20070896 Ver 1_Restoration Plan_20070522

Stream Restoration Plan for Wolf Pond
(UT to Adams Branch)
Union County, North Carolina
Project ID No. D 06054-B
Prepared for:
Y
i
~',I11~11 t`l~l~'l1~
NCDENR-Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
Submitted: Apri127, 2007
Submitted by:
©Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2007
{ ,~~~Y.
~~~,

Prepared By:
^ ~ ~ Kimley-Hom
~ ___ and Associates, Inc.
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
3001 Weston Parkway
Cary, NC 27513
Phone Number:
Fax Number:
[phone]
[phone]
Project Manager: Daren Pait, P.E
Submitted By:
Environmental Banc & Exchange
10055 Red Run Blvd., Suite 130
Owings Mills, MD 211117
Phone Number: [phone]
Project Manager: Norton Webster, PWS
Phone Number:
[phone]
Phone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]

•
•
•
•
i
i
07 0 8 9 6
Executive Summary
Site Description
The Wolf Pond site, here after referred to as the "site," is located off of highway 207 approximately
five miles south of Monroe North Carolina in Union County. The project is located in the USGS
Hydrologic Unit Code 03040105070010 and all of the project streams are located in the Yadkin
River Basin and the 03-07-14 NCDWQ sub-basin.
In response to RFP 16-D06054 the Wolf Pond site was proposed by Environmental Banc and
Exchange (EBX) and accepted by the North Carolina Division of Natural Resources to provide
stream mitigation in the Yadkin River Basin (Cataloging Unit 03040105).
The site contains two Unnamed Tributaries to Adams Branch. Unnamed Tributary 1 (UT 1) flows
from northeast to southwest and enters another Unnamed Tributary (UT2) at approximately the
midpoint of the project reach. UT2 flows east to west and enters Adams Branch offsite. Adams
Branch is listed as NCDWQ Water Supply (WS-IV) waters. UT1 has a drainage area of 0.12 square
miles. The upper section of UT2 (Upper UT2) has a drainage area of 0.63 square miles, and the
lower section of UT2 (Lower UT2) has a drainage area of 0.83 square miles. The project site is
currently maintained as an active agricultural field. The streams appear to have been historically
straightened and have gone through periods of having the riparian buffer cleared.
Reference Location
• One reference reach was located outside of the project watershed. The reference reach is within the
same hydrophysiographic region as the project reaches. The reference reach has a drainage area of
0.18 square miles and is located in an isolated forested area upstream of a culvert grade control
under Roscoe-Howey Road. The reach exhibited stable pattern, profile, and bankfull dimension and
• will be used to generate dimensionless ratios for design comparison.
Restoration Approach
The objective of this restoration approach is to plan, design, and construct a dynamically stable
• stream/riparian floodplain to provide an ecological improvement for the entire site and watershed.
• The pattern, profile, and dimension of the channel will be adjusted to approximately match Regional
Curve values and to mimic reference reach conditions. Structures such as rock cross vanes, a-vanes,
rock vanes, log sills, log vanes, and root wads will be used to provide grade control, added habitat,
and/or bedform diversity. It is proposed that UT1 and UT2 be relocated to a more natural position
• in the center of both the valley and the historic floodplain of the stream. Adding pattern to the stream
would result in proper pool-to-pool spacing. In some areas the existing channel bed elevation will
be maintained and an inner berm and floodplain bench will be excavated to add flood relief and to
reduce shear stress on the banks. The bed elevation throughout the remaining areas will be raised to
• allow access to the historic floodplain. Proper pool-to-pool spacing and the use of appropriate
• structures are critical for providing sufficient energy dissipation throughout the stream.
• Table 1: Pro'ect Restoration Summar
Stream Restoration 4,750 4,520
*The designed linear footage resulted in a reduced length due to the relocation of the project reaches
~ and the correction of the excessive meanders.

Contents
1.0 Project Site Identification and Location ............................................................................... 7
1.1 Directions to Project Site ...................................................................................................... 7
1.2 USGS Hydrologic Unit Code and NCDWQ River Basin Designations ............................... 7
1.3 Project Vicinity Map ............................................................................................................. 7
2.0 Watershed Characterization .................................................................................................. 7
2.1 Drainage Area ....................................................................................................................... 7
2.2 Surface Water Classification /Water Quality ....................................................................... 7
2.3 Physiography, Geography, and Soils .................................................................................... 8
2.4 Land Use and Development Trends ...................................................................................... 8
2.4.1 Land Use ....................................................................................................................... 8
2.4.2 Development Trends ..................................................................................................... 8
2.5 Threatened and Endangered Species .................................................................................... 9
2.6 Cultural Resources ................................................................................................................ 9
2.7 Potential Constraints ............................................................................................................. 9
2.7.1 Property Ownership and Boundary ............................................................................... 9
2.7.2 Site Access .................................................................................................................... 9
2.7.3 Utilities ........................................................................................................................ 10
2.7.4 FEMA /Hydrologic Trespass ..................................................................................... 10
3.0 Project Site Streams .............................................................................................................. 10
3.1 Channel Classification ........................................................................................................ 10
3.2 Channel Discharge .............................................................................................................. 10
3.3 Channel Morphology .......................................................................................................... 11
3.4 Channel Stability Assessment ............................................................................................. 11
3.5 Bankfull Verification .......................................................................................................... 12
3.6 Vegetation ........................................................................................................................... 12
4.0 Reference Streams ................................................................................................................ 12
4.1 Watershed Characterization ................................................................................................ 12
4.2 Channel Classification ........................................................................................................ 12
4.3 Discharge ............................................................................................................................ 12
4.4 Channel Morphology .......................................................................................................... 13
4.5 Channel Stability Assessment ............................................................................................. 13
4.6 Bankfull Verification .......................................................................................................... 13
4.7 Vegetation ........................................................................................................................... 13
5.0 Project Site Restoration Plan ............................................................................................... 14
5.1 Restoration Project Goals and Objectives ........................................................................... 14
5.1.1 Designed Channel Classification ................................................................................ 15
5.1.2 Target Buffer Communities ........................................................................................ 16
5.2 Sediment Transport Analysis .............................................................................................. 16
5.2.1 Methodology ............................................................................................................... 16
5.2.2 Calculations and Discussion ....................................................................................... 16
5.3 HEC-RAS Analysis ............................................................................................................ 17
5.3.1 No-Rise, LOMR, CLOMR ......................................................................................... 17
5.3.2 Hydrologic Trespass ................................................................................................... 17
5.4 Stormwater Best Management Practices ............................................................................ 18
5.4.1 Site-Specific Stormwater Concerns ............................................................................ 18

5.5 Soil Restoration ................................................................................................................... 18
5.6 Natural Plant Community Restoration ................................................................................ 18
5.6.1 Reforestation Scheme ................................................................................................. 18
5.6.2 Planting Zones ............................................................................................................ 19
5.6.3 Plant List ..................................................................................................................... 20
5.6.4 Plant Sources ............................................................................................................... 20
5.6.5 Plant Care and Installation .......................................................................................... 20
5.6.6 Schedule ......................................................................................................................21
5.6.7 Stabilization ................................................................................................................ 21
5.6.8 Site Preparation ........................................................................................................... 21
5.6.9 Planting Review .......................................................................................................... 21
5.6.10 Monitoring and Maintenance ...................................................................................... 21
6.0 Performance Criteria ............................................................................................................ 22
6.1 Stream Success Criteria ...................................................................................................... 22
6.2 Vegetation Success Criteria ................................................................................................ 22
6.3 Schedule /Reporting ........................................................................................................... 23
7.0 References ..............................................................................................................................25
Report Tables
Table l: Project Restoration Summary .................................................................
3
..............................
Table 2: Draina
e A
d St
Cl
if
ti ..
g
rea an
ream
ass
ica
on ............................................................................. .. 7
Table 3: Existing Land Use of the Watershed .................................................................................... .. 8
Table 4: Summary of Stream Classification ....................................................................................... 10
Table 5: Project Site Streams Peak Discharges .................................................................................. 11
Table 6: Restoration Reach Characteristics ........................................................................................ 11
Table 7: Reference Stream Peak Discharges ...................................................................................... 13
Table 8: Summary of Shear Stress Calculations ................................................................................. 17
8.0 Restoration Tables
Table I. Project Restoration Structure and Objectives
Table II. Drainage Areas
Table III. Land Use of Watershed
Table N. Morphological Table
Table V. Designed Vegetative Communities (by zone)

9.0 Figures
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Project Site Vicinity Map
Project Site Location
Project Site Watershed Map
Project Site NRCS Soil Survey Map
Project Site Hydrologic Features Map with Gauge Locations
Reference Site Vicinity Map
Reference Site Watershed Map
Reference Site NRCS Soil Survey Map (1994)
Project Site FEMA Firm Map
Reference Site Vegetative Communities Map
10.0 Appendices
Appendix 1 Project Site Photographs
Appendix 2 Project Site NCDWQ Stream Classification Forms
Appendix 3 Categorical Exclusion Report
Appendix 4 Rainfall Information
Appendix 5 HEC-RAS Analysis
Appendix 6 Soil Nutrient Testing Report
Attachment
Restoration Plan Design Sheets

1.0 Project Site Identification and Location
1.1 Directions fo Project Sife
The Wolf Pond project area is located five miles south of Monroe, North Carolina in Union County.
From Raleigh take US 1 South and bear right on US 74 West. Turn left onto highway 207/ Wolf
Pond Road at Monroe, NC and turn right onto JD Helms Road. See Figure 1 for the project site
vicinity map.
1.2 USGS Hydrologic Unif Code and NCDWQ River Basin Designations
The project is located in the USGS Hydrologic Unit Code 03040105070010 and all of the project
streams are located in the Yadkin River Basin and the 03-07-14 NCDWQ sub-basin.
1.3 Project Vicinity Map
Refer to Figure 1 of the Figures section of this report for the Project Site Vicinity Map.
2.0 Watershed Characterization
Table 2 provides hydrological and surface water classification information for the major project
reaches. See Figure 2 for the Project Site Watershed Map.
2.1 Drainage Area
The site contains two Unnamed Tributaries to Adams Branch. Unnamed Tributary 1 (UT 1) flows
from northeast to southwest and enters another Unnamed Tributary (UT2) at approximately the
midpoint of the project reach. UT2 flows east to west and enters Adams Branch at the property line.
UT 1 has a drainage area of 0.12 square miles. The upper section of UT2 has a drainage area of 0.63
square miles and the lower section of UT2 has a drainage area of 0.83 square miles. Table 2
provides hydrological and surface water classification information for the major project reaches.
Table 2: Drainaue Area and Ctream ('laccifiratinn
Reach Drainage Area
l Surface Water Stream Order
mi Classification
UTl 0.12 WS-IV 1
UT2 0.83 WS-N 2
2.2 Surface Water Classification /Wafer Quality
The onsite tributaries are not classified under the NCDWQ water bodies report. Adams Branch has
a NCDWQ stream index number 13-17-36-2, and is described as "From source to Richardson
7

Creek". Adams Branch is classified as WS-IV, which are waters protected as water supplies and are
generally in moderately to highly developed watersheds.
2.3 Physiography, Geography, and Soils
The project watershed lies within the Carolina Slate Belt Ecoregion, part of the Piedmont
physiographic providence. Valley slopes between 0.007 and 0.014 typify the topography of the
project watershed. The elevation within the project area ranges from 599 to 623 feet above sea level.
The geology of the site consists of Metamudstone and Meta-Argillite which is thin to thick bedded;
bedding plane and axial-planar cleavage common; interbedded with metasandstone,
metaconglomerate, and metavolcanic rock and is considered a Cid formation. Chewacla silt loam,
Cid channery silt loam, and Secrest -Cid complex soils cover the floodplain of UT 1 and UT2 as
shown in Figure 4.
2.4 Land Use and Development Trends
2.4.1 Land Use
Historically, cultivated farmland and forests have dominated the landscape. Based on a review of
recent aerial photography (2004) (Figure 4), forest and cultivated land cover 97 % of the watershed.
Table 3 shows the distribution of land cover within the watershed. Table 3 shows the distribution
of land cover within the watershed.
Table 3: Existing Land Use of the Watershed
Land Cover Acreage Percentage of Totai
Coverage
Upland Forest 393 73
Herbaceous Planted/Cultivated 128 24
Developed 19 3
Impervious surfaces comprise approximately 3 % of the watershed.
2.4.2 Development Trends
Based on an analysis of aerial photographs there has been no increase in impervious surface in the
project watershed between 1998 and 2004. The landowner expects to continue to cultivate the land
adjacent to the project site. It is anticipated that there will be little to no increase in impervious
surface in the project watershed.
Zoning
The project area is zoned as RA-40. The RA-40 zoning district is low density residential that allows
most types of residential housing and agricultural uses. It is not anticipated that there be a
significant increase in urbanization in the project watershed because of this zoning type.
Major Transportation Projects
The North Carolina Department of Transportation has listed several projects in there Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP) that are located within the Monroe, NC vicinity. Several of these
projects are listed below.
• R-2616 - US 601 widen to four lanes

•

• ~ R-2559 -Monroe Bypass four lanes new location
~ U-4024 - US 601 to US 74 multilanes
• These TIP projects will not directly affect any construction activities associated with this project.
• These projects are anticipated to encourage some growth; however, it is expected most of the
development will be outside of the project watershed.

~ 2.5 Threatened and Endangered Species
According to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) database dated March 2, 2006, there are
three federally listed endangered species. The vascular plants Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii)
and Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthusschweinitzii) along with a freshwater mussel, the Carolina
• heel splitter (Lasmigona decorata) are listed as occurring in Union County. The entire Wolf Pond
• site has been under intensive agricultural use for an extended period of time. The frequent
disturbance of the proposed site along the proposed restoration corridor makes it unlikely that any of
the listed plant species occur in this area. The channel is also highly disturbed and impacted by
sediment. The present channel condition makes it unlikely that the heel splitter occurs in this system.
• Additional investigations will be conducted for these species to determine if suitable habitat exists.
A Section 7 ESA clearance will be obtained from the USFWS prior to restoration activities.

A search of the US Fish and Wildlife Service website (http://www.fws.gov/endangered/) and the
• North Carolina Natural Heritage Program website (http://207.4.179.38/nhp/) in August 2006
identified the Carolina heel splitter (Lasmigona decorata) as an endangered species residing within
Union County.

• 2.6 Cultural Resources
A review of properties to be determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places at the
State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) was conducted for the project area and the surrounding
• area. According to the most recent (2002) NCCGIA database, there are no National Register
• properties within a 1-mile radius of the project area. In addition, the SHPO Archaeological Database
was reviewed, and no significant archaeological sites were identified within a 1-mile radius.

~ 2.7 Potential Constraints
•
~ 2.7.1 Property Ownership and Boundary
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC (EBX) has entered into an Agreement for Purchase of
• Easement with the landowner for the Site. The conservation easement exists entirely on a parcel
owned by Franklin W. Howey and the conservation easement area has been secured by
Environmental Banc and Exchange. The conservation easement boundary is shown on the attached
Restoration Plan Design Sheets.
2.7.2 Site Access
•
The site will be accessed for construction off of highway 207 and Austin Road. It is not anticipated
that there will be any site access conflicts.

9

2.7.3 Utilities ~
The certified survey map, Environmental Data Resources report, and visual field inspections
indicated that there were no known utilities on site.
2.7.4 FEMA /Hydrologic i --~~sl~ss ,
Neither reach on the site was designated a flood zone under the Federal Emergency Management
Association (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) program according to map number .
3717900175 C effective July 5, 1994. The project is anticipated to lower flood stage elevations due •
to the construction of a floodplain bench, and debris removal.
3.0 Project Site Streams
Kimley-Horn and Associates performed a geomorphic survey (cross sections, longitudinal survey,
and pattern) and sampled stream materials (classification and entrainment pebble counts, bar
samples, sub-pavement and pavement samples) on several reaches representative of the geomorphic
settings within the project area. Table 4 below summarizes the channel classifications of the
surveyed reaches within the project area and Restoration Table IV (Section 8) provides detailed
morphological data.
3.1 Channel Classification
UT1 is classified as a Rosgen stream type E4 channel. The reach has an entrenchment ratio of 1.5, a
width-to-depth ratio of 10.5, bank height ratios of 2.3 to 3.8, and a slope of 0.0060. UT2 is classified
as a Rosgen stream type Bc4 channel. The reach has an entrenchment ratio of 3.2, a width-to-depth
ratio of 6.4, bank height ratio of 2.1, and a slope of 0.0108. The stream morphology is included in
Restoration Table IV.
Table 4: Summary of Stream Classification
Assmt. Drainage Entrenchment Width/Depth Stream
l A
bkf W
bkf K Sloe
p
Reach Area mi Ratio Ratio T e
Upper
UT2
0.52
1.5
4.6
6.9
10.5
1.23
0.0060 Incised
Bc4
Lower
UT2 0 83
1.7
8.7
7.1
5.6
1.55
0.0056 Incised
Bc4
UT1 0.10 3.2 1.7 3.3 6.4 1.04 0.0108 E4
3.2 Channel Discharge
The designer estimated the peak flows for the 2-, 10-, 25-, and 100-year storms using the North
Carolina rural flood-frequency equations for the Blue Ridge-Piedmont Region (United States
Geological Survey 2003) (Table 5).
10

Table 5: Pro'ect Site Streams Peak Dischar es
Assessment Area Bankfull
* 2yr Q 10yr Q 25yr Q 100yr Q
Reach ac.
( ) Disc fsrge cfs
( )
(cfs)
(cfs)
(cfs)
Upper UT2 332.8 10.5 85.3 155 3 ] 2 495
Lower UT2
492.8 29.5 112 281 402 633
UT1
76.8 4.3 30.5 82.1 121 198
*Calculated using Manning's equation (n=0.038)
3.3 Channel Morphology
Most of the project reach has been historically straightened and relocated to the edge of the valley to
maximize usable farmland. As a result the channel has become incised and disconnected from the
historic floodplain. Restoration Table IV shows complete channel morphology data including
channel, pattern, dimension, and profile for all restoration and project reaches.
3.4 Channel Stability Assessment
Appendix 1 displays photos of existing conditions.
The restoration reaches lie within an area that historically has been used for agricultural purposes.
UT1 has a limited riparian buffer that includes some exotic and invasive species. UT2 has been
cleared to the banks and has no riparian buffer.
The agricultural practice of the historical floodplain has caused the soils to become compacted and
has decreased the infiltration rate. As a result the surface mimics the characteristics of a semi-
impervious area, increasing the quantity and rate at which storm event hydrology reaches these
streams. The restoration reaches have downcut and incised until it encountered bedrock outcrops
which act as grade control. The stream is currently attempting to widen which is accelerating the
bank erosion. There is also evidence of beaver activity which is causing a backwater effect on the
lower end of UT1.
Bank height ratios (low bank height divided by the maximum bankfull depth) were determined for
the surveyed reaches. In the methodology used for this report (Rosgen 2001), bank height ratios
between 1.1 and 1.3 are regarded as "moderately unstable," ratios between 1.3 and 1.5 as "unstable,"
and bank height ratios greater than 1.5 are "highly unstable."
Table 6: Restoration Reach Characteristics
Bank Ve etative Buffer
Assmt
. Adjacent Disturbance /
Reach Right Bank Left Bank Land Use Relocation
Ratio
Upper 3 1 Scattered Scattered Active Agriculture Beavers /
UT2 Shrubs /Field Shrubs /Field Channelization
Lower Isolated Isolated Beavers /
UT2 3.1 Hardwoods - Hardwoods - Active Agriculture Channelization
Shrubs /Fields Shrubs /Fields
UT1 2.1 None /Field None /Field Active Agriculture Channelization
11

3.5 Bankfull Verification
Determination of the bankfull elevation is vital to generating meaningful geomorphic values. Field
indicators for bankfull were strong for the reference reaches; however, due to down cutting and bed
and bank instability, the restoration candidates had weaker bankfull indicators. To verify bankfull
elevations, the bankfull area values for the project reaches and reference reaches were checked
against the North Carolina Piedmont Rural regional curves (Harman, Jennings et al. 1999). The
results indicate a general agreement between the three sets (site, references, and regional curve) thus
providing a measure of validation.
3.6 Vegetation
Three major areas of land cover were observed within the project area: piedmont alluvial forest;
piedmont bottomland forest (Schafale and Weakley 1990); and open fields.
The piedmont alluvial forest community is situated along the higher floodplain predominantly in the
upper sections. The alluvial forest are commonly dominated by river birch (Betula nigra), sycamore
(Platanus occidentalis), black willow (Salix nigra), box elder (Ater negundo), black walnut (Juglans
nigra), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), red maple (Ater rubrum), muscle wood (Carpinus
caroliniana), and tag alder (Alnus serrulata).
Piedmont bottomland forests are located in the lower project area and isolated areas within the upper
section. The forest is typically dominated by yellow poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), sycamore
(Platanus occidentalis), American elm (Ulmus americana), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), red
maple (Ater rubrum), sugar maple (Ater saccharum), and sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua). The
understory includes spice bush (Lindera benzoin), tag alder (Alnus serrulata), arrowood (Viburnum
spp.), and poison ivy (Toxicondenron radicans).
The fields were dominated with fescue (Festuca spp.) and corn. There was little woody vegetation
growing in these areas.
4.0 Reference Streams
4.1 Watershed Characterization
One reference reach was located outside of the project watershed. Figure 6 shows the location of the
reference reach. The reference reach is within the same hydrophysiographic region as the project
reaches. The off-site reference reach has a drainage area of 0.18 square miles
4.2 Channel Classification
The reference reach classifies as a Rosgen E channel. The reach has an entrenchment ratio of 17.9, a
width to depth ratio of 6.0, bank height ratio of 1.0-1.1, and a slope of 0.0127.
4.3 Discharge
The peak flows for the 2-, 10-, 25-, and 100-year storms were modeled for the given drainage areas.
These flows were calculated using the North Carolina rural flood-frequency equations for the Blue
12

Ridge/Piedmont hydrologic region (Robert R. Mason, Fuste et al. 2002). The peak flows calculated
are summat7zed in Table 7.
Table 7: Reference Stream Peak Discharees
Reference Area Bankfull 2yr Q 10yr Q 25yr Q 100yr Q
Reach (ac.) his cfs rge (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs)
U~1,1 115 30.9 40.5 107 157 255
4.4 Channel Morphology
Restoration Table IV shows the complete channel morphology data including channel pattern,
dimension, and profile for all restoration and reference reaches.
4.5 Channel Stability Assessment
KHA staff determined that the reference stream exhibits stable dimension, pattern, and profile
because it is located within a forested area upstream from a culvert grade control at Roscoe-Howey
Road. The channel also has been isolated from adjacent land uses with a stable vegetative buffer.
4.6 Bankfull Verification
Determination of the bankfull elevation is vital to generating meaningful geomorphic values. Field
indicators for bankfull were strong for the reference reaches. To verify bankfull elevations, the
bankfull area values for the reference reaches were checked against the North Carolina Piedmont
Rural regional curves (Harman, Jennings et al. 1999). The results indicate a general agreement
between the three sets (site, references, and regional curve) thus providing a measure of validation.
No discernible bankfull indicators exist in the project reach. These dimensions represent a stable
inner bench that was consistently visible in the field and thus incorporated into the typical cross
sections. Designed bankfull dimensions rely more heavily on the reference and regional curve data.
4.7 Vegetation
The Restoration Plan Design Sheets will use the vegetation communities associated with and
surrounding the reference reach as reference communities for riparian restoration. Two distinct
communities lie within riparian area of the reference reach: piedmont alluvial forest and piedmont
bottomland forest (Schafale and Weakley 1990). These landscapes match landscapes within the
project area. The piedmont alluvial forest landscape is flat, somewhat frequently flooded. The
piedmont bottomland forest landscape is flat, frequently flooded, and the water table remains close
to the surface.
13

5.0 Project Site Restoration Plan
5.1 Restoration Project Goals and Objectives
The goal of this project is to restore the site back to a naturally functioning stream system designed
to address and correct the impairment issues typically associated with highly disturbed systems. The
project will provide ecological functional lift to the existing system by restoring the stream and
riparian habitat to a stream type and vegetative community appropriate for the given valley and
watershed conditions. Benefits will include improved water quality by reducing sediment load
through stabilization and by reducing nutrient and other pollutant input by the addition of forested
riparian buffers planted with native species. Additionally, the forested buffers and reconnection with
the historic flood plain will improve channel hydraulics and system capacity. Improvements to the
ecosystem include the addition of in-stream habitat by the use of in-stream structures and bank
revetments such as root wads. By providing an appropriate mix of native forest vegetation to create
an appropriate canopy and understory, the soil structure will improve, a leaf litter source will be
established to support aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, and shading and cooling will be provided
to improve water quality. This will provide functional uplift for the watershed as a whole.
Stream Restoration Approach
A natural channel design technique, using priority I and II methodologies was used to adjust the
channel dimension, pattern, and profile to a stable configuration. The configuration was based on
reference reach morphology, values from regional curves, regime equations, experience from other
restoration projects, and the existing channel morphology. These reference values are presented in
Restoration Table IV. The stream restoration either restored the streams in place or created a new
channel. The base flow elevation will remain relatively in place and lower, more active flood prone
areas will be created along with an inner berm bench to help alleviate bank stress during
intermediate storm events.
Channel restoration will be based on Rosgen "C" type stream modified from Rosgen "E" type
reference streams. Alluvial streams in the Piedmont of North Carolina tend to be Rosgen "E" type
channels or relatively narrow and deep. Such geometry typically forms because the existing, mature
vegetation root system holds the bank soil in place causing the stream to develop a relatively narrow
and deep cross section. Typically when an alluvial stream is relocated or restored in an open field in
the Piedmont, it cannot be constructed as an "E" channel because there is no existing, mature
vegetation root system to hold the banks in place. As such, it is better to construct a "C" type channel
cross section with flatter banks to reduce the possibility of bank erosion. However, it is anticipated
that as mature vegetation is established on the stream banks that the root system will cause the
stream to develop a deeper, narrower bankfull channel (or an "E" type channel). As such, the
relocated channel maybe constructed with a "C" type channel cross section, but will quickly develop
into an "E" type channel as mature vegetation is established.
Dimension
The riffle channels cross sectional areas were calculated from the hydraulic geometry curves derived
from the reference reaches and regional curves. The riffle cross sections were shaped to have a mean
depth and width capable of transporting existing and predicted future sediment loads for the
designed channel slope. A bankfull bench was added to create access to a lower flood prone area.
14

The pool cross sections were shaped based on riffle to pool cross section relationships found in the
appropriate reference reach. The reference dimensionless ratios are included in the morphological
table (Restoration Table IV) and typical cross sections are shown in the attached Restoration Plan
• Design Sheets.
Pattern
The channel planform was dictated by reference ratios for meander wavelength and radius of
curvature derived from the reference reaches and typical Rosgen reference reach values for C type
• channels. The belt widths were based on reference ratios but were limited in some areas by the
topography of the valley. The proposed planform sinuosity allowed pool to pool spacing and riffle
locations to match reference conditions. The proposed sinuosity provided the appropriate slope to
transport the material coming into the reach. The planform values and ratios are provided in the
morphological table in Restoration Table IV and the Restoration Plan Design Sheets provides the
• designed channel alignment.
Bedform
The design channel bedform predominantly consists of a riffle -pool sequence with runs and glides
between them. The design depths and pool to pool spacing of the features were based on reference
• reach values and typical Rosgen reference reach values for C type channels (Restoration Table IV).
The pools were located in the apex of meander bends with riffles located between the pools in the
tangent portions of the channel. The pools will be over-dug to allow for some sedimentation during
construction activities. The profile section of the Restoration Plan Design Sheets shows the
designed channel bedform.
Structures
In-stream structures were placed in the design channel to provide grade control and maintain overall
design slope. In-stream structures also were used to protect stream banks and increase aquatic habitat
• diversity. The types of structures incorporated into the restoration project include rock cross vanes,
• A-vanes, rock vanes, root wads, log sills, and log vanes. Root wads were used only for the purpose
of providing habitat.

• Beaver Management
. The project reaches appeared to have been impacted by past beaver activity. The beavers have since
• been removed or have left; however a beaver management program will be implemented to insure
that beavers do not repopulate the site.

~ Riparian Buffer Restoration Approach
Reestablishing the riparian buffer will restore habitat connectivity throughout the conservation
• easement. Prior to planting, the soils will be treated as described in section 5.5 to facilitate plant
establishment. New plants will be installed as directed in section 5.6.

~ 5.1.1 Designed Channel Classification
The restoration reaches are designed as Rosgen C4~E4 channels.

15

5.1.2 Target Buffer Communities
The vegetation communities for the reference reaches were similar to the on-site piedmont alluvial
forest and bottomland communities (described in Section 4.7). See Figure 10 for the Reference Site
Vegetative Communities Map.
5.2 Sediment Transport Analysis
5.2.1 Methodology
Sediment transport was calculated using shear stress equations to verify that the designed channel
would be able to transport at bankfull its bedload without aggrading or degrading. The Shields curve
was used for initiation of particle movement to estimate the range of particles transported for a given
shear stress.
Two physical characteristics of the channel design that affect the shear stress on the channel bed are
the slope of the channel and hydraulic radius.
i = ~yRs
Where: i= shear stress (lb/ft2)
y =specific gravity of water (62.41b/ft3)
R =hydraulic radius (ft)
s =water surface slope (ft/ft)
The hydraulic radius equals the cross sectional area divided by the wetted perimeter.
R= A
P
Where: R =hydraulic radius
A =cross-sectional area (ft2)
P =wetted perimeter (ft)
5.2.2 Calculations and Discussion
The restoration reaches were designed with a mean depth and slope sufficient to transport a range of
particles. Table 8 provides the results of the sediment transport calculations using the shear stress
equation and Shields curve. The channel is designed to eliminate bank erosion and to flush the sands
and transport the characteristic sediments. The characteristic sediments were determined from
analyzing bed materials in comparative streams having less impacted watersheds. The shear stress
results show that the proposed channel should transport a range of materials that include the existing
or characteristic (in case of the sand laden channels) channel materials.
16

Table 8: Summary of Shear Stress Calculations
Proposed Proposed Shear Particle Largest Particle
Restoration Reach Slope Hydraulic Stress Transport Size (Sub-Pavement/
Radius (mm) Bar)
(ft/ft) (ft) (Ib/ft2) (mm)
Upper UT2 0.0036-
0.0053 0.90 0.20 - 0.30 14 - 18 22
Lower UT2 0.0029-
0.0049 0.94 0.17 - 0.29 9 - 16 55
UT1 0.0058
0.0087 0.55 0.20 0.30 14 - 18 55
5.3 HEC-RAS Analysis
The HEC-RAS model (v. 3.1.3) analyzed the bankfull, 2-, 5-, 10-, and 100-year discharges for the
project stream. The HEC-RAS model verified a net increase in water surface elevation, which is due
to the priority I restoration approach. Bankfull channel velocities were less than 4.5 ft/s throughout
the project. The proposed 15-inch and 30-inch floodplain pipes proposed for the stream crossings
for UT1 and UT2 will add additional conveyance to the stream crossings, which will help to reduce
backwater conditions upstream. Shear stresses throughout the project are within range according to
the sediment transport calculations. See Appendix 5 for the results.
5.3.1 No-Rise, LOMR, CLOMR
The project streams are not mapped under the FEMA National Flood Insurance Program; therefore,
approval is not required by FEMA or the State of North Carolina.
5.3.2 Hydrologic Trespass
A priority UII approach will raise the stream bed elevation in some reaches. For UT1 and UT2 there
is an increase in water surface elevation for the 100-year event. The increase in water surface in
UT1 extends the flood boundary approximately 5-feet beyond the existing limits; and is only
experienced from cross-section 111+20 to 106+20. The increase in UT 1 does not create a
significant risk to the adjacent fields. The majority of UT2 has a range of 5 to 30 foot difference in
the 100-year flood boundary limit. when the proposed water surface elevation exceeds the existing
water surface elevation. This difference is mostly experienced in the Upper UT2 reach between
cross-sections 38+40 and 32+90. There is an isolated incident where the increase in the 100-year
elevation extends into an existing drainage Swale and extends the flood boundary approximately 230
ft into the drainage swale. This occurs at station 31+90. This increase occurs due to a low area in
the floodplain that is situated in a natural drainage swale, and the fact that the existing bed elevation
will be raised in this area. Since this affected area is an adjacent drainage Swale the rise is not
anticipated to pose a threat to adjacent fields. Downstream of this cross-section the proposed water
surface elevation for the 100-year-storm falls below the existing 100-year storm elevation, showing
that this variance in the 100-year flood boundary limit is an isolated incident. The remaining reach
areas should not create a significant risk to the adjacent fields.
17

5.4 Stormwater Best Management Practices
5.4.1 Site-Specific Stormwater Concerns
The project site is situated in a predominately rural setting. It is anticipated that the re-established
riparian buffer will be sufficient in filtering and treating any stormwater runoff from the adjacent
agricultural fields.
5.5 Soil Restoration
Soils within the riparian restoration areas will be treated to facilitate the growth and development of
plantings. The soils will be ripped prior to planting to break up compacted soils and create a
favorable environment for new plantings. Plant nutrients and soil amendments will be applied to the
soils as prescribed by the soils test report performed by the North Carolina Department of
Agriculture and Consumer Services Agronomic Division for sample sites located throughout the
project area (Appendix 6).
5.6 Natural Plant Community Restoration
The goal of the riparian restoration is to provide long-term improvements to ecological functions of
the existing forest community. The Restoration Plan Design Sheets has been developed to provide
these functional uplifts through the re-establishment of target natural communities. The target
natural communities have been determined based on comparison of existing site conditions with
established type communities with verification of appropriate species from proximate reference
natural communities. Based on the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program's Nature Community
Classification, the site's riparian area most closely correlates to Piedmont Bottomland Forests within
the lower floodplains and Piedmont Alluvial Forest in the remaining riparian areas. (Schafale and
Weakley 1990).
5.6.1 Reforestation Scheme
The goal of the planting scheme seeks to establish a riparian community consistent with the
reference community using an approach that accelerates the successional process leading to a mature
riparian community. The planting plan will use reference plant communities discussed in the
previous paragraph as a base to design a planting scheme and develop a vegetation list.
Re-colonization of cleared riparian habitats characteristically begins with an invasion of pioneer
species that creates an environment (e.g. shading) suitable for species more typical of a mature
community. To initialize the proposed riparian community, the restoration area will be planted with
a mix of pioneer and climax species that have been selected and arranged to meet the following
objectives:
^ Establish mix of shade intolerant canopy and shade tolerant understory species
^ Provide vegetative source of dominant species
^ Establish local seed sources for those species less likely to migrate into the restoration area
^ Provide stability to disturbed or high stress areas
18

The design of a planting plan involves several components. The planting zones have been developed
considering site hydrology, soils, and disturbance regimes and are referenced to natural
communities. Each zone has a unique environment that dictates species selection and community
structure. The planting list is developed for each zone to match the vegetation in the reference
• community and meet the objectives given above. The planting list also reflects which species are
readily available and have a reasonable expectation of survival. For a given zone and species, a plant
source and planting type (e.g. containerized or bare root) is recommended. A planting schedule is
developed so that site preparation and plant installation occur at the optimal time and season. After
• installation, the planting should be verified. The maintenance plan is developed to promote long-
. term success of the planting. These planting plan components are described below.
~ 5.6.2 Planting Zones
The planting plan includes 5 zones of distinct vegetative composition and structure.
~ Zone 1 -Stream Channel
^ Zone 2 -Stream Bank

^ Zone 3 -Riparian
•
Zone 4 -Bottomland
• Zone 5 -Transitional
Zone 1 -Stream Channel
The stream channel zone includes the stream channel from base flow to bankfull. The zone features
the steepest slopes of the zones and highest saturation levels. This environment dictates the planting
offast-growing, obligate pioneer species to provide stability to areas at or below bankfull.
Zone 2 -Stream Bank
The stream bank zone includes the area from the top of bank outward away from the stream 10 feet.
It is an area exposed to regular stream flows and frequent soil deposition. The most stressed areas are
• located on the outside bends of meanders. The banks will be planted with fast-growing, deep-rooted
species that will provide biostabilization and shading to the stream
~
• Zone 3 -Riparian
The riparian zone includes the area beyond zone 2 to the edge of the floodplain where the hydrology
• supports piedmont alluvial hardwood forest vegetation. The area is flat, somewhat frequently
flooded. The composition of the vegetation includes a mix of canopy and understory trees.

• Zone 4 -Bottomland
The Bottomland zone includes the area beyond zone 2 to the edge of the floodplain where the
• hydrology supports Bottomland hardwood forest vegetation. The area is flat, frequently flooded, and
the water table remains close to the surface. Zone 4 remains flooded or saturated for longer periods
~ than Zone 3. The composition of the vegetation includes a mix of canopy and understory trees.

19

Zone 5 -Transitional
The transitional zone includes an approximately 10-foot buffer between zone 3 or 4 and an adjacent
open area such as a field outside of the conservation easement. The planting list consists of a subset
of species consisting of smaller species that tolerate full sun and will eliminate an abrupt boundary
between the open field and zone 3 or 4.
5.6.3 Plant List
The plant list is based on the target community, reference community, and recommendations from
the North Carolina Stream Restoration Institute (Ha112001) and the North Carolina Ecosystem
Enhancement Program (Smith 2004). The selection of species also depends on availability from
local nursery sources.
5.6.4 Plant Sources
The planting plan preferentially selects local genetic stock and utilizes three sources of plants. Two
sourcesnursery stock and on-site transplants-will be tied directly to the initial planting and will
be utilized in numbers to support permit guidelines. The remaining sourcerecruitment-has been
factored into the selection of species in the plant list. The plant list includes a significant portion of
species not likely to establish from natural propagation.
Nursery Stock
The planting plan may utilize any of the following nursery stock forms of woody species: bare roots,
containerized seedlings, and ball and burlap. Additionally, the planting plan also may use sod or
seeds from commercial sources. The planting plan prescribes that nursery stock are grown under
environmental conditions similar to the target environment. The planting list includes alternates in
case specific species ofpre-ordered plants are not available or acceptable for installation.
On-Site Transplants
Several favorable species grow within the existing site. In the course of constructing a new channel
alignment, some individual plants may need to be removed. The individuals of a target species that
are of an appropriate size and age maybe transplanted into the restoration area.
Recruitment
It is expected that the restoration sites will be populated with species from adjacent communities.
The restoration sites will be maintained to keep unwanted species at less than 10% of the total
population.
5.6.5 Plant Care and Installation
The plantings will be cared for and installed based on guidelines provided in the included planting
notes. When planted properly, bare root seedlings are the most cost-effective and successful plant
material. Containerized plantings, live stakes, and other plant materials will be used based on the
needs of the planting zone (e.g. frequent disturbance, immediate shading, and others). Larger
unprotected trees will be guarded using tree shelters that should protect against herbivory and inhibit
site occupation by beavers.
20

~ 5.6.6 Schedule
The planting plan will be scheduled around stream construction activities and growing season.
Special attention will be paid to stabilizing disturbed areas that include newly-constructed channels
and temporary construction easements. The final vegetation planting will occur after proper site
• preparation (described below) during the appropriate season.
Plantings maybe staggered based on surrounding activities. Live stake planting on stream banks
• (zone 1) will follow closely after channel construction to provide immediate stabilization. On-site
transplants will be planted immediately after removal from their existing habitat. Planting of zones
2-4 will occur from late winter to early spring after construction to minimize or eliminate threats
from the construction; exotic vegetation treatment; unpredictable weather; and beaver activity.
5.6.7 Stabilization
Immediately after construction, the stream banks and all disturbed areas will be seeded with
permanent and temporary seed mixes. If within the appropriate season, permanent seeding will be
completed in conjunction with construction with temporary seeding applied per Land Quality
Section requirements. Within the stream channel (Zone 1), pioneer species that provide immediate
bank stabilization will be planted. Live stakes and bare roots will be planted around structure
installations and the outside of meander bends to provide an area of high density root mass. Coir
fiber matting and live stakes will be used along the entire reach of the restored channels to provide
stabilization until vegetation can be established.
5.6.8 Site Preparation
Prior to planting the riparian buffer, efforts will be made to eradicate fescue and invasive plants such
as multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), Chinese privet (Lingustrum sineses), and Japanese honeysuckle
(Lonicera japonica). These efforts should include herbicide use during the spring and afollow-up
spraying in early fall to eliminate any fescue that was not killed in the spring. A permanent seed mix
can be used after application of the pre-emergent. Woody planting can follow during the dormant
season.
5.6.9 Planting Review
After the final planting is complete, the planting supervisor will verify that the site was planted
properly through inspection of stem counts and condition. The planting contractor will be
responsible for replacing damaged plantings.
5.6.10 Monitoring and Maintenance
Monitoring will verify that the restoration area is meeting restoration goals. Damaged plantings will
be removed and replanting will occur if the planting survival fails to meet restoration goals. If
monitoring indicates that an area is trending towards greater than 10% coverage by nuisance
vegetation, that area will be treated to remove the nuisance vegetation.
21

6.0 Performance Criteria
6.1 Stream Success Criteria
The stream geometry will be considered successful if the cross-section geometry, profile, and
sinuosity are stable or reach a dynamic equilibrium. It is expected that there will be minimal changes
in the designed cross sections, profile, and/or substrate composition. Changes that may occur during
the monitoring period will be evaluated to determine if they represent a movement toward a more
unstable condition (e.g. down cutting, erosion, etc.) or are minor changes that represent an increase
in stability (e.g. settling, vegetative changes, coarsening of bed material, etc.).
An initial, though not exclusive, indicator of success will be adherence to design or reference ratios
of stream geometry found in the morphological table (Restoration Table I~ or in comparable and
stable reference systems. The channel may not adhere to design or reference ratios of stream
geometry, but can be considered stable if the following key indicators are present:
Stream Type: Maintenance of the design stream type or progression or conversion to stable
stream type such as B, C, or E will indicate stability
Bank Height Ratio: Bank height ratio between 1.0 and 1.1 will indicate flood flows have access
to the active floodplain and that higher flows do not apply excessive stresses to stream banks
Determination of true bankfull maybe difficult until the stream has had adequate flooding events to
create strong bankfull indicators.
The nature of the watershed presents challenges to stream restoration. The contributing watersheds
lie within a rapidly developing region. The urbanizing watershed's runoff character will continue to
change as the nature of the land cover shifts to less permeable surfaces. The hydrograph will shift
such that bankfull flooding events will become more frequent and peak discharges will be higher.
The cross sections have been designed with bankfull benches to account for some shifting in
bankfull discharges.
Upstream construction activities driven by land development likely will lead to episodic sediment
pulses sent downstream through the stream network. Additionally, erosion of upstream unstable
stream banks will persistently contribute sediment to the project reaches. Excess sediment will either
be routed though the project area or deposited in target areas such as point bars and the floodplain.
Minor sedimentation of pools and glides may occur. The pools are designed to be over dug to
account for some sedimentation of pools and glides.
If a large storm event occurs before the woody vegetation has established, isolated bank erosion may
occur in sections where the flood prone area has been restricted due to topography and/or utility
easements. Areas of bank erosion will be repaired as necessary.
6.2 Vegetation Success Criteria
The success of riparian and wetland vegetation planting will be gauged by stem counts of planted
species. Stem counts of over 320 trees per acres after 3 years, and 260 trees per acre after 5 year will
be considered successful. Photos taken at established photo points should indicate maturation of
riparian vegetation community.
22

~

• 6.3 Schedule /Reporting
• The monitoring plan to evaluate the success of the stream restoration project is based on guidance
• provided by The Stream Mitigation Guidelines disseminated by the United States Corps of
Engineers -Wilmington District (McLendon, Fox et al. 2003) and recommendation from the
Ecosystem Enhancement Program. The collection and summarization of monitoring data will be
conducted in accordance with the most current version of the EEP documents entitled "Content,
. Format, and Data Requirements for EEP Monitoring Reports"
• Upon completion of the restoration project, an as-built survey will be conducted that documents the
S following conditions:
^ Geomorphology (dimension, pattern, and profile)
• Channel materials
^ Channel stability and in-stream structure functionality
~ Wetland hydrology
^ Vegetation (stream and wetland)
The survey of channel dimension will consist of permanent cross sections placed at approximately
two cross sections (one riffle and one pool) per unique stream segment. The cross sections will
• represent approximately 50% riffles and 50% pools. Annual photographs showing both banks and
• upstream and downstream views will be taken from permanent, mapped photo points. The survey of
the longitudinal profile will represent distinct areas of restoration and will cover a cumulative total
of 3,000 linear feet of channel. Newly-constructed meanders will be surveyed to provide pattern
measurements. Channel material measurements will be collected by using pebble counts for at least
• six of the permanent cross sections.
• The entire restored length of stream will be investigated for channel stability and in-stream structure
• functionality. Any evidence of channel instability will be identified, mapped, and photographed. All
structures will be inventoried for functionality and photographed.

Wetland hydrology will be measured using groundwater wells that were set up before restoration
efforts began. The wells will sample groundwater elevations continuously throughout the monitoring
period.
Successful restoration of the vegetation on a stream mitigation site is dependent upon hydrologic
restoration, active planting of preferred canopy species, and volunteer regeneration of the native
• plant community. In order to determine if the criteria are achieved, vegetation-monitoring quadrants
will be installed across the restoration site, as directed by NCEEP monitoring guidance. The number
of quadrants required will be based on the species/area curve method, as described in NCEEP
monitoring guidance documents, with a minimum of at least three quadrants. The size of individual
quadrants vegetation-monitoring plots will be installed on approximately 1.0 percent of the
. restoration site. The individual monitoring plots will be 0.01 hectare in size. Vegetation monitoring
will occur in spring after leaf-out has occurred. Individual quadrant data will be provided and will
include diameter, height, density, and coverage quantities. Relative values will be calculated and
• importance values will be determined. Individual seedlings will be marked such that they can be
• found in succeeding monitoring years. Mortality will be determined from the difference between the
'
'
previous year
s living planted seedlings and the current year
s living planted seedlings.

23

At the end of the first growing season, species composition, density, and survival will be evaluated.
For each subsequent year, until the final success criteria are achieved, the restored site will be
evaluated between July and November. Permanent photo points will be set up for each quadrant.
The monitoring will occur annually for five years. The monitoring period should include two
separate years with bankfull events. Bankfull events will be verified using an installed crest gauge
that will be inspected during each monitoring visit. If a bankfull event has not been documented by
the end of the second year of monitoring, a mandatory quarterly check will be required. If there are
not two bankfull events, the monitoring period maybe extended at the discretion of the Corps of
Engineers, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Project Manager and the 401-Wetlands Unit Monitoring
reports will be submitted during every year for years 1-5.
24

7.0 References
Hall, Karen (2001). Recommended Native Plant Species for Stream Restoration in North Carolina.
Raleigh, NC, North Carolina Stream Restoration Institute NCSU.
Harman, William A., Gregory D. Jennings, et al. (1999). Bankfull Hydraulic Geometry
Relationships for North Carolina Streams. Wildland Hydrology Symposium, Bozeman, MT,
AWRA.
McLendon, Scott, Becky Fox, et al. (2003). Stream Mitigation Guidelines. United States Army
Corps of Engineers -Wilmington District, United States Environmental Protection Agency, North
Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and North Carolina Department of Natrual Resources -
Division of Water Quality.
Robert R. Mason, Jr., Luis A. Fuste, et al. (2002). The National Flood-Frequency Program-Methods
for Estimating Flood Magnitude and Frequency in Rural and Urban Areas in North Carolina, 2001.
U. S. G. Survey.
Rosgen, David L. (2001). A Stream Channel Stability Assessment Methodology. Seventh Federal
Interagency Sedimentation Conference. Reno, NV. w: 18-26.
Schafale, Michael P. and Alan D. Weakley (1990). Classification of the Natural Communities of
North Carolina, Third Approximation, NC Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and
Recreation, NC Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources.
Smith, Cherri L. (2004). Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration. Raleigh, NC, North Carolina
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources -Ecosystem Enhancement Program.
United States Geological Survey (2003). The National Flood-Frequency Program.
25

8.0 Restoration Tables

Table I: Pro'ect Restoration Structure and Ob'ectives
Assessment Reach Station Mitigation Priority Existing Designed
(Design Reach) Range Type Approach Linear Linear Comments
~: Ros en Foota a Foota e
,;:.
~J`l l 10;~~00 - r ~
Restoration i, TI ~
1
560 ~
i
550 ,!~. Ct3II1UIEic?~~vi „i~ n" ~_ ~~, ? ,,r. , °,YI~^`
116+07.58 , , channel relocation.
Upper UT2 200+00 - Restoration III 1 770 1 700 A combination of PI and PII with
217+13.14 channel relocation.
Lower UT2 216+73.30- Restoration I, II 1
420 1
270 A combination of PI and PII with
230+31.56 , , channel relocation.
Table II: DrainaEe Area and Stream Classification

Reach Drainage Area
mil Surface Water
Classification
Stream Order
,F,~ ' 4.i'l ~ ~,~,r~-1~'
UT2 0.83 WS-N 2
O
O
Cp
01
Table III: Land Use of Watershed

O
r N
N
G ~
G ~
m
U ~
v ~
C
d
o
F
i m N
~ o
~ o
~ ~ iri m ~ ~i I
~ o
~ ~ S
o o
c w n
~
~ t ~ ~
~
m
~
F
p ~
~
b
~

U

O `r
~ o
O m
m m
~ m
N

v

N

r:

~ o
N o

O °
O

f

N o
~

o N
~

o

N a
47

O o
N

n

m -
-

~

N o
V

O '-
N

~ ~
O
O
O
O 'n
O
O

. N
o
O o,

N o
O
0

0
op ~
O

O m

. m
N

~ N
~

~

n
N y

N co
O

~ m °
~

° o
~

o
~ ~
O O c7 m

u. tfi

~

~ N
O

~ 0.
p O

r N

r
V V
Q
O
O
r
C
m
v
S

m
C
m
v
~

m
C
m
v
m

m
C
m
v
~
C
ro
C
m
v
~
G
m,
C
m
v
~
C
ro
C
m
v
.S
'C
m
C
m
v
~
C
m
C
m
v ..
.a
>L
ro
C
m
v
~
C
.C
m
~ .:
p

:~
~C
m
v
~

cm
.L
m

m ..
~
G

ro
C
m

d ..
p~
C

m
C
m

v ..
~
C

m
C
m

v
O
C

n
C
m

v ..
p~

ca
C
m

v
U
c

m
..C
m

.
a

.

~
4'
~

m
C
m

v
Q~

m
C
m

v
-~

-
C
N
--~

_
=i G
r] ! h

-
v .y.
..pi
C
C
m

v
~
U]

o
C
m

v
m
C,

;
C
m

v
~

S
C
m

V
~

m
C
m

w
~

c
C

m
v
a'

c
C

m
m
~

~
l
z : m c m m m c
m
m

I
~
u?
'
~
. I
~
O
ni
in

r
O
~ m
E~ ~ I ~ , I ~ I ~ ~ ,~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ n
v v
v v
v
r
N
~r
m
°.
v
"~
,
ar.
o

o
a w
N
w
m

U

~ ~ o ~ a m

N

O N

V] o m m
>
~ ~
W
p
Ol
(V
~ N
O N O
~(j
U ~
m
m
c c
o
¢
rn
¢ ~
C
S
C
-~'i
C
Q~
o
~
C~
C
N
q
..
~
~
••
C
N
q
~
~

C
N
q

~
C
p~

C
N
q
~
C
N

C
N
p

C
N
p~

C
CJ
p~

C
Q
O
~-
C
N
~p
~
~

~~

C
N

C
~
a
-~
m
N
p~

C

-~

C
P

C
~
r-.

C
N
m

C
~.
rn

G
~
C
4
C
~
C
N
O~
C
ai
C
N
~
~ ~
5
fr
~ C
C R
`.t C
m ,
`r C
T ~
`s C
2
`L
L' ~0
~
2
S
CC l0
`dN q
Cf a
c
~ m
~
~ N
5
m
5
fT m
W
~

7. 10

~

m
s
_ c

~ m

~
m
m

S C

° d

? C
m
2

5

rm

5

_

~ ~

m m

s,

7

5_
-
r
~
. L
N
.tt m

~ ~

~C m

E

¢

~ c

m m
<
~
,~v-
~ m
~
.l
m
[L
a~i
'.
v
r
d
~
I
~
m ~
N
N
O
a~
'
o

n
c N
M
c
+
o

'

o

cri
"'

L,
°

a
~

~

m

~
~

~
o

'

'q

'

~'
~

v
°

-
-
~ ~

`Q
z

Q
~

¢
z

-

~r
-

`

a
z

¢
z

o
N

o
o.
i
o
~
o
o
O
°io
o
o
O

h

v
~
O
N

S
o O
O
O

o O

~
o

o
i]

m

m
~

ro

n

o

`

O
° .
~'
N

m
ri m
'j~ ~
W
~ O

.

~

~

~

. O
O

--
..- O
D O O O ~-1'
N
O
M

N

m g
~

.
m

2

c

m

N

~

,
m

v

m

N

CO

.
C
v

n

-

R

)
co

.
m

~

m

r

C

_

Cf

.
~

N

q

C

O

C

O

C

d

C

16

S

G

C

m

"

c

G

N

O

rn

C

C

m

m

C

m

~

e

C

~0

O

Cp

~;

R

~

m

y

OI
C

C

m

L

C

m

C

g

.

m

~

c

.

m

il

°1

m

N

p!

C

m

.,

C

C

m

1
U
~ ¢ U
~
~ v
~ m
¢ U
~ ti
¢ U
~ m
fC
~ N
¢ m
.e m
¢ . d
~ ro
¢ W
~
fL' '~
~
~ ry
~ -
~ N
~ ~p
¢ d
E ~
¢ w
E m
¢ v
~ m
¢ v
E m
¢ v
E m
¢ v
~
~ v
.f'. m
. lC v
~ ¢ v
~ ro
¢ v
E
~ v
g m
¢ c
v
E ¢ v
f m
¢` v
~ C
~ v
~ ro
m. v
~
Q v
~ io
¢ m
f C
m
¢ v
~ ro
¢ w
~ m
¢

s

m F
~

m
O

~

~

o

.
N N
:*J

'

~

~ V
~

~

m

o

q

O y
N

o

~ O
O

~

N

O

~

v

~+ m
47

o

N N
~

~

N O
CJ

c

°

0

~

o

V O
~fJ

n
ro
d

c

p

o

~
~
O N
p
O O

~
o

,

m
o
S N
O
0
O

_
O

h

N O~
N

~ O

~

n
N ~'
~

~

.

o

m

N

O

NO ~
N
"

O O
m
a. ~ N m
~ N ,. O O O O (7 O O
~

U

O U ro

O

' N

M

~

~

~ -

--
_

p o

M

~
o o

Ui n

~
M m

r
ry

~ o

l7

,

. mo

O
_

~ S

O o

O ~,

~ v

N _

r

~

~ ~°.

.- o
t N N
N
W ~
W J M ~. O O
~ +
~D
N ~ m~ C ~ , m m
~-
C c~. N a C Uri
~ C~ ~ ~ C g

~
C - u LA C

m ci C

m ~ C Oi C Q C ~ C Oi C cu C N C `n C N
g d
C
C Ci
q i
C p.
~
C U
~ ..
C 2
C rn a•
C O
C ¢i
g
C N
p~
C Q~
C
C N

m ro
g ¢
v a
~ ~
U
E
m
~
m n
~ ~
m m
f s
m
E
m
¢
~ m
f [r
w
~
m
¢
~ m
~ ¢

~
m
Q f C
m
¢
v
E C

Q
v
~
ro
¢ m
m
~ C
m
m m
v
~
is
¢
m
E
m
¢ m
v
~
m
¢ m C
w r.
~ Q m
v
E

¢ m ~

~ ¢ m

~ C

¢ m C

~ ~ ~d

~
m
¢ m
v ro
> ¢ m
v
g C
m
¢
v
~
~
¢ m
v
~ C
ro
¢ ro a
v n
~ Q n
v
~
m
Q m
v
E
m
¢ m
v
g
S
¢ m
v
E C
m
¢
N
m

r
J

'

'

'

~
O
O

O

Y

r
o m , , i , I ~
~ V
~ ~, I ~ ~ N O N ~ ~ O
n
W V ~ V m m * - ~
~ ~ ~ 6 l ~1 . .. O u 7
a W h ` 1 r - {
I N O c +J l p

>~
~ U
W ro
O N O
O ~
N N
O ~;
N o
~j
U m
m rn
O
~
m ~
~ J

a[

N O
41
m

A c

v~

W

v

m

cm

A c~ l

v m

C6 C

v m

C

v

yJ Cp
N

m

~

v

N

m

Cm C

v m

N d

v m

C
~NN6

-

'c°c
~.
c

v K

m

_- C

m u

W

m

C S

dm

v

~

c

C

d

S
C

ro

C-
C

w

C
m

v

O
C

~:
m

v m

C
m

m

Oi
C

C =~
~

d m

C
m

v

R
C

C a,
m

v m

C ml
m G.

v-

C
m

v

~:

c

C
m

v

'OS
C

C ~,

v `

L
m

v

A
C

C
m

p~
C

C
m

v

~"
~

m

C
g

N
C
. ro m ro m m m m v ro

~

~

r

-

-

~

u~ o
r

"

N .n
N

-'

C n

~

c m
~

7

N

N
~ o

~ ~i
N

..
Z

Q

~

Q
Z

.

~

~

~

~

n
m

<
V

n
i

~
V ~
O
O

c

f Oa
O
O
S O
O o
O

. <r
N

.~
N ~ o
N

I-

'

Y~.~

~

~

J

~

O

m m
~

~
s o
O

r
t
C 7 m N
" ~ . Z Z O O O ~ O H
N~ ~ m m o N m o m " m o m ~ m
', ~
~ ~
~
', ~
~
',
S
O o ca -
'
I u~

W J
+
O
O o , N

tn+1
C `~

c C OI

m c C :a C

m c m ~' C

m O~ C

v ~ C Qi

d C

N ~

C C ~

m C a C ~ C Q C : ~ C G
~
c ~:._
¢ C UI ~ N

c d

m N ~.
m •• Qi
C rn~
A ~ N
m, C ~.
m e N
W CW
q ..,.
~ 6i
Of Ci
~ c ~ d±
u"~
C
C Ui ~
Oi ~ Oi
C N
C
y N. 2 T 0 1 N v co d .~.. W ~ ~ N N N m u m d G c
t i ~ d C
m v ~- N m v v v tC v C
N m v T d C
cC W ,.. a p
) ro y N W [cS N (C

L
W~

th
+

~
h
!

~ m
O
-

~ ~
O

m
N

r
~
v
. h

O

O
~

~ r.
~ ~ i

N
~

-', ~
O
ch
O
c

O
m
O

~

~

On
S

O
O

N
O ~n

O O
o
N

r. m
0
pN O N
S O
o

c
co
V. c
J

O ~

N
N
~,~

~

~ v
N

~'1

1 O
~
o
~ O
~
m
[L ~
C A
m r
N

~
U m
O

o
~

N ~
~ :
O
O'

iTi

-
O

~
O

v O O O m
S O O
S
O

o

M

v

i
01

oN
~,
O
m a
a
Q ]
o
o v ~ o
d o
n c ~ ~ v
0
N
C p~
to
m C

v ro
C ~
m C

m m
C a C
m C

v ca v
2 =
m V m

m v
~
C

m
~ 4:
m~

v m
C ~
m C

v m
c
m

v
N

:a ~
C ~

ro
C

v
N
O~

m
C

m
~

m
~

a
T

m
C

v
~

cro
C

v
N

m
= '_

v~
C

d
Ul .
q
C
m
.
C
m
v
Qj .
D+

m
. G;
C ,~

m`

C

~
Qj

C
m
C
C~'i
O
v c
..
C

~
~ .
g

`ro
. Q•
C m

m m
.. d) .
C q
W C
v ro
. Cl
C O•
m
v m
~~ Gl
C DI
m
v m
C '+i
_

v m
C

v
a

~
C n,.

m m
G O~

a c°a
C

am,
~,

m
C G)

~ r~
C N

m m

m
v
~
~

.
°
o
o
co
u~

m
C
v ~
U

h

i

~

i
~

~
~

~

i

r

i

~
r

ri

i

~

~

N
~

o

~

~

i o

r~
y (h
i 4 :
~ `n .-
: .
I ~
I
I N
m
I
~
O
~
_
a y a r d ~ p m
> `w U cMp ~! o N
~ ~ w o rn _ o N ~
U v
_
rn
m
y
C O
O
~
m >
¢~ c m c m c~ c m= cvn c c~ c a c -°n c Sa c m c a c a c ai
m c
d, c
~ c d
p~ c
c m ~~
p~ c
rc ~ c

c
c.
m 2 c

m
Q v
~~ c
m e a
m d .
c m c
m . a
~ v
c ..~ c
m c m

°'

m ~

a c ~ c;

~ m i

°1 E

m c~

~ ci

c A hi

c

I
I

I
O o
QOi
o
O
O

~f ~n
N
`6'
O
~
o
N
N
O
m
N
O
a
N
T H n
} m
O 1~
O Q m N th O
N ~

~ -
- =
- Q
Z _Q
Z d
Z Q
Z _
'
Z = N M1
O
O o V
~ O
O N N
r0
O N
O V h
O Q
N ~
N ~ 1~
N
c~
. ~ m , ' d c o m o
~
~
y
•x $~,
o m m
o
I
I °
o .
° S
o o
o r m
m v
w] °
O i I o 0

c
m

v . ai
rn c
m

m v ui
o,

c

m ai .
c o c

m c m

v m v . .
°1 c

c m

v . ui
o, c

m

~ v ~ ai
o, c

c m

v c
d,

A _
.. c

m m
v m v . - ~
~

~ ~
c m

m
v m
e

1p
v iS
q

~ ~ ~
c

m
v a
a,

E
c

m
v aS
q

~ • -
c

v 'ci
o, c

am ai
o, c

~ y ai
w c

w rr~
p c

G
v a

`
c

m ~
c

v ~
~ a
c a, c
c.

m
v ,:
o,

E m .
c~ c
m e

w .
°~'

~
c ~' c
m c m a
~

m
t
m d ~
p, c
e

y
a c

~
m ai
o,
c ~ ~
c
m a
~ c
m E
c

~
m d

~
~ CL ~ ¢ ~ CC ~ ¢ ~ ~ ~ ¢ E ¢ ~ ¢ ~ ¢ ~ S ~ ¢ ~ Q ~ [[ E ¢ ~ ¢ ~ ¢ : ry
t ¢ ~ m
CL ~ ¢ ~ r
('L m
~ CC ~ ~ ~ v m
[[ ~ ¢ E a m v
¢ ~ ¢ v
~ m
~' ~ c
y
¢ ~ ro
¢ v
~ v
~ ~ a
LC ~ i
¢

t I

T

' O

N O

O
m ~

~

N n

N m

(~

~ m

O O

O M

O -•~

O ~.

CV N

n
N

C
d
h

.-
(
O N
CfJ
TO
h
r

~
r O
N ~
n
^~"
~
:
O
'a
N m
N
Cri ~

N m
O r
C O O
O

N ~t
S J O
O
N

N
m
N
m

d (..'
I
W
~
~
~
~
~
O
~
O

O
~ .
)
~'
O
~~.

N
m
~
Y~

O

O

i
O W
O
N

S
O
c.J
- y

O
n
W 3

U Z O
r

lIJ
r.
-
j ~ ~
~ N N O

O O

O O N
N
. N (7
v
C
OI ~
O~
~ O~ ~
h~ C
C ~0
g C
C
~ C
C ~0
©
C
C
m
~ 'C
C m
Lp
C
C
p~
C
C
m ~
ID
C
C
m
~
C
m
p~
C
m
~ C
lp
p~ C
C m
p~ C
C m
~ C
m
~
c
C
m
C C
C
,7,
C
C p. C
A m
O C
~ I
p. C
E C
S C
I
pi C
C L m
a~
C
N
S. C
~r L
r-
p~

m
~~. C
c m
O O
m
N
~ ¢ ~ Q ~ ¢ ~ ¢ ~ ¢ rC CL .`G ~¢. ~ ¢ ~ S ~ ¢ ~ ¢ ~ ¢ ~ ¢ `C CC ~ ¢ ~2 m f ¢ E Q ~ ¢ ~ Q ~ ¢ ~ Q ~ ¢ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ¢ ~ 2 rC ¢ ~ S Si ¢ ~ ¢

~

~

~°
~
m
X
ro
L

~ N
N
2
*
~
~
°"

~
Q
°
~
~
'
~
_
~
m
~

J C
O ~
~
c
j ~
O
S
.
~
J 2
ri
~
U
¢ o
cD
~ _
,~
n -
~ ~
=
1
T
a r
S a
d
U
Q
A
m
L
C
¢ ~
vi
>
L
~
L
d ¢ r
~
D ~
L '~
Z O
~ ~
.Q ~
~ >
4 ~
f/J ~

n
q~
;
L
G ~ m
E
p
D
¢ N
> v

~ m

°1 .n
~ m
f s

o m
sg
. v
o x
~

R
.X o
LL
's c
E

~
~ m

E a

3 b

m ~
= r °
~
^_
¢,
~
S.
o
cn -

fD n:
°'..
¢
q
~
a ~

E
8 °
a
a
~
'
a

3
o
a T
~
a
o
a
_
~
E
m c
m
y m
C ~-
. ~
E Y -
3
~ Y1 ~
e
Y a c
\` ~ _
¢ ~
iL Y
~. 1 ~
= C e
D ~ °
R 0
~ 3
~ s
~
N
~ .c',
C o
O c
Y o
m
O `o
0 ~ >~>
0> -co
.~ C ~
Z
ry 0 E
4 ~
T a
.., i

. c
m o
N O ~
. ~ r-. ° n
Q~ E o
°
.C
p f
L a
>>
>

~ ~
yy
.~ 4 m
~~
.~
1 ,,, o

O s
C
d
¢
~
m 3S
3 m
3
f
~ _
>
m i
O m ?f
`°
.~ o
~i
`
e
3
'
~
m
cm
a
¢ ro ~
d
3 m
3 c 4J
i m
'°
~ °"
' .
i
S
o° ~
z
t _
~. ~
m_
'~
$
~.
;~ o
~
T O
2 a
~ m m
N :.- a 3 o ¢
~ m a
..:
~
~
3
¢
w
.,
~
r[
m
~
~ ¢ o
.. m
~
~ u~ n
~
>
a v
_ v
¢ ~ Q
u~ a o
._ Q
~n E
^ m
o
a
,; ~
m a
,,
c~
m a
¢ a
N !7 ~ V 7 O h 00 C11 O N Cl ~ N f0 n G O O r O
N ~
N N
N a
N N
N (p
N A
N o
N f Q)
N O
m N
m ~ V
m
m
U
t
O
C
a
N
O
a
c
a
m
a
m
L
n
N
T
N
Ul
O
3
a ~
c m
a
c m
c m 2
m ro ~
~ N m
a m CO
m E c of
M m v m
O N N
d a
o m a c
II N N ~
C a UI U
N V~
O) ~ O m
`m
ro c° ~
m m E v
O a L
~ D N
O
O ~ ~ >.
O ~ j
C~ N L N
U L
m ~ m
OI D O
2~ '" E
3 `0 0 ''
O U d
O O'
m y ~ N
~ L O
O ~ ~ C
II ~ X
m 'o
~ L Q ~
E v ~ s
~ U m
O m O ~
j U ~
_ ~
~ E w q
w m ,c .
N ~ ~
m
~ N ~ ~
q v
O ~ N
X E
v v
D y N
~~
0 0
~- N Z

x ew-ss-os ez,u.-oy;uex
x x x x wn;e;uap wnu-ngln
x x wnsogw oo wrr-ulooe~
x e.-qn.- snwln
x x euo;oul; soool w S
x uo.-puapooelew el~-eMa;S
x e/lo,;u; eal u elS
x s/suapeueo snongweS
x ea /u x-IeS
x euelu/lo.-eo x/IeS
x wnsoosln uo.-puapopoy~y
x saplouaw loua uo.-puapopou~/
x wnwlxew uo.-puapopoy~/
x eue/ul .-In e ;sp
x e.-qn.- sn.-oW
x x euelu/ a-n eyou eW
x ele;a la; ellou ew
x x euu;sn 11 e/uo ~
x ulozuaq e~apulq
x esowaoea aou;oonaq
x suell-xe aoy;oonaq
x eo-ul ~In ea;l
x x x x e;el;-o/~an xall
x x x x eoe o xall
x enp/oap xall
x x euelul ,nn s//awewel-1
x snueouawe snw uon3
x eueouawe snl o~
x x x wnwowe snu-o~
x slsuapeueo s/o.-a~
x x x x euelullo.-eo snul.-e~
x snpuol~ snu;ueo lei
x eueouawe e aeogle~
x x x x egolu; eulwlsy
x x x eyo~/;nq.-e e/uo.-y
x x x e;eln.-.-as snug y
x x x eo/;enl s snlnosa y
ao~saapun
uor$isuuas
:s auoZ puepzco~;og
:~ auoZ u~ta~ ~
:£auoZ oZ - gauag
uieaa;s :z auoZ tauuuq~ - xueg
uieaa~s :i auoZ
aiugu ag~~uaias
ui~u~id uot~~~a a~ pooM
~auoL ngJ jai;iunwu-u;) an-;e;aaaA paua-saQ :•;uoa A a~ge,L

•••i`•••••••••••••••~••••••••••••••••••••••
Table V: Designed Vegetative Communities (By Zone
oody V
Zone 1: Zone 2: Stream Zone 3: Zone 4: Zone 5:
Scientific Name Stream Bank - Bench -Top Riparian Bottomland Transition
Channel
Cano
Acer barbatum x
Acer saccharinum x
Betula ni ra x x x
Ca a cordiformis x x x x
Ca a ousts x x x x
Celtis laevi eta x x x x
Dios ros vir iniana x x x
Fraxinus americans x
Fraxinus enns Ivanica x x x x
Ju lens ni ra x
Ma nolia acuminate x
N ssa s Ivatica x x x
Po ulus deltoides x
Prunus serotina x x x
Quercus falcate x
Quercus michauxii x x x x
Quercus ni ra x x x
Quercus a ode x x
Quercus hellos x x x x
Quercus rubra x
Quercus shumardii x x x
Salix ni ra x
Tilia americans var. hetero h lla x
Ulmus slats x
Ulmus americans x

9.0 Figures

Figure 1 Project Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2 Project Site Location
Figure 3 Project Site Watershed Map
Figure 4 Project Site NRCS Soil Survey Map (1994)
Figure 5 Project Site Hydrologic Features Map with Gauge
Locations
Figure 6 Reference Site Vicinity Map
Figure 7 Reference Site Watershed Map
Figure 8 Reference Site NRCS Soil Survey Map (1994)
Figure 9 Project Site FEMA Firm Map
Figure 10 Reference Site Vegetative Communities Map

07 0 89 6
site
Prepared For
Project
r~
hcosystcn~
Wolf Pond Stream Restoration
Union County, North Carolina
Date
4/26/07
oject Number
012620006
Prepared By
Title ~ Project Site Vicinity Map

Fieure 2 Proiect Site Location
v'- _ _ _
.,
~ ~ I. -- f '' ~ I
l,/S' 1 t , a
/ , .,,_. 1 ~• ~/ ~ ti„~ltf,,• 1 ~ 217 ~
_' L_ • , '1 ~7C~~ , axhaw Monroe
=~ I 4Z- •,~ ~;, _ ~ ~ Wingate
'~
~ ~~~ i ~ i~ l 207 ~~
• i ~
i ~ .. ..t..._~
' ~i
. / I
-~ T 522
. l
- J - ~`- ' a
~O r /- ~
• ,~ ~' }~f - ~ '`~~~~ _ Unity ° Tradesville
"' ` ~ Pageland
"e` - ~° ~~~ I F a ~~! I ~ _~ ~~ ~ ~ 1
~~~
~ r _ ~~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ _...
~,/ , _ _ ,-.,f %~/ _ / ~~ if ~ ~`~ °?I
e
` .
.,a
e / _ ~
\ .r~ , ~. ,` ~, ~~~
r , ~° ~
~ Sc
,~ ,
~, - t ;
r ~ ~=~ ~r ~ f
tea. ~~ '~ r" ~ ~ r k I ~ ~ ~ ~p ~ ~ ,-~~~
p witt.Hel-ns y ~ ;~.~a~ j y ~ ~ ~ i ~~ ~ _ -_ ~~ ~' _ ~~
` _ ;,\~ k ~`~ 7 (t ~~;` .~ ',`` ~f .ll~ l`~- 1 ~ ~' 1 J andy Ridge R
1 J r , ~ ~ ` ~ .~ , 7 iii r i ",, ,` • - ' •~ ~f B M •
i
~ , a
~, i~.', , l ,>, ~ .~ • ~ _ ~~•~_' ~ •-~ , .~ '. Legend
_. ,
N u 1,000 2,000 .. •~ :ac '..., ~-. T _~ '_ ~~~~ Project Area
-` . ,.
~ ,
Feet • -^~"E ~~ ~ - - ~~ +3~s~ f~ti ~ (~ ~ ~ ~.~ _ ~ ~ ~ i L.. 1 watershed ..
M /,
., - _ ~~_
__ _ ,_ .__ F., ..~,_.._ __,,, _ _ , ,_:.. . .:.
Title Project Site Location/USGS Quad Map (Monroe 1988)
Prepared For Wolf Pond Stream Restoration Prepared By
~` Project Union County, North Carolina ~
1'd'OSY5~1 Date Project Number
. .... 4/26/07 012620006

3 Project Site W
Prepared For
Project
r~
ta~c~yst~t
Wolf Pond Stream Restoration
Union County, North Carolina
Date
4/26/07
oject Number
012620006
Prepared By
Title ~ Project Site Watershed Map

4 Project Site NRCS Soil Survey Map (1994)
Prepared For
Project
r~
I?~.~systct7t
Wolf Pond Stream Restoration
Union County, North Carolina
Date
4/26/07
oject Number
012620006
Prepared By
Title ~ Project Site NRCS Soil Survey Map (1994)

5 Project Site Hvdrological Features Mau with
Prepared For
Project
r~
,1?~t>Systett~
Wolf Pond Stream Restoration
Union County, North Carolina
Date
4/26/07
oject Number
012620006
Prepared By
Title ~ Project Site Hydrological Features Map with Gauge Locations

Figure 6 Reference Site Vicinity Ma
d ~~ i f r ~ f ~;
~ "~ ~ l ` 52
~ ~, ~•~
tJ`CA
Miles" ~_ j rr` ' ~ `,T._._. M~les.:.u::~
84 , ti 1
2909 ~ _ san/. ~---?
ora_~n Fyd
2889 0 ~ a~K`~5• ~Monro~
m do~~;~y ~~~
2890 \ -p lea 6o a
Qa \ ~ iP Vo~9 67 te~~ ~ ~ ~D_~a
~,. oo Ga ~ oa ay
3~ Y o 0
o F~ o \a3 ~o
~ .ca bUi~l. 84 2 ~ ~,o~
~a G o~9hby Rd ~ o~°,
m~
O ('~,
yy:
O~ ~
M°n~~ n
~$~°~ De Araek Ln
~-~m
sh ~ Na ~.Rd
e
d~~O'~ 2822 a TN ~`O~
a
ea d P~
,Z.o ~ N o ~^~ s
!~ oe ~~' ~ ~ a ~ o O
~/ ,- ~~
~/ Grove-~r '~'° c, ,c
e~Q°\~~G o?~ ~ ~~e,
f GN '% O ~ ~ c` Ci
i
~ ~~~ C ~ Got
f
a°
~ ° ~ Q-d
f /~pQ, o a~oe
/ c ~.~
_~ 75 ~a~,.
~dler-- d t ~a+
o ` ~ era°~~d ~"~CKSS o\a ~ C'':
N M~Neety Rd wee ` ~) ~a ~ ter-Rd °
~ o~ ~prin9;iew•Or c~~~
Z ~v
d~~°
G o~.Et` ~.~/ ~,oPe.Rd
o ~eP9•
° 0 0.5 I ,
~ _
Title Reference Site Vicinity Map
Prepared For Wolf Pond Stream Restoration Prepared By
Project Union County, North Carolina
Date Project Numbe-•
h',~cisystci~i ~ ~~
4126/07 012620006

7 Reference Site Watershed Map
Prepared For
Project
r~
(~,ec>Syste~n
Wolf Pond Stream Restoration
Union County, North Carolina
Date
4/26/07
oject Number
012620006
Prepared By
Title ~ Reference Site Watershed Map

8 Reference Site NRCS Soil Sm
Prepared For
Project
r~
I{,c~system
Wolf Pond Stream Restoration
Union County, North Carolina
Date
4/26/07
oject Number
012620006
Prepared By
Title I Reference Site NRCS Soil Survey map

Fiuure 9 Pr~iect Rite FF.MA FIRM Man

~° .' ~ ~ '~ S ancrm~ne ~nwrance : a~a~ a e na^ rs commpndv, comxl yopr
e agento~call the National Flood lnw ce Program at 18(101636-6620.
ii/ '''#``> ZONE A-
~~
~ ::.....:....
::..:
...
: {{y~~
:; ~;{_
~•
/ ~
~~ ..
:
.
\ \::
~ N
-~//' l
`~ ~~., `.~'%~•
O ~ APPRO%IMATE SCALE
2000 U 2000 FEET
1156 /O
J/~ ~~
J „
~
®IUTIYNAL FLYBY INSYNANCE 1NYINAY
" Union County t~ _ ~%
" ~~"`
-"
_
\ '' Unincorporated Areas ~%
:
~
'
F~~
'ZONE A 370234
' fL00D INSURANCE HATE MAP
_

~ ~ UN[ON COUNTY,
FS,
~
°
~ NORTH CAROLINA AND
~~...~,
`~
Ns
.;~' ` INWRPORATEDAREAS
PANEL 175 0 F2Y
0

i e
a
Y~ ~ ~
..~1 ~ ~
~ ~; mvn~u.m.nrrs tmnr aps c
~
,_i
_ j:
~ r.......m d»:ma:«a
~
~'~ ;l
n MAP NUMBER
3717900175 C
/ EFFECiIYE DATE:
JULY 5, 1994
_` ~ ~///
I__ Federal Fmngena:y Managatavl MeacY
_ /
'an1/~
\`\~` \ ~ / ~\\ /

' rnla la an omcml cop; or a pproen or m. atbw .erarencee nooe map. n
extracted uaing F-MIT On11ne. Thla map does not reject chaipes
~amendneMa wTlch may have bean ma4 eubaequera to Ns dale on Ibe
title black. ForiM Irteat product IMUmaUOn about National Flood Insurance
Program hood mega check tM FEMA Foal Map Store rt vmw.msc.bma.pw

Title Project Site FEMA FIRM Map -Panel Number 3717900175 C effective July 5, 1994
Prepared For Wolf Pond Stream Restoration Prepared By

r~ Project Union County, North Carolina

I'yCOS Stefl
t
Date
Project Number r
1
!
I ~xtlta.~ctltc?7t 4/26/07 012620006

ure 10 Reference Site V
Prepared For
Project
r;
h~osysten~
Wolf Pond Stream Restoration
Union County, North Carolina
Date
4/26/07
oject Number
012620006
Prepared By
Title ~ Reference Site Vegetative Communities Map

10.0 Appendices

.Appendix 1
Project Site Photographs

7 0 8 9 6
Yl~oto YaEe 1
P~MC,~1 i~ ~.b r ~ ~F tl ~. 4 M D'~~~'~.I!S,Ay•~pp
~'~$t ~ v ~ i :~1 r46}~ ~ 1e ~ ~ s ~ d"5
gg g ~ Y
~ ~ IfJd f ~ ~ ~~'st~7
t '~ ~ d ~~ ~~ d k~A ~~ ex ' 'a',~ ~` b ~
Photograph 1: Upstream Reach of the UT2 to Adams Branch looking upstream
!S`~ ~ ,.°
Photograph 2: Upstream Reach of the UT2 to Adams Branch looking upstream
Title Appendix 1. Project Site Photographs
Prepared For Prepared By
Project Wolf Pond Stream Restoration
~~ Union County, North Carolina ;
L'~(.'01 titElil Date Project Number
y 4/26/07 012620007 ~~

3
~~ ~
~S~
_~ Y
,

~:
om
~
` ~ ~'C' ;
~
'
~ 5 Y
~` ~,
t
~
/ A ^"
~
~
: ~ § l
d 1
~
&
r ~ ;
1~
~ s ~~ ~}~d
k

~f ~ s ~
" ~`AL~';a ;F ~~
&!
s,~R , : ap x

Photograph 5: 72-inch Reinforced Concrete Pipe
,''~
~ ~4~
~.p' ~.
s~ e s w .. ,x.~
~~}z~ ~~
~ `„{j
Photograph 6: Lower UT to Adams Branch looking upstream
Title
Prepared For
r
L;cosy~~tcllt ,
Appendix 1. Project Site Photographs
Project Wolf Pond Stream Restoration
Union County, North Carolina
Date
4/26/07
eject Number
012620007
Prepared By

Appendix 2
Project Site NCDWQ Stream Classification Forms

i
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
i
•.
i
•.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form, Version 3.1
Date: 3/5/2006 Project: EBX Latitude: 34.8957
Evaluator: Todd st..lonn, Norton Site: Wolf Pond - UT 1 Longitude: 80.55148
Webster
Total Points: 41
Stream is at least intermittent County: Union County, NC Other Waxhaw, NC
e.g. Quad Name:
if ? 19 or perennial if _> 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 17 :,Absent Weak Moderate. Strong Score
1 a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3
2. Sinuosit 0 1 2 3 2
3. In-channel structure: riffle- ool se uence 0 1 2 3 1
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sortin 0 1 2 3 1 ' .
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3 -1
6. De ositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 2:
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3 `- 9.
8. Recent alluvial de osits 0 1 2 3 3
9a. Natural levees 0 1 2 3 D
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 ! `1
11. Grade Control 0 0.5 1 1.5 `' "0.5
12. Natural valle or draina a wa 0 0.5 1 1.5 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS ma or other documented evidence. No = 0 Yes = 3 0
a Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussion in manual
B. Hvdroloav Subtotal = 11
14. Groundwater flow/dischar e 0 1 2 3 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- dry or growing season
0
1
2
3
3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0 9 >.
17. Sediment on lants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 s1:5
18. Or anic debris lines or files (Wrack lines 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
19. H dric soils redoximor hic features) resent? No = 0 Yes = 1.5 1.5
C. Bioloav Subtotal = 13
20b. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0 2
21 b. Rooted lants in channel 3 2 1 0 0 .
22. Cra fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3 ?
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 1:5
25. Am hibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 1.5
26. Macrobenthos note diversit and abundance 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
27. Filamentous al ae; eri h ton 0 1 2 3 3
28. Iron oxidizin bacteria/fun us 0 0.5 1 1.5 ' 1:5'
29b. Wetland lants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = L5; sav = z.o; otner = 0 1:5
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:

North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form, Version 3.1
Date: 3/5/2006 Project: EBX Latitude: 80.553077
Evaluator: Todd sV~/ebsterNorton Site: Wolf Pond - UT 2 Longitude: 34.893402
Total Points: 43
Stream is at least intermittent County: Union County, NC Other Waxhaw, NC
e.g. Quad Name:
if ? 19 or perennial if ? 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 20.5 Absent `Weak' Moderate? Strong Score
1 a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3
2. Sinuosit 0 1 2 3 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle- ool se uence 0 1 2 3 1
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sortin 0 1 2 3 1
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3 3
6. De ositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 `3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3 0
8. Recent alluvial de osits 0 1 2 3 2
9a. Natural levees 0 1 2 3 A
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 0
11. Grade Control 0 0.5 1 1.5 0''
12. Natural valle or drains a wa 0 0.5 1 1.5 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS ma or other documented evidence. No = 0 Yes = 3 3
" Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussion in manual
B. H drolo Subtotal = 11
14. Groundwater flow/dischar e 0 1 2 3 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel --dry or growing season 0 1 2 3 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0 1.5
17. Sediment on lants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 1 .
18. Or anic debris lines or files Wrack lines 0 0.5 1 1.5 1>
19. H dric soils redoximor hic features resent? No = 0 Yes = 1.5 1.5
C. Biolo Subtotal = 11.5
20b. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0 3:
21 b. Rooted lants in channel 3 2 1 0 3 `
22. Cra fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3 0
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
25. Am hibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
26. Macrobenthos note diversit and abundance 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
27. Filamentous al ae; eri h on 0 1 2 3 3
28. Iron oxidizin bacteria/fun us 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 "
29b. Wetland lants in streambed
F FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; SAV = 2.0; Other = 0 0
items zu ana li Locus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:

Appendix 3
Categorical Exclusion Report

s °;,_ i ~'_;-: ~'S...~',,,•~~e'~~S"~- '#<f"i?Sa`~tr!#Aa~r~"-~i.7~~M2a~'~'eWS~{~;'+#-av~}'i"?u7a nf.?t>r.~iftwT.'~.~tC"'F~["o!i`.~R"t,`f~~~P'~7 -~;~ ~o;C"u:~ya^.S+':?$F:;"~t''~"c's~v.+='G~•,vfh':x ..'.vi, "-v
•
i
i
•
a
•
•
a
i
•
•
•
•
•
•
i
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
i
•
•

~ ~ Kimley-Horn
"^ ~ ~ antl Associa
~ tes, Inc.

September 29, 2006 ~
• P.O. Box 33068
• Raleigh, North Carolina
2763&3068
Mr. Donnie Brew
Environmental Protection Specialist
Federal Highway Administration
• 310 New Bern Avenue, Suite 410
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601
i
•
Re: Wolf Pond Property Stream Restoration Site
Full Delivery Project
Union County, North Carolina

Dear Mr. Brew:
•
This letter serves to re-transmit a Categorical Exclusion Form for Ecosystem
Enhancement Program Projects to your agency for Wolf Pond Stream
Restoration Full Delivery Project for your review and approval. Per your request,
additional documentation including correspondence to and from resource
agencies, a completed NRCS AD-1006 form, Environmental Data Resource
maps, and a biological assessment of affect for federally listed endangered
• species have been attached.

• The Wolf Pond Property Stream Restoration Site is located 5 miles south of
Monroe, Union.County, North Carolina (Figure 1). The Wolf Pond Property site
'
s Branch. UT 1 to
contains two unnamed- tributaries (UT 1, UT 2) to Adam
• Adam's Branch is unstable due to agricultural activity and lack of riparian buffer.
S The channel has failing banks and is incised in some areas. Heavy sedimentation
'
s Branch has been impacted
occurs in many areas of this channel. UT 2 to Adam
by past- beaver activity. The stream bed and banks are heavily eroded and the
• riparian buffer is degraded.
The purpose of this project is to restore the site back to a naturally functioning
stream system. The plan for the Wolf Pond Property site involves the restoration
• of dimension, pattern, and longitudinal profile to approximately 4,185 linear feet
• of existing stream channel. Total stream length within the restoration area will be
increased to approximately 4,500 linear feet. Approximately 12.4 acres of
bottomland and riparian buffer will be protected with a permanent conservation
• easement. Invasive plant species will be removed and all restored areas will be
planted with native vegetation to provide biological diversity. Stream banks will
•
• TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]
•

~ ^ Kimley-Horn
~ and Associates, Inc.
be stabilized using erosion matting, bare-root plantings, and bio-engineering. In
stream structures (rock-vanes, constructed riffles, and log vanes) will be used to
maintain grade, protect banks, and enhance bed form diversity.
I appreciate your assistance with this matter. If you have any questions regarding
this application, please do not hesitate to contact me at 919.653.5843.
Very truly yours,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
ang
Environmental Scientist

•
•
Version 1.4, 8/18/05
Categorical Exclusion Form for Ecosystem Enhancement Program Projects
.~
Project Name: Wolf Pond Property -Stream Restoration Full Delivery Project
County Name: Union County, North Carolina
EEP Number: D06054-B
Project Sponsor: Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC
Project Contact Name: Norton Webster
Project Contact Address: 2530 Meridian Parkway, Suite 200, Durham, NC 27713
Project Contact E-mail: [e-mail]
EEP Project Manager: Guy Pearce
. - ~ -
The Wolf Pond Property stream restoration site is located 5 miles south of Monroe in Union County, North Carolina
(Figure 1) The Wolf Pond Property site contains two unnamed tributaries (UT 1, UT 2) to Adam's Branch. UT 1 to
dam's Branch is unstable due to agricultural activity and lack of riparian buffer. The channel has failing banks and
's incised in some areas. Heavy sedimentation occurs in many areas of this channel. UT 2 to Adam's Branch has
een impacted by past beaver activity. The stream bed and banks are heavily eroded and the riparian buffer is
egraded.
The plan for the Wolf Pond Property site involves the restoration of dimension, pattern, and longitudinal profile to
pproximately 4,185 lineal- feet of existing. stream channel. -Total stream length within the restoration area will be
~ncreased to approximately 4, 500 linear feet. Approximately 12.4 acres of bottomland and riparian buffer will be
rotected with a permanent conservation easement. Invasive plant species will be removed and all restored areas
ill be planted with native vegetation to provide biological diversity. Stream banks will be stabilized using erosion
acting, bare-root plantings, and bio-engineering. In stream structures (rock-vanes, constructed riffles, and log
vanes) will be used to maintain grade, protect banks, and enhance bed form diversity.
The purpose of this project is to restore the site back to a naturally functioning stream system. Benefits will include
'mproved water quality by reducing sediment load through stabilization and by reducing nutrient input by the addition
f forested riparian buffers. Ultimately, the restoration is being conducted to provide compensatory stream and
wetland mitigation credits for the NCEEP in lieu mitigation fee program. It is anticipated that the project will provide
unctional uplift for the watershed as a whole.
~ - ~
Reviewed By: .~ .
Date EEP Project Manager
Conditional Approved By:
Date For Division Administrator
FHWA
Check this box if there are outstanding issues
Final Approval By:
Date For Division Administrator
FHWA

Version 1.4, 8/18/05

-. ~ ..
Coastal Zone_Management Act (CZMA)
1. Is the project located in a CAMA county? ^Yes
®No
2. Does the project involve ground-disturbing activities within a CAMA Area of Environmental ^Yes
Concern (AEC)? ^No
®N/A
3. Has a CAMA permit been secured? ^Yes
^No
®N/A
4. Has NCDCM agreed that the project is consistent with the NC Coastal Management ^Yes
Program? ^No
®N/A
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and _iability Act(CE RCLA~
1. Is this a "full-delivery" project? ®Yes
^No
2. Has the zoning/land use of the subject property and adjacent properties ever been ^Yes
designated as commercial or industrial? ®No
^N/A
3. As a result of a limited Phase I Site Assessment, are there known or potential hazardous ^Yes
waste sites within or adjacent to the project area? ®No
^ NIA
4. As a result of a Phase I Site Assessment, are there known or potential hazardous waste ^Yes
sites within or adjacent to the project area? ^No
®N/A
5. As a result of a Phase II Site Assessment, are there known or potential hazardous waste ^Yes
sites within the project area? ^No
®N/A
6. Is there an approved hazardous mitigation plan? ^Yes
^No
®N/A
- .,.
National_1~istotic SP_reservatiorf'Act~(SeYct~on'106~
.. .
1. Are there properties listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of Historic ^Yes
Places in the project area? ®No
2. Does the project affect such properties and does the SHPO/THPO concur? ^Yes
^No
®N/A
3. If the effects are adverse, -have they been resolved? ^Yes
^No
®N/A
lJnifo'tm Relocation Assistance and Real Property-Acquisition Policies'Aet (lJniform.Act).
1. Is this a "full-delivery" project? ®Yes
^No
2. Does the project require the acquisition of reef estate? ®Yes
^No
^N/A
3. Was the property acquisition completed prior to the intent to use federal funds? ^Yes
®No
^N/A
4. Has the owner of the property been informed: ®Yes
"` prior to making an offer that the agency does not have condemnation authority; and ^No
* what the fair market value is believed to be? ^N/A

Version 1.4_ R/1 R/~5
. ~

-. ~
,., ~. , -
American Indian Religious Free~dam Act,`(AIRFA~
_ ,r_ .
1. Is the project located in a county claimed as "territory" by the Eastern Band of Cherokee ^Yes
Indians? ®No
2. Is the site of religious importance to American Indians? ^Yes
^No
®N/A
3. Is the project listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of Historic Places? ^Yes
^No
®N/A
4. Have the effects of the project on this site been considered? ^Yes
^No
®N/A
Antiquities Acf fAA)
1. Is the project located on Federal lands? ^Yes
®No
2. Will there be loss or destruction of historic or prehistoric ruins, monuments or objects of ^Yes
antiquity? ^No
®N/A
3. Will a permit from the appropriate Federal agency be required? ^Yes
^No
®N/A
4. Has a permit been obtained? ^Yes
^No
®N/A
' 'Archaeological Resources Protection'Act (ARPA)
_,:. _ .. _
1. Is the project located on federal or Indian lands (reservation)? ^Yes
®No
2. Will there be a loss or destruction of archaeological resources? ^Yes
^No
®N/A
3. Will a permit from the appropriate Federal agency be required? ^Yes
^No
®N/A
4. Has a permit been obtained? ^Yes
^No
®N/A
__
Endangered SpeciesAet'(ESA)
1. Are federal Threatened and Endangered species and/or Designated Critical Habitat listed for ®Yes
the county? ^No
2. Is Designated Critical Habitat or suitable habitat present for listed species? ®Yes
^No
^N/A
3. Are T&E species present or is the project being conducted in Designated Critical Habitat? ^Yes
®No
^N/A
4. Is the project "likely to adversely affect" the species and/or "likely to adversely modify" ^Yes
Designated Critical Habitat? ^No
®N/A
5. Does the. USFWS/NOAH-Fisheries concur in the effects determination? ^Yes
^No
®N/A

V,.....:.._ t w oitnmc
aU1V11 l.-T~ V/ 1 V/ V/
6. Has the USFWS/NOAA-Fisheries rendered a "jeopardy" determination?
^Yes
^No
®N/A
Executive Order 13l)D7 (Indian Sacred Sites)
1. Is the project located on Federal lands that are within a county claimed as "territory" by the ^Yes
EBCI? ®No
2. Has the EBCI indicated that Indian sacred sites may be impacted by the proposed project? ^Yes
^No
®N/A
3. Have accommodations been made for access to and ceremonial use of Indian sacred sites? ^Yes
^No
®N/A
Farmland Protection-Policy Act (FPPA)
1. Will real estate be acquired? ®Yes
^No
2. Has NRCS determined that the project contains prime, unique, statewide or locally important ®Yes
farmland?
^No
^ N/A
3. Has the completed Form AD-1006 been submitted to NRCS? ®Yes
^No
^ N/A
_
Fish ahd'Wldlfe Coordination Act (FWCAI
1. Will the project impound, divert, channel deepen, or otherwise control/modify any water body? (]Yes
^No
2. Have the USFWS and the NCWRC been consulted? ®Yes
^No
• ^ N/A
Land ancJ Vllater Conservation Fun"d Act (Se`c'tion `fi(f))
1. Will the project require the conversion of such property to a use other than public, outdoor ^Yes
recreation?
®No
2. Has the NPS approved of the conversion? ^Yes
^No
®N/A
Magnuson-Stevens':"Fishery Conservafiori and Management~Act'{Esse'nfial'Fish'Hat iltat)
1. Is the project located in an estuarine system? Yes
®No
2. Is suitable habitat present for EFH-protected species? ^Yes
^No
®N/A
3. Is sufficient design information available to make a determination of the effect of the project on ^Yes
EFH?
^No
®N/A
4. Will the project adversely affect EFH? ^Yes
^No
®N/A
5. Has consultation with NOAA-Fisheries occurred? ^Yes
^No
®N/A
MigCator~r~Brd Treaty Act~(MBT4) -
1. Does the USFWS have any recommendations with the project relative to the MBTA? ^Yes
®No
2. Have the USFWS recommendations been incorporated? ^Yes
^No
®N/A
_
Wilderness Act;'
1. Is the project in a Wilderness area? ^Yes
®No

VPYCInn 1 d R/1 Q/(15
2. Has a special use permit and/or easement been obtained from the maintaining federal agency? ^Yes
^No
®N/A

Title ~ Site Location
Prepared For:
Project Wolf Pond Site
® Union County, North Carolina
Date Project Number Figure
9/27/06 012620006 1
T:\pn\OI26?0006 Wolf Pond Restoration\Categorical Exclusion\Piwres\Wulf Pond Figures.doc Przpared by Tommy Cousins ~~~~ ~n~~ ,m

/ ~ 1 J t
'\~
J ~ x- ~.
l-~
f t,~,, ~
' ~
'
~
bar
j
,
/f
/,` S
7
`
C~ 6«
'
. ~ C- !!/ /111
_ f{~
,~~~.~
Q. ~ ~ ~~ L
. , .x

:~~~,
1 {
~ c-a
~
~ ~_
~
.
f y
f ,
~ t _
SC3±~• '•_._,-~
t t/' r J ~fi
~ L
~ yi s~~ rJt
'
~
~
~
'
i 'f t+ ~
',
_
__ ._J i
t
'!
~_ C.
i
1
; ~ ~ .
..

,` +
=> 4 i-.,
/, ^
I
~...
P
..
`~
.
~~
-

~
\
~ _
j,
Y~
--.
..
o
l y S
I
.~
+:' ~ r ' ',
~
~ r
-
1
~~
~
~
~'
'
'
~'~
~~~1
1
~, -.
~
,r
.
'
% ~
~ ~ ~
,~
t ~
~
,
~ ~%` r.-~ ~' t t\ ~ ` ~ t , ~~ ~~ f a dal, _Y.` \fr ~~__
,
~, r - ! i
r : ~,
•
`~ /r
._ . _ ~. ~ t
_: .. .
.. -~ -
~ ~ ~ fi f ~y, a, tf~ ~l 1 r ~/ L; ~ ~ " ~ ~~ ~ 4 ~
_ t ~~ () ~,,/{~'v' f _`,3yA ~ ~`,/.~, .- ~ y r. .1 }tJJ ~T Y ~ f >
j }
.- ~ ~
~ ,
r ~
I~~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~
C
;1 ~
~
~ ' ~
~
~'
.
~
,
.
,- .
~
.
,
.gat
i[ ~ k r ti / . i ~ ~ •_• i ~ .A
. ~ ~ ~' _,~ ~ ~ . ~• ,~~•. , '~~~ ~ j
EJ z. s ~. ~'-~'~ .;
'~ n .fir rr ',"~ ~ ~`~ (} ll _J t ~ ~~~ .:_ ~~t~ ~; :f£iM~3 ;~. j ~ ~ r i1tl { (.
• ~ - ~:_ ~ r _ - 7 t ;
+ S
~/
~ ' •
"
r
l ~d9
~~
~
~
/
~ ~ fit
A
5 r
~ 1 ~ ~
~
.~~1
\
,
"~
`
y t
~ \ l
/
~
-
\ }
__ ) ~ .r
y~,,.~ `
~7 ~ °' _ 7
~•~.
~
t
:.
,~ _.~
r ~ ,
.~ 5 '
v_.
~ ~ .
• ~ ~
~
~
,, ,
~ r ~ 6
t
~
Legend _ ` r ~ ~ -.. 1 ` _
1
Approximate Easement Boundary ~= ~
-.
, ~
' ~ ~
,,
,
, ~ ~
,
Pro
e
Bo
~
~'a
p
rty
undary
r

Title Topographic Map (USGS Quad Waxhaw, 1988)
Prepared For:
Pt'oject
Wolf Pond Site
Union County, North Carolina

Date Project Number Figure
9/27/06 012620006 Z
T:\pn\Ol?620006 Wolf Pond Resmration\Categorical Exclusion\FigureslWOlfPnnd Figures.doc Prepared by Tommy Cousins ~~~ ~ i~

T ~pn\Ol?fi20006 Wolf Pond Rzstoration\Cate~orical EzclusionlFigures\Wolf Pond Figures.doc Prepared by Tommy Cousins G~~ Kn0°~"u'"
~ bn.im

Photograph 1. Upper reach of UT 1 to Adams Branch
.~. ~.
`~. ~ ~
~ ~- ~: ' ~ 1~~°~.~, 1,
Photograph 2. Incised channel, UT 2 with Chinese privet (Gigustf-una sinertse)
Title Site Photographs
Prepazed For:
= Project Wolf Pond Site
Union County, North Carolina
Date Project Number Page
9/27/06 012620006 1
T:ApnA012620006 Wolf Pond RestorationACategoricel Exclusio~r~Photos\Wolf Pond_Photos.doc Prepared by Laura Lang
•
~ ~~
~ ~+•. ice.

'1~ 1 `: ..ter S~ .~ ~ -1 i^ . . P ~
y t r
I~r~ J x ,, ~ ~,. ~ ~ '~~t ~n~3r~l, ~
7 ~
S 3
'c
~. iii

. ~ .
' s ~q
Photograph 3. UT 2 Channel

r,, r
j'
~

~ ~ ~ ~ a
~4 yh" r $ s
^ a ~x}R ik ~'`:~rlYr~ 1~ ~ arty ~z ~ ~'
,~~
.s -Y.,
4r~~ 4y S { k 4
'~ 3~~~ ~~ Et~. v"~T
~~$~'Fi~ _
~~~~ - M1 F r~.~ "'^t~ 3 11~µ
~ _ ~~c t~~ i
'~ Ti
~ s
t .~, i ~ ~ fry:
} r^
[ ; ~,
~ F~a
~'Q~
~ :.. ~
~ r
r" 2e
s i~~ ^v,; . R
~
~,^„
-Y
a f'~3~ pe .-.,~ ^+,'~? ~
;r.
i ~ ~ '~{'Y ?s. .. '7k' ~x 'M:"fS~ M .~.~
~ x
~?a y~q'yT7€
. `4!,."1" 'Ff
~ di-
/
u
~ 1
~
.:_, ,~
*_r ~ f. ~. C~
(~E
RtF~ l1~ h
~
DS ~ ~. .r+- ,. i ,1 i f ~Se v 1
Y3' .-fit"
`
l4
'~
L
`
`
-4i
.
.
ay
} 3f4#-r
i
i ~
.
y
µ~
Z~ rptf 2:s Y~`Ffy~ Wia~ ,fN ~3* ~~~~ ~~5~ ~ -~
w`F~" s a AAbApo .~# ~rs `k '~l s ,: ~` y F :a ~ ~ 't~`'2 'a~/
12fSF' h`r~~~~Ar '"1~ ~ Po ~ f ~ ~ °iC'_. e~ ~fc'/' .~ ~ ~' ^a ~ ~Q 6~h H
~~.'S` ~3~yf d ~1~ +~.ydy i~r yf
r` 1 ~~ '/
l ~ 1.
:~' { ~ /
J
Photograph 4. Lower section of UT 2
Title Site Photographs
Prepazzd For:
Project Wolf Pond Site
Union County, North Carolina

Date Project Number Page
9/27/06 012620006 2
T:\pn\012620006 Wolf Pond Restoration\Categorical Exclusion\Photos\Wolf Pond_Photos.doc Preparzd by Laura Lang ~~~~ ~x ~.~,x.

Memorandum
To: Donnie Brew
Federal Highway Administration
From: Laura Lang
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Date: October 30, 2006
Subject: Threatened and Endangered Species
Wolf Pond Property Stream Restoration Site
Union County, NC
This memo is intended to document the absence/presence of threatened and endangered
species or suitable habitat at the Wolf Pond Property Stream Restoration Site.
~ The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) database (updated April 27, 2006) lists
three federally endangered species for Union County, NC: the Carolina heelsplitter
• (Lasmigona decorata), Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii), and Schweinitz's sunflower
• (Helianthus schweinitzii). Review of the Natural Heritage Program (NIP) database of
documented occurrences did not reveal the presence of any of these species within aone-
mile radius of the proposed mitigation site.
Carolina Heelsplitter (Lasmi~ona decorata)
The Carolina heelsplitter is a medium-sized mussel with an ovate, trapezoidal shaped,
greenish-brown to dark brown shell. This species has been reduced to six known
populations, two of which occur in Union County. The Carolina heelsplitter has been
• found in a variety of substrates including mud, muddy sand, or muddy gravel along
stable, well-shaded stream banks. The decline of the Carolina heelsplitter has been
attributed to a variety of factors including siltation and channelization due to agricultural
and forestry practices, road construction, impoundments and streambank scouring caused
• by storm water runoff.
There are two unstable streams proposed for restoration at the Wolf Pond Property site
that have been affected by sedimentation and channelization associated with past and
~ present agricultural activity. These stream channels are incised, have failing banks, and in
• some areas, completely lack a riparian buffer. Suitable habitat for the Carolina
heelsplitter is not present at this site.
No occurrences of the Carolina heelsplitter have been documented in the NHP database
• within aone-mile radius of the proposed mitigation site and presence of this species has
not been observed by KHA or EBX biologists.
~ BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT.
1

Michaux's Sumac (Rhus michauxir~
Michaux's sumac is a rhizomatous, densely hairy, deciduous shrub, usually 1 to 3 feet
high. Small, greenish-yellow to white flowers usually occur from June to July. The fruit,
a small, red drupe, is produced through the months of August to October. Michaux's
sumac grows in sandy or rocky open woods and survives best in areas where some form
of disturbance, such as fire, has provided an open area. Thirty one of the thirty six known
extant populations exist in North Carolina, twelve of which occur on highway rights-of-
way, roadsides, or on the edges of artificially maintained clearings.
The Wolf Pond property site has been under active, intensive agricultural use for an
extended period of time. Much of the area around the streams proposed for mitigation is
open, active agricultural field void of any native vegetation. Where buffer does exist, it is
only a narrow, insignificant, herbaceous fringe of invasive species. The frequent
disturbances associated with active agricultural use across the site and along the proposed
restoration corridor makes the site unfavorable for Michaux's sumac. Suitable habitat for
this species does not occur in this area.
No occurrences of Michaux's sumac have been documented in the NHP database within
a one-mile radius of the proposed mitigation site and presence of this species has not
been observed by KHA or EBX biologists.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT.
Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitziil
Schweinitz's sunflower is a perennial herb, usually 3 to 6 feet tall with yellow flowers
which occur in late August to October. Schweinitz's sunflower is found in relatively open
habitats such as roadsides, maintained rights-of--way, early successional fields, and
woodland openings. Generally, Schweinitz's sunflower occurs on shallow, poorly
drained, clayey and/or rocky soils.
Marginal habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower exists along the agricultural field edges at
the Wolf Pond property; however the frequent disturbance of the site makes these areas
unfavorable. The majority of this site is used as open active agricultural fields, void of
any native vegetation. Site soils are predominantly deep and moderately to well-drained.
No occurrences of Schweinitz's sunflower have been documented in the NHP database
within cone-mile radius of the proposed mitigation site and presence of this species has
not been observed by KHA or EBX biologists during site investigations or plant surveys
conducted in October 2006 during Schweinitz's sunflower flowering season.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT.
2

U.S. Department of Agriculture
~ ~ FARMLAND CONVERSION IMPACT RATING
~~
ART I (To be completed by Federal Agency) Date Of Land Evaluation Request g/24/06
• Name Of Project Wolf Pond Property Stream Restoration Federal Agency Involved FHWA
• Proposed land Use Stream Restoration Easement County And State Union County, North Carolina
AFtTII (To~~jfe~pmple'tec! ky NRCS) Da[e Request RecPivc,~~y NRt'"S x '`'~ ~' ' ~ s'~

Does the site contain prime unique; statewide or local Important farmland? ~ Yes No
• '? t 'h 'Jd .~Ay - _
Aces Irnq~b d Av~r3gearm Size
' ~~If no the FPPA~ does not apply=,do not complete additional parts of#his forrrl).~ [~ [~
_.. ,._ ~ ~,S~j %9C~-s

MaiorCrop(s) Fannable Land InGovt Juri~~~~f~on
• ~ -~ ~ / C /
°
~
~~~ _ _
Amount Of Farmland As Defined m-FPPA

"
' °
r~
Acres ~.~.~(!js/
T C~ Acres ~
'~~ ~
~°~~~
x~
~ fu ~/stem Us~~ N am
• Name pf~
Of~Logl S
te Assessn?~nt ~
t mat
t?
d `I
f~et' 'D
f
~
CS
t
g
em t
a
t at
;~ pn,
~
.
e
-
~
?
"
-
`
~
.3e-~ ...~..tb. ~~2 SA
~eF
~t>F'» d Y.~ s~2..-.. ['E.?t~ oe :`.. ~..
~- t .
-
:s
.. s3'%~iit~'~i .,. A~
ART III (To be completed by Federal Agenc
) Aftemative Site Ratin
y Site A Site B Site C Site D
A. Total Acres To Be Converted Directly 12.4
B. Total Acres To Be Converted Indirectly
C. Total Acres In Site 12.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
~~~ , ~' led b NRCS r` Fd fEvalua oil 1 O rf~ "~~'
/~ Tz') ,~ 9 .~~ Y ~ ,~) a1,4 `t ~ ref rmat~on -~~ ~~ r'
L s~ ~~ ~

-
~
~, ~ , ~ "" ~' .~, ~>, y jsi ,
~~ t ~ eAnclGtlniAue~Fa`mland F ~:~~~~
~
~ '
-~~
'`~ ,~' p~~ -
.
•~ ~, ewrde'And ~~ocat ]mpo a ~~'~~ and x`~ a a t ~ ,;
~ ~
d
I
oCi`
l
'
T~~'
'
" .~
..
~~ ~
~ '~ ~~~
~ '~
, ,
<
r
an
,
n,,C;
~y~0
It
Con
. ,fc~
0 1
Vii.<~
~r
: ~ ~ .x "} x~~ ~{n .
,..,~ ~ ~
_ _ ,
~ ~
rD~ ~.f`a~r!larj' I~ Gout~duO;sc~,lciion~ I ; g ~~ ~..
x. ~
a
~ o
~
_ ~ '' ~
} ~
p d~ti~i ~ (~`~~~ n Eva iat~ Cr ef~,q ~ a ~ . `~

sµ
ART VI (To be completed by Federal Agency) Maximum
ite Assessment Criteria (These criteria are explained in 7 CFR 658.5(6) Points
1. Area In Nonurban Use
2. Perimeter In Nonurban Use (,
3. Percent Of Site .Being Farmed
4. Protection Provided By State And Local Government
5. Distance From Urban Builtup Area
6. Distance To Urban Support Services ~
7. Size Of Present Farm Unit Compared To Average
8. Creation Of Nonfalmable Farmland
9. Availability Of Farm Support Services
10. On-Farm Investments
11. Effects Of Conversion On Farm Support Services ~
12. Compatibility With Existing Agricultural Use
TOTAL SITE ASSESSMENT POINTS 160 0 '7 0 0 0
ART VII (To be completed by Federal Agency)
Relative Value Of Farmland (From Part V) 100 8 W 0 0 0
Total Site Assessment (From Part VI above or a focal
160
0 ~ ~
0
0
0
site assessment)
TOTAL POINTS (Total ofabove 2lines) 260 0 I 0 0 0

ite Selected: ~~~y~
Date Of Selection q ~ ~"'~ Was A Local Site Assessment Used?
Yes ~ No
season For Selecfion: ~ /
• Sim ~ ~Q6 ~(ec-~ (~ca.ccsv ~ ~ I~~cs
• ,
• a-(n~ owl avac ~a,lOl~ st ~
y
•
ee instructions on reverse side) Forth AD-1006 (10-83)
his form was electronically produced by NaGanal Production Services Staff -
•
•

~ ^ Kimley-Horn
~ antl Associates, Inc.
August 24, 2006
Mr. Mark Ferguson
NRCS Soil Conservationist
3230-B Presson Road
Monroe, NC 28112
Re: Wolf Pond Property Stream Restoration Site,
Monroe, Union County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Ferguson:
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (KHA) is writing this letter on behalf of our
client, NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP), to request input from your
agency regarding a proposed stream restoration site located five miles south of
Monroe in Union County and potential effects it may have on farmland
resources. We have completed sections I and III of Form AD-1006. A location
map and site overview map are also included.
I appreciate your help with this matter. Please either mail or fax [phone])
your reply to my attention. If you have any questions regarding this request,
please feel free to call me at 919.653.5843.
Very truly yours,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Laura Lang
Environmental Scientist
^
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]
^
P.o. Bax 33068
Raleigh, North Carolina
27636.3068

~ ~ ~~o- RECEIVED
~ ~
• ~ _ ~ AU G 0 7 2006
~ ~~ ;,,~~ KimleY-Hom ~ Assoc.
~ Civll Departrr-ent
• North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
• State Historic Preservation Office
• Peter B. Sandbeck, Administrator
• Michael F. Easley, Governor Office of Archives and History
I.isbeth C. Evans, Secretary Division of Historical Resources
• Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary David Brook, Director
August 2, 2006
• Laura Lang
Kitnley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
PO Box 33068
• Raleigh, NC 27636-3068
Re: Wolf Pond Property Stream Restoration Site, Union County, ER 06-1949
• Dear Ms. Lang:
Thank you for your letter of July 20, 2006, concerning the above project.
• We have conducted a review of the proposed undertaking and are aware of no historic resources that would be
• affected by the .project. Therefore, we have no comment on the undertaking as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
• Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations fox Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
• Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
• contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763. In all future
• communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
eter Sandbeck
~.
Location Mailing Address Telephone/Fax
ADMINISTRATION 507 N. Blount Street, Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 [phone]/733-8653
• RESTORATION S15 N. Blount Street, Raleigh NC 4617 Ma+l Service Centet, Raleigh NC 27699-0617 (919)733-G547/715~1801
• SURVEY & PLANNING Sly N. Blount Street, Raleigh, NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 [phone]/715-4801

^ ~ ^ Kimley-Horn
~ and Associates, Inc.
July 20, 2006
Ms. Renee Gledhill-Earley
Environmental Review Coordinator
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
515 Blount Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Re: Wolf Pond Property Stream Restoration Site
Full Delivery Project
Union County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Gledhill-Earley:
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. is writing this letter on behalf of our client,
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC, to request a no effect determination
from your agency regarding a proposed stream and wetland mitigation project.
The Wolf Pond Property Stream Restoration Site is located 5 miles south of
Monroe, Union County, North Carolina (Figure 1). The Wolf Pond Property site
contains two unnamed tributaries (UT 1, UT 2) to Adam's Branch. UT 1 to
Adam's Branch is unstable due to agricultural activity and lack of riparian buffer.
The channel has failing banks and is incised in some areas. Heavy sedimentation
occurs in many areas of this channel. UT 2 to Adam's Branch has been impacted
by past beaver activity. The stream bed and banks are heavily eroded and the
riparian buffer is degraded.
The purpose of this project is to restore the site back to a naturally functioning
stream system. The plan for the Wolf Pond Property site involves the restoration
of dimension, pattern, and longitudinal profile to approximately 4,185 linear feet
of existing stream channel. Total stream length within the restoration area will be
increased to approximately 4,500 linear feet. Approximately 12.4 acres of
bottomland and riparian buffer will be protected with a permanent conservation
easement. Invasive plant species will be removed and all restored areas will be
planted with native vegetation to provide biological diversity. Stream banks will
be stabilized using erosion matting, bare-root plantings, and bio-engineering. In
stream structures (rock-vanes, constructed riffles, and log vanes) will be used to
maintain grade, protect banks, and enhance bed form diversity.
^
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]
^
P.O. Box 33068
Raleigh, North Carolina
27636-3068

~ Kimley-Horn
~ and Associates, Inc.
I appreciate your help with this matter. Please either mail or fax [phone])
your reply to my attention. If you have any questions regarding this request,
please call me at [phone].
Very truly yours,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
aura Lang
Environmental Scientist

North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Richard B. Hamilton, Executive Director
8 September 2006
Ms. Laura Lang
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 33068
Raleigh, NC 27636-3068
Subject: Wolf Pond Property Stream Restoration Site, Union County, North Carolina.
Dear Ms. Lang;
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission have reviewed the subject
document. Our comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d) and North Carolina General Statutes
(G.S. 113-131 et seq.).
Kimley-Horn and Associates proposes to restore, using natural channel design, 4,185 linear feet
of two unnamed tributaries to Adams Branch in the Yadkin-Pee Dee River basin. Approximately 12.4
acres of bottomland and riparian buffer will be protected with a permanent conservation easement.
Invasive plant species will be removed and restored areas will be planted with native vegetation. Stream
banks will be stabilized using erosion matting, bare-root plantings, and bio-engineering. In-stream
structures such as rock-vanes will be used to maintain grade, protect banks and enhance bed form
diversity.
There are records for the federal species of concern and state special concern Carolina darter
(Etheostoma Collis) in Richardson Creek downstream of the project site.
Stream and wetland restoration projects often improve water quality and aquatic habitat.
Provided measures are taken to minimize erosion and sedimentation from construction restoration
activities, we do not anticipate the project to result in significant adverse impacts to aquatic and terrestrial
wildlife resources.
Thank you for the opportunity to review this project. Ifyou require further assistance, please
contact our office at [phone].
Sincerely,
Shari L. Bryant
Piedmont Region Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries 1721 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Z •d SZ9L-61~b-9EE ~.ueRug •1 •S dLT =ZT 90 80 daS

®~ ^ Kimley-Horn
~ antl Associates, Inc.
August 14, 2006
Ms. Shannon Deaton
NCWRC Division of Inland Fisheries
1721 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Re: Wolf Pond Property Stream Restoration Site
Full Delivery Project
Union County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Deaton:
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. is writing this letter on behalf of our client,
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC, to request a no effect determination
from your agency regarding a proposed stream and wetland mitigation project.
The Wolf Pond Property Stream Restoration Site is located 5 miles south of
Monroe in Union County, North Carolina (Figure 1). The Wolf Pond Property
site contains two unnamed tributaries (UT 1, UT 2) to Adam's Branch. UT 1 to
Adam's Branch is unstable due to agricultural activity and lack of riparian buffer.
The, channel has failing banks and is incised in some areas. Heavy sedimentation
occurs in many areas of this channel. UT 2 to Adam's Branch has been impacted
by past beaver activity. The stream bed and banks are heavily eroded and the
riparian buffer is degraded.
The purpose of this project is to restore the site back to a naturally functioning
stream system. The plan for the Wolf Pond Property site involves the restoration
of dimension, pattern, and longitudinal profile to approximately 4,185 linear feet
of existing stream channel. Total stream length within the restoration area will be
increased to approximately 4,500 linear feet. Approximately 12.4 acres of
bottomland and riparian buffer will be protected with a permanent conservation
easement. Invasive plant species will be removed and all restored areas will be
planted with native vegetation to provide biological diversity. Stream banks will
be stabilized using erosion matting, bare-root plantings, and bio-engineering. In
stream structures (rock-vanes, constructed riffles, and log vanes) will be used to
maintain grade, protect banks, and enhance bed form diversity.
^
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]
^
P.O. Box 33068
Raleigh, North Carolina
27636-3068

~ Kimley-Horn
^
® ~
~
and Associates, Inc.
r

We would appreciate a reply from you as soon as possible. Please either mail or
f
919
6 •
ax (
-
77-2050) your reply to my attention. If you have any questions
regarding this request, please call me at [phone]. a
Very truly yours,

KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. •

ura L
Environmental Scientist

o •

•
•
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Cazolina 28801
August 22, 2006
Ms. Laura Lang
Environmental Scientist
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 33068
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3068
Dear Ms. Lang:
R~cFevFc
AUG 2 >~ 2006
KIMLEY HORN
ENVIR.
Subject: Wolf Pond Property Stream Restoration Site, South of the Town of Monroe, Union
County, North Carolina
• In your letter dated July 20, 2006, you requested our comments on the subject project. (Please
note that your letter was sent to -our Raleigh Field Office. In the future you would receive
our responses in a more timely fashion if requests were sent to the appropriate office. To
assist you with this, enclosed is a list of North Carolina's counties showing which ones are
• handled by our respective offices in North Carolina.) We have reviewed the information you
presented. and are providing the following comments in accordance with the provisions of the
Fish and.Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 661-667e), and section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act).
• .Project Description. According to the information provided, your client (Environmental Banc
and Exchange; LLC) is proposing to conduct complete stream restoration projects on two
unnamed tributaries to Adam's Branch. Unnamed tributary #1 to Adam's Branch is unstable due
to agricultural activity and the lack of a riparian buffer. The channel has failing banks, and
• heavy sedimentation occurs in many areas of this channel. Unnamed tributary #2 to Adam's
Branch has been impacted by beaver activity. The streambed and banks are heavily eroded, and
the riparian buffer is degraded. The purpose of these projects is to restore the sites back to
naturally functioning stream systems. The plan for the Wolf Pond Property site will involve the
• restoration of dimension, pattern, and longitudinal profile to about 4,185 linear feet (lf) of stream
• channel. About 12.4 acres of bottomland and riparian buffer will be protected with a permanent
conservation easement. Invasive plant species will be removed, and all restored areas will be
~ replanted with native riparian vegetation. Stream banks will be stabilized using erosion-control
matting, bare-root plantings, and bioengineering.

Federally Listed Species. Based on the project location and pictures obtained from the Union
County GIS web site, there appears to be suitable habitat for the federally endangered
Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii). Your letter did not indicate whether surveys
have been conducted for this or other rare plant species within the project impact area. Unless an
area has been specifically surveyed for this listed species, a survey should be conducted to ensure
that it is not inadvertently lost. Though we agree that Schweinitz's sunflower is not likely to
occur in the disturbed agricultural fields or along the stream, we do believe potential suitable
habitat exists along the edges of the fields and riparian buffer. These areas may not be included
in the project plans, but they should be surveyed before any equipment/construction staging or
invasive plant eradication activities take place. Schweinitz's sunflower occurs in relatively open
habitats-road, power line, and other maintained rights-of--way; early successional fields; forest
ecotonal margins; forest clearings; etc. The species thrives in full sun but also grows in the light
-shade of open stands of.oak-pine-hickory. Schweinitz's sunflower generally occurs on soils
characterized as moist to dryish clays, clay-foams, or sandy-clay foams that often have high
gravel content. The species is known from a variety of soil types, including Iredell (Fine,
Montmorillonitic, Thermic Typic Hapluduff), Enon (Fine, Mixed, Thermic Ultic Hapludalfj, and
Cecil (Clayey, Kaolinitic, Thermic Typic Hapludult). Schweinitz's sunflower is difficult to
identify at any time, but even more so outside the flowering season of late August to October, so
we recommend that surveys for this species be conducted during this period.
In accordance with the Act, it is the responsibility of the appropriate federal agency or its
designated representative to review its activities or programs and to identify any such activities
or programs that may affect endangered or threatened species or their habitats. If it is
determined that the proposed activity may adversely affect any species federally listed as
endangered or threatened, formal consultation with this office must be initiated.
We recommend that you contact Ms. Linda Pearsall, Director of the North Carolina Natural
Heritage Program, for further information about North Carolina's rare species and/or unique and
rare habitat types located in the subject project areas. Her mailing address is Natural Heritage
Program, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, 1601 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601.
Project Recommendations. Your letter did not mention the width of the riparian buffers that
will bepreserved/restored along the streams and protected within the conservation easement.
We recommend that riparian buffers (a minimum of 100 feet wide along perennial streams and
50 feet wide along intermittent streams) be created and/or maintained along all aquatic areas.
Riparian buffers provide travel corridors and habitat for wildlife displaced by development. In
addition, riparian buffers protect water quality by stabilizing stream banks, filtering storm-water
runoff, and providing habitat for aquatic and fisheries resources.
We are pleased with this proposed restoration effort. However, at this stage and without more
specifics about restoration plans, reference reaches, and stream designs, it is difficult for us to
fully assess and comment on the proposed project. We request the opportunity to be involved
throughout the restoration process, review all future design plans, and make recommendations
about the entire restoration design as more information becomes available. We are available to

assist with the selection of reference sites for the stream and riparian restoration designs and
subsequent monitoring. As a measure of restoration success, we recommend sampling fish,
benthic macroinvertebrates, and water quality before and after project completion.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide these comments early in your planning efforts. Please
keep us informed of the progress of this project. If we can be of further assistance or if you have
any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Bryan Tompkins of our staff at
828/258-3939, Ext. 240. In any future correspondence concerning this project, please reference
our Log Number 4-2-06-381.
Sincerely,
Brian P. Cole
Field Supervisor
Enclosure

®~ ^ Kimley-Horn
~ antl Associates, Inc.
July 20, 2006
Mr. Dale Suiter
United States Fish and Wildlife Service
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Re: Wolf Pond Property Stream Restoration Site
Full Delivery Project
Union County, North Carolina
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. is writing this letter on behalf of our client,
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC, to request a no effect determination
from your agency regarding a proposed stream and wetland mitigation project.
The Wolf Pond Property Stream Restoration Site is located 5 miles south of
Monroe, Union County, North Carolina (Figure 1). The Wolf Pond Property site
contains two unnamed tributaries (UT 1, UT 2) to Adam's Branch. UT 1 to
Adam's Branch is unstable due to agricultural activity and lack of riparian buffer.
The channel has failing banks and is incised in some areas. Heavy sedimentation
occurs in many areas of this channel. UT 2 to Adam's Branch has been impacted
by past beaver activity. The stream bed and banks are heavily eroded and the
riparian buffer is degraded.
The purpose of this project is to restore the site back to a naturally functioning
stream system. The plan for the Wolf Pond Property site involves the restoration
of dimension, pattern, and longitudinal profile to approximately 4,185 linear feet
of existing stream channel. Total stream length within the restoration area will be
increased to approximately 4,500 linear feet. Approximately 12.4 acres of
bottomland and riparian buffer will be protected with a permanent conservation
easement. Invasive plant species will be removed and all restored areas will be
planted with native vegetation to provide biological diversity. Stream banks will
be stabilized using erosion matting, bare-root plantings, and bio-engineering. In
stream structures (rock-vanes, constructed riffles, and log vanes) will be used to
maintain grade, protect banks, and enhance bed form diversity.
According to the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, there are three endangered
species and no threatened species potentially occurring in Union County. The
endangered species are: the Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata),
^
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]
^
P.O. Box 33068
Raleigh, North Carolina
27636-3068

®~ ^ Kimley-Horn
~ and Associates, Inc.
Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii), and Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus
schweinitzii). Review of the Natural Heritage Program database of documented
occurrences did not reveal the presence of any of the aforementioned species
within aone-mile radius of the proposed mitigation site. The entire Wolf Pond
Property site has been under intensive agricultural use for an extended period of
time. The frequent disturbance along the proposed restoration corridor makes it
unlikely that any of the listed plant species occur in this area. The degraded
condition of the channel makes it unlikely that the heelsplitter occurs in this
stream system.
Specifically, we would like information that the area described above -
• is not located in an officially designated wildlife refuge
will not affect listed threatened or endangered species or designated
critical habitats; or will not jeopardize the continued existence of any
proposed endangered or threatened species or likely to result in the
destruction or adverse modification of proposed critical habitats, as
determined by the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to the Endangered
Species Act of 1973.
We would appreciate a reply from you as soon as possible. Please either mail or
fax [phone]) your reply to my attention. If you have any questions
regarding this request, please call me at [phone].
Very truly yours,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
v
aura Lang
Environmental Scientist
v

R®Environmental
Data Resources Inc
The EDR Radius Map
with GeoCheck®
Wolf Pond
Highway 207
MONROE, NC 28112
Inquiry Number: 1736016.18s
August 15, 2006
The Standard in
Environmental Risk
Management Information
440 Wheelers Farms Road
Milford, Connecticut 06461
Nationwide Customer Service
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Internet: www.edrnet.com
rotor-sro-~

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
PAGE
Executive Summary------------------------------------------ ------------- ES1
Overview Map----------------------------------------------- ------------ 2
Detail Map-------------------------------------------------- ------------ 3
Map Findings Summary--------------------------------------- ------------- 4
Map Findings----------------------------------------------- ------------- 6
Orphan Summary-------------------------------------------- ------------- 9
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ GR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum_________________________ _________________. A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary__________________________ _________________. A-2
Physical Setting Source Map______________________________ __________________ A-7
Physical Setting Source Map Findings_______________________ _________________ A-8
Physical Setting Source Records Searched___________________ _________________. A-10
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer -Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources rgeasonably available to Eppnvironmental Data
other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMP I~D IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORTroEN IRONMENTALexist from
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2006 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources. Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the ro art of their res active owners.
TC1736016.18s Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-05) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of
environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
HIGHWAY 207
MONROE, NC 28112
C~ORDIN4TFS
Latitude (North):
Longitude (West):
Universal Tranven
UTM X (Meters):
UTM Y (Meters):
Elevation:
34.894400 - 34° 53' 39.8"
80.554100 - 80° 33' 14.8"
~e Mercator: Zone 17
540742.4
3861226.0
611 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map: 34080-H5 MONROE, NC
Most Recent Revision: 1988
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
FEDERAL RECORDS
NPL______________________ ___Natlonal Priority List
Proposed NPL___________ ___froposed National Priority List Sites
Delisted NPL_____________ __.Natlonal Priority List Deletions
NPL RECOVERY__________ __. Federal Superfund Liens
CERCLIS__________________ __.Comprehenslve Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information
System
CERC-NFRAP_____________ __. CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned
CORRACTS_______________ ___Correctlve Action Report
RCRA-TSDF_______________ __ Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information
RCRA-LQG________________ __ Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information
TC1736016.18s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

•
•
•
•
•
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RCRA-SQG___________ _______ Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information
ERNS__________________ ______ Emergency Response Notification System
HMIRS_________________ ______ Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
US ENG CONTROLS__ ______. Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROL___ _______Sltes with Institutional Controls
DOD___________________ ______. Department of Defense Sites
FUDS__________________ ______ Formerly Used Defense Sites
US BROWNFIELDS____ ______ AListing of Brownfields Sites
CONSENT_____________ ______ Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
ROD___________________ ______. Records Of Decision
UMTRA________________ ______ Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
ODI____________________ ______ Open Dump Inventory
TRIS___________________ ______ Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
TSCA__________________ ______ Toxic Substances Control Act
FTTS___________________ ______ FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, &
Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
SSTS__________________ ______. Section 7 Tracking Systems
ICIS____________________ ______ Integrated Compliance Information System
PADS__________________ ______ PCB Activity Database System
MLTS__________________ ______ Material Licensing Tracking System
MINES_________________ ______ Mines Master Index File
FINDS__________________ ______Facllity Index System/Facility Registry System
RAATS_________________ _____. RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
STATE AND LOCAL RECORDS
SHWS__________________ _____.lnactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
NC HSDS_______________ _____ Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
SWF/LF________________ ______ List of Solid Waste Facilities
OLI_____________________ _____.Old Landfill Inventory
LUST TRUST___________ _____.State Trust Fund Database
UST__________________________ Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
AST__________________________RST Database
INST CONTROL_____________. No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
VCP__________________________Responslble Party Voluntary Action Sites
DRYCLEANERS_____________ Drycleaning Sites
BROWNFIELDS______________Brownfields Projects Inventory
NPDES_______________________ NPDES Facility Location Listing
TRIBAL RECORDS
INDIAN RESERV_____________lndian Reservations
INDIAN LUST________________ Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
INDIAN UST_________________. Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS
Manufactured Gas Plants___ FOR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Historical Auto StationsEDR Proprietary Historic Gas Stations
EDR Historical Cleaners_____ EDR Proprietary Historic Dry Cleaners
SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were identified.
TC1736016.18s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on
a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been
differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property.
Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed
data on individual sites can be reviewed.
Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
STATE AND LOCAL RECORDS
IMD: Incident Management Database.
A review of the IMD list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/01/2006 has revealed that there is 1 IMD
site within approximately 1 mile of the target property.
EquaUHigher Elevation Address Dist /Dir Map ID Page
LANEY OIL COJ U-SAVE STATION 4923 WOLF POND ROAD 1/2 - 1 SE 1 6
LUST: The Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incidents Management Database contains an inventory
of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. The data come from the Department of Environment, &
Natural Resources' Incidents by Address.
A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/02/2006 has revealed that there is 1 LUST
site within approximately 1 mile of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation
Address
Dist /Dir Map ID Page
1/2 - 1 SE 1 6
LANEY OIL CO/ U-SAVE STATION 4923 WOLF POND ROAD
Incident Phase: Remedial Action Implemented
TC1736016.18s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped:
Site Name Database(s)
SCOVILL INC/SECURITY PRODUCTS SHWS
SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW LUST, IMD
GREY'S GROCERY LUST, IMD
BOREN BRICK-MONROE LUST, IMD
BOREN BRICK - 5000 H.O. LUST, IMD
YALE NORTON LUST, IMD
MONROE MALL LUST, IMD
BOREN BRICK CO. LUST, IMD
LAKE LEE GROCERY-NCDOT LUST, IMD
ZIPP (CYNTHIA) PROPERTY LUST, IMD
ROY WALTERS PROPERTY/NCDOT#10 LUST, IMD
NCDOT SITE #5/DAVID WILSON PRO LUST, IMD
BARRY HELMS RESIDENCE LUST, IMD
PENEGAR PROPERTY LUST, IMD
NEWELL HELMS RESIDENCE LUST, IMD
FRANKLIN PLAZA LUST, IMD
CHARLOTTE PLASTICS - MONROE LUST, IMD
MONROE OIL PROPERTY LUST, IMD
PRUITT, JOHNNY/NCDOT SITE #15 LUST, IMD
BANTAM MART LUST, IMD
COOK'S GROCERY LUST TRUST
BANTAM MART (FORMER) LUST TRUST
CROWN NC - 632 LUST TRUST
CITY OF MONROE ASPHALT PLANT ( IMD
TC1736016.18s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4

~VERVIEVII I'~As~ ®17360 6.~ ~~ ~
. ~ ^°~
ry

S
` ~
~.
Q.
ti

9

^/ Target Property
s Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
• Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
1 Manufactured Gas Plants
National Priority List Sites
Landfill Sites
' Dept. Defense Sites
0 1/2 1 2 Ylles
Indian Reservations BIA Hazardous Substance
Power transmission lines Disposal Sites
Oil & Gas pipelines
National Wetland Inventory •
n State Wetlands •
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.

SITE NAME: Wolf Pond CLIENT: K'imley-Horn & Associates, Inc.
ADDRESS: Highway 207 CONTACT: Laura Lang
MONROE NC 28112 INQUIRY #: 1736016.18s
LAT/LONG: 34.8944 / 80.5541 DATE: August 15, 2006
CapynghtCZi 2006 EDR, Inc. ®2006 Tale Atlas Rsl. 07!2005.
i
•

•
•
®ETAIL MAP - 1736016.18s
CO`~t NS PO
JOE
~_J
G
N
1
Q
H
• /~/ Target Property
~ Sites at elevations higher than
• or equal to the target property
• Sites at elevations lower than
• the target property
• 1 Manufactured Gas Plants
t Sensitive Receptors
•~ National Priority List Sites
•~ Landfill Sites
• ~ ' Dept. Defense Sites
~ ~~ pia 1/2 411es
Indian Reservations BIA
~' Oil & Gas pipelines
National Wetland Inventory
State Wetlands
Hazardous Substance
Disposal Sites
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Wolf Pond CLIENT: IGmley-Horn & Associates, Inc.
ADDRESS: Highway 207 CONTACT: Laura Lang
MONROE NC 28112 INQUIRY #: 1736016.18s
LAT/LONG: 34.8944 / 80.5541 DATE: August 15, 2006
• Copyright m 2006 EOR, Inc. ~ 2006 Tele Atlas Rel. 0712005.

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Target Distance Total
Database Property (Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
FEDERAL RECORDS
NPL 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0
Proposed NPL 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0
Delisted NPL 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0
NPL RECOVERY 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
CERCLIS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
CERC-NFRAP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
CORRACTS 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0
RCRA TSD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
RCRA Lg. Quan. Gen. 0.750 0 0 0 0 NR 0
RCRA Sm. Quan. Gen. 0.750 0 0 0 0 NR 0
ERNS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
11MIRS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
US ENG CONTROLS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
US INST CONTROL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
DOD 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0
FUDS 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0
US BROWNFIELDS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
CONSENT 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0
ROD 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0
UMTRA 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
ODI 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
TRIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
TSCA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
FTTS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
SSTS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
ICIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
PADS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
MLTS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
MINES 0.750 0 0 0 0 NR 0
FINDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
RAATS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
STATE AND LOCAL RECORDS
State Haz. Waste 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0
NC HSDS 1.500 0 0 0 0 0 0
IMD 1.000 0 0 0 1 NR 1
State Landfill 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
OLI 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
LUST 1.000 0 0 0 1 NR 1
LUST TRUST 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
UST 0.750 0 0 0 0 NR 0
AST 0.750 0 0 0 0 NR 0
INST CONTROL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
VCP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
DRYCLEANERS 0.750 0 0 0 0 NR 0
BROWNFIELDS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
NPDES 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
TC1736016.18s Page 4

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
• Database
• TRIBAL RECORDS
• IN
• IN
IN
• ED
ED
• ED
• NO
T
• N
. S
•
•
Search
Target Distance Total
Property (Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
IAN RESERV 1.500
IAN LUST 1.000
IAN UST 0.750
R PROPRIETARY RECORDS
nufactured Gas Plants 1.500
R Historical Auto Stations 0.750
R Historical Cleaners D
D
D
0.750
TES:
P =Target Property
R =Not Requested at this Search Distance
ites may be listed in more than one database
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 NR 0
0 0 0 0 NR 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 NR 0
0 0 0 0 NR 0
TC1736016.18s Page 5

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance
Distance (ft.) EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
1 LANEY OIL COJ U-SAVE STATION LUST 1005539632
SE 4923 WOLF POND ROAD IMD N/A
1/2-1 MONROE, NC 28110
4312 ft.
Relative: LUST:
Higher Facility ID: Not reported
Incident Number: 3021 UST Number: MO-2738
Actual: LaULong: 35 52 54.1 8 80 32 29.64 Lat/Long Decimal: 35
881722 80
541586
.
.
705 ft. Testlat: Not reported
Regional Officer Project Mgr: EGL
Region: Mooresville
Company: LANEY OIL COMPANY
Contact Person: WALT LANEY
Telephone: Not reported
RP Address: PO BOX 68
RP City,St,Zip: MONROE, NC 281100068
RP County: UN
Comm /Non-comm UST Site: Commercial
Risk Classification: H
Risk Class Based On Review: H
Corrective Action Plan Type: PA
Level Of Soil Cleanup AchievediJot reported
Tank Regulated Status: R
Contamination Type: GW
Source Type: Leak-underground Product Type: Petroleum
Date Reported: 6/4/1988 Date Occur: Not reported
NOV Issue Date: 2/7/1991 NORR Issue Date: 2!7/1991
Site Priority: 185/8 Phase Of LSA Req:1
Site Risk Reason: Not reported Land Use: Not reported
Closure Request: Not reported # Of Supply Wells: 3
Close Out: Not reported
MTBE: No MTBEi: Yes
Flag: No FIag1: No
Release Code: 0 LUR Filed: Not reported
GPS Confirmed: 3 Cleanup: 6/4/1988
Current Status: File Located in House RBCA GW: Not reported
PETOPT: 3 RPL: No
CD Num: 0 Reel Num: 0
RPOW: No RPOP: No
Error Flag: 0
Error Code: Not reported Error Type: Not reported
Submitted: 6/10/1985 Valid: No
Description: EST. LOSS OF UST IS APPROX. 6,000 GAL. LEAK OCCUR. PRIOR TO 3/12/85 BUT NOT
REPORTED UNTIL 3/31/85. THREE WELLS CONTAM. AS A RESULT OF THIS INCIDENT

Ownership: Private .
Operation Type: Commercial Facility Type: 3
Location: Facility Site Priority: 185/8
Priority Update: 5/15/1998 PIRF/Min Soil: Pirf
Wells Affected: Yes Wells Affected #: 3
Samples Taken: 5 Samples InGude: Not reported
5 Min Quad: V62m 7.5 Min Quad: Not reported
Comments: JUNE & DEC - MW-2,2A, 5,7,10,16,17&18 RW-1,2,3,4,5&6 WSWs at Drake,
Montgomery & Smith for 601/602 extended. JUNE - MW-1,6,13&15 for 601/602
extended. Reports due 1/31 & 7/30.. Allowed shutting off AS wells P-1, 7, 8
& 9 & replacement of otherAS blower by Nov 28/02 w/ no Enhancement report.
Samples not collected from MW-1&13. All future reports to be ARMR meeting all
format requirements. 2.09.04 add MW-16 & 17 to semi-annual schedule. 6.05.96
WSW Survey Update 9 active WSW's. Update needs to be done.
TC1736016.18s Page 6

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance
Distance (ft.) EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
LANEY OIL COJ U-SAVE STATION (Continued) 1005539632
Last Modified: 8/16/1999
Incident Phase: Remedial Action Implemented
NOV Issued: 8/5/1999
NORR Issued: Not reported
45 Day Report: Not reported
Public Meeting Held: Not reported
Corrective Action Planned: Not reported
SOC Sighned: Not reported
Reclassification Report: Not reported
RS Designation: Not reported
Closure Request Date: Not reported
Close-out Report: Not reported
IMD:
Facility ID: 3021
Region: MOR
Date Occurred: Not reported
Submit Date: 6/10/1985
GW Contam: Yes
Soil Contam: No
Incident Desc: EST. LOSS OF UST IS APPROX. 6,000 GAL. LEAK OCCUR. PRIOR TO 3/12/85 BUT NOT
REPORTED UNTIL 3/31/85. THREE WELLS CONTAM. AS A RESULT OF THIS INCIDENT.
Operator: WALT LANEY
Contact Phone: Not reported
Owner Company: LANEY OIL COMPANY
Operator Address :PO BOX 68
Operator City: MONROE
Oper City,St,Zip: MONROE, NC 281100068
Ownership: Private
Operation: Commercial
Material: REGULAR LEADED GASOLINE
Qty Lost 1: Not reported
Qty Recovered 1: NONE
Source: Leak-underground
Type: Gasoline/diesel
Location: Facility
Setting: Rural
Risk Site: H
Site Priority: 185/B
Priority Code: H
Priority Update: 5/15/1998
Dem Contact: EGL
Wells Affected: Yes
Num Affected: 3
Wells Contam: ALTON U SAVE STATION
Sampled By: None
Samples Include: Not reported
7.5 Min Quad: Not reported
5 Min Quad: Not reported
Latitude: 35.88166666
Longitude: -80.54138888
Latitude Number: 355254
Longitude Numbe r: 803229
Latitude Decimal: 35.8816666666667
Longitude Decimal: 80.5413888888889
GPS: GPS
TC1736016.18s Page 7

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance
Distance (ft.)
Elevation Site
LANEY OIL CO/ U-SAVE STATION (Continued)
Agency: DWM
Facility ID: 3021
Last Modified: 8/16/1999
Incident Phase: Remedial Action Implemented
NOV Issued: 8/5/1999
NORR Issued: Not reported
45 Day Report: Not reported
Public Meeting Held: Not reported
Corrective Action Planned: Not reported
SOC Sighned: Not reported
Reclassification Report: Not reported
RS Designation: Not reported
Closure Request Date: Not reported
Close-out Report: Not reported
EDR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
1005539632
TC1736016.18s Page 8

Appendix 4
Rainfall Information

•
•
MONROE 4 SE, NORTH CAROLINA Period of Record General Climate Summary -Pre... Page 1 of 2
MONROE 4 SE, NORTH CAROLINA
Period of Record General Climate Summary -Precipitation
II From Year=1933 To Year=2005 II
I Station:(315771) MONROE 4 SE I
Averages Dailv Extremes
Precipitation ~~ Total Snowfall
an~~ High ~~Year~
>_ >_ >_ >_
Low Year 1 Day Max. 0.01 0.10 0.50 1.00 Mean High Year
in. in. in. in.
dd/yyyy # # # #
in. in. - in. - in. or Days Days Days Days in. in. -
yyyymmdd
January 3.96 9.81 98 0.48 81 3.62 11/1984 003 ~1 1.5 19.0 100
February 3.80 8.58 39 0.63 78 2.65 14/1984 ~9 0~3 ~1 1.0 11.0 69
March 4.36 9.86 80 1.30 85 3.93 24/1989 ~9 ~7 ~3 ~1 0.5 10.5 60
April 3.30 7.60 36 0.48 76 3.49 01/1973 ~©0~1 0.0 0.0 33
May 3.18 8.25 57 0.04 41 3.11 28/1990 ®©0~1 0.0 0.0 33
June 4.01 10.30 37 0.35 90 3.25 30/1951 ®0~3 ~1 0.0 0.0 33
July 4.91 12.19 59 0.75 83 4.90 10/1959 10 ®0~1 0.0 0.0 33
August 4.86 13.66 86 0.32 97 5.01 24/1983 ~9 ~7 ~3 ~ 0.0 0.0 33
September 4.16 13.90 104 0.00 54 6.74 04/1998 ©~0~1 0.0 0.0 33
October 3.29 15.94 90 0.00 74 7.72 11/1990 ©®0~l 0.0 0.0 33
November 2.96 11.12 48 0.35 73 2.69 28/1948 ~7 ~5 0~1 0.0 1.5 68
December 3.40 9.07 72 0.44 55 3.65 15/1972 ®©~~1 0.6 11.8 35
Annual 46.19 61.56 64 31.12 40 7.72 19901011 96 76 32 13 3.8 19.5 100
Winter 11.16 21.57 84 3.55 86 3.65 19721215 26 20 ®0 3.2 27.5 C
Spring 10.84 20.10 103 3.24 104 3.93 19890324 24 20 ®0 0.5 10.5 C
Summer 13.78 22.54 85 5.84 80 5.01 19830824 27 21 ~® 0.0 0.0 33
Fall 10.41 19.61 90 2.77 33 7.72 19901011 19 15 ~~ 0.0 1.5 C
Table updated on Ju128,
For monthly and annual means, thresholds, and sums:
Months with 5 or more missing days are not considered
Years with 1 or more missing months are not considered
Seasons are climatological not calendar seasons
Winter =Dec., Jan., and Feb. Spring =Mar., Apr., and May
http://cirrus.dnr.state.sc.us/cgi-bin/sercc/c1iGCStP.p1?nc5771
12/5/2006

Appendix 5
HEC-RAS Analysis

+-'. '+~.'+.'~'Y4lk>>:e15,:'~i t~'.'K.z;~i'4i'f~.?: .. , -i'LSt'~k..'vJVTr~3'1E!'x"+t'5{..'u`.'~~;~~ar,.~.. 1!r."~~ti .,. .... a~.:{,:-~°.i~~`. _:4'. ?~. ;3'
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•..
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
. •
_ - - •".
•
•
•
•

River Reach River Sta Profile Pian QTotal Min Ch El W.S, EIev Vel Chnl Vel Total Shear Total Power Total
(cis) (ft) (ft) (fUs) (fUs) (Ib/sq ft) (Iblft s)
Reach#3 WHPnd UTi 11546.51 8ankfull Exist 4.10 618.00 619.76 0.23 0.18 0.00 0.00
Reach#3 WHPnd UTi 11546.51 Banktull Prop 4.10 618.00 618.70 1.59 1.59 0.10 0.16
Reach#3 WHPnd UT1 11546.51 2Year Exist 30.50 618.00 620.86 0.69 0.43 0.01 0.00
Reach#3 WHPnd UTi 11546.51 2Year Prop 30.50 618.00 619.22 3.20 2.41 0.19 0.47
Reach#3 WHPnd UTi 11546.51 10 Year Exist 82.10 618.00 621.58 1.15 0.69 0.03 0.02.
Reach#3 WHPnd UTt 11546.51 10 Year Prop 82.10 678.00 619.78 4.10 2.66 0.22 0.60
Reach #3 WHPnd UTt 11546.51 100 Year Exist 198.00 618.00 622.40 1.61 1.08 0.07 0.07
Reach #3: WHPnd UTt 11546.51 100 Year Prop 198.00 618.00 620.68 4.64 2.52 0.23 0.58

Reach#3 WHPnd UTt 11518.39 8ankfull Exist 4.10 619.00 619.75 0.71 0.71 0.03 0.02
Reach #3 WHPnd UTi 11518.39' 8ankfull Prop 4.10 617.83 678.51 1.73 1.73 0.12 0.21
Reach#3 WHPnd UTt 11518.39 2Year Exist 30.50 619.00 620.82 1.65 1.16 0.05 0.06
Reach#3 - WHPnd UTt . 11518.39 2Year.". Prop 30.50 617.83 619.04 3.25 2.45 0.21 0.52
Reach #3 WHPnd UTt - 11518.39 t0 Year Exist 82.10 619.00 821.52 2.41 1.42 0.09 0.13
Reach#3 WHPnd UTi 11518.39 tOYear Prop 82.10 617.83 619.57 4.53 3.24 0.36 1.18
Reach#3 WHPnd UT1 11578.39 100 Year Exlat 198.00 679.00 622.29 3.35 1.84 0.17 0.32
Reach#3 WHPnd UT1.. 11518.39 100 Year Prop 198.00 617.83 620.36 5.95 3.98 0.41 1.fi5

Reach#3 WHPnd UT1 11407.02 Banktull Exist 4.10 619.00 619.39 2.78 2.78 0.52 1.45
Reach#3 WHPnd UT1 _ 11401.02 8ankfull' Prop 4.10 617.15 617.89 1.41 1.41 O.OB 0.11
Reach #3 W HPnd UT1 11401.02 2Year Exisl 30.50 619.00 620.22 4.28 3.86 0.49 1.88
Reach #3 WHPnd UTi 11401.02 - 2 Yeaf. Prop 30.50 617.15 618.41 3.01 2.26 0.18 0.40
Reach#3 " WHPnd UT1 - 71401.02 10 Year Exist.: 82.10 619,00 620.88 5.06 3.11 0.44 1.37
Reach #3 WHPnd UT1 11401.02 10 Year Prdp:. 82.10 617.15 618.95 4.30 3.06 0.32 0.99
Reach #3 WHPnd UT1 11401.02 100 Year Exist 198.00 619.00 621.44 6.79 3.44 0.65 2.25
Reach#3 WHPnd UT1 11401.02 100 Year Prop 198.00 617.15 619.71 6.00 4.06 0.53 2.17

Reach#3 WHPnd UTt 11320.38 - Banktull Exisb 4.10 618.00 618.54 1.61 1.61 0.16 0.25
Reach#3' WHPnd UTt 11320.38 8ankfull Prop 4.10 616.61 617.12 3.22 3.22 0.39 1.26
Reach #3 W HPndUTt - 11320.38 2Year Exist 30.50 618.00 619.36 3.39 2.88 0.29 0.83
Reach#3. -. WHPnd UTt - 11320.38 2 Year - Prop 30.50 616.61 611.71 4.00 3.09 0.32 1.00
Reach#3.-.' WHPnd UTi Y 11320.38 10 Year Exist 82.10 618.00 619.80 5.27 3.65 0.59 2.16
Reach #3 WHPnd UT1 11320.38 10 Year -. Prop - 82.10 616.61 618.11 5.81 4.24 0.63 2.67
Reach #3 W HPne UT1 11320.38 100 Year Exist 198.00 618.00 620.34 5.27 2.20 0.30 0.66
Reach#3 WHPnd UT7 11320.38- - 100 Year. Prop 198.00 61fi.67 618.77 7.74 5.37 0.96 5.17

Reach ti3 WHPnd UTi ' 11221.22 Banktull - Exist 4.10 617.00 617.22 2.56 2.56 0.51 1.30
Reach#3 ' WHPnd UTi 11221.22 Banktull. - Prop 4.10 615.50 616.28 1.22 1.22 0.05 0.07
Reach #3 WHPnd UTi 11225.22 2Year - Extsf ! 30.50 617.00 617.76 4.44 4.44 1.07 4.74
Reaeh #3 W HPnd UTt 71221.22 2 Year Prop... 30.50 615.50 616.86 2.59 1.91 0.13 0.25
Reach#3 WHPnd UT1 51221:22 10 Y6ar - Exist 82.10 617.00 618.44 4.74 3.36 0.37 1.25
Reacb #3 WHPnd UT1 11221.22 - 10 Year Prop 82.10 615.50 617.39 3.94 2.78 0.27 0.74
Reach #3 WHPnd UT7 ', 11221.22 100 Year Exist ': 198.00 617.00 618.97 5.63 2.96 0.46 1.36
Reach#3 WHPnd UT1 11221.22 - 100 Year Prop' 198.00 615.50 617.93 6.47 4.41 0.64 2.81

Reach #3. -- WHPnd UT1 ii119.65_ Banktull Exist 4.10 612.00 614.39 0.52 0.52 0.01 0.01
Reach #3. WHPnd UT1 11119.65 ", Banktull. '. Prop. 4.10 615.06 615.57 3.21 3.21 0.39 1.25
Reach #3 W HPnd UT7 11119.65 2Year Exist': 30.50 612.00 615.41 2.04 1.97 0.13 0.27
Reach#3 WHPnd U71 11119.65 2Year ' Prop 30.50 615.06 616.15 4.06 3.00 0.30 0.90
Reach#3. ~ WHPnd UT1 11119.65 10.Year Exist '- 82.10 612.00 616.24 3.56 2.98 0.25 0.76
Reacb#3 WHPnd UT1 11119.65 10 Year Prop _ - 82.10 615.06 616.55 5.55 3.67 0.49 1.80
Reacb#3 WHPnd UT1 11119.65 900 Year Exist 198.00 612.00 616.99 5.62 3.66 0.45 1.66
Reach#3 - WHPnd UTi.-- 11119,65'f 100.Year. Prop 198.00 615.06 617.22 6.35 3.40 0.31 1.06

Reach#3 WHPnd UT7 11001.69 Banktull' Exist 4.10 614.00 614.22 2.39 2.39 0.46 1.101
Reacb#3 WHPnd UTi 11001.69 Banktull Prop. 4.10 613.62 614.34 1.47 1.47 0.08 0.12
Reach#3 : WHPnd.UT1 11001.69' 2Year Exist". 30.50 614.00 614.68 3.84 3.84 0.87 3.35
Reach #3 WHPnd UT7 11001.69 2 Year Prop " 30.50 613.62 614.80 3.23 2.12 0.16 0.33
Reach #3: WHPnd UT1 11001.69. 10 Year Exist 82.10 614.00 615.11 4.82 4.76 0.98 4.69
Reach #3 - WHPnd UT7 11001.69 10 Year: Prop s° 82.10 613.62 615.17 4.44 2.64 0.29 0.76
Reach#3 WHPndU71 17001.69 100 Year Exist 198.00 674,00 675.72 5.81 4.71 0.81 3.80
Reach #3 WHPnd UT7 71001.69 100 Year ' Prop ' 198.00 613.62 615.64 6.12 3.63 0.55 2.00

Reach #3 WHPnd UTi 70919.86 8ankfull Exist 4.10 612.00 612.79 1.20 1.20 O.OB 0.10
Reacb#3. WHPnd UTt 10919.86 8ankfull Prop 4.10 613.12 613.77 1.93 1.93 0.15 0.30
Reach#3 WHPnd UTt .. 10919.86 . 2Year Eaiaf 30.50 612.00 613.52 3.08 2.38 0.21 0.50
Reach #3 WHPnd UTi. - 10919.88 2Year Prop 30.50 613.12 614.16 3.40 1.90 0.16 0.37
Reach #3 WHPnd UT1 - 10919.86 10 Year Exist 82.10 612.00 614.05 4.57 2.85 0.38 1.07
Reach#3 WHPnd UT7 10919.86 10 Yeer Prop`. 82.10 613.12 614.40 4.85 2.70 0.38 1.03
Reach.#3 WHPnd UTt 70919.86 - 100Year Exist 198.00 612.00 614.70 6.04 3.29 0.59 7.93
Reach #3 WHPnd UT7. 10919.86 100 Year Prop 198.00 613.12 614.77 6.42 3.66 0.68 2.50

Reach #3 WHPnd UTi '- 10819.68 . 8ankfull : Exisl 4.10 612.00 612.24 1.59 1.59 0.20 0.31
Reach #3 WHPnd UTt 10819.68 8ankfull Prop 4.10 612.25 612.94 1.67 1.67 0.11 0.19
Reach#3 ' WHPnd UTi 10819.68 2Year Exist 30.50 612.00 612.78 2.45 2.45 0.34 0.82
Reach #3 WHPnd UTi 10819.68. . 2Year Prop 30.50 612.25 613.34 2.79 1.43 0.10 0.14

River Reach River Sta Profile Plan Q Total Min Ch EI W.S. Elev Vel Chnl Vel Tofal Shear Tdtal Power Total
(cfs) (ft) (ft) (ft/s) (iUs) (Ib/sq ft) (Ib/its)
Reach#3 WHPnd UT7 10619.68 70 Year Exist 82.10 612.00 613.25 3.30 3.19 0.41 1.31
Reach#3 WHPnd UTi 10619.66 tOYear Prop 82.10 612.25 613.63 3.58 1.88 0.20 0.37
Reach #3 WHPnd UTi 10819.66 100 Year Ezist 198.00 612.00 613.82 4.60 3.90 0.54 2.11
Reach#3 WHPnd UT7 10819.68 . 100 Year Prop 198.00 612.25 614.06 4.52 2.46 0.32 0.78

Reach#3 WHPnd UT1 10719.06. Bankfull Exist 4.10 611.00 611.47 1.19 1.19 0.10 0.11
Reach#3 WHPnd UT1 10719.06 Bankfull Prop 4.10 611.36 672.00 2.06 2.06 0.18 0.37
Reach #3 WlfPnd UT1 10719.06 2Year Exisf 30.50 611.00 612.07 2,17 2.15 0.20 0.44'
Reach#3 WHPnd UT1 10719.06 2Year Prop 30.50 611.36 612.46 3.77 2.43 0.19 0.45
Reach#3 WHPnd UTt 70719.06 10 Year. Ezist 82.10 611.00 612.57 3.14 2.51 0.22 0.56
Reach #3 WHPnd UT1 10719.06 10 Year Prop 82.10 611.36 612.82 4.60 2.40 0.25 0.60
Reach#3 WHPnd UT1 10719.06 100 Year Exist 198.00 611.00 613.16 4.21 2.76 0.33 0.90
Reach #3 WHPnd UTi 10719.06 100 Year Prop 198.00 671.36 613.17 6.09 3.14 0.45 1.41

Reach#3 WHPnd UTt 10619.63 Bankfull Exist 4.10 610.00 610.24 2.57 2.57 0.51 1.30
Reach#3 WHPnd UT1 10619.63 Bankfull Prop 4.10 609.60 670.31 3.19 3.19 0.39 1.23
Reach#3 WHPnd UT7 70679.63 2Year Exist 30.50 610.00 610.78 4.28 4.28 1.01 4.34
Reach #3 WHPnd UT7 10619.63 2Year Prop 30.50 609.80 610.90 4.00 3.08 0.32 0.99
Reach #3 WHPnd UT7 10619.63 t 0 Year Exisf 62.10 610.00 611.35 5.17 4.55 0.70 3.21
Reach #3 WHPnd UTi 10619.63 10 Year Prop 82.10 609.80 61 i.32 5.62 4.09 0.52 2.13
Reach#3 WHPnd UT7 10619.63 100 Year Exist 198.00 610.00 612.03 6.14 4.12 0.70 2.88
Reach#3 WHPnd UT1 10619.63 70D Year Prop 198.00 609.80 611.96 7.03 4.21 0.53 2.22

Reach#3 WHPnd UTt 10520:17 Bankfull Exis[ 4.10 606.00 608.43 0.14 0.08 0.00 0.00
Reach#3 WHPnd UT1 10520.17 Bankfull Prop. 4.10 608.44 609.13 1.64 1.64 0.11 0.18
Reach#3 WHPnd UT1 10520.17 2Year Exist - 30.50 606.00 609.13 0.65 0.35 0.01 0.00
Reach#3. WHPnd UT7 10520.17. 2Year Prop 30.50 608.44 609.59 3.24 1.93 0.14 0.26
Reach#3 WHPnd UT1 10520.1Y tOYear Exlst 82.10 606.00 610.06 1.04 0.52 0.02 0.01
Reach#3 WHPnd UTt. 10520.17 10Year Prop 82.10 608.44 670.70 1.49 0.75 0.03 0.02
Reach #3 WHPnd UTt 70520.17 100 Year Exist 198.00 606.00 611.43 1.40 0.65 0.03 0.02
Reach #3 WHPnd UTt 10520.17 100 Year Prop 198.00 608.44 611.22 2.37 1.17 0.07 0.08

Reach#3 WHPndLTt .10417.93 Bankfull - Exist 4.10 608.00 608.40 1.16 1.16 0.10 0.11
Reach #3 WlfPnd UTt - 10417.93 Bankfull Prop ~ 4.10 607.90 608.64 1.39 1.39 0.07 0.10
Reach#3 WlfPnd UTi 10417.93 2Year. Exlst 30.50 608.00 609.06 1.67 1.66 0.14 0.22
Reach#3 WHPnd UT1 10417.93 2Year Prop 30.50 607.90 609.37 7.87 1.07 0.05 0.05
Reach#3 WHPnd UT1 10417.93 10 Year Exist 82.10 606.00 610.00 1.57 1.13 0.05 0.06
Reach#3 WHPnd UTt 10417.93 tOYear Prop 82.10 607.90 610.67 1.15 0.59 0.01 0.01
Reach#3 WHPnd UTi 10417.93 100 Year " Exist 198.00 608.00 611.40 1.41 0.88 0.04 0.03
Reach #3 WHPnd UTt 10417.93 100 Vear Prop 198.00 607.90 611.17 1.96 1.00 0.04 0.04

Reach#3 WHPnd UTt 10320.52 Bankfull Exist 4.10 607.00 607.46 2.28 2.28 0.33 0.75
Reaeh#3 WHPnd UT7 10320.52 Bankfull Prop , 4.10 607.26 607.77 3.19 3.19 0.38 1.22
Reach #3 W HPnd UT7 10320.52 ~ 2Year - Exist 30.50 607.00 606.73 2.33 1.39 0.09 0.12
Reach#3 WHPnd UTt 10320.52. 2Year Prop 30.50 607.26 609.30 1.45 1.16 0.04 0.05
Reach#3 WHPnd UTi 10320.52 tOYear Exist 82.10 607.00 609.94 1.67 0.77 0.04 0.03
Reach #3 WHPnd UT1 10320.52 10 Year Prop 82.10 607.26 610.66 0.96 0.42 0.07 0.00
Reach #3 WHPnd UT7 10320.52 100 Year Exist 198,00 607.00 611.37 1.49 0.68 0.03 0.02
Reach #3 WHPnd UTt 10320.52 100 Year Prop 198.00 607.26 611.14 1.79 0.76 0.03 0.02

Reach#3 WHPnd UTt - 10219.76 Bankfull Extst 4.10 606.00 606.73 1.60 1.60 0.15 0.23
Reach #3 WHPnd UT1 10219.76 Bankfull Prop _ 4.10 606.58 607.27 1.66 1.66 0.11 0.18
Reach#3 - WHPnd UTt 10219:76 2Year Exist 30.50 606.00 608.59 1.50 0.93 0.02 0.02
Reach #3 WHPnd UTt - 10219.76. 2Year Prop 30.50 606.58 608.06 2.36 1.90 0.12 0.23
Reach#3 ` WHPnd UTt 10219.76 10 Year Exisf 82.10 606.00 609.92 0.86 0.45 0.01 0.01
Reach #3 - WHPnd UTt 10219.76 10 Year Prop'" 82.10 606.56 609.67 0.74 0.38 0.01 0.00
Reach#3 WHPnd UT1 10219.76. 700 Year Exist- 198.00 606.00 611.36 0.89 0.45 0.01 0.01
Reach#3 WHPnd UTt 70219.76 100 Vear Prop 198.00 606.58 610.00 1.48 0.76 0.02 0.02

Reach #3. WHPnd UTi t0218.0• Bankfull Exist 4.10 606.00 606,72 7.55 1.55 0.73 0.21
Reaeh#3 WHPnd UTi 10218.0' 2Year Exist 30.50 606,00 fi08.61 0.92 0.49 0.02 0.01
Reach #3. WHPnd UTt 10218.0'. 10 Year Exist 82.10 606.00 609.92 0.69 0.38 0.01 0.00
Reach #3 WHPnd UTt t0218.0` 100 Year ~ Exist 796.00 606.00 611.36 0.80 0.42 0.01 0.00

Reach #3 WHPnd UTt 10216.4' - Bankfull - Exist 4.70 606.00 606.72 1.49 1.49 0.13 0.19
Reach#3 WHPnd UT7 10216.4' 2Year Exist 30.50 606.00 608.61 0.92 0.48 0.01 O.D7
Reach #3 WHPnd UT7 10216.4` 10 Year Exist 82.10 606.00 609.92 0.69 0.37 0.01 0.00
Reach#3 WHPnd UT1 10216.4• 100 Year: Exist 798.00 606.00 611.36 0.79 0.47 O.Ot 0.00

Reach#3 WHPnd UT1 70214:73 - Bankfull Exisf 4.10 606.00 606.71 1.44 7.44 0.72 0.17
Reach #3 WHPnd UT1 10214.73 Bankfull Prdp 4.10 606.53 607.25 1.51 1.51 0.09 0.13
Reach #3 WHPnd UTt - 10214.73 - 2 Year Exist 30.50 606.00 608.57 1.68 1.21 0.02 0.02
Reach#3 WHPnd UTt 10214.73 2Year Prop 30.50 606.53 608.10 1.24 0.61 0.02 0.01
Reaeh#3 WHPnd UTt 10214:73 10 Year Exist 82.10 606.00 609.92 0.90 0.45 0.01 0.01
Reach #3 WHPnd UTt 10214.73 10 Year" Prop 82.70 606.53 609.67 0.68 0.35 0.01 0.00
Reach#3 WHPnd UTi 10274.73 100 Year Exist 198.00 606.00 611.36 0.90 0.45 0.01 0.07

River Reach River Sta .Profile Plan Cl Total Min Ch El W.S. EIev Vel Chnl Vel Total Shear TOtal Power TOfal
(cfs) (ft) (it) (fUs) (fUs) (Ib/sq ft) (IWft s)
Reach#3 WlfPnd UTi 10214.73 100 Year Prop 798.00 606.53 610.00 1.37 0.70 0.02 0.02

Reach#3 WNPnd UT7 10188.5 Culvert

Reach #3 WNPnd UT7 10162.36 Bankfull Exist 4.10 606.00 606.39 2.89 2.89 0.55 1.60
Reach#3 WNPnd UT1 10162.36 Bankfull Prop 4.10 606.23 606.90 1.77 1.77 0.13 0.22
Reach #3 WNPnd UT7 10162.36 2Year Exist 30.50 606.00 607.21 6.11 6.11 1.63 9.96
Reach fk3 WNPnd UT7 10162.36 2Year Prop 30.50 606.23 606.07 1.35 0.75 0.01 0.01
Reach#3 WNPnd UT7 10162.36 tOYear Exist 82.10 606.00 609.92 0.50 0.25 0.00 0.00
Reach#3 WNPnd UT7 10162.36 10 Year Prop 82.10 606.23 609.67 0.67 0.28 0.00 0.00
Reach#3 Wt(Pnd UT7 - 10162.36 100 Year Exist 198.00 606.00 611.36 0.59 0.29 0.01 0.00
Reach #3 WNPnd UT7 10162.36 100 Year Prop 198.00 606.23 610.00 1.33 0.55 0.02 0.07

Reach#3 WNPndUT1 10153.9' Bankfull Exisf 4.10 605.80 606.17 2.75 2.75 0.51 1.41
Reach#3 WlfPntl UT1 10153.9' 2Year Exist 30.50 605.80 607.09 3.92 3.92 0.73 2.88
Reach#3 WNPnd UTt 10153.9' 10 Year Exist 82.10 605.80 609.92 0.45 0.22 0.00 0.00
Reach #3 WNPnd UT7 10153.9' 100 Year ` Exist 198.00 605.80 611.36 0.54 0.27 0.00 0.00

Reach #3 WNPnd UTt 10145.5• Bankfuli Exist 4.10 605.60 605.95 2.66 2.66 0.46 1.28
Reach #3 WNPnd UTt 10145.5` 2Year Exist 30.50 605.60 607.05 3.32 3.32 0.50 1.68
Reach #3 WNPnd UTt 10145.5' 10 Year . Exist 82.70 605.60 609.92 0.40 0.20 0.00 0.00
Reach #3 WNPnd UT7 10145.5' 100 Year : Exist 196.00 605.60 611.36 0.50 0.25 0.00 0.00

Reach #3 WNPnd UTt 10137.1' BankfuN Exist 4.10 605.40 605.71 2.70 2.70 0.50 1.36
Reach #3 W NPntl UT7 10137.P 2Year Exist 30.50 605.40 607.03 2.86 2.66 0.36 1.03
Reach#3 WNPnd UTt 10737.1" - tOYear Exist 82.10 605.40 609.92 0.36 0.16 0.00 0.00
Reach #3 W HPnd UTi 10137.1' 100 Year Ezlat 198.00 605.40 611.36 0.46 0.23 0.00 0.00

Reach #3 WNPnd UT7 - 10128.7 Bankfull Exist 4.10 605.20 605.52 2.38 2.38 0.39 0.91
Reach#3 WNPnd UT7 10128.7" 2Year Exist 30.50 605.20 607.01 2.53 2.53 0.27 0.60
Reach#3 WNPnd UT1 10126.7• - 76 Year `. Exist_ 02.10 605.20 609.92 0.32 0.16 0.00 0.00
Reacb#3 WNPnd UT1 10128.7- 100 Year Exist 198.00 605.20 671.36 0.42 0.21 0.00 0.00

Reach#3 WNPhdUT1 16720.38 BankfdlL : Exist 4.10 605.00 605.25 2.80 2.00 0.58 1.62
Reaeh#3. WNPnd UT1 . 10120.38 - 8ankfull : Prop. 4.10 605.95 60fi.fi9 1.39 1.39 0.07 0.10
Reach fR3 WNPnd UT7 10720.38 2 Year Exis[ 30.50 605.00 607.00 2.29 2.29 0.22 0.50
Reach #3 WNPnd UTi 10120.38 2Year Prop.. ` 30.50 605.95 608.08 0.44 0.18 0.00 0.00
Reach#3 WNPnd.UT1 10120.38,- 10 Year'. " Exist 82.10 605.00 609.92 0.28 0.14 0.00 0.00
Reach #3 : W NPntl UT7 10120.38 10 Year Prop 82.10 605.95 609.67 0.40 0.16 0.00 0.00
Reach #3 - WNPnd UTi 10120.38 100 Year Exist 198.00 605.00 617.36 0.37 0.20 0.00 0.00
Reach #3'. WNPnd UTi 70120.38 100 Year Prop 798.00 605.95 610.00 0.82 0.33 0.01 0.00

Reach#3 WNPnd U71 10020.28 Bankfull Exist ' - 4.10 604.00 605.02 0.68 0.68 0.02 0.01
Reach #3 WNPnd UT1 10020.28 -- 2Year Exist 30.50 604.00 60202 0.66 0.25 0.00 0.00
Reach #3 WNPnd UT1 10020.28 10 Vear Exiat .. 82.10 604.00 609.92 0.16 0.08 0.00 0.00
Reach #3 WNPnd UTi - 10020.28.. - 100 Year Exist :. 196.00 604.00 617.36 0.23 0.17 0.00 0.00

Reach#3 WNPnd UT1 10000 ". Bankfull Exls1 4.10 fi03.00 605.02 0.34 0.34 0.00 0.00
Reach #3 . WNPnd UTt 10000 2.Year Exist 30.50 603.00 607.02 0.52 0.21 0.00 0.00
Reach#3 WNPnd UTi 10000 10 Yea( Exist '. 82.10 603.00 609.92 0.16 0.07 0.00 0.00
Reach#3 ~ WlfPnd UT7 10000 -: 100 Yeaf Exist 198.00 603.00 611.3fi 0.23 0.10 0.00 0.00

Reach #2 WNPnd UpparUT2 4188,48 Bankfull Exist 23.40 613.00 614.95 2.82 2.36 0.29 0.68
Reach#2 WNPnd Upper UT2 4188.48 Bankfull " Prop 23.40 613.50 614.80 2.16 2.14 0.07 0.14
Reach#2 WNPnd Upper UT2 4188.48 2Year Exiat.' 85.30 613.00 615.74 4.89 3.30 0.49 7.62
Reach#2 WNPnd Upper UT2 ' 4188,48 2Year Prop. - 05.30 613.50 615.32 3.70 2.84 0.23 0.64
Reach #2 WNPnd Upper UT2 4188.48 10 Year.. : Exist 155.00 613.00 616.20 6.24 3.74 0.66 2.48
Reach#2 WNPnd Upper UT2 4188.48 10 Year Prop.. 155.00 613.50 615.5fi 5.25 3.93 0.45 1.77
Reacb #2 WNPnd Upper UT2 4188.48 100 Year " 6cisb 495.00 673.00 617.29 9.18 4.60 7.21 5.55
Reach#2 WNPnd Upper UT2 4188.48 - 100 Year Plop ~ ~ 495.00 613.50 616.54 8.47 6.00 0.90 5.39

Reach#2 ' WNPnd Upper UT2 4088.33 Bankfull Exist': 23.40 613.00 614.44 2.39 1.93 0.14 0.26
Reach #2 ` WNPnd Upper UT2 4088.33 Bankfult Prop 23.40 613.15 614.43 2.24 2.24 0.15 0.34
Reach#2. WNPnd Upper UT2. 4088,33. 2Year Exist 85.30 613.00 615.31 3.18 1.93 0.19 0.37
Reach#2 WHPnd.Upper UT2 - 4088.33 2Year Prop: 85.30 613.15 614.99 3.09 1.72 0.09 0.16
Reach #2~.- WNPnd Upper UT2 4088.33. tOYear` Exist 755.00 613.00 615.77 3.83 2.15 0.26 0.56
Reach #2 WNPnd Upper.UT2 4088.33 70 Year Prop 155.00 613.15 615.36 3.74 1.67 0.11 0.18
Reach#2 WNPnd Upper UT2 4008.33 100 Year . Exist `:. 495.00 fi13.00 616.80 5.34 2.43 0.34 0.82.
Reach #2: WNPnd Upper UT2. 4088.33 100 Year' Prop. 495.00 613.15 616.40 3.99 2.12 0.10 0.39

Reach#2 WNPnd Upper UT2 4038.45 8ankfull Exist 23.40 613.00 614.17 2.57 2.48 0.22 0.55
Reach #2 WNPnd Upper UT2 40311.45 Bankfu0 - Prop - 23.40 fi12.94 fi 14.26 2.10 2.03 0.06 0.13
Reach #2 WNPnd Upper UT2 4638.45: 2 Year Exist 85.30 613.00 614.98 3.90 2.76 0.33 0.90
Reach #2 WNPnd Upper UT2 4038.45 2Year Prop 65.30 612.94 614.71 3.78 2.60 0.18 0.47
Reach#2 WNPnd Upper UT2 4038.45 : 10 Year Exisf ' 155.00 673.00 615.39 4.78 2.91 0.34 0.99
Reach#2 WNPnd Upper UT2 4038.45 10 Year Prop 155.00 612.94 615.08 4.33 2.67 0.22 0.59

HEC-RAS (Continueril
River Reach River Sta Profile Pian ll Total Min Ch El W.S. EIev VelChnl Vei Total Shear Tofaf Pover Total
(cfs) (ft) (ftJ (fVs} (fVs) (ib/sq ft) (Ib/ft s)
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 4038.45 100 Year Exist 495.0 0 613.0 0 616.42 6.12 2.9 1 0.4 9 1.42
Reach #2 W HPnd Upper UT2 4036.45 100 Year Prop 495.00 612.94 616.06 5.75 3.22 0.3 1 1.00

Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 393825 Bankfull Exist 23.40 612.00 613.82 1.68 1.68 0.14 0.23
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3938.25 Bankfull Prop 23.40 612.61 613.86 2.34 2.34 0.17 0.39
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3938.25 2Year Exist 85.30 612.00 614.62 2.60 1.86 0.11 0.21
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3938.25 2Year Prop 85.30 612.61 614.60 1.94 1.02 0.04 0.05
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3938.25 10 Year Exist 155.00 612.00 615.06 2.99 1.78 0.14 0.24
Reach#2
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2
WHPntl Upper UT2 3938.25
3938.25 10 Year
100 Year Prop
Grist 155.00
495.00 612.61
612.00 615.02
616.08 2.15
4.19 i.12
2.29 0.06
0.29 0.06
0.67
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3936.25 100 Year Prop 495.00 612.61 616.03 3.22 1.70 0.13 0.22

Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3838.61 Bankfull Exist 23.40 612.00 612.82 4.81 4.81 1.21 5.82
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3838.61 Bankfull Prop 23.40 612.07 613.80 1.13 0.87 0.02 0.02
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3836.61 2Year Exist 85.30 612.00 614.04 4.28 2.69 0.35 0.95
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3638.61 2Year Prop 85.30 612.07 614.50 2.04 1.35 0.04 0.06
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3838.81 - 10 Year Exist 155.00 612.00 614.51 4.87 2.61 0.36 0.95
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3838.fi1 10 Year Prop 155.00 612.07 614.87 2.76 1.63 0.07 0.11
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3838.61 100 Year Exist 495.00 612.00 615.51 6.29 3.02 0.58 1.76
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3838.61 100 Year' Prop 495.00 612.07 615.73 4.95 2.49 0.21 0.52

Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2. 3667.98 Bankfull Exist 23.40 609.00 612.11 1.89 1.89 0.16 0.30
Reach #7
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2
WHPnd Upper UT2 3687.98
3667.96. Bankfull
2Year - Prop
Ezlst ~ 23.40
85.30 612.35
609.00 613.38
613.23 3.65
3.06 3.65
2.83 0.46
0.20 1.66
0.57
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3687.98 2Year Prop 85.30 612.35 613.98 4.48 3.05 0.22 0.68
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3687.98 tOYear Exist 155.00 609.00 613.70 3.79 2.64 0.21 0.56
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3687.98 10 Year Prop 155.00 612.35 614.27 5.22 3.00 0.28 0.84
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3687.98 100 Year -. Exist 495.00 609.00 614.61 5.46 3.01 0.47 1.41
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3687.98 100 Year Prop 495.00 612.35 615A2 6.81 3.24 0.43 1.39

Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3589.36 Bankfull Exist 23.40 610.00 611.82 2.24 2.24 0.22 0.50
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3589.36 Bankfull Prop 23.40 611.44 612.81 1.93 1.68 0.04 0.06
Reach#2 WHPnd.Upper UT2 3589.36 2Year ExisC - 85.30 610.00 612.53 4.45 3.03 0.25 0.75
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3589.36 2 Year: Prop 85.30 611.44 613.32 2.36 1.24 0.06 0.08
Reach#2 WHPnd UpperUT2 3589.36 10 Year Exist - 155.00 610.00 612.89 5.56 3.02 0.36 1.09
Reach #2 WHPntl Upper UT2 3589.36 10 Year Prop 155.00 611.44 613.59 2.87 1.53 0.10 0.16
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3589.36 100 Year Exist 495.00 610.00 613.86 6.68 3.24 0.64 2.07
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3589.36 100 Year Prop 495.00 611.44 614.37 4.43 2.42 0.23 0.57

Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3488.52 Bankfull Exist 23.40 609.00 611.23 3.39 2.75 0.18 0.49
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3488.52 Bankfull Prop 23.40 611.15 612.14 3.93 3.93 0.46 1.80
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3488.52. 2Year - Exist 85.30 609.00 612.07 3.66 1.67 0.20 0.33
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3488.52 2Year Prop 85.30 611.15 612.79 4.31 2.73 0.18 0.50
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3486.52 - 10 Year Exist 155.00 609.00 612.44 4.02 1.85 0.27 0.50
Reach #2 - WHPnd Upper UT2 3468.52 10 Year - Prep 155.00 611.15 613.07 4.73 2.50 0.21 0.54
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3488.52 100 Year Exist 495.00 6W.00 613.24 5.93 2.84 0.64 1.82
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 - 3488.52 100 Year ' Prop 495.00 611.15 613.61 7.13 3.65 0.55 2.01

Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3389.04 Bankfull Exist 23.40 608.00 609.83 4.67 4.67 1.08 5.07
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3369.04 Bankfull Prop 23.40 610.27 611.48 2.50 2.50 0.19 0.48
Reach #2 . WHPnd Upper UT2 r 3389.04 - 2Year Exist ~ 85.30 608.00 611.30 4.69 2.82 0.25 0.69
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3389.04 2Year Prop. 85.30 610.27 612.02 3.43 1.89 0.11 0.20
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3389.04 10 Year Exist 155.00 608.00 611.60 5.73 2.92 0.42 1.22
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 - 9389.04 10 Year Prop. 155.00 610.27 612.37 3.39 1.77 0.12 0.22
Reach #2 . WHPnd Upper UT2 3389.04 - 100 Year - Exist - 495.00 608.00 612.68 5.76 2.73 0.52 1.41
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 ~ 3389.04 100 Year Prop 495.00 610.27 613.75 4.73 2.44 0.25 0.61

Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3288.4Y Bankfull -- Ezlst 23.40 608.00 609.75 1.15 1.15 0.06 0.07
Reach #2 '. WHPnd Upper UT2 3288,47 Bankfu9 - Prap ' 23.40 609.80 611.33 1.42 0.97 0.02 0.02
Reaeh #2 - WHPnd Upper UT2 3288.47. 2Year Exist 05.30 600.00 610.!12 1.64 1.31 0.05 0.07
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2. ' 3288.47 2Year Prop 85.30 609.80 611.93 1.87 0.97 0.04 0.04
Reach #2 ' WHPnd Upper UT2 3288.47. 10 Year Exist 155.00 608.00 611.37 2.04 1.41 0.07 0.10
Reach #2 ` WHPnd Upper UT2. " 3288.47 10 Year Prep 155.00 609.80 612.24 2.3fi 1.19 0.06 0.07
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3288.47 Y00 Year. ' Exist 495.00 608.00 612.45 3.49 2.03 0.17 0.35
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3268.47 100 Vear Prop - 495.00 609.80 612.89 4.32 2.12 0.20 0.42

Reach.#2 : WHPnd Upper UT2 9188.63 BankfuN ... ExisE 23.40 608.00 609.34 3.20 3.20 0.51 1.62
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3188.63 Bankfull Prop 23.40 609.85 610.76 4.51 4.51 0.62 2.78
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3188.63 - 2Year Exist 85.30 608.00 609.96 6.21 6.21 1.70 10.58
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 - 3188.63 2Year Prop 85.30 609.85 611.49 4.32 2.74 0.18 0.50
Reach #2 WHPntl Upper UT2 3168.63 10 Year Exist 155.00 608.00 610.71 5.72 3.72 0.44 1.64
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3188.63 10 Year Prop 155.00 609.85 611.75 5.01 2.65 0.23 0.62
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3188.63 100 Vear EzisE. 495.00 608.00 611.67 7.45 3.78 0.77 2.92
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3188.83 100 Year Prop 495.00 609.85 612.32 6.20 2.46 0.26 0.64

Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3089.29 Bankfull Exist 23.40 607.00 609.05 2.00 1.35 0.04 0.05

River Reach River Ste Profile Plan Q Total Min Ch EI W.S. Elev Vel Cnnl Vel Total Shear Total PowQr Total
(cfs). (ft) (ft) (fUs) (fUs) (Ib/sq ft) (IWft s)
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3089.29 Bankfull Prop 23.40 608.05 609.38 2.08 1.99 0.05 0.11
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3089.29 2Year Exist 85.30 607.00 609.76 2.60 1.15 0.09 0.10
Reach #2 - WHPnd Upper UT2 3089.29 2Year Prop 85.30 608.05 609.93 2.44 1.16 0.05 0.06
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3089.29 10 Year Exisf 155.00 607.00 610.27 2.71 1.14 0.10 0.11
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3089.29 tOYear Prop 155.00 608.05 610.25 2.52 1.20 0.07 0.08
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 3089.29 100 Year Exlst 495.00 607.00 611,58 2.90 1.20 0.11 0.13
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 308929 100 Year Prop 495.00 608.05 611.07 3.44 1.72 0.13 0.22

Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 2988.61 Bankfull Exist 23.40 607.00 608.88 1.65 1.13 0.07 0.08
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 2988.61 Bankfull Prop 23.40 607.71 609.22 1.51 1.15 0.03 0.03
Reach #2' WHPnd Upper UT2 2988.61 2Year Exist 85.30 607.00 609.52 3.15 1.57 0.15 0.23
Reach.#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 2988.61 2Year Prop 85.30 607.71 609.80 2.23 1.18 0.05 0.06'
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 2988.61 10 Year Exist 155.00 607.00 610.11 3.01 1.36 0.13 0.17
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 2986.61 10 Year Prop' 155.00 607.77 610.12 2.71 1.36 0.07 0.10
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 2988.61 100 Year Exist - - 495.00 607.00 611.50 2.84 1.26 0.11 0.14
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 2968.61 100 Year Prop 495.00 607.71 610.89 4.D7 2.01 0.15 0.29

Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 2889.32 Bankfull Exist 23.40 607.00 608.27 4.15 2.96 0.27 0.79
Reach#2 WHPnd Uppef UT2 2889.32 Bankfull Prop 23.40 607.60 609.09 1.55 1.16 0.03 0.03
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 2889.32 2Year ~ Exist 85.30 607.00 609.01 4.04 1.79 0.24 0.44
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 2889.32 2Year Piop 85.30 607.60 609.69 2.10 1.04 0.04 0.04
Reach #2. W IFPed Upper UT2 2889.32 10 Year Exist 155.00 607.00 609.97 2.27 0.95 0.06 0.07
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 2869.32 10 Year Prop 155.00 607.60 609.98 2.SB 1.18 0.06 0.07
Reach #2 WHPnd UDPer UT2 2889.32 100Year Exist 495.00 607.00 611.42 2.27 0.95 0.07 0.07
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 . 2869.32 100 Year Prop 495.00 607.60 610.73 3.61 1.72 0.12 0.20

Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 2789.1 Bankfull Exfst- 23.40 606.00 607.63 2.21 1.37 0.11 0.15
Reach #2 WHPnd Uppe(UT2 2789.1 . Bankfull - Prop 23.40 607.58 608.77 2.62 2.62 0.21 0.56
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 2789.1 - 2Year Exist - 85.30 606.00 607.87 5.84 3.40 0.73 2.48
Reach #2 : WHPnd Upper UT2 2789.1 2Year Prop 85.30 607.58 609.22 4.34 2.78 0.19 0.52
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 2789.1 YO Year - ' Exist 155.00 606.00 609.92 1.74 0.74 0.04 0.03
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 - 2789.1 10 Year: Prop 155.00 607.58 609.57 4.40 2.26 0.18 0.40
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 2789.1 100 Year Exist 495.00 606.00 611.30 2.23 0.89 0.06 0.05
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 2789.1 100 Year Prop 495.00 607.58 610.12 6.67 3.06 0.42 1.27

Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 2689.21 8ankfuli Exist 23.40 605.00 606.58 5.16 4.16 0.83 3.43
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 2689.21 Bankfull Prop 23.40 606.68 607.59 4.46 4.46 0.60 2.66
Reach#2 - WHPnd Upper UT2 2669.21 2Year Ezist 85.30 605.00 607.12 0.82 0.71 0.04 0.03
Reach #2.. WHPnd Upper UT2 268921. 2Year' - Prop 85.30 606.68 608.21 3.55 1.59 0.11 0.17
Reach#2 WHPndUpper UT2. 2689.21 10Year Exist 155.00 605.00 609.92 0.44 0.29 0.00 0.00
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 I , 2689.21 10 Year Prop 155.00 606.68 609.68 0.81 0.44 0.01 0.00
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 2689.21 . 100 Yeaf - Exist 495.00 605.00 611.37 0.88 0.52 0.02 0.01
Reach#2 WHPridUppeNT2~ 2689.21 - 100.Year. Prop; 495.00 606.68 610.04 2.09 1.13 0.05 0.06

Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 2539.16 Bankfull : Exist 23.40 605.00 606.23 3.86 3.88 0.74 2.88
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2. 2539.16 Bankfull Prop.' 23.40 605.75 607.25 1.41 0.77 0.01 0.01
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 2539.16 ' Z Year '. Exist '. 85.30 605.00 607.05 1.44 0.78 0.06 0.04
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 - 2539.16 2Year_ ' Prop 85.30 605.75 608.11 0.96 0.49 0.01 0.01
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2-: 2539.16 10 Year Exist 155.00 605.00 609.92 0.43 0.23 0.00 0.00
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 :. 2539.16 10 Year . Prop 155.00 605.75 609.68 0.56 0.30 0.00 0.00
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 2539.16 100 Year Exist 495.00 605.00 611.36 0.84 0.44 0.01 0.01
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 2539.16 100 Year Prop 495.00 605.75 610.03 1.59 0.81 0.03 0.02

Reach#2 WHPedUpper UT2 2439.2t Bankfull Exist - 23.40 604.00 605.14 3.19 3.19 0.48 1.53
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 2439.21 Bankfull Prop 23.40 605.74 606.99 2.35 2.35 0.17 0.40
Reach#2. WHPnd Upper UT2' 2439.21 2Year Fxist 65.30 604.00 607.03 1.18 0.68 0.03 0.02
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 2439.21 - 2Year Prop 85.30 605.74 608.08 1.14 0.59 0.02 0.01
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 2439.21 10 Year- Exist 155.00 604.00 609.92 0,49 0.23 0.00 0.00
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 2439.21 10 Year Prop 155.00 605.74 609.67 0.66 0.32 0.00 0.00
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 2439.21 100 Year Exist - 495.00 604.00 611.36 0.89 0.43 0.01 0.01
Reach #2 . WHPnd Upper UT2 ~ 243921 100 Year Prop 495.00 605.74 610.00 1.79 0.85 0.03 0.02

Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 2430.19 Bankfull ' Exist ' 23.40 604.00 605.04 3.35 3.35 0.54 1.81
Reach#2' WHPnd Upper UT2 - 2430.19 Bankfull Prop ' 23.40 605.73 60fi.92 2.59 2.59 0.21 0.54
Reach#2 WlfPnd Upper UT2 2430,19 2Year Exist 58.30 604.00 607.03 1.07 0.60 0.02 0.01
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2 2430.19 2Year Prop.. 58.30 605.73 608.08 0.79 0.42 0.01 0.00
Reach#2 - WHPndUppe~UT2 2430.19 : 10 Year Exist -. 155.00 604.00 609.92 0.55 0.25 0.00 0.00
Reach#2 WHPnd Upper UT2. 2430.19 10 Year:: Prdp- 155.00 605.73 609.67 0.69 0.33 0.00 0.00'.
Reach #2 WHPnd Upper UT2 2430:19 100 Year: Exiet' 495.00 604.00 611.36 0.97 0.45 0.01 0.01'
Reach#7 WHPnd Upper UT2 - 2430.19-'-. 100 Year. Prop 495.00 605.73 610.00 1.88 O.BB 0.03 0.03

Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2410.04 '. Bankfull Exist 15.80 604.00 604.66 2.90 2.90 0.43 1.25
Reaeti#t WHPnd Lower UT2. 2410.04 Bankfull Prop 15.80 605.18 606.35 1.83 1.63 0.11 0.19
Reach#i WHPnd Lower UT2 2410.04 2Year Exist 112.00 604.00 606.83 3.74 2.60 0.33 0.8fi
Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2410.04 2Year Prop 112.00 605.16 608.06 0.90 0.4D 0.01 0.00
Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2410.04 10 Year Exist 281.00 604.00 609.92 0.68 0.33 0.01 0.00

River Reach River Sta Profile Plan QTofal Min Ch El W.S. EIev Vei Chnl Vel Total Shear Total Power Total
(cis) (ft) (ft) (fVs) (ftls) (Ib/sq ft} (Iblft s)
Reach#1 WHPnd lower UT2 2410.04 70 Year Prop 281.00 605.16 609.67 0.85 0.37 0.01 0.00
Reach #1 WHPnd Lover UT2 2410.04 100 Year Exist 633.00 604.00 611.36 0.88 0.45 0.01 0.01
Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2410.04 100 Year Prop 633.00 605.18 609.97 1.68 0.73 0.03 0.02

Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2339.41 Bankfull Exist 15.80 603.00 604.63 1.54 1.54 0.12 0.18
Reach #t WHPnd Lower UT2 2339.41 Bankfull Prop 15.80 605.01 605.92 3.01 3.01 0.27 0.82
Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2339.41 2Year Exist 112.00 603.00 606.80 2.03 1.39 0.07 0.10
Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2339.41 2Year Prop 112.00 605.07 608.05 1.23 0.70 0.01 0.01
Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2339.41 tOYear Exist 281.00 603.00 609.91 1.06 0.42 0.01 0.00
Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2339.41 10Year Prop 281.00 605.01 609.66 1.14 0.49 0.01 0.00
Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2339.41 100 Year Exist 633.00 603.00 611.35 1.21 0.51 0.01 0.01
Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2339.41 100 Year Prop. 633.00 605.01 609.94 2.23 0.95 0.03 0.03

Reach#i WHPnd lower UT2 2319.53' Bankfull Exist 15.80 603.00 604.54 2.13 2.13 0.21 0.45
Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2319.53` 2Year Exist 112.00 603.00 606.58 3.70 3.69 0.46 1.70
Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2319.53' 10 Year Exist 281.00 603.00 609.90 1.39 0.72 0.03 0.02
Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2319.53' 100 Year Exist 633.00 603.00 611.34 1.59 0.69 0.03 0.02

Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2299.66. Bankfull Exist 15.80 603.00 604.34 3.07 3.07 0.47 1.43
Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2299.66. Bankfull ProO 15.80 604.64 605.75 2.07 2.07 0.14 0.29
Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2299.66. 2Year : Exisf 112.00 603.00 606.19 5.34 5.34 1.11 5.90
Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2299.66 2Year Prop 112.00 604.64 608.01 1.72 1.33 0.05 0.06
Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2299.66 10 Year Exist 281.00 603.00 609.79 2.83 2.27 0.19 0.44
Reach#1 WHPnd LowefUT2 2299.fi6 ,. 10 Year Prop 281.00 604.64 609.57 2.58 2.02 0.10 0.20
Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2299.66 100 Year Exist 633.00 603.00 611.31 2.26 0.99 0.05 0.05
Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2299.66 . 100 Year. Prop 633.00 604.64 609.83 3.81 1.50 0.06 0.09

Reach#1 WHPnd Lovrer UT2 2293.88 Bankfull Eziet 15.80 603.00 604.22 3.54 3.54 0.64 2.25
Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2293.88 2 Year Exist 112.00 603.00 606.01 5.91 5.91 1.38 8.13
Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2293.88 10 Year ExIsL 281.00 603.00 609.71 3.39 3.12 0.32 1.00
Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2293.88 100 Year' Exist 633.00 603.00 611.29 2.48 1.06 0.06 0.06

Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2291.8 Bankfull Exist 15.80 603.00 604.15 3.88 3.66 0.78 3.02
Reach #1 WHPnd lower UT2 2291.8 2Year Exisf 112.00 603.00 605.92 6.20 6.20 1.53 9.51
Reach #t WHPnd lower UT2 2291.8 10 Yeaf Exist 281.00 603.00 609.65 3.81 3.72 0.41 1.51
Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2291.8 100 Year Exist 633.00 603.00 611.29 2.55 1.09 0.06 0.07

Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2290.8 Bankfull Exist 15.80 603.00 604.01 4.71 4.71 1.19 5.60
Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2290.8. 2Year Exist 112.00 603.00 605.66 7.25 7.25 2.15 15.55
Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2290,6 10 Year Exist 281.00 603.00 609.52 4.65 4.65 0.60 2.81
Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2290.8 - 100 Yeer Exist - 633.00 603.00 608.89 11.98 11.98 4.19 50.24

Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2268.92 - Culvert

Reach #i WHPnd Lower UT2 2238.17 Bankfull Exist 15.80 603.00 603.55 3.95 3.95 0.91 3.61
Reach#i WHPnd Lower UT2 2238.17 Bankfull - Prdp - 15.80 603.62 604.60 2.34 2.34 0.16 0.37
Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2236.17 2Year Exist - 112.00 603.00 604.80 6.38 6.36 1.72 10.97
Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2' . 2238.17 2Year Prop 112.00 fi03.62 605.64 3.65 2.94 0.22 0.66
Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2238.17 10 Year F~dst 281.00 603.00 606.04 7.54 7.54 2.06 15.71
Reach#1 WHPnd LOWer UT2 2238.17 tOYear Prop 281.00 603.62 606.19 5.84 4.59 0.57 2.62
Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2238.17 100 Year Exist 633.00 603.00 607.43 9.53 9.53 2.98 28.41
Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2238.17 100 Year Prop 633.00 603.62 606.86 9.00 7.05 1.31 9.25

Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 ` 2228.32' Bankfull Exist 15.80 602.60 603.44 2.73 2.73 0.39 1.07
Reach#1-. WHPnd Lower UT2 2228.32` 2Year Exist 112.00 602.60 604.71 5.71 5.71 1.33 7.57
'Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2. 2228.32' 10 Year- Exist 281.00 602.60 605.95 7.12 7.12 1.83 13.05
Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2228.32• 100 Year Exist 633.00 602.60 607.26 9.45 9.45 2.93 27.70

ReacF#1 WHPnd LovreYUT2 2218.47` . Bankfull Exisf 15.80 602.20 603.43 1.89 1.89 0.17 0.32
Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 ' 2218.47 2Year Exist 112.00 602.20 604.65 5.13 5.13 1.04 5.35
ReacA#1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2218.47• ' tOYear Exist 281.00 602.20 605.08 6.74 6.74 1.63 10.98
Reach #1 - WHPnd Lower UT2 2218.47` 100Year Exist 633.00 602.20 607.07 9.46 9.33 2.54 23.68

Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2206.62' Bankfull - Exist 15.60 601.80 603.42 1.47 1.47 0.10 0.14
Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2208.62' 2 Year Exist 112.00 601.80 604.60 4.68 4.68 0.85 3.98
Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2208.62• 10 Year Exist 281.00 601.80 605.79 6.51 6.51 1.51 9.82
Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2208.62' - 100 Year Exist fi33.00 601.60 606.92 9.37 8.89 2.3fi 21.02

Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2198.77 Bankfull Exist 15.80 601.40 603.42 1.23 1.23 0.06 0.08
Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2198.77• 2Year Exist 112.00 601.40 604.55 4.44 4.44 0.75 3.35
Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2196.77. 10 Year Exist - 281.00 601.40 605.69 6 44 6.34 1.03 6.55
Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2198.77 100 Year Exist 633.00 601.40 606.74 9.41 8.54 2.33 19.86

Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2186.93 Bankfull Exist 15.80 601.00 603.41 1.11 1.11 0.05 0.06
Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2188.93 Bankfull Prop 15.80 603.45 604.36 2.57 2.57 0.20 0.50
Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2 2188.93 2Year Exist 112.00 601.00 604.46 4.47 4.47 0.77 3.44

River Reach River Sta Profile Plan QTotal Min Ch El W.S. EIev Vel Chnl Vel Total Shear Total Power Total
(cfs) (ff) (ft) (fVs) (fUs) (Ib/sq ft) (Iblft s)
Reach#1 WNPnd Lower UT2 2188.93 2Year Prop 112.00 603.45 605.28 4.43 3.41 0.25 0.86
Reach#1 WlfPnd Lower UT2 . 2188.93 tOYear Exist 261.00 601.00 605.09 8.20 8.16 2.14 17.46
Reach#1 WNPnd Lower UT2 2188.93 tOYear Prop 281.00 603.45 605.81 6.24 3.99 0.45 1.78
Reach #1 . WNPnd LoweNT2 2788.93 100 Year Exist 633.00 601.00 606.76 8.82 7.02 7.41 9.89
Reach#1 WNPnd Lower UT2 2188.93 100 Year Prop 633.00 603.45 606.53 7.62 4.00 0.52 2.09

Reach#1 WNPnd Lower UT2 2139.99 Bankfull Exist 15.80 602.00 603.37 1.29 0.83 0.03 0.03
Reach#1 WNPnd Lower UT2 2739.99 Bankful! Prop 15.80 603.21 604.12 2.56 2,56 0.19 0.50
Reach#1 WNPnd Lower UT2 2139.99 2Year Exis[ 112.00 602.00 604.56 1.72 0.95 0.07 0.06
Reach #1 WNPnd Lower UT2 2139.99 2Year Prop 712.00 603.21 605.16 3.16 1.89 0.10 0.19
Reach #1 WNPnd Lower UT2 2139.99 10 Year Exist 281.00 602.00 60528 2.30 1.39 0.14 0.19
Reach#1 WNPnd Lower UT2 2139.99 70 Year Prop 281.00 603.21 605.72 3.83 2.19 0.19 0.41
Reach #1 WNPnd Lower UT2 2139.99 700 Year Exist 633.00 602.00 606.15 3.14 2.03 0.26 0.53
Reaeh#1 WNPnd Lower UT2 2139.99 100 Year Prop 633.00 603.21 606.22 5.68 3.29 0.39 1.28

Reach #1 WNPnd Lower UT2 2039.2 Bankfull Exist 15.80 607.00 603.25 1.42 0.89 0.03 0.02
Reach#1 WNPnd Lower UT2 2039.2 Bankfull.. Prop 15.80 602.67 603.51 2.86 2.88 0.25 0.72
Reach#1 WNPnd lower UT2. 2039.2 2Year. Exist 112.00 601.00 604.42 2.29 1.04 0.08 0.08
Reach #1 WNPnd Lower UT2 2039.2 2Year Prop 112.00 602.67 604.50 4.44 3.29 0.20 0.66
Reach #t WNPnd Lower UT2 . 2039.2 10 Year ~ Exist 287.00 601.00 605.10 3.06 1.46 0.16 0.23
Reach#L WNPnd Lower UT2 2039.2. tOYear -. Prop- 281.00 602.67 604.98 5.95 3.26 0.31 1.00
Reach#7 WNPnd Lower UT2 2039.2 100 Year Exfst 633.00 601.00 605.92 4.12 1.97 0.27 0.52
Reach #1 WNPnd Lower UT2 2039.2 100 Year Prop - 633.00 602.67 605.70 6.07 3.14 0.36 1.14

Reach#1 WNPnd Lower UT2 7939.62 Bankfull Exist 15.80 602.00 602.96 2.42 2.42 0.30 0.73
Reach#1 WNPnd Lower UT2 1939.62 Bankfull Prop 15.80 602.06 603.02 2.40 2.40 0.17 0.41
Reach#1 WNPnd Lower UT2 1939.62 - 2Year Ezlst - 112.00 602.00 603.81 5.43 3.05 0.45 1.38
Reach #1 - WNPnd Lower UT2 1939.62 2 Year Prop 712.00 602.06 603.97 3.83 2.51 0.14 0.36
Reach#1 .' WNPnd Lower UT2 1939.62 10 Year Exist 281,00 602.00 604.36 6.90 3.40 0.73 2.47
Reach #1 WNPnd Lower UT2 1939.62 10 Year - Prop 281.00 602.06 604.51 4.83 2.77 0.27 0.74
Reach#7 ` WNPnd Lower UT2 1939.62'. 100 Year Ezfsf fi33.00 602.00 604.99 8.84 4.17 1.77 4.88
Reach #1 WNPnd lower UTZ 1939.62 100 Year Prop 633,00 602.06 605.03 6.87 3.84 0.52 2.01

Reach #1 WNPnd Lower UT2 1839.78 ' - Bankfull Exist 75.60 601.00 601.58 3.36 3.36 0.71 2.40
Reach#1 WNPnd lower UT2 1839.78 Bankfull Prop, 15.00 601.64 602.68 2.14 2.14 0.13 0.28
Reach #1 WNPnd Lower UT2 7839.78 '. - 2 Yeer : Exist 112.00 601.00 602.98 3.08 2.29 0.27 0.47
Reach #i WNPnd Lower UT2 - 1639.78 2Year . Prop 112.00 601.64 603.58 3.44 2.19 0.14 0.31
Reach#1. WNPnd LowerUT2 1639.78 70Yeaf Exist- 281.00 601.00 603.77 4.36 2.70 0.37 0.84
Reach#1 WNPnd Lower UT2 .1839.78 ' 10 Year Prop'. 281.00 601.64 604.03 4.63 2.52 0.17 0.44
Reach#1 WNPnd tourer UT2 1839.78 - 100 Ysar-. Exist 633.00 601.00 604.48 4.44 2.15 0.27 0.58
Reach #1 WNPnd Lower UT2 1839.78 100 Year Prop 633.00 601.64 604.64 5.56 2.64 0.29 0.76

Reach#1 WNPnd Lower UT2 . 1740.03 Bahkfull Exist 15.80 599.00 601.65 0.65 0.37 0.01 0.00
Reach #1 WNPnd Lower UT2 1740.03 Bankfull - Prop. 15.80 601.35 602.27 2.54 2.54 0.19 0.49
Raach#1 WNPnd Lower UT2 1740.03 2Year" : Exist 112.00 599.00 602.95 1.81 0.93 0.05 0.05
Reach #1 WNPnd Lower UT2 ` 1740.03 2 Year Prop 112.00 601.35 603.30 2.85 7.43 0.08 0.11
Reach#1 : WNPnd Lower UT2 1740.03 10 Year-: Exist 281.00 599.00 603.64 3.02 1.20 0.10 0.12
Reach #1 WNPnd Lower UT2 1740.03 -. 10 Year Prop 281.00 607.35 603.80 3.45 1.70 0.73 0.23
Reach#1 WNPnd Lower UT2 1740.03 100 Year - Exist 633.00 599.00 604.34 4.01 1.71 0.21 0.35
Reach#1 WNPnd Lower UT2. 1740.03 .100 Vear Prop 633.00 607.35 604.35 4.62 2.30 0.25 0.58

Reach #1 WNPnd Lower UT2 164029 Bankfull Exist 15.80 599.00 601.63 0.97 0.54 0.02 0.01
Reach #1 WNPnd Lower UT2 164029 Bankfull Prop 75.80 600.82 601.65 2.95 2.95 0.27 0.78
Reach #1 WlfPnd Lower UT2. 1640.29 2 Vear Exist 112.00 599.00 60267 2.13 1.05 0.06 0.09
Reach#1 WNPnd Lower UT2 1640.29 t 2Year Prap:. 172.00 600.82 602.59 4.79 3.74 0.28 1,04
Reach#1' WNPnd LowerUT2 1640;29-.- tO:Year. Exist- 261.00 599.00 603.49 3.74 1.32 0.13 0.16
Reach#1 WNPnd Lower UT2 1640.29 10 Yea('. Prop - 281.00 600.82 603.22 5.28 2.71 0.20 0.54
Reach #1. WNPnd LowerUT2 1640.29 100 Year Exist fi33.00 599.00 604.15 4.03 1.79 0.25 0.44
Reach#1 WNPatllowerUT2 164029. 100 Year.' Prop fi33.00 600.82 603.75 6.42 3.02 0.38 1.13

Reach#1 WNpndtower UT2 1540.45 Bankfoq Exl6t 15.a0 600.00 601.25 4.03 3.10 0.41 1.26
Reach #1 W IfPad Lower UT2 1540.45 Bankfull Prop 75.60 600.12 601.34 1.54 1.54 0.07 0.11
Reach #1 WNPnd Lower UT2 ' 1540.45 2Year. Exist 112.00 600.00 602.62 3.54 1.32 0.14 0.19
Reach #1 " WNPnd Lower UT2 1540.45 2 Yeaa Prop 112.00 600.12 602.31 2.28 1.23 0.05 0.07
Reach#1 WNPnd Lower UT2 1540.45 10 Year. Exist 287.00 600.00 603.25 3.42 1.32 0.76 0.21
Reach#1- WltPnd Lower UT2' 1540;45 10 Year Prop_ 261.00 fi00.72 602.97 2.71 7.40 0.07 0.09
Reach #1 ' WNPnd Lower UT2 1540.45 - 100 Year - Exist - 633.00 600.00 603.65 4.07 1.76 0.26 0.46
Reach #1 WNPnd Lower UT2 1540:45 100 Year Prop 633.00 600.72 603.66 3.50 1.72 0.12 0.20

Reach #1 WNPnd Lower UT2 ' 1439.82 - Bankfutl Ezist 15.80 599.00 600.43 2.18 2.18 0.22 0.48
Reach#1 WNPno Lower UT2 -.- 1439.82 : Bankfull Prop 15.80 599.95 600.61 4.02 4.02 0.52 2.10
Reach#1 WNPnd Lower UT2 1439.82 2Year. Exist 112.00 599.00 602.24 3.70 1.95 0.13 0.25
Reach#1. WNPnd Lower UT2 7439.82` 2Year Prop 112.00 599.95 601.72 4.80 3.78 029 1.09
Reach #i WNPnd Lower UT2 1439.82' 70 Year Exist 281.00 599.00 603.01 4.03 1.52 0.14 0.21
Reach#1 WNPnd Lower UT2 1439.82 10 Year Prop 281.00 599.95 602.30 6.12 3.74 0.40 1.51
Reach #i WNPnd Lower UT2 1439.82 100 Year Exist 633.00 599.00 603.66 4.53 1.85 0.24 0.44

H F(:-RAS !(:nnriniwAl
River Reach River Sta Profile Plan Q Totai Min Ch EI W.S. Elev Vel Chnl Vel Totai Shear Total Power Total '~,
(cfs) (ft) (ft) (fUs) (fUs) (Iblsq ft) (Ib/ft s)
Reach #i WHPnd Lower UT2 1439.82 700 Year Prop 633.00 599.95 603.07 6.92 3.19 0.33 1.06

Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2 1339.63 Bankfult Exist 15.80 599.00 599.84 2.62 2.62 0.35 0.92
Reach #1 WlfPnd LOWEf UT2 1339.63 8ankfull Prop 15.80 598.93 599.89 2.38 2.38 0.17 0.40
Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2 1339.63 2Year Exist 112.00 599.00 607.26 5.79 5.18 0.55 2.87
Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2 1339.63 2Year Prop 112.00 598.93 600.94 3.57 2.51 0.75 0.38
Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2 7339.63 tOYear Exist 287.00 599.00 602.25 6.23 3.08 0.38 1.18
Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2 1339.63 10 Year Prop 281.00 598.93 607.56 4.86 2.85 0.25 0.77
Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 1339.63 100 Year Exist 633.00 599.00 602.93 7.23 3.00 0.50 1.49
Reach#7 WHPnd Lower UT2 1339.63 100 Year Prop 633.00 598.93 602.35 6.72 3.23 0.37 7.19

Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 1241.02 8ankfull Exist 15.80 597.00 598.01 5.24 5.24 1.40 7.36
Reach#1 WifPnd Lower UT2 1241.02 8ankfull Prop - 15.00 598.42 599.15 3.48 3.48 0.38 1.33
Reach #1 - W IFPnd Lower UT2 1241.02 - 2 Year Exist 112.00 597.00 599.74 6.50 3.95 0.90 3.55
Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2 1247.02 2Year Prop 112.00 598.42 600.19 4.84 3.86 0.30 1.18
Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 1241.02 10 Year Exist 281.00 597.00 600.86 6.28 3.56 0.81 2.88
Reach #1 WHPnd lower UT2 1241.02 10 Year Prop 281.00 598.42 600.78 6.21 3.93 0.44 1.71
Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 1241.02 100 Year Exist 633.00 597.00 602.12 7.04 2.98 0.63 1.88
Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 1241.02 100 Year Prop 633.00 598.42 601.48 8.00 4.39 0.64 2.82

Reach#1 WHPnd lower UT2 1140.75 8ankfull Exist 15.80 596.00 597.60 1.58 1.58 0.12 0.79
Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2 1740.75 8ankfull Prop 15.80 597.48 598.32 2.87 2.87 0.25 0.71
Reach#1 WlfPnd Lower UT2 1140.75 2Year Exist 112.00 596.00 599.61 2.30 1.60 0.09 0.15
Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 1140.75 2 Year Prop 112.00 597.48 599.24 4.53 3.14 0.24 0.74
Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 1140,75 10 Year Exist 281.00 596.00 600.72 3.30 2.04 0.17 0.35
Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2 1140.75 70 Year Prop 281.00 597.48 599.86 5.13 3.22 0.36 1.17
Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 1140.75 100 Vear Exist 633.00 596.00 601.71 5.40 2.62 0.26 0.68
Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2 7740.75 100 Year Prop 633.00 597.48 600.82 5.85 3.68 0.46 1.69

Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 1039.96 BankfuH Exist 15.80 596.00 597.31 1.96 1.96 0.78 0.35
Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2 1039.96 8ankfull Prop - 15.80 596.50 597.76 4.02 4.02 0.52 2.70
Reach#f WHPnd Lower UT2 1039.96 2Year Exist 712.00 596.00 599.36 3.30 2.40 0.20 0.49
Reach #7 WHPnd Lower UT2 1039.96 2Year Prop 112.00 596.50 598.26 4.85 3.91 0.34 1.33
Reach #7 WHPnd Lower UT2 1039.96 10 Year Exist 281.00 596.00 600.38 4.SB 2.72 0.27 0.74
Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 1039.96. 70 Year Prop 281.00 596.50 598.83 fi.55 4.80 0.65 3.13
Reach #1 : WHPnd lower UT2 1039.96 100 Year Exist 633.00 596.00 601.33 5.99 2.81 0.38 1.07
Reach #1 WHPnd Ldwar UT2 1039.96 700 Year Prop 633.00 596.50 599.69 8.38 5.92 0.99 S.BB

Reach #1 WHPntl Lower UT2 1000 8ankfull Exist 15.80 595.00 597.12 2.43 2.43 0.27 0.67
Reach#1 - WHPnd Lower UT2 1000 8ankfull : Prop 15.80 595.90 596.82 2.53 2.53 0.19 0.48
Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2 1000 2Year Ezlst 112.00 595.00 599.12 4.19 2.87 0.28 0.79
Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 1000 2 Year Prop 112.00 595.90 597.86 3.87 3.08 0.24 0.73
Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2 1000 tOYear Exist 281.00 595.00 600.77 5.25 2.74 0.34 0.92
Reach #1 WHPnd Lower UT2 1000 10 Year Prop 281.00 595.90 598.60 5.29 3.95 0.42 1.67
Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2 1000 700 Year Exist 633.00 595.00 601.18 6.17 2.fi5 0.40 1.05
Reach#1 WHPnd Lower UT2 1000 100 Year Prop 633.00 595.90 599.61 6.99 4.84 0.53 2.58

Appendix 6
Soil Nutrient Testing Report

ri: X:'~"~* '~?~-:GH' : ~ . 's :-::.Y,'+Z~F1.L'S~3 c.l' "r ~:. ~r Xrr .n'.. r~ , ~s r~ :41 ..
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
i
•
•
•
•
i
•
i
•
•
•
r
r
i
•
•
•
•
•
i
•
•

~ N ~
ti O
N o 0
V o 0
~ O O
0 0
~ ~
~ ~
h ~ O
~ OM
O
+-~ O
O O
N
r ~
0~
O O
N
w
V] .~
~ 3
~ ~
V3] :%
ci
O O V
O V .b
V r-+ N
0
v
h
N

ti ~
~ r"
~ o

~ o
~ ~
~ ~ N ,-~

h O
v] 'G

~ ~
Ci) N
N `ys ~
ti
V °O -; U o 0
,--i ~ o P
~ ~
N
0 0
ti
.-.
N ~
o
O ~ o00
,~ ~
c
0
~ Q .Mr ~
~ i
O
N ~
O
~ N '_"~

O

N
`~ ~+ O
!
. O O
'C N
O
~+ ON 0~
O O
~ ~
v~
~~
cn
w
~ '-
o
~~ e
c
~ b
~~
~
'
l
' ~ ~ ~~
~
f
~ Q
0 0

~
V s.
~ v ~
~
0 O
N ~~r
G ~
F1
~ °O a

v
~ ~'
•
v~ a
$

o
~ 'a
°
-~
~~ F
.
v
h

~ O

~ O
T.~
.~.~
~
h L.
~ O
~
~ v Z ~ ~

U ~
~ ~
~
~
V] .N ~
F ~° w ~
~ ~?
~ o

~'

~ ~ N r,
.-~ .-,
~
~ ~ O

~ O
~ ~
N o 0
U ~' U o 0
0 0
N N
,~ ~ ~n in
~ N '-~ '-"
N
~~ 0 0
~ ~
N N
O ~~° ~°
0 0
h
~ O O
~~~iii ~
n
~ N
O
~ N ~ O
ti ~}' O O
'G .--`
O
M ~
O O
O N
V ~'
~ ~
w
fA .~
~ O ~ ~ 3
4 ~ +V-. "d
~ ~~ GC
:/~ ~-.
~ ~ o o v
o ,R U
V1 V
p ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ '~ a
a~
w~+~
v~ ~~
~ ~
a3 ~ U
b ~
N O
N ~
y O ~+
~.+r..~
..r
O
w
A
,~ z `" ,~ ~
ti ~
+, V ~ ~ ~,
F ~° w
~ r"
~ ~

~

~ o
~
~
' ,. Cl N .--~
.--a '--,
~
h O
~ 'C
~ N
Vj N
N o 0
"r o
U ~ U o 0

G1 ~ O O
~
~ ~
N
~ o 0
~ ~
N ~
o
O ~ ~
,~ o

0
~ .N-i ~
M
W (Y O Vr

~ N ~

~ O
~
~
ti ~t -+ O
O O
'C N
.--~
O
~`+ N 0~
~~ O O
O ~
v~
'r o
aC "~
~, w

~ cn .~

a~ .C 3

, Cn "~i
~
~ ~
Q
O O

~ ~
O v
U 'n.
O
~ b
V ~
N
O
C\ ~ Q

v
-~ ~'
t
V o0 0, o

~ ~
°3 N V
h

N_ ~ ~
b
O L7
.~''~

h _'"
0
w C
~L ~ z '~ y
er
~, U ~ ~3 ~
'

VJ
.N
CJ
i
p
...
~3
et
~ o

+~

~ C1 N ~--+

ti O
~ 'C

ti
~ ~
Cij N
N va ss

V °O V o 0
~ o 0
N M
0 0
ti ~
N M o
O ~ o00
,~
~ ~
0
O ~ ~°.
N O
.--~ O
~ ~

~ ^' O
~

ti
~--~ O
o0 O O
'C N

•--~ 0~
O O
O ~
v
~. ~
V] W

"~ ~ ~
a.
o ~
~ b
°

~~
U
~ a
'~
~
C!) ~
`rTr"
ti ~ ~
~ o

v °O
~'
o o
~
-ci
~' ~ ai V ~--~ N

~o '~ a

v ,~
v~
~ ~

~ U

p N
~ ~

N O
"" L.
a
~ o
~
, ~ z
U ~
"C ti°'
~
~,
Vi
: 'ti
° y
E ~
, w
~N
~ o
M
ti
~ O
~ ~
U ~
~--~
N N
ti r,
N N
N
H
W
~ ~
~ ~
O
c!1
O
~~
v ~^
ti ~
~o
~^
~~
U ~
~i ti
O
~ ~
~ ~
wOI
v°
>~
~~
N
N O
++
z
V ~
y ti
N
H ~

o
h "~ ~"
~ ~
~
~
A ¢
Z A
~ C
D
.~ c~ t0

o
"' n
,~
~
w ^*
~
A .
~
~
.-- ~
.- C ~
,~ n

~,
y y
~
w ~ o
N ~
''C
~ "":
~
~`

O
~
~ r
o a ~
~y
N ~ ~ ~ ~
~' n ~

'
~ ~

A
~
C
) ~-s
~ ~ 0
~ ~ ~ o W
iv ~
~ ~ A
b
o
~
~ ~„
~,
o ~
r_L ~
c~~~, ~
A
O o\°

~
~ ~
0 0
~ p
~
b o\° t~
c~
o ~ o o
~~ o ~
o ~'.
~ ~
~ -~ ~.
o o b
~ w O
0
'7
Jo 0
~

N
~- ~
w `~
O
o '''
o

Ct!!~
ti
~
~ ~ o o
w ~ ~n
0 0

~ ~
~~ o o
~ ~
w ~
w ,r ,~:a
"'

ti
~
~
~ ~ d~

O O
~'~

~ i
o A
w
GJJ