NC0003719_WWTP Update_20040514

[Fwd: Monsanto/ DAK Resins]
Subject:1[Fwd: Monsanto/ D AK Resins].
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 15:29:02 -0400
From: Grady Dobson <[e-mail]>
To: Belinda Henson <[e-mail]>
Subject: Monsanto/ DAK Resins
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 14:03:28 -0400
From: Susan Wilson <[e-mail]>
To: Paul Rawls <[e-mail]>
CC: Grady Dobson <[e-mail]>, Dave Goodrich <[e-mail]>,
Mark Mcintire <[e-mail]>
I spoke with Penny Mahoney of DAK. From what she was telling me, they
already have (or will have) wastewater going to PWC. They want, to do
the name/ownership change then get a permit to discharge NCCW directly
to the river (because PWC doesn't want the NCCW). She's under the
impression that they can maintain the permit •as -is. They want to keep
discharging to PWC but eventually go back to their own permitted
discharge. Essentially, they want to hold the discharge permit for.
future use.
From my read of the permit, I thought they needed to do all the
stipulations of the condition A(5) upon purchase - which includes
justification of the flow, telling us what they are going to do, doing
an EAA, etc. She thinks that's only the case if they expand (so I think
she thinks if they operate at 0.5 MGD - which is what Monsanto was at
after closure - that they would not need to do anything but the
name/ownership change and apply for the NCCW permit via a general permit)
anyway - just an FYI and I'll try and get it straightened out.
1 of 1 6/23/2004 11:39 AM