Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0024538_Wasteload Allocation_19960606NPDES DOCUMENT SCANNING COVER !;14EET NPDES Permit: NC0024538 Shelby / First Broad River WWTP Document Type: Permit Issuance yiF Wasteload Allocation Authorization to Construct (AtC) Permit Modification Complete File - Historical Engineering Alternatives (EAA) Correspondence Instream Assessment (67b) Speculative Limits Environmental Assessment (EA) Document Date: June 6, 1996 This document is printed on reuse paper - ignore any content on the reirerse aide Note for Marcia Toler-McCullen From: Jackie Nowell Date: Thu, Jun 6, 1996 2:54 PM Subject: RE: Shelby WWTP To: Marcia Toler-McCullen Yes, it goes to First Broad River. From: Marcia Toler-McCullen on Thu, Jun 6, 1996 2:43 PM Subject: Shelby WWTP To: Jackie Nowell Is the correct discharge location First Broad River for Shelby now. There was a Hickory Creek discharge. Has this ceased? I need to know to correct these two files. Thanks so much. NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION Facility Name: G/ry DF 5//ELEY 4/4%77' • Existing 0 Proposed 0 Permit No.: Nc C) 24 S,3 S Design Capacity (MGD): 6_ 0 Pipe No.: _Industrial (% of Flow): 3 4- Z Engineer Dat Rec. 1 1�3/7j Date 6///',P �O ( County: 2EYEZ4/1% Domestic (% of Flow) : (p 6 7 Receiving Stream: f{/GKQRV GeK Class: G Sub -Basin: 03 0 8 —"-- E1<<ST1NC� �i S c �cicj Reference USGS Quad: G " / 2 " /(%E (Please attach) Requestor: Regional Office gc,4cKS8u r I`1c TM (Guideline limitations, if applicable, are to be listed on the back of this form.) Ao Design Temp.: 24 Drainage Area (mil): L Avg. Streamflow (cfs): Z i. 7Q10 (cfs) 3 Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 30Q2 (cfs) Location of D.O. minimum (miles below outfall): b Slope (fpm) f6.---7 Velocity (fps) : O .6 DZ K1 (base e, per day) : G. i K2 (base e. per day) : l4.(. �S Effluent Characteristics Monthly Average Comments -&D, (n(Q) 3° - ( 1,6 3 d ��LC.Q L (abo * loo,/,..1 O0EM- 1 ,, Origina4 Allocatfio Re co /Prepared By: QJAtti (2 I2 Comments: Reviewed Effluent 1- Characteristics :'Dnthly l.verage Comments BY: Lc° PLOTTED Date: Facility Name Type of Waste Status Receiving Stream Stream Class Subbasin County Regional Office Requester Date of Request Quad WASTELOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL FORM CITY OF SHELBY MUNICIPAL EXISTING HICKORY CREEK C 030804 CLEVELAND ARO SAM BRIDGES 6/23/86 G12NE Wasteflew 5-Day BOD Ammonia Nitrogen Dissolved Oxygen TSS Fecal Coliform pH Request No. :3317 R ECEIVTED `'Vdibr � ua!ity Division AUG 12 1986 tii'.il(,yrrl N: r':..nf (Jfttc! Viorth Carolina Drainage Area (sq mi) : 19. Summer 7Q10 Winter 7Q10 Average Flaw RECOMMENDED EFFLUENT LIMITS (mgd): 6 (mg/1) : 30 (mg/1): (mg/1): 4 (mg/1) : 30 (#/11=10ml): 1000 (SU): 6-9 (cfs) : 3.4 (cfs) : (cfs) : 26.2 k 2_ COMMENTS nn TOXICITY LIMITTS ATTACHED. ?j ta_we,s,, stxw .�. * �,14. c. j In (iUL vps m /clowns r►•. man 14oR-kr,0 Lc", = -'710 ho 1,,, pezviit• Recommended by �V( C. Caa Reviewed by: Tech. Support Superviso Regional Su Permits & En.ineering Date Date Date Date 20 o � 73 IT 1.) The permittee shall conduct chronic toxicity testa on a quarterly basis using protocols defined in E.P.A. Document 600/4-85/014 entitled "Short -Term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms". The testing shall be performed as a Ceriodaphnia Survival and Repro- duction Test. Effluent collection will be performed twice during each test as 24 hour composite samples. Toxicity test exposure using the first composite sample will include the first three full days of testing. Exposure to the second composite sample will in- clude the last four full days of testing. Effluent samples will be taken immediately prior to disinfection, but below all other treatment processes. "the Chronic Value (ChV) must be greater than 13.%. There will be minimally five effluent concentrations and a control exposure treatment. One effluent concentration shall equal 13 %, which represents the instream waste concentration (I.W.C.) during 7Q10 low flow conditions and daily permitted discharge volume. The remaining concentrations shall be /0,2o y, 9��' There may not be more than 20% mortality in .€a&t OZ effluent after 48 hours of exposure. Note: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in.:the cited document, such as minimum control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will re- quire immediate retesting. Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute a permit violation. State of North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development Asheville Regional Office James G. Martin, Governor Mr. Don Rhom, Plant Engineer City of Shelby Post Office Box 207 Shelby, North Carolina 28150 Subject: S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER QUALITY SECTION October 2, 1986 Draft of NPDES Permit Wastewater Treatment Facility City of Shelby Cleveland County, North Carolina Dear Mr. Rhom: In response to our recent telephone conversation concerning the sampling schedule in the draft of the City's NPDES Permit, the following ,information is offered: 1. The City applied approximately one year early for renewal of their NPDES Permit in an attempt to eliminate the upstream and downstream monitoring requirements contained in their Discharge Permit. 2. For domestic wastewater treatment facilities which have discharge requirements based upon effluent limitations, there are normally no stream monitoring requirements. On the other hand, for treatment facilities which have dis- charge limitations based upon water quality standards, stream monitoring requirements are imposed as stated in Title 15 North Carolina Administrative Code 2B.0500 (copy attached). representative of the Cityof Shelbytelephoned to 3. When a repre P inquire about the possibility of deleting the City's stream monitoring requirements, the writer checked the sub -basin printout to determine if Shelby's Discharge Permit numbers were water quality based or effluent limited. The printout had Shelby's limits as being effluent based. A copy of that printout is attached. The representative of the City was given that information and told that he should request Interchange Building, 59 Woodtin Place, PO. Box 370, Asheville, N.C. 28802-0370 • Telephone 704-253-3341 Mr. Don Rhom October 2, 1986 Page Two renewal of the City's Permit since it was within approximately one year of expiration, and was told that the new permit would not contain stream monitoring requirements. 4. The City properly completed the application process and re- ceived a draft permit which contained stream monitoring requirements. The City had expected no stream sampling re- quirements and inquired about the situation. 5. The writer investigated and discovered that the State's sub -basin printout was incorrect and that Shelby's limit- ations should indeed have been water quality based and not effluent limited. The City's permit therefore should contain upstream and downstream monitoring requirements for dissolved oxygen, fecal coliform, and temperature with a frequency of three times per week during June, July, August, and September and once per week during the remainder of the year. I am sorry for the confusion and inconvenience. If the City desires to pursue the matter, objections to the requirements contained in the draft should be filed in accordance with procedures outlined in the cover letter. By copy of this letter, I am requesting that our Technical Services Group correct the sub -basin printout to show that Shelby's limitations are water based. Sincerely, James R. Reid Environmental Chemist JRR:ls Enclosure xc: Gene Bracket Robert S. kidney Meg Kerr (/ uwuuwx11441111.1w ,ww..hi•44.a 44.1.1i a.. •..► IA 0 8 c Facility Name: Existing Proposed Q 77110 N-et NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION rStit(L y wwrF '!iy Permit No.: MdOOZ-4538 Pipe No.: CO 6 P7.. Date: /2/FJ 1P�l County: 1flitfern ct Design Capacity (MGD): (o.O Industrial (% of Flow): Domestic (% of Flow): Receiving Stream: i-(10k(Xl,j � Oteet G. Class: Sub -Basin: �'?.3 -o8 - O¢ Reference USGS Quad• (Please attach) Requestor: (Guideline limitations, if applicable, are to be listed on the back of this form.) .S. A& (- AleXj7 Regional Office ('01 ,/ Design Temp.: 7Q10: I D� Drainage Area: l a rn Avg. Streamflow: • a in , Z Ci Winter 7Q10: I C TJ 30Q2• Ci 0 1 Location of D.O.minimum m les below outfall): 0 I�- Slope.. R cu as ' (I Velocity (fps). ..� Kl (base e, per day, 20o C) : �• St K2 (base e, per day, 20°C) : 1 �� 0 c.� 0 N i Effluent Characteristics Monthly Average Comments .P(0 LOlKhrrn, I - r Original Allocation Revised Allocation )1ti1Itit7,M co) Gm.,� Effluent Characteristics Monthly Average Comments Date(s) of Revision(s) (Please attach previous allocation) Prepared By: Reviewed By: ,27/C Date: REQUEST NO. 264 ********************* WASTELOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL FORM ********************* FACILITY NAME TYPE OF WASTE COUNTY REGIONAL OFFICE RECEIVING STREAM 7010 : 3.4 CFS DRAINAGE AREA SHELBY WWTP DOMESTIC CLEVELAND ASHEVILLE HICKORY CREEK W7010 : 6.1 19.00 SQ.MI. CFS REQUESTOR : S. ABDUL-HAQQ SUBBASIN : 030804 3002 :9.2 CFS STREAM CLASS :'C' ************************ RECOMMENDED EFFLUENT LIMITS ************************ WASTEFLOW(S) B0D-5 NH3-N D.O. PH FECAL COLIFORM TSS (MGD) (MG/L) : (MG/L) : (MG/L) (SU) (/100ML): (MG/L) 6.0 THIS IS A REVISION TO PREVIOUS 30 ALLOCATION WHICH HAD THE DIS- CHARGE GOING DIRECTLY INTO 4 THE FIRST BROAD RIVER. 6-9 1000 30 ******************************************************************************** FACILITY IS : PROPOSED ( ) EXISTING ( ,) NEW ( ) LIMITS ARE : REVISION (,/) CONFIRMATION ( ) OF THOSE PREVIOUSLY ISSUED REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED BY: MODELER HEAD,TECHNICAL SERVICES BRANCH REGIONAL SUPERVISOR. PERMITS MANAGER APPROVED BY : DIVISION DIRECTOR �-'i-tc-an/440A- 4.)!._(.;? DATE :_� _ __DATE : �'- : eel, a_ DATE DATE