The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNC0003719_Inspection_20060608NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Michael F. Easley, Governor June 8, 2006 Mr. Anthony Hudson Safety, Health, and Environment Manager PO Box 1690 Fayetteville, NC 28312 SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report (June 8, 2006) DAK Resins LLC — Fayetteville NC0003719 Cumberland County William G. Ross Jr., Secretary Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director Division of Water Quality Dear Mr. Hudson, Enclosed you will find a copy of the Report for the Compliance Evaluation Inspection conducted on. June 8, 2006. As part of the inspection a tour of the Wastewater Treatment Plant was conducted. All observations are in Section D. Summary of Findings/Comments of this inspection report. This facility was found to be in Compliance with permit NC0003719. The cooperation of Mr. Donald Allbright, ORC, was greatly appreciated. Dale Lopez Environmental Specialist Enclosures: EPA Water Compliance Inspection Report Check List for Field Parameters cc: Donald Ray Allbright, ORC 225 Green Street —Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043 Phone: 910-486-1541 \ FAX: 910-486-0707 \ Internet: www.enr.state.nc.us/ENR/ An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer - 50 % Recycled 110 % Post Consumer Paper NorthCarolina Naturally United States Environmental Protection Agency EPA Washington, D.C. 20460 Water Compliance Inspection Report Form Approved. OMB No. 2040-0057 Approval expires 8-31-98 Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS) Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection 1 I NI 2 I SI 31 NC0003719 111 121 06/06/08 117 Type Inspector Fac Type 18I CI 191 SI 20II Remarks 211IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIl111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII66 Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating_ B1 QA-----------------------Reserved — 671 : 1.0 169 70I 31 711 II 72I NI 731 1 174 751 I 1 I 1 1 I 180 Section B: Faeility Data Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include POTW name and NPDES permit Number) Cedar Creek Site 3468 Cedar Creek Rd E Fayetteville NC 28301 Entry Time/Date 08:30 AM 06/06/08 Permit Effective Date 03/04/01 Exit Time/Date 10:30 AM 06/06/08 Permit Expiration Date 06/10/31 Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s) /// Donald Ray Allbright/ORC/910-433-8227/ Other Facility Data ' Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number Contacted Anthony Hudson,P.O. Box 1690 28302//910-433-8338/ No • Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated) Permit ® Flow Measurement ® Operations & Maintenance Facility Site Review • Effluent/Receiving Waters Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative " Records/Reports as necessary) and checklists (See attachment summary) Name(s) Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Dale Lopez FRO WQ//910-486-1541 Ext.712/ r..." Numbers / Date (Q/1 62 Signature of Management A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date CA '1 9-1/100:-/ 6/811) 6 EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete. Page # `. m�oES yr/mnmay Inspection Type o 1 mr0003719 |11 10 | 06/06117 m08 | ICI ' GactionD: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) DAK appeared to be in compliance with the NPIDES permit. The quality of record keeping and process control is excellent. ' Permit: NC0003719 Owner- Facility: Cedar Creek Site Inspection Date: 06/08/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Operations & Maintenance Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? Doesthe facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable? Comment: Yes No NA NE Permit (If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application? Is the facility as described in the permit? # Are there any special conditions for the permit? Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? Comment: Equalization Basins Is the basin aerated? Is the basin free of bypass lines or structures to the natural environment? Is the basin free of excessive grease? Are all pumps present? Are all pumps operable? Are float controls operable? Are audible and visual alarms operable? # Is basin size/volume adequate? Comment: ' Secondary Clarifier Is the clarifier free of black and odorous. wastewater? Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier? Are weirs level? Is the site free of weir blockage? Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting? Is scum removal adequate? Is the site free of excessive floating sludge? Is the drive unit operational? Ervin ■ nnn Yes No NA NE ■ nnn ■ nnn ■ nnn ■ nnn ■ nnn Yes No NA NE n n■n ■ nnn n nn■ n n■n n n■n ■ nnn ■ nnn ■ nnn Yes No NA NE ■ nnn ■ nnn ■ nnn ■ nnn ■ nnn ■ nnn ■ nnn ■ nnn Page # 3 Permit: NC0003719 Owner - Facility: Cedar Creek Site • Inspection Date: 06/08/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Secondary Clarifier Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)? Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc? Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately'/ of the sidewall depth) Comment: Aeration Basins Mode of operation Type of aeration system Is the basin free of dead spots? Are surface aerators and mixers operational? Are the diffusers operational? Is the foam the proper color for the treatment -process? Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface? Is the DO level acceptable? Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/I) Comment: Laboratory Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory? Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab? # Is the facility using a contract lab? Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at 1.0 to 4.4 degrees Celsius)? Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees? Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/-1.0 degrees? Comment: Flow Measurement - Effluent # Is flow meter used for reporting? Is flow meter calibrated annually? Is the flow meter operational? (If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? Comment: Record Keeping Yes No NA NE ■ nnn ■ nnn. ■ nnn Yes No NA NE Ext. Air Surface ■ nnn • nnn •nnn ■ nnn ■ nnn ■ nnn ■ n.nn Yes No NA NE ■ nnn Ennn . nnn •nnnm. n n■n n n■n Yes No NA NE' Ennn Ennn ■ nnn W HEW Yes No NA NE Page # 4 Permit: NC0003719 Owner - Facility: Cedar Creek Site Inspection Date: 06/08/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Record Keeping Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit? Is all required information readily available, complete and current? Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)? Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs? Is the chain -of -custody complete? Dates, times and location of sampling Name of individual performing the sampling. Results of analysis and calibration Dates of analysis Name of person performing analyses Transported COCs Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters? Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ? (If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift? Is the ORC visitation log available and current? Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification? Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification? Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review? Comment: Yes No NA NE ■ nnn ■ nnn ■ nnn n nn■ n nn■ n 0 n n n n ■ nnn W HEW ■ nnn Ennn Ennn ■ nnn ■ nnn n n■n Page # 5 ame of site to be Inspected: eld certification # (if applicable PDES #: ®p b . 37 Region: Circle the parameter or parameters performed at this site sidual Chlor'. Settleable, Solids Instrumentation: . Does the facility have the equipment necessary to analyze field parameters as circled above A pH meter / C A Residual Chlorine meter DO meter A Conefor settleable solids A thermometer or meter that measures temperature. Conductivity. meter,:. II Calibration/Analysis: ▪ Is thepH meter calibrated with a. buffers and checked with - • ` = ffer each day of use? ▪ For Total Resir-' al Chlorine, is a.check standard analyzed each day of us ? . �,L dI f 3. Is the air calibration of he DO meter performed each day of use?. 4. For Settleable Solids, is 1 liter of sample settled for 1 hour? 5. Is the temperature measuring device calibrated annually against a certified. thermometer? 6. For Conductivity, is a calibration standard analyzed each day of use? Yes Yes Yes Yes No IV. Documentation: 1. Is the date and time that the sample was collected documented? 2. Is the sample site documented 3. Is the sample collector documented? :. 4. Is the analysis dateand time documented` 5. Did the analyst sign the documentation. 6. Is record of calibration documented? 7. For Settleable Solids`, is sample volume an 1 hour time settling time documented?.` '8 For Temperature, is the annual' calibration of the measuring device documented? Comments: Please submit a copy of this completed form to the Laboratory Certification Program. DWQ Lab Certification Chemistry Lab Courier # 52-01-01 FIELD INSPECTOR CHECKLIST REV. 04/23/2002