310099_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20210310

_. 0 Division of Water Resources
Facility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0"Other Agency °
l ype of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
2eason for Visit: dRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 3-10 - a 1 Arrival Time: Q° Departure Time: � County: V PL/ Region: W I �A
Farm Name: Nape. All Q,*- 5A,,s Owner Email:
Owner Name: N T-4 L UrzW-t C W Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: pj i L &aA CK Certification Number: 9 `I0 Ri
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine. o Capacity , Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish Ljjoo 11491
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Other,
Other
Certification Number:
Latitude:
a
Design Current
Wet Poultry
° P
Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Design` Current r
Dry Poultry
Capacity Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
H
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
i
Longitude:
Design Current,
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
,Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
[:]Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
[yNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
12rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
[:]Yes
N
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: -N i - q 9 1 jDate of Inspection: 3,/ o — -a I
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes R�No
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ff No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: I a 3 4
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): 39 Iq's
Observed Freeboard (in): ^) aS S 5'
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes [2f No ❑ NA ❑ NE
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes EZ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes E]-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application -
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes []'No ❑ NA ❑ NE "
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑-<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): S 1_O CB__Pg g 4 L />7 i //e
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? [-]Yes E�(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the'irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Reauired Records & Documents
❑ Yes [/No
❑ Yes �10
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[]'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
6 o
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
Q.Ko
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑'1�To
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
To
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes CNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes FlNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No [2"*NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
[:]Yes 2�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes []( No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
FNNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
EZrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes
E2/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
L, ®e (,3 P= 9.-d-
S1vj �)e
Reviewer/Inspector Name: �� �1n1 R �'� Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: /i � Date HO It
Page 3 of 3 v / 21412015