20120904 Ver 1_401 Application_20120912

I I
[IlEcoEngineeri,ng
A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
20120904
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
To: Ms. Karen Higgins Date: September 26, 2012
NC Division of Water Quality
Wetlands & Stormwater Branch
1650 Mail Service Center REGULAR MAIL
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Re: GC 3890 / IWGP 100000 Job No. CMT -12000
Southbridge Fellowship Church
(NBRRO 12 -161)
I am sending you the following item(s):
COPIES
DATE
NO.
DESCRIPTION
1
CD with files of submittal
1
check for $240.00
5
letters, agent authorization forms, submittal checklists
5
PCN Forms, maps
2
Coutesy Copies of SW Management Plan
These are transmitted as checked below:
I
As requested
For approval
❑ For your use
Copy to:
Signed.
Kevin Yates
Senior Envir
FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY
® Copy Letter of Transmittal Only to File
❑ Copy Entire Document to File
2905 Meridian Parkway, Durham, North Carolina 27713
PO Box 14005, RTP, North Carolina 27709
Scientist

EcoEngineering
A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
September 26, 2012
Ms. Karen Higgins
NC Division of Water Quality
Wetlands and Stormwater Branch
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Re: GC 3890 I iWGP 100000
Southbridge Fellowship Church
Raleigh, North Carolina
CMT -12000
Dear Ms. Higgins:
On behalf of Southbridge Fellowship Church, we are applying for an NC
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) General Water Quality Certification (GC)
3890 and IWGP 100000 for permanent impacts to isolated and riparian
wetlands associated with construction of Southbridge Fellowship Church. The
subject property is + 10.78 acres in size and is located at 10931 Glenwood
Avenue on the south side of U.S. Hwy. 70 east, just east of the Durham 1
Wake County line, in Raleigh, Wake County, within the Neuse River Basin of
North Carolina.
• Signed Agent Authorization
0 Fig. l - USGS Quad — Southeast Durham
• Fig.2- Wake County Soil Survey (Sheets 17)
• Fig.3- Existing Conditions
0 Fig.3- Existing Conditions w. Aerial
• Fig.4- Overall Site Plan/impact Map (Insets 1 & 2)
0 Pre - Construction Notification
• DWQ Neuse River Buffer determination (NBRRO # 12 -161)
• SW Cale Book w. Detail Sheets
0 PCN Checklist
WETLAND/STREAM MAPPING: The streams and wetlands were verified
by Mr. Craig Brown of the USACE on April 17, 2012, and a Neuse River
Riparian Buffer determination was conducted by Mr. Martin Richmond on
April 17, 2012 (NBRRO # 12 -161 enclosed). The proposed project drains to
Brier Creek, a tributary of the Neuse River Basin and a designated Class
CINSW, and subject to the Neuse River Buffer Rules. There is one
Research Triangle Park, NC
unimportant intermittent tributary (Stream A), which runs through the
Post OMCB Box 14005
property approximately 324 linear feet and one important perennial tributary
Reseaeh Triangle Park,
(Stream B) which runs 47 linear feet across the northeast corner of the
North Carolina 27709
property and ultimately drains to Brier Creek, and the Neuse River (HUC
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, North Carolina 27713
03020201). Stream Feature "B" is depicted on the Wake County Soils
80733 -5646
919. 287.4262
919. 361.2269 Fax
www,ocoengf.COM
Design Services Focused On Client Success

EcoEngineering
A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc,
Ms. Karen Higgins
Southbridge Fellowship Church
September 26, 2012
Page 3 of 6
Wetlands do exist within the project area, and while it is the intent of the
church to avoid significant impacts to wetlands, streams or other
environmentally sensitive features, there are proposed impacts to 0.04 acre of
Isolated Wetlands and 0.01 acre of jurisdictional riparian wetlands. There are
no stream impacts or Neuse Buffer impacts associated with the proposed
project.
Inset 1: There are proposed impacts to two isolated wetlands B and C
associated with a stormwater BMP and a small portion of wetland C
associated with providing access to the facilities. The proposed development
is located within the Neuse River basin and will be subject to the stormwater
management requirements set forth in Section 10, Chapter 9 of the City of
Raleigh regulations. Per City of Raleigh regulations, stormwater management
on this site shall address two primary issues: (1) peak discharge rates and (2)
water quality management, and will employ a stormwater wetland facilities to
meet these requirements. Since the site will be required to provide 85% TSS
for all impervious surfaces, two stormwater management facilities are
proposed for the project; a constructed wetland for Sub -Basin 1 and a
bioretention area for Sub -Basin 2. Stream "A" is not subject to the Neuse
River Riparian Buffer Rules therefore while the discharge from the
bioretention area will be diffuse, diffuse flow was not addressed.
Inset 2: To provide access to the front portion of the building and to allow for
ingress and egress of emergency vehicles using driveway, there is a retaining
wall proposed in order to construct the driveway and avoid impacts to Stream
"A ". However, there is a minimal amount of clearing and grading proposed
along the edge of wetland "A" associated with the installation of the retaining
wail (Fig. 4 ).This wetland area is mostly shrub /herbaceous with a few larger
trees, and has likely been timbered in the last 30 years. It should be noted that
the church proposing at least one acre dedicated to a tree conservation area on
the western end of the property.
Typical construction equipment will be used such as a long -arm track -hoe,
front end loader, and bush hog for the initial clearing.

EcoEngineering
A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
Ms. Karen Higgins
Southbridge Fellowship Church
September 26, 2012
Page 4 of 6
TOTAL WETLAND IMPACTS:
Impact Location
Wetland Type
Impact Total
(Acres)
Inset 1
Wetland "A"
Riparian
0.01
Permanent
Inset 2
Isolated
Wetland "B"
Non- Riparian
0.03
Permanent
Inset 2
Isolated
Wetland "C"
Nan - Riparian
0.01
Permanent
4041401: 0.01 ac
TOTAL
401 Only: 0.04 ac
TOTAL: 0.05 ac
AVOIDANCE and MINIMIZATION: Stream and Buffer impacts have
been avoided to the greatest extent practicable, while achieving a successful
project. Wetlands do exist within the project area, and while it is the intent of
the church to avoid significant impacts to wetlands, streams or other
environmentally sensitive features, there are proposed impacts to 0.04 acre of
Low Quality Isolated Wetlands and 0.01 acre of jurisdictional riparian
wetlands.
To provide access to the front portion of the building and to allow for ingress
and egress of emergency vehicles using driveway, there is a retaining wall
proposed in order to construct the driveway and avoid impacts to Stream "A ".
Using this retaining wall completely avoids impacting Stream "A ". Only the
minimal amount of wetland area will be impacted for safe construction and
installation of the retaining wall, and temporary impacts to the stream bed
itself will be avoided during construction. This wetland area is mostly
shrub /herbaceous with a few larger trees, and has likely been timbered in the
last 30 years. It should be noted that the church proposing at least one acre
dedicated to a tree conservation area on the western end of the property.
DIFFUSE FLOW: Since the proposed project is located within the Neuse
River Basin, it is subject to the diffuse flow requirements, however neither
stormwater BMP outlets to or near a buffered stream feature. Stream "A" is
not subject to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules therefore while the
discharge from the bioreterntion area will be diffuse, diffuse flow was not
addressed. The constructed wetland BMP, outlets to over 500 feet of low

EcoEngineering
A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc,
Ms. Karen Higgins
Southbridge Fellowship Church
September 26, 2012
Page 5 of 6
gradient upland area and into a ditch network along Hwy 70. Therefore a
diffuse flow plan is not included.
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT: Since the site will be required to
provide 85% TSS for all impervious surfaces, two stormwater management
facilities are proposed for the project; a constructed wetland for Sub -Basin 1
and a bioretention area for Sub -Basin 2.
Constructed Wetland
The proposed constructed wetland is to be along the east property line and
provide both peak flow rate detention and water quality (TSS and N). The
proposed facility has some walls to accommodate the grading. The dam is
proposed to have 3(H ):1(V) slopes with a 10' top width. An access route to
the dam is provided from the south of the project. The spillway acts as both a
principal and emergency spillway system with just under a foot of freeboard
in the 100 -year, worst -case scenario. The proposed normal pool elevation is
395 with an orifice at invert 395 to accommodate the 1" runoff volume over
one vertical foot. The surface area of the facility was preliminarily sized
based on this one vertical foot ponding of the 1" runoff volume. Final
grading, details, and specifications will be provided through the City of
Raleigh permitting process for the facility.
Bioretention Area
The proposed bioretention area is located to the west of the proposed entrance
drive off of Glenwood Avenue. The facility is designed to capture the
majority of the driveway for N and TSS removal. The preliminary sizing of
the facility is based on the 1" runoff volume and a 9" ponding depth for the
water quality function. The facility is mostly in cut with a 5' wide berm "top"
provided. For this preliminary analysis, no peak flow rate detention benefit
was assumed for the bioretention area. Final grading, details, and
specifications will be provided through the City of Raleigh permitting process
for the facility.
A detailed report has been submitted to the City of Raleigh with final
hydrologic and hydraulic calculations detailing the expected stormwater
impacts as a result of the proposed development, including final design of the
proposed stormwater wetland facility and bioretention area that will be used to
treat the site. Enclosed is a copy of the SW notebook with detail sheets.
MITIGATION: Combined wetland impacts (isolated and 4041401)
combined are below 0.10 -acre, and the applicant is avoiding impacts to
Stream "A" completely but installation of a retaining wall; therefore no
mitigation is proposed at this time.

EcoEngineering
A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
Ms. Karen Higgins
Southbridge Fellowship Church
September 26, 2012
Page 6 of 6
Consideration of this project is greatly appreciated. If you should have any
questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact
me at (919) 287 -4262.
Sincerely,
EcoEngineering
A division of The John R. McA arras Company, Inc.
f Yates
Environmental Scientist
t Manager
KYlmaf
Enclosures

Since 1979
'JOHN R. MCADAMS COMPANY, INC.
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In By The CurrentPro a Owner
Name: - Southbridge Fellowship Church c/o John Cullen
Address: 9311 Focal Point., Suite 101, Raleigh, NC 276
Phone: [phone]
Project Name/Description: 11 -acre Glenwood Ave. -
Project Number: CMT -12000 Protect Manz
Date: Aup-ust 15.2012
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Mr. James Lastinger
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
NC
an Akers/ Kevin Yates
1, the current owner, hereby designate and authorize The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. to act
in my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request
supplemental information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward,
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only
for government officials to enter the property when accompanied by The John R.
McAdams Company, Inc. staff. You should call The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. to
arrange a site meeting prior to visiting the site.
Print for Property Owner Sign ure
Cc: Mr. Martin Richmond
NCDENR DWQ
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G • L A N D P L A N N I N G • S U R V E Y I N G
PD Box 14005 • Research Triangle Part[, NO 27709 - (919) 361 -5000 • fax [phone]
www.johnrrnoadams.com

topoz0l10 ,� 1a *e�• 9 _.
ISITHI
"pYrrtj'1 :NN•i1►.,illiap,:i :,t:,tln l•1: %�`� ' �.�, � +' •' � I � ► � � � !
` � "'�[� � ,fir 'r � .. � !�• � - -- = s
t
iL
1p
k
rte.
i �-� i• `t i ;i � ;�- - A►�Fx . Atsc rn ""'� i ,-�a�t .ti ,4� ...••.• '�,.
f -;r ur,v , ^� - __ • _ fit, srrn r•. a Fl,
rux
Tl(' II r Till Y -
i. .tea -"
lk
c ill —— � kl, �# �' j .�� •� 1•I '� •��.�' :1' +�} �
('41
J. e71
td
• ^� 11 } ''iii � � • ' + r � F•, r .•F - } Irl- `+'��71
Lochm,gre +' ; . •t L . s :^.r . ,.
® "m 'm NO' CRY -09000
FIGURE 1
THE JOHN R. McADAMS
^W"ASUS. Quad —Sails
USGS +quad. LAM WHEELER
COMPANY, INC.
BCAiE.
1 " 1500'
Town of Macedoula Lake G
' i ��
envlrr�axs/ptA"" &RB�suRVRYOas
a
CAW (WAM COUMM. NORM CAWLA
R898ARCH TRIAHCLE PARR, "C
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP M09 -4005
cn 07 -10• -7010
001 -5000

CRY -09000
FIGURE
THE JOHN R. McADAMS
IL
r,ISxAUe: Quad -- Soils
Wake Oounty Sow Survey (sheet 67)
COMPANY, INC.
ENGINEERS /PLANNERS /SURVEYORS
d SCALE: 1 �� = 1540'
Town of Cary Macedonia Lake Greenway
RESEARCII TRIANGLE PARK: NC
rn nnrn: 07 -10 -2010
CARY NAM C.OUH�YJ, NORTH CAROLINA
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 87709 -4005
(910) 361 -5000

I t y -f
1C
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
❑ Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 39 1 GC 3890 or General Permit (G P) number:
100000
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
LED Yes
❑ No
Id.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification -- Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Southbridge Fellowship Church
2b.
County:
Wake
2c.
Nearest municipality 1 town:
Raleigh
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T. 1, P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
SouthBridge Church (not changed as of yet on Wake Co. GIS)
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
DB: 11577 Page: 344
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
c/o James Cullen
3d.
Street address:
9311 Focal Point
3e. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27617
3f.
Telephone no.:
919 -789 -9955
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
49.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Kevin Yates
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
EcoEngineering - A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
5c.
Street address:
P.O. Box 14005
5d.
City, state, zip:
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
5e. Telephone no.:
919- 361 -5000
5f.
Fax no.:
91 9- 361 -2269
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 15
PCN Form -- Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
0759816591
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.924958 N Longitude: - 78.801958 W
(MIDDooDD) (- DD.{DDDDDD)
1 c.
Property size:
10.78 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Brier Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C; NSW
2c.
River basin:
Neuse River (03020201)
3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
The subject property is ± 10.78 acres in size and is located at 10931 Glenwood Avenue on the south side
of U.S. Hwy. 70 east, just east of the Durham 1 Wake County line, in Raleigh, Wake County, North
Carolina. (PIN Number: 0759815591). The subject contains a residential structure and four (4) wooden
sheds, all of which are in degraded conditions. The majority of the subject property consists of forested
and cleared land. The subject property is bordered to the west, south, and east are forested land and to
the north by Glenwood Avenue
Approximately 20 percent of the subject property is comprised of forested areas and would be generally
characterized as a Dry Mesic Oak- Hickory Forest (Schafale and Weakley, 1990), while 10 percent can be
characterized as a maintained/disturbed land. The property is located within the Triassic Basin, a unique
geologic area of the eastern Piedmont Region of North Carolina. The Soil Survey of Wake County,
North Carolina (Soil Conservation Service, 1970) lists the soils within the subject property area as
Mayodan sandy loam and Creedmoor sandy loam (Figure 2). The proposed project drains to Brier Creek,
a tributary of the Neuse River Basin and a designated Class CINSW, and subject to the Neuse River
Buffer Rules. There is one unimportant intermittent tributary (Stream A), which runs through the
property approximately 324 linear feet and one important perennial tributary (Stream B) which runs 47
linear feet across the northeast corner of the property and ultimately drains to Brier Creek, and the Neuse
River. Stream Feature "B" is depicted on the Wake County Soils Survey, and is therefore subject to the
Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules. Stream Feature "C" depicted on the DWQ Neuse Buffer
Determination Letter dated August 21, 2012, was deemed an isolated wetland feature (Wetland C), and is
therefore not subject to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules (NBRR0 4 12-161). There is one
jurisdictional 404 /401 riparian wetland (Wetland A: 0.05 acre), at the head of Stream A, and two isolated
401 wetland pockets in the central and western portions of the property (Wetland B: 0.03 acre/ Wetland
C: 0.01 acre).
The streams and wetlands were verified by Mr. Craig Brown of the USAGE on April 17, 2012, and a
Neuse River Riparian Buffer determination was conducted by Mr. Martin Richmond on April 17, 2012
(NBRRO # 12 -181 enclosed).
Land use within the vicinity of the project is a mix of retail /commercial, multi - family, and single - family
residential, office, and natural forested areas adjacent to the project area. RDU International Airport is to
the southeast of the property boundary.
Page 3 of 15
PC Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
404140 Wetlands: 0.05 acres 1 Isolated Wetlands (401 only): 0.04 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Intermittent Stream A: 324 If 1 Perennial Stream B: 47 if
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to provide a place of worship for the members of Southbridge Fellowship Church.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project consists of a church, a youth center, associated utilities, parking, ingress, egress from
the site, and other improvements. The property is located in the Neuse River Basin, but not in the Falls Lake
Watershed. The proposed project will require permitting for impacts with the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality and US Army Corps of Engineers. The proposed project will require a Stormwater
Management Plan and therefore 85% TSS Removal for all impervious surfaces. Sine the City of Raleigh is
a delegated authority for NC DWQ Stormwater Management Plans, the review and approval of the SWMP
will be part of the City of Raleigh review process.
Proposed Impacts:
Wetlands do exist within the project area, and while it is the intent of the church to avoid significant impacts
to wetlands, streams or other environmentally sensitive features, there are proposed impacts to 0.04 acre of
Isolated Wetlands and 0.01 acre of jurisdictional riparian wetlands.
Inset 1: There are proposed impacts to two isolated wetlands B and C associated with a stormwater BMP and
a small portion of wetland C associated with providing access to the facilities. The proposed development is
located within the Neuse River basin and will be subject to the stormwater management requirements set forth in
Section 10, Chapter 9 of the City of Raleigh regulations. Per City of Raleigh regulations, stormwater management on
this site shall address two primary issues: (1) peak discharge rates and (2) water quality management, and will employ a
stormwater wetland facilities to meet these requirements. Since the site will be required to provide 85% TSS for all
impervious surfaces, two stormwater management facilities are proposed for the project; a constructed wetland for Sub -
Basin 1 and a bioretention area for Sub -Basin 2. Stream "A" is not subject to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules
therefore while the discharge from the bioretention area will be diffuse, diffuse flow was not addressed.
Inset 2: To provide access to the front portion of the building and to allow for ingress and egress of
emergency vehicles using driveway, there is a retaining wall proposed in order to construct the driveway and
avoid impacts to Stream "A ". However, there is a minimal amount of clearing and grading proposed along
the edge of wetland "A" associated with the installation of the retaining wall (Fig. 4).This wetland area is
mostly shrub/herbaceous with a few larger trees, and has likely been timbered in the last 30 years. It should
be noted that the church proposing at least one acre dedicated to a tree conservation area on the western end
of the property.
Typical construction equipment will be used such as a long -arm track -hoe, front end loader, and bush hog for
the initial clearing.
Page 4 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property l
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
project (Including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ Preliminary ® Final (UNKNOWN)
of determination was made?
4c. if yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company: EcoEngineering
Name (if known): Kevin Yates
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
NCDWQ Neuse Buffer On -site Meeting with Mr. Martin Richmond conducted on 04/17/2012
(NBRRO # 12 -161 Surface Water Determination Letter Enclosed)
- USACE On -Site Concurrence Meeting with Mr. Craig Brown conducted on 04/17/2012
(No signed JD map)
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ® Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file' instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page S of 15
PON Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number—
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
Inset 1
Wetland "A"
Fill
Riparian
No
Corps /DWQ
Ull
Permanent
Inset 2
Isolated
Wetland "B"
Fill
Non - Riparian
No
DWQ (Isolated)
0.03
Permanent
Inset 2
Wetland "C"
Fill
Isolated
DWQ (Isolated)
0.01
Permanent
Non - Riparian
No
4041401: 0.01 ac
2g. Total wetland impacts
401 Only: 0.04 ac
TOTAL: 0.05 ac
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b,
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(1NT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
51 ❑ P [IT
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
52 ❑ P ❑ T
El PER
El Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 6 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
— Permanent
(P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c,
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑ P ❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
NIA
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then com Iete the chart below.
5a.
Pond Ill
number
51b.
Proposed use or purpose of
pond
50.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
NIA
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ Na If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 7 of 15
PCN Form -- Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWO)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason for
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent [P]
impact
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
or Temporary
required?
T
81 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P ❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Stream and Buffer impacts have been avoided to the greatest extent practicable, while achieving a successful
project. Wetlands do exist within the project area, and while it is the intent of the church to avoid significant
impacts to wetlands, streams or other environmentally sensitive features, there are proposed impacts to 0.04
acre of Low Quality Isolated Wetlands and 0.01 acre of jurisdictional riparian wetlands.
To provide access to the front portion of the building and to allow for ingress and egress of emergency
vehicles using driveway, there is a retaining wall proposed in order to construct the driveway and avoid
impacts to Stream "A ". Using this retaining wall completely avoids impacting Stream "A ". Only the minimal
amount of wetland area will be impacted for safe construction and installation of the retaining wall, and
temporary impacts to the stream bed itself will be avoided during construction. This wetland area is mostly
shrub/herbaceous with a few larger trees, and has likely been timbered in the last 30 years. It should be noted
that the church proposing at least one acre dedicated to a tree conservation area on the western end of the
property.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Proper sedimentation and erosion control methods will be utilized during all phases of construction and installation
as described in the Erosion Control Plan sheet reviewed and approved by the NC Division of Land Quality and City
of Raleigh. All work will take place during dry conditions and can be facilitated from high, non jurisdictional,
stable ground adjacent to the Neuse Buffer. The contractor shall install silt fence, inlet protection, sediment traps,
diversion ditches, tree protection, clearing only as necessary to install these devices. All erosion and sediment
control measures will be checked for stability and operation following every runoff producing rainfall , but in no
case less than once every week. Any needed repairs will be made immediately to maintain all measures designed.
An erosion control inspections report is required and will be kept by the owner's representative.
The project will meet all relative requirements of Best Management Practices and Engineered Stormwater Control
Structures as outlined through State and Local Stormwater Rules.
Page S of 15
PC Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Page 9 of 15
PC Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation sank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non- riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 9 of 15
PC Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

S. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes 19 No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 10 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
comments: Since the proposed project is located within the Neuse River
Basin, it is subject to the diffuse flow requirements, however neither
stormwater BMP outlets to or near a buffered stream feature. Stream "A" is
not subject to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules therefore while the
discharge from the bioretention area will be diffuse, diffuse flow was not
El Yes ®No
addressed. The constructed wetland BMP, outlets to over 500 feet of low
gradient upland area and into a ditch network along Hwy 70. Therefore a
diffuse flow plan is not included.
Page 11 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
-48%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Proposed Stormwater Management Facilities
Since the site will be required to provide 85% TSS for all impervious surfaces, two stormwater management
facilities are proposed for the project; a constructed wetland for Sub -Basin 1 and a bioretention area for Sub -
Basin 2.
Constructed Wetland
The proposed constructed wetland is to be along the east property line and provide both peak flow rate
detention and water quality (TSS and N). The proposed facility has some wails to accommodate the grading.
The dam is proposed to have 3(H):1(V) slopes with a 10' top width. An access route to the dam is provided
from the south of the project. The spillway acts as both a principal and emergency spillway system with just
under a foot of freeboard in the 100 -year, worst -case scenario. The proposed normal pool elevation is 395
with an orifice at invert 396 to accommodate the 1" runoff volume over one vertical foot. The surface area of
the facility was preliminarily sized based on this one vertical foot ponding of the 1" runoff volume. Final
grading, details, and specifications will be provided through the City of Raleigh permitting process for the
facility.
Bioretention Area
The proposed bioretention area is located to the west of the proposed entrance drive off of Glenwood Avenue.
The facility is designed to capture the majority of the driveway for N and TSS removal. The preliminary
sizing of the facility is based on the 1" runoff volume and a 9" ponding depth for the water quality function.
The facility is mostly in cut with a 5' wide berm "top" provided. For this preliminary analysis, no peak flow
rate detention benefit was assumed for the bioretention area. Final grading, details, and specifications will be
provided through the City of Raleigh permitting process for the facility.
Please note that there is a small remaining area of the proposed entrance drive than cannot physically be
treated in either the constructed wetland or bioretention area. This area is considered bypass. Therefore the
85% TSS removal is to the maximum extent practical for the site.
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWO Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Raleigh
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally- implemented stormwater management programs
® NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached? R courtesy copy of the SW Management Plan will be provided upon
Page 12 of 15
PC Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Page 13 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
approval by the City of Raleigh.
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
® Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes
® No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
® Yes
❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
® Yes
❑ No
F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ yes
® No
use of public (federal /state) land?
lb.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPAISEPA)?
1c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project is a single and complete project with appropriate land use control and Stormwater
measures in
place for specific areas which require them.
Page 13 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Waste water will be directed into an existing City of Raleigh maintained sewer line.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
10 Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The USFWS web page http:// www .fws.gov /nc- es /es /countyfr.htmi and the Natural Heritage virtual workroom
http: / /nhpweb.enr. state. nc. us /nhis /public /gmap75_main.phtmI was accessed on September 10, 2012 to determine if the
project would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical habitat. Based on this research, the bald eagle
(Haliaeetus leucocephalus - BGPA), Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii - E), and red - cockaded woodpecker (Picoides
borealis - E) are federally listed species to occur within Wake County. Based on field inspections, it is believed no
adverse impacts will occur to threatened and endagered species and their known habitiat due to the contruction of the
proposed project.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
An interactive map located at http: // ocean. floridamarine .orgefh_coral /ims /viewer.htm was utilized on September 10, 2012
to determine if the project will impact Essential Fish Habitat.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
A review of the list of properties and districts in North Carolina entered in the National Register of Historic Places
( http: Ilwww,hpo.ncdcr.goV /nrlist.htm) was conducted on September 10, 2012 for Wake County, and it did not reveal any
listing within the project area. It is believed the proposed project will not occur in or near an area that has been
designated as having historic or cultural preservation status by the state, federal, or tribal governments
Page 14 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

S. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain? E13yes ® No
$b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? North Carolina Flood Insurance Rate Map Panels
0759J (May 2, 2006; Map Number 3720075900J) does show 100 -year flood areas or floodways located on the subject
property.
Kevin Yates
Q/ z
Date
Applicant/A nfs Signature
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
(Agent's signature is valid only iF n authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 15 of 15
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

A.r;
HD" \n
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, PE
Governor Director
August 21, 2012
Kevin Yates
EcoEngineering
P.O. Box 14005
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject: Surface Water Determination Letter
NBRRO# 12-16 I
Wake County
The Raleigh Regional Office of the NC Division of Water Quality /Surface Water Protection Section conducted a
site visit at the subject property and is providing the below- Iisted deternination pursuant to your request for a formal
surface water determination:
BASIN:
® Neuse (15A NCAC 2B ,0233)
❑ Tar - Pamlico (15A NCAC 2B.0259)
® EphemeralllntermittentlPerennial Determination ❑ Isolated Wetland Determination
Project Name; 10931 Glenwood Ave Raleigh
Location/Directions: Subject property is a former private residence /undeveloped property
located at the project address
Subject Stream: UT to Little Brier Creek
Date of Determination: April 17, x012
FeaB E111P* Nat 7Fjj @ Stap[ya Stream Soil
Subject Form Pis, Surve
1 la
E F x x
*E111P = Ephemera lllnrermittenrlPerennial
USGS
Explanation: The feature(s) listed above has or have been located on the Soil Survey of Wake County, North
Carolina or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1 :24,000 scale. Each feature that is checked
"Not Subject" has been determined not to be a stream or is not present on the property. Features that are checked
"Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be a stream. There may be
other streams located on your property that do not show up on the maps referenced above but, still may be
considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and/or to the Division of Water Quality.
t���° Caro '
dvaiWN, na
North Carolina Division of Water Qualify Raleigh Regional Office Surface water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
Intemet www =waierqual ty.org 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 -1628 FAX [phone]
Art Equal bpportunitylAtfimmllve Action Employer — 50% Recyded110% Post Consumer Paper

10931 Glenwood Ave Raleigh
Wake County
August 21, 2012
Page 2 of 2
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties that
dispute a determination made by the DWQ or Delegated Local Authority may request a determination by the
Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter or from the date the affected
party (including downstream and/or adjacent owners) is notified of this fetter. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Ian McMillan, DWQ Wetlands/401 Unit, 165€1 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -1650.
If you dispute the Director's determination you may file a petition for an administrative (searing. You must file the
petition with the Office of Administrative Hearings within sixty (60) days of the receipt of this notice of decision. A
petition is considered filed when it is received in the Office of Administrative Hearings during normal office hours.
The Office of Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:00 am and 5:00
pm, except for official state holidays. To request a hearing, send the original and one (1) copy of the petition to the
Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -6714. The petition may also be
faxed to the attention of the Office of Administrative Hearings at (919) 733 -3478, provided the original and one (1)
copy of the document is received by the Office of Administrative Hearings within five (5) days following the date of
the fax transmission. A copy of the petition must also be served to the Department of Natural Resources, c/o Mary
Penny Thompson, General Counsel, 1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1601.
This determination Is final and binding unless, as detailed above, you ask for a hearing or appeal within sixty (60)
days.
The owner /future owners should notify the Division of Water Quality (including any other Local, State, and Federal
Agencies) of this decision concerning any future correspondences regarding the subject property (stated above). This
project may require a Section 4041401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be directed to the
Division of Water Quality (Central Office) at (919 )-807 -6301, and the US Army Corp of Engineers (Raleigh
Regulatory Field Office) at (919)- 544 -4884.
Respectfully,
Martin R' mind
Environmental Specialist
cc: Wetlands/ Stormwater Branch, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -1650
RRO /SWP File Copy

y 'V E
. AIL
N SOUTHBRIDGE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH
THE JOHN R. McADAMS
j.
SOILS MAP COMPANY, INC.
0 100 200 400 sycmu s • n.nMCRS • sL*R-Ypas • t! vm—nwr m—xr kL
Feet K WAM4:1 MAN" -VJX • MAX.LIMY
1 inch = 200 feet

. � • ��
�0 1)
oe
Z
■ /�
z
k �
q�
{ r
§ . qp
�_ �• � �
03
• <�
4
�-
\ } }} g 0
$ � .
§| ƒ! � / %� � � �
�
w�
-
� 2`
k �
{({\ '
z N f,

� f
ro
2y
41.
I � ■
��■ ��� SFr �
��ex7mr P6)y4r
����� WE"Tt�•rD
r
st
Fes%❑ ?a Iwr
CA%
Cruz f:�-nzcn)`
w/s
N
Southbridge dFllwl%- iro 8n al
Yx t7 J
w
4111-41t,
to .
i
r
if 100
ip
i
caw w t-w�� Holz
E CHI- 6
WAKE
CUi;ti EF

INC U W Q Stream 1clent1t1Catlon rorm yerslon 4.11
Cate: ProjeettSite: r` 6t [44r
Evaluator: County: "Ike
Total Points: Stream Deter n [circle one)
Stream is at least intermittent I, � �6- Ephemera Intermittent erenniat
if 2:19 or perennial if Z 30'
Latitude:-3
Longitude: „ 7
Other Lo&A -e 1,ij
e.g. Quad Name:
4 I I`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = is .5..)
Absent
Weak
Mo erate
Strong
18' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
M
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0
1
3
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
Ye K- 3
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1<
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
T
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No 40
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions In manual
R "wrirnlnnv Miihtnfal = V 1
12, Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
3
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
b
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Ye K- 3
r_ Rlnirtrni f _C:i ihfnfal = L L 7 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
11
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
M
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW =
.75) OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
p rf
�j it

1 inch = 20 ft
® n°' CMT -12000
� HBRID ,�
IN 1
GIL xoMH c„��
RlEcoEngineering
A division of Tha Ioha R. McAdams Campmy, �
IK lARiA1Fi�= CMT12000 -PR
SCAM 1"=20'
n" 08 -08 -2012
IIf • pi�lQl�S ■ • IIIPIBIXIl�tiI
3
Nw C-M

i s
Awdw
AV-
NNNO.
i
.tea ��•
W
Q
Wd
�3
V�
N
W�
Q
Vl
O
IL N
I
N 0 N N
H O
N all q
a U �
a
®McADAMs

K Oct � z 6, �ZY 2
Version 1.4
EC cr �X5iA0PriAl �A)c sr, Z a 146 1 January 9, 2009
401 Oversight/Express Permitting PCN Su mittal Checklist
The lication fee (Checks may be made out to "N.C. Division of Water Quality"
- 2�4 00 r 401 Water Quality Certification with minor impacts
- $570.00 for 401 Water Quality Certification with major impacts
- Express Review Fee (Amount requested on Acceptance Letter)
Five (5) complete and collated copies of the PCN Application and supporting
documentation (instead of providing 5 copies of the full size plans you may provide two
copies of full size plans along with three copies of 11 X 17 plans)
stormwater Management Plan (if applicable — see PCN Form Help File Section E)
1) Please provide three (3) copies of the stormwater management plans along with all
supporting information pertaining to this project including the following:
(vwr e� a. Entire site development/layout plans delineating all drainage areas;
b. Design calculation sheets for all proposed BMP(s) sized for both on -site and
off -site drainage;
�i c. BMP supplements for each proposed BMP and Required Items Check List
P ew ew ed i (hftp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/bmi) forms.htm) along with all required
items;
�I d. A Notarized Operation & Maintenance Agreement for each stormwater
1 I management facility;
Q_� �a� e t�l e. Detailed construction drawing sheets shall include
(i) Erosion and sediment control plans;
(ii) Installation and planting schedules for the proposed BMPs;
(iii) Appropriately scaled plan views and cross sectional details of all
BMPs and associated components -- inlet and outlet structures,
forebay, respective zones and pertinent elevations.
If your project is located within a State implemented Riparian Buffer Rule Area, submit the
following along with site plans and PCN form:
1) Three (3) copies of the details for on -site diffuse flow provisions, (refer to
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/bmp_forms.htm).
DWQ Stream Determination Forms for streams on property and DWQ determination
letter for wetlands or streams (if applicable). �i G 6 � � U t� 11 _ 4,/
The following is the most critical of all the information that you must provide, The quality and
detail of the information will often determine the expeditiousness of the review. The following is
a checklist of the types of pertinent information required at a minimum:
Maps and Plans:
The most recent version of the 1:24,000 USGS Topographic Map - Please cleanly draw or
deli Bate the site boundaries on the topographic map.
El The most recent version of the bound and published County NRCS Soil Survey Map -
(required for projects within the Neuse River Basin, Tar - Pamlico River Basin, Randleman
Lake Watershed and the Catawba River Basin, also recommended for all projects) -
Please clearly delineate the site boundaries, etc. on the map. If the delineation obscures
any of the features, it is recommended that a clean copy be provided. Copies of the

Version 1.4
January 9, 2009
current soil survey andlor soil survey map sheets can be obtained from the local NRCS
County Office (http: / /www.nc.nres.usda.go ). GIS soil layers are not acceptable.
Vicinity map - Please clearly mark the location and approximate boundaries of the property
and project on the map. Please indicate north arrow and scale. Please include applicable
road names or State Road numbers.
The Site Plan - The most critical map to be provided is the site plan. You must provide full
sized plans. The following is the minimum list of plans that are typically needed.
Pre - construction /Pre- existing conditions - This sheet (or sheets) must include:
• All jurisdictional and non jurisdictional wetland, stream, water features, State regulated
buffers (delineated into Zones 1 and 2)
• Topographic contours with elevations
• Any existing structures and impervious areas
• Existing utility lines and easements
• Existing roads, culverts, and other pertinent features
• North arrow and the scale (1 ":50' scale is recommended).
Proposed conditions - This sheet (or sheets) must include:
• All jurisdictional and non jurisdictional wetland, stream, water features, State regulated
buffers (delineated into Zones 1 and 2)
• Lot layout (if a subdivision or commercial development is proposed) - lots must be
developable without further impacts to murisdictional and non- murisdictional wetlands
streams water features and State regulated buffers. Building envelopes must be
provided when streams, wetlands, riparian buffers, or water features exist on a lot
• All built -out structures and impervious cover
• Final grading contours with elevations
• All utilities and easements (including septic fields on all lots within 100 feet of stream,
wetland, or water features - if applicable)
• Impacted areas -- these should correspond with the Impact numbers listed on your PCN
form.
- 15ainage Plans - Final drainage plans must include the following:;,, Sw /V# 44666
• Locations and pertinent elevations and sizes of the stormwater collection system and
drainage ways
• All inlets and outlets must also be shown with pertinent elevations (All outlets to
wetlands must be at a non- erosive velocity, generally less than 2 ft/sec durin g the peak
flow from the 10 -yr storm)
• Scaled stormwater BMPs must also be indicated as required by OWQ rules and policies
• In certain cases (see Section E of PCN form), final stormwater management plans must
also be provided (see Stormwater Management Plan Checklist)
2--proposed Impacts - All impacts to jurisdictional and non - jurisdictional wetland, stream,
water features, and State regulated buffers must be shown and labeled on the site plans at
a scale no smaller than 1" = 50'. Al excavation, fill, flooding, stabilization, and other impacts
that will be conducted in or near jurisdictional and non - jurisdictional wetland, stream, water
features, and State regulated buffers must be indicated. Please provide cross sectional
details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage (burial of culvert 20% for culverts r 48
inches, and 1 -foot for culverts > 48 inches).

Version 1.4
January 9, 2009
Wetland Impacts:
Precise grading and final elevation contours must be provided. Existing
vegetation and any clearing must be specified.
Er All subsurface utility lines must indicate the location of anti -seep collars.
Construction detail for anti -seep collars must be provided.
❑dway or other crossings of riparian wetlands may require floodway culverts to
maintain existing hydrological conditions.
Plans should show that the hydrology of remaining wetlands on the site will be
maintained.
Stream Impacts:
Stream impacts must be clearly shown on the plans. The centerline as well as
the banks of the stream must be surveyed or located by GPS for the portion of
the stream to be impacted.
—�® The inlet and the outlet of all culverts should be aligned with the stream as
much as possible. Inlet and outlet elevations and streambed elevations should
be indicated. Any inlet or outlet protection must be shown and enumerated on
the impact map(s).
" For bottomless culverts or other spans, a vertical cross section should be
provided that shows the minimum distance from each span to each stream bank,
the stream cross section, the height of the span above the stream and the
minimum distance from the edge of each footer to each stream bank.
Additionally, please provide a signed and sealed geotechnical report of
subsurface soils at the proposed bottomless culvert location. The report must
comply with the Division of Highways — Guidelines for Drainage Studies and
Hydraulic Design, prepared by A.L. Hankins, Jr., State Hydraulics Engineer -
1999.
cE Multiple culverts or sectioned box culverts typically require the use of sills, off-
setting or other means to match the cross section of the existing stream (in order
to maintain stream stability and provide aquatic life passage). A vertical cross
section of the culverts should be shown overlain with the up and downstream
stream cross section including the stream flood -prone area.
--E5-- Impacts associated with dam construction must indicate and enumerate all fill
associated with the dam footprint, spillway and any bank stream bank
stabilization. The length of stream impounded must also be indicated and
enumerated.

',„
\ F a A
;ky
p "a, t: ��,� fir. ,§ \',
J f
4
1 44
i
l � i
i
A
&.
IS
''{ '9 1'•`'" r`'r,,- .,n,„,w.«^ \ _S �� # 4 2 t �'.+ x `'+. a '4. F "`F`� IN
\� \ 1 1 d. p JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND A
\ _ (404 / 401) = 0.05 AC
777777— \ °\ \ 1 >
S TRE\ A M B \ —\ 47 LF
o -_D,RTP
/
-- a25,_ -- — _ _ — — \ \ ( f } ( I / / \ \ ` \ — _ / 1 l } I 1 I II �\ ,
l ® ; I I
14 ^ �
� ,,., � � � ~ \ \ \ \ \ � \ \ \ o I ! / _
/ \ i \ 1 t 4 50 NEUSE
— \ EXISTING \ \ \ °U EAM BUFFER j, (
420— HOUSE
ou
\sly
DIRT PATH
ou
vo
1�' 1 }/ / ` �� \ \ \ \ \\ \ —4zo -- —� / I \ \ I \ �\ \ \\ \ \ \ \��� - -;� —� f
• 1 l t I ` � — - — -- _ , _ UNBUFFERED JURISDICTIONAL (401/404)
J// / 40S \ \ \ \ \ ! \ I I } \ \ \ \ \ \ \ — - _ `� -INTERMITTENT STREAM A =349.5 LF
ISOLATED WETLAND G
f 1 I (401 ONLY) — 0.01 AC
\ \ t 1 1 1 \
ou
ago ✓ `' / f / / /i/ /�Y
roll
I \ \\it
ISOLATED WETLAND B / / // /!�
401 ONLY) 0.03
AC'-,,
° °
1J
`,,� ,,."`r `� '� t 'a i }{ 7 r t F � I ^ \ � °',: " ~, ,,, " --„,,, `-'». ,.'""°.«° w. ....,...w._.,w,,...M,..«,... ..,.,,/ ! /' ,,• / i- � � /''/ �/ `,f // .+ ,et,,. ;�'�,,' f'
JI
o
\ t i i` � St ^., m_, "`a "`;,,3_, `',.,,,, ""'""`.r..,- '""' ,,,.,,.-,-' -•.d" •-- °,...,,. -'`°" �% / ! / ^'r ` e,�''' , ,>t�,r` ,.:''" _„. fi �: � ;tf
e
A`y
N. -. a
a
t 1 '� e i 3 .. h. °""°-- aam.,,,. ...•^ ^°°'°° _ -,J !e"r' `y+.' f.'✓` { fie" 7
.i `^k ` -. � i i y % '� , t "y„ k c `,*,.. -.. «-. rN .- .. »,-- °'"'"M.e, ,-... ' d "" � �tf .e� / ✓' F ,r'`' �d d``v.2� °` ,
1 4 2
0
k
<.r
^vim c
"ib.
', _ "`... ` "< \ \ 4 �� - ` "E. `,..,_ ,„ ',; -.,, � ''a . � t ''*,. `_- - ,........_... _ s" mow°"'• � r r ✓" !` kf ,' rf`_x F .r'' ..u'". af'' ,r'`' ^'
w
y
F.„,'f
', "` " tl \ � l t '` � .. u. "`°w.. '''" "w, '^"` ""zw:,. 'b`,,, "" `' 'L *. t ,i r "•- ....'"'"^,. 'h ....- „,„- .- «_, -a �.«''_.,.,. -w' ,! .f
'm''
�°�'°A.,,µ y \ \. � S � � �•. � ` , ', `^\ `°^ � '`• �5, \ � ^"., -,-,., ,... -.... .. ^^"°_°-- ,"^,.._ -w,.,. ,_,'.- -- ...__.._...- ......,..._,., . "n=" ,,.^'„.p fir^' ,,,' ;l ,,,,'' ,'. €` °. t' ,p,, �' ,,° f' { r" t'` .+�fi,. jJp ,° F <,f°'
',. �. _ ```' \ i, y 'x � y \ '; '',, ,„ M1,. '"'° �^�, \ � � '`,, ,."" _n” °'^°,,.,>.m... _"°° °,^..- .- ...... e`F -r 4> „!°� P,r° .r'f' .F` f ✓' :` .i ,+' �f � f F ,' ,:�
.°^,,\ °a,„ .S \,<; '�4 _ '`'^+.. •a,..,,,.. • `S._ ;•'"4. `+',''`+•. h. `O \a `f\s`.. ;�" .,r' " ."°^-'. ^...,. --. ,t ,+-v., -° ' x,.w` *fi.` .'` :f'` -a` ,:`^' <f ` d,r ,'' rt f
^w_
-
s.
'°'- ,y °. 'mot t ``. ., `' .°". '`>.` x �� . @. °- a .•.Rn ,....',,,'� °^_`-..� ,d' � �` ; t° s' ,r`l' ,P "3,� <,r`fit°e fiF it `4rr � �'' qtr
\,. ',,, �� ,,� '•� ,: `', `yi __ .,4 `""�� ,.. ,�`' +`l t' f r?� ,° f ; r° �;�" 1�- �' u� � } r` ''_ \.
'"a �\, s "k, ♦TM\z `°- z� 'it-°�°,.k� ','c ``r, `'i � `� -F'o-`` r' � „l, r,„wL*,„.• ,f, 3 � t J 6
e `
4
t � s
' ``- """^a, � 'e }`t "+._ '� `te ~""- \,t \3;s� '•,. i. il, pit 'z �{ E tk ` " ..y .,_'' ``b, ' i "va 3 } ". "a„ - "- .."`°^.,. .,'r'° .r"`,„
STREAM WETLAND NOTES.
1. A ON
CONCURRENCE MEETING CONDUCTED WITH R. CRAIG BROWN
US CE C xc Gaut (xen es}
ON APRIL 17, 2012.
2. NCDWQ NEUSE RIVER STREAM BUFFER CONCURRENCE MEETING CONDUCTED
�,,, _" ' ON —SITE WITH MR. MARTIN RICHMOND ON APRIL 17. 2012.
X `{i "'y \ wv° 3. JURISDICTIONAL 404 401 WETLAND A = 2,390 SQ FT 0.05 AC
\ \.. \ :AS M r ,aN r c > ( ) GRAPHIC scAl�
\ 4;, \'\ p - JURISDICTIONAL 404 { 401 STREAM A — 324 LF 50 0 25 50 100
rr .;a,= � '^.,. �„. � fP � fAs = r § �, 't, , \ '± .,., ,,.,, s <y •g} l ��4 rp � ( i )
JURISDICTIONAL 404 / 401) STREAM B = 47 LF
lei
ISOLATED (401) WETLAND B = 1,299 SO FT (0.03 AC) —
ISOLATED (401) WETLAND C = 277 SO FT (0.01 C) I inch — 50 ft
PRELIMINARY DRAWING — NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION

C
C
75
rn
U-
0

C'MCa,. o _ /
b7
t /
�9\ 264 5
LAA 8 FFFER
a, y d \ \f ,, / + q' \ \a \ \ \ `L 20' E C 0 \ \ M1 g
(M URE 50 FRO TOP F cP
sTT7i� CH 1 ( \ ` � \ , �` l •`` � � PR
` \. � f � '° °• % ) � c� � r , r �
/g /I \ �_ cs� / \ — �� '' r INV -3s2'3 f F
404 401 w ,x / D A
#M \ ° e \ t IMPACTS 0.01 AG, \ l /4
� r, a°� �� � . a • rte, s� :a � .,-A �c' \ _.../ `a ° . s, � ate- � \ _� ` \ � � // i t % ' /% ° 1 ` s'�
RSHEP-
NG
/ \ \ \ 8, \ Y CORNELL�
/ D YFRI L[PKfN — P N: 98260s� \
ri . \� till
PF
Dg 121,80, PG 74
'PO 7
��, r� \. x r x •, \ \ .� D�STUR eE, �rrP. `' ° °u 1 / ONE '
. , x `t� \r.: INSET 2' / \
a\. f �®
°... ',. $�\ e P , Q f ` ` \ , \ \ 3s� RESID CE /,< /`
C \ \ \ UNBUFFERED INTERMITTENT
.. d STREAM B EASEMENT
I A�v\ < I �x L 1
aia6 \ / e \� — \ STORMW CE
YI R \
\Y-
s� � —.. ✓
�'' GHQ t1 .� RErgtNING wAtL § t 1 , \ — ' FLUME @3 ? ®4 / c� �► `,�i`'
k �' .� ,� ° , (DESIGN BY OTHERS) Y�
4
ISOLATED 401. W D C
P
IMACT = 0.01 AC \ / \ \� \1
� � \ \ \ \ �� ' i BIOREIENTION � _71 � /�1' �s f �;;�' � ,�C�'`�
CONSTIRLICIED
WETLAND
Ag
C �\ \ ISOLATED 40t W D B
� -.. \N. -. ;f r:;'a4 ' � a t;..s`'`h..: .� \ ea,n®nr — n nz A^ I _ _ \ \ �C \ \ \ �\ 13 .r o, - �J / / S ,?:` _ r?` �/ !LY .F°.0 "
®` - ✓ ®a -�'"� D IG — — a r , / t \ / ` - v PIN - '?759828320/
�y
P
P 18 RC / a}
f
% ( 2H:tV
? \ TO BERM ELEVATION AS
SHOWN
` PIN: 0759828297
\ 10' WIDE ACCESS PATH TOP OF BERM f / / %
TO TOP OF BERM
10' WIDE, MIN. 3H:1V SLOPES ON BERM, r — — - / / ` 12TRENCH DRAIN FLUME }\t
// TO PROPOSED; 8f0—R ON
\ (5H :1v LONG SLOPE) PROPOSED LIMITS l / f X , EA m
\ I PROTECTION FENCING, TYP. — — — — — — — —_— — — _ _ / i / !r/ 6 ' E ' °
OF DISTURBANCE, TYP. % /� ie/ %/ �9`° 1 30` fA EM a
sy
CIP BRIER CREEK LLC — — — — — _ — —j1 / / / N
PIN: 0759809897 — —
�. DB 14291, PG 1088 CIP BRIER CREEK LLC — r /
�? ZONE: CUD TD PIN: 0759910693 —
ALTERNATE COMPLIANCE• SECONDARY TREE VACANT DB 14291, PG 10 / PROPOS MITS
OF DISTUR CE, a
CONSERVATION AREA \ ZONEA CUD TD �,
32' PERIMETER YARD
64j \ .14 AC \ I
AIS FORESTRY 14688 LLC
PIN: 07699 014688
DB 14084, PG 0770 b
ZE. R4
FLORIC® TURE —FARM
A � I
STREAM f wMTLAND NQI ES:
1. USACE ON —SITE CONCURRENCE MEETING CONDUCTED MR, CRAIG BROWN
s4 \ ON APRIL 17, 2012. NO GRID (Nan 83)
s L, 4 401 WETLAND IMPACTS
/ 2. NCDWQ NEUSE RIVER STREAM :BUFFER .CONCURRENCE MEETING CONDUCTED
ON —SITE WITH MR. MARTIN RICHMOND ON APRIL 17, 2012.
3. JURISDICTIONAL (404 / 401) WETLAND A = 2,390 SO FT (0.05 AC) GRAPHIC SCALE
JURISDICTIONAL (404 / 401) STREAM A 324 LF
JURISDICTIONAL (404 / 401) STREAM B = 47 LF 50 0 25 50 100
401 MILANU IMPACTS ISOLATED (401) WETLAND B = 1,299 SO FT (.03 A(;}
ISOLATED (401) WETLAND C = 277 SO FT (0.01 AC) 1 inch = 50 ft.
PRELIMINARY DRAWING - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
E
W w
car
i.. a z °
ce
w
F�a
■ Ye U ® ■
A R
.�� N jt
ca
0
rA
x�
cq
r! a ko
w a
1-4
z
w
z
0
0
w
IZ'i a
�v�oA a
uz
04 'co
F=4 EE_
A v &.4
I]YP9''xz �
Ix x ­4
o �COD� b
W vj a
W
A
a
Q
Z
w
W
PROJECT NO. CMT -12000
FHmAAm- CMT12000 -PR
DESIGNED BY: JWCi /JES
DRAWN BY- JES
SCALE: 1"=50'
DATE' 07 -19 -12
SHEEP N0.
PR-1

G
.i
L
M
d
O
!f!
N
O
N
U3
N
,D
O
O
O
N_
H
U
6
rn
c
T
ID
d
c
m
U
a
c
E
`o
ul
L
a
L
U
o_
L
N
LL3
0
m
rn
v
a
L
7
O
CA
O
O
a
N
i
F"
2
U
U
U
N