WI0300065_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2018 (2)

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
October 7, 2011
David Patten
Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
110 Franklin Rd. SE., Box 13
Roanoke, VA 24042
Subject: Final Project Evaluation and Status of 51 Injection Well Permit W10300065
Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
Gaston County
Dear Mr. Patten:
i ; +,
Dee Freeman
Secretary
' r d
nki'`I
il
#'\i OCT 112011 iL'j
If
. ENR M;
On January 11, 2008, the Aquifer Protection Section issued a 51 groundwater remediation permit to Norfolk Southern
Railway Co. for the Virginia Avenue Auto and Wrecker facility located at 201 W. Virginia Ave., Bessemer City, Gaston
County, NC 28016. The expiration date for the permit was January 31, 2010. Per permit condition requirements, a Final
Project Evaluation (FPE) was to be submitted after completing all injection activity. A review of our files indicates that
the last information received for this injection project was the Groundwater Monitoring Report, which was received
March 15, 2010.
Although a FPE has not been submitted, it appears the above referenced report received March 15, 2010, fulfills much of
the required information. Staff from the Mooresville Regional Office has confirmed that there are no outstanding
reporting, compliance, or enforcement issues associated with your permit. Any other compliance monitoring or
reporting requirements of any other regulatory programs shall continue as needed.
Please be advised this permit is expired and no further injection activities are permitted. If you wish to conduct future
injection operations' you must first apply for and receive a new injection well permit. Operating an injection well
without a valid permit could result in a civil penalty of up to $25,000 per day. Please contact Michael Rogers at 919-715-
6166 or Debra Watts at 919-715-6699 if you have any questions.
Best Regards,
Michael Rogers, P.G. (NC & FL)
Environmental Specialist
cc: Andrew Pitner, Moo-resville Regional Office,
Tim Grant, PG, Marshall Miller and Associates, 5900 Triangle Dr., Raleigh, NC 27617
WI0300065 Permit File
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard, Raleigh. North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] \ FAX 1: 919-715-0588; FAX 2: 919-715-6048 \ Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwateroualit\.oro
One
NorthCarolma
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Acton Employer

Mission, KS • [phone]
Lexington, KY • [phone]
Bossier City, LA • [phone]
Raleigh, NC • [phone]
Camp Hill, PA • [phone]
March 11, 2010
www.mmai:com
5700 Broadmoor, Mission, KS 66202
Mr. Brad Newton
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Kingsport, TN • [phone]
Ashland, VA • [phone]
Bluefield, VA • [phone]
Beckley, WV • [phone]
Charleston, WV • [phone]
Re: Norfolk Southern Railway Company — Virginia Ave. Auto & Wrecker
Pollution Incident No.: 19216
Norfolk Southern File No. 1-9-NC-BSMR-UT98.133-002
MM&A Project No. NS1411
Dear Mr. Newton:
E -EpdIE
L U � MAR 2 9 1010
NC DENR MRO
D' 'fl-A•uifer Protection
Marshall Miller & Associates, Inc. (MM&A), on behalf of Norfolk Southern Railway Company
(NSRC), is pleased to submit the enclosed ground water monitoring report for the January 2010
semi-annual sampling event at the former underground storage tank (UST) site at Virginia Ave.
Auto & Wrecker, 201 W. Virginia Avenue, Bessemer City, Gaston County, North Carolina (Site).
If you have any questions or need additional information, please don't hesitate to call us at (913)
648-4424.
Sincerely,
MARSHALL MILLER & ASSOCIATES, INC.
ailey, P.G.
Bran nager
Enclosure
cc: Ms. Georgia Lewis, NSRC
Mr. Jesse Wiseman, NCDENR-DWQ
Mr. Qu Qi, NCDENR-DWQ UIC
MM&A File: NS1411
RECEIVED / DENR /DWQ
AQUIFFR'PROTFCTION SECTION
MAR 15 2010_
ENERGY & MINERAL RESOURCES • CIVIL & STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES • HYDROGEOLOGY & GEOLOGY
EMERGENCY RESPONSE • EXPERT WITNESS TESTIMONY • MINING ENGINEERING • GEOPHYSICAL LOGGING SERVICES • PETROLEUM ENGINEERING

MAR 2 9 2010 LI:9
NC DENR MRO
DWQ -Aquifer Protection
GROUND WATER MONITORING REPORT
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Virginia Avenue Auto & Wrecker
201 W. Virginia Avenue
Bessemer City, Gaston County, North Carolina
Pollution Incident #19216
Intermediate Risk Classification
Latitude: 35° 17' 5" North
Longitude: 81° 17' 2" West
March 2010
Prepared For:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Ms. Georgia Lewis
1200 Peachtree Street, NE, Box 13
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
Norfolk Southern File No. 1-9-NC-BSMR-UT98.133-002
Prepared By:
MARSHALL MILLER & ASSOCIATES, INC.
5700 Broadmoor
Mission, Kansas 66202
[phone]
Prepared by:
Mat r ew J. Smith
Staff Scientist
MM&A Project No. NS1411
Reviewed by:
v.vp Ap_w.
,iii...6,10.31if..
1`a�—
�;,� : .: alley:
Manager it
RECEIVED 1 DENR 1 DWQ
Aft' ncro.oRc1TFCTION SECTION
MMMHft 15. Z010
778

Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Ground Water Monitoring Report
March 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
2.0 SITE HISTORY 1
3.0 GROUND WATER MONITORING ACTIVITIES AND RESULTS 5
3.1 GROUND WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS 6
4.0 DISCUSSION OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS 7
5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8
FIGURES
Figure 1 — Vicinity Map
Figure 2 — Site Map
Figure 3 — Ground Water Contour Map
Figure 4 — Benzene Isoconcentration Map
Figure 5 — Toluene Isoconcentration Map
Figure 6 — Ethylbenzene Isoconcentration Map
Figure 7 — Total Xylenes Isoconcentration Map
Figure 8 — Naphthalene Isoconcentration Map
TABLES
Table 1— Ground Water Elevation and Field Measurement Data
Table 2 — Ground Water Analytical Results
Table 3 — Injection Permit Analytical Results
APPENDIX A
Ground Water Sampling Forms
APPENDIX B
Laboratory Analytical Data Sheets

Site:
Report Submittal Date:
Site Risk Classification:
Reason for Risk Classification:
Land Use Category:
Owner of Former USTs:
Current Property Owner:
Consultant:
Release Information Sources:
Date of Discovery:
Quantity of Release:
Cause of Release:
Latitude/Longitude of Release:
Virginia Avenue Auto & Wrecker
201 W. Virginia Ave.
Bessemer City, North Carolina
Gaston County
Pollution Incident # 19216
March 11, 2010
Intermediate
Ground water impacted by gasoline constituents from
former underground storage tanks (USTs) above North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (NCDENR) Ground Water Standards (GWS)
and Gross Contamination Levels (GCLs).
Industrial/Commercial
Patterson Oil Company
c/o Mr. John Cheshire
2714 Seabrook Island Road
Johns Island, South Carolina 29455-6019
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
1200 Peachtree, N.E., Box 13
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
Contact: Ms. Georgia Lewis
Phone: [phone]
Marshall Miller & Associates, Inc.
5700 Broadmoor, Suite 504
Mission, Kansas 66202
Contact: Ms. Suzanne E. Bailey, P.G.
Phone: [phone]
Two, 2,000-gallon gasoline USTs
One, 1,000-gallon gasoline UST
Two, 500-gallon gasoline USTs
One, 500-gallon kerosene UST
September 1998 and January 1999 during UST removal
activities.
Unknown
Suspected historical overfill, spillage, or leaking
35° 17' 5" North; 81° 17' 2" West
Signature of Consultant's Licensed Geologist:
Suzanne E. Bailey, NC LG # 177
Bessemer City Report 02/10

Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Ground Water Monitoring Report
March 2010
1.0 INTRODUCTION
On behalf of Norfolk Southern Railway Company (NSRC), Marshall Miller & Associates,
Inc. (MM&A) has prepared this Ground Water Monitoring Report to document results of
the January 2010 semi-annual ground water sampling event at the NSRC property known
as Virginia Avenue Auto & Wrecker, located at 201 W. Virginia Avenue, Bessemer City,
Gaston County, North Carolina (hereafter referred to as the Site). This sampling event is
the ninth semi-annual monitoring event following application of Oxygen Release
Compound® (ORC); and the third semi-annual monitoring event following application of
Regenesis brand Regenox® at the Site to aid in natural attenuation of petroleum
hydrocarbons in the ground water. The Site location and vicinity are illustrated on Figure
1. A map of the Site is depicted on Figure 2.
2.0 SITE HISTORY
Five gasoline underground storage tanks (USTs) and one kerosene UST were originally
located at the Site. These USTs were removed in September 1998 and January 1999 by
Earth Tech, Inc. (Earth Tech). Earth Tech removed approximately 277 tons of petroleum
hydrocarbon impacted soil associated with the USTs. The excavation pits were backfilled
with clean material. Confirmation soil samples indicated the presence of gasoline -range
petroleum hydrocarbons above the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (NCDENR) soil to ground water maximum contaminant levels (MCLs).
Burns & McDonnell Consultants, Inc. (Burns & McDonnell) conducted Phase I and Phase
II Site Assessment activities in 1999, which included installation of five monitoring wells
(MW-1 through MW-5) and collection of soil and ground water samples. Burns &
McDonnell submitted a Phase II Limited Site Assessment (LSA) report to NCDENR in
January 2000. The Phase II LSA report indicated that soil and ground water at the Site are
impacted with benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes (BTEX), and naphthalene at levels
exceeding the NCDENR soil to ground water MCLs and Ground Water Standards (GWS).
Benzene was also detected in ground water from MW-2 above the NCDENR Gross
Contamination Level (GCL) of 5000 micrograms per liter (µg/1). Based on the Phase II
LSA report, NCDENR classified the Site as an intermediate risk and mandated that NSRC
Bessemer City Report 02/10
1
kkIJki \►

Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Ground Water Monitoring Report
March 2010
conduct a Comprehensive Site Assessment (CSA) to evaluate the extent of impacted media
at the Site. Burns & McDonnell conducted CSA activities in March 2000 and submitted
the CSA report to NCDENR in May 2000. Owners of properties adjacent to the Site did
not allow NSRC access for the CSA investigation. In addition, utilities along 13th Street
and W. Virginia Avenue and the railroad embankment and trestle prohibited advancement
of any soil borings or installation of monitoring wells beyond the Site boundaries. In
March 2000, Burns & McDonnell advanced nine direct -push soil borings along the
( perimeter of the Site to obtain subsurface soil samples for laboratory analysis. Burns &
_J
McDonnell also collected ground water samples from the five Site monitoring wells. CSA
soil sample results indicated the presence of BTEX compounds and volatile petroleum
hydrocarbons (VPH) above the NCDENR soil to ground water MCLs. Ground water
samples confirmed the presence of BTEX and VPH in ground water at levels exceeding the
NCDENR GWS and GCLs.
Burns & McDonnell submitted a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) to NCDENR in October
2000 recommending ground water monitoring to evaluate natural attenuation. Prior to
approving the CAP, NCDENR requested installation of two monitoring wells south of the
railroad trestle, downgradient from the Site to further evaluate the extent of impacted
ground water. Burns & McDonnell confirmed that this area was NSRC's property,
installed two monitoring wells (MW-6 and MW-7) in January 2001, and submitted a
summary report to NCDENR in June 2001. Analytical results for soil samples were below
laboratory detection limits for volatile organic compounds (VOCs), VPH, and extractable
petroleum hydrocarbons (EPH). Ground water analytical results were below laboratory
detection limits for VOCs, VPH, and EPH; however, total lead was detected in both
ground water samples and exceeded the NCDENR GWS in the sample from Monitoring
Well MW-6. Based on the results from the newly installed monitoring wells, NCDENR
approved the CAP in a letter dated July 17, 2001.
NCDENR required quarterly monitoring for the first year, followed by semi-annual
monitoring in subsequent years. Burns & McDonnell conducted four quarterly ground
Bessemer City Report 02/10
2

[ Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Ground Water Monitoring Report
March 2010
water monitoring events at the Site between August 2001 and June 2002. NCDENR
approved the following methods for ground water analysis at the Site:
• Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), including isopropyl ether (IPE), methyl tertiary
butyl ether (MTBE), and ethyl dibromide (EDB) using United States Environmental
Protection Agency (USEPA) Method 8260; and
• Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) using USEPA Method 8270.
Burns & McDonnell submitted quarterly monitoring reports to NCDENR following each
quarterly monitoring event. Burns & McDonnell performed the first semi-annual
monitoring event in June 2002.
In November 2002, NSRC contracted MM&A to continue semi-annual ground water
monitoring at the Site, in accordance with the approved CAP. MM&A conducted the
second semi-annual ground water monitoring event at the Site on November 26, 2002, the
third event on May 14, 2003, and the fourth event on November 10, 2003. Following the
November 2003 event, MM&A submitted a monitoring report with recommendations for
enhancement of natural attenuation using ORC® in MW-2 and MW-4. Prior to
implementing this corrective action, an injection permit was required from NCDENR
Division of Water Quality (DWQ). The permit application was submitted August 25, 2004
and supplemental information was submitted November 1, 2004. NCDENR DWQ
approved the permit in a letter dated December 7, 2004. The first ORC® socks were
installed in January 2005. The second set of ORC® socks were installed and monitoring
wells sampled on June 14, 2005. MM&A sampled the wells and installed the third set of
ORC® socks on December 13, 2005. MM&A removed the ORC® socks from MW-2 and
MW-4 after the June 2006 sampling event and the monitoring wells were allowed to
equilibrate. The January and August 2007 sampling events established ground water
quality post treatment with ORC® socks.
In an attempt to effectively and permanently lower benzene levels in the ground water
below the GCL (5000 µg/L), MM&A obtained an injection permit (Injection Well Permit
Bessemer City Report 02/10
3

Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Ground Water Monitoring Report
March 2010
WI0300065) for injecting Regenesis brand RegenOx® and ORCAdvanced® via direct -push
technology. As a condition of the permit, MM&A installed a monitoring well (MW-8)
downgradient from monitoring well MW-2. The injection permit also required baseline
ground water sampling for historical parameters (VOC, PAH, BOD and COD) and
additional analytes (RCRA Metals, Sulfates, Total Na, Fe and dissolved Fe). This baseline
sampling was combined with the April 2008 semi-annual sampling event for the Site.
On August 11-14, 2008, September 10-12, 2008, and September 14-18, 2009 MM&A
personnel conducted three of four injection events with Regenesis brand Regenox® and
ORCAdvanced® at the site via direct push technology, as approved in (injection Well
Permit WI0300065). Approximately 1,890 gallons of Regenesis brand Regenox® was
injected at 9 different injection wells in the immediate vicinity of MW-2 during the August
and September 2008 events. Each injection well was advanced to a depth of 21 feet below
surface grade (bgs), and injection took place at one foot intervals beginning at 21 feet (bgs)
and ending at 9 feet (bgs). During the September 2009 event, approximately 1,419 gallons
of Regenesis brand Regenox® was injected at 9 different injection wells in the immediate
vicinity of MW-2. Each injection well was advanced to a depth of 24 feet (bgs), and
injection took place at one foot intervals beginning at 24 feet (bgs) and ending at 12 feet
(bgs). Following the three injection events, each well was properly abandoned by a North
Carolina Certified Well Contractor. Injection event records summarizing the three
injection events were then submitted to NCDNR, DWQ, Underground Injection Control on
October 3, 2008, and September 30, 2009. On December 22 & 23, 2008 MM&A
personnel conducted the twelfth semi-annual ground water sampling event at the Site. The
results of which were used to establish post treatment ground water conditions following
the second injection of Regenesis brand Regenox®. In accordance with the approved CAP,
on July 15 & 16, 2009 MM&A personnel conducted the thirteenth semi-annual ground
water sampling event at the Site.
MM&A personnel mobilized to the Site on January 5 & 6, 2010 for the purpose of semi-
annual ground water sampling in order to further evaluate post treatment groundwater
Bessemer City Report 02/10
4

Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Ground Water Monitoring Report
March 2010
conditions following the third injection of Regenesis brand Regenox . This event is
summarized in the remainder of this report.
3.0 GROUND WATER MONITORING ACTIVITIES AND RESULTS
MM&A personnel mobilized to the Site on January 5 & 6, 2010 to conduct fluid level
measurements and to collect ground water samples for VOC, PAH, RCRA Metals,
Sulfates, Total Na, Fe, and dissolved Fe (field filtered) analysis.
MM&A measured fluid levels in MW-1 through MW-8 using an electronic water level
meter. Ground water measurements and elevations are summarized in Table 1. Figure 3
illustrates ground water elevation contours for the January 2010 data. The January 2010
data indicate ground water was flowing generally to the southeast, which is consistent with
historical ground water flow.
MM&A collected ground water samples from MW-1 through MW-8 on January 5 & 6,
2010. Less than 2 feet of water was measured in MW-7 and as a result, it could not be
sampled for PAHs. Samples were collected with a peristaltic pump using low flow
sampling methods. Temperature, pH, specific conductivity, dissolved oxygen (DO),
oxidation-reduction potential (ORP), and turbidity were periodically measured during
purging activities and recorded on the field sampling logs. Field logs for the January 5 &
6, 2010 sampling event are presented in Appendix A. Table 1 includes a summary of the
final field parameter readings prior to sampling.
Quality control samples consisted of one duplicate sample (MW-22, duplicate sample of
MW-2) analyzed for the same parameters as the original sample and a trip blank analyzed
for VOCs. Ground water samples were packed on ice and shipped under proper chain -of -
custody procedures to Test America Laboratories, in Savannah, Georgia for laboratory
analyses of VOCs with IPE, MTBE, and EDB using USEPA Method 8260 and PAHs
using USEPA Method 8270C Low Level under the State of North Carolina Lab
Certification No. 269. Additional parameters including RCRA Metals, Sulfates, Total Na,
Bessemer City Report 02/10
5
►► L1►►J.i'13

Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Ground Water Monitoring Report
March 2010
Fe, and dissolved Fe (field filtered) were included to satisfy the requirements of the
NCDENR DWQ Injection Well Permit.
3.1 GROUND WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Ground water analytical results for January 5 & 6, 2010 were compared to the NCDENR
GWS and GCLs. Analytical results for VOCs that exceeded the NCDENR GWS include
benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, total xylenes, isopropylether (IPE), methyl tertiary butyl
ether (MTBE), 1,2-dibromoethane and acetone.
Analytical results for benzene exceeded the NCDENR GWS in MW-1 through MW-5,
MW-7, and MW-8 at detections ranging from ND (1.2) to 25000 µg/1. The benzene
concentrations detected in the ground water samples from MW-2 (11000 µg/1) and MW-8
(25000 µg/1) also exceeded the NCDENR GCL for benzene (5000 µg/1). Additionally, the
analyte 1,2-dibromoethane was detected at MW-8 at a concentration of (340 µg/1)
exceeding the NCDENR GCL of (50 µg/1).
Analytical results for toluene exceeded the NCDENR GWS (600 µg/1) in MW-2 through
MW-5 and MW-8 at detections ranging from 2800 to 38000 µg/1. Analytical results for
ethylbenzene exceeded the NCDENR GWS (600 µg/1) in MW2 through MW5 and MW8
at detections ranging from 1000 to 2500 µg/1. Analytical results for total xylenes exceeded
the NCDENR GWS (500 µg/1) in MW-1 through MW-5 and MW-8 at detections ranging
from 950 to 21,000 µg/1.
IPE was detected in MW-2, MW-3, MW-5 and MW-8 at 1600 µg/1, 140 µg/l, 320 µg/1 and
6400 µg/1, respectively. This exceeded the NCDENR GWS for IPE of 70 µg/l. MTBE
detections at MW-2 (1500 µg/1), MW-3 (200 µg/1), MW-5 (380 µg/1), and MW-8 (5300
µg/1) exceeded the NCDENR GWS of 20 µg/1. Acetone was detected at MW-2 (1000
µg/1) and MW-8 (ND 1000 µg/1) exceeding the NCDENR GWS of (600 µg/1). Acetone is
a common laboratory contaminant and the most likely cause of the high concentrations.
Bessemer City Report 02/10
6
•„1a SOCI. ES

Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Ground Water Monitoring Report
March 2010
The PAH naphthalene exceeded the NCDENR GWS (6 µg/1) in ground water from MW-1
through MW-5 and MW-8 with detections ranging from 48 to 750 µg/1. In addition,
concentrations of 2-methylnaphthalene exceeded the NCDENR GWS (30 µg/1) in MW-1,
MW-2, MW-4, MW-5 and MW-8 with concentrations ranging from 47 to 150
Results from the duplicate sample (MW-22) were consistent with the original sample
results for MW-2.
Table 2 summarizes ground water analytical results obtained to date for the Site. Table 3
summarizes the ground water analytical results for January 5 & 6, 2010 including analytes
required by the injection well permit (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead,
selenium, silver, mercury, total sodium and iron, dissolved iron, and sulfates). Copies of
the laboratory analytical data sheets for January 5 & 6, 2010 are included in Appendix B.
4.0 DISCUSSION OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
BTEX, MTBE, IPE, naphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene and 1,2-dibromoethane continue to
be the compounds detected in ground water at levels exceeding the NCDENR GWS.
Benzene levels at MW-2 and MW-8 are above the NCDENR GCL of 5000 µg/1.
1,2-dibromoethane at MW8 is above the NCDENR GCL of 50 µg/1. Some concentrations
exceeded the calibration range of the instrument and required sample dilution, resulting in
some detection limits exceeding the GWS or estimation of results.
Historically, the BTEX ground water plume has been observed mostly in the vicinity of
wells MW-2, MW-4, and MW-5. However, analytical results from the recently installed
well MW-8 indicate that the BTEX ground water plume extends in a southeast direction,
Table 2. Figures 4 through 8 illustrate isoconcentration contours for benzene, toluene,
ethylbenzene, total xylenes, and naphthalene, respectively. Data obtained to date indicate
that the petroleum hydrocarbon plume appears to be located within the Site boundaries and
extends southeast in the direction of ground water flow.
Bessemer City Report 02/10
7

Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Ground Water Monitoring Report
March 2010
MM&A compared the January 2010 ground water analytical results from MW-1 through
MW-8 to the previous post injection data (July 2009) and noted that BTEX concentrations
showed a slight increase in all monitoring wells sampled. MW-8 continues to show the
highest concentration of benzene recorded to date at the Site. Past drought conditions have
caused historic low ground water elevations at MW-1 through MW-7. Results for benzene
at MW-3 remained at a historic low in December 2008. In January 2007, benzene levels in
wells MW-2 and MW-4 dropped significantly following ORC application in 2005 and
2006. While the benzene levels remained at low levels at well MW-4 during August 2007,
a rebound effect was observed in MW-2. Large rebound responses are characteristically
observed in wells located close to the soil impact. During the April 2008 monitoring event
benzene levels decreased in well MW-2 while increasing in MW-4. Analytical results for
the December 2008 monitoring event showed benzene levels remained consistent with this
trend. This is likely due to the historically low ground water elevations at the Site causing
a lack of contact between the ground water and a smear zone of impacted soil near MW-2.
During the January 2010 sampling event groundwater elevations increased by
approximately 6-7 feet in MW-1 through MW-8 from the December 2008 elevations. This
large increase in groundwater elevation is likely causing increased contact between the
smear zone of impacted soil and groundwater accounting for the elevated BTEX
concentrations in MW-1 through MW-8.
5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
ORC® socks applied to monitoring wells MW-2 and MW-4 improved aerobic conditions
from January 2005 through June 2006. Higher ground water elevations in June 2006
compared to December 2005 may have allowed ground water to contact a smear zone of
impact, which could account for higher concentrations of target analytes. Lower ground
water elevations in April 2008 compared to August 2007 may have continued to prevent
contact between a zone of impacted soil and ground water accounting for the relatively
consistent analytical data between the two monitoring events. Aerobic conditions
improved at the Site following injection of Regenesis brand Regenox® in August and
September, 2008 accounting for generally lower levels of target analytes in MW-1 through
MW-5. However, MW-8 showed a slight increase of target analytes. The high
Bessemer City Report 02/10
„
8
• �t

Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Ground Water Monitoring Report
March 2010
concentrations measured at MW-8 may indicate extension of the BTEX plume in a
southeast direction. The elevated concentrations of BTEX coupled with the sharp increase
in groundwater elevations measured at MW-1 through MW-8 during the January 2010
event points toward increased contact between groundwater and a zone of impacted soil.
MM&A has been issued an injection permit by NCDENR DWQ (injection Well Permit
WI0300065) authorizing 4 separate injection events of Regenesis brand Regenox® and
ORCAdvanced® via direct push technology, followed by semi-annual sampling. To date
MM&A has conducted 3 injection events of Regenesis brand Regenox® at numerous
points around MW-2. Post injection analyses indicate an overall improvement in aerobic
conditions at the Site. MM&A will conduct a final round of Regenesis brand Regenox®
injections via direct push technology to further enhance the aerobic conditions of the
aquifer and degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons. Injection will take place in the Spring
of 2010.
The next scheduled sampling event is in July 2010. After evaluation of the July 2010
sampling, MM&A will further assess the efficiency of the Regenesis brand Regenox® and
ORCAdvanced® injections and the potential need of expansion of the injection program to
include areas near well MW-8. In order to evaluate long term efficiency of the injections,
MM&A recommends continued ground water sampling to be conducted on a semi-annual
basis.
Bessemer City Report 02/10
9
►•
,:'s�il�'L1► ►Ji13i�

FIGURES
ME.1:1-12A1:111.11

NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY - BESSEMER CITY
SOUTHEAST SECTION OF USGS 7.5' BESSEMER CITY, N.C. QUADRANGLE BESSEMER CITY AD
Prepared by:
HALL 6 , LLE
IIIINLI
NS1411 02/2010
SOURCE:
- North Carolina Department of Transportation
LiDAR Data. 2007
- United Slates Geological Survey
7.5' Quadrangle -
Besscmer City. NC 1973
2,000
0 2,000'
SCALE 1: 24,000
VICINITY MAP
FIGURE 1
NORTH CAROLINA
QUADRANGLE LOCATION

VIRGUVIAAVF
50
MW-7
PENNSYLVANIAAVE.
0
VIRGINIA
AVENUE
AUTO
RAILROAD
BRIDGE
9MW-6
50'
NOTE: The location and dimensions of features shown on this map have
been derived from various sources and supplemented by field
measurements. Though sufficient for its intended purpose, no
claim is made as to the degree of accuracy of this drawing.
STORM
SEWER
MW-1
4
MW-2
9
MW-4
•MW-5
h MWJ-3
I u,
MW-8
s
r
LEGEND
9 MONITORING WELL
FIGURE 2
SITE MAP
JANUARY 2010
itiSNORFOLK
SOUTHERN
201 W. VIRGINIA AVENUE
BESSEMER CITY, NC
DATE:
FEB.2010
SCALE:
1 "
= 50 '
DESIGNED:
MS
DRAWN:
JAH
Prepared by: 1.
FILENAME.MXD

VIERGINM Ave
50
879
878
MW-7
877.53
VIRGINIA
AVENUE
AUTO
FIBER OPTIC CABL
g80
PENNSYLVANIAAVE.
0
RAILROAD
BRIDGE
MW-6
876,99
50'
NOTE: The location and dimensions of features shown on this map have
been derived from various sources and supplemented by field
measurements. Though sufficient for its intended purpose, no
claim is made as to the degree of accuracy of this drawing.
STORM
SEWER
9- MW-1
882.08
880.14
880.28
MW-5
880.06
MW-3
879.27
� I
MW-8
878.07
LEGEND
MW-1
MONITORING WELL
890
GROUNDWATER CONTOUR
APPROXIMATE GROUNDWATER
FLOW DIRECTION
FIGURE 3
GROUNDWATER CONTOUR MAP
JANUARY 2010
NORFOLK
SOUTHERN
201 W. VIRGINIA AVENUE
BESSEMER CITY, NC
DATE:
FEB.2010
SCALE:
1 "
= 50 '
DESIGNED:
MS
DRAWN:
JAH
Prepared by.'
Groundwater Contour.MXD

50
VIRGINIA
AVENUE
AUTO
FIBER OPTIC CABLE
/ .AL MW-7
20
PENNSYLVANIAAVE.
RAILROAD
BRIDGE
MW-6
0,37
o so.
NOTE: The location and dimensions of features shown on this map have
been derived from various sources and supplemented by field
measurements. Though sufficient for its intended purpose, no
claim is made as to the degree of accuracy of this drawing.
STORM
SEWER
MW
/ ND (1.2) MW-5
300
//� II
1 /M 0 3
/ MW-2 \
1 11,000* \
I \ M/4
\ 1,,800 MW-8
soo 25,000*
w
cr
o
LEGEND
MW-1
9 MONITORING WELL
5,000- BENZENE ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR
INTERPRETED EXTENT OF BENZENE ABOVE
NCDENR GROUNDWATER STANDARD
EXCEEDS NCDENR GROSS CONTAMINATION
LEVEL
ND NOT DETECTED
NOTES:
1. GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED
JANUARY 5 AND 6, 2010.
2. ALL RESULS IN MICROGRAMS PER LITER (pg/L)
3. NCDENR GROUNDWATER STANDARD FOR
BENZENE = 1 pg/L
FIGURE 4
BENZENE ISOCONCENTRATION MAP
JANUARY 2010
NsNORFOLK
SOUTHERN
201 W. VIRGINIA AVENUE
BESSEMER CITY, NC
DATE:
FEB.2010
SCALE:
1
"=50'
DESIGNED:
MS
DRAWN:
JAH
Prepared by.'
BENZENE MAP.MXD

V/Ro.
GIN1AAVE
50
VIRGINIA
AVENUE
AUTO
FIBER OPTIC CABLE
9 MW-7
76
PENNSYLVANIAAVE.
RAILROAD
BRIDGE
MW-6
1.4
o so.
NOTE: The location and dimensions of features shown on this map have
been derived from various sources and supplemented by field
measurements. Though sufficient for its intended purpose, no
claim is made as to the degree of accuracy of this drawing.
STORM
SEWER
MW1 =�
5.5 MW-5
3;100
I )
• MW-3
MW-2 Y 2,800
33,000
MW4 rr
24,000 MW-8 i
/ 38,000
20,o
1000
LEGEND
MW-1
MONITORING WELL
20,o0o TOLUENE ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR
INTERPRETED EXTENT OF TOLUENE ABOVE
NCDENR GROUNDWATER STANDARD
NOTES:
1. GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED
JANUARY 5 AND 6, 2010.
2. ALL RESULS IN MICROGRAMS PER LITER (Ng/L)
3. NCDENR GROUNDWATER STANDARD FOR
TOLUENE= 1,000 pg/L
FIGURE 5
TOLUENE ISOCONCENTRATION MAP
JANUARY 2010
NsNORFOLK
SOUTHERN
201 W. VIRGINIA AVENUE
BESSEMER CITY, NC
DATE:
FEB.2010
SCALE:
1
"=50'
DESIGNED:
MS
DRAWN:
JAH
Prepared by.
13. 1 `1i1.ii
TOLUENE MAP.MXD

50
VIRGIIWAAVE
' VIRGINIA
AVENUE
AUTO
STORM
_SEWER
MW-1
/-9.4'---_ MW-5
1,000
9
MW-3
MW-2 1,100
2,100
MW-8
2,500
FIBER OPTIC CABLE 1,000 -/
9M8-7
PENNSYLVANIAAVE.
MW-4
2,100
550 — —
RAILROAD
BRIDGE
MW-6
qr 0.17
0 50'
NOTE: The location and dimensions of features shown on this map have
been derived from various sources and supplemented by field
measurements. Though sufficient for its intended purpose, no
claim is made as to the degree of accuracy of this drawing.
Cr
LEGEND
MW-1
9 MONITORING WELL
•
1,000 ETHYLBENZENE ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR
INTERPRETED EXTENT OF ETHYLBENZENE
ABOVE NCDENR GROUNDWATER STANDARD
NOTES:
1. GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED
JANUARY 5 AND 6, 2010.
2. ALL RESULS IN MICROGRAMS PER LITER (pg/L)
3. NCDENR GROUNDWATER STANDARD FOR
ETHYLBENZENE = 550 pg/L
FIGURE 6
ETHYLBENZENE ISOCONCENTRATION MAP
JANUARY 2010
AISNORFOLK
SOUTHERN
201 W. VIRGINIA AVENUE
BESSEMER CITY, NC
DATE:
FEB.2010
SCALE:
1"=50'
DESIGNED:
MS
DRAWN:
JAH
Prepared by:
ETHYLBENZENE MAP.MXD

50
— — — — VU2GIA/IgAVE.
VIRGINIA
AVENUE
AUTO
FIBER OPTIC CABLE
MW-7
59
PENNSYLVANIAAVE.
RAILROAD
BRIDGE
MW-6
1.2
0 50'
NOTE: The location and dimensions of features shown on this map have
been derived from various sources and supplemented by field
measurements. Though sufficient for its intended purpose, no
claim is made as to the degree of accuracy of this drawing.
STORM
SEWER
MW 1--�`\
/950 MW-5
/ 11:000
I/
MW-3
MW-2
5,000
21,000 \ /
�J w
YMW 4 I cr
16,000 MW-8 co
/ 14,000
10,000 / //
530 — —
LEGEND
MW-1
MONITORING WELL
10,00o TOTAL XYLENES ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR
INTERPRETED EXTENT OF TOTAL XYLENES
ABOVE NCDENR GROUNDWATER STANDARD
NOTES:
1. GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED
JANUARY 5 AND 6, 2010.
2. ALL RESULS IN MICROGRAMS PER LITER (Ng/L)
3. NCDENR GROUNDWATER STANDARD FOR
TOTAL XYLENES = 530 pg/L
FIGURE 7
TOTAL XYLENES ISOCONCENTRATION MAP
JANUARY 2010
NSNORFOLK
SOUTHERN
201 W. VIRGINIAAVENUE
BESSEMER CITY, NC
DATE:
FEB.2010
SCALE:
1
"=50'
DESIGNED:
MS
DRAWN:
JAH
Prepared by:
XYLENES MAP.MXD

50
MW-7
NS
— — — VfRGIIWgAVE
•
STORM
„Z.—SEWER
VIRGINIA / MW-1
AVENUE 48
M
frt.
160-
W-5
AUTO
FIBER OPTIC CABLE
RAILROAD
BRIDGE
MW-6
ND (0.094)
PENNSYLVANIAAVE.
0 50'
NOTE: The location and dimensions of features shown on this map have
been derived from various sources and supplemented by field
measurements. Though sufficient for its intended purpose, no
• claim is made as to the degree of accuracy of this drawing.
1 MW 3
/ MW-2 1 90
/ 750 1 /
/ / /
/ MW-4 / / x
1 450 ,' MW-8 co
\300—' , 270
\ /
.-<21--'- —
LEGEND
MW-1
MONITORING WELL
•
•
INTERPRETED EXTENT OF NAPHTHALENE
ABOVE NCDENR GROUNDWATER STANDARD
ND NOT DETECTED
NS NOT SAMPLED
NOTES:
1. GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED
JANUARY 5 AND 6, 2010.
2. ALL RESULS IN MICROGRAMS PER LITER (pg/L)
3. NCDENR GROUNDWATER STANDARD FOR
NAPHTHALENE = 21 Ng/L
FIGURE 8
NAPHTHALENE ISOCONCENTRATION MAP
JANUARY 2010
NSNORFOLK
SOUTHERN
201 W. VIRGINIA AVENUE
BESSEMER CITY, NC
DATE:
FEB.2010
SCALE:
1 "
= 50 '
DESIGNED:
MS
DRAWN:
JAH
Prepared by
NAPHTHALENE MAP.MXD

1
TABLES

r
TABLE 1
GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND FIELD MEASUREMENT DATA
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Bessemer City, North Carolina
GROUND WATER
ELEVATION DATA
FIELD MEASUREMENT
DATA
Monitoring
Well Number
Date
Measured
Ground
Surface
Elevation
Top of
Casing
Elevation (ft
Depth
to Water
Ground
Water
Elevation
Temperature
(°Celsius)
pH
Specific
Conductivity
Dissolved
Oxygen
Oxidation
Reduction
potential
Turbidity
(NTU)
(MSL)
MSL)
(ft TOC)
(ft MSL)
(uS/cm)
(mg/I)
(mV)
MW-1
12/07/99
895.49
894.72
15.77
878.95
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
03/16/00
895.49
894.72
12.59
882.13
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
03/18/00
895.49
894.72
12.61
882.11
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
09/14/00
895.49
894.72
16.30
878.42
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
04/04/01
895.49
894.72
12.32
882.40
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
08/22/01
895.49
894.72
17.76
876.96
19.5
4.48
1390
0.26
NA
NA
11/29/01
895.49
894.72
19.52
875.20
19.2
4.41
1430
0.21
NA
NA
03/04/02
895.49
894.72
16.60
878.12
20.0
4.91
1160
0.39
NA
NA
06/12/02
895.49
894.72
17.41
877.31
19.5
4.58
42*
0.12
NA
NA
11/26/02
895.49
894.72
18.35
876.37
17.9
5.13
1410
1.47
NA
NA
05/14/03
895.49
894.72
8.22
886.50
19.6
5.97
1360
0.5
NA
NA
11/10/03
895.49
894.72
11.33
883.39
18.4
6.78
1290
NM
NA
NA
11/17/04
895.49
894.72
12.33
882.39
20.1
4.9
1410
1.11
NA
NA
06/14/05
895.49
894.72
10.24
884.48
19.1
6.87
85.5
NM
NA
NA
12/13/05
895.49
894.72
15.45
879.27
18.6
5.32
67
NM
NA
NA
06/08/06
895.49
894.72
14.99
879.73
21.5
5.13
71
NM
NA
NA
01/03/07
895.49
894.72
14.50
880.22
17.92
4.73
147
1 #
NA
NA
08/24/07
895.49
894.72
20.21
874.51
24.9
4
100
0.1
NA
NA
04/03/08
895.49
894.72
20.10
874.62
18.22
4.48
137
.037#
50.5
132
12/22/08
895.49
894.72
20.02
874.70
16.10
4.54
151
0.60
47.5
84
07/15/09
895.49
894.72
15.12
879.60
19.88
4.39
96
0.62
80.5
6.59
01/05/10
895.49
894.72
12.64
882.08
18.27
5.22
120
0.29
95.5
11.9
MW-2
12/07/99
894.77
894.30
15.57
878.73
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
03/16/00
894.77
894.30
12.93
881.37
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
08/22/01
894.77
894.30
17.19
877.11
19.2
5.30
1150
0.20
NA
NA
11/29/01
894.77
894.30
18.96
875.34
20.0
5.86
1450
0.18
NA
NA
03/04/02
894.77
894.30
16.90
877.40
20.0
5.60
1100
0.92
NA
NA
06/12/02
894.77
894.30
17.63
876.67
19.4
5.58
103*
NA
NA
NA
11/26/02
894.77
894.30
19.37
874.93
20.3
6.13
1480
1.7
NA
NA
05/14/03
894.77
894.30
10.40
883.90
21.8
6.05
1370
0.8
NA
NA
11/10/03
894.77
894.30
10.90
883.40
17.0
9.9
1670
NM
NA
NA
11/17/04
894.77
894.30
13.20
881.10
21.2
5.18
1270
NM
NA
NA
06/14/05
894.77
894.30
12.12
882.18
19.7
8.51
391.5
NM
NA
NA
12/13/05
894.77
894.30
16.44
877.86
19.9
8.66
388
NM
NA
NA
06/08/06
894.77
894.30
15.60
878.70
23.1
8.83
353
NM
NA
NA
01/03/07
894.77
894.30
15.75
878.55
18.2
6.91
600
3.7 #
NA
NA
08/24/07
894.77
894.30
20.35
873.95
24.5
6
501
0.73
NA
NA
04/03/08
894.77
894.30
20.77
873.53
17.2
6.57
377
0.54#
-60.9
653
12/23/08
894.77
894.30
21.02
873.28
17.3
6.07
330
1.53
-76.4
56.3
07/15/09
894.77
894.30
15.54
878.76
21.1
5.13
144
0.65
9.1
2.62
01/05/10
894.77
894.30
14.16
880.14
19.1
6.26
358
0.59
-117
1.39
GW Elevation Data Table 1.xlsx
Page 1 of4

TABLE 1
GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND FIELD MEASUREMENT DATA
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Bessemer City, North Carolina
GROUND WATER
ELEVATION DATA
FIELD MEASUREMENT
DATA
Ground
Top of
Ground
Oxidation
Monitoring
Date
Surface
Casing
Depth
Water
Temperature
Specific
Dissolved
Reduction
Turbidity
Well Number
Measured
Elevation
Elevation (ft
to Water
(ft TOC)
Elevation
(°Celsius)
pIi
Conductivity
(uS/cm)
Oxygen
(mg/1)
Potential
(NTU)
(MSL)
MSL)
(ft MSL)
(mV)
MW-3
12/07/99
894.07
893.84
15.60
878.24
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
03/16/00
894.07
893.84
12.59
881.25
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
03/18/00
894.07
893.84
12.63
881.21
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
09/14/00
894.07
893.84
14.84
879.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
04/04/01
894.07
893.84
12.20
881.64
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
08/22/01
894.07
893.84
15.51
878.33
21.3
5.10
2000
0.54
NA
NA
11/29/01
894.07
893.84
17.79
876.05
20.4
4.89
2220
2.08
NA
NA
03/04/02
894.07
893.84
16.86
876.98
20.9
5.69
2000
0.87
NA
NA
06/12/02
894.07
893.84
17.39
876.45
19.8
5.50
155*
0.80
NA
NA
11/26/02
894.07
893.84
19.03
874.81
18.2
5.29
1440
2.64
NA
NA
05/14/03
894.07
893.84
10.73
883.11
21.8
5.03
2080
0.60
NA
NA
11/10/03
894.07
893.84
11.85
881.99
16.9
10.08
1420
NM
NA
NA
11/17/04
894.07
893.84
15.79
878.05
20.5
5.15
1830
NM
NA
NA
06/14/05
894.07
893.84
12.23
881.61
19.8
7.02
186
NM
NA
NA
12/13/05
894.07
893.84
16.57
877.27
19.6
5.91
111
NM
NA
NA
06/08/06
894.07
893.84
15.92
877.92
24.6
5.62
114
NM
NA
NA
01/03/07
894.07
893.84
17.05
876.79
18.6
4.85
181
3.7 #
NA
NA
08/24/07
894.07
893.84
20.08
873.76
27.5
4.66
207
0.12
NA
NA
04/03/08
894.07
893.84
20.65
873.19
18.3
5.39
184
0.67#
39.1
0.89
12/22/08
894.07
893.84
20.66
873.18
19.2
6.11
480
9.57
20.8
4.04
07/15/09
894.07
893.84
15.93
877.91
21.3
5.01
232
0.78
56.4
0.27
01/05/10
894.07
893.84
14.57
879.27
18.0
9.63
2153
5.86
-89.6
5.69
MW-4
12/07/99
894.84
894.33
16.00
878.33
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
03/16/00
894.84
894.33
13.20
881.13
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
03/18/00
894.84
894.33
13.23
881.10
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
09/14/00
894.84
894.33
16.89
877.44
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
04/04/01
894.84
894.33
13.42
880.91
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
08/22/01
894.84
894.33
18.34
875.99
18.5
4.70
770
0.30
NA
NA
11/29/01
894.84
894.33
19.92
874.41
19.2
4.97
870
0.34
NA
NA
03/04/02
894.84
894.33
17.37
876.96
18.7
5.09
800
0.25
NA
NA
06/12/02
894.84
894.33
18.25
876.08
18.4
5.02
61*
0.34
NA
NA
11/26/02
894.84
894.33
19.92
874.41
17.6
5.13
961
2.08
NA
NA
05/14/03
894.84
894.33
7.37
886.96
21.4
5.84
1680
1.3
NA
NA
11/10/03
894.84
894.33
9.05
885.28
17.1
9.87
1420
NM
NA
NA
11/17/04
894.84
894.33
12.76
881.57
19.18
4.69
780
0.81
NA
NA
06/14/05
894.84
894.33
10.83
883.50
18.7
7.1
225
NM
NA
NA
12/13/05
894.84
894.33
16.79
877.54
18.1
8.4
469
NM
NA
NA
06/08/06
894.84
894.33
15.79
878.54
23.1
9.34
344
NM
NA
NA
01/03/07
894.84
894.33
16.10
878.23
16.16
5.19
114
5 #
NA
NA
08/24/07
894.84
894.33
20.95
873.38
21.58
4.18
103
0.14
NA
NA
04/03/08
894.84
894.33
21.13
873.20
14.13
5.27
148
0.70#
-31.5
1.24
12/23/08
894.84
894.33
21.67
872.66
17.35
5.95
307
0.63
-54
0.65
07/15/09
894.84
894.33
15.83
878.50
21.88
4.56
89
0.43
-153.2
-0.65
01/06/10
894.84
894.33
14.05
880.28
16.84
5.45
199
0.78
28.8
0.37
GW Elevation Data Table 1.xlsx
Page 2 of 4
\lik•L\LLE '�

TABLE 1
GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND FIELD MEASUREMENT DATA
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Bessemer City, North Carolina
GROUND
WATER
ELEVATION DATA
FIELD MEASUREMENT
DATA
Monitoring
Well Number
Date
Measured
Ground
Surface
Elevation
Top of
Casing
Elevation (ft
Depth
to Water
Ground
Water
Elevation
Temperature
(°Celsius)
pH
Specific
Conductivity
Dissolved
Oxygen
Oxidation
Reduction
Potential
Turbidity
(NTU)
(MSL)
MSL)
(ft TOC)
(ft MSL)
(uS/cm)
(mg�)
(mV)
MW-5
12/07/99
894.49
894.18
15.09
879.09
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
03/16/00
894.49
894.18
12.50
881.68
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
03/18/00
894.49
894.18
12.52
881.66
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
09/14/00
894.49
894.18
14.89
879.29
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
04/04/01
894.49
894.18
12.18
882.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
08/22/01
894.49
894.18
16.08
878.10
20.1
4.26
1430
0.20
NA
NA
11/29/01
894.49
894.18
17.86
876.32
21.0
4.20
1510
0.77
NA
NA
03/04/02
894.49
894.18
16.33
877.85
20.6
4.67
1270
0.37
NA
NA
06/12/02
894.49
894.18
17.29
876.89
20.0
4.53
237*
0.34
NA
NA
11/26/02
894.49
894.18
18.66
875.52
17.9
5.28
1350
1.68
NA
NA
05/14/03
894.49
894.18
9.92
884.26
24.4
5.86
1770
1.3
NA
NA
11/10/03
894.49
894.18
12.25
881.93
19.4
9.91
1580
NM
NA
NA
11/17/04
894.49
894.18
13.43
880.75
20.9
4.58
1310
0.89
NA
NA
06/14/05
894.49
894.18
11.64
882.54
19.8
8.76
153
NM
NA
NA
12/13/05
894.49
894.18
16.25
877.93
19.7
5.10
69
NM
NA
NA
06/08/06
894.49
894.18
15.57
878.61
22.5
4.79
84
NM
NA
NA
01/03/07
894.49
894.18
15.50
878.68
18.9
4.37
190
1.5 #
NA
NA
08/24/07
894.49
894.18
20.12
874.06
25.0
3.61
156
0.1
NA
NA
04/03/08
894.49
894.18
20.48
873.70
17.1
4.68
163
0.66#
-3.3
0.73
12/22/08
894.49
894.18
20.44
873.74
18.4
5.50
287
19.21
101.4
1.82
07/15/09
894.49
894.18
15.53
878.65
22.0
5.63
244
0.46
-157.9
2.28
01/06/10
894.49
894.18
14.12
880.06
17.8
5.81
343
0.40
85
6.30
MW-6
12/07/99
893.58
893.26
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
03/16/00
893.58
893.26
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
03/18/00
893.58
893.26
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
09/14/00
893.58
893.26
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
04/04/01
893.58
893.26
15.45
877.81
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
08/22/01
893.58
893.26
19.73
873.53
13.7
NA
NA
2.74
NA
NA
11/29/01
893.58
893.26
19.81
873.45
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
03/04/02
893.58
893.26
19.08
874.18
17.3
4.54
1520
4.90
NA
NA
06/12/02
893.58
893.26
19.76
873.50
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
11/26/02
893.58
893.26
Dry
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
05/14/03
893.58
893.26
10.84
882.42
18.4
5.54
1850
11.6
NA
NA
11/10/03
893.58
893.26
13.21
880.05
16.7
6.31
1910
NM
NA
NA
11/17/04
893.58
893.26
15.10
878.16
19.35
4.5
2170
3.15
NA
NA
06/14/05
893.58
893.26
13.09
880.17
18.7
7.12
211.5
NM
NA
NA
12/13/05
893.58
893.26
18.01
875.25
18.9
4.98
132
NM
NA
NA
06/08/06
893.58
893.26
17.57
875.69
22.5
4.34
119
NM
NA
NA
01/03/07
893.58
893.26
Dry
NA
NM
NM
NM
NM
NA
NA
08/24/07
893.58
893.26
Dry
NA
NM
NM
NM
NM
NA
NA
04/03/08
893.58
893.26
19.97
873.29
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
12/22/08
893.58
893.26
19.98
873.28
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
07/16/09
893.58
893.26
17.44
875.82
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
01/06/10
893.58
893.26
16.27
876.99
18.91
4.19
198
5.25
335.7
-1.25
GW Elevation Data Table 1.xlsx
Page 3 of 4

TABLE 1
GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND FIELD MEASUREMENT DATA
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Bessemer City, North Carolina
GROUND
WATER
ELEVATION DATA
FIELD MEASUREMENT
DATA
Monitoring
Date
Ground
Surface
Top of
Casing
Depth
Ground
Water
Temperature
Specific
Dissolved
Oxidation
Reduction
Turbidity
Well Number
Measured
Elevation
Elevation (ft
to Water
(ft TOC)
Elevation
(°Celsius)
pH
Conductivity
(uS/cm)
Oxygen
(mg/1)
Potential
(NTU)
(MSL)
MSL)
(ft MSL)
(mV)
MW-7
12/07/99
896.02
895.81
NA
NA
NA
Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 0 0 7
ZZZZZZZZZZ,;,6.,,NZZZZZZZ't
NA
Q Q Q Q Q N Qrye iG W
ZZZZZ,;ZZZZ,-.ZMZZZZZZZZVI
NA
NA
03/16/00
896.02
895.81
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
03/18/00
896.02
895.81
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
09/14/00
896.02
895.81
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
04/04/01
896.02
895.81
18.40
877.41
NA
NA
NA
NA
08/22/01
896.02
895.81
19.80
876.01
18.1
NA
NA
NA
11/29/01
896.02
895.81
Dry
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
03/04/02
896.02
895.81
Dry
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
06/12/02
896.02
895.81
Dry
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
11/26/02
896.02
895.81
Dry
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
05/14/03
896.02
895.81
12.12
883.69
18.1
1420
NA
NA
11/10/03
896.02
895.81
15.06
880.75
16.3
1310
NA
NA
11/17/04
896.02
895.81
16.70
879.11
18.7
18.1
NA
NA
06/14/05
896.02
895.81
14.17
881.64
17.5
166.5
NA
NA
12/13/05
896.02
895.81
19.79
876.02
NM
NM
NA
NA
06/08/06
896.02
895.81
19.71
876.10
NM
NM
NA
NA
01/03/07
896.02
895.81
Dry
NA
NM
NM
NA
NA
08/24/07
896.02
895.81
Dry
NA
NM
NM
NA
NA
04/03/08
896.02
895.81
19.90
875.91
NM
NM
NM
NM
12/22/08
896.02
895.81
19.94
875.87
NM
NM
NM
NM
07/15/09
896.02
895.81
19.75
876.06
NM
NM
NM
NM
01/06/10
896.02
895.81
18.28
877.53
17.05
147
297.8
-1.43
MW-8
04/03/08
NA
892.67
20.40
872.27
15.3
5.25
178
0.834
7.5
1.54
12/23/08
NA
892.67
20.58
872.09
17.95
4.56
177
0.52
145.9
-0.49
07/15/09
NA
892.67
15.43
877.24
19.56
4.12
162
0.49
-60.1
1.88
01/06/10
NA
892.67
14.60
878.07
17.81
4.50
156
0.34
248.8
0.47
Notes:
Elevations are in reference to feet above mean sea level (MSL).
ft - Feet
uS/cm - Micro -Siemens per centimeter
mg/1- Milligrams per liter
TOC - Top of casing
NA - Not Available
* - Units are in micro -ohms per centimeter
NM - Not Measured
GW Elevation Data Table 1.xlsx Page 4 of 4
- Estimated conversion from % DO to Mg/L
mV - Milli Volts
NTU - Nephelometric turbidity units
ki

Sampling Date ->
Volatile Organic Compounds (µg/1)
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
Toluene
Xylenes
1,1 Dichloroethene (1,1 dichloroethylene)
1,2-Dibromoethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
2-Butanone (MEK)
2-Hexanone
4-methyl-2-pentanone (M1BK)
Acetone
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Isopropyl ether
Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE)
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene (perchloroethylene)
Trichloroethene (trichloroethylene)
TABLE 2
HISTORICAL GROUND WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Bessemer City, North Carolina
NCDENR
GWS
t'+,. sy n`'
by ' e Fir•. `
MW-1
06/30/99
12/07/99
03/16/00
08/22/01
11/29/01
03/04/02
06/12/02
11/26/02
05/14/03
11/10/03
11/17/04
06/14/05
12/13/05
12/13/05
06/08/06
01/03/07
08/24/07
04/03/08
12/22/08
07/15/09
01/05/10
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (µg/1)
1 - Methylnaphthalene
2 - Methylnaphthalene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Naphthalene
Notes:
�2'tp�r�^rap
1
600
600
500
7
0.02
0.60
280
600
0.300
70
70
20
70
0.7
3.0
30
0.05
0.005
200
0.5
5
6
- exceeds NCDENR Gross Contamination Limit (GCL)
- exceeds NCDENR Groundwater Standards (GWS)
Bold Values - Result is Above Detection Limit
pgd - Micrograms per liter
ND (2.0) - Below Detection Limit in Parentheses
J - Results estimated; reported value below detection limit
U - Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected
•• - Detection limits elevated due to limited sample volume
B - Detected in method blank
D - Diluted sample
u - Lab Control Spike (LCS) Exceeded Control Limits
E = Concentrations exceedsd the calibration range of the instrument
NA - Not analyzed
NS - Not sampled
5,000
84,500
257,500
87,500
7,000
50
510
280,000
700,000
70,000
70,000
200,000
100,000
700
2,800
12,500
22
1.5
210
0.40
4.79
15,500
19
63
60
:681
ND
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND
ND
ND
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND
ND
NA
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(I0)
ND(5.0)
49
ND(5.0)
720
ND
NA
NA
ND(50)
ND(50)
ND
ND
ND
. 22
ND(50)
ND(50)
ND(5.0)
ND
ND
NA
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA
ND(2.0)
56
ND(2.0)
740
ND
NA
NA
ND(20)
23
ND
ND
ND
21.
ND(20)
ND(20)
ND(2.0)
ND
ND
NA
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA
ND(5.0)
140
ND(5.0)
1500 -
ND
ND(5.0)
NA
ND(50)
ND(50)
ND
ND
ND
•12
ND(120)
ND(50)
ND(5.0)
ND
ND
14
32
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
59 • .
ND(5.0)
130
ND(5.0)
130.0
ND
ND(5.0)
NA
ND(50)
ND(50)
ND
ND
ND
14
ND(50)
ND(50)
ND(5.0)
ND
ND
22
49
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
78
ND(5.0)
130
ND(5.0)
1300
ND
ND(5.0)
NA
ND(50)
ND(50)
ND
ND
ND
21
ND(50)
ND(50)
ND(5.0)
ND
ND
24
50
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
68 .
ND(25)
66
ND(25)
870
ND
ND(25)
NA
ND(120)
ND(120)
ND
ND
ND
ND(25)
ND(50)
ND(50)
ND(25)
ND
ND
11
24
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
28
ND(I20)
550
18J
4500 •
ND(120)
ND(120)
NA
ND(620)
ND(620)
ND(620)
ND(1200)
ND(120)
ND(I20)
NA
ND(250)
ND(120)
ND(120)
ND(120)
27
60 •-
ND
ND
ND(10)
ND
ND
180
ND(20)
22 B
ND(20)
650 B
ND(20)
ND(20)
NA
ND(100)
ND(100)
ND(100)
ND(200)
ND(20)
ND(20)
24
ND(40)
ND(20)
2.1 JB
ND(20)
NA
22
ND
ND
ND(10)
ND
ND
30
ND(20)
35
ND(20)
600
ND(20)
ND(20)
NA
ND(200)
ND(200)
ND(200)
ND(500)
ND(20)
ND(20)
ND(100)
ND(200)
ND(20)
ND(20)
ND(20)
NA
22
ND
ND
ND(10)
ND
ND
38
ND(20)
44
13 J
1400 '
ND(20)
ND(20)
NA
ND(200)
ND(200)
ND(200)
ND(500)
ND(20)
20
ND(200)
ND(200)
8.8 J
ND(20)
ND(20)
NA
60
1.2 J
0.89J
0.97 J
1.5 J
96 '
ND(1.0) ND(1.0)
ND(1.0) 20
ND(1.0) ND(1.0)
ND(2.0) 1010
ND(1.0) ND(2.0)
ND(1.0)
NA
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(2.0)
NA
44
20 J
ND(10) ND(6.0)
ND(25) 53
ND(1.0) ND(2.0)
ND(1.0) 25
ND(10) ND(2.0)
ND(10) ND(1.0)
ND(1.0) ND(2.0)
ND(1.0) ND(2.0)
ND(1.0) ND(2.0)
13
25 .
ND(9.5)
ND(9.5)
ND(9.5)
ND(9.5)
ND(9.5)
41
31
'63
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
9'4
Duplicate
ND(1.0)
20
ND(1.0)
970
ND(2.0)
ND(2.0)
NA
47
21
ND(6.0)
54
ND(2.0)
23 '
ND(2.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(2.0)
ND(2.0)
ND(2.0)
31
•63
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
98
ND(0.5)
39
0.8 J
1120
ND(0.8)
ND(1.0)
21
32
6J
37
ND(1.0)
12
ND(0.8)
ND(0.5)
ND(1.0)
ND(0.8)
ND(1.0)
NA
NA
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
110
130
70
690
790
1ID(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
20
ND(3.0)
20
93
ND(1.0)
27
13
3J
ND(1.0)
ND(0.8)
ND(1.0)
NA
NA
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9) '
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
56 .
ND(I.6)
19
33
690
ND(1.8)
ND(1.5)
ND(1.8)
43 J
ND(3.4)
ND(3.0)
ND(25)
ND(1.4)
21
ND(1.7)
ND(2.9)
ND(1.8)
ND(1.4)
ND(2.0)
11
24
ND(0.49)
ND(0.47)
ND(0.45)
ND(0.38)
ND(0.53)
44
ND(1.6)
50
3.6 J
1600
ND(1.8)
ND(I.5)
ND(1.8)
69
ND(3.4)
ND(3.0)
45 J
ND(1.4)
ND(1.4)
ND(1.6)
ND(2.9)
14D(1.8)
ND(1.4)
ND(2.0)
17
36
ND(0.25)
ND(0.24)
ND(0.23)
ND(0.19)
ND(0.27)
76
ND(1.6)
17
1.8J
' . 900
ND(1.8)
ND(1.5)
ND(1.8)
43J
ND(3.4)
ND(3)
48J *
ND(1.4)
ND(1.4)
ND(1.6)
ND(2.9)
ND(1.8)
ND(1.4)
ND(2)
20
48*
ND(0.49)
ND(0.17)
ND(0.49)
ND(0.34)
ND(0.49)
ND(1.2)
8
2J
1100
ND(0.55)
ND(1.2)
ND(0.65)
ND(5.0)
ND(5.0)
ND(5.0)
56J
ND(2.5)
ND(0.70)
ND(1.2)
4.1J
ND(0.55)
ND(0.75)
ND(0.65)
ND(1.2)
9.4
5.5
950 -
ND(0.55)
ND(1.2)
ND(0.65)
ND(5.0)
ND(5.0)
ND(5.0)
59J
ND(2.5)
17
ND(1.2)
ND(1.0)
ND(0.55)
1.2J
ND(0.65)
28 ND (40.0)
ND(0.47) ND(10.0)
ND(0.16)
ND(0.47)
ND(0.33)
ND(0.47)
84
ND(10.0)
ND(10.0)
48
Page I of 7

Sampling Date ->
Volatile Organic Compounds (µg/l)
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
Toluene
TABLE 2
HISTORICAL GROUND WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Bessemer City, North Carolina
.NCDENR.tilrsv��
GWS
MW-2
+ c.',
06/30/99
12/07/99
03/16/00
08/22/01
11/29/01
03/04/02
06/12/02
11/26/02
05/14/03
11/10/03
11/17/04
11/17/04
06/14/05
12/13/05
06/08/06
01/03/07
08/26/07
8/26/07
4/3/2008
4/3/2008
12/23/08
12/23/08
07/15/09
07/15/09
01/05/10
01/05/10
1
600
600
5,000
84,500
257,500
3450"
•32700
3400-
35000'
2500
24000
2700'.
• '33000
2500
29000
2900
33000
3200.
35000
2900 - '
. 33000
2900 -'
35000
'2700
36000
3600'
46000
Duplicate
,111
2400•
31000
1500:
31000
800
14000
. 880 •
23000
440
8500 E
1700
28000
Du licate
1600
26000
Duplicate
24000 23000 D
1100,
17000
Duplicate
.20000
Xylenes
1,1 Dichloroethene (1,1 dichloroethylene)
1,2-Dibromoethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
2-Butanone (MEK)
2-Hexanone
4-methy1-2-pentanone (MIBK)
Acetone
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Isopropyl ether
Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE)
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene (perchloroethylene)
500
7
0.02
0.60
280
600
0.300
70
70
20
70
0.7
Trichloroethene (trichloroethylene) 3.0
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (µg/I)
1 - Methylnaphthalene
2 - Methylnaphthalene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Naphthalene
Notes:
30
87,500
7,000
50
510
280,000
700,000
70,000
70,000
200,000
100,000
700
2,800
12,500
19400
ND
37.6
NA
NA
NA
ND
ND
ND
NA
7160
2880
478 .
ND
ND
NA
NA
20000
ND
NA
NA
ND(2000)
ND(2000)
ND
ND
ND
ND(200)
ND(2000)
ND(2000)
ND(200)
ND
ND
NA
NA
14000
ND
NA
NA
ND(2000)
ND(2000)
ND
ND
ND
ND(200)
• 5300
ND(2000)
ND(200)
ND
ND
NA
NA
17000
ND
ND(250)
NA
ND(2500)
ND(2500)
ND
ND
ND
ND(250)
ND(6200)
ND(2500)
ND(250)
ND
ND
59 D
1 1
14000
ND
ND(250)
NA
ND(2500)
ND(2500)
ND
ND
ND
ND(250)
3800
ND(2500)
ND(250)
ND
ND
58
iID
18000'
ND
ND(250)
NA
ND(2500)
ND(2500)
ND
ND
ND
ND(250)
3400 •
ND(2500)
ND(250)
ND
ND
54
140
19000
ND
ND(I200)
NA
ND(6200)
ND(6200)
ND
ND
ND
ND(1200)
3600
ND(2500)
ND 1200)
ND
ND
42
110
18000
ND(2000)
ND(2000)
NA
ND(10000)
ND(10000)
ND(10000)
ND(20000)
ND(2000)
ND(2000)
NA
ND(4000)
ND(2000)
ND(2000)
• 18000
ND(2000)
ND(2000)
NA
1100 J
ND(10000)
ND(10000)
930J
ND(2000)
ND(2000)
4200
2000 J
ND(2000)
ND(2000)
ND(2000) ND(2000)
ND(100
210
NA
280
17000
ND(500)
ND(500)
NA
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(12000)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(2500)
ND(5000)
ND(500)
ND(500)
23000'
ND(20)
ND(500)
NA
910 J
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(12000)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(5000)
- 1700 J
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(500) ND(500)
NA
180
NA
410
16000'
ND(500)
ND(500)
NA
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(12000)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(5000)
1200 J
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(500)
NA
11
18000
ND(200)
ND(200)
NA
ND(2000)
ND(2000)
ND(2000)
ND(5000)
ND(200)
ND(200)
4300
3200
ND(200)
ND(200)
ND(200)
96
240
9400 '
ND(20)
32 J
NA
320
81 J
ND(60)
450
ND(20)
ND(16)
3400
1300'
ND(20)
ND(16)
ND(20)
100
250
12800
ND(4)
30
9'J
350
120
80
380
ND(5)
ND(4)
5800
3500
ND(5)
ND(4)
ND(5)
NA
NA
4300
ND(8.0)
28 J
ND(10)
770
170
74 J
580
ND(10)
ND(8.0)
'2100
460
ND(10)
ND(8.0)
ND(10)
NA
NA
13000
ND(36)
32 J
ND(36)
440 J
ND(68)
ND(60)
ND(500)
ND(270
ND(29)
4900.
2400
ND(36)
ND(28)
ND(40)
30
78
13000
ND(72)
ND(60)
ND(72)
500 J
ND(140)
ND(120)
ND(1000)
ND(54)
ND(58)
4700
2400
ND(72)
ND(56)
ND(80)
23
56
ND(72) ND(36)
ND(60) ND(30)
ND(72)
ND(36)
ND(140) ND(68)
ND(120) ND(60)
ND(1000) ND(500)
ND(54) ND(27)
ND(58) ND(29)
ND(72)
ND(56)
ND(80)
0.05
0.005
200
0.5
5
6
22
1.5
210
0.40
4.79
15,500
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
.'1030
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
750 D .
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
840.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
600
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
460.
ND
ND
ND(100)
ND
ND
. 800
ND
ND
ND(100)
ND
ND
. 900
ND
ND
ND(100)
ND
ND
950.
ND(100)
ND(100)
ND(100)
ND(I00)
ND(100)
1300
ND(100)
ND(100)
ND(100)
ND(100)
ND(100)
1100
ND(95)
ND(95)
ND(95)
ND(95)
ND(95)
1100
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
1100.
ND(1)
ND(1)
ND(1)
ND(1)
ND(1)
.1000
ND(1)
ND(I)
ND(1)
ND(1)
ND(1)
. .260
ND(1.3)
ND(1.2)
ND(1.2)
ND(0.96)
ND(1.3)
• .390-
ND(1.2)
ND(1.1)
ND(0.94)
40
110
ND(2.5) ND(1.3)
210 D
8900
ND(36)
ND(30)
ND(36)
1300
ND(68)
140J
ND(27)
ND(29)
ND(36)
12000.
ND(72)
ND(60)
ND(72)
1400 J
320 J
moo u
ND(54)
ND(58)
ND(72)
ND(28) ND(28) ND(56)
ND(40)
21
57
ND(40)
32
69*
ND(80)
28
15000
ND(11)
ND(25)
ND(13)
600J
ND(100)
970J
ND(50)
ND(14)
4900'
4200
ND(11)
ND(15)
ND(13)
74
13000
ND(22)
ND(50)
ND(26)
650J
ND(200)
ND(200)
ND(100)
3800
ND 22)
ND(30)
ND(26)
81
190
21000
ND(22)
ND(50)
ND(26)
1200J
ND(200)
ND(200)
1200J
ND(100)
ND(28)
1600J
ND(22)
ND(30)
ND(26)
64
170.
21000
ND(22)
ND(50)
ND(26)
1100J
ND(200)
ND(200)
ND(100)
ND(28)
1500
ND(22)
ND(30)
ND(26)
56
150
ND(2.4)
ND(2.3)
ND(2.6)
830'
ND(0.97) ND(3.4) ND(3.4)
ND(1.4) ND(4.9) ND(4.9)
360
ND(9.4)
ND(6.6)
ND(9.4)
1100
ND(4.7) ND(9.5) ND(9.4)
ND(3.3)
ND(9.5)
ND(9.5)
ND(9.5)
ND(4.3)
.750
ND(9.4)
ND(9.4)
ND(9.4)
ND(4.2)
- exceeds NCDENR Gross Contamination Limit (GCL)
- exceeds NCDENR Groundwater Standards (GWS)
Bold Values - Result is Above Detection Limit
pg/1 - Micrograms per liter
ND (2.0) - Below Detection Limit in Parentheses
J - Results estimated; reported value below detection limit
U - Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected
• - Detection limits elevated due to limited sample volume
B - Detected in method blank
D - Diluted sample
* - Lab Control Spike (LCS) Exceeded Control Limits
E = Concentrations exceedsd the calibration range of the instrument
NA - Not analyzed
NS - Not sampled
BessemerTables (2 & 3).xlsx Page 2 of 7

Sampling Date ->
Volatile Organic Compounds (µg/1)
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
Toluene
TABLE 2
HISTORICAL GROUND WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Bessemer City, North Carolina
'NCDENR
.' GWS'.
{i , .•'
MW-3
i�+
,f rlp r$ ili
- '
12/08/99
03/16/00
08/22/01
11/29/01
03/04/02
06/12/02
11/26/02
05/14/03
11/10/03
11/10/03
11/17/04
06/14/05
12/13/05
06/08/06
06/08/06
01/03/07
08/24/07
04/03/08
12/22/08
07/15/09
01/05/10
1
600
600
5,000
84,500
257,500
4100' .
770,
. 12000
4600'
'•'1100 '
16000
1200-
1800' •
16000-''
1000
�1800
14000
940
• 2200
15000 -
ND(620)
2100
9900
610
. 2200'
10000 .
670
2000
10000,'
'1200
•16.00 •
15000
Duplicate
•.•1400
1800
• '18000
1400-
1800
.15000
2500
2200
20000•
950
.1400
-9300
1700
1400
13000
Duplicate
1700
'1200 '
15000
600
•' 930 •
6600 E
960
1700
'13000 E
360•
-
1700 '
9400
150
990
4100
370•
1200
2400 .
90 •
1100
,2800
Xylenes
500
87,500
'4600
7500:
10000
10000 '
14000 '
12000':
12000.
12000
8900
10000 ° '
10000
13000
7600
7000 -
7300
5300 E
l0000
5000
1,1 Dichloroethene (1,1 dichloroethylene)
1,2-Dibromoethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
2-Butanone (MEK)
2-Hexanone
4-methyl-2-pentanone (M03K)
Acetone
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Isopropyl ether
Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE)
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene (perchloroethylene)
Trichloroethene (trichloroethylene)
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (µg/1)
1 - Methylnaphthalene
2 - Methylnaphthalene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Naphthalene
Notes:
7
0.02
0.60
280
600
0.300
70
70
20
70
0.7
3.0
30
0.05
0.005
200
0.5
5
6
- exceeds NCDENR Gross Contamination Limit (GCL)
- exceeds NCDENR Groundwater Standards (GWS)
Bold Values - Result is Above Detection Limit
ggri - Micrograms per liter
ND (2.0) - Below Detection Limit in Parentheses
J - Results estimated; reported value below detection limit
U - Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected
•• - Detection limits elevated due to limited sample volume
B - Detected in method blank
D - Diluted sample
• - Lab Control Spike (LCS) Exceeded Control Limits
E = Concentrations exceedsd the calibration range of the instrument
NA - Not analyzed
NS - Not sampled
7,000
50
510
280,000
700,000
70,000
70,000
200,000
100,000
700
2,800
12,500
22
1.5
210
0.40
4.79
' 15,500
ND
NA
NA
2300
ND(1000)
ND
ND
ND
ND(100)
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
ND(100)
ND
ND
NA
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA
ND
NA
NA
1300
ND(1000)
ND
ND
ND
ND(100)
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
ND(100)
ND
ND
NA
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA
ND
ND(250)
NA
ND(2500)
ND(2500)
ND
ND
ND
ND(250)
ND(6200)
ND(2500)
ND(250)
ND
ND
41 D
91D '
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
500 D
ND
ND(120)
NA
ND(1200)
ND(1200)
ND
ND
ND
ND(120)
ND(1200)
ND(1200)
ND(120)
ND
ND
ND(40)
82
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
470 . ,
ND
ND(120)
NA
ND(1200)
ND(1200)
ND
ND
ND
ND(120)
ND(1200)
ND(1200)
ND(120)
ND
ND
30
68
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
.350
ND
ND(620)
NA
ND(3100)
ND(3100)
ND
ND
ND
ND(620)
ND(1200)
ND(1200)
ND(620)
ND
ND
20
48
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
240 .•
ND(500)
ND(500)
NA
ND(2500)
ND(2500)
ND(1000)
ND(5000)
ND(500)
ND(500)
NA
ND(1000)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(50)
58-
ND
ND
ND(50)
ND
ND
.'310
ND(500)
ND(500)
NA
1000 J
380 J
ND(2500)
310 J
ND(500)
ND(500)
80J
ND(1000)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(500)
NA
5
ND
ND
ND(50)
ND
ND
400
ND(500)
ND(500)
NA
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(I2000)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(2500)
ND(5000)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(500)
NA
ND(50)
ND
ND
ND(50)
ND
ND
370
ND(500)
ND(500)
NA
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(12000)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(2500)
ND(5000)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(500)
NA
ND(50)
ND
ND
ND(50)
ND
ND
390 ..
ND(200)
ND(200)
NA
980 J
270 J
ND(2000)
ND(5000)
ND(200)
ND(200)
ND(2000)
160 J
ND(200)
ND(200)
ND(200)
NA
60 '
ND(50)
ND(50)
ND(50)
ND(50)
ND(50)
420
ND(100)
ND(100)
NA
1000
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
ND(2500)
ND(100)
ND(I00)
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
ND(100)
ND(100)
ND(100)
ND(48)
'49
ND(48)
ND(48)
ND(48)
ND(48)
ND(48)
.390 ,
ND(8.0)
ND(10)
NA
890
250
100 J
160 J
ND(10)
ND(8.0)
130--
130
ND(10)
ND(8.0)
ND(10)
34
71
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(4.0)
ND(5.0)
ND(5.0)
1100
230
90
120
ND(5.0)
ND(4.0)
190
120
ND(5.0)
ND(4.0)
ND(5.0)
NA
NA
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
280
ND(2.0)
3J
4
1100
240
93
110
ND(2.0)
ND(2.0)
'190
120
ND(2.0)
ND(2.0)
ND(2.0)
NA
NA
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
:370
ND(8.0)
ND(10)
ND(10)
830
220
85 J
ND(10)
ND(8.0)
90
100
ND(10)
ND(10)
NA
NA
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(18)
ND(15)
ND(18)
570
230 J
ND(250)
ND(14)
ND(15)
150 J°
250 J
ND(18)
ND(14)
ND(20)
12
ND(0.38)
ND(0.53)
ND(36)
ND(30)
ND(36)
940
ND(68)
ND(60)
ND(500)
ND(27)
ND(29)
ND(36)
ND(28)
ND(40)
ND(46)
46.
1413(1.3)
ND(1.2)
ND(0.97)
ND(14)
ND(12)
ND(14)
390 J
280 J
200 U *
ND(11)
ND(12)
200 J
ND(14)
ND(11)
ND(16)
33
ND(12)
280J
ND(25)
ND(7)
550
ND(5.5)
ND(7.5)
32
68
ND(1.6)
ND(4.7)
ND(3.3)
ND(4.7)
ND(12)
ND(6.5)
380J
340J
ND(250)
ND(25)
ND(7)
ND(5.5)
ND(38)
17J
ND(9.4)
BessemerTables (2 & 3).xlsx
Page 3 of 7
Lk

Sampling Date ->
Volatile Organic Compounds
TABLE 2
HISTORICAL GROUND WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Bessemer City, North Carolina
NCDENR
GWS ,
MW-4
,;e f`I°
12/07/99
03/16/00
08/22/01
8/22/2001
11/29/01
03/04/02
06/12/02
06/12/02
11/26/02
11/26/02
05/14/03
11/10/03
11/17/04
06/14/05
06/14/05
12/13/05
06/08/06
01/03/07
01/03/07
8/24/07
04/03/08
12/23/08
07/15/09
01/06/10
Duplicate
Duplicate
Duplicate
Duplicate
Duplicate
Benzene
1
5,000
• 930 •
2800
f.i;`4�
U'*•+��QO'!i
50;0. ��
�,
2200
1300
720 •
760
260
800
310
490
270
430
1200
1700
1800 •
Ethylbenzene
600
84,500
1500
1900 '
1900 ,
2200
'1900
2200
: 2500 '
2300
'2200
•2100 ..
1900
' 1800
2700
460
490
54
1400
550
' 970
2000
1900 •
880'
1600;
2100
Toluene
600
257,500
15000
' 25000
• 32000
38000
29000
33000
35000 .
35000
30000 '
31000
24000
24000
24000
11000•
12000
2500
'21000
' 5700
• 8400 E
' 9400
11000
17000'
22000D '
24000 '
Xylenes
500
87,500
8400
12000.
11000
13000
11000-
' 13000
15000
13000
13000
13000
: 12000 '
11000
16000 -
8800
' 9600'
4400'
9700 '
3500
5800'
'11000
11000
11000.
'13000:
'16000
1,1 Dichloroethene (1,1 dichloroethylene)
7
7,000
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(100)
ND(100)
ND(4.0)
ND(4.0)
ND(10)
ND(8.0)
ND(18)
ND(36)
ND(36)
ND(11)
ND(22)
1,2-Dibromoethane
0.02
50
NA
NA
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(250)
ND(250)
ND(1200)
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
28 J.
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(100)
ND(100)
ND(5.0)
ND(5.0)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(15)
ND(30)
ND(30)
ND(25)
ND(50)
1,2-Dichloropropane
0.60
510
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
_
NA
ND(5.0)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(18)
ND(36)
ND(36)
ND(13)
ND(26)
2-Butanone (MEK)
--
--
ND(I000)
ND(2000)
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(2500)
ND(2500)
ND(6200)
ND(2000)
ND(5000
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
50
26 J
50 J
53 J
ND(30)
230 J
320 J
ND(100)
ND(200)
2-Hexanone
280
280,000
ND(1000)
ND(2000)
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(2500)
ND(2500)
ND(6200)
ND(2000)
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
24 J
24 J
ND(8.0)
ND(30)
ND(34)
ND(68)
200 J
ND(100)
ND(200)
4-methyl-2-pentanone (MB3K)
-
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
ND(15)
ND(15)
ND(30)
ND(30)
ND(30)
ND(60)
83 J
ND(100)
ND(200)
Acetone
600
700,000
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(10000
ND(10000)
490 J
ND(12000)
ND(12000)
ND(2500)
ND(2500)
96 J
85 J
130 J
160 J
ND(250)
ND(500)
500 U *
600J
ND(1000)
Carbon tetrachloride
0.300
--
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(100)
ND(100)
ND(5.0)
ND(5.0)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(14)
ND(27)
ND(27)
ND(50)
ND(100)
Chloroform
70
70,000
ND(100)
ND(200)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(250)
ND(250)
ND(1200)
ND(200)
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(100)
ND(100)
ND(4.0)
ND(4.0)
ND(8.0)
ND(8.0)
ND(15)
ND(29)
ND(29)
ND(14)
ND(28)
Isopropyl ether
70
70,000
ND(1000)
ND(2000)
ND(12000)
ND(12000)
ND(2500)
ND(2500)
ND(2500)
ND(2000)
NA
NA
. 440 J
ND(2500)
ND(5000)
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
ND(4.0)
ND(4.0)
ND(8.0)
ND(8.0)
ND(17)
ND(33)
ND(33)
ND(24)
ND(48)
Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE)
20
200,000
ND(2000)
ND(2000)
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(2500)
ND(2500)
ND(2500)
ND(2000)
ND(2000)
ND(2000)
100 J
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
ND(3.0)
ND(3.0)
ND(5.0)
ND(5.0)
ND(29)
ND(58)
ND(58)
ND(20)
ND(40)
Styrene
70
100,000
ND(100)
ND(200)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(250)
ND(250)
ND(1200)
ND(200)
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
ND(500)
-470,J
ND(100)
ND(100)
ND(5.0)
ND 5.0)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(18)
ND(36)
ND(36)
ND(11)
ND(22)
Tetrachloroethene (perchloroethylene)
0.7
700
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(100)
ND(100)
ND(4.0)
ND(4.0)
ND(8.0)
ND(8.0)
ND(14)
ND(28)
ND(28)
ND(15)
ND(30)
Trichloroethene (trichloroethylene)
3.0
2,800
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(100)
ND(100)
ND(5.0)
ND(5.0)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(20)
ND(40)
ND(40)
ND(13)
ND(26)
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (µg/I)
1 - Methylnaphthalene
2 - Methylnaphthalene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Naphthalene
30
0.05
0.005
200
0.5
5
6
12,500
22
1.5
210
0.40
4.79
15,500
NA
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA
NA
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA
33 D
76 D
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
550 D
31D
71D'
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
•520D
ND(40)
• 63
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
450 .
26
60
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
. 420
16
39
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2'40,
13
33
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
. 210
ND(50)
59
ND
ND
ND(50)
ND
ND
430 •
ND(50)
•52
ND
ND
ND(50)
ND
ND
370
NA
ND
ND
ND(50)
ND
ND
370
NA
59'
ND
ND
ND(50)
ND
ND
370
NA ND(19) ND(19)
83 38 34
ND(50) ND(19) ND(19)
ND(50) ND(19) ND(19)
ND(50) ND(19) ND(19)
ND(50) ND(19) ND(19)
ND(50) ND(19) ND(19)
530 .., 260 250.
19
37
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
220.
NA
NA
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
460
NA
NA
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
240
NA
NA
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
260
11
25
ND(0.49)
ND(0.47)
ND(0.45)
ND(0.38)
ND(0.53)
200
16
38
ND(1.2)
ND(1.2)
ND(1.1)
ND(0.94)
ND(1.3)
370
32
71*
ND(4.9)
ND(I.7)
ND(4.9)
ND(3.4)
ND(4.9)
600
31
ND(4.7)
ND(1.6)
ND(4.7)
ND(3.3)
ND(4.7)
600'.
25
59 .
ND(4.7)
ND(4.7)
ND(4.7)
ND(4.7)
ND(2.1)
450
Notes:
' •b - exceeds NCDENR Gross Contamination Limit (GCL)
- exceeds NCDENR Groundwater Standards (GWS)
Bold Values - Result is Above Detection Limit
Ngn - Micrograms per liter
ND (2.0) - Below Detection Limit in Parentheses
J - Results estimated; reported value below detection limit
U - Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected
" - Detection limits elevated due to limited sample volume
B - Detected in method blank
D - Diluted sample
" - Lab Control Spike (LCS) Exceeded Control Limits
E = Concentrations exceedsd the calibration range of the instrument
NA - Not analyzed
NS - Not sampled
BessemerTables (2 & 3).xlsx
Page4 of 7
l�a�.S�ir� ►r

Sampling Date ->
Volatile Organic Compounds (µg/1)
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
Toluene
Xylenes
1,1 Dichloroethene (1,1 dichloroethylene)
1,2-Dibromoethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
2-Butanone (IvIEK)
2-Hexanone
4-methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
Acetone
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Isopropyl ether
Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE)
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene (perchloroethylene)
Trichloroethene (trichloroethylene)
TABLE 2
HISTORICAL GROUND WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Bessemer City, North Carolina
NCDENR
GWS
:t.
MW-5
p b z
+v,:. jc%I't,
12/07/99
03/16/00
08/22/01
11/29/01
11/29/01
03/04/02
03/04/02
06/12/02
11/26/02
05/14/03
11/10/03
11/17/04
06/14/05
12/13/05
06/08/06
01/03/07
08/24/07
04/03/08
12/22/08
07/15/09
01/06/10
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (µg/I)
1 - Methylnaphthalene
2 - Methylnaphthalene
Benzo(a)anthracene
600
600
500
7
0.02
0.60
280
600
0.300
70
70
20
70
0.7
3.0
5,000
84,500
257,500
87,500
7,000
50
510
280,000
700,000
70,000
70,000
200,000
100,000
700
2,800
30 12,500
0.05 22
Benzo(a)pyrene 0.005 1.5
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 200 210
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Naphthalene
Notes:
0.5 0.40
5 4.79
6 15,500
- exceeds NCDENR Gross Contamination Limit (GCL)
- exceeds NCDENR Groundwater Standards (GWS)
Bold Values - Result is Above Detection Limit
µg/1- Micrograms per liter
ND (2.0) - Below Detection Limit in Parentheses
] - Results estimated; reported value below detection limit
U - Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected
•" - Detection limits elevated due to limited sample volume
B - Detected in method blank
D - Diluted sample
• - Lab Control Spike (LCS) Exceeded Control Limits
E = Concentrations exceedsd the calibration range of the instrument
NA - Not analyzed
NS - Not sampled
1000.
1900
21000
11000
ND
NA
NA
ND(2000)
ND(2000)
ND
ND
ND
ND(200)
ND(2000)
ND(2000)
ND(200)
ND
ND
600
1800
12000
12000
ND
NA
NA
1400
ND(1000)
ND
ND
ND
ND(100)
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
ND(100)
ND
ND
220
1600
7800
10000
ND
ND(100)
NA
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
ND
ND
ND
ND(100)
ND(2500)
ND(1000)
ND(100)
ND
ND
NA NA 35
NA NA 72
ND ND ND
ND ND ND
ND ND ND
ND ND ND
ND ND ND
NA NA 510
230 .
1600
7800
9700
ND
ND(50)
NA
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND
ND
ND
ND(50)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(50)
ND
ND
ND(40)
70 •
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
510
Duplicate
220
1600
7400
9700
ND
ND(50)
NA
520
ND(500)
ND
ND
ND
ND(50)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(50)
ND
ND
210
1800
'8400
11000
ND
ND(50)
NA
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND
ND
ND
ND(50)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(50)
ND
ND
ND(40) 26
66 56
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
490 . 400.
Duplicate
220
1700
8300
11000
ND
ND(120)
NA
ND(1200)
ND(1200)
ND
ND
ND
ND(120)
ND(1200)
ND(1200)
ND(120)
ND
ND
24
51
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
380
ND(250)
1900
8800
11000
ND
ND(250)
NA
ND(I200)
ND(1200)
ND
ND
ND
ND(250)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(250)
ND
ND
14
30
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
210
BessemerTables (2 & 3).xlsx Page 5 of 7
260
1600
8600
10000
ND(250)
ND(250)
NA
ND(1200)
ND(1200)
ND(1200)
ND(2500)
ND(250)
ND(250)
NA
ND(500)
ND(250)
ND(250)
ND(250)
ND(50)
44 J
ND
ND
ND(50)
ND
ND
290
• 250
1900
5200
11000
ND(250)
ND(250)
NA
590 J
180 J
67 J
ND(2500)
ND(250)
ND(250)
240 J
ND(500)
ND(250)
ND(250)
15 J
NA
51
ND
ND
ND(50)
ND
ND
340
260
1500
5500
8400
ND(200)
ND(200)
NA
ND(2,000)
ND(2,000)
ND(2000)
ND(5000)
ND(200)
ND(200)
ND(1,000)
ND(2,000)
ND(200)
ND(200)
ND(200)
NA
62
ND
ND
ND(50)
ND
ND
380
140
1800
6100
11000
ND(100)
ND(100)
NA
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
ND(100
ND(2500)
ND(100)
ND(100)
ND(1000)
270 J
190
ND(100)
ND(100)
NA
• 64
ND(50)
ND(50)
ND(50)
ND(50)
ND(50)
400
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(2.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
NA
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(25)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(47)
71
ND(47)
ND(47)
ND(47)
ND(47)
ND(47)
420
90
1200
5500
6800
ND(8.0)
ND(10)
NA
160
180
72 J
ND(60)
ND(10)
ND(8.0)
67
92
ND(10)
ND(8.0)
ND(10)
37
79
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
490
150
1500
5200
9000
ND(4.0)
ND(5.0)
ND(5.0)
180
260
98
53 J
ND(5.0)
ND(4.0)
230
340
ND(5.0)
ND(4.0)
ND(5.0)
NA
NA
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
460
• 550
2800
590
4100
ND(8.0)
ND(10)
ND(10)
130
240
97 J
85 J
ND(10)
ND(8.0)
270
340
ND(10)
ND(8.0)
ND(10)
NA
NA
ND(0.9)
61
1200
6000
7100'
ND(18)
ND(15)
ND(18)
ND(30)
150 J
ND(30)
ND(250)
ND(14)
ND(15)
ND(17)
ND(29)
ND(18)
ND(14)
ND(20)
9.9
22
ND(0.49)
ND(0.9) ND(0.47)
ND(0.9) ND(0.45)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.38)
ND(0.53)
64
• 970
3200
6500
ND(18)
ND(15)
ND(18)
130 J
ND(34)
77 J
ND(250)
ND(14)
ND(14)
23 J
30 J
ND(18)
ND(14)
ND(20)
11
27
ND(0.49)
ND(0.47)
ND(0.45)
ND(0.38)
ND(0.53)
150
410
isoo
-7400
ND(9)
ND(9)
210J
140J
83J
450J *
ND(7.2)
110 J
78J
ND(9)
ND(7)
ND(10)
25
51*
ND(1.7)
ND(4.9)
ND(3.4)
ND(4.9)
200
190
1500
9100D
9200
ND(5)
510
320
120J
270J
ND(10)
150J
ND(3)
141)(2.61
17J
50
ND(4.7)
ND(1.6)
ND(4.7)
ND(3.3)
ND(4.7)
300
1000
3100
11000
ND(5.5)
ND(50.0)
ND(50.0)
190J
ND(25.0)
ND(5.5)
ND(7.5)
ND(6.5)
ND(38.0)
73
ND(9.4)
ND(9.4)
ND(9.4)
ND(4.2)

Sampling Date ->
Volatile Organic Compounds (µg/I)
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
Toluene
TABLE 2
HISTORICAL GROUND WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Bessemer City, North Carolina
NCDENR
GWS
i .•i'�t, r
;K,.r
"t� i. owAsi ,
;' 0 a 4
MW-6
04/04/01
08/22/01
11/29/01
03/04/02
06/12/02
11/26/02
05/14/03
11/10/03
11/17/04
06/14/05
12/13/05
06/08/06
01/03/07
08/24/07
04/03/08
12/22/08
07/16/09
01/06/10
1
600
600
5,000
84,500
257 500
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
2.6.
1.8
15
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND() ND(1.0) ND(1.0) ND(1.0) ND(0.5) ND(0.5)
0.52 JB ND(1.0) ND(1.0) ND(1.0) ND(0.8) ND(0.8)
0.45 J
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(0.7)
ND(0.7)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.25) 0.37J
ND(0.11) 0.17J
ND(0.33)
1.4
Xylenes
1 1 Dichloroethene (1,1 dichloroethylene)
1 2-Dibromoethane
500
7
0.02
87,500
7 000
50
ND(2.0)
ND
NA
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
12
ND
ND(1.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
1.6 JB
0.45 J
ND(5)
ND(2.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(2.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(2.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(0.8)
ND(0.8)
ND(1.0)
ND(0.8)
ND(0.8)
ND(1.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.20)
ND(0.1 I)
ND(0.25)
1.2J
ND(0.11)
ND(0.25)
1 2-Dichloropropane
2-Butanone (MEK)
2-Hexanone
0.60
510
280
280,000
NA
ND(10)
NA
NS
NA
NS
NA
ND(10)
NA
NS
NA
NS
NA
ND(25)
NA
ND(10)
NA
ND(10)
NA
ND(10)
NA
ND(3.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(3.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.13)
ND(1)
ND(0.13)
ND(1.0)
ND(10)
NS
NS
ND(10)
NS
NS
ND(25)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(3.0)
ND(3.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(1)
ND(1.0)
4-methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
Acetone
600
700,000
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(25)
ND(50)
ND(10)
ND(25)
ND(10)
ND(25}
ND(10)
ND(25)
ND(3.0)
ND(6.0)
ND(3.0)
ND(6.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(1)
ND(5)
ND(1.0)
ND(5.0)
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Isopropyl ether
Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE)
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene (perchloroethylene)
Trichloroethene (trichloroethylene)
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (µg/1)
I - Methylnaphthalene
2 - Methylnaphthalene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(g h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Naphthalene
Notes:
0.300
70
70
20
70
0.7
3.0
70,000
70,000
200 000
100 000
700
2,800
ND
ND(1.0)
ND(I0)
ND(10)
ND(1.0)
ND
ND
NA
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND(1.0)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(1.0)
ND
ND
0.3
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
0.41 J
ND(5)
ND(10)
ND(10)
0.33 JB
ND(5)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(5.0)
ND(10)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
14D(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(1.0)
141)(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(0.8)
ND(0.8)
ND(0.5)
ND(1.0)
ND(0.8)
141)(1.0)
ND(0.8)
ND(0.8)
ND(0.5)
ND(1.0)
ND(0.8)
0.42 JB ND(1.0) ND(1.0) ND(1.0) ND(1.0) ND(1.0)
NA
NA
NA
ND(9.3) ND(1.0)
NA
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.50)
ND(0.14)
ND(0.24)
ND(0.20)
ND(0.11)
ND(.15)
ND(0.50)
ND(0.14)
ND(0.24)
ND(0.20)
ND(0.11)
ND(0.15)
ND(0.13) ND(0.13)
ND(0.021) ND(0.38)
30
0.05
0.005
200
0.5
5
6
12 500
22
1.5
210
0.40
4.79
15 500
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA
NS
ND
ND
NS
ND
ND
NS
NS
ND
ND
NS
ND
ND
NS
0.3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.30**
NS
ND
ND
NS
ND
ND
NS _
NS
ND
ND
NS
ND
ND
NS
ND(10)
ND
ND
ND(10)
ND
ND
ND(10)
ND(I0)
ND
ND
ND(10)
ND
ND
ND(10j
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(9.3)
ND(9.3)
ND(9.3)
ND(9.3)
ND(9.3)
ND(9.3)
ND(9.3)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0_)
ND(1.0)
ND(I.0)
ND(1.0)
NA
ND(1.0)
ND(I.0)
ND(I.01
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.047)
ND(0.016)
ND(0.047)
ND(0.033)
ND(0.047)
0.034J
,i `, k1 F`: •". - exceeds NCDENR Gross Contamination Limit (GCL)
- exceeds NCDENR Groundwater Standards (GWS)
Bold Values - Result is Above Detection Limit
pgd - Micrograms per liter
ND (2.0) - Below Detection Limit in Parentheses
J - Results estimated; reported value below detection limit
U - Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected
•• - Detection limits elevated due to limited sample volume
B - Detected in method blank
D - Diluted sample
• - Lab Control Spike (LCS) Exceeded Control Limits
E = Concentrations exceedsd the calibration range of the instrument
NA - Not analyzed
NS - Not sampled
ND(0.094)
ND(0.094)
ND(0.094)
ND(0.094)
ND(0.042)
ND(0.094)
Page 6 of 7
SOCI ES

r
BessemerTables (2 & 3).xlsx
TABLE 2
HISTORICAL GROUND WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Bessemer City, North Carolina
Sampling Date ->
NCDENR
GWS
)
MW-7
MW-8
t 't` \ ..1
. CI) `
04/04/01
08/22/01
11/29/01
03/04/02
06/12/02
11/26/02
05/14/03
11/10/03
11/17/04
06/14/05
12/13/05
06/08/06 _
01/03/07
08/24/07
04/03/08
12/22/08
07/15/09
01/06/10
_ 04/03/08
12/23/08
07/15/09
01/06/10
Volatile Organic Compounds (µg/I)
Benzene
I
5,000
ND(1.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(5)
ND(1.0)
ND(I.0)
ND(4.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
20
_(,, D
1IM
1600
i 71 MO -r
2000
111MI
2500
Ethylbenzene
600
84,500
ND(1.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
0.22 JB
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(4.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
8
1400 D
Toluene
600
257,500
ND(1.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(5)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
25
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
76
23000 D
27000
30000
38000
Xylenes
500
87,500
ND(2.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
0.66 JB
ND(2.0)
ND(2.0)
28
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
59
8300 D
9200
12000
14000
1,1 Dichloroethene (1,1 dichloroethylene)
7
7,000
ND
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(5)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(4.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.11)
ND_(0.25)
ND(36)
MiraiiiMeWV
ND(72)
ND(22)
ND(22)
1,2-Dibromoethane
0.02
50
NA
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(5)
ND(I.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(4.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
1,2-Dichloropropane
0.60
510
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.13)
44 J
ND(72)
ND(26)
ND(26)
2-Butanone (MEK)
-
-.
ND(10)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(25)
ND(10)
NDL 0)
ND(40)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(1.0)
2000 J D
2100
1300J
2400
2-Hexanone
280
280,000
ND(10)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(25)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(40)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(1.0)
ND(68)
200J
ND(200)
ND(200)
ND(200)
4-methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
--
-
ND
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(25)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(40)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(1.0)
ND(60)
130J
ND(200)
Acetone
600
700,000
ND
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(50)
ND(25)
ND(25)
ND(_10(1)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(5.0)
ND(500)
1000U *
ND(1000)
ND(100)
ND(28)
4700
ND(1000)
ND(100)
ND(28)
6400
Carbon tetrachloride
0.300
-
ND
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(5)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(4.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.50)
ND(27)
ND(29)
'3800 D
ND(54)
ND(58)
5900
Chloroform
70
70,000
ND(1.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
0.18 J
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(4.0)
.NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.14)
0.56J
Isopropyl ether
70
70 000
ND(10)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(10)
ND(5.0)
ND(10)
ND(40)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE)
20
200,000
ND(10)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(40)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.20)
2500 D
4600
2500
5300
yrene
70
100,000
NA
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
0.17 JB
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(4.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.1 I)
ND(36)
ND(72)
ND(56)
ND(22)
ND(30)
ND(22)
ND(30)
Tetrachloroethene (perchloroethylene)
0.7
700
ND
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(5)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(4.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.15)
ND(28)
Trichloroethene (trichloroethylene)
3.0
2,800
ND
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
0.24 JB
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(4.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.13)
ND(40)
ND(80)
ND(26)
ND(26)
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (µg/I)
1 - Methylnaphthalene
--
--.
NA
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NA
NA
NA
ND(9.3)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
14
19 J
36
ND(38)
52
2 - Methylnaphthalene
30
12,500
NA
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(9.3)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
18
39*
71
Benzo(a)anthracene
0.05
22
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(10)
ND(9.3)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.50)
ND(4.9)
ND(4.7)
ND(9.4)
ND(9.4)
ND(9.4)
Benzo(a)pyrene
0.005
1.5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(10)
ND(9.3)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.49)
ND(1.7)
ND(4.9)
ND(1.6)
ND(4.7)
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
200
210
ND
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
0.78 J
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(9.3)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.47)
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
0.5
0.40
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(10)
ND(9.3)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.39)
ND(3.4)
ND(3.3)
ND(9.4)
Chrysene
5
4.79
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(10)
ND(9.3)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.54)
ND(4.9)
270
ND(4.7)
550
ND(4.2)
270'
Naphthalene
6
15 500
NA
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(9.3)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
300
Notes:
- exceeds NCDENR Gross Contamination Limit (GCL)
- exceeds NCDENR Groundwater Standards (GWS)
Bold Values - Result is Above Detection Limit
µg/I - Micrograms per liter
ND (2.0) - Below Detection Limit in Parentheses
J - Results estimated; reported value below detection limit
U - Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected
•• - Detection limits elevated due to limited sample volume
B - Detected in method blank
D - Diluted sample
• - Lab Control Spike (LCS) Exceeded Control Limits
E = Concentrations exceedsd the calibration range of the instrument
NA - Not analyzed
NS - Not sampled
Page 7 of 7
SOCI: ES

Sample Date ->
Total Metals (µg/1)
TABLE 3
GROUND WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
INORGANIC ANALYSES
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Bessemer City, North Carolina
•
NCDENR GWS
h °`;,+; `•,(, 4•, f�
MW-1
MW-2
"OA lL l Z«,S b..
04/03/08
12/22/08 07/15/09
I 01/05/10
04/03/08
I 04/03/08
12/23/08
12/23/08 07/15/09
07/15/09
I 01/05/10 I 01/05/10
Duplicate
Duplicate
Duplicate
Duplicate
Arsenic
10
40
130
9.4J
57
12
52
6.2 J
33
ND(4.6)
ND(4.6)
6.5J
8.0J
Barium
700
2,000,000
200
240
140
180
360
580
300
360
110
100
160
150
Cadmium
2.0
ND(0.53)
0.63
ND(2)
2.0
ND(0.53)
ND(0.53)
ND(0.53)
ND(0.53)
ND(2)
ND(2)
ND(2)
ND(2)
Chromium
10
50,000
2J
4.3
1.2JB
1.3
4.4 J
17
2.6 J
11
ND(1.2)
16B
1.3J
1.7J
Iron
300
2,200
6,800
330
2,700 •
15,000
44,000
11,000
30,000
'5,300
6,200,
15,000
14,000 .
Lead
15
15,000
26
29
ND(4)
ND(4)
9.9
• 40
2.6 J
15
ND(4)
ND(4)
ND(4)
ND(4)
Mercury
1.0
ND(0.08)
ND(0.08)
ND(0.091)
ND(0.091)
ND(0.08)
ND(0.08)
ND(0.08)
ND(0.08)
ND(0.091)
ND(0.091)
ND(0.091)
ND(0.091)
Selenium
20
ND(3.6)
ND(3.6)
ND(6.4)
ND(6.4)
ND(3.6)
ND(3.6)
4.7 J
5.3 J
8.4J
9.1J
ND(6.4)
ND(6.4)
Silver
20
18,000
ND(0.51)
ND(0.51)
ND(0.89)
ND(0.89)
0.57 J
ND(0.51)
0.56 J
ND(0.51)
ND(0.89)
ND(0.89)
1.2J
ND(0.89)
Sodium
19,000
17,000
12,000
10,000
24,000
22,000
20,000
21,000
25,000
25,000
63,000
68,000
Other Inorganics (µg/1)
Dissolved Iron (field filtered)
430
ND(2.5)
240
2600
11,000
9,500
ND(2.5)
ND(2.5)
5,700
6,000
16,000
14,000
Sulfate
250,000
ND(2500)
46000 J
ND(2500)
ND(2500)
ND(2500)
ND(2500)
13,000
12,000
ND(2500)
ND(2500)
ND(2500)
ND(2500)
Notes:
- exceeds NCDENR Gross Contamination Limit (GCL)
- exceeds NCDENR Groundwater Standards (GWS)
Bold Values - Result is Above Detection Limit
µg/I - Micrograms per liter
ND (2.0) - Below Detection Limit in Parentheses
J - Results estimated; reported value below detection limit
S - Result was determined by the Method of Standard Additions
** - Detection limits elevated due to limited sample volume
B - Detected in method blank
D - Diluted sample
* - Lab Control Spike (LCS) Exceeded Control Limits
E = Concentrations exceedsd the calibration range of the instrument
NA - Not analyzed
NS - Not sampled
1 of 3

Sample Date ->
Total Metals (µg/I)
Arsenic
TABLE 3
GROUND WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
INORGANIC ANALYSES
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Bessemer City, North Carolina
NCDENR GWS
' " b
�,
MW-3
MW-4
MW-5
4(C',Cjjt
04/03/08
I 12/22/08 07/15/09
01/05/10
04/03/08
I 12/23/08 07/15/09
01/06/10
04/03/08
I 12/22/08 07/15/09
01/06/10
10
ND(5.9)
ND(5.9)
ND(4.6)
8.7J
9.3 J
ND(5.9)
ND(4.6)
8.2J
ND(5.9)
ND(5.9)
ND(4.6)
ND(4.6)
Barium
700
2,000,000
180
130
140
27
220
200
130
320
130
31
90
68
Cadmium
2.0
ND(0.53)
ND(0.53)
ND(2)
ND(2)
ND(0.53)
0.72 J
ND(2)
ND(2)
ND(0.53)
ND(0.53)
ND(2)
ND(2)
Chromium
10
50,000
1.9 J
1.6 J
15B
1.3J
2.5 J
1.9 J
1.5JB
1.4J
ND(1.3)
ND(1.3)
ND(1.2)
I.4J
Iron
300
250
• 1,300
300
800
4,600
1,200.
260
6,100
140
97
930
320
Lead
15
15,000
3.3 J
ND(2.3)
ND(4)
ND(4)
5.5
ND(2.3)
5.2J
ND(4)
ND(2.3)
ND(2.3)
ND(4)
ND(4)
Mercury
1.0
ND(0.08)
ND(0.08)
ND(0.091)
0.11J
ND(0.08)
ND(0.08)
ND(0.091)
ND(0.091)
ND(0.08)
ND(0.08)
ND(0.091)
0.15J
Selenium
20
ND(3.6)
ND(3.6)
ND(6.4)
ND(6.4)
ND(3.6)
4.4 J
ND(6.4)
ND(6.4)
ND(3.6)
ND(3.6)
ND(6.4)
ND(6.4)
Silver
20
18,000
ND(0.5 1)
ND(0.51)
ND(0.89)
ND(0.89)
ND(0.51)
0.82J
ND(0.89)
ND(0.89)
ND(0.5 1)
ND(0.5 1)
ND(0.89)
ND(0.89)
Sodium
18,000
98,000
55,000
570,000
18,000
22,000
11,000
29,000
23,000
88,000
54,000
80,000
Other Inorganics (µg/1)
Dissolved Iron (field filtered)
330
15
160
470
2,600
6.2
290
6,000
360
6
830
250
Sulfate
250,000
ND(2500)
14,000
ND(2500)
18,000
6,900
3,800
8,100
3,500J
ND(2500)
ND(2500)
ND(2500)
3,400J
Notes:
- exceeds NCDENR Gross Contamination Limit (GCL)
- exceeds NCDENR Groundwater Standards (GWS)
Bold Values - Result is Above Detection Limit
µg/1- Micrograms per liter
ND (2:0) - Below Detection Limit in Parentheses
J - Results estimated; reported value below detection limit
S - Result was determined by the Method of Standard Additions
** - Detection limits elevated due to limited sample volume
B - Detected in method blank
D - Diluted sample
* - Lab Control Spike (LCS) Exceeded Control Limits
E = Concentrations exceedsd the calibration range of the instrument
NA - Not analyzed
NS - Not sampled
2 of 3

TABLE 3
GROUND WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
INORGANIC ANALYSES
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Bessemer City, North Carolina
Sample Date ->
NCDENR GWS
t f ,
MW-6
MW-7
MW-8
"i Cj "�,i l` iC (Y11 cY
04/03/08 12/23/08 07/16/09
01/06/10
04/03/08 .
12/23/08
07/15/09
01/06/10
04/03/08 I 12/23/08
07/15/09
01/06/10
Total Metals (µg/1)
Arsenic
10
--
NS
NS
ND(4.6)
ND(4.6)
NS
NS
NS
ND(4.6)
ND(5.9)
ND(5.9)
ND(4.6)
ND(4.6)
Barium
700
2,000,000
NS
NS
52
52
NS
NS
NS
75
98
210
220
180
Cadmium
2.0
--
NS
NS
ND(2)
ND(2)
NS
NS
NS
ND(2)
ND(0.53)
ND(0.53)
ND(2)
ND(2)
Chromium
10
50,000
NS
NS
ND(1.2)
1.7J
NS
NS
NS
1.8J
1.7 J
1.9 J
2.8JB
1.4J
Iron
300
--
NS
NS
ND(50)
ND(50)
NS
NS
NS
ND(50)
350
280
330
170
Lead
15
15,000
NS
NS
ND(4)
ND(4)
NS
NS
NS
ND(4)
43
21
12
24
Mercury
1.0
--
NS
NS
ND(0.091)
ND(0.091)
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.091)
ND(0.08)
0.27 S
ND(0.091)
0.18J
Selenium
20
--
NS
NS
6.5J
ND(6.4)
NS
NS
NS
ND(6.4)
ND(3.6)
4.5 J
8J
ND(6.4)
Silver
20
18,000
NS
NS
ND(0.89)
ND(0.89)
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.89)
ND(0.51)
0.99 J
ND(0.89)
1.0J
Sodium
--
--
NS
NS
8,400
8,600
NS
NS
NS
4,000
28,000
22,000
15,000
24,000
Other Inorganics (p.g/1)
Dissolved Iron (field filtered)
--
--
NS
NS
ND(50)
24
NS
NS
NS
51
140
ND(2.5)
150
120
Sulfate
250,000
--
NS
NS
67,000
89,000
NS
NS
NS
62,000
8.4
120
ND(2500)
2,500
Notes:
- exceeds NCDENR Gross Contamination Limit (GCL)
- exceeds NCDENR Groundwater Standards (GWS)
Bold Values - Result is Above Detection Limit
µg/1- Micrograms per liter
ND (2.0) - Below Detection Limit in Parentheses
J - Results estimated; reported value below detection limit
S - Result was determined by the Method of Standard Additions
** - Detection limits elevated due to limited sample volume
j B - Detected in method blank
D - Diluted sample
* - Lab Control Spike (LCS) Exceeded Control Limits
E = Concentrations exceedsd the calibration range of the instrument
NA - Not analyzed
NS - Not sampled
3 of 3

I
APPENDIX A

GROUND WATER MONITORING WELL MW-1
Client/Site: Norfolk Southern Railway Company Bessemer City Date: 0/g p/0
Location: 201 W. Virginia Avenue, Bessemer City, NC 28016 Protect No: NS1411
HISTORICAL DATA
Free product historically present : NO
rt below Well
casing Constr. 2" Sch 40 PVC; 10' screen Notes: 2" well=0.17 gal/ft
Historical Water ft below Installed Well
Level: 15 casing Depth: 25.22
FIELD MEASUREMENTS
Water
/ 1
Quality,Instrument(s):
Pump
Sampling
Tubing Discarded
YSI 556MPS HACH DR/850 Lamotte 2020e
'Purge,Method:
Low Flow Purge
Measured Water Measured Well
Level: a. 6 4/ Depth: 'tr.
Brand/
After
Model: Peristaltic Pump
Tubing: 1l4" OD Polyethylene
Time started 7 Pumping Depth:
purging: I2z S ,?.3.0�
Use? CYESS NO
Units (circle one) Initial 1 2 3 4 5 Final
Time
/225-
123.0
l235".
/21la
/2YS
a3'0
%,zSS
Water Level feet
a. 6 y
/3. $
.13. 7S.
/.3 • $'4
13 • Cj0
/y oe
/'/. 1 /
Flow o min • m Ipm
46,
C1, D
g, ;Q
1,0
$.O
'�?•. 0
7 0
Temp. dal of
a.'95.
a. 06
)73 ,.4p
11.74
/ 1.
/ N 4 d f
/ •. 1 7
SC a.NS/cm
0, / 36
0.. /.?s
O. /.?6
O, /27
0. /2.
O,122?
0. 12b
DO %DO g/...
2. 4
,. OQ
4 /0 -
6.1g
D .5-3
C. z
6.21
pH pH units
.5".. R3
.5: R /
.6: 21
5: RI/
S..? 5'
5t• 2ii
,.C.. 2 g
ORP Q
7g.g
q!• Y
/02.2
/04/.6
10.3. 0 -
97.1
g5'$
4/1/ . 7
31,9
OA 7
_
27. 7
%'tip • R
/ 3. Y
/l. %
Turbidity NTU
Ferrous Iron
I3.y3d
Notes: �s 6w(t� Gd
.2..aiCr- is CG , 4VV7 di?V.
«
�4r
I .
Purged / sampled by: Matthew Smith Sample placed on ice after sampling? 0411. NO
SAMPLE LOG
Container type:
No. of Containers:
Volume
Preservative
Gv
O O
47' .�.0�� Qr
QP QG
G
G
G
G
G
Turb: Opaque
Turbid n �I�rr
5, i Pe.?7O.
JO
3
2
1
1
1
Odor: None Other:
40m1
1L
250m1
125m1
250m1
Color one Other:
HCI
HCI
HNO3
None
HNO3
Sample'ID Sampling Time
'`P�
le.,
�4
_
CP
O\�`'
Q
c5�O
O�
♦
Ahi-. /
/300
X.
1/
X
X
g
X
Duplicate collected (circle)?. YES
Duplicate ID:
(I O
„. • •,
s.i: la _

GROUND WATER MONITORING WELL MW-2
Client/Site: Norfolk Southern Railway Company Bessemer City Date: / /512t /v
Location: 201 W. Virginia Avenue, Bessemer City, NC 28016 Project No: NS1411
HISTORICAL DATA
Free product historically present : NO
tt below Well 2" Sch 40 PVC; 5' screen Notes: 2" well=0.17 gal/ft
casing Constr:
Historical Water 15 ft below Installed Well 25 02
Level: casing Depth:
FIELD MEASUREMENTS
Water
O
, 0 p
Quality Instrument(s):
Pump
Sampling
Tubing Discarded
YSI 556MPS HACH DR/850 Lamotte 2020e
Purge Method: Low Flow Purge
Measured Water 6 / Measured Total
Level: ill. / Depth: 25
Brand/
After
Model: Peristaltic Pump
Tubing: 1/4" OD Polyethylene
Time started purging: /"U/t1111 ,2 3• 60 Pumping depth:
7 /
Use? NO
Units (circle one) Initial 1 2 3 4 5 Final
Time
% q/a
/9/ 5
/'/ 20
/4/2 S
/ y30
/2/.75-
All. 13
/1/110
hi, 7 /
Water Level feet
/y, f6
// 417
/y, S 7
N. 6 ?
/i. ?S
Flow min pm Ipm
/0 , 0
9, 0
7, 0
7'. O
V . 0
S, o
S. 0
Temp. ilalk °F
16.3 l
/4,4/G
/$,68
Moo
19,06
/1, S#
/7,13
v.35$
0.51
sc /cm s/cm
0. 3v 3
0. 34'
0. 3,S.Z
D. 33.s.
m. 3s6
p . 35-6
,?, q.?
J. 3 '
o •'(3
0.77
6,75f
0, 3T
DO %DO
pH pH units
6.34(
G. 2 7
66.2/.
C.26
6. 2C
G..?
6 .g6
ORP FO
—61. S
-%. 7
-77,y
-/03. 9
-/o?, 3
--/13.4
-//7, e
Turbidity 4
y, S /
3.06
2, yO
.. / 41
/, 4'?
/ 76
/, 3?
Ferrous Iron I mg/L)
l',rto
3.3
Notes: PN� el �p�X• 2.O Ga/�. l ti4Ter' , s de r Wi 7 ,rir0. Od,P/',
Purged / sampled by: Matthew Smith Sample placed on ice after sampling? _Err
NO
SAMPLE LOG
Container type:
No. of Containers:
Volume
Preservative
xN4Z0
���lrx�
o� oG\•
QQ ciG
G
G
G
G
G
Turb: Opaque
Turbid Clear
Perr'D .
JO
3
2
1
1
1
Odor: None Other:
40m1
1L
250m1
125m1
250m1
Color: None Other:
HCI
HCI
HNO3
None
HNO3
Sample ID Sampling Time
l��
e
Op
O�
�l
`el
j---.�
/4141- 2
/ 1/5-0
X
X
X
K
Duplicate collected (circle)
Duplicate ID: MW-22
? t ES
NO
•.
►\' . ►\
x
)(
x
K
X
K
1"AINNI

GROUND WATER MONITORING WELL MW-3
Client/Site: Norfolk Southern Railway Company Bessemer. City Date: 1 / 5" / RO/a
Location: 201 W. Virginia Avenue, Bessemer City, NC 28016 Project No: NS1411
HISTORICAL DATA
Free product historically present : NO
ft below Well
casing Constr: 2" Sch 40 PVC; 10' screen Notes: 2" well=0.17 gal/ft
Historical Water ft below Installed Well
Level: 16 casing Depth: 31.35
FIELD MEASUREMENTS
Water
33
Quality Instrument(s):
Pump
Sampling
Tubing Discarded
YSI 556MPS HACH DR/850 Lamotte 2020e
Purge Method: Low Flow Purge
Measured Water Measured Total
Level: f �/r 7 Depth: ,3%
Brand/
After
Model: Peristaltic Pump
Tubing: 1/4" OD Polyethylene
Time started5 3
purgrging:ng: % 9' Pumping depth: OG
Use? YES NO
Units (circle one) Initial 1 2 3 4 5 Final
Time
(SSO
/SSS
/400
aoS
4/0
/6/6-
/620
Water Level feet
H9 s 7
/G. 4 /
a. 7?
/7. z/
/7. S3
0.4 ,7
17. 95-
Flow z/min m Ipm
/,, 0
/0. 0
$, 0
7, 0
7. O
G, d
to . 0
Temp. °C °F
/s,yr
/5.63
/7.37
/'L'/9
/L,17
1$.AO
/1.03
sC m _ /cm. /cm
0,'0 5?
0. 3 $ 7
/. 3 to?
2, //3
2, No
z 133
2153
DO %DO mg/L
O. Sa
O. RC
2 7.3
,j. 3 R
5', Hy
Z$
S. $G
pH pH units
3-.40
$,240
7.66'
q.66
9.66-
?.6V
?.63
ORP 671-
3 q• 9'
-.90,1
- 213. 7
-1/ 7. y
- /02.1
-- q2. 4.
- V 9.6
Turbidity TU,
(/. 6 4(
2. 3$'
3,57
5. 7 7
S. 9G1
4.(97
S. Gc7
Ferrous Iron mg/
1. ?Q
Notes: ,Pez.remi Aia px, 2.0 641 IJare r I %5 s/(i it-/, /h d /'% y .S .)Ir 4rrro . &or.
,
Purged / sampled by: Matthew Smith Sample placed on ice after sampling? YES NO
SAMPLE LOG
Container type:
No. of Containers:
Volume
Preservative
O0
xQ 0•$\
�cbQ3-
G
G
G
G
G
Turb: Opaque
Turbid Clear
1- T IQt'!D
Gtb
JO
3
2
1
1
1
Odor: None Other:.
40m1
1L
250m1
125m1
250m1
,
Color: None Other: s% if4i/y 7 eky
HCI
HCI
HNO3
None
HNO3
V
Sample ID Sampling Time
\5
P
‹P
CSC
\J,
�,�
e�a
�'�% - 3
i 7 C
X
�/QF'.
'(
�/q-
/(
y�J
X
�,/cO
It
�Q(�
' \.
Duplicate collected (circle)?
Duplicate ID:
YES 0
,, . „ •,

GROUND WATER MONITORING WELL MW-4
Client/Site: Norfolk Southern Railway Company Bessemer City Date: / f s/ 20/e
Location: 201 W. Virginia Avenue, Bessemer City, NC 28016 Project No: NS1411
HISTORICAL DATA
Free product historically present : NO
ftbelow Well
casing Constr: 2" Sch 40 PVC; 5' screen Notes: 2" well=0.17 gal/ft
Historical Water ftbelow Installed Well
Level: 16 casing Depth: 25.05
FIELD MEASUREMENTS
Water
r
D J
Quality Instrument(s):
Pump Brand/
Sampling
Tubing Discarded After
YSI 556MPS HACH DR/850 Lamotte 2020e
Purge Method: Low Flow Purge
Measured Water Measured
Level: /' /. 0.S
Total
Depth:
depth:
W Sr
Model:
Tubing:
Use?
Peristaltic Pump
1/4" OD Polyethylene
Time urstging D 3 6-Pumping
urin
?3 •00
NO
Units (circle one) Initial 1 2 3 4 5 Final
Time
D-53 S
o S1/0
O S4/S
DSSa
D$ SS
0900
egos
Water Level feet
p/, 0 s
l i,, J./5-
pi. S[I/
74/. / y
/4 72
JL//, $3D
/dil. .
Flow oz/min pm Ipm
/0. 0
/0 .0
9% 0
5'. 0
$, 0
$ ,a
`3, Q
Temp. °C °F
,y. s.1
/ S. '56
4. R6
/6... 1
/ . 4/V
/. 76
/(• 1. it
D. /cog
Q. 205-
O. 20/
D. 200
O, /91
co. 200
O. / 97
SC S/cry%NS/cm
DO %DO g/L
/,%7
2.6p.
/, 06
0.5s
0.76
o. y'Y
0.75
unnitss
pH pH units
Jr. $S
5-, 5-6
5. 5 0
S . y
J$ • 4LT (
Jam• Y'S
5 els
ORP e
�.e/.
/a.3
/7. L/
2F• /
OB.2
3t0. 3
g`17.5
Turbidity 1►
//y
0• 7 S
0. S7
0. 5- 7
O..s.S
v. l(1
o, 3 7
Ferrous Iron g/)
3. 30
Notes: Pr eI , 'px. 2.0 GA(,� Warer i S c/ r I./. T� f r-i . lof2'd7 •
Purged / sampled by: Matthew Smith Sample placed on Ice after sampling?
YES
NO
SAMPLE LOG
Container type:
No. of Containers:
Volume
Preservative
e
AN,-
,.㤠0
e 0
felt, ��'\C'
`I`
QP eG
G
G
G
G
G
Turb: Opaque
Turbid 4
JDe% ro •
JO
3
2
1
1
1
Odor: None Other:
40m1
1L
250m1
125m1
250m1
Color: one Other:
HCI
HCI
HNO3
None
HNO3
Q/'lpk co/leer mn //6//d/o
Sample
Sample ID Sampling Time
s
�CP
yJ�,,O
P��
�Q
4.,
OO
r75'
O�
„i_o
v_ 4,
\�0�e
cep
,g,
Jr-O
Al0-4/
oq/o
X
K
X
X
X
Duplicate collected (circle)
Duplicate ID:
? YES
!!!

GROUND WATER MONITORING WELL MW-5
(
Client/Site: Norfolk Southern Railway Company Bessemer City Date: J /6/ 2 0/0Location:
201 W. Virginia Avenue, Bessemer City, NC 28016 Project No: NS1411
HISTORICAL DATA
Free product historically present : NO
bow
cas ng Consul 2" Sch 40 PVC; 10' screen Notes: 2" well=0.17 gal/ft
Historical Water ft below Installed Wellft
Level: 15 casing Depth: 25.02
FIELD MEASUREMENTS
Water
O (
Quality Instrument(s):
Pump Brand/
Sampling
Tubing Discarded After
YSI 556MPS HACH DR/850 Lamotte 2020e
Purge Method: Low Flow Purge
Measured Water Measured
Level: ///, / ?
Total
Depth:
depth:
l S,
Model:
Tubing:
Use?
Peristaltic Pump
1/4" OD Polyethylene
Time started R 3 Pumping
purging: 0
,?.3. 00
NO
Units (circle one) Initial 1 2 3 4 5 Final
Time
of30
og3s
07e/0
oQ4s
04sd
o.7SY
/boo
Water Level feet
jy, )2
/y, 6/
/1/.7.0
/4/. 97
/s,/q
/5.21,
/5.33
Flow oz/min g m Ipm
/0. O
/O.O
/ , O
1g. 0
7. c7
7,0
70
Temp. 0 OF
/7,/5-
/8.4R
/7, 'c
/7, `r(1
/7 $'I
)7,12
J7. 10
SC ap S/cm '
D, $3g
co, ?Ys
0,513
0, 4'44"
D, 313
©. 36 c/
D. 3k 3
DO %DO 0
,s, 56
a • So
D, 6 .z
D. s3
D. 413
b, 9/
O. 4/O
pH pH units
6,(3
4 , ha
6.27
c.D,S
5.?5
5,g6
5 7l
ORP d
_/7,i
^30, y
3'.D
YS. 2
43.S
77.1
SS.o
Turbidity TU
/Od . 9
Co. 3
S. /
l 3. i
7, l (
7, 6 7
lam, 30
Ferrous Iron 4121
o,37
Notes: Al A.pexs 20 £a/J waTer ,'5 / if/rky W/�/ .5/i ,L. }-/'f�
0daa r • `!
Purged / sampled by: Matthew Smith Sample placed on ice after sampling? ES....) NO
SAMPLE LOG
Container type:
No. of Containers:
Volume
Preservative
00
q,`t�� �cbg, 0,��
Q P �G
G
G
G
G
G
Turb: Opaque
Turbid 1 Clear
3"/ jiT / /j tr'o.
O
J
3
2
1
1
1
Odor: None Other:
40m1
1L
250m1
125m1
250m1
Color: None Other:,: 4Th/ /' /rk)/
HCI
HCI
HNO3
None
HNO3
semirk e-,/(eeTed OI% //e0O/D
Sample ID Sampling Time
��
5J
- ,sP50
. ,SO
5�
0�
\Q-O�
jit w-s
/aos
X
X
x
X:
x
X
Duplicate collected (circle)? YES 0
Duplicate ID:
IMAIIN!

GROUND WATER MONITORING WELL MW-6
Client/Site: Norfolk Southern Railway Company Bessemer City Date: //5-12O/U
Location: 201 W. Virginia Avenue, Bessemer City, NC 28016 Project No: NS1411
HISTORICAL DATA
Free product historically present : NO
tt below Well
casing Constr: 2' Sch 40 PVC; 5' screen Notes: 2" well=0.17 gal/ft
Historical Water ft below Installed Well
Level: 18 casing Depth: 20.00
FIELD MEASUREMENTS
Water
Quality Instrument(s):
Pump Brand/
Sampling
Tubing Discarded After
YSI 556MPS HACH DR/850 Lamotte 2020e
Purge Method: Low Flow Purge
Measured Water Measured
Level: /�• , ,� 7
Total
Depth:
depth:
/7,111
Model:
Tubing:
Use?410
Peristaltic Pump
1/4" OD Polyethylene
Time started Pumping
purging: 11.) S
/ q , `5,0
NO
Units (circle one) Initial 1 2 3 4 5 Final
Time
&,SS
/200
/2DS
/,'/a
/vS
/220
/i?ZS
Water Level feet
a.„,7
!e, iG
/4 , c1 7
1 ?, g/
0,..57 S1
1).72
/?. q,
Flow z/min pm Ipm
7 O
7,0
6,0
G, e)
5,0
.5, 0
S,Q
Temp. of
1 (, 113
/8, 4/
/1. / '7
/?/
re, V/
/ 13, 7 i
/8,7/
SC ,abpS/om
0,/86
a/qs
a,114
49i1g7
a, 197
2./q7
o,I`tg
DO %DO
cf. 39
,r', 6l
4� 3 .
S. 2S
S. 29
'1.10
5.2s.
pH pH units
4f, 32
L/. 22
L5/.
47. 20
7, 20
41. 20
y, /7
41,19
ORP 10
24/1, /
.2q', 7.
312. y
319.4
3zS, 9
330. 7
335; 7
Turbidity TU
t/, 02
0.14
2,12
0 . i1.
0,21
- 0. 3.s
r /. AS -
Ferrous Iron g/L
d.0 5
Notes: Ai ,,,1 AP",l(. 2. 0 64(. , %/A%t•r i 5 G�e4 % AM /9Gr'�r- .
Purged / sampled by: Matthew Smith Sample placed on ice after sampling? 4 wal I II I I I NO
SAMPLE LOG
Container type:
of Containers:
Volume
Preservative
Alt,
Xs
,R �O\
q0Ob ,ysz
'1�G.
se� ¢
QP e6
G
G
G
G
G
Turb: Opaque
Turbid
40,No.
G�
JO
3
2
1
1
1
Odor: Vim Other:
40m1
1L
250m1
125m1
250m1
Color: one Other:
HCI
HCI
HNO3
None.
HNO3
,/
540te/e GO/(etreG/' Ort 1(6/Zo/0
Sample ID Sampling Time
v5
4.
�P
yJ
.4'
,cQy
,sO
\JCS
co
cote
O)
@e�
�O
"t/•- G
/230
K
X
X
X
K
Duplicate collected (circle) ? YES XI.
Duplicate ID:
minisig
„, . „LIE.'

GROUND WATER MONITORING WELL MW-7
Client/Site: Norfolk Southern Railway Company Bessemer City Date: // 3 /" a/0
Location: 201 W. Virginia Avenue, Bessemer City, NC 28016 Project No: NS1411
HISTORICAL DATA
Free product historically present : NO
Historical Water ft below Installed Well
Level: 20 casing Depth: 20.00
ft below Well
casing Constr: 2' Sch 40 PVC; 10' screen Notes: 2" well=0.17 gal/ft
FIELD MEASUREMENTS
Water Quality Instrument(s): YSI 556MPS HACH DR/850 Lamotte 2020e
Purge Method: Low Flow Purge
Pump Brand/ Model: Peristaltic Pump
Measured Water Measured Total
Level: /', 28 Depth: 2D
; / 5 _ Sampling Tubing: 1/4" OD Polyethylene
Time started Pumping depth:
purging: MS 00
Tubing Discarded After Use? NO
11110
Units (circle one) Initial 1
2 3 4 5 Final
Time
/a Co
/Rs's"
/3o0
/34.5
/3/0
/3/5-
/3 D
Water Level feet
/e„ z g
/$, 7p
/$, cj
let. 31
/9. !o/
/9. 9-7
Flow pm Ipm
5-. /
5.O
.S. Q
S. o
y. o
3.D
Temp. • °F
/ 4. 3a
/6. 99
17. 2 G
)7.212
17.23
/ 7 a 5
SC i pS/cm
o./6y
D./4.0
o./ -q
0./s0
o.//q
o,/Y7
DO %DO CP
43i q
6 .24
C. 35
6, to
5i v
S. S2
`,
pH pH units
.S. L/$
6-. 33
'/ .91
L. So
Y. fl y
'/. 4/'3-
%
ORP ®
19G• 4
.//. 9
.q3. 3
R83.7
295.. 6
297.1
,
Turbidity S)
3,z)
Z. ?
0.31
- d. q S
--/. 30
-1. L1/3
Ferrous Iron /7.
6). 0 /
,
Notes: /vr e,1 `";/ y Q Ter J. 5- 6di:i
li)oire r i 5 /_/el r , DAr,
1 // i.'4're'- e7A4
,11 Very
f
sA iil , Akar P/zavA IAA ,r-er• i
y.
e iIlP_LT Sam, le TiDr '127i%
— 41, •N/if flakei /-,E .
Purged / sampled by: Matthew Smith
Sample placed on ice after sampling? ma NO
SAMPLE LOG
Container type:
G
G
G
G
G
Turb: Opaque Turbid
No. of Containers:
3
2
1
1
1
O.
Odor: one Other:
Volume
40m1
1L
250m1
125m1
250m1
Color: one Other:
Preservative
HCI
HCI
HNO3
None
HNO3
Sarlple G/(ecT4mn 1 /G%aa/d G�ti6
Sample ID Sampling Time JO
00
x\Q� G`O�
0 0
����
. QP QC'
Qom`'
�� ���
co
�P�
•C
A)4\s
o
O�
`\��a
r'
�`�o
'
nw-7
)3A.-
X
x
X
X
,ram
Duplicate collected (circle) ? YES
miniiiir
Duplicate ID:

GROUND WATER MONITORING WELL MW-8
Client/Site: Norfolk Southern Railway Company Bessemer City Date: //s /o1D
Location: 201 W. Virginia Avenue, Bessemer City, NC 28016 Project No: NS1411
HISTORICAL DATA
Free product historically present :
ft below Well 2" Sch 40 PVC; 15' screen Notes: 2" well=0.17 gal/ft
casing Constr:
Historical Water it below Installed Well
Level: casing Depth:
FIELD MEASUREMENTS
Water
. 5- .5-
Quality Instrument(s):
Pump Brand/
Sampling
Tubing Discarded After
YSI 556MPS HACH DR/850 Lamotte 2020e
Purge Method: Low Flow Purge
Measured Water Measured
Level: /1/. G D
Total
Depth:
depth:
21
Model:
Tubing:
Use?ASS
Peristaltic Pump
1/4" OD Polyethylene
Time started
purging: /0 30 Pumping
24, O a
NO
Units (circle one) Initial 1 2 3 4 5 Final
Time
1030
/035
/04'o
/04Y5.
/dsd
/ass
//e90
Water Level feet
l g. 0
/1 /S
! S.. q
ISryv
IS, SG
15.4 ?
/5, s /
Flow oz/min •pm Ipm
/e, D
/0 . d
f, 6
$•O
7.0
7. 407eb
Temp. °F
L.
4.'5 -
1$e 1.
% leo5
/71 11.4
0 7g
1 ?. , .
/7..wr
SC S/cm pS/cm
„,,a/
0. 1.56
0, /.SC
D. 1 S .
6.1 sy
O. 1.51/
O, /56
DO %DO gal
�, SO
d r % $
b , 4/7
o. 9`j
0. YS
..53
p• 31/
pH pH units
-7 ' 14
q'�6� .s//
.11,,5 �
ua
/,J, S /
ly,,.SV
/�7n. 8
ORP
1,'38.7
2014 f0
rr��q.//.56
A.24. 7
n'rj�r./,5.2
;'Tt. S
gT�, 1
2y5•?
Turbidity TU
S. 67
Aso
O. ,s3
0.21
o. Z 1
O, SS
0. y
Ferrous Iron g/L
, 1 L/
Notes: tl/C/ ed f roe . 2.0 G 4 / biJa re r i's. clear Gr/, %d T C�fO. ell r.
,
Purged / sampled by: Matthew Smith Sample placed on ice after sampling? YES) NO
SAMPLE LOG
Container type:
No. of Containers:
Volume
Preservative
00
•<�li
xQ�li 0
ON/
90 cb
QP �
G
G
G
G
G
Turb: Opaque
Turbid
/ 4 ire •
Clear
JO
3
2
1
1
1
Odor: None Other:
40m1
1L
250m1
125m1
250m1
Color: one Other:
HCI
HCI
HNO3
None
HNO3
Safryle. esl/edrel on 1/6/�010
Sample ID Sampling Time
e
\rp
'Ce'
`�
4
�P�
O
J�•
00
P
O\5
HOC\
�`e\a
\-\
5��'°
\`ea\
/iw - 1
#oS
X
X
X
X
X
Duplicate collected (circle) ? YES NO
Duplicate ID:
IIIIIIII L 2.

APPENDIX B
• lk

THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING
ANALYTICAL REPORT
Job Number: 680-54031-1
Job Description: Norfolk Southern Bessemer City
For:
Marshall Miller & Associates
5700 Broadmoor
Suite 504
Mission, KS 66202
Attention: Mr. Carmelo Blazekovic
LONA-A6-0,. &Nu: 11)
Kathryn Smith
Project Manager I
[e-mail]
01/25/2010
Approved for release.
Kathryn Smith
Project Manager I
1/25/2010 4:48 PM
The test results in this report meet NELAP requirements for parameters for which accreditation is required or available.
Any exceptions to the NELAP requirements are noted. Results pertain only to samples listed in this report. This report
may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory. Questions should be directed to the
person who signed this report.
Savannah Certifications and ID #s: A2LA: 0399.01; AL: 41450; ARDEQ: 88-0692; ARDOH; CA: 03217CA; CO; CT:
PH0161; DE; FL: E87052; GA: 803; Guam; HI; IL: 200022; IN; IA: 353; KS: E-10322; KY EPPC: 90084; KY UST; LA
DEQ: 30690; LA DHH: LA080008; ME: 2008022; MD: 250; MA: M-GA006; MI: 9925; MS; NFESC: 249; NV: GA00006;
NJ: GA769; NM; NY: 10842; NC DWQ: 269; NC DHHS: 13701; PA: 68-00474; PR: GA00006; RI: LA000244; SC:
98001001; TN: TN0296; TX: T104704185; USEPA: GA00006; VT: VT-87052; VA: 00302; WA; WV DEP: 094; WV
DHHR: 9950 C; WI DNR: 999819810; WY/EPAR8: 8TMS-Q
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc.
TestAmerica Savannah 5102 LaRoche Avenue, Savannah, GA 31404
Tel [phone] Fax [phone] www.testamericainc.com
Page 1 of 53

METHOD SUMMARY
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
Description
Lab Location Method Preparation Method
Matrix: Water
Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Purge and Trap
Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Low level PAH
Liquid -Liquid Extraction (Continuous)
Metals (ICP)
Sample Filtration, Field
Preparation, Total Metals
Preparation, Total Recoverable or Dissolved Metals
Mercury (CVAA)
Preparation, Mercury
Sulfate
Lab References:
TAL SAV = TestAmerica Savannah
TAL SAV SW846 8260B
TAL SAV SW846 5030B
TAL SAV SW846 8270D_LL_PAH
TAL SAV SW846 3520C
TAL SAV SW846 6010C
TAL SAV FIELD_FLTRD
TAL SAV SW846 3010A
TAL SAV SW846 3005A
TAL SAV SW846 7470A
TAL SAV SW846 7470A
TAL SAV MCAWW 375.4
Method References:
MCAWW = "Methods For Chemical Analysis Of Water And Wastes", EPA-600/4-79-020, March 1983 And Subsequent Revisions.
SW846 = "Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods", Third Edition, November 1986 And Its Updates.
TestAmerica Savannah
Page 2 of 53

METHOD / ANALYST SUMMARY
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
Method Analyst Analyst ID
SW846 8260B Bearden, Robert RB
SW846 8270D LL PAH Smith, Tashan T TTS
SW846 6010C Bland, Brian BCB
SW846 7470A Eaton, Cliff CE
MCAWW 375.4 Ross, Jon JR
TestAmerica Savannah
Page 3 of 53

SAMPLE SUMMARY
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
Date/Time Date/Time
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Client Matrix Sampled Received
680-54031-1 MW-1 Water 01/05/2010 1300 01/07/2010 1023
680-54031-2 MW-2 Water 01/05/2010 1450 01/07/2010 1023
680-54031-3 MW-22 Water 01/05/2010 1515 01/07/2010 1023
680-54031-4 MW-3 Water 01/05/2010 1625 01/07/2010 1023
680-54031-5 MW-4 Water 01/06/2010 0910 01/07/2010 1023
680-54031-6 MW-5 Water 01/06/2010 1005 01/07/2010 1023
680-54031-7 MW-8 Water 01/06/2010 1105 01/07/2010 1023
680-54031-8 MW-6 Water 01/06/2010 1230 01/07/2010 1023
680-54031-9 MW-7 Water 01/06/2010 1325 01/07/2010 1023
680-54031-10 Trip Blank Water 01/06/2010 0000 01/07/2010 1023
TestAmerica Savannah
Page 4 of 53

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
Client Sample ID: MW-1
Lab Sample ID: 680-54031-1
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 01/05/2010 1300
Date Received: 01/07/2010 1023
Method: 8260B
Preparation: 5030B
Dilution: 5.0
Date Analyzed: 01/08/2010 1423
Date Prepared: 01/08/2010 1423
8260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Analysis Batch: 680-157917
Instrument ID: MSO
Lab File ID: o4307.d
Initial Weight/Volume: 5 mL
Final WeightNolume: 5 mL
Analyte Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Acetone 59 J 25 120
Benzene 1.2 U 1.2 5.0
Carbon tetrachloride 2.5 U 2.5 5.0
Isopropyl ether 1.2 U 1.2 50
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 5.0 U 5.0 50
1,1-Dichloroethene 0.55 U 0.55 5.0
Chloroform 17 0.70 5.0
2-Butanone (MEK) 5.0 U 5.0 50
1,2-Dichloropropane 0.65 U 0.65 5.0
Trichloroethene 0.65 U 0.65 5.0
2-Hexanone 5.0 U 5.0 50
1,2-Dibromoethane 1.2 U 1.2 5.0
Tetrachloroethene 1.2 J 0.75 5.0
Toluene 5.5 1.6 5.0
Ethylbenzene 9.4 0.55 5.0
Styrene 0.55 U 0.55 5.0
Xylenes, Total 950 1.0 10
Methyl tert-butyl ether 1.0 U 1.0 50
Surrogate %Rec Qualifier Acceptance Limits
4-Bromofluorobenzene 109 75 - 120
Dibromofluoromethane 102 75 - 121
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 104 75 - 120
TestAmerica Savannah Page 5 of 53

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
Client Sample ID: MW-2
Lab Sample ID: 680-54031-2
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 01/05/2010 1450
Date Received: 01/07/2010 1023
Method: 8260E
Preparation: 5030E
Dilution: 200
Date Analyzed: 01/08/2010 1444
Date Prepared: 01/08/2010 1444
8260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Analysis Batch: 680-157917
Instrument ID: MSO
Lab File ID: o4308.d
Initial WeightNolume: 5 mL
Final WeightNolume: 5 mL
Analyte Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Acetone 1200 J 1000 5000
Benzene 11000 50 200
Carbon tetrachloride 100 U 100 200
Isopropyl ether 1600 J 48 2000
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 200 U 200 2000
1,1-Dichloroethene 22 U 22 200
Chloroform 28 U 28 200
2-Butanone (MEK) 1200 J 200 2000
1,2-Dichloropropane 26 U 26 200
Trichloroethene 26 U 26 200
2-Hexanone 200 U 200 2000
1,2-Dibromoethane 50 U 50 200
Tetrachloroethene 30 U 30 200
Toluene 33000 66 200
Ethylbenzene 2100 22 200
Styrene 22 U 22 200
Xylenes, Total 21000 40 400
Methyl tert-butyl ether 1300 J 40 2000
Surrogate %Rec Qualifier Acceptance Limits
4-Bromofluorobenzene 110 75 - 120
Dibromofluoromethane 102 75 - 121
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 104 75 - 120
TestAmerica Savannah Page 6 of 53

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
Client Sample ID: MW-22
Lab Sample ID: 680-54031-3
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 01/05/2010 1515
Date Received: 01/07/2010 1023
Method: 8260B
Preparation: 5030B
Dilution: 200
Date Analyzed: 01/08/2010 1505
Date Prepared: 01/08/2010 1505
8260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Analysis Batch: 680-157917
Instrument ID: MSO
Lab File ID: o4309.d
Initial WeightNolume: 5 mL
Final WeightNolume: 5 mL
Analyte Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Acetone 1000 J 1000 5000
Benzene 11000 50 200
Carbon tetrachloride 100 U 100 200
Isopropyl ether 1700 J 48 2000
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 200 U 200 2000
1,1-Dichloroethene 22 U 22 200
Chloroform 28 U 28 200
2-Butanone (MEK) 1100 J 200 2000
1,2-Dichloropropane 26 U 26 200
Trichloroethene 26 U 26 200
2-Hexanone 200 U 200 2000
1,2-Dibromoethane 50 U 50 200
Tetrachloroethene 30 U 30 200
Toluene 33000 66 200
Ethylbenzene 1900 22 200
Styrene 22 U 22 200
Xylenes, Total 21000 40 400
Methyl tert-butyl ether 1500 J 40 2000
Surrogate %Rec Qualifier Acceptance Limits
4-Bromofluorobenzene 111 75 - 120
Dibromofluoromethane 100 75 - 121
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 104 75 - 120
TestAmerica Savannah Page 7 of 53

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
Client Sample ID: MW-3
Lab Sample ID: 680-54031-4
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 01/05/2010 1625
Date Received: 01/07/2010 1023
Method: 8260E
Preparation: 5030E
Dilution: 50
Date Analyzed: 01/08/2010 1525
Date Prepared: 01/08/2010 1525
8260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Analysis Batch: 680-157917
Instrument ID: MSO
Lab File ID: 04310.d
Initial WeightNolume: 5 mL
Final WeightNolume: 5 mL
Analyte Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Acetone 250 U 250 1200
Benzene 90 12 50
Carbon tetrachloride 25 U 25 50
Isopropyl ether 140 J 12 500
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 50 U 50 500
1,1-Dichloroethene 5.5 U 5.5 50
Chloroform 7.0 U 7.0 50
2-Butanone (MEK) 380 J 50 500
1,2-Dichloropropane 6.5 U 6.5 50
Trichloroethene 6.5 U 6.5 50
2-Hexanone 340 J 50 500
1,2-Dibromoethane 12 U 12 50
Tetrachloroethene 7.5 U 7.5 50
Toluene 2800 16 50
Ethylbenzene 1100 5.5 50
Styrene 5.5 U 5.5 50
Xylenes, Total 5000 10 100
Methyl tert-butyl ether 200 J 10 500
Surrogate %Rec Qualifier Acceptance Limits
4-Bromofluorobenzene 110 75 - 120
Dibromofluoromethane 100 75 - 121
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 103 75 - 120
TestAmerica Savannah Page 8 of 53

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
Client Sample ID: MW-4
Lab Sample ID: 680-54031-5
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 01/06/2010 0910
Date Received: 01/07/2010 1023
Method: 8260E
Preparation: 5030E
Dilution: 200
Date Analyzed: 01/08/2010 1546
Date Prepared: 01/08/2010 1546
8260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Analysis Batch: 680-157917
Instrument ID: MSO
Lab File ID: o4311.d
Initial WeightNolume: 5 mL
Final Weight/Volume: 5 mL
Analyte Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Acetone 1000 U 1000 5000
Benzene 1800 50 200
Carbon tetrachloride 100 U 100 200
Isopropyl ether 48 U 48 2000
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 200 U 200 2000
1,1-Dichloroethene 22 U 22 200
Chloroform 28 U 28 200
2-Butanone (MEK) 200 U 200 2000
1,2-Dichloropropane 26 U 26 200
Trichloroethene 26 U 26 200
2-Hexanone 200 U 200 2000
1,2-Dibromoethane 50 U 50 200
Tetrachloroethene 30 U 30 200
Toluene 24000 66 200
Ethylbenzene 2100 22 200
Styrene 22 U 22 200
Xylenes, Total 16000 40 400
Methyl tert-butyl ether 40 U 40 2000
Surrogate %Rec Qualifier Acceptance Limits
4-Bromofluorobenzene 109 75 - 120
Dibromofluoromethane 102 75 - 121
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 103 75 - 120
TestAmerica Savannah Page 9 of 53

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
Client Sample ID: MW-5
Lab Sample ID: 680-54031-6
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 01/06/2010 1005
Date Received: 01/07/2010 1023
Method: 8260E
Preparation: 5030B
Dilution: 50
Date Analyzed: 01/08/2010 1812
Date Prepared: 01/08/2010 1812
8260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Analysis Batch: 680-157917
Instrument ID: MSO
Lab File ID: 04318.d
Initial WeightNolume: 5 mL
Final WeightNolume: 5 mL
Analyte Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Acetone 250 U 250 1200
Benzene 300 12 50
Carbon tetrachloride 25 U 25 50
Isopropyl ether 320 J 12 500
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 190 J 50 500
1,1-Dichloroethene 5.5 U 5.5 50
Chloroform 7.0 U 7.0 50
2-Butanone (MEK) 50 U 50 500
1,2-Dichloropropane 6.5 U 6.5 50
Trichloroethene 6.5 U 6.5 50
2-Hexanone 50 U 50 500
1,2-Dibromoethane 12 U 12 50
Tetrachloroethene 7.5 U 7.5 50
Toluene 3100 16 50
Ethylbenzene 1000 5.5 50
Styrene 5.5 U 5.5 50
Xylenes, Total 11000 10 100
Methyl tert-butyl ether 380 J 10 500
Surrogate %Rec Qualifier Acceptance Limits
4-Bromofluorobenzene 108 75 - 120
Dibromofluoromethane 101 75 - 121
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 106 75 - 120
TestAmerica Savannah Page 10 of 53

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
Client Sample ID: MW-8
Lab Sample ID: 680-54031-7
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 01/06/2010 1105
Date Received: 01/07/2010 1023
Method: 8260E
Preparation: 5030B
Dilution: 200
Date Analyzed: 01/08/2010 1628
Date Prepared: 01/08/2010 1628
8260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Analysis Batch: 680-157917
Instrument ID: MSO
Lab File ID: o4313.d
Initial WeightNolume: 5 mL
Final WeightNolume: 5 mL
Analyte Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Acetone 1000 U 1000 5000
Benzene 25000 50 200
Carbon tetrachloride 100 U 100 200
Isopropyl ether 6400 48 2000
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 200 U 200 2000
1,1-Dichloroethene 22 U 22 200
Chloroform 28 U 28 200
2-Butanone (MEK) 2400 200 2000
1,2-Dichloropropane 26 U 26 200
Trichloroethene 26 U 26 200
2-Hexanone 200 U 200 2000
1,2-Dibromoethane 340 50 200
Tetrachloroethene 30 U 30 200
Toluene 38000 66 200
Ethylbenzene 2500 22 200
Styrene 22 U 22 200
Xylenes, Total 14000 40 400
Methyl tert-butyl ether 5300 40 2000
Surrogate %Rec Qualifier Acceptance Limits
4-Bromofluorobenzene 111 75 - 120
Dibromofluoromethane 102 75 - 121
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 105 75 - 120
TestAmerica Savannah Page 11 of 53

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
Client Sample ID: MW-6
Lab Sample ID: 680-54031-8
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 01/06/2010 1230
Date Received: 01/07/2010 1023
Method: 8260E
Preparation: 5030B
Dilution: 1.0
Date Analyzed: 01/08/2010 1710
Date Prepared: 01/08/2010 1710
8260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Analysis Batch: 680-157917
Instrument ID: MSO
Lab File ID: o4315.d
Initial Weight/Volume: 5 mL
Final WeightNolume: 5 mL
Analyte Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Acetone 5.0 U 5.0 25
Benzene 0.37 J 0.25 1.0
Carbon tetrachloride 0.50 U 0.50 1.0
Isopropyl ether 0.24 U 0.24 10
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 1.0 U 1.0 10
1,1-Dichloroethene 0.11 U 0.11 1.0
Chloroform 0.14 U 0.14 1.0
2-Butanone (MEK) 1.0 U 1.0 10
1,2-Dichloropropane 0.13 U 0.13 1.0
Trichloroethene 0.13 U 0.13 1.0
2-Hexanone 1.0 U 1.0 10
1,2-Dibromoethane 0.25 U 0.25 1.0
Tetrachloroethene 0.15 U 0.15 1.0
Toluene 1.4 0.33 1.0
Ethylbenzene 0.17 J 0.11 1.0
Styrene 0.11 U 0.11 1.0
Xylenes, Total 1.2 J 0.20 2.0
Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.20 U 0.20 10
Surrogate %Rec Qualifier Acceptance Limits
4-Bromofluorobenzene 110 75 - 120
Dibromofluoromethane 100 75 - 121
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 105 75 - 120
TestAmerica Savannah Page 12 of 53

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
Client Sample ID: MW-7
Lab Sample ID: 680-54031-9
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 01/06/2010 1325
Date Received: 01/07/2010 1023
Method: 8260B
Preparation: 5030E
Dilution: 1.0
Date Analyzed: 01/11/2010 1934
Date Prepared: 01/11/2010 1934
8260E Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Analysis Batch: 680-158096
Instrument ID: MSO
Lab File ID: 04341.d
Initial WeightNolume: 5 mL
Final WeightNolume: 5 mL
Analyte Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Acetone 5.0 U 5.0 25
Benzene 20 0.25 1.0
Carbon tetrachloride 0.50 U 0.50 1.0
Isopropyl ether 0.56 J 0.24 10
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 1.0 U 1.0 10
1,1-Dichloroethene 0.11 U 0.11 1.0
Chloroform 0.14 U 0.14 1.0
2-Butanone (MEK) 1.0 U 1.0 10
1,2-Dichloropropane 0.13 U 0.13 1.0
Trichloroethene 0.13 U 0.13 1.0
2-Hexanone 1.0 U 1.0 10
1,2-Dibromoethane 0.25 U 0.25 1.0
Tetrachloroethene 0.15 U 0.15 1.0
Toluene 76 0.33 1.0
Ethylbenzene 8.0 0.11 1.0
Styrene 0.11 U 0.11 1.0
Xylenes, Total 59 0.20 2.0
Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.20 U 0.20 10
Surrogate %Rec Qualifier Acceptance Limits
4-Bromofluorobenzene 110 75 - 120
Dibromofluoromethane 100 75 - 121
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 106 75 - 120
TestAmerica Savannah Page 13 of 53

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
Client Sample ID: Trip Blank
Lab Sample ID: 680-54031-10
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 01/06/2010 0000
Date Received: 01/07/2010 1023
Method: 8260E
Preparation: 5030B
Dilution: 1.0
Date Analyzed: 01/08/2010 1321
Date Prepared: 01/08/2010 1321
8260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Analysis Batch: 680-157917
Instrument ID: MSO
Lab File ID: o4304.d
Initial WeightNolume: 5 mL
Final WeightNolume: 5 mL
Analyte Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Acetone 5.0 U 5.0 25
Benzene 0.25 U 0.25 1.0
Carbon tetrachloride 0.50 U 0.50 1.0
Isopropyl ether 0.24 U 0.24 10
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 1.0 U 1.0 10
1,1-Dichloroethene 0.11 U 0.11 1.0
Chloroform 0.14 U 0.14 1.0
2-Butanone (MEK) 1.0 U 1.0 10
1,2-Dichloropropane 0.13 U 0.13 1.0
Trichloroethene 0.13 U 0.13 1.0
2-Hexanone 1.0 U 1.0 10
1,2-Dibromoethane 0.25 U 0.25 1.0
Tetrachloroethene 0.15 U 0.15 1.0
Toluene 0.33 U 0.33 1.0
Ethylbenzene 0.11 U 0.11 1.0
Styrene 0.11 U 0.11 1.0
Xylenes, Total 0.20 U 0.20 2.0
Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.20 U 0.20 10
Surrogate %Rec Qualifier Acceptance Limits
4-Bromofluorobenzene 107 75 - 120
Dibromofluoromethane 101 75 - 121
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 103 75 - 120
TestAmerica Savannah Page 14 of 53

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
Client Sample ID: MW-1
Lab Sample ID: 680-54031-1
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 01/05/2010 1300
Date Received: 01/07/2010 1023
8270D_LL_PAH Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Low level PAH
Method: 8270D_LL_PAH
Preparation: 3520C
Dilution: 100
Date Analyzed: 01/19/2010 1712
Date Prepared: 01/11/2010 1316
Analyte
Analysis Batch: 680-158760
Prep Batch: 680-157985
Result (ug/L)
Instrument ID: MSY
Lab File ID: y0221.d
Initial Weight/Volume: 500 mL
Final Weight/Volume: 0.5 mL
Injection Volume: 1 uL
Qualifier MDL RL
1-Methylnaphthalene 40 U 40 40
2-Methylnaphthalene 47 10 20
Benzo[a]anthracene 10 U 10 20
Benzo[a]pyrene 10 U 10 20
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 10 U 10 20
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 10 U 10 20
Chrysene 4.5 U 4.5 20
Naphthalene 48 10 20
Surrogate %Rec Qualifier Acceptance Limits
o-Terphenyl 0 D 44 - 123
TestAmerica Savannah Page 15 of 53

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
Client Sample ID: MW-2
Lab Sample ID: 680-54031-2
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 01/05/2010 1450
Date Received: 01/07/2010 1023
8270D_LL_PAH Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Low level PAH
Method: 8270D_LL_PAH
Preparation: 3520C
Dilution: 100
Date Analyzed: 01/19/2010 1735
Date Prepared: 01/11/2010 1316
Analyte
Analysis Batch: 680-158760
Prep Batch: 680-157985
Result (ug/L)
Instrument ID: MSY
Lab File ID: y0222.d
Initial WeightlVolume: 1050 mL
Final Weight/Volume: 1 mL
Injection Volume: 1 uL
Qualifier MDL RL
1-Methylnaphthalene 64 38 38
2-Methylnaphthalene 170 9.5 19
Benzo[a]anthracene 9.5 U 9.5 19
Benzo[a]pyrene 9.5 U 9.5 19
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 9.5 U 9.5 19
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 9.5 U 9.5 19
Chrysene 4.3 U 4.3 19
Naphthalene 750 9.5 19
Surrogate %Rec Qualifier Acceptance Limits
o-Terphenyl 0 D 44 - 123
TestAmerica Savannah Page 16 of 53

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
Client Sample ID: MW-22
Lab Sample ID: 680-54031-3
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 01/05/2010 1515
Date Received: 01 /07/2010 1023
8270D_LL_PAH Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Low level PAH
Method: 8270D_LL_PAH
Preparation: 3520C
Dilution: 100
Date Analyzed: 01/20/2010 1725
Date Prepared: 01 /11 /2010 1316
Analyte
Analysis Batch: 680-158788
Prep Batch: 680-157985
Result (ug/L)
Instrument ID: MSY
Lab File ID: y0245.d
Initial WeightNolume: 1060 mL
Final WeightNolume: 1 mL
Injection Volume: 1 uL
Qualifier MDL RL
1-Methylnaphthalene 56 38 38
2-Methylnaphthalene 150 9.4 19
Benzolalanthracene 9.4 U 9.4 19
Benzo[a]pyrene 9.4 U 9.4 19
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 9.4 U 9.4 19
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 9.4 U 9.4 19
Chrysene 4.2 U 4.2 19
Naphthalene 570 9.4 19
Surrogate %Rec Qualifier Acceptance Limits
o-Terphenyl 0 D 44 - 123
TestAmerica Savannah Page 17 of 53

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
Client Sample ID: MW-3
Lab Sample ID: 680-54031-4
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 01/05/2010 1625
Date Received: 01/07/2010 1023
8270D_LL_PAH Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Low level PAH
Method: 8270D_LL_PAH
Preparation: 3520C
Dilution: 100
Date Analyzed: 01/20/2010 1749
Date Prepared: 01 /11 /2010 1316
Analyte
Analysis Batch: 680-158788
Prep Batch: 680-157985
Result (ug/L)
Instrument ID: MSY
Lab File ID: y0246.d
Initial Weight/Volume: 1060 mL
Final Weight/Volume: 1 mL
Injection Volume: 1 uL
Qualifier MDL RL
1-Methylnaphthalene 38 U 38 38
2-Methylnaphthalene 17 J 9.4 19
Benzo[alanthracene 9.4 U 9.4 19
Benzo[a]pyrene 9.4 U 9.4 19
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 9.4 U 9.4 19
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 9.4 U 9.4 19
Chrysene 4.2 U 4.2 19
Naphthalene 90 9.4 19
Surrogate %Rec Qualifier Acceptance Limits
o-Terphenyl 0 D 44 - 123
TestAmerica Savannah Page 18 of 53

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
Client Sample ID: MW-4
Lab Sample ID: 680-54031-5
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 01/06/2010 0910
Date Received: 01/07/2010 1023
8270D_LL_PAH Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Low level PAH
Method: 8270D_LL_PAH
Preparation: 3520C
Dilution: 50
Date Analyzed: 01/20/2010 1947
Date Prepared: 01 /11 /2010 1316
Analyte
Analysis Batch: 680-158788
Prep Batch: 680-157985
Result (ug/L)
Instrument ID: MSY
Lab File ID: y0251.d
Initial Weight/Volume: 1060 mL
Final Weight/Volume: 1 mL
Injection Volume: 1 uL
Qualifier MDL RL
1-Methylnaphthalene 25 19 19
2-Methylnaphthalene 59 4.7 9.4
Benzo[a]anthracene 4.7 U 4.7 9.4
Benzo[a]pyrene 4.7 U 4.7 9.4
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 4.7 U 4.7 9.4
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 4.7 U 4.7 9.4
Chrysene 2.1 U 2.1 9.4
Naphthalene 450 4.7 9.4
Surrogate %Rec Qualifier Acceptance Limits
o-Terphenyl 0 D 44 - 123
TestAmerica Savannah Page 19 of 53

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
Client Sample ID: MW-5
Lab Sample ID: 680-54031-6
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 01/06/2010 1005
Date Received: 01/07/2010 1023
8270D_LL_PAH Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Low level PAH
Method: 8270D_LL_PAH Analysis Batch: 680-158760 Instrument ID: MSY
Preparation: 3520C Prep Batch: 680-157985 Lab File ID: y0226.d
Dilution: 100 Initial WeightNolume: 1060 mL
Date Analyzed: 01/19/2010 1910 Final WeightNolume: 1 mL
Date Prepared: 01/11/2010 1316 Injection Volume: 1 uL
Analyte Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
1-Methylnaphthalene 38 U 38 38
2-Methylnaphthalene 73 9.4 19
Benzo[a]anthracene 9.4 U 9.4 19
Benzo[a]pyrene 9.4 U 9.4 19
Benzo[g,h,ilperylene 9.4 U 9.4 19
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 9.4 U 9.4 19
Chrysene 4.2 U 4.2 19
Naphthalene 160 9.4 19
Surrogate %Rec Qualifier Acceptance Limits
o-Terphenyl 0 D 44 - 123
TestAmericaSavannah Page 20 of 53

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
Client Sample ID: MW-8
Lab Sample ID: 680-54031-7
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 01/06/2010 1105
Date Received: 01/07/2010 1023
8270D LL PAH Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Low level PAH
Method: 8270D_LL_PAH
Preparation: 3520C
Dilution: 100
Date Analyzed: 01/19/2010 1934
Date Prepared: 01/11/2010 1316
Analyte
Analysis Batch: 680-158760
Prep Batch: 680-157985
Result (ug/L)
Instrument ID: MSY
Lab File ID: y0227.d
Initial Weight/Volume: 1060 mL
Final WeightNolume: 1 mL
Injection Volume: 1 uL
Qualifier MDL RL
1-Methylnaphthalene 38 U 38 38
2-Methylnaphthalene 52 9.4 19
Benzo[a]anthracene 9.4 U 9.4 19
Benzo[a]pyrene 9.4 U 9.4 19
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 9.4 U 9.4 19
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 9.4 U 9.4 19
Chrysene 4.2 U 4.2 19
Naphthalene 270 9.4 19
Surrogate %Rec Qualifier Acceptance Limits
o-Terphenyl 0 D 44 - 123
TestAmerica Savannah Page 21 of 53

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
Client Sample ID: MW-6
Lab Sample ID: 680-54031-8
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 01/06/2010 1230
Date Received: 01/07/2010 1023
8270D_LL_PAH Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Low level PAH
Method: 8270D_LL_PAH
Preparation: 3520C
Dilution: 1.0
Date Analyzed: 01/19/2010 1537
Date Prepared: 01/11/2010 1316
Analyte
Analysis Batch: 680-158760
Prep Batch: 680-157985
Result (ug/L)
Instrument ID: MSY
Lab File ID: y0217.d
Initial Weight/Volume: 1060 mL
Final Weight/Volume: 1 mL
Injection Volume: 1 uL
Qualifier MDL RL
1-Methylnaphthalene 0.38 U 0.38 0.38
2-Methylnaphthalene 0.094 U 0.094 0.19
Benzo[a]anthracene 0.094 U 0.094 0.19
Benzo[a]pyrene 0.094 U 0.094 0.19
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.094 U 0.094 0.19
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.094 U 0.094 0.19
Chrysene 0.042 U 0.042 0.19
Naphthalene 0.094 U 0.094 0.19
Surrogate %Rec Qualifier Acceptance Limits
o-Terphenyl
100 44 - 123
TestAmerica Savannah Page 22 of 53

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
Client Sample ID: MW-1
Lab Sample ID: 680-54031-1
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 01/05/2010 1300
Date Received: 01/07/2010 1023
6010C Metals (ICP)
Method: 6010C Analysis Batch: 680-157937 Instrument ID: ICPD
Preparation: 3010A Prep Batch: 680-157874 Lab File ID: N/A
Dilution: 1.0 Initial Weight/Volume: 50 mL
Date Analyzed: 01/09/2010 0119 Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
Date Prepared: 01/08/2010 0942
Analyte Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Arsenic 57 4.6 20
Barium 180 2.3 10
Cadmium 2.0 U 2.0 5.0
Chromium 1.3 J 1.2 10
Iron 2700 50 100
Lead 4.0 U 4.0 10
Selenium 6.4 U 6.4 20
Silver 0.89 U 0.89 10
Sodium 10000 500 1000
Method: 6010C
Preparation: 3005A
Dilution: 1.0
Date Analyzed: 01/13/2010 0322
Date Prepared: 01/08/2010 1141
Analyte
6010C Metals (ICP)-Dissolved
Analysis Batch: 680-158161
Prep Batch: 680-157895
Instrument ID: ICPD
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial WeightNolume: 50 mL
Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Dissolved Iron 2600 24 50
7470A Mercury (CVAA)
Method: 7470A Analysis Batch: 680-158165 Instrument ID: LEEMAN1
Preparation: 7470A Prep Batch: 680-158029 Lab File ID: N/A
Dilution: 1.0 Initial WeightNolume: 50 mL
Date Analyzed: 01/12/2010 1759 Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
Date Prepared: 01/12/2010 0850
Analyte
Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Mercury
0.091 U 0.091 0.20
TestAmericaSavannah Page 23 of 53

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
Client Sample ID: MW-2
Lab Sample ID: 680-54031-2
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 01/05/2010 1450
Date Received: 01/07/2010 1023
Method: 6010C
Preparation: 3010A
Dilution: 1.0
Date Analyzed: 01/09/2010 0124
Date Prepared: 01/08/2010 0942
Analyte
6010C Metals (ICP)
Analysis Batch: 680-157937
Prep Batch: 680-157874
Result (ug/L)
Instrument ID: ICPD
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial Weight/Volume: 50 mL
Final Weight/Volume: 50 mL
Qualifier MDL RL
Arsenic 6.5 J 4.6 20
Barium 160 2.3 10
Cadmium 2.0 U 2.0 5.0
Chromium 1.3 J 1.2 10
Iron 15000 50 100
Lead 4.0 U 4.0 10
Selenium 6.4 U 6.4 20
Silver 1.2 J 0.89 10
Sodium 63000 500 1000
Method: 6010C
Preparation: 3005A
Dilution: 1.0
Date Analyzed: 01/13/2010 0328
Date Prepared: 01/08/2010 1141
6010C Metals (ICP)-Dissolved
Analysis Batch: 680-158161
Prep Batch: 680-157895
Instrument ID: ICPD
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial Weight/Volume: 50 mL
Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
Analyte Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Dissolved Iron 16000 24 50
7470A Mercury (CVAA)
Method: 7470A Analysis Batch: 680-158165 Instrument ID: LEEMAN1
Preparation: 7470A Prep Batch: 680-158029 Lab File ID: N/A
Dilution: 1.0 Initial Weight/Volume: 50 mL
Date Analyzed: 01/12/2010 1802 Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
Date Prepared: 01/12/2010 0850
Analyte
Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Mercury
0.091 U 0.091 0.20
TestAmerica Savannah Page 24 of 53

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
Client Sample ID: MW-22
Lab Sample ID: 680-54031-3
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 01/05/2010 1515
Date Received: 01/07/2010 1023
Method: 6010C
Preparation: 3010A
Dilution: 1.0
Date Analyzed: 01/09/2010 0129
Date Prepared: 01/08/2010 0942
6010C Metals (ICP)
Analysis Batch: 680-157937
Prep Batch: 680-157874
Instrument ID: ICPD
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial WeightNolume: 50 mL
Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
Analyte Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Arsenic 8.0 J 4.6 20
Barium 150 2.3 10
Cadmium 2.0 U 2.0 5.0
Chromium 1.7 J 1.2 10
Iron 14000 50 100
Lead 4.0 U 4.0 10
Selenium 6.4 U 6.4 20
Silver 0.89 U 0.89 10
Method: 6010C Analysis Batch: 680-158076 Instrument ID: ICPD
Preparation: 3010A Prep Batch: 680-157874 Lab File ID: N/A
Dilution: 10 Initial WeightNolume: 50 mL
Date Analyzed: 01/11/2010 1718 Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
Date Prepared: 01/08/2010 0942
Analyte Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Sodium 68000 5000 10000
Method: 6010C
Preparation: 3005A
Dilution: 1.0
Date Analyzed: 01/13/2010 0333
Date Prepared: 01/08/2010 1141
Analyte
6010C Metals (ICP)-Dissolved
Analysis Batch: 680-158161
Prep Batch: 680-157895
Instrument ID: ICPD
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial WeightNolume: 50 mL
Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Dissolved Iron 14000 24 50
7470A Mercury (CVAA)
Method: 7470A Analysis Batch: 680-158165 Instrument ID: LEEMAN1
Preparation: 7470A Prep Batch: 680-158029 Lab File ID: N/A
Dilution: 1.0 Initial WeightNolume: 50 mL
Date Analyzed: 01/12/2010 1805 Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
Date Prepared: 01/12/2010 0850
Analyte Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Mercury
0.091 U 0.091 0.20
TestAmerica Savannah Page 25 of 53

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
Client Sample ID: MW-3
Lab Sample ID: 680-54031-4
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 01/05/2010 1625
Date Received: 01/07/2010 1023
Method: 6010C
Preparation: 3010A
Dilution: 1.0
Date Analyzed: 01/09/2010 0134
Date Prepared: 01/08/2010 0942
6010C Metals (ICP)
Analysis Batch: 680-157937
Prep Batch: 680-157874
Instrument ID: ICPD
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial WeightNolume: 50 mL
Final Weight/olume: 50 mL
Analyte Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Arsenic 8.7 J 4.6 20
Barium 27 2.3 10
Cadmium 2.0 U 2.0 5.0
Chromium 1.3 J 1.2 10
Iron 800 50 100
Lead 4.0 U 4.0 10
Selenium 6.4 U 6.4 20
Silver 0.89 U 0.89 10
Method: 6010C Analysis Batch: 680-158076 Instrument ID: ICPD
Preparation: 3010A Prep Batch: 680-157874 Lab File ID: N/A
Dilution: 10 Initial WeightNolume: 50 mL
Date Analyzed: 01/11/2010 1724 Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
Date Prepared: 01/08/2010 0942
Analyte Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Sodium 570000 5000 10000
Method: 6010C
Preparation: 3005A
Dilution: 1.0
Date Analyzed: 01/13/2010 0349
Date Prepared: 01/08/2010 1141
Analyte
6010C Metals (ICP)-Dissolved
Analysis Batch: 680-158161
Prep Batch: 680-157895
Instrument ID: ICPD
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial WeightNolume: 50 mL
Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Dissolved Iron 470 24 50
Method: 7470A
Preparation: 7470A
Dilution: 1.0
Date Analyzed: 01/12/2010 1808
Date Prepared: 01/12/2010 0850
7470A Mercury (CVAA)
Analysis Batch: 680-158165
Prep Batch: 680-158029
Instrument ID: LEEMAN1
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial WeightNolume: 50 mL
Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
Analyte Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Mercury
0.11 J 0.091 0.20
TestAmerica Savannah Page 26 of 53

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
Client Sample ID: MW-4
Lab Sample ID: 680-54031-5
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 01/06/2010 0910
Date Received: 01/07/2010 1023
Method: 6010C
Preparation: 3010A
Dilution: 1.0
Date Analyzed: 01/09/2010 0139
Date Prepared: 01/08/2010 0942
Analyte
6010C Metals (ICP)
Analysis Batch: 680-157937
Prep Batch: 680-157874
Result (ug/L)
Instrument ID: ICPD
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial WeightNolume: 50 mL
Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
Qualifier MDL RL
Arsenic 8.2 J 4.6 20
Barium 320 2.3 10
Cadmium 2.0 U 2.0 5.0
Chromium 1.4 J 1.2 10
Iron 6100 50 100
Lead 4.0 U 4.0 10
Selenium 6.4 U 6.4 20
Silver 0.89 U 0.89 10
Sodium 29000 500 1000
Method: 6010C
Preparation: 3005A
Dilution: 1.0
Date Analyzed: 01/13/2010 0354
Date Prepared: 01/08/2010 1141
6010C Metals (ICP)-Dissolved
Analysis Batch: 680-158161
Prep Batch: 680-157895
Instrument ID: ICPD
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial WeightNolume: 50 mL
Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
Analyte Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Dissolved Iron 6000 24 50
7470A Mercury (CVAA)
Method: 7470A Analysis Batch: 680-158165 Instrument ID: LEEMAN1
Preparation: 7470A Prep Batch: 680-158029 Lab File ID: N/A
Dilution: 1.0 Initial WeightNolume: 50 mL
Date Analyzed: 01/12/2010 1811 Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
Date Prepared: 01/12/2010 0850
Analyte
Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Mercury
0.091 U 0.091 0.20
TestAmerica Savannah Page 27 of 53

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
Client Sample ID: MW-5
Lab Sample ID: 680-54031-6
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 01/06/2010 1005
Date Received: 01/07/2010 1023
Method: 6010C
Preparation: 3010A
Dilution: 1.0
Date Analyzed: 01/09/2010 0145
Date Prepared: 01/08/2010 0942
Analyte
6010C Metals (ICP)
Analysis Batch: 680-157937
Prep Batch: 680-157874
Instrument ID: ICPD
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial Weight/Volume: 50 mL
Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Iron
Lead
Selenium
Silver
Method: 6010C
Preparation: 3010A
Dilution: 10
Date Analyzed: 01 /11 /2010 1729
Date Prepared: 01/08/2010 0942
Analyte
4.6 U 4.6 20
68 2.3 10
2.0 U 2.0 5.0
1.4 J 1.2 10
320 50 100
4.0 U 4.0 10
6.4 U 6.4 20
0.89 U 0.89 10
Analysis Batch: 680-158076
Prep Batch: 680-157874
Result (ug/L)
Instrument ID: ICPD
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial WeightNolume: 50 mL
Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
Qualifier MDL RL
Sodium 80000 5000 10000
Method: 6010C
Preparation: 3005A
Dilution: 1.0
Date Analyzed: 01/13/2010 0359
Date Prepared: 01/08/2010 1141
Analyte
6010C Metals (ICP)-Dissolved
Analysis Batch: 680-158161
Prep Batch: 680-157895
Instrument ID: ICPD
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial WeightNolume: 50 mL
Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Dissolved Iron 250 24 50
Method: 7470A
Preparation: 7470A
Dilution: 1.0
Date Analyzed: 01/13/2010 1627
Date Prepared: 01/13/2010 1125
7470A Mercury (CVAA)
Analysis Batch: 680-158266
Prep Batch: 680-158151
Instrument ID: LEEMAN1
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial WeightNolume: 50 mL
Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
Analyte Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Mercury
0.15 J 0.091 0.20
TestAmericaSavannah Page 28 of 53

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
Client Sample ID: MW-8
Lab Sample ID: 680-54031-7
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 01/06/2010 1105
Date Received: 01/07/2010 1023
Method: 6010C
Preparation: 3010A
Dilution: 1.0
Date Analyzed: 01/09/2010 0200
Date Prepared: 01/08/2010 0942
Analyte
6010C Metals (ICP)
Analysis Batch: 680-157937
Prep Batch: 680-157874
Result (ug/L)
Instrument ID: ICPD
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial WeightNolume: 50 mL
Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
Qualifier MDL RL
Arsenic 4.6 U 4.6 20
Barium 180 2.3 10
Cadmium 2.0 U 2.0 5.0
Chromium 1.4 J 1.2 10
Iron 170 50 100
Lead 24 4.0 10
Selenium 6.4 U 6.4 20
Silver 1.0 J 0.89 10
Sodium 24000 500 1000
6010C Metals (ICP)-Dissolved
Method: 6010C Analysis Batch: 680-158161 Instrument ID: ICPD
Preparation: 3005A Prep Batch: 680-157895 Lab File ID: N/A
Dilution: 1.0 Initial WeightNolume: 50 mL
Date Analyzed: 01/13/2010 0405 Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
Date Prepared: 01/08/2010 1141
Analyte
Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Dissolved Iron 120 24 50
Method: 7470A
Preparation: 7470A
Dilution: 1.0
Date Analyzed: 01/13/2010 1630
Date Prepared: 01/13/2010 1125
Analyte
7470A Mercury (CVAA)
Analysis Batch: 680-158266
Prep Batch: 680-158151
Instrument ID: LEEMAN1
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial WeightNolume: 50 mL
Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Mercury
0.18 J 0.091 0.20
TestAmerica Savannah Page 29 of 53

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
Client Sample ID: MW-6
Lab Sample ID: 680-54031-8
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 01/06/2010 1230
Date Received: 01/07/2010 1023
Method: 6010C
Preparation: 3010A
Dilution: 1.0
Date Analyzed: 01/09/2010 0205
Date Prepared: 01/08/2010 0942
Analyte
6010C Metals (ICP)
Analysis Batch: 680-157937
Prep Batch: 680-157874
Result (ug/L)
Instrument ID: ICPD
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial Weight/Volume: 50 mL
Final Weight/Volume: 50 mL
Qualifier MDL RL
Arsenic 4.6 U 4.6 20
Barium 52 2.3 10
Cadmium 2.0 U 2.0 5.0
Chromium 1.7 J 1.2 10
Iron 50 U 50 100
Lead 4.0 U 4.0 10
Selenium 6.4 U 6.4 20
Silver 0.89 U 0.89 10
Sodium 8600 500 1000
Method: 6010C
Preparation: 3005A
Dilution: 1.0
Date Analyzed: 01/13/2010 0410
Date Prepared: 01/08/2010 1141
6010C Metals (ICP)-Dissolved
Analysis Batch: 680-158161
Prep Batch: 680-157895
Instrument ID: ICPD
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial Weight/Volume: 50 mL
Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
Analyte Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Dissolved Iron
24 U 24 50
7470A Mercury (CVAA)
Method: . 7470A Analysis Batch: 680-158266 Instrument ID: LEEMANI
Preparation: 7470A Prep Batch: 680-158151 Lab File ID: N/A
Dilution: 1.0 Initial Weight/Volume: 50 mL
Date Analyzed: 01/13/2010 1633 Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
Date Prepared: 01/13/2010 1125
Analyte Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Mercury
0.091 U 0.091 0.20
TestAmericaSavannah Page 30 of 53

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
Client Sample ID: MW-7
Lab Sample ID: 680-54031-9
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 01/06/2010 1325
Date Received: 01/07/2010 1023
Method: 6010C
Preparation: 3010A
Dilution: 1.0
Date Analyzed: 01/09/2010 0211
Date Prepared: 01/08/2010 0942
Analyte
6010C Metals (ICP)
Analysis Batch: 680-157937
Prep Batch: 680-157874
Result (ug/L)
Instrument ID: ICPD
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial WeightNolume: 50 mL
Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
Qualifier MDL RL
Arsenic 4.6 U 4.6 20
Barium 75 2.3 10
Cadmium 2.0 U 2.0 5.0
Chromium 1.8 J 1.2 10
Iron 50 U 50 100
Lead 4.0 U 4.0 10
Selenium 6.4 U 6.4 20
Silver 0.89 U 0.89 10
Sodium 4000 500 1000
Method: 6010C
Preparation: 3005A
Dilution: 1.0
Date Analyzed: 01/13/2010 0415
Date Prepared: 01/08/2010 1141
6010C Metals (ICP)-Dissolved
Analysis Batch: 680-158161
Prep Batch: 680-157895
Instrument ID: ICPD
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial WeightNolume: 50 mL
Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
Analyte Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Dissolved Iron 51 24 50
Method: 7470A
Preparation: 7470A
Dilution: 1.0
Date Analyzed: 01/13/2010 1636
Date Prepared: 01/13/2010 1125
7470A Mercury (CVAA)
Analysis Batch: 680-158266
Prep Batch: 680-158151
Instrument ID: LEEMAN1
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial WeightNolume: 50 mL
Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
Analyte Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Mercury
0.091 U 0.091 0.20
TestAmerica Savannah Page 31 of 53

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
General Chemistry
Client Sample ID: MW-1
Lab Sample ID: 680-54031-1
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 01/05/2010 1300
Date Received: 01/07/2010 1023
Analyte Result Qual Units MDL RL Dil Method
Sulfate
2.5 U mg/L 2.5 5.0 1.0 375.4
Analysis Batch: 680-158199 Date Analyzed: 01/13/2010 1114
TestAmerica Savannah Page 32 of 53

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
General Chemistry
Client Sample ID: MW-2
Lab Sample ID: 680-54031-2
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 01/05/2010 1450
Date Received: 01/07/2010 1023
Analyte Result Qual Units MDL RL Dil Method
Sulfate
2.5 U mg/L 2.5 5.0 1.0 375.4
Analysis Batch: 680-158199 Date Analyzed: 01/13/2010 1114
TestAmericaSavannah Page 33 of 53

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
General Chemistry
Client Sample ID: MW-22
Lab Sample ID: 680-54031-3
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 01/05/2010 1515
Date Received: 01 /07/2010 1023
Analyte Result Qual Units MDL RL Dil Method
Sulfate
2.5 U mg/L 2.5 5.0 1.0 375.4
Analysis Batch: 680-158199 Date Analyzed: 01/13/2010 1126
TestAmerica Savannah Page 34 of 53

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
General Chemistry
Client Sample ID: MW-3
Lab Sample ID: 680-54031-4
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 01/05/2010 1625
Date Received: 01/07/2010 1023
Analyte Result Qual Units MDL RL Dil Method
Sulfate 18 mg/L 2.5 5.0 1.0 375.4
Analysis Batch: 680-158199 Date Analyzed: 01/13/2010 1126
TestAmerica Savannah Page 35 of 53

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
General Chemistry
Client Sample ID: MW-4
Lab Sample ID: 680-54031-5
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 01/06/2010 0910
Date Received: 01/07/2010 1023
Analyte Result Qual Units MDL RL Dil Method
Sulfate
3.5 J mg/L 2.5 5.0 1.0 375.4
Analysis Batch: 680-158199 Date Analyzed: 01/13/2010 1126
TestAmericaSavannah Page 36 of 53

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
General Chemistry
Client Sample ID: MW-5
Lab Sample ID: 680-54031-6
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 01/06/2010 1005
Date Received: 01/07/2010 1023
Analyte Result Qual Units MDL RL Dil Method
Sulfate
3.4 J mg/L 2.5 5.0 1.0 375.4
Analysis Batch: 680-158199 Date Analyzed: 01/13/2010 1128
TestAmerica Savannah Page 37 of 53

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
Client Sample ID: MW-8
Lab Sample ID: 680-54031-7
Client Matrix: Water
Analyte
Result
General Chemistry
Date Sampled: 01/06/2010 1105
Date Received: 01/07/2010 1023
Qual Units MDL RL Dil Method
Sulfate
2.5 U mg/L 2.5 5.0 1.0 375.4
Analysis Batch: 680-158199 Date Analyzed: 01/13/2010 1128
TestAmericaSavannah Page 38 of 53

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
General Chemistry
Client Sample ID: MW-6
Lab Sample ID: 680-54031-8
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 01/06/2010 1230
Date Received: 01/07/2010 1023
Analyte Result Qual Units MDL RL Dil Method
Sulfate 89 mg/L 12 25 5.0 375.4
Analysis Batch: 680-158199 Date Analyzed: 01/13/2010 1206
TestAmericaSavannah Page 39 of 53

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
General Chemistry
Client Sample ID: MW-7
Lab Sample ID: 680-54031-9
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 01/06/2010 1325
Date Received: 01 /07/2010 1023
Analyte Result Qual Units MDL RL Dil Method
Sulfate 62 mg/L 5.0 10 2.0 375.4
Analysis Batch: 680-158199 Date Analyzed: 01/13/2010 1148
TestAmerica Savannah Page 40 of 53

DATA REPORTING QUALIFIERS
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
Lab Section
Qualifier Description
GC/MS VOA
U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected.
J
GC/MS Semi VOA
Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL
and the concentration is an approximate value.
U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected.
J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL
and the concentration is an approximate value.
D Surrogate or matrix spike recoveries were not obtained
because the extract was diluted for analysis; also compounds
analyzed at a dilution may be flagged with a D.
Metals
U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected.
J
General Chemistry
Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL
and the concentration is an approximate value.
U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected.
J
TestAmerica Savannah
Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL
and the concentration is an approximate value.
Page 41 of 53

Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Method Blank - Batch: 680-157917
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
MB 680-157917/8
Water
1.0
01/08/2010 1127
01/08/2010 1127
Analysis Batch: 680-157917
Prep Batch: N/A
Units: ug/L
Result
Qual
Quality Control Results
Job Number: 680-54031-1
Method: 8260E
Preparation: 5030B
Instrument ID: GC/MS Volatiles - 0
Lab File ID: og060.d
Initial Weight/Volume: 5 mL
Final WeightNolume: 5 mL
MDL
RL
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Isopropyl ether
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
1,1-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone (MEK)
1,2-Dichloropropane
Trichloroethene
2-Hexanone
1,2-Dibromoethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Xylenes, Total
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Surrogate
5.0
0.25
0.50
0.24
1.0
0.11
0.14
1.0
0.13
0.13
1.0
0.25
0.15
0.33
0.11
0.11
0.20
0.20
% Rec
5.0
0.25
0.50
0.24
1.0
0.11
0.14
1.0
0.13
0.13
1.0
0.25
0.15
0.33
0.11
0.11
0.20
0.20
Acceptance Limits
25
1.0
1.0
10
10
1.0
1.0
10
1.0
1.0
10
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
10
4-Bromofluorobenzene
Dibromofluoromethane
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
110
100
105
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.
75 - 120
75 - 121
75 - 120
TestAmerica Savannah Page 42 of 53

Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Lab Control Sample/
Lab Control Sample Duplicate Recovery Report - Batch: 680-157917
LCS Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
LCS 680-157917/5
Water
1.0
01/08/2010 0943
01/08/2010 0943
LCSD Lab Sample ID: LCSD 680-157917/6
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
Water
1.0
01/08/2010 1004
01/08/2010 1004
Analysis Batch: 680-157917
Prep Batch: N/A
Units: ug/L
Analysis Batch: 680-157917
Prep Batch: N/A
Units: ug/L
% Rec.
LCS LCSD Limit
RPD
Quality Control Results
Job Number: 680-54031-1
Method: 8260B
Preparation: 5030B
Instrument ID: GC/MS Volatiles - 0
Lab File ID: og056.d
Initial WeightNolume: 5 mL
Final WeightNolume: 5 mL
Instrument ID: GC/MS Volatiles - 0
Lab File ID: og057.d
Initial WeightNolume: 5 mL
Final WeightNolume: 5 mL
RPD Limit LCS Qual LCSD Qual
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
1,1-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone (MEK)
1,2-Dichloropropane
Trichloroethene
2-Hexanone
1,2-Dibromoethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Xylenes, Total
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Surrogate
107
104
113
113
112
109
117
106
102
106
107
100
105
99
103
101
116
108
103
112
109
113
109
112
105
103
103
103
101
105
98
100
99
115
LCS % Rec
17-175
77-119
71 - 135
40 - 151
62 - 141
82 - 120
33 - 157
73 - 124
84 - 115
34 - 161
80 - 121
76 - 126
81 - 117
86-116
82 - 122
84 - 118
77 - 121
1
1
1
4
1
0
4
1
1
2
4
1
1
1
3
2
1
LCSD % Rec
50
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
Acceptance Limits
4-Bromofluorobenzene
Dibromofluoromethane
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
99
109
106
97
108
104
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.
75 - 120
75 - 121
75 - 120
TestAmerica Savannah Page 43 of 53

Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Method Blank - Batch: 680-158096
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
MB 680-158096/8
Water
1.0
01/11/2010 1416
01/11/2010 1416
Analysis Batch: 680-158096
Prep Batch: N/A
Units: ug/L
Result
Qual
Quality Control Results
Job Number: 680-54031-1
Method: 8260B
Preparation: 5030B
Instrument ID: GC/MS Volatiles - 0
Lab File ID: og075.d
Initial WeightNolume: 5 mL
Final Weight/Volume: 5 mL
MDL RL
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Isopropyl ether
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
1,1-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone (MEK)
1,2-Dichloropropane
Trichloroethene
2-Hexanone
1,2-Dibromoethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Xylenes, Total
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Surrogate
5.0
0.25
0.50
0.24
1.0
0.11
0.14
1.0
0.13
0.13
1.0
0.25
0.15
0.33
0.11
0.11
0.20
0.20
% Rec
5.0
0.25
0.50
0.24
1.0
0.11
0.14
1.0
0.13
0.13
1.0
0.25
0.15
0.33
0.11
0.11
0.20
0.20
Acceptance Limits
25
1.0
1.0
10
10
1.0
1.0
10
1.0
1.0
10
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
10
4-Bromofluorobenzene
Dibromofluoromethane
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
111
102
105
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.
75 - 120
75 - 121
75 - 120
TestAmerica Savannah Page 44 of 53

Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Lab Control Sample/
Lab Control Sample Duplicate Recovery Report - Batch: 680-158096
LCS Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
LCS 680-158096/5
Water
1.0
01/11/2010 1152
01/11/2010 1152
LCSD Lab Sample ID: LCSD 680-158096/6
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
Water
1.0
01/11/2010 1221
01/11/2010 1221
Analysis Batch: 680-158096
Prep Batch: N/A
Units: ug/L
Analysis Batch: 680-158096
Prep Batch: N/A
Units: ug/L
% Rec.
LCS LCSD Limit
RPD
Quality Control Results
Job Number: 680-54031-1
Method: 8260B
Preparation: 5030B
Instrument ID: GC/MS Volatiles - 0
Lab File ID: og067.d
Initial WeightNolume: 5 mL
Final Weight/Volume: 5 mL
Instrument ID: GC/MS Volatiles - 0
Lab File ID: og069.d
Initial WeightNolume: 5 mL
Final WeightNolume: 5 mL
RPD Limit LCS Qual LCSD Qual
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
1,1-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone (MEK)
1,2-Dichloropropane
Trichloroethene
2-Hexanone
1,2-Dibromoethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Xylenes, Total
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Surrogate
94
104
114
107
109
107
100
105
105
100
106
102
107
101
104
102
109
107
104
112
110
111
109
109
108
105
101
110
100
105
98
104
101
113
LCS % Rec
17-175
77-119
71 - 135
40-151
62-141
82 - 120
33 - 157
73 - 124
84-115
34 - 161
80 - 121
76 - 126
81 - 117
86-116
82 - 122
84 - 118
77-121
12
0
3
2
2
1
8
2
1
1
4
2
1
3
1
1
4
LCSD % Rec
50
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
Acceptance Limits
4-Bromofluorobenzene
Dibromofluoromethane
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
100
109
109
99
110
107
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.
75 - 120
75 - 121
75 - 120
TestAmerica Savannah Page 45 of 53

Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Method Blank - Batch: 680-157985
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
MB 680-157985/9-B
Water
1.0
01/19/2010 1204
01/11/2010 1316
Analysis Batch: 680-158760
Prep Batch: 680-157985
Units: ug/L
Result
Qual
Quality Control Results
Job Number: 680-54031-1
Method: 8270D_LL_PAH
Preparation: 3520C
Instrument ID: GC/MS SemiVolatiles - Y
Lab File ID: y0208.d
Initial WeightNolume: 1000 mL
Final WeightNolume: 1 mL
Injection Volume: 1 uL
MDL RL
1-Methylnaphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
Benzo[a]anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Chrysene
Naphthalene
Surrogate
0.40
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.045
0.10
% Rec
0.40
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.045
0.10
Acceptance Limits
0.40
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
o-Terphenyl
Lab Control Sample - Batch: 680-157985
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
LCS 680-157985/10-B
Water
1.0
01/19/2010 1228
01/11/2010 1316
91
Analysis Batch: 680-158760
Prep Batch: 680-157985
Units: ug/L
Spike Amount
Result
44 - 123
Method: 8270D_LL_PAH
Preparation: 3520C
Instrument ID: GC/MS SemiVolatiles - Y
Lab File ID: y0209.d
Initial WeightNolume: 1000 mL
Final WeightNolume: 1 mL
Injection Volume: 1 uL
% Rec.
Limit Qual
1-Methylnaphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
Benzo[alanthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Chrysene
Naphthalene
Surrogate
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
% Rec
1.87
2.00
1.94
1.74
1.48
1.72
1.67
1.56
93
100
97
87
74
86
83
78
51-110
49-110
54 - 119
43-110
46-117
53-119
56 - 110
50 - 110
Acceptance Limits
o-Terphenyl
84
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.
44 - 123
TestAmerica Savannah Page 46 of 53

Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Method Blank - Batch: 680-157874
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
MB 680-157874/18-A
Water
1.0
01/08/2010 2355
01/08/2010 0942
Analysis Batch: 680-157937
Prep Batch: 680-157874
Units: ug/L
Result
Qual
Quality Control Results
Job Number: 680-54031-1
Method: 6010C
Preparation: 3010A
Instrument ID: ICP/AES - D
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial WeightNolume: 50 mL
Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
MDL RL
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Iron
Lead
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Lab Control Sample - Batch: 680-157874
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
LCS 680-157874/19-A
Water
1.0
01/09/2010 0001
01/08/2010 0942
4.6
2.3
2.0
1.2
50
4.0
6.4
0.89
500
Analysis Batch: 680-157937
Prep Batch: 680-157874
Units: ug/L
Spike Amount
Result
4.6
2.3
2.0
1.2
50
4.0
6.4
0.89
500
Method: 6010C
Preparation: 3010A
20
10
5.0
10
100
10
20
10
1000
Instrument ID: ICP/AES - D
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial WeightNolume: 50 mL
Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
% Rec. Limit
Qual
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Iron
Lead
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
2000
2000
50.0
200
1000
500
2000
50.0
5000
1960
1950
45.5
195
976
485
1900
49.0
4550
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.
98
97
91
97
98
97
95
98
91
75 - 125
75 - 125
75 - 125
75 - 125
75 - 125
'75-125
75 - 125
75 - 125
75 - 125
TestAmerica Savannah Page 47 of 53

Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Method Blank - Batch: 680-157895
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
MB 680-157895/21-A
Water
1.0
01/13/2010 1015
01/08/2010 1141
Analysis Batch: 680-158161
Prep Batch: 680-157895
Units: ug/L
Result
Qual
Quality Control Results
Job Number: 680-54031-1
Method: 6010C
Preparation: 3005A
Total Recoverable
Instrument ID: ICP/AES - D
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial Weight/Volume: 50 mL
Final Weight/Volume: 50 mL
MDL RL
Dissolved Iron
Lab Control Sample - Batch: 680-157895
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
LCS 680-157895/22-A
Water
1.0
01/13/2010 1019
01/08/2010 1141
24
Analysis Batch: 680-158161
Prep Batch: 680-157895
Units: ug/L
Spike Amount
Result
24 50
Method: 6010C
Preparation: 3005A
Total Recoverable
Instrument ID: ICP/AES - D
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial Weight/Volume: 50 mL
Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
% Rec. Limit
Qual
Dissolved Iron
1000
1030
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.
103
75 - 125
TestAmericaSavannah Page 48 of 53

LiA i
Iri
r
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Method Blank - Batch: 680-158029
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
MB 680-158029/23-A
Water
1.0
01/12/2010 1654
01/12/2010 0850
Analysis Batch: 680-158165
Prep Batch: 680-158029
Units: ug/L
Result
Qual
Quality Control Results
Job Number: 680-54031-1
Method: 7470A
Preparation: 7470A
Instrument ID: LEEMAN1
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial WeightNolume: 50 mL
Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
MDL RL
Mercury
Lab Control Sample - Batch: 680-158029
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
LCS 680-158029/24-A
Water
1.0
01/12/2010 1657
01/12/2010 0850
0.091
Analysis Batch: 680-158165
Prep Batch: 680-158029
Units: ug/L
Spike Amount
Result
0.091 0.20
Method: 7470A
Preparation: 7470A
Instrument ID: LEEMAN1
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial WeightNolume: 50 mL
Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
% Rec. Limit
Qual
Mercury
2.50
Matrix Spike/
Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery Report - Batch: 680-158029
MS Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
MSD Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
680-54031-5
Water
1.0
01/12/2010 1814
01/12/2010 0850
680-54031-5
Water
1.0
01/12/2010 1817
01/12/2010 0850
2.68
Analysis Batch: 680-158165
Prep Batch: 680-158029
Analysis Batch: 680-158165
Prep Batch: 680-158029
% Rec.
MS MSD Limit
107
80 - 120
Method: 7470A
Preparation: 7470A
Instrument ID: LEEMAN1
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial WeightNolume:
Final Weight/Volume:
50 mL
50 mL
Instrument ID: LEEMAN1
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial WeightNolume: 50 mL
Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
RPD RPD Limit MS Qual MSD Qual
Mercury
94
93
80 - 120
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.
1
20
TestAmerica Savannah Page 49 of 53

Login Sample Receipt Check List
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-54031-1
Login Number: 54031
Creator: Conner, Keaton
List Number: 1
Question
T / F/ NA Comment
List Source: TestAmerica Savannah
Radioactivity either was not measured or, if measured, is at or below N/A
background
The cooler's custody seal, if present, is intact. True
The cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or True
tampered with.
Samples were received on ice. True
Cooler Temperature is acceptable. True
Cooler Temperature is recorded. True
COC is present. True
COC is filled out in ink and legible. True
COC is filled out with all pertinent information. True
There are no discrepancies between the sample IDs on the containers and True
the COC.
Samples are received within Holding Time. True
Sample containers have legible labels. True
Containers are not broken or leaking. True
Sample collection date/times are provided. True
Appropriate sample containers are used. True
Sample bottles are completely filled. True
There is sufficient vol. for all requested analyses, incl. any requested True
MS/MSDs
VOA sample vials do not have headspace or bubble is <6mm (1/4") in True
diameter.
If necessary, staff have been informed of any short hold time or quick TAT True
needs
Multiphasic samples are not present. N/A
Samples do not require splitting or compositing. N/A
Is the Field Sampler's name present on COC? N/A
Sample Preservation Verified True
TestAmerica Savannah
Page 53 of 53

Mission, KS • [phone]
Lexington, KY • [phone]
Bossier City, LA • [phone]
Raleigh, NC • [phone]
Camp Hill, PA • [phone]
December 31, 2009
17a'OL1. , ,
IONEjaY...Jr:i.11/111111
www.mmal:com
5700 Broadmoor, Mission, KS 66202
Mr. Brad Newton
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Kingsport, TN • [phone]
Ashland, VA • [phone]
Bluefield, VA • [phone]
Beckley, WV • [phone]
Charleston, WV • [phone]
RECEIVE c.9)
APR 142010•
NCDENR MRO
Re: Norfolk Southern Railway Company — Virginia Ave. Auto & Wrecker
Pollution Incident No.: 19216
Norfolk Southern File No. 1-9-NC-BSMR-UT98.133-002
MM&A Project No. NS1411
Dear Mr. Newton:
Marshall Miller & Associates, Inc. (MM&A), on behalf of Norfolk Southern Railway Company
(NSRC), is pleased to submit the enclosed ground water monitoring report for the July 2009
semi-annual sampling event at the former underground storage tank (UST) site at Virginia Ave.
Auto & Wrecker, 201 W. Virginia Avenue, Bessemer City, Gaston County, North Carolina (Site).
If you have any questions or need additional information, please don't hesitate to call us at (913)
648-4424.
Sincerely,
MARSIIALL MILLER & ASSOCIATES, INC.
S�t�2eE jBailey, P.G., C
Brads anager
Enclosure
cc: Ms. Georgia Lewis, NSRC
Mr. Jesse Wiseman, NCDENR-DWQ
VMr. Qu Qi, NCDENR-DWQ UIC
MM&A File: NS1411
RECEIVED / DENR /DWQ
AQUIFFR-PPn i Fri-m . ECTION
JAN 0420i0
ENERGY & MINERAL RESOURCES • CIVIL & STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES • HYDROGEOLOGY & GEOLOGY
EMERGENCY RESPONSE • EXPERT WITNESS TESTIMONY • MINING ENGINEERING • GEOPHYSICAL LOGGING SERVICES • PETROLEUM ENGINEERING

RECEIVED
APR 14 2010
NCDENR IRO 14;PS
Ir'� Sir
GROUND WATER MONITORING REPORT
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Virginia Avenue Auto & Wrecker
201 W. Virginia Avenue
Bessemer City, Gaston County, North Carolina
Pollution Incident #19216
Intermediate Risk Classification
Latitude: 35° 17' 5" North
Longitude: 81° 17' 2" West
December 2009
Prepared For:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Ms. Georgia Lewis
1200 Peachtree Street N.E., Box 13
Atlanta, GA 30309
Norfolk Southern File No. 1-9-NC-BSMR-UT98.133-002
Prepared By:
MARSHALL MILLER & ASSOCIATES, INC.
5700 Broadmoor, Suite 504
Mission, Kansas 66202
[phone]
MM&A Project No. NS1411
Prepared by: Reviewed by:
Matthew J. Smith '-Su a 'e . Bailey, 7G. #/1778
Staff Scientist Bra Manager
Raleigh, NC Office Mission, KS Office
RECEIVED / DENR / DWQ
AQUIFFR'PRfITFr.TInN SECTION
JAN 0 4 20 i0.

Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Ground Water Monitoring Report
December 2009
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
2.0 SITE HISTORY 1
3.0 GROUND WATER MONITORING ACTIVITIES AND RESULTS 4
3.1 GROUND WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS 5
4.0 DISCUSSION OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS 7
5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8
FIGURES
Figure 1— Vicinity Map
Figure 2 — Site Map
Figure 3 — Ground Water Contour Map
Figure 4 — Benzene Isoconcentration Map
Figure 5 — Toluene Isoconcentration Map
Figure 6 — Ethylbenzene Isoconcentration Map
Figure 7 — Total Xylenes Isoconcentration Map
Figure 8 — Naphthalene Isoconcentration Map
TABLES
Table 1— Ground Water Elevation and Field Measurement Data
Table 2 — Ground Water Analytical Results
Table 3 — Injection Permit Analytical Results
APPENDIX A
Ground Water Sampling Forms
APPENDIX B
Laboratory Analytical Data Sheets

it I
I i
Site:
Report Submittal Date:
Site Risk Classification:
Reason for Risk Classification:
Land Use Category:
Owner of Former USTs:
Current Property Owner:
Consultant:
Release Information Sources:
Date of Discovery:
Quantity of Release:
Cause of Release:
Latitude/Longitude of Release:
Virginia Avenue Auto & Wrecker
201 W. Virginia Ave.
Bessemer City, North Carolina
Gaston County
Pollution Incident #19216
December 31, 2009
Intermediate
RECEIVED
APR 14 2010
NCDENR MRO
Ground water impacted by gasoline constituents from
former underground storage tanks (USTs) above North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (NCDENR) Ground Water Standards (GWS)
and Gross Contamination Levels (GCLs).
Industrial/Commercial
Patterson Oil Company
c/o Mr. John Cheshire
2714 Seabrook Island Road
Johns Island, South Carolina 29455-6019
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
1200 Peachtree Street N.E., Box 13
Atlanta, GA 30309
Contact: Ms. Georgia Lewis
Phone: [phone]
Marshall Miller & Associates, Inc.
5700 Broadmoor, Suite 504
Mission, Kansas 66202
Contact: Ms. Suzanne E. Bailey, P.G.
Phone: [phone]
Two, 2,000-gallon gasoline USTs
One, 1,000-gallon gasoline UST
Two, 500-gallon gasoline USTs
One, 500-gallon kerosene UST
September 1998 and January 1999 during UST removal
activities.
Unknown
Suspected historical overfill, spillage, or leaking
35° 17' 5" North; 81° 17'
Signature of Consultant's Licensed Geologist:
Suzanne E. Bailey, NC LG # 177
Bessemer City Report 08/09
2" West oouufi
QaO���©rr�l�1 �r^ !!�r�Offee
Op08,
do �
S
I S-
N s SEAL
1770
om
NE
O
1

Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Ground Water Monitoring Report
December 2009
1.0 INTRODUCTION
On behalf of Norfolk Southern Railway Company (NSRC), Marshall Miller & Associates,
Inc. (MM&A) has prepared this Ground Water Monitoring Report to document results of
the July 2009 semi-annual ground water sampling event at the NSRC property known as
Virginia Avenue Auto & Wrecker, located at 201 W. Virginia Avenue, Bessemer City,
Gaston County, North Carolina (hereafter referred to as the Site). This sampling event is
the eighth semi-annual monitoring event following application of Oxygen Release
Compound° (ORC); and the second semi-annual monitoring event following application of
Regenesis brand Regenox® at the Site to aid in natural attenuation of petroleum
hydrocarbons in the ground water. The Site location and vicinity are illustrated on Figure
1. A map of the Site is depicted on Figure 2.
2.0 SITE HISTORY
Five gasoline underground storage tanks (USTs) and one kerosene UST were originally
located at the Site. These USTs were removed in September 1998 and January 1999 by
Earth Tech, Inc. (Earth Tech). Earth Tech removed approximately 277 tons of petroleum
hydrocarbon impacted soil associated with the USTs. The excavation pits were backfilled
with clean material. Confirmation soil samples indicated the presence of gasoline -range
petroleum hydrocarbons above the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (NCDENR) soil to ground water maximum contaminant levels (MCLs).
Burns & McDonnell Consultants, Inc. (Burns & McDonnell) conducted Phase I and Phase
II Site Assessment activities in 1999, which included installation of five monitoring wells
(MW-1 through MW-5) and collection of soil and ground water samples. Burns &
McDonnell submitted a Phase II Limited Site Assessment (LSA) report to NCDENR in
January 2000. The Phase II LSA report indicated that soil and ground water at the Site
were impacted with benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes (BTEX), and naphthalene at
levels exceeding the NCDENR soil to ground water MCLs and Ground Water Standards
(GWS). Benzene was also detected in ground water from MW-2 above the NCDENR
Gross Contamination Level (GCL) of 5,000 micrograms per liter (41). Based on the
Phase II LSA report, NCDENR classified the Site as an intermediate risk and mandated
Bessemer City Report 08/09
1

Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Ground Water Monitoring Report
December 2009
that NSRC conduct a Comprehensive Site Assessment (CSA) to evaluate the extent of
impacted media at the Site. Burns & McDonnell conducted CSA activities in March 2000
and submitted the CSA report to NCDENR in May 2000. Owners of properties adjacent to
the Site did not allow NSRC access for the CSA investigation. In addition, utilities along
13th Street and W. Virginia Avenue and the railroad embankment and trestle prohibited
advancement of any soil borings or installation of monitoring wells beyond the Site
boundaries. In March 2000, Burns & McDonnell advanced nine direct -push soil borings
along the perimeter of the Site to obtain subsurface soil samples for laboratory analysis.
Burns & McDonnell also collected ground water samples from the five Site monitoring
wells. CSA soil sample results indicated the presence of BTEX compounds and volatile
petroleum hydrocarbons (VPH) above the NCDENR soil to ground water MCLs. Ground
water samples confirmed the presence of BTEX and VPH in ground water at levels
exceeding the NCDENR GWS and GCLs.
Burns & McDonnell submitted a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) to NCDENR in October
2000 recommending ground water monitoring to evaluate natural attenuation. Prior to
approving the CAP, NCDENR requested installation of two monitoring wells south of the
railroad trestle, downgradient from the Site to further evaluate the extent of impacted
ground water. Burns & McDonnell confirmed that this area was NSRC's property,
installed two monitoring wells (MW-6 and MW-7) in January 2001, and submitted a
summary report to NCDENR in June 2001. Analytical results for soil samples were below
laboratory detection limits for volatile organic compounds (VOCs), VPH, and extractable
petroleum hydrocarbons (EPH). Ground water analytical results were below laboratory
detection limits for VOCs, VPH, and EPH; however, total lead was detected in both
ground water samples and exceeded the NCDENR GWS in the sample from Monitoring
Well MW-6. Based on the results from the newly installed monitoring wells, NCDENR
approved the CAP in a letter dated July 17, 2001.
NCDENR required quarterly monitoring for the first year, followed by semi-annual
monitoring in subsequent years. Burns & McDonnell conducted four quarterly ground
Bessemer City Report 08/09
2
kk
=Mti
kk
SOCI: ES

Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Ground Water Monitoring Report
December 2009
water monitoring events at the Site between August 2001 and June 2002. NCDENR
approved the following methods for ground water analysis at the Site:
• Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), including isopropyl ether (IPE), methyl tertiary
butyl ether (MTBE), and ethyl dibromide (EDB; aka, 1,2-Dibromoethene) using United
States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Method 8260; and
• Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) using USEPA Method 8270.
Burns & McDonnell submitted quarterly monitoring reports to NCDENR following each
quarterly monitoring event. Burns & McDonnell performed the first semi-annual
monitoring event in June 2002.
In November 2002, NSRC contracted MM&A to continue semi-annual ground water
monitoring at the Site, in accordance with the approved CAP. MM&A conducted the
second semi-annual ground water monitoring event at the Site on November 26, 2002, the
third event on May 14, 2003, and the fourth event on November 10, 2003. Following the
November 2003 event, MM&A submitted a monitoring report with recommendations for
enhancement of natural attenuation using ORC® in MW-2 and MW-4. Prior to
implementing this corrective action, an injection permit was required from NCDENR
Division of Water Quality (DWQ). The permit application was submitted August 25, 2004
and supplemental information was submitted November 1, 2004. NCDENR DWQ
approved the permit in a letter dated December 7, 2004. The first ORC® socks were
installed in January 2005. The second set of ORC® socks were installed and monitoring
wells sampled on June 14, 2005. MM&A sampled the wells and installed the third set of
ORC® socks on December 13, 2005. MM&A removed the ORC® socks from MW-2 and
MW-4 after the June 2006 sampling event and the monitoring wells were allowed to
equilibrate. The January and August 2007 sampling events established ground water
quality post treatment with ORC® socks.
In an attempt to effectively and permanently lower benzene levels in the ground water
below the GCL (5,000 µg/L), MM&A obtained an injection permit (Injection Well Permit
Bessemer City Report 08/09
3

Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Ground Water Monitoring Report
December 2009
WI0300065) for injecting Regenesis brand RegenOx® and ORCAdvanced® via direct -push
technology. As a condition of the permit, MM&A installed a monitoring well (MW-8)
downgradient from monitoring well MW-2. The injection permit also required baseline
ground water sampling for historical parameters (VOC, PAH, BOD and COD) and
additional analytes (RCRA Metals, Sulfates, Total Na, Fe and dissolved Fe). This baseline
sampling was combined with the April 2008 semi-annual sampling event for the Site.
On August 11-14, 2008 and September 10-12, 2008 MM&A personnel conducted two of
four injection events with Regenesis brand Regenox® and ORCAdvanced® at the site via
direct push technology, as approved in (injection Well Permit WI0300065).
Approximately 1,890 gallons of Regenesis brand Regenox® was injected at 9 different
injection wells during each event in the immediate vicinity of MW-2. Each injection well
was advanced to a depth of 21 feet below surface grade (bgs), and injection took place at
one foot intervals beginning at 21 feet (bgs) and ending at 9 feet (bgs). Following both
injection events each well was properly abandoned by a North Carolina Certified Well
Contractor. Injection event records summarizing both injection events were then
submitted to NCDNR, DWQ, Underground Injection Control on October 3, 2008. On
December 22 & 23, 2008 MM&A personnel conducted the twelfth semi-annual ground
water sampling event at the Site. The results of which were used to establish post
treatment ground water conditions following the injection of Regenesis brand Regenox®.
In accordance with the approved CAP, MM&A personnel mobilized to the Site on July 15
& 16, 2009 for the purpose of semi-annual ground water sampling. This event is
summarized in the remainder of this report.
3.0 GROUND WATER MONITORING ACTIVITIES AND RESULTS
MM&A personnel mobilized to the Site on July 15 & 16, 2009 to conduct fluid level
measurements and to collect ground water samples for VOC, PAH, RCRA Metals,
Sulfates, Total Na, Fe, and dissolved Fe (field filtered) analysis.
Bessemer City Report 08/09
4

Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Ground Water Monitoring Report
December 2009
MM&A measured fluid levels in MW-1 through MW-8 using an electronic water level
meter. Ground water measurements and elevations are summarized in Table 1. Figure 3
illustrates ground water elevation contours for the July 2009 data. The July 2009 data
indicate ground water was flowing generally to the southeast, which is consistent with
historical ground water flow.
MM&A collected ground water samples from MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, MW-4, MW-5,
MW-6, and MW-8 on July 15 & 16, 2009. Less than 1 foot of water was measured in
MW-7 and as a result, it could not be sampled. Samples were collected with a peristaltic
pump using low flow sampling methods. Temperature, pH, Specific Conductivity,
Dissolved Oxygen (DO), oxidation-reduction potential (ORP), and turbidity were
periodically measured during purging activities and recorded on the field sampling logs.
Field logs for the July 15 & 16, 2009 sampling event are presented in Appendix A. Table
1 includes a summary of the final field parameter readings prior to sampling.
Quality control samples consisted of one duplicate sample (MW-22, duplicate sample of
MW-2) analyzed for the same parameters as the original sample and a trip blank analyzed
for VOCs. Ground water samples were packed on ice and shipped under proper chain -of -
custody procedures to Test America Laboratories, in Savannah, Georgia for laboratory
analyses of VOCs with IPE, MTBE, and EDB using USEPA Method 8260 and PAHs
using USEPA Method 8270C Low Level under the State of North Carolina Lab
Certification No. 269. Additional parameters including RCRA Metals, Sulfates, Total Na,
Fe, and dissolved Fe (field filtered) were included to satisfy the requirements of the
NCDENR DWQ Injection Well Permit.
3.1 GROUND WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Ground water analytical results for July 15 & 16, 2009 were compared to the NCDENR
GWS and GCLs. Analytical results for VOCs that exceeded the NCDENR GWS include
benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, total xylenes, IPE, MTBE, 1,2-dibromoethane and
acetone.
Bessemer City Report 08/09
5

-
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Ground Water Monitoring Report
December 2009
Analytical results for the following VOCs exceeded the NCDENR GWS in MW-1 through
MW-5 and MW-8 at the following range of detections:
• Benzene — ND (1.2) to 20,000 µg/1;
• Total xylenes —1,100 to 13,000 µg/1;
The benzene concentrations detected in the ground water samples from MW-2 (11,000
µg/1) and MW-8 (20,000 µg/1) also exceeded the NCDENR GCL for benzene (5,000 µg/1).
Additionally, the analyte 1,2-dibromoethane was detected at MW-8 at a concentration of
(270 µg/1) exceeding the NCDENR GCL of (50 µg/1)
Analytical results for toluene exceeded the NCDENR GWS (1,000 µg/1) in MW-2 through
MW-5 and MW-8 at detections ranging from 2,400 to 30,000 µg/1. Analytical results for
ethylbenzene exceeded the NCDENR GWS (550 µg/1) in MW2 through MW5 and MW8
at detections ranging from 1,200 to 2,000 µg/1. Isopropyl ether was detected in MW-2,
MW-3, MW-5 and MW-8 at 4,500 µg/1, 550 µg/1, 110 µg/1 and 4,700 mil respectively.
These detections exceeded the NCDENR GWS for IPE of 70 µg/1. MTBE detections at
MW-2 (3,800 µg/1), MW-3 (570 µg/1) and MW-8 (2,500 µg/1) exceeded the NCDENR
GWS of 200 41. Acetone was detected at MW-2 (1,000 41) and MW-8 (1,000 µg/1)
exceeding the NCDENR GWS of (700 µg/1). Acetone is a common laboratory
contaminant and the most likely cause of the high concentrations.
The PAH naphthalene exceeded the NCDENR GWS (21 14/1) in ground water from MW-
1 through MW-5 and MW-8 with detections ranging from 84 to 1,000 µg/1. In addition,
concentrations of 2-methylnaphthalene exceeded the NCDENR GWS (14 µg/1) in MW-1
through MW-5 and MW-8 with concentrations ranging from 50 to 190 µg/1.
Results from the duplicate sample (MW-22) were consistent with the original sample
results for MW-2.
Bessemer City Report 08/09
6

Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Ground Water Monitoring Report
December 2009
Table 2 summarizes ground water analytical results obtained to date for the Site. Table 3
summarizes the ground water analytical results for July 15 & 16, 2009 including analytes
required by the injection well permit (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead,
selenium, silver, mercury, total sodium and iron, dissolved iron, and sulfates). Copies of
the laboratory analytical data sheets for July 15 & 16, 2009 are included in Appendix B.
4.0 DISCUSSION OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
BTEX, MTBE, IPE, naphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene and 1,2-dibromoethane continue to
be the compounds detected in ground water at levels exceeding the NCDENR GWS.
Benzene levels at MW-2 and MW-8 are above the NCDENR GCL of 5,000 µg/1.
1,2-dibromoethane at MW8 is above the NCDENR GCL of 50 µg/1. Some concentrations
exceeded the calibration range of the instrument and required sample dilution, resulting in
some detection limits exceeding the GWS or estimation of results.
Historically, the BTEX ground water plume has been observed mostly in the vicinity of
wells MW-2, MW-4, and MW-5. However, analytical results from the recently installed
well MW-8 indicate that the BTEX ground water plume has migrated in a southeast
direction, Table 2. Figures 4 through 8 illustrate isoconcentration contours for benzene,
toluene, ethylbenzene, total xylenes, and naphthalene, respectively. Data obtained to date
indicate that the petroleum hydrocarbon plume appears to be located within the Site
boundaries but has migrated southeast in the direction of ground water flow.
MM&A compared the July 2009 ground water analytical results from MW-1 through MW-
6 and MW-8 to the previous post injection data (December 2008) and noted that BTEX
concentrations showed a slight increase in all monitor wells sampled. MW-8 continues to
show the highest concentration of benzene recorded to date at the Site. Drought conditions
have caused historic low ground water elevations at MW-1 through MW-7. Results for
benzene at MW-3 remained relatively lower than in previous years. In January 2007,
benzene levels in wells MW-2 and MW-4 dropped significantly following ORC
application in 2005 and 2006. While the benzene levels remained at low levels at well
MW-4 during August 2007, a rebound effect was observed in MW-2. Large rebound
Bessemer City Report 08/09
7

Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Ground Water Monitoring Report
December 2009
responses are characteristically observed in wells located close to the soil impact. During
the April 2008 monitoring event benzene levels decreased in well MW-2 while increasing
in MW-4. Analytical results for the December 2008 monitoring event showed benzene
levels remained consistent with this trend. This is likely due to the historically low ground
water elevations at the Site causing a lack of contact between the ground water and a smear
zone of impacted soil near MW-2. During the July 2009 sampling event groundwater
elevations increased by approximately 4-5 feet in MW-1 through MW-8 from the
December 2008 elevations. This large increase in groundwater elevation is likely causing
increased contact between the smear zone of impacted soil and groundwater accounting for
the elevated BTEX concentrations in MW-1 through MW-6 and MW-8.
5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
ORC® socks applied to monitoring wells MW-2 and MW-4 improved aerobic conditions
from January 2005 through June 2006. Higher ground water elevations in June 2006
compared to December 2005 may have allowed ground water to contact a smear zone of
impact, which could account for higher concentrations of target analytes. Lower ground
water elevations in April 2008 compared to August 2007 may have continued to prevent
contact between a zone of impacted soil and ground water accounting for the relatively
consistent analytical data between the two monitoring events. Aerobic conditions
improved at the Site following injection of Regenesis brand Regenox® in August and
September, 2008 accounting for generally lower levels of target analytes in MW-1 through
MW-5. However, MW-8 showed a slight increase of target analytes. The high
concentrations measured at MW-8 may indicate migration of BTEX in a southeast
direction. The elevated concentrations of BTEX coupled with the sharp increase in
groundwater elevations measured at MW-1 through MW-6 and MW-8 during the July
2009 event points toward increased contact between a zone of impacted soil and
groundwater.
MM&A has been issued an injection permit by NCDENR DWQ (injection Well Permit
WI0300065) authorizing 4 separate injection events of Regenesis brand Regenox® and
ORCAdvanced® via direct push technology, followed by semi-annual sampling. To date,
Bessemer City Report 08/09
8

Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Ground Water Monitoring Report
December 2009
MM&A has conducted 2 injection events of Regenesis brand Regenox® at numerous
points around MW-2. Post injection analyses indicate an overall improvement in aerobic
conditions at the Site. MM&A will conduct another round of Regenesis brand Regenox®
injections followed up by a round of liquid ORCAdvanced® injections via direct push
technology to further enhance the aerobic conditions of the aquifer and degradation of
petroleum hydrocarbons. Injection will take place in the summer of 2010.
The next scheduled sampling event is in December 2009. After evaluation of the
December 2009 sampling, MM&A will further assess the efficiency of the Regenesis
brand Regenox® and ORCAdvanced® injections and the potential need of expansion of the
injection program to include areas near well MW-8. In order to evaluate long term
efficiency of the injections, MM&A recommends continued ground water sampling to be
conducted on a semi-annual basis.
Bessemer City Report 08/09
9

FIGURES

Prepared by.
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY - BESSEMER CITY
SOUTHEAST SECTION OF USCS 7.5' BESSEMER CITY, N.C. QUADRANGLE
ARSH L
SOCI_TES
Prepared for:
NORFOLK
SOUTHERN
2,000'
0 2,000'
SCALE 1:24,000
VICINITY MAP
FIGURE 1
NORTH CAROLINA
QUADRANGLE LOCATION

50'
'MW-7
V/RG1Nvq
Vf. STORM
SEWER
MW-5
MW-2 •
VIRGINIA
AVENUE
AUTO
FIBER OPTIC CABLE
RAILROAD
BRIDGE
*MW-6
PENNSYLVANIA AVE.
0
50'
1"=50'
NOTE: The location and dimensions of features shown on this map have
been derived from various sources and supplemented by field
measurements. Though sufficient for its intended purpose, no
claim is made as to the degree of accuracy of this drawing.
*MW-4
*MW-8
0)
MW-1
LEGEND
MONITORING WELL
FIGURE 2
SITE MAP
JULY 2009
NORFOLK SOUTHERN
201 W. VIRGINIA AVENUE
BESSEMER CITY, NC
n
DATE: 08/10/2009
SCALE: 1" = 50'
DESIGNED: MS
DRAWN: BEQ
PROJECT: NS1411
Prep ore
d by.
NPSHALL : I.
L SOCP-TES

50'
VIRchvo
AVE. ,-STORM
VIRGINIA
AVENUE
AUTO
FIBER OPTIC CABLE
878
RAILROAD
BRIDGE
877
MW-7
117 876.06
MW-6
*875.82
PENNSYLVANIA AVE.
a
0 50'
1"=50'
NOTE: The location and dimensions of features shown on this map have
been derived from various sources and supplemented by field
measurements. Though sufficient for its intended purpose, no
claim is made as to the degree of accuracy of this drawing.
SEWER
•MW-1�\
879.60 W-5
M
!78.65
MW-3
MW-2
878.76
MW-4
878.50
MW-1
— 879 —
877.91
MW-8
877.24
LEGEND
MONITORING WELL
GROUND WATER CONTOUR
APPROXIMATE GROUND WATER FLOW DIRECTION
FIGURE 3
GROUND WATER CONTOUR MAP
JULY 2009
NORFOLK SOUTHERN
201 W. VIRGINIA AVENUE
BESSEMER CITY, NC
DATE: 08/10/2009
SCALE: 1" = 50'
DESIGNED: MS
DRAWN: BEQ
PROJECT: NS1411
Prepared by.
NRSHALLMILLE•
.LSSOCI:f

MW-7
NS
VIRGIA//A A VE
VIRGINIA
AVENUE
AUTO
MW 2
-011,000*
\41,:)\
\ MW-4
so1,700
o
FIBER OPTIC CABLE
RAILROAD \ /
BRIDGE �1
STORM
SEWER
\ MW-1'
ND (\2)4-1 0
\ BMW-3
74
f�370
'MW-8
/I 20'000*
11111j
�1111j-j-j
An MW-6
ND (0.25)
PENNSYLVANIA AVE.
50'
0
50'
1"=50'
NOTE: The location and dimensions of features shown on this map have
been derived from various sources and supplemented by field
measurements. Though sufficient for its intended purpose, no
claim is made as to the degree of accuracy of this d awing.
MW-1
ND
NS
5000
NOTES:
LEGEND
MONITORING WELL
NOT DETECTED
NOT SAMPLED
BENZENE ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR
EXCEEDS NCDENR GROSS CONTAMINATION
LEVEL
INTERPRETED EXTENT OF BENZENE ABOVE
NCDENR GROUND WATER STANDARD
1. GROUND WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED ON JULY
15 AND 16, 2009.
2. ALL RESULTS IN MICROGRAMS PER LITER (pg/L).
3. NCDENR GROUND WATER STANDARD FOR
BENZENE = 1Ng/L.
FIGURE 4
BENZENE ISOCONCENTRATION MAP
JULY 2009
.111111=111.3,116
NORFOLK SOUTHERN
201 W. VIRGINIA AVENUE
BESSEMER CITY, NC
DATE: 08/10/2009
SCALE: 1" = 50'
DESIGNED: MS
DRAWN: BEQ
PROJECT: NS1411
Prepared by.
RSHNLLMLLE— ,•
Socr-"rES

MW-7
NS
_ WRG/Njq
VIRGINIA
AVENUE
AUTO
A VE STORM
/
SEWER
- MW-1
/ MW-5
( • ) 9,100
MW-3
• m `/ 2,400
/
MW-2
25,000
*MW-4
22,000
FIBER
FIBER OPTIC CABLE I 20 pp0
RAILROAD
BRIDGE
MW-6
•ND (0.33) i --
PENNSYLVANIA AVE.
MW-1
NS
—15,000 —
50'
0
50'
1"=50'
NOTE: The location and dimensions of features shown on this map have
been derived from various sources and supplemented by field
measurements. Though sufficient for its intended purpose, no
claim is made as to the degree of accuracy of this d awing.
NOTES:
MW-8
30,000
LEGEND
MONITORING WELL
NOT SAMPLED
TOLUENE ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR
INTERPRETED EXTENT OF TOLUENE ABOVE
NCDENR GROUND WATER STANDARD
1. GROUND WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED ON JULY 15
AND 16, 2009.
2. ALL RESULTS IN MICROGRAMS PER LITER (Ng/L).
3. NCDENR GROUND WATER STANDARD FOR
TOLUENE = 1000Ng/L.
FIGURE 5
TOLUENE ISOCONCENTRATION MAP
JULY 2009
NORFOLK SOUTHERN
201 W. VIRGINIA AVENUE
BESSEMER CITY, NC
DATE: 08/10/2009
SCALE: 1" = 50'
DESIGNED: MS
DRAWN: BEQ
PROJECT: NS1411
Prepared by.
RSHNLLWLE
e�ssoa-res

MW-7
NS
VIRGINIA
AVENUE
AUTO
WRGIN11A AVE:
STORM
SEWER
$MW 1 j
i MW-5
4' 1, 500
MW-3
4-* 6/1,200
MW-2
1,800
600 T/,MW-8
\ 1�000//
_/ 2,000
FIBER OPTIC CABLE
� -----�
RAILROAD \ 550 —
BRIDGE
An MW— 6
ND (0.11)
PENNSYLVANIA AVE.
50'
0
50'
1"=50'
NOTE: The location and dimensions of features shown on this map have
been derived from various sources and supplemented by field
measurements. Though sufficient for its intended purpose, no
claim is made as to the degree of accuracy of this d awing.
MW-1
4-
NS
1,000
LEGEND
MONITORING WELL
NOT SAMPLED
ETHYLBENZENE ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR
INTERPRETED EXTENT OF ETHYLBENZENE
ABOVE NCDENR GROUND WATER STANDARD
NOTES:
1. GROUND WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED ON JULY 15
AND 16, 2009.
2. ALL RESULTS IN MICROGRAMS PER LITER (pug/L).
3. NCDENR GROUND WATER STANDARD FOR
ETHYLBENZENE = 550pg/L.
FIGURE 6
ETHYLBENZENEISOCONCENTRATION MAP
JULY 2009
NORFOLK SOUTHERN
201 W. VIRGINIA AVENUE
BESSEMER CITY, NC
DATE: 08/10/2009
SCALE: 1" = 50'
DESIGNED: MS
DRAWN: BEQ
PROJECT: NS1411
Prepared by.
RSHNLLMILLE•
SLSSOCFrES

MW-7
NS
0- 14RGINhA VE
VIRGINIA
AVENUE
AUTO
STORM
SEWER
MW 1�.�
1,100_ MW-5
1 9,200
MW-3
• : \ y 1 1,000
MW-2
15,000
I
*MW-4
13,000 Y MW-8
FIBER OPTIC CABLE \ 10,000 j/ 12,000
\N /
RAILROAD
BRIDGE 53o-
i
MW-6
lir ND (0.20)
PENNSYLVANIA AVE.
50'
0
50'
1"=50'
NOTE: The location and dimensions of features shown on this map have
been derived from various sources and supplemented by field
measurements. Though sufficient for its intended purpose, no
claim is made as to the degree of accuracy of this drawing.
MW-1
NS
10, 000 --
LEGEND
MONITORING WELL
NOT SAMPLED
TOTAL XYLENES ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR
INTERPRETED EXTENT OF TOTAL XYLENES
ABOVE NCDENR GROUND WATER STANDARD
NOTES:
1. GROUND WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED ON JULY 15
AND 16, 2009.
2. ALL RESULTS IN MICROGRAMS PER LITER (Ng/L).
3. NCDENR GROUND WATER STANDARD FOR TOTAL
XYLENES = 530Ng/L.
FIGURE 7
TOTAL XYLENES ISOCONCENTRATION MAP
JULY 2009
NORFOLK SOUTHERN
201 W. VIRGINIA AVENUE
BESSEMER CITY, NC
DATE: 08/10/2009
SCALE: 1" = 50'
DESIGNED: MS
DRAWN: BEQ
PROJECT: NS1411
Prepared by.
ARSHNLLMILLE•
-- ss.ssoCI-7ES

MW-7
-17 NS
VIRGINIA
AVENUE
AUTO
V/Rch,,
AVE. STORM
SEWER
/ �fl
/ •MW-'I� .
84 MW-5
/ *360
/ I I
p0\ MW-3
/1 360
00
M600 7MW-8
\\ // 550
�
FIBER OPTIC CABLE \ 300 "-
_ _-
RAILROAD
BRIDGE
ti
fn
1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
MW-6
0.034
PENNSYLVANIA AVE.
MW-1
4-
NS
-1,100
50'
0 50'
r'=50'
NOTE: The location and dimensions of features shown on this map have
been derived from various sources and supplemented by field
measurements. Though sufficient for its intended purpose, no
claim is made as to the degree of accuracy of this drawing.
LEGEND
MONITORING WELL
NOT SAMPLED
NAPHTHALENE ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR
INTERPRETED EXTENT OF NAPHTHALENE
ABOVE NCDENR GROUND WATER STANDARD
NOTES:
1. GROUND WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED ON JULY 15
AND 16, 2009.
2. ALL RESULTS IN MICROGRAMS PER LITER (Ng/L).
3. NCDENR GROUND WATER STANDARD FOR
NAPHTHALENE = 21jg/L.
FIGURE 8
NAPHTHALENE ISOCONCENTRATION MAP
JULY 2009
NORFOLK SOUTHERN
201 W. VIRGINIA AVENUE
BESSEMER CITY, NC
DATE: 08/10/2009
SCALE: 1" = 50'
DESIGNED: MS
DRAWN: BEQ
PROJECT: NS1411
Prepared by.
�RSHALLMILLE
3r- socI.rFS

TABLES

TABLE 1
GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND FIELD MEASUREMENT DATA
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Bessemer City, North Carolina
GROUND WATER
ELEVATION DATA
FIELD MEASUREMENT
DATA
Monitoring
Well Number
Date
Measured
Ground
Surface
Elevation
Top of
Casing
Elevation (ft
Depth
to Water
Ground
Water
Elevation
Temperature
(°Celsius)
pH
Specific
Conductivity
Dissolved
Oxygen
Oxidation
Reduction
Potential
Turbidity
(NTU)
(MSL)
MSL)
(ft TOC)
(ft MSL)
(uS/cm)
(mg/1)
(mV)
MW-1
12/07/99
895.49
894.72
15.77
878.95
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
03/16/00
895.49
894.72
12.59
882.13
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
03/18/00
895.49
894.72
12.61
882.11
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
09/14/00
895.49
894.72
16.30
878.42
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
04/04/01
895.49
894.72
12.32
882.40
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
08/22/01
895.49
894.72
17.76
876.96
19.5
4.48
1390
0.26
NA
NA
11/29/01
895.49
894.72
19.52
875.20
19.2
4.41
1430
0.21
NA
NA
03/04/02
895.49
894.72
16.60
878.12
20.0
4.91
1160
0.39
NA
NA
06/12/02
895.49
894.72
17.41
877.31
19.5
4.58
42*
0.12
NA
NA
11/26/02
895.49
894.72
18.35
876.37
17.9
5.13
1410
1.47
NA
NA
05/14/03
895.49
894.72
8.22
886.50
19.6
5.97
1360
0.5
NA
NA
11/10/03
895.49
894.72
11.33
883.39
18.4
6.78
1290
NM
NA
NA
11/17/04
895.49
894.72
12.33
882.39
20.1
4.9
1410
1.11
NA
NA
06/14/05
895.49
894.72
10.24
884.48
19.1
6.87
85.5
NM
NA
NA
12/13/05
895.49
894.72
15.45
879.27
18.6
5.32
67
NM
NA
NA
06/08/06
895.49
894.72
14.99
879.73
21.5
5.13
71
NM
NA -
NA
01/03/07
895.49
894.72
14.50
880.22
17.92
4.73
147
1 #
NA
NA
08/24/07
895.49
894.72
20.21
874.51
24.9
4
100
0.1
NA
NA
04/03/08
895.49
894.72
20.10
874.62
18.22
4.48
137
.037#
50.5
132
12/22/08
895.49
894.72
20.02
874.70
16.10
4.54
151
0.60
47.5
84
07/15/09
895.49
894.72
15.12
879.60
19.88
4.39
96
0.62
80.5
6.59
MW-2
12/07/99
894.77
894.30
15.57
878.73
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
03/16/00
894.77
894.30
12.93
881.37
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
08/22/01
894.77
894.30
17.19
877.11
19.2
5.30
1150
0.20
NA
NA
11/29/01
894.77
894.30
18.96
875.34
20.0
5.86
1450
0.18
NA
NA
03/04/02
894.77
894.30
16.90
877.40
20.0
5.60
1100
0.92
NA
NA
06/12/02
894.77
894.30
17.63
876.67
19.4
5.58
103*
NA
NA
NA
11/26/02
894.77
894.30
19.37
874.93
20.3
6.13
1480
1.7
NA
NA
05/14/03
894.77
894.30
10.40
883.90
21.8
6.05
1370
0.8
NA
NA
11/10/03
894.77
894.30
10.90
883.40
17.0
9.9
1670
NM
NA
NA
11/17/04
894.77
894.30
13.20
881.10
21.2
5.18
1270
NM
NA
NA
06/14/05
894.77
894.30
12.12
882.18
19.7
8.51
391.5
NM
NA
NA
12/13/05
894.77
894.30
16.44
877.86
19.9
8.66
388
NM
NA
NA
06/08/06
894.77
894.30
15.60
878.70
23.1
8.83
353
NM
NA
NA
01/03/07
894.77
894.30
15.75
878.55
18.2
6.91
600
3.7 #
NA
NA
08/24/07
894.77
894.30
20.35
873.95
24.5
6
501
0.73
NA
NA
04/03/08
894.77
894.30
20.77
873.53
17.2
6.57
377
0.54#
-60.9
653
12/23/08
894.77
894.30
21.02
873.28
17.3
6.07
330
1.53
-76.4
56.3
07/15/09
894.77
894.30
15.54
878.76
21.1
5.13
144
0.65
9.1
2.62
GW Elevation Data Table 1
Page 1 of 4

TABLE 1
GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND FIELD MEASUREMENT DATA
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Bessemer City, North Carolina
GROUND
WATER
ELEVATION DATA
FIELD MEASUREMENT DATA
Monitoring
Well Number
Date
Measured
Ground
Surface
Elevation
Top of
Casing
Elevation (ft
Depth
to Water
Ground
Water
Elevation
Temperature
(a Celsius)
pH
Specific
Conductivity
Dissolved
Oxygen
Oxidation
Reduction
Potential
Turbidity
(NTU)
(MSL)
MSL)
(ft TOC)
(ft MSL)
(uS/cm)
(mg/1)
(mV)
MW-3
12/07/99
894.07
893.84
15.60
878.24
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
03/16/00
894.07
893.84
12.59
881.25
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
03/18/00
894.07
893.84
12.63
881.21
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
09/14/00
894.07
893.84
14.84
879.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
04/04/01
894.07
893.84
12.20
881.64
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
08/22/01
894.07
893.84
15.51
878.33
21.3
5.10
2000
0.54
NA
NA
11/29/01
894.07
893.84
17.79
876.05
20.4
4.89
2220
2.08
NA
NA
03/04/02
894.07
893.84
16.86
876.98
20.9
5.69
2000
0.87
NA
NA
06/12/02
894.07
893.84
17.39
876.45
19.8
5.50
155*
0.80
NA
NA
11/26/02
894.07
893.84
19.03
874.81
18.2
5.29
1440
2.64
NA
NA
05/14/03
894.07
893.84
10.73
883.11
21.8
5.03
2080
0.60
NA
NA
11/10/03
894.07
893.84
11.85
881.99
16.9
10.08
1420
NM
NA
NA
11/17/04
894.07
893.84
15.79
878.05
20.5
5.15
1830
NM
NA
NA
06/14/05
894.07
893.84
12.23
881.61
19.8
7.02
186
NM
NA
NA
12/13/05
894.07
893.84
16.57
877.27
19.6
5.91
111
NM
NA
NA
06/08/06
894.07
893.84
15.92
877.92
24.6
5.62
114
NM
NA
NA
01/03/07
894.07
893.84
17.05
876.79
18.6
4.85
181
3.7 #
NA
NA
08/24/07
894.07
893.84
20.08
873.76
27.5
4.66
207
0.12
NA
NA
04/03/08
894.07
893.84
20.65
873.19
18.3
5.39
184
0.67#
39.1
0.89
12/22/08
894.07
893.84
20.66
873.18
19.2
6.11
480
9.57
20.8
4.04
07/15/09
894.07
893.84
15.93
877.91
21.3
5.01
232
0.78
56.4
0.27
MW-4
12/07/99
894.84
894.33
16.00
878.33
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
03/16/00
894.84
894.33
13.20
881.13
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
03/18/00
894.84
894.33
13.23
881.10
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
09/14/00
894.84
894.33
16.89
877.44
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
04/04/01
894.84
894.33
13.42
880.91
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
08/22/01
894.84
894.33
18.34
875.99
18.5
4.70
770
0.30
NA
NA
11/29/01
894.84
894.33
19.92
874.41
19.2
4.97
870
0.34
NA
NA
03/04/02
894.84
894.33
17.37
876.96
18.7
5.09
800
0.25
NA
NA
06/12/02
894.84
894.33
18.25
876.08
18.4
5.02
61*
0.34
NA
NA
11/26/02
894.84
894.33
19.92
874.41
17.6
5.13
961
2.08
NA
NA
05/14/03
894.84
894.33
7.37
886.96
21.4
5.84
1680
1.3
NA
NA
11/10/03
894.84
894.33
9.05
885.28
17.1
9.87
1420
NM
NA
NA
11/17/04
894.84
894.33
12.76
881.57
19.18
4.69
780
0.81
NA
NA
06/14/05
894.84
894.33
10.83
883.50
18.7
7.1
225
NM
NA
NA
12/13/05
894.84
894.33
16.79
877.54
18.1
8.4
469
NM
NA
NA
06/08/06
894.84
894.33
15.79
878.54
23.1
9.34
344
NM
NA
NA
01/03/07
894.84
894.33
16.10
878.23
16.16
5.19
114
5 #
NA
NA
08/24/07
894.84
894.33
20.95
873.38
21.58
4.18
103
0.14
NA
NA
04/03/08
894.84
894.33
21.13
873.20
14.13
5.27
148
0.70#
-31.5
1.24
12/23/08
894.84
894.33
21.67
872.66
17.35
5.95
307
0.63
-54
0.65
07/15/09
894.84
894.33
15.83
878.50
21.88
4.56
89
0.43
-153.2
ANA
GW Elevation Data Table 1
Page 2 of 4

TABLE 1
GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND FIELD MEASUREMENT DATA
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Bessemer City, North Carolina
GROUND WATER
ELEVATION DATA
FIELD MEASUREMENT
DATA
Monitoring
Well Number
Date
Measured
Ground
Surface
Elevation
Top of
Casing
Elevation (ft
Depth
to Water
Ground
Water
Elevation
Temperature
(°Celsius)
pH
Specific
Conductivity
Dissolved
Oxygen
Oxidation
Reduction
Potential
Turbidity
(NTU)
(MSL)
MSL)
(ft TOC)
(ft MSL)
(uS/cm)
(mg�)
(mV)
MW-5
12/07/99
894.49
894.18
15.09
879.09
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
03/16/00
894.49
894.18
12.50
881.68
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
03/18/00
894.49
894.18
12.52
881.66
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
09/14/00
894.49
894.18
14.89
879.29
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
04/04/01
894.49
894.18
12.18
882.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
08/22/01
894.49
894.18
16.08
878.10
20.1
4.26
1430
0.20
NA
NA
11/29/01
894.49
894.18
17.86
876.32
21.0
4.20
1510
0.77
NA
NA
03/04/02
894.49
894.18
16.33
877.85
20.6
4.67
1270
0.37
NA
NA
06/12/02
894.49
894.18
17.29
876.89
20.0
4.53
237*
0.34
NA
NA
11/26/02
894.49
894.18
18.66
875.52
17.9
5.28
1350
1.68
NA
NA
05/14/03
894.49
894.18
9.92
884.26
24.4
5.86
1770
1.3
NA
NA
11/10/03
894.49
894.18
12.25
881.93
19.4
9.91
1580
NM
NA
NA
11/17/04
894.49
894.18
13.43
880.75
20.9
4.58
1310
0.89
NA
NA
06/14/05
894.49
894.18
11.64
882.54
19.8
8.76
153
NM
NA
NA
12/13/05
894.49
894.18
16.25
877.93
19.7
5.10
69
NM
NA
NA
06/08/06
894.49
894.18
15.57
878.61
22.5
4.79
84
NM
NA
NA
01/03/07
894.49
894.18
15.50
878.68
18.9
4.37
190
1.5 #
NA
NA
08/24/07
894.49
894.18
20.12
874.06
25.0
3.61
156
0.1
NA
NA
04/03/08
894.49
894.18
20.48
873.70
17.1
4.68
163
0.66#
-3.3
0.73
12/22/08
894.49
894.18
20.44
873.74
18.4
5.50
287
19.21
101.4
1.82
07/15/09
894.49
894.18
15.53
878.65
22.0
5.63
244
0.46
-157.9
2.28
MW-6
12/07/99
893.58
893.26
NA
NA
NA
z z h¢ M Vl
zzz zzzz4zz,-;,.prz 44
NA
z z z z z z z z 7-1
N V'
NA
NA
03/16/00
893.58
893.26
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
03/18/00
893.58
893.26
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
09/14/00
893.58
893.26
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
04/04/01
893.58
893.26
15.45
877.81
NA
NA
NA
NA
08/22/01
893.58
893.26
19.73
873.53
13.7
NA
NA
NA
11/29/01
893.58
893.26
19.81
873.45
NA
NA
NA
NA
03/04/02
893.58
893.26
19.08
874.18
17.3
1520
NA
NA
06/12/02
893.58
893.26
19.76
873.50
NA
NA
NA
NA
11/26/02
893.58
893.26
Dry
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
05/14/03
893.58
893.26
10.84
882.42
18.4
1850
NA
NA
11/10/03
893.58
893.26
13.21
880.05
16.7
1910
NA
NA
11/17/04
893.58
893.26
15.10
878.16
19.35
2170
NA
NA
06/14/05
893.58
893.26
13.09
880.17
18.7
211.5
NA
NA
12/13/05
893.58
893.26
18.01
875.25
18.9
132
NA
NA
06/08/06
893.58
893.26
17.57
875.69
22.5
119
NA
NA
01/03/07
893.58
893.26
Dry
NA
NM
NM
NA
NA
08/24/07
893.58
893.26
Dry
NA
NM
NM
NA
NA
04/03/08
893.58
893.26
19.97
873.29
NM
NM
NM
NM
12/22/08
893.58
893.26
19.98
873.28
NM
NM
NM
NM
07/16/09
893.58
893.26
17.44
875.82
NM
NM
NM
GW Elevation Data Table 1
Page 3 of 4

TABLE 1
GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND FIELD MEASUREMENT DATA
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Bessemer City, North Carolina
GROUND WATER
ELEVATION DATA
FIELD MEASUREMENT
DATA
Monitoring
Date
Ground
Surface
Top of
Casing
Depth
Ground
Water
Temperature
Specific
Dissolved
Oxidation
Reduction
Turbidity
Well Number
Measured
Elevation
Elevation (ft
to Water
Elevation
(*Celsius)
pH
Conductivity
Oxygen
Potential
(NTU)
(MSL)
MSL)
(ft TOC)
(ft MSL)
(uS/cm)
(mg�)
(mV)
MW-7
12/07/99
896.02
895.81
NA
NA
¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ .--i ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ .--i M l" � �+
zzzzz°O,zzzz.°:P.00,, z4-
¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢gzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzz,-: ,ram
NA
¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ N ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ F. ~ F. zzzzz�;zzzz.. M
NA
NA
03/16/00
896.02
895.81
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
03/18/00
896.02
895.81
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
09/14/00
896.02
895.81
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
04/04/01
896.02
895.81
18.40
877.41
NA
NA
NA
08/22/01
896.02
895.81
19.80
876.01
NA
NA
NA
11/29/01
896.02
895.81
Dry
NA
NA
NA
NA
03/04/02
896.02
895.81
Dry
NA
NA
NA
NA
06/12/02
896.02
895.81
Dry
NA
NA
NA
NA
11/26/02
896.02
895.81
Dry
NA
NA
NA
NA
05/14/03
896.02
895.81
12.12
883.69
1420
NA
NA
11/10/03
896.02
895.81
15.06
880.75
1310
NA
NA
11/17/04
896.02
895.81
16.70
879.11
18.1
NA
NA
06/14/05
896.02
895.81
14.17
881.64
166.5
NA
NA
12/13/05
896.02
895.81
19.79
876.02
NM
NA
NA
06/08/06
896.02
895.81
19.71
876.10
NM
NA
NA
01/03/07
896.02
895.81
Dry
NA
NM
NA
NA
08/24/07
896.02
895.81
Dry
NA
NM
NA
NA
04/03/08
896.02
895.81
19.90
875.91
NM
NM
NM
12/22/08
896.02
895.81
19.94
875.87
NM
NM
NM
07/15/09
896.02
895.81
19.75
876.06
NM
NM
NM
MW-8
04/03/08
NA
892.67
20.40
872.27
15.3
5.25
178
0.83#
7.5
1.54
12/23/08
NA
892.67
20.58
872.09
17.95
4.56
177
0.52
145.9
-0.49
07/15/09
NA
892.67
15.43
877.24
19.56
4.12
162
0.49
-60.1
1.88
Notes:
Elevations are in reference to feet above mean sea level (MSL).
ft - Feet
uS/cm - Micro -Siemens per centimeter
mg/I - Milligrams per liter
GW Elevation Data Table 1
TOC - Top of casing
NA - Not Available
* - Units are in micro -ohms per centimeter
NM - Not Measured
Page 4 of 4
# - Estimated conversion from % DO to Mg/L
mV - Milli Volts
NTU - Nephelometric turbidity units

TABLE2
HISTORICAL GROUND WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Bessemer City, North Carolina
Sampling 0ate->
NCDENR
WOWS
MW-I
1 rC9,j li/
C6.ra 06/30/99
12/07/99
03/16/00
08/22/01
11/29/01
03/04/02
06/12/02
11/26/02
05/14/03
11/10/03
11/17/04
06/14/05
12/13/05
12/13/05
06/08/06
01/03/07
08/24/07
04/03/08
12/22/08
07/15/09
Volatile Organic Compounds (pg/I) Duplicate
Benzene1
5,000
M19
ND(5.0)
ND(2.0)
ND(5.0)
ND(5.0)
ND(5.0)
ND(25)
ND(120)
M)(20)
ND(20)
ND(20)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.01
ND(1.0)
ND(0.5)
13UW '^.
ND(1.6)
ND(1.6)
ND(1.6)
ND(1.2)
Toluene
1,000
257,500
60
ND(5.0)
ND(2.0)
ND(5.0)
ND(5.0)
ND(5.0)
ND(25)
18J
ND(20)
ND(20)
13J
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
0.8J
690
33
3.6J
1.8J
21
Ethylbetzenc
550
84,500
63
49
56
140
130
130
66
550
2261
35
44
ND(1.0)
20
20
39
70
19
50
17
8
Xylenes
530
87,500
W(681(_O rlI
720.
a n7461 me7IITSWOA
. M"1300 %
(i,13j)J.(/
.8700/
itaiiiA11.
VaB sti
600
` "- )(
40' ,,
� 1400v"�.
ND(2.0)
e
�"i1010643
. )w"
"^�t 970•.".�
w)"ig
�+1d1120itv.�`7^
'�.7901""_'>
�'
�S 690a
5 . '
* •a160OW
�3
� 9004.
3 �I100 ^,.'
'
1,1 Diohlorocthene (1,1 dichloroethylene)
7
7,000
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(120)
ND(20)
ND(20)
ND(20)
ND(1.0)
ND(2.0)
ND(2.0)
ND(0.8)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.8)
ND(1.81
ND(I.8)
ND(0.55)
1,2-Dibromoethane
0.0004
50
NA
NA
NA
ND(5.0)
NO(5.01
ND(5.0)
ND(251
M7(1201
ND(201
ND(20)
ND(20)
ND(1.0)
ND(2.0)
ND(2.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.5)
ND(1.5)
ND(1.51
ND(.2)
1,2-Dichloropropanc
0.51
510
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
7re•t�"
ND(1.0)
ND(I.8)
ND(1.8)
ND(1.8)
ND(0.65)
2-Butanone (MEK)
-
-
NA
ND(50)
ND(20)
ND(50)
ND(50)
ND(50)
ND(120)
ND(620)
ND(100)
ND(200)
ND(200)
ND(10)
44
47
21
20
43 J
69
43J
ND(5.0)
2-Hexnnone
280
280.000
NA
ND(50)
23
ND(50)
ND(50)
ND(50)
ND(120)
ND(620)
ND(100)
ND(200)
ND(200)
ND(10)
20 J
21
32
ND(3.01
ND(3.4)
ND(3.4)
ND(3.41
ND(5.0)
4-methyl-2-pentanone (MIRK)
-
-
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(620)
ND(100)
ND(200)
ND(200)
ND(10)
ND(6.0)
ND(6.0)
6J
20
ND(3.0)
ND(3.0)
ND(3)
ND(5.0)
Acetone
700
700.000
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(1200)
ND(200)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(25)
53
54
37
93
NO(251
45 J
48 J •
56 J
Carbon tetrachloride
0.269
-
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(120)
ND(20)
ND(20)
ND(20)
ND(1.0)
ND(2.0)
ND(2.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.4)
ND(1.4)
ND(I.4)
ND(2.5)
Chloroform
70
70,000
NA
22U 6(
t .,21 eA
-i. 12 •` d
1J
"'21 "
ND(25)
ND(120)
ND(20)
ND(20)
.. r20" ')'
ND(1.0)
a 255 =
a` .23, yJ
-,'"F+'�'12
3"27 ''
§20 )5_
ND(1.4)
ND(1.4)
ND(0.70)
Isopropyl ether
70
70,000
NA
ND(50)
ND(20)
ND(120)
ND(50)
ND(50)
ND(50)
NA
24
ND(100)
ND(200)
ND(10)
ND(2.0)
ND(2.0)
ND(0.8)
13
ND(1.7)
ND(1.6)
ND(1.6)
ND(1.2)
Methyl tertiary butyl ether(MfBE)
200
200,000
NA
ND(50)
ND(20)
ND(50)
ND(50)
ND(50)
ND(50)
ND(250)
ND(40)
ND(200)
ND(200)
ND(10)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(0.5)
3 J
ND(2.91
ND(2.91
ND(2.9)
4.1 J
Styrene
100
100,000
NA
ND(5.0)
ND(2.01
ND(5.0)
ND(5.0)
ND(5.01
ND(25)
ND(120)
ND(20)
ND(20)
8.8J
ND(1.0)
ND(2.0)
ND(2.01
ND(1.01
ND(I.0)
ND(I.8)
ND(1.8)
ND(I.8)
ND(0.55)
Tetmchlorocthene(perchloroethylene)
0.7
700
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(120)
•l2.1JBrii
ND(20)
ND(20)
ND(1.01
ND(2.0)
ND(2.01
ND(0.8)
ND(0.8)
ND(1.4)
ND(1.4)
ND(I.4)
ND(0.75)
Trichloroethene(ltichloroelhylene)
2.8
2.800
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(120)
ND(201
ND(20)
ND(20)
ND(1.0)
ND(2.0)
ND(2.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(2.01
ND(2.0)
ND(2)
ND(0.65)
Polynuelear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (pg/1
1-Methyhwphthalene
-
-
NA
NA
NA
14
22
24
11
27
NA
NA
NA
13
31
31
NA
NA
11
17
20
28
2-Methyhmphthakne
14
12.500
NA
NA
NA
;fit 32
( 9..�
IRMO
etriam5)%
i
2r"1Jts `)hI
tolls*,
tna
4 63i610
5()63 .i///
NA
NA
' 21
3M) , 3�44B
w° S
s» !p61.47)',
ND(0.47)
Benzo(a)anthm
0.0479
22
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
BIM
La2 J'
ND(9.5)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.49)
ND(0.25)
ND(0.49)
Benzo(alpyrene
0.00479
1.5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ViiI7171
ND(9.5)
ND(1.0)
ND(l.0)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.47)
ND(0.24)
ND(0.17)
ND(0.16)
Benzo(g,h,i)pervlenc
210
210
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(101
ND(10)
ND(10)
0.971
ND(9.51
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.45)
ND(0.23)
ND(0.49)
ND(0.47)
Benzo(k)Buoranthene
0.479
0.40
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(9.5)
ND(I.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.38)
ND(0.19)
ND(0.34)
ND(0.33)
Chysene
4.79
4.79
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.5 J
ND(9.5)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.53)
ND(0.27)
ND(0.49)
ND(0.47)
Naphthalene
21
I5,500
ND(101
NA
NA
59 •,
78
Og.468 fil
28 0
180,=,
€S1,770 ,.
.38
1"_= 96
41.A
94,. "
1.. 98 ,
',.-:i1D
5
440 -.
, I76 t--
a-: ' T9, -
tvia =''.
Now:
er arch NCDENR Gross Contamination Limh(GCL)
°seed. NCDENR Cnmualwater Standards (GWS)
Bold V.lues - Result u Above 4wiion Limit
pg4-NGwffiamcpm liter
ND (20)-Below Detection Li 4t in Parm.ese
I - Rcaults etimatcd; reported value below detection lit
U-fMinto W &olytc was analyzed for but rmt detected
••-Dcteetion limits elevated due to limited sample volume
B-Detectd in method blank
D-Diluted sample
• - Lab C./ Spike (LCS) Execedd Control Limits
E=Common-Aiwae ax. the calibrationsang° of the Win. 4
NA. Not malyzed
NS-Not sampled
BeamnerTeble (2 ®3) Page 1 of

TABLE2
HISTORICAL GROUND WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Bessemer City, North Carolina
Sam. I'•• Date>
NCDENR
GWS
06/30/99
12/07/99
03/16/00
08/22/01
11/29/01
03/04/02
06/12/02
11/26/02
05/14/03
11/10/03
11/17/04
11/17/04
06/14/05
12/13/05
06/08/06
01/03/07
08/26/07
4/3/2008
4/3/2008
12/23/08
12/23/08
07/15/09
07/15/09
D8/226/007
Volatile Organic Compounds (WO- DuQlicate i� Gc ale hcatea_
Du
iliooScale
t11.220001.. 1
g'1500"'I
Benzene
1
5,000
32700
t+ 35000
:. 3400°'a
2400
Mialtiiti
33000
.. 2700
,-1
29000
2500
--
a33000 s
2900'?
--
135000_
,;.a3200
33000
2900 ''i
35000.a,x
gfi900
36000
,-2700 '§7
fay 46000�hv'.�
-sm,3600,.
MOM
z''2400 w
,31000fa6
ViAliZ
-------
.14000 :
E800'
I�2300eal
. 88'f,..'
------_�La�.��Du
= B500 E ,
440
; e28000 .I
x1700
"26000e1
( 1600.6
rI40009-.:a23000
t 1800
D.)
r2-,1700D!
7-.17000d+
'i2riart
WiRoip7X
tA1400.
4100073.
I800 3
Toluene
1,000
257,500
Ethylbenzene
550
84.500
3450.1--'.
Xvlenes
530
87,500
..1949 0'4,'
P20000
m-40 0..4
W.:t700a0 (
T14050
1.180000a
ZFIVa0et 4
r1800
5,718000
F,1700r
A"2300.
, 3.1'6'00
(4y18000 -`�.�L9400":4
d.80'
.'`-.+M300.^"
.4 ,i3000N
w 1300m.
12000 a
,"11000D•"
rs8'0
m Iioli0e
Ii13000 "p'•'13000
';'I
1,1 Dichlorocthenc (1,1 dichloroethylene)
7
7,000
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(2000)
ND(2000)
N1(500)
ND(20)
ND(500)
ND(200)
ND(201
ND(4)
ND(8.01
ND(36)
ND(72)
ND(721
ND(36)
ND(36)
ND(72)
ND(11)
ND(22)
1,2-Dibromoethane
0.0004
50
'37.6 "'
NA
NA
ND(250)
21D(250)
ND(250)
ND(1200)
ND(2000)
ND(2000)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(200)
. 32J.''
,L30i.":S
1l28J..'4,32J-'-
ND(60)
ND(601
ND(30)
ND(30)
ND(601
ND(25)
ND(50)
1,2-Dichloropropane
0.51
510
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
•9J•,`.'.
ND(10)
ND(36)
ND(721
ND(72)
ND(36)
ND(36)
ND(72)
ND(13)
ND(26)
2-Butanone (MEK)
-
-
NA
ND(2000)
ND(2000)
ND(2500)
ND(2500)
1ID(2500)
ND(6200)
ND(10000)
1100 J
ND(5000)
910 J
ND(5000)
N1(2000)
320
350
770
440 J
500 J
1600 J
1100 J D
1300
1400 J
600 J
650 J
2-H •xanone
280
280,000
NA
ND(2000)
ND(2000)
ND(2500)
NO(2500)
ND(2500)
ND(6200)
ND(10000)
ND(10000)
ND(50001
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(2000)
81 J
120
170
ND(68)
ND(140)
ND(140)
ND(68)
ND(68)
'7+ 3204a.:.
ND(100)
ND(200)
4-mcthvl-2-penlanone (MIBK)
-
-
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(10000)
ND(10000)
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(2000)
ND(60)
80
74 J
ND(60)
ND(120)
ND(120)
ND(60)
140.1
150 J
ND(100)
ND(200)
Acetone
700
700,000
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(20000)
'930J'+'
ND(120001
ND(12000)
ND(120001
ND(5000)
450
380
580
ND(500)
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
ND(500)
+780J`t
"1000 II '''
' 970J +
ND(1000)
Carbon tetrachloride
0.269
-
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(2000)
ND(2000)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(200)
ND(20)
ND(5)
ND(I0)
ND(270
ND(54)
ND(54)
14D(271
ND(27)
ND(54)
ND(50)
ND(100)
Chloroform
70
70,000
NA
ND(200)
ND(200)
ND(250)
ND(250)
ND(250)
ND(1200)
ND(2000)
ND(2000)
ND(500)
ND(500)
N1(500)
ND(200)
ND(161
ND(4)
ND(8.0)
ND(29)
ND(581
ND(58)
ND(29)
ND(291
ND(58)
ND(14)
ND(281
kopropvl ether
70
70,000
'r"7160 ':1:
ND(2000)
5300'=:(
ND(6200)
•3800
,3400,'"
.3600 ".
NA
y'4200 +•
ND(2500)
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
.:4300':
..•3400.`r'
5800
62100 Mg
4900 1
4700
2100
42200D
4'---1I00 •"'/
1300'J
4900
4500 i.+.
Methyl tertiary butyl ether(MTBE)
200
200,000
,2880'-.
ND(2000)
ND(2000)
ND(2500)
ND(2500)
ND(2500)
ND(2500)
ND(4000)
: 2000`5---
ND(5000)
--1700 J:
'1206
.320ik"
.1300 '
i 3500 =
.t-
y2400 r
2400,`
ISOO Jt4
3140DJ1
434aill
T-7-390'J.
4200Z
Ti13101
Styrene
100
100,000
4
ND(200)
ND(200)
ND(250)
ND(2501
ND(250)
ND(1200)
ND(2000)
ND(2000)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(200)
ND(201
ND(5)
ND(10)
ND(36)
ND(72)
ND(72)
-7,219D7)',.
ND(36)
ND(72)
ND(11)
ND(22)
Tetmchloroethene (perchloroothvlene)
0.7
700
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(2000)
ND(2000)
ND(500)
ND(500)
14D(5001
ND(200)
ND(16)
ND(4)
ND(8.0)
ND(28)
ND(56)
ND(56)
ND(28)
ND(28)
ND(561
ND(15)
ND(301
Trichloroethene(trichloroethylone)
2.8
2,800
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(2000)
ND(2000)
ND(500)
ND(5001
ND(500)
ND(200)
ND(20)
ND(5)
ND(10)
ND(40)
ND(80)
ND(80)
ND(40)
ND(40)
ND(80)
ND(l3)
ND(26)
Polynucicar Aromatic Hydrocarbons (p0/1
1-Methvhmphthalene
-
-
NA
NA
NA
59D
58
54
42
ND(100)
NA
NA
NA
NA
96
100
NA
NA
30
23
40
21
32
28
74
81
2-Methvhmphthalene
14
12.500
NA
NA
NA
115011
' 150'."
.140
`-': 110 '.
'210-s
.` 280`.:
°I80 .:
410. .
`40010
)2i0,''-^
"..250 :.
NA
NA
':78
J56'•/-
t 110'
57
a -'69'//'
63`«.
' 190 •-(
('/ 190`i:.I
Benzo(a)anthrettnc
0.0479
22
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(100)
ND(100)
ND(951
ND(0.9)
ND(I)
ND(I)
ND(1.3)
ND(1.2)
ND(2.5)
ND(1.3)
ND(4.9)
ND(4.9)
ND(9.4)
ND(4.7)
Benzo(alpvrenc
0.00479
1.5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(100)
ND(100)
ND(95)
ND(0.9)
ND(1)
ND(I)
ND(1.21
ND(1.2)
ND(2.4)
ND(1.2)
ND(1.7)
ND(1.7)
ND(3.2)
ND(1.6)
Benza(p.h,i)perylene
210
210
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(100)
ND(100)
ND(100)
ND(100)
ND(100)
ND(95)
ND(0.91
ND(1)
ND(1)
ND(1.2)
21D(1.1)
ND(2.3)
ND(1.21
ND(4.91
ND(4.91
ND(9.4)
ND(4.7)
Benza(k)Buoranthc o
0.479
0.40
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(100)
ND(100)
ND(95)
14D(0.9)
ND(1)
ND(1)
ND(0.96)
ND(0.94)
ND(1.91
ND(0.97)
ND(3.4)
ND(3.4)
ND(6.6)
ND(3.3)
Chrysene
4.79
4.79
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(100)
ND(100)
ND(951
ND(0.9)
ND(1)
ND(1)
ND(1.3)
ND(1.3)
ND(2.6)
ND(1.4)
ND(4.9)
ND(4.9)
ND(9.4)
ND(4.7)
Naphthalene
21
15,500
. 1030.
NA
NA
750D
8401''-'
'600
..-460
4'800"'
900-
950 -
1300
.- 1100
1100''
1100 --'
1000-
=.,. 260 • .
390
' .330 -
830 .... 420
. --390-
'360 '
1100 ..
1000:
Nolo:
cuccd*NCDENE Gant Comamivadw Limit(GCL)
- mods NCDENR Groundnut= Standards(GWS)
Bold Values - Ranh is Above Ddectim Limit
psi • hEcrogmms p= Etc
N12(2.0) - Below Dctccdon Limit io eu W Imu
I - Rooks eat6wtcd: rcpond value blow detection limit
U-Idicates aaalytc was amlycd for but notdnacd
•• -Boeotian limits devoted duo to limitd .'ample volume
B-Delccted in meted blank
D-DilwN sample
• -lab Cowol Spike (LCS) Exceeded Control Limits
E • Concentration ea=dad the calibration range of Wa 'morn®t
NA -Not analyzed
NS-Not umpld
Bwrnidl'abl=(2Orr 3)
Page 2 of

Sampling Date>
TABLE 2
HISTORICAL GROUND WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Bessemer City, North Carolina
MW-3
12/08/99 03/16/00 08/22/01 11/29/01 03/04/02 06/12/02 11/26/02 05/14/03 11/10/03 11/10/03 11/17/04 06/14/05 12/13/05 06/08/06 06/08/06 01/03/07 08/24/07 04/03/08 12/22/08 07/15/09
icate
Duplieate
Benzene
1
5,000
U110a
W464i
102)1
I0P0
941311
3ND(620)1,
6I0
dtViiild
A6i200
n.71a001'./4
-1400
_-iiiiiik,
rE;giilifi
Pliiiiliq.
11706','-:'6005
. i960ai
!tigigaiii
Wiliii&V
3101rY")-
Toluene
1,000
257.500
000
16000. -
16000_.,
14000
I5000
9900
FA0000
l0000
MOON
-18000
I5000.
20000
9300 ..7
130
l 5000L1
660J0�E
13000E..
Mail
4100
2400,5,)
Ethvlbenzcme
550
84.500
,: 770 7
�'�'
IIW%
I800 -,
1800(6`
KUM
210Tii`
2200
lIt2000
1600
t 18U0
180041
.C22B0
fir1400P_.
giririiiiie
,vrata
930
1700
p LI70021-..en940
*
ktillial'F'
Xylenes
530
87,500
maw
Pr1.'. ,75002ri*�
MOIR
IOOOO r
gaga
'. i20001
WiTal
ETIOOM
RIMITI,
'=1100000k
0000l
4'".130001
,,. 7600'
.: 7000m
,73004a
00^E
If,* 92007` '
=10�000 t
8� 80
IA1.600",('.1
1,1 Dichloroethene(1.1 dichloroethvlene)
7
7,000
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(200)
ND(100)
ND(8.0)
ND(4.0)
14D(2.0)
ND(8.0)
ND(18)
ND(36)
ND(14)
ND(5.5)
1.2-Dibromoethano
0.0004
50
NA
NA
ND(250)
ND(120)
ND(120)
ND(6201
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(200)
ND(100)
ND(10)
ND(5.0)
; 3"J V
ND(10)
ND(I5)
ND(30)
ND(I2)
ND(12)
1,2-Dichloropropanc
0.51
510
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND(5.0)
F` "ay24 '..
ND(10)
ND(18)
ND(36)
ND(14)
ND(6.51
2-Bubmonc(MEK)
-
-
2300
1300
ND(2500)
580(1200)
ND(1200)
ND(31001
581)92500)
10001
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
980J
1000
890
1100
1100
830
570
940
390J
280J
2-Heranon°
280
280,000
ND(I000)
ND(1000)
ND(2500)
ND(1200)
ND(1200)
ND(3100)
ND(2500)
3801
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
2701
ND(1000)
250
230
240
220
230 J
ND(68)
280 J
310J
4-methyl-2-pentanone (MIRK)
-
-
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(1000)
ND(2500)
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(20001
ND(1000)
100 J
90
93
85 J
110 J
ND(60)
130 J
130 J
Acetone
700
700,000
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(5000)
310 J
ND(12000)
ND(12000)
ND(5000)
ND(2500)
160 J
120
110
140 J
ND(250)
ND(500)
200 U •
350 J
Carbon tetrachloride
0.269
-
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(200)
ND(100)
ND(10)
ND(5.0)
ND(2.0)
ND(10)
14D(14)
ND(27)
ND(II)
ND(25)
Chloroform
70
70,000
ND(100)
ND(100)
ND(250)
ND(120)
ND(120)
ND(620)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(200)
ND(100)
ND(8.01
ND(4.01
ND(2.0)
ND(8.0)
ND(151
ND(29)
ND(12)
M)(7)
Isopropyl ether
70
70,000
ND(10001
ND(1000)
ND(62001
ND(I200)
ND(1200)
ND(1200)
NA
21980J+3
ND(2500)
ND(2500)
ND(2000)
ND(10001
,..,130.,
., 190
)9l..l090 t)
=i5),90X
LIfiefit,4120J
'`,ai200J)
145SS( :l
Methyl tertiary butyl ether(MIBE)
200
200,000
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
ND(2500)
ND(12001
ND(1200)
ND(1200)
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
1601
ND(I000)
130
120
120
100
vpriait50J
290J
rtriTm
Styrene
100
100,000
ND(100)
ND(100)
ND(250)
ND(I20)
ND(120)
ND(620)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(200)
ND(100)
ND(10)
ND(5.0)
ND(2.0)
ND(101
ND(18)
ND(361
ND(14)
ND(5.5)
TeOmhlorocthene(pemhlorocthvlene)
0.7
700
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(200)
ND(100)
ND(8.0)
ND(4.01
ND(2.0)
ND(8.0)
ND(14)
ND(281
ND(11)
ND(7.5)
Trishloroethene l ichloroethyleno)
2.8
2.800
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(200)
ND(I00)
ND(10)
ND(5.0)
ND(2.0)
ND(10)
5D(20)
ND(40)
ND(16)
ND(6.5)
P0) nuclear Aromatic H drocarbooe
1 - Methylnaphthalene
2 - Methvinaphthalene
Benro(n)anthrdcenc
Benzo(a)pvrene
Benzo(R.h,i)perylene
Benzo(d)nuomnthene
Chtysene
Naphthalene
Nan:
WI?
14
0.0479
0.00479
210
0.479
4.79
21
- eacada NCDENR Gros. Conumimtien Emit (GM)
-a<cads NCDENR Groundwater Standards (GWS)
Bold Values - Result its Above Rtwtion Limit
pg4 - hliaogram per liter
ND (2.0)- Below Detection Limit in Paren@eses
3 - Results estimated; reported vale below dela-lion limit
U-Indicate the avtyte was amlyzd for fennel detected
•• -Detection limits elcvatd due to limited sample volume
B - Detected in method bulk
D-Dilutd sample
• -Lab Control Spike (LCS) Exceeded Control Limits
E= Concentrations vuedd the calibration range of Me instrument
NA -Not artelyzd
NS - Not sampled
12,500
22
1.5
210
0.40
4.79
15,500
NA
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA
NA
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA
41 D
d91 D.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
50013
ND(401
14D
ND
ND
ND
ND
30
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
20
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
6`�a2J0
ND(50)
L=v58K k(
ND
ND
ND(50)
ND
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND(50)
ND
ND
a4
NA
ND(50)
ND
ND
ND(501
ND
ND
NA
ND(50)
ND
ND
ND(50)
ND
ND
%+/ l390.
NA
ND(50)
ND(50)
ND(50)
ND(50)
ND(50)
ND(48)
ND(481
ND(48)
ND(48)
ND(48)
ND(48)
390.
34
dr71
ND(1.0)
ND(1.01
ND(1.01
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
NA
NA
ND(1.01
ND(I.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.01
NA
NA
ND(0.9)
ND(0.91
ND(0.91
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
'-370
NA
NA
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
I2
ND(0.49)
ND(0.47)
ND(0.45)
ND(0.38)
ND(0.53)
.200 l5
ND(46)
46y ^
ND(1.3)
ND(1.2)
ND(1.2)
ND(0.97)
ND(1.4)
400 et_
33
ND(4.9)
ND(1.7)
ND(4.9)
ND(3.4)
ND(4.9)
32
ND(4.7)
ND(1.6)
ND(4.7)
ND(3.3)
ND(4.7)
BessammTables (2 & 3) Page 3 of 7
►+l'S�;1.' ! ► \LU3�

TABLE 2
HISTORICAL GROUND WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Bessemer City, North Carolina
Sampling Date >
-�,
PICDENR--
GWS°��••
- -
I
I GCh11;P.13
CLG Pr
MW-1
12/07/99
03/16/00
08/22/01
8/22/2001
11/29/01
03/04/02
06/12/02
06/12/02
11/26/02
11/26/02
05/14/03
11/10/03
11/17/04
06/14/05
06/14/05
12/13/05
06/08/06
01/03/07
01/03/07
8/24/07
04/03/08
12/23/08
07/15/09
Volatile Organic Compounds (p8/l)
Du I' to Duplicate Du I' to Duplicate Duplicate
r
Benzene
1
5,000
9304'
i2800.i
59i
ed
_
08.
c0
Ot�
6280
ta162200 "
x1300 <
.6720 v
760
260 '9,
- 0
480
-.310
490
E '270` l
'430 '
a, '1200
.'1700 - i
Toluene
1,000
257,500
:^ 19000
25000
_ 32000
:38000
29000 r
•.-33000.
35000 .
"1
+' 35000„...
3 000
triTrall
' 24000
24000u,'
180orx
240�00
'w270U
'i,,''110004
460
071200(1
490
?.625001r^^!
54
21000.
'''.Z..- 400'cli"r,.
t,� 5700g2
550
^: ef00�E
-v'970 y.0
400
n 2000*.
^s��11000' i
1900
frigid.w
.'..880' .
2000Dl
,"£a`1600 '
Elhvlbenzene
550
84,500
. 150o w'�
1900 t
1900i
2200
a#1900. ;
�ii Y200
2500
/s2300..
2200
2100
19000
Xylem
530
87,500
8400
2000
1000ll
- 13000.z
I000 '
t176171.415000
'''.
n` 3000
.413000 i
X1T00
'1(1Til'2751
Ft110007
1.716000 r
i800 .,
t9600•-
> 4400:.,r
d 9700
35007
'57oVe
' 11000 5
" .11000':
11000
)13000 I
1,1 Dichloroethene(I,1 dichlareethylene)
7
7,000
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
ND(10001
ND(500)
ND(5001
ND(100)
ND(100)
ND(4.0)
ND(4.0)
ND(101
ND(8.0)
ND(l8)
ND(361
ND(36)
ND(111
1,2-Dibromoolharlc
0.0004
50
NA
NA
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(250)
ND(250)
ND(1200)
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
(i.293
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(100)
ND(100)
ND(5.0)
ND(5.0)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(15)
ND(30)
ND(30)
ND(25)
1,2-Dichloropropone
0.51
510
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND(5.01
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(18)
ND(36)
ND/6)
ND(13)
2-Butanone (MEK)
-
-
ND(1000)
ND(2000)
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(2500)
ND(2500)
ND(6200)
ND(2000)
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
50
26 J
50 J
53 J
ND(30)
230 J
320 J
ND(100)
2-Hcxunonc
280
280,000
ND(10001
ND(2000)
ND(5000)
ND(50001
ND(2500)
ND(25001
ND(6200)
ND(2000)
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
24 J
24 J
ND(8.0)
ND(30)
ND(34)
ND(68)
200 J
ND(100)
4-methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK)
-
-
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(1000)
ND(10001
ND(15)
ND(I5)
ND(30)
ND(301
ND(30)
ND(60)
83J
ND(1001
Acetone
700
700,000
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(10000
ND(10000)
490 J
ND(12000)
ND(12000)
ND(2500)
ND(2500)
96 J
85 J
130 J
160 J
ND(250)
ND(5001
500 U •
600 J
Carbon tetrachloride
0.269
-
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(I000)
ND(1000)
ND(10001
ND(5001
ND(500)
ND(100)
ND(100)
ND(5.01
ND(5.0)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(14)
ND(271
ND(27)
ND(50)
Chloroform
70
70,000
ND(100)
ND(200)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(250)
ND(250)
ND(1200)
ND(200)
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(100)
ND(100)
ND(4.0(
ND(4.01
ND(8.0)
ND(8.0)
ND(15)
ND(29)
ND(29)
ND(14)
Isopropyl ether
70
70,000
ND(1000)
ND(2000)
ND(12000)
ND(12000)
ND(2500)
ND(2500)
ND(2500)
ND(2000)
NA
NA
t490J1:
ND(2500)
ND(5000)
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
ND(4.0)
ND(4.0)
ND(8.0)
ND(8.0)
ND(17)
ND(33)
ND(33)
ND(24)
Methyl tertiary butyl ether(M7BE)
200
200,000
ND(2000)
ND(2000)
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(2500)
ND(2500)
ND(2500)
NO(2000)
ND(2000)
ND(2000)
100 J
ND(5000)
ND(5000)
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
ND(3.0)
ND(3.0)
ND(5.01
ND(5.0)
ND(291
ND(58)
ND(58)
ND(20)
Styrene
100
100,000
ND(100)
ND(2001
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(250)
ND(250)
ND(1200)
ND(200)
ND(1000)
ND(10001
ND(1000)
ND(5001
-'/o4701,11'j
ND(100)
ND(100)
ND(5.0)
ND(5.0)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(18)
ND(36)
ND(36)
ND(111
Tetmchlorocthene(perchloroethylene)
0.7
700
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
ND(5001
ND(500)
ND(100)
ND(100)
ND(4.0)
ND(4.0)
1113(8.0)
ND(8.0)
ND(14)
ND(28)
ND(281
ND(15)
Trichloroethene(trichloroethylene)
2.8
2,800
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(100)
ND(100)
ND(5.01
ND(5.0)
ND(101
ND(10)
ND(20)
ND(40)
ND(401
ND(13)
Polvouclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (pp/1
1 - Methylnaphtholene
-
-
NA
NA
33 D
31 D
ND(40)
26
16
13
ND(50)
ND(50)
NA
NA
NA
ND(19)
ND(19)
19
NA
NA
NA
I1
16
32
31
2-Methvinaphthalene
14
12,500
NA
NA
-•76D '',
71D'%<-
463 7'1n
v,6
;-39 )'1
33
''59 '1
v' 52
, 56
66 59 O--
83'ytK,
t)R38:
•4•v"34...1/
37'
NA
NA
NA
25:. 1
1,w38. "''l71
s `s65 nz.I
Benzo(a)a.Nunccne
0.0479
22
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(50)
ND(19)
ND(19)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.91
ND(0.49)
ND(1.21
ND(4.9)
ND(4.7)
Benza(a)pyrene
0.00479
1.5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(50)
ND(19)
14D(19)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.47)
ND(1.21
ND(1.7)
ND(1.6)
Beozo(g.h,i)pervlene
210
210
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(501
ND(501
ND(50)
ND(501
ND(50)
ND(19)
ND(19)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.91
ND(0.91
ND(0A5)
ND(1.11
ND(4.91
ND(4.7)
Beczo(k)tiuorantheno
0.479
0.40
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(50)
ND(19)
ND(19)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.38)
ND(0.94)
ND(3.4)
ND(3.3)
Chrysene
4.79
4.79
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(50)
ND(191
ND(19)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.91
ND(0.53)
ND(1.3)
ND(4.9)
ND(4.7)
Naphthalene
21
15,500
NA
NA
560 DC,
*520ll
-4t50
'.°420'
^'J 24o)0?0
210( 5
:1`'43090'
370
370 t-
z 370'�
5300..
•, '260 i,
''', 250E
, 220'''
460
-. 240
' 260
2(10t'
..0 370 '
e"%`6005'w
-.600"'4
Nate
-exceeds NCDENR Gross Contamination Limit(OCL)
-exceds NCDENROmundwatcr Standards(DWS)
Bold Vdue-Result is Above Detection Limit
pgl-htieograms per liter
ND IS.0)-Below Detection Lnmt in PaaaNeso
I - Results estimated; reputed value below detection limit
U-Indicatestie annlyte was analyzed for bonnotdomed
• -Detection limits elevated due to limited.ample volwx
13 -Detected is method blank
D-Diluted sample
• -I,b Control Spike (LCS) Exceeded Control Limits
E ^ Concentrations otcaedsd the calibration range of the instrument
NA -Non a,ultvd
NS - Not sampled
Bo .o,orTables (2 A 3) Page 4 of "I
, , , a „ a'
INE.i:

TABLE 2
HISTORICAL GROUND WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Bessemer City, North Carolina
Sampling Date ->
NCDE4VR'
r CWS '"�'
. `6 <1 4fEB
, )
MW-5
12/07/99
03/16/00
08/22/01
11/29/01
11/29/01
03/04/02
03/04/02
06/12/02
11/26/02
05/14/03
11/10/03
' 11/17/04
06/14/05
12/13/05
06/08/06
01/03/07
08/24/07
04/03/08
12/22/08
07/15/09
Volatile Organic Compounds (WI) Duplicate Duplicate
Benzene
1
5,000
=-10001
8 600=*,
dt2i'Ll'I 3*.
4TL230
1'a fiiii.$
C 210 7,
CiiiiU,..
ND(250)
`, 260s-},
G.;250 A
A' 260
:v14Ot4.
ND(1.0)
- 90
..S-150' .
-550`:'
--,61tz-:
"a 64
'-• 150} 3
;;1=190�=4,
Toluene
1,000
257,500
a:21 -
�2100
oclau
t2000:�
- .7800
�780D
.
.7800
r
a7400
w:
BJ00 �
8300�..
4,,
�- a ,,, n
2�8800�'.
...-P '� l'
.-e&8600��..
ft x�aeasag
�52003ss
` '90
5500 �,
xwame :,.
l�-s._6100, '.
ND(1.0)
.. N', M
'�i 5500 � s
N ' 5.:
r'_ 5200 ;,5
ti yn tM
590:3 �
,
`60�0;!�"
ru' W N
>�•720D _.
. �"12800 (y„r
.�n1 9I00 D"'^i
Ethylbenzene
550
84,500
5iliWirl
Wahl
aft1600i'ik`
tRribItg
8 1600
an80o
70
7;1900 :'
`;+1600r3
i1900:'.
`15000
fi418008("".
ND(1.0)
*dJ.. 12004
;(A'Sli0,P
i(c28005
:ik.12o0'c•;
9704,A
410
1500".Y<
Xylrnes
530
87,500
110ial.
WIMP
W10SIN
10
,c,r97670
, -I IppO,.
,11000U
'$,I10004
Fi000�0
,�'1000°
J00
�+ 51000"•
ND(2.0)
" 6800
^ ' 90001'?
y J100X
s r7F
fi500C,,
'. 7400
:'.3:'9200E"
1,1 Diehloroethene (1,1 dichloroethylene)
7
7,000
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(250)
ND(250)
ND(2001
ND(100)
ND(1.0)
NO(8.0)
N17(4.0)
ND(8.01
ND(18)
ND(18)
ND(9)
ND(2.2)
1,2-Dibromoothmte
0.0004
50
NA
NA
ND(100)
ND(50)
ND(50)
ND(50)
ND(120)
ND(250)
ND(250)
ND(2501
ND(200)
ND(100)
ND(1.0)
ND(10)
ND(5.0)
ND(10)
ND(15)
ND(15)
14D(7.5)
ND(5)
1,2-Dichloropropone
0.51
510
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND(5.0)
ND(10)
ND(I8)
ND(18)
ND(9)
ND(2.6)
2-Butanone(MEK)
-
-
ND(20001
1400
ND(I000)
ND(500)
520
ND(500)
ND(I200)
ND(1200)
ND(12001
590J
ND(2000)
ND(1000)
ND(10)
160
180
130
ND(30)
130J
210J
510
1-Hexanone
280
280,000
ND(2000)
ND(1000)
ND(1000)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(5001
ND(1200)
ND(1200)
ND(1200)
180 J
ND(2,000)
ND(1000)
ND(I0)
180
260
240
150 J
ND(34)
140 J
320
4-methyl-2-pentunone (MIBK)
-
-
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(1200)
67 J
ND(2000)
ND(1000)
ND(10)
72 J
98
97 J
ND(30)
77 J
83 J
120 J
Acetone
700
700,000
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(2500)
ND(25001
ND(5000)
ND(25001
ND(25)
0D(601
53 J
85 J
ND(250)
ND(250)
450 J •
270 J
Carbon tetrachloride
0.269
-
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NI)
ND(2501
ND(250)
ND(200)
ND(100)
ND(1.0)
ND(10)
ND(5.0)
ND(10)
ND(14)
ND(14)
ND(6.81
ND(101
Chloroform
70
70,000
ND(200)
ND(100)
ND(100)
ND(50)
ND(50)
ND(50)
ND(120)
ND(250)
ND(250)
ND(250)
ND(200)
ND(100)
ND(1.01
ND(8.01
ND(4.0)
ND(8.0)
ND(15)
ND(I4)
ND(7.2)
ND(2.8)
Lsopropyl ether
70
70,000
ND(2000)
ND(1000)
ND(2500)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(1200)
ND(500)
NA
,240 J}.i,
ND(1,000)
ND(1000)
ND(10)
67
1 230,
. _ 270 -. ,:.:
ND(17)
23 J
- .110 J
(110,r
Methyl tertiary butyl ether(MTBE)
200
200,000
ND(2000)
ND(1000)
ND(10001
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(1200)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(500)
ND(2,000)
-276c3a'
ND(10)
92
i:_-340
;740u--.
ND(29)
30 J
78J
150J
Styrene
100
100,000
ND(200)
ND(100)
ND(I00)
ND(50)
ND(50)
ND(50)
ND(120)
ND(250)
ND(250)
ND(250)
ND(200)
5w5190
ND(1.0)
ND(10)
ND(5.0)
ND(10)
ND(18)
ND(181
ND(9)
ND(2.21
Tetmchlorocthcnc (perchloroothylcne)
0.7
700
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(250)
ND(250)
ND(200)
ND(100)
ND(1.0)
ND(8.0)
ND(4.0)
ND(8.0)
ND(14)
ND(14)
ND(7)
ND(3)
Trichloroethene (8ichloroethylene)
2.8
2,800
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(250)
'=`15J;."'
ND(200)
ND(100)
ND(I.0)
ND(10)
ND(5.0)
ND(10)
ND(20)
ND(20)
11D(10)
ND(2.6)
Poh•nuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (ppJD
I - Mcthvinophthalene
-
-
NA
NA
35
ND(40)
ND(40)
26
24
14
ND(501
NA
NA
NA
ND(47)
37
NA
NA
9.9
11
25
17J
2-MethvinaPhOalrne
14
12,500
NA
NA
72
.« 70��(�.�=66
v
i_'S6;
_,.,:,51 -�,
30'":a*:
4JJ .
, r ;'51t f
` 62'
�
. 64'1;',
: 71 .
' ' 79 --
NA
NA
22 =r .1
27 i
' . 51,.
= =50 ' --I
Benzo(o)anihacene
0.0479
22
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(50)
ND(47)
ND(0.9)
ND(1.0)
ND(0.9)
NO(0.491
ND(0.49)
ND(4.9)
ND(4.7)
Benzo(o)pyrene
0.00479
1.5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(50)
ND(47)
ND(0.91
ND(1.0)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.471
ND(0.47)
ND(1.71
ND(1,6)
Benzo(p,h,i)perylene
210
210
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(50)
ND(50)
ND(50)
ND(50)
ND(471
ND(0.9)
ND(1.0)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.45)
ND(0.45)
ND(4.9)
ND(4.7)
Benzo(k)Bucranthene
0.479
0.40
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(501
ND(47)
ND(0.9)
ND(1.0)
ND(0.9)
ND(0.38)
ND(0.38)
ND(3.4)
ND(3.3)
Chryse0e
4.79
4.79
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(50)
ND(471
ND(0.91
ND(I.01
ND(0.91
ND(0.53)
ND(0.53)
ND(4.9)
ND(4.7)
Naphthalene
21
IS,S00
NA
NA
c` 510^",
::•p 510--*"s
"1:J90 }^'"
• �400.: ^
`�380'"J
%• 210
^"+�290 at,
.+a'3J0
" ;380`:"
"^ J00 ")`
420
--" 'J90""
J60 ''
(80.'
140 '`:
200
u: 200
')360
Notre
- «avcda NCDENR Gress Contamination Limit (GCL)
F Y p_'CN1` - exceeds NCDENRGmundwata Statdards(GWS)
Bold values - Rauh is Above D0octio,Limit
P64-Miangum pa liter
ND (2.0)-Below Detection Limit in P,rtn,Acus
1- Results estimated; reported value below ...ion Emit
U- Wicata the awltae was aiul)ud for but not detailed
••-Da>tion Iimir,lrnlod duo b limited ample volume
0-Delaled a, metbad blank
D-DBad ample
• - Lab Core. Spike (LCS) Exceeded Conmol Limits
E=Concentrations amdui the calibration range of Bs imamnad
NA -Not analysed
NS - Not ampld
BessmmTabtm (2 Sr 3) Page 5 of'!
a • „ ILE
•/
Via:.-z

Sampling Date ->
TABLE 2
HISTORICAL GROUND WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Bessemer City, North Carolina
08/22/01
11/29/01
03/04/02
06/12/02
11/26/02
05/14/03
Il/10/03
11/17/04
06/14/05
12/13/05
06/O8/06
01/03/07
08/24/07
04/03/08
12/22/08
07/16/09
Benzene
1
5,000
ND(1.0)
NS
NS
iMiZZI
NS
NS
ND(5)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(0.5)
ND(0.5)
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.25)
Toluene
1,000
257,500
ND(1.0)
NS
NS
15
NS
NS
OAS .1
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.01
ND(0.7)
ND(0.7)
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.33)
Ethylbenzeoe
550
84,500
ND(1.0)
NS
NS
1.8
NS
NS
0.52JB
ND(1.01
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(0.8)
ND(0.8)
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.111
Xytones
530
87,500
ND(2.0)
NS
NS
12
NS
NS
1.6 JB
ND(2.0)
ND(2.0)
ND(2.0)
ND(0.8)
ND(0.8)
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.20)
1,1 Dichloroethene(1,1 dichlorocthylene)
7
7,000
ND
NS
NS
ND
NS
NS
0.45J
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.01
ND(0.8)
ND(0.8)
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.11)
1.2-Dibromoethone
0.0004
50
NA
NS
NS
ND(1.01
NS
NS
ND(5)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(I.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.25)
1,2-Dichloropropane
0.51
510
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND(1.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.13)
2-Butanone(MEK)
-
-
ND(10)
NS
NS
ND(10)
NS
NS
ND(25)
ND(I0)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(3.0)
ND(3.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(1)
2-Hexanone
280
280,000
ND(10)
NS
NS
ND(10)
NS
NS
ND(25)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(3.0)
ND(3.01
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(I)
4-methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK)
-
-
ND
NS
NS
ND
NS
NS
ND(25)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(3.01
ND(3.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(1)
Acetone
700
700,000
ND
NS
NS
ND
NS
NS
ND(50)
ND(25)
ND(25)
ND(25)
ND(6.0)
ND(6.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(5)
Carbon tetrachloride
0.269
-
ND
NS
NS
ND
NS
NS
ii'r0:4IJ.
NL)(1.0)
ND(1.01
ND(1.0)
ND(1.01
ND(1.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.50)
Chloroform
70
70,000
ND(1.01
NS
NS
ND(1.0)
NS
NS
ND(5)
ND(1.0)
ND(I.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(0.8)
ND(0.8)
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.14)
Isopropyl ether
70
70,000
ND(10)
NS
NS
ND(10)
NS
NS
ND(10)
ND(5.0)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(0.8)
ND(0.8)
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.24)
Methyl tertiary butyl ether(MTBE)
200
200,000
ND(10)
NS
NS
ND(10)
NS
NS
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(0.5)
ND(0.5)
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.201
Styrene
100
100.000
ND(1.0)
NS
NS
ND(1.0)
NS
NS
0.33 JB
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.01
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.1I)
Tetrachlornethcne(perchloroethylene)
0.7
700
ND
NS
NS
ND
NS
NS
ND(5)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.01
ND(0.8)
ND(0.8)
NS
NS
NS
NS
140(0.15)
Trichloloethene(trichloroethylene)
2.8
2,800
ND
NS
NS
ND
NS
NS
0.42JB
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(I.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.13)
Pol 'nuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbon.
1 - Melhvloaphthalene
2 - Methylnephthoiene
Benza(o)anthracene
Be o(a)pvrene
Benxo(n,h,i)porylene
Bc k)nuormohene
Chrvson°
Naphthalene
14
0.0479
0.00479
210
0.479
4.79
21
aQcd.NCDENA Gm.CoNamiotion Limit (GCL)
P➢: g't'F,:ti. i- cxmdsNCDENR Grmmdw70r Standards(GWS)
Bold Value. - Result is Above Dalection Limit
µgo-A4.mgams liter
ND (2.0)-Below Detntion Limit iv Pamuha .
1-Rea tl, o0iwtd; cpanod value below dcLLelion limit
U -Indicate the unalyte was analyvf for but not dnocld
••- Dnecliml Emits elrntd dot fvoitd .ample ok
B-Dctend N mcthd blank
D-Dilutdumplc
• -Lab Control Spike (1.CS) Excedd Control Limits
E ^ Corcrn4s0ma exccodd Ih calibration range ofBc inaoanmt
NA -Not analyzed
NS-N tsampled
12,500
22
1.5
210
0.40
4.79
15,500
NA
NA
NI)
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA
NS
NS
ND
ND
NS
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
NS
ND
ND
NS
0.3
0.3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.30•'
NS
NS
ND
ND
NS
ND
ND
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
NS
ND
ND
NS
NA
ND(10)
ND
ND
ND(10)
ND
ND
ND(10)
NA
ND(10)
ND
ND
ND(101
ND
ND
ND(10)
NA
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(9.3)
ND(9.3)
ND(9.31
ND(9.3)
ND(9.3)
ND(9.3)
ND(9.3)
ND(9.3)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(I.0)
ND(1.0)
NA
NA
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.021)
ND(0.022)
ND(0.047)
ND(0.016)
ND(0.047)
ND(0.0331
ND(0.047)
0.034 J
Boso,, Tabla(2d:l) Page of
„ a/

TABLE 2
HISTORICAL GROUND WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Bessemer City, North Carolina
Sampling Date
BCDENR p SI.Eid3
WOWS- -. xr
MW_7
MWA
04/04/01
08/22/01
11/29/01
03/04/02
06/12/02
11/26/02
05/14/03
11/10/03
11/17/04
06/14/05
12/13/05
06/08/06
01/03/07
08/24/07
04/03/08
12/22/08
07/15/09
04/03/08
12/23/08
07/15/09
Volatile Organic Compounds (pg I)
irgal
terMill
Benzene
1
5,000
ND(1.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(5)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(4.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
t !
Y
Toluene
1,000
257,500
ND(1.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(5)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
25
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
23001111.
EMS
Ethvlbnzene
550
84,500
ND(1.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
0.22 JB
ND(1.0)
ND(1.01
ND(4.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ETREll
SMIIE
2000
Xylcnes
530
87,500
ND(2.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
0.66 JB
ND(2.0)
ND(2.0)
28
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
8300D
WAIN
SETIMII
Dichlorcethene (l,l diehlorcelhylene)
7
7,000
ND
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(5)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(4.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
72N
22)22)
1,2-Dibromoethane
0.0004
50
NA
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(5)
ND(1.0)
N13(1.01
ND(4.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
rii.1,1
1.2-Dichloropropane
0.51
510
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
WIN
ND(721
ND(26)
2-Butenone(MEK)
-
-
ND(10)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(25)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(40)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
2000JD
2100
1300J
2-Hconone
280
280,000
ND(10)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(25)
N13(101
ND(10)
ND(40)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(68)
2005
ND(200)
4-methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK)
-
-
ND
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(25)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(40)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(60)
1301
ND(200)
Acetone
700
700,000
ND
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(50)
ND(251
ND(25)
ND(100)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(500)
ramiNCCI000)1
Carbon tetrachloride
0.269
-
ND
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(5)
ND(1.0)
ND(l.0)
ND(4.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(27)
ND(54)
ND(I00)
Chloroform
70
70,000
ND(1.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
0.18J
74D(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(4.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(29)
ND(58)
ND(28)
Isopropyl ether
70
70,000
ND(10)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(10)
ND(5.0)
ND(10)
ND(40)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
WMOTS
ErSIM
;700 1(1
Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE)
200
200,000
ND(10)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(40)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
2500,D
;600
2500
Styrene
100
100,000
NA
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
0.17JB
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(4.01
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(36)
ND(721
ND(22)
Tetrachloroethene(perchloroethvlene)
0.7
700
ND
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(5)
ND(1.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(4.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(28)
ND(56)
ND(30)
Trichloroethene(trichloroethylcne)
2.8
2,800
ND
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
0.24JB
ND(I.0)
ND(1.0)
ND(4.0)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(40)
ND(80)
ND(26)
Polynnelear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (pg/1
1 - Methylnaphthaleoe
-
-
NA
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NA
NA
NA
NO(9.3)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
14
19 J
36
2-Methvhmphthalene
14
12,500
NA
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(9.31
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
M84�:,
:trims
71 J
Benzo(a)ant rocene
0.0479
22
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(101
ND(9.31
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.50)
ND(4.9)
ND(4.7)
Benzo(o)pyrene
0.00479
1.5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(10)
ND(9.3)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.491
ND(1.7)
ND(1.6)
Benzo(g.h,i)pcolene
210
210
ND
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
0.78J
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(9.3)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.47)
' ND(4.91
ND(4.7)
Benza(k)luomnthene
0.479
0A0
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(10)
ND(9.31
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.39)
ND(3.4)
ND(3.3)
Chrysene
4.79
4.79
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND(10)
ND(9.3)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.541
ND(4.9)
¢L�N�D=(4.7)
P"'T'S50t
Naphthalene
21
15,500
NA
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND(10)
ND(10)
ND(10)
NO(9.3)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
)I300N�'r'1
(+. 270m
Notes:
- n uecds NCDENR Bona Contamination Limit (0CL)
euxede NCDENR Grmmdwata Standards(GWS)
Bold Valuta -Result is Above Dntu,6on Limit
µg/1- ItGaogrann per Iita
ND(3.0)- Below Dotectiou Limit in Parentnn
1- Rosults estimetd; roportd valve blow dctmian limit
U-idicates the analyb was analyred for but ret ddccicd
••-Detection Inn). cicvamd due to limitd sample volume
B-Dctvld in nwl6nd blank
D- Diluted sample
•- Lab Control Spike (LCS) Eaxdod Control Limits
E • Concentrations cxeccded der calibration range of We instnmwt
NA -Not analyad
NS - Not sampled
Bananaiablo (2 R 3) Page ',of 7
► ► ►L1S3�

TABLE 3
GROUND WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
INORGANIC ANALYSES
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Bessemer City, North Carolina
Sample Date->
.:
MW-1
MW-2
MW-3
MW-4
NCDENR GWS!
04/03/08 12/22/08 07/15/09
04/03/08 04/03/08 12/23/08 12/23/08 07/15/09 07/15/09
04/03/08 12/22/08 07/15/09
04/03/08 12/23/08 07/15/09
Total Metals (µg/I) Duplicate Duplicate Duplicate
Arsenic
50
--
40
;:: .130
9.4J?-
12
, 52 ':
6.2J
33
ND(4.6)
ND(4.6)
ND(5.9)
ND(5.9)
ND(4.6)
9.3J
ND(5.9)
ND(4.6)
Barium
2,000
2,000,000
200
240
140
360
580
300
360
110
100
180
130
140
220
200
130
Cadmium
1.75
--
ND(0.53)
0.63
ND(2)
ND(0.53)
ND(0.53)
ND(0.53)
ND(0.53)
ND(2)
ND(2)
ND(0.53)
ND(0.53)
ND(2)
ND(0.53)
0.72 J
ND(2)
Chromium
50
50,000
2 J
4.3
1.2JB
4.4 J
17
2.6 J
11
ND(1.2)
16B
1.9 J
1.6 J
15B
2.5 J
1.9 J
1.5JB
Iron
300
--
2,200 .,
?.3.6,800
`-.. .330
',; 15,000
.,...-44,000-7
... 11,000 .,
• 30,000
'5,300,
•; '6,200 '.
250
.:_ 1,300 ---
300
`-.4;600.
1,2004 .
260
Lead
15
15,000
r26 .a
ND(4)
9.9
40
2.6J
15
ND(4)
ND(4)
3.3J
ND(2.3)
ND(4)
5.5
ND(2.3)
5.2J
Mercury
1.05
--
ND(0.08)
ND(0.08)
ND(0.091)
ND(0.08)
ND(0.08)
ND(0.08)
ND(0.08)
ND(0.091)
ND(0.091)
ND(0.08)
ND(0.08)
ND(0.091)
ND(0.08)
ND(0.08)
ND(0.091)
Selenium
50
--
ND(3.6)
ND(3.6)
ND(6.4)
ND(3.6)
ND(3.6)
4.7 J
5.3 J
8.4J
9.1J
ND(3.6)
ND(3.6)
ND(6.4)
ND(3.6)
4.4 J
ND(6.4)
Silver
18
18,000
ND(0.51)
ND(0.51)
ND(0.89)
0.57 J
ND(0.51)
0.56 J
ND(0.51)
ND(0.89)
ND(0.89)
ND(0.51)
ND(0.51)
ND(0.89)
ND(0.51)
0.82 J
ND(0.89)
Sodium
-
-
19,000
17,000
12,000
24,000
22,000
20,000
21,000
25,000
25,000
18,000
98,000
55,000
18,000
22,000
11,000
Other Inorganics (µg/I)
Dissolved Iron (field filtered)
--
--
430
ND(2.5)
240
11,000
9,500
ND(2.5)
ND(2.5)
5,700
6,000
330
15
160
2,600
6.2
290
Sulfate
250,000
--
ND(2500)
46,000 J
ND(2500)
ND(2500)
ND(2500)
13,000
12,000
ND(2500)
ND(2500)
ND(2500)
14,000
ND(2500)
6,900
3,800
8,100
Notes:
- exceeds NCDENR Gross Contamination Limit (GCL)
- exceeds NCDENR Groundwater Standards (GWS)
Bold Values - Result is Above Detection Limit
pg/1 - Micrograms per liter
ND (2.0) - Below Detection Limit in Parentheses
J - Results estimated; reported value below detection limit
S - Result was determined by the Method of Standard Additions
•• - Detection limits elevated due to limited sample volume
B - Detected in method blank
D - Diluted sample
• - Lab Control Spike (LCS) Exceeded Control Limits
E = Concentrations exceedsd the calibration range of the instrument
NA - Not analyzed
NS - Not sampled
1 of 2

TABLE 3
GROUND WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
INORGANIC ANALYSES
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Bessemer City, North Carolina
Sample Date->
z`-
NCDENR GWS
ER,l
6z•;zC�x.L_
MW-5
MW-6
MW-7
MW-8
04/03/08 12/22/08 07/15/09
04/03/08 12/23/08 07/16/09
04/03/08 12/23/08 07/15/09
04/03/08 12/23/08 07/15/09
Total Metals (µg/1)
Arsenic
50
--
ND(5.9)
ND(5.9)
ND(4.6)
NS
NS
ND(4.6)
NS
NS
NS
ND(5.9)
ND(5.9)
ND(4.6)
Barium
2,000
2,000,000
130
31
90
NS
NS
52
NS
NS
NS
98
210
220
Cadmium
1.75
--
ND(0.53)
ND(0.53)
ND(2)
NS
NS
ND(2)
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.53)
ND(0.53)
ND(2)
Chromium
50
50,000
ND(1.3)
ND(1.3)
ND(1.2)
NS
NS
ND(1.2)
NS
NS
NS
1.7 J
1.9 J
2.8 JB
Iron
300
--
140
97
=;t 930 ; .,,
NS
NS
ND(50)
NS
NS
NS
'V iz5350J.
280
330
Lead
15
15,000
ND(2.3)
ND(2.3)
ND(4)
NS
NS
ND(4)
NS
NS
NS
;';43 '
- 21;;'
12
Mercury
1.05
-
ND(0.08)
ND(0.08)
ND(0.091)
NS
NS
ND(0.091)
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.08)
0.27 S
ND(0.091)
Selenium
50
--
ND(3.6)
ND(3.6)
ND(6.4)
NS
NS
6.5 J
NS
NS
NS
ND(3.6)
4.5 J
8 J
Silver
18
18,000
ND(0.51)
ND(0.51)
ND(0.89)
NS
NS
ND(0.89)
NS
NS
NS
ND(0.51)
0.99J
ND(0.89)
Sodium
--
-
23,000
88,000
54,000
NS
NS
8,400
NS
NS
NS
28,000
22,000
15,000
Other Inorganics (µgo)
Dissolved Iron (field filtered)
-
-
360
6
830
NS
NS
ND(50)
NS
NS
NS
140
ND(2.5)
150
Sulfate
250,000
-
ND(2500)
ND(2500)
ND(2500)
NS
NS
67,000
NS
NS
NS
8.4
120
ND(2500)
Notes:
- exceeds NCDENR Gross Contamination Limit (GCL)
- exceeds NCDENR Groundwater Standards (GWS)
Bold Values - Result is Above Detection Limit
µg/l - Micrograms per liter
ND (2.0) - Below Detection Limit in Parentheses
J - Results estimated; reported value below detection limit
S - Result was determined by the Method of Standard Additions
•• - Detection limits elevated due to limited sample volume
B - Detected in method blank
D - Diluted sample
• - Lab Control Spike (LCS) Exceeded Control Limits
E = Concentrations exceedsd the calibration range of the instrument
NA - Not analyzed
NS - Not sampled
2 of 2
IMMI:(•T 'il`l4_

APPENDIX A

GROUND WATER MONITORING WELL MW-1
Client/Site: Norfolk Southern Railway Company Bessemer City Date: / 7// S /p
Location: 201 W. Virginia Avenue, Bessemer City, NC 28016 Project No: NS1411
HISTORICAL. DATA
Free product historically present : NO
Historical Water ft below Installed Well ft below Well
15 2522 2" Sch 40 PVC; 10' screen
'
Level: casing Depth: casing Constc
Notes: 2" well=0.17 gal/ft
FIELD MEASUREMENTS
Purge Method: Low Flow Purge
Measured Water Measured Well
Level: % 5. 1 a Depth:
Time started Pumping Depth:
purging: /0 `j"7
Z5%2D
g"l, 5d
Water Quality Instrument(s): YSI 556MPS Lamotte 2020e
Pump Brand/ Model: Peristaltic Pump
Sampling Tubing: 1/4" OD Polyethylene
Tubing Discarded After Use? NO
Units (circle one) Initial 1 2 3 4 5
Final
Time
/oJ r
nog
//© 7
J//z.
///7
//Z2
Water Level feet
Flow
m Ipm
Temp. °F
/3-, /2
7,D
/•,2,2
/5-, ?
7o
/1. 17
4,4
>q.7 7
/'./V
0
/41,74/
A • 3 2
/ c, 7`l
Ve
o
MI ?S
SC m /cm S/cm
DO %DO mg/L
pH pH units
ORP mV
Turbidity NTU
i-•errous Iron 'nng&L
/17
�.36
/OT
/4 /2
sfq
47q
D,0ge
0.1/
'4.36
4o�S
/o,o5
ePrOfq
/4,37
12.3
4,67
1/-31
4.7a
p,o9e
,,9,G�
1437
Notes:
Purged / sampled by: Matthew Smith
Sample placed on ice after sampling?
NO
SAMPLE LOG
Turb: Opaque Turbid
Odor:
Color: one Other:
Other:
Sample ID Sampling Time
Container type:
No. of Containers:
Volume
Preservative
//27 X )
Duplicate collected (circle)? YES 101
Duplicate ID:
HCI
HNO3
None
HNO3
3
2
1
1
1
40m1
1L
250m1
125m1
250m1
HCI
x x

GROUND WATER MONITORING WELL MW-2
Client/Site: Norfolk Southem Railway Company Bessemer City Date: (.9.7/i3./0
Location: 201 W. Virginia Avenue, Bessemer City, NC 28016 Project No: NS1411
HISTORICAL DATA
Free product historically present : NO
ft below Well
casing Constr: 2" Sch 40 PVC; 5' screen Notes: 2" well=0.17 gal/ft
Historical Water ft below Installed Well
Level: 15 casing Depth: 25.02
FIELD MEASUREMENTS
Water Quality Instrument(s):
Pump Brand/
Sampling
TubingDiscarded After
YSI 556MPS Lamotte 2020e
Purge Method: Low Flow Purge
Measured Water Measured Total
Level: t 5 41 Depth: lc.
Model: Peristaltic Pump
Tubing: 1/4" OD Polyethylene
Time startedrgPumping depth: n/,
purging: l� � � p g !, G . ®�
Use? NO
Units (circle one) Initial 1 2 3 4 5 Final
Time
12 / 6
/ 21:
/2 2 b
/ o�.2
/2 30
/ 2 3 s
Water Level feet
.
f.S, c I/t,
/ 2
/4. 21
Ia,347
Je,a 1
Flow oz/mi gpm Ipm
�! �
7 6
I r V
'2 0
4 1 V
� ��
6, 6
b-s 0
i) I V"
6-Y
Temp. °C °F
1, /4
2/,DV
W. 17
a`, 04e
2/, d1
;1i e 7
SC Cita pS/cm
,
0, %i?
0, /l 2
0, /q9
03 /c7 %
0'/f/
e . iiiii
DO %DO mg/L
2,04
/, /t
Q , `d 1
.0, -77
P , '7,2
d, 46--
pH pH units
5 5-C
S 3 %
t7 , /2
C. 05-
5, //
Jam, /3
ORP mV
* 43. S
•J-c-, 1
-.1, '3
- l Z,
- Ll ► 2
7 pi
Turbidity NTU
4,'
` %J-, v
7, 0S
9, tco
2 , oq
.l n . 42
Notes: •
Purged / sampled by: Matthew Smith ' Sample placed on ice after sampling? YE NO
SAMPLE LOG
Container
type:
Volume
.s4e,
.,\,
0
0\,
4\C'
�G
G
G
G
G
G
Turb: Opaque
Turbid
Ring,
No. of Containers:
Preservative
,,,
„, ,,q
`L.„,.
g§)
QP
3
2
1
1
1
Odor: None Other:5/11%.
40m1
1L
250m1
125m1
250m1
HCI
HCI
HNO3
None
HNO3
Color: None' Other:
Sample ID Sampling Time
e co
`��P
Os
co
4/bV
.,
BOO
0r5
n...0,\
, .
,o,
0
co
,cp
Pik) " '2.
/ 2 `7'
�JO
r/ �
X
X
��,C0
tx
Duplicate collected (circle) ? MP NO
Duplicate ID: MW-22 1 ii -5-
X
X-,
174--
; f1
)C--
X
INIIMEZIzAJZ MINI

GROUND WATER MONITORING WELL MW-3
Client/Site: Norfolk Southern Railway Company Bessemer City Date: t) 7 / is—/v'1
Location: 201 W. Virginia Avenue, Bessemer City, NC 28016 Project No: NS1411
HISTORICAL DATA
Free product historically present : NO
Historical Water ftbelow Installed We nbeiow Well
Level: 16 casing Depth: 31.35 sing Constr. 2" Soh 40 PVC; 10' screen Notes: 2" well=0.17 gal/ft
FIELD MEASUREMENTS
Water Quality Instrument(s): YSI 556MPS Lamotte 2020e
Purge Method: Low Flow Purge Pump Brand/ Model: Peristaltic Pump
Measured Water Measured Total , Sampling Tubing: 1/4" OD Polyethylene
3
Level: fc/ 3 Depth: 3 '-/
Time started YEPumping depth: 00 Tubing Discarded After Use? S ) NO
^� ti 3 3�
purging: 'S �
Units (circle one) Initial 1 2 3 4 5 Final
Time
/
/34/ 3
1 "6
9 353
i .3 TV
AO 3
Pio%
Water Level feet
/
/5.Gl3
!4,/G
14,6-3
/4,$�j
/`7,07,
j",3V
Flow oz/min m Ipm
-7 . ®
7. D
• 6. 0
d
q , t'J
Li. EP
Temp. CD °F
22.415
;2/. //
2 t) . 1 P8
21,13
2 i . Z
21, aq
SC C SIcm
0.230
oa/€
O . ? lO
O. 2161
O, 22 q
O. 233
DO %DO mg/L
2.5'.4
/• %2
0 . V *7
a I" i
A Q 1
®. '7 O
pH pH units
6:3/I
1/ 9)
'70‘.3
LI 5(
II. ,5-
3,Of
ORP mV
3
34i 2
.1c0.9
g0r 'AV{tJ
.3
•57. 1
3-4if)i
Turbidity NTU
s". v 3
8. '7h
(7 . 2&-.
e , /3
® aqo
D. 2 7
Notes:
Purged / sampled by: Matthew Smith Sample placed on ice after sampling?
Y S' NO
SAMPLE LOG
Container type:
G
G
G
G
G
Turb: Opaque Turbid Mai No. of Containers:
3
2
1
1
1
Odor:, o - Other: Volume
40m1
1L
250m1
125m1
250m1
Color;Other: Preservative
HCI
HCI
HNO3
None
HNO3
OQ'
4`I6 �`tA .
Sample ID Sampling Time J QQ' .G
P
c•oJ
�Pk�
kO
O
Q��
e
)`
\�O
Duplicate collected (circle) ? YES • NO _
Lk' ►` \`1Z7.�.
Duplicate ID:

GROUND WATER MONITORING WELL MW-4
Client/Site: Norfolk Southern Railway Company Bessemer City Date: v 7/is/el
Location: 201 W. Virginia Avenue, Bessemer City, NC 28016 Project No: NS1411
HISTORICAL DATA
Free product historically present : NO
Historical Water ft below Installed Well
Level: 16 casing Depth: 25:05
ft below Well
casing Constr 2" Sch 40 PVC; 5' screed Notes: 2" well=0.17 gal/ft
FIELD MEASUREMENTS
Water Quality Instrument(s): YSI 556MPS Lamotte 2020e
PurgeiMethod: Low Flow Purge Pump Brand/ Model: Peristaltic Pump
Measured Total
Measured Water j 5-, 13 Depth: , ezi
Level: Sampling Tubing: 1/4" OD Polyethylene
1
Time started purging: ' Li h1.7 Pumping depth: is-,aw 67,Tubing Discarded After Use? NO
Units (circle one) Initial 1 2 3 4 5 Final
Time
/git`7
/I' s2
/415-7
16-eg
%Sod
I /g
Water Level feet
/6. d 3
% e , 41
/1, 13
1- 7,. `
% '! o23
% "Z , 3 ,`Z
_.
Flow oz/m'i Qpm Ipm
7, a
6 . ®
C, et
6-..O
, 0
J, 6 r
Temp. 0 OF
20; 4/
2b .16/
'.21 t /
22,�5
2/ Sa
21.i $y,I:
sc sic ps/cm
6 .0e13
D , Del ©
0. 011:1
4e', mew4.
o ?
8, O$q ..
DO %DO mg/L
/ . ® 1
0 . 'VI
0 , 5.-
r.%. 1 g'
O. I'
, e ,
pH pH units
/ (
q, e,3
s./, s 3
7 ,-5-`
1/, S%
Li•54
ORP mV
" le. s
'-101;.0 .-/`e.0
,- ig6,3
-igo,1
•-/S3•a
Turbidity NTU
i •Sr-e a
6, -2o..;.
. 0,4O
,-0, )1
- O. 52
" 9 C3
FaFwus.lrnn mg11—
Notes:
Purged / sampled by: Matthew Smith _ . Sample placed on ice after sampling?
YES ` NO
SAMPLE LOG
Container type:
G.
G
G
G
G
Turb: Opaque Turbid- No.
of Containers:
. 3
2
1
1
.1
Odor: None . Other: 1 T er/T .
Volume
40mf•'
` 1L
250m1
125m1
250m1
Color: one Other:
Preservative
. HCI
';HCI
HNO3
None
HNO3
Sample ID Sampling Time J
Ay;
cp ,k)0 _ -
g`1; :• g`L
G�
, q
Q.
FP
5J .
4�
�Qy
O
�00
co
O5�
OIL
ru,
•
ri �- L/
1 ‘
X
Duplicate collected (circle) ? YES NO" '• _
Duplicate ID:
.:

GROUND WATER MONITORING WELL MW-5
Client/Site: Norfolk Southern Railway Company Bessemer City Date: c?/ Imo/ d,7
Location: 201 W. Virginia Avenue, Bessemer City, NC 28016 Project No: NS1411
HISTORICAL DATA
Free product historically present : NO
Historical Water ft below Installed Well ft below Well
Level: 15 casing Depth: 25.02 casing Constr. 2" Sch 40 PVC; 10' screen Notes: 2" well=0.17 gal/ft
FIELD MEASUREMENTS
Water Quality Instrument(s): YSI 556MPS Lamotte 2020e
Purge Method: Low Flow Purge Pump Brand/ Model: Peristaltic Pump
Measured Water Measured Total
Level: (6-, (3 Depth: .42.5., eV Sampling Tubing: 1/4" OD Polyethylene
Pumping depth: Tubing Discarded After Use? YES • NO
Time u grog !
yq x7 o6
Units (circle one) Initial 1 2 3 4 5 Final
Time
j
jJ lI t
/5 S t
l55 e
>,OLi
aa./
%)/9
Water Level feet
/
/54-3
%$ , 10
1 $ . 7/
1,) , 517
1 7 45'
11 23
Flow �niin pm Ipm
'-'2.go. 0
, 0
s1,0
41. ©
II. P
Z/, 0
Temp. ° OF
2
22,5?
2 l • 65"
2Z I'1
22.23
22.0q
21 . 1 0
SC420. PS/cm
10.Z37
0,23S
®.237
!,,%?'3`i
0.210
0.2gLir
DO %DO
�. 4 •7
/, I g
©. l 7
0. 65"
0. (1
Q, da.
pH pH units
5--. '70
1 5'. 7 3
5: GS
6-, bS
., . 6 3
6 3�
ORP mV
'- 3. 9
•—/i0.1
—17 i. 3
.. / 5-49
" in 7
- is 7 6
Turbidity NTU
2
2 , G»
) , g$
%, 61
1,'/0
1,2V
9. 213
« accous Iron mg/L
Notes:
Purged / sampled by: Matthew Smith Sample placed on ice after sampling?
Y S NO
SAMPLE LOG
Container type:
G
G
G
G
G
Turb: Opaque Turbid :n No. of Containers:
3
2
1
1
1
Odor: None Other. .S %,Y.erne' • Volume
40m1
1 L
250m1
125m1
250m1
Color: o e " Other. V Preservative
HCI
HCI
HNO3
None
HNO3
Al)
(Pp0
co
Sample ID Sampling Time JO Q- .4,-G
P
.\'
4)
O�
e
`
/7 AI •- S
n 2P
X-
X
P(
ii
X
Duplicate collected (circle) ? YES
02,111
1. I.L ► �1
M1111.1: .- :11d♦
Duplicate ID:
-

GROUND WATER MONITORING WELL MW-6
Client/Site: Norfolk Southern Railway Company Bessemer City Date: D ?"- -/e, ati
Location: 201 W. Virginia Avenue, Bessemer City, NC 28016 Project No: NS1411
HISTORICAL DATA
Free product historically present : NO
ft below Well
using Constr: 2" Sch 40 PVC: 5' screen Notes: 2" well=0.17 gal/ft
Historical Water ft below Installed Well
Level: 18 casing Depth: 20.00
FIELD MEASUREMENTS
'r
Water Quality Instrument(s):
Pump Brand/
Sampling
Tubing Discarded After
YSI 556MPS Lamotte 2020e
Purge Method: Low Flow Purge
Measured Water Measured Total
Level: 1) , i/e/ Depth: � el,
Model: Peristaltic Pump
Tubing: 1/4" OD Polyethylene
epumping depth: Gai .%J y-'
Time started purging: 17 415 p yishi lei
Use? YES ' NO
Units (circle one) Initial 1 2 3 4 5 Final
Time
Water Lev feet
Flow oz/min gpm Ip
Temp. °C °F
SC mS/cm pS/cm
DO %DO mg/L
pH pH units
ORP mV
Turbidity NTU
Ferrous Iron mg/L
Notes: p
u eS I-, al der ton a7/isfaq f:.,,ka Le /erg ci,l/e4re
'-,.stele 04 07/M,/01 Co -8.9 ) .
Purged / sampled by: Matthew Smith Sample placed on ice after sampling? YES NO
SAMPLE LOG
Container
type:
Volume
4, e
�o�
(61,
eG
G
G
G
G
G
Turb: Opaque
Turbid
Clear'
No. of Containers:
Preservative
xQ�
�qro
JO QP
3
2
1
1
1
Odor: A• - Other:
40m1
1L
250m1
125m1
250m1
Color: one Other.
HCI
HCI
HNO3
None
HNO3
Sample ID Sampling Time
,v
,
P5
5J
Ps
,�O
J%
co,O.'S/
O�
,
.
:cz--
��a
e
.
,,,,
0,
fri w.,,e
o1Li.-
X_
X
x
x
X
><,
Duplicate collected (circle) ? YES NO
Duplicate ID:
L, . •111.. \LLE•4

J
GROUND WATER MONITORING WELL MW-7
Client/Site: Norfolk Southern Railway Company Bessemer City Date: 7/4„-/d,
Location: 201 W. Virginia Avenue, Bessemer City, NC 28016 Project No: NS1411
HISTORICAL DATA
Free product historically present : NO
Historical Water ft below Installed Well ft below Well
Level: 20 casing Depth: 20.00 casing Constr 2" Sch 40 PVC; 10' screen
Notes: 2" well=0.17 gal/ft
FIELD MEASUREMENTS
Purge Method: Low Flow Purge
Measured Water Measured Total
Level: ICI, % Depth:
Pumping depth:
Time started
purging:
20 i1(
Water Quality Instrument(s): YSI 556MPS Lamotte 2020e
Pump Brand/ Model: Peristaltic Pump
Sampling Tubing: 1/4" OD Polyethylene
Tubing Discarded After Use?
YES
NO
Units (circle one)
Time
Water Level feet
Flow oz/min gpm Ipm
Temp. °C °F
SC mS/cm pS/cm
DO %DO mg/L
pH pH units
ORP mV
Turbidity NTU
Ferrous Iron mg/L
Notes:
Initial
1
2
1 V i lids to i e e- % 0 .5o v l� .
3
4
5
Final
Purged / sampled by: Matthew Smith
Sample placed on ice after sampling? YES
NO
SAMPLE LOG
r
Container type:
Turb: Opa• ' Turbid Clear No. of Containers:
Odor: None Other: Volume
Color None Other: Preservative
Sample ID
3
2
1
1
1
40m1
1L
250m1
125m1
250m1
HCI
HCI
HNO3
None
HNO3
0 •'s g5.
Sampling Time JO QQ Q.G c k° O�
Duplicate collected (circle) ? YES NO
\ k\
Duplicate ID:

GROUND WATER MONITORING WELL MW-8
Client/Site: Norfolk Southern Railway Company Bessemer City Date: 0 7// 5 74 7
Location: 201 W. Virginia Avenue, Bessemer City, NC 28016 Project No: NS1411
HISTORICAL DATA
Free product historically present :
Historical Water ft below Installed Well ft below Well 2. Sch 40 PVC; 15' screen Notes: 2" well=0.17 gal/ft
Level: casing Depth: casing Constr.
FIELD MEASUREMENTS
Water Quality Instrument(s): YSI 556MPS Lamotte 2020e
Purge Method: Low Flow Purge Pump Brand/ Model: Peristaltic Pump
Measured Water / 9 5, G q 3 Depth: 2$ , Measured Total
Level:5-2 Sampling Tubing: 1/4" OD Polyethylene
Time started
purging: - 7 3q Pumping depth: d2.+�75-0TubingDiscarded After Use? NO
,/‘
Units (circle one) Initial 1//2 3 4 5 Final
Time
/
/` 39
%47'7'
it f r
/�. .ei
,4 5''
/70y
Water Level feet
/57 ,c/ 3
/e., p;Z
/6. 3/
/1, S3
/G. 72
/6.Ufa
Flow oz/min pm Ipm
-2 Q
7, D
6, o
s; Q
6-, O
5`, D
Temp. V °F
V/ .14
6, 41
%�, s 7
Hi g 3
/9, G`/
if, s‘
SC 4114, pS/cm
6
6, / ? 3
0 t /6s/
a 145
b, /63
D. /42
D, /6_2
DO %DO mg/L
A9. 3/
/• 3y
D. -
D. ge)
ASl
9.e/1
pH pH units
5": if
4 - 35-
�-1
4/ . z "1
11, / cf
', 1 ?
4'. /2
ORP mV
4
4,4
• -/2..v
•- 5-/, 6
-- 2.q
- %.9, 8
-Co. f
Turbidity NTU
7
Fe R---rny/t-
Notes:
Purged / sampled by: Matthew Smith Sample placed on ice after sampling?
ES NO
SAMPLE LOG
Container type:
G
G
G
G
G
Turb: Opaque Turbid tear No.
of Containers:
3
2
1
1
1
Odor: None Other: /3 I% re .
Volume
40m1
1L
250m1
125m1
250m1
Color: one ether:
Preservative
HCI
HCI
HNO3
None
HNO3
Sample ID Sampling Time J
xO�
)iq O
�00 1�G�
,0- �G
�5
��
cp
��
,sO
JC
500
Op
���\
q.Off`
/1/14/ -- /
/ 7 /D
X
)-
X
)
x
Duplicate collected (circle) ? YES
L L • .lifillL LLLE',
ItttQlttttttM: yl:lkd♦
Duplicate ID:

APPENDIX B
►•�L1► ►LU3
�i: `ice

THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING
ANALYTICAL REPORT
Job Number: 680-49092-1
Job Description: Norfolk Southern Bessemer City
For:
Marshall Miller & Associates
5700 Broadmoor
Suite 504
Mission, KS 66202
Attention: Mr. Carmelo Blazekovic
LoAtik-A6vv &rvu tfr)
Kathryn Smith
Project Manager I
[e-mail]
07/28/2009
Approved for release.
Kathryn Smith
Project Manager I
7/28/2009 10:26 AM
The test results in this report meet NELAP requirements for parameters for which accreditation is required or available.
Any exceptions to the NELAP requirements are noted. Results pertain only to samples listed in this report. This report
may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory. Questions should be directed to the
person who signed this report.
Savannah Certifications and ID #s: A2LA: 0399.01; AL: 41450; ARDEQ: 88-0692; ARDOH; CA: 03217CA; CO; CT:
PH0161; DE; FL: E87052; GA: 803; Guam; HI; IL: 200022; IN; IA: 353; KS: E-10322; KY EPPC: 90084; KY UST; LA
DEQ: 30690; LA DHH: LA080008; ME: 2008022;MD: 250; MA: M-GA006; MI: 9925; MS; NFESC: 249; NV: GA00006;
NJ: GA769; NM; NY: 10842; NC DWQ: 269; NC DHHS: 13701; PA: 68-00474; PR: GA00006; RI: LA000244; SC:
98001001; TN: TN0296; TX: T104704185; USEPA: GA00006; VT: VT-87052; VA: 00302; WA; WV DEP: 094; WV
DHHR: 9950 C; WI DNR: 999819810; WY/EPAR8: 8TMS-Q
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc.
TestAmerica Savannah 5102 LaRoche Avenue, Savannah, GA 31404
Tel [phone] Fax [phone] www.testamericainc.com
Page 1 of 59

Job Narrative
680-J49092-1
Comments
No additional comments.
Receipt
All samples were received in good condition within temperature requirements.
GC/MS VOA
No analytical or quality issues were noted.
GC/MS Semi VOA
Method(s) 8270C LL: Sample MW-1 (680-49092-1), MW-2 (680-49092-2), MW-22 (680-49092-3), MW-3 (680-49092-4), MW-4
(680-49092-5), MW-5 (680-49092-6), MW-8 (680-49092-8) was diluted due to the nature of the sample matrix . As such, surrogate
recoveries are not reported, and elevated reporting limits (RLs) are provided.
No other analytical or quality issues were noted.
Metals
No analytical or quality issues were noted.
General Chemistry
No analytical or quality issues were noted.
Organic Prep
No analytical or quality issues were noted.
VOA Prep
No analytical or quality issues were noted.
Page 2 of 59

METHOD SUMMARY
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Description
Lab Location Method
Job Number: 680-49092-1
Preparation Method
Matrix Water
Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Purge and Trap
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GCMS - Low Levels
Liquid -Liquid Extraction (Continuous)
Metals (ICP)
Sample Filtration, Field
Preparation, Total Metals
Mercury (CVAA)
Preparation, Mercury
Sulfate
Lab References:
TAL SAV = TestAmerica Savannah
TAL SAV
TAL SAV
TAL SAV
TAL SAV
TAL SAV
TAL SAV
TAL SAV
TAL SAV
TAL SAV
TAL SAV
SW846 8260B
SW846 8270C LL
SW846 6010B
SW846 7470A
MCAWW 375.4
SW846 5030B
SW846 3520C
FIELD_FLTRD
SW846 3010A
SW846 7470A
Method References:
MCAWW = "Methods For Chemical Analysis Of Water And Wastes", EPA-600/4-79-020, March 1983 And Subsequent Revisions.
SW846 = "Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods", Third Edition, November 1986 And Its
Updates.
TestAmerica Savannah
Page 3 of 59

METHOD / ANALYST SUMMARY
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-49092-1
Method Analyst Analyst ID
SW846 8260B Bearden, Robert RB
SW846 8270C LL Haynes, Carion CRH
SW846 6010B Bland, Brian BCB
SW846 7470A Reeves, Lorene LR
MCAWW 375.4 Ross, Jon JR
TestAmerica Savannah
Page 4 of 59

SAMPLE SUMMARY
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-49092-1
Date/Time Date/Time
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Client Matrix Sampled Received
680-49092-1 MW-1 Water 07/15/2009 1127 07/17/2009 0857
680-49092-2 MW-2 Water 07/15/2009 1240 07/17/2009 0857
680-49092-3 MW-22 Water 07/15/2009 1255 07/17/2009 0857
680-49092-4 MW-3 Water 07/15/2009 1413 07/17/2009 0857
680-49092-5 MW-4 Water 07/15/2009 1517 07/17/2009 0857
680-49092-6 MW-5 Water 07/15/2009 1620 07/17/2009 0857
680-49092-7 MW-6 Water 07/16/2009 0845 07/17/2009 0857
680-49092-8 MW-8 Water 07/15/2009 1710 07/17/2009 0857
TestAmerica Savannah
Page 5 of 59

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-49092-1
Client Sample ID: MW-1
Lab Sample ID: 680-49092-1
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 07/15/2009 1127
Date Received: 07/17/2009 0857
Method: 8260B
Preparation: 5030B
Dilution: 5.0
Date Analyzed: 07/20/2009 1841
Date Prepared: 07/20/2009 1841
8260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Analysis Batch: 680-143179
Instrument ID: MSO
Lab File ID: o0289.d
Initial WeightNolume: 5 mL
Final WeightNolume: 5 mL
Analyte Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Acetone 56 J 25 120
Benzene 1.2 U 1.2 5.0
Carbon tetrachloride 2.5 U 2.5 5.0
Isopropyl ether 1.2 U 1.2 50
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 5.0 U 5.0 50
1,1-Dichloroethene 0.55 U 0.55 5.0
Chloroform 0.70 U 0.70 5.0
2-Butanone (MEK) 5.0 U 5.0 50
1,2-Dichloropropane 0.65 U 0.65 5.0
Trichloroethene 0.65 U 0.65 5.0
2-Hexanone 5.0 U 5.0 50
1,2-Dibromoethane 1.2 U 1.2 5.0
Tetrachloroethene 0.75 U 0.75 5.0
Toluene 2.0 J 1.6 5.0
Ethylbenzene 8.0 0.55 5.0
Styrene 0.55 U 0.55 5.0
Xylenes, Total 1100 1.0 10
Methyl tert-butyl ether 4.1 J 1.0 50
Surrogate %Rec Qualifier Acceptance Limits
4-Bromofluorobenzene 96 75 - 120
Dibromofluoromethane 105 75 - 121
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 105 75 - 120
TestAmerica Savannah Page 6 of 59

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
MW-2
680-49092-2
Water
Job Number: 680-49092-1
Date Sampled: 07/15/2009 1240
Date Received: 07/17/2009 0857
Method:
Preparation:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
8260B
5030B
100
07/20/2009 1910
07/20/2009 1910
8260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Analysis Batch: 680-143179
Result (ug/L)
Qualifier
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial WeightNolume:
Final WeightNolume:
MDL
MSO
o0291.d
5 mL
5 mL
RL
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Isopropyl ether
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
1,1-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone (MEK)
1,2-Dichloropropane
Trichloroethene
2-Hexanone
1,2-Dibromoethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Xylenes, Total
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Surrogate
970
11000
50
4900
100
11
14
600
13
13
100
25
15
24000
1800
11
15000
4200
%Rec
J
U
U
U
J
U
U
U
U
U
E
Qualifier
500
25
50
24
100
11
14
100
13
13
100
25
15
33
11
11
20
20
2500
100
100
1000
1000
100
100
1000
100
100
1000
100
100
100
100
100
200
1000
Acceptance Limits
4-Bromofluorobenzene
Dibromofluoromethane
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
96
103
103
75 - 120
75 - 121
75 - 120
TestAmerica Savannah Page 7 of 59

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-49092-1
Client Sample ID: MW-2
Lab Sample ID: 680-49092-2
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 07/15/2009 1240
Date Received: 07/17/2009 0857
8260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Method: 8260B Analysis Batch: 680-143325 Instrument ID: MSO
Preparation: 5030B Lab File ID: o0307.d
Dilution: 200 Initial Weight/Volume: 5 mL
Date Analyzed: 07/21/2009 1516 Run Type: DL Final WeightNolume: 5 mL
Date Prepared: 07/21/2009 1516
Analyte Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Acetone 1100 J D 1000 5000
Benzene 12000 D 50 200
Carbon tetrachloride 100 U 100 200
Isopropyl ether 4900 D 48 2000
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 200 U 200 2000
1,1-Dichloroethene 22 U 22 200
Chloroform 28 U 28 200
2-Butanone (MEK) 620 J D 200 2000
1,2-Dichloropropane 26 U 26 200
Trichloroethene 26 U 26 200
2-Hexanone 200 U 200 2000
1,2-Dibromoethane 50 U 50 200
Tetrachloroethene 30 U 30 200
Toluene 25000 D 66 200
Ethylbenzene 1900 D 22 200
Styrene 22 U 22 200
Xylenes, Total 16000 D 40 400
Methyl tert-butyl ether 4200 D 40 2000
Surrogate %Rec Qualifier Acceptance Limits
4-Bromofluorobenzene 97 75 - 120
Dibromofluoromethane 106 75 - 121
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 103 75 - 120
TestAmerica Savannah Page 8 of 59

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-49092-1
Client Sample ID: MW-22
Lab Sample ID: 680-49092-3
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 07/15/2009 1255
Date Received: 07/17/2009 0857
Method: 8260E
Preparation: 5030B
Dilution: 200
Date Analyzed: 07/20/2009 1939
Date Prepared: 07/20/2009 1939
8260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Analysis Batch: 680-143179
Instrument ID: MSO
Lab File ID: o0293.d
Initial WeightNolume: 5 mL
Final WeightNolume: 5 mL
Analyte Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Acetone 1000 U 1000 5000
Benzene 11000 50 200
Carbon tetrachloride 100 U 100 200
Isopropyl ether 4500 48 2000
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 200 U 200 2000
1,1-Dichloroethene 22 U 22 200
Chloroform 28 U 28 200
2-Butanone (MEK) 650 J 200 2000
1,2-Dichloropropane 26 U 26 200
Trichloroethene 26 U 26 200
2-Hexanone 200 U 200 2000
1,2-Dibromoethane 50 U 50 200
Tetrachloroethene 30 U 30 200
Toluene 22000 66 200
Ethylbenzene 1500 22 200
Styrene 22 U 22 200
Xylenes, Total 13000 40 400
Methyl tert-butyl ether 3800 40 2000
Surrogate %Rec Qualifier Acceptance Limits
4-Bromofluorobenzene 97 75 - 120
Dibromofluoromethane 106 75 - 121
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 102 75 - 120
TestAmerica Savannah Page 9 of 59

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-49092-1
Client Sample ID: MW-3
Lab Sample ID: 680-49092-4
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 07/15/2009 1413
Date Received: 07/17/2009 0857
Method: 8260B
Preparation: 5030B
Dilution: 50
Date Analyzed: 07/21/2009 1545
Date Prepared: 07/21/2009 1545
8260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Analysis Batch: 680-143325
Instrument ID: MSO
Lab File ID: o0309.d
Initial Weight/Volume: 5 mL
Final Weight/Volume: 5 mL
Analyte Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Acetone 350 J 250 1200
Benzene 370 12 50
Carbon tetrachloride 25 U 25 50
Isopropyl ether 550 12 500
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 130 J 50 500
1,1-Dichloroethene 5.5 U 5.5 50
Chloroform 7.0 U 7.0 50
2-Butanone (MEK) 280 J 50 500
1,2-Dichloropropane 6.5 U 6.5 50
Trichloroethene 6.5 U 6.5 50
2-Hexanone 310 J 50 500
1,2-Dibromoethane 12 U 12 50
Tetrachloroethene 7.5 U 7.5 50
Toluene 2400 16 50
Ethylbenzene 1200 5.5 50
Styrene 5.5 U 5.5 50
Xylenes, Total 11000 10 100
Methyl tert-butyl ether 570 10 500
Surrogate %Rec Qualifier Acceptance Limits
4-Bromofluorobenzene 98 75 - 120
Dibromofluoromethane 104 75 - 121
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 103 75 - 120
TestAmerica Savannah Page 10 of 59

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
MW-4
680-49092-5
Water
Job Number: 680-49092-1
Date Sampled: 07/15/2009 1517
Date Received: 07/17/2009 0857
Method:
Preparation:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
8260B
5030B
100
07/21/2009 1614
07/21/2009 1614
8260E Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Analysis Batch: 680-143325
Result (ug/L)
Qualifier
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial WeightNolume:
Final WeightNolume:
MDL
MSO
00311.d
5 mL
5 mL
RL
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Isopropyl ether
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
1,1-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone (MEK)
1,2-Dichloropropane
Trichloroethene
2-Hexanone
1,2-Dibromoethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Xylenes, Total
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Surrogate
600
1700
50
24
100
11
14
100
13
13
100
25
15
22000
1600
11
13000
20
%Rec
J
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
E
Qualifier
500
25
50
24
100
11
14
100
13
13
100
25
15
33
11
11
20
20
2500
100
100
1000
1000
100
100
1000
100
100
1000
100
100
100
100
100
200
1000
Acceptance Limits
4-Bromofluorobenzene
Dibromofluoromethane
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
97
104
102
75-120
75 - 121
75 - 120
TestAmerica Savannah Page 11 of 59

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
MW-4
680-49092-5
Water
Job Number: 680-49092-1
Date Sampled: 07/15/2009 1517
Date Received: 07/17/2009 0857
Method:
Preparation:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
8260E
5030B
200
07/22/2009 1247
07/22/2009 1247
8260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Analysis Batch: 680-143567
Run Type: DL
Result (ug/L)
Qualifier
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial WeightNolume:
Final Weight/Volume:
MDL
MSO2
o0336.d
5 mL
5 mL
RL
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Isopropyl ether
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
1,1-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone (MEK)
1,2-Dichloropropane
Trichloroethene
2-Hexanone
1,2-Dibromoethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Xylenes, Total
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Surrogate
1000
1600
100
48
200
22
28
200
26
26
200
50
30
22000
1500
22
13000
40
%Rec
U
D
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
D
D
U
D
U
Qualifier
1000
50
100
48
200
22
28
200
26
26
200
50
30
66
22
22
40
40
5000
200
200
2000
2000
200
200
2000
200
200
2000
200
200
200
200
200
400
2000
Acceptance Limits
4-Bromofluorobenzene
Dibromofluoromethane
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
107
107
102
75 - 120
75 - 121
75 - 120
TestAmerica Savannah Page 12 of 59

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
MW-5
680-49092-6
Water
Job Number: 680-49092-1
Date Sampled: 07/15/2009 1620
Date Received: 07/17/2009 0857
Method:
Preparation:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
8260B
5030B
20
07/21/2009 1531
07/21/2009 1531
8260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Analysis Batch: 680-143320
Result (ug/L)
Qualifier
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial WeightNolume:
Final WeightNolume:
MDL
MS02
00308.d
5 mL
5 mL
RL
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Isopropyl ether
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
1,1-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone (MEK)
1,2-Dichloropropane
Trichloroethene
2-Hexanone
1,2-Dibromoethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Xylenes, Total
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Surrogate
270
190
10
110
120
2.2
2.8
510
2.6
2.6
320
5.0
3.0
8700
1500
2.2
9200
150
%Rec
J
U
J
J
U
U
U
U
U
U
E
U
J
Qualifier
100
5.0
10
4.8
20
2.2
2.8
20
2.6
2.6
20
5.0
3.0
6.6
2.2
2.2
4.0
4.0
500
20
20
200
200
20
20
200
20
20
200
20
20
20
20
20
40
200
Acceptance Limits
4-Bromofluorobenzene
Dibromofluoromethane
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
105
104
101
75 - 120
75 - 121
75 - 120
TestAmerica Savannah Page 13 of 59

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-49092-1
Client Sample ID: MW-5
Lab Sample ID: 680-49092-6
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 07/15/2009 1620
Date Received: 07/17/2009 0857
Method: 8260B
Preparation: 5030E
Dilution: 100
Date Analyzed: 07/22/2009 1836
Date Prepared: 07/22/2009 1836
Analyte
8260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Analysis Batch: 680-143567
Run Type: DL
Result (ug/L)
Qualifier
Instrument ID: MS02
Lab File ID: ' 00360.d
Initial Weight/olume: 5 mL
Final WeightNolume: 5 mL
MDL RL
Acetone 500 U 500 2500
Benzene 190 D 25 100
Carbon tetrachloride 50 U 50 100
Isopropyl ether 110 J D 24 1000
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 110 J D 100 1000
1,1-Dichloroethene 11 U 11 100
Chloroform 14 U 14 100
2-Butanone (MEK) 600 J D 100 1000
1,2-Dichloropropane 13 U 13 100
Trichloroethene 13 U 13 100
2-Hexanone 350 J D 100 1000
1,2-Dibromoethane 25 U 25 100
Tetrachloroethene 15 U 15 100
Toluene 9100 D 33 100
Ethylbenzene 1600 D 11 100
Styrene 11 U 11 100
Xylenes, Total 10000 D 20 200
Methyl tert-butyl ether 140 J D 20 1000
Surrogate %Rec Qualifier Acceptance Limits
4-Bromofluorobenzene 106 75 - 120
Dibromofluoromethane 108 75 - 121
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 101 75 - 120
TestAmerica Savannah Page 14 of 59

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
MW-6
680-49092-7
Water
Job Number: 680-49092-1
Date Sampled: 07/16/2009 0845
Date Received: 07/17/2009 0857
Method:
Preparation:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
8260B
5030E
1.0
07/24/2009 1811
07/24/2009 1811
6260E Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Analysis Batch: 680-143763
Result (ug/L)
Qualifier
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial WeightNolume:
Final WeightNolume:
MSO
00423.d
5 mL
5 mL
MDL RL
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Isopropyl ether
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
1,1-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone (MEK)
1,2-Dichloropropane
Trichloroethene
2-Hexanone
1,2-Dibromoethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Xylenes, Total
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Surrogate
5.0
0.25
0.50
0.24
1.0
0.11
0.14
1.0
0.13
0.13
1.0
0.25
0.15
0.33
0.11
0.11
0.20
0.20
%Rec
Qualifier
5.0
0.25
0.50
0.24
1.0
0.11
0.14
1.0
0.13
0.13
1.0
0.25
0.15
0.33
0.11
0.11
0.20
0.20
25
1.0
1.0
10
10
1.0
1.0
10
1.0
1.0
10
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
10
Acceptance Limits
4-Bromofluorobenzene
Dibromofluoromethane
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
94
111
101
75 - 120
75 - 121
75 - 120
TestAmerica Savannah Page 15 of 59

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
MW-8
680-49092-8
Water
Job Number: 680-49092-1
Date Sampled: 07/15/2009 1710
Date Received: 07/17/2009 0857
Method:
Preparation:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
8260E
5030E
200
07/21/2009 1629
07/21/2009 1629
8260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Analysis Batch: 680-143320
Result (ug/L)
Qualifier
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial WeightNolume:
Final WeighWolume:
MDL
MSO2
00312.d
5 mL
5 mL
RL
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Isopropyl ether
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
1,1-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone (MEK)
1,2-Dichloropropane
Trichloroethene
2-Hexanone
1,2-Dibromoethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Xylenes, Total
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Surrogate
1000
20000
100
4700
200
22
28
1300
26
26
200
270
30
30000
2000
22
12000
2500
%Rec
U
U
U
J
U
U
U
Qualifier
1000
50
100
48
200
22
28
200
26
26
200
50
30
66
22
22
40
40
5000
200
200
2000
2000
200
200
2000
200
200
2000
200
200
200
200
200
400
2000
Acceptance Limits
4-Bromofluorobenzene
Dibromofluoromethane
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
106
108
100
75 - 120
75 - 121
75 - 120
TestAmerica Savannah Page 16 of 59

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-49092-1
Client Sample ID: MW-1
Lab Sample ID: 680-49092-1
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 07/15/2009 1127
Date Received: 07/17/2009 0857
Method: 8270C LL
Preparation: 3520C
Dilution: 10
Date Analyzed: 07/23/2009 1613
Date Prepared: 07/20/2009 1323
Analyte
8270C LL Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GCMS - Low Levels
Analysis Batch: 680-143620
Prep Batch: 680-143106
Instrument ID: MSK
Lab File ID: k8771.d
Initial WeightNolume: 1060 mL
Final WeightNolume: 1 mL
Injection Volume: 1.0 uL
Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Benzo[a]anthracene 0.47 U 0.47 1.9
Benzo[a]pyrene 0.16 U 0.16 1.9
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.47 U 0.47 1.9
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.33 U 0.33 1.9
Chrysene 0.47 U 0.47 1.9
1-Methylnaphthalene 28 0.21 1.9
2-Methylnaphthalene 61 0.22 1.9
Naphthalene 84 0.25 1.9
Surrogate %Rec Qualifier Acceptance Limits
o-Terphenyl 0 D 44 - 123
TestAmerica Savannah Page 17 of 59

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
MW-2
680-49092-2
Water
Job Number: 680-49092-1
Date Sampled: 07/15/2009 1240
Date Received: 07/17/2009 0857
Method:
Preparation:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
8270C LL
3520C
200
07/24/2009 1237
07/20/2009 1323
8270C LL Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GCMS - Low Levels
Analysis Batch: 680-143659
Prep Batch: 680-143106
Result (ug/L)
Qualifier
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
Injection Volume:
MDL
MSK
k8778b.d
1060 mL
1 mL
1.0 uL
RL
Benzo[a]anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Chrysene
1-Methylnaphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
Naphthalene
Surrogate
9.4
3.2
9.4
6.6
9.4
74
190
1100
%Rec
U
U
U
U
U
Qualifier
9.4
3.2
9.4
6.6
9.4
4.2
4.3
4.9
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
Acceptance Limits
o-Terphenyl
0
44 - 123
TestAmerica Savannah Page 18 of 59

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-49092-1
Client Sample ID: MW-22
Lab Sample ID: 680-49092-3
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 07/15/2009 1255
Date Received: 07/17/2009 0857
Method: 8270C LL
Preparation: 3520C
Dilution: 100
Date Analyzed: 07/24/2009 1018
Date Prepared: 07/20/2009 1323
Analyte
8270C LL Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GCMS - Low Levels
Analysis Batch: 680-143659
Prep Batch: 680-143106
Instrument ID: MSK
Lab File ID: k8779.d
Initial Weight/Volume: 1060 mL
Final Weight/Volume: 1 mL
Injection Volume: 1.0 uL
Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Benzo[a]anthracene 4.7 U 4.7 19
Benzo[a]pyrene 1.6 U 1.6 19
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 4.7 U 4.7 19
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 3.3 U 3.3 19
Chrysene 4.7 U 4.7 19
1-Methylnaphthalene 81 2.1 19
2-Methylnaphthalene 190 2.2 19
Naphthalene 1000 2.5 19
Surrogate %Rec Qualifier Acceptance Limits
o-Terphenyl 0 D 44 - 123
TestAmerica Savannah Page 19 of 59

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-49092-1
Client Sample ID: MW-3
Lab Sample ID: 680-49092-4
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 07/15/2009 1413
Date Received: 07/17/2009 0857
Method: 8270C LL
Preparation: 3520C
Dilution: 100
Date Analyzed: 07/24/2009 1041
Date Prepared: 07/20/2009 1323
Analyte
8270C LL Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GCMS - Low Levels
Analysis Batch: 680-143659
Prep Batch: 680-143106
Instrument ID: MSK
Lab File ID: k8780.d
Initial WeightNolume: 1060 mL
Final WeightNolume: 1 mL
Injection Volume: 1.0 uL
Result (ug/L) Qualifier MDL RL
Benzo[a]anthracene 4.7 U 4.7 19
Benzo[a]pyrene 1.6 U 1.6 19
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 4.7 U 4.7 19
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 3.3 U 3.3 19
Chrysene 4.7 U 4.7 19
1-Methylnaphthalene 32 2.1 19
2-Methylnaphthalene 68 2.2 19
Naphthalene 360 2.5 19
Surrogate %Rec Qualifier Acceptance Limits
o-Terphenyl 0 D 44 - 123
TestAmerica Savannah Page 20 of 59

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
MW-4
680-49092-5
Water
Job Number: 680-49092-1
Date Sampled: 07/15/2009 1517
Date Received: 07/17/2009 0857
Method:
Preparation:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
8270C LL
3520C
100
07/24/2009 1128
07/20/2009 1323
8270C LL Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GCMS - Low Levels
Analysis Batch: 680-143659
Prep Batch: 680-143106
Result (ug/L)
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final WeightNolume:
Injection Volume:
Qualifier
MDL
MSK
k8781.d
1060 mL
1 mL
1.0 uL
RL
Benzo[a]anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
B enzo [k]fl uo ra nth e n e
Chrysene
1-Methylnaphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
Naphthalene
Surrogate
4.7
1.6
4.7
3.3
4.7
31
65
600
%Rec
U
U
U
U
U
Qualifier
4.7
1.6
4.7
3.3
4.7
2.1
2.2
2.5
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
Acceptance Limits
o-Terphenyl
0
44 - 123
TestAmerica Savannah Page 21 of 59

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
MW-5
680-49092-6
Water
Job Number: 680-49092-1
Date Sampled: 07/15/2009 1620
Date Received: 07/17/2009 0857
Method:
Preparation:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
8270C LL
3520C
100
07/24/2009 1151
07/20/2009 1323
8270C LL Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GCMS - Low Levels
Analysis Batch: 680-143659
Prep Batch: 680-143106
Result (ug/L)
Qualifier
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final WeightNolume:
Injection Volume:
MDL
MSK
k8782.d
1060 mL
1 mL
1.0 uL
Benzo[a]anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Chrysene
1-Methylnaphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
Naphthalene
Surrogate
4.7
1.6
4.7
3.3
4.7
17
50
360
%Rec
U
U
u
U
U
J
Qualifier
4.7
1.6
4.7
3.3
4.7
2.1
2.2
2.5
RL
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
Acceptance Limits
o-Terphenyl
0
44 - 123
TestAmerica Savannah Page 22 of 59

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
MW-6
680-49092-7
Water
Job Number: 680-49092-1
Date Sampled: 07/16/2009 0845
Date Received: 07/17/2009 0857
Method:
Preparation:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
8270C LL
3520C
1.0
07/22/2009 0033
07/20/2009 1323
8270C LL Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GCMS - Low Levels
Analysis Batch: 680-143360
Prep Batch: 680-143106
Result (ug/L)
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial WeightNolume:
Final Weight/Volume:
Injection Volume:
Qualifier
MDL
MSY
y0167.d
1060 mL
1 mL
1.0 uL
Benzo[a]anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Chrysene
1-Methylnaphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
Naphthalene
Surrogate
0.047
0.016
0.047
0.033
0.047
0.021
0.022
0.034
%Rec
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
J
0.047
0.016
0.047
0.033
0.047
0.021
0.022
0.025
RL
0.19
0.19
0.19
0.19
0.19
0.19
0.19
0.19
Qualifier Acceptance Limits
o-Terphenyl
107
44 - 123
TestAmerica Savannah Page 23 of 59

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
MW-8
680-49092-8
Water
Job Number: 680-49092-1
Date Sampled: 07/15/2009 1710
Date Received: 07/17/2009 0857
Method:
Preparation:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
8270C LL
3520C
100
07/24/2009 1214
07/20/2009 1323
8270C LL Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GCMS - Low Levels
Analysis Batch: 680-143659
Prep Batch: 680-143106
Result (ug/L)
Qualifier
Instrument ID: MSK
Lab File ID: k8783.d
Initial Weight/Volume: 1060 mL
Final WeightNolume: 1 mL
Injection Volume: 1.0 uL
MDL
Benzo[a]anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Chrysene
1-Methylnaphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
Naphthalene
Surrogate
4.7
1.6
4.7
3.3
4.7
36
71
550
%Rec
U
U
U
U
U
Qualifier
4.7
1.6
4.7
3.3
4.7
2.1
2.2
2.5
RL
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
Acceptance Limits
o-Terphenyl
0
44 - 123
TestAmericaSavannah Page 24 of 59

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Client Sample ID: MW-1
Lab Sample ID: 680-49092-1
Client Matrix: Water
Job Number: 680-49092-1
Date Sampled: 07/15/2009 1127
Date Received: 07/17/2009 0857
Method:
Preparation:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
6010B
3010A
1.0
07/24/2009 0128
07/22/2009 1208
6010B Metals (ICP)
Analysis Batch: 680-143653
Prep Batch: 680-143420
Result (ug/L)
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial WeightNolume:
Final WeightNolume:
Qualifier
MDL
ICPD
N/A
50 mL
50 mL
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Iron
Lead
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
9.4
140
2.0
1.2
330
4.0
6.4
0.89
12000
J
U
JB
U
U
U
4.6
2.3
2.0
1.2
50
4.0
6.4
0.89
500
RL
20
10
5.0
10
100
10
20
10
1000
Method:
Preparation:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
6010B
3010A
1.0
07/24/2009 0338
07/22/2009 1213
6010B Metals (ICP)-Dissolved
Analysis Batch: 680-143653
Prep Batch: 680-143421
Result (ug/L)
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial WeightNolume:
Final WeightNolume:
Qualifier
MDL
ICPD
N/A
50 mL
50 mL
RL
Iron
240
50
100
Method:
Preparation:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
7470A
7470A
1.0
07/22/2009 1301
07/20/2009 1110
7470A Mercury (CVAA)
Analysis Batch: 680-143519
Prep Batch: 680-143134
Result (ug/L)
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial WeightNolume:
Final WeightNolume:
Qualifier
MDL
LEEMANI
N/A
50 mL
50 mL
RL
Mercury
0.091
0.091
0.20
TestAmerica Savannah Page 25 of 59

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
MW-2
680-49092-2
Water
Job Number: 680-49092-1
Date Sampled: 07/15/2009 1240
Date Received: 07/17/2009 0857
Method:
Preparation:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
6010B
3010A
1.0
07/24/2009 0204
07/22/2009 1208
6010B Metals (ICP)
Analysis Batch: 680-143653
Prep Batch: 680-143420
Result (ug/L)
Qualifier
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial WeightNolume:
Final WeightNolume:
MDL
ICPD
N/A
50 mL
50 mL
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Iron
Lead
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
4.6
110
2.0
1.2
5300
4.0
8.4
0.89
25000
U
U
U
J
U
4.6
2.3
2.0
1.2
50
4.0
6.4
0.89
500
RL
20
10
5.0
10
100
10
20
10
1000
Method:
Preparation:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
6010B
3010A
1.0
07/24/2009 0404
07/22/2009 1213
6010B Metals (ICP)-Dissolved
Analysis Batch: 680-143653
Prep Batch: 680-143421
Result (ug/L)
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial WeightNolume:
Final WeightNolume:
Qualifier
MDL
ICPD
N/A
50 mL
50 mL
RL
Iron
5700
50
100
Method:
Preparation:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
7470A
7470A
1.0
07/22/2009 1304
07/20/2009 1110
7470A Mercury (CVAA)
Analysis Batch: 680-143519
Prep Batch: 680-143134
Result (ug/L)
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial WeightNolume:
Final WeightNolume:
Qualifier
MDL
LEEMANI
N/A
50 mL
50 mL
RL
Mercury
0.091
0.091
0.20
TestAmerica Savannah Page 26 of 59

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
MW-22
680-49092-3
Water
Job Number: 680-49092-1
Date Sampled: 07/15/2009 1255
Date Received: 07/17/2009 0857
Method:
Preparation:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
6010B
3010A
1.0
07/24/2009 0209
07/22/2009 1208
6010B Metals (ICP)
Analysis Batch: 680-143653
Prep Batch: 680-143420
Result (ug/L)
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial WeightNolume:
Final WeightNolume:
Qualifier
MDL
ICPD
N/A
50 mL
50 mL
RL
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Iron
Lead
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
4.6
100
2.0
16
6200
4.0
9.1
0.89
25000
U
B
U
J
U
4.6
2.3
2.0
1.2
50
4.0
6.4
0.89
500
20
10
5.0
10
100
10
20
10
1000
Method:
Preparation:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
6010B
3010A
1.0
07/24/2009 0409
07/22/2009 1213
6010B Metals (ICP)-Dissolved
Analysis Batch: 680-143653
Prep Batch: 680-143421
Result (ug/L)
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial WeightNolume:
Final WeightNolume:
Qualifier
MDL
ICPD
N/A
50 mL
50 mL
RL
Iron
6000
50
100
Method:
Preparation:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
7470A
7470A
1.0
07/22/2009 1306
07/20/2009 1110
7470A Mercury (CVAA)
Analysis Batch: 680-143519
Prep Batch: 680-143134
Result (ug/L)
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial WeightNolume:
Final WeightNolume:
Qualifier
MDL
LEEMAN1
N/A
50 mL
50 mL
RL
Mercury
0.091
0.091
0.20
TestAmerica Savannah Page 27 of 59

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
MW-3
680-49092-4
Water
Job Number: 680-49092-1
Date Sampled: 07/15/2009 1413
Date Received: 07/17/2009 0857
Method:
Preparation:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
6010B
3010A
1.0
07/24/2009 0215
07/22/2009 1208
6010B Metals (ICP)
Analysis Batch: 680-143653
Prep Batch: 680-143420
Result (ug/L)
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/olume:
Final WeightNolume:
Qualifier
MDL
ICPD
N/A
50 mL
50 mL
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Iron
Lead
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
4.6
140
2.0
15
300
4.0
6.4
0.89
55000
U
B
U
U
U
4.6
2.3
2.0
1.2
50
4.0
6.4
0.89
500
RL
20
10
5.0
10
100
10
20
10
1000
Method:
Preparation:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
Iron
6010B
3010A
1.0
07/24/2009 0425
07/22/2009 1213
6010B Metals (ICP)-Dissolved
Analysis Batch: 680-143653
Prep Batch: 680-143421
Result (ug/L)
160
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial WeightNolume:
Final WeightNolume:
Qualifier
MDL
50
ICPD
N/A
50 mL
50 mL
RL
100
Method:
Preparation:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
Mercury
7470A
7470A
1.0
07/22/2009 1309
07/20/2009 1110
7470A Mercury (CVAA)
Analysis Batch: 680-143519
Prep Batch: 680-143134
Result (ug/L)
0.091
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial WeightNolume:
Final WeightNolume:
Qualifier
MDL
0.091
LEEMAN1
N/A
50 mL
50 mL
RL
0.20
TestAmericaSavannah Page 28 of 59

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
MW-4
680-49092-5
Water
Job Number: 680-49092-1
Date Sampled: 07/15/2009 1517
Date Received: 07/17/2009 0857
Method:
Preparation:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
6010E
3010A
1.0
07/24/2009 0220
07/22/2009 1208
6010B Metals (ICP)
Analysis Batch: 680-143653
Prep Batch: 680-143420
Result (ug/L)
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial WeightNolume:
Final WeightNolume:
Qualifier
MDL
ICPD
N/A
50 mL
50 mL
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Iron
Lead
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
4.6
130
2.0
1.5
260
5.2
6.4
0.89
11000
U
JB
J
U
U
4.6
2.3
2.0
1.2
50
4.0
6.4
0.89
500
RL
20
10
5.0
10
100
10
20
10
1000
Method:
Preparation:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
Iron
6010B
3010A
1.0
07/24/2009 0430
07/22/2009 1213
6010B Metals (ICP)-Dissolved
Analysis Batch: 680-143653
Prep Batch: 680-143421
Result (ug/L)
290
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial WeightNolume:
Final WeightNolume:
Qualifier
MDL
50
ICPD
N/A
50 mL
50 mL
RL
100
Method:
Preparation:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
7470A
7470A
1.0
07/22/2009 1312
07/20/2009 1110
7470A Mercury (CVAA)
Analysis Batch: 680-143519
Prep Batch: 680-143134
Result (ug/L)
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial WeightNolume:
Final WeightNolume:
Qualifier
MDL
LEEMANI
N/A
50 mL
50 mL
RL
Mercury
0.091
0.091
0.20
TestAmerica Savannah Page 29 of 59

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Client Sample ID: MW-5
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
680-49092-6
Water
Job Number: 680-49092-1
Date Sampled: 07/15/2009 1620
Date Received: 07/17/2009 0857
Method:
Preparation:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
6010E
3010A
1.0
07/24/2009 0225
07/22/2009 1208
6010B Metals (ICP)
Analysis Batch: 680-143653
Prep Batch: 680-143420
Result (ug/L)
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial WeightNolume:
Final Weight/Volume:
Qualifier
MDL
ICPD
N/A
50 mL
50 mL
RL
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Iron
Lead
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
4.6
90
2.0
1.2
930
4.0
6.4
0.89
54000
U
U
U
U
U
4.6
2.3
2.0
1.2
50
4.0
6.4
0.89
500
20
10
5.0
10
100
10
20
10
1000
Method:
Preparation:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
6010E
3010A
1.0
07/24/2009 0435
07/22/2009 1213
6010B Metals (ICP)-Dissolved
Analysis Batch: 680-143653
Prep Batch: 680-143421
Result (ug/L)
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial WeightNolume:
Final WeightNolume:
Qualifier
MDL
ICPD
N/A
50 mL
50 mL
RL
Iron
830
50
100
Method:
Preparation:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
7470A
7470A
1.0
07/22/2009 1314
07/20/2009 1110
7470A Mercury (CVAA)
Analysis Batch: 680-143519
Prep Batch: 680-143134
Result (ug/L)
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial WeightNolume:
Final WeightNolume:
Qualifier
MDL
LEEMANI
N/A
50 mL
50 mL
RL
Mercury
0.091
0.091
0.20
TestAmericaSavannah Page 30 of 59

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
MW-6
680-49092-7
Water
Job Number: 680-49092-1
Date Sampled: 07/16/2009 0845
Date Received: 07/17/2009 0857
Method:
Preparation:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
6010B
3010A
1.0
07/24/2009 0230
07/22/2009 1208
6010B Metals (ICP)
Analysis Batch: 680-143653
Prep Batch: 680-143420
Result (ug/L)
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial WeightNolume:
Final WeightNolume:
Qualifier
MDL
ICPD
N/A
50 mL
50 mL
RL
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Iron
Lead
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
4.6
52
2.0
1.2
50
4.0
6.5
0.89
8400
U
U
U
U
J
u
4.6
2.3
2.0
1.2
50
4.0
6.4
0.89
500
20
10
5.0
10
100
10
20
10
1000
Method:
Preparation:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
6010B
3010A
1.0
07/24/2009 0440
07/22/2009 1213
6010B Metals (ICP)-Dissolved
Analysis Batch: 680-143653
Prep Batch: 680-143421
Result (ug/L)
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial WeightNolume:
Final WeightNolume:
Qualifier
MDL
ICPD
N/A
50 mL
50 mL
RL
Iron
50
50
100
Method:
Preparation:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
7470A
7470A
1.0
07/22/2009 1322
07/20/2009 1110
7470A Mercury (CVAA)
Analysis Batch: 680-143519
Prep Batch: 680-143134
Result (ug/L)
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial WeightNolume:
Final WeightNolume:
Qualifier
MDL
LEEMANI
N/A
50 mL
50 mL
RL
Mercury
0.091
0.091
0.20
TestAmerica Savannah Page 31 of 59

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Client Sample ID: MW-8
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
680-49092-8
Water
Job Number: 680-49092-1
Date Sampled: 07/15/2009 1710
Date Received: 07/17/2009 0857
Method:
Preparation:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
6010E
3010A
1.0
07/24/2009 0235
07/22/2009 1208
6010B Metals (ICP)
Analysis Batch: 680-143653
Prep Batch: 680-143420
Result (ug/L)
Qualifier
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final WeightNolume:
MDL
ICPD
N/A
50 mL
50 mL
RL
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Iran
Lead
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
4.6
220
2.0
2.8
330
12
8.0
0.89
15000
U
JB
J
u
4.6
2.3
2.0
1.2
50
4.0
6.4
0.89
500
20
10
5.0
10
100
10
20
10
1000
Method:
Preparation:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
6010B
3010A
1.0
07/24/2009 0446
07/22/2009 1213
6010B Metals (ICP)-Dissolved
Analysis Batch: 680-143653
Prep Batch: 680-143421
Result (ug/L)
Qualifier
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial WeightNolume:
Final WeightNolume:
MDL
ICPD
N/A
50 mL
50 mL
RL
Iron
150
50
100
Method:
Preparation:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
7470A
7470A
1.0
07/22/2009 1325
07/20/2009 1110
7470A Mercury (CVAA)
Analysis Batch: 680-143519
Prep Batch: 680-143134
Result (ug/L)
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial WeightNolume:
Final Weight/Volume:
Qualifier
MDL
LEEMANI
N/A
50 mL
50 mL
RL
Mercury
0.091
0.091
0.20
TestAmerica Savannah Page 32 of 59

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-49092-1
General Chemistry
Client Sample ID: MW-1
Lab Sample ID: 680-49092-1
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 07/15/2009 1127
Date Received: 07/17/2009 0857
Analyte Result Qual Units MDL RL Dil Method
Sulfate
2.5 U mg/L 2.5 5.0 1.0 375.4
Analysis Batch: 680-143678 Date Analyzed: 07/24/2009 1229
TestAmerica Savannah Page 33 of 59

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-49092-1
General Chemistry
Client Sample ID: MW-2
Lab Sample ID: 680-49092-2
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 07/15/2009 1240
Date Received: 07/17/2009 0857
Analyte Result Qual Units MDL RL Dil Method
Sulfate
2.5 U mg/L 2.5 5.0 1.0 375.4
Analysis Batch: 680-143678 Date Analyzed: 07/24/2009 1229
TestAmerica Savannah Page 34 of 59

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-49092-1
General Chemistry
Client Sample ID: MW-22
Lab Sample ID: 680-49092-3
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 07/15/2009 1255
Date Received: 07/17/2009 0857
Analyte Result Qual Units MDL RL Dil Method
Sulfate
2.5 U mg/L 2.5 5.0 1.0 375.4
Analysis Batch: 680-143678 Date Analyzed: 07/24/2009 1229
TestAmericaSavannah Page 35 of 59

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-49092-1
General Chemistry
Client Sample ID: MW-3
Lab Sample ID: 680-49092-4
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 07/15/2009 1413
Date Received: 07/17/2009 0857
Analyte Result Qual Units MDL RL Dil Method
Sulfate
2.5 U mg/L 2.5 5.0 1.0 375.4
Analysis Batch: 680-143678 Date Analyzed: 07/24/2009 1231
TestAmericaSavannah Page 36 of 59

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-49092-1
General Chemistry
Client Sample ID: MW-4
Lab Sample ID: 680-49092-5
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 07/15/2009 1517'
Date Received: 07/17/2009 0857
Analyte Result Qual Units MDL RL Dil Method
Sulfate 8.1 mg/L 2.5 5.0 1.0 375.4
Analysis Batch: 680-143678 Date Analyzed: 07/24/2009 1231
TestAmerica Savannah Page 37 of 59

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-49092-1
General Chemistry
Client Sample ID: MW-5
Lab Sample ID: 680-49092-6
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 07/15/2009 1620
Date Received: 07/17/2009 0857
Analyte Result Qual Units MDL RL Dil Method
Sulfate
2.5 U mg/L 2.5 5.0 1.0 375.4
Analysis Batch: 680-143678 Date Analyzed: 07/24/2009 1231
TestAmerica Savannah Page 38 of 59

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-49092-1
Client Sample ID: MW-6
Lab Sample ID: 680-49092-7
Client Matrix: Water
Analyte
Result
General Chemistry
Date Sampled: 07/16/2009 0845
Date Received: 07/17/2009 0857
Qual Units MDL RL Dil Method
Sulfate 67 mg/L 5.0 10 2.0 375.4
Analysis Batch: 680-143678 Date Analyzed: 07/24/2009 1316
TestAmerica Savannah Page 39 of 59

Analytical Data
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-49092-1
General Chemistry
Client Sample ID: MW-8
Lab Sample ID: 680-49092-8
Client Matrix: Water
Date Sampled: 07/15/2009 1710
Date Received: 07/17/2009 0857
Analyte Result Qual Units MDL RL Dil Method
Sulfate
2.5 U mg/L 2.5 5.0 1.0 375.4
Analysis Batch: 680-143678 Date Analyzed: 07/24/2009 1233
TestAmerica Savannah Page 40 of 59

DATA REPORTING QUALIFIERS
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-49092-1
Lab Section
Qualifier Description
GC/MS VOA
GC/MS Semi VOA
Metals
General Chemistry
U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected.
E Result exceeded calibration range.
J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the
MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.
D Surrogate or matrix spike recoveries were not obtained
because the extract was diluted for analysis; also compounds
analyzed at a dilution may be flagged with a D.
U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected.
J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the
MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.
D Surrogate or matrix spike recoveries were not obtained
because the extract was diluted for analysis; also compounds
analyzed at a dilution may be flagged with a D.
J
Compound was found in the blank and sample.
Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected.
Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the
MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.
U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected.
TestAmerica Savannah
Page 41 of 59

Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Method Blank - Batch: 680-143179
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
MB 680-143179/8
Water
1.0
07/20/2009 1322
07/20/2009 1322
Analysis Batch: 680-143179
Prep Batch: N/A
Units: ug/L
Result
Qual
Quality Control Results
Job Number: 680-49092-1
Method: 8260B
Preparation: 5030B
Instrument ID: GC/MS Volatiles - 0
Lab File ID: og639.d
Initial WeightNolume: 5 mL
Final WeightNolume: 5 mL
MDL
RL
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Isopropyl ether
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
1,1-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone (MEK)
1,2-Dichloropropane
Trichloroethene
2-Hexanone
1,2-Dibromoethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Xylenes, Total
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Surrogate
5.0
0.25
0.50
0.24
1.0
0.11
0.14
1.0
0.13
0.13
1.0
0.25
0.15
0.33
0.11
0.11
0.20
0.20
°A° Rec
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
5.0
0.25
0.50
0.24
1.0
0.11
0.14
1.0
0.13
0.13
1.0
0.25
0.15
0.33
0.11
0.11
0.20
0.20
Acceptance Limits
25
1.0
1.0
10
10
1.0
1.0
10
1.0
1.0
10
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
10
4-Bromofluorobenzene
Dibromofluoromethane
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
95
103
102
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.
75 - 120
75 - 121
75 - 120
TestAmerica Savannah Page 42 of 59

Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Lab Control Sample/
Lab Control Sample Duplicate Recovery Report - Batch: 680-143179
LCS Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
LCSD Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
LCS 680-143179/5
Water
1.0
07/20/2009 0925
07/20/2009 0925
LCSD 680-143179/6
Water
1.0
07/20/2009 0954
07/20/2009 0954
Analysis Batch: 680-143179
Prep Batch: N/A
Units: ug/L
Analysis Batch: 680-143179
Prep Batch: N/A
Units: ug/L
Rec.
LCS LCSD Limit
RPD
Quality Control Results
Job Number: 680-49092-1
Method: 8260E
Preparation: 5030E
Instrument ID: GC/MS Volatiles - 0
Lab File ID: oq631.d
Initial WeighWolume: 5 mL
Final WeightNolume: 5 mL
Instrument ID: GC/MS Volatiles - 0
Lab File ID: og633.d
Initial Weight/Volume: 5 mL
Final WeighWolume: 5 mL
RPD Limit LCS Qual LCSD Qual
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
1,1-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone (MEK)
1,2-Dichloropropane
Trichloroethene
2-Hexanone
1,2-Dibromoethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Xylenes, Total
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Surrogate
93
95
107
93
104
102
99
95
98
98
98
100
94
98
100
98
104
99
96
109
94
105
104
99
95
98
96
98
101
94
98
101
100
106
LCS % Rec
17 - 175 6
77-119 1
71 - 135 2
40 - 151 1
62 - 141 1
82 - 120 2
33 - 157 0
73 - 124 0
84 - 115 1
34 - 161 2
80 - 121 1
76 - 126 1
81 - 117 0
86 - 116 0
82 - 122 1
84-118 1
77 - 121 2
LCSD % Rec
50
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
Acceptance Limits
4-Bromofluorobenzene
Dibromofluoromethane
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
93
98
96
94
99
97
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.
75 - 120
75 - 121
75 - 120
TestAmerica Savannah Page 43 of 59

Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Method Blank - Batch: 680-143320
Lab Sample ID: MB 680-143320/8
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
Water
1.0
07/21/2009 1208
07/21/2009 1208
Analysis Batch: 680-143320
Prep Batch: N/A
Units: ug/L
Result
Qual
Quality Control Results
Job Number: 680-49092-1
Method: 8260B
Preparation: 5030B
Instrument ID: GC/MS Volatiles - 0 C2
Lab File ID: og656.d
Initial WeightNolume: 5 mL
Final WeightNolume: 5 mL
MDL RL
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Isopropyl ether
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
1,1-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone (MEK)
1,2-Dichloropropane
Trichloroethene
2-Hexanone
1,2-Dibromoethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Xylenes, Total
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Surrogate
5.0
0.25
0.50
0.24
1.0
0.11
0.14
1.0
0.13
0.13
1.0
0.25
0.15
0.33
0.11
0.11
0.20
0.20
% Rec
5.0
0.25
0.50
0.24
1.0
0.11
0.14
1.0
0.13
0.13
1.0
0.25
0.15
0.33
0.11
0.11
0.20
0.20
Acceptance Limits
25
1.0
1.0
10
10
1.0
1.0
10
1.0
1.0
10
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
10
4-Bromofluorobenzene
Dibromofluoromethane
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
103
110
101
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.
75 - 120
75 - 121
75-120
TestAmerica Savannah Page 44 of 59

Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Lab Control Sample/
Lab Control Sample Duplicate Recovery Report - Batch: 680-143320
LCS Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
LCSD Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
LCS 680-143320/5
Water
1.0
07/21/2009 0936
07/21/2009 0936
LCSD 680-143320/6
Water
1.0
07/21/2009 1005
07/21/2009 1005
Analysis Batch: 680-143320
Prep Batch: N/A
Units: ug/L
Analysis Batch: 680-143320
Prep Batch: N/A
Units: ug/L
Rec.
LCS LCSD Limit
RPD
Quality Control Results
Job Number: 680-49092-1
Method: 8260B
Preparation: 5030E
Instrument ID: GC/MS Volatiles - 0 C2
Lab File ID: og648.d
Initial WeightNolume: 5 mL
Final WeightNolume: 5 mL
Instrument ID: GC/MS Volatiles - 0 C2
Lab File ID: oq650.d
Initial WeightNolume: 5 mL
Final WeightNolume: 5 mL
RPD Limit LCS Qual LCSD Qual
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
1,1-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone (MEK)
1,2-Dichloropropane
Trichloroethene
2-Hexanone
1,2-Dibromoethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Xylenes, Total
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Surrogate
108
96
108
95
107
100
102
92
98
108
101
101
95
98
98
97
102
109
98
111
98
110
101
104
96
99
111
103
101
98
98
100
99
103
LCS % Rec
17-175 2
77-119 2
71 - 135 3
40 - 151 4
62 - 141 2
82 - 120 2
33 - 157 2
73-124 4
84 - 115 1
34 - 161 2
80 - 121 2
76 - 126 0
81 - 117 3
86 - 116 0
82 - 122 2
84 - 118 3
77 - 121 1
LCSD % Rec
50
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
Acceptance Limits
4-Bromofluorobenzene
Dibromofluoromethane
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
103
100
97
106
103
100
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.
75 - 120
75 - 121
75 - 120
TestAmerica Savannah Page 45 of 59

Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Method Blank - Batch: 680-143325
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
MB 680-143325/8
Water
1.0
07/21/2009 1144
07/21/2009 1144
Analysis Batch: 680-143325
Prep Batch: N/A
Units: ug/L
Result
Qual
Quality Control Results
Job Number: 680-49092-1
Method: 8260B
Preparation: 5030B
Instrument ID: GC/MS Volatiles - 0
Lab File ID: oq655.d
Initial WeightNolume: 5 mL
Final WeightNolume: 5 mL
MDL
RL
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Isopropyl ether
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
1,1-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone (MEK)
1,2-Dichloropropane
Trichloroethene
2-Hexanone
1,2-Dibromoethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Xylenes, Total
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Surrogate
5.0
0.25
0.50
0.24
1.0
0.11
0.14
1.0
0.13
0.13
1.0
0.25
0.15
0.33
0.11
0.11
0.20
0.20
% Rec
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
5.0
0.25
0.50
0.24
1.0
0.11
0.14
1.0
0.13
0.13
1.0
0.25
0.15
0.33
0.11
0.11
0.20
0.20
Acceptance Limits
25
1.0
1.0
10
10
1.0
1.0
10
1.0
1.0
10
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
10
4-Bromofluorobenzene
Dibromofluoromethane
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
95
107
100
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.
75-120
75 - 121
75 - 120
TestAmerica Savannah Page 46 of 59

Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Lab Control Sample/
Lab Control Sample Duplicate Recovery Report - Batch: 680-143325
LCS Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
LCSD Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
LCS 680-143325/5
Water
1.0
07/21/2009 0921
07/21/2009 0921
LCSD 680-143325/6
Water
1.0
07/21/2009 0950
07/21/2009 0950
Analysis Batch: 680-143325
Prep Batch: N/A
Units: ug/L
Analysis Batch: 680-143325
Prep Batch: N/A
Units: ug/L
% Rec.
LCS LCSD Limit
RPD
Quality Control Results
Job Number: 680-49092-1
Method: 8260B
Preparation: 5030B
Instrument ID: GC/MS Volatiles - 0
Lab File ID: og647.d
Initial Weight/Volume: 5 mL
Final Weight/Volume: 5 mL
Instrument ID: GC/MS Volatiles - 0
Lab File ID: oq649.d
Initial Weight/Volume: 5 mL
Final Weight/Volume: 5 mL
RPD Limit LCS Qual LCSD Qual
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
1,1-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone (MEK)
1,2-Dichloropropane
Trichloroethene
2-Hexanone
1,2-Dibromoethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Xylenes, Total
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Surrogate
93
94
104
88
107
101
94
93
98
91
98
101
91
97
99
98
100
101
97
106
91
109
104
98
96
99
95
98
101
95
99
101
100
105
LCS % Rec
17 - 175 9
77 - 119 2
71 - 135 2
40 - 151 2
62 - 141 2
82 - 120 3
33 - 157 4
73 - 124 3
84-115 2
34-161 3
80 - 121 0
76 - 126 0
81 - 117 3
86 - 116 2
82 - 122 2
84-118 2
77 - 121 5
LCSD % Rec
50
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
Acceptance Limits
4-Bromofluorobenzene
Dibromofluoromethane
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
92
99
94
96
100
97
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.
75 - 120
75 - 121
75 - 120
TestAmerica Savannah Page 47 of 59

Client:
Marshall Miller & Associates
Method Blank - Batch: 680-143567
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
MB 680-143567/12
Water
1.0
07/22/2009 1137
07/22/2009 1137
Analysis Batch: 680-143567
Prep Batch: N/A
Units: ug/L
Result
Qual
Quality Control Results
Job Number: 680-49092-1
Method: 8260B
Preparation: 5030B
Instrument ID: GC/MS Volatiles - 0 C2
Lab File ID: og670.d
Initial Weight/Volume: 5 mL
Final WeightNolume: 5 mL
MDL RL
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Isopropyl ether
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
1,1-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone (MEK)
1,2-Dichloropropane
Trichloroethene
2-Hexanone
1,2-Dibromoethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Xylenes, Total
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Surrogate
5.0
0.25
0.50
0.24
1.0
0.11
0.14
1.0
0.13
0.13
1.0
0.25
0.15
0.33
0.11
0.11
0.20
0.20
Rec
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
5.0
0.25
0.50
0.24
1.0
0.11
0.14
1.0
0.13
0.13
1.0
0.25
0.15
0.33
0.11
0.11
0.20
0.20
Acceptance Limits
25
1.0
1.0
10
10
1.0
1.0
10
1.0
1.0
10
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
10
4-Bromofluorobenzene
Dibromofluoromethane
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
104
111
102
Calculations are performed before rounding to 'avoid round -off errors in calculated results.
75 - 120
75 - 121
75 - 120
TestAmerica Savannah Page 48 of 59

Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Lab Control Sample/
Lab Control Sample Duplicate Recovery Report - Batch: 680-143567
LCS Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
LCSD Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
LCS 680-143567/9
Water
1.0
07/22/2009 0929
07/22/2009 0929
LCSD 680-143567/10
Water
1.0
07/22/2009 0958
07/22/2009 0958
Analysis Batch: 680-143567
Prep Batch: N/A
Units: ug/L
Analysis Batch: 680-143567
Prep Batch: N/A
Units: ug/L
% Rec.
LCS LCSD Limit
RPD
Quality Control Results
Job Number: 680-49092-1
Method: 8260B
Preparation: 5030B
Instrument ID: GC/MS Volatiles - 0 C2
Lab File ID: og662.d
Initial Weight/olume: 5 mL
Final WeightNolume: 5 mL
Instrument ID: GC/MS Volatiles - 0 C2
Lab File ID: og664.d
Initial WeightNolume: 5 mL
Final WeightNolume: 5 mL
RPD Limit LCS Qual LCSD Qual
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
1,1-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone (MEK)
1,2-Dichloropropane
Trichloroethene
2-Hexanone
1,2-Dibromoethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Xylenes, Total
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Surrogate
114
96
108
93
113
103
102
92
98
105
102
102
99
101
99
100
102
114
97
107
95
112
105
104
94
99
104
103
101
99
100
99
98
104
LCS % Rec
17 - 175 1
77 - 119 1
71 - 135 1
40 - 151 1
62 - 141 1
82 - 120 2
33-157 2
73 - 124 1
84-115 1
34 - 161 1
80 - 121 1
76 - 126 1
81 - 117 0
86 - 116 1
82 - 122 0
84 - 118 1
77 - 121 2
LCSD % Rec
50
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
Acceptance Limits
4-Bromofluorobenzene
Dibromofluoromethane
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
104
106
100
104
104
101
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.
75 - 120
75 - 121
75 - 120
TestAmerica Savannah Page 49 of 59

Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Method Blank - Batch: 680-143763
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
MB 680-143763/19
Water
1.0
07/24/2009 1124
07/24/2009 1124
Analysis Batch: 680-143763
Prep Batch: N/A
Units: ug/L
Result
Qual
Quality Control Results
Job Number: 680-49092-1
Method: 8260B
Preparation: 5030B
Instrument ID: GC/MS Volatiles - 0
Lab File ID: og697.d
Initial WeightNolume: 5 mL
Final WeightNolume: 5 mL
MDL RL
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Isopropyl ether
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
1,1-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone (MEK)
1,2-Dichloropropane
Trichloroethene
2-Hexanone
1,2-Dibromoethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Xylenes, Total
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Surrogate
5.0
0.25
0.50
0.24
1.0
0.11
0.14
1.0
0.13
0.13
1.0
0.25
0.15
0.33
0.11
0.11
0.20
0.20
% Rec
U
U
U
u
u
u
u
u
u
U
u
U
u
U
U
U
U
U
5.0
0.25
0.50
0.24
1.0
0.11
0.14
1.0
0.13
0.13
1.0
0.25
0.15
0.33
0.11
0.11
0.20
0.20
Acceptance Limits
25
1.0
1.0
10
10
1.0
1.0
10
1.0
1.0
10
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
10
4-Bromofluorobenzene
Dibromofluoromethane
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
94
111
97
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.
75 - 120
75 - 121
75 - 120
TestAmerica Savannah Page 50 of 59

Client:
Marshall Miller & Associates
Lab Control Sample/
Lab Control Sample Duplicate Recovery Report - Batch: 680-143763
LCS Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
LCSD Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
LCS 680-143763/16
Water
1.0
07/24/2009 0923
07/24/2009 0923
LCSD 680-143763/17
Water
1.0
07/24/2009 0952
07/24/2009 0952'
Analysis Batch: 680-143763
Prep Batch: N/A
Units: ug/L
Analysis Batch: 680-143763
Prep Batch: N/A
Units: ug/L
% Rec.
LCS LCSD Limit
RPD
Quality Control Results
Job Number: 680-49092-1
Method: 8260E
Preparation: 5030B
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
GC/MS Volatiles - 0
og689.d
Initial WeightNolume:
Final WeightNolume:
5 mL
5 mL
Instrument ID: GC/MS Volatiles - 0
Lab File ID: og691.d
Initial WeightNolume: 5 mL
Final WeightNolume: 5 mL
RPD Limit LCS Qual LCSD Qual
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
1,1-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone (MEK)
1,2-Dichloropropane
Trichloroethene
2-Hexanone
1,2-Dibromoethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Xylenes, Total
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Surrogate
102
95
107
87
115
107
95
94
100
96
97
109
93
104
104
105
104
103
97
106
90
115
107
98
95
102
99
100
110
94
105
107
107
107
LCS % Rec
17 - 175 1
77 - 119 2
71 - 135 1
40-151 3
62 - 141 1
82 - 120 1
33 - 157 3
73 - 124 1
84 -115 2
34 - 161 3
80 - 121 4
76 - 126 0
81 - 117 1
86 - 116 1
82 - 122 3
84-118 2
77 - 121 3
LCSD % Rec
50
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
Acceptance Limits
4-Bromofluorobenzene
Dibromofluoromethane
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
96
105
96
101
107
98
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.
75 - 120
75 - 121
75 - 120
TestAmerica Savannah Page 51 of 59

Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Method Blank - Batch: 680-143106
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
MB 680-143106/19-A
Water
1.0
07/21/2009 2058
07/20/2009 1323
Analysis Batch: 680-143360
Prep Batch: 680-143106
Units: ug/L
Result
Qual
Quality Control Results
Job Number: 680-49092-1
Method: 8270C LL
Preparation: 3520C
Instrument ID: GC/MS SemiVolatiles - Y
Lab File ID: y0159.d
Initial Weight/Volume: 1000 mL
Final WeighWolume: 1 mL
Injection Volume: 1.0 uL
MDL RL
Benzo[a]anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Chrysene
1-Methylnaphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
Naphthalene
Surrogate
0.050
0.017
0.050
0.035
0.050
0.022
0.023
0.026
% Rec
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
0.050
0.017
0.050
0.035
0.050
0.022
0.023
0.026
Acceptance Limits
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
o-Terphenyl
Lab Control Sample - Batch: 680-143106
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
LCS 680-143106/20-A
Water
1.0
07/21/2009 2125
07/20/2009 1323
114
Analysis Batch: 680-143360
Prep Batch: 680-143106
Units: ug/L
Spike Amount
Result
44 - 123
Method: 8270C LL
Preparation: 3520C
Instrument ID: GC/MS SemiVolatiles - Y
Lab File ID: y0160.d
Initial Weightolume: 1000 mL
Final WeightNolume: 1 mL
Injection Volume: 1.0 uL
% Rec.
Limit Qual
Benzo[a]anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Chrysene
1-Methylnaphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
Naphthalene
Surrogate
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
Rec
2.12
1.83
1.83
1.74
1.77
1.69
1.87
1.64
106
92
92
87
88
84
94
82
54 - 119
43-110
46 - 117
53 - 119
56 - 110
51 - 110
49-110
50 - 110
Acceptance Limits
o-Terphenyl
113
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.
44 - 123
TestAmerica Savannah Page 52 of 59

Client:
Marshall Miller & Associates
Method Blank - Batch: 680-143420
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
MB 680-143420/18-A
Water
1.0
07/24/2009 0057
07/22/2009 1208
Analysis Batch: 680-143653
Prep Batch: 680-143420
Units: ug/L
Result
Qual
Quality Control Results
Job Number: 680-49092-1
Method: 6010B
Preparation: 3010A
Instrument ID: ICP/AES - D
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial WeighWolume: 50 mL
Final Weightolume: 50 mL
MDL RL
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Iron
Lead
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Lab Control Sample - Batch: 680-143420
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
LCS 680-143420/19-A
Water
1.0
07/24/2009 0102
07/22/2009 1208
4.6
2.3
2.0
4.6
50
4.0
6.4
0.89
500
Analysis Batch: 680-143653
Prep Batch: 680-143420
Units: ug/L
Spike Amount
Result
U
U
U
J
U
U
U
U
U
4.6
2.3
2.0
1.2
50
4.0
6.4
0.89
500
Method: 6010B
Preparation: 3010A
20
10
5.0
10
100
10
20
10
1000
Instrument ID: ICP/AES - D
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial Weight/Volume: 50 mL
Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
% Rec. Limit
Qual
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Iron
Lead
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
2000
2000
50.0
200
1000
500
2000
50.0
5000
2050
2100
50.9
213
1110
520
2060
52.6
5420
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.
102
105
102
107
111
104
103
105
108
75 - 125
75-125
75 - 125
75 - 125
75 - 125
75 - 125
75 - 125
75 - 125
75-125
TestAmerica Savannah Page 53 of 59

Client:
Marshall Miller & Associates
Matrix Spike/
Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery Report - Batch: 680-143420
MS Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
MSD Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
680-49092-1
Water
1.0
07/24/2009 0143
07/22/2009 1208
680-49092-1
Water
1.0
07/24/2009 0159
07/22/2009 1208
Analysis Batch: 680-143653
Prep Batch: 680-143420
Analysis Batch: 680-143653
Prep Batch: 680-143420
% Rec.
MS MSD
Limit
Quality Control Results
Job Number: 680-49092-1
Method: 6010B
Preparation: 3010A
Instrument ID: ICP/AES - D
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial WeightNolume:
Final WeightNolume:
50 mL
50 mL
Instrument ID: ICP/AES - D
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial Weight/Volume: 50 mL
Final Weight/Volume: 50 mL
RPD RPD Limit MS Qual MSD Qual
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Iron
Lead
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
101
105
100
103
102
103
102
104
121
99
103
100
101
98
101
100
102
112
75 - 125
75-125
75 - 125
75 - 125
75 - 125
75 - 125
75 - 125
75 - 125
75 - 125
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.
2 20
1 20
0 20
1 20
3 20
2 20
2 20
2 20
3 20
TestAmerica Savannah Page 54 of 59

Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Method Blank - Batch: 680-143421
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
MB 680-143421/9-A
Water
1.0
07/24/2009 0328
07/22/2009 1213
Analysis Batch: 680-143653
Prep Batch: 680-143421
Units: ug/L
Result
Qual
Quality Control Results
Job Number: 680-49092-1
Method: 6010E
Preparation: 3010A
Instrument ID: ICP/AES - D
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial WeightNolume: 50 mL
Final Weight/Volume: 50 mL
MDL RL
Iron
Lab Control Sample - Batch: 680-143421
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
LCS 680-143421/10-A
Water
1.0
07/24/2009 0333
07/22/2009 1213
50
Analysis Batch: 680-143653
Prep Batch: 680-143421
Units: ug/L
Spike Amount
Result
50 100
Method: 6010B
Preparation: 3010A
Instrument ID: ICP/AES - D
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial Weight/Volume: 50 mL
Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
% Rec. Limit
Qual
Iron
1000
Matrix Spike/
Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery Report - Batch: 680-143421
MS Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
MSD Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
680-49092-1
Water
1.0
07/24/2009 0354
07/22/2009 1213
680-49092-1
Water
1.0
07/24/2009 0359
07/22/2009 1213
1070
Analysis Batch: 680-143653
Prep Batch: 680-143421
Analysis Batch: 680-143653
Prep Batch: 680-143421
% Rec.
MS MSD
Limit
107
75 - 125
Method: 6010B
Preparation: 3010A
Dissolved
Instrument ID: ICP/AES - D
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial WeightNolume:
Final WeightNolume:
50 mL
50 mL
Instrument ID: ICP/AES - D
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial WeightNolume: 50 mL
Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
RPD RPD Limit MS Qual MSD Qual
Iron
88
100
75 - 125
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.
10 20
TestAmerica Savannah Page 55 of 59

s
1
1
1
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates
Method Blank - Batch: 680-143134
Lab Sample ID: MB 680-143134/14-A
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
Water
1.0
07/22/2009 1251
07/20/2009 1110
Analysis Batch: 680-143519
Prep Batch: 680-143134
Units: ug/L
Result
Qual
Quality Control Results
Job Number: 680-49092-1
Method: 7470A
Preparation: 7470A
Instrument ID: LEEMAN1
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial Weight/Volume: 50 mL
Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
MDL RL
Mercury
Lab Control Sample - Batch: 680-143134
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
LCS 680-143134/15-A
Water
1.0
07/22/2009 1253
07/20/2009 1110
0.091
Analysis Batch: 680-143519
Prep Batch: 680-143134
Units: ug/L
Spike Amount
Result
0.091 0.20
Method: 7470A
Preparation: 7470A
Instrument ID: LEEMANI
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial Weight/Volume: 50 mL
Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
% Rec. Limit
Qual
Mercury
2.50
Matrix Spike/
Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery Report - Batch: 680-143134
MS Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
MSD Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
Dilution:
Date Analyzed:
Date Prepared:
Analyte
680-49092-8
Water
1.0
07/22/2009 1328
07/20/2009 1110
680-49092-8
Water
1.0
07/22/2009 1330
07/20/2009 1110
2.69
Analysis Batch: 680-143519
Prep Batch: 680-143134
Analysis Batch: 680-143519
Prep Batch: 680-143134
% Rec.
MS MSD Limit
108
80 - 120
Method: 7470A
Preparation: 7470A
Instrument ID: LEEMANI
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial WeightNolume:
Final WeightNolume:
50 mL
50 mL
Instrument ID: LEEMAN1
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial WeightNolume: 50 mL
Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
RPD RPD Limit MS Qual MSD Qual
Mercury
93
94
80 - 120
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.
1
20
TestAmericaSavannah Page 56 of 59

Quality Control Results
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-49092-1
Method Blank - Batch: 680-143678
Lab Sample ID: MB 680-143678/1
Client Matrix: Water
Dilution: 1.0
Date Analyzed: 07/24/2009 1220
Date Prepared: N/A
Analyte
Analysis Batch: 680-143678
Prep Batch: N/A
Units: mg/L
Method: 375.4
Preparation: N/A
Instrument ID: KoneLabl
Lab File ID: N/A
Initial WeightNolume: 2 mL
Final WeightNolume: 2 mL
Result Qual MDL RL
Sulfate
Lab Control Sample - Batch: 680-143678
2.5 U 2.5 5.0
Method: 375.4
Preparation: N/A
Lab Sample ID: LCS 680-143678/2 Analysis. Batch: 680-143678 Instrument ID: KoneLabl
Client Matrix: Water Prep Batch: N/A Lab File ID: N/A
Dilution: 1.0 Units: mg/L Initial WeightNolume: 2 mL
Date Analyzed: 07/24/2009 1220 Final WeightNolume: 2 mL
Date Prepared: N/A
Analyte
Spike Amount Result % Rec. Limit Qual
Sulfate
Duplicate - Batch: 680-143678
20.0 18.9 94 75 - 125
Method: 375.4
Preparation: N/A
Lab Sample ID: 680-49092-4 Analysis Batch: 680-143678 Instrument ID: KoneLabl
Client Matrix: Water Prep Batch: N/A Lab File ID: N/A
Dilution: 1.0 Units: mg/L Initial WeightNolume: 2 mL
Date Analyzed: 07/24/2009 1231 Final WeightNolume: 2 mL
Date Prepared: N/A
Analyte
Sample Result/Qual Result RPD Limit Qual
Sulfate 2.5 U 2.5 NC 30 U
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.
TestAmerica Savannah Page 57 of 59

TestAmerica Savannah
5102 LaRoche Avenue
Savannah, GA 31404
Phnna (0171 RSd-7RFA Fav (G1'J1
Chain of Custody Record
IestAmerica
Ti•IG L5s40ER 7P3-e10/1RQt4Air_,,4TAt, TesTON 5
Client Information
Sampler.
/ 1a 9Z +7 Sin;1;1
Lab PM:
Smith, Kathryn
Canter Tracking No(s):
COG No:
680-22416.1
Client Contact
Mr. Carmelo Blazekovic
Phone:
gig — 7/4 _ /y/41
E-Malt
[e-mail]
Page:
Page 1 of 2
Company.
Marshall Miller & Associates
Analysis
Requested
Job #:
AJS P V) /
Address:
5700 Broadmoor Suite 504
Due Date Requested:
pp` ,:
IINR,
rr�s=
I
I '
:!,Ri
Preservation Codes:
A - HCL M -Hexane
City:
Mission
TAT Requested (days):
i'z
�1
r
II
`•_1=;
?t
B - NaOH N - None
C -Zn Acetate 0-AsNa02
DNitricAcid P Na204S
Stale. Zip:
KS,66202
;4rj
{_
;.
ir
Is•,
t;is•,;
- -
E-NaHSO4 Q - Na2S03
F -Me0H-Amchlor I R - Na2S2S03
Phone:
p > !
(1 3 v 6 `[ � - 0Z�
PO#:
1-9-NC-BSMR-UT98.133-02
�'if
(a?
-
=
`-
rr
it,if
GS -H2SO4
H-Ascorbic Acid T=TSPDodecahydrate
Email:
[e-mail]
WO#:
NS 1411NEN #3166401SC 20
;V
7
ill
y j,'t
.mix
1-Ice tJ-Acetone
J - DI Water V - MCAA
K-EDTA W-ph4-5
Protect Name:
�
Norfolk Southern Bessemer City
Project #:
I
68001327
°o
�'�•`°
,.
:tea
ie,'
�
o
=
y,
't2ti
!!aF
L-EDA Z- other(speaTy)
Site: '.ct� I)SSOW#:
1!;
m
0g
x
�sry
other:
Sam le Identification
Sample Date
Sample
Time
Sample
Type
(C=comp,
G= rab)
Matrix
(wwatcr.th
sesvtf,
owastr�uf.
BT=Ti SU ,A-wr)
�,pat
:.::
`iW,,
jf
=•L'i
a
a
0
m
,
y
o
>
m
o,
J
rl
a
e%
y
a
e;
M
(�
j
U'
i'L•`-.
;�OF
cia ns o
Spe Ins In
.• . ... .. . .. .. .... . .-........
:: �:. _.. .. _.. . ,.... va..y�:•Yl..l :11: t: r!IP/n1111v r..i..+:.•
e 1 3. li
d a- ra _ _ •.,,,,,. i 1;
,� � °•��
E} r )i,a tm
- �f"+(A.r.i
..
.1.,.-rr .:..
n. .,<t*at^
i -� ,...:..•�..
,�,x,,�l
- lyYs 'z
� .., , .
•xd it . .�.
,tt . .�f t. , �:-R.-�,...•,.
.. r1 �`�;
,1 ..�fi (�./;�
,•.
J. Jr: .-)
•-ill
. B°
Is0�1_r,?�f -
i^.•9Yn� ,...1 �lii
,per
5`T�
- Jatl:i..
"L
]n. V�a
u•
,�ls�i
.. f
,
�itl'.T.
. ?-
: s
A: {p..
..ilele
. , �p;=1'3��'..o
y,
-t'� •I
i E.1
�j ?
:, t t
II
i
li'ri-
:;..
as;Ji
1 �:i•`
r. 9
.•) - i
`r�_;f3t
, h,1'
i ,
�zarl;
Al-
• :1„
;filvi.;
(.
.r,a(,':'=
Mil
\._. ;6,
'r.'d
r,:1..-,_4.:.
..).t..
.'trltP'
..-r.6
♦ra'
{.:
-�UiCt10
_...�,.. �til
br.... .,_"'�,., , '-`�.t�tr+W
..
.0 ......... .:..r•,r,;n9.;r :. iT> v-...•..... ...
/I 44 d- i
_.
....,.i,.,..•_. ..
©`Vis/o7
.4JI+...�t..7-,..rrz�ttr.C.',....:.a
it Zi
6
..� .. ,.t
Water
y
..
..
1
... ..
1
_
.. .t7•'�.7
3
2
I
t
�$
0
„-
1'°i I)— `Z
07/'1s/07
1240
6
Water
y
1
i
g
l
;1-:
in
m
d' 1 tom- 2Z.
071i57ci
12,S,5"
6
Water
i
1
1
3
2
1
ra'
CD
A W •- 3
D7f )$/2 cf
IN/3
6
Water
y
1
1
3
2)
0
w
MI"' v Ire
07/1,5/
is-1?
,
Water
i
r
i
3
a
1
3I: ?
ri tn!— ,'
07%s//mil
z‘ze.
6
Water
�'
?
1
3
2
I
°r
rit w- 6
a7/44 f 0``}
oSgS
6
Water
y
1
1
3
,2
1
.1 II
1" f, 0)-- $
07// /
17Io
6
Water
j
1
l
3
l
>)$}
t
1
rr ( 3 la, k
Water
�
„_:
;((+`;
Water
Water
I,
,
Possible Hazard Identification
`Non Flammable Skin Irritant Poison 8 Unknown Radiological
Sample Disposal (A fee may be assessed if samples are retained longer than 1 month)
Return To Client Disposal By Lab Archive For Months
-Hazard
Deliverable Requested: I, II, III, IV, Other (specify)
Special Instructions/QC Requirements:
Empty Kit Relinquished bModell
Date:
Time: btry5
Method of Shipment
Relinquished y:
DatelTime:
Company
Receiv d by / ¢F ^
DateRme: t
Comaany
Relinquished by: /
DatelTime:
Company
Received by:
Date(Time:
Company
Rermquished by:
Dale/me:
Company
Received by:
DatelTime:
Company
CUsod :Se S: tact...
n Yes . s:.No. ..
Custody.Seal NO... • .:..: �..:�'...:�.�.:::�.::�,`:,.:;;�:_'.
..::...:..
...•.,.�.:� . .. � ��
Cooler:T.emperatu0(s)°CandOthef.Remart<s.

Login Sample Receipt Check List
Client: Marshall Miller & Associates Job Number: 680-49092-1
Login Number: 49092
Creator: Kicklighter, Marilyn
List Number: 1
Question
T / F/ NA Comment
List Source: TestAmerica Savannah
Radioactivity either was not measured or, if measured, is at or below N/A
background
The cooler's custody seal, if present, is intact. True
The cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or True
tampered with.
Samples were received on ice. True
Cooler Temperature is acceptable. True
Cooler Temperature is recorded. True
COC is present. True
COC is filled out in ink and legible. True
COC is filled out with all pertinent information. True
, There are no discrepancies between the sample Ds on the containers and False
the COC.
Samples are received within Holding Time. True
Sample containers have legible labels. True
Containers are not broken or leaking. True
Sample collection date/times are provided. True
Appropriate sample containers are used. True
Sample bottles are completely filled. True
There is sufficient vol. for all requested analyses, incl. any requested True
MS/MSDs
VOA sample vials do not have headspace or bubble is <6mm (1/4") in True
diameter.
If necessary, staff have been informed of any short hold time or quick TAT True
needs
Multiphasic samples are not present. N/A
Samples do not require splitting or compositing. N/A
Is the Field Sampler's name present on COC? True
Sample Preservation Verified True
no trip blanks
TestAmerica Savannah
Page 59 of 59