WQ0017373_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2018

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
D isinr /fr ater Quality
June 24, 2008
Harborgate Homeowners Association, Inc.
c/o Art Gibson
Condo Services, Inc.
P.O. Box 4810
Davidson, NC 28036
Subject: Wastewater Collection System
Permit No. WQ0017373
Harborgate HOA
Mecklenburg County, NC
Dear Mr. Gibson:
On June 3, 2008, Mr. Andrew Martin of the Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program
(MCWQP) conducted an inspection of the subject collection system. This inspection was
conducted as part of a cooperative working agreement between Mecklenburg County and the
Division of Water Quality. The enclosed report should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Ms. Barbara Sifford at
704/663-1699.
Sincerely,
ACtkoata „5-t
Barbara Sifford
Technical Support
Surface Water Protection Section
Mooresville Regional Office
Enclosures
cc: Rusty Rozzelle, MCWQP
Dennis King, King Plumbing and Repair PO Box 1104, Davidson, NC 282036
PERCS Unit - Raleigh
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Mooresville Regional Office
Internet: www.ncwaterouality.org 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Mooresville NC 28115
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
NOrthCarolina
atura!/y
Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

b
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan E. Klimek, P.E., Director
Av"A
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
NON -DISCHARGE COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
GENERAL INFORMATION
Owner Harborgate HOA
County Mecklenburg
Permit No. NPDES N/A
Issuance Date N/A
If applicable, SOC Issuance Date N/A
Permittee Contact Art Gibson
ORC Name N/A
24 hr Contact Name Dennis King
WQ N/A
Expiration Date N/A
Expiration Date N/A
Telephone No. [phone]
Telephone No. N/A
Telephone No. [phone]
Reason for Inspection
X ROUTINE COMPLAINT FOLLOW-UP OTHER
Type of inspection
X Collection System
Spray Irrigation Sludge Other
Inspection Summary: (additional comments may be included on attached pages)
The subject collection system is owned by the Harborgate Homeowners Association, Inc. and is serviced by
King Plumbing Company. The system is comprised of gravity sewers with one lift station servicing the
Harborgate Condominiums. No problems were noted during the inspection.
Is a follow-up inspection necessary yes X no
Inspector(s) Name(s)/Title(s) Andrew Martin/Environmental Specialist
Telephone No. [phone] Fax No. [phone]
Date of Inspection 06-03-08

Dermi N/A
Owner: Harborgate HOA
Facility: Harborgate
Inspection Date: 06-03-08
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Contractor: King Plumbing Company
Pump Station: 20420 Harborgate Drive
Pump station type: Submersible pump station with duplex grinder pumps
Yes No NA NE
Are pump station logs available?
Is it accessible in all weather conditions?
Is general housekeeping acceptable?
Are all pumps present?
Are all pumps operable?
Are wet well/siphons free of excessive debris?
Are upstream manholes free of excessive debris/signs of overflow?
Are floats/controls for pumps/alarms operable?
Is "auto polling" feature/SCADA present?
Is "auto polling" feature/SCADA operational?
Is simple telemetry present?
Is simple telemetry operational?
Are audio and visual alarms present?
Are audio and visual alarms operable?
Is the Pump station inspected as required?
Are backflow devices in place?
Are backflow devices operable?
Are air relief valves in place?
Are air relief valves operable?
Is an emergency generator available?
Can the emergency generator run the pumps?
Is the pump station equipped for quick hook-up?
Is the generator operable?
Is the fuel tank full?
Is the generator inspected according to their schedule?
Is a 24-hour notification sign posted?
Does it include:
Instructions for notification?
Pump station identifier?
Emergency phone number?
Is public access limited?
Is pump station free of overflow piping?
Is the pump station free of signs of overflow?
Are run times comparable for multiple pumps?
Pump Station Additional Comments:
El
❑❑❑❑❑❑❑

June 3, 2008
Harborgate Homeowners Association, Inc.
c/o Art Gibson
Condo Services, Inc.
P.O. Box 4810
Davidson, NC 28036
Subject: Wastewater Collection System
Harborgate
Mecklenburg County, NC
Dear Mr. Gibson:
On June 3, 2008, Mr. Andrew Martin of the Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program
(MCWQP) conducted an inspection of the subject collection system. This inspection was
conducted as part of a cooperative working agreement between Mecklenburg County and the
Division of Water Quality. The enclosed report should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Ron Boone or me at
704/663-1699.
Sincerely,
Robert B. Krebs
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
Mooresville Regional Office
RBK/adm
Enclosures
cc: Rusty Rozzelle, MCWQP
Dennis King, King Plumbing and Repair Po Box 1104, Davidson, NC 282036
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan E. Klimek, P.E., Director
ATA
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
NON -DISCHARGE COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
GENERAL INFORMATION
Owner Harborgate HOA
County Mecklenburg
Permit No. NPDES N/A
Issuance Date N/A
If applicable, SOC Issuance Date N/A
Permittee Contact Art Gibson
ORC Name N/A
24 hr Contact Name Dennis King
f
WQ N/A
Expiration Date N/A
Expiration Date N/A
Telephone No. [phone]
Telephone No. N/A
Telephone No. [phone]
Reason for Inspection
X ROUTINE COMPLAINT FOLLOW-UP OTHER
Type of inspection
X Collection System Spray Irrigation
Sludge Other
Inspection Summary: (additional comments may be included on attached pages)
The subject collection system is owned by the Harborgate Homeowners Association, Inc. and is serviced by
King Plumbing Company. The system is comprised of gravity sewers with one lift station servicing the
Harborgate Condominiums. No problems were noted during the inspection.
Is a follow-up inspection necessary yes X no
Inspector(s) Name(s)/Title(s) Andrew Martin/Environmental Specialist
Telephone No. [phone] Fax No. [phone]
Date of Inspection 06-03-08

Permit: N/A
-.Owner: Harborgate HOA
Facility: Harborgate
Inspection Date: 06-03-08
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Contractor: King Plumbing Company
Pump Station: 20420 Harborgate Drive
Pump station type: Submersible pump station with duplex grinder pumps
Yes No NA NE
Are pump station logs available?
Is it accessible in all weather conditions?
Is general housekeeping acceptable?
Are all pumps present?
Are all pumps operable?
Are wet well/siphons free of excessive debris?
Are upstream manholes free of excessive debris/signs of overflow?
Are floats/controls for pumps/alarms operable?
Is "auto polling" feature/SCADA present?
Is "auto polling" feature/SCADA operational?
Is simple telemetry present?
Is simple telemetry operational?
Are audio and visual alarms present?
Are audio and visual alarms operable?
Is the Pump station inspected as required?
Are backflow devices in place?
Are backflow devices operable?
Are air relief valves in place?
Are air relief valves operable?
Is an emergency generator available?
Can the emergency generator run the pumps?
Is the pump station equipped for quick hook-up?
Is the generator operable?
Is the fuel tank full?
Is the generator inspected according to their schedule?
Is a 24-hour notification sign posted?
Does it include:
Instructions for notification?
Pump station identifier?
Emergency phone number?
Is public access limited?
Is pump station free of overflow piping?
Is the pump station free of signs of overflow?
Are run times comparable for multiple pumps?
Pump Station Additional Comments:
El
❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑®❑❑
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
El El
Z ❑
® ❑
El El
El 0
❑ ❑

Michael F. Easley
Govemor
William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
-Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
May 21, 2001
Mr. Bill Williams, President
Harborgate Homeowners Association
401 Harborgate Court
Cornelius, NC 28031
Subject: Permit No. WQ0017373
Harborgate Home Owners Assoc.
Harborgate Condominiums
Wastewater Collection System
Mecklenburg County, NC
Dear Mr. Williams:
On April 25, 2001, Mr. David Caldwell of the Mecklenburg County Department of Environmental
Protection (MCDEP) conducted an inspection of the subject collection system. This inspection was
conducted as part of a cooperative working agreement between Mecklenburg County and the Division of
Water Quality. The attached inspection report should be self-explanatory. The inspection revealed that the
facilities are being properly operated and maintained.
Also, attached is an excerpt from the regulation applicable to collection system permitting and a
copy of the relevant permit shell. Please review these two documents closely. Presently the subject system
is deemed permitted pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0227(d); however, in accordance with 15A NCAC
2H.0227(e), if inadequate operation and maintenance (O&M) of the system is documented or there is a
failure to implement an adequate O&M management program, then the Division may issue an individual
permit.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact either Mr. Don Price or me at
704/663-1699.
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
DRG/dc
Attachments
cc: Rusty Rozzelle, MCDEP
Aquatrol, Inc.
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
4-17+6
NCDEht
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
1 800 623-7748 FAX [phone]

i
1
i
Q67-2 9r
1 -sd
,

Michael F. Easley, G or
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary.
North Carolina Department ofEnvironment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H.-.Sullins, P. E.,;beputy Director
Division of Water Quality
June 24, 2003
Mr. Don Noe
Focus Management
P.O. Box 11015
Charlotte, NC 28220
Subject: Wastewater Collection System
Harborgate Apartments
Mecklenburg County, NC
Dear Mr. Noe:
On May 30, 2003, Mr. Derrick A. Harris of the Mecklenburg County Water Quality
Program (MCWQP) conducted an inspection of the subject collection system. This inspection
was conducted as part of a cooperative working agreement between Mecklenburg County and the
Division of Water Quality. The enclosed report should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Ms. Sonja Williams or me
at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
DRG/dah
Enclosures
cc: Rusty Rozzelle, MCWQP
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
11711
N DEN
Mooresville Regional Office 919. North Main Street Mooresville, North Carolina. 28115 [phone] Customer Service 1-877-623-6748

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Zia
NCDENR
NORTH CAROIJNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
NON -DISCHARGE COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
GENERAL INFORMATION
City/Town/Owner Harborgate HOA
Permit No. NPDES N/A
Issuance Date N/A
If applicable, SOC Issuance Date N/A '
Permittee Contact William Williams
ORC Name N/A
24 hr Contact Name Dennis King
County Mecklenburg
WQ N/A
Expiration Date N/A
Expiration Date N/A
Telephone No. [phone]
Telephone No. N/A
Telephone No. [phone]
Reason for Inspection
X ROUTINE COMPLAINT FOLLOW-UP OTHER
Type of inspection
X Collection System Spray Irrigation Sludge Other
Inspection Summary: (additional comments may be included on attached pales)
Is a follow-up inspection necessary _yes x no
The subject collection system is owned by the Harborgate Homeowners Association. Effective
March 2003, King Plumbing Company is contracted to be responsible for maintaining the lift
station. All components of the facility were operating properly at the time of the inspection. The
facility is currently being inspected on a weekly basis.
Inspector(s) Name(s)/Title(s) Derrick A. Harris/Environmental Hygienist II
Telephone No. [phone] Fax No. _(704) 336-4391
Date of Inspection 05-30-03

Harborgate Apartments ,
Sewer Collection System
May 30, 2003
Collection System File Review
1. Does DWQ Database indicate repetitive overflows at any point? Yes❑ No❑ N/A
If yes, is there a corrective action plan? Yes❑ No❑ N/A®
2. Do records include a map of the collection system? Yes❑ No N/A❑
3. Are there records of annual visual inspections of all lines not visible from
normal public access? Yes No® N/AD
Regular visual inspections of high priority areas? Yes❑ No /5 N/A❑
4. Do records indicate that right of ways are maintained to allow access? YesD No / 1 N/A❑
5. Are there areas of regular or scheduled cleaning? Yes❑ No N/A❑
6. Is there a spare parts inventory and list of contractors? Yes❑ No N/A❑
7. Is the spare parts inventory adequate? Yes❑ No N/A
8. Are maintenance logs up-to-date and include inspections, tests, maintenance? Yes® No N/A❑
9. Is there a trouble log of all problems that include the following information? Yes❑ NoZ N/A❑
Overflows locations, who responded time/date, action taken, cause of
problem/overflow, and how the problem was resolved.
10. Does the Town have a Sewer Use Ordinance? Yes❑ No❑ N/A®
Does it appear the SUO is enforced? Yes❑ Non N/A
11. Does the system have any known points of bypass? Yes❑ No N/A❑
If yes, describe type of bypass and location. Yes❑ No❑ N/A®
12. Do records log pump station telemetry/SCADA notifications? Yes❑ No N/A❑
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS RELATIVE TO ITEMS OF COLLECTION SYSTEM FILE REVIEW: A maintenance
log is kept on site and is updated weekly. The operator inspects the alarm, dialer, pumps, floats and the wet well as part of his
weekly inspection.

Harborgate Apartments •
Sewer Collection System
May 30, 2003
Gravity Sewers
Manholes:
1. Are manholes accessible? Yes❑ No N/AZ
2. Are manhole covers above grade? Yes❑ No❑ N/A®
Visible signs of overflow? Yes❑ No N/AZ
Sinkholes or depressions? Yes❑ No❑ N/AZ
3. Are manhole covers missing or improperly seated? Yes❑ No❑ N/A
4. Are manholes in need of repair? Yes0 No N/AZ
Due to normal wear and tear? Yes❑ No❑ N/AZ
Due to vandalism? Yes❑ No❑ N/AZ
5. Are inverts in need of repair? Yes❑ Noll N/AZ
6. Is there evidence of collection system deterioration? Yes❑ No❑ N/AZ
7. Is flow visibly restricted in pipe or manhole? Yes❑ No❑ N/AZ
8. Is there an excessive amount of grease? Yes❑ No N/AZ
Roots? Yes❑ No❑ N/A®
Sand? Yes❑ No❑ N/A
9. Is there evidence of submergence of vents? Yes❑ No❑ N/AZ
10. Are bypass structures or pipes visible in manhole? Yes❑ No❑ N/A®
Lines/Right-of-Ways:
1. Are easement, right-of-ways, in need of mowing or clearing? Yes❑ No❑ N/A®
2. Are sink holes or depressions observed above line? Yes❑ Non N/A®
3. Is there evidence of leakage or seepage from the line? Yes❑ No❑ N/A®
4. Are there areas of exposed line? Yes❑ No❑ NIA®
Are exposed lines constructed of piping other than ductile iron or comparable? Yes❑ No❑ N/A
5. Are stream/ditch crossings and aerial supports in need of repair? Yes❑ No❑ N/AZ
6. Are right-of-ways being used for roads? Yes❑ No❑ N/AZ
7. Do lines show evidence or history of damage? Yes ❑ No N/A®
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS RELATIVE TO ITEMS OF COLLECTION SYSTEM GRAVITY SEWERS REVIEW
The gravity sewer was not evaluated during this inspection (it is maintained by Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities).

Harborgate Apartments;
Sewer Collection System
May 30, 2003
Pump Stations/Siphons
1. Are any pump station/siphon sites difficult to access?
2. Does general housekeeping need improvement?
3. Are there any missing pumps?
Yes❑ No N/A❑
Yes❑ No® N/A❑
Yes❑ No N/A❑
4. Do wet wells/siphons have accumulations of debris that could potentially
affect the operation of the unit? Yes❑ No® N/A❑
5. Does the first manhole up line from the pump station or siphon show signs
of backup, overflow, debris originating from the line? Yes❑ No® N/A❑
6. Are there any floats/controls for pumps, alarms or alternators that does
not work? Yes❑ No I N/A❑
7. Did high water alarms fail to work when tested? Yes❑ No N/A❑
8. Did ORC fail to produce maintenance log? Yes❑ No N/A❑
9. Is telemetry/SCADA present? Yes® No❑ N/A❑
Operable? Yes® No❑ N/A❑
10. Are backflow devices in place and operable? Yes❑ No N/A
11. Where necessary are air relief valves present and operable? Yes❑ No❑ N/A®
12. Are standby generators present? Yes No❑ N/A❑
Operable? Yes® No N/A❑
Is fuel tank full? Yes❑ No❑ N/A®
13. Is there a 24 hr notification sign? Yes /1 No N/A❑
14. Is public access limited? Yes No N/A❑
15. Is there any bypass mechanism present? Yes❑ No N/A❑
16. Any signs of overflow at the station/siphon? Yes❑ No N/A❑
17. Is there chemical addition present? Yes❑ No N/A❑
❑ Odor control
❑ pH control
❑ Other, explain
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS RELATIVE TO ITEMS OF COLLECTION SYSTEM PUMP STATION/SIPHON
REVIEW :
The pumps, alarm, and dialers were tested and were found to be operating properly at the time of the visit.

CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Rod Beard, President
Harborside Home Owners Association
18331 Harborside Dr.
Cornelius, NC 28031
Dear Mr. Beard:
Michael F. Easley, G� SCo
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Depamnent of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
f Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
November 7, 2003
7001 2510 0004 8286 4910
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Permit No. WQ0014177
Harborside Condominiums &
Town Homes
Wastewater Collection System
Mecklenburg County, NC
On May 8, 2003, Mr. Jeff Price of the Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program
(MCWQP) conducted an inspection of the subject collection system. This inspection was
conducted as part of a cooperative working agreement between Mecklenburg County and the
Division of Water Quality. The enclosed report should be self-explanatory.
This report is being issued as a Notice of Violation (NOV) because the every day
visitation of the pump stations is not being met in accordance to 15A NCAC 2H .0227 (d)(4), and
pump station # 5 does not utilize duplex pumps as required by Permit No.WQ0014177. Pursuant
to North Carolina General Statute (NCGS) 143-215.6A, a civil penalty of not more than twenty-
five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) may be assessed against a person who violates any
management practice established pursuant to NCGS 143-215. Should this Office make an
enforcement recommendation relative to the violations, you will be advised in writing.
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this Office by December 5, 2003,
addressing the violations noted above. In responding, please address your comments to Ms. Sonja
Williams. In addition, please send a copy of your response to Mr. Rusty Ro7Jelle, Mecklenburg
County Water Quality Program, 700 N. Tryon St., Suite 205, Charlotte, NC 28202.
NorthCarolina
Naturally
di
NCDENR
N. C. Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville NC 28115 [phone] Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

Mr. Rod Beard
Harborside HOA
November 7, 2003
Page 2
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Ms. Williams or me at
704/663-1699.
Sincerely,
/ /2-e,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
DRG/jsp
Enclosures
cc: Rusty Rozzelle, MCWQP
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
John Swope, Condo Services, Inc.
File Name: Harborside.WQ0014177.0503.doc

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Ala
NCDENR
NORTH CAROUNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
NON -DISCHARGE COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
GENERAL INFORMATION
City/Town/Owner Harborside Owners Assoc.
Permit No. WQ 0014177
Issuance Date August 18, 1997
If applicable, SOC Issuance Date N/A
Permittee Contact John Swope
ORC Name N/A
24 hr Contact Name Mr. Dennis King
County Mecklenburg
Expiration Date N/A
Expiration Date N/A
Telephone No. [phone]
Telephone No.
Telephone No. [phone]
Reason for Inspection
X ROUTINE COMPLAINT
FOLLOW-UP OTHER
Type of inspection
X Collection System Spray Irrigation Sludge Other
Inspection Summarp: (additional comments may be included on attached pages)
Mr. Dennis King (King Plumbing Repair Co.) maintains the eight (8) pump stations specified in
Permit WQ0014177. The gravity lines comprising the balance of the collection system are
maintained by Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities, and therefore were not evaluated during the
inspection. The pump stations need some maintenance, as detailed in the Pump Station/Siphons
Section. One of the pump stations is operated in a simplex configuration, although the individual
permit specifies that all stations be operated in duplex. This is a violation of Permit WQ0014177.
The pump stations are inspected daily (5 days per week). However, since the pump stations do
not have telemetry they are required to be inspected every day (365 days per year). This is a
violation of 15 A NCAC 2H.0227.
Is a follow-up inspection necessary Xeres - no
Inspector(s) Name(s)/Title(s) Jeff Price / MCWQP Inspector
Telephone No. [phone] Fax No. [phone]
Date of Inspection May 8.2003

Collection System File Review
1.. Does DWQ Database indicate repetitive overflows at any point? Yes❑ Non N/A
If yes, is there a corrective action plan? Yes❑ Non N/A
2. Do records include a map of the collection system? Yes❑ Non N/A
3. Are there records of annual visual inspections of all lines not visible from
normal public access? Yes No N/A®
Regular visual inspections of high priority areas? Yes❑ Non N/A®
4. Do records indicate that right of ways are maintained to allow access? Yes❑ Non N/A
5. Are there areas of regular or scheduled cleaning? Yes❑ No❑ N/A
6. Is there a spare parts inventory and list of contractors? Yes❑ Non N/AZ
7. Is the spare parts inventory adequate? Yes❑ Non N/A
8. Are maintenance Togs up-to-date and include inspections, tests, maintenance? Yes❑ Non N/A
1/
10
9. Is there a trouble log of all problems that include the following information? Yes❑ Non N/A®
Overflows locations, who responded time/date, action taken, cause of
problem/overflow, and how the problem was resolved.
10. Does the Town have a Sewer Use Ordinance? Yes❑ Non N/A®
Does it appear the SUO is enforced? Yes❑ Non N/AZ
11. Does the system have any known points of bypass? Yes❑ Non N/A®
If yes, describe type of bypass and location. Yes❑ Non N/A
..
12. Do records log pumpstation telemetry/SCADA notifications? Yes❑ Non N/A®
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS RELATIVE TO ITEMS OF COLLECTION SYSTEM FILE REVIEW:
King Plumbing Repair Co. is contracted to maintain the pump stations only. The gravity sewers
are maintained by Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities and were not evaluated during this inspection.

Gravity Sewers
Manholes:
1. Are manholes accessible? Yes❑ Non N/AZ
2. Are manhole covers above grade? Yes❑ No N/A
Visible signs of overflow? Yes❑ No❑ N/AZ
Sinkholes or depressions? Yes❑ No❑ N/A
3. Are manhole covers missing or improperly seated? Yes❑ Non N/A
4. Are manholes in need of repair? Yes No❑ N/A
Due to normal wear and tear? Yes❑ No❑ N/AZ
Due to vandalism? Yes❑ Non N/A
5. Are inverts in need of repair? Yes❑ Nor] N/A®
6. Is there evidence of collection system deterioration? Yes No N/AZ
7. Is flow visibly restricted in pipe or manhole? Yes❑ No N/AZ
8. Is there an excessive amount of grease? Yes❑ Non N/A
Roots? Yes❑ No❑ N/A
Sand? Yes❑ No N/AZ
9. Is there evidence of submergence of vents? Yes❑ No❑ N/A
10. Are bypass structures or pipes visible in manhole? Yes❑ No❑ N/A
Lines/Right-of-Ways:
►/
1. Are easement, right-of-ways, in need of mowing or clearing? Yes❑ Non N/AZ
2. Are sink holes or depressions observed above line? Yes❑ No❑ N/AZ
3. Is there evidence of leakage or seepage from the line? Yes❑ No❑ N/AZ
4. Are there areas of exposed line? Yes❑ No❑ N/AZ
Are exposed lines constructed of piping other than ductile iron or comparable? Yes❑ No❑ N/A
5. Are stream/ditch crossings and aerial supports in need of repair? Yes❑ No❑ N/AZ
6. Are right-of-ways being used for roads? Yes❑ No❑ N/AZ
7. Do lines show evidence or history of damage? Yes❑ No❑ N/A
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS RELATIVE TO ITEMS OF COLLECTION SYSTEM GRAVITY SEWERS
REVIEW :
Gravity sewers and Right -of -Ways in this collection system are maintained by Charlotte -
Mecklenburg Utilities and were not evaluated during this inspection.

Pump Stations/Siphons — Pump Station 1
18701 Ramsey Cove
1. Are any pump station/siphon sites difficult to access?
2. Does general housekeeping need improvement?
3. Are there any missing pumps?
4. Do wet wells/siphons have accumulations of debris that could potentially
affect the operation of the unit? Yes❑ No N/AD
5. Does the first manhole up line from the pump station or siphon show signs
of backup, overflow, debris originating from the line? Yes❑ Non N/AZ
6. Are there any floats/controls for pumps, alarms or alternators that do
not work? YesZ Non N/AD
7. Did high water alarms fail to work when tested? Yes® Non N/A❑
17. Is there chemical addition present?
❑ Odor control
❑ pH control
❑ Other, explain
Yes❑ No N/A❑
Yes❑ No N/AD
Yes® Non N/AD
8. Did ORC fail to produce maintenance log? Yes❑ No N/AD
9. Is telemetry/SCADA present? Yes❑ No N/A❑
Operable? Yes❑ Non N/A®
10. Are backflow devices in place and operable? Yes❑ Non N/A
11. Where necessary are air relief valves present and operable? Yes❑ Noll N/A
12. Are standby generators present? Yes❑ No N/A❑
Operable? Yes0 No❑ N/A®
Is fuel tank full? Yes❑ Non N/AZ
13. Is there a 24 hr notification sign? YesZ Non N/A❑
14. Is public access limited? Yes Non N/A❑
15. Is there any bypass mechanism present? Yes❑ No '/ N/A❑
16. Any signs of overflow at the station/siphon? Yes❑ No N/A❑
Yes❑ No N/AD
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS RELATIVE TO ITEMS OF COLLECTION SYSTEM PUMP
STATION/SIPHON REVIEW :
The pump station design includes two (2) float controlled, submersible grinder pumps with
audible and visible high water alarms. The station control panels are locked for security. The
operator utilizes a portable generator for loss of power situations.

One (1) pump was pulled from the wet well for maintenance service. The station was
operating on one (1) pump only during the inspection.
The station's audible alarm operated properly during the inspection; however the visible
alarm failed to indicate a simulated high water condition during the inspection, reportedly due to a
failed bulb. Repair service to correct the non-functioning alarm is required immediately.
An emergency notification sign identifying a twenty-four (24) hour contact phone number
was posted and visible, as recommended in the previous inspection; however, pump -hour meters,
as recommended in the previous inspection, were still absent from the station. It is recommended
that pump -hour meters be installed to monitor pump function and efficiency as part of a
comprehensive preventive maintenance program.
It noted that the pump station's electrical wiring harness was damaged within the wet
well. This situation presents a corrosion hazard to the pump's wiring, and increases the likelihood
of pump failure and subsequent station overflow. The wiring harness should be replaced.
Except as noted, all other components of the pump station appeared to be well maintained
and were properly operating at the time of the inspection. Maintenance logs were not available
during the inspection; however visitation and daily inspection logs were maintained on -site. The
operator maintains monthly logs, which include ongoing maintenance records, at his office. The
operator made these logs available for inspection.
*Please note that air relief valves and backflow devices are required by permit, but were
not evaluated during this inspection.

Pump Stations/Siphons — Pump Station 2
18703 Ramsey Cove
1. Are any pump station/siphon sites difficult to access? Yes❑ No® N/A❑
2. Does general housekeeping need improvement? Yes NoZ N/A❑
3. Are there any missing pumps? Yes❑ No N/A❑
4. Do wet wells/siphons have accumulations of debris that could potentially
affect the operation ofthe unit?
Yes❑ No N/A❑
5. Does the first manhole up line from the pump station or siphon show signs
of backup, overflow, debris originating from the line? Yes❑ No❑ N/A®
6. Are there any floats/controls for pumps, alarms or alternators that does
not work?
7. Did high water alarms fail to work when tested?
Yes❑ NoZ N/A❑
Yes❑ No►/ N/A❑
11. Did ORC fail to produce maintenance log? Yes❑ No N/A❑
12. Is telemetry/SCADA present? Yes❑ No N/A❑
Operable? Yes❑ No❑ N/A
13. Are backflow devices in place and operable? Yes❑ No❑ N/A®
11. Where necessary are air relief valves present and operable? Yes❑ No N/A
17. Is there chemical addition present?
❑ Odor control
❑ pH control
❑ Other, explain
12. Are standby generators present? Yes❑ No N/A❑
Operable? Yes❑ No❑ N/A®
Is fuel tank full? Yes❑ No❑ N/A
13. Is there a 24 hr notification sign? YesZ No❑ N/A❑
14. Is public access limited? Yes® No❑ N/A❑
15. Is there any bypass mechanism present? Yes❑ No N/A❑
16. Any signs of overflow at the station/siphon? Yes❑ No N/A❑
Yes❑ No N/A❑
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS RELATIVE TO ITEMS OF COLLECTION SYSTEM PUMP
STATION/SIPHON REVIEW :
The pump station design includes two (2) float controlled, submersible grinder pumps with an
audible and visible high water alarms. The station control panels are locked for security. The
operator utilizes a portable generator for loss of power situations.

An emergency notification sign identifying a twenty-four (24) hour contact phone number
was posted and visible, as recommended in the previous inspection; however, pump -hour meters,
as recommended in the previous inspection, were still absent from the station. It is recommended
that pump -hour -meters be installed to monitor pump function and efficiency as part of a
comprehensive preventive maintenance program.
Except as noted, all other components of the pump station appeared to be well maintained
and were properly operating at the time of the inspection. Maintenance logs were not available
during the inspection; however visitation and daily inspection logs were maintained on -site. The
operator maintains monthly logs, which include ongoing maintenance records, at his office. The
operator made these logs available for inspection.
*Please note that air relief valves and backflow devices are required by permit, but were
not evaluated during this inspection.

Pump Stations/Siphons — Pump Station 3
18704 Ramsey Cove
1. Are any pump station/siphon sites difficult to access?
2. Does general housekeeping need improvement?
3. Are there any missing pumps?
4. Do wet wells/siphons have accumulations of debris that could potentially
affect the operation of the unit? Yes No N/A❑
Yes❑ No N/A❑
Yes❑ NoZ N/A❑
Yes❑ No N/A❑
5. Does the first manhole up line from the pump station or siphon show signs
of backup, overflow, debris originating from the line? Yes❑ Non N/A®
6. Are there any floats/controls for pumps, alarms or alternators that does
not work? Yes❑ No N/A❑
7. Did high water alarms fail to work when tested? Yes❑ No® N/A❑
14. Did ORC fail to produce maintenance log? Yes❑ No® N/A❑
15. Is telemetry/SCADA present? Yes❑ No N/A❑
Operable? Yes❑ No N/A
16. Are backflow devices in place and operable? Yes❑ Non N/A®
11. Where necessary are air relief valves present and operable? Yes❑ Non N/A®
12. Are standby generators present? Yes❑ No►/ N/A❑
Operable? Yes❑ Non N/A
Is fuel tank full? Yes❑ Non N/A®
13. Is there a 24 hr notification sign?, Yes® No N/A❑
14. Is public access limited? Yes® No N/A❑
15. Is there any bypass mechanism present? Yes❑ No C1 N/A❑
16. Any signs of overflow at the station/siphon? Yes No N/A❑
17. Is there chemical addition present? Yes❑ No N/A❑
❑ Odor control
❑ pH control
❑ Other, explain
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS RELATIVE TO ITEMS OF COLLECTION SYSTEM PUMP
STATION/SIPHON REVIEW:
The pump station design includes two (2) float controlled, submersible grinder pumps with an
audible and visible high water alarms. The station control panels are locked for security. The
operator utilizes a portable generator for loss of power situations.

An emergency notification sign identifying a twenty-four (24) hour contact phone number
was posted and visible, as recommended in the previous inspection; however, pump -hour meters,
as recommended in the previous inspection, were still absent from the station. It is recommended
that pump -hour meters be installed to monitor pump function and efficiency as part of a
comprehensive preventive maintenance program.
Except as noted, all other components of the pump station appeared to be well maintained
and were properly operating at the time of the inspection. Maintenance logs were not available
during the inspection; however visitation and daily inspection logs were maintained on -site. The
operator maintains monthly logs, which include ongoing maintenance records, at his office. The
operator made these logs available for inspection.
*Please note that air relief valves and backflow devices are required by permit, but were
not evaluated during this inspection.

Pump Stations/Siphons — Pump Station 4
18715 Skysail Court
1. Are any pump station/siphon sites difficult to access?
2. Does general housekeeping need improvement?
3. Are there any missing pumps?
Yes❑ No "I N/A❑
Yes!: No N/A❑
Yes❑ No N/A❑
4. Do wet wells/siphons have accumulations of debris that could potentially
affect the operation of the unit? Yes❑ No N/A❑
5. Does the first manhole up line from the pump station or siphon show signs
of backup, overflow, debris originating from the line? Yes❑ Non N/AZ
6. Are there any floats/controls for pumps, alarms or alternators that does
not work? Yes❑ NoZ N/A❑
7. Did high water alarms fail to work when tested? Yes❑ No►i4 N/A❑
17. Did ORC fail to produce maintenance log? Yes❑ NoZ N/A❑
18. Is telemetry/SCADA present? Yes❑ NoZ N/A❑
Operable? Yes❑ Non N/A
19. Are backflow devices in place and operable? Yes❑ Non N/A
11. Where necessary are air relief valves present and operable? Yes❑ No❑ N/A / 1
12. Are standby generators present? Yes❑ No N/A❑
Operable? Yes❑ Non N/A®
Is fuel tank full? Yes Non N/AZ
13. Is there a 24 hr notification sign? YesZ Non N/A❑
14. Is public access limited? YesZ No N/A❑
15. Is there any bypass mechanism present? Yes❑ No �I N/A❑
16. Any signs of overflow at the station/siphon? Yes❑ NoZ N/A❑
Yes❑ No N/A❑
17. Is there chemical addition present?
❑ Odor control
❑ pH control
❑ Other, explain
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS RELATIVE TO ITEMS OF COLLECTION SYSTEM PUMP
STATION/SIPHON REVIEW :
The pump station design includes two (2) float controlled, submersible grinder pumps with an
audible and visible high water alarms. The station control panels are locked for security. The
operator utilizes a portable generator for loss of power situations.

An emergency notification sign identifying a twenty-four (24) hour contact phone number
was posted and visible, as recommended in the previous inspection; however, pump -hour meters,
as recommended in the previous inspection, were still absent from the station. It is recommended
that pump -hour meters be installed to monitor pump function and efficiency as part of a
comprehensive preventive maintenance program.
Except as noted, all other components of the pump station appeared to be well maintained
and were properly operating at the time of the inspection. Maintenance logs were not available
during the inspection; however visitation and daily inspection logs were maintained on -site. The
operator maintains monthly logs, which include ongoing maintenance records, at his office. The
operator made these logs available for inspection.
*Please note that air relief valves and backflow devices are required by permit, but were
not evaluated during this inspection.

Pump Stations/Siphons — Pump Station 5
18435 Harborside' (pool)
1. Are any pump station/siphon sites difficult to access? Yes❑ NoZ N/AD
2. Does general housekeeping need improvement? YesE No N/AD
3. Are there any missing pumps? YesZ No❑ N/AD
4. Do wet wells/siphons have accumulations of debris that could potentially
affect the operation of the unit? Yes❑ NoZ N/AD
5. Does the first manhole up line from the pump station or siphon show signs
of backup, overflow, debris originating from the line? Yes❑ Non N/A®
6. Are there any floats/controls for pumps, alarms or alternators that does
not work? Yes❑ No N/AD
7. Did high water alarms fail to work when tested? YesD NoZ N/AD
20. Did ORC fail to produce maintenance log? Yes❑ No NIA
21. Is telemetry/SCADA present? YesE No N/AD
Operable? YesE No❑ N/AZ
22. Are backflow devices in place and operable? Yes❑ No❑ N/AZ
11. Where necessary are air relief valves present and operable? Yes❑ No❑ N/A /5
12. Are standby generators present? YesE NoZ N/AD
Operable? Yes❑ No❑ N/A®
Is fuel tank full? Yes❑ NoD N/A
13. Is there a 24 hr notification sign? YesZ No❑ N/AD
14. Is public access limited? Yes® No❑ N/AD
15. Is there any bypass mechanism present? Yes❑ NoZ N/AD
16. Any signs of overflow at the station/siphon? Yes❑ No N/AD
17. Is there chemical addition present? Yes❑ NoZ N/AD
❑ Odor control
❑ pH control
❑ Other, explain
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS RELATIVE TO.ITEMS OF COLLECTION SYSTEM PUMP
STATION/SIPHON REVIEW :
The pump station consists of one (1) submersible grinder pump (simplex configuration) with an
audible and visible high water alarms. The Collection System Permit (WQ0014177) specifies that
the permittee operate only duplex pump stations. The operation of a simplex pump station at this

location is inconsistent with the permit requirements. This is a violation of the subject permit. The
station must be reconfigured for duplex operation or a permit modification should be requested to
more accurately reflect the existing collection system.
The station control panels are locked for security. The operator utilizes a portable
generator for loss of power situations.
An emergency notification sign identifying a twenty-four (24) hour contact phone number
was posted and visible, as recommended in the previous inspection; however, pump -hour meters,
as recommended in the previous inspection, were still absent from the station. It is recommended
that pump -hour meters be installed to monitor pump function and efficiency as part of a
comprehensive preventive maintenance program.
It noted that the pump station's electrical wiring harness was damaged within the wet
well. This situation presents a corrosion hazard to the pump's wiring, and increases the likelihood
of pump failure and subsequent station overflow. The wiring harness should be replaced.
Except as noted, all other components of the pump station appeared to be well maintained
and were properly operating at the time of the inspection. Maintenance logs were not available
during the inspection; however visitation and daily inspection logs were maintained on -site. The
operator maintains monthly logs, which include ongoing maintenance records, at his office. The
operator made these logs available for inspection.
*Please note that air relief valves and backflow devices are required by permit, but were
not evaluated during this inspection.

Pump Stations/Siphons — Pump Station 6
18500 Mizzenmast
1. Are any pump station/siphon sites difficult to access? Yes❑ NoZ N/A❑
2. Does general housekeeping need improvement? Yes❑ No N/A❑
3. Are there any missing pumps? Yes❑ No® N/AD
4. Do wet wells/siphons have accumulations of debris that could potentially
affect the operation of the unit? Yes❑ NoZ N/A❑
5. Does the first manhole up line from the pump station or siphon show signs
of backup, overflow, debris originating from the line? Yes❑ Non N/AZ
6. Are there any floats/controls for pumps, alarms or alternators that does
not work? Yes❑ No® N/A❑
7. Did high water alarms fail to work when tested? Yes❑ NoZ N/AD
23. Did ORC fail to produce maintenance log? Yes NoZ N/AD
24. Is telemetry/SCADA present? Yes❑ NoZ N/AD
Operable? Yes❑ Non N/AZ
25. Are backflow devices in place and operable? Yes❑ Non N/AZ
11. Where necessary are air relief valves present and operable? Yes No .N/AZ
12. Are standby generators present? Yes❑ NoZ N/AD
Operable? Yes❑ Non N/AZ
Is fuel tank full? Yes❑ No❑ N/AZ
13. Is there a 24 hr notification sign? Yes® Non N/AD
14. Is public access limited? YesZ Non N/AD
15. Is there any bypass mechanism present? Yes❑ No N/AD
16. Any signs of overflow at the station/siphon? Yes❑ No N/A❑
17. Is there chemical addition present? Yes❑ NoZ N/AD
❑ Odor control
❑ pH control
❑ Other, explain
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS RELATIVE TO ITEMS OF COLLECTION SYSTEM PUMP
STATION/SIPHON REVIEW :
The pump station design includes two (2) float controlled, submersible grinder pumps with an
audible and visible high water alarms. The station control panels are locked for security. The
operator utilizes a portable generator for loss of power situations.

An emergency notification sign identifying a twenty-four (24) hour contact phone number
was posted and visible, as recommended in the previous inspection; however, pump -hour meters,
as recommended in the previous inspection, were still absent from the station. It is recommended
that pump -hour meters be installed to monitor pump function and efficiency as part of a
comprehensive preventive maintenance program.
Except as noted, all other components of the pump station appeared to be well maintained
and were properly operating at the time of the inspection. Maintenance logs were not available
during the inspection; however visitation and daily inspection logs were maintained on -site. The
operator maintains monthly logs, which include ongoing maintenance records, at his office. The
operator made these logs available for inspection.
*Please note that air relief valves and backflow devices are required by permit, but were
not evaluated during this inspection.

Pump Stations/Siphons — Pump Station 7
19503 Topgallant
1. Are any pump station/siphon sites difficult to access? Yes❑ No // N/A❑
2. Does general housekeeping need improvement? Yes❑ No N/A❑
3. Are there any missing pumps? Yes❑ No N/A❑
4. Do wet wells/siphons have accumulations of debris that could potentially
affect the operation of the unit? Yes❑ No N/A❑
5. Does the first manhole up line from the pump station or siphon show signs
of backup, overflow, debris originating from the line? Yes❑ Non N/AZ
6. Are there any floats/controls for pumps, alarms or alternators that does
not work? Yes❑
7. Did high water alarms fail to work when tested? Yes❑
26. Did ORC fail to produce maintenance log? Yes❑
27. Is telemetry/SCADA present? Yes❑
Operable? Yes❑
28. Are backflow devices in place and operable? Yes❑
11. Where necessary are air relief valves present and operable? Yes❑
12. Are standby generators present? Yes❑
Operable? Yes❑
Is fuel tank full? Yes❑
13. Is there a 24 hr notification sign? YesZ
17. Is there chemical addition present?
❑ Odor control
❑ pH control
❑ Other, explain
NoZ N/A❑
NoZ N/A❑
No N/A❑
No N/A❑
N/A
Non N/A®
Non N/AZ
No N/A❑
Non N/A
Non N/A
Non N/A❑
Non N/A El
No N/A❑
No N/A❑
N/A❑
Non
14. Is public access limited? YesZ
15. Is there any bypass mechanism present? Yes❑
16. Any signs of overflow at the station/siphon? Yes❑
Yes ❑
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS RELATIVE TO ITEMS OF COLLECTION SYSTEM PUMP
STATION/SIPHON REVIEW :
No®
The pump station design includes two (2) float controlled, submersible grinder pumps with an
audible and visible high water alarms. The station control panels are locked for security. The
operator utilizes a portable generator for loss of power situations.

An emergency notification sign identifying a twenty-four (24) hour contact phone number
was posted and visible, as recommended in the previous inspection; however, pump -hour meters,
as recommended in the previous inspection, were still absent from the station. It is recommended
that pump -hour meters be installed to monitor pump function and efficiency as part of a
comprehensive preventive maintenance program.
It noted that the pump station's electrical wiring harness was damaged within the wet
well. This situation presents a corrosion hazard to the pump's wiring, and increases the likelihood
of pump failure and subsequent station overflow. The wiring harness should be replaced.
Except as noted, all other components of the pump station appeared to be well maintained
and were properly operating at the time of the inspection. Maintenance logs were not available
during the inspection; however visitation and daily inspection logs were maintained on -site. The
operator maintains monthly logs, which include ongoing maintenance records, at his office. The
operator made these logs available for inspection.
*Please note that air relief valves and backflow devices are required by permit, but were
not evaluated during this inspection.

Pump Stations/Siphons — Pump Station 8
18345 Harborside
1. Are any pump station/siphon sites difficult to access? Yes❑ NoZ N/A❑
2. Does general housekeeping need improvement? Yes❑ NoZ N/A❑
3. Are there any missing pumps? Yes❑ NoZ N/A❑
4. Do wet wells/siphons have accumulations of debris that could potentially
affect the operation of the unit? Yes❑ No► . N/A❑
5. Does the first manhole up line from the pump station or siphon show signs
of backup, overflow, debris originating from the line? Yes❑ NoZ N/A❑
6. Are there any floats/controls for pumps, alarms or alternators that does
not work? Yes❑ No N/A❑
7. Did high water alarms fail to work when tested? Yes❑ NoZ N/A❑
29. Did ORC fail to produce maintenance log? Yes No N/A❑
30. Is telemetry/SCADA present? Yes NoZ N/A❑
Operable? Yes❑ No❑ N/AZ
31. Are backflow devices in place and operable? Yes❑ Non N/AZ
11. Where necessary are air relief valves present and operable? Yes No❑ N/A
12. Are standby generators present? Yes!: No N/A❑
Operable? Yes❑ No❑ N/A®
Is fuel tank full? Yes❑ No❑ N/AZ
13. Is there a 24 hr notification sign? Yes®. No❑ N/A❑
14. Is public access limited? Yes® No N/A❑
15. Is there any bypass mechanism present? Yes❑ No / 1 N/A❑
16. Any signs of overflow at the station/siphon? Yes❑ No N/A❑
17. Is there chemical addition present? Yes❑ No N/A❑
❑ Odor control
❑ pH control
0 Other, explain
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS RELATIVE TO ITEMS OF COLLECTION SYSTEM PUMP
STATION/SIPHON REVIEW :
The pump station design includes two (2) float controlled, submersible grinder pumps with an
audible and visible high water alarms. The station control panels are locked for security. The
operator utilizes a portable generator for loss of power situations.

An emergency notification sign identifying a twenty-four (24) hour contact phone number
was posted and visible, as recommended in the previous inspection; however, pump -hour meters,
as recommended in the previous inspection, were still absent from the station. It is recommended
that pump -hour meters be installed to monitor pump function and efficiency as part of a
comprehensive preventive maintenance program.
Except as noted, all other components of the pump station appeared to be well maintained
and were properly operating at the time of the inspection. Maintenance logs were not available
during the inspection; however visitation and daily inspection logs were maintained on -site. The
operator maintains monthly logs, which include ongoing maintenance records, at his office. The
operator made these logs available for inspection.
*Please note that air relief valves and backflow devices are required by permit, but were
not evaluated during this inspection.

Property Management
November 14, 2003
Ms. Sonja Williams
NC Division of Water Quality
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
RE: Permit No. WQ0014177, Harborside Condominiums and Townhomes
Dear Ms. Williams,
This is to inform you that Harborside Townhomes is in compliance regarding visitation of the
pump stations. Auto dialers have been installed at all of the community's pump stations and are
in working order.
Pump station # 5 in now utilizing duplex pumps as required by Permit No. WQ0014177.
If you have further questions, please contact John or Karen Swope at CSI Property Management.
Sincerely,
ktro?'
John Swope, President
CSI Property Management
Cc: Mr. Rusty Rozzelle, Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program
girt ®EAT. oF
6 NATURAL.REsoURCEP
NOV 1 7 2003
A
P.O. Box 4810 • 709 Peninsula Drive, Davidson, NC 28036 • Tel: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
rcinrnnertipc rnm

Properties, LLC
Real Estate Sales & Services
Ms. Sonja Williams
NC Division of Water Quality
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
Dear Ms. Williams:
November 14, 2003
This is to inform you that we are in compliance regarding the pump at Harborside
Condominiums. The pump was repaired and we now have two.
Sincerely,
John Swope
President CSI
D DEPT. OF ENV ROMPA
AND NATURAL RESOURCES .A
RESV1LL7T.;-GI ►9ALOF
NOV 1 7 2003
WATER QUALITY S CTi
709 Peninsula Drive, Davidson, NC 28036 • Tel: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
csiproperties.com

j4Ce.c22 „aL
82/47/D1 5-1.g/D
kQ O o ) L f 7'7
etckv.4.
k_Ed(
Cfnu ?
/7/Wo,