780024_inspections_20210323

Type of Visit: p Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
3/93 191
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Arrival Time:
1/
.224/11(-r7
Departure Time:
u)64--be,,
Opi
Owner Email:
Phone:
County:
RegioE
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
11
I
3 s,--7 P4V?)?,a4.. ag414-6;
Latitude:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
4-71(4'
Design Curre
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Design Curre
oultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Cu
Foul Ca * aci p
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Design Curren
Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: - ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No NNA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No \ELNA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Ik\lo
❑ Yes'No
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑NE
Page 1 of 3
2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: !r - (,r
Date of Inspection: / ,;23 / 2
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
n Yes
Structure 5
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Structure 6
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
seating rib 130Y
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s): 6c / / ,i (1U
14. Do the receiving crops differ from Mose designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
--eat
%r7►
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
1 9 Di,i the facility fail to love the Certificate of Coverage 8 Pe +t readily available?
l 77/4e,64...ezt,,,,
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA LI NE
❑ Yes NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes IN No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check n Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ['Checklists n Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard 'N Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ CI-lc/Yield 120 Minute Inspections D Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspeons
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a Train gauge? ❑ Yes
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? n Yes
Page 2 of 3
ITKI Yes El No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Waste Transfers
Weather Code
Sludge Survey
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: � -
Date of Inspection: 33 �a
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? Ifyes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
Yes 0 No ❑ NA 0 NE
❑ Yes
❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No D NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? n Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
0
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 11 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes IN No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Ist No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
n Yes tallo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes I No ❑ NA 0 NE
❑ Yes IN No ❑ NA 0 NE
to question
cility to better expla
tswers and/or any additional rec
ditional pages' as necessary
any other comma
DoTE: S.L 94ut.7 oP e /1/a./a i
TF ' .4ftat a)cArJ; 1s/7/9-0 ao
/10-r ?-10?-0 deze.? derriLee,
OxiArt
/(t,'CL/ icy /2-13/1ai ce-aiditapizt /`i2"'d
be Co Pe;G,,nLJ
ri t o
let- ouce
pi-- ffor�,eS GetfirbINO t� /eqc
note a4d U+ter, to your 1Rg.-2, fQjq DU SprQq�,
bL- a) a (6, X gal cf• n�ri- yec-
vOk minter XDr is wea,K.)
Reviewer/Inspector Name: _ �Cfoflt:er)Dt1 c n -e
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: aav r+ i-
Page 3 of 3
d,U 6e -Phone: c-11 1 / 7(P 17/
6/49,Date:
2/4/2015