310688_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20210311

- Division of'Water°Resources
Facility Number • , �3� - O Division of Soil and Water Conservation .
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: CB'Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
3- 11 -91 7? 3-M-Iti
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: p° c�a.1 Departure Time: 1 16 O o�tve County: v Lt f✓ Region: 'b•� l'-®
Farm Name: STAB
aS lip"
we ,
Owner Email:
Owner Name: S`fr
p n S
I lic,
Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity' .° Wp.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish 3'aR4 ?-oo
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Title:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current,
Design:.` Current
`VetPoultry ° ° Capacity Pop., Cattle,' , " Caphety,' Fop. `
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
Dry Poultry Capacity -Pon..
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
ZNo
1. Is any discharge observed from.any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes EfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes E/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes Y❑
NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes [ o
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
N
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 3 1 - Date of Inspection:.-1.0— 1
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes / No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes YNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: I
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): 19 , '
Observed Freeboard (in): a�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [3No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed -and/or managed through a ❑ Yes EX 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmenta threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 41 S 6-0 _
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes &No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes EZ"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes E o ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes � o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes [7No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design [:]Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes E3No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 31 - I Date of Inspection: - 0 j
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �rZN5 ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
[//No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑.No
ZNA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
E/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Er/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
El� o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments. (refer, to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
Reviewer/Inspector Name
JaV0 Pejz-q Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date: 3m 10 o2 (
511212020