NC0003719_NPDES Permit_20090422

474
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
' Director
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Craig Leite, Cedar Creek Site Manager
DAK Americas LLC
3468 Cedar Creek Road
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301
Dear Mr. Leite:
April 22, 2009
APR 2 tt 20
Q
Subject: NPDES Permit DRAFT
Permit No. NC00.03719
DAK Americas, LLC — Cedar Creek Site
3468 Cedar Creek Road
Fayetteville, NC 28301
Cumberland County
In response to your request to renew the subject NPDES permit, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ
or the Division) hereby transmits this draft permit for your review and comment: Please note that this
permit is set to expire on October 31, 2011.
Please review this draft carefully toensure your thoroughly:understanding of permit conditions and
requirements. Concurrent with this transmittal, the Division will solicit public comment by publishing
a notice in newspapers having circulation in the general Cumberland County area, as required by the
NPDES Program. Should: you wish to comment on this draft pr correct possible errors, please contact,
the DENR / DWQ / NPDES Program in writing no later than 30 days after receiving this document.
Review of the Renewal Application and Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA) — The Division
• has reviewed DAK's updated permit Renewal Application (received December 11, 2008) arid its
associated revised Engineering Alternative Analysis (EAA) received March 5, 2008. The Division
notes that the Permittee's lowest cost -estimate comparison of viable discharge alternatives falls within
13% considering;_ a) remaining connected to the Fayetteville PWC, or b) continuing discharge to the
Cape Fear River: Historically, the Division has considered EAA discharge -alternative costs equally
viable if within 15%. In light of water quality considerations and the Division's mission to eliminate
discharges, we ask that you reconsider your choice to abandon your active city sewer connection and
to continue surface -water discharge to the Cape Fear River.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity\ Affirmative Action Employer
NorthCarolina
Naturally

Decision Against Future Renewal - The Division understands that DAK currently discharges
approximately 0.030 MGD (about 15%) of its treated effluent via the city sewer system to the
Fayetteville PWC, and has done so since May 1, 2006 under the PWC's Pretreatment Program.
Considering the Division's NPDES directives to eliminate a point -source discharge when faced with a
viable discharge alternative, the DWQ will not consider further application to renewthis permit. It
follows then that, DAK must abandon all treated effluent discharge to the Cape Fear River, and make
all changes and upgrades necessary to convey 100% of its effluent flow to the City of Fayetteville. The
Division has thereforeadded: a permit special condition requiring this compliance on or before permit
expiration on October 31, 2011 (see permit Special Condition A. (5.).
The Division has made the following additional changes to the previous permit:
1. Revised Flow and Wastewater Treatment Plant Downgrade — Based on DAK's revised flow
estimates (2007), the Division has lowered the permit flow limit at Outfall 002 from 0.500 to 0.300
MGD to accommodate the full range of the 2007 estimates. With this decrease in permitted flow,
DWQ has downgraded this wastewater treatment plant from Grade III to Grade II. Therefore,
monitoring frequencies for many parameters have been relaxed from 3/Week to 1/Week [see
permit, Part A. 1.)].
2. Effluent Limits and Monitoring Conditions — The Division recalculated limits for parameters of
concern required underfederal categorical regulations for Organic Chemicals, Plastics and
Synthetic Fibers (OCPSF) in compliance with §40 CFR 414.40, Subpart D, 414.41 Best Available
Technology (BAT) for Thermoplastic Resins, and §414.91 (b), Subpart I for Direct Discharge
Point Sources That Use End -of -Pipe Biological Treatment. The Division applied these calculations
using a long-term average flow (as recommended by EPA) .of 0.200 MGD based on data submitted
by the Permittee (January 2005 through December 2008). Monitoring frequencies for these
parameters remain 1/Year (unchanged from the previous permit) except for one parameter, now
water -quality limited (2, 6 di-nitrotoluene) to be monitored 1/Quarter.
3. Total Residual Chlorine (TRC) -.A TRC limit has also been added to the permit (28 ug/L),
consistent with the new statewide standard for chlorine. However, compliance is required only if
chlorine is used, and because of difficulties quantifying TRC in a wastewater matrix, values
detected below 50 ug/L will be considered compliant with the permit [see permit, Part 1. (A.),
TRC footnote].
4.. Stormwater Outfalls — DAK has requested that this renewal combine under a single permit, this.
OCPSF-regulated effluent, with stormwater outfalls permitted under stormwater permit
NCS000389'(also in renewal). In light of the Division's intent not to renew this permit, this request
is hereby denied. Previous references to stormwater have been removed from this permit. They
will be included in the renewal of your active stormwater permit NCS000389.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] \ Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity\ Affirmative Action Employer
NorthCarolina
Naturally

5. Proposed Plastic Bottle Recycling Facility — DAK has asked the Division to permit a proposed
new onsite plastic bottle recycling facility. The Division understands that OCPSF-regulated.
process -contact wastes will be generated from two existing warehouses (located near DAK's
eastern property perimeter); wastes to be routed to the existing onsite WWTP. We further
understand that DAK intends to provide an open, uncovered area north of these warehouses for
product bulk storage. This recycling facility is hereby permitted, however its effluent flow, waste
concentrations, and stormwater needs remain uncharacterized:
Therefore, after receiving an Authorization to Construct (ATC) permit from the Division's
Construction Grants and Loans, please provide information concerning flow, waste character, and
stormwater needs, prior to start up, so that the Division may modify permits, if needed.
Following the mandatory 30-day public comment period, the Division will review all pertinent
comments and take appropriate action prior to issuing a final NPDES permit. If you have questions
concerning this draft permit, please contact me by e-mail [[e-mail]], or call me at (919)
807-6394.
Re pe
oron, L.G.
Program, East
Enclosure: NPDES Permit NC000371 (DRAFT)
cc: Vary mi11aRrgiM11 fic,/6urface Water Protection Section, Attn: Mark Brantley
NPDES Program
PERCs Unit
Stormwater Permitting Unit, Attn: Jennifer Jones
Aquatic Toxicology Unit, Attn: Susie Meadows
EPA Region 4, Attn: Marshall Hyatt
DAK Americas LLC, 3500 Daniels Road, N.E., Leland, NC, 28451, Attn: Elizabeth Wike
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] \ Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer
NorthCarolina
Naturally

Permit NC0003719
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA -
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL -RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT. DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
(NPDES)
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute '4L,215.1, other lawful standards
vironmental Management
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North • Carolina E3i'
Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution (ontrolAct, as amended,
is hereby authorized to discharge
.�DAK la ttevi
3 68 Cedar 6r, ek Tx ad, Fayetteville
Ou �G
�ouri ty
a facility located at
to receiving waters designated\\as the CaFearRiver in the Cape Fear River Basin in accordance with
effluent limitations, monitonngrequire ne is and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, Ill and IV
hereof.
This permit.shall become effective
2009.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on October 31, 2011.
Signed this day , 2009.
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit NC0003719
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby
revoked, and as of this issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer effective.
Therefore, the exclusive authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises under the permit
conditions, requirements, terms, and provisions described herein.
DAK Americas, LLC
is hereby authorized to:
1. continue to operate an existing 0.300 MGD wastewater treatmen pt� lani (WWTP) consisting of
• flow equalization,
• spill basin
• pH adjustment
• oil skimming
• comminutor
• dual aeration basins
• clarifier
• parshall flume
• sludge pump station
• dual aerobic digester
• aerated biosolids holding basin
• biosolids �a\abated e quipmen�
located at the D�Plant, 34�68 Cedar Creek Road, south of Fayetteville in
Cumberland County,
2. after receiving an Authorizatio' cVConstruct (ATC) permit from the Division's Construction Grants
and Loans, construct an OCPSF-regulated plastic bottle recycling plant with connection to the onsite
WWTP, and upon completing construction, submit an Engineer's Certification form, and after
receiving Authorization to Operate (ATO),
3. discharge from said treatment works and plastic bottle recycling plant via Outfall 002 (located on
the attached map) into the Cape Fear River, a Class C waterbody within the Cape Fear River Basin.

Outfa110(12
(flow southeast)
DAK Americas, LLC
Cedar Creek Site
Receiving Stream: Cape Fear River : Stream Class: C
Drainage Basin: Cape Fear River Basin Sub -Basin: 03-06-15
Latitude: 34° 58' 71" N Longitude: 77° 47' 00" W_
State Grid/Quad: H 23 NE / Cedar Creek, NC
North
Facility
Location LL::a
not to scale
NPDES Permit NC0003719
Cumberland County

Permit NC0003719
A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is
authorized to discharge from Outfall 002. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as
•
1�.. Efflu � , ,i
u�.
�z
.ro i.
e�ir
Characteristic's'-
� L
� :._
.t. 4,a. ,
rin
-. g ::,.;
": y:f-ii.31 U„ ��y:
n'J„
-'cement§." ,_��*�``
'=i'� �:;; - -- ... �Requi „
- - ,', ;
1Vlonhy�
�Day�;�,
`111aximum:
Meauremnf:�
Fre uene
Saple
am Ple =
�Location:
Flow -
0.300 MGD
Continuous
Recording
I or E
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
66 lbs /day
216 lbs/day
1/Week
Composite 2
E
BOD5, 20°C (April 1— October 31)
16 lbs /day
121 lbs /day
1/Week .
Composite 2
E
BOD5, 20°C (November 1— March 31)
32 lbs /day
42 lbs /day
1/Week
Composite 2.
E
NH3-N (April 1-October 31)
21 lbs /day
42 lbs /day
1/Week
Composite 2
E
NH3-N (November 1 — March 31)
42 lbs /day
84 lbs /day
,1/W4k
Composite• 2
E
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean)
/.1/eek
Grab
E
Total Residual Chlorine 3
28 ug/L
('/l#Veek
Grab
E
Temperature (°C)
/ "
> v 1/Week
Grab
E
Dissolved Oxygen 4
,/ ,/
1/Week\
Crab
E
pH
Not <6.0 nor > 9.0 standard<Gnits
1/Week\'\
Grab
E
Total Nitrogen (NO2 + NO3 + TKN)
\ \
. /1,(Quarter \
\Composite
E
Total Phosphorus
('
\ \,'
. //Quarter 1•\
Composite
E
Acute Toxicity 5
\
.>N \-
< 1/Quarter
Composite
E
Dissolved Oxygen 6
..-.--`
\\\
\\Variable 7
Grab
U & D
Temperature (°C) 6
/ \
\ \ .) ' '
, \Variable 7
Grab
U & D
•Conductivity 6 '�
- / • \ \
\ v / N
'-\\a.dable 7
Grab
U & D
Footnotes:
—u
1 E = Effluent; I = Influent;; eam'2.\mi. oin�utfall. D = o tream, 100 yards upstream of Lock and Dam #3.
2 Composite samples must be ''-efri er �ted. .: ,.,
3 Total Residual Chl rin RC)�ecause o level T\dr' cult to quantify in a wastewater matrix, the
Division shall conside \all�effluent TRRC v lue reported belo 0 µg/L to be "in compliance" with this permit..
However, the Permittee § al continue toy or 'all values recorded using North Carolina -certified field and lab
test methods, even if these values fa11\be ow'5 g/L.
4 Effluent dissolved oxygen (t O \shall not fall below 5 mg/L. The Permittee shall collect effluent DO downstream of
the combined effluents of Outfal1s `001 an}iti0 .
5 Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) teshneaptie toxicity P/F at 90% using Fathead Minnow.. WET tests shall be
conducted in February, May, Augu d November [See Part A. (2.)]. Samples for toxicity shall be collected
downstream of the combined effluents`of Outfalls 001 and 002:
6 Receiving Stream Monitoring — As a member of the Middle Cape Fear River Basin Association, the Permittee's
instream monitoring responsibilities are hereby waived by Memorandum of Agreement. However, should this
membership terminate for any reason, the Permittee shall notify the Division immediately, and the Permittee shall
immediately resume instream monitoring requirements, as specified herein.
7 Variable Sampling — the Permittee shall collect receiving -stream samples 3/Week during the summer months of June
through September and'1/week for the remaining months of the year.
The Permittee shall add no chromium, zinc, or copper to the treatment system except as pre -approved additives
to biocide compounds or those resulting from the normal degradation of process piping or equipment. The
Permittee shall discharge no floating solids or foam visible in other than trace amounts.
Additional effluent limitations and monitoring requirements apply to this permit [see additional tables,
Part A. (1.) continued, and Parts A. (2.) through A. (5.) Abandoning Discharge].

Permit NC0003719
A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (Continued)
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is
authorized to discharge from Outfall 002. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee for
OCPSF parameters, as specified below:
:F«u"
Effluent, _
Characteristics-
- - -
`
: ,.,y
Limits *
...
" Monitorin
yRequire meats"
DAILY•'
nZA7�IlVIUIVI,
`(Pounds%day):.
..MO NTHLY:
` ,:� �
,Measurement
• �..
; -,4 y'
Fre• uenc' s
.
Sam le'
l? •
;_T e"•°,tir`',
yP
Sam le' is
P,
` 'Location°,.:
,4
;AVERAGE•
:{.
ounds/da'.
Acenaphthene
0.098
0.037
1/Year
Grab
Effluent
Acenaphthylene
0.098
0.037
1/Year
Grab
Effluent
Acrylonitrile --
' 0.402
0.159
1/Year
Grab
Effluent
Anthracene
0.098
0.037
1/Year
rab
Effluent
Benzene
0.226
0.061
1/Year ,/
9r'ab
Effluent
Benzo(a)anthracene
0.098
0.037
1/Year ,
i\ .'rab
Effluent
3,4-Benzofluoranthene
0.101
0.038
1/Yeai\U
\Grlab
Effluent
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
0.098
0.037
Ji$ear/
G?ab\
Effluent
Benzo(a)pyrene
0.101
0.038
<' 1/,Year
Grab\\,
Grab \
Effluent
\Effluent
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
0.463
0.171
lYear ,'\
Carbon Tetrachloride
0.063
0.03 9
17�Year,/
/ Grab
\Effluent
Chlorobenzene -
0.046
0.025\ \i"
•N 1/Year 7
Grab
Effluent
Chloroethane
0.445
0.173 \ \`
NN1,/Year\ \
Grab
. Effluent
Chloroform
0.076 ,
---0,035 \ '
\ N1,/fear \,
\ Grab
. Effluent
2-Chlorophenol
0.163Z
/'--Q.051 \
\ /1'/Ypar\
\ \Grab
Effluent
Chrysene
0.09-4'
0.01
\ ` )4Year\`
"Grab
Effluent
Di-n-butyl phthalate
0.095\ \
0, 45'
\ \1/Year
Grab
Effluent
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
, 0 \
\/0.128'"-
\ 1Y\Year,
Grab
Effluent
1,3-Dichlorobenzene /
/- 0 J7 \
\ <0:051 -----.,,
Tear
Grab
Effluent
1,4-Dichlorobenzene \ '
\ 0.046 \ \
\0:Q25
"----1/Year
Grab
Effluent
1,1-Dichloroethane
\ \ 0.098 \
\ 0>0
1/Year -
Grab
Effluent
1,2-Dichloroethane
\ `0,350
\ \ 0.113">
1/Year .
Grab
Effluent
1,1-Dichloroethylene
"Q:b41
) .10.027
1/Year
Grab
Effluent
1,2-trans-Dichloroethylene
0b*\ //
/ 0.035 •
1/Year
Grab
. Effluent
2,4-Dichlorophenol
0.186\ "
/ 0.065
1/Year
Grab
Effluent
1,2-Dichloropropane
0.382 \/
0.254
1/Year
Grab
Effluent
1,3-Dichloropropylene
. 0.073
' 0.048
1/Year
Grab
Effluent
Diethyl phthalate
0.337
0.134
1/Year -
Grab
Effluent
2,4-Dimethylphenol
0.060
0.030
1/Year
Grab
Effluent
Dimethyl phthalate
0.078
0.032
1/Year
Grab
Effluent
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
0.460
0.129
1/Year
Grab
Effluent
2,4-Dinitrophenol
0.204
0.118
1/Year '
Grab
Effluent
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
0.473
0.188
1/Year
Grab
Effluent
Ethylbenzene
0.179
0.053
1/Year
Grab
Effluent
Fluoranthene •
0.113
0.041
1/Year
Grab
Effluent
Fluorene
0.098
0.037
1/Year
Grab
Effluent
[Part A. (1.) continues on next page]

Permit NC0003719
A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
(OCPSF - Continuedl
j5'. �e S ii S::
:�•
.-Pry..;
aracteri
..,, F
si.'. �3 �,.`,
.f : � ,:rr; r`%3hk,v
:.t. '�.z`��s�s. �r,�J,.
� .:Tunits=,- :>,�<,
i.}: 'u.a=. �'t -a.::
�
�.F"-'�-'��yy
."$.!IS',- _, s?°, ,'-
e3iM. , A.rv�s
,rye � ��: .t-...: itQ � . 'M. �� �t:�}ti�.;
'�'r'kv Gi ,' nib ,4•"'' .•»ss:]':?'-er�.r=>,:
= : ;,�>,1VlonitoXin eRe; uire�ments°:;.z 3:r
' Mil
- ;",E. ...,, ''.ka.aiit _ ;,».. ft'i,'R
, h
`;�:��.`;
z;r; .
�����;��
>i
�t ., 1 •p
DAILXvG„
'.�.�..�
®
s
°xiPounds7day),`n=�iPoundsLdaj�)P
;��
M0IYTHI�Y
r;;,, :.� . �,.a ; �
AVERAGE
,.F,:Fre
�rY .;�.,. .. -;�
..,4;«_,y,�...i �Sn <<i �.ti�ii ": y,.h�
��1Vleasurement�:x�
}.;.. _ ,e: ' n
uenckw
r�,�,.��.....�:Tt ��r,
F.,°�r�"'+r.
� s(++x
Sam le:
j,. .. P ,y-
T e,
..
�,$,-. :t.',i•saF� r'u
=M , --
hSam le�;.�;��
= 3,� ;,;r,n.....k :,
j Location
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.081-. • .
' 0,033
1/Year -
- Grab .
Effluent -
Hexachloroethane '.
0.090
0:035 '
1/Year
-Grab
Effluent
Methyl Chloride
' 0.315'''
0.143 -
1/Year :
- Grab`:.
' : Effluent = .
Methylene Chloride
' 0.148
0.066
1/Year ..
Grab
Effluent
Naphthalene' -
0.098
0.037
1/Year.
Grab..
. Effluent
Nitrobenzene .
0.113
0:045 ,`
1/Year
= Grab
', -Effluent
2-Nitrophenol
0.115
0.068 ,
• '1/Year
_Grab
: Effluent
4-Nitrophenol
0.206'
0.119'
-1/Year
,Grub
Effluent
Phenanthrene
0.098
0.037
' 1/Year._ , - /
`.; Crfab .
.. Effluent
Phenol
0.043
0.025
' 1/Year /.' ,'
rab
Effluent
Pyrene
0.111
0.041
1/Ye f��
- "\\ra�l -
.Effluent
Tetrachloroethylene
0.093
0.037 ;
1 eay/
• Grad,\
• ' Effluent
Toluene
0.133
0.043, .
` 1/-y6ar ; ;
.. - Grab\
\ Effluent
1,2,4-Triehlorobenzene
0.232 -
0.113
..'Wear - /
Grab `
.:Effluent
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
0.090
0.035 .
i / ''ea . /; `, .,
Y Grab
' \E%luent
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
' 0.090 .
0.035 ' \;:
`' ' `. 1/Yet<''.`, %
' . Grab'
' ' Effluent
Trichloroethylene
0.090 '
0.0351 \'\\N/Yeat\'\-•'
,: Grab .
:. Effluent
Vinyl Chloride. ,
0.445
- ,--0` 73 '
\ :\ / e,ar \`r\, , Grab
1' ;-Effluent
';Effluent=`,<,��=�
-
aracterhcs..
.Y,... -;-s,-.-s,N:,
s:� ,< �'��4^.=2Y�Yt%. .'�F
;>m�:r _ �,�F�` � F .. _ � „
:����....-W��.�-0�:., , - �} .��W ��,::��.�
i�.�:i �" ;' - _:•d:�:';,,q
tg~�Y;
r a .:i: � Sri. .+.C1 ..1 .a.:s
,:�: �`=Re uirements�'` ==
�5.:��`t��:._ Q _ ;�:-
";
x ; ';;
. ; f
z ° .... r s
DAILY rY x
v
NraxiNr
...
}"<
1VIONTFILY; r
AVERAGE"7'
' ,(pope is%day
.:.::t = +' : n
Measurement
_r
Fie uenc
s - - yr,. rY
%t ' ' > {' °
' am
j o
. T e
' '
g
am Sample
` Location
= x- t ., .. .
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
-
0.423 g/L \
\ •1/Quarter •
' Grab,
-:Effluent '
Total Chromium', .
' 4.5 : \
1.841 \
\:' 1/Quarter
Grab
. Effluent .. -
Total Copper "
5.610 \,.``,\
- 2.40' ;, A
' .1/Quarter
Grab
. .
Effluent .'
Total Cyanide I
1.992 '
'‹N 0 6 T ..)
1/Quarter
Grab
Effluent .
Total Lead -
1.145
P.53 Y .
, '• 1/Quarter -
- - Grab .
•
Effluent
Total Nickel
6.605
2'805 , -
1/Quarter -
. Grab.
- Effluent '
Total Zinc
4.332,, '
..1.743 .. -.
' 1/Quarter - -
- Grab '
- =
Effluent : .
Footnotes:
Cyanide-The.Division shall consider' all cyanide values reported below' the. equivalent -of.;
- 10 ug/L.to be "compliant" with this permit.' However, the Permittee shall submit all. values, _
reported by a. North Carolina -certified laboratory (even if valuesfall _below ,10 µg/L), and* .
Permittee shall use these real.values to' calculate required averages, if any..

Permit NC0003719
A. (2.) ACUTE TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QUARTERLY)
The Permittee shall conduct acute toxicity tests 1/Quarter using protocols defined in the North Carolina
Procedure Document entitled "Pass/Fail Methodology for Determining Acute Toxicity in a Single Effluent
Concentration" (Revised July, 1992 or subsequent versions). The monitoring shall be performed as a Fathead
Minnow (Pimephales promelas) 24-hour static test. The effluent concentration, at which there may be at no time
significant acute mortality, is 90% (defined as treatment two in the procedure document). Effluent samples for
self -monitoring purposes must be obtained during representative effluent discharge below all waste treatment.
The tests will be performed during the months of February, May, August, and November.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGE6C.
Additionally, DWQ Form AT-2 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: NC DENR / DWQ / Environmental Sciences Branc
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the/En iionmental Sciences Branch no later than 30
days after the end of the reporting period for which the repo4 isde.
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chem ci al/physicameasurements performed
in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all d so e/respons data T 41 residual chlor ne of the effluent
toxicity sample must be measured and reported if ch\emphiye for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from-the..facility`di
the Permittee will complete the infoaffori4eted at t
facility name, permit number, pipe
Flow" in the comment area of the fo
the address cited above.
ing-a month
op,pof the
ear
bmitted t
which toxicity monitoring is required,
itoxicity (AT) test form indicating the
\the report with the notation of "No
-tie Environmental Sciences Branch at
•
Should any single guar erl fmoit,itoring 'nd't ae a a cilur g meet specified limits, then monthly
monitoring will begin im ediate1y" n it su +time that a -single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly
test requirement will re'e to quarterlyin thinonths specified above.
Should the Permittee fail tom it r during la onth in which toxicitymonitoringis required, then monthly
„
monitoring will begin immediate til s eheh/ime that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test
requirement will revert to quarterly in h rpi nths specified above.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North Carolina Division
of Water Quality indicate potential impacts; to the receiving, stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to
include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate
follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial
monitoring.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate
follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial
monitoring.

Permit NC0003719
A. (3.) BIOCIDE APPROVAL
The Permittee shall obtain approval from the Division's Aquatic Toxicology Unit prior to discharging any
biocide (not previously approved by the Division) under this permit. Approval for use of any biocide not
previously The Permittee shall request approval of any new unauthorized biocide at least 90 days in advance of
planned usage.
Contact the Aquatic Toxicology Unit for detailed instructions on requesting biocide approval:
NC DENR / DWQ / Aquatic Toxicology Unit
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Concentrations of chromium, copper, or zinc added to biocides shall not exceed applicable water quality
standards or action levels in the receiving stream.
A. (4.) LABORATORY TEST -METHOD QUANTITA/ION'LI E S AND COMPLIANCE
parameter,
For a 'ven the Permittee must perform, or cause o'pei oorrm, the stag-c rtified analytical test method
with a practical quantitation level (PQL) at or below the )'permit limit. If no to hnically feasible, the
Permittee shall employ the state -certified analysis with the to e t availab�test-met od\KQL, and any value
reported as "not detected" by this test method shalibb,deemed ' in cp p jiance" with t4s permit.
A. (5.) ABANDONING DISCHARG`T\O THE CAP`FEAYtIVER
On or before permit expiration (bctober 31,2011), tl\e Permitte all discontinue all discharge of
OCPSF-regulated wastewater, the apeyarRiver, anshall formally abandon, to the satisfaction of
the Division's Fayettev lie Regional 0 fice, 11-treated ste-to-surface-water facilities.
Concurrent with the above, the Perm e shall provide wastewater treatment system upgrades,
sufficient to convey 100' o of�ts permitteec effl ent flow to the Fayetteville Public Works Commission
(PWC) via its existing city�ewTr syste connection, and update its existing Long Term Management
Plan (LTMP) activated May 1, 2 06, it co pliance with PWC's NPDES Pretreatment Program.
Should treatment -system upgrades e . ire significant alteration to the existing system, the Permittee
shall apply to the Division's Construction Grants and Loans for an Authorization to Construct (ATC)
permit.

DENR / DWQ / NPDES Program, Joe R. Corporon,NPDES East .
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES Permit Renewal
Permit NC0003719
INTRODUCTION
DAK Americas, LLC - Cedar Creek Site (herein referred to as DAK or the Permittee) requires a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit to discharge treated wastewater to the surface
waters of the state. The permittee's 5-year permit has expired and they have requested renewal from the
Division of Water Quality (the Division or DWQ). This Fact Sheet summarizes background information and
rationale used by the Division's NPDES Program to determine permit limits and monitoring conditions.
•
FACILITY RECORDS REVIEW
Facility Description. DAK Americas, LLC (Table 1) treats wastes from their manufacture of polyester resin
chips and also from neighboring DuPont Teijin Films (both OCPSF regulated). A Service Complex provides
utilities to both DAK and to DuPont including steam, cooling water, chilled water, demineralized water, and
wastewater treatment. The Service Complex also treats local domestic wastes from plant personnel.
Wastewater treatment facilities consists of flow equalization, spill basin, pH adjustment, oil skimming,
comminutor, dual aeration basins, clarifier, parshall flume, sludge pump station, dual aerobic digesters,
aeratedbiosolids holding basin, biosolids drying beds, and other associated equipment. With a decrease in
flow from 0.500 to 0.300 MGD, this plant will be downgraded from a Grade III to Grade II WWTP.
While maintaining its surface -water discharge, DAK connected to Fayetteville's sewer -collection system
on May 1, 2006 with average flow — 0.030 MGD to the Fayetteville Public Works Commission (PWC).
_
•
Facility Idol-n*00ri _ = =
•Applicant/Facility-Name ., ,
DAK Americas, LLC — Cedar Creek Site
Applicant Address:::.•:, ` ;:_;;,:
P.O. Box 1690, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28302
FacilityAddress: " ` . ` , •
3468 Cedar Creek Road; Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301
Permitted,,Flow "'-
0.300 MGD
_
f•W `Type°oaste; � >�.;. :., „
OCPSF Outfall 002 (95% industrial, 5% domestic) '
' Facility/Perinit-Status:.=.';:"'; ,
Grade II / Active; Renewal
County: , ," ._. -,
Cumberland County
iscellaneousr -
Receiving Stream:.:: `; : = '-:'~;
Cape Fear River
,:Regional•"Office:;: ' = `:``. ;
Fayetteville
Stream Classification:- ' , •,
_
C
", State'Grid/
US:GS'. uad" : `
H23NE /
Cedar Creek, NC
' 303(d):-Listed?:_:;: ,". ;.: , ,.
No • •
Permit,. riter' w%:_ :#_'.`'`=, = r;" '
Joe Corporon
Subbasin:`
03-06-15
"Date::' ;4s`':;=; ,
10Mar09
Drainage A;ea; (nii):
4395
a .+ (-`
'^'p.
,•`�'
78° 47' 00" W
Surriiiier•'7.Q10 (cfs)= .
791
Winter 7Q 10 (cfs)
'30.Q2 (cfs):
N,
Lat. 34°•58' 71" N Long.
Average,Flow (cfs .
4340
'1WC�(%o):. -::
0.06%
FINAL Fact Sheet
Renewal -- NPDES Permit NC0002305
Page 1

PERMIT HISTORY AND CORRESPONDENCE
Previous Permit and Waste Load Allocation (WLA) -- Division WLA records for this facility date
previous Permittees from 1985. The previous permit (effective Jun 7, 2004 / expired Oct 31, 2006) included
a special condition providing detailed requirements for DAK's closure of the Monsanto facilities.
The Permittee's Renewal Application -- With this renewal, DAK has requested the Division to consider
the discharge requirements for a proposed new OCPSF-regulated plastic bottle recycle plant. DAK
anticipates applying for permit Authorization to Construct from DWQ's Construction Grants and Loans.
Closure of the Monsanto Plant — Previous Permittee, the Monsanto Company's Fayetteville Facility,
produced Roundup®, a glyphosate-based pesticide/herbicide. This facility was formally closed and "
demolished to the satisfaction of the Division, as specified in the permit modification, effective June 7,
2004. Accordingly, this renewal is no longer concerned with Monsanto -related chemicals in the discharge
(see Permitting Strategy). Moreover, Monsanto negotiated with Fayetteville's PWC to connect to the city's
sanitary sewer system and Fayetteville. ran a city sewer line to this property.
Special Condition, A.(5.) to the previous permit addressed this newly completed sewer line, the closure of
the Monsanto plant, and the change -of -ownership in progress. This special condition required any new
owner/renewal applicant to justify flow needs and to .provide an Engineering 'Alternatives Analysis (EAA)
to justify continuing discharge to surface waters.
DAK's Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA) History -- Since assuming ownership of the facility,
DAK has continued to discharge under this permit, but also discharges approximately 0.030 MGD to the
city sewer (connected under PWC's Pretreatment Program on May 1, 2006).
Subsequent to notifying change -of -ownership, DAK submitted a"flow justification and EAA to evaluate
discharge alternatives (received August 30, 2004) in accord with previous permit Special Condition A.(5.).
The Division was dissatisfied with this EAA, requested clarification and additional information (letter of
October 21, 2004), and DAK responded on December 8, 2004.
After additional review and correspondence, the Division again requested clarification, and DAK provided
a revised flow summary and new present -value costs for viable discharge alternatives (see Permittee's letter
received March 5, 2008). In this document, DAK concluded that they prefer (based on cost) to discontinue
their active discharge to the city sewer and to continue surface -water discharge under the NPDES permit.
Despite Division urgings, DAK will not request to rescind this permit, and has again requested renewal.
(For renewal decisions, and justification for DWQ's intent not to renew this permit, see Permitting
Strategy).
Total Residual Chlorine (TRC) and Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) Testing. Considering that DAK's
discharge constitutes less than one percent of the receiving stream (IWC 0.06% at 0.300 MGD), DAK
conducts acute WET testing to evaluate acute, end -of -pipe impacts to the receiving stream. This is
consistent with facilities statewide with an IWC less than 0.25%. The DAK facility has passed WET test
consistently for the past 21 Quarters with one failure in May, 2003.TRC limit has also been added to the
permit (28 ug/L), consistent with the new statewide standard for chlorine. However, TRC values detected
below 5,0 ug/L will be considered compliant with the permit [see permit, Part 1. (A.), TRC footnote].
Fact Sheet for Perrnit Renewal - 2009
NPDES NC00037 19
Page 2

PERMITTING APPROACH
Decision to Revoke This Permit — the Division intends to renew this permit, but for two years only. It
will expire in accord with the Cape Fear basinwide renewal schedule on October 31, 2011. The Division
will not consider further application to renew.
The Division notes that the Permittee's latest present -value costs for viable discharge alternatives range
within 12.8% considering, a) remaining connected to the city sewer, orb) continuing discharge to the Cape
Fear River. Historically, the Division has considered EAA discharge -alternative costs equally viable if
within 15%. Considering the Division's directive under the NPDES Program to regionalize wastewater
treatment statewide, the Division disagrees with the Permittee's choice to abandon its city sewer
connection, and continue discharge to the Cape Fear River.
In support of this decision, state and federal statutes provide grounds and guidance to revoke a permit:
§40 CFR 122.64(a) (4) "The following are causes for terminating a permit during its term,
or for denying a permit renewal application: ... (4) A change'in any condition that requires
either a temporary or permanent reduction" or elimination of any discharge or sludge use or
disposal practice controlled by the permit (for example; plant closure or termination of
discharge by connection to a POTW)." and,
§15A NCAC 02H .0104(a)(3) "(a) Any permit issued pursuant to this Section is subject
to revocation or modification in whole or part pursuant to 40 CFR 122.62 or for any of
the following: ...(3) a change in any condition that requires either a temporary or
permanent reduction or limitation of the permitted discharge"
In light of DWQ's mission to eliminate point -source discharges in support of its Long Term Management
Plan (LTMP) or Pretreatment Program, we will allow this permit to expire and formally close and abandon
facilities discharging to the Cape Fear River. Upon expiration, 100 % of this discharge will be conveyed to
the Fayetteville PWC for wastewater treatment under its existing Pre -Treatment Program permit [see
renewal, Special Condition A. (5.)]. This information will be outlined in the renewal cover letter.
Flow Limit and Instream Waste Concentration (IWC) Revised for Renewal — DAK has. provided
revised flow estimates, (see DAK's letter, received March 5, 2009), and the Division understands that this
facility now generates less wastewater at Outfall 002; flows averaging 0.175 MGD (range 0.131 to 0.243
MGD). Based on these new data, the Division will lower permit flow limit for final Outfall 002 from the
previous 0.500 MGD to 0.300 MGD to comfortably accommodate the flow range. This revises the instream
waste concentration (IWC) from the previous 0.24% to 0.06% of the receiving stream (based on a summer
7Q10 of-791 cfs). With a decrease in permitted flow from 0.500 to 0.300 MGD, this plant has been
downgraded from a Grade 1TI to Grade II WWTP — parameter monitoring frequencies have been adjusted
accordingly. _
•
Verifying Existing Stream Conditions -- this facility discharges to the Cape Fear River [.18-(26)], a Class
C waterbody, extending from the City of Fayetteville's water -supply intake to the mouth of Harnmond
Creek, within the Cape Fear River Basin.
Fact Sheet for Permit Renewal - 2009
NPDES NC0003719
Page 3

.
Renewal Staff Report
permit in accordance
Compliance Review
February of 2004,
consecutive months
Stormwater Outfalls
discharge with their
Division's decision
Federal Regulations
Monsanto (former
reference to categorical
application to renew,
Synthetic Fibers
• §40 CFR
Thermoplastic
• §414.91
Biological
§40 CFR 414.40,
required under OCPSF
because DAK's previous
million pounds projected
In keeping with EPA
months from January
and Monthly Average
Table 2. - Parameter
-- Pending
a final technical review, the FRO recommends
Plan and comments presented herein.
Violation (NOVs). This facility received BOD
received no permit limit violations and no assessed
December 2008).
requested that this renewal combine under a single
outfalls (see stormwater permit NCS000389).
permit, this request is hereby denied.
Renewal — With the DWQ-approved abandonment
the previous permit cycle, this renewal hereby
concerning pesticides/herbicides. In accord
applied the following regulations for Organic
renewal:
D, ,414.41 Best Available Technology (BAT)
Direct Discharge Point Sources That Use End
Division applied multipliers for the parameters
D. Based on production, Section §414.41
OCPSF volume exceeds five million pounds
as:outlined in the renewal application received
DWQ used the actual reported long-term
December 2008) of 0.199 MGD to calculate
for BOD5 and TSS (Table 2).
Calculations
renewal
limit violations
penalties
permit,
In light
of
discontinues
with the Permittee's
Chemicals,
for
-of -Pipe
BOD5
BAT is appropriate
per year
December
average
both Daily
of this
in
for.58
their effluent
of the
discharges from
any
Plastics and
and TSS, as
(310.25
11, 2008.
flow (60
Maximum
57
for
with the Basin
- Notices of
but has since has
(March 2004 through
— DAK has
existing stormwater
not to renew this
Applicable to
Permittee) during
regulations
the Division
(OCPSF) for this
414.40, Subpart
Resins, and
(b), Subpart I for
Treatment.
Subpart D — The
414.40, Subpart
and projected
for 2009),
Region 4 guidance,
2005 through
permit limits
Limit
§40 CFR 414.40, Subpart D
(Flow in MGD)
Previous Limits
(Ibs./day)
Renewal Limits
(lbs./day)
Parameter
For Daily
Maximum
' For Monthly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Monthly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Monthly
Average
BOD, 5-day
64 x 0.199 1
24 x 0.199 1"
115.7
43.5
21.11
15.45
TSS
130 x 0.1991
40 x 0.1991
235.7
72.5
215.76
66.39
pH
6.0-9.0
6.0-9.0
6.0-9.0
6.0-9.0
6.0-9.0
6.0-9.0
1 The Division used the 4-year average, flow of 0.200 MGD (Jan 2005 — Dec 2008) for both Daily Maximum
and Monthly Average limits, as recommended by EPA. .
Application of §40 CFR 414.91, Subpart I — This subpart requires the Perrnittee to monitor a list of
organic compounds, and 6 toxicants [including metals and cyanide; for toxicants limit calculations, see
Metals and Toxicants - Reasonable Potential Analysis (RPA)]. As dictated by this subpart, permit limits
each of these 57 compounds were determined by a multiplier (in µg/L) times the process wastewater flow.
Again, the Division used the average flow of 0.199 MGD.
•
Fact Sheet for Permit Renewal - 2009
IN'PDES NC00037I9
Page 4

Each parameter's resultant limit was further evaluated against existing state and federal standards to find the
more stringent (see attache d XL spread sheet, Limit Calculations for 40CFR, Subpart I, 414.90 and 91).
Final values appear in the permit as masslimitsnot to exceed in lbs/day. The previous permit renewal
relaxed monitoring frequencies to 1/Year for organics and 1/Quarter for metals and cyanide. Based on
minimum or no detection of these parameters during the past permit cycle, the Division considers these
limits and monitoring conditions appropriate for this renewal.
Concerning Ammonia (NH3 as N) and Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) - Previously permitted
parameter COD - maximum reported 413 lbs/day, was not permit -limited at a flow rate of 0.500 MGD, and
was monitored 1/Week. The. Division recommends no changes to the permit for COD. Ammonia (NH3)
limits were adjusted proportionally to the revised effluent flow (0.500 to 0.300 MGD) by multiplying 0.6
times the previous Daily Maximum and Monthly Average limits.
Metals and Toxicants - Reasonable Potential Analysis (RPA). Based on the previous permit, the
parameters of concern include Total Copper, Total Chromium, Total Cyanide, Total Lead, Total Nickel, and
Total Zinc. The Division conducted an RPA to determine the "reasonable potential" for a given toxicant to
exceed its water -quality standards or criteria. The RPA evaluated on 60 months of data (12 to 15 samples
collected quarterly) during the period January 2005 through December 2008. At an IWC of 0.06%, none of.
these parameters show reasonable potential to exceed water -quality standards. [These metals require limits
under 40 CFR despite RPA findings]
PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF ISSUANCE
Draft Permit to Public Notice:
Permit Scheduled to Issue:
April 22, 2009.
June 30, 2009
NPDES UNIT ! TAC
If you have questions reg. din any of he above information or on the attached permit, please contact Joe
Corporon at (91.95 807-6
NAME:
DATE: 0;12 2
Fact Sheet for Permit Renewal - 2009
NPDES NC0003719
Page 5
„1"

OCPSF Subpart I Calculations
FACILITY: _>
DES Permit #�
.- OCPSF Flow
WS class 7
7Qi0s =>
Average Stream Flow =,>
DAK Americas, LLC -- Fayettevi
NC0003719
0.2 MGD .
0.30 MGD
no
791 cfs
4,340 cfs'
le, NC
Joe Corporon, NPDES East, 26Mar09
[OCPSF flow adjusted from previous 0.2179 MGD to 0.20 MGD, in accord with the renewal application ]
Parameter' "
1
.00PSF T,
•• Daily ;:
Maximum _.
2
OCPSF
Monthly:
Average '.
Acenaphthene _ . 59 22
Acenaphtlrylene.......... . . 59 .
Anthracene 5922
Benzene _ 136, 37 0.226 0.061
Benzo(a)anthracene 59_.--_.... 22 0.098;0.037. FC none
3,4-Benzofuoranthene 61 23 0.101. 0.038• _ PC ___ none : 0.0311
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene 59 22 0.098; _ 0037 PC__. none _ _0.031I 0.
Benzo(a)pyrene __. - _. 61 23, 0.1011_ 0.038 FC [hone 0.0311 0.0028 .__.- _, __yes _ ,_,,,,0.03 _, 0.73 • 0.101
' Bis(2-ethylhexy) phthalate , 279 103, 0.463. _ - _0.171 FC _ _ _ _ none 2.2 1.2 yes , 2.20 51.38 • 0.463
n�cd vex 1.6 37.37 0.063
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzeue _,__ _ __ _.
Chloroethane
Chloroform __ _.- _
2-Chlorohenol 98: 3li 0.163: ll.u�l _ _ . n_, _. __ nuoc ��� - ..-. .., .-_- --
p- - - -
Chrysene __ 59 22' 0.098; 0.037 FC _ none 0.018 none - - - - yes _ , �0.018 - , _0.42 _ • _ 0;098
Di-n-butyl phthalate57.._ ., _ 27' 0.095' _ 0.045' FC _ _ 9.5 none , _ none _ . no . _., _ 10_ _ 40.46 0.095 _
1,2-Dichlorobethzene 163 77' 0.271 0.128 FC , 470 17000 2700 _ __ no 470 • 2002 0.271
:-
1 3 Dichlorobenzene 44� 31� 0.073; 0.051' FC 390 � 2600 400 no „ 390 1661 0.073
426
'•-OCPSF.,.'• S.00P.SF.' '.1 Federal..:', Standard,-. ' 'Htiman Water. ; : ` '
• Daily;': ' ` Monthly, '; -Criteria or'':; Aquatic ' - Health"' Consumption Carcinogen?- �- Minumim
,•Maximum; 1, Average'; " State . 'Life Standard', !-_ Standard: criteria j..
_' lbs/day+.`r i-9bs//day. ='Standard: •'1" gel- • ' _ tiff,:,", Pg/L P &
0.098, 0.037 FC 60 None 20 no 602 255.52 0,098 0.098 ___ OCPSF 0.098 __lbs/day .,,• _,_ 0,037
0.098 0.037 FC none none none no none none 0.098 0.098 OCPSF 0.098. Ibs/day, 6.017
0.402 0,159 FC none 0.25 • 0.051 yes 0.25 5.84 0.402 0.402 OCPSF • 0.402 lbs/day0.15
. 0.098 OCPSF 0,098 Ibs/da 0.037�
6.098 0.037 FC 0.05 40000 • 9600 no 0.05 0.21 0 098 • _ ,__
none 51 1.19 yes 51.00 1191 0.226 0.226 OCPSF 0.226 lbs/day_; __ 0.061
0.0311 0.0028 yes 0.03 0.73 0.098 OA98 _OCPSF _.T0_098___ lbs/da 0._
0.0028 yes 0.03- .0_73,_ ;.__0.101_. __0.101_ ___OCPSF_ __ 0101_ Ibs/dayv__,0.038_
0028 yes 0.03 - 0.73 0.098 0 098 OCPSF ! 0.095 ]bs/day 0.0370 128
none 130 none
none
3970
11
Wales Qual<:-
.:_,rAllowable
• - Load•_ '' •
- ltis/dav
12 13 14 15 16
OCPSF"
.'..Daily
Maximum'
Ibs/day ,
0.046_
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 28: 15'0.046 0.025 FC . WO 2600 400 no 100
I,1-Dichloroethane -59' 22 _ 0.098 .__ 0.037 FC 20000 170000 ; 6700 .no_ __,. 20,000 • 85,172 0,098
1,2-Dichloroethane 211; ^T. 68. 0.350 0.113 FC none 37 0.38 yes 37
0 041 0 027 FC none 7100 • 330 yes 7,100 _
1,1-Dichlmroeth lene 3. . 16;
1,2-trans-Dichloroethylene _ , , -. 54 ; _ _^__ 21,_ 0.090 . _ 0.035 . , FC
2,4-Dichlorophenol 112I 39 0.186'; 0-.065jFC none
1,27Dichloropropane_ 230 153• 0.382: , 0.254' _ . FC _ none
1,3-Dichloropropylene • 44: 29 0.073 0.048 • FC none
Diethyl phthalate ,_ ... -.. . 203' 81' 0.337, 0.134. ,FC __ 1200
•
2,4-Dimethylphenol 36' 18. 0.060: 0.030 __- SS 320
Dimethyl phthalate _ _-.-__ 47; 19. 0.078' 0.032' FC 3400 none none
4,6--
Dinitro_otresol 277,Y-,_ _ 78,__ , _ _0.460. 0.129 ._ FC,_ none ,_ - 765_ , .
2,4-Dinitrophenol__. 123j,_ __ .71 0.204= 0.118 _. FC „ ,_ 26 ,.. _ ..._.. none _ -_ none
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 285rv_ _113 0.473: 0.188__ FC___,_, none 3.4 0.11
2:6-Dinitrotoluene 641 2551.064 0.423 FC none 0.048 0.71
Ethylbenzene _ _ , 108 32 0.179 0.053' FC _. _-' 97• _ none - none
68 __- --- 25 0.113 0.041 FC 0.11 -cone none _ - _• ..no
59..__ -_... 22 _ 0.098' 0.037' FC 46 none _ _ none no
28 :_ 15 0.046 0.025 PC- none ._ _ 0.00028 0.00029 _ _ yes
49y 20' 0.081, 0.033 SS_ .., none_,_:. _,18 0.44 yes 18.
54 21' 0.090: 0.035 F.0 __ none 3.3 1.4 yes ; 3.3 _
190'' 86 0.315,_ - 0.143 FC none 96 2.6 no __ 96 _
. 89 _.-.. . _. 40 -.. _ . ..0.148 0.066 . .._ .. none 590 _ ... ._ 4.6 . - ...... Yes 59
0
59: 22 0.098 0.037 FC 330 none none no 330 _.
68. 27: 0.113 0.045 FC .-- none __ _ - 30 17 no .... 30
-,___. _.
0.115. , 0.068;_ FC 8000 none none no $'
000
124• . 72 0.206_0.119 FC 750 • none 270 no 750 ,__
59 _ 22•0.098: 0.037i _FC __ none _ • none _. none no_. none
26' 15 0.043'T 0.025'3,00,_ FC none „ 300 _ no , , : 300 __
4/15/2009
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hezachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachloroethane _ _,
Methyl Chloride
Methylene Chloride
Naphthalene ___ _ _
Nitrobenzene _ . _ ,.
2-Nitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Phenanthrene _ _,
Phenol
15 0.5 -
21 0.31
none none
none none
no _ • _ 1,200
no 320
no 3,400
• no _ 765 __
no 26 111
yes 3.4 _...,.._ 79 •
_no . 0.048 0.20
no 97 _
0.11 -
46
0.0003
10,000
none
no _ 15 64 0.382 0.382 __OCPSF_ 0.382 _ ay _ ,._ _ ._ _,
no 2.1 89 _ __ _ 0.073 _ _ 0.073 _OCPSF _ T0073 _ ibs/day , _ _ 0.048 • _
_ 5,110 O. 0.337 OCPSF 0.337 _ Ibs/day _ 0134
1,363 • _ 0.060 0.060 • OCPSF _ 0.060� " lbs/day ___ _0.32 - 030
14,479 0.078 0.078 OCPSF 0.078 •_• Ibs/day 0.0
3,258 0.460 0.460 ~ _CPOCPSF� �0,460 : ]bs/day_ _ _ _ 0129 _
0.204 _ 0.204 _i_ OSF .0.204-7' Ibs/day _ 0.118
' 0.473 • 0 473 L OCPSF : 0 473 Jlbs/day 0.188
1.064 ' 0.204 'WO Standard' 81.7 • iug/L 0.423V
413 0.179 0.179 ' OCPSF '_ 0 179, lbs/day . - _ OA53 _
0.47 _ _
0.113 . 0.113 : OCPSF :_ Ib/day 0.113 _: s_ _ _ _0.041 _
196 0.098 0.098 ' OCPSF ' 0.098 lbs/day _, _ 0.037_
-
0.007 0.046 ' 0.007 WQStandard', 2.6_jug/L 0.025
420 0.081 ' , 0.081 OCPSF ' 0.081 t lbs/day ' 0.033_
77 0.090 ' 0.090 . OCPSF 0.090 Ibs/day 0.035
13409 0.315 .,_' 0.315 OCPSF; 0.315 .lbs/day. , 0.143
- ,779 __ 0.148 0 148 ,_
OCPSF 0.148 s Ibs/day_ __0.066 _
1,405 0.098 .__ 0.098, OCPSF 0.098 Ibs/day_•_,_0,037 ,
128 ; 0.113 0 113.' : OCPSF,_;___0.113 ; Ibs/day_ _ 0.045
34,069 _ ,_ _ 0.115 __ 0.115 OCPSF • 0.115 _ , lbs/day _ . 0.068
3,194 1 0.206 ' 0.206 ;OCPSF : 0.206 _ lbs/day 0.119
none __0.098 _0.098_ OCPSF. _0.098 •_ ! 1bs/day _ -_ 0.037 _
_ 1,278 _ 0..043 _ 0.043 _ SF _-°CP _ 0.043 1 lbs/day - 0.025
4
Limit Calculations per 40 CFR, Subpart I -- 414.90 and 91
(Comparisons to state standards and criteria)
* Standards and Criteria Updated 27Mar2009 - changes to previous permit in blue
Standards and Criteria _
7 8- 9 10
17
Minvnutn
Limit
Based.On;
•: Daily,,_
Maximum.:
Limitr
0.101 _ OCPSF 0.101 • Ibs/day
• 0.463 OCPSF _ 0.463 __ lbs/day 0.171
'Monthly':
„Ave age.
lbs/day.
0.271 OCPSF 0.271 lbs/day-
0.073 _OCPSF_ '0.073 lbs/day
__ 0.046 , OCPSF 0.046 Ibs/day ,
0.038

OCPSF Subpart I Calculations
OCPSF,,_ -OCPSF OCPSF,: -,OCPSF. ': Federal_'- .= Standard' Human';,; Water =: §c-,q ; -.- ,'WaterQual. - OCPSF.
Daily Monthly Daily-..= -.Monthly, Criteiaor .,-',Aquatic' , Health Consumption Carcmogen9_"MMinimum= .Allowable = • .'Daily
,lviaximum -Averse Masimuin--'-Average'` = 'State?:.' ,-Life'', Standard;-s Standard -:criteria;_- Load Maximum
,- - _ g _- - ,.; r :.'rr . - . - ,. . 1 - . •bs/day'- .
llis/da ]bs/dey Standard- s .. r ,.` µfa r > ,RPM t ::µPS :' _' 1 • y , ?.r
Parameter µgR ^'. • y;,.:;
Pyrene - -_ .. 67 25 0.111_ _ - . _0.041 ... FC_ none _ 4000 ._.. 830 no ,, 4,000 17,034 0.111 0.111 OCPSF 0.111 lbs/day 0041
Tetrachloroethylene _. _56___ , _??_ ,. _ 0.093 . , _0.037,, - SS, none _303 0.7 yes 303 7,076 0.093 _ _0.093 _ OCPSF _ 0.093 lbs/day ._-_ 0.037_
..-
Toluene 80 260.133 - 0.043 SS 11 _ none none no :- _•11 _' _ 47 0.133 _ 0.133__-_ OCi•SF ... , 0.133J _Ibs/day 0.043
__
TotalChromimn _ - _, 2770 1110 4.597, -_ , L842' .__ ,SS_ __ _-,-_50__ _ _, _none , ,.none _,. - no_
_no _ _, _ __SO__ ,_ 213____. 4.597 _ 4597 OCPSF 4.597 lbs/day L842
.. . __-„
Total Copper 3380 _ _- _ 1450' 5.610 _ ,_2.407 _ _ SS -AL , 7 _ none _ , , , 1300 - no 7 30 5.610 5.610_ . _ OCPSF 5.610_ _ ibs/day _ , _ _2_407
_. _ PP - .------ - .. -- _
Total Cyuride 1200 420 1.992 .0.697 _ SS _ 5 220000. 700 no _ 5-,_ _ 21 __ _ 1.992 _ _ 1;992 _ _ OCPSF ___ L992 _ _]bs/day 0.697
--
.._ ._ _- . _ __. . __._ __ _
Total Lead 690 „ _. 320y_ _ -_ 1.145' 0.531 _- , SS _ _ _25 pone none po 25 .,, 106 - -, 1.145 1145 OCPSF _ 1.145Ibs/day 0.531
Tidal Nickel ,____ 3980 1690 _ _ _ 6;605 2.805 ., SS ._ 88 4600 ...,,_25 no Si 375 6.605-v 6.. __OCPSF _ ___„_ _ Ib... l2.805
050_
Total Zinc _ - - 2610 _ 14.332' _ _ 1.743 SS -AL 50 _ - , none _ -_none __-_ - .._ __no ;. _- 50 __., 213 _- _ _ 4.332 -_. 4332 OCPSF 4.332 lbs/day._ 1.743
T_. ..
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 140 68 . _ 0.232 _ _0.113 FC 61 none 35 no 61- _260 0232 _0.2 _ _OCPSF 0.232� lbs/day 0.113_
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 54 21 0.090 0.035 FC none 4.4 0.54 no 4.4 19 0.090 0.090 _ OCPSF __ 0.090 _ lbs/day__ ___ _ ._ _
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 54 21 - 0.090 0.035' __ FC .___ _ __ none
. _ . _ 16 0.59 _ , ,. _yes_ 16 _ , • 374 _• _ 0.090 _ 0.090 OCPSF 0.090 lbs/day 0.035_
__..
Trichloroethylene 54 __ __ 21 ___ 0.090 _ 0.035 FC none _ ' 30 2.5 yes ,__ 30 701 10.090 0.090 OCPSF 0.090 lbs/day 0.035
Vinyl Chloride 268 104 0.445 0.173 SS none 2.4 0.025 yes 2.4 56 • 0.445 0.445 OCPSF ' 0.445� lbs/day 0.173
Colmnn Coles:
1 OCPSF Guidelines (sec 40 CFR 414.90)
2 OCPSF Guidelines (see 40 CFR 414.90)
3 col 1 * OCPSFFIow * 8.34/1000
4 col2 * OCPSF Flow * 8.34/1000
5, 6, 7, 8, 9 from Fed /state water quality standards
10 ' if WS class then find minimum of col 6, 7, & 8. Otherwise fmd minimum of col 6 & 7. (i.e., which is the more stringent]
11 if parameter is a carcinogen then all load = 8.34 * Qavg* col 10 /1000. Otherwise all load = 8.34 * 7Q10 * col 10 /1000.
12 - copy of column 3
13 find minimum of col 11 and 12.
14 note which load is lower.
15 if limit is not based on OCPSF guidelines then calculate concentration based on Qp. Otherwise copy OCPSF load
16 if limit is not based on OCPSF guidelines then use units of'ug/1'. Otherwise use'Ids/day'.
17 if limit is not based on OCPSF guidelines then leave balnk. Otherwise copy OCPSF limits from col. 4.
4/15/2009
• Find'
,
Mihwni m -
_Based On:--`
Daily
Maximum
Units'
Monthly,
Average:
Lmdt
Ibs/day'"

Joe's Notes Limits Calculations
Monthly Average, Flows in MGD DAK Americas, LLC NC0003719
Jan-05 0.179 Flow History (MGD):,
Feb-05 0.194 _• •• 0.1.99 4-Year. Ave' (Jan2005-Dec2008)
Mar-05 0.178 0.388 Highest -Monthly Average (Aug2006)
Apr-05 0.085 • 0.032 Lowest 'Monthly Ave (May 2005)
May-05 0.032 0.603 Max daily flow (Sep.10, 2008) for Jan2005-Dec2008
Jun-05 0.189
Jul-05 0.278
Aug-05 0.242 ... according to 40 CFR, Subpart D, 414.41 (BPT)
Sep-05 0.147 Limits Calc: Daily Max . • Monthly Ave -
Oct-05 0.203-
Nov-05 0.282 -. BODS . 64 x 0,603 = 38.59 trig/L 24 x 0.388 9.31 mg/L
Dec-05 0.227` TSS 130 x 0.603 = 78.39 mg/L 40 x 0.388. 15.52 mg/L
Jan-06 0.209, Do not use. 'Do not use.
Feb-06 0.209... -
Mar-06 0.203 Considering EPA prefers to use the 4-year average flow:;
Apr-06 0.173
May-06 0.200 BOD5' BPT mg/L . Limit
Jun-06 0.191 Daily Max (64 x 0.199 MGD) . ' • 64 - ' -12.72 21.11 -Ibs/day
Jul-06 0.276 Monthly Ave (24 x 0.199 MGD) •' 24 - 9.31 15.45 Ibs/day
Aug-06 0.388
Sep-06 0.358 ' TSS
Oct-06 0.182_. ' Daily Max (130 x 0.199 MGD)130 . 25.84 .215.76 Ibs/day'
•
Nov-06 0.284 ' Monthly Ave (40 x 0.199 MGD). 40 - 7.95 ' 66.39 Ibs/day
Dec-06 0.260 .
Jan-07 0.236. COD
Feb-07 0.306
Mar-07 0.166
Apr-07 0.126
May-07 0.171 ;
Jun-07 0.177
JuI-07 ' 0.209
Aug-07 0.198--
Sep-07 0.221-
- Oct-07 0.141
Nov-07 0.118
" Dec-07 0.154
Jan-08 0.203 '
Feb-08 0.229
Mar-08 0.176
Apr-08 0.182
May-08 0.165
Jun-08 0:223 -
Jul-08 0:288
Aug-08 0.256
Sep-08 .0.211
Oct-08 0.175
Nov-08 0.170 - .
Dec-08 0.182

IWC Calculations
'DAK Americas,. LLC Cedar r Creek Site
NC0003719
Prepared By: Joe Corporon, NPDES Program
Enter Permitted Flow (MGD):
Enter s7Q10(cfs):.
Enter w7Q10 (cfs):
0.300
791
Residual Chlorine
7Q10 (CFS)
PERMITTED FLOW (MGD)
PERMITTED FLOW (CFS)
STREAM STD (UG/L)
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (1
IWC (%)
Allowable Conc. (ug/I)
Fecal Limit
(If DF >331 Monitor)
(If DF <331; Limit)
Dilution Factor (DF)
NPDES Server/Current Versions/IWC
Ammonia (NH3 as N)
(summer)
791 7010 (CFS)
0.3 PERMITTED FLOW (MGD)
0.465 PERMITTED -FLOW (CFS)
17.0 STREAM STD (MG/L)
0 UPS. BACKGROUND LEVEL (MG/L)
0.06 IWC (%)
28,935 Allowable Conc. (mg/I)
Not Required
Ammonia (NH3 as N)
(winter)
7Q10 (CFS) •
PERMITTED FLOW (MGD)
PERMITTED FLOW (CFS)"
STREAM STD (MG/L) •
1,702 UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (MG/L)
IWC (%) - - • .
Allowable_Conc: (mg/I)
791
0.30
0;465
1.0
0.22
0.06
1328
791
0.3
0.465.
1.8
'0.22
0.06
_2,689
4/15/2009

16 1 15 I 14 I 13
t
LANTWY. BOUNDARY53 " I
N/H
A
R
1 DRAINAGE AREA 2 .I i
•APPROX. 6.4 ACRES '1
I 0X IMPERVIOUS j
I. T. _..I
ALPHA AVENUE • 'I
BRAVO AVENUE
CHARLIE AVENUE
DELTA AVENUE
• LIPONT
PROPERTY
ECHO AVENUE
FOXTROT AVENUE
GOLF AVENUE
HOTEL AVENUE
VOIA AVENUE
JULIETTE AVENUE
,LOxC_lmCf 150A1Us
USERNMIE
WELLMAN
rtsm .4r
PARKING
DRAINAGE AREA 14
APPROX. 55 ACRES
OX. 9/PERVIOUS
12
. DRAINAGE AREA
3% DJPROPER IOUS
---6
MAI HOP
N
ouPrALL
0 u1CONCRETE DITCH)
L_
A
B
C
0
E
G
Ps-pkilC AC -S , c
n-rc7
10 9 'Pr B I 7
SUB
STATION
AINAGE AREA 4
PROX. B.6 ACRES
40Y. WPERVI
WATER
R'ES-
OUTFALL
PARKING
STORES
DRAIN
APPRO
32X
WASTE TREATMENT
DRAINAGE AREA 3
APPROX. 23.2 ACRES
64X IMPERVIOUS
6
0
5 1
PROPERTY
LINE TYP.
DRAINAGE AREA 5
APPROX, 7.1 ACRES
EXIST. WHSE. 65Z 9/PERVIOUS
DELTA AV
E AREA 7
60 ACRES
ERVIOUS
ECHO AVE
RIVERN7ER1
FEAR
GAR
IVIWIO.
,A
PLANT
OUTFACE
� 7
4
OUTFACE
T /NAGE AREA
•PROX. D.RAAIl
5BX RAPERV.
_3
I DRAINAGE
APPROX
OX OAP
, OUTF
TFALL
EA 10
.5 ACRES
%NOUS
\DRAINAGE AREA 11
APPROX.
IMPERVIOUS
WEAL!.
DRAINAGE AREA 12
—APPROX. 1.1 ACRE
AZ IMPERVIOUS
FIRST S
2
SCA1.EE I-••• 200•
COIPMf 'co.taot�
MONSANTO
Aw!•IMI•lip,•
..—• FAYETTEVILLE N.C.
STORM SEWER
SITE PLAN
FAYETTEVILLE SITE
1147it
743 DI 01 C 1001 A
""'- 01C1001 •
. ....e m nm n ,tCSjO,fLMMRnM,n,;A n,unu1st.

Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing Self -Monitoring Summary March 16, 2009
FACILITY REQUIREMENT YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
CWS The Harbour Well H4 WTP Chr Qtr Monit 90% Ceri7dPF 2005 — — — — Fail — Fail — Pass
NC0086606/001 Begin•4/1/2005 Frequency: Q Mar Jun Sep Dec + NonComp: 2006 — Fall — — Fall — — Fail — Fall
County Iredell Region: MRO Subbasin: CTB32 2007 — Fall — — Fail — Fail — — Fail
PF: NA Special 2008 __ — Fail — -- Fail — — Fa0 — — Fail
7Q10: IWC(%) Order. 2009 --
CWS The Point WTP - Well N 1 Chr Qtr Monit: 90% Ceri7dPF 2005 -- — -- — Fail — — Fail — — Fail
NC0086592/001 Begin:5/1/2005 Frequency: Q Mar Jun Sep Dec + NonComp: . 2006 -- Fall — — Fail — — Fail — — Fall
County Iredell Region: MRO Subbasin: CTB32 2007 -- Fail — — Fail — Fail — — Fail
PF: NA Special 2008 — — Fail -- — Fail — — Fan, — Fail
7Q10: .IWC(%) Order: 2009 —
CWS Willowbrook chr lim: 90%@0.U3or0.06MGD Ceri7dPF 2005 Pass — — Pass — — Pass — — Pass
NC0064378/00I Begin•5/1/2008 FrequencyQ Jan Apr Jul Oct + NonComp:Single 2006 Pass — — Pass — — Pass — — Pass
County. Wake Region: RRO Subbasin: NEU02 2007 Pass — — Pass -- — Pass — — Pass
PF: 0.030 Special 2008 Pass — Fail >100 >100 Pass — — Pass
7Q10: 0.0 IWC(%) 100.0 Orden 2009 Pass
DAK Americas, LLC - Cedar Creek Site 24hr p/f ac lim: 90% Rhd (combined outfall) Fthd24PF 9 2005 — , Pass — — Pass -- — Pass — — Pass
NC0003719/002 Begin:l/1/1996 Frequency.QP/F + Feb May Aug Nov •NonComp:Single 2006 — Pass — — Pass — — Pass — — Pass
County. Cumberland Region: FRO Subbasin: CPF15 2007 — Pass — Pass — — Pass — — Pass
PF: 1.3 Special 2008 ._ Pass — — Pass — — Pass — — Pass
7Q10: 791.0 IWC(%)0.25 Order: 2009 —
- DAK Americas, LLC - Cape Pear Site 24hr p/f ac lim: 90% Rhd - Fthd24PF 2005 Pass — Pass — Pass — — Pass
NC0000663/001 Begin5/1/2007 FrequencyQ + Jan Apr Jul Oct NonComp:Single 2006 Pass — — Pass — Pass . — — Pass
County. Brunswick Region: WIRO Subbasin: CPF17 2007 Pass — — Pass — — Pass — — Pass
PF: 3.0 Special 2008 Pass — — Pass — — Pass — — Pass
7Q10: 918 IWC(%)0.38 . Order. 2009 Pass
Dallas WWTP chr lim: 90% Ceri7dPF 2005 — Pass — — Pass — Pass — — Pass —
NC0068888/001 Begin3/1/2002 FrequencyQ Feb May Aug Nov + NonComp:SINGLE 2006 — Pass — — Pass — — Pass — — Fall >100
County. Gaston Region: MRO Subbasin: CTB36 2007 >100 Pass — — Pass — — Fail 94.87 >100 14R/invalid —
PF: 0.60 Special 2008 — Pass — — Pass — — Pass — — Pass —
7Q10: 0.075 IWC(%) 92.52 Order: • 2009 —
Daniel Stowe Botanical Garden Chr Lim: 90% Ceri7dPF 2005 —
NC0088684/001 Begin•7/I/2008 Frequency. Q Mar Jun Sep Dec NonComp: 2006 —
County Gaston Region: MRO Subbasin: CTB37 2007 —
PF: 0.0038 Special 2008 —
7Q10: 0 IWC(%) 100 Orden 2009 —
Fell — —
H
— — H -- — H
Dare County-/001(RO) WTP 24hr p/f ac monit: 90% mysid Mysd24PF 2005 Fall — — Pass — -- Fall — — Fail — —
NC0070157/001 Begin. 2/1/2009 Frequency:Q Jan Apr Jul Oct NonComp: 2006 Pass — — Pass — — Pass — — Pass — —
County Dare Region: WARO Subbasin: PAS56 - 2007 Pass — — Pass — — Fail — — Pass — —
PF: NA Special 2008 pass — — Pass — — Pass — — Pass — —
7Q10: Tidal IWC(%)NA Order: 2009 Pass
Dare County-/002 (RO) WTP 24hr p/fac monit: 90% mysid Mysd24PF 2005 Fail — — Pass — — Pass — — Pass
NC0070157/002 Begin.2/1/2009 Frequency:0 Jan Apr Jul Oct NonComp: _ 2006 Pass — Pass — — Fail — — Fail
County. Dare Region: WARO Subbasin: PAS56 2007 Pass — — Fail — Pass — — Pass
PF: 1.42 • Special 2008 pass ' — Pass — — Pass — — Pass
7Q10: Tidal IWC(%)NA Order: 2009 Pass
• Dawson International Prop-Albermarle chr lim: 90% . Ceri7dPF 2005 Pass — — Pass — — H — — Pass — —
NC0086487/00I Begin-6/1/2004 FrequencyQ Jan Apr Jul Oct + NonComp:Single 2006 Pass — — NRIFai1 NR/Invalid .94.87 Pass — — Invalid,Fail >100 NR
County Stanly Region: MRO Subbasin: YADOS 2007 Pass — Fail >100 , 94.87 Pass — — Pass — —
PF: 0.03 Special 2008 pass — Pass -- — Pass — — Pass — -
- 7Q10: 0.0 . IWC(%) 100 Order: ' 2009 H
Deer Chase Subdivision WWTP chr lim: 90%(n) 0.05 or 0.11 or 0.22 MGD Ceri7dPF 2005 Pass — — Pass — — Pass '
NC0063746/001 Begim6/I2008 Frequency: Q Jan Apr Jul Oct • + NonComp:Single 2006 Pass — — Pass — — Pass
County Wake Region: RRO Subbasin:NEU02 2007 Pass — Pass -- — Pass
PF: 0.05 Special 2008 pass . — — Invalid Fail >100 Pass,>100
7Q10: 0.0 IWC(%) 100 Order: - 2009 Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Pass
>100 >100
k Pre 2005 Data Available
LEGEND:
PERM = Permit Requirement LET= Administrative Letter - Target Frequency= Monitoring frequency: Q- Quarterly; M- Monthly; BM- Bimonthly; SA- Semiannually; A- Annually; OWD- Only when discharging; D- Discontinued monitoring requirement
Begin = First month required 7Q10 = Receiving stream low flow criterion (cfs) += quarterly monitoring increases to monthly upon failure or NR Months that testing must occur - ex. Jan, Apr, Jul, Oct NonComp = Current Compliance Requirement
PF= Permitted flow (MGD) IWC% = Instream waste concentration P/F = Pass/Fail test AC=Acute CHR=Chronic •
Data Notation: f - Fathead Minnow; * - Ceriodaphnia sp.; my - Mysid shrimp; ChV - Chronic value; P - Mortality of slated percentage at highest concentration; at - Performed by DWQ Aquatic Tox Unit; bl - Bad test
Reporting Notation: --- = Data not required; NR - Not reported Facility Activity Status: I - Inactive, N - Newly Issued(To construct); H - Active but not discharging; 1'-More data available for month in question; = ORC signature needed
15

NC DENR - DIVISON OF WATER QUALITY
.0311 CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN
2B .0300
Name of 'Stream
Description
Class
Class
Date Index No.
Greens Creek' (Holmes Pond)
Evans Lake
CAPE FEAR RIVER
CAPE FEAR RIVER
Cross Creek (Big Cross
Creek) (Texas Pond, Smith
Lake, Rose Lake)
Unnamed Tributary near
Rosehill Road (Country Club
Lake)
Unnamed Tributary near
Rosehill Road
Cross Creek (Big Cross
Creek)'
Cross Creek (Big Cross
Creek)
From source to McPherson WS-IV,B
Creek
Entire lake and connecting WS-IV
stream to Cape Fear River
WS-IV;CA
From a point 0.5 mile
upstream of City of
Fayetteville water supply
intake to City of
Fayetteville water supply
intake
From City of Fayetteville C
water supply intake to
mouth of Hammond Creek
From source to a point 0.5 WS-IV
mile upstream of water
supply intake at Murchison
Road in Fayetteville
From source to dam at -
Country Club Lake
WS-IV,B
From dam at Country Club WS-IV
Lake to Cross Creek
From a point 0.5 mile
upstream of water supply
intake to water supply.
intake at Murchison Road, in
Fayetteville
WS-IV;CA
From water supply intake at C
Murchison Road in
Fayetteville to Cape Fear
River
Little Cross Creek (Bonnie From source to a point 0.5 WS-IV
Donne Lake, Kornbow Lake, mile upstream of backwaters
Mintz Pond), of Glenville Lake
Little Cross Creek
(Glenville Lake)
Little Cross Creek
Blounts Creek
Branson Creek (Branson Lake)
Hybarts Branch
Locks Creek
Gum Log Canal
Flat Swamp Ditch
Reece Creek
From a point 0.5 mile
upstream of backwaters of
Glenville Lake to dam at
Glenville Lake
From dam at Glenville Lake
to Cross Creek
From source
From source
From source
From source
River
to Cross Creek
to Blounts Creek
to Branson Creek
to Cape Fear
From source to Locks Creek
From source to Gum'Log Canal
From source to Locks Creek
WS-IV;CA
C
C
C
C
C
C
c
08/03/92 18-24-3-3
0B/03/,92. 18-25
08/03/92 18-(25.5)
04/01/59 18-(26)
- 08/03/92 18-27-(1)
08/03/92 18-27-2-(1)
08/03/92 18-27-2-(2)
08/03/92 18-27-(2.5)
03/01/77 18-27-(3)
08/03/92 18-27-4-(1) •
08/03/92 18-27-4-(1.5)
03/01/77 18-27-4-(2)
03/01/77 18-27-5
03/01/77 18-27-5-1
03/01/77 18-27-5-1-1
07/01/73 18-28
09/01/74 18-28-1
09/01/74 18-28-1-1
09/01/74 18-28-2
Page 35 of 68 2009-04-04 04:35:02

CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN
Name of Stream
Subbasin Stream Index Number Map Number Class
CAPE FEAR RIVER CPF07 18-(16.7) F23NE8 WS-IV
CAPE FEAR RIVER CPF13 18-(16.7) F23NE8 WS-IV
CAPE FEAR RIVER CPF07 1B-(20.3) F24SW5 WS-IV;CA.
CAPE FEAR, RIVER - CPF13 18-(20.3) F24SW5 WS-IV;CA
CAPE FEAR RIVER CPF14 18-(20.3) F24SW5 WS-IV;CA
CAPE FEAR RIVER CPF07 18-(20.7) F24SW5 WS-V
CAPE FEAR RIVER - CPF14 18-(20.7) F24SW5 WS-V
CAPE FEAR RIVER ,CPF15 18-(20.7) F24SW5 WS-V
CAPE FEAR RIVER CPF15 18-(23:5) G24NW4 WS-IV
CAPE FEAR RIVER CPF15 18-(25.5) G23SE1 WS-IV;CA
CAPE FEAR RIVER CPF15 18-(26) G23SE4 C
CAPE FEAR RIVER CPF16 18-(26) G23SE4 C
CAPE FEAR RIVER CPF16 18-(49) I25SW4 WS-V
CAPE FEAR RIVER CPF16 18-(53.5) I25SW8 WS-IV
CAPE FEAR RIVER ,CPF16 18-(58.5) J25NE8 WS-IV;CA
CAPE FEAR RIVER CPF16 18-(59) J25NE8 WS-IV;Sw
CAPE FEAR RIVER CPF16 18-(62.5) J26SW1 WS-IV;Sw,CA
CAPE FEAR RIVER CPF17 18-(62.5) J26SW1 WS-IV;Sw,CA
CAPE FEAR RIVER CPF17 18-(63) J26SW1 C;Sw
CAPE FEAR RIVER CPF20 18-(63) J26SW1 C;Sw
CAPE FEAR RIVER CPF17 18-(71) J27SW7 SC
CAPE FEAR RIVER (excluding area described below) CPF17 18-(87.5) L27NW1 SA;HQW
Carltons Mill Run CPF19 18-68-2-10-2 H26NW6 C;Sw
Carolina Beach Yacht Basin CPF24 18-8731.2 ' K27SW6 SB
Carrols Branch (Lake Bay) CPF14 18-23-13-3 G21NE5 WS-III
Carrs Creek CPF13 18-20-7 F22NE4 C
Cartwheel Branch CPF17 18-72 J26SE9 SC;Sw
Carvers Creek. CPF16 18-56-(0.3) J25NW2 C
Carvers Creek CPF16 18-56-(0.7) . J25NW2 WS-IV
Carvers Creek (Cypress Lake) CPF15 18-24 G23NW6 WS-IV,B
Cary Branch CPF07 18-7-5 E23SW2 C
Castle Mill Creek (Mill Creek) CPF18 18-68-12-9 - H25NW7 C;Sw
Caswell Basin CPF17 18-88-13 L26NE9 SC
Cat Tail Branch - CPF19 18-68-1-10-2 G25SE8 C;Sw
Caterpillar Creek CPF04 16-27-6-(1) D21NE3 WS-II;HQW,NSW
Caterpillar Creek CPF04 16-27-6-(2) D22NW4 WS-II;HQW,NSW,CA
Catfish Creek CPF17 18-69 J26SE6 C;Sw
Catskin Creek CPF23 18-74-49-2-1 J28NW1 C;Sw
Cattail Creek CPF04 16-31-2 D21SE5 C;NSW
Causey Lake CPF03 16-19-3-2 C20SW7 WS-IV;NSW
Cedar Creek CPF10 17-26.5 F2ONE3 C;HQW
Cedar Creek CPF11 .17-39 ' - E21SE5 C
Cedar Creek CPF07 18-11-(1) F23NW1 C
Cedar Creek CPF07 . .18-11-(2) F23NW1 WS-I.V,
Cedar Creek CPF15 18-33 H24NW3 C
Cedar Creek CPF17 18-88-8-2-4 L27NW7 SA;HQW
Cedar Fork CPF06 16-41-1-15-2-3 D22NE3 B;NSW
Cedar Snag Creek . CPF24 .18-87-17 J28SW4 SA;ORW
Chapel Creek CPF06 16-41-2-8 D22NE9 WS-IV;NSW
Cherry Tree Prong CPF17 18-70-2 J26SE5 C;Sw
Cherry Tree Swamp CPF17 .18-81-6-1-5-1 K26NW9 C;Sw
Chinnis Branch CPF17 18-66-5-1 ' J26SW9 C;Sw
Chocolate Creek CPF03 16-19-8-1-1 D2ONE1 C;NSW
Page 6 of 31
2009-04-04 04:37:38