820076_Complinace Inspection Routine_20210210

Facility Number
A.
glmS al�ald
Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit:
Reason for Visit:
Date of Visit:
Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Farm Name: rn ? rn
1
Arrival Time:
Departure Time:
Owner Name: JOSf mathi�
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
09
Owner Email:
Phone:
County:
Region:
J�! mathu5
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
dal mks
o ))
Title:
7/
Latitude:
Integrator:
Phone:
r-etaq e
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
i7SL01
Swine
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
JO
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
Dry Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Cattle
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: E Structure 0 Application Field 0 Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system'? (If yes, notify DWR) 0 Yes EV No 0 NA 0 NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? n Yes No 0 NA 0 NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters 0 Yes No 0 NA 0 NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
0 Yes No 0 NA NE
0 Yes No 0 NA ONE
0 Yes No 0 NA 0 NE
Page 1 of3
2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: Ppg\, - ' 1 Y
Date of Inspection: apo ai
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes NkNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
n Failure to complete annual sludge survey n Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 1No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes\N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? n Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
n Application Field n Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ YesN No 0 NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes,i91 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
ie
ol
Phone:
Date:a Iv/ii
2/4/2015

Facility Number: ga
Date of Inspection: gi to -1
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
n Y• es larNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
n Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes tSil No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes `4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes IN No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes isRNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
II. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding n Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
n PAN n PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): / ®�"� d � l rn ov�giul (o UVhea4
13. Soil Type(s): 11V) No ft) WM ' 1'
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes NI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 0 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable n Y• es No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 1\11-1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No 0 NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes IN No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check n Yes QNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP Checklists n Design n Maps ❑ Lease Agreements nOther:
❑ Yes NNo ❑NA ❑NE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No I] NA ❑ NE
1-1WasteApplication 1-1WeeklyFreeboard ❑ Waste Analysis n Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Trans Nrs ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections n Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes INNo n NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Y• es ,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued