20070896 Ver 1_401 Application_20070507

2 0 0 7 0 8 9 6
~ ~~ Kimley-Horn
~ ~ _ and Associates, Inc.
~.
May 18, 2007
Ms. Amanda Jones
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NC Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Suite 250
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Re: Wolf Pond Stream Restoration Project
NWP # 27 Application Submittal
Union County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Jones and Ms. Karoly:
On behalf of our client, Environmental Banc & Exchange, Kimley-Horn and
Associates, Inc. is submitting the enclosed joint Section 404/401 Pre-
Construction Notification for the above reference project for your review
pursuant to Nationwide Permit number 27, and Genera1401 Water Quality
Certification number 3626. The following information is included as part of the
application submittal:
• Project Summary Sheet
• Agent Authorization Letter
• Ecosystem Enhancement Concurrence Letter
• Pre-Construction Notification Form
• Site Location Map (Figure 1)
• USGS Topographic Map (Figure 2)
• NRCS Soils Map (Figure 3)
• Wetlands and Aerial Photograph (Figure 4)
• Close-up of Wetland Impacts (Figure 5)
• Project Plans
• Site Photographs (Exhibit A)
• DWQ Stream Identification Form (Exhibit B)
• Wetland Determination Forms (Exhibit C)
^
P.0 Box 33068
Raleigh, North Carolina
27636-3068
~~~~~1~~
,~ ~
'~~;~ .zoo
MAC ~ ~.
nENR ~~ T~? !A`PJ4~~p g !~!C!~
y1G'M.PNr..
^
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]

~ Kimley-Horn Ms. Jones and Ms. Karoly, May 17, 2007, Pg. 2
~ ~~ and Associates, Inc.
Proposed impacts resulting from the project include 4,4501inear feet of
perennial/important stream channel and 0.10 acres of wetland. The stream
impacts are required for the relocation of the tributary to a more natural position
in the historic floodplain of the stream. Pattern will be added to the stream in
order to result in proper pool to pool spacing. The existing channel bed elevation
will be maintained and an inner berm and floodplain bench will be excavated to
add flood relief and reduce shear stress on the banks. Structures such as rock
cross vanes, A-vanes, j-hook vanes, log sills, and rood wads will be used to
provide grade control, added habitat, and bedform diversity. Temporary wetland
impacts in the form of mechanized clearing amount to 0.09 acres are necessary in
order to gain access to the location of the proposed channel. Permanent impacts
amounting to 0.01 acre are in the form of grading and are expected to be negated
considering the groundwater table will be raised throughout the site enhancing
the hydrology of the existing wetlands. In addition, we expect that wetland areas
will be formed and that there will be no net loss of wetlands as a result of the
restoration.
If there is any additional information you need or any way we can assist in
expediting the processing of this application, please do not hesitate to contact me
at [phone].
Very truly yours,
KI]GHORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
To d St. Jo
Scientist
Enclosures
Cc: Norton Webster
Environmental Banc & Exchange
909 Capability Drive, Suite 3100
Raleigh, NC 27606

~ ~~ Kimley-Horn
~ _ _ and Associates, Inc. project Summary Sheet
Project Name: Wolf Pond Stream Restoration
Applicant Name and Address: Norton Webster, Environmental Banc &Exchange
909 Capability Drive Suite 3100
Raleigh, NC 27606
Telephone Number: [phone]
Type of Request: ®Nationwide PCN (NWP # 27) ^ Indivic
^ Jurisdictional Determination ^ Other:
Included Attachments: ®Project Plans ®USGS Map
® Agent Authorization ®Delineation Sketch
® Data Forms (Up & Wet) ®NCDWQ Stream Forms
^ NCEEP Confirmation ®Aerial Photo
^ Agency Correspondence ^ Other:
tual Permit Application
® NRCS Soil Survey
^ Delineation Survey
^ USACE Stream Forms
® Site Photos
^ Other:
Check if applicable: ^ CAMA County ^ Trout County ^ Isolated Waters
^ Section 7, ESA ^ Section 106, NHPA ^ EFH
^ Mitigation Proposed (^ NC EEP ^ On-Site ^ Off-Site ^ Other)
County: Union Nearest City/Town: Monroe
Waterway: Adams Branch
H.U.C.: 03040105070010
Property Size (acres): 13.37
River Basin: Yadkin
USGS Quad Name: Monroe
Approx. Size of Jurisdiction on Site (acres): 0.73
Site Coordinates (in decimal degrees): 34.8948 °N -80.5545 °W
Project Location: The Wolf Pond proiect area is located five miles south of Monroe North Carolina in Union County
From Raleigh, take US 1 South and bear right on US 74 West Turn left onto Highway 207/Wolf Pond Road at Monroe
NC and turn right onto JD Helms Road
Site Description: The stream restoration site is currently maintained as an active agricultural field The site contains two
unnamed tributaries to Adams Branch at the property line
Impact Summary (if applicable): This proiect is a Full Deliver~Mitigation Project for the EEP Proposed improvements
include relocating the unnamed tributary to a more natural position in the center of the valley and the historic floodplain of
the stream. Adding pattern to the stream would result in additional len th and proper pool to pool spacing The existing
channel bed elevation will be maintained and an inner berm and floodplain bench will be excavated to add flood relief and
to reduce shear stress son the banks. Structures such as rock cross vanes a-vanes j-hook vanes log sills and root wads will
be used to provide grade control added habitat and/or bedform diversity Approximately 4 502 linear feet of stream channel
will be restored as part of the proiect There will be no net loss of stream channel Temporary wetland impacts in the form
of mechanized clearing amount to 0 09 acres are necessary in order to gain access to the location of the proposed channel
Permanent impacts will occur due to the conversion of the existing wetland to stream amounting to 0 O1 acre We expect
that the groundwater table will be raised throughout the site enhancin tg he hydrology of the existing wetlands and forming
new wetland systems. We do not anticipate any net loss of wetlands
P.0 Box 33068 TEL [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina FAX [phone]
27636-3068

Ms. Jones and Ms. Karoly, May 17, 2006 Pg. 2
Kimley-Horn Contact: ~ ~~~5~ ~ ~'n°
Direct Number: J/fig/~~~~
O
en Water Wetland Stream Channel
p
(acres)
(acres) Intermittent and/or Perennial and/or Important
NWP # Unim ortant A uatic Function A uatic Function
T P T P Tem Perm. Tem Perm.
emp. erm. emp. erm.
if ac If ac if ac if Ac
0.09 0.01 4,750 0.63
Total 0.09 0.01 4,750 0.63
Total
Permanent
Impact to
Waters of
the U.S.
acres

March 12.2007
Mr Norton Webster
Environmental Banc and Exchange
909 Capability Drive, Suite 3100
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Subject: Wolf Pond Property (UT to Adams Branch)
Stream Restoration Plan Review
Yadkin River Basin -Cataloging Unit 03040105
Union County
Contract # D06054-B
Dear Mr. Webster:
On January 30, 2007 Environmental Banc and Exchange submitted a Restoration Plan for the subject
site. The plan proposes to restore reaches of two (2) unnamed tributaries to Adams Branch totaling
4,750 ft. Due to correction of excessive meanders along these reaches the total length of the restored
sections will total 4, 520 ft. Appropriate vegetation will be planted in four (4) zones (stream channel
to transitional) along the riparian corridor. Successful completion of the project will restore the
channelized degraded stream to a more natural stable condition and provide a riparian buffer.
The Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) has completed its review of the restoration plan and
has no additional comments at this time. Please proceed with acquiring all necessary permits and/or
certifications and complete the implementation of the earthwork portion of the mitigation project
(Task 4). A copy of this letter should be included with your 401/404 permit applications.
If you have any questions, or wish to discuss this matter further, please contact me at [phone]
or email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
~~ JJ ----
Guy C.rce
EEP Full Delivery Program Supervisor
cc: files

Letter of Authorization
Environmental Banc and Exchange, LLC authorizes Kimley-Horn and
Associates, Inc. to act as our limited agent to prepare and coordinate in the
application to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for 404/401 permits and
jurisdictional determinations associated with the Wolf Pond Stream Restoration
project located in Monroe, North Carolina. Authorization will terminate on
either final agency action or upon written notification from either party involved.
.~~
(Signature of
Date
Address: Environmental Banc and Exchange, Southeast Regional Office
909 Capability Drive, Suite 3100
Raleigh, NC 27606
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

~~ ~'a
8
Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
fir any parncuiar item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".}
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 27
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check h~~.~ ~; ; ~ ~,~; ~-,~, ry
II. Applicant Information ~^~
MAY ~ ~; z0~7
1. Owner/Applicant Information
nE TER QUALITY
Name: Norton Webster, Environmental Banc and Exchange Southeast Ra,~~a~sMnTFa aR,M1ClE
Mailing Address: 909 Capability Drive, Suite 3100
Raleigh NC 27606
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: Norton(a,ebxusa.com
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Todd St. John
Company Affiliation: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Mailing Address: 3001 Weston Parkway Cary North Carolina 27513
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: (9191) 677
E-mail Address: Todd.StJohn(a~Kimley-Horn.com
Page 5 of 14

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Wolf Pond Stream Restoration Project
2.T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3.Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): Not available
4.Location
County: Union Nearest Town: Monroe
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): The Wolf Pond project
area is located five miles south of Monroe, North Carolina in Union County. From Raleigh,
take US 1 South and bear right on US 74 West. Turn left onto highway 207/Wolf Pond Road
at Monroe, NC and turn right onto JD Helms Road.
S.Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately
lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 34.8948 °N -80.5545 °W
6.Property size (acres):
7.Name of nearest receiving body of water: Adams Branch
8.River Basin: Yadkin River Basin
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The stream restoration site is currently maintained as an
Page 6 of 14

active agricultural field. Two unnamed tributaries to Adams Branch (UT 1 and UT2 are
present on the site. UT1, a first order stream, flows from northeast to southwest and enters
UT2 at approximately midpoint of the proiect reach.UT2 , a secondary order stream, flows
east to west and enters Adams Branch offsite. These streams have been straightened and the
riparian buffers have been removed. Four wetlands systems are present within the easement
limits. See the enclosed USGS topographic quadrangle (Fi ug re 2), soils map (Fi ug re 3), and
wetlandl delineation map (Figure 4). Wetland A is a seep that occurs within an active
agricultural field in the northernmost portion of the property. Wetland B occurs within the
southeast portion of the easement, Wetland C occurs along the northwestern portion of the
easement boundary, and Wetland D occurs at the southwestern portion of the project
easement. Wetlands B, C, and D are vegetated systems that are bounded by the agricultural
fields to one side. Vegetation includes mixed hardwood species common alon stg ream
banks in North Carolina such as river birch (Betula nigra), tag alder (Alnus serulata), and
green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanicum). Data forms are included as Exhibit C.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: This project
is a Full Delivery Mitigation Project for the EEP. Proposed improvements include relocating
the two unnamed tributaries to the center of the valley and the historic floodplain of the
stream. In order to establish flood relief and reduce stress on the banks and inner berm, the
floodplain bench will be excavated. The bed elevations throughout the remaining areas will
be raised to allow access to the historic floodplain. The pattern, profile, and dimension of the
channel will be adjusted to approximately match regional curve values and mimic reference
reach conditions. Structures including rock cross vanes, a-vanes, rock vanes, log_sills, log
vanes, and rood wads with be used to provide grade control, added habitat, and/or bedform
diversity. In order to construct the new channel, impacts will occur to Wetland C in the form
of clearing and conversion to a stream. Total impacts to Wetland C amount to .O1 acres of
permanent impacts (conversion to a stream) and .09 acres of temporary impacts (clearing).
Constructions of the project will include backhoes, excavators, and other equipment
appropriate to the work. The restoration plan is attached for your review.
10. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of this project is to restore the site back
to a naturally functioning stream system designed to address and correct the impairment issues
typically associated with highly disturbed systems. The proposed work will provide an
ecological and functional improvement to the existing system by restoring the stream and
riparian habitat to a stream type and vegetative community for the given valley and watershed
conditions.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
Page 7 of 14

certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. None
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
None anticipated
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Restoration activities will include the
relocation of UTl ad UT2 dewaterin~ excavation the,placement of fill material (earth rock
etc) followed by the installation of in-stream structures (rock cross vanes a-vanes root wads
etc.) into the new channels. The proposed relocation of UTl and UT2 will result in impacts
equaling the entire project length. The restoration plan is included for your review In order
to complete the restoration, clearing and excavation will be necessarv at two locations where
the proposed channel intersects within the boundaries of Wetland C Clearing etation
will be necessarv in order to gain access to the location for the proposed channel resulting_in
0.09 acres of temporary impacts. Temporary clearinglimits will be defined prior to
construction using Tree Protection fencing. Conversion of the wetland to a stream in the
form of excavation, is necessary to establish the streamside bench discussed in the
restoration plan. Impact from excavation will not exceed 0.01 acres as discussed above A
figure of the location of the impacts is provided as Figure 5
Page 8 of 14

2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
(yes/no) (linear feet)
Wetland C Temporary/
Forested
Yes
0
0
09
Mechanized clearing .
Wetland C Permanent/ Conversion Forested Yes 0 0
01
to Stream .

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.10
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 2.68
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage. multiply lencth X width_ then divide by 43.560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on map)
Stream Name
Type of Impact Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
1 UT1 Temporary/
Relocation perennial 3'3 1,560 0.12

2
Upper UT2 Temporary/
Relocation
Perennial 6.9
1,770
0.28
3 Lower UT2 Temporary/
Relocation perennial 7~1 1,420 0.23

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 4,750 0.63
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact Name of Waterbodv Tvne of Impact Tvne of Waterbodv Area of
Page 9 of 14

Site Number
(indicate on map) (if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Impact
(acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.63
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.10
Open Water Impact (acres):
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.73
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 4,750
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
NA
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., darY/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond:
Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It maybe useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The goal of the proposed
restoration is to correct the current impairment issues and improve the ecological function of the
stream system. Benefits will include improved water quality reducing sediment load through
stabilization, reducing the input of nutrients, and other pollutants by establishing a forested
riparian buffer planted with native species. The impacts are necessary to restore a stable
Page 10 of 14

dimension, pattern, and profile. Approximately 4,520 linear feet of stream channel will be
created as a result of the restoration. There will be no net loss of stream channel. Impacts to
Wetland C are necessary in order to gain access to the proposed channel as well as the
conversion of the existing wetland to a stream. The groundwater table will be raised at Wetland
C, as well as throughout the site, with the goal of improving the steam functions within the
designated reach. We expect that wetland areas will be formed and that there will be no net loss
of wetlands as a result.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that maybe appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o. enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strm~ide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
No proposed mitigation because the project purpose is to improve aquatic function within
the s.. s
Page 11 of 14

2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): NA
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ^
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
Page 12 of 14

2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(square feet) Mitieation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additiona120 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. NA
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
Stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. NA
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
Page 13 of 14

http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: Project
is a restoration activity and is expected to improve the aquatic function of this system.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
;~~i~i
Applicant/Agent';
(Agent's signature is valid
b/
iature Date
if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 14 of 14

~~ CAI3AR USA, ~~A~`VLY J
_ ~ . 1~ to . - ;~ ~i
:_<_ ~ e
-SCl €M ~ KLEN UR ,,,_ '. i
,~ i_~ r
ez1 51 01 ~ HM ND
_ ~ ~ _ ,
~ ~~. 1?3.,~.1~ ~ .i X52
`~'=~ ~~~~i~ ~ ~~-•..aY Al 74
~ _ rt
0 50 t00 ~~` 0 10 ZO
~ Mil__._ 5 ~_..~ ~--_ _ ~,__.. _ ~
O t (~ ~I`-~ _ ~
Falge~ ~r 2236 "~
01
~~ 2229 O Earl-Griffin.Rd _
e~~ ~
`` d r~ ~'
~eF'' ~. ~- is
~A;2~°Q o
Via. r ~ E
F! ~a 2216
r
~~
200 C,~~~-~--'~'- ~ SRd~''
'z ~.J'~\~~am
~.. 6~ Gear\~e^
Al'co"th-..d 207 ~.
~d
to
~ A PaaCO \' { 1
~~ `~° Project Area
~[ ~ J Troy Med6in_Rd
~ ~" ~"
cri ~_ 5
~ ~ ~__~
a°i ~-
'v
t' an.,Fddr ~ a''
!j II a
r
a ~._
a
Ube ~ W S ~ d ~ Ridge ~,d~, a .- 6. - ome-Ftd
~u9 rO
N
~ ~a = d
Gay^ ~ ~F
~ - ;tea a ~a
a~
C~irele- _ `"
\~~ ~ ~ 4 S Ranch } d Q~
A
^~S,p rC _~
'; ~
`"- ~c~'A ~ ~'RQ, Jack pats Rd ~°
0 OS 1
Church-Rd ~.~ ,.; ._
pity` - ~ ~ Miles
Title Project Site Vicinity Map
Yrepared For:
;:g Project Wolf Pond
Union County, North Carolina
1 ~ ~ r y 1 Date Project Number Figure
1 ~'O~'y 4~E 1 ~
5/ l6/07 012620006 I
T:\pn\012620006 Wolf Pond Restoration\Restora[iou Plan\Figures\Report Figures (Wolf Prepared by Jason. Diaz ~~~~ ~~ai~~~~~.
Pond) doc

r```
~,•
• ~ . ~ ~ ,.
~,
Q- , ~ , .
G`~~~,~. f ~ i °.1 200 ,.,;,,,.:,- Winate
~~ c 207
,, ,
- - 601
4. ,
1 .4 ,.:
r -~ ` ,
j
--. ; . _, . 522
1 +~' , ' r _ ~ ~ ;~ ,. ~ Unity Tradesville pageland
o ~ t ,;,; toe
dso R ~ ~~ Jl Es pis ~ v
~: ~~ ,'
`,~~ ,~ f ~~ , .
_~ ~ r
.. ~~ ~ ~
~~" ~`~ r` O witbHetms - ~l} _ ~1 •rrf ~, /~' - yQr `~
~~ i. ! f f-,r.~ t ~ /~• '~A~ta~n~Ri flr ~' p ~ ~
t •`.~ _ . ~l~ a E Sandy RidgeR '~
- `~~~~ IK~~ Q •, . . ~ //
,, Jr~.
`°~
.. r ~oodsRd
- ,
•
~e
o°
0~
~ ~a
Gay
c~
- ~" `.
Circle S Ranch Rd ~ -l ~
f.t?.~t
Title Project Site Locatiot~/USGS Quad Map (Union County, North Carolina 1987)
Prepazed For
~- Project Wolf Pond Stream and Wetland Restoration
4~= UnionCounty, North Carolina
'i ~{ 1~~,~,~~-~,~ 1 g Date Project Number Figure
5/16/07 012620006 2
T:\pn\012620006 Wolf Pond Restoration\Restoration Plan\Figures\Report Figures (WoIC Prepared by Jason.Diaz [~~~ ~a,~~i~s, ix
Pond) doc

Title Soils Map
Prepared For:
~; ``~'~ Project Wolf Pond Stream and Wetland Restoration
~,, - ^~ Union County, North Carolina
~ ~'~ .l.)`i~'4~C11 Date Project Number Figure
~ r~.
5/ 16/07 012620006 3
'f~.\nn\012fi2000fi Wnlf Pnnd Restoration\Restnration Plan\Fieures\Renori Fieures f Wolf Preoazed by Jason.Diaz [~~, ~~i~ o-:
3)_akr.doc

r ~
S ~: ~
~
~
.Y
~ ~ I

y

i

t. .~ t

{i
4~

,yl,.
~'~, ~~'
~
~~ ~

,
y
r ~ ~~:
a ~ ~ ~
:
. 4
~""~ ~ ~ ~ ~
i~
k
~ ~
~
~
y
~
!, 9~+ _ r
R ! .
,~
r
. .:
~ti ;~~
~, t
tf
~

~ ,,r
..~
fV~
` T
I JtJ' S ~~`~
..
`~ d ~ < r ~
~j 3
'~
! ~~i
~'
~
~
`4
r u
~ ~
, °' ~ - :ate,
~
~_
~^
` ,
}~
i~f ~l
~
6 ` i~ ,,~ F i f 1
~
•
'~
?
,* `~4, .,
4 `~~~'~'a''Tlty~'~t~~t ~i ,~+
~
F
!
1
.. .
:.
~' ~ 4' .
.._
~ rsw~..vq~.w+w~
~.~
y
e ,.

3
{ ~} 1
f
a
~
~~
.41 . ~ Wetland A
#
~
`'
~
k
v`
~
~ ~n
. ~ Wetland C
~,
h y
/~
.Af~ ~
J

t ~'(
•~,
_
~ ~
~
'
~ Wetland D ~ ~~,
~~~~#
~. ~ e ~

y ~ rz '.
,
,~
v
j
~~
y
~
t _ _
, _
, \ N ..
,~,
\. Wetland B ~~ ~ ~_''
~ 1
'S)
T t
'
,~
V ~ ,, 4
~
~ 5!~~ ,
F4. ~ `t L~
t 1
LL'''
~
` ~ ~~
'~ F

,.

a{

J
,: Existing Stream Centerline ~~ '
~
Proposed Easement !
;~ ,~ '~ ~` ~ ~" 4 ° «,~:. . zt;
S
~.'

® Wetlands060725 ~ lr }F~
~`
I
ilk f_ ;~' ~
:: , •I i
90%Proposed_Stream Centerline_20070514 "' ~ ;, .~
y~F. y K w~`i
i
~
~
.~~ ~
'
2
iil
.. ,~ 1 E
4 :t
'I - +5 l M1.

Title Wetland Location Map
Prepared Por

~ Wolf Pond
~
°
;; Project
~ Union County, North Carolina

~r~ )5tir~l~~ij j~ Date Project Number Figure
5/16/07 012620006 4
T:\pn\Ol?620006 Wolf Pond Restoration\Restoration Plan\PiguresU2eport Figures (Wolf Preparzd by Jason.Diaz [~/\ ~~~. i~
Pond)_akr.doc

. .p. tt_ 'z _,,, ~
y'iiN4
~J, _ ~
Existing Stream Centerline
Proposed Easement ~ • ,
.'~5: ~ Wetlands060725
`~'i 90%Proposed_Stream Centerline_20070514
Permanent_Impacts_1
,~' Temporarylmpacts2 [
- Permanent Impacts
"`~ Grading
at
~ `~
~; ,
,' ~ ~. a
4 9
E °a,
&P.r.. Vic"
Title Impacts to Wetlands
Prepared For
~F_u. ~ Project Wolf Pond Stream and Wetland Restoration
i'+~ Union County, North Carolina
r,~~,{')~~r~~~'~j ~ Date Project Number Figure
5/ 17/07 012620006 5
T:\pn\012620006 Wolf Pond Restoration\Restoration Plan\Figures\Repori Figures (Wolf Prepared by JasonDiaz [~~, '~~+~~ iz
Pond) akr.doc

EXHIBIT A

0 7 0 8 9 6
Photo Page 1

~~
. - ~; '
,
~ a !5
' ~. ~5Fr1 - ,Y
M1f~ ill' %1 "~4 • p ~
'
Tf 1 ~
t ~ a~ ~F
! 1 t
T

~
ti
«~ ~ vP
1
~fi ...
~
9
~ > l~;J

'' ~ ~ - _ :i kF w fit.;
~ #~ J ~ ..'a ~ ~~ 't 1'7,,... ~~ 3 ~'
n.
gyp.
'
d4
y~ Q
~t~ d Iy~. ~ ~
} ~~/ f~
n 5 ~ re 1~ +p ~d4,~ ~ 1 ~ rat;~ ~tr Sx\`,~ ~
~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~
i f ~ ~e
„l B
X70
r . r ",~ ~
Photograph l : Upsh~eam Reach of the UT2 to Adams F3ranch looking upsh~eam
1
ff''
J
`ltl
. ~:
°~
~f
~S
1 6 ~
~ r
5TH ~
f ~" k ,5
~~. 4 I
,
}iS3i4'
`y,.
q
1~ '~~k s \ ~~, t
r+!
++
~
~
~
~
44~ ~.- .5~' .p~i, f f
~ :~ ~i ~
'
~
P
~ "L tl~dl~S ~ .. ?i.
rY
,ay
'ter }, i ~;~ A 'ff
~ ~.~'' .. S~
1
]
~

_ J' ~ ,eta i ,+~ v
aL ~ ~
YEA' \
~ . •
v h'k i
t
P
""
^
fi
M1
3 it
r~)~
b
1 ~ ~
Fyn
{~.
4
°e~
'
y
"
v
~ '
~1~
~
H
~.
+~i
\fY~
tea" ~. T Y~~ 9 Y W~~ .~1 Si i~ \,~

..i~ ~ _+F..` §t.
Photograph 2: Upstream Keach of the UT2 to Adams I3ranch looking upstream
Title Appendix 1. Project Site Photographs
Prepared For Wolf Pond Stream Restoration Prepared By
Project

h- Union County, North Carolina ~~

~~ ~„~ ~, )51',`t~~l ~ i Date Project Number
5/1(/07 012620007

Photo Page 2
~ \F
~~ i ly• :..~,~
1 ~~ b «-
1, w.~ ~ ~~~ ~
`,. ' 'ant - ~~~.
i n may, ~ ,yo- ~ ^~~, .a ~
~ ~
~~ a .y ~ ,x# tie "' t ~
,dj ._ 4 c ,
~ ~ 4,~i ? ~~ yr "M:"~ F '~t 1 3
r~t „ r•`~`t ~ ~ ~~ `~ ,~ ` r e e
~~'~
i ! ~; _.~~ _, M t. ~1~ ~Ap `' ice, +5 P
y, ~.i C*9 ~ ~U1~4a~`, 'G n. •~~'1 T."~
,,.•teti
~
~
A
fl~'1
•fh ~J
s
yy
~~
yy
=
~+
~
Photograph 3: Middle of UT2 to Adams Branch looking downstream
* 6 f 414 Y R~„RtLra t'f l ~ ~. fyI ~; r ~ `q~pt~ -. ~ ~ 1
'M ~~~ ~} ktlas E j ~ ~Y J ~ivf ~.~'~~~ S ~`F', 11z ~gki19 1 r~•k a~ J~~I f~'~.

x`95/ S ~ri~~: ~. . FF +~+ tab L
~Y~ " 'R y i ~a} } -i F~ ~'F~^ ~~ .Y.• Y.l 'F J5f 1A __ ,
~ ~ 1 ~~ ) ~ k
i S~. SSA ~-,~' ~r ~zn
~ ~ i ~ ,, I~ ~i '~ I ~ ~~~ : ~4 ' f t' r,
I s
,~ ~~~ ~ «
< ~ - w~~ .Y
`[ ,'{• ~e~
p~5n.~- a ~ ili~~
q ., °•e1.
7 - F t~'1. ~ .~yp~
<,L+v ''!y`,~;'~pf{ I ... . i~~ rj ~ iNJ ~ ~ !1 .1 J ~ Y
\t'iH `4 HAM' 1 p4 ,~ ~~:-j~.~y ~~, s. nr/~1 ~ s~r,•
~k f91a s1't' A _t ~ CtIVd t,~er. yi/w'~L6~ F ~, ~Y'~ ~Gf '~~"' ~
'Ss~ a - 5s ~. ~F,.:r, ~.r t~ ~.k.~'zw. _ 1AF..,, x:
Photograph 4: Lower UT2 looking downstream
Title Appendix I. Project Site Photographs
Prepared For Wolf Pond Stream Restoration Prepared By
-
~Y Project Union County, North Carolina
:i
~'~ ~t ~.,~,.,~t .l ~ 1 Date Project Number
5/16/07 012620007

Photo Page 3

R~
g ~~~{` / +~ w
a /iI> , ~ ~` ,~~ ~r ~ ,
.S.` ~.,~~ .Llr^' ,gib ~ ~#''~xu FM: tt ~ '~` " f 'k •r ~ 3
i ~~
( n
~ "
f ~
~4~
yip
~
g
f ~~ ~ f ~ ~~ ~ ~iF~
~y ~y ~(~y ^ 'L ~( ~ R
i'" t 'rYi' +e ~' 4
'~' ~ S~ ,~~ ,q5, ~ ~~ ~ 34
{
,r y~. ,w
Photograph 5: 72-inch Reinforced Concrete Pipe
,~ ~>~ ~~ ;
,~ ~ ~~ ~ .
~':,

~,
~~ ~. ;~ ~t
~'
~;
~ r"
'.. , ~,, i ", ~ j"
~~ `.~ ~ ,.
1
~! t ^/.
r"
~ ~ ~
~ ~
~
,.
Mt'
a
~''~ ..~ '\ '; S' tea...
xrS '
yL.
~ 1~ i,
,~ 4t ~, ,. e ~, ~;.
a+"

•~ 6°ts6~
f ~~ yew.' ` ' :.'L•
`
4~a, - ~: .
~
~ ,.
" ~i Y
.
K~ ~
~~~"
Photograph 6: Lower UT to Adams Branch looking upstream
Title Appendix 1. Project Site Photographs
Prepared For
P Wolf Pond Stream Restoration Prepared By

~' roject
~ - Union County, North Carolina ~}~~
't
r ~ i71' ~ ~l 1 Date Project Number
5/ 16/07 012620007

North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form, Version 3.1
Date: 3/5/2006 Project: EBX Latitude: 34.895419
Evaluator: tws/dnw Site: Wolf Pond / UT1 Longitude: -80.552203
Total Points: 39.5
Stream is at least intermittent County: Union Other Monroe
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 17 Absent ' :Weak .:Moderate Strong Score
1 a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3
2. Sinuosit 0 1 2 3 2
3. In-channel structure: riffle- ool se uence 0 1 2 3 1
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sortin 0 1 2 3 1
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3 1
6. De ositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 2
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3 1
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 3
9a. Natural levees 0 1 2 3 0
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 1
11. Grade Control 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
12. Natural valle or draina a wa 0 0.5 1 1.5 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS ma or other documented evidence. No = 0 Yes = 3 0
e Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussion in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 11
14. Groundwater flow/dischar e 0 1 2 3 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- dry or rowing season 0 1 2 3 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0 1
17. Sediment on lants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 1.5
18. Or anic debris lines or files (Wrack lines 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
19. H dric soils (redoximor hic features) resent? No = 0 Yes = 1.5 1.5
C. Biology Subtotal = 11.5
20b. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0 2
21 b. Rooted lants in channel 3 2 1 0 0
22. Cra fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3 2
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 1.5
25. Am hibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 1.5
26. Macrobenthos note diversit and abundance 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
27. Filamentous al ae; eri h ton 0 1 2 3 3
28. Iron oxidizin bacteria/fun us 0 0.5 1 1.5 1.5
29b. Wetland lants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; SAV = 2.0; Other = 0 1.5
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:

North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form, Version 3.1
Date: 3/5/2006 Project: EBX Latitude: 34.894944
Evaluator: tws/dnw Site: Wolf Pond Longitude: -80.555394
Total Points: 43

Stream is at least intermittent
County: Union Other
e.g. Quad Name: Monroe
if >_ 19 or perennial if ? 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 20.5 ..Absent: Weak Moderate ::.Strong Score
1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3
2. Sinuosit 0 1 2 3 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle- ool se uence 0 1 2 3 1
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sortin 0 1 2 3 1
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3 3
6. De ositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3 0
8. Recent alluvial de osits 0 1 2 3 2
9a. Natural levees 0 1 2 3 0
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 0
11. Grade Control 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
12. Natural valle or draina a wa 0 0.5 1 1.5 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS ma or other documented evidence. No - 0 Yes - 3 3
a Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussion in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 11
14. Groundwater flow/dischar e 0 1 2 3 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- dry or growing season 0 1 2 3 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0 1.5
17. Sediment on lants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
18. Or anic debris lines or files Wrack lines 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
19. H dric soils redoximor hic features) resent? No = 0 Yes = 1.5 1.5
C. Biology Subtotal = 11.5
20b. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0 3
21b. Rooted lants in channel 3 2 1 0 3
22. Cra fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3 0
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
25. Am hibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
26. Macrobenthos note diversit and abundance 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
27. Filamentous al ae; eri h on 0 1 2 3 3
28. Iron oxidizin bacteria/fun us 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
29b. Wetland lants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; SAV = 2.0; Other = 0 0
b Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:

EXHIBIT C

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND. DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual
ProjectlSite: ~~jo' ~ '~o ~a~ Date:
Appticant/Owner:
Investigator. I ~ L
Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? ~_
Is the site sign'~f"icant}y disturbed (Atypical Situation?) ,~' _
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ~_
Vegetation
Dominant Plant Speciles Stratum Indicator
1. NtiS t t,,~e~ed ~~ ~-
2. ! rY'4 SS~S _
3. ~y~ack5 e-~,-s~-S ~'w
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
County:
State:
Community ID:
Transact ID:
PlottD:
~/ r 3/0
U ~~ ~
/l1 c,

w~~~~~~
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding.FACU): /O V ___.__
Remarks: / /~
C o ~ .1"ti' '~ ~e h f -1 W e~ c~tV'a r Sk-"'ou+,.c~2af d t~ Ge / v~ 'f'~ e /o~.S
Hydro}ogy:
RECORDED DATA:
~-
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
No Recorded Data Available
FIELD OBSERVATIONS:
Depth to Surface Water: _ r~ (in)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in)
Depth to Saturated Soil: _ U (in)
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS:
PRIMARY INDICATORS:
aturated in Upper 12 inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
SECONDARY INDICATORS:
Oxidized Root Channels in 12 inches
Water Stained Leaves
Local Soil Suvey Data
1=ac-Neutral Test
Other

SODS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phrase): L ~~ C ~4n-ncY y 5~ ~f ~~°'^''
Taxonomy (Subgroup): '~ir-e W~~J~ec~ Sew~i ac`~~JC.
-fi~e,rw~L A-~.kic ~+~ luduf
Drainage Class: saw~e,~lno-~ ~~~ <<`~ aEVaiNeoi
Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? (YIN)
PROFILE DE SCRIPTION
tl
Concretions
Texture
Depth
inches
Horizon Matrix Color
Munsell Moist Mottle Colors
Munsell Moist e
Mot
Abundance/Contrast ,
,
Structure, etc.
5 ~'~ ~o a
_ D tZ y

HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS
Histosol educing Conditions Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Histic Epipedon leyed or Low-Chroma Colors Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Sulfidic Odor Concretions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Aquic Moisture Regime High Organic Streaking in Other (Explain in remarks)
Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Hydric Soil Present? (YIN) ~_
rcemarKS:
WETLAND DETERMINAT}ON (Y/N) , J
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ,,,~ T
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Present? _
Is this sampling point a Wetland? ~-
rcemai t~s.

DATA FARM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manua!
~!
project/Site:
AppiicantlOvrner:
Investigator:
Wo~~ }~c-1ct7 Date: 7 J3 0~
County: ~H 1 c h
•-~ L State: N ~_
Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site?
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation?)
!s the area a potential Problem Area?
Vegetation
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Ze4 L.
2. M,tiG` rcSSCS/
3. b.~ee~S
4.
5.
6.
7.
B
Community iD: C{^o p~_
~__._.. ---r---r
fJ Transact lD:
__
1v Plot ID: ~ ~~_'~~
~~
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FACU): ~U
Remarks:
~p t r'T ~ ~ ~ 6 Yt C'a'~~ C C•~ Ga t' -Z Lro ~p
Hydrology:
RECORDED DATA:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
' No Recorded Data Available
FIELD OBSERVATIONS:
Depth to Surface Water. __ (in)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >~ (in)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 7 a= (in)
WETLAND HYDROLOGY 1NDICATORS:
~ v ~ rwlr'24-~''S ~ reSe.~~
PRIMARY INDICATORS:
Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
SECONDARY 1NDICATORS:
Oxidized Root Channels in 12 inches
Wafer Stained Leaves
Local Soil Suvey Data
Fac-Neutral Test
Other

so~~s
lVIaN ul m rvan lc
(Series and Phrase): ~t c~ c~.AN Kc/y SI f f ~°=r^
Taxonomy (Subgroup): eke M~Ceo~ Se+M ~ a °'~'Vc
Drainage Class: SoY-aet.~~ poor t ~, ~~ ~s1e~
Field Observations _T_
Confirm Mapped Type? (Y/N) ~
PROFILt ut
Depth
inches
?' a- o st,:K~r i wn

Horizon
t3
Matrix Color
Munsell Moist
~ K `r
Mottle Colors
Munsell Moist
Mottle
Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
G c Q r~

HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS
Nistosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Concretions
High Organic Streaking in
Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in remarks)
Hydric Soil Present? (Y/N) •~ '
ttemarKS:
WETLAND DETERMINATION (Y/N)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? I`~
Wetland Hydrology Present? Al
Hydric Soils Present? N
Is this sampling point aWetland? =_
f[CI I IC71 f~J.

DATA FORIVf
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual
.~ ~~ ~ -
project/Site: j„) o ~ ~ ~'-ow.~ Date:
Applicantl0wner:
investigator: t 1 L
Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site?
is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation?) /J_
Is the area a potential Problem Area? '~l
Vegetation
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. f}Iv~~s 52~r~1a~ 7~ S /~-Lw
2. hrxX;n~s pen~syhrk~ca T ~~~cw
3. ~`e -ca ey~S~S~~_
4. Jac Ca n IQY~ Ffi; c, W
5. Sm ~ lax y. _/~L_ F ~ "'
8.
County: Uvt i o vi
State: /l1 v
Community ID:
Transect ID:
Plot ID: ~Jefi~Q~ ~, L~ d
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
s.
10.
11.
12,
13.
14.
15.
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (exGuding FACU): ~ 0 d
f.~~~~a~..~.
Hydrology:
RECORDED DATA:
_~
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
No Recorded Data Available
FIELD OBSERVATIONS:
Depth to Surface Water: r~ (in)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: O (in)
Depth to Saturated Soil: ~_ (in)
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS:
PRIMARY INDICATORS:
Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
'Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
SECONDARY INDICATORS:
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
Water Stained Leaves
Local Soil Suvey Data
Fac-Neutral Test
Other

~o M ~ ~6 ~.d .- W e~' (~ ~ G~
SOILS
Map Unit Name
{Series and Phrase): C,~-ewa.~~ a ~ji ( (o a+^1
Taxonomy (Subgroup): ~;e~c-I6ar^~/ . w~`Ikcd, a.~/e~
_ ~..,.,,.,,„~~.1
Drainage Class: So~~~~ ~oo,tl~d/e recd
Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? (YIN) ~J
_~
!'KVrILC UC
Depth
inches
D -
-f'D JV,[Ir uvl

Hor'¢on

tai ~
Matrix Color
Mansell Moist
D K 3
2 3 i
Mottle Colors
Mansell Moist

o~2 S
Mottle
Abundance/Contrast

'o
Texture, Concretions,
Structure etc.
Mw'~k
C~"'~ ~a~
o~ ~ r7 2 i o ~ D ~~~

HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS
Histosol Reducing Conditions Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Histic Epipedon . Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Sulfidic Odor Concretions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Aquic Moisture Regime High Organic Streaking in ~ Other {Explain in remarks)
Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Hydric Soil Present? (Y/N)
~~_
--~--•
I~cl1 ~w n..
WETLAND DETERMINATION (YIN) i/
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? T
Wetland Hydrology Present? ~
Hydric Soils Present?
Is this sampling point a Wetland? _~
RGI I IQI I~.~.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manua[
ProjectlSite:
Applicant/Owner:
UJ o ~ ~ ~o wok Date:
County:
~ f3 a~
v~~v~
Investigator:
j ~j G
State:
Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? _! . Community iD
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation?) r~ Transact tD:
is the area a potential Problem Area? +v _ Plot iD:
~L.
C~ P~s`~e
t~P 14 -~~ P, ~,.~
Vegetation
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Zea L. ' s.
2• ~+~is~ , Grosses „~ FA-~ 10-
3. 11.
4. 12.
5. 13.
_ 14.
7. 15.
$ 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FACU): s •b
o., .4c-
..._ ~ ~ ke,H ~- b ` o w~'S~de o$ W~~ b m u-v`~°rv~ i n Co ~' h `t-~ 2 pct' .
fit„ ~~ I
Hydrology:
RECORDED DATA:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
No Recorded Data Available
FIELD OBSERVATIONS:
Depth to Surface Water. '7 a a (in)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 7 a o (in)
Depth to Saturated Soil: ~ ~-c~ (in)
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS:
T1m i.~~ ~a`{~z P~s~~
PRIMARY INDICATORS:
Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
SECONDARY INDICATORS:
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
Water Stained Leaves
Local Soil Suvey Data
Fac-Neutral Test
Other

SOILS
IVfQ vuu wane ~
(Series and Phrase): Lhe1fOr-~a S~ ~'~ j°am
Taxonomy (Subgroup): ~;,,.e.-(oc Ctc ~~ ~^~k~_
-I~nen~.l~c- Flu aya,,,e.~C ~y51~ueEe~'1•~
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors
finches) Horizon (Munsell Moist Munsell Moisi
b
- ~u
HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
Hydric Soil Present? (Y/N)
Reducing Conditions
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Coors
Concretions
High Organic Streaking in
Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
.~-
exture, Concretions,
Structure; etc.
/eaw+
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in remarks)
rcemarKS:
s ~ ~ o[*riL sat ~ s (V~ i La'~'o /S P /~-5 riv~,~
WETLAND DETERMINATION (YIN)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Present?
Is this sampling point a Wetland?
Drainage Class: ~ftite_ y~s'}" ,~o°~~ o(.rarrted
Field Observations `/
Confirm Mapped Type? (YIN)
KemarKS: