HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0024538_Wasteload Allocation_19960606NPDES DOCUMENT SCANNING COVER !;14EET
NPDES Permit:
NC0024538
Shelby / First Broad River WWTP
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
yiF
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Correspondence
Instream Assessment (67b)
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Document Date:
June 6, 1996
This document is printed on reuse paper - ignore any
content on the reirerse aide
Note for Marcia Toler-McCullen
From: Jackie Nowell
Date: Thu, Jun 6, 1996 2:54 PM
Subject: RE: Shelby WWTP
To: Marcia Toler-McCullen
Yes, it goes to First Broad River.
From: Marcia Toler-McCullen on Thu, Jun 6, 1996 2:43 PM
Subject: Shelby WWTP
To: Jackie Nowell
Is the correct discharge location First Broad River for Shelby now. There was a Hickory
Creek discharge. Has this ceased? I need to know to correct these two files. Thanks so
much.
NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
Facility Name: G/ry DF 5//ELEY 4/4%77'
•
Existing 0
Proposed 0 Permit No.: Nc C) 24 S,3 S
Design Capacity (MGD): 6_ 0
Pipe No.:
_Industrial (% of Flow): 3 4- Z
Engineer
Dat
Rec. 1
1�3/7j
Date 6///',P
�O ( County: 2EYEZ4/1%
Domestic (% of Flow) : (p 6 7
Receiving Stream: f{/GKQRV GeK Class: G Sub -Basin: 03 0 8 —"--
E1<<ST1NC� �i S c �cicj
Reference USGS Quad: G " / 2 " /(%E (Please attach) Requestor:
Regional Office
gc,4cKS8u r I`1c TM
(Guideline limitations, if applicable, are to be listed on the back of this form.)
Ao
Design Temp.: 24 Drainage Area (mil): L Avg. Streamflow (cfs): Z i.
7Q10 (cfs) 3 Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 30Q2 (cfs)
Location of D.O. minimum (miles below outfall): b Slope (fpm) f6.---7
Velocity (fps) : O .6 DZ K1 (base e, per day) : G. i K2 (base e. per day) : l4.(. �S
Effluent
Characteristics
Monthly
Average
Comments
-&D, (n(Q)
3°
- ( 1,6
3 d
��LC.Q L
(abo
* loo,/,..1
O0EM-
1 ,,
Origina4 Allocatfio
Re
co
/Prepared By: QJAtti (2 I2
Comments:
Reviewed
Effluent 1-
Characteristics
:'Dnthly
l.verage
Comments
BY:
Lc° PLOTTED
Date:
Facility Name
Type of Waste
Status
Receiving Stream
Stream Class
Subbasin
County
Regional Office
Requester
Date of Request
Quad
WASTELOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL FORM
CITY OF SHELBY
MUNICIPAL
EXISTING
HICKORY CREEK
C
030804
CLEVELAND
ARO
SAM BRIDGES
6/23/86
G12NE
Wasteflew
5-Day BOD
Ammonia Nitrogen
Dissolved Oxygen
TSS
Fecal Coliform
pH
Request No. :3317
R ECEIVTED
`'Vdibr � ua!ity Division
AUG 12 1986
tii'.il(,yrrl N: r':..nf (Jfttc!
Viorth Carolina
Drainage Area (sq mi) : 19.
Summer 7Q10
Winter 7Q10
Average Flaw
RECOMMENDED EFFLUENT LIMITS
(mgd): 6
(mg/1) : 30
(mg/1):
(mg/1): 4
(mg/1) : 30
(#/11=10ml): 1000
(SU): 6-9
(cfs) : 3.4
(cfs) :
(cfs) : 26.2
k
2_ COMMENTS nn
TOXICITY LIMITTS ATTACHED. ?j ta_we,s,, stxw
.�. * �,14. c. j
In (iUL vps m /clowns r►•. man 14oR-kr,0
Lc", = -'710 ho
1,,, pezviit•
Recommended by �V( C. Caa
Reviewed by:
Tech. Support Superviso
Regional Su
Permits & En.ineering
Date
Date
Date
Date
20
o � 73 IT
1.) The permittee shall conduct chronic toxicity testa on a quarterly
basis using protocols defined in E.P.A. Document 600/4-85/014
entitled "Short -Term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity
of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms". The
testing shall be performed as a Ceriodaphnia Survival and Repro-
duction Test. Effluent collection will be performed twice during
each test as 24 hour composite samples. Toxicity test exposure
using the first composite sample will include the first three full
days of testing. Exposure to the second composite sample will in-
clude the last four full days of testing. Effluent samples will
be taken immediately prior to disinfection, but below all other
treatment processes. "the Chronic Value (ChV) must be greater than
13.%. There will be minimally five effluent concentrations and a
control exposure treatment. One effluent concentration shall equal
13 %, which represents the instream waste concentration (I.W.C.)
during 7Q10 low flow conditions and daily permitted discharge volume.
The remaining concentrations shall be /0,2o y, 9��'
There may not be more than 20% mortality in .€a&t OZ effluent
after 48 hours of exposure.
Note: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in.:the cited
document, such as minimum control organism survival and appropriate
environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will re-
quire immediate retesting. Failure to submit suitable test results
will constitute a permit violation.
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Asheville Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor
Mr. Don Rhom, Plant Engineer
City of Shelby
Post Office Box 207
Shelby, North Carolina 28150
Subject:
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
October 2, 1986
Draft of NPDES Permit
Wastewater Treatment Facility
City of Shelby
Cleveland County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Rhom:
In response to our recent telephone conversation concerning the
sampling schedule in the draft of the City's NPDES Permit, the
following ,information is offered:
1. The City applied approximately one year early for renewal of
their NPDES Permit in an attempt to eliminate the upstream
and downstream monitoring requirements contained in their
Discharge Permit.
2. For domestic wastewater treatment facilities which have
discharge requirements based upon effluent limitations,
there are normally no stream monitoring requirements. On
the other hand, for treatment facilities which have dis-
charge limitations based upon water quality standards,
stream monitoring requirements are imposed as stated in
Title 15 North Carolina Administrative Code 2B.0500 (copy
attached).
representative of the Cityof Shelbytelephoned to
3. When a repre P
inquire about the possibility of deleting the City's stream
monitoring requirements, the writer checked the sub -basin
printout to determine if Shelby's Discharge Permit numbers
were water quality based or effluent limited. The printout
had Shelby's limits as being effluent based. A copy of that
printout is attached. The representative of the City was
given that information and told that he should request
Interchange Building, 59 Woodtin Place, PO. Box 370, Asheville, N.C. 28802-0370 • Telephone 704-253-3341
Mr. Don Rhom
October 2, 1986
Page Two
renewal of the City's Permit since it was within
approximately one year of expiration, and was told that the
new permit would not contain stream monitoring requirements.
4. The City properly completed the application process and re-
ceived a draft permit which contained stream monitoring
requirements. The City had expected no stream sampling re-
quirements and inquired about the situation.
5. The writer investigated and discovered that the State's
sub -basin printout was incorrect and that Shelby's limit-
ations should indeed have been water quality based and not
effluent limited. The City's permit therefore should
contain upstream and downstream monitoring requirements for
dissolved oxygen, fecal coliform, and temperature with a
frequency of three times per week during June, July, August,
and September and once per week during the remainder of the
year.
I am sorry for the confusion and inconvenience. If the City
desires to pursue the matter, objections to the requirements contained
in the draft should be filed in accordance with procedures outlined in
the cover letter. By copy of this letter, I am requesting that our
Technical Services Group correct the sub -basin printout to show that
Shelby's limitations are water based.
Sincerely,
James R. Reid
Environmental Chemist
JRR:ls
Enclosure
xc:
Gene Bracket
Robert S. kidney
Meg Kerr (/
uwuuwx11441111.1w ,ww..hi•44.a 44.1.1i a.. •..► IA
0
8
c
Facility Name:
Existing
Proposed
Q
77110 N-et
NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
rStit(L y wwrF '!iy
Permit No.: MdOOZ-4538 Pipe No.:
CO
6 P7..
Date: /2/FJ 1P�l
County: 1flitfern ct
Design Capacity (MGD): (o.O Industrial (% of Flow): Domestic (% of Flow):
Receiving Stream: i-(10k(Xl,j � Oteet G. Class: Sub -Basin: �'?.3 -o8 - O¢
Reference USGS Quad• (Please attach) Requestor:
(Guideline limitations, if applicable, are to be listed on the back of this form.)
.S. A& (- AleXj7 Regional Office ('01 ,/
Design Temp.:
7Q10:
I D�
Drainage Area: l a rn
Avg. Streamflow: • a in , Z Ci
Winter 7Q10: I C TJ 30Q2• Ci 0 1
Location of D.O.minimum m les below outfall): 0 I�- Slope.. R
cu
as ' (I
Velocity (fps). ..� Kl (base e, per day, 20o C) : �• St K2 (base e, per day, 20°C) : 1 ��
0
c.�
0
N
i
Effluent
Characteristics
Monthly
Average
Comments
.P(0 LOlKhrrn,
I -
r
Original Allocation
Revised Allocation
)1ti1Itit7,M co) Gm.,�
Effluent
Characteristics
Monthly
Average
Comments
Date(s) of Revision(s)
(Please attach previous allocation)
Prepared By: Reviewed By:
,27/C
Date:
REQUEST NO.
264
********************* WASTELOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL FORM *********************
FACILITY NAME
TYPE OF WASTE
COUNTY
REGIONAL OFFICE
RECEIVING STREAM
7010 : 3.4 CFS
DRAINAGE AREA
SHELBY WWTP
DOMESTIC
CLEVELAND
ASHEVILLE
HICKORY CREEK
W7010 : 6.1
19.00 SQ.MI.
CFS
REQUESTOR : S. ABDUL-HAQQ
SUBBASIN : 030804
3002 :9.2 CFS
STREAM CLASS :'C'
************************ RECOMMENDED EFFLUENT LIMITS ************************
WASTEFLOW(S)
B0D-5
NH3-N
D.O.
PH
FECAL COLIFORM
TSS
(MGD)
(MG/L) :
(MG/L) :
(MG/L)
(SU)
(/100ML):
(MG/L)
6.0 THIS IS A REVISION TO PREVIOUS
30 ALLOCATION WHICH HAD THE DIS-
CHARGE GOING DIRECTLY INTO
4 THE FIRST BROAD RIVER.
6-9
1000
30
********************************************************************************
FACILITY IS : PROPOSED ( ) EXISTING ( ,) NEW ( )
LIMITS ARE : REVISION (,/) CONFIRMATION ( ) OF THOSE PREVIOUSLY ISSUED
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED BY:
MODELER
HEAD,TECHNICAL SERVICES BRANCH
REGIONAL SUPERVISOR.
PERMITS MANAGER
APPROVED BY :
DIVISION DIRECTOR
�-'i-tc-an/440A-
4.)!._(.;? DATE :_� _
__DATE : �'-
: eel, a_
DATE
DATE