HomeMy WebLinkAbout20201347 Ver 1_401 Application_20210310CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES, INC.
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
704-527-1177 (office)
704-527-1133 (fax)
To: Ms. Krystynka Stygar Date: March 5, 2021
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Charlotte Regulatory Office
8430 University Executive Park Drive
Charlotte, NC 28262
Mr. Alan Johnson
NCDWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury St., 9th Floor
Raleigh, NC 27604
Subject: Pre -Construction Notification Pursuant to Nationwide Permit Nos. 12 & 13
Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Cabarrus County, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2019-0109
Dear Ms. Stygar and Mr. Johnson,
The Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor project limits consist of a variable width, 30,000-foot long
corridor beginning at Coddle Creek Drive SW and running southeast along Coddle Creek to Rocky
River Road in Cabarrus County, North Carolina (Figure 1, Attachment A). On behalf of the Water
and Sewer Authority of Cabarrus County, Gavel & Dorn has subcontracted Carolina Wetland
Services, Inc. (CWS) to provide Section 404/401 permitting services for this project. An executed
Agent Authorization Form is attached (Attachment B).
On behalf of the Water and Sewer Authority of Cabarrus County, CWS is submitting a
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) pursuant to Nationwide Permit Nos. 12 & 13 to the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and Water Quality Certification Nos. 4133 and 4134 to the North Carolina
Division of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) for proposed impacts to jurisdictional waters of the
U.S. associated with sewerline replacement along Coddle Creek.
This PCN includes a wetland delineation for the Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor Improvements
study area. No Jurisdictional Determination is requested at this time.
A copy of the PCN application is being provided to the North Carolina Division of Environmental
Quality (NCDEQ) with a check of $570 for the 401 Water Quality Certification approval fee.
Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
Pre -Construction Notification Pursuant to Nationwide Permit Nos. 12 & 13
March 5, 2021
CWS Project No. 2019-0109
ATTACHMENTS INCLUDED:
DESCRIPTION
Attachment A - Figures
1: Vicinity Map
2: USGS Topographic Map
3: Aerial Imagery
4: USDA-NRCS Web Soil Survey of Cabarrus County
5: USDA-NRCS Published Soil Survey of Cabarrus County
6: National Wetlands Inventory
7: FEMA National Flood Hazard Map
8-8E: Jurisdictional Boundaries
Attachment B - Agent Authorization Form
Attachment C - Photopage (Photographs 1-47)
Attachment D - NCDEQ Stream Classification Forms (SCP1-SCP16)
Attachment E - USACE Wetland Determination Data Form (DP1-DP19)
Attachment F - Impact Figures
Attachment G - Protected Species Habitat Assessment
Attachment H - SHPO Letter
Attachment I - Mitigation Credit Reservation Letter
Please do not hesitate to contact Megan Bollero at 757-576-6433 or megan@cws-inc.net should
you have any questions or comments regarding this request.
Sincerely,
Megan Bollero, WPIT
Project Scientist
Aliisa Harjuniemi, PWS
Senior Project Manager
Page 2 of 2
DWR
mrlslon of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
April 11, 2020 Ver 3.1
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
C Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20201347
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office *
Mooresville Regional Office - (704) 663-1699
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Megan Bollero
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
megan@cws-inc.net
Date Submitted
3/10/2021
Nearest Body of Water
Coddle Creek
Basin
Yadkin-PeeDee
Water Classification
Class C
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.346003
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Cabarrus
Is this a NCDMS Project
r Yes r No
Longitude:
-80.617560
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
W Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Version#*
1
What amout is owed?*
r $240.00
r $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Alan Johnson:eads\adjohnson1
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
(757)576-6433
V
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
W Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
12 - Utility Lines
13 - Bank Stabilization
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
F- 401 Water Quality Certification - E)press
r Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
Attachment I - Mitgation Credit Reservation Letter.pdf
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
4 Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
W Owner r Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Chad VonCannon
2b. Deed book and page no.:
WA (Water and Sewer Authority of Cabarrus County easement)
2c. Responsible party:
2d.Address
Street Address
232 Davidson Highway
Address Lim 2
aty
Concord
Postal / Zip code
28027
2e. Telephone Number:
(704)786-1783
2g. Email Address:*
cvoncannon@macc.org
State / Province / legion
North Carolina
country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
362.96KB
r Yes r No
r Yes r No
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Megan Bollero
4b. Business Name:
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
4c.Address
Street Address
550 E Westinghouse Blvd
Address tine 2
City
State / Province / legion
Charlotte
North Carolina
Postal / Zip Code
Country
28273
USA
4d. Telephone Number: 4e. Fax Number:
(757)576-6433
4f. Email Address:*
megan@cws-inc.net
Agent Authorization Letter*
Attachment B - Agent Authorization_Linear Project - Google Docs.pdf 130.39KB
C. Project Information and Prior Project History U
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(d appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Harrisburg
2. Project tt Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
Multiple
2c. Project Address
Street Address
NC HWY49
Address Line 2
City
Harrisburg
Postal / Zip (ode
28027
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Coddle Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
Class C
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Yadkin-PeeDee
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030401050105
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
55
State / Rovince / %gion
North Carolina
try
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor project limits consist of a variable width, 30,000-foot long corridor beginning at Coddle Creek Drive SW, and extending southeast along the
floodplain of Coddle Creek to Rocky River Road (Figures 1 and 2, Attachment A).
The project area consists of undeveloped forest, a maintained sewer line right-of-way, a maintained powerline right-of-way, gravel roads, and maintained lawns. On -site elevations
range from 520-600 feet above mean sea level (Figure 2). Land cover within the project area consists of mixed forest, deciduous forest, herbaceous area, woody wetlands, and
emergent wetlands (Figure 3). The surrounding land use consists of undeveloped forested areas, multi -and single family housing developments, and commercial properties.
According to the United States Department of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS) Web Soil Survey of Cabarrus County (Figure 4) and the NRCS
Published Soil Survey for Cabarrus County (Figure 5), on -site soils consist often soil
types. Of these soils, Armenia loam (ArA), Chewacla sandy loam (ChA), Iredell loam (IdA), and Wehadkee loam (WeA) are listed on the Web Soil Survey as containing hydric inclusions
A review of the NWI GIS layer depicts a freshwater forested/shrub wetland and a riverine system flowing on and off of the project limits for the length of the site, and an emergent
wetland in the north -central portion of the project limits (Figure 6).
FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer was reviewed for the project area (FEMA Panels 3710550900K, 3710551900K, 3710551800K, 3710552800K, and 3710552700K). Various sections
of the study area are located within the Regulatory Floodway Zones, 1 % Annual Chance Flood Hazard, and 2 % Annual Chance Flood Hazard Zones (Figure 7).
Based on the results of wetland delineation performed by Carolina Wetland Services, there are 32 jurisdictional waters of the U.S. located within the project boundary totaling
approximately 1.99 acres, including 2,578 linear feet of jurisdictional stream channel (Figures ME).
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
Figure2_USGS.pdf
4.02MB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Figure5_HistoricSoils.pdf 4.61MB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.60
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
507 intermittent 2,071 perennial
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor project involves installing a new sewerline running along Coddle Creek. The proposed sewerline will be placed next to an existing deteriorating
sewerline that will be abandoned. This project will provide for future wastewater needs in Cabarrus County.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
Under Nationwide Permit (NWP) Nos. 12 and 13, proposed stream impacts associated with this sewer line construction project are due to 29 stream crossings. Out of these 29 stream
crossings, there will be five permanent at grade crossings and four permanent culvert crossings. Additionally, the project proposes 14 wetland crossings and stream bank restoration
that will result in permanent impacts.
The proposed impacts and construction plan details are included in the Attachment F. The proposed impacts are described in detail below
Stream Impacts (S1-S58)
Coddle Creek and many of its tributaries are highly incised and are beginning to erode in the banks, compromising the future of the sewer line. Therefore The Water and Sewer
Authority of Cabarrus County is proposing to perform a total of 3,076 linear feet of stream bank restoration using permanent techniques such as boulder toe (Sheet D-4, Detail 4-F,
Attachment F), and rip rap (Sheet D-4, Detail 5-A, Attachment F).
All stream sewer line crossings will be constructed via open trench. The temporary impacts were calculated based on the width of the construction corridor and will include the temporary
dewatering devices required in order to construct the sewer line in the dry, temporary stream crossings, sewer line installation, and bank stabilization. Proposed temporary stream
impacts total 1,762 linear feet. Permanent stream impacts associated with stream crossings total 140 linear feet, but will only result in 80 linear feet of permanent loss of water.
The five proposed permanent at grade crossings are required to provide access for maintenance and will be constructed at existing grade using armornex (Sheet D-3, Detail 3-D,
Attachment F). Al at grade crossings will be limited to 12 linear feet, totalling 60 linear feet.
The four proposed permanent culvert crossings are required to provide access for maintenance across streams that were too incised and steep to use at grade crossings (Sheet D-3,
Detail 3-13, Attachment F). All culvert crossings will be limited to 20 linear feet, totalling 80 linear feet.
All areas disturbed by the work shall be re -graded to leave the area in a smooth condition, sloped for drainage and stabilized. All impacted stream banks shall be permanently stabilized
with rip rap belowthe ordinary high water mark and seeding and mulch with woven coir net above the ordinary high water mark. Riprap will be keyed at the level of existing grade (Sheet
D-5, Detail 5-13, Attachment F). The project is located within urban watershed, therefore rip rap below the ordinary high water mark is required to protect the installed utility crossing.
The Water and Sewer Authority of Cabarrus County will be requesting a waiver for the Water Quality Certification #4133 Activity Condition No. 4 due to constraints associated with
sewer main construction and construction access. The construction techniques being used including, coffer dams, excavation, and temporary bridgemat stream crossings require a
larger temporary construction corridor in order to safely and effectively perform the work.
Wetland Impacts (W1-W25)
Proposed impacts to jurisdictional wetlands total approximately 0.592 acres. The proposed permanent wetland impacts total 0.338 acres. The permanent impacts are the result of a
permanently maintained easement through forested wetland, where forested wetland will be mechanically cleared and permanently converted to maintained herbaceous wetland. The
temporary wetland impacts total 0.254 acre and are the result of temporary clearing and fill for construction.
All disturbed areas will be returned to original grade and seeded with a native seed mix within 90 days of completion of the project. Planting of canopy and shrub species is not
proposed. The undisturbed canopy and shrub species abutting the project corridor will naturally reseed the non -maintained portions of the corridor and will provide an assortment of
existing and diverse native vegetation that matches the abutting species.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
Attachment F-Impact Figures.pdf 50.69MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No f Unknown
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r' Preliminary r Approved r' Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company: Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
Other:
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
W Wetlands W Streams -tributaries r Buffers
r Open Waters r Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type * M
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name *
2e. Forested *
2C Type of
2g. Impact
Jurisdicition*(?)
area
W1
Construction
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland NN
�[orps
]0.030
disturbance
(acres)
W2
Temporary clearing ��T
Bottomland Hardwood For
Wetland MM
Yes
Corps
0.023
(acres)
W3
Permanent clearing
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland MM
Yes
Corps
0.003
(acres)
W4
Permanent clearing
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland LL
Yes
Corps
0.003
(acres)
WS
Construction
T
mland Hardwood Forest
ff
Wetland LL
No
Corps
0.010
disturbance
(acres)
W6
Temporary clearing
T
ff-mland Hardwood Forest
Wetland JJ
Yes
Corps
0.004
(acres)
W7
Construction
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland JJ
No
Corps
0.005
disturbance
(acres)
W8
Temporary clearing
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland II
Yes
Corps
0.001
(acres)
W9
Permanent clearing
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland II
Yes
Corps
0.005
(acres)
W10
Temporary clearing
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland HH
Yes
Corps
0.020
(acres)
W11
Permanent clearing
P
fforniand Hardwood Forest
Wetland HH
Yes
Corps
0.020
(acres)
W12
Temporary clearing
T
fforniand Hardwood Forest
Wetland GG
Yes
Corps
0.010
(acres)
W13 Construction T ffmland Hardwood Forest Wetland FF Yes Corps 0.010
disturbance (acres)
W14
Construction
_]�
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland EE
No
Corps
0.030
disturbance
(acres)
W15
Permanent clearing
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland EE
Yes
Corps
0.170
(acres)
W16
Temporary clearing
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland EE
Yes
Corps
0.080
(acres)
W17
Temporary clearing
T
ffo mland Hardwood Forest
Wetland DID
Yes
Corps
0.001
(acres)
W18
Permanent clearing
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland DID
Yes
Corps
0.001
(acres)
W19
Permanent clearing
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland CC
Yes
Corps
0.020
(acres)
W20
Permanent clearing
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland BB
Yes
Corps
0.080
(acres)
W21
Construction
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland BB
Corps
0.020
disturbance
(acres)
W22
Construction
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland AA
Corps
0.005
disturbance
(acres)
ff=]
Temporary clearing ��T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland AA
Yes
Corps
0.004
(acres)
W24
Permanent clearing
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland AA
Yes
Corps
0.036
(acres)
W25
Temporary clearing
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland BAA
Yes
Corps
0.001
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.254
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.592
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.338
2h. Comments:
Permanent wetland impacts are the result of converting forested wetland to herbaceous for the utility -line maintenance easement.
3. Stream Impacts
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type *
3c. Type of impact *
3d. S. name *
Stream Type *
3f. Type of
3g. S. width *
3h. Impact
❑
�3e.
(?)
Jurisdiction*
length*
S1
Permanent crossing
9
Permanent
Culvert
Stream R
Intermittent
Corps
P
3
20
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeel)
S2
Construction disturbance
Tem orar
p Y
Fill
Stream R
Intermittent
Corps3
40
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeet)
S3
Stream bank restoration
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
Stream R
Intermittent
Corps3
107
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
S4
Construction disturbance
Tem ora
p rY
Fill
Stream Q
Intermittent
Corps2
70
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
S5
Construction disturbance
Tem orar
P Y
Fill
Stream P
Intermittent
Corps6
75
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeet)
S6
Stream bank restoration
Permanent
Bank Stabilization J
Stream P
Intermittent
Corps
P
6
151
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
S7
Construction disturbance
Tem orar
P Y
Fill
Stream B
Perennial
Corps40
70
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeet)
SS
Stream bank restoration
Permanent
Bank Stabilization J
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
P
40
148
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
S9
Permanent crossing
9
Permanent
Culvert
Stream N
Perennial
Corps
P
3
20
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeet)
S10
Construction disturbance
Temporary
Fill
Stream N
Perennial
Corps
3
50
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
S11
Stream bank restorarion
Permanent
Bank Stabilization J
Stream N
Perennial
Corps
P
3
130
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeet)
��2�Construction
disturbance
Temporary
Fill
Stream M
Intermittent
Corps
2
60
Aver�e(feet)
(lir�rfeet)
S93
Construction disturbance
Temporary
Fill
Stream L
Intermittent
Corps
2
70
Average (feet)
(lir�earfeet)
S14
Construction disturbance
Temporary
Fill
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
70
Average (feet)
(lirtearfeet)
S15
Stream bank restore rion
Permanent
Bank Stabilization J
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
P
40
140
gverage (feet)
(liriearfeet)
S16
Construction disturbance
Temporary
Fill
Stream K
Intermittent
Corps
4
75
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeet)
�7
Construction disturbance
Temporary
Fill
Stream J
Perennial
Corps
4
75
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeet)
S18
Stream bank restoration
Permanent
Bank Stabilization J
Stream J
Perennial
Corps
150
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeet)
S19
Construction disturbance
Temporary
Fill
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
80
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeet)
Stream bank restoration
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
fream B
Perennial
�CorpsS20Average
(feet)
(linearfeet)
S21
Construction disturbance
Temporary
Fill
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
70
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
Stream bank restoration
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
fream B
Perennial
�CorpsS22Average
(feet)
(lir�rfeel)
S23
fonstruction disturbance
Temporary
Fill
Stream I
Intermittent
Corps
4
58
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeet)
S24
Permanent crossing
9
Permanent
Fill
Stream I
Intermittent
Corps
P
4
12
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
S25
Construction disturbance
Temporary
Fill jream
B
Perennial
Corps
40
70
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
]Stream
bank restoration
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
Stream B
Perennial
Cor sS26P
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
S27
fonstruction disturbance
Temporary
Fill
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
70
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
]Stream
bank restorarion
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
Stream B
Perennial
Cor sS28P
Average (feet)
(liriearfeet)
S29
Construction disturbance
Temporary
Fill
Stream G
Intermittent
Corps
4
18
Averge(feet)
(linearfeet)
�01
Permanent crossing
9
Permanent
Fill
Stream G
Intermittent
Corps
P
4
12
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
S31
Construction disturbance
Temporary
Fill jream
Intermittent
Corps
4
10
Average (feet)
(lirtearfeet)
�2�Permanent9
crossin
Permanent
Culvert
Stream G
Intermittent
Corps
P
4
20
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeet)
�3�ConstruGtion
disturbance
Temporary
Fill jream
Perennial
Corps
40
70
Aver�ge(feet)
(lir�rfeet)
S
�4�Stream
bank restoration
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
Stream B
Perennial
Corps40
155
Aver�e(feet)
(lir�rfeet)
S35
Construction disturbance
Temporary
Fill jream
Perennial
Corps
40
70
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeet)
S
�6�Stream
bank restoration
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
Stream B
Perennial
Corps40
145
Average (feet)
(lir�rfee[)
�7�Construction
disturbance
Temporary
Fill
fream
Intermittent
Corps
50
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
S38
Permanent crossing
9
Permanent
Culvert
Stream D
Intermittent
Corps
P
2
20
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
S39
Stream bank restoration
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
fream
Perennial
�CorpsAverage
(feet)
(linearfeet)
S40
Construction disturbance
Tem orar
P Y
Fill
Stream BB
Perennial
Corps3
18
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeet)
S41
Permanent crossing
9
Permanent
Fill
Stream BB
Perennial
Corps
P
3
12
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeet)
S42
Construction disturbance
Tem orar
P Y
Fill
Stream E
Perennial
Cor s
P
30
90
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
]Stream
bank restoration
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
Stream E
Perennial
Cor sS43P
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
S44
Construction disturbance
Tem orar
P Y
Fill
Stream B
Perennial
Corps40
70
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
S45
Stream bank restoration
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
Stream B
Perennial
Cor s
P
40
156
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
S46
Construction disturbance
Tem orar
P Y
Fill
Stream C
Perennial
Corps
P
4
63
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
S47
Permanent crossin 9
Permanent
Fill
Stream C
Perennial
Corps
P
4
12
Average (feet)
(lirtearfeet)
S48
Stream bank restoration
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
Stream C
Perennial
Corps
P
4
235
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
S49
Construction disturbance
Tem orar
P Y
Fill
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
P
40
75
Average (feet)
(lineerfeet)
S9
Stream bank restoration
Permanent
Bank Stabilization J
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
177
Average (feet)
(lineerfeet)
S51
Construction disturbance
Temporary
Fill
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
75
Average (feet)
(lineerfeet)
S
�2�StreamP
bank restoration
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
160
Average (feet)
(lineerfeet)
�3�Gonstruction
disturbance
Temporary
Fill
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
70
Average (feet)
(lineerfeet)
�4�StreamP
bank restoration
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
120
Average (fee)
(linear feet)
S55
Construction disturbance
Temporary
Fill
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
60
Average (feet)
(lineerfeet)
�6]�StreamP
bank restoration
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
Stream B
Perennial
Corps
40
127
Average (feet)
(lineerfeet)
S57
Construction disturbance
Temporary
Fill
Stream A
Perennial
Corps
3
20
Average (feet)
(lineerfeet)
�8]�Permanent9
crossing
Permanent
Fill
Stream A
Perennial
Corps
P
3
12
Average (feet)
(lineerfeet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
31. Total permanent stream impacts:
3,216
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
4988
31. Total temporary stream impacts:
1.762
3j. Comments:
Temporary stream impacts are the result of open cut sewer crossings and dewatering devices. Permanent impacts are the result of stream bank
restoration, bank stabilization, and permanent crossings via culverts and at grade crossings. Total loss of ureters is 80 If.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Impacts to on -site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent practicable. The Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor project
has been designed to avoid impacts to jurisdictional waters wherever possible and minimize the extent of necessary impacts to jurisdictional waters.
In the original design there were seven permanent culvert crossings proposed and two of those were removed and one was changed to an at grade
crossing to reduce the permanent impacts and loss of waters. The at grade crossings were originally designed to be 20 linear feet, and that number
was reduced down to 12 linear feet to reduce permanent impacts. The widths of the permanent crossings have been limited to 12 linear feet for at
grade and 20 linear feet for culverts for the entire 30,000 If project.
All proposed stream crossings are perpendicular or near perpendicular
The original design encroached on the 10-foot buffer along Coddle Creek, and the temporary construction easements were re -designed to provide a
60-foot corridor to allow for plenty of room for construction while maintaining a safe distance from Coddle Creek.
Trenchless boring under the creek was considered, but this carries the risk of "blow out" of the stream bed where bore pressures exceed the capacity
of the stream bed. Therefore, boring the proposed stream crossings would greatly increase the safety risk to persons and property during
construction, as well as the potential environmental impacts as compared with a more controlled open trench installation. Therefore, the trenchless
boring option was abandoned from further consideration.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Best Management Practices (BMP's) Will be implemented during construction to avoid further Impacts. Proper sediment and erosion control measures
will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters. All channel work will be constructed in the dry in accordance With Water Quality
Certification Nos. 4133 and 4134.
Timber mats will be utilized within wetland areas to prevent rutting and all impacted areas will be returned to their pre -impact grades.
All impacted stream banks shall be permanently stabilized with rip rap belowthe ordinary high water mark and seeding and mulch with woven coir net
above the ordinary high water mark. Riprap will be keyed at the level of existing grade. For shallow streams, matting and seeding methods will be used
to stabilize the sewer crossing instead of rip rap to reduce permanent impacts.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
r DWR W Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
r Mitigation bank 9 Payment to in -lieu fee r Permittee Responsible
program Mitigation
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
r Yes r No
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
(linear feet)
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only):
(square feet)
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
4h. Comments
4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
.335
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes f• No
If no, explain why:
This project is not adjacent to protected riparian buffers.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
Comments:
There will be no significant change in impervious surface.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
C Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
U
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This project will not result in cumulative impacts in the foreseeable future.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?`
r Yes r No
r Unknown
51. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
If yes, please provide details to include type of percussive activity, purpose, duration, and specific location of this activity on the property.
Blasting - Google Docs.pdf 26.94KB
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
To determine which protected species are listed as occurring or potentially occurring within the project vicinity and prior to conducting the on -site field
investigation, CWS consulted the United States Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) Endangered and Threatened Species and Species of Concern by
County for North Carolina online database for Cabarrus County. In addition, CWS performed a data review using the North Carolina Natural Heritage
Program (NCNHP) Data E)Vlorer to determine if any record occurrences of federally -listed, candidate endangered, threatened species, or critical
habitat were located within the project limits and conducted a habitat assessment within the study area. The results of the desktop review and habitat
assessment are included in the Protected Species Habitat Assessment report (Attachment G).
Consultation Documentation Upload
Attachment G-PETS.pdf 5.57MB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
https://vmw.fisheries. noaa. gov/resou rce/ma p/esse ntial-fish-habitat-ma ppe r
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
A letter was forwarded to the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on February 25, 2021 to determine the presence of any areas
of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance that would be affected by this project. CWS also consulted the SHPO online GIS service. The
search indicated there are no known historical structures, buildings, sites, or districts eAsting within the project limits (Attachment H). A response letter
from SHPO has not yet been received.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
Attachment H- SHPO Letter.pdf 9.08MB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year flood plain?*
r Yes r No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
This project will not result in above ground fill.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA Firm Nos. 3710550900K, 3710551900K, 3710551800K, 3710552800K, and 3710552700K
Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Transmittal Letter - Google Docs.pdf
122.81 KB
Attachment A - Figures.pdf
20.25MB
Attachment C - Photopage.pdf
10.11 MB
Attachment D - NCDEQ Stream Classification Forms.pdf
1.681VIB
Attachment E - USACE Wetland Determination Data Forms.pdf
5.7MB
Signature
*
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Megan Bollero
Signature
��. O'Aata
Date
3/10/2021
I
G:\Shared drives\Consulting Team Drive\2019\2019 Consulting Projects\2019-0109 Lower Coddle Creek\JD\ArcGIS\Revised 7.5.2020\Figure2_USGS.mxd2Lower Coddle Creek InterceptorCabarrus County, North CarolinaUSGS Topographic MapCOORDINATES:CHECKED BY:CWS PROJECT NO:SCALE:DATE:DRAWN BY:2,0 00 0 2,0 001,0 00 Feet
Legend
Project Limits (55 ac.)ALHAVH7/5/20201 inch = 2,000 feet2019-010935.346003, -80.617560FIGURE NO.
REFERENCE: USGS 7.5 MINUTE TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLES: HARRISBURG AND CONCORD SE, NC (2019).
I
G:\Shared drives\Consulting Team Drive\2019\2019 Consulting Projects\2019-0109 Lower Coddle Creek\JD\ArcGIS\Revised 7.5.2020\Figure5_HistoricSoils.mxdFIGURE NO.5Lower Coddle Creek InterceptorCabarrus County, North CarolinaUSDA-NRCS Published SoilSurvey of Cabarrus CountyCOORDINATES:CHECKED BY:CWS PROJECT NO:SCALE:DATE:DRAWN BY:REFERENCE: USDA-NRCS PUBLISHED SOIL SURVEY OF CABARRUS COUNTY, NC, SHEETS 5 AND 6, DATED 1988.
2,0 00 0 2,0 001,0 00 Feet
Legend
Project Limits (55 ac.)ALHAVH7/6/20201 inch = 2,000 feet2019-010935.346003, -80.617560Roberta Road
NC HW Y 49 S
Rocky Rive r Roa d
HydricChA Chewac la s andy loam , 0 to 2 perc ent slopes , frequently flooded YesEnB Enon s andy loam, 2 to 8 perc ent slopes NoEnD Enon s andy loam, 8 to 15 perc ent slopes NoIdA Iredell loam, 0 to 2 perc ent s lopes YesMeB Mecklenburg loam, 2 to 8 percent s lopes NoMeD Mecklenburg loam, 8 to 15 percent s lopes NoPaF Pacolet s andy loam, 15 to 35 perc ent slopes NoPoD Poindexter loam, 8 to 15 perc ent slopes NoPoF Poindexter loam, 15 to 45 perc ent slopes NoWeA W ehadkee loam , 0 to 2 perc ent slopes , frequently flooded Yes
Soil Unit Name and Description