090025_Compliance Inspection Follow Up_20190625

Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint ollow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: R-Arrival Time:
� j�� Departure Time: County: 7 JII Re
giou: )=WD
Farm Name:%®�JJIS>rrL G °/p �`/p�yy Owner Email:
Owner Name: G� f'�i m�� y Phone
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: —A �%y Cj' p/yy[�✓ Title:Phone: /
Onsite Representative: /e
/ , s� , Integrator: !°>.y�psp �f
Certified Operator: , %�j-�..—��MdQ-" Certification Number. / T 7
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Certification Number:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
❑ Yes D 1VO
❑ Yes []No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
Q` o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
E'f l"o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

]Facility Number: Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes
Structure 5
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑No ❑NA ❑NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes <o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA E
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ET -No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops ditter from those designated in the CAW MY'!
I__I x es
L--rNo
L_I iNr
" rvn
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
" Ei Io
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
ENo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
E211 O
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
IE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑LeaseAgreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
o
" ❑ NA
D IE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
[]Waste Tra
sfers
❑ Weather
Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspectio ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
[]NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
EJ'NE
Page 2 of 3
21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
eNE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
0' E
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
[]"NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
$fo
[3/NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
ffNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
Io ❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
0-Ko ❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
rNoo❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
IT 4
SI��1 1t)ce5 1�r d �cuyn�v.l 7d1r /N57Lr edram ! rT'�Tak`'S
fc(,-
-5'11zs
A c."Ir / B3 �( � 61C+.'.'(C :C / 2•"Cy!J` �Gn /z'6fJ�;d
;rin WWI
�
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatm
Page 3 of 3
n 89 /2 tavt::! �'rt�eL.�-'t"�cz:
Phone: Wo'5/j b )6 f
Date:
21412015