20210221 Ver 1_Preliminary WoUS Evaluation_20210302

October 5, 2020

ELECTRONIC SUBMITTAL
[e-mail]
Mr. Jay McMullen
Project Manager I
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC.
Water Strategy and Hydro Licensing – EC12Q
526 South Church Street
Charlotte, NC 28202

Dear Mr. McMullen:

Subject: Preliminary On-site Waters of the United States Evaluation, Dan River
Game Land Access, Rockingham County, NC
Duke Project Group LS2019DRGLAA
CEC Project 195-507

This report summarizes the results of CEC’s desktop and on-site Preliminary Waters of the United
State (WoUS) evaluation conducted for Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (Client) totaling
approximately 24.44 acres, located at the proposed Dan River Game Land Access Area in
Rockingham County, North Carolina (Project or Project Area). The purpose of this desktop
assessment and on-site WoUS evaluation was to provide a preliminary opinion on the presence or
absence of potential jurisdictional WoUS within the designated Project Area, for preliminary
planning purposes only.

1.0 BACKGROUND

WoUS are defined by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as “those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface
or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and under normal circumstances,
do support a prevalence of vegetation adapted for life in saturated soil conditions.” In order for an
area to be classified as a jurisdictional wetland, hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland
hydrologic indicators must be present, and must be adjacent to a jurisdictional non-wetland water
(tributary) of the United States.

In North Carolina, the USACE and the EPA jointly regulate the discharge of dredged and fill
material within jurisdictional WoUS under Sections 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act and
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. WoUS includes territorial seas, navigable
coastal and inland lakes, rivers and tributaries (perennial and intermittent), and wetlands.
Jurisdictional features include wetlands, open waters, ponds, lakes and perennial/intermittent
streams. Jurisdictional features are regulated by the USACE and North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality, Division of Water Quality (NC DEQ/DWQ). Permit requirements are
specific to the type, location, and amount of impacts, if proposed. Stormwater management plans
and/or mitigation for proposed impacts could be a requirement of the permit approval process.
Mr. Jay McMullen– Duke Project Group LS2019DRGLAA; Dan River Game Land Access
CEC Project 195-507
Page 2
October 5, 2020

This assessment can be used to assist the County with a preliminary review of the Project Area
only and is not considered final until verified by the USACE and NC DEQ/DWQ. The following
supporting documents are provided:

Figure 1: Vicinity Map;
Figure 2: USGS Topographic Map;
Figure 3: Aerial Map;
Figure 4A: NRCS Current Soil Survey Map;
Figure 4B: NRCS Published Soil Survey Map;
Figure 5: National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Map; and
Figure 6: Potential Jurisdictional Boundaries Map.

Attachment A: USACE Wetland Determination Data Forms and Antecedent Rain Data;
Attachment B: NC DEQ Stream Classification Forms; and
Attachment C: Representative Photographs.

2.0 CURRENT SITE CONDITIONS AND DESKTOP REVIEW

Upper portions of the project area consist of regenerating secondary successional tracts composed
largely of young Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda), with lesser amounts of Winged Elm (Ulmus alata),
Red Maple (Acer rubrum var. rubrum), and Sweet Gum (Liquidambar styraciflua). Moving
downslope towards the Dan River, the vegetation becomes more mature and diverse, and is
dominated by broad-leaved mesophytic woody species such as American Beech (Fagus
grandifolia), Tuliptree (Liriodendron tulipifera), White Oak (Quercus alba), Northern Red Oak
(Quercus rubra), Flowering Dogwood (Cornus florida), Mockernut Hickory (Carya tomentosa),
Redbud (Cercis canadensis), and Blackhaw (Viburnum prunifolium). The herbaceous layer is
relatively sparse, but does include Christmas Fern (Polystichum acrostichoides), New York Fern
(Parathelypteris noveboracensis), Shining Clubmoss (Huperzia lucidula), Virginia Snakeroot
(Endodeca serpentaria), Lined Sedge (Carex striatula), and Beechdrops (Epifagus virginiana).
At toe of slope and in bottomland terraces, one encounters woody vegetation typical of piedmont
floodplain forests including Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvancia), River Birch (Betula nigra),
American Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), Sugarberry (Celtis laevigata), Black Walnut
(Juglans nigra), and Box Elder (Acer negundo). Shrubs present are Pawpaw (Asimina triloba),
Northern Spicebush (Lindera benzoin), and American Strawberry-bush (Euonymus americanus).
Vines are numerous and include Muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia), Poison Ivy (Toxicodendron
radicans), Trumpet Creeper (Campsis radicans), Crossvine (Bignonia capreolata), and Greenbrier
(Smilax rotundifolia). The herbaceous layer in the bottomland terraces is dense with species such
as Canada Wood-nettle (Laportea canadensis), Orange Jewel-weed (Impatiens capensis), and
Common Woodreed (Cinna arundinacea).

Surrounding land use consists mainly of undeveloped wooded lands, with a single residential home
along the northeast project area boundary. According to US Drought Monitor,
https://www.ncdrought.org Rockingham County was not classified as dry or under drought
conditions at the time of the investigation. Additionally, queries were made of the USACE
Mr. Jay McMullen– Duke Project Group LS2019DRGLAA; Dan River Game Land Access
CEC Project 195-507
Page 3
October 5, 2020

Antecedent Rain Database, indicating that recent rainfall in the Project Area was below normal
(Attachment A).

A review of available topography, United State Geologic Survey (USGS) information shows the
surrounding area to be moderately sloping (Figure 2). The Project contains elevations ranging from
approximately 560 feet above mean sea level (amsl) to 630 feet amsl (Figure 5). One stream, Dan
River, is indicated along the south Project Area boundary.

A review of the published and on-line National Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil
Surveys for Rockingham County indicates potential for hydric soils within the Project Area, where
the Chewacla Soil Series occurs (Figures 4A and 4B). While this Series is not hydric by soil
taxonomy standards, it can have inclusions of hydric soils due to landscape position and slow
permeability. A stream (Dan River) is indicated on the published soil survey (Figure 4B)

A review of the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map indicates there are potential WoUS
within the Project Area (Figure 5). An inspection of the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map
indicates that there is one stream (Dan River) within the Project Area, along the southern boundary.
The NWI map classifies the Dan River as R2UBH (Riverine Perennial Unconsolidated Bottom
Permanently Flooded). The NWI map appears to concur with the stream identified on the USGS
and Published Soil Survey maps.

3.0 WATERSHED CLASSIFICATION AND BUFFER REQUIREMENTS

According to the NC DEQ, the Project is in the eight digit HUC 03010103, Roanoke, the 10 digit
HUC 0301010305, Matrimony Creek-Dan River, and the 12 digit HUC 030101030504, Rock
House Creek-Dan River. The Dan River is classified as “Class WS-IV Waters” by the NCDEQ.
WS-IV Waters are used as sources of water supply for drinking, culinary, or food processing
purposes whereas a WS-I, II or III classification is not feasible. These waters are also protected for
Class C uses. WS-IV waters are generally in moderately to highly developed watersheds or
Protected Areas. More information: Class C waters are defined as: Waters protected for uses such
as secondary recreation, fishing, wildlife, fish consumption, aquatic life including propagation,
survival and maintenance of biological integrity, and agriculture.

Mandatory vegetative riparian buffers are not required by the NC DEQ based on the site locality
in a specific river basin or watershed. Development or stormwater setbacks that are specific to the
proposed development of the site could be required by the NC DEQ. Consultation with the local
zoning authority is recommended to determine site specific vegetation buffers adjacent to the
features located on the site prior to submittal for zoning approval.

Mr. Jay McMullen– Duke Project Group LS2019DRGLAA; Dan River Game Land Access
CEC Project 195-507
Page 4
October 5, 2020

4.0 PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW

This assessment utilized the 1987 USACE Wetland Delineation Manual along with the USACE
2010 Regional Supplement: Supplemental Guide ERDC/EL TR-12-9 (Eastern Mountains and
Piedmont Region (Version 2.0), Wilmington, NC District office.

Potential jurisdictional areas were delineated (flagged in the field), classified, and mapped with a
sub-foot Trimble Geo7X GPS unit using the USACE Routine On-Site Determination Method.
Data representative of on-site jurisdictional wetland areas, excluded waters, and non-jurisdictional
upland areas was collected and reported using Wetland Determination Data Forms (Attachment
A).

Potential jurisdictional tributaries and excluded waters were classified according to NC DWQ
Stream Identification Form Version 4.11. CEC utilizes the NC DWQ stream classification forms
in order to document on-site stream conditions as requested by the USACE Asheville field office.
These classifications include sampling with a D-shaped dip net, collecting photographic
documentation, and defining approximate breakpoints (location at which stream changes
classification) within each on-site stream channel. NC DWQ Stream Classification Forms
representative of on-site stream channels were used to document stream conditions (Attachment
B).

Representative photographs were taken of on-site aquatic features and existing site conditions
(Attachment C). The locations of mapped wetlands and other WoUS, Stream Classification Points
(SCP), and Wetland or Upland Determination Data Points (DP) are depicted on (Figure 6).

5.0 RESULTS

On July 28th, 2020, CEC Scientists Kevin Thomas, Professional Wetland Scientist (PWS) and
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist (NC LSS) and David Campbell, Botanist, performed the
onsite preliminary WoUS evaulation within Project Area.

Tributaries

Four potential jurisdictional tributaries were identified within the Project Area (Attachment B,
Figure 6 & Table 1). Tributary Area (TA) 1 and TA 3, originate along the south central portion
of the Project Area, and traverse the site in a south-westerly direction. Both TA 1 and TA 3 are
intermittent tributaries. TA 2 originates along the south-western Project Area boundary and
flows south as a perennial tributary, then transitions within the Project Area to an intermittent
tributary until confluencing with TA 4 (Dan River). TA 4 (Dan River) is a Navigatable Water
and perennial tributary, and flows along the entire southerm portion of the Project Area.

Perennial tributaries exhibit year-round flow with strong geomorphological, hydrological, and
biological characteristics. The on-site perennial tributary generally included soil based evidence
Mr. Jay McMullen– Duke Project Group LS2019DRGLAA; Dan River Game Land Access
CEC Project 195-507
Page 5
October 5, 2020

of high water table, iron oxidizing bacteria, strong continuity of channel bed and bank, with some
aquatic biological activity.

Intermittent tributaries exhibit seasonal flow with moderate geomorphological, hydrological, and
biological characteristics. On-site intermittent tributaries generally exhibit moderate continuity of
channel bed and bank, generally include soil based evidence of high water table, and absent leaf
litter with little or no biological activity.

Table 1. Summary of On-site Streams Within the Project Area
Jurisdictional
Tributary SCP NCDEQ
Classification
NCDEQ
Score(s) Photographs Linear
Footage
TA 1 SCP 3 Intermittent 19.5 9,10,11,12 90
TA 2 SCP 4 Perennial 37 15,16,1718 497
TA 2 SCP 7 Intermittent 21.25 13,14 183
TA 3 SCP 6 Intermittent 27.25 19,20 31
TA 4 N/A* Perennial 30+ 21 806
Tributary
Total 1,607**
*Named tributary and does not need a data sheet, considered perennial by the DWQ and USACE
** Rounded up to nearest whole number

Excluded Features and Upland Areas

No additional WoUS or State were delineated within the Project Area, Wetland Determination
Data Forms, Stream Collection Points (SCP) and Photos representative of upland areas or
excluded features believed to be non-jurisdictional were collected outside the delineated WoUS
boundaries (Figure 6 and Attachments A, B & C; photos 22-24, 25-27 & 28-30). However, these
findings can only be considered preliminary and are not an official governmental approval.

6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

The Report and on-site preliminary evaluation provided by CEC represents our best professional
judgment regarding the potential of on-site wetlands, streams, and other water features at the time
of the investigation that can be used for preliminary project planning only. However, until a
Jurisdictional Determination (JD) is issued by the regulatory agency, these findings can only be
considered preliminary and is not an official governmental approval. CEC recommends that before
any construction or other earth disturbance activities occur on site, a formal JD should be obtained
from the USACE.

Mr. Jay McMullen– Duke Project Group LS2019DRGLAA; Dan River Game Land Access
CEC Project 195-507
Page 6
October 5, 2020
Thank you for the opportunity to provide these services on this project. Please do not hesitate to
contact Kevin Thomas at [phone] or [e-mail] should you have any questions
or comments regarding this report.
Sincerely,
CIVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
Kevin Thomas, PWS, NC LSS Todd Gingerich, PE
Senior Project Manager Vice President
Attachments

FIGURES

DRAWN BY:
DATE:
APPROVED BY:
PROJECT NO:
FIGURE NO:1
DUKE ENERGYLS2019DRGLAADAN RIVER GAME LAND ACCESS AREAROCKINGHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
MAK10/5/2020 1 " = 2,000 '
VICINITY MAP
KT KT*195-507CHECKED BY:
SCALE:\\MKRAMER\Share\Temp\195-507\Maps\PJWD\195507_PJWD_Fig1_Vicinity.mxd 10/5/2020 9:48 AM (mkramer)3701 Arco Corporate Dr., Suite 400 - Charlotte, NC 28273980-237-0373 800-365-2324www.cecinc.com
*Hand Signature on file
NORTH!a
0 2,000 4,0001,000
SCALE IN FEET
LEGEND
APPROXIMATE SITE BOUNDARY (24.44 ACRES)APPROXIMATE SITE LOCATION
REFERENCEHTTP://GOTO.ARCGISONLINE.COM/MAPS/ESRI_STREETMAP, ACCESSED 10/5/2020
DRAWN BY:
DATE:
APPROVED BY:
PROJECT NO:
FIGURE NO:2
DUKE ENERGYLS2019DRGLAADAN RIVER GAME LAND ACCESS AREAROCKINGHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
MAK10/5/2020 1 " = 2,000 '
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
KT KT*195-507CHECKED BY:
SCALE:\\MKRAMER\Share\Temp\195-507\Maps\PJWD\195507_PJWD_Fig2_Topo.mxd 10/5/2020 9:47 AM (mkramer)3701 Arco Corporate Dr., Suite 400 - Charlotte, NC 28273980-237-0373 800-365-2324www.cecinc.com
*Hand Signature on file
NORTH!a
0 2,000 4,0001,000
SCALE IN FEETLEGEND
APPROXIMATE SITE BOUNDARY (24.44 ACRES)
REFERENCEHTTP://GOTO.ARCGISONLINE.COM/MAPS/USA_TOPO_MAPS, ACCESSED 10/5/2020
USGS 7.5 MINUTE TOPOGRAPHIC MAP:SOUTHWEST EDEN, NORTH CAROLINA QUADRANGLEPUBLISHED 1974.
APPROXIMATE SITE LOCATION
DRAWN BY:
DATE:
APPROVED BY:
PROJECT NO:
FIGURE NO:3
DUKE ENERGYLS2019DRGLAADAN RIVER GAME LAND ACCESS AREAROCKINGHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
MAK10/5/2020 1 " = 400 '
CURRENT AERIAL MAP
KT KT*195-507CHECKED BY:
SCALE:\\MKRAMER\Share\Temp\195-507\Maps\PJWD\195507_PJWD_Fig3_Aerial.mxd 10/5/2020 9:47 AM (mkramer)3701 Arco Corporate Dr., Suite 400 - Charlotte, NC 28273980-237-0373 800-365-2324www.cecinc.com
*Hand Signature on file
NORTH!a
0 400 800200
SCALE IN FEETLEGEND
APPROXIMATE SITE BOUNDARY (24.44 ACRES)
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY PARCEL BOUNDARY
REFERENCE1.ESRI WORLD IMAGERY / ARCGIS MAP SERVICE:http://goto.arcgisonline.com/maps/World_Imagery,ACCESSED 10/5/2020, IMAGERY DATE: 2017.
2. PARCEL BOUNDARIES OBTAINED FROM ROCKINGHAMCOUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA. DATED 2019
CmB
DaA
CmE
CmD
CmE
W
CmE RnE
DRAWN BY:
DATE:
APPROVED BY:
PROJECT NO:
FIGURE NO:4A
DUKE ENERGYLS2019DRGLAADAN RIVER GAME LAND ACCESS AREAROCKINGHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
MAK10/5/2020 1 " = 400 '
NRCS CURRENT SOILS MAP
KT KT*195-507CHECKED BY:
SCALE:\\MKRAMER\Share\Temp\195-507\Maps\PJWD\195507_PJWD_Fig4a_CurrentSoils.mxd 10/5/2020 9:49 AM (mkramer)3701 Arco Corporate Dr., Suite 400 - Charlotte, NC 28273980-237-0373 800-365-2324www.cecinc.com
*Hand Signature on file
NORTH!a
0 400 800200
SCALE IN FEET
LEGEND
APPROXIMATE SITE BOUNDARY (24.44 ACRES)
SOIL MAP UNIT
REFERENCE1.ESRI WORLD IMAGERY / ARCGIS MAP SERVICE:http://goto.arcgisonline.com/maps/World_Imagery,ACCESSED 10/5/2020, IMAGERY DATE: 2017.
2. USDA, NRCS SOIL SURVEY GEOGRAPHIC (SSURGO)DATABASE. 2018.
Map Symbol Unit Description Hydric Status Acres
CmB Clover sandy loam, 2-8% slopes No 9.3CmDClover sandy loam, 8-15% slopes No 2.5CmEClover sandy loam, 15-25% slopes No 3.9DaADan River loam, 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded No 8.2RnERhodhiss sandy loam, 15-30% slopes No 0.02WWaterNo 0.5
www.cecinc.com
3701 Arco Corporate Dr., Suite 400 - Charlotte, NC 2873980-237-0373 800-365-2324
DRAWN BY:DATE:APPROVED BY:PROJECT NO:
FIGURE:4B
DUKE ENERGYLS2019DRGLAADAN RIVER GAME LAND ACCESS AREAROCKINGHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
MAK10/5/2020
NRCS PUBLISHED SOILS MAP
195-507
\\MKRAMER\Share\Temp\195-507\Maps\PJWD\195507_PJWD_Fig4B_PublishedSoils.mxd LS:( 10/5/2020 - mkramer) - LP:12/4/2018 3:31:58 PM - LExported:10/5/2020 9:54:15 AMCHECKED BY:MAP SCALE:
LEGEND
APPROXIMATE SITE BOUNDARY (24.44 ACRES)
DAN RIVER
NRCS STREAM & WETLAND
KT1 " = 500 '
0 500 1,000250
SCALE IN FEET
*Hand signature on file
KT*
REFERENCEU.S.D.A., N.R.C.SSOIL SURVEY GEOGRAPHIC (SSURGO) DATABASE FORROCKINGHAM COUNTY, NC, 2004.
Map Symbol Unit Description Hydric Status Acres
Co Congaree loam No 9.2MdB Mayodan sandy clay loam, 2-8% slopes No 6.9MdD Mayodan sandy clay loam, 8-15% slopes No 2.5MdE Mayodan sandy clay loam, 15-25% slopes No 2.5RnE Rion sandy loam, 15-30% slopes No 3.2
PUBHh
R4SBC
R4SBC
R4SBC
R4SBCx
R5UBH
R2UBH
69
0
680670
630
620
650
590640610600
580
59
0
58
0
570
560
550
600
540
520
510
580
550
520
56
0
540
5
5
0
520 560540580560 6806606306
1
0640620700690670660700
530
530 570530590570640600580630630
640
59
05905
9
0
590510
520
520
520
520
www.cecinc.com
250 Old Wilson Bridge Road, Suite 250 - Worthington, OH 43085614-540-6633 · 888-598-6808
DRAWN BY:DATE:APPROVED BY:PROJECT NO:
FIGURE:5
DUKE ENERGYLS2019DRGLAADAN RIVER GAME LAND ACCESS AREAROCKINGHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
MAK10/5/2020
NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY (NWI) MAP
195-507
\\MKRAMER\Share\Temp\195-507\Maps\PJWD\195507_PJWD_FIG5_NWIMap.mxd LS:( 10/5/2020 - mkramer) - LP:12/4/2018 3:31:58 PM - LExported:10/5/2020 9:51:41 AMCHECKED BY:MAP SCALE:
LEGEND
APPROXIMATE SITE BOUNDARY (24.44 ACRES)
NWI RESOURCE
10' INDEX CONTOUR
2' CONTOUR
KT1 " = 500 '
0 500 1,000250
SCALE IN FEET
*Hand signature on file
KT*
REFERENCE1. ESRI IMAGERY / ARCGIS MAP SERVICE:HTTP://GOTO.ARCGISONLINE.COM/MAPS/IMAGERY, ACCESSED 10/5/2020, IMAGERY DATE: 2017.
2. U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICENATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY (NWI) DATABASEFOR NORTH CAROLINA, 2014.
3. CONTOURS DERIVED FROM ROCKINGHAM COUNTYGIS
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
SCP 4
SCP 3
SCP 5
SCP 1
DP4 UP
DP3 UP
DP1 UP
DP 2 UP
SCP 2
SCP 6
SCP 7Potential Waters of the US TA 2: 680 l.f.a(2) Tributary Flow Intermittent 183 l.f.Perennial Flow 497 l.f.
Potential Waters of the US TA 3: 31 l.f.a(2) Tributary Flow Intermittent 31 l.f.
Potential Waters of the US TA 1: 90 l.f.a(2) Tributary Flow Intermittent 90 l.f.
Potential Traditional Navigable Waters of the US TA 2: 806 l.f.a(1) Perennial Flow 806 l.f.
570
560550510
530 540520
630
65
0
660620
610
590600580640
670
640
6
6
0
520
670
5906
0
0600
5
9
0
630620
64
0
6
1
0
520580590590
520
650640 6703701 Arco Corporate Dr., Suite 400 - Charlotte, NC 28273980-237-0373 800-365-2324www.cecinc.com
DRAWN BY:
DATE:
APPROVED BY:
PROJECT NO:
FIGURE NO:6MAK10/5/2020 KT 195-507CHECKED BY:
SCALE:
\\MKRAMER\Share\Temp\195-507\Maps\PJWD\195507_PJWD_FIG6_Delineation.mxd 10/5/2020 9:52 AM (mkramer)
1 " = 200 'KT*
*Hand signature on file
POTENTIAL JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES MAP
DUKE ENERGYLS2019DRGLAADAN RIVER GAME LAND ACCESS AREAROCKINGHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINANORTH!a
LEGEND
APPROXIMATE PROJECT AREABOUNDARY (24.44 ACRES)
a(1) PERENNIAL FLOW
a(2) INTERMITTENT FLOW
a(2) PERENNIAL FLOW
10' INDEX CONTOUR
2' CONTOUR
#*DP
#*SCP
0 200 400100
SCALE IN FEET
REFERENCES1. ESRI IMAGERY / ARCGIS MAP SERVICE:HTTP://GOTO.ARCGISONLINE.COM/MAPS/IMAGERY, ACCESSED 10/5/2020, IMAGERY DATE: 2017.
2. CONTOURS DERIVED FROM ROCKINGHAM COUNTYGIS
NOTESJURISDICTIONAL FEATURES HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIEDBY THE USACE.SCP = STREAM COLLECTION POINTDP = DATA POINT

ATTACHMENT A
USACE DETERMINATION DATA FORMS

Jan
2020
Feb
2020
Mar
2020
Apr
2020
May
2020
Jun
2020
Jul
2020
Aug
2020
Sep
2020
Oct
2020
Nov
2020
Dec
2020
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Rainfall (Inches)2020-07-28
2020-06-28
2020-05-29
Antecedent Precipitation vs Normal Range based on NOAA's Daily Global Historical Climatology Network
Daily Total
30-Day Rolling Total
30-Year Normal Range
30 Days Ending 30th %ile (in)70th %ile (in)Observed (in)Wetness Condition Condition Value Month Weight Product
2020-07-28 3.191732 5.182284 2.464567 Dry 1 3 3
2020-06-28 2.492913 4.864173 4.452756 Normal 2 2 4
2020-05-29 3.224803 5.337795 12.314961 Wet 3 1 3
Result Normal Conditions - 10
Coordinates 36.434098, -79.796291
Observation Date 2020-07-28
Elevation (ft)522.77
Drought Index (PDSI)Moderate wetness (2020-06)
WebWIMP H2O Balance Dry Season
Weather Station Name Coordinates Elevation (ft)Distance (mi)Elevation Weighted Days (Normal)Days (Antecedent)
EDEN 36.4742, -79.7433 678.15 4.043 155.38 2.448 10889 90
REIDSVILLE 2 NW 36.3797, -79.6944 890.092 6.799 367.322 5.557 462 0
MARTINSVILLE FLTR PLT 36.7056, -79.865 759.843 19.143 237.073 13.152 1 0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -- Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: pan River Access City/County: Rockingham Sampling Date: 7.28,2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Power State: NC Sampling Point: DP-1 UP
Investigator(s): Kevin Thomas, David Campbell Section, Township, Range:
Land€orm (hilislope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 36.4342816893359 Long:-79.7964745615187 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Dan River Loam (DaA) 0-2% slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic 1 hydrologic condillons on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No f (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegotat€on IS oil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes - No f
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks,)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓ Is the Sampled Area /
within a Wotlaland7 Yes No V
Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Socondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one Is required: check all that agoly)
_ Surface Solt Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (814)
____ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
✓ Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
u Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
✓ Sediment Deposits (62)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
✓ Drift Deposits (1713)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Other (Explain In Remarks)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
Iron Deposits (135)
✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquilard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (89)
Micrctopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Wotland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Rainfall levels below 30 year normal
averages for this time of year (Please
see attached Antecedent Rain Data }.
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) -- Use scientific names of plants,
Sampling Point: DP-1 UP
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 Foot )
% Cover
Soecles?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Betula nigra
50
YES
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
2 Uquldambar siyradflua
30
YES
FAC
Total Number of Dominant e
3 fraxinus pennsylvanlca 10 NO FACW
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4 Platanus occidenialis
5
NO
FAGW
Percent of Dominant Species
5'
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 78� (A/B)
Prevalence Indexworksheet:
7
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
95
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 w
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 Feet
)
FACW species x 2 =
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
30
YES
FACW
PAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4
2. Acernegundo 15 YES FAC
3. Lin dera benzoin
10
NO
FAC
UPL species X 5 =
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
4.
5.
-
-
Prevalence Index = B/A = 0
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7
8
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytle Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
55
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 Feet
)
= Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
1. Chasmanlhium laiifolium
40
YES
FACU
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
2 Kcrostoglum vimineunl
20
YES
FAC
3 Frymus virglnEcus
10
NO
FACW
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.- Onna arundinacea
3
NO
FACW
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5. Loportea canadensis
3
NO
FAC
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
6. Lindern benzoin 1 NO FAC
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7 Llgustrum slnenso
1
NO
FACU
height.
Sapling/Shrub--Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8. Symphodcorpos orbiculatus 1 NO FACU
9 Acernegundo 1 NO FAC
-
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11
12.
B0
= Total Cover
Woody vine —All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum {Plot size: 30 Fact
)
height.
1 Toxicodendron radlcans
30
YES
FAC
2 Campsls radicens
10
YES
FAC
3 Parthenoclssus qulnquefolia 10 YES FACU
Hydrophytic
5
Vegetation
6.
-
Present? Yes • No
50
Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate shoot.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP-1 UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
!inches} Color (moist) % Color (moist] % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-10 10 YR 4/4 100 SL
10-20 10 YR 5/4 100
SL
#Type: C=Concentration, D=Deplotion, RM=reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocatlon: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric
. Histosol (All)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
^ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al1)
—._ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
— Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Typo:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks: Dan River Loam (DaA) 0-2% slopes
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -- Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Dan River Access City/County: Rockingham Sampling Date: 7•2&2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Power State: NO Sampling Paint: DP-2 UP
Investigator(s): Kevin Thomas, David Campbeli Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%a): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 36.4337684541302 Long:-79.7972106846689 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Dan River Loam (DaA) 0-2% slopes NWi classification: N/A
Are climatic ! hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No ✓ (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No ✓
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks,)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓ !s tSampled Area `
within a Wetland? Yes Na �/
Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (68)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizosphoras on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (816)
Water Marks (91)
_ Presence of reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
f Sediment Deposits (B2)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Solis (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
✓ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
— Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iran Deposits (85)
✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (69)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
/
Saturation Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes Y No
Includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous Inspections), if available:
Rainfall levels below 30 year normal
averages for this time of year (Please
see attached Antecedent Rain Data ).
Remarks:
US Army Carps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP-2 UP
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3o Feet )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Acer moundo
70
YES
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
2 Fraxlnus pennsylvanica
10
NO
FACW
Total Number of Dominant
Juglans nlgra 5 NO FACU
3
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (AIB)
6.
7
_
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
8
66 = Total Cover
SaNinnlShrub Stratum (Plot size; 15 Faat
}
FACW species x 2 =
1. Arundfrodagigantaa
so
YES
FACW
FAC species x 3 =
2. Acernegundo
5
NO
FAG
FACU species x 4 =
3. Llndera benwin
3
NO
FAC
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: 0 (A) I (B)
4 Fraxlnus pennsylvanica 2 NO FACW
Prevalence Index = BIA = 0
7
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
8
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓ 2 - Dominance Test Is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
10.
-
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
90
Herb Stratum (Plot size; 5 Feel
)
Total Cover
data In Remarks or on a separate sheet)
1 Laportea canadensis
30
YES
FAC
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
2. Amphlcarpaea bracteala
10
YES
FAC
'Indicators of hyd€Ic soil and wetland hydrology must
3 Verbesina alternlrolla 5 NO FAC
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
2
NO
FACW
Definitions of tour Vegetation Strata:
5, Acernegundo
2
NO
FACW
6
_
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 9 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7•
-
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
10.
11.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
A9
= Total Cover
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 f1 in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 Feet
)
height.
1 Taxlcadendron radicans
15
YES
FAC
Hydrophytic
2 Vltis ratundifulla 10 YES FAC
3. _
4. -
5
Vegetation
$.
_
Present? Yes No
25 = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP-2 UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Coo Texture Remarks
0-20 10 YR 414 100 SL
D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand
Hydric Soft Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solls3:
_ Hlstosol (Ai)
— Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
— Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
— Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
— Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
,_ _, Loamy Gteyed Matrix (172)
— Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
— Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (176)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (178)
Other (Exp)ain In Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
— Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
— Piedmont Floodplain Soils (Ft 9) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Typo:
Depth (inches):
Dan River Loam (DaA) 0-2% slopes
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -- Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
ProlectlSite: Dan River Access City/County: Rockingham Sampling Date: 7•28.2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Power State: NC Sampling Point: DP-3 UP
Investigator(s): Kevin Thomas, David Campbell Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, torrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slightly convex Slope (%): 7
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 36.4399133744767 Long:-79.7950160790773 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Clover Sandy Loam (CmB) 2-8% slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No ✓ (If no, explain In Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No ✓
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ✓
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓ /
within a Welland? Yes No V
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (All)
_ True Aquatic Plants (814)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (1313)
High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (810)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
— Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (CS)
Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
— Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
— Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Shallow Aquitard (133)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
✓
`
J
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspections), if available:
Rainfall levels below 30 year normal
averages for this time of year (Please
see attached Antecedent Rain Data ).
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) -- Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 Foot )
1 Fagus grandifolla
2
Urlodendron luiipifera
3,
4uarcus alba
4
Carya tomentosa
5,
6.
7.
8,
SaplinplShrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 Feat )
1 Fagus grandirolia
2 "mus alata
3 Carya tomontosa
4,
5.
6,
7.
8.
9.
10.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 9 Feat )
1. Polystichum acrosticholdes
2 Caryx faxlfiora
3. Fagus gra ndifolla
4 Carya tomentosa
5,
6.
7.
8,
9.
10.
11,
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 Feat )
1 Smilax rotundifolla
2 Vitls rolundifolia
3.
4.
5,
6.
or on a separate
Sampling Point: DP-3 UP
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dorninance Test worksheet:
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2
(A)
30 YES FACU
10
YES
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
3
NO
FACU
Species Across All Strata: 7(B)
2
NO
Ni
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 29%
(AIB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total °% Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
45 = Total Cover
FACW species x 2 =
10
YES
FACU
FAC species x 3
5
YES
FACU
FACU species x 4 =
1
NO
NI
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals; 0 (A) 0
(B)
Prevalence Index = BIA= 0
_
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - dominance Test is >50%n
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
16
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate shoot)
10
YES
FACU
— Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation; (Explain)
1 NO FACU
1 NO FACU
1 NO NI
13 = Total Cover
15 YES FAC
5 YES FAG
20 = Total Cover
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
Height.
SaplinglShrub —Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tali.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine —All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation /
Present? Yes No V
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

SOIL,
Sampling Point: DP-3 UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators,)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(Inches) Color moist % Color (moist) % Type Lac Texture Remarks
0-5 7.5 YR 514 100
SL
5-20 7.5 YR 414 100
SL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocatlow PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al) _
dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) _
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3) _
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 146)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Solis (Fig)
Stratified Layers (A5) _
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) —
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _
Depleted hark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallaw Dark Surface (TF12)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (St) (LRR N, _
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5) _
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (56)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Rost rictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (Inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks. Clover Sandy Loam (CmB)
2-8% slopes
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -- Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Projecusite: ' "" " ""..... " City/County: Rockingham Sampling Date: 7•28•2020
Applicant/Owner: Duke Power State: NC Sampling Point: DP-4 UP
Investigator(s): Kevin Thomas, David Campbell Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slightly concave Slope (%): 5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Let: 36.439925192376 Long:-79.7951434412169 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Clover Sandy Loam (CmB) 2-8% slopes NWi classification: NIA
Are climatic! hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No ✓ (If no, explain in Remarks,)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No ✓
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks,)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrephytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ✓
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No V is the Sampled Area
within a Welland? Yes No V
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
PfimaN Indicators minimum of one is re uired• check all that a I
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A?)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
" Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (316)
_ Water Marks (Bi)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Wator Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Titled Soils (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal twat or Crust (134)
Other (Fxplain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
. Iron Deposits (65)
u Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
— Shallow Aqultard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Watland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Rainfall levels below 30 year normal
averages for this time of year (Please
see attached Antecedent Rain Data ).
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) -- Use scientific names of plants,
Tree Stratum (Plots lze: 30 Feat )
9 Fegus grandifolfa
2 Llrlodondron tuliplfera
3. Quercus alba
4.
5.
6,
7.
8.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 Feel )
1 Fagus grandifolia
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 Feet )
1 Polystichum acrosclichuldes
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11,
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 Feet )
1 Smilax rotundlfolla
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a
s
Sampling Point: UP-4 UP
Absolute Dominant indicator
Dominance Test worksheat:
% Cover species?, Status
30 YES FACU
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC; (A)
10 YES FACU
5 NO FACU
Total Number of Dominant
Spoctes Across All Strata: 5 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 20% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by
45 = Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
5 YES FACU
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
_
-
UPL species x 5 =
-
Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B)
Prevalence Index - BIA= 0
_
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.o'
5 = Total Cover
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data In Remarks or on a separate sheet)
20 YES FACU
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of lour Vegetation Strata:
Tr W d I t i d' 3 1 7 6
20 = Total Cover
5 YES FAC
5 Total Cover
ee - oo y pan s, exc u Ing vines, n. ( . cm) or
more In diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
SaplingfShrub-Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb --All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vino All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No It
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP-4 UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators,)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color fmoist) % _ _Color (moist ) % Tyae To Texture Remarks
0-7 7.5 YR 5/4 100 SL
7-20 7.5 YR 414 100
SL
'Type: =Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil indicators:
Indicators for Problernatic Hydric Solls3:
Histosol (Al)
— Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
— Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
` Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
— Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172)
_ Piedmont Floodplaln Solis (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
— Depleted Matrix (173)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (Ffi)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
T Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
Redox Depressions (178)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'indicators of hydrophylic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Type;
Depth (inches):
Clover Sandy Loam (CmB) 2-8% slopes
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

ATTACHMENT B
NC DEQ STREAM CLASSIFICATION FORMS

NC Division of Water Quality – Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams
and their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal=_7.5_) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1.a Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. in-channel structure: ex. Riffle-pool, step-pool 0 1 2 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade Control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural Valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
a-artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal=__1.5_____)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal=_3__)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW= 0.75 OBL= 1.5 Other= 0
Polystichum acrostichoides and Lonicera japonica rooted in streambed.
Date: 7.28.2020 Project/Site: Dan River Access Latitude: 36.4350040084976

Evaluator: KT/DC County: Rockingham, NC Longitude: -79.7977523597846

Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30* 12
Stream Determination: (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Stream ID: SCP 1
NC Division of Water Quality – Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams
and their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal=_7.5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1.a Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. in-channel structure: ex. Riffle-pool, step-pool 0 1 2 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade Control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural Valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
a-artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal=__4_)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal=__2 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW= 0.75 OBL= 1.5 Other= 0
Ligustrum sinense rooted in streambed.
Date: 7.28.2020 Project/Site: Dan River Access Latitude: 36.4346402388402

Evaluator: KT/DC County: Rockingham, NC Longitude: -79.7982061257566

Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30* 13.5
Stream Determination: (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Stream ID: SCP 2
NC Division of Water Quality – Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams
and their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal=_10.5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1.a Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. in-channel structure: ex. Riffle-pool, step-pool 0 1 2 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade Control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural Valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
a-artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal=__3_)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal=__6 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW= 0.75 OBL= 1.5 Other= 0
Laportea canadensis and Microstegium vimineum rooted in streambed
Date: 7.28.2020 Project/Site: Dan River Access Latitude: 36.434611586626

Evaluator: KT/DC County: Rockingham, NC Longitude: -79.7983039934094

Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30* 19.5
Stream Determination: (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Stream ID: SCP 3
NC Division of Water Quality – Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams
and their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal=_20 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1.a Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. in-channel structure: ex. Riffle-pool, step-pool 0 1 2 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade Control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural Valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
a-artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal=_9__)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal=_8_ )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW= 0.75 OBL= 1.5 Other= 0
Gravels, cobbles, sands.
Date: 7.28.2020 Project/Site: Dan River Access Latitude: 36.4352598994997

Evaluator: KT/DC County: Rockingham, NC Longitude: -79.7987127130168

Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30* 37
Stream Determination: (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Stream ID: SCP 4
NC Division of Water Quality – Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams
and their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= 5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1.a Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. in-channel structure: ex. Riffle-pool, step-pool 0 1 2 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade Control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural Valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
a-artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal=_0.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal=_ 1.75)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW= 0.75 OBL= 1.5 Other= 0
Fraxinus pennsylvanica in streambed.
Date: 7.28.2020 Project/Site: Dan River Access Latitude: 36.4344759537165

Evaluator: KT/DC County: Rockingham, NC Longitude: -79.7983395278411

Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30* 7.25
Stream Determination: (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Stream ID: SCP 5
NC Division of Water Quality – Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams
and their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= 7.5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1.a Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. in-channel structure: ex. Riffle-pool, step-pool 0 1 2 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade Control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural Valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
a-artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal=_6.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal=_7.25 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW= 0.75 OBL= 1.5 Other= 0
Gravels, sand. Saturated soil. Boehmeria cylindrica in streambed.
Date: 7.28.2020 Project/Site: Dan River Access Latitude: 36.4344946752127

Evaluator: KT/DC County: Rockingham, NC Longitude: -79.7984485513844

Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30* 21.25
Stream Determination: (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Stream ID: SCP 6
NC Division of Water Quality – Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams
and their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= 11 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1.a Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. in-channel structure: ex. Riffle-pool, step-pool 0 1 2 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade Control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural Valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
a-artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal=_8 )
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal= 8.25 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW= 0.75 OBL= 1.5 Other= 0
Clay, silts. Boehmeria cylindrica in streambed.
Date: 7.28.2020 Project/Site: Dan River Access Latitude: 36.4341084376933

Evaluator: KT/DC County: Rockingham, NC Longitude: -79.7984927868379

Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30* 27.25
Stream Determination: (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Stream ID: SCP 7

ATTACHMENT C
REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPHS

1 | Page

Photo Number: 1

Date: July 30, 2020
Description:
DP 1 UP Soil Profile

Photo Number: 2
Date: July 30, 2020
Description:
DP 1 UP View Looking West

Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Charlotte, NC
Phone [phone] ∙ Toll Free: 855/859-9932 www.cecinc.com
Dan River Game Land Access
Rockingham County, NC
CEC Project # 195-507
2 | Page

Photo Number: 3
Date: July 30, 2020
Description:
DP 2 UP Soil Profile

Photo Number: 4
Date: July 30
Description:
DP 2 UP View Looking North

Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Charlotte, NC
Phone [phone] ∙ Toll Free: 855/859-9932 www.cecinc.com
Dan River Game Land Access
Rockingham County, NC
CEC Project # 195-507
3 | Page

Photo Number: 5
Date: July 30, 2020
Description:
DP 3 UP Soil Profile

Photo Number: 6
Date: July 30, 2020
Description:
DP 3 UP View Looking East

Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Charlotte, NC
Phone [phone] ∙ Toll Free: 855/859-9932 www.cecinc.com
Dan River Game Land Access
Rockingham County, NC
CEC Project # 195-507

4 | Page

Photo Number: 7
Date: July 30, 2020
Description:
DP 4 UP Soil

Photo Number: 8
Date: July 30, 2020
Description:
DP 4 UP View Looking Northeast

Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Charlotte, NC
Phone [phone] ∙ Toll Free: 855/859-9932 www.cecinc.com
Dan River Game Land Access
Rockingham County, NC
CEC Project # 195-507

5 | Page

Photo Number: 9

Date: July 28, 2020
Description:
TA 1 @ SCP 3 Soil Based Evidence of High
Water Table

Photo Number: 10
Date: July 28, 2020
Description:
TA 1 @ SCP 3 View Looking North East Up
Reach at Headcut

Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Charlotte, NC
Phone [phone] ∙ Toll Free: 855/859-9932 www.cecinc.com
Dan River Game Land Access
Rockingham County, NC
CEC Project # 195-507
6 | Page
Photo Number: 11

Date: July 28, 2020
Description:
TA 1 @ SCP3 Crayfish Hole

Photo Number: 12
Date: July 28, 2020
Description:
TA 1 @ SCP3 View Looking South West
Down Reach

Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Charlotte, NC
Phone [phone] ∙ Toll Free: 855/859-9932 www.cecinc.com
Dan River Game Land Access
Rockingham County, NC
CEC Project # 195-507
7 | Page
Photo Number: 13

Date: July 28, 2020
Description:
TA 2 @ Confluence of Dan River

Photo Number: 14
Date: July 28, 2020
Description:
TA 2 @ Confluence of Dan River View
Looking North

Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Charlotte, NC
Phone [phone] ∙ Toll Free: 855/859-9932 www.cecinc.com
Dan River Game Land Access
Rockingham County, NC
CEC Project # 195-507
8 | Page
Photo Number: 15

Date: July 28, 2020
Description:
TA 2 @ SCP 4 Soil Based Evidence of High
Water Table

Photo Number: 16
Date: July 28, 2020
Description:
TA 2 @ SCP 4 View Looking North, Up
Reach

Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Charlotte, NC
Phone [phone] ∙ Toll Free: 855/859-9932 www.cecinc.com
Dan River Game Land Access
Rockingham County, NC
CEC Project # 195-507
9 | Page
Photo Number: 17

Date: July 28, 2020
Description:
TA 2 @ SCP 4 View Looking South, Down
Reach

Photo Number: 18
Date: July 30, 2020
Description:
TA 2 @ SCP 7 View Looking South

Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Charlotte, NC
Phone [phone] ∙ Toll Free: 855/859-9932 www.cecinc.com
Dan River Game Land Access
Rockingham County, NC
CEC Project # 195-507
10 | Page
Photo Number: 19

Date: July 28, 2020
Description:
TA 3 @ SCP 6 Soil Based Evidence of High
Water Table

Photo Number: 20
Date: July 30, 2020
Description:
TA 3 @ SCP 6 View Looking East Up Reach

Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Charlotte, NC
Phone [phone] ∙ Toll Free: 855/859-9932 www.cecinc.com
Dan River Game Land Access
Rockingham County, NC
CEC Project # 195-507
11 | Page
Photo Number: 21

Date: July 28, 2020
Description:
TA 4 Dan River View Looking North Across
Reach

Photo Number: 22
Date: July 28, 2020
Description:
SCP 1 No Soil Based Evidence of High Table

Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Charlotte, NC
Phone [phone] ∙ Toll Free: 855/859-9932 www.cecinc.com
Dan River Game Land Access
Rockingham County, NC
CEC Project # 195-507
12 | Page
Photo Number: 23

Date: July 28, 2020
Description:
SCP 1 View Looking North East at Headcut

Photo Number: 24
Date: July 28, 2020
Description:
SCP 1 View Looking South West

Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Charlotte, NC
Phone [phone] ∙ Toll Free: 855/859-9932 www.cecinc.com
Dan River Game Land Access
Rockingham County, NC
CEC Project # 195-507
13 | Page
Photo Number: 25

Date: July 28, 2020
Description:
SCP 2 Soil Based Evidence of High Water
Table

Photo Number: 26
Date: July 28, 2020
Description:
SCP 2 View Looking North East

Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Charlotte, NC
Phone [phone] ∙ Toll Free: 855/859-9932 www.cecinc.com
Dan River Game Land Access
Rockingham County, NC
CEC Project # 195-507

14 | Page
Photo Number: 27

Date: July 28, 2020
Description:
SCP 2 View Looking South West

Photo Number: 28
Date: July 28, 2020
Description:
SCP 5 No Soil Based Evidence of High Water
Table

Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Charlotte, NC
Phone [phone] ∙ Toll Free: 855/859-9932 www.cecinc.com
Dan River Game Land Access
Rockingham County, NC
CEC Project # 195-507

15 | Page
Photo Number: 29

Date: July 28, 2020
Description:
SCP 5 View Looking North

Photo Number: 30
Date: July 28, 2020
Description:
SCP 5 View Looking West

Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Charlotte, NC
Phone [phone] ∙ Toll Free: 855/859-9932 www.cecinc.com
Dan River Game Land Access
Rockingham County, NC
CEC Project # 195-507