Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20201347 Ver 1_401 Application_20210310CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES, INC. 550 E. Westinghouse Blvd. Charlotte, NC 28273 704-527-1177 (office) 704-527-1133 (fax) To: Ms. Krystynka Stygar Date: March 5, 2021 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Charlotte Regulatory Office 8430 University Executive Park Drive Charlotte, NC 28262 Mr. Alan Johnson NCDWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit 512 N. Salisbury St., 9th Floor Raleigh, NC 27604 Subject: Pre -Construction Notification Pursuant to Nationwide Permit Nos. 12 & 13 Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor Cabarrus County, North Carolina CWS Project No. 2019-0109 Dear Ms. Stygar and Mr. Johnson, The Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor project limits consist of a variable width, 30,000-foot long corridor beginning at Coddle Creek Drive SW and running southeast along Coddle Creek to Rocky River Road in Cabarrus County, North Carolina (Figure 1, Attachment A). On behalf of the Water and Sewer Authority of Cabarrus County, Gavel & Dorn has subcontracted Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) to provide Section 404/401 permitting services for this project. An executed Agent Authorization Form is attached (Attachment B). On behalf of the Water and Sewer Authority of Cabarrus County, CWS is submitting a Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) pursuant to Nationwide Permit Nos. 12 & 13 to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Water Quality Certification Nos. 4133 and 4134 to the North Carolina Division of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) for proposed impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. associated with sewerline replacement along Coddle Creek. This PCN includes a wetland delineation for the Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor Improvements study area. No Jurisdictional Determination is requested at this time. A copy of the PCN application is being provided to the North Carolina Division of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) with a check of $570 for the 401 Water Quality Certification approval fee. Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor Pre -Construction Notification Pursuant to Nationwide Permit Nos. 12 & 13 March 5, 2021 CWS Project No. 2019-0109 ATTACHMENTS INCLUDED: DESCRIPTION Attachment A - Figures 1: Vicinity Map 2: USGS Topographic Map 3: Aerial Imagery 4: USDA-NRCS Web Soil Survey of Cabarrus County 5: USDA-NRCS Published Soil Survey of Cabarrus County 6: National Wetlands Inventory 7: FEMA National Flood Hazard Map 8-8E: Jurisdictional Boundaries Attachment B - Agent Authorization Form Attachment C - Photopage (Photographs 1-47) Attachment D - NCDEQ Stream Classification Forms (SCP1-SCP16) Attachment E - USACE Wetland Determination Data Form (DP1-DP19) Attachment F - Impact Figures Attachment G - Protected Species Habitat Assessment Attachment H - SHPO Letter Attachment I - Mitigation Credit Reservation Letter Please do not hesitate to contact Megan Bollero at 757-576-6433 or megan@cws-inc.net should you have any questions or comments regarding this request. Sincerely, Megan Bollero, WPIT Project Scientist Aliisa Harjuniemi, PWS Senior Project Manager Page 2 of 2 DWR mrlslon of Water Resources Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form April 11, 2020 Ver 3.1 Initial Review Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?* r Yes r No Is this project a public transportation project?* C Yes r No Change only if needed. BIMS # Assigned 20201347 Is a payment required for this project?* r No payment required r Fee received r Fee needed - send electronic notification Reviewing Office * Mooresville Regional Office - (704) 663-1699 Information for Initial Review 1a. Name of project: Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor 1a. Who is the Primary Contact?* Megan Bollero 1b. Primary Contact Email:* megan@cws-inc.net Date Submitted 3/10/2021 Nearest Body of Water Coddle Creek Basin Yadkin-PeeDee Water Classification Class C Site Coordinates Latitude: 35.346003 A. Processing Information County (or Counties) where the project is located: Cabarrus Is this a NCDMS Project r Yes r No Longitude: -80.617560 Is this project a public transportation project?* r Yes r No 1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: W Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act) r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act) Version#* 1 What amout is owed?* r $240.00 r $570.00 Select Project Reviewer* Alan Johnson:eads\adjohnson1 1c. Primary Contact Phone:* (757)576-6433 V 1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization? W Nationwide Permit (NWP) r Regional General Permit (RGP) r Standard (IP) 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? r Yes r No Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS): 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR: W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit r Individual Permit 12 - Utility Lines 13 - Bank Stabilization le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWR 401 Certification: For the record only for Corps Permit: F- 401 Water Quality Certification - E)press r Riparian Buffer Authorization 1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?* r Yes r No 1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? r Yes r No 1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? r Yes r No Acceptance Letter Attachment Attachment I - Mitgation Credit Reservation Letter.pdf 1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties? r Yes r No 1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed? 4 Yes r No B. Applicant Information 1d. Who is applying for the permit? W Owner r Applicant (other than owner) le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?* r Yes r No 2. Owner Information 2a. Name(s) on recorded deed: Chad VonCannon 2b. Deed book and page no.: WA (Water and Sewer Authority of Cabarrus County easement) 2c. Responsible party: 2d.Address Street Address 232 Davidson Highway Address Lim 2 aty Concord Postal / Zip code 28027 2e. Telephone Number: (704)786-1783 2g. Email Address:* cvoncannon@macc.org State / Province / legion North Carolina country USA 2f. Fax Number: 362.96KB r Yes r No r Yes r No 4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable) 4a. Name: Megan Bollero 4b. Business Name: Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. 4c.Address Street Address 550 E Westinghouse Blvd Address tine 2 City State / Province / legion Charlotte North Carolina Postal / Zip Code Country 28273 USA 4d. Telephone Number: 4e. Fax Number: (757)576-6433 4f. Email Address:* megan@cws-inc.net Agent Authorization Letter* Attachment B - Agent Authorization_Linear Project - Google Docs.pdf 130.39KB C. Project Information and Prior Project History U 1. Project Information 1b. Subdivision name: (d appropriate) 1c. Nearest municipality/ town: Harrisburg 2. Project tt Identification 2a. Property Identification Number: Multiple 2c. Project Address Street Address NC HWY49 Address Line 2 City Harrisburg Postal / Zip (ode 28027 3. Surface Waters 3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:* Coddle Creek 3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:* Class C 3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?* Yadkin-PeeDee 3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located. 030401050105 4. Project Description and History 2b. Property size: 55 State / Rovince / %gion North Carolina try USA 4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:* The Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor project limits consist of a variable width, 30,000-foot long corridor beginning at Coddle Creek Drive SW, and extending southeast along the floodplain of Coddle Creek to Rocky River Road (Figures 1 and 2, Attachment A). The project area consists of undeveloped forest, a maintained sewer line right-of-way, a maintained powerline right-of-way, gravel roads, and maintained lawns. On -site elevations range from 520-600 feet above mean sea level (Figure 2). Land cover within the project area consists of mixed forest, deciduous forest, herbaceous area, woody wetlands, and emergent wetlands (Figure 3). The surrounding land use consists of undeveloped forested areas, multi -and single family housing developments, and commercial properties. According to the United States Department of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS) Web Soil Survey of Cabarrus County (Figure 4) and the NRCS Published Soil Survey for Cabarrus County (Figure 5), on -site soils consist often soil types. Of these soils, Armenia loam (ArA), Chewacla sandy loam (ChA), Iredell loam (IdA), and Wehadkee loam (WeA) are listed on the Web Soil Survey as containing hydric inclusions A review of the NWI GIS layer depicts a freshwater forested/shrub wetland and a riverine system flowing on and off of the project limits for the length of the site, and an emergent wetland in the north -central portion of the project limits (Figure 6). FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer was reviewed for the project area (FEMA Panels 3710550900K, 3710551900K, 3710551800K, 3710552800K, and 3710552700K). Various sections of the study area are located within the Regulatory Floodway Zones, 1 % Annual Chance Flood Hazard, and 2 % Annual Chance Flood Hazard Zones (Figure 7). Based on the results of wetland delineation performed by Carolina Wetland Services, there are 32 jurisdictional waters of the U.S. located within the project boundary totaling approximately 1.99 acres, including 2,578 linear feet of jurisdictional stream channel (Figures ME). 4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?* r Yes r No r Unknown 4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR) Figure2_USGS.pdf 4.02MB 4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR) Figure5_HistoricSoils.pdf 4.61MB 4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.60 4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property: 507 intermittent 2,071 perennial 4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:* The Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor project involves installing a new sewerline running along Coddle Creek. The proposed sewerline will be placed next to an existing deteriorating sewerline that will be abandoned. This project will provide for future wastewater needs in Cabarrus County. 4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:* Under Nationwide Permit (NWP) Nos. 12 and 13, proposed stream impacts associated with this sewer line construction project are due to 29 stream crossings. Out of these 29 stream crossings, there will be five permanent at grade crossings and four permanent culvert crossings. Additionally, the project proposes 14 wetland crossings and stream bank restoration that will result in permanent impacts. The proposed impacts and construction plan details are included in the Attachment F. The proposed impacts are described in detail below Stream Impacts (S1-S58) Coddle Creek and many of its tributaries are highly incised and are beginning to erode in the banks, compromising the future of the sewer line. Therefore The Water and Sewer Authority of Cabarrus County is proposing to perform a total of 3,076 linear feet of stream bank restoration using permanent techniques such as boulder toe (Sheet D-4, Detail 4-F, Attachment F), and rip rap (Sheet D-4, Detail 5-A, Attachment F). All stream sewer line crossings will be constructed via open trench. The temporary impacts were calculated based on the width of the construction corridor and will include the temporary dewatering devices required in order to construct the sewer line in the dry, temporary stream crossings, sewer line installation, and bank stabilization. Proposed temporary stream impacts total 1,762 linear feet. Permanent stream impacts associated with stream crossings total 140 linear feet, but will only result in 80 linear feet of permanent loss of water. The five proposed permanent at grade crossings are required to provide access for maintenance and will be constructed at existing grade using armornex (Sheet D-3, Detail 3-D, Attachment F). Al at grade crossings will be limited to 12 linear feet, totalling 60 linear feet. The four proposed permanent culvert crossings are required to provide access for maintenance across streams that were too incised and steep to use at grade crossings (Sheet D-3, Detail 3-13, Attachment F). All culvert crossings will be limited to 20 linear feet, totalling 80 linear feet. All areas disturbed by the work shall be re -graded to leave the area in a smooth condition, sloped for drainage and stabilized. All impacted stream banks shall be permanently stabilized with rip rap belowthe ordinary high water mark and seeding and mulch with woven coir net above the ordinary high water mark. Riprap will be keyed at the level of existing grade (Sheet D-5, Detail 5-13, Attachment F). The project is located within urban watershed, therefore rip rap below the ordinary high water mark is required to protect the installed utility crossing. The Water and Sewer Authority of Cabarrus County will be requesting a waiver for the Water Quality Certification #4133 Activity Condition No. 4 due to constraints associated with sewer main construction and construction access. The construction techniques being used including, coffer dams, excavation, and temporary bridgemat stream crossings require a larger temporary construction corridor in order to safely and effectively perform the work. Wetland Impacts (W1-W25) Proposed impacts to jurisdictional wetlands total approximately 0.592 acres. The proposed permanent wetland impacts total 0.338 acres. The permanent impacts are the result of a permanently maintained easement through forested wetland, where forested wetland will be mechanically cleared and permanently converted to maintained herbaceous wetland. The temporary wetland impacts total 0.254 acre and are the result of temporary clearing and fill for construction. All disturbed areas will be returned to original grade and seeded with a native seed mix within 90 days of completion of the project. Planting of canopy and shrub species is not proposed. The undisturbed canopy and shrub species abutting the project corridor will naturally reseed the non -maintained portions of the corridor and will provide an assortment of existing and diverse native vegetation that matches the abutting species. 4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project. Attachment F-Impact Figures.pdf 50.69MB 5. Jurisdictional Determinations 5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?* r Yes r No f Unknown Comments: 5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?* r' Preliminary r Approved r' Not Verified r Unknown r N/A Corps AID Number: 5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Name (if known): Agency/Consultant Company: Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. Other: 5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project?* r Yes r No Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity? D. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply): W Wetlands W Streams -tributaries r Buffers r Open Waters r Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts 2a1 Reason (?) 2b. Impact type * M 2c. Type of W.* 2d. W. name * 2e. Forested * 2C Type of 2g. Impact Jurisdicition*(?) area W1 Construction T Bottomland Hardwood Forest Wetland NN �[orps ]0.030 disturbance (acres) W2 Temporary clearing ��T Bottomland Hardwood For Wetland MM Yes Corps 0.023 (acres) W3 Permanent clearing P Bottomland Hardwood Forest Wetland MM Yes Corps 0.003 (acres) W4 Permanent clearing P Bottomland Hardwood Forest Wetland LL Yes Corps 0.003 (acres) WS Construction T mland Hardwood Forest ff Wetland LL No Corps 0.010 disturbance (acres) W6 Temporary clearing T ff-mland Hardwood Forest Wetland JJ Yes Corps 0.004 (acres) W7 Construction T Bottomland Hardwood Forest Wetland JJ No Corps 0.005 disturbance (acres) W8 Temporary clearing T Bottomland Hardwood Forest Wetland II Yes Corps 0.001 (acres) W9 Permanent clearing P Bottomland Hardwood Forest Wetland II Yes Corps 0.005 (acres) W10 Temporary clearing T Bottomland Hardwood Forest Wetland HH Yes Corps 0.020 (acres) W11 Permanent clearing P fforniand Hardwood Forest Wetland HH Yes Corps 0.020 (acres) W12 Temporary clearing T fforniand Hardwood Forest Wetland GG Yes Corps 0.010 (acres) W13 Construction T ffmland Hardwood Forest Wetland FF Yes Corps 0.010 disturbance (acres) W14 Construction _]� T Bottomland Hardwood Forest Wetland EE No Corps 0.030 disturbance (acres) W15 Permanent clearing P Bottomland Hardwood Forest Wetland EE Yes Corps 0.170 (acres) W16 Temporary clearing T Bottomland Hardwood Forest Wetland EE Yes Corps 0.080 (acres) W17 Temporary clearing T ffo mland Hardwood Forest Wetland DID Yes Corps 0.001 (acres) W18 Permanent clearing P Bottomland Hardwood Forest Wetland DID Yes Corps 0.001 (acres) W19 Permanent clearing P Bottomland Hardwood Forest Wetland CC Yes Corps 0.020 (acres) W20 Permanent clearing P Bottomland Hardwood Forest Wetland BB Yes Corps 0.080 (acres) W21 Construction T Bottomland Hardwood Forest Wetland BB Corps 0.020 disturbance (acres) W22 Construction T Bottomland Hardwood Forest Wetland AA Corps 0.005 disturbance (acres) ff=] Temporary clearing ��T Bottomland Hardwood Forest Wetland AA Yes Corps 0.004 (acres) W24 Permanent clearing P Bottomland Hardwood Forest Wetland AA Yes Corps 0.036 (acres) W25 Temporary clearing T Bottomland Hardwood Forest Wetland BAA Yes Corps 0.001 (acres) 2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact 0.254 2g. Total Wetland Impact 0.592 2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact 0.338 2h. Comments: Permanent wetland impacts are the result of converting forested wetland to herbaceous for the utility -line maintenance easement. 3. Stream Impacts 3a. Reason for impact (?) 3b.lmpact type * 3c. Type of impact * 3d. S. name * Stream Type * 3f. Type of 3g. S. width * 3h. Impact ❑ �3e. (?) Jurisdiction* length* S1 Permanent crossing 9 Permanent Culvert Stream R Intermittent Corps P 3 20 Average (feet) (lir�rfeel) S2 Construction disturbance Tem orar p Y Fill Stream R Intermittent Corps3 40 Average (feet) (lir�rfeet) S3 Stream bank restoration Permanent Bank Stabilization Stream R Intermittent Corps3 107 Average (feet) (linearfeet) S4 Construction disturbance Tem ora p rY Fill Stream Q Intermittent Corps2 70 Average (feet) (linearfeet) S5 Construction disturbance Tem orar P Y Fill Stream P Intermittent Corps6 75 Average (feet) (lir�rfeet) S6 Stream bank restoration Permanent Bank Stabilization J Stream P Intermittent Corps P 6 151 Average (feet) (linearfeet) S7 Construction disturbance Tem orar P Y Fill Stream B Perennial Corps40 70 Average (feet) (lir�rfeet) SS Stream bank restoration Permanent Bank Stabilization J Stream B Perennial Corps P 40 148 Average (feet) (linearfeet) S9 Permanent crossing 9 Permanent Culvert Stream N Perennial Corps P 3 20 Average (feet) (lir�rfeet) S10 Construction disturbance Temporary Fill Stream N Perennial Corps 3 50 Average (feet) (linearfeet) S11 Stream bank restorarion Permanent Bank Stabilization J Stream N Perennial Corps P 3 130 Average (feet) (lir�rfeet) ��2�Construction disturbance Temporary Fill Stream M Intermittent Corps 2 60 Aver�e(feet) (lir�rfeet) S93 Construction disturbance Temporary Fill Stream L Intermittent Corps 2 70 Average (feet) (lir�earfeet) S14 Construction disturbance Temporary Fill Stream B Perennial Corps 40 70 Average (feet) (lirtearfeet) S15 Stream bank restore rion Permanent Bank Stabilization J Stream B Perennial Corps P 40 140 gverage (feet) (liriearfeet) S16 Construction disturbance Temporary Fill Stream K Intermittent Corps 4 75 Average (feet) (lir�rfeet) �7 Construction disturbance Temporary Fill Stream J Perennial Corps 4 75 Average (feet) (lir�rfeet) S18 Stream bank restoration Permanent Bank Stabilization J Stream J Perennial Corps 150 Average (feet) (lir�rfeet) S19 Construction disturbance Temporary Fill Stream B Perennial Corps 40 80 Average (feet) (lir�rfeet) Stream bank restoration Permanent Bank Stabilization fream B Perennial �CorpsS20Average (feet) (linearfeet) S21 Construction disturbance Temporary Fill Stream B Perennial Corps 40 70 Average (feet) (linearfeet) Stream bank restoration Permanent Bank Stabilization fream B Perennial �CorpsS22Average (feet) (lir�rfeel) S23 fonstruction disturbance Temporary Fill Stream I Intermittent Corps 4 58 Average (feet) (lir�rfeet) S24 Permanent crossing 9 Permanent Fill Stream I Intermittent Corps P 4 12 Average (feet) (linearfeet) S25 Construction disturbance Temporary Fill jream B Perennial Corps 40 70 Average (feet) (linearfeet) ]Stream bank restoration Permanent Bank Stabilization Stream B Perennial Cor sS26P Average (feet) (linearfeet) S27 fonstruction disturbance Temporary Fill Stream B Perennial Corps 40 70 Average (feet) (linearfeet) ]Stream bank restorarion Permanent Bank Stabilization Stream B Perennial Cor sS28P Average (feet) (liriearfeet) S29 Construction disturbance Temporary Fill Stream G Intermittent Corps 4 18 Averge(feet) (linearfeet) �01 Permanent crossing 9 Permanent Fill Stream G Intermittent Corps P 4 12 Average (feet) (linearfeet) S31 Construction disturbance Temporary Fill jream Intermittent Corps 4 10 Average (feet) (lirtearfeet) �2�Permanent9 crossin Permanent Culvert Stream G Intermittent Corps P 4 20 Average (feet) (lir�rfeet) �3�ConstruGtion disturbance Temporary Fill jream Perennial Corps 40 70 Aver�ge(feet) (lir�rfeet) S �4�Stream bank restoration Permanent Bank Stabilization Stream B Perennial Corps40 155 Aver�e(feet) (lir�rfeet) S35 Construction disturbance Temporary Fill jream Perennial Corps 40 70 Average (feet) (lir�rfeet) S �6�Stream bank restoration Permanent Bank Stabilization Stream B Perennial Corps40 145 Average (feet) (lir�rfee[) �7�Construction disturbance Temporary Fill fream Intermittent Corps 50 Average (feet) (linearfeet) S38 Permanent crossing 9 Permanent Culvert Stream D Intermittent Corps P 2 20 Average (feet) (linearfeet) S39 Stream bank restoration Permanent Bank Stabilization fream Perennial �CorpsAverage (feet) (linearfeet) S40 Construction disturbance Tem orar P Y Fill Stream BB Perennial Corps3 18 Average (feet) (lir�rfeet) S41 Permanent crossing 9 Permanent Fill Stream BB Perennial Corps P 3 12 Average (feet) (lir�rfeet) S42 Construction disturbance Tem orar P Y Fill Stream E Perennial Cor s P 30 90 Average (feet) (linearfeet) ]Stream bank restoration Permanent Bank Stabilization Stream E Perennial Cor sS43P Average (feet) (linearfeet) S44 Construction disturbance Tem orar P Y Fill Stream B Perennial Corps40 70 Average (feet) (linearfeet) S45 Stream bank restoration Permanent Bank Stabilization Stream B Perennial Cor s P 40 156 Average (feet) (linearfeet) S46 Construction disturbance Tem orar P Y Fill Stream C Perennial Corps P 4 63 Average (feet) (linearfeet) S47 Permanent crossin 9 Permanent Fill Stream C Perennial Corps P 4 12 Average (feet) (lirtearfeet) S48 Stream bank restoration Permanent Bank Stabilization Stream C Perennial Corps P 4 235 Average (feet) (linearfeet) S49 Construction disturbance Tem orar P Y Fill Stream B Perennial Corps P 40 75 Average (feet) (lineerfeet) S9 Stream bank restoration Permanent Bank Stabilization J Stream B Perennial Corps 40 177 Average (feet) (lineerfeet) S51 Construction disturbance Temporary Fill Stream B Perennial Corps 40 75 Average (feet) (lineerfeet) S �2�StreamP bank restoration Permanent Bank Stabilization Stream B Perennial Corps 40 160 Average (feet) (lineerfeet) �3�Gonstruction disturbance Temporary Fill Stream B Perennial Corps 40 70 Average (feet) (lineerfeet) �4�StreamP bank restoration Permanent Bank Stabilization Stream B Perennial Corps 40 120 Average (fee) (linear feet) S55 Construction disturbance Temporary Fill Stream B Perennial Corps 40 60 Average (feet) (lineerfeet) �6]�StreamP bank restoration Permanent Bank Stabilization Stream B Perennial Corps 40 127 Average (feet) (lineerfeet) S57 Construction disturbance Temporary Fill Stream A Perennial Corps 3 20 Average (feet) (lineerfeet) �8]�Permanent9 crossing Permanent Fill Stream A Perennial Corps P 3 12 Average (feet) (lineerfeet) 3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet: 31. Total permanent stream impacts: 3,216 31. Total stream and ditch impacts: 4988 31. Total temporary stream impacts: 1.762 3j. Comments: Temporary stream impacts are the result of open cut sewer crossings and dewatering devices. Permanent impacts are the result of stream bank restoration, bank stabilization, and permanent crossings via culverts and at grade crossings. Total loss of ureters is 80 If. E. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project: Impacts to on -site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent practicable. The Lower Coddle Creek Interceptor project has been designed to avoid impacts to jurisdictional waters wherever possible and minimize the extent of necessary impacts to jurisdictional waters. In the original design there were seven permanent culvert crossings proposed and two of those were removed and one was changed to an at grade crossing to reduce the permanent impacts and loss of waters. The at grade crossings were originally designed to be 20 linear feet, and that number was reduced down to 12 linear feet to reduce permanent impacts. The widths of the permanent crossings have been limited to 12 linear feet for at grade and 20 linear feet for culverts for the entire 30,000 If project. All proposed stream crossings are perpendicular or near perpendicular The original design encroached on the 10-foot buffer along Coddle Creek, and the temporary construction easements were re -designed to provide a 60-foot corridor to allow for plenty of room for construction while maintaining a safe distance from Coddle Creek. Trenchless boring under the creek was considered, but this carries the risk of "blow out" of the stream bed where bore pressures exceed the capacity of the stream bed. Therefore, boring the proposed stream crossings would greatly increase the safety risk to persons and property during construction, as well as the potential environmental impacts as compared with a more controlled open trench installation. Therefore, the trenchless boring option was abandoned from further consideration. 1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques: Best Management Practices (BMP's) Will be implemented during construction to avoid further Impacts. Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters. All channel work will be constructed in the dry in accordance With Water Quality Certification Nos. 4133 and 4134. Timber mats will be utilized within wetland areas to prevent rutting and all impacted areas will be returned to their pre -impact grades. All impacted stream banks shall be permanently stabilized with rip rap belowthe ordinary high water mark and seeding and mulch with woven coir net above the ordinary high water mark. Riprap will be keyed at the level of existing grade. For shallow streams, matting and seeding methods will be used to stabilize the sewer crossing instead of rip rap to reduce permanent impacts. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? r Yes r No 2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): r DWR W Corps 2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project? r Mitigation bank 9 Payment to in -lieu fee r Permittee Responsible program Mitigation 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. r Yes r No 4b. Stream mitigation requested: (linear feet) 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only): (square feet) 4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested: (acres) 4h. Comments 4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature: 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: (acres) .335 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: (acres) F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? r Yes f• No If no, explain why: This project is not adjacent to protected riparian buffers. 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?* r Yes r No 2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)? r Yes r No Comments: There will be no significant change in impervious surface. G. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?* C Yes r No 2. Violations (DWR Requirement) U 2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? * r Yes r No 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement) 3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?* r Yes r No 3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. This project will not result in cumulative impacts in the foreseeable future. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement) 4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?* r Yes r Nor N/A 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?* r Yes r No 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?* r Yes r No 5d. Is another Federal agency involved?* r Yes r No 5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8? r Yes r No 5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.? r Yes r No 5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal? r Yes r No 5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?` r Yes r No r Unknown 51. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.? r Yes r No If yes, please provide details to include type of percussive activity, purpose, duration, and specific location of this activity on the property. Blasting - Google Docs.pdf 26.94KB 5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? To determine which protected species are listed as occurring or potentially occurring within the project vicinity and prior to conducting the on -site field investigation, CWS consulted the United States Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) Endangered and Threatened Species and Species of Concern by County for North Carolina online database for Cabarrus County. In addition, CWS performed a data review using the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) Data E)Vlorer to determine if any record occurrences of federally -listed, candidate endangered, threatened species, or critical habitat were located within the project limits and conducted a habitat assessment within the study area. The results of the desktop review and habitat assessment are included in the Protected Species Habitat Assessment report (Attachment G). Consultation Documentation Upload Attachment G-PETS.pdf 5.57MB 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?* r Yes r No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?* https://vmw.fisheries. noaa. gov/resou rce/ma p/esse ntial-fish-habitat-ma ppe r 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?* r Yes r No 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?* A letter was forwarded to the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on February 25, 2021 to determine the presence of any areas of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance that would be affected by this project. CWS also consulted the SHPO online GIS service. The search indicated there are no known historical structures, buildings, sites, or districts eAsting within the project limits (Attachment H). A response letter from SHPO has not yet been received. 7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload Attachment H- SHPO Letter.pdf 9.08MB 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year flood plain?* r Yes r No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: This project will not result in above ground fill. 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?* FEMA Firm Nos. 3710550900K, 3710551900K, 3710551800K, 3710552800K, and 3710552700K Miscellaneous Comments Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested. Transmittal Letter - Google Docs.pdf 122.81 KB Attachment A - Figures.pdf 20.25MB Attachment C - Photopage.pdf 10.11 MB Attachment D - NCDEQ Stream Classification Forms.pdf 1.681VIB Attachment E - USACE Wetland Determination Data Forms.pdf 5.7MB Signature * By checking the box and signing below, I certify that: • I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form; • I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act'); I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act'); • I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND • I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form. Full Name: Megan Bollero Signature ��. O'Aata Date 3/10/2021 I G:\Shared drives\Consulting Team Drive\2019\2019 Consulting Projects\2019-0109 Lower Coddle Creek\JD\ArcGIS\Revised 7.5.2020\Figure2_USGS.mxd2Lower Coddle Creek InterceptorCabarrus County, North CarolinaUSGS Topographic MapCOORDINATES:CHECKED BY:CWS PROJECT NO:SCALE:DATE:DRAWN BY:2,0 00 0 2,0 001,0 00 Feet Legend Project Limits (55 ac.)ALHAVH7/5/20201 inch = 2,000 feet2019-010935.346003, -80.617560FIGURE NO. REFERENCE: USGS 7.5 MINUTE TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLES: HARRISBURG AND CONCORD SE, NC (2019). I G:\Shared drives\Consulting Team Drive\2019\2019 Consulting Projects\2019-0109 Lower Coddle Creek\JD\ArcGIS\Revised 7.5.2020\Figure5_HistoricSoils.mxdFIGURE NO.5Lower Coddle Creek InterceptorCabarrus County, North CarolinaUSDA-NRCS Published SoilSurvey of Cabarrus CountyCOORDINATES:CHECKED BY:CWS PROJECT NO:SCALE:DATE:DRAWN BY:REFERENCE: USDA-NRCS PUBLISHED SOIL SURVEY OF CABARRUS COUNTY, NC, SHEETS 5 AND 6, DATED 1988. 2,0 00 0 2,0 001,0 00 Feet Legend Project Limits (55 ac.)ALHAVH7/6/20201 inch = 2,000 feet2019-010935.346003, -80.617560Roberta Road NC HW Y 49 S Rocky Rive r Roa d HydricChA Chewac la s andy loam , 0 to 2 perc ent slopes , frequently flooded YesEnB Enon s andy loam, 2 to 8 perc ent slopes NoEnD Enon s andy loam, 8 to 15 perc ent slopes NoIdA Iredell loam, 0 to 2 perc ent s lopes YesMeB Mecklenburg loam, 2 to 8 percent s lopes NoMeD Mecklenburg loam, 8 to 15 percent s lopes NoPaF Pacolet s andy loam, 15 to 35 perc ent slopes NoPoD Poindexter loam, 8 to 15 perc ent slopes NoPoF Poindexter loam, 15 to 45 perc ent slopes NoWeA W ehadkee loam , 0 to 2 perc ent slopes , frequently flooded Yes Soil Unit Name and Description