20120377 Ver 1_Application_20120730

AYK� N 9�) TRANSMITTAL
Robert Ridings [phone] DATE July 27 2012
NCDWQ Environmental Specialist
TO
512 N Salisbury St
Raleigh NC 27603 JOB NO 100029289
Elizabeth Schemer Phone [phone] / fax [phone]
From Atkins North America Inc
RE U 4716 A/C Clegg Passing Siding & Hopson
1616 East Millbrook Road Suite 310 Road Grade Separation Nationwide 14
Address /Office Raleigh NC 276094968 Permit SAW 2012 00430
WE ARE SENDING YOU ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via
the following items
❑ Shop Drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans
❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Change Order ❑ Specifications
❑ Samples
COPIES
DATE
NO
DESCRIPTION DnR rA
1
7 27 12
®
Cr
Copy of Section 401 Permit Package j
7
727 12
For review and comment
cd with permit materials JUL 3 U Q�2
❑
For bids due
20
DW WATER QUALITY
I
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED As Checked Below
❑
For approval
❑ Reviewed as submitted
®
For your use
❑ Reviewed as noted
®
As requested
❑ Returned for corrections
❑
For review and comment
❑
❑
For bids due
20
❑ Prints returned after loan to us
REMARKS
Please let me know if any additional information is required
SIGNED Elizabeth Scherrer 6 � D\ �j 4
DISTRIBUTION
❑ Resubmit copies for approval
❑ Submit copies for distribution
❑ Return corrected prints
If enclosures are not as noted kindly notify us at once

FA
kITOKm
July 27, 2012
Rob Ridings
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality - Surface Water Protection Section
512 N Salisbury St
Raleigh, NC 27603
��
RE U 4716 A/C Clegg Passing Siding & Hopson Road Grade Separation Nationwide 14 Permit
SAW- 2012 -00430 v
�2
Dear Mr Ridings
Enclosed please find an amended permit package in support of a Nationwide 14 Permit for the
above mentioned project Since our April 13, 2012 permit application, the project impacts have
been amended to include the extension of a stream (Stream AF) and its buffer zones to allow
for drilling impacts An isolated wetland (Wetland AB) under the Jurisdiction of NCDWQ, will be
protected with fencing and will not be impacted The project is located on the Wake /Durham
County line along NC Highway 54 Included are a PCN form, mapping and supporting materials
We have pursued a Nationwide Permit for this project due to its small scale and minimal
impacts
Impacts for this project total 0 07 acre of permanent wetland impacts from fill, excavation, and
clearing Permanent impacts to open waters total 0 02 acre and 215 linear feet due to culvert
extensions Temporary surface water impacts are 0 01 acre and 45 feet The project occurs
within the Neuse River Basin and buffer impacts total 0 79 acre at three stream crossings We
propose that project impacts are below mitigation thresholds, and therefore do not require
mitigation
Please let me know if you have any comments or need any other documentation from us We
will be happy to furnish any additional information required
Yours truly
Atkins North America Inc
E(I Wst if) 5 ch wavirf,
Elizabeth Scherrer
Senior Scientist
1616 East Mdibrook Road Suite 310 Raleigh NC 27609 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone] www atkinsgiobal com

U 4716 A/C Hopson Road Rail
Table of Contents
Cover Letter
Table of Contents
PCN Form
Figures
Figure 1 Project Location
Figure 2 Topography
Figure 3a 3b Soils
Attachments
Block B 1 b Project Location
Block B 3 Permit Drawings
Block B 4 a Jurisdictional Determination 2006
Block B 4 a Jurisdictional Determination 2012
Block C 2 3 Wetland Impact Summary
Block C 6b Buffer Impact Summary
Block E 1 2 Stormwater
Block F lc FONSI
Block F 7b SHPO memo
Appendix A Wetland and Stream data forms

O�ot W A TF9vG
y r
0 0 >
uo�,o o
Office Use Only
Corps action ID no
DWQ project no
Form Version 13 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 12
PCN`Form —Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A Applicant Information
1
Processing
1 a
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
ib Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 14 or General Permit (GP) number
is
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
id
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non 404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit
❑ Yes ® No
If
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in lieu
fee program
❑ Yes
❑ No
1 g
Is the project located in any of NC s twenty coastal counties If yes answer 1 h
below
❑ Yes
® No
1 h
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2
Project Information
2a
Name of project
Clegg Passing and Hopson Road Grade Seperation
2b
County
Wake and Durham
2c
Nearest municipality / town
Mornswlle /Durham
2d
Subdivision name
NA
2e
NCDOT only T I P or state
project no
U- 4716A/C
3
Owner Information
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed
NA Multiple Properties
3b
Deed Book and Page No
NA
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
NA
3d
Street address
NA
3e
City state zip
NA
3f
Telephone no
NA
3g
Fax no
NA
3h
Email address
NA
Page 1 of 12
PCN`Form —Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

4
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
❑ Agent ❑ Other specify NCDOT Rail Division
4b
Name
Marc Hamel
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
Rail Division NC Department of Transportation
4d
Street address
1553 Mad Service Center
4e
City state zip
Raleigh NC 27699 1553
4f
Telephone no
919 707 4705
4g
Fax no
919 715 6580
4h
Email address
mhamel @ncdot gov
5
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
Elizabeth Scherrer
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
Atkins North America Inc
5c
Street address
1616 East Mdibrook Road Suite 310
5d
City state zip
Raleigh NC 27609 -4968
5e
Telephone no
919 431 5296
5f
Fax no
919 876 6848
5g
Email address
elizabeth scherrer@atkinsgiobal com
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

B Project Information and Prior Project History
1 Property Identification
1 a Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
N/A
Latitude See Attached Table Longitude
lb Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
(DD DDDDDD) ( DD DDDDDD)
1c Property size
project study area is approximately 70 acres
2 Surface Waters
2a Name of nearest body of water (stream river etc ) to
proposed project
Stirrup Iron Creek DWQ Index # 27 33 4 2
2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
C NSW
2c River basin
Neuse 03020201
3 Project Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
The project is split equally between the municipal boundaries of Durham and Morrisville with Durham to the north and
Morrisville to the south Land use in the vicinity consists of Mixed Urban /Developed Land Industrial /Commercial
Complexes and relatively small patches of Forest Land and Grass /Shrublands Many of the ditches and tributary
channels are degraded and filled with silt
3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property
0 062 acres 404 Wetlands 0 063 acres Non 404 State Isolated Wetlands
3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property
458
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project
The purpose of the project is to increase railroad capacity improve passenger and train schedule reliability and improve
railroad and vehicular safety
3e Describe the overall project in detail including the type of equipment to be used
NCDOT Rail Division proposes to construct a grade seperation at the North Carolina Railroad/Norfolk Southern Railroad
(NCRR/NS) crossing at Hopson Road (SR 1978) in Durham County North Carolina The project also includes track
realignment and new siding track for the adjoining 3 4 mile segment of track extending from 140 south to McCrnmmon
Parkway (SR 1635) Fill will be used to construct the realigned track and new siding tracks and several ditches will be
relocated The clearing and grubbing work will require the use of trackhoes tandem dump trucks and bulldozers
Compaction of earth material will require the use of sheep s foot compactors and smooth drum rollers in cooperation with
the bulldozers that spread and place the earth and subballast material Additional activities that would result in impacts
include riparian canopy removal in stream construction use of fertilizers and pesticides for revegetation and
pavement/culvert installation
4 Jurisdictional Determinations
4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments Please see attached approvals
4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination what type
® Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made
4c If yes who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company Atkins North America
Name (if known) Adam Efird David O Loughlin (Current)
Inc (Current)
Names of delineators from other firms are not known
Other S &EC (2004 ?) EcoScience (2006)
4d If yes list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
2006 Action ID 200620636 06/26/2006 2012 SAW 2012 00430
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

5 Project History
5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past
5b If yes explain in detail according to help file instructions
NA
6 Future Project Plans
6a is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑ No
6b If yes explain
NA
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

_ n
N
�
N m
w r
N C)
a D
F N
Z
� O
s v
m
C
0
CL
w
r
w
x
CD
f
w
m
C
CD
a
0
s
CD
n
Pa
a
CD
m
CD
a
IIIII�IIIuN�I�'�
S
SIN
m
W
��
IIRIIIIIIIUTA���
INIIIIIIIIINII
Z
O
o n
U) zG �v
m xO �-i
Z Om
N p G) D
W y >
o m S Z
ON nmN =v
m �v �O
z {
D N�
<
-{go
O O
w
IIIII�IIIuN�I�'�
SIN
��
IIRIIIIIIIUTA���
INIIIIIIIIINII

O
a
y
m
r
z
O
�
O D
rn
3 -1
N
O
OZ
m
w
o
w
N m
W M
w
OD
1
Ln OD
D
Z
m
�U
cn
�_
�o
"m
Z
Z
N
W
O
C
cn
In
m
i
D
4
Cl)
o
Z
0
��
zG)
o0
<�
=
m
�O
��
O
N
p GI D
w
D
0>
Om
N
Z
mG)
L7z
N
O
�_
2
n
v_o
*O
Z
�
m
CD
DO G)
�
-<
<
Q°
O
O
a)
Z
Z

(
)
ı
°
M
_
\
d
\
\
\
\
0/
\ k
\/
°
j
j
j
� \
u
2 m
� I
a I ]
/
�a
?
\/q
E
q
2
°
k \/j
CL
�
$
� 4
k
/ $
o
§
k 5
e
2
m
� k
2 K
/�
» o
�
eƒ
n
�}SS7
�
/k}
/\
z
�A /=
2
2
\�k
V
ƒ
q
2ƒ$\)
@
Q
&
-
■
»
Eq
y222
a
7
§k2
/
2 -om�
q]$ /$�
� q
§
\
E ] 4
»�c2
q #
}
§ (
999\
q_m =wee
)
r f § \
\)�
} k '
°
§ § § `
�29/
>
) ® /
� � k \
$
(� co \
2
}
m
» o
�
�}SS7
�
�A /=
2
2
ƒ
q
2ƒ$\)
@
Q
&
-
■
»
Eq
y222
a
7
§k2
/
2 -om�
q]$ /$�
� q
§
E ] 4
»�c2
}
999\
q_m =wee
\)�
°
�29/
� � k \

C Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
1 a Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
® Wetlands ® Streams tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps 404 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ —non 404 other)
(acres)
Tem ora T
W1 ®P ❑ T
Fill Excavation
Wetland AO
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
0 05
Clearing
AQ/AR
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ® P ❑ T
Excavation Fill
Wetland AD /AE
❑ Yes
❑ No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
002
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWO
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g Total wetland unpacts
007
2h Comments Wetland impact numbers correspond to site numbers on drawings
3 Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number
(PER) or
(Corps 404 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non 404
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ® P ❑ T
Culvert
AN UT to Stirrup
❑ PER
® Corps
5
47
Iron Cr
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ®P ®T
Culvert Riprap
AF UT to Kit Cr
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
4
118
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ®P ❑ T
Culvert Riprap
AA UT to Stirrup
❑ PER
❑ Corps
6
95
Iron Cr
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
260
31 Comments Stream impact numbers correspond to site numbers on drawings
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

4 Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes ponds estuaries tributaries sounds the Atlantic Ocean or any other open water of
the U S then individually list all open water impacts below
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑ PEI T
NA
02 ❑P ❑T
NA
03 ❑P ❑T
NA
04 ❑P ❑T
NA
4f Total open water impacts
NA
4g Comments NA
5 Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed the complete the chart below
5a
5b
5c
5d
5e
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
NA
P2
NA
5f Total
5g Comments NA
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required
❑ Yes 0 N If yes permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
NA
5j Size of pond watershed (acres)
NA
5k Method of construction
NA
6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer then complete the chart below If yes then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a
® Neuse ❑ Tar Pamlico ❑ Other
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b
6c
6d
6e
6f
6g
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
re uired7
B1 ❑ P ❑ T
RR
AN UT to Stirrup Iron Cr
El Yes
4377
2933
crossing
® No
B2 ® P ❑ T
RRng
AF UT to Kit Cr
® Nos
9228
6291
cr
B3 ❑ P ❑ T
RR
crossing
AA UT to Stirrup Iron Cr
El Yes
❑ No
7240
4500
6h Total buffer impacts
20845
13724
61 Comments B1 is at Site 1 on drawigs 82 is at Site 2 B3 is at Site 4
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

D Impact Justification and Mitigation
1 Avoidance and Minimization
1 a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
The NCDOT Rail Division has been at all times committed to incorporating all reasonable and practical design features to
avoid and minimize jurisdictional area impacts Fill slopes have been minimized to the extent practicable Impacts at Site 2
(Station 3391) have been restricted to the west side of the existing railroad bed Impacts at Site 3 (Station 3410) occur in a
narrow fragmented wooded area between the rail bed and Chapel Hill Road The proposed access road turnaround near Site
4 (Station 3435) is placed to avoid impacts to Stream AA Fill slopes were adjusted to minimize impacts to this stream
1 b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
Construction will be limited to an area between the existing railroad and the extents of the realigned track and the new siding
track This minimization will be reinforced by the installation of silt fence along both eastern and western margins of the track
bed Rip rap will not be placed in stream beds
2 Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑ No
2b If yes mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c If yes which mitigation option will be used for this
project
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3 Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank N/A
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c Comments
4 Complete if Making a Payment to In lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
N/A linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation stream temperature
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4f Non riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments
5 Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
N/A
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

6 Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation
[S] Yes ❑ No
6b If yes then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
N/A
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1 5
6f Total buffer mitigation required
6g If buffer mitigation is required discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g payment to private mitigation bank
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration payment into an approved in lieu fee fund)
6h Comments Impacts for each of 3 crossings do not exceed the mitigation threshold
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

E
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1
Diffuse Flow Plan
la
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
lb
If yes then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no explain why
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments Please see attached Plan and permit drawings
2
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
21 %
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ❑ No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan explain why
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan then provide a brief narrative description of the plan
Please see attached Plan and permit drawings
❑ Certified Local Government
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local governments jurisdiction is this project?
City and County of Durham City of
Morrisville Wake County
❑ Phase II
3b
Which of the following locally implemented stormwater management programs
® NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes El No
attached?
4
DWO Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a
Which of the following state implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply)
❑ Session Law 2006 246
❑ Other
4b
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5 DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

F
Supplementary Information
1
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes
❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
lb
If you answered yes to the above does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c
If you answered yes to the above has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter )
® Yes
❑ No
Comments FONSI signed February 2 2012
2
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500) Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300) DWO Surface Water or Wetland Standards
❑ Yes
❑ No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b
Is this an after the fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c
If you answered `yes to one or both of the above questions provide an explanation of the violation(s)
NA
3
Cumulative Impacts (DWO Requirement)
3a
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
❑ No
additional development which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b
If you answered yes to the above submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered no provide a short narrative description
NA
4
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project or available capacity of the subject facility
N/A
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

5 Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
®Yes ❑ No
habitat
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
®Yes ❑ No
impacts
5c If yes indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
Raleigh
®
❑ Asheville
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Protected species listed for Wake and Durham County are the endangered Michaux s sumac (Rhus Michauxii) smooth
coneflower (Echinacea laevigata) red cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) and dwarf wedgemussel (Alasmidonta
heterodon) Directed surveys were conducted on May 22 2006 and again in May 2011 for these species There was no
suitable habitat identified for smooth coneflower due to soil type Suitable habitat was identified for Michaux s sumac but
no plants were found There was no suitable habitat identified for red cockaded woodpecker or dwarf wedgemussel
6 Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑Yes ® No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
N/A
7 Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
El Yes No
status (e g National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The N C State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) was contacted regarding the proposed project and a subsequent
investigation of historical resources was initiated by SHPO The results of that investigation indicated that there are no
historic resources that would be affected by this project Written verification was received from the SHPO by letter dated
March 9 2006 A copy of the letter is attached to this application
8 Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA designated 100 year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b If yes explain how project meets FEMA requirements N/A
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Data pulled from the NC Floodplain Mapping Program
Applicant/Agent s Printed Name
Date
Applicagh/A�ent s Signature
(Agent s signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

U 4716 A/C Hopson Road Rail
Block B 1 b — Project Location
Site 1 Latitude 35 871444 Longitude 78 853057
Site 2 Latitude 35 858514 Longitude 78 844168
Site 3 Latitude 35 853619 Longitude 78 842342
Site 4 Latitude 35 847698 Longitude 78 838234

North Carolina Department of Transportation
Rail Division
OE itORTO �4
yr� Ao`7
F/
OFTRI�i �
Hopson Road/Church Street
Rail and Roadway Improvements
Durham County, NC
STIP Project U -4716
State WBS Project No 39080 1 STROM
Administrative Action
Finding of No Significant Impact
Submitted Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act
42 USC 4332(2)(c)
US Department of Transportation
Federal Railroad Administration
Federal Highway Administration
and
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Prepared in accordance with FRA's Environmental Procedures
(64 Fed Reg 28545 (May 26, 1999))
January 2012

Finding of No Significant Impact
Background Information
The Piedmont Improvement Program is an initiative by the North Carolina Department of
Transportation ( NCDOT) the Norfolk Southern Railway (NS) and the North Carolina
Railroad (NCRR) to improve passenger and freight railroad operations along the NCRR
Piedmont Corridor from Raleigh to Charlotte The NCRR Piedmont Corridor consists of the
Greensboro to Charlotte portion of the NS Mainline from Washington DC and Atlanta and
the Greensboro to Raleigh portion of the NCRR H line
The proposed project NCDOT Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Project No
U 4716 is located in southeastern Durham County with portions of the project located
within Durham city limits The project study area is about 12 miles long and encompasses
approximately 165 acres Portions of the project study area are located within Durham city
limits with the remainder located in the unincorporated area of Durham County Other
incorporated towns near the project study area include Morrisville and Cary to the south
and Raleigh to the southeast all of which are located In Wake County
Land uses within and adjacent to the project study area consist of rapidly developing
residential commercial and industrial uses as well as pine dominated woodlots
pastureland and existing residential lots
Procedural History
The project is included in the NCDOT 2009 2015 State Transportation Improvement
Program (STIP) as project U 4716 Funding for the protect is anticipated to come from a
variety of sources including FRA and FWHA grants
The project began at the NCDOT Rail Division with the Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) as the lead agency The Hopson Road Grade Separation and NC Railroad /North
South Track Realignment and Church Street Grade Separation and Street Realignment
Durham County NC Environmental Assessment (EA) was approved and signed by FHWA
on September 2 2009 There was a public comment period and a public hearing was held
on January 14, 2010 Agencies and members of the public provided comments
Subsequently, the project became eligible for American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
(ARRA) funding requiring a change in the lead agency The FRA became the lead agency
and a revised and updated Hopson Road /Church Street Rail and Roadway Improvements
Durham County NC Environmental Assessment was completed on December 1 2011
Updates to existing conditions were included in the updated EA, as well as some minor
corrections There were no changes to the project the Preferred Alternative or project
impacts
Because there were no changes to the protect or to the Preferred Alternative, nor were there
notable changes in project impacts NCDOT determined that another public hearing and
public comment period were not required Comments received on the previous version of
the EA are still valid Responses to all comments received are included In a later section of
this FONSI
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements 1
STIP U 4716

Findino of No SioniFcant Impact
Statement of Purpose and Need
The purpose of the project is to improve the safety efficiency and mobility of train and
vehicular traffic in the area around Hopson Road and Church Street in Durham County
North Carolina
This project will facilitate and support future increased passenger rail service for the NCRR
Piedmont Corridor NCDOT proposes to add six daily (three round trip) NCDOT Piedmont
Service trains to the NCRR Piedmont Corridor between Raleigh and Charlotte The
additional Piedmont Service trains will serve the following nine stations Raleigh Cary
Durham Burlington Greensboro, High Point Salisbury Kannapolis and Charlotte
Because this corridor development plan consists of the expansion of an existing service
there are no changes planned in the classes of service fare policies or service quality
standards
The proposed project is located along the Preferred Alternative for the Southeast High
Speed Rail Corridor (SEHSR) determined by the FRA and FHWA in the Record of Decision
(ROD) for the Tier I SEHSR Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) For the southern
portion of the SEHSR NCDOT is preparing individual project level NEPA documents
including this EA FRA and NCDOT have determined that the individual projects each
have independent utility that is each project will provide tangible benefits to existing
freight and passenger rail service even if no additional investments are made for high
speed service Regardless of future high speed rail development the proposed projects
would provide benefits to schedule reliability train speeds and overall rail capacity and
safety The respective NEPA documents provide more details on the independent utility of
each project
The SEHSR corridor is planned to include eight daily (four round trip) high speed trains to
the route between Charlotte and Raleigh with service extending beyond the NCRR
Piedmont Corridor northward to Richmond VA and Washington DC and southd to
Atlanta GA and points further south This includes a Piedmont service train that will be
extended north beyond Raleigh upon completion of the proposed Raleigh to Richmond
segment of the SEHSR Ultimately the NCRR Piedmont Corridor is expected to host up to
20 daily (10 round trip) passenger trains between Charlotte and Raleigh by 2030 including
the current and proposed frequencies
The need for the project is summarized below
Improve Mobility and Efficiency for Train Traffic The existing curve of the railroad
tracks at the Hopson Road railroad crossing has a radius that requires passenger trains to
slow down to maneuver through the curve safely Realigning the track and straightening
the curve to maintain a 79 mph speed limit through the study area would improve mobility
and reduce travel time for passenger train traffic
Straightening the curve also would allow trains to maintain momentum When trains slow
down they lose momentum and must accelerate to get back to the speed limit which takes
a considerable amount of time due to the size and weight of the trains Accelerating less
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements Z
STIP U-4716

Finding of No Significant Impact
would reduce emissions and fuel consumption allowing the trains to operate more
efficiently
The freight train speed limit is separate from the passenger train speed limit and is
restricted by NS the freight operator of the railroad in this area to 50 mph throughout the
area for safety reasons This restriction is part of NS standard practice for the types of
freight trains that pass through this area (freight trains that are long and carry a mix of
materials) Therefore the freight train speed limit would not change as a result of this
project However the reduced degree of curve would result in less wear and lower
maintenance costs and fuel costs for the NS Railroad
Improve Rail and Road Safety Currently the intersection of Hopson Road and the
NCRR/NS tracks is an at grade intersection with the potential for collisions between
vehicular traffic and freight and passenger trains Providing a grade separation for this
intersection would eliminate the potential for vehicle /train collisions which would improve
safety for both road and rail traffic
The current vertical alignment for Hopson Road at the railroad crossing makes it difficult
for drivers to see past the railroad tracks This poor sight distance for vehicular traffic has
the potential to contribute to collisions During construction of the grade separation the
vertical alignment of Hopson Road would be improved which would improve safety for road
traffic
The Church Street at grade crossing also has a very high potential for collisions Church
Street (SR 1980) has poor geometrics at the crossing for both roadway and railroad traffic
There are inadequate stacking distances between the railroad and the adjacent intersection
with NC 54 (Miami Boulevard) unsafe movements short queuing distances and poor sight
lines
Improve Traffic Flow for Roadway Traffic At present traffic along Hopson Road and
Church Street passing through the at grade intersections with the railroad tracks must
stop for passing trains Typically ten to twelve trains per day cross both Hopson Road and
Church Street This contributes to delay and has a negative effect on traffic flow for cars
and trucks Grade separating Hopson Road and closing the Church Street railroad crossing
would eliminate the need for vehicular traffic to stop for passing trains which would reduce
delays for vehicular traffic
Alternatives Considered
A reasonable range of alternatives was considered for the proposed action These included
the No Build Alternative Transportation System Management (TSM) Alternatives Travel
Demand Management (TDM) Alternatives Mass Transit Alternatives and two Build
Alternatives (Hopson Road Under Railroad Alternative and Hopson Road Over Railroad
Alternative)
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements 3
STIP U 4716

Finding of No Significant Impact
Preferred Alternative The Preferred Alternative is the Hopson Road Under Railroad
Alternative Figure 1 shows the Preferred Alternative This was the Recommended
Alternative in the EA The NCDOT Rail Division proposes to improve rail and vehicular
safety efficiency and mobility within the project study area through the following actions
• Realignment of the NCRR/NS rail line within the project limits to straighten the
curve allowing trains to operate at higher speeds and thereby improve efficiency of
rail operations The new railroad track alignment would be constructed to
accommodate a future parallel passing siding track (Clegg to Nelson passing siding)
• Replacement of the at grade rail crossing at Hopson Road (SR 1978) with a grade
separated crossing increasing safety by eliminating train vehicle conflicts and
improving mobility for vehicles by removing the need to stop for passing trains
Hopson Road would be expanded to a curb and gutter section with one 12 foot and
one 16 foot travel lane in each direction and 5 foot sidewalks on both sides Phe
outside 16 foot travel lanes would be striped to accommodate bicyclists 1 he
centerline of Hopson Road would shift approximately 30 feet to the south and will
include a minimum 17 foot vertical clearance under the rail line
• Closure of the at grade rail crossing of the NCRR/NS at Church Street (SR 1980)
and closure of the adjacent Church Street/NC 54 (Miami Boulevard) intersection for
safety reasons
• Extension of Church Street northward to intersect with Hopson Road to maintain
mobility as a result of closing the Church Street /NC 54 (Miami Boulevard)
intersection and at grade railroad crossing Church Street would be constructed to
include 36 feet of pavement with curbs and sidewalks on both sides which would
match the cross section constructed by the private developer of Keystone Crossing
Through the Keystone Crossing residential subdivision the proposed pavement
striping would have two lanes of travel and on street parking on both sides of the
street and the speed limit would be 30 mph The Church Street extension to the
north is proposed to be striped to provide two lanes of travel with a center turn lane
and no on street parking However the final lane striping plan for Church Street
through the project study area will be determined during final design
Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Further Stud v Other alternatives
considered but eliminated from further study included the Hopson Road Over Railroad
Alternative the No Build Alternative TSM Alternatives TDM Alternatives and Mass
Transit Alternatives
The Hopson Road Over Railroad Alternative would carry Hopson Road over the NCRR/NS
rail line Hopson Road would be shifted approximately 150 feet south Other features of
this alternative would be similar to the Preferred Alternative (Hopson Road Under Railroad
Alternative)
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements 4
STIP U 4716

Finding of No Significant Impact
The Hopson Road Over Railroad Alternative was eliminated from consideration during the
project development process This alternative was eliminated due to the additional area
required from surrounding properties for right of way and the greater expense involved
with construction of a roadway bridge over the rail alignment The inconvenience of a
detour during construction and the larger impact footprint were other contributing factors
The Hopson Road Over Railroad Alternative received additional concerns from Hopson
Road residents due to its proximity to their properties
The No Build Alternative TSM Alternatives TDM Alternatives and Mass Transit
Alternatives were eliminated from consideration because these measures would not meet
the projects purpose and need They would not address the safety concerns at the two at
grade iail crossings nor would they improve efficiency of rail operations
1J. i • A- • _ i • l 1
Discussions of the environmental impacts associated with the Hopson Road/Church Street
Rail and Roadway Improvements are located in Chapter 4 of the EA The potential for
environmental effects is summarized for each resource category in Table 1 below
Table 1 Summary of Impacts Preferred Alternative
Impact Area
EA Sections
Containing
More Detail
Summary of Impact
Proposed Mitigation
Air Quality
3 3 2 4 3 2
No long term Impact The project area is a
In accordance with NCDOT
maintenance area for carbon monoxide (CO) and
standard practice during
ozone and in attainment for all other criteria air
construction measures will be
pollutants The Preferred Alternative meets general
taken to reduce dust generated
conformity and transportation conformity
by construction when the
requirements The Preferred Alternative would not
control of dust is necessary for
cause or contribute to any new localized CO violations
the protection and comfort of
or increase the frequency or severity of any existing
motorists and area residents
CO violations The Preferred Alternative does not
These dust suppression
include a significant air pollutant emissions source
measures may include watering
New USEPA rules (March 2008) will dramatically
unpaved work areas and
reduce emissions from diesel locomotives of all types
covering stockpiled materials
Construction Activities Air quality impacts from
For construction activities in
construction of the Preferred Alternative are expected
Durham County open burning if
to be minor and short term
allowed will require a permit in
accordance with the Durham
County Code of Ordinances
Section 16-13
Water Quality
343 4 5 2
Project activities such as clearing and grubbing
Utilize NCDOT s Best
riparian canopy removal in water construction
Management Practices for the
fertilizer and pesticide use for revegetation
Protection of Surface Waters
redirection of surficial groundwater flows could
and Design Standards for
impact surface water resources in the absence of
Sensitive Watersheds
appropriate Best Managements Practices (BMPs)
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements
STIP U 4716

Finding of No Significant Impact
Table 1 Summary of lmDaCtS Preferred Alternative
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements
STIP U-4716
EA Sections
Impact Area
Containing
Summary of Impact
Proposed Mitigation
More Detail
Noise and
3 3 1 4 3 1
No impact from Train Noise The FTA Noise Impact
The construction of roadway
Vibration
Criteria were used to determine whether the
noise barriers would not be
Preferred Alternative would result in noise impacts to
feasible for the Preferred
nearby noise sensitive receivers from trains All
Alternative because roadway
receivers fall into the No Impact' range from trains
noise impacts in the project area
The railroad tracks would be realigned farther from
would occur in residential areas
existing neighborhoods Also because the at grade
where roadway access is
crossings in the project study area would be removed
required for each individual
trains will not need to use horns and existing horn
home and the construction of
noise would not occur in the future a noise benefit to
long uninterrupted sound walls
the environment Vibration impacts were determined
would not be possible
to not be of concern for this project due to low speeds
and infrequent operations
The predicted unmitigated
Impacts from Vehicular Traffic Noise Vehicular
traffic noise impacts do not rise
traffic noise levels are predicted to be between 56 and
to the level of significance
72 dBA Leq Predicted traffic noise would result in
projected exceedances of FHWA Noise Abatement
Criteria at approximately 75 residences and a daycare
in the project study area The impacted receptors are
along Hopson Road and along Church Street in the
Keystone Crossing neighborhood
Solid Waste
4 1 3
No impact The Preferred Alternative would not
Not applicable
Disposal
46
generate substantial solid waste or hazardous waste
Waste generated during construction would be
properly disposed of in accordance with State and
local regulations
Ecological
3 5 2
Permanent impacts would occur to 3 5 acres of Pine
None needed
Systems (Biotic
4 5 1
Forest and 16 1 acres of maintained /disturbed areas
Communities
Short term displacement of wildlife would occur
and Wildlife)
during construction
Wetlands and
3 S 4 1
The Recommended Alternative (with a 40 ft buffer
A permit under Section 404 of
Neuse River
3 5 4 2
around construction limits) would impact
the Clean Water Act will be
Buffer Rules
4 5 3
approximately 760 linear feet (If) of stream at four
required from the US Army
crossings Of these impacts 245 If are along a
Corps of Engineers (USACE) and
perennial stream and 515 If are along three
a Section 401 Water Quality
intermittent streams There are no wetland or pond
Certification will be required
impacts
from the NC Division of Water
The Recommended Alternative would impact up to
Quality ( NCDWQ)
approximately 123 acres of Neuse River buffer
Depending on the impacts
The Recommended Alternative avoids and minimizes
calculated during final design
impacts to streams and buffers to the extent
the project may require
practicable It is expected that actual impacts to
mitigation for buffer impacts in
streams and Neuse River Buffers will be less when
accordance with the Neuse River
calculated using final design information because the
Buffer Rules
buffer used around the construction limits will be less
Final determinations on
compensatory mitigation are
made by the USACE and NCDWQ
as part of the permitting
processes
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements
STIP U-4716

Finding of No Significant Impact
Table 1 Summary of Impacts Preferred Alternative
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements
STIP U 4716
EA Sections
Impact Area
Containing
Summary of Impact
Proposed Mitigation
More Detail
Endangered
3543
No impact No suitable habitat exists in the Preferred
Not applicable
Species
4 5 4
Alternative study area for smooth coneflower
Directed surveys for Michaux's sumac in suitable
habitat conducted on May 22 2006 and July 21 2010
within the project study area found no plants The
Biological Conclusion for smooth coneflower and
Michaux s sumac is no effect
Flood Hazards
3 3 8 4 3 7
No impact There are no floodplams in the Preferred
Not applicable
and Floodplain
Alternative study area
Management
Coastal Zone
14
No impact Durham County is not in a coastal zone
Not applicable
Management
Energy
15 1
Positive Effect By straightening the curve of the
None needed
Resources
4 1 5
railroad track the Preferred Alternative would allow
more consistent speeds through the project study
area for passenger trains Accelerating less would
reduce emission and fuel consumption allowing the
trains to operate more efficiently
Implementation of the Preferred Alternative would
decrease the average delay time per vehicle at the
intersections within the project study area compared
to the No Budd Alternative However the closure of
the Church Street intersection with NC 54 (Miami
Boulevard) would lengthen travel distances between
the subdivisions along Church Street and destinations
on or requiring access to NC 54 (Miami Boulevard)
thus offsetting travel time and energy savings for
these vehicular trips
Other Natural
3 3 3
No Impact There are no active farmlands or mines in
Not applicable
Resources
3 3 7 4 3 3
the project study area
(water
minerals
timber
farmland etc)
Aesthetics and
3 3 5
No impact Minor changes in the visual landscape
None needed
Design Quality
4 3 5
would occur as a result of the project These changes
are consistent with the adopted land use plans for the
area The proposed railroad badge over Hopson Road
would include aesthetic design features
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements
STIP U 4716

Finding of No Significant Impact
Table 1 Summary of Impacts Preferred Alternative
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements 9
STIP U 4716
EA Sections
Impact Area
Containing
Summary of impact
Proposed Mitigation
More Detail
Impacts on
22
Positive Effect Overall the project would have a
Not applicable
Transportation)
2 4 2
positive effect on passenger train and freight train
4 1 1
traffic and vehicular traffic flattening the railroad
track curve through the area would provide more
efficient train operations Closing the at grade
crossings at Hopson Road and Church Street and
grade separating Hopson Road would improve safety
for vehicles and trains and improve vehicular traffic
flow Extending Church Street to Hopson Road would
provide connectivity
Positive Effect Bicycles and pedestrians would be
provided facilities on Hopson Road Sidewalks would
be provided on Church Street in the project area
Currently Hopson Road in the project area does not
have sidewalks or a wide outside lane to
accommodate bicyclists as would be provided under
the Preferred Alternative
Minor Impact As a result of closing the Church Street
at grade railroad crossing and extending Church Street
to Hopson Road traffic patterns would change as
increased traffic is routed through the Keystone
Crossing neighborhood Measures to minimize
impacts coordinated with the neighborhood residents
and incorporated into the preliminary design included
reducing the speed limit on Church Street to 30 mph
through Keystone Crossing and allowing on street
parking
Possible Barriers
4 1 1
No impact The Preferred Alternative would not
Not applicable
to Elderly and
divide or isolate the Keystone Crossing or Hopson
Handicapped
Road neighborhoods nor create barriers to the
mobility of the elderly or handicapped Sidewalks
would be provided along Church Street and Hopson
Road and provisions for bicyclists would be provided
on Hopson Road
Land Use
32 1
No impact The Preferred Alternative is consistent
Not applicable
4 2 1
with existing land use and local land use plans and
zoning
SoaoeconomIcsz
3 1
Minor positive impact The Preferred Alternative
Not applicable
41
would not create or eliminate permanent jobs but
construction of the project would generate temporary
construction jobs No relocations of businesses or
residences are required Neighborhoods and
communities would not be disrupted and business
districts would not be negatively impacted
Environmental
4 1 4
No impact No direct or indirect impacts to any
Not applicable
Justice
neighborhoods residences or churches including
potential minority communities would occur
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements 9
STIP U 4716

Finding of No Significant Impact
Table 1 Summary of Impacts Preferred Alternative
1 Impacts on transportation include impacts to passengers and freight by all modes Including bicycles and pedestrians in local regional
national and international perspectives and impacts on traffic congestion
2 Socioeconomic impacts includes effects on number and kinds of available lobs potential for community disruption and demographic shifts
the need for and availability of relocation housing, impacts on commerce including existing business districts metropolitan areas and the
immediate area of the alternative and impacts on local government services and revenues
Potential indirect and cumulative effects in the project specific Indirect and Cumulative
Effects (ICE) Study Area also were investigated for this study Indirect and cumulative
effects of the overall program of corridor improvements were addressed in the Tier I EIS for
the SEHSR corridor
Adverse indirect water quality impacts may occur under the Recommended Alternative due
to stormwater runoff However these impacts would be minimized through
implementation of NCDors Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface
Waters
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements 10
STIP U 4716
EA Sections
Impact Area
Containing
Summary of Impact
Proposed Mitigation
More Detail
Public Health
4 1 3
No Impact The Preferred Alternative would not
Not applicable
generate substantial hazardous waste nor would
operations pose a public health concern
Public Safety
1 6 2 4 1 3
Positive Effect The Preferred Alternative would
Not applicable
(including
provide improved access for emergency vehicles by
Hazardous
eliminating delays occurring at the Hopson Road and
Materials)
Church Street at grade crossings Elimination of the
at grade crossings would also improve safety for local
motorists and train crews The construction of
sidewalks along Hopson Road would provide safe
pedestrian walkways The Preferred Alternative
would not generate hazardous waste nor would
operations pose a public health concern
Recreational
3 1 5 4 1 3
No Impact There are no public parks or other
Not applicable
Opportunities
recreational facilities within the Preferred Alternative
Historic
34 44
No impact There are no significant historic
Not applicable
Architectural
architectural or archaeological resources within the
and
Preferred Alternative study area as confirmed by the
Archaeological
State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) The letter
Resources
from the SHPO(dated November 2 2009) is included
in Appendix D
Section 4(f) and
3 15
No impact There are no Section 4(f) or Section 6(f)
Not applicable
Section 6(f)
resources in the Preferred Alternative study area
Resources
Construction
4 7
Temporary impacts associated with construction of
Utilize Best Management
Impacts
the Preferred Alternative could occur to air quality
Practices and standard NCDOT
water quality and wildlife
procedures during construction
1 Impacts on transportation include impacts to passengers and freight by all modes Including bicycles and pedestrians in local regional
national and international perspectives and impacts on traffic congestion
2 Socioeconomic impacts includes effects on number and kinds of available lobs potential for community disruption and demographic shifts
the need for and availability of relocation housing, impacts on commerce including existing business districts metropolitan areas and the
immediate area of the alternative and impacts on local government services and revenues
Potential indirect and cumulative effects in the project specific Indirect and Cumulative
Effects (ICE) Study Area also were investigated for this study Indirect and cumulative
effects of the overall program of corridor improvements were addressed in the Tier I EIS for
the SEHSR corridor
Adverse indirect water quality impacts may occur under the Recommended Alternative due
to stormwater runoff However these impacts would be minimized through
implementation of NCDors Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface
Waters
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements 10
STIP U 4716

r
Finding of No Significant Impact
There is also the potential for cumulative visual and aesthetic effects and effects to
unnamed streams in the vicinity of the study area Minor changes to the visual landscape
would occur under the Preferred Alternative Although there are no prominent scenic
vistas or visual resources in the project area the widening of Hopson Road and Church
Street as well as the extension of Church Street to connect with Hopson Road would
introduce new elements into the built environment These new elements combined with
those of projects on Davis Drive NC 54 and the Triangle Parkway would introduce new
man made elements to the visual environment and continue changing the visual character
of the area from rural to suburban However this is consistent with the land use plans for
the area and recent developments such as Keystone Crossing
The Preferred Alternative together with other growth and development in the ICE Study
Area would increase the amount of soil disturbing activities thus increasing the risk of
stieam sedimentation and turbidity from construction related erosion However local
sediment and erosion control regulations Neuse River buffer rules post construction and
stormwater ordinances and other water quality protection measures would minimize these
effects
Construction of the Preferred Alternative would contribute to continued forest
fragmentation and wildlife habitat disturbance that has occurred throughout the ICE Study
Area Cumulatively there are several projects planned in the ICE Study Area that could
add to this effect However the area is developing consistent with the land use plans of
Durham County which call for a mix of commercial industrial and medium density
residential development in the project area
Public and Agency Coordination
Circulation of the Environmental Assessment As previously noted the original EA
for the project was approved and signed by FHWA on September 2 2009 when FHWA was
the lead agency The EA was made available for public review at various government
offices Copies were distributed to state and federal environmental resource and regulatory
agencies and local governments A map displaying the location and design of the project
and a copy of the environmental document were available for public review at the NCDOT
Highway Division 5 Office located at 2612 N Duke Street in Durham the Town of
Morrisville Town Hall located at 100 Town Hall Drive in Morrisville and at the City of
Durham — Transportation Division located at 101 City Hall Plaza (41h floor) in Durham
Copies of the Public Hearing Map also were available upon request at
www nedot ore / doh /nreconstruct /highway /roadway/heanngmaps by county/ Comments on
the EA were accepted by NCDOT through February 19 2010
Subsequently the project was selected for ARRA funding through the FRA requiring a
change in the lead agency The FRA became the lead agency and a revised and updated
EA was completed on December 1 2011 Because there were no changes to the project or to
the Preferred Alternative nor were there notable changes in project impacts NCDOT
determined with FRA s concurrence that another Public Hearing and public comment
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements 11
STIP U-4716

Finding of No Significant Impact
period were not required Comments received on the FHWA version of the EA are still
valid and are addressed below and in Appendices B and C
Public Hearing Following circulation of the FHWA version of the EA for comments a
Public Hearing was held for the protect The public hearing was held on January 14 2010
from 4 30 pm to 7 30 pm at the Archie K Davis Conference Center at the Research Triangle
Park Headquarters The public notice and handout for the hearing are included in
Appendix A The Public Hearing was held in an informal setting to answer questions and
receive comments regarding the proposed project Public Hearing Maps presenting the
protect design as well as environmental constraints were available for viewing Copies of
the EA also were available
Approximately 39 people attended the Public Hearing A total of 29 public comments were
submitted at the Public Hearing and an additional ten comments were Submitted
afterwards All public comments received are included in Appendix C with responses for
each comment Common concerns also are addressed below under Public Comments
Received on the Environmental Assessment
Neighborhood Meeting with Keystone Crossing A neighborhood meeting with
residents and property owners of the Keystone Crossing subdivision was held at the
Research Triangle Park Headquarters at 12 Davis Drive Research Triangle Park NC on
August 26, 2010 from 5 00 pm to 7 00 pm Residents and property owners in Keystone
Crossing were informed of the meeting through a direct mailing
The purpose of this neighborhood meeting was to provide information to the residents and
property owners in Keystone Crossing regarding traffic calming measures proposed along
Church Street (Keystone Park Drive) through their neighborhood These measures
included striping Keystone Park Drive (future Church Street) for two travel lanes and on
street parking through the subdivision and a proposed speed limit of 35 mph
Approximately 32 residents and/or owners from the Keystone Crossing subdivision
attended the meeting Most attendees appeared satisfied with the proposed measures
although some expressed a desire for a 25 mph speed limit through the neighborhood
Upon consideration of public comments the NCDOT changed the proposed speed limit to
30 mph on Church Street through Keystone Crossing A newsletter was mailed to meeting
attendees and the neighborhood residents in February 2011 to announce the decision
Agency Comments Received on the Environmental Assessment Several local and
state agencies provided comments on the FHWA version of the EA during the public
comment period In addition two agency letters were received after the project scoping
process but before the comment period for the FHWA version of the EA These letters are
from the City of Durham Transportation Manager (January 8 2009) and the Durham
Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee (March 31 2008)
All comment letters from state and local agencies and the responses to these comments
are included in Appendix B It should be noted that the comments received were based on
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements 12
STIP U-4716

Finding of No Significant Impact
the agencies review of the FHWA version of the EA The FRA version of the EA
incorporated many of these comments
Public Comments Received on the Environmental Assessment Thirty nine
comment forms /emails/letters were received from the public during the comment period
Many of the public comments were similar and involved concerns with common issues
Responses to each of these frequently cited concerns are provided below Appendix C
includes all the comments received from the public and individual responses
Issue 1 The extension of Church Street through the Keystone Crossing subdivision will
cause unsafe conditions for pedestrians particularly children within the community due to
elevated traffic levels and travel speeds
Response Sufficient pedestrian crossings are available to minimize potential
safety issues 1 he existing section of roadway through Keystone Crossing includes
sidewalks The proposed extension also would include sidewalks and there are
striped pedestrian crossing locations in the neighborhood Also the extension and
connection of Church Street would maintain the existing lower speed limit (30 miles
per hour) through the neighborhood and would be consistent with area
transportation and land use plans Traffic calming measures through the
neighborhood being proposed by NCDOT include striping the section of Church
Street through the neighborhood for two travel lanes with parking on both sides
The roadway striping will be finalized during final design
Issue 2 The extension of Church Street through the Keystone Crossing subdivision will
reduce home values by negatively affecting the quality of life within the neighborhood
Response The extension of Church Street is consistent with land use and
transportation plans for the area and was part of the approved site plan for the
Keystone development Traffic calming measures through the Keystone Crossing
subdivision have been included in the preliminary designs As discussed in the
previous response sidewalks and pedestrian crossings will be included in the
project The speed limit on Church Street is proposed to be 30 mph through
Keystone Crossing The proposed pavement striping on Church Street includes two
lanes of travel with on street parking on both sides of the street and crosswalks
Issue 3 Residents of the Keystone Crossing subdivision were not provided advanced
knowledge of the planned extension of Church Street and therefore were not able to make
an informed decision regarding the purchase of their homes
Response The developers of Keystone Crossing Keystone Corporation have been
consulted on the planning process for the Church Street extension project since
2003 approximately four years prior the first home sales within the subdivision
Keystone Corporation was responsible for providing homebuyers with information
on the planned Church Street extension project The extension was included on the
plans for the Keystone development
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements 13
STIP U 4716

Finding of No Significant Impact
NCDOT held two Citizen Information Workshops on January 29 2008 and
October 30 2008 and a Public Hearing on January 14 2010 These meetings were
advertised through direct mailings and public notices in local newspapers In
addition for the Citizen Informational Workshops approximately 75 notices were
hand delivered to local businesses within and adjacent to the project study area
Issue 4 The elimination of the Church Street/NC54 intersection will result in severe
traffic delays for drivers that are attempting to access NC 54
Response The rail bridge over Hopson Road should improve traffic flow because
train crossings will no longer cause delays on Hopson Road and NC 54 While
construction activities may impact travel in the short term the project will provide a
wafer trip overall
Also the Church Street at grade crossing has a very high potential for crashes with
poor geometrics at the crossing for both roadway and railroad traffic including
inadequate stacking distances between the railroad and the adjacent intersection
with NC 54 unsafe movements short queuing distances and poor sight lines The
grade separation at Hopson Road will eliminate the potential for vehicle /train
collisions which would improve safety for both road and rail traffic
Environmental Commitments
During the NEPA process, commitments are made to avoid minimize or mitigate project
impacts Commitments result from public comment or through the requirements of or
agreements with, environmental resource and regulatory agencies The determination that
project implementation will not have a significant impact on the environment is predicated
on these commitments made to protect the environment
In addition to compliance with applicable federal and state requirements and regulations
such as Section 404 Individual Permit Conditions Nationwide Permit Conditions Regional
Conditions and State Consistency Conditions NCDOT Guidelines for Best Management
Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters General Certification Conditions and Section
401 Conditions of Certification, and the Endangered Species Act, the following special
project commitment has been agreed to by the North Carolina Department of
Transportation
• The privately owned Creekstone Creative School daycare located at 4823 Hopson
Road has an outdoor play space in front of the building facing Hopson Road
Current plans show land from this parcel is required for right of way but that there
would be no encroachment on the outdoor play space If this facility is still a
daycare at the time Hopson Road is widened adjacent to the building and the
outdoor play area is still in use, the final design for the project will avoid
encroaching on the play area (based on current boundaries)
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements 14
STIP U 4716

Finding of No SigniFcant Impact
Conclusion
FRA and FHWA find that the impacts of the Preferred Alternative as assessed in the
Hopson Road /Church Street Rail and Roadway Improvements Durham County NC
Environmental Assessment (December 1 2011) and this Finding of No Significant Impact
satisfy the requirements of FRA s Procedures of Considering Environmental Impacts and
FHWA s requirements and that the project will not have a significant impact on the quality
of the human or natural environment following the implementation of identified mitigation
measures
Joseph C Szabo Administrator Date
Federal Railroad Administration
-ohn Sullivan III PE Division Administrator Date
Federal Highway Administration
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements 15
STIP U 4716

Finding of No Significant Impact
FRA Contact Person
John Winkle
Environmental Protection Specialist
Federal Railroad Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE RM W38 311
Washington DC 20590
202 493 6067
List of Persons and Organizations Preparing the FONSI
Ryan White PE
NC Department of Transportation — Rail Division
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699 1548
919 733 7245 x266
Jill Gurak PE AICP
Project Manager
Atkins
1616 East Millbrook Road Suite 31
Raleigh NC 27609
919 431 5298
Hopson Rd and Church St Rail and Roadway Improvements 16
STIP U 4716

O
C L
O
d
a
c
N
c
mc
co
N
CL)o
d
C`i
N_
wpm
N
>
o
i
4
y
"do
i
m
°o
C
m
v
Cp
m
d
N
a�
N
M
C
� �
COL.
Z c
a
3 °
'
}
co
U
ccn,
Z
Cn0
vC
3 fo
�r
Z
N
O`
4G N
9N
b
cao
r
rn
°
(on
-r-
(d
E
r
C —
O N
O
CD
N
IF
E
N
^
v-
m
N
0
CTS
1
a�i
N
i
Z
O N
c
�
f
C
N 0 co
N
U
'
D2NCc
# '
m_
r
C)
Eccz�
Q
#
co
U
o
O
cu
z
k R
A
3
N
i0
N
C
r
r+
N lL
E
E
c
o
M rn
O
E
o
� a
o
O
E�
co
N
^
0
m
E
V
L
a
W
o
LL U
co
Z
C •: U
a
e
v
Q
x Z
°
_
c
to
N
_
O CO y
yEa�
�co
°
cm
'`
w E
O
C
�a
0
H
W N
M
7
rn
V CO
U
M
° t
0
2
cn m
rn
O
Y
N
u
O J
m
O
Z
d
O
E�
m
N
O
3
0`
a
a
w
N C M
c
O
z
K
?
«s ��
O
m
0
y
>
d
c
U
O
U
QS
;
c
vi
ai
E
N
O 7
L d
y4
C
N
O
a�i
4O.
c
C
2!
cNO
U
c
R w
«
U
O
L
d
e
rn
O
C L
O
d
a
c
c
mc
co
N
CL)o
7
O
wpm
N
>
o
i
4
y
"do
i
m
°o
C
m
v
Cp
p as
d
N
a�
N
M
C
� �
Z
Z c
a
3 °
'
}
co
U
ccn,
Z
Cn0
vC
3 fo
�r
Z
N
O`
4G N
9N
b
cao
r
rn
°
(on
-r-
(d
E
E
C —
O N
N
IF
N
^
m
N
co
CTS
1
a�i
N
O N
c
�
C
N 0 co
N
'
D2NCc
# '
m_
r
C)
Eccz�
Q
c`o
co
U
o
z
k R
A
3
N
i0
N
C
l0
N lL
E
E
IL
cR
� a
o
O
E�
O
E
V
L
a
W
o
V
C •: U
a
v
Q
c
to
N
_
O CO y
yEa�
�co
°
w E
O
C
Um
C,
c
V CO
U
O
al
u
O J
N
N
O
L
C,
N C M
c
d
d W
z
m a
O
0
y
>
d
U
E
E c
y
O
U
c
vi
¢
N
d
O 7
e
?
a�i
4O.
m
a
v
y
O
U
V
L
d
eo
O
v
d
(.)aca`
z
0c°)m
o
�
w
o
U
C L
a
c
mc
co
N
CL)o
wpm
N
i N
4
i
C
d
a
� �
3 °
'
}
Q
E o
3 fo
�r
Z
N
O`
4G N
9N
b
Of y
IO
(d
C —
O N
N
IF
U
CTS
1
x
O N
c
�
C
N 0 co
N
"O m
# '
m_
cz
Q
c`o
co
U
Z
3 m
N
i0
to
N
N lL
E
E
IL
cR
� a
w
o
U
00
a
c
mc
co
N
L N
wpm
c Z
4
d
co
r
x 0
c .o
O c
N
}
O �
= fo
lb U
O
C —
O N
N
O
N d
�
N L
ca
cz
Q
co C
lC0
Z
U 7
C
t
i0
mU
_
C
IL
Y
o
E�
)
� >
�
o
a`
(I7 Y
fo IL
to
N
_
O CO y
yEa�
�co
°
w E
Um
C,
c
V CO
U
O
al
O J
N
N
L
C,
N C M
O
O
0
a U co
a�i
a
v
O
U
V
L
d
eo
O
v
d
O
y
o
�
Z
_
d
r
y
y
T
cc
Jl
to
U
a
r
i

.... �
�
~\
� �/
.
0
�
6
§
§��
U
�
2
§
J ,
C
a
kk�o
{
§
2
� § §�
)
[
c
vim§
�
a
�
z
J 2
!J
\ �
I �
W &
CL k / /
CL
� ■ « < <
7 z z z
w
° © \ \ \
R I
�
R
#t
k % $ k %
o z > z
2 u o $ o
z
»
E
10
�k\ -_
co
2 L m
z �
£m7 |7|«
§ §)�)))�
%E °(saQm
§ ° /QRR7a
=2= _
■
)
£ �
o
� k
/ �
) 2
& £
m ■o
IF
? A
| E
) }
)/
\c
'kk
�[k
\[k
CO
c
-0
0) �/k
'w<
I/
�
§
J ,
C
a
2�}
{
�
■�E
f
[
CD
-
J
§
E
E
E
■ ,
�
§
§
£m7 |7|«
§ §)�)))�
%E °(saQm
§ ° /QRR7a
=2= _
■
)
£ �
o
� k
/ �
) 2
& £
m ■o
IF
? A
| E
) }
)/
\c
'kk
�[k
\[k
CO
c
-0
0) �/k
'w<
I/

U
C
M
U U 6)
O
Z
O
Z
O
Z
O
Z
O
Z
O
Z
c U=
O
t
4
Z
�
y N
L
N
O N
M
r
M
O
m
f�
O
N
O
w
r
N
r
r
O
O
a)
ca Q
—
N N
O
M
>
r C
M
r
oo
(O
M
O
r
T
Q V
N
P-
r
r
N
N
al 0
O
E
o c
d
C
C O C
(C
m
IL
N H
N
O
r
m
O
w
D
.O
>
r
N
r
O
O
O
N
N N
N
O
O
CD
U
E o
N tl)
I�
N
N
M
m
m
N
L
L
r
N (fl
L O
C
O
a\
m
m
O
O
m
(D
w
co
M
y
�, a a)
O N
C N
N
N
d
r
O
O
O
O
>
O C U
E O
J
x
n
C
L
N 'O
L
l0 :E
p
H � L_
O
C '
M co
N O
l O fl
N
3
QJ
cn
13- cu CD
V
N > (u
t
v m
o EJ
e a F
U
N O
N m co
p
E
E
W
g
c J
c
N
C
0
y o
L. C
o a ¢
E
d ;:
°m
O
N
N
o
N
°�°
O
O
o
o
O
O
o
o
O
o
o
O
O
o
E
3
w m W a
c wC7>
H
E
pE
r
r
0)
E
om.
�
��°—'�
O p
o�d
m N N
m v1cc x
W
°M
3
07
Q
A W H W
CO E
N
o j U
W U
d
a
N
O
N
co
co
O
N
r
r
O
O
O C
m w
ca
xa o
c`
U N
(u
M °'
L >
E
Z
E
O N
o
a)
N co
o cz >1
Z
=3
o
N 0
m �o
>
r
r
r
r
r
r
E
U
N
C N
Y
lC
C
C u
p� (V
m
N N
p p N
N U
N 'p
p N
0
y
a)
C
.2>
Q A
3
O y (n
E
r
r
r
r
r
r
cz
m
C
C=
co
co
M
N
M
M
f� 0
U
7
0
O
LL
C
` (d a
o 0
C
C + U
L
Cf6
U a) .T.
�
3
o
0
o
O
o
o
C
2) f0
in
� M O
a)
y
h
(n
m
1n
to
(n
(n
a
N x
(D
p >
m o m
o�
E
O+ 0'
E r
M m
E c
m
m
C)
°o
(D
n
c
m Q
^
m H
+
+
+
+
+
+
E m
3 o
a
i y Y
0
to
cc,)
w
M
m
0)
M
M
N a
N '� N
-..l
N N
m
m
m
m
m
N i
C O
cu
O
E
CL
N
"
N
9Y {
VV €
C F
O N
0
O N
O O
O O
O O
O N
C N
O O
U
C
#
O
Z
p
O
+ +
O (0
+ +
O O
+ +
O O
+ +
O 0
+ +
O N
+ +
O
_ E
st({ W
a
(4 E
N 2
CO W
(M co
co co
Cl) (O
(f) co
M M
O O
m m
M m
O
0) m
M co
'e a
N M
t <t
N CO
V M
d-
N E O
01 W LL
5
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
co M
C
N
U
N
N a�
O
y o
)n
(n
m
oo
`
a
N C
d p
r� m
tZ

U S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id SAW 2012 -00430 County Wake U S G S Quad NC CARY
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner North Carolina DOT, Rail Division Axent Atkins North America Inc
Ryan White Adam Efird
Address 1553 Mad Service Center Address 1616 East Millbrook Road, Suite 310
Raleigh, NC, 27699 Raleigh. NC, 27607 4968
919 7334245 919 876 6888x5257
Nearest Town MorrLwdle Nearest Waterways UTs to Crabtree, Kit and Stirrup Iron Creeks
River Basin Upper Neuse North Carohna USGS HUC 3020201
Coordinates Latitude 35 861 Longitude -78 846
Location description Study area for improvements to Hopson/Clegg rail sections On existing RR corridor west of
NC 54 from MCCrlmmon Parkway to 1 -40 m Durham and Wake Counties, North Carolina
Indicate Which of the Following Apply
A Preliminary Determination
_ Based on preliminary information there may be waters of the U S including wetlands on the above described project area
We strongly suggest you have this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA)
jurisdiction To be considered final a junsdichonal determination must be verified by the Corps This preliminary
determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33
CFR Part 33 1) If you wish you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed) by contacting the Corps district
for further instruction Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the
JD
B Approved Determination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements
of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act Unless there is a change in the law
or our published regulations this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of
this notification
X There are waters of the U S including wetlands on the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification
_ We strongly suggest you have the waters of the U S including wetlands on your project area delineated Due to the
size of your property and/or our present workload the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a
timely manner For a more timely delineation you may wish to obtain a consultant To be considered final any
delineation must be verified by the Corps
X The waters of the U S including wetlands on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps We strongly suggest you have tlus delineation surveyed Upon completion this survey should be
reviewed and verified by the Corps Once verified this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to
CWA jurisdiction on your property which provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years
_ The waters of the U S including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on _ Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification
There are no waters of the U S to include wetlands present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344) Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification
Page 1 of 2

Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311) If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program please contact Eric Alsmever at 919 - 554 -4884 x23/
Eric C AhnievetuRnsace armv mil.
C The study area contains relatively Permanent waters, with indicators of ordinary high water marks, stream channels
of unnamed tributaries of Crabtree. Kit and Stirrup Iron Creeks, and abutting wetlands Crabtree and Kit Creeks are
tributaries of Lake Crabtree. and Kit Creek is a tributary of Jordan Lake Those lakes have been determined to be
Traditional Navigable Waters
D Remarks
This JD was confirmed by field inspection on 7/26/2011 The drawings. FiLrure 3A - 3D (copy att.), submitted by
e-mail on 8/10/2011, generally depict the jurisdictional waters of the US within the subiect study area Wetlands AB,
AC, AK. AJ and AL as shown on previous Figures 3A 3D, submitted on 6/8/2011, are isolated wetlands, not subject to
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.
E Attention USDA Program Participants
This delmeation/determmation has been conducted to identify the lunits of Corps Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request The delmeation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985 If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants or anticipate participation
in USDA programs you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service prior to starting work
F Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved ,jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site If you object to this
determination you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331 Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn Jason Steele Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps the Corps must determine that it is complete that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 3315 and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP
Should you decide to submit an RFA form it must be received at the above address by 5/7/2012
* *It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence * *
Corps Regulatory Official 4)00%
Digitally signed by ALSMEYER ERIC C 1087624486
DN c =US o =U S Government, ou =DoD ou =PKl
you =USA cn= ALSMEYER ERIC C 1087624486
Daie 2012 03 09 15 16 25 -05 00
Date 3/9/2012 Expiration Date 3/9/2017
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public To help us ensure we continue to
do so please complete the attached customer Satisfaction Survey or visit http / /per2 nwp usace army mil/survey html to
complete the survey onlme
Copy fiumshed Atkins Global (A Efird)

NOTIFICATION OF MQ1II5�PEALQP„3�IONS AND PROCESS AND �41
�«
�x�REt1tI)1}53FOR APPEAL
Applicant North Carolina Department of
File Number SAW- 2012 -00430
Date 3/9/2012
Transportation, Rail Division
Attached is
See Section below
❑ INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
❑ PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
❑ PERMIT DENIAL
C
® APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
F-11 PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision
Additional information may be found at http / /www usace army miUmet/functions/cw /cecwo /reg or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331
A INITIAL PROFFERED PERNUT You may accept or object to the permit
• ACCEPT If you received a Standard Permit you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP) you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety and waive all
rights to appeal the permit including its terms and conditions and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit
• OBJECT If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future Upon receipt of your letter the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections or (c) not modify the penrut having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written After
evaluating your objections the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration as indicated in
Section B below
B PROFFERED PERMIT You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT If you received a Standard Permit you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP) you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety and waive all
rights to appeal the permit including its terms and conditions and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit
• APPEAL If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice
C PERMIT DENIAL You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice
D APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information
• ACCEPT You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD
• APPEAL If you disagree with the approved JD you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice
E PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD The Preliminary JD is not appealable If you wish you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed)
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD

For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division Attn Eric Alsmeyer, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington,
North Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to
Division Engineer, Commander, U S Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn Mr Jason Steele,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD -PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
Phone [phone]
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record )
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record
However you may provide additional information to clanfy the location of information that is already in the administrative
record
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact
also contact
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division,
Mr Jason Steele Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn Eric Alsmeyer
CESAD PDO
US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
U S Army Corps of Engineers South Atlantic Division
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
60 Forsyth Street Room 1OM15
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 8801
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Phone [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel and any government
consultants to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation and will have the opporatuwnui to participate in all site invest aions
Date Telephone number
Signature of appellant or agent
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division Attn Eric Alsmeyer, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington,
North Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to
Division Engineer, Commander, U S Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn Mr Jason Steele,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD -PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
Phone [phone]

1 a`V
X411■ ��
North Carohna Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M Bartos Administrator
Be e ly Eaves Pe due Go ernor
Linda A Carhsle Secretary
Jeff ey J C o Deputy Secretary
July 24 2012
MEMORANDUM
TO Ryan Wlute
NCDOT Rail Division
Environmental and Planning e Brancch�
i
FROM Renee Gledhill Earleyp -o -Z6
Environmental Review Coordinator
Office of Archi es and History
Din ision of Historical Resources
Da id B ook Directo
SUBJECT Hopson Road Grade Separation & RR Track Realignment U 4716 Durham County
ER 06 0312
This memorandum is to follow up on your email of June 27 2012 concerning the O Briant Farm a property
that was determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places in 1999 as part of a TTA
proposed project A review of our files indicates that we failed to notify your agency of the presence of the
eligible project in early 2007 Thus there was no way that either the North Carolina Railroad or the North
Carolina Department of Transportation would have been aware of its historical status
We appreciate your providing us with a very clear and definitive timeline of what was done by who when We
will add this information to the O Briant Farm file so there is a record of its loss
Given the circumstances involved a finding of no historic properties affected by the proposed undertaking is
appropriate under Section 106
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation s Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration If you have questions concerning the above comment
contact Renee Gledhill Earley environmental review coordinator at 919 807 6579 In all future
communication concerning this project please cite the above referenced tracking number
cc Mary Pope Furr NCDOT
Location 109 East Jone Street Rate gh NC 27601 Mailing Add ess 4617 Mail Ser% ce Center Rate gh NC 27699 4617 Telephone /Fax [phone] 6599

,AY01— w
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — `Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site f4estN —�5 City /County WOW a 9-k"� 6"'f Sampling Date "S H9 11!
Applicant/Owner A NC QVT State �C Sampling Point o l — a
A
Investigator(s) 6F-VJ ., 0 o�gh /a, Section Township Range
Landform (hilislope terrace etc) Local relief (concave convex none) Slope(/)
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) Lat 35.'941SJ Long --)8 839713 Datum N1117.93
Soil Map Unit Name e#eeJW►Oa(( S(M4 �OGtM f20 e`m S fapt S J w104iv°klY ¢d NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes t! No (If no explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes ' No
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Hydric Sod Presents Yes V, No Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes `/ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes V No
Remarks
Ovt ✓4.1 eos`%m.,i' -t a P° / #&QNy "f"ed ww9/ fo (reye off c{N��
cfev'5171 wqW fgtGi�H9
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (136)
✓ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
— Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
✓ Water Marks (61)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Agwtard (03)
✓ Water Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613)
_ FAC Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches) 2 5
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
/
Saturation Presents Yes No
Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes ✓ No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous Inspections) if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size ) /Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1 That Are OBL FACW or FAC
2
3
4
5
6
7
= Total Cover
Sapling
Stratum (Plot size )
A1,4vs eS fdlg�
1ox
�,c5 1'/od
1
2
IfanvS rj6ra
3
4
5
6
7
Total Cover
Shrub Stratum (Plot size )
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot s/iz�e, )
�JJ1C�/S e SVi
r-S fff-lr✓
1
2
A leans smadcK S
_
Z „�°
yeti FACti/
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
�p
= Total Cover
Woody
Vine Stratum (Plot size
)
1 SSIA,Iap
2
3
4
5
_
= Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata
(A)
7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL FACW or FAC —o (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet
Total / Cover of Multiply by
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
_ 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 Dominance Test is >500/
_ 3 Prevalence Index is :53 0'
_ 4 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology must
be present unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
Shrub - Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb - All herbaceous (non woody) plants including
herbaceous vines regardless of size and woody
plants except woody vines less than approximately
3 It (1 m) in height
Woody vine - All woody vines regardless of height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) / Color (moist) °/ Tvae LoC2 Texture Remarks
0-10 10V KID _QS 7SY9 4%6 _ Al C(
etion RM= Reduced Matrix MS= Masked Sand Grains
Hydnc Soil Indicators
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
— Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N
MLRA 147 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
2Location PL =Pore Lining M =Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydnc So
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
— Iron Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N
MLRA 136)
_ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136 122)
_ Piedmont Floodplam Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type 8ed�
Depth (inches) 10
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplam Sods (F19)
(MLRA 136 147)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present
unless disturbed or problematic
Hydnc Soil Present? Yes !/ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

rp- - -%F
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site en - O e City /County wo w % pAOM �.�� Sampling Date QS/ tytl
Applicant/Owner _C- 00 State NC Sampling Point AC L✓
Investigators) A G-PA, V O'Lo Alm Section Township Range
Landform (hillslope terrace etc) Local relief (concave convex nonce) Slope (/ )
Subregion (LRR or
MLRA) Lat 3S 9S106 Long -79 349 S q Datum NAO 83
Soil Map Unit Name (_ell ooc S4yJl
�oMNI�?'d `O t��`( cd NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes _" No
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects Important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes �— No
.YSOW, p4a41lY �iJAW. td we4-6#14
HYDROLOGY
1%oa 4�Ye✓t•� aH donsi /� clofty
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (66)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (614)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (810)
V Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (62)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Shallow Agwtard (D3)
Water Stained Leaves (69)
_
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (813)
_ FAC Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches) L �Nf�VS
✓
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge monitoring well aenal photos previous inspections) if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point )k —V./
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size )
/ Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
That Are OBL FACW or FAC_ (A)
2
3
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata �_ (B)
4
5
5
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL too
FACW or FAC (A/B)
7
Prevalence Index worksheet
= Total Cover
Total / Cover of Multiply by
Saplinq Stratum (Plot size
)
OBL species x 1 =
1 li uc spy(rAiA
� _ ���
FACW species x 2 =
2
FAC species x 3 =
3
FACU species x 4 =
4
UPL species x 5 =
5
Column Totals (A) (B)
6
7
Prevalence Index = B/A =
�0 = Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
Shrub Stratum (Plot size
)
— 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
1
2 Dominance Test is >50%
2
3 Prevalence Index is s3 0'
3
— 4 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
5
— Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
6
7
'Indicators of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology must
be present unless disturbed or problematic
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
= Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata
1 M LOftV&A S
\p �(� �A'�i�✓
Tree — Woody plants excluding woody vines
2
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 In
3
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
4
Sapling — Woody plants excluding woody vines
5
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
6
7
Shrub — Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
8
g
Herb — All herbaceous (non woody) plants including
10
herbaceous vines regardless of size and woody
plants except woody vines less than approximately
11
3 ft (1 m) in height
12
Woody vine — All woody vines regardless of height
Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size )
1 C 4AZ\* �o+�,G ®�g
S�
2
3
4
Hydrophytic
Vegetation /
5
Present? Yes No
=Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point C — w/
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators )
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) / Color (moist) / Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0 -11&5 1011 -`� /t
'Type C= Concentration D =De lebon RM= Reduced Matrix MS= Masked Sand Grains 21-ocation PL =Pore Lining M =Matrix
Hydnc Soil Indicators Indicators for Problematic Hydnc Sods'
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147 148)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N
_ Iron Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N
MLRA 147 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136 122)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (MLRA 148)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type ye oL
Depth (inches) S
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplam Sods (F19)
(MLRA 136 147)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present
unless disturbed or problematic
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

$off - t I AC -V
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site Hgsoo- C-1w City /County Jake C)%)164✓1 Co�� Sampling Date OS Iq It
Applicant/Owner /fA(ya ` State _ Sampling Point ABoI_V
Investigator /T s) C�i fc�, 0 o IL0�1�3'1 Section Township Range
Landform (hillslope terrace etc) Local relief (concave convex none) Slope (/ )
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) Lat 3S 8S11SZ Long -29 8'40771 Datum M93
Sod Map Unit Name Cite Wbt- <AMJJ L%, -I, ?,- 6 �*%(. f5, yu16"4t tY-odeA NWI classification —
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes `/ No (If no explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology significantly disturbed' Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects Important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No V Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Sod Present? Yes No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
— Drainage Patterns (610)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous inspections) if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point A v 1— U, AC-
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL FACW or FAC (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL FACW or FAC 600 `s (A/B)
7
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size )
/ Cover
Species?
Status
1 P 4U¢dq
'
j5
r- A.-,-
2 Q v arc "5 ii � s ra
S
w o
Ek
3 44o cq-% b4,f S4-irg c -f1.Jq
it
1,19
f Arc
4 pct YJ1oro-^
aO
GS
FACU species
5 — Qge Lac (Arq
_
IS
_ jeS
FALL
6
5
'Indicators of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology must
Column Totals
Sampling Point A v 1— U, AC-
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL FACW or FAC (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL FACW or FAC 600 `s (A/B)
7
Prevalence Index worksheet
�7S = Total Cover
= Total Cover
Total / Cover of
Multiply by
Sapling Stratum (Plot size )
1
CBL species
x 1 =
1 j] VAIeer VS Vt g1jil'Ct Kq
20 t5 FlklJ
FACW species
x 2 =
2 �u(L"Ka ,J5 8164
_ 4 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
FAC species
x 3 =
3
FACU species
x 4 =
4
UPL species
x 5 =
5
'Indicators of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology must
Column Totals
(A) (B)
6
be present unless disturbed or problematic
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
= Total Cover
7
Prevalence Index = B/A =
�7S = Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
Shrub Stratum (Plot size )
_ 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
1
_ 2 Dominance Test is >50 /
2
3 Prevalence Index is 53 0'
3
_ 4 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5
6
'Indicators of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology must
7
be present unless disturbed or problematic
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
= Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata
1 _TfoY- teAeyiJmv► r4J. -ta n C
Ao It-, f-At
Tree - Woody plants excluding woody vines
2 Po IV Sti-O V wt o c rosfi c ho, do S
�_ j0 t-p'C
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
_
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
3
4
Sapling - Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
5
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
6
7
Shrub - Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height
8
9
Herb - All herbaceous (non woody) plants including
herbaceous vines regardless of size and woody
10
plants except woody vines less than approximately
11
3 ft (1 m) in height
12
Woody vine - All woody vines regardless of height
=Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size
)
1
2
3
4
Hydrophytic
Vegetation /
5
Present? Yes 1l No
= Total Cover
or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of i
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) /
0-11S [OY t
t,s A to Y (Z 616 go
'Type C= Concentration
Hydric Sod Indicators
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N
MLRA 147 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches)
Redox Features
Color (moist) / Type Loc
10Y� sl8 jfj_ c- AA
MS= Masked Sand Grains
Sampling Point R0 V & —b
Texture Remarks
l,�► � c 1a v
aid
2Location PL =Pore Lining M =Matrx
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sods'
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147 148)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136 122)
— Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (MLRA 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplam Sods (F19)
(MLRA 136 147)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present
unless disturbed or problematic
Hydric Sod Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

740MIV -V Ak--�'l
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site OlDesov) — 0% Cay /County W4UG D 00&44q (�� Sampling Date 0 S1 ft7i 11
Applicant/Owner State —S— Sampling Point AD
Investigator(s) A E(dt 0'Lct,+jl.l,� Section Township Range
Landform (hillslope terrace etc) Local relief (concave convex none) Slope (/ )
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) Lat 35, RQS5 r J Long _ -?t sn-sa3 Datum 91 le3
Sod Map Unit Name k,,J0f36MA S4Nd�j 64VAO-V c�apei�� G641"WOVIO -) NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes t-/ No (If no explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes L/ No
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes ✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
✓ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_✓ Drainage Patterns (610)
✓ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water Stained Leaves (139)
_
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
_ FAC Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches) Z
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous inspections) if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants
A 0
Sampling Point
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size )
/ Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species C
1 N�SSO 1 S`I�JDitA_
�CS VK
That Are OBL FACW or FAC l (A)
2
Total Number of Dominant
3
Species Across All Strata (B)
4
5
Percent of Dominant Species
(00
That Are OBL FACW or FAC (A/B)
6
7
Prevalence Index worksheet
= Total Cover
Total / Cover of Multiply by
Sapling Stratum (Plot size
)
OBL species x 1 =
1 A ,p,r
FACW species x 2 =
2 ltrAf 4,.-At Our Q
�eS � %.
FAC species x 3 =
3
FACU species x 4 =
4
UPL species x 5 =
5
Column Totals (A) (B)
6
7
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
=Total Cover
Shrub Stratum (Plot size )
_ 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
1
2 Dominance Test is >50 /
2
3 Prevalence Index is <_3 0'
3
_ 4 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophyhc Vegetation' (Explain)
5
—
6
7
'Indicators of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology must
be present unless disturbed or problematic
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
= Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata
1 &�CfaSfea Vvh Y i Murt[./vVI
_� �ZS F19C
Tree — Woody plants excluding woody vines
2
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
3
4
Sapling — Woody plants excluding woody vines
5
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
6
7
Shrub — Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
8
9
Herb — All herbaceous (non woody) plants including
herbaceous vines regardless of size and woody
10
plants except woody vines less than approximately
11
3 ft (1 m) in height
12
Woody vine — All woody vines regardless of height
LO = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size )
1
2
3
4
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
5
Present? Yes No
= Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators )
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist)
color (moist) / Type Loc
Texture Remarks
101 Q- I IZ 100
toolm Cloy
S l ion z gs
'61C std c An
c�4
'Type C= Concentration D =De letion RM=
Reduced Matrix MS= Masked Sand Grains
2Location PL =Pore Lining M =Matrx
Hydnc Soil Indicators
Indicators for Problematic Hydnc Sods'
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
— 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147 148)
(MLRA 147 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplam Sods (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N
_ Iron Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N
MLRA 147 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplam Sods (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches)
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes ✓ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

A0tAE- v,Ak -v
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site 6esao - ct f4
City /County \fit**-
44 0JA%4VA 61101�1 - Sampling Date WIR
Applicant/Owner VC00T
_ Surface Water (Al) -
_ True Aquatic Plants (614)
State 0C Sampling Point AO1m-ut Alc"v
Investigator(s) _ A GW i O
O iM
Section Township Range
Saturation (A3)
Landform (hdlslope terrace etc)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
relief (concave convex none) Slope (/ )
Subregion (LRR or MLRA)
Lat
GLocal
3S 862 `�i
Long -70 gt{ 7 o It Datum Nom_
Sod Map Unit Name 6wwtoof
SOV144 (oowli2
-
NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions
on the site typical for
this time of year? Yes
No (If no explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Sod
or Hydrology
significantly disturbed?
Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Sod
or Hydrology
naturally problematic?
(If needed explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects Important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (Al) -
_ True Aquatic Plants (614)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
— Drainage Patterns (610)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (CS)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous inspections) if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants
AvIAE -til Ak-U
Sampling Point
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size )
Pmg% -4AeAa
/ Cover
3�—
Species? Status
eA) FA
Number of Dominant Species
1
That Are OBL FACW or FAC (A)
2
fLel"i n4ti rQi
to
00 �
3
L1av,JlL4Wb0i S�YrL�+ Ji
IS
`GS O-C
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata (B)
4
Aziir raior j^
25'
uo phc
—
5
✓ dc,
�Q W u; (An d
Z©
V� �
Percent of Dominant Species
Y� 14
That Are OBL FACW or FAC (A/B)
6
�—
7
Prevalence Index worksheet
= Total Cover
Total / Cover of Multiply by
Sapling
Stratum (Plot size )
OBL species x 1 =
1
T iouptn& tjl!� nbNct
G}
FACW species x 2 =
2 _ _
��nJS ��Aa
_�`
�j�
FAC species x 3 =
3 ���JGfG✓�
alb_
FACU species x 4 =
4
UPL species x 5 =
5
Column Totals (A) (B)
6
7
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
Total Cover
Shrub Stratum (Plot size )
_ 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
1
_ 2 Dominance Test is >50 /
2
_ 3 Prevalence Index is :53 0'
3
_ 4 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
5
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
6
7
'Indicators of hydrnc sod and wetland hydrology must
be present unless disturbed or problematic
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
= Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata
1 T"ey.
to "[wpM C14 t QaS
3o
Tree — Woody plants excluding woody vines
2
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
3
4
Sapling — Woody plants excluding woody vines
5
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
6
7
Shrub — Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
8
9
Herb — All herbaceous (non woody) plants including
herbaceous vines regardless of size and woody
10
plants except woody vines less than approximately
11
3 ft (1 m) in height
12
Woody vine — All woody vines regardless of height
= Total Cover
Woody
Vine Stratum (Plot size
)
1
�Imi l4n rDAV A41� -6
�(�5 FAC
a
2
3
4
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
5
Present? Yes No
= Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

SOIL
AolAE -of AK -0
Sampling Point
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators )
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color moss / Color (moist) / Type' LoC2 Texture Remarks
0 -10 161R- K I (Awr G�
1,©-6b
RM= Reduced Matrix
Hydnc Sod Indicators
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N
MLRA 147 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches)
Remarks
Sand Grains 2Location PL =Pore Lining M =Matnx
Indicators for Problematic Hydnc Sc
_ Dark Surface (S7)
— 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147 148)
(MLRA 147 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Iron Manganese Masses (1712) (LRR N
MLRA 136)
Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Sods (1719) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present
unless disturbed or problematic
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

FARIM
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site [Je050TA-ClaJy City/County l,Jal�Q $ A1M Sampling Date 01 (g (1
Applicant/Owner - O000 ( State . ff—C Sampling Point /X - K/
Investigator(s) A a,"A f 0 Wto,54411, Section Township Range
Landform (hdlslope terrace etc) Local relief (concave convex none) Slope (/ )
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) Lat Lo �3
1ng `�8 84464$ Datum A
Sod W�1 Map Unit Name X S1nflu� Sgal�V4 4VA 2'6 `�t100eS , w�c &m't'4 19-14C NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes _lam No
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes '� No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes I./ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (66)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (814)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (61)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (62)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches) t _
Saturation Present9 Yes No
Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes L/ No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous inspections) if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot )
1 VISSN $A%,,rq
/ Cover SDecies� Status
10
Number of Dominant Species
�R l
NG FAC
That Are OBL FACW or FAC (A)
2 ���
i S
3 L•re114uk6aV- shrac)P[ ✓a
��_
Total Number of Dominant
Z
Species Across All Strata (B)
4
5
Percent of Dominant Species
too
That Are OBL FACW or FAC (A/B)
6
7
Prevalence Index worksheet
= Total Cover
Total / Cover of Multiply by
Sapling Stratum (Plot size )
OBL species x 1 =
1
FACW species x 2 =
2
FAC species x 3 =
3
FACU species x 4 =
4
UPL species x 5 =
5
Column Totals (A) (B)
6
7
Prevalence Index = B/A =
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
Shrub Stratum (Plot size )
— 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
1
2 Dominance Test is >50 /
2
3 Prevalence Index is < -3 0'
3
_ 4 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
5
— Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
7
'Indicators of hydnc soil and wetland hydrology must
be present unless disturbed or problematic
Herb Stratum size )
= Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata
`(Plot
1 MjJaslet worn 1� MIift.iu�
S �tS �
Tree - Woody plants excluding woody vines
2
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
3
4
Sapling - Woody plants excluding woody vines
5
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
6
7
Shrub - Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
8
9
Herb - All herbaceous (non woody) plants including
herbaceous vines regardless of size and woody
10
plants except woody vines less than approximately
11
3 ft (1 m) in height
12
Woody vine - All woody vines regardless of height
Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size )
1 s01Aft4,o C04 /yl Qr%A
2
3
4
/
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
5
Present? Yes No
l = Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) / Color (moist) / Ty e' Loc
D It 10 -10— 101 g q9 to C M
RM= Reduced Matrix MS= Masked Sand
Hydric Sod Indicators
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N
MLRA 147 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matnx (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches)
Sampling Point AT—
Texture Remarks
C�
2Location PL =Pore Lining M =Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sods'
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147 148)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147 148)
_ oamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (178)
_ Iron Manganese Masses (1712) (LRR N
MLRA 136)
_ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136 122)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Praine Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147 148)
_ Piedmont Fioodplain Sods (F19)
(MLRA 136 147)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present
unless disturbed or problematic
V/
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — interim Version

I -v
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains ands "Piedmont p
Project/Site }' 16 to Ckm City/County �aGL 1d. 9�4+A1 Ce''+�► tV Sampling Date OS 11
Applicant/Owner K00-F State J ` C Sampling Point A37- 0
Investigator(s) A I 0115l1av91 l,V Section Township Range
Landform (hillslope terrace etc) pLocal relief (concave convex none) Slope (/ )
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) t Lat 3S $S 1 `3 Long -A 2A .f 1791 Datum /V�D if
Sod Map Unit Name Aie Aar- Sa.%�t �eaNf Z'do�° S�C�fMocia�ra��f caAe, NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects Important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes tJ No t
Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes No V
✓ within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (614)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
— Drainage Patterns (810)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
— Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Agwtard (D3)
Water Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613)
_ FAC Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous inspections) if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point A-1- V
Dominance Test worksheet
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL FACW or FAC_ (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata_ (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL FACW or FAC too (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size )
// Cover Species? Status
1 Pi�Aurk J926 A
i FK-
2 Lt�4 ✓,6046✓ 63yr CA'A
]t�t
3 Atjjf (iJb✓JAA
_
Po F)k-
10_
4
x 4 =
5
x 5 =
6
(A) (B)
7
_ = Total Cover
Sapling Stratum (Plot size )
1 _ AHvs -faeda
36 `CGS VAC
2
3
4
5
6
7
Total Cover
Shrub Stratum (Plot size )
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
Sampling Point A-1- V
Dominance Test worksheet
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL FACW or FAC_ (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata_ (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL FACW or FAC too (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet
Total A Cover of
Multiply by
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
_ 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 Dominance Test is >50 /
3 Prevalence Index is <_3 0'
_ 4 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology must
be present unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata
1 jt)y4scedP.v1OMN Ririe ?Q s 2S jes _ Tree — Woody plants excluding woody vines
2 approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size )
1
2
3
4
5
= Total Cover
Rema
or on a separate sheet )
Sapling — Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
Shrub — Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb — All herbaceous (non woody) plants including
herbaceous vines regardless of size and woody
plants except woody vines less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height
Woody vine — All woody vines regardless of height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

A-!-- V
SOIL Sampling Point
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators )
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) A Color (moist) / Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks
5-,g o 6 Goo lG WT
g 16 Loge- 611 too �—
RM= Reduced Matrix MS= Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Sod Indicators
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N
MLRA 147 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Tvoe
Depth (inches)
Remarks
_ Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147 148)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N
MLRA 136)
_ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (MLRA 148)
on PL =Pore Lining M =Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric So
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplam Sods (F19)
(MLRA 136 147)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present
unless disturbed or problematic
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No L/
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

,A I-)ag_L,,,/
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
u
Project/Site ' tiegaV1— City /County Wad A OV QVW1 of Sampling Date OS
Applicant/Owner 1 State NC Sampling Point ADDS �✓
Investigator(s) GT A V9 Oi C h1iw Section Township Range
Landform (hillslope terrace etc) 4 uLocal relief (concave convex no rip) Slope (°/ )
Subregion (LRR or ML'R-fA) Lat 35 U� W� Long - ��ZZ� Datum N On_�
Soil Map Unit Name �de(A S, W f 0° _ / NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes V No (If no explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects Important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
nc Sod Presents Is the Sampled Area
Hyd
Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes ✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (614)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_/High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
]/Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (83)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
_ FAC Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
T
Water Table Presents Yes V No
Depth (inches) 1 1hS
Saturation Present? Yes �_ No
Depth (inches) —I
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous inspections) if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — interim Version

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size )
1 "j,g��`Iro(14(14
2 ��S sog
3
4
5
= Total Cover
l0
5
= Total Cover
photo numbers here or on a separate sheet
Sampling Point Age 0
Dominance Test worksheet
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum ( Plot size l � �ry )
1 Ia4j,,tMAM C.+m c1Gi t1R
/Cover S Sts
F�
2
4>.'A,/,. JV.4 a
` ' ft ��%
3
Ay-, Of fvlofL"
W An t-h
4
Species Across All Strata
5
Percent of Dominant Species
That
n
(00
6
Are OBL FACW or FAC
7
Prevalence Index worksheet
= Total Cover
Sapling Stratum (Plot size )
Multiply by
1
Cetf tu% Ck "►OVAIJOA
YeS FA-CV''
2
—ANAj5 4° UV kill
FACW
�� '�'p_
3e�
FAC species
FACW
S f�-
4
FACU species
x 4 =
5
UPL species
x 5 =
6
Column Totals
(A)
7
30 = Total Cover
Shrub Stratum (Plot size )
1 --
Aamlig ct✓I)Pcy-4
2
S6"W C- [awaj.c
3
[�nMslau. . occ,�do�4nlrS
_lam fit? 08L
4
5
6
7
_ = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
1 Cj r, &+Tv %/ S
zo In OhKw
2
pk,r+ 1I%4VCjSjS gll,14�111e41 g
s .(0 AFA
3
4i Jfi%S
0 FAyj
4
_
AID t
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size )
1 "j,g��`Iro(14(14
2 ��S sog
3
4
5
= Total Cover
l0
5
= Total Cover
photo numbers here or on a separate sheet
Sampling Point Age 0
Dominance Test worksheet
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL FACW or FAC
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That
n
(00
Are OBL FACW or FAC
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet
Total / Cover of
Multiply by
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals
(A)
(B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
— 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 Dominance Test is >50 /
_ 3 Prevalence Index is :53 0'
_ 4 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology must
be present unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
Shrub - Woody plants excluding woody vines
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb - All herbaceous (non woody) plants including
herbaceous vines regardless of size and woody
plants except woody vines less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height
Woody vine - All woody vines regardless of height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL Sampling Point ho eg
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators )
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) / Color (moist) / Type Loc Texture Remarks
0_1 LOA 9- S I S loo* 64
3 -1b coy,R -`4L! A0 IA (�S 11) M C1 !
'Type C= Concentration D= Depletion RM= Reduced Matrix MS= Masked Sand
Hydnc Sod Indicators
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N
MLRA 147 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type
Depth (inches)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matnx (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N
MLRA 136)
_ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136 122)
Piedmont Floodplam Sods (F19) (MLRA 148)
0
on PL =Pore Lmina M =Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydnc Sc
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplam Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136 147)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophyhc vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present
unless disturbed or problematic
Hydric Sod Present? Yes V/ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

,4009-(/
11 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site � 60SOA — cl n 5 City /County W 0" �J O f�(h 4'� ^ CO Sampling Date
Applicant/Owner WCQG State Sampling Point ibex —�
Investigator(s) 15 eAl(A 0 t Lg x„41 ,A Section Township Range
Landform (hdlslope terrace etc) Local relief (concave convex none) Slope (A)
Subregion (LRRorMLRA) Lat 3S_`$C�'fOS Long 78 VS 3 ZZe Datum NA09 -S
Sod Map Unit Name yJ&l4lete S L44kA NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes V No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes V" No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
— Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Agwtard (D3)
_ Water Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613)
_ FAC Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous inspections) if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point Aoffl -i-
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size )
1 em" -faec:Q
/ Cover
(9_0
Species? Status
le5 lr�,,,
Number of Dominant Species 6
That Are OBL FACW
S
or FAC (A)
2 LA J1,dnNnher &4} j (ac�Jq
3rO-
`des �
/
3ted r�brJw.
W_�
Total Number of Dominant 4.
Species Across All Strata lJ (B)
4
5
Percent of Dominant Species I
o
That Are OBL FACW or FAC LQ (AB)
6
7
Prevalence Index worksheet
8
Total / Cover of Multiply by
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
Sa Iin /Shrub Stratum (Plot size
)
FACW species x 2 =
1 fl,,AvS Uadc%
30
_ FFtC
FAC species x 3 =
2 kg r t ✓llo OM
��
�� _
FACU species x 4 =
3
UPL species x 5 =
4
Column Totals (A) (B)
5
6
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
7
8
— 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9
— 2 Dominance Test is >50 /
10
— 3 Prevalence Index is s3 0'
_ 4 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
= Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
zti«oA«."U
— Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
ad,ntn
t 5
2
3
'Indicators of hydnc soil and wetland hydrology must
be present unless disturbed or problematic
4
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
5
6
Tree - Woody plants excluding vines 3 in (7 6 cm) or
7
more in diameter at breast height (DBH) regardless of
height
8
9
Sapling /Shrub - Woody plants excluding vines less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 it (1 m) tall
10
1 t
Herb - All herbaceous (non woody) plants regardless
of size and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
12
{S
= Total Cover
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size
)
height
2
3
4
5
Hydrophytic
Vegetation /
6
Present*7 Yes ✓ No
= Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point /i0 or$
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators )
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) / Color (moist) / Type' LOC2 Texture Remarks
o-,% ►019- 6 6 o4wq 041
do 1� LUC 6/2— 'Loo 04
'Type C= Concentration D= Depletion
Hydnc Sod Indicators
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N
MLRA 147 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type
Depth (inches)
Remarks
RM= Reduced
Grains 2Location PL =Pore Lining M =Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric So
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147 148)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N
MLRA 136)
_ Umbrnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (MLRA 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplam Sods (F19)
(MLRA 136 147)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present
unless disturbed or problematic
Hydnc Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

M
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # AA04
0 o p i u STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET rr
�
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment
1 Applicants name NCDOT 2 Evaluator s name A Efird
3 Date of evaluation 05/19/11 4 Time of evaluation 9 OOAM
5 Name of stream
6 River basin Neuse
7 Approximate drainage area 140 ac 8 Stream order
9 Length of reach evaluated 50 feet 10 County Wake and Durham Co
11 Site coordinates (if known) 35 847716 78 838127 12 Subdivision name (if any)
13 Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location)
Immediately west of Chanel Hill Road (54) between Watkins Road and McCrimmon Parkway
14 Proposed channel work (if any)
15 Recent weather conditions Rain within 48 hours, sunny and warm otherwise
16 Site conditions at time of visit Water in channel
17 Identify any special waterway classifications known _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I IV)
18 Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes estimate the water surface area
19 Does channel appear on USGS quad map9 YES NO 20 Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21 Estimated watershed land use 10_% Residential 35_% Commercial 15_% Industrial 0_% Agricultural
20_% Forested 20_% Cleared / Logged _% Other (
22 Bankfull width 6 feet 23 Bank height (from bed to top of bank) 2 feet
24 Channel slope down center of stream _Flat (0 to 2 %) X_Gentle (2 to 4 %) _Moderate (4 to 10 %) _Steep ( >10 %)
25 Channel sinuosity Straight X_Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2) Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location terrain vegetation stream classification etc Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e g the stream flows from a pasture into a forest) the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity and a separate form used to evaluate each reach The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100 with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality
Total Score (from reverse) 46
Comments
Evaluator's Signature Date 05/25/11
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement Form subject to change — version 06/03 To Comment please call 919 876 8441 x 26

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
Presence of now / persistent pools in stream
1
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
3
no flow or saturation = 0 strong flow = max points)
Evidence of past human alteration
2
0-6
0 — 5
0-5
2
extensive alteration = 0 no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
3
no buffer = 0 contiguous wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
1
extensive dischar es = 0 no dischar es =max omts
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
1
no discharge = 0 springs sees wetlands etc = max points)
Presence of adjacent floodplain
6
no flood lam = 0 extensive flood lam = max points)
0-4
0 - 4
0-2
1
Entrenchment / floodplain access
p
7
(deeply entrenched = 0 frequent flooding = max points)
0— 5
0— 4
0— 2
2
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
0
no wetlands = 0 large adjacent wetlands = max points)
Channel sinuosity
9
0-5
0-4
0-3
2
extensive channelization = 0 natural meander = max points)
Sediment input
10
0-5
0-4
0-4
1
extensive deposition= 0 little or no sediment = max points)
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
11
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
2
fine homogenous = 0 large diverse sizes = max points)
Evidence of channel incision or widening
12
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
3
(deeply incised = 0 stable bed & banks = max points)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
4
d
(severe erosion = 0 no erosion stable banks = max points)
Root depth and density on banks
14
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
3
H
no visible roots = 0 dense roots throughout = max points)
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
15
substantial impact =0 no evidence = max points)
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
3
16
Presence of riffle pool/ripple pool complexes
0-3
0 - 5
0-6
2
no nffles/npples or pools = 0 well developed = max points)
F
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
4
little or no habitat = 0 frequent vaned habitats = max points)
Canopy coverage over streambed
18
no shading vegetation = 0 continuous canopy = max points)
0 -5
0 -5
0 -5
5
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
2
(deeply embedded = 0 loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 - 5
0-5
0
no evidence = 0 common numerous types = max points)
Presence of amplubians
21
(no evidence = 0 common numerous types = max points)
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
a
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0 — 4
0-4
0
no evidence = 0 common numerous types = max points)
Evidence of wildlife use
23
0-6
0-5
0-5
2
no evidence = 0 abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
46
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # AF02
U ZrA)l
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment
1 Applicants name NCDOT 2 Evaluator s name A Efird
3 Date of evaluation 05/19/11 4 Time of evaluation 10 OOAM
5 Name of stream
6 River basin
7 Approximate drainage area 65 ac 8 Stream order
9 Length of reach evaluated 50 feet 10 County Wake and Durham Co
11 Site coordinates (if known) 35 858489 78 844102 12 Subdivision name (if any)
13 Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location)
Immediatelv west of Chanel Hill Road (54) directly across from Lrtchm Boulevard
14 Proposed channel work (if any)
15 Recent weather conditions Rain within 48 hours, sunny and warm otherwise
16 Site conditions at time of visit Water in channel
17 Identify any special waterway classifications known _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I IV)
18 Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point9 YES NO If yes estimate the water surface area
19 Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20 Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21 Estimated watershed land use 10_% Residential
20_% Forested
35_% Commercial 15_% Industrial 0_% Agricultural
20_% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
22 Bankfull width 4 feet 23 Bank height (from bed to top of bank) 1 foot
24 Channel slope down center of stream _Flat (0 to 2 %) X_Gentle (2 to 4 %) _Moderate (4 to 10 %) _Steep ( >10 %o)
25 Channel sinuosity Straight X_Occastonal bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2) Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location terrain vegetation stream classification etc Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e g the stream flows from a pasture into a forest) the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity and a separate form used to evaluate each reach The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100 with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality
Total Score (from reverse) 58 Comments
Evaluator's Signature Date 05/25/11
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement Form subject to change — version 06/03 To Comment please call 919 876 8441 x 26

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
Presence of now / persistent pools in stream
1
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
2
no flow or saturation = 0 strong flow = max points)
Evidence of past human alteration
2
0-6
0-5
0-5
3
extensive alteration = 0 no alteration = max points)
Riparian zone
3
0-6
0-4
0-5
3
no buffer = 0 contiguous wide buffer = max points)
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
4
0-5
0-4
0-4
2
extensive discharges = 0 no discharges = max points)
a
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
4
no discharge = 0 springs sees wetlands etc = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplam
0-4
0 — 4
0-2
2
m
no flood la = 0 extensive flood lam = max points)
Entrenchment / floodplam access
a"
(deeply entrenched = 0 frequent flooding = max points)
0-5
0 — 4
0-2
3
Presence of adjacent wetlands
8
0-6
0-4
0-2
3
no wetlands = 0 large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
2
extensive channehzation = 0 natural meander = max points)
Sediment input
10
0-5
0-4
0-4
2
extensive deposition= 0 little or no sediment = max points)
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
11
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
2
fine homogenous = 0 large diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
3
�+
(deeply incised = 0 stable bed & banks = max points)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
4
asevere
erosion = 0 no erosion stable banks = max points)
Root depth and density on banks
14
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
3
F
no visible roots = 0 dense roots throughout = max points)
rA
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
15
0-5
0 — 4
0-5
3
substantial impact =0 no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle pool/ripple pool complexes
0-3
0 - 5
0-6
3
no es/npples or p ools = 0 well developed = max points)
F
17
Habitat complexity
Habitat
0-6
0 — 6
0-6
4
or no habitat = 0 frequent vaned habitats = max points)
Canopy coverage over streambed
18
0 -5
0 -5
0 -5
5
no shading vegetation = 0 continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
3
(deeply embedded = 0 loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 - 5
0-5
0
no evidence = 0 common numerous types = max p omts
Presence of amplubians
O
21
no evidence = 0 common numerous types = max points)
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0 — 4
0-4
0
no evidence = 0 common numerous types = max points)
Evidence of wildlife use
23
0-6
0-5
0-5
2
no evidence = 0 abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
58
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # AL02
v a Q A o STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET —
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment
1 Applicants name NCDOT 2 Evaluator s name A Eiird
3 Date of evaluation 05/19/11 4 Time of evaluation 1 OOPM
5 Name of stream
7 Approximate drainage area
6 River basin
8 Stream order
9 Length of reach evaluated 50 feet 10 County Wake and Durham Co
11 Site coordinates (if known) 35 847716 78 838127 12 Subdivision name (if any)
13 Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location)
Immediately west of Chanel Hill Road (54) between the 1 540 ramp and Surles Court
14 Proposed channel work (if any)
15 Recent weather conditions Rain within 48 hours, sunny and warm otherwise
16 Site conditions at time of visit Water in channel
17 Identify any special waterway classifications known _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutnent Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I IV)
18 Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation pointy YES NO If yes estimate the water surface area
19 Does channel appear on USGS quad map9 YES NO 20 Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21 Estimated watershed land use 10_% Residential 35_% Commercial 15_% Industrial 0_% Agricultural
20_% Forested 20_% Cleared / Logged _% Other
22 Bankfull width 5 feet 23 Bank height (from bed to top of bank) 1 5 feet
24 Channel slope down center of stream _Flat (0 to 2 %) X_Gentle (2 to 4 %) _Moderate (4 to 10 %) _Steep ( >10 %)
25 Channel sinuosity Straight X_Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2) Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregmon based on
location terrain vegetation stream classification etc Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregmon Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e g the stream flows from a pasture into a forest) the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity and a separate form used to evaluate each reach The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100 with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality
Total Score (from reverse) 47
Comments
Evaluator's Signature Date 05/25/11
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a prelimmary assessment of stream
quality The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement Form subject to change — version 06/03 To Comment please call 919 876 8441 x 26

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
I
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
2
no flow or saturation = 0 strong flow = max points)
Evidence of past human alteration
2
0-6
0-5
0-5
2
extensive alteration = 0 no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
3
no buffer = 0 contiguous wide buffer = max points)
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
4
0-5
0-4
0-4
2
extensive discharges = 0 no discharges = max points)
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
1
(no discharge = 0 springs sees wetlands etc = max points)
Presence of adjacent floodplain
6
no flood lam = 0 extensive flood lam = max points)
0-4
0-4
0-2
2
Entrenchment / floodplain access
a"
7
(deeply entrenched = 0 frequent flooding = max points)
0— 5
0— 4
0— 2
2
Presence of adjacent wetlands
8
0-6
0-4
0-2
0
no wetlands = 0 large adjacent wetlands = max po mts
Channel sinuosity
9
0-5
0-4
0-3
2
extensive channelizahon = 0 natural meander = max points)
Sediment input
10
0-5
0-4
0-4
1
extensive deposition= 0 little or no sediment = max points)
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
11
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
2
fine homogenous = 0 large diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
3
�+
(deeply incised = 0 stable bed & banks = max points)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
4
asevere
erosion = 0 no erosion stable banks = max points)
Root depth and density on banks
14
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
3
H
no visible roots = 0 dense roots throughout = max points)
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
15
0-5
0 — 4
0-5
3
substantial impact =0 no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle pool/ripple pool complexes
0-3
0 - 5
0-6
2
no nffles/npples or pools = 0 well developed = max points)
F
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
4
little or no habitat = 0 frequent vaned habitats = max points)
Canopy coverage over streambed
18
0-5
0 — 5
0-5
5
no shading vegetation = 0 continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
2
(deeply embedded = 0 loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 - 5
0-5
0
no evidence = 0 common numerous types = max points)
Presence of amphibians
O
21
no evidence = 0 common numerous types = max points)
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
a
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0 — 4
0-4
0
no evidence = 0 common numerous types = max points)
Evidence of wildlife use
23
0-6
0-5
0-5
2
no evidence = 0 abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
47
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # AN02
eee
u p u STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET �
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment
1 Applicants name NCDOT 2 Evaluator s name A Efird
3 Date of evaluation 05/26/11 4 Time of evaluation 9 35 AM
5 Name of stream
7 Approximate drainage area
6 River basin Neuse
8 Stream order
9 Length of reach evaluated 15 feet 10 County Wake and Durham Co
11 Site coordinates (if known) 35 871382 78 853174 12 Subdivision name (if any)
13 Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location)
West of Chapel Hill Road (NC 54) between Surles Ct and Emperor Blvd in Durham County
14 Proposed channel work (if any)
15 Recent weather conditions No rain within 48 hours, sunny and warm
16 Site conditions at time of visit Water in channel___
17 Identify any special waterway classifications known _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I IV)
18 Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation pomt9 YES NO If yes estimate the water surface area
19 Does channel appear on USGS quad map9 YES NO 20 Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey9 YES NO
21 Estimated watershed land use 10_% Residential
20_% Forested
35_% Commercial 15_% Industrial 0_% Agricultural
20_% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
22 Bankfull width 5 feet 23 Bank height (from bed to top of bank) 1 feet
24 Channel slope down center of stream _Flat (0 to 2 %) X_Gentle (2 to 4 %) _Moderate (4 to 10 %) _Steep ( >10 %)
25 Channel sinuosity Straight X_Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2) Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location terrain vegetation stream classification etc Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e g the stream flows from a pasture into a forest) the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity and a separate form used to evaluate each reach The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100 with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality
Total Score (from reverse) 51 Comments
Evaluator's Signature Date 05/27/11
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement Form subject to change — version 06/03 To Comment please call 919 876 8441 x 26

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
Presence of now / persistent pools in stream
1
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
3
no flow or saturation = 0 strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
1
(extensive alteration = 0 no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
2
no buffer = 0 contiguous wide buffer = max points)
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
4
0-5
0-4
0-4
2
extensive discharges = 0 no discharges = max points)
a
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
4
d�
no discharge = 0 springs sees wetlands etc = max points)
Presence of adjacent floodplam
6
no flood lam = 0 extensive flood lam = max poi nts
0-4
0 - 4
0-2
3
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0— 5
0— 4
0— 2
2
a"
(deeply entrenched = 0 frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
3
no wetlands = 0 large adjacent wetlands = max points)
Channel sinuosity
9
0-5
0-4
0-3
2
extensive channehzation = 0 natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
0
extensive deposition= 0 little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
1
line homogenous = 0 large diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
3
'!
(deeply incised = 0 stable bed & banks = max points)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
2
a
severe erosion = 0 no erosion stable banks = max omts
Root depth and density on banks
14
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
2
H
no visible roots = 0 dense roots throughout = max points)
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
3
15
substantial impact =0 no evidence = max points)
0-5
0 — 4
0-5
16
Presence of riffle pool/ripple pool complexes
0-3
0 - 5
0-6
3
no nffles/npples or pools = 0 well developed = max points)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0 — 6
0-6
4
little or no habitat = 0 frequent vaned habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0
0
0
4
no shading vegetation = 0 continuous canopy = max points)
-5
-5
-5
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
1
(deeply embedded = 0 loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 - 5
0-5
2
no evidence = 0 common numerous types = max points)
Presence of amphibians
Q
21
no evidence = 0 common numerous types = max points)
0-4
0-4
0-4
2
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0 - 4
0-4
0
no evidence = 0 common numerous types = max p omts
Evidence of wildlife use
13
0— 6
0— 5
0— 5
2
( no evidence = 0 abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
51
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams

4hoY
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4 11
Date 195111111
Project/Site 401W -CIO
Latitude IS 2411114
Evaluator 4 CA;9
County g OA41,4 Co
Longitude --72 231m)
Total Points
Stream is at least intermittent a
Stream Determ o�circle one)
Ephemeral�ri� Perennial
Other
if?: 19 or perennial if ? 30
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
e g Quad Name
A Geomorphology (Subtotal = i 3 �)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3 In channel structure ex We pool step pool
ripple sequence
0
1
Q
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
W
3
5 Active /relictfloodplam
0
1
2
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
1
1 5
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
M
26 Wetland plants in streambed
3
8 Headcuts
perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
1
2
3
9 Grade control
0
015,
1 5
10 Natural valley
0
0 5
1
1-5-
11 Second or greater order channel
No
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are notrated see discussions in manual
B Hydrology (Subtotal= I? - )
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14 Leaf htter
1-5
1
05
0
15 Sediment on plants ordebns
0
05
2
1 5
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 05
1
1 5
17 Soil based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes
C Biology (Subtotal = H ) v
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
10
1
2
3
22 Fish
05
1
1 5
23 Crayfish
05
1
15
24 Amphibians
05
1
1 5
25 Algae
05
1
15
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75 OBL = 1 5 Other 0
perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes
Sketch

,A Fo 2
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4 11
Date 0S(M I ( (
Project/Site no f sp,lt � C(ey y
Latitude 3S 90491
Evaluator A Uivl
County 6k(,p_ 6 OA4v-A Co
Longitude
Total Points
Stream is at least intermittent 3 2 S
Stream Determination (circl
Ephemeral Intermittent
Other
if 2:19 or perennial if ? 30
P eren
a Quad Name
9
A Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
05
3
3 In channel structure ex We pool step pool
ripple sequence
0
1
2
15
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1
3
5 Active /relict floodplam
0
1
XJ
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
15
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
15
8 Headcuts
0
1
2
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
9 Grade control
0
5
1
15
10 Natural valley
0
COP
1
15
11 Second or greater order channel
No 0
Yes = 3
"artificial ditches are not rated see discussions in manual
B Hvdrolocav (Subtotal= -7 1� )
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
O1
2
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
W
1
2
3
14 Leaf titter
15
1
05
0
15 Sediment on plants ordebris
0
05
2
15
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 05
1
5
17 Sod based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes
XJ
G t31010ov (Subtotal = `i
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants In streambed
3
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22 Fish
Q
05
1
1 5
23 Crayfish
05
1
1 5
24 Amphibians
0
05
1
15
25 Algae
05
1
15
26 Wetland plants In streambed
FACW = 0 75 OBL = 1 5 Other
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes
Sketch

AIOZ*
NC DWO Stream Identification Form VerQinn 4 11
Date 05 I l I
Protect/Site Hop Seel - it kjq
Latitude 35 86 3Y S 3
Evaluator A aY8
County W&k go,/AgM Co
Longitude
Total Points
Stream is at least intermittent ZA 5
Stream Deter mm_aL circle one)
Ephemeral
Other
if ? 19 or perennial if z 30
ntermitt Perennial
e g Quad Name
A Geomorphology (Subtotal =_� 5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2 )
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
05
3
3 In channel structure ex nffle pool step pool
ripple sequence
0
1
1
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
05
2
3
5 Active /relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
05
2
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8 Headcuts
0
1
2
9 Grade control
0
1
15
10 Natural valley
0
5
1
1 5
11 Second or greater order channel
No -
Yes = 3
aniticial ditches are not rated see discussions in manual
B Hvdroloav (Subtotal= 1A )
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
M
1
2
3
14 Leaf titter
15
jUS
05
0
15 Sediment on plants ordebris
0
05
1
xv
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0 1
05
1
1 5
17 Soil based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes
L b101oQV (Subtotal = `-A, 1
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
O
T
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22 Fish
0
05
1
1 5
23 Crayfish
05
1
1 5
24 Amphibians
05
1
1 5
25 Algae
0
05
1
1 5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75 OBL = 1.15. Other - 0
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods Seep 35 of manual
Notes
Sketch

/% /0Z
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4 11
Date OYU/ I I
Project/Site { 0?50410e�
Latitude 35 r 13$ Z
Evaluator A
County V" / 0,/A*V1
Longitude ,— 0 ,95 3 1?�
Total Points
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determi ircle one)
Other
if z 19 or perennial if 2 30
Ephemer ntermitte Perennial
e g Quad Name
A Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
f 1
2
3
3 In channel structure ex nffle pool step pool
ripple pool sequence
0
1
1
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1 05
2
3
5 Active /relict floodplain
0
Yes in
2
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
05
2
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8 Headcuts
OV
1
2
3
9 Grade control
0
05
1
1 5
10 Natural valley
0
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
1
1 5
11 Second or greater order channel
No 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated see discussions in manual
B Hydrology (Subtotal =_U5--)
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
©
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14 Leaf litter
1 5
1
05
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
1 i 5
1
15
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 05
1
1 5
17 Soil based evidence of high water tables
No = 0
Yes in
C Biology (Subtotal = )
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22 Fish
0
05
1
15
23 Crayfish
05
1
1 5
24 Amphibians
0
0
1
1 1 5
25 Algae
no
05
1
1 1 5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75 OBL
1 5 Other = 0
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes
Sketch

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U S Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook
SECTION I BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD)
B DISTRICT OFFICE FILE NAME AND NUMBER
C PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION Hopson/Clegg NCDOT Rail Division Wake and Durham
Counties North Carolina Stream AA AL Isolated Wetland AB AC AK AJ Al
State NC County /pansh/borough Wake and Durham City Morrisville (nearest)
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format) Lat 35 852469 S Long 78 841663 �W
Universal Transverse Mercator
Name of nearest waterbody
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 030202010801
I" Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is /are available upon request
Check if other sites (e g offsite mitigation sites disposal sites etc ) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form
D REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
raOffice (Desk) Determination Date 05/25/11
Field Determination Date(s) 05/19/11
SECTION II SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION
There a no navigable waters of the US within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) junsdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area [Required]
Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide
Waters are presently used or have been used in the past or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce
Explain
B CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION
There KE9 waters of the U S within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area [Required]
Waters of the U S
a Indicate presence of waters of U S in review area (check all that apply) i
TNWs including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Relatively permanent waters (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters including isolated wetlands
b Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U S in the review area
Non wetland waters 312 7261mear feet width (ft) and/or acres
Wetlands 134 acres
c Linuts (boundaries) of Jurisdiction based on 987 Dehneadon Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known)
2 Non regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable) 3
Potentially jurisdictional waters and /or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional
Explain
1 Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section 111 below
Z For purposes of this form an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year round or has continuous flow at least seasonally
(e g typically 3 months)
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section III F

SECTION III CWA ANALYSIS
A TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs If the aquatic resource is a TNW complete
Section III A 1 and Section III D 1 only if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW complete Sections III A 1 and 2
and Section III D 1 otherwise see Section III B below
1 TNW
Identify TNW
Summarize rationale supporting determnation
2 Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is adjacent
B CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY)
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands if any and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under R&Fwarhave been met
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are relatively permanent
waters (RPWs) i e tributaries that typically flow year round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e g typically 3
months) A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional If the aquatic resource is not a TNW but has year round
(perennial) flow skip to Section III D 2 If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow
slop to Section III D 4
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law
If the waterbody° is not an RPW or a wetland directly abutting an RPW a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW If the tributary has adjacent wetlands the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary or its adjacent wetlands or both If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands complete Section III B 1 for
the tributary Section III B 2 for any onsite wetlands and Section III B 3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary both onsite
and offsite The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III C below
1 Characteristics of non TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions
Watershed size ckLis
Drainage area Pick List
Average annual rainfall inches
Average annual snowfall inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics
(a) Relationship with TNW
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW
❑ Tributary flows through ek List tributaries before entering TNW
Project waters are ck List river miles from TNW
Project waters are ck List river miles from RPW
Project waters are ck List aerial (straight) miles from TNW
Project waters are ck List aerial (straight) miles from RPW
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries Explain
Identify flow route to TNW5
Tributary stream order if known
" Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales ditches washes and erosional features generally and in the and
West
5 Flow route can be described by identifying e g tributary a which flows through the review area to flow into tributary b which then flows into TNW

(b) General Tnbutary Characteristics (check all that apply)
Tnbutary is ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man made) Explain
❑ Manipulated (man altered) Explain
Tnbutary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate)
Average width feet
Average depth feet
Average side slopes Pid Lrst
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply)
❑ Silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation Type /% cover
❑ Other Explain
Tributary condition /stability [e g highly eroding sloughing banks] Explain
Presence of run/nffle /pool complexes Explain
Tributary geometry ck List
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope) %
(c) Flow
Tributary provides for ck List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year Pick -List
Describe flow regime
Other information on duration and volume
Surface flow is Fhck List Characteristics
Subsurface flow I ck List Explain findings
❑ Dye (or other) test performed
Tributary has (check all that apply)
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply)
❑ clear natural line impressed on the bank
❑
the presence of litter and debris
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
❑
the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down bent or absent
❑
sediment sorting
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑
scour
❑ sediment deposition
❑
multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑
abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list)
❑ Discontinuous OHWM 7 Explain
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
High Tide Line indicated by []
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings /charactenstics
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list)
me lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply)
Mean High Water Mark indicated by
❑ survey to available datum
❑ physical markings
❑ vegetation lines /changes in vegetation types
(m) Chemical Charactenstics
Characterize tributary (e g water color is clear discolored oily film water quality general watershed characteristics etc )
Explain
Identify specific pollutants if known
6A natural or man made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e g where the stream temporarily flows underground or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices) Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody s flow
regime (e g flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert) the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break
'Ibid

(iv) Biological Characteristics Channel supports (check all that apply)
❑ Riparian corridor Characteristics (type average width)
❑ Wetland fringe Characteristics
❑ Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish/spawn areas Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally sensitive species Explain findings
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity Explain findings
2 Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics
(a) General Wetland Characteristics
Properties
Wetland size acres
Wetland type Explain
Wetland quality Explain
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries Explain
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non TNW
Flow is ck List Explain
Surface flow is „ c k List
Characteristics
Subsurface flow Pick -List Explain findings
❑ Dye (or other) test performed
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non TNW
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection Explain
❑ Ecological connection Explain
❑ Separated by berm/barrier Explain
(d) Proximity (RelationshID) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pck "List river rules from TNW
Project waters are ck List aenal (straight) miles from TNW
Flow is from ck List'
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Pick List floodplam
(n) Chemical Characteristics
Characterize wetland system (e g water color is clear brown oil film on surface water quality general watershed
characteristics etc ) Explain
Identify specific pollutants if known
(m) Biological Characteristics Wetland supports (check all that apply)
❑ Riparian buffer Characteristics (type average width)
❑ Vegetation type/percent cover Explain
❑ Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish/spawn areas Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally sensitive species Explain findings
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity Explain findings
3 Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis ek List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered m the cumulative analysis

For each wetland specify the following
Directly abuts9 (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts9 (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological chemical and physical functions being performed
C SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical physical and biological integrity
of a TNW For each of the following situations a significant nexus exists if the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include but are not limited to the volume duration and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e g between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW) Similarly the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplam is not solely determinative of significant nexus
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook Factors to consider include for example
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW9
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species such as feeding nesting spawning or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) have other relationships to the physical chemical or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below
1 Sigmficant nexus findings for non RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary itself then go to Section III D
2 Significant nexus findings for non RPW and its adjacent wetlands where the non RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands then go to Section III D
3 Sigmficant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands then go to
Section III D
D DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY)
1 TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area
TNWs linear feet width (ft) Or acres
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs acres
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
�]
Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year round are jurisdictional Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial
® Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow seasonally (e g typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III B Provide rationale indicating that tnbutary flows
seasonally Stream AL is an intermittent channel based on a score of 24 5 on the NCDWQ Stream ID form Stream AA is an
intermittent channel based on a score of 22 on the NCDWQ Stream ID form

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply)
Tributary waters 312 726 linear feet width (ft)
❑ Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
3 Non RPWs8 that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is junsdichonal Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply)
B Tnbutary waters linear feet width (ft)
Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
4 Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year round Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III D 2 above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow seasonally Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III B and rationale in Section III D 2 above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area acres
5 Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands have a significant nexus with a TNW are junsidictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area acres
6 Wetlands adjacent to non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Q Wetlands adjacent to such waters and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area acres
7 Impoundments of jurisdictional waters 9
As a general rule the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from waters of the U S or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 6) or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below)
E ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA STATE] WATERS INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS THE USE
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) 10
which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes
from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce
which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce
Interstate isolated waters Explain
Other factors Explain
8See Footnote # 3
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III D 6 of the Instructional Guidebook
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Junsdichon Following Rapanos

Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply)
[]
Tributary waters linear feet width (ft)
❑ Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
❑ Wetlands acres
F NON JURISDICTIONAL WATERS INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area these areas did not meet the cntena in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements
❑ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in SWANCC the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
Migratory Bird Rule (MBR)
Waters do not meet the Significant Nexus standard where such a finding is required for jurisdiction Explain The wetlands AB
AC AK AJ and AI do not have any connections to jurisdictional waters and exist as isolated poor quality wetlands in an
area heavily disturbed by human activities
❑ Other (explain if not covered above)
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area where the sole potential bans of junsdiction is the MBR
factors (i a presence of migratory birds presence of endangered species use of water for irrigated agriculture) using best professional
udgment (check all that apply)
Non wetland waters (i a rivers streams) linear feet width (ft)
Lakes /ponds acres
Other non wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
Wetlands acres
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the Significant Nexus standard where such
a finding is required forjunsdictmon (check all that apply)
Non wetland waters (i a rivers streams) linear feet width (ft)
Lakes /ponds acres
Other non wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
Wetlands 134acres
SECTION IV DATA SOURCES
A SUPPORTING DATA Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply checked items shall be included in case file and where checked
and requested appropriately reference sources below)
Maps plans plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant
❑ Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report
Data sheets prepared by the Comps
Comps navigable waters study
U S Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas
❑ USGS NHD data
® USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
U S Geological Survey map(s) Cite scale & quad name
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey Citation Soil Conservation Service Soil Survey of Wake County
November 1970 118 p Soil Conservation Senvice Soil Survey of Durham County 1976 74p
National wetlands inventory map(s) Cite name
State/Local wetland inventory map(s)
FEMA/FIRM maps
100 year Floodplam Elevation is (National Geodectmc Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs ❑ Aenal (Name & Date) NAIP 2009 Ortho
or ❑ Other (Name & Date)
Previous determination (s) File no and date of response letter
Applicable /supporting case law
Applicable /supporting scientific literature
Other information (please specify) Field Verification and Delineation

B ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U S Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook
SECTION I BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD)
B DISTRICT OFFICE FILE NAME AND NUMBER
C PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION Hopson/Clegg NCDOT Rail Division Wake and Durham
Counties North Carolina Wetland AE AD
State NC County /pansh/borough Wake and Durham City Morrisville (nearest)
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format) Lat 35 852469 [l Long 78 841663 W
Universal Transverse Mercator
Name of nearest waterbody
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 030202010801
® Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is /are available upon request
❑ Check if other sites (e g offsite mitigation sites disposal sites etc ) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form
D REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
Office (Desk) Determination Date
Field Determination Date(s) 05/19/11
SECTION II SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION
There re no navigable waters of the US within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) junsdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area [Required]
B Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide
Waters are presently used or have been used in the past or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce
Explain
B CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION
There re waters of the U S within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area [Required]
1 Waters of the U S
a Indicate presence of waters of U S in review area (check all that apply) i
TNWs including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Relatively permanent waters (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters including isolated wetlands
b Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U S in the review area
Non wetland waters linear feet width (ft) and/or acres
Wetlands 022 acres
c Limits (boundaries) of Jurisdiction based on R987 Dehneahon Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known)
2 Non regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable) 3
❑ Potentially jurisdictional waters and /or wetlands were assessed within the review area and deterrmned to be not jurisdictional
Explain
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below
2 For purposes of this form an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year round or has continuous flow at least seasonally
(e g typically 3 months)
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section III F

SECTION III CWA ANALYSIS
A TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs If the aquatic resource is a TNW complete
Section III A 1 and Section III D 1 only if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW complete Sections III A 1 and 2
and Section III D 1 otherwise see Section III B below
1 TNW
Identify TNW
Summarize rationale supporting determmation
2 Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is adjacent
B CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY)
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands if any and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under R4vaaor have been met
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are relatively permanent
waters (RPWs) i e tributaries that typically flow year round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e g typically 3
months) A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year round
(perennial) flow skip to Section III D 2 If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow
skip to Section III D 4
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW or a wetland directly abutting an RPW a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW If the tributary has adjacent wetlands the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands This significant nexus evaluation that combines for
analytical purposes the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary or its adjacent wetlands or both If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands complete Section HI B 1 for
the tributary Section III B 2 for any onsite wetlands and Section III B 3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary both onsite
and offsite The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III C below
1 Characteristics of non TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions
Watershed size Pick List
Drainage area Pick List
Average annual rainfall inches
Average annual snowfall inches
(n) Physical Characteristics
(a) Relationship with TNW
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW
❑ Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW
Project waters are ck List river ❑ules from TNW
Project waters are Mck List river miles from RPW
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW
Project waters are ck List aerial (straight) mules from RPW
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries Explain
Identify flow route to TNW5
Tributary stream order if known
Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales ditches washes and erosional features generally and in the and
West
5 Flow route can be described by identifying e g tributary a which flows through the review area to flow into tributary b which then flows into TNW

(b) General Tnbutary Characteristics (check all that apply)
Tnbutary is ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man made) Explain
❑ Manipulated (man altered) Explain
Tnbutary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate)
Average width feet
Average depth feet
Average side slopes ck Eist
Pnmary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply)
❑ Silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation Type /% cover
❑ Other Explain
Tributary condition /stability [e g highly eroding sloughing banks] Explain
Presence of run/nffle /pool complexes Explain
Tributary geometry ck List
Tnbutary gradient (approximate average slope) %
(c) Flow
Tnbutary provides for ck List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year Pick -List
Describe flow regime
Other information on duration and volume
Surface flow is ck List Characteristics
Subsurface flow ek Lis Explain findings
❑ Dye (or other) test performed
Tributary has (check all that apply)
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply)
❑ clear natural line impressed on the bank
❑ the presence of litter and debris
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑ destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
❑ the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down bent or absent
❑ sediment sorting
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑ scour
❑ sediment deposition
❑ multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑ abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list)
❑ Discontinuous OHWM 7 Explain
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply)
❑ High Tide Line indicated by ❑
Mean High Water Mark indicated by
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ survey to available datum
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings
❑ physical markings / charactenstics
❑ vegetation lines /changes in vegetation types
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list)
(m) Chenucal Charactenstics
Charactenze tributary (e g water color is clear discolored
oily film water quality general watershed characteristics etc )
Explain
Identify specific pollutants if known
6A natural or man made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e g where the stream temporarily flows underground or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices) Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody s flow
regime (e g flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert) the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break
'Ibid

(iv) Biological Characteristics Channel supports (check all that apply)
❑ Riparian corridor Characteristics (type average width)
❑ Wetland fringe Characteristics
❑ Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish/spawn areas Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally sensitive species Explain findings
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity Explain findings
2 Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics
(a) General Wetland Characteristics
Properties
Wetland size acres
Wetland type Explain
Wetland quality Explain
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries Explain
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non TNW
Flow is EFek List Explain
Surface flow is ck List
Characteristics
Subsurface flow Pick Ltst Explain findings
❑ Dye (or other) test performed
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non TNW
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection Explain
❑ Ecological connection Explain
❑ Separated by berm/barrier Explain
(d) Proximity ( Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are ck Lis river miles from TNW
Project waters are ck List aerial (straight) miles from TNW
Flow is from ck L
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Nck List floodplain
(u) Chenucal Characteristics
Characterize wetland system (e g water color is clear brown oil film on surface water quality general watershed
characteristics etc ) Explain
Identify specific pollutants if known
(in) Biological Characteristics Wetland supports (check all that apply)
❑ Riparian buffer Characteristics (type average width)
❑ Vegetation type /percent cover Explain
❑ Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish/spawn areas Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally sensitive species Explain findings
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity Explain findings
3 Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis fick List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis

For each wetland specify the following
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
AE Y
AD Y
Summarize overall biological cherrucal and physical functions being performed
C SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical physical and biological integrity
of a TNW For each of the following situations a significant nexus exists if the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include but are not linuted to the volume duration and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e g between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW) Similarly the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplam is not solely determinative of significant nexus
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW as identified in the Rapanos Gmdance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook Factors to consider include for example
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW')
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species such as feeding nesting spawning or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW9
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs'?
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) have other relationships to the physical chemical or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below
1 Significant nexus findings for non RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tnbutary itself then go to Section III D
2 Significant nexus findings for non RPW and its adjacent wetlands where the non RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands then go to Section III D
3 Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tnbutary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands then go to
Section III D
D DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS THE SUBJECT WATERSIWETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY)
1 TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area
TNWs linear feet width (ft) Or acres
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs acres
2 RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
�] Tributanes of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year round are jurisdictional Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial
�] Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow seasonally (e g typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III B Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply)
Tributary waters linear feet width (ft)
❑ Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
3 Non RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide estimates for junsdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply)
❑ Tributary waters linear feet width (ft)
❑ Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tnbutanes typically flow year round Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III D 2 above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW Wetland flows from across Hwy 54 /Chapel Hill Road (large culvert) to under the
existing railroad bed and out of the subject area where it becomes a junsdictional stream channel The culvert
below the railroad bed indicates that flow is significant through this area
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow seasonally Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III B and rationale in Section III D 2 above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area 022 acres
5 Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands have a significant nexus with a TNW are junsidictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area acres
6 Wetlands adjacent to non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to such waters and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area acres
7 Impoundments of jurisdictional waters'
As a general rule the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains junsdictional
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from waters of the U S or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 6) or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below)
E ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA STATE] WATERS INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS THE USE
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) io
which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes
from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce
which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce
Interstate isolated waters Explain
❑ Other factors Explain
BSee Footnote # 3
9 To complete the analysts refer to the key in Section III D 6 of the Instructional Guidebook
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Junsdictwn Following Rapanos

Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting deternunation
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply)
Tributary waters linear feet width (ft)
Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
❑ Wetlands acres
F NON JURISDICTIONAL WATERS INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements
❑ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in SWANCC the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
Migratory Bird Rule (MBR)
Waters do not meet the Significant Nexus standard where such a finding is required for jurisdiction Explain
❑ Other (explain if not covered above)
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (1 a presence of nugratory birds presence of endangered species use of water for irrigated agriculture) using best professional
udgment (check all that apply)
Non wetland waters (i a rivers streams) linear feet width (ft)
Lakes /ponds acres
Other non wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
❑ Wetlands acres
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the Significant Nexus standard where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply)
Non wetland waters (i a rivers streams) linear feet width (ft)
Lakes /ponds acres
Other non wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
❑ Wetlands acres
SECTION IV DATA SOURCES
A SUPPORTING DATA Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply checked items shall be included in case file and where checked
and requested appropriately reference sources below)
Maps plans plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant
Data sheets prepared /submtted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant
❑ Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report
Data sheets prepared by the Corps
Corps navigable waters study
U S Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas
❑ USGS NHD data
® USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
U S Geological Survey map(s) Cite scale & quad name
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey Citation Soil Conservation Service Soil Survey of Wake County
November 1970 118 p Soil Conservation Senvice Soil Survey of Durham County 1976 74p
National wetlands inventory map(s) Cite name
State/Local wetland inventory map(s)
FEMA/FIRM maps
100 year Floodplam Elevation is (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs ❑ Aerial (Name & Date) NAIP 2009 Ortho
or ❑ Other (Name & Date)
�] Previous detemmnation(s) File no and date of response letter
❑ Applicable /supporting case law
❑ Applicable /supporting scientific literature
Other information (please specify) Field Verification and Delineation
B ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD

U S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS V410OPY/
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID 200620636 County Durham U S G S Quad Southeast Durham & Cary
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERNIINATION
Property Owner NCDOT - Rail Division
Attn Marc Hamel, Environment & PIanning Branch
Mailing Address 1553 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1553
Telephone No (919) 733 -7245, ext 270
Authorized Agent EcoScience Corporation
Attn Layna Thrush
Mailing Address 1101 Haynes Street, Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27604
Telephone No (919) 828 -3433
Property description
Size (acres) —133 Nearest Town Durham
Nearest Waterway unnamed tributaries to Stirrup Iron and Burdens Creeks River Basin Neuse and Cane Fear
USGS HUC 03020201 & 03030002 Coordinates N 35 873° W 78 852 °
Location description Study area for the Hopson Road Grade Separation and Norfolk Southern Track Realignment
(TIP Y 4117B), as shown on the drawings submitted on 2/21/2006
Indicate Which of the Followmi, Apply
A Preliminary Determination
Based on preliminary information there may be waters of the U S including wetlands on the above described property
We strongly suggest you have this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA)
jurisdiction To be considered final a jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps This preliminary
determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Admimstrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33
CFR Part 331)
B Approved Determination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act Unless there is a change in the la x or
our published regulations this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification
X There are waters of the U S including wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification
_ We strongly suggest you have the waters of the U S including wetlands on your property delineated Due to the size of
your property and/or our present workload the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely
manner For a more timely delineation you may wish to obtain a consultant To be considered final any delineation must
be verified by the Corps
X The waters of the U S including wetlands on your property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified
by the Corps We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed Upon completion this survey should be reviewed
and verified by the Corps Once verified this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA
jurisdiction on your property which provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations may be relied
upon for a period not to exceed five years

AID 200620636
The waters of the U S including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations this deterrmnation may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification
There are no waters of the U S to include wetlands present on the above described property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344) Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311) If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program please contact Eric Alsmever at [phone], ext 23
C Basis For Determination
The study area contains stream channels of unnamed tributaries to Stirrup Iron and Burdens Creeks, tributaries of the
Neuse and Cape Fear Rivers, respectively, with indicators of ordinary high water marks, and wetlands adjacent to the
tributaries
D Remarks
Per site inpection on 1/10/2006, wetlands and streams are accurately depicted on maps submitted on 2/21/2006 There
are isolated wetlands and ponds within the study area that are not subject to Section 404 because of no connection to
jurisdictional waters and no nexus to interstate commerce
E Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved ,jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved, jurisdictional determination for the above described site If you object to this
determination you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR. part 331 Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the South Atlantic Division Division Office at the Following
address
Mr Michael F Bell Administrative Appeal Review Officer
CESAD ET CO R
U S Army Corps of Engineers South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street Room 9M15
Atlanta Georgia 30303 8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps the Corps must determine that it is complete that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 3315 and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP
Should you decide to submit an RFA form it must be received at the above address by 8/28/2006
* *It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence **
1
Corps Regulatory Official
Date 6/26/2006 Expiration Date 6/26/2011
Copy furnished EcoScience

D APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information
• ACCEPT You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD
• APPEAL If you disagree with the approved JD you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice
E PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD The Preliminary JD is not appealable If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction Also you may provide new
information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD
T ~ NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS4AND PROCESS ANDk
L - r REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant NCDOT - Rail Division/
File Number 200620636
Date 6/26/2006
TIP Y 4117B
Attached is
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above
decision Additional information may be found at http / /www usace army mil/inet/functions /cw /cecwo /reg or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331
PERMIT INITIAL PROFFERED PERT You may accept or object to the permit
• ACCEPT If you received a Standard Permit you may sign the permit document and return it to the distract engineer for final
authorization If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP) you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety and waive all rights to appeal the
permit including its terms and conditions and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit
• OBJECT If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may request that the permit be modified accordingly You must complete Section II of this form and return
the form to the district engineer Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of
the date of this notice or you will forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future Upon receipt of your
letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may (a) modify the permit to address all of your
concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit having
determined that the permit should be issued as previously written After evaluating your objections the
district en meer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below
B PROFFERED PERMIT You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT If you received a Standard Permit you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP) you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety and waive all rights to appeal the
permit including its terms and conditions and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit
• APPEAL If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and
conditions therein you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal
Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer This form must
be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice
C PERMIT DENIAL You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Comps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice
D APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information
• ACCEPT You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD
• APPEAL If you disagree with the approved JD you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice
E PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD The Preliminary JD is not appealable If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction Also you may provide new
information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD

SECTION H - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record )
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record However, you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is already in the administrative record
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION
If you have questions regarding this decision
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you
and/or the appeal process you may contact
may also contact
Eric Alsmeyer
Mr Michael Bell Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
CESAD ET CO R
US Army Corps of Engineers
U S Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Atlanta Georgia 30303 -8801
RIGHT OF ENTRY Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel and any
government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process You
will be provided a 15 day notice of any site investigation and will have the opportunity to participate in all site
investigations
Date
Telephone number
Signature of appellant or agent
DIVISION ENGINEER
Commander
U S Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -3490

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U S Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook
SECTION I BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD)
B DISTRICT OFFICE FILE NAME AND NUMBER
C PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION Hopson/Clegg NCDOT Rail Division Wake and Durham
Counties North Carolina Stream AF AN AP Wetland AG AO AQ AR
State NC County /pansh/borough Wake and Durham City Morrisville (nearest)
Center coordinates of site (latAong in degree decimal format) Lat 35 852469 N Long 78 841663 EW
Universal Transverse Mercator
Name of nearest waterbody
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 030202010801
Check if map /diagram of review area and /or potential jurisdictional areas is /are available upon request
Check if other sites (e g offsite mitigation sites disposal sites etc ) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form
D REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
Office (Desk) Determination Date
Field Deternunation Date(s)
SECTION II SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION
There a no navigable waters of the US within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area [Required]
Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide
Waters are presently used or have been used in the past or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce
Explain
B CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION
There Am waters of the U S within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area [Required]
Waters of the U S
a Indicate presence of waters of U S in review area (check all that apply) '
TNWs including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Relatively permanent waters (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters including isolated wetlands
b Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U S in the review area
Non wetland waters 118 6 + 110 66 (Stream AN /AP) linear feet width (ft) and /or acres
Wetlands 044 + 042 (Wetland AO /AQ /AR) acres
c Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on 1987,.Dehneatioi Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known)
2 Non regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable) 3
Potentially jurisdictional waters and /or wetlands were assessed within the review area and deterrrnned to be not jurisdictional
Explain
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section ]II below
2 For purposes of this form an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year round or has continuous flow at least seasonally
(e g typically 3 months)
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section III F

SECTION III CWA ANALYSIS
A TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs If the aquatic resource is a TNW complete
Section III A 1 and Section III D 1 only if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW complete Sections III A 1 and 2
and Section III D 1 otherwise see Section III B below
1 TNW
Identify TNW
Summarize rationale supporting determination
2 Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is adjacent
B CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY)
Tlus section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanor have been met
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are relatively permanent
waters' (RPWs) i e tributaries that typically flow year round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e g typically 3
months) A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional If the aquatic resource is not a TNW but has year round
(perennial) flow skip to Section III D 2 If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow
skip to Section III D 4
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water even
though a significant nexus finding is not regtured as a matter of law
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW or a wetland directly abutting an RPW a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW If the tributary has adjacent wetlands the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands This significant nexus evaluation that combines for
analytical purposes the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary or its adjacent wetlands or both If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands complete Section III B 1 for
the tributary Section III B 2 for any onsite wetlands and Section HI B 3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary both onsite
and offsite The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III C below
1 Characteristics of non TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions
Watershed size Est
Drainage area 65 acres
Average annual rainfall inches
Average annual snowfall inches
(u) Physical Characteristics
(a) Relationship with TNW
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW
EJ Tributary flows through 5 or more) tributaries before entering TNW
Project waters are
ck List river miles from TNW
Project waters are
ck Lisi river miles from RPW
Project waters are
Eck ck List aerial (straight) rmles from TNW
Project waters are
List aerial (straight) miles from RPW
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries Explain
Identify flow route to TNW5
Tributary stream order if known
Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales ditches washes and erosional features generally and in the and
West
5 Flow route can be described by identifying e g tributary a which flows through the review area to flow into tributary b which then flows into TNW

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply)
Tnbutary is ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man made) Explain
❑ Manipulated (man altered) Explain
Tnbutary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate)
Average width 4 feet
Average depth 1 feet
Average side slopes 1 (or greater)
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply)
❑ Silts ® Sands
❑ Cobbles ® Gravel
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation Type /% cover
❑ Other Explain
❑ Concrete
❑ Muck
Tributary condition /stability [e g highly eroding sloughing banks] Explain stable
Presence of run/nffle /pool complexes Explain Moderate riffle /run /pool complexes
Tributary geometry elahvely straight
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope) %
(c) Flow
Tributary provides for easonal flow
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year _ or greater)
Describe flow regime
Other information on duration and volume
Surface flow is Discrete and confined Characteristics
Subsurface flow idniown Explain findings
❑ Dye (or other) test performed
Tributary has (check all that apply)
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply)
❑ clear natural line impressed on the bank
❑
the presence of litter and debris
❑ changes in the character of soil
®
destruction of terrestnal vegetation
❑ shelving
❑
the presence of wrack line
® vegetation matted down bent or absent
®
sediment sorting
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
®
scour
® sediment deposition
❑
multiple observed or predicted flow events
® water staining
❑
abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list)
❑ Discontinuous OHWM 7 Explain
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
❑ High Tide Line indicated by []
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings / charactenstics
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list)
me lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply)
Mean High Water Mark indicated by
❑ survey to available datum
❑ physical markings
❑ vegetation lines /changes in vegetation types
(m) Chemical Charactenstics
Characterize tributary (e g water color is clear discolored
Explain no visible signs of chemical input
Identify specific pollutants if known
oily film water quality general watershed characteristics etc )
6A natural or man made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e g where the stream temporarily flows underground or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices) Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody s flow
regime (e g flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert) the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break
'Ibid

(iv) Biological Characteristics Channel supports (check all that apply)
® Riparian corridor Characteristics (type average width) 100+ meters on either side
® Wetland fringe Characteristics
® Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish/spawn areas Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally sensitive species Explain findings
® Aquatic /wildlife diversity Explain findings Relatively decent habitat opportunity for aquatic organisms
2 Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics
(a) General Wetland Characteristics
Properties
Wetland size 044acres
Wetland type Explain Riparian wetland
Wetland quality Explain
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries Explain
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non TNW
Flow is erenmahflow Explain
Surface flow is 0
Characteristics
Subsurface flow Rik List Explain findings
❑ Dye (or other) test performed
(c) Wetland Adiacency Determination with Non TNW
® Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection Explain
❑ Ecological connection Explain
❑ Separated by berm/barrier Explain
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are ckLfis river miles from TNW
Project waters are pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW
Flow is from L
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the k List floodplain
(n) Chemical Characteristics
Characterize wetland system (e g water color is clear brown oil film on surface water quality general watershed
characteristics etc ) Explain
Identify specific pollutants if known
(in) Biological Characteristics Wetland supports (check all that apply)
® Riparian buffer Characteristics (type average width)
❑ Vegetation type /percent cover Explain
® Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish/spawn areas Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally sensitive species Explain findings
® Aquatic /wildlife diversity Explain findings
3 Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis

For each wetland specify the following
Directly abuts9 (Y/N) Size (m acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (m acres)
AG Y 044
AO /AQ /AR Y 042
Summarize overall biological cherrucal and physical functions being performed Riparian wetland that provides nutrient
filtration pollutant removal and buffer for stream AF and AN /AP
C SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical physical and biological integrity
of a TNW For each of the following situations a significant nexus exists if the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include but are not limited to the volume duration and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e g between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW) Similarly the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook Factors to consider include for example
Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) provide habitat and lrfecycle support functions for fish and
other species such as feeding nesting spawning or reanng young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) have other relationships to the physical chemical or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below
1 Significant nexus findings for non RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary itself then go to Section III D
2 Significant nexus findings for non RPW and its adjacent wetlands where the non RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands then go to Section III D
3 Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands then go to
Section III D
D DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY)
1 TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area
TNWs linear feet width (ft) Or acres
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs acres
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
�] Tributanes of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year round are jurisdictional Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial
Q Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow seasonally (e g typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section IlI B Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply)
B Tributary waters linear feet width (ft)
Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
3 Non RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply)
❑ Tributary waters linear feet width (ft)
❑ Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
4 Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands
EJ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year round Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III D 2 above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW Stream AF02 is a stream with a NCDWQ Stream ID form score of 32 5 indicating that is
is perennial Wetland AG directly abuts the right bank of the stream
ED Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow seasonally Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III B and rationale in Section III D 2 above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW Stream AN /AP is a stream with a NCDWQ Stream ID form score of 20 indicating that it is
intenmttent Wetland AO and AR directly abut both banks of Stream AN /AP
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area 044 + 042 acres
5 Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with smularly situated adjacent wetlands have a significant nexus with a TNW are junsidictional Data supporting tins
conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area acres
6 Wetlands adjacent to non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to such waters and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area acres
7 Impoundments of jurisdictional waters 9
As a general rule the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from waters of the U S or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 6) or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below)
E ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA STATE] WATERS INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS THE USE
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) 10
which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes
from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce
which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce
Interstate isolated waters Explain
8See Footnote # 3
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III D 6 of the Instructional Guidebook
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos

❑ Other factors Explain
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting deterimnation
Provide estimates for Jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply)
❑ Tributary waters linear feet width (ft)
❑ Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
❑ Wetlands acres
F NON JURISDICTIONAL WATERS INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements
❑ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in SWANCC the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
Migratory Bird Rule (MBR)
❑ Waters do not meet the Significant Nexus standard where such a finding is required for Jurisdiction Explain
❑ Other (explain if not covered above)
Provide acreage estimates for non Jurisdictional waters in the review area where the sole potential basis of Jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i a presence of migratory birds presence of endangered species use of water for irrigated agriculture) using best professional
Judgment (check all that apply)
Non wetland waters (i a rivers streams) linear feet width (ft)
Lakes /ponds acres
Other non wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
Wetlands acres
Provide acreage estimates for non Jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the Significant Nexus standard where such
a finding is required for Jurisdiction (check all that apply)
Non wetland waters (i a rivers streams) linear feet width (ft)
Lakes /ponds acres
Other non wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
Wetlands acres
SECTION IV DATA SOURCES
A SUPPORTING DATA Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply checked items shall be included in case file and where checked
and requested appropriately reference sources below)
® Maps plans plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant
® Data sheets prepared /submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant
❑ Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report
Data sheets prepared by the Corps
Corps navigable waters study
U S Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas
❑ USGS NHD data
® USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
U S Geological Survey map(s) Cite scale & quad name
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey Citation Soil Conservation Service Soil Survey of Wake County
November 1970 118 p Soil Conservation Senvice Soil Survey of Durham County 1976 74p
National wetlands inventory map(s) Cite name
State/Local wetland inventory map(s)
FEMA/FIRM maps
100 year Floodplam Elevation is (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs ® Aerial (Name & Date) NAIP 2009 Ortho
or ❑ Other (Name & Date)
❑ Previous deterrrunation(s) File no and date of response letter
Applicable /supporting case law
Applicable /supporting scientific literature
Other information (please specify) Field Verification and Delineation

B ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD

r
(CONTRACT 54000 1 STR01T1B TIP PROJECT U- 4716A/C I
o 0
�I
o m of o
m _
_
m 0
�
N O o o D
n
m
CD 0
z cZi
_ _
O O
n T
c
c
C
n
-1 _0
C '0
M 0 O
m c-
0 m
M
n
0 r
m m
0 Z
i
ca _
rn 4
°i 3
UJ )
04 m --q
0 o
rnG) Da m
a im
m -a -=
N m O n sz
z . m�
cn r w
w�+m
0
NS
L .S� b O
1DaLpp2 O O o
� �D6rtX MI z.ma m
0 a- o m s
"0 ym c�ca"�
�� O�m2jc a oa °
aZ M� 0ZyA >�o
mho �xmm
M .QT y�
� N
m v -V �»
m mm m
W
v
z
4 on
C7
a
s , z o
1 -` 1
r
m
z
0
z
m
m
x
zC
mC
8
o �
y
CrJ
p It
o Z
z �
It
z
0 b
l=7
O
M
•i
°z Z
C1/,
m
r
D
z
0
U)
U)
T1
N
m
n
D
z
D
0
0
WAKE C pUNN
0
C
X
D
O
m
0
0
D
S-n
v�
o
X
0
r
z
m
C
��
00
0
�o
0�
z
=
Dm
�rn
z�
GAD
��
C7
�
mD
00
�?
0�
r
m z
z K
rn_
c/)
C
DK
cn-v
mpG
z
DZ
=?
DD
M
Zmm�0>
Zw
i z
U)
U�
0
zo
;d
n
=
co
z
�
O
_
CG)
r-
m
m �
z
* **
ys
A
��
0
C a
G)
O
fO
e
N
p
7
m

2 23 56 PM
\Sheets \HO son hyd Ilwetb dgn
$$$$USERNAMe$$$$ I
`\ OL -2121 ON JMd 33S
\ \, 010 OO +LL££ d1S 3NIIH :)IVW
��s
� \ \ `I � I I I I I I � II � � II , \` -- ^396'
m Ili II �jlll� I �Illm �r 1
e
_ II I I II)
0cs - <�� l I)IIIII� I IIII II I' I / \ I I
II m
n I� II \ + \ \I j fil\ �I'J I
o
Z6E —�0E
o \\ \ \6
s
\1+
�r
\ I /
-4e \ c as D
_ _ - ,w I 11 __ pull, ,III
�IL__ i�� ��-a - Illillllilll1111
1I1�11111N
r IIII IIII \111
�ee84 — -39�8g +
IIII IIII �� ` III 111111
/I — J �� �? I 1 N � _ i� I i I ��I` ' J_ - -_'ti _ Iillllllllllll Ijlllllllllll�llll
;g
m
l' \��� �0� ,\\\ I
/ / w n \\ lT O
Ft>4 o X o / m �� �8w a I I m; I + °o° n I e= s°
1,� -
it
;�: ® w m I IIII I i� I 6 II ,,,m'
c I ` I 11 II II �I
10;,
>I X
zxas I�mll II I le \ \\
2= c1 \1 I / ` am W, 1� III /�o
(z)IM r x� —x I x
Z »T> z Ih \ 1 1
// w I� I II 11 I II I I O
N�9> y o I I \I� I m \) I i = I II I l\
>rs� Imo♦ yz /� / /// D C `Ifrj�1 I 1 r I
D I J11
I \ \
z It
L I
o - 4 D
o l '
0<
/ I I I I 36z/ I I I I r-
7)
<
\'� $ J I� I P\ I J I ` 1� j II o
m �° �° v \ y \- ��� _��3a�� 1 I 1 \! IAN IO I ) r'
A n n Z �' 1 \\ \ 1; \-' I I I ) I I I D o I�l I• p geJ \\ i
CC [�
01 3
Z
wl N z 0 L1 7LC� \I w�
a ` � n Z �,�, �l i Q /' z.� r �( !J `�\ III \ \r l ; "' 171 Ile �' \ 14 11 , II � I C_
I
\l m0 I \ I Al 33 8 +6 41 /
,°, '^ �\ // I I� �- [I J/ 113 + I y IIII
v \ w j
-\ m �m i I\ l ^ J \ III III/ I II \I I 66 Ill lm I
x//310_ I
0-4
oo m m m
DD
oO ^ -- / x /e� / `�m
Q
u Q
o I 1 I/ to ^ N iI =mx
372— �m °�
m (A m J o rO \ O I I
vl A I �� 1 3"00 1 Il I I I ez, �m Iac�iDl 1 I 1 \
m D o o c r \ \�( 21 �I I 10 Iii
v z z z cm stem G1 m l -� I /jJ I \ l m n r
o c° =o mso m I —� T yr>
D` Z rm zT.� �*ln a.r ��i -. Z _ I 'J
D3 r='F.i I m; NN p ,��� 00 Z� as ON
t Z< Z po - / O0 + L6££ blOM� 33S
0 S 3NI1HJlbryy ���,

I
I
III I I �I
II I �i
4
c� II 99 1
I I ti +
li L4199 +'
I I (
�� II
lo�
N IU
J Il
Y
Q
II it I
III II
I �J
II 11
II II
II II
II II
II II
II ,►
ii II
II II
II II
II II
II ii
II II
II II
II it
II II
II II
I
O °
°
°
oil it II
II II
A I
II
i I1
A4ATCHLIINE STq y
SEE I)WG 3391 +00 00
NO
N
W
££�Vl V)
I
l I Q
z
a
D
II
II° ° a
Ili o
II
U
II I
II, b
111 Y
G a
II O
U
it
I
II
z
II
III
I
`5
II
II
II
II
I
I� 1
II
II
II
III
1
r.
it
UI
I
I
I
I
O
i I
I
I
�
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I►
I
I
O
Iv
I
I
�
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
o
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
o I
I
m
'
� ( o
co
I
I
Z Q
I
'
I rl
Q
IZ 00
Q
r z
I� 00
m Q
Q I—
J 0 0
IWFST
ICS' W
LU
O
I I
II
II
I I
II
1
' II
I
1
N
IIII
I I
I
I
II I
Z
I I
} i I
1 �I
II
I III
I II
II
II
II
II
II
II
1 I
1
II
g
o
O
WJ
uj
rn
�o Qa
mW
�o
C3
V)
If
w 0
w
>o
Q =
wz
Q w
J Q
U _
�J m U_
O° z :2
QO
J \
U U
U
I N.
0
x eus
t
Q gZ G m
s �
V ~ �
d
N e
Z Q �
H�
II
Il I I I I I
-
- W I II
I I
II I I II
I I
II � I III II
I I II
II MATCHLINE STA 3377+0000
SEE DWG NO RR -10
/A
1, K z 0
mu 0 W
N N O
O
IL
0 W W U tllti lns UIJ o
o 3
_Z I
Z oQw oW �W �Z Z
Z Q
r
Q
r z
0 m
m Q
Q I—
J 0 0
= I
II
Il I I I I I
-
- W I II
I I
II I I II
I I
II � I III II
I I II
II MATCHLINE STA 3377+0000
SEE DWG NO RR -10
/A
1, K z 0
mu 0 W
N N O
O
IL
0 W W U tllti lns UIJ o
o 3
_Z I
Z oQw oW �W �Z Z
Z Q
r
Q
r z
0 m
m Q
Q I—
J 0 0
= I
ICS' W
LU
LL
Cie
Z
0 N O
O
0O V I
II
Z �
�
� \�� 0 F.-
Z
CD
N W
Lf Jr
° W Z O Z> o
J F
w
u g u Z
x 3a o
CL !
1,I U,
°(D W a
1t�_
00 °
x
r Ii 'D
P
VI
0
0
P
LL /
.
N
[y
a
0
N
m
YO
m
< r
N
K ♦� U m
oC •IN
0 r ^ M¢
os
0
� � z
0
o � 4
z
za o
C
U
O
z
z� z
a zJ
i zg gS
�x
r x—
1 u o �x-
a �X
W sz f
o - 0
_r P
m
W cn
H _ �
N
Z� � --
ep +
Q = m
Qo�z a o
c _ „
f mA W
- -�
III i
UOPD�aMjj p!y UO
Wd
z� z
a zJ
i zg gS
�x
r x—
1 u o �x-
a �X
W sz f
o - 0
_r P
m
W cn
H _ �
N
Z� � --
ep +
Q = m
Qo�z a o
c _ „
f mA W
- -�
III i
UOPD�aMjj p!y UO
Wd

2 22 52 PM
gz gz
Iy
I'
hyd 08weta dgn
0
0 0 0
b 0
i1 °
°°
" 11 0
o0 O
d7H b
° 2
� I
0 mH
QI 0 °
0 •
lI o
I
0
o
II IJ 0 °
o e
III �0 0 0
0
o�
�Q0 0
0
J� o
J 0
0 0
o° °
0
I
1
0
0
0
o_
0I0
0
0
0
o Vitt' O
�o 0 0
8 0
O
� II
0 1
�z r>� o
o � o
d�
C °
0
a
0
oa
m z 0 0
D
9 'y
N '
AIM
o
° z
o
m
N
D
00 Op bb ON OMd 33S
S£££ b'1S 3NIlHDlyw / ��
�1
1 E I I I o I
r I I I I I
"' STA.3336 +00 63 F� �
I I
1 1 I IVAL SSA 3336 +01 00 0
r o T
OT I ► ► 48 SCP
°1
m -i
y ° 5m
DDI
Oz�
� a
dA ,` n,, I U
of My I
m; IIt
o �fA
O I
0 I
0 x J
0
O
a I
0
y
Ca
0 2p
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
o °
rp
0
o w w
0
0
0
50
O
O
a I 0
o
O
o 0
0.
>y L0 m °
^ Z 1
n
o< Z p z m o
0 i o
cp
N �_ n D v oo 0 0
0 LA
V z 00 0 V
00 0 �J
m v
P
G) °
J
_ 0 O�2
_
11 n O J-
0
°o N O
Z O O
o
m m
m �S H
N T O w
r
'T' Z m °m Ino ;o m s P °
OZ mz v
N O Oy 1 0 X� , -'•si z 5
Z nm zm Z
O O mN ar
T Z mm -. +m Or
r
CA V z O n
D 2 M- D ao
O m O N na
o z = m
I
I
I
I
II
I
II
I
I
I m
I o 1tie >
o ti� I m� I �mm V •
II �I I Ki
I
II ml I Imo
n I I I D I I i m�
�i I r l i i SPA
111 I I I I
I I I I T
III I T
I
II I >
s ii I I I a
I I I I I o
I I I 1 1 I o
I ► I ► D
II
I I II ► w
II 11 I I I +
I I � I I ► I °
I I ► � ► I I
P4,
w
w
T
C
I I I I I I
I II I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I ► I I
I I I ► 1 I 1
II I I m C ti
a
1 0► ► I I I I<y o y C
' I II I IF z = CQA \
w z ` 14
I I I I I
I I I I I i co
I II I I
I ►1 i I , �
I� II I I p
I�
II � I >
I II I
1 I ►1 +
II I I V
� I
Z I I D
I +
I I I
I I ► +
I
I I I i
I I I I h
� I �
I Ili
I II I
I II ► 1
I II I
II ►► I F
I II
a
I � I ► c
I
li I i I
I I
MATCHU E STA 3349 + 00 00
SEE DWG NO RR -09
9 11
= Y
n
m
r
C^
>
w
Y
l Bi
L /C
/
/
/
N
r \\
T,
s
$a
Z
�
II
cl
m
e)
o
SL
r
,
u�
m
O
O
S
n
ICI
a
_
r°
r
�
C
I I I I I I
I II I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I ► I I
I I I ► 1 I 1
II I I m C ti
a
1 0► ► I I I I<y o y C
' I II I IF z = CQA \
w z ` 14
I I I I I
I I I I I i co
I II I I
I ►1 i I , �
I� II I I p
I�
II � I >
I II I
1 I ►1 +
II I I V
� I
Z I I D
I +
I I I
I I ► +
I
I I I i
I I I I h
� I �
I Ili
I II I
I II ► 1
I II I
II ►► I F
I II
a
I � I ► c
I
li I i I
I I
MATCHU E STA 3349 + 00 00
SEE DWG NO RR -09
9 11
= Y
n
m
r
C^
>
w
Y
l Bi
L /C
/
/
/
N
r \\
T,

60-NN ON `JMa 33S �� o W
W E IS 3Nti I IHXV/ N a� 00 00+ 0 �
N a
Z U.
O O
, l II U I /lrI II II I� I�� �� "\ ; om s Z Z p�
�jJl rl��llf+l � ° ° ° F w
- // - - z °
400, �o ?c o = a n
C/�g 1 // / i / //, i I °° / 7 II IIII i I I�� \�✓ =off /o \ \Amy re- o
ad
° o o 'N � ° ZQ 'L U
v �� NC
`
�i Z O z
° ( I i 1 I I 398 / > O
�I II I IAmO o/ I _ v:
t o
a+ Z N W
01 c
its ybe-'� \ ` I I i I 1 NI I IL-39 �O n Z
J96— 1 8— / \ 96— QU U
0
IT r $3 0
X _ \��, I IIII I I or
Z
�Cw P G
° m om"
I I III I` I II III HMO o ° $ `era I �P
ou
1\ \ os o / II II °I I ° s C ° z
m <
_ I ° I U➢ U LL z
m m o
0 0 3 c°� �o / \`_ a o"cd
w ro
of p II < (LWmJ
/ I I II I I I 1 b 3 0
zv
la I o l j
Icc
\ 1 it I I L -- - - - -- °
j R
db 2 � W i ° I I w� -. � I� � ��° o �■
NSW I ' ' II I ' I o 0 \\8 f
o/ 0
L- /J) rI 1 e4 +�`' m � I C I I I p/ o I �
3g - \ �I II III I i I II O
l I I z \ J I I III 11 9 I 392
/� I 0
L r i 11 11 1, I I I \ II �seo f p I z
l,J / m I I� I I I/ 'III I I I/ ( z
i�� u I t I 1 1 I � 6
N 0
1 I 1 \
I! \ 1�1 I II w• ag
o? o I
390—
I I aE z�
g
o) o
✓/ /I i 1 i I ly i a�'P° a ° III 2
-390 JO ° DI s r r
III '\� I�f °
I / °
I�w
R P 0L--- / \LWa' `•, °
I \
IIII
\ \\ .3- 360 I I jl I I �� I1 11 II 1 ° IIII
\� \r � I III III 7�gll ICI III
\E � a� ax 1 II III 1
°
366- \� i� /!y \� U g d'� j�4�. I I I�� II I Q
° I�
/ 1 / I \� _�--- •��, -_, � �/ \� �I111 III I� m1 � `" ° I
o
r t
r/ dOS 941 IIII 1111 II r�i \ , 00
/ , _'o 1� e
r f _ 00 L0 +9EEE 'd�S TdAl \ I I I I I y F I lrr r I
e- 00+9M
\\ 370 - -- £9 00 +9 ii1S
I
\ ��\ loI fit r \\I o \ \
\% 1!
w
9 �
MATCHLI E / II I Ill IIII 11 IIII II i�` �, e� I
\ TA 3335 + 00 SEE pWG 00 I `\\`� 1 \ 2 \� °
NO RR_07 �
4sa.5$$
UEP Q4-aMBO PAU uo$RWH\ � .14 $\
Wd LI H z

2 24 49
\She
$$$$US
iyd 13weto dgn
MATCHLINE STA 3405+0000
\ II III
DWG Np RR -12 0 l ° o Ilill IL
'I 1 °l �
�- --
�
I
j i i Ij Ill 1111 � b_ o
l
°
m III
l
qq
I I I I °
°
CD
ko
Cn
QD
j TTm II VIII
1 N r Of 1 QZ SO? WN I3 /
co
_= m o I / •
> = 1 S caa }
m I ll I w
D
S 8z I r I o I� ill I in
o
�y
W m mm I� ll �
oO IZ l p rp
I 0
�.ti 2r rml � I D ll °wN c°n
0
m
Z l i o I I II
o
> Sys // it it ICI I
n P2
NNT u (�
S 2 ^O J
N 9 VINO C% o I I 11 I II
z °C
y
m 1� j II II
ANnD �y z \ // / m i II Il II
v y v/7 /
\ I 1
D I 111 1
�o x
° i 111 1 0
l Sd 1
;�
o�
m r)
z �: a
�Z * go _ov
m m P z
S n = oo
~ aoD
tN� -a
O v O Ps so m \\
Cw a z \ 1 11
N 70 IT v N C+
z 00
m
��
=� a
o
H ,
11
° I-�v r 1 1 1 r
1 0R
H m a ` _ 1\ 1 111 111 11 111 I' R�j�/
m 1
710 ci � z z i s °m >� °m G1 a / /x 1 1
O _° oy t° ro mso 0 + J 11 11 1
D3 ANN DT mN
O Z I MM mac Or
E O�_ -x ©°ice J 51�1
DA H A J s
M n ° = mK 66 +811
N a H
1-kJ
STAN
F yFOCF
C41V AA
"r
1
❑7F
e

3418 +9915 ./ « N o W o
s TCHUNE S' %, RR — 14 � off £/ <� c 1.
aW >Z
W ND /1, W" �a �o ° J u
/ y D G —�° __ __ A Z LL
+ a ��¢ wu � ws mJ � 3 0
LL, u�i ow p
\ C3 r\ r e� �e i 1 � 1� CL
+ W �
\ \ `1 o s a
/1 �,_ C-� \ � •�� � �`_ �� J \III I \l I � ('f Q�z � � e o
cc
O o
Q \ II wl 1 / s = -a
11 4 �y
4n
tD \� ! a Z
Z ex
�++
.. m Q u \ r
0 \ \ Z 17m Z
Q
r� e \ / ✓\ II N \II J�p N� O W Z QZ >O
3l0/ \ \ \ / a� \ V ~ W
oo= 'L sg N 3 0= r
vv z
\\ - - -- -370- 11 \ \ \I9 £ 3 Ss — / /// U
h
l C
_ J -- - - -- 368 - - - - --
\ l I� ---�\ ✓ IIII III ``\ / I \\ \ I�'"� -368— \ \ \\ o
m
366__ - --
3eq
/
©°°
362- _ \\__ 36�� \; Iil'IIII \/�� -�� \o ° \I\ \ K
�✓� \ \ \\ �1\ � \\ III�III � I l (IIII IIII � - - -I / S��d 8 ' Z m��J
/360\, I \ �I I n I III �I \��_- J JY sm¢z
Al I I/ Ire \I�I II/ \`� / O, /ys U
f;3 •� � o �
z
a
y
x\360/' - - \_�
\-
376^ 360 I I I I
{ II _ \
358 \\ II \ IIII I p� �r \\
z
/Q iW
h/ Ii l I
Qm
\352 \// \3s \\ �uy�J \\ III F- u' III III
\JS m II ll) \ III
li� 11I J ze a8
W M I E I 11 I W'
m
a
u �'I III I' I I�JI \Z
LL
/
�
JR I I r' I I --J I/
V)/ /
iuf I I
Q7
\ \a_,zs
3 Ito"
3 f
-�- o \� o � I
o
lu
°��� I "sa ` pt / I �F / 1111 (�1� \
Ltj
II�I I�l I h�dlf I 1 llrlll
I II G� ° J I l l�l'l' 111 i r ,II IIII 2 /'M
C) II ,( \ L>,
0 y��III /� I II l))
c \ I'
-�>, ----_ __ �� � i I/ �,/
�� 11 �/ III ((m I �1n 110
i
f �^ \ l IIN )II 1 )llN Muo �i / / 74, I I l I l I / 1 j11 ! -' \ I,-' r ✓- \ I /�' r I ° X362 `, o' j ,..�' I ' I/ � � Zl- 11 i I;il
\III ° 8 _ _ _Z9F 0000+ S �a �N �Ma
�' £ b1S ��' '� - '
1 ti'W - LM �
u6P q +aMil P!y uos$ Hd sa EL4S$$$
Wd 11 5Z Z

4
2 24 12 PM
\Sheets \Ho son hyd 12weto dgn
$$$$USERNAM$$$$
� tr1--dd ON JMd 33S
X 00 00 + l6££ VIS 3NIIH:)IV W
I cl G
not �� SIB
}
X�
NARRiS�
• ,1 ° BRA "I
V Q ppRA I WCD
CD
k \ /}
, E p I ,_
p o
I° I n
ZZ
r I III ���ff
/r
\� ° \ � 1 Ill 1 1 Z� /
ILI
•II I � I m Q ` III �tJRRIEaOR, \\ 0Q � \
C) Q 0 n n 0 0 ' 11 1
0
1 Q II II I II U /RR /
0 � E Q
a \\ I
o o S
n n na n o 1 �I I v� I I I l 1l �I YnES
0000 o
m I 1 c n o
m
n \
� p,
Db —
� _ I
n
\ 1 I I I
n
no o
Q Q nQ
Q ° 0000 60
ommz — — — --
Z nn n n Q ©47 n
n n o
co QQ n n O Q Q
s
=T> ~ � � �nQ � °�l 1lI I I j Ill I 11 l
�F° � \g
az �A l Ij I Iw ' III I 11 //
n / /� I°
D s
mN rR
PR uS
H N Q o NP z j 00
n8 I/ / I III II Ili
1 1 1 TNERSH/P PENN /NG // o
A n & HARpCD DCM qR q % l l I III /II 0
M r) I C I I l
m a // /z lI II l LEROY E
I- STATE
°`Z° Z
mZ
v
nnn © l0l
Z w /SCiad0n On o / I I I iJ \
/r
CClM PgCI /l / N'
D I �N —
H l o
•
Z
� I I II 11 I I I I 6.9III r C
m m
m °o I m „ o ;m
p
,. O ° 7E,: z° Z- o az m I I II 11 1 I I
Z nn zm ^Fn a per° Z
Q` O DS LN mN NN v z RC
T Zs ny Zm I 'D
a�
H ` o z A� \ / MATCHLINE STA 3405 +00 00 n
° m e DWG NO RR -13
O z Z m
i 1 \
N
II � Ilj D
Z x
x
m� ,
vy � I
_� ; I N�
Dv F D�P X
MCA 0 D rRAIINSP p T
CA r
HD
-
cZiM I
o
0 I
v0 �
/r
\� ° \ � 1 Ill 1 1 Z� /
ILI
•II I � I m Q ` III �tJRRIEaOR, \\ 0Q � \
C) Q 0 n n 0 0 ' 11 1
0
1 Q II II I II U /RR /
0 � E Q
a \\ I
o o S
n n na n o 1 �I I v� I I I l 1l �I YnES
0000 o
m I 1 c n o
m
n \
� p,
Db —
� _ I
n
\ 1 I I I
n
no o
Q Q nQ
Q ° 0000 60
ommz — — — --
Z nn n n Q ©47 n
n n o
co QQ n n O Q Q
s
=T> ~ � � �nQ � °�l 1lI I I j Ill I 11 l
�F° � \g
az �A l Ij I Iw ' III I 11 //
n / /� I°
D s
mN rR
PR uS
H N Q o NP z j 00
n8 I/ / I III II Ili
1 1 1 TNERSH/P PENN /NG // o
A n & HARpCD DCM qR q % l l I III /II 0
M r) I C I I l
m a // /z lI II l LEROY E
I- STATE
°`Z° Z
mZ
v
nnn © l0l
Z w /SCiad0n On o / I I I iJ \
/r
CClM PgCI /l / N'
D I �N —
H l o
•
Z
� I I II 11 I I I I 6.9III r C
m m
m °o I m „ o ;m
p
,. O ° 7E,: z° Z- o az m I I II 11 1 I I
Z nn zm ^Fn a per° Z
Q` O DS LN mN NN v z RC
T Zs ny Zm I 'D
a�
H ` o z A� \ / MATCHLINE STA 3405 +00 00 n
° m e DWG NO RR -13
O z Z m

tw w
�9 £L -2111 ON JMa / t r Q� °
z cc
00 OO +SOb£ V1S 3NIIHD1VW / / / / ��/ \I _� dm Z ^
Q
—\ l � � _,,_\ 1 °� fo \ - FC— S I \ I I I I iI/ l/ I I l y \@ I I f j I I I � / 4 I I I II ti/ / I I i I I � I / I I I I � I 1 I s1 I i I 1 w i I I 1 \ —s u� a I I t ,f/IIJ( I , i • l I I i I Ii�lI+ � I Il ( I I l iiI I � a r / 1 [F I/ ( i J I s— a l i I l / , / l / / m/ � //ljl / ° / r l /�P \ �_ i r , � 0 U' �w�F p �=i �0 LL w z � N W
�ZW
LL
3 o 3 O ° it
wu cr w z w °u
zazm r 0 z an p� off; W:) W
19E - 00 0 0 =
S_-N
� t I II � l ) � i t I / w \ I LL � II t i 1 1 I t I il J � I / l I J I / -I r I I � I I r / • i / / ' I I I m / I ` I t u I I I I ` I / i > ti / 1 ir II ' I \ / I 'm\ J I� I i Jl j \1 4 \I 0I I I I l I i ( I� I I 1 \ I I I I �t w I 1 6 l I �I� J I I II I II I I I 1 r6 I m I I JI \ j � JI �I� °°� I ''i I 1 ti I � i! I rI I I Iti I� I ' I 1 /z I IIi _� ( , \ I , C /I 1 ' I � r I /i i II LL ;l II � / I I II I I j i i IiJ i IIeI£\ I I / I ` I I zII 1 I I I I l I I i rI I '�g �O I I I n I I I I I � �I
i
it,
CL
/
o\ i
` _ H
\ k \ 1 \
\
_
\ �
1
2� 11�I�
n \
\ _l
\ \
�
, \ 6
m f < m°y a ! °
c
n 1� �;Hi 0 —z W w a �
C z^
C~y Hwo ,^ � nL °o
Zb
C3
49e \ O
I
II I N p
or
° 0000 Op z
° o P "' z _ % ° 9 a < v
C3 80
u
m u, >
u z � 0 W 31 bl S3 A0831 I z /TY 0 u u ,
"W
b
°o N z
v C o J z w
u � 9 N ,
( \0 E -3N
f{ o / °q z
Noy 1 jn g &1 06 ) 11 I I I �P° '7
0 oao as
C, P
a 0 P °a°Oa PP° 0000 9E` O
o ° o° °
aa 000 } a
Pp P a {3 z a P a° a 0 9-3 37� o ,
08 `
ILLI
a °/o a 0
° /o oa ° a
° a
/ 0 \ f3 \ ' Yn J 0.
O I °
a ' f
C, 0 o 31
0 C3 C3 �° �I 0 a 0 °i ,'� � 3'
Z I
0:3 II
In 1--o C3
Co
0 �
1Z5 C3
OE
ax \--I) Jill / a�
0� C Ax I I b &l � d
CIL
" 0
CL
III II —360
LU
m < C
Lo
i P C
W
1 x I O t n
`\ \x
1 �` ►�ATCHLINE STA 3391+0000 �� �� , I ,'^ �' \ �X\
__0 \\ \
SEE DWG NO RR -11
u6P 44-aMZI P�4 uos$TH' sa ae4S\ $
Ad bE bZ Z

c ° � � lj II
°
ryl
II IIr �
� I
a �� �� II °•III I� fill II
a°
,ijS1' L i ill ii
I y° ti� ° °
a °� °
i
° o III
�I
I °
0, goo
U
L,j
w °O
tea° \'lll\ I . m °°
° Fill I�
I III I �Z U'� —
g Z O
_ -- - - - - --
'o U) LL
Doll I I� 11 ,
b� 0 144E 1
Jy& °oj� 4E v $
o �
01JS�
Lu
II II ^L I i
• II II
_w
¢LL N N O
QO z h
Q a0 � V
I F � UJ (1=
_ Q Q�E ZU.
❑ Q ��¢ �_ N� = NJ o 3 O
Z OUW . tyY FZ 4�L! Z
(, o�; W7 Z Z z O P) Q
ON W W W
J o o c g F� w
Qa� UU� N
W 2 d
OJ
S Z
o o
I � y o a ��
Z �
s � a
N �
F
iw
f y W i
Z
( w S 0 Z> o
V ~
W
U
l m
10 W
Z
— � o
N
0 0
- - -- ! r
y, UN
a
Z v a
!
O � .IN
a
r�¢
J UU
OY
¢ t
z < «
VLL Z
! 1 + Z
p z a
m J
Z
l -
M- o
p az
U
o
z z
mix
+
O
w
0. g
J �Jf 1 m rA z
w ► �'
a
1
a
0
s 05 W JI o h z
j �QO m S
o V) I - b�
H WZ 4� W N Z
O~ ur U I Z
yQ
• II ' 0
a
CL
Q a
I II
° I III I I
, I
U q
�
CL uQ /_ of
1 Z(
m
W
1:`� II III �I I
oF-
Cno �II jo�0 I n
J t <
J �N Ili M o < W� o�
I
00
J
�a II I I Qs +
�
W II II I� =1
O u
<N
WWit o I it i °'
If
MATCHLINE STA 3433 +U0'-0 5
DWG NO RRA4
Ubp o +amSI pX4 ubscrb \s ae4S\
Wd 6S SZ 2

2 26 21 PM
\Sheet
$$$$LISFF
d ISwetb dgn
Ir LIU ON JMa > \
00 00 +££IF£ ` IS 3NIIH :)IVW I I \
( 37 -� 1
\ \ �
\\ \\ /JbL£ n
\ \\ \ \�L�7 /� — — ----- 1 -) cn�
\� ✓/ /� 1 III I I I (� COO I m J e \\ /� ✓/
W,
3P
f D
/372 " a
0
o
0,'C o
le N 1� I111 I j I I I I 1 1111 li � / g v, �
a /
/ 0
\ \�
>r
\ I III IIII ) N II m� / /9�
o \e/ I l u mD
m o
F� /
\ X370 �_ 11 � `III
_ �� \ ICI II11 I I I lg III ! \ter m +^ ase \r \\
I `\ I II t I I III \ \ \\ \ / N ; \O0\
X e
�\ �o
u S \ � II��I I � I II I III II \ I o ! N aN � D ✓- ; `^
\ _
N sm \-i' JI IlY III / \\ oo r�0 0 \gsF \ \Sn
amD I I\ V \ (A
�I '� x a r
O A II MT r — %I I I
000 2 � _= -� T � / i
m s i Ic IIII II i° °> 0 `—�
°
Id€ / i z — Z�
$ m G
z �Fq �� �ss� �II il' I I 15 c)g� °
p 11 1 I q D' M py \ 0-f 01 y }g3
' jj 1 eE I OI1 \` 0 11 cog F- a, I §a
z 01
D
o o =S
a D _
1 III I d
-�> `\ IIII III
$ ss
Z A I III Ie1 "'
I I m
I F 0
z..= r° I I I I ° I I Q\s'
�
> / 1
w'mo ��
_ "_ ►�-- -� , l s� l \ \\ , I i f I I i t III I \ r S�- /
N 0 Q I 1 O /
34 t b 0 I J
N�9> I i /f I I /gym / �� I I I�\I I I Io I / ✓I 11 111 �S / r/ lbl l /i
z
\1/ 3S2—
Qsk /r � 0'
\ \ \ \jo
___
T Z f'S /I 1,'_`3 I I r36 \ \� ml I \ I I / Cl
// ��\
a N Z O Zv
N 4 o
m —,
`\ a I' In �o ° 04141
0,
D o FA I \� I I I i 1\ w� l 1 \IIII �II / I trip
y
III III '
O�C�S f °
I Co � r' I i I ,` i Iris II III�� � I I• °ill ��4_ ��'�, 1\ �i/
I
rn � I �sTO I
m �\
N
r v I 7 I 1
�y�O o ZOR =o no sai m
C Z rerun m nm A�rn Z
O ` O T i`A D� mEn IAN /iy
TZ or D� =m \�/ 1\ 11 I �6 J r r Ali I'C 0 I ° BLi - -- 1

�I
/
8 /
/
N
60 -bb ON OMa 33S
00 00 + 61r££ V1S 3NIIHD1VW
• 1
C5s
2
J �
W
Q U
1 y = Z
Y F
T F O
Y N
l7
2
a
Te <
0
N K
m LL
J
W 0
a I
y I
a_
in I
U)
g ao
U wl
co
I
I
I
2— ¢N O
I � z LL.
�Q Z 0 go
5 12, 0 N
I ZO
J N
° w d
a N Q i
0 0
0 °o
2c 0 = w n
� i coo ° � a
lw
i 2 °
�Y W
O LL ❑
C O O V
a� 4n W
2 0 0 m U cw 'b
O O O 00 d d U N
° °
w 0 Z > O
O U N v
Z I vWi
0 0a a o
10 W
O n Z
U U 01
v��d
0
O 4 L{ O U
O
O
O O
°
I °
� o
O
0 O
ch C O O
O
❑J
° o
I °
O
0 0
I
° O
0 0
O O
I 0 0
I
0 0
0 0
I
O ry °
°
�o 0 0 0
4�2h O O
° °
J 0
a4P ° O
0 0
I U
n O
W
o
71 mW Y�r` 00 O
F O u ow
W nNN^ om a ,o
10 fq a�°,�o ^no PCP O
n
<Oii o00 �n ° 0
0 I °
laZ I °
I �
°
e Uo i 0
m O
N
O R O
rLL
OLL O 00
MATCI-ILIINE STq 3335 + 00 DO
SEE DWG NO
RR -07
2c
a4
°
I
I
I
I
I
I
1I
i
I�
0
ubp o804-nq pAL4
w► a�
a1 z�
za 0.8
A0
s$
i z
O
O
N
m
O
a
p
«m
N
U N
O
a
z
< u
a c
r1N
J VU
m u
F I^
OY
< «o
OLL Z
S Z
G
m
¢m
� t
O
= o
w w
C
U
0
B a��o2c
ti
z
ca
° 2y
0
O
O
z� z
e
2c
a4
°
I
I
I
I
I
I
1I
i
I�
0
ubp o804-nq pAL4
w► a�
a1 z�
za 0.8
A0
s$
i z

2 27 03 PM
d buf08b dgn
\� m LO -bb ON q
00 00 + M4 33 l
NI t/Vy
) T oSDasO��HV I I INJ L
0 o a NJo�o
o �° m , / /
h /r/ ' I I I I I I 4 I I1I I 1 IIpIIhI IhiIIt I I // II I r T / - � _
14
\1
I
� I e` —_OLE-_
ST A 3336 +00 63 \ l
—e \
VAL SSA 3336 +01 00 \
mm \ 388 r'- 1 dV I I I I O I\ i t ✓ J /' /
° a° _ ° / ®I \ II III III 48 SCP —� a <i J \ `/ m /��✓ �—
cp
I o ,.,
o� q�
9z CD w
°
—99E \
° All 'I <-
1 I �I mo
3-1 III 11 M 9� �J \\ i
III ° I ; I , Ii II 08E Do> m \
�
I I
\ I ooawss9o; m� I I It
III
Jul /- - - -ffi° a s o�PSIM bibl \ \\ 2 I I I IIII I It
6v F
`} 1
T
°/ J U o
jl�Il
Q I o o /\ I III I I m \J \ c y _ 5 i \ I 01/
b£- - - j
° o� � \I r " � — I � I I I
S I° °
°aye I I I iP I III IL
7i p7 I 06E- 3� O O, XT
rj cv ZGe- I
I \\
U
2'0
$z / oa � /II It it IT (�
Z y d I $a
,v/
gc _ ✓ —I l I I 1 a
a o
° /°
I
Zz III o o I I �I\ I II 1 mI
i`` \� 6 - - - - -I — I° I III I I I I D D I C C4
_ A rt"
,4 <
o\ °
µmm ' I N o I I I It
m z W I o% ui
°
• m
5.
ZMT> z ° �^ 9 ° I �_lO II I� II S� €a , \I O
N�ocD d , ° _ 11 \\
v / m /
[~I J °9 s�m
:r 8 0 ° J�m /� JI I I II 1 1 1 \\ a0°� 8 I I
mn A o 0 1 I I I I I I I \ y °'
i Oyo 1
mN z
G � /
w
.
ttJJ
°
A V y- 96f\`�
nl
e Z o I I,' I ll I I II li i i I I I �In
m N n / °
o °I II I ,.,
o< Z m 96E i �11 I I I I I /I /r-'
asZn G) ° /r P
m m /
> I o �� \° o ° ° O? I I I I II \\ \1 / / ✓ // `
G1 T G1 pO °
m o
A p
FRRi
NCT
I'y
p I / I I I 1 / �✓ / s v \
z o c I I 1 1 1 II
>
/ 1, III 11
I
m CA
m 102
^' `a ��11ye IIII _ I v I
iz o
7o W iz s 5 \Vr(
o Z Z
(A ee� Ilil
\� JI MATCHUNE STA 3349+0000 IIII i
0 ^� -A SEE DWG NO RR -09 T�'

ill0 ID
II I II
SO,
II I it
)i�d II I it
x
� °
0/ti°
Q9 I 1
I 1b199
N
V
_ Il
U
Y
Q
s�
II
III II
E
II
II II
��II
II
II
III II
II
II
II I{
it
III II
it
� II
II
II II
II
Ig
I
x
Iho
II
IIIQ`�
T
`un`I is Lb
I N�
•
3 1 I I I ~
I w
I�\ N o1 I I �~
N
d I W
+9I9££ IVl V)
+91££ Ml
I
II
z
J-1 Q
II °'
LD
U
III
II ��
IIG Q
►I�U
II'
II
III
f�
IZ
II
II
II
II
II
II
ii
III �
I�I �
I
0
II II
0
° ji II
O
ll II
II II
�1
r
II
V I I 0!5 MI ( OLn =
—{y{
Ji Z OQ
I�_I < W
w
~ J
f w o ¢< LLI
co
UI O 1
CD
I
I I
,I NO
I I� jU V
I I I I OJ
I
I
I� II II
togsssl
I
S
a w
Oo m U
I I °° Z
II
I U U
Oil U o I I I I U
�co
f
(9 I I�
�
I�
II
II
II
II
II
II
i
II
.I
II
J l
II I I rI-
II
_ II
-_ I o
_ I II
I r I M m
II I I II
II , i I I II II
II � i � I li III
II � i I II
II �� I III II
II � I II
II MATCHLINE STA 3377+000(
SEE DWG NO RR -10
y
\
LL n
Z U-
� W
COr v�� m V �
V \ esf
;o
J � O
u N
\ Z N W
0a
IC3
/ � Q
1
•
NJ
— ( °
0
+
o
LL
SIB
m
0
Z u
3aa
is °za
Z
~
�m
O�
Z ° °�
Lu
W
N
J
h
u
uj
W
a
�
d
V
:E
Z
O
O
a
Q
\
LL n
Z U-
� W
COr v�� m V �
V \ esf
;o
J � O
u N
\ Z N W
0a
IC3
/ � Q
1
•
NJ
— ( °
0
+
o
LL
SIB
U6P o114-nq PA4
0
0
N
W
0 0
e ^
N
Q N
v�a
C J UU
ox
Q G
z <
ULL ~2
SN
o =�
p =w¢z
m
U
F
O
z z
®�a
z z�
w• a�
zs 0.8
Wd OZ LZ Z
0
00
a
_�-
�m
u
00
N
1
�\
V
:E
a
Q
aE
Q�
a
m
o
P
k
I
4
1
U6P o114-nq PA4
0
0
N
W
0 0
e ^
N
Q N
v�a
C J UU
ox
Q G
z <
ULL ~2
SN
o =�
p =w¢z
m
U
F
O
z z
®�a
z z�
w• a�
zs 0.8
Wd OZ LZ Z

2 27 44 PM
\Sheets \Ho son hyd bufllb dgn
$$$$USERNAME$$$$ i
Ol —IHN ON 9M4 33S ,
00 OO +LL££ VIS 3NIIH :)I"
• I m �IIII 1 \�- -`398'
_ X�x \ Vs <�
o J ti
iIi_I o
or
to �� \
o e
C12 I I I l I Y b� I I Il I 1 6
�_ o
�-n =���
\ 71 _
/
i l i III i 1 7�
`'-
I I I I I I _-
L_
111 I it _ I T-4 `,
�� I I _gUVlllll111111
J I m l I I I I I I - ii I II 1111111111111
1�I111�gs
��__IIIIIIII�III�I�I
Illllq�ull IIlhq;lllllu
HIM
I _
Y I � 11 III IIII I J,l/ JI J
o ;
A,
1 \ I +
+
l4
m
39 III \
I I \ I p \ I I
I I II III II, \\ \9„
:- 1s�i� / / / / „ /J / / / / /�� I
III I \I i I I s� 111 II II 9 `\\ \`�� e9� ✓ % /' / / /' / %// /
III I I ml I �b ®
z
A l l ,� I I III i�l I II Il II iII , ,
0 II II III ��9/ l� i
> \
cq Xr -F--X tc l�� m II i
r � > ' —� // / \ \I I l -318 po II
n sz l 6
'W-4 z
I
\1x A � \ III I / + I I
o °�� \y �a/ ` �q / II �4/ I I 01
I n
—\” s n I \
x 1 e O
I
°> C z /i
,� /J I mnH�p
- - - - -- \
mn A // M I I I m IA I I I s
I c w a} \ \' �a6 t- _{ I till I I I I� I mllo
m
z x'
! w \
o °o43So,�
z
t k Lp
z
n
H
v Z
m O
� n �
N �
V �
0
m
rn
o
"Z
N 14
0
u o
0" / o N�UNNNoo-'9
IL ''g D
'
VI n
-{ C"I to / �6> �'I_ \\ �- °w I m I �I\ !I IWn' I I �+-
N r,2 �'s,e I I I I ImI /
T GZi / I (� f �I I I ( �o I �AJ 33 8 +6 41
3 ( wm�
z \ K u'i I II \� l '�'6,� I I m
D / -- /' / i' v-
310 ID m
O /eve /I I Dm c
n FA
z �3 — / \ �J c�� o� I rr-� I
�L"
37 (D '' I I I N � 4m 1 s t, q
=
C
1Oc oo m
m i \ 11 coil
m
I�--Imlll I' II I II 1
a -, \ \III \- 3�m= Im I II I II \
3 v I / '/ S I m l \ \� I I I I ( II \\
z Do o = N l I III I II I I I m\ \gel
00 00+ 6£ON �MQ 33 I I I I \ \�
ZT ZT s yl S
D S 3N114Jlvw ' ��

CL-11N ON JMQ
Q: 00 00 +501F£ VIS 3NIIHDIVW �° m
LLO LLO
1 C I I I II II II I i 4 o 10
a a Q r
W °_ °f gg �qq, o �
W
N t^ H
r
[,Z3 s s
I
Z o I I C3 Q d o
04 0
° ll I I i J/ lr° oapp QQp
a I I I LL / °000 QQp 0 _
I °I 000%0 No ui
° �cc
CL
°���1 !! 41 LL / 11 W oZ,o
" ZI `
P
31 d1 S3 .10131 1 111 11 �l I z
nl %/ b ybn' 0 p = u��d
/V0 �0� by W it
/ // I i 1 DN /NN-3d dlyS�3N1 a
p ..�
Mr
N �s
��1 i'�� 110 C3
V� �i�o 11 !1 I M � �// "'.,0, r
p °° C oYUU
All 11 1 I ill 1 ©g° z
% / 11 i 11 1 1 ill 1 0300 0a � � _
l 11 1 11 1 I I 111 1 °° a 4� oNtd
1
° o p t = mx Wm"¢a
00 °
a ° O °° ° � GO O 0800 Qo@ OaQp 000
J i
<
%UQOa-- 1r- -� 1� I I 1 © ° O p° ° °p°p 0 ° _
° a
Q ©aod� I I �__� \�\ 00 f3 °
/ i I I I \I °0 Q ap °QO t� ° ; z Z
-ulo \\ Q 0
\ \
I I ! I� ; I I I � I I I I I I II , ' I I I I IIIIII I II II II I 11 IjI II 1l �I I I 1I p Q � Q 000
0 Q ° 0 ° 0 ° ° °
° W
c� �ls Q � � w w zazW g
a � °° � C3
oq
0� � O. B
° p Q
­4
p b ODO � a O° ° C° OD 0 °
° ° ° ° a °p
��o
04 C3 °p° � C3 0 �i �� ° ° ° Z C Zxv
a C3 C3
s
1 TD 0� ° I III I II �\ \ \ \ \� %/�
/ o � �" / � /
of III I ° \�\ °
I ~N Lo
CLX
ALU
1 od I a° "� °
1 bdN�d�1 d oo 3 I I I
i DN < By I I I
o m3 I I o C3
X I =
d I I//
J
x � W
m g,
>� i I II I I I I
(C3 k
° ° ° O
I CL O
I I Y�o� o
�' III d I II CN I ' �;, I ;, C � J ° °
ION
I i I a l o y,
p �J
all II Ij LJJ ° °
tdI 1 ° °
1 II a C3 CC3
a 1 1 II o HLINE S 3391 + 00 00
MAT SEE DWG NO RR -11
0
° x �
$$$$WVN2f3sn$$$$
ubp oZI}nq pfL4 u°s off \s ..14s\
wd SO 8Z Z

2 28 34 PM
\Sheets \Hop son hyd bu-fl2b dgn
$$$$USERNAME$$$$ I
\ \ ��
ll bbl ON E 33S
00 + lb££ IS 3N11HD1W
00
m x I\ 01
� m
R%
Hot o �- /� I '� -Y6
\ �1Q CORq
s I III i E I I it II II I I I \
,r I
A I II I \
I\09, \60 %p� "` mmw /I i 01 - I
%%
c-, N l i
=� D INO I x
I
I
Bill T l
I i I ° T R q � °me I G
xD
lo d I ° I m Zoo
w _ I III N
c Ill fl
0 1 I l I i t T rJ r
��' O-i 1 D /
�`I �9��1 i I�,'� \ e I /I I, II I i i iI� i v� r /
8 z / /// ////\ \ \�` , //� °; I I I I I i II I I i i // m I UR II
RI
I
° _ Q } }/I ^ I I I el 11 o I I 11 I W
� •d L\ 6 \ \��� i;} Q i / I I 1 1 I I
C1 Yo I I s j y �z °a
� � E a a a o/a ro
,
ot o
�° sZ 00 o Ey. o
0 0
Z I \m
I / 0 0 °o Ih jl o cr o
3 a cas e�90 °
a ° oo
°° °pad 376
Z9W= °
".2 ' °°
z a
o o ° Q-
's
II a /
I Mz o m �\ � � l a °oa ( l� 11ry366 -Ir I,lll l� "/ III 1 �37 1 �o � 40
--
o V
CQ9 1 1/ I\ 1 / ^ I ,I 13 ➢2 i �� 11 I 11 /� J�'�-- ��374 \�
°Il
eft
. a �z l0
II 99 �a l llI /L110 �+P
RTRTNUSONTP IO
N
x �� \ o II I li a dr� l \/ r I I I /'r
0 °/� 0
T �� I
/OsS /IP \�\ PENI�r/N _ �( �m \ \\ // I / ,/ \I �mi �� / I
V I&--fgA GTGly \ \ 30
m \ r�LD Q�MARIq �� ,J� iiil JI \37 -/
I� \ C I 80 / / I 1 / \ / 3➢
z \ // r \ ,// / I /I /,� I I 11 / V LEROY
P� a \\ r/ I / I I IjI I1 I �= 11 I I ESTATE
z /i% 11 I/ 1 11 ( 37 Q)
o
N Z O A F, 1
A \ / /✓ I I %�32 I /I /I I I p�\
q` jO m C 0
�' G1 T G7 �� 1° f 36 I / / I / I
T ^
D adQ Q4 °
� a c/�/ / ii I r I iT C y
r
PA l l� Q��// y \ I/I� / i l I III 1/
o ° Q I I / r o l I r I 1 r =_ =� — —
"o /'\ _/ ,ham // / / I 3� I �w Ili / i I i I w 11� z - - -_
z
It
/Il /// I :f / \
m `^
2 CIS $$ �Do / -1 Hy „ro ! I
o oZ �� \J �\ / ,� I I IJ II( I I I I II\I�/ li ( r 362/
z D0 D0 / 6 6
° ° N
Z
i i 1 r R� /
H _� /a / / i // "9� MATCHLINE STA 3405 +0000
14
DWG NO RR -13

II
aI II E �
� II %r �N Its
CP
�I
I III
II I 'III II
-70 ti �� c �I III II
I a iip� ° C3 IIII II
-
©
II it
-- - - - - -, I I old
°
IIII � 0
I m
p
Nb 0 44£ V41 WA
00'+ it 4E
biJ II I I I
OSSG
&'p!y p III I �I I I I I x
Lu
LU
L I
to"as °oo �
ED z
o
Z o
��° m 0
LL. Z �
LLI
g
Q OZ Lf) U
F-N Q UD
to 03 \v
s
U. ' II III
I I
No � �C,
IL
IIZ
i
VZ W
m
o
o 0 30
Zo of
W W
Np� � o � a
OJ
Of
S�Jo,p o 0
d = N u
CL
I s
LU
J
Z j W
m U ne 4
ne 1 �U��
U
LL! p Z > o
J F F
/ / 1 0
—I I Oa
/ ^ Z W
\ T o
N
- - -___- — m
P °
him
-- t ^
z 60 yY
a N
10"
„s
J UU
f
°x
a
Cz7 ULL ~2
a ¢mr
m °
p z m
mW J
z mw
Zd U
C xP1CZ
L'
U
o
z z
o �
V n o+
W ° °
J� r
a P o
os?
m w• �
u x$
Jk
d
— rf-rl-r
C?
I
Lj F
Wo I� 'll
to
l l m`n �2 I o< W� 1
02 J m
y
2:o
— w o
U) �
W
�H <mmo S�` o CD I I ° /
mp ^o ^
ao
^ ° o I I c
o ^oo °O n U I •
N <O"a�g
MATCHLINE STA 3433+0000
DWG NO RR -14 °
ubp oSI}nq pAL4
4S\ $
SBZZ
gg
o°
o
t
,
o00
LL OB
a
m O
P
~
c
°
5
— rf-rl-r
C?
I
Lj F
Wo I� 'll
to
l l m`n �2 I o< W� 1
02 J m
y
2:o
— w o
U) �
W
�H <mmo S�` o CD I I ° /
mp ^o ^
ao
^ ° o I I c
o ^oo °O n U I •
N <O"a�g
MATCHLINE STA 3433+0000
DWG NO RR -14 °
ubp oSI}nq pAL4
4S\ $
SBZZ

2 29 13 PM
\Sheets\
$$$$USERW
ld bufl5b dgn
0"
Irl -bb ON JMa \
-_ \3, _i 00 00 +££Ir£ VIS 3NIIH :)IVW \ I I T\
_ � t
ego
oomo m I ` �m ! \ / ✓
�3J
\ I old
C� v
cam`_
m
00 1
II
r �Ilw III o I m> 'I
�I° III
0/ I I 111 lr s mm / ft
vA
3, \ N II it �I i i }� 11 III Ilnl ' -( 11 �,_
\\ �� \� = I'�
°� N
0 I
/ N F v \ _ : I i I i\ I I IV / \ \� \ C) rn r-2!
CA CA
° \ �0 0� J \
MCA
/ D \
0. , �� , � x> g`
II w I , a
H� �_ I j\ I JDp 11 cn\ W° Zp
IB�4 ti/� vmssv 8 0 I I cn 11 �a A G1A O
v
v I 11 I ri O c�� D �\ �+ Y ? �5) _
W ° a I ) I IP Dde 1 a� vtn O� L �� I e ?�
4ST �a III � `\ f I 9s I °IIII \�D °— 11 ZOR � 3s
8 : to + ^' \�
Y
O a
�a � / � III I I �I III d �'89E�\ i o Oo~
yoD ' IIi I III Iii / �{ ������a.) "9,9c\
00 1
bJf-%
/ � 8 � 1 � \ 1 w � I I I \ fI � • � 'a�aR \\ \ � m
a 9
Z� r� // en�d o °z�c `\ A 9e \ �\ \ \ \\ \ \� 9r,
1 / X I; I , III I �; F� `\ \ \ \
TO
>= r r ' 4 % c/ ° it I I �i I L¢ kr' iII II �'
x
yell d�j 4
i gl �r I I
�
Z�; z F -O
\\ ro , \\ /1 I I ICI I I III I I r {
A 3I,, 4 0 3js I I �4C
c r 6 V L A 344 0 .c r J I I I �CQ ti0
m sD 1E,bl(�I II° I / ✓I 11��P� �r I / /
Arnim yxy I J�3\ \J I/— �362�__— I _ �� �.3 V'd I`
o I •R �J / S I
o(a i l �n
��O VU10 / °
O I III I� \� 1
p
o 1 I im I I
70 ' \o�
a N ZZH O 11 1 \ \\ \\_\ / CLILY
T z / I 1 II \I I\ 1 Ill t \`,
m I l 1 1/ `— �z C�
' \ I I I \ \ II I I a \� ) 1 \ \\
W( —fj
T
or
�^ o I'�
°z 1 \� ' \ \I II 1 IIII �_�s�
o
CO I I \ ' it �> hhen /r lryl
S h \ r;1 �I/ I II °i 1� 0
v
i� Illl;l II II=
N STO ` \II II I °I�11 \III /l — Iil� \r\
m
y� m m , I I ,Ct
Z
O O D� ��� ❑ �1 ) o°
TZ sz
14 \ III I�6 1 11 1 II \
IIII l
9
3
3D
y
I +
r/ T
ez
u
0
0"
Irl -bb ON JMa \
-_ \3, _i 00 00 +££Ir£ VIS 3NIIH :)IVW \ I I T\
_ � t
ego
oomo m I ` �m ! \ / ✓
�3J
\ I old
C� v
cam`_
m
00 1
II
r �Ilw III o I m> 'I
�I° III
0/ I I 111 lr s mm / ft
vA
3, \ N II it �I i i }� 11 III Ilnl ' -( 11 �,_
\\ �� \� = I'�
°� N
0 I
/ N F v \ _ : I i I i\ I I IV / \ \� \ C) rn r-2!
CA CA
° \ �0 0� J \
MCA
/ D \
0. , �� , � x> g`
II w I , a
H� �_ I j\ I JDp 11 cn\ W° Zp
IB�4 ti/� vmssv 8 0 I I cn 11 �a A G1A O
v
v I 11 I ri O c�� D �\ �+ Y ? �5) _
W ° a I ) I IP Dde 1 a� vtn O� L �� I e ?�
4ST �a III � `\ f I 9s I °IIII \�D °— 11 ZOR � 3s
8 : to + ^' \�
Y
O a
�a � / � III I I �I III d �'89E�\ i o Oo~
yoD ' IIi I III Iii / �{ ������a.) "9,9c\
00 1
bJf-%
/ � 8 � 1 � \ 1 w � I I I \ fI � • � 'a�aR \\ \ � m
a 9
Z� r� // en�d o °z�c `\ A 9e \ �\ \ \ \\ \ \� 9r,
1 / X I; I , III I �; F� `\ \ \ \
TO
>= r r ' 4 % c/ ° it I I �i I L¢ kr' iII II �'
x
yell d�j 4
i gl �r I I
�
Z�; z F -O
\\ ro , \\ /1 I I ICI I I III I I r {
A 3I,, 4 0 3js I I �4C
c r 6 V L A 344 0 .c r J I I I �CQ ti0
m sD 1E,bl(�I II° I / ✓I 11��P� �r I / /
Arnim yxy I J�3\ \J I/— �362�__— I _ �� �.3 V'd I`
o I •R �J / S I
o(a i l �n
��O VU10 / °
O I III I� \� 1
p
o 1 I im I I
70 ' \o�
a N ZZH O 11 1 \ \\ \\_\ / CLILY
T z / I 1 II \I I\ 1 Ill t \`,
m I l 1 1/ `— �z C�
' \ I I I \ \ II I I a \� ) 1 \ \\
W( —fj
T
or
�^ o I'�
°z 1 \� ' \ \I II 1 IIII �_�s�
o
CO I I \ ' it �> hhen /r lryl
S h \ r;1 �I/ I II °i 1� 0
v
i� Illl;l II II=
N STO ` \II II I °I�11 \III /l — Iil� \r\
m
y� m m , I I ,Ct
Z
O O D� ��� ❑ �1 ) o°
TZ sz
14 \ III I�6 1 11 1 II \
IIII l
9

F.
Background 2010 NAIP Aerial Imagery PgF PgF" dyleA
CrC2 WsE CrE CrC2 PkC
WsE WSB2
WsE.wYA CaD
W
CrB2
WsC2
WsC2 r13.2
F Y_ -- ,., t CrC2
W sB2 CrC2
�� PgF
CnA,
CrE
�!= CrB2
/ W PtD3
WsE s
��. CaB
MeA
WsC2
l yyyA PtD3 CaB; g CaC
9F CrB2 CaC
WsC2
r CnA
nry, WSB2 v CaC
WsC2 E; PgF
WsC2:: Ws62
PgF
rc
CaB CaCI
MeA
/// WsC2 PtD3 CaD CmA
WsE CrB2;'
CaB
CaD
MeA \
V WyA
sC2 WsC2 \ CaB PgF'
sE
WsB2 WsC2
WsE PtD3 WsE
WsE CaC CaB
WsC2.- 4
CaB
'WsC2 �� WsC '.
tA'JsC2 /
PgF WSB2;
WsB2 „ r
CrB2
WsB2
Me A - -- Cab J
CmA \ i
WS
-
/, WsC2
E ��� Aa
CrC2
Symbol Series % Hydric
CaB Carbonton - Brickhaven complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes
CaC Carbonton - Brickhaven complex, 6to 10 percent slopes !A
CaD Carbonton - Brickhaven complex, 10 to 15 percent slopes .
CmA Chewacla sandy loam, Oto 2 percent slopes, frequently ftnded® 5% Ud_D
CnA Colfax sandy loam, Oto 3 percent slopes 5% 2 ° � CnA WsC2
Cr62 Creedmoor sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, moderately eroded
CrC2 Creedmoor sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded +
W i.
CrE2 Creedmoor sandy loam, 10to 20percent slopes CrC2
WsC2
MeA Mantachie sandy loam, Oto 2 percent slopes, rarely ftnded[E
i WsB2
PkC Pinkston sandy loam, Oto 10 percent slopes
PgF Pacolet - Gullied land complex, 4 t 25 percent slopes Cr62
Pt D3 Polkton -White Store complex, 2 t 15 percent slopes, severely eroded CaB
W Water CrB2, .CnA
WSB:' White Store sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, moderately eroded
WsC: White Store sandy loam, 6 t 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded C�B2
WsE White Store sandy loam, 10 to 20 percent slopes WsB2 �:
wsB2 ` - WsC2
WyA Worsham sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes 90% CrC2,
• . __ <. WYA, \WSC2,
3 0 370 74 ; 'i ,11 Q, - WsC2 WsC2 C 132 VW
- Feet �. / WsC2
PtD3 CrC2
NORTHC,9o` Project: Title: Dwn By: Ckd By: FIGURE
Clegg Passing and ARE DKo
Hopson Road Date: Scale:
Grade Seperation - SSURGO SOILS MAY 2011 1:1000
�P 3B
Wake and Durham Counties, ATKINS Project No.:
OF?R "`�� North Carolina
100021689

G
u�
.y
G
a
C
z
ua
A
JC
JI
cn Ord /�
to Ala P aft
. GceelF ;tv
ne
•r
'G -11 fi d
4
i�
surtes Gt
n
s
c
o�
cleg
4
4
1r
w
L
J
Legend
Q Hopson -Clegg Study Boundary
p�
IIIIIw
Z
rn
3
s
a_
4
Emperor Blvd
shitoh G1CnI%b°
ANOW
Wake and Durham County, NC
C9
!;�b
4b
54
t.ichtin � /�d
FaimRd3 °
P zlt'
a
Everette Flews Rd 04
a
Q" ace p oio t Rd
0
P
540'
t'aramou
4!
10 �y
C01)) .
' s 4cd!
Watkins Rd wati;
McGlmmon pk
O
925 4,, 2.5 0 925 1,850 54 A*
Feet { Background: ESRI World Streets Basemap
"OHTH Ce
Project: Title: Dwn By: Ckd By: FIGURE
Clegg Passing and ARE DKo
Hopson Road Date: Scale:
1 �; =1 Grade Seperation VICINITY MAP MAY 2011 1:14000
Wake and Durham Counties, ATKINS Project No.:
°FTRA North Carolina
100021689
cleg
L
�. CrI -
Legend
Q Hopson -Clegg Study Boundary
p�
IIIIIw
Z
rn
3
s
a_
4
Emperor Blvd
shitoh G1CnI%b°
ANOW
Wake and Durham County, NC
C9
!;�b
4b
54
t.ichtin � /�d
FaimRd3 °
P zlt'
a
Everette Flews Rd 04
a
Q" ace p oio t Rd
0
P
540'
t'aramou
4!
10 �y
C01)) .
' s 4cd!
Watkins Rd wati;
McGlmmon pk
O
925 4,, 2.5 0 925 1,850 54 A*
Feet { Background: ESRI World Streets Basemap
"OHTH Ce
Project: Title: Dwn By: Ckd By: FIGURE
Clegg Passing and ARE DKo
Hopson Road Date: Scale:
1 �; =1 Grade Seperation VICINITY MAP MAY 2011 1:14000
Wake and Durham Counties, ATKINS Project No.:
°FTRA North Carolina
100021689

T \ • r / ��
. � 1
r V 1
t
.� d,,
MW
1, i •'� r r'r �t3" i ■
egend
�► ��
Hopson-Clegg Study Boundary ` '� �` _ �,4 -'rte.. At-
-7
, • __!
Project: Title:
Clegg Passing and •
PROJECT �.
•• • '•.•
Grade Seperation BOUNDARY MAY 2011,; 1: 14_
Wake and Durham Counties, ATKINS Project No.:
North Carolina
1000216

6896z000L ewlaeO LWON
:'ON PafoJd SNIAld 'sai;unoo weyjnp pue aNeM a�
Sc 000L:1, �1oz and Sd32�d uoi ;ejadaS opeq)
.aleos .ale(] -leNOilOiasimnr peon uosdoH a
oNa 3ad pue 6uissed BBOID
3anou :A8 polo :AS uMQ :alpL :loafoid b °fudoNio
0s� oo� 05 0 9z 05
tiepuno8 Apn }S 66910- uosdoH —
(jaaj 0£) L auoZ jagn8 asnaN
(19a; OZ) Z auoZ jagn8 asnaN
su06AI0d puel}aM
su06AI0d wear ;S
pa1Janlno
— -- s9ui-1 pue119M
sauil weal ;S _
- s ;uiod we94S
-- s;uiod pueIIaM o
- - -_ puafa-1
,
r(.
M
f t �
3
■
z
i... a
(8E Jld) easy dew a �_
pueBe -
L �
VX
•i
4-
mom ' r Irk=
w
Aua6ewl leuaydIVN OLOZ :puna6Noe8

6991Z000I ewlaeo ylJoN vxiio
ON loafad SN1711y sallunoo weyjnp pue a�leM
a 000 �wz 0nd SV311V uoi ;ejadag apejE)
:aleog :a ;eQ -lVNOIl�IaSimnr peoa uosdoH
010 Sad pue 6uissed 66013
3�jnoij :As Pmo :;oafwd okido►+�°
�.. ■ i _ f 4r
Y
' Os� '` 09 0 sZ 09
M
tiepuno9 ApnjS 66910- uosdoH ~t
(1991 0£) auoZ aalln8 asnaN
(Zeal OZ) Z auoZ jegn8 asnaN
--
suo
`� � - de- uaeaa�s.- '.: -=�. - � ■ �: _ plod puallaM
-� - suofiAIod uaeaa ;s
pa:pa^Ino
saui-1 pUellem
'r
sauil weaa ;s
- * sluiod weaa ;S
y1
N. sluiod puellaM o
puaBa-j
0
it
ti
r ■
,w a
-v
(0£ Jld) easy den
puaBa-I s
.:iv.. ■■
■
rA
ANA
AdrV
■ F DGiat 4 Rs...
■6
■ fua6ew el�a unoi oe
I I Vdlb'N OLOZ �P �1 8
s IV rm , :7