NWP
29
PFO1A/PSS1A
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
® DWQ
08
W3 ®P ❑ T
Detail C - NWP
29
PFO1A
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
® DWQ
09
Detail C and D -
® Yes
® Corps
W4 ❑ P ® T
NWP
PFO1A
❑ No
® DWQ
.14 - temporary
12 - sewer line
W5 ® P ❑ T
Detail D - NWP
29
PFO1A
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
® DWQ
.01
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
Detail E - NWP
29
PFO1A
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
® DWQ
.01
(.2
2g. Total wetland impacts
e.39
t
P )
2h. Comments: These wetland area impacts are an accumulation 7 small wetland pockets and edges.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g•
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear feet)
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T
Detail A - road
UT of Lake Wylie
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
® DWQ
6'
42 LF
crossing
Detail A - road
® PER
® Corps
55 linear
feet of
S2 ®P ❑ T
crossing - replace
UT of Lake Wylie
❑ INT
® DWQ
0
replacement
existing culvert
culvert 0 LF
S3 ®P ❑ T
Detail E - road
UT of Lake Wylie
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
® DWQ
6'
31 If
crossing
S4 O P ❑ T
Detail F - Road
Crossing
UT of Lake Wylie
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
® DWQ
3'
86 If
S5 [� P [:IT
Detail G - Rgoad
Crossing
UT of Lake Wylie
a W R
® Corps
140 If
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
300 If
3i. Comments:
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number —
Permanent (P)
or Temporary
(T)
4b.
Name of
waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4E Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose
of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
K Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar-Pamlico El Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P)
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
or Temporary
impact
required?
T)
B1 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P ❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The proposed project uses existing road crossings to the extent feasible. Headwalls are used to minimize the length of
impacts. The road crossing designs are proposed to maintain existing stream width instead of twin culverts where applicable
Wetland impacts are an accumulation of small wetland pockets and unavoidable edges. Impacts have been limited to 0.25 of
permanent impacts to wetlands and 0.14 of temporary impacts to install a sewer line. Wetland areas will be restored and
planted with an approved wetland seed mix. Anti -seep collars have been specified with in the utility crossings.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Project is subject to strict enforcement of erosion control plans and clearly marking or barricading areas to be preserved.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters df the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
® Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
® DWQ ® Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
®Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments: NA
14. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
® Yes
300 If at 1:1 basis per USACE and NCDENR linear feet
® warm ❑ cool ❑cold
square feet
0.25 at a 2:1 basis
0.14 at a 1:1 basis
0.64 total mitigation acres required acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
16. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that I El Yes ® No
requires buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
24%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The stormwater plan will be also designed in accordance with The Palisades Water Quality Management Plan which
meets or exceeds Charlotte Mecklenburg PCCO - NPDES Phase 2 Requirements. Based on the outcome of a meeting
with Cyndi Karoly and Annette Lucas of NCDENR and with Rusty Rozelle and Don Ceccarelli of Charlotte /Mecklenburg
LUESA, the stormwater plan review and approval will be delegated to Charlotte Mecklenburg Land Use and
Environmental Services Agency (LUESA). As required, the final stormwater plans and /or approvals will be submitted to
NCDENR for approval prior to any impacts to streams and wetlands.
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Charlotte /Mecklenburg
® Phase II
❑ NSW
3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
® Other. Palisades Water Quality
Plan / PCCO - See 2d
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ® No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
El ❑ No
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
El Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Site was evaluated during the wetland delineation process for the presence of Schweinitz's Sunflower. The existing
vegetation along road sides is maintained lawn. Ecotonal edges along roads and clearings were inspected to determine
if Schweinitz's sunflower was present. Project site is not in a watershed that has been identified as habitat for the Carolina
heelsplitter. Based on a field evaluation Schweinitz's sunflower or it's habitat was determined not to be present.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
http: / /www. nmfs. noaa.gov/ habitat /habitatprotection /efh /G IS— inven. htm
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
According to the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places for the presence or absence of
registered properties, or properties listed as being eligible for inclusion therein, this site is not registered property or
property listed as being eligible for inclusion in the Register. There ar no known existing structures on the site.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determinations her/e' e provided information
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC
9-27 -12
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

1•-
ffl s �sterr� �. ��'t
PROGRAM
September 27, 2012
George Leone
Toll Brothers, Inc.
160 Cape May Avenue
Ponte Vendra, FL 32081
Project: Regency at the Palisades
Expiration of Acceptance: March 27, 2013
County: Mecklenburg
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to accept
payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as indicated in the table below. Please
note that this decision does not assure that participation in the NCEEP will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation
for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be
approved. You must also comply with all other state federal or local government permits, regulations or authorizations associated
with the proposed activity including SL 2009 -337• An Act to Promote the Use of Compensatory Mitigation Banks as amended by
S.L. 2011 -343.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a copy of the
issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's
responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based
on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the In-
Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed at www.nceep.net.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the NCEEP, the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are
summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation required for this impact is determined by permitting agencies.
Impact
River
Basin
CU
Location
Stream (feet)
Wetlands (acres)
Buffer I
(Sq. Ft.)
Buffer 11
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold
Cool I
Warm
Ri arian
Non -Ri arian
Coastal Marsh
Catawba
03050101
0
0
300
0.39
1 0
0
0
0
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The mitigation will be peifoimed in
accordance with the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources' Ecosystem Enhancement Program In -Lieu Fec
Instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the NCEEP. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at
(919) 716 -1921.
Sincerely,
t
S li ek
t' it ctor
cc, Karen Higgins, NCDWQ Wetlands /401 Unit
Steve Kichefski, USACE- Asheville
Michael Burkhard, NCDWQ - Mooresville
Len Rindner, agent
File
A"holrt;Kg... E .. Prot"" Ow Itatt✓
MUM
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652 / 919 - 715 -0476 / www.nceep.net

LEONARD S. RINDNER, I'I.IA:
► ( - 3714 Spoke lime I.:►ne
I�:u�iroomcnt:�111aun�n ('omultnnt
Profe%%iona►I 1Ve11and scientist N( 28101;
Land 11almini Icle: (704)904 -2277
Fchruar� 1 _', ?OI'
Mi. Steve hichet'skt
I hotel States jlrmv Corps of t_tigincers
1 i 1 Patton Avenue. Room 208
Asheville. NC 28,401 -5006
Re: Jurisdictional Determination — Palisades Frart 2 - +/- 134) .Acre~, Charlotte. NC
Dca+ Nk1r. Krcht:til%k+.
On behall' of Mr. (►corgc I cone, of Toll Brothcrs, htc . I am rctluesimu wur rcvicw
approval of the 1urisdiclronal (lei ermination. 1 look list +ard to vour site N iN11 on Fchru lly
14. 2012.
'I'hank you PIca"r contact me rf tiou havc .utN. Clue. tans.
`uuerrly. � j
ollard S. iZrnthicr, NVS
;�, -- {:nviron3i�rnlai I'lannin� Cnntiult;uit
CC. George Leone
1
)if 1'o I+ys +1) f,,Irul 17+'ve l +�hnu �yt
Io+11 HII,llr+ rti, 1n+.
IreO GII'I NLIv A %,( nu+�
1' ill l+, VI tIw, FI, �?(isI

LEONARD S. RINDNER, PITC• --
Environm c mal Planning Consultant 3714 SpokoJime I.:ine
Profemdonal Wclland Scientio-1 N1atlhei%s. NC 2810;'
Land Planning! I dc: (714) 904 -2277
Fchruarr 12. _)()l'
Mr. C:corr;c Leone
I )irector o t' l ,and Do clopmem
`I'o11 Molhcts, Inc.
1611 C'ahc May Avenuc
110nic Vedr•a, FL 32081
Dear Mr. Lcone:
In order to interlace with the United tilatcs Anny Corps of' I_ngincers and the Norlh
Carolina Dclru-tnxnt ol'Natural Resources I will need your authoriiat011 Please sn-m the
1,01lowin1; statement.
7'hi.c letwr attthori; e% Leonard S. Riudner. P/ LC • a% our irnt '.% t kgent in mall er% reed ed
to Raters of the VS. and Ifatrry of North Carolina.for the nfi,renced project site!. this
inc/tides int dining with the United States ,-1rn!►• Corp. c►/' L•iiginvers and flit, :Vorlh
Carolina Department of'Natutwl Revpurc (%.
Signatnrc,
Dale
t'lea"c contact nu•,41- �pu have m1V cluc"l iow, or require addin( nal explanation, -I hank
ti•ou.
i
Sincerely-. "
{< i[} !+�Iz111tlner. lid's
ilt'1rl�t11 ►tl'lilal Plamim'_' i on`llll:lnl
(Toole Sfml WC11;111l Selelltlst
(-'c. Malc 114 +111c

PALISADES TRACT 2
Lake Wylie
LANGSTON DRIVE
FIGURE NO. LEONARD S. RINDNER PLLC
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, NC 28105
(7D4)904 -2277
LEN. RIN DNER. PWS@gmail corn
Pineville
Fast
PALISADES TRACT 2
Mecklenburg County, NC
VICINITY MAP
APPROXIMATE SITE LOCATION
SHEET
DRAWN REVIEWED
By PJK I BY LSR
DATE PAGE
02108112 1
Hartikw
IWO
Tryon Hills
Belmort
HfAise
GNP
C11 -1
Charlotte
+
Charlotte Douglar I
21
U
Injernavoral
Jai*qnn
Homes
�Jre
Sedgefield
Dimw
Farlip Lake
-409
)U
0
Whit-haft
r
rj
Grei,, Fork,
z
Clef-1,
H3 L, 1-5t'00,
Lake Wylie
LANGSTON DRIVE
FIGURE NO. LEONARD S. RINDNER PLLC
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, NC 28105
(7D4)904 -2277
LEN. RIN DNER. PWS@gmail corn
Pineville
Fast
PALISADES TRACT 2
Mecklenburg County, NC
VICINITY MAP
APPROXIMATE SITE LOCATION
SHEET
DRAWN REVIEWED
By PJK I BY LSR
DATE PAGE
02108112 1

PALISADES TRACT 2
,,� ��! �"�r' `� j r y( � ~~ '` +�'� ��r•' ��• F Aar �� r�td .�
�r j- , �; F f � , /' � r4 r ^�,v ,1� (• ,t r �._.�'"' - `1 �'1� � A,,�
�` r�^47 ' Kr,`r i^ a,,, " - e` i j� �,tt, «• ,,�j t +�h �, � i , _ �` �,� �'
_ y�4� ` } •r 'vi' y�,,,,,s� �`"'Y' -, i�r 1 I t ' n ,�Y"` �°'/����� �j= ,°,= '- �"�'�° s %
°r
Ilk r -"!r Foe)
k ,
Br
Ile -71
�Y!': r h Y ? ?f � � j ' 4 4 , "` i' .Q . - �'^ I .� Irl s ✓
SITE
'"� _ .��� `0�� r_'� �� �` yr' ^�•�' ._ � ���'" ,) '`1 �'`r
LOCATION.
SCALE LATITUDE 35 08093 N -8 1 03294 W
LONGITUDE
2000 1000 0 2000(Feet) HUC 03050101
Upper Catawba
FIGURE NO. LEONARD S. RINDNER PLLC PALISADES TRACT 2 SHEET
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group DRAWN PA BY LSR
BY BY
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, NC 28105 USGS LOCATION MAP DATE PAGE
(704) 904 — 2277
LEN RINDNER PWS @gmall com APPROXIMATE LOCATION 04116112
LAKE WYLIE (SC - NC) QUADRANGLE
1993

PALISADES TRACT 2 SITE

PALISADES TRACT 2 SITE

0 I
PALISADES TRACT 2
i
�r PER - RPW E1
PER Z 1- 40 •�" '• +•
exis mg cu ve s wi m
-
- Project edge flagged only r
(Studmarl Bi
LAKE
;
- Does not close - %•
From culvert to pro) perty
II
WYLIE
f
v r
line / lake / bea a pond
locations
r
5 _
11 r J +�
WETLAND
` ''
EXISTING RIP RAP i. +i
. •
BASINS AND BERMS
WETLAND "1 '
N 1 - 37
J-r P _
' ' VRY 'n, : �, V
'rr
l i•
Y 1 -14 + + r, -,�
- Ties to lake /PL
To culvert / property line '•.,
-�`�
Ties to lake /PL
- Includes Shallow asp: i>f
SEA - RPW
littoral zone
•
! B1
SEA - RPW,
%per NCDENR field
�__ -_
, {NYRCw,� 1
��� •i i
determination on
11128/11)
s '
,y
`V A `��
• . -
s +,
-USACE verification
- �- : „ h•
Y � � `
;�T +
04105112
F$
•
1
WETLAND
it EXISTING
`
R 1 - 9 / S 1 -11 WETLAND
RIP RAP BASINS
P 1 -13(w) I
AND BERMS
PER - RPW C1
%
t \\
04105112
i 4'
• i
-To culvert property line
i- x{
FIGURE NO.
- WETLAND
PALISADES TRACT 2
V1- 13IW1 -8
Mecklenburg County, NC
DRAWN
REVIEWED
.WD
By
•-
�? •.�` iac
Based on USACE
7.......:•
1
Matthews, NC 28105
field visit 04105112
Based on USACE
PAGE
(704)904— 2277
field visit 04105112''
t 1/2&11
LEN RINDNER PWS @gmail.com
USACEvenfica6on
SUBJECT TO USACE /NCDENR VERIFICATION
0410542
Locate C/L and width of ;
Y;
WETLAND
all stream channels and
X 1 - 90
exis mg cu ve s wi m
-
property boundary
. ;,
Confirm braided stream
locations
EXISTING
PER - RPW D7
RAP BASINS
RIAND
To culvert / property line '•.,
-�`�
BERMS
d
SEA - RPW,
`
Al
a
EXISTING
Ties to property line
%per NCDENR field
determination on 1112ari 1)
- USACE verification
PER - RPW C1
%
t \\
04105112
i 4'
• i
-To culvert property line
FIGURE NO.
LEONARD S. RINDNER PLLC
PALISADES TRACT 2
SHEET
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
Mecklenburg County, NC
DRAWN
REVIEWED
By PJK
By
3714 3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, NC 28105
APPROXIMATE MAP FOR SURVEY
Rev based on
NCDENRfieldvad
PAGE
(704)904— 2277
WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES
t 1/2&11
LEN RINDNER PWS @gmail.com
USACEvenfica6on
SUBJECT TO USACE /NCDENR VERIFICATION
0410542

NC Division of Water Quality - Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.1
W DCVO Stream Identification Forin Version 4.1
Date: November 08, 2012
Pro ect/Site: Palisades Tr2
1 Seasonal RPW B
Latitude: 35 07952 N
Evaluator: LSR, PJK
County: Mecklenburg County, NC
Longitude: - 81.03247 W
Total Points:
Stream Determi c circle one)
Other Lake Wylie (SC) Quad
Stieam is at least intermittent 19.5
Ephemeral ntermitten Perennial
e y Ouad Name: HUC 03050101
if >_ 19 or renniat if = 30'
2
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =__10 5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
co
2
3
3 In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
d le- ool sequence
0
O
2
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
co
2
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6, Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
C1 3
2
3
9. Grade control
0
.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No U0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
B. Hvdrology (Subtotal = 5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15, Sediment on plants or debris
Co
0.5
1
1.5
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water tables
No = 0
Yes
3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 4
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22 Fish
co
05
1
1.5
23 Crayfish
0
05
05
1
1
1.5
1.5
24 Amphibians
0
25 Algae
0
05
1
1.5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75: OBL = 15
Other 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes. (+/-)l' - 3' wide chan. +/- 5'- 6' wide and 1'— 3' deep@ top
of bank, Silt, sand.
No flow, persistent pools, saturated.
Sketch

NC Division of Water Quality - Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.1
�iCDWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.1
Date: November 08, 2012
Pro j ect /Site: Palisades Tr2
1 Seasonal RPW A
Latitude: 35 07785 N
Evaluator: LSR, PJK
County: Mecklenburg County, NC
Longitude: - 81.03341 W
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Lake Wylie (SC) Quad
Stream is at least intermittent 24
Ephemera ntermltten Perennial
e g Oifad Name: HUC 03050101
rf_ 19 or erennral ri- 3U'
2
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= 14.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex riffle -pool. step -pool.
ripple-pool sequence
0
1
O
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
CO3
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
Noco_3
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
B. Hvdrologv (Subtotal = 5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14 Leaf litter
15
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
.5
1
15
17. Soll -based evidence of high water table'?
No = 0
Yes
3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 4.5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
Q31
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
C0j
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0 )
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23 Crayfish
0
05
1
1.5
24 Amphibians
0
05
1
1.5
25 Algae
0
0.
1
15
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75: OBL = 15 Other 0
.perennial streams may also be identified using other methods see p 35 of manual
Notes: (+/-)l'- 3' wide chan. +/- 6'- T wide and 1'- 3' deep top
of bank;
Silt, sand, few cobble, few boulders.
No flow, persistent pools, saturated.
Sketch:

NC Division of Water Quality - Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.1
NC' DZI**'O Stream Identification Form Version 4.1
Date: November 08, 2012
Pro ect/Site: Palisades W
1 Perennial RPW C
latitude: 35.08156 N
Evaluator: LSR, PJK
County: Mecklenburg County, NC
Longitude: - 81.02780 W
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle a )
Other Lake Wylie (SC) Quad
Stream is at least intermittent 31.5
Ephemeral Intermitte erennia
e g Ouad Name: HUC 03050101
if >_ 19 or perennial rf _ 30'
CD
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= 15 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
CD
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool.
ripple-pool sequence
0
1
O2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
05
CD
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
Yes
co
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
Cl
2
3
8. Headcuts
CO-)
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 9 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
0
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14 Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
05
1
1.5
17 Soil -based evidence of high water table'?
No = 0
Yes
QJ
C. Biology (Subtotal = 7.5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
05
(1-3
1.5
24 Amphibians
0
05
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
05
1
1.5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75: OBL = 15 Other 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes. (+/-)2'- 4' wide chap. +/- 6'- 10' wide and 1'- 3' deep@ top of bank; sand, gravel, cobble, few boulders.
Amphibians, crayfish, and fish observed. Macros expected,
not scored.
Sketch:

D
N/A
log,
09/25/12
/
E
31 L.F.
480 SF.
off t w14
F
Be L.F.
WA
a
140 L.F.
N/A
r
TOTAL
209 LF
17.448 SF.
C
S On
Ft
X9Vr ,
D
N/A
log,
09/25/12
/
E
31 L.F.
480 SF.
off t w14
F
Be L.F.
WA
a
140 L.F.
N/A
r
TOTAL
209 LF
17.448 SF.
C
D
N/A
3,329 8F.
09/25/12
/
E
31 L.F.
480 SF.
off t w14
F
Be L.F.
WA
a
140 L.F.
N/A
r
TOTAL
209 LF
17.448 SF.
C
_J
SHEET TITLE
WETLANDS IMPACT EXHIBIT
'' °400'
09/25/12
PROJECT
REGENCY AT THE PALISADES
BTG
MAH
Yeu=0v=-Wujjimg lr noise HOU14 ing
Planning a Srrohd�s c B�rlpa /w
m � am aof
TOLOLM
off t w14

\ HW 86 • • , • , • GRAPHIC SCALE
\ Io TOP OF HW 579.70 ; ; ` . ` .1,� ' . + ' , 50 0 2s so
r INV (66 ") 572.20
\ \ INV (78 ") 571.20 . \. ;.:.•.. - -
\ \ INV OF CREEK 571.20 - J
V.= 19.4 16 L.F. STREAM • tJ�f. :.. - ' • / / i
L: 64.2 xW: 83.7 IMPACT
\ ) APRON
12" DIA. RIP RAP \ ; j.I ;.'•'• .1�.'.'.'. ;.' -./
4" MIN. DEPTH . . . .
D INED CHANNEL.'.'. ;. ;. _.' �;000" EX 18 "CMP
// INV 571 32
•�' �� j j INV OF CREEK 571 32
0 OrV G�/��• - p / /
� ° Q 0° ` EX 18 "CMP
\ 00 % `�o N �° INV 573 83 /
N ® / w@ INV OF CREEK 573 90
O .. '::�•••:•�'.. • 2,819 SQ.FT. (0.06 AC)/
•� WETLANDS IMPACTED /
/ * • • - - - • • - HW 85 64.00 AC.
/ - TOP OF HW 587.05
26 L.F. STREAM.' INV (66 ") 574.90 / 1
IMPACT . -. - INV (78 ") 573.90 '
/ •.; ;- - ; - ;•; ;'' ; : ;• INV OF CREEK 573.90 \ l
' - INSTALL (2) 66 "CMP
• •- -• - +• • -••+ •/i '-�• - •• -•• RIP RAP FOR INLET \
. J PROTECTION \ \
�' : ;•,• ;.yam '•'•;• ;- • \?� ••• ;• \A3
.. .. ...... k�.
\• PaS R D \
108 \ \ \ •.. ..... ,. • ?. .....; ...... ' - ; 42 L.F. STREAM IMPACT
. •i` . ' . ' . ' : 2,819 SF WETLAND IMPACT
i � l
SHEET TITLE
WETLANDS IMPACT EXHIBIT
' °50.
09/25/12
PRREGENCY AT THE PALISADES
DETAIL AA"
M
Pl�rslra • Srroglrs a Brr(rseslr
qwYes> cons W1u uses at Home, ffis
Tr ids olk amat �1 P
1riL

o
vrnp
�D�
Al
_nm
rZ
r
D�
Z
v
�aa
aM
0:
r-
D
n
s
4
11-0
co
ED
N
C
N
V:

-I
a'
i
rn
N
Q
Ir
\
N
A.
�
immmmmmmmmmms
No
■
■
■
■■
..: -
..
-j�ugl
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■■
■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■mm■■i°°■�■
■■■■■■■■■■■LIIMNE■■IL's■cam_
mMmMMMMMMM
0,
w
, • '
mill
am
■■■■■■■■
■l
11
.:: ial
■11■■■■
■■■■'1
■
■■ii�111'1
■
■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■F�i■■■■■■■■■■■
MMMmmMMMM
■■■■■■■■■■
■m
�,�
MUMMMMMMLUMMMMMMMMMME
■■■■■■■■■■■■■1■1■
■■■L■■■■■■MU■■GR'/■■■■■■
■■■■■■■m■■■■■[11�1■■■■■,i■■FR'
■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
-
• ..:...
.. •
. •
�:,��'
-_'�
:��i■a■■■■■■■■■■■
■■
■■IIl�iiiw
i■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■C
■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■ii■
■■■■■■■■■■.
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■■■■
■■■■■■■
■
■■
■M■■■■■■M■■■■■■M■■■■M■■
■■■■■■■■■
■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■N
■■■
■■1■
...■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
3
D m
rn
D�
CO
rn
0-0
rl
^�
z
�
n
■■■■EM
....
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■.
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■'
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■M■■■■MM■■■m■■■■■■■■■■m■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
MMMMMMMMMMMMmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmms
■■■■
.
.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■ii■■■■i■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
I
■■i■■■
■ii■■■■■■■■■■i■i■■■■■i■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
IN
-I
a'
i
rn
N
Q
Ir
\
N
A.
�

GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
IN FEET
= f /
00
i
,- 322 SQ. FT. (0.01 AC.)
WETLANDS IMPACTED
3,173 SQ. FT. (0.07 AC.)
WETLANDS IMPACTED
/s
x
oy
r
/ 3,495 SF WETLAND IMPACT
SHEET TITLE
' °50'
WETLANDS IMPACT EXHIBIT
09/25/12
PROJECT
REGENCY AT THE PALISADES
DETAIL ABA
BTG
AIAH
YPlanni IIGH-WILi2AStr OL sSimse � INC.
Pbrrtsa a Srrogtra c 13ralr�n/r
m 1 3&w %=O seu ID) PA Ba
5 ,14

GRAPFUC SCAM
50 0 25 50 100
\To
r
ISM
_N
saw
WN
•. �;���
♦�i IIiIs�� � -`� � ^
► - ' 1 i
REVEGETATED WITH
WETI.AND SEED MIX
i
SHEET TITLE
' -50'
WETLANDS IMPACT EXHIBIT
09/25/12
PROJECT
REGENCY AT THE PALISADES
DETAIL ACA
BTG
MOH
&x
lbsslrs o Srnrplrs a Brg/rserrlr
T!0 ffir 0 = O] PA so vw am

2,788 SQ. FT. (0.06 AC.) \\\\
WETLANDS IMPACTED 1
SEWER CROSSING
NATIONWIDE PERMIT #12
WETLANDS TO BE
RESTORED AND
REVEGETATED WITH dI
� WETLAND SEED MIX
1541 SQ. FT. (0.01 AC.)
WETLANDS IMPACTED ,
•
• {I r • • • • r • • • r
R S R ED tt • • ` -
.fir .. -. -... ..•.
` r•� :. rte• ' . ` �= :,~ -��:
.N • I
r•rr O t••.�.. r 7
•
•
`• 1 • • i • • i' •�•`
• ILU ` • •
541 SF WETLAND IMPACT
2,788 SF WETLAND IMPACT FOR UTILITIES
SHEET TITLE
WETLANDS IMPACT EXHIBIT
' °50'
09/25/12
PRREGENCY AT THE PALISADES
DETAIL "DA
MAH
a>.
Pbrrlss • Srney�rs u Brslr��rlr
TIO m01r o w°i
qw
"Comm

_ GRAPHIC SCALE
I I I I 1 \ \ \ \ 50 0 25 50 100
rn �
IN FEW
N �
i
I 480 S.F. (0.01 AC.)
/ f WETLANDS IMPACTED _
84 I
IMPACTED STREAM
1P
� � i /ilk / •/l I /11• \\ � / � ��� //'
1 •
/` I 131 LF. STREAM IMPACT
S.F. WETLAND IMPACT
/ I / J J� r• ' SHEET TITLE
WETLANDS IMPACT EXHIBIT 1v-50'
09/25/12
/ /�i —J •� PRREGENCY AT THE PALISADES MAH
DETAIL E
�. Ye>:e>:omjwlwmU"m a Hovj4hm
Plawsins . Srwgixa 01, elvio
m maw 0* 11 umow
0=00 offall,

�►�`
mw
ale
L.F. STREAM,
CT
Mw F CREEK 592.70
AP FOR INLET
IPA,
FrIm 1616 � 11
• �'`�
RIP RAP FOR INLET
PROTECTION
AmmWWr
add
��� i
e r
86 L.F. STREAM IMPACT
SHEET TITLE
WETLANDS IMPACT EXHIBIT ash 0'
\\ PROJECT AT THE PALISADES MAN
DETAIL AF'
/ f hm In
Piaxuiss o Srrroyias ° BH i r w •$
PA 1001 mm

71.00'
48 "RCP
® 2.82%
BURY 1'
SHEET TITLE
mm
WETLANDS IMPACT EXHIBIT
1 °50' &5'
09/25/12
PRREGENCY AT THE PALISADES
BTG
DETAIL AF" PROFILE
MAH
QWPlastlsa o Srrohrlsa o Srslrrtrlss
7d0 >h�r 00s01l1 Pities 1007 pE
mmum
1 14

I I I I I I
VGy
\ \ I \ �` s
/A
6
L �LL
EX W -84
TOP 60 7 890 \ I c'j �/ � /• � •—
40, 6e �� 72 E56 56 I , /� 6 / / \
a�o / 40.00, E H W 83
`• l 1,�2�T0Tq� TOP OF HW 5848
ft-low _ 2,g "CMP / IIVa(60 ") 57407
. ® 2 CMP INV (72 ") 1 26
eURy * INV OF CR 57 3 .•
IMPACTED STREAM
— ®� ♦.
7
ADD 38.00' 21' STREAM" IMP
1 -72 CMP ADD 21.00' z —
2 -60 "CMP 1 -72 "CMP — ' PROP HW 84
U ® 2.23% " — E ST TOP OF HW 581.50 -�
®2.23 6' INV (60n) 574.49
PROP HW 84 — — — INV (72) 571.72
— (1)�, "cMp, INV OF CREEK 571.7
TOP OF 579.00 \ �-� ( \
INV (60 ") ) 571.92 _ \ 0, 2 \ ®»
INV (72 ") 568.62 — \
/ / INV OF CREEK 568.9
140 LF. STREAM IMPACT
/ / r
SHEET TITLE
WETLANDS IMPACT EXHIBIT
' -50'
09/25/12
PRREGENCY AT THE PALISADES
DETAIL AG"
MAH
Pis..l.s u S.rogl.a c B.gl....l.
T10 �s �hlMl1 P� 7W!
(md
1$14

v �o�
m�
rn
Dm
r
m
f= z
z
Ci -<
to D
v
_Cf)
to
� m
D
- m
n
a
D
m
s
D
;ma
= �
\
;
u
o
w
N
R
to

v
�
• =
��
:. •
.,
: immmmmeammonammmmmmmmmmmmmmm
�.iNOM
■
ommm
■m■■mm■NNmmmmmmmME■mmmmmmmmms
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■mm■■m■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■mo
'^aD
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■s
■
■
■
■
■■■■
Omm■NONE
mmmmommmmmmmm■Esmm■
N
�
■
■■
■■
■■
■■
■
■EM
■■■■
E■
NONE
■�.
■
■
■
■
■
\�_
NOON
■
■mm
■EEO■■
No
■
■
-
. •
.,
:
imomm
► �n
1
NN
I
Sri
�
■mmmomm■■■■■■■■■■
■m■■■■
■■■
■M
■M
■■►
�■M
■
■
■■
■
■��■O
■mmENENOEE■
immmmmmm..
■O
■NN
NONE
�_ ,
■
■
In
M
.■
. n
•
..
M ■
■MME
■■
■OMEN
■E
■■
■MWE
■■MME
■t
■■■■moss
■■
m■lummo■mmm■■■■■
{NOON
■■■■■■■■■
■v
SOMEONE
■M
-
omm■■lWE
■�FmM
■
■
■m
■
■
■
■
■■
■■■■■
�OEN
► �n■r�■
■1.toN��Q
■►
�■r�
■■■
■m
■rte
■���75
■
■
■i■
■Mm
■Mm■
■M
■■
■■E■
■■
■mm■■■■
: •
HEM
■■MONO■
1�!
■n
■
■1
■1'IMN�EMENN
■mNN
■EM■
M■■■■■■
■�
■
■
■It�.1:N�1i�1r
.111111111■
■ENE
■
■
■OEMO
■C■
■'
.,
�•
ommoom
ommommom
MEN
■■■■MOON
■m
■
mmm
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■Om
■
■
■
■
■■
■ommo■■mo
■mm
NOON
■
■m
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■mM
■
■
■
■
■■
■EN■MEEME■■■
■m
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■■
■MME■■■■
ommoom
SOONER
■
■MN
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
m�
CV,
rn
r
Emu,
MEMO
-
NN
■
■
■
■
■
■■
■ENE
■■
■NNE
■
■E■
ONE
■■Nm
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■m
■
■mm
■mE
■
■
■
■
■■
MEMOE
■
■
■
■NNM
■
■
■
■NO■
■NON■■■■■
momommoommomm
■
■■
■mil
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■M
■N
■
■
■NMm■
■■■■■■mE■■
NOON
■
■
■NM■
■■■■■■■■■
■
■ENE
■
■
■
■M
■
■M
■
■
■
■N
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■■
■
■
■Mm
■
■Sm
■
■NM
■
■M
■
■■
NOON
■M
■
■E
■
■MM■■■■■■
NOON
■
■Em
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■ESm
mmoom
■
■m
■m■
■m■
■o■■■mm
NONE
■EE■■
■ION
mo■mo■■mosommoomm■om
■E
■m■■mo■
■m■■
■mm
■m■
■mm■mmNN
■E
m
■mm■
■ms
NOON
■
■N
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■OE
■
■EN
■M
■N■
v
�
D z
^'
rn
z
'^aD
a
N
�

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section iV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION 1: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FiLE NAME, AND NUMBER:
ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801 -5006
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Palisades Tr2 Site
State.NC County /parish /borough. Mecklenburg City Charlotte
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format)- Lat. 35.08093 ° N, Long - 81.03294 ° W
Universal Transverse Mercator- 17
Name of nearest waterbody: Catawba River (Lake Wylie)
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: Catawba River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 03050101 • Upper Catawba
® Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential Jurisdictional areas is /are available upon request.
El Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc ) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SiTE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
El Office (Desk) Determination Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): 04/05/2012
SECTION H: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no "navigable waters of the U S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area [Required]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide
❑ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain-
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters of the U S" within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): i
❑ TNWs, includingtemtonal seas
® Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent watersz (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters. +/- 5200 linear feet: width (ft) and /or 0.633 acres.
Wetlands- 8 401 +/- acres
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 1987_ De lineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known)-
i Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
Z For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TN W and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e g , typically 3 months)

2. Non - regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable):3
Q Potentially jurisdictional waters and /or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to he not jurisdictional.
Explain:
' Supporting documentation is presented in Section III F

identify flow route to TNW5: SeaRPW A, which originates onsite, flows into PerRPW C, which empties directly into
Catawba River (TNW). SeaRPW B, which originates onsite, flows into PerRPW D, which empties directly into Catawba
River (TNW). PerRPW E, which flows through the site, empties directly into Catawba River (TNW)
Tributary stream order, if known 1 st
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is. ® Natural
❑ Artificial (man- made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man- altered) Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate).
Average width- 3'- 6' feet
Average depth. F- 3' feet
Average side slopes- 2:1.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
M Silts ® Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ® Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type /% cover:
❑ Other Explain:
Tributary condition /stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: relatively stable.
Presence of run /riffle /pool complexes. Explain. Not identified.
Tributary geometry: Rel 0Ve_1k'_4r fight
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope). 1 -2 %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Sesison 9w
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: ll'-16
Describe flow regime- Seasonal flows with input from storm events.
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is- Discrete,and:confined. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Unknown. Explain findings•
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
® Bed and banks
® OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
® clear, natural line impressed on the bank
®
the presence of litter and debris
® changes in the character of soil
❑
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
M
the presence of wrack line
M vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
M
sediment sorting
M leaf litter disturbed or washed away
M
scour
M sediment deposition
M
multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑
abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list)
❑ Discontinuous OHWM 7 Explain-
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
❑ High Tide Line indicated by-
El oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings /characteristics
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
ine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply)
Mean High Water Mark indicated by
❑ survey to available datum,
❑ physical markings,
❑ vegetation lines /changes in vegetation types
` Flow route can be described by identifying, e g, tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.
6A natural or roan -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e g, where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices) Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e g, flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break
'ibid

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian corridor Characteristics (type, average width): Forested, > 100'+/-.
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
® Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings•
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings.
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species Explain findings-
0 Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings: Channel supports habitat for isopods and other invertebrates.
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics.
Properties:
Wetland size:Wtld WD = 0.007, Wtld V/W = 0.072 acres
Wetland type ExplainTorested.
Wetland quality. Explain.
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries Explain- No
season.
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW.
Flow is: fit-ACM ittenttiow. Explain: Wetlands will discharge into downslope RPW's periodically during the growing
Surface flow is: Diserete
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: tTnknowti. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non -TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
® Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain•
❑ Ecological connection. Explain-
0 Separated by berm/barrier. Explain: small sandy berm
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Protect wetlands are f(or- lea`s) river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1(6'r:less) aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Wetland to navigsble waters.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the 2 -_§ -year floodplam.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain- generally undisturbed
identify specific pollutants, if known.
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width) • Forested, > 100'.
® Vegetation type /percent cover Explam:Alluvial /Riparian +/- 85%
® Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings.
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species Explain findings:
® Aquatic /wildlife diversity Explain findings Provides habitat for amphibians and other wildlife.
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis 4
Approximately ( +/- 4 ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/NN) Size (in acres)
N (Y) .895
V/W (N) 0 072
WD (N) 0 007
X (Y) 3 038
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed. Onsite wetlands provide habitat for
herpetofauna and macroi n vertebrates The wetlands provide flood storage and ground water recharge The wetlands also trap and
filter pollutants before reaching RPWs and the TNW (Catawba River).
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III. D:
2. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III. D-
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section 111.13 A significant nexus is present between the adjacent wetlands WD, V /W, abutting wetland X, the perennial RPW C,
and the Catawba River (TNW) An small sandy berm exists between wetland WD, wetland V /W, and wetland X, which empties
directly into perennial RPW C This small sandy berm is the only seperation for the wetlands to flow to the RPW, which directly
flows to the Catawba River( TNW) The adjacent wetlands have the capacity to reduce pollutants through vegetation filtering, and
reduce flooding by providing storage before reaching the TNW The wetlands provide recharge to the RPW during dry climate
conditions These features also provide habitat for amphibians and other wildlife
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS /WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
TNWs. linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
® Wetlands adjacent to TNWs- 014 acres
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.

® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial Perennial RPW's (C, D, and E ") were observed to have geomorphology, biology and hydrologic flow
characteristics consistent with perennial streams. The channels had observed flows, clear bed and banks, macromvertebrates,
substrate sorting, and fish See NC Stream Data Form PerRPW C (typical)
® Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section iil.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally. Seasonal RPW A and seasonal RPW B have the geomorphology, hydrology, and biology consistent with
intermittent streams The channels have clear bed and banks, scour, and substrate sorting See NC Stream Data Form
SeaRPW Al and NC Stream Data Form SeaRPW 131.
Provide estimates forjurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
® Tributary waters: +/- 5200 linear feet3 - 6width (ft)
[] Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters-
3. Non -RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
El Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section iIi.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
Q Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft)
El Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year- round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW. Wetland N and wetland X, empty directly into and are not seperated from PerRPW B.
Wetland R/S and wetland P /O /Q empty directly into and are not seperated from PerRPW D. Wetland Z empties
directly into and is not seperated from PerRPW E. .
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally " Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section Iii.B and rationale in Section Iii.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW: Wetland WB empties directly into and is not seperated from Seasonal RPW B.
Provide acreage estimates forjurtsdictional wetlands in the review area 8.278acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section 111 C
Provide acreage estimates for-jurisdictional wetlands in the review area- 0.079 acres
6. Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that now directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW arejunsdictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section IIi C
Provide estimates forjurisdictionai wetlands in the review area. acres.
7. impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S ," or
[l Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
0 Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
8See Footnote # 3
v To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section iiI D 6 of the instructional Guidebook

E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATE) WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) :t0
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
Interstate isolated waters Explain:
❑ Other factors Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply).
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
[] Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
[� Wetlands. acres.
F. NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
[] Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
¢� Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
�] Lakes /ponds: acres.
d Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource.
❑ Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply).
❑ Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
❑ Lakes /ponds: acres
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource.
❑
Wetlands- acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant
® Data sheets prepared /submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
[] Data sheets prepared by the Corps
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:l •24K - Lake Wylie (SC) quadrangle
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL- http: / /websoilsurvey.nres usda.gov
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps /EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

■
i
v
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name.
State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/FIRM maps-
100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑ Other (Name & Date)•
Previous determination(s) File no. and date of response letter,
Applicable /supporting case law:
Applicable /supporting scientific literature:
Other information (please specify)-
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

PALISADES TRACT 2
—4rfts Raich My
Tryon
04
Harbor
Hilk.
Belmont
d
_IX
0
0
Charlotte
%
Charlotte Douglas
Inlnnalr a I
Airport
Jack -.on
Hames
�:Jr�
Seagefield
Cimp
Fa(Ile Lake
13
W,
Gpi•i,; Fntk
Ccfef-k
Rtdt.Mnrnt m -k
Hn'Ow
Carr
ake tNylie
(writ."
Y,
0,1
Pinewfle
Ftrrk R( W
6wvr ..errs
f" :4 EaSi
FIGURE NO. LEONARD S. RINDNER PLLC PALISADES TRACT 2 SHEET
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group Mecklenburg County, NC DRAWN PJK REVIEWED LSR
3714 Spokeshave Lane BY BY
Matthews, NC 28105 VICINITY MAP DATE PAGE
1 (704) 904 —2277 APPROXIMATE SITE LOCATION
LEN RINDNER [e-mail] 02108112

PALISADES TRACT 2
q
n"
A
Alt,
V 1 0j,
(Vt
4
it
r
it
r
V.
Z,
,4
SITE
• At
r
It
r
I if
LOCATION,
SCALE LATITUDE LONGITUDE
2000 1000 0 20DO(Fe 35 08093 N - 81 03294 W
et
HUC 03050101
Upper Catawba
FIGURE NO. LEONARD S. RINDNER PLLC PALISADES TRACT 2 SHEET
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group DRAWN REVIEWED
3714 Spokeshave Lane BY PA By LSR
Matthews, NC 28105 LISGS LOCATION MAP DATE PAGE
(704) 904 —2277 APPROXIMATE LOCATION
LEN RINDNER PWS@gmail com 04116112
LAKE WYLIE (SC - NC) QUADRANGLE
1993

PALISADES TRACT 2 SITE

PALISADES TRACT 2 SITE

r r
PALISADES TRACT 2
�T
WETLAND Z 1 — 40 ��"- •'� r �'� PER -RPW E1 -
--�. - Project edge flagged only (Studman Br.)
LAKE - Does not close - From culvert to property
" f WYLIE !i line /lake /beaver pond I
�' F
' k EXISTING RIP RAP
'yt \ WETLAND - - BASINS AND BERMS
WETLAND, y i N 1 — 37 ° "t' +
Y
1-14 a :'' _'7d - Ties to lake/PL Ra IhC n - ®.
- Tlas to lake/PL
- Includes Shallow f� �fi SEA - RPW `
~� littoral zone
Ell
`; ' ._•saes, i • �.; - ' L t '(perNCDENR field
determination on
11128111)
USACE verification
`` ` 3` +.........a.. 04105112
r, • ri WETLAND EXISTING
��`• R 1 — 9 / S 1 - 11 WETLAND ` RIP RAP BASINS
x • - ' ; x 1 P 1 — 13(w) / + AND BERMS
01- 6/Q1 -38
WETLAND
K _
,. ,•
' s* '�; ra¢ WB 1— 8
n1 r'ti teic Based on USACE
WD 1-7 , `� �� field visit 04/05/12
Based on USACE
field visit 04105112 _ _ •mac _� i� ���:
.•, '� a Locate C/L and width of
WETLAND all stream channels and • �,� �''
X 1 — 90 existing culverts within '
` property boundary
Confirm braided stream ?!]►
locations i
4: �, y •-"' EXISTING
` PER - RPW D1 — RIP RAP BASINS
- To culvert /property line AND BERMS
SEA-RPW : TF
Al RIP
EXISTING +'
- Ties to roe line
RAP BASINS L - ` '
%per NCDENR field •„
determination on 11128111) �• �\
USACE verification j PER - RPW C1
04105112 r "t ' d' - To culvert / property line
FIGURE NO. LEONARD S. 1RINDNER PLLC PAUSADES TRACT 2 SHEET
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group Mecklenburg County, NC DRAWN PJK REVIEWED LSR
BY BY
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Rev based on PAGE
Matthews, NC 28105 APPROXIMATE MAP FOR SURVEY NCDENR field visit
(704) 904 — 2277 WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES 11/28/11 LEN. RI NDNER. PW S @gmad. com USACE vernficatton
SUBJECT TO USACE /NCDENR VERIFICATION 0410502

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
ProjecvrAe a•-% k is 4 —c,, �Y � CdytCounty !'j •t_c I4 ) e -, L" r C►, T -1 Sampling Date I I " e-1 - i I
AppticanVOvhner- State Sampling Point f)P 1 . WkI is
Invostgator(sy L S 12 r IP�T 1L Section, Township, Range
Landform (hifislope, terrace, etc) V40-:4 ____ local relief (concave, convex, none). Pons.. Slope M
Subregion (lRR or MLRA)- 11" t. FA lat °, 5 •OS 07 -1 Long- - b' ( . 0 3 a.sl S' `` Datum NA 1% 2 3
Soil Map Unit Name- iA O - 'n" °i •` `_-, '--% l r "' ``-% NWI ciassdlcatlow
Are climatic ! hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes �-v4_ No (It no, explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation N_, Sod _. f4 or Hydrology .�._ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances present? Yes a No
Are Vegetation rQ Sod _JJ _, or Hydrology _ t naturally problemabc? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydiophytic Vegetation Present? Yes r No is the Sampled Area
Hydric Sod Present? Yes _ No wdhin a Wetland? Yes _� No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks
/i r C t i S � t(.� t S � r."> -4T'!V E ®t 1 Vr r S� � a. 4 � • `1 a� W t�'I' �l :"�+^� i� .
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
S4condary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required,
chock all that aogly)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (B6)
?( Surface Water (All)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Cnnc.-wo Surtnce (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_X Drainage Patterns (810)
Saturation IA3)
i� Oxidized Rhirospheres on living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim linos (816)
Water Marks (81)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment DeposKs (82)
Y Recent Iron Reduction in Titled Soils (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (83)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
..._ Algal M31 or Crust (84)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Di)
Iron Doposrt. (85)
s Geomorphic Posrtion (02)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
._ Shallow Aqudard (D3)
1i Water-Stained loaves (89)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
,. Aquatic Fauna (813)
FAC- Neutral Test 05)
Field Observations:
Surface Walor Presents Yes -Y_ Na
Depth (inches) C' -
Water Table Present? Yes ;,r_ No
Depth (inches► d ' Co
Saturation Procenl? Yes X No
Depth (inches).
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes k _ No
(includes capftfy fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (,cream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, ptevaus inspections). if available,
Remarks•
:�Ui"!�".,n :J I"fG.�ij aell�`�-
k,1i•.�. -1 l.�'�L,)i.
w r Ht� r •'� f �,e� ! , .l:'d , L t. •` a7 I es k1✓ G! �, I� J j4" F l.' L'°-7 .
00"Corps of Emo toors
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
DP L
Sampling Point' \X0 1- A
US Amry Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountain, and Piedmont - Interim Version
Absolute Dominant indicator
Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size )
%Cover species t Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
p i. -.•j y { pt,G: F� [� � aia S
�G _ t A C
That Are OBL FACW or FAC (A)
3
----r-
FAC-
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across Ail Strata (B)
°7
Percent of Dominant Species
5
That Are OBL FACW or FAC (ArB)
6
Prevalence Index worksheet.
7
8.
Total % Cover of MAu1(iply bv.
Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
Soplin9
/61hrub Stratum (Plat wo
FACW species x 2 -
1
L+ i a� S 5 + • �' u � .. �:^
1 �� t= wo'
FAC species x 3 -
2
FACU species . 4-
3
t..1'
—7tl -- 47A
UPL species x5=
4
Column Totals (A) (B)
5
Prevalence Index = EVA =
6
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators-
8
_ 1 • Rnpid Tait for Hydrophyti¢ Vegetation
A 2 • Dominance Test is >50%
9
3 • Prevalence Index is s3 0'
10
_
i 5
_ 4 • Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Nor Stratum )
(Plot size
a Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
1
1 "'t , a. r o i} or V-i v v i ..� r n t i. i Y+
�� t
_ Problematic Hydrophyhc Vegetation' (Expiaml
3
l ua t i. ..t , a a t u } c.
a (j u h t
IIn<j=tom of hydnc sod and vrctiand hydrology must
_
he Dissent, unless disturbed or problamat*
4
----- -- —
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5
6
Tree - Mody plants, ov ctuding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more
ore in diameter at broast hoightyD rn
BH), gardlrss of
7
8
Sapling!Shrub - Woody plants, erNuding vines less
9
than 3 in DBH and greater thin 3 26 ft i 1 m} tali
1 t
Herb - Ail herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size and woody plants less than 3.28 it tall
12
Tntal Cover
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3,28 it in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size )
height
4
5
Hydrophytic
--
Vegetation
6
_ _
-�
Present? Yes X No
R Total Covcr
Remarks (Inciude photo numlwm hoto or on a t;omiratc sheet)
r:
r
US Amry Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountain, and Piedmont - Interim Version

i i 3
SOIL
Sampling Point
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Rodox Featuros
(inches) Color tmoisii A COlor tmoist) _'% TV a Lvs� Texture Remarks
()-10 5 Y K -;% 9 5 "7. 5 YR 3A- 5 C- ? t. S A h 1 G) a Sl 10
Hydnc Soil Indicators.
Indicators for Problematic Hydnc Sods':
_ Histosol (A1)
Dark Surface (Si)
2 cm Muds (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Hisbc Eprpedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S81 (MLRA 147,148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Hisbc (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Grayed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (0)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
r_
_ Rodox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TFZ)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shatiow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thk k Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Rodox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Exptaln in Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
Iron - Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy G eyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 138, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy RedoK (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodpiain Soils (1719) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic
Type
Depth (inches)
Remarks
Hydnc Soil Present? Yes )(_ No
IN eJ riL der,! ttii'.{ r 1'j�'✓vC' x11.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountain. and Piedmont - Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Pro ectrsdo a I i g ' - C__ r j__ )ty ty r
) p �, �1 � � C rCoun )h �.- i�iC- �,%wva. �+� "'� Sampling Data
Appticant0mer State- _ Sampling Point- DIP 9 . U�L�'
Investigator(s) L 5 Section. Township, Range
Landforrn (hiilskipa, tetrace, etc) h li S i b - Local relief (ooricave, convex, none) n V�,x Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) Wit �'� Lat 715 • 0 X (,`t ( Long ' � 1 L•'3 3 4.3 Datum. ,MhO a 3
Soil Map Unit Name r°` �' ^ r V i 4L NWI classification,
Aro climatic t hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this climb of yoar7 Yes 'rC No _ _ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation t`r , Soil tj , or Hydrology 1 1 significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances* prosont7 Yes X No
Arc Vegetation 11 .,Soil N , or Hydrology h naturally problematic? ()f needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Prosent7 Yes No X_ Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No �C
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks.
i
I, nn . GS i S . r �, r. c, ._.a`� s r U E n Q n Art ' 1 t� r r S d •} I [a q V,, C!
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators in�ninurm of one
is required. chock all that norgy)
_ Surface Soil Crocks (B6)
_ Surface Water (At)
_ True Aquatic Plants (814)
_ Sparsety Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patto"%s (B14)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhaospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (816)
Water Marks (B1)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (82)
Recent Uon Reduction in Tilled Soils (CG)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (83)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturabon Visible nn Aerial Irrmsgery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (64)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (01)
_ Iron Deposits (85)
_ Georwrphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(97)
` ShallowAquitard (D3)
_ Water- Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Ralml (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (813)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
-� No 1r� Oepth Cinches).
Water Table Present*7 Yes
No X_ Depth (inches),
Saturation Ptescnt? Ycs
No _ r� Depth ( inchee),
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 'A
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge., monitoring well, aenat photos, previous inspecbons), It available Y�
_
Remarks
liJ..,.� (r.,,.e
I1•�rt rf. -`t l}/ ir���ir_.t('pr ' l�.+'.• C_
rA
a�eFf t,�:75r_�-VC,r-6' .
US Army Corp. of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

0 t r 6
DP a
SOIL Sampling Point. 'LA o ld
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist)
Color (rnoistl % Loc`
Textum Reffmft
_ _�L
0-G 7. s YIP 54
1., raa..
r, s 6 Q 1-
-7, 5 Y k
'Type, C= Coruontratlon, D-Do lotion RMeReducod Matrix MSuMasked Sand Grains
2Locabon PL -Pore Lining, MmMatrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solis
_ Histosof (A1)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A 10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipodon (A2)
_ Poyvalue (3etow Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Coast Praine Redox (A16)
_ Black H+stic (A3)
, Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfido (A4)
_ Loamy Glayed Matrix (F2)
_ Piodmont Floodplam Sods (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (AS)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_, Red Parent Malarial (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Dark Surface (Fn
— Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF121
_ Thick Dark Surface (At 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
, Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N.
r Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N.
MLRA 147,148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gieyed Matra (S4)
_ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136,122)
Indicators of hydrephytle vegetation and
Sandy Redox (SS)
_ Piedmont Floodpbrn Solis (1719) (MLRA 148) vwtland hydrology mLmt bo present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed of problorintic
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type'
Depth (inches),
Hydric Soil Present? Yez No
Remarks
/
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Ptedmont – Interim Version
I

I 1 1
NC Division of Water Quality - Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Oriqins v. 4.1
vC' DR'Q Stream Identification Form Version 4.1
Date: November 08, 2012
Pro'ectlSite: Palisades Tr2
Seasonal RPW B
Latitude: 35.07952 N
Evaluator: LSR, PJK
County: Mecklenburg County, NC
Longitude: - 81 03247 W
Total Points:
Stream least 19.5
Stream Determi 'on circle one)
Other Lake Wylie (SC) Quad.
is at intermittent
if > 19 or perennial if;: 30'
Ephemeral ntermitten Perennial
e g Oijad Name: HUC 03050101
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 10.5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2, Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In- channel structure, ex. riffle -pool, step -pool.
ripple-pool sequence
0
O
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
(71-3
2
3
5 Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
2
3
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8 Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No 0
Yes = 3
- artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
Q ,5
1
1.5
17 Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes
3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 4
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
1
0
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
CO3
2
3
22 Fish
co
0.5
1
1 5
23 Crayfish
0
0.5
0.5
1
1
1 5
1 5
24. Amphibians
0
25 Algae
C0_)__
05
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75 OBL = 1.5
Other 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35
of manual
Notes: (+/-)l'- 3' wide chan. +/- 5'- 6' wide and V- 3' deep@ top
of bank; Silt, sand.
No flow, persistent pools, saturated.
Sketch

NC Division of Water Quality - Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Oriqins v. 4.1
NC DAVO Stream Identification Form Version 4.1
Date: November 08, 2012
Pro ect/Site: Palisades TO
Seasonal RPW A
Latitude: 35.07785 N
Evaluator: LSR, PJK
County: Mecklenburg County, NC
Longitude: - 81.03341 W
Total Points:
24
Stream Determ' on (circle one)
Other Lake Wylie (SC) Quad
Stream is at least tntennttent
Ephemera ntermitten Perennial
e g Ouad Name: HUC 03050101
if z 19 or eremnal d = 3U`
2
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =__L4_-5)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool.
sequence
0
1
lO
3
-ripple-pool
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
CiD
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
Qj
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
Not 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
1
0
1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
.5
1
Yes
15
3
17 Soil -based evidence of high water tables
No = 0
C. Biology (Subtotal = 4.5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
1
0
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
CO-)
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
co
1
2
3
22 Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
05
0.5
1
1
1 5
1.5
24 Amphibians
Q0j
25 Algae
0
0
1
15
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75: OBL = 1.5 Other
.perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes: (+/-)l'- T wide chan. +/- 6' - 7' wide and 1'- 3' deep top
of bank;
Silt, sand, few cobble, few boulders.
No flow, persistent pools, saturated.
Sketch:

... . k
NC Division of Water Quality - Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Oriains v. 4.1
NC' DWQ Strewn Identification Form Version 4.1
Date: November 08, 2012
Pro'VSite: Palisades Ti2
ec
i Perennial RPW C
Latitude: 35 08156 N
Evaluator: LSR, PJK
County: Mecklenburg County, NC
Longitude: - 81 02780 W
Total Points:
Stream least 31.5
Stream Determination (circ a
Other Lake Wylie (SC) Quad
is at intermittent
if y 19 or perennial if = 30'
Ephemeral Intermitte erennia
e g 0100 40117e: HUC 03050101
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 15 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool. step -pool.
ripple-pool sequence
0
1
0
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5 Active /relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
Qj
2
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8 Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
.5
1
1.5
10 Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No COD
Yes = 3
artmaai ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 9 )
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2O
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
15
17 Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes
C-) j
C. biology (Subtotal= 7.5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
1
2
0
0
3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22 Fish
0
C D5
1
1.5
23 Crayfish
0
0.5
i
1.5
1.5
24 Amphibians
0
0.5
1
25 Algae
0
05
1
1.5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75: OBL - 1.5 Other 0
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods Seep 35 of manual
Notes. (+/-)2' - 4' wide chan +/_ 6'- 10' wide and V-
3' deep top of bank, sand, gravel, cobble, few boulders.
Amphibians, crayfish, and fish observed. Macros expected,
not scored.
Sketch.