310436_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20210310

V Division of Water Resources �Jl`1rYl �' ,►
Facility Number O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other °Agency
Type of Visit: Com iance Inspection Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: 3 —1O —al 1 Arrival Time: aM Departure Time: County: _ Region: L,) 11?6
Farm Name:! T S 1-4 Owner Email:
Owner Name: �1,.,�..�o�yS ` Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:.
Certified Operator: `13r_ o� S
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish 35 a 0 pfl
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other°
Other
Title:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certification Number: 1-1%
Certification Number:
Latitude:
Design Current
Wet Poultry °Capacity Pop.
NLayer
Non -Layer
Design Current
Pullets
Poults
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
EfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the -conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
El 1V oo
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
Ert o
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
P g
❑ Yes
[ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
E�N(o
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
21412015 Continued

Facili Number: '3' - L(ISL I Date of Inspection: 3 -,10
1
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
[-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: a`
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):a-a-
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
[?fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
E2,/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [Z/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 1-219, S � 1 G)k'�' S�
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
FZ�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
F21No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[ "No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[2f/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[ f1 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑/ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [INo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - 43 Date of Ins ection: ' i 0—DI 1
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes R f No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ENo
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ffNo
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
I ❑ NE
❑ Yes
[3/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
E2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
eNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes dNo
❑ Yes dNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
het
w, �
arn�h�q
t{�tct�ec-
e(�,r� S�c��S�
C�aS�G o�
Seccm� "krof �V,
-k�,e_
�_-, V1 d
moo,
weft `fie
c S}�i � s1�
ems ks4
year- C�jo -AjjP►dO
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: �yle
Date: b �021
21412015