20080900 Ver 1_Baseline Monitoring Report_20111114

eT
Not

Meadowbranch Swamp Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03040203
Baseline Monitoring Report • Robeson County, North Carolina November 2011
Table of Contents
1 0
Executive Summary I
2 0
Project Goals, Background and Attributes 2
2 1 Location and Setting 2
2 2 Project Goals and Objectives 3
2 3 Project Structure, Restoration Type and Approach 3
2 4 Project History, Contact and Attribute Data 4
3 0
Success Criteria 5
31 Vegetation 5
3 2 Hydrology 5
4 0
Monitoring Plan Guidelines 7
41 Hydrology 7
4 2 Vegetation Plan 7
5 0
Maintenance and Contingency Plans 7
6 0
Documenting the As Built Condition (Baseline) 7
6 1 As- Built/Record Drawings 7
6 2 Baseline Data Collection 7
7 0
References 8
Project Conditions and Monitoring Data Appendices
Appendix 1 — General Figures and As -Built Drawings
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
Figure 2 Baseline Protect Drawings (Sheets l thru 5)
Figure 3 As -Built Drawings (Sheets AB -1 thru AB -4)
Appendix 2 — General Project Tables
Table la Project Components
Table 1 b Component Summations
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 Project Contacts RECEIVER)
Table 4 Project Attnbutes R
NOV 1 5 2011
Appendix 3 —Assessment Data
NC ECOSYSTEM
Table 5 Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
Table 6 Vegetation Metadata
Table 7 Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Table 8 Vegetation Condition Assessment
Table 9 Stem Count Total by Random Transect Plot
Chart 1 Consecutive Days of Groundwater within 12" of Ground Surface
Appendix 4 — Project Site Photographs
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Random Vegetation Monitoring Plots within Chinese Privet Areas Photos
t i
Structure Photos
®EcoEngmeering
A d­., n of The John R W \dam. (umpam 1.

Meadowbranch Swamp Wetland Restoration USGS HUC 03040203
Baseline Monitoring Report • Robeson County, North Carolina November 2011
0
1.0 Executive Summary
The Meadowbranch Swamp Wetland Restoration site was selected for wetland restoration,
enhancement, and preservation by the North Carolina Department of the Environment and
Natural Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCDENR -EEP) The purpose of this
restoration project was to restore, enhance, and preserve a low lying area adjacent to
Meadowbranch Swamp This was be accomplished by restoring surface flow and
groundwater elevations within the site area by removing a former logging road and
modifying the canal access road The intent of this project was to change these site features
to restore the wetland functions as closely as possible to that of pre - disturbance conditions
The project site is approximately one -half mile west - northwest of Lumberton, in Robeson
County, North Carolina as depicted on Figure 1 (Appendix 1), Project Site and Reference
Site Vicinity Map The site consists of a wooded parcel owned by the Lumber River
Conservancy which encompasses approximately 55 4 acres The site is located along
Carthage Road which bounds the site to the south Located immediately adjacent to the west
of the site is a channelized water feature known as Meadowbranch Swamp canal There is an
access road, which is maintained by the City of Lumberton, along Meadowbranch Swamp
canal which extends north from Carthage Road to SR 211 In addition, there was a former
logging road located within the interior of the site which began approximately 100 feet from
Meadowbranch Swamp canal The former logging road began at Carthage Road and
extended north, roughly paralleling Meadowbranch Swamp canal for a distance of
approximately 2,000 feet Along the eastern edge of the former logging road was a ditch
feature
Several approaches were used to restore the project site The primary actions to restore the
site included removal of the former logging road, filling the ditch feature along the eastern
edge of the former logging road, minor earthwork to modify the existing access road along
Meadowbranch Swamp canal, removal of existing culverts within the former logging road
and access road, treatment of the largest concentrations of Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinese),
and replanting areas along the former logging road, filled in drainage feature, and areas with
highest concentrations of Chinese privet Removal of the former logging road involved
excavating material from the logging road and placing it back into the ditch feature located
along the eastern edge of the former logging road In addition, there were five (5) culverts
along the former logging road which were removed Modifications to the access road along
Meadowbranch Swamp canal involved designing several road crossings, or low areas built
into the access road, to mimic the natural Swale observed adjacent to the reference area
These road crossings will allow flood events onto the project parcel In addition, there were
six (6) culverts along the access road which were removed This will hydrologically
reconnect the site with Meadowbranch Swamp canal, allowing water from overbank flood
events to be distributed and stored over the entire site Within the highest concentrations of
Chinese privet, the trunks and branches of the Chinese privet were removed, treated with
aquatic safe herbicide, and were replanted
©EcoEngineenng
A do—of TTc H fm %I Adorn U qu W

Meadowbranch Swamp Wetland Restoration - USGS HUC 03040203
Baseline Monitoring Report - Robeson County, North Carolina November 2011
Through these actions, the project has restored and enhanced 47 31 acres of riverme wetlands
Ci which had a disturbed surface flow regime The project also included 0 35 acres of vegetative
riverme wetland enhancement and the preservation of existing riverme wetlands (0 87 acres)
2.0 Proiect Goals, Background and Attnbutes
2.1 Location and Setting
The site is located approximately 2,500 feet to the west of Interstate 95 near Exit 19 in
Lumberton, North Carolina The project area encompasses 55 4 acres along Carthage Road
which abuts the site to the south The site is situated within the 100 -year floodplain
associated with Meadowbranch Swamp canal which is adjacent to the west The site
includes an access road along the canal which has been established by the City of Lumberton
From Carthage Road extending north, the canal road extends approximately 3,000 feet of the
access road along the east side of Meadowbranch Swamp canal From SR 211 extending
south, the City primarily utilizes approximately 4,200 feet of the access road along the
western side of Meadowbranch Swamp canal Located within the interior of the site was a
former logging road which roughly paralleled Meadowbranch Swamp canal The former
logging road began along Carthage Road approximately 100 feet east of Meadowbranch
canal and extended north for approximately 2,000 feet A ditch feature was located along the
eastern edge of the former logging road
The project site is almost entirely forested primarily with young hardwoods and some areas
of young pine This is due to the fact that the site was logged approximately 15 years ago
J Due to the timing of the logging, the site is currently at a stage of succession where the
vegetation is very dense In general, the site is too disturbed to adequately assess the ultimate
climax community types Also, the increase in hydrology from the project may also adjust
the community type boundary Currently, there are a few small areas near the access road
along Meadowbranch Swamp that still have stands of relatively older growth bald cypress
(Taxodium distichum) and would be designated as Cypress -Gum Swamp Other larger areas
have some young bald cypress, but the areas are more dominated by red maple (Acer
rubrum) and river birch (Betula nigra) and it is not clear what community will ultimately
predominate Besides those few areas of Cypress -Gum Swamp on the site, the remainder of
the area could probably best be described as a disturbed site undergoing succession to a
Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwood (based on reference wetland conditions) In general, the
majority of the site appears to have strong characteristics of bottomland hardwood In
general, large portions of the site are naturally regenerating with appropriate native
vegetation and it would probably be counter - productive to intercede in this natural process
However, some portions of the site contained large concentrations of Chinese privet which
have been removed, treated, and replanted
The site is located in the Inner Coastal Plain Physiographic Region of North Carolina and lies
within the USGS Hydrologic Unit Code 03040203 080010 (USGS, 1974), which falls within
the Lumber River basin The NC DWQ River Subbasin for the project area is listed as the
Lumber 03 -07 -51 (NCDENR, 2003) The current State classification for Meadowbranch
Swamp (Stream Index # 14 -12) from its source to the Lumber River, is Class C and Swamp
J Waters (Sw) waters (NCDENR, 2006) Class C waters support aquatic life, wildlife, and
2 [JEcoEngineenng
Aib% n of Thc J,hn R MicAda Cm qw Inc

Meadowbranch Swamp Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03040203
Baseline Monitoring Report • Robeson County, North Carolina November 2011
they can also be used for secondary recreation and agriculture The Sw classification is
intended for waters which have low velocities and other natural characteristics, different
from adjacent streams
2.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The goal of this project was to restore, enhance, and preserve the project area This was
achieved by creating low areas in the access road based on flood elevations, removing an
existing former logging road and adjacent canal within the site, and planting native wetland
vegetation in select areas This has returned the site to a more natural hydrologic state which
will
• Store and treat runoff from 1 8 square miles of developed land, nearly half of
Lumberton, which drains to the project site
• Allow for retention and treatment of sediment, nutrients, and toxins to improve water
quality of the Lumber River which is listed as impaired approximately six miles
downstream of project site
• Support the goals outlined in the 2003 Lumber River Basinwide Water Quality Plan
by implementing a project within a watershed that has been identified by the NC
Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) as having the greatest need
• Assist in the improvement of water quality, the Basinwide plan indicates 406 miles of
waters within Subbasin 03 -07 -51 are impaired
• Provide a more natural flood regime and flood storage for waters in Meadowbranch
Swamp
�) 0 Connect to surrounding wetland areas and enhance the wildlife habitat present in the
wetland
2.3 Project Structure, Restoration Type and Approach
The project area is located adjacent to Meadowbranch Swamp with a drainage area of 34 4
square miles In addition, the site is located only about 1,000 feet upstream where
Meadowbranch Swamp empties into the Lumber River The drainage from Meadowbranch
Swamp and the Lumber River contribute to the flood events at the site As such, the project
area regularly experiences hydrologic inputs from local rain events and more widespread
"whole basin" events The entire project area is located within a designated 100 year
floodplain Therefore, the type of wetland targeted for the project area was a palustrine
riverme floodplain wetland system Historically, alterations to the site associated with the
maintenance of the access road along Meadowbranch Swamp canal and from the previous
logging operations modified the hydrologic functions of the existing wetlands The project
will counteract these impacts to the wetlands by improving hydrologic connections to
Meadowbranch Swamp and by removing a constructed logging road which is impeding
surface water movement across the site
The first modification was the installation of road crossings along the access road which are
cuts in the access road to allow surface flow from Meadowbranch Swamp canal into the
adjacent low lying areas A total of nine (9) areas were lowered along the access road and
consisted of a series of cuts along the canal to promote temporary flooding of the site during
3 ®EcoEngmeenng
A4- -r7TelnhnR %kAd.m lump., Inc

I 1
Meadowbranch Swamp Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03040203
Baseline Momtonng Report • Robeson County, North Carolina November 2011
overbank events The City of Lumberton requires vehicle traffic along the eastern side of
Meadowbranch Swamp Therefore, five (5) crossings along the access road were reinforced
and referred to as roadway crossings The remaining four (4) crossings, located north of
where the City of Lumberton requires vehicle traffic, were referred to as berm cuts
Additionally modifications to the access road included the removal of six (6) culverts
The crossings and berm cuts constructed along the access road allow more frequent overbank
flooding of the site which enhances the hydrologic wetland component of the project Each
of the nine (9) crossings or berm cuts has lowered the top of bank elevation by approximately
two to three feet Historical flooding information provided in Appendix 7 of the 2007
Restoration Plan for this project, showed the site (on average) flooding to an elevation of 113
five times per year and to an elevation of 115 only two tames per year Re- connecting the
historic floodplam to the Meadowbranch Swamp canal at an elevation of 113 more than
doubles the average flooding frequency and enhances the hydrologic regime on -site
The second modification was the removal of the former logging road to allow surface flow
across the site The ditch located along the east side of the former logging road was filled in
with soil material excavated from the former logging road Additional modifications
included the removal of five (5) culverts under the former logging road The former logging
road and filled in drainage feature were replanted
The third modification was the removal of trunks and branches of the Chinese privet located
within high concentration areas The Chinese privet was treated with aquatic herbicide and
replanted The final action was the establishment of a conservation easement on the parcel
owned by the Lumber River Conservancy which encompasses approximately 55 4 acres
The actions of the project have restored and enhanced 47 31 acres of nverme wetlands which
had a disturbed surface flow regime The project also included 0 35 acres of vegetative
riverme wetland enhancement and the preservation of existing riverme wetlands (0 87 acres)
The preservation of existing uplands (1 59 acres) and areas associated with the access road,
staging area, and utility easement (5 28 acres) round out the remainder of the conservation
easement acreage
Located to Appendix 2 are Table la (Project Components) and Table lb (Component
Summations)
Z4 Project History, Contact and Attribute Data
Located in Appendix 2 are Table 2 (Project Activity and Reporting History), Table 3 (Project
Contacts), and Table 4 (Project Attributes)
4 ®EcoEngineenng
Adnu not TLCA hnR McAdam C-1— la

Meadowbranch Swamp Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03040203
Baseline Monitoring Report • Robeson County North Carolina November 2011
r --�� 3.0 Success Criteria
l fJ 3.1 Vegetation
The project area has been planted in targeted areas with species appropriate for Coastal Plan
Bottomland Hardwood and Cypress -Gum Swamp community types Areas planted included
the former logging road and adjacent drainage ditch, and the Chinese privet areas after their
removal
Vegetation will be monitored on an annual basis to determine survival This monitoring
process will be conducted in an effort to show the survival of a diverse target community
such that the restored site has survival at a density of 320 stems /acre after three years and 288
at year 4 Final stem count criteria are 260 trees per acre at the end of the five (5) year
monitoring In addition, the areas being controlled for privet will be assessed during
monitoring for the return of privet If the privet returns in a quantity that threatens the
targeted plants, then corrective actions will need to be taken
In accordance to CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation (CVS -EEP, v4 2), three (3)
vegetation monitoring plots, which are 20 meter by 5 meter in size, have been established
within the former logging road Figure 2 As Built located in Appendix 1 shows the location
of the vegetation plots In addition, within the Chinese privet areas two (2) random transects,
which were 50 meter by 2 meter in size, were assessed for planted stems (Appendix 1, Figure
2)
3.2 Hydrology
The restored wetlands have been designed to function as a bottomland hardwood forest, but
will consist of Cypress -Gum Swamp and Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwood communities
(Schafale & Weakley, 1990) according to reference data Therefore, the wetlands restored on
this project site shall target establishing a wetland with water tables near or at the surface
Based on reference data collected, the performance criteria for the site shall consist of the
water table being within 12 inches of the soil surface continuously for greater than 10% of
the growing season under average rainfall conditions (USACE, 1987), as measured in the
restored area of the former logging road Groundwater table elevations within this area will
be deemed successful if water tables meet these criteria For this region, the growing season
is 213 days, therefore, the water table must be within 12 inches of the soil for twenty four
(21) consecutive days or more To monitor the water table at the site, ten (10) automated
groundwater gauges were installed in October, 2006
5 ©EcoEngineering
A drown of rht Nhn R %S Ad— l wryum Inc

Meadowbranch Swamp Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03040203
Baseline Momtonng Report • Robeson County North Carolina November 2011
Maximum Consecutive
` —' Monitorin g
Days of Ground Water Within 12" of the Surface
Growing Season
Wells
2006*
2007
2008 2009
2010
2011 **
24
30
23 22
25
n/a
1
2
15
34
55 40
42
50
3
24
116
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
4
14
29
24 20
22
8
5
24
113
120 59
50
55
6
23
87
120 113
64
73
7
23
89
122 112
65
83
8
9
2
15 39
11
13
9
14
31
49 40
26
50
REF
15
13
32 52
37
21
Notes
Construction/earthwork completion around 9/15/2010
*Year 2006 data collection began on 10/27/2006
* *Year 2011 data collection ended on 9/1/2011
During a site visit on September 1, 2011, Monitoring Well 8 was found protruding from the
�\ ground The calibration point was a significant amount above the ground surface It has yet
to be determined if the well was originally installed above the calibration point or if the well
has moved over time The data from Monitoring Well 8 does not accurately represent the
groundwater elevation
J
Additionally, the site will experience overbank flooding events as an important part of its
function Specific performance criteria for the site indicating success shall consist of flood
waters reaching the improved road crossings, at an elevation equal to the existing elevation
of the adjacent wetlands, at least four (4) times per year The flooding occurrence
performance criteria are only valid if rainfall amounts are equal to or greater than historical
averages Table 3, below, provides a summary of rainfall data for Lumberton, NC
Lumberton Yearly Total Rainfall
1 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Average
Rainfall (in) 1 422 2265 433 326 357 34 51* 4685
Notes
*Total rainfall from 01/01/2006 to 10/01/2011
The data obtained from the State Climate Office of North Carolina shows the annual rainfall
amounts for Lumberton, NC from 2006 to present to be less than the historical average
6 ©EcoEnglneenng
A do i ion M The John R %k \dam C mq� Inc

(� 4.0 Monitorine Plan Guidelines
4.1 Hydrology
Meadowbranch Swamp Wetland Restoration USGS HUC 03040203
Baseline Momtonng Report • Robeson County, North Carolina November 2011
To monitor the water table at the site during the initial project investigation and design, ten
(10) automated groundwater gauges, a stream gauge, and rainfall gauge were installed at the
site during the initial project investigation and design Three (3) additional automated
groundwater gauges have been placed within the limits of the restored area of the former
logging road to measure the groundwater table All thirteen (13) automated groundwater
gauges, the stream gauge, and rainfall gauge wells will be monitored at least three (3) times
per year
4.2 Vegetation Plan
Vegetation will be monitored on an annual basis to determine planted stem survival This
monitoring process will be conducted in an effort to show the survival of a diverse target
community such that the restored site has survival at a density of 320 stems /acre after three
years and 288 at year 4 Final stem count criteria are 260 trees per acre at the end of the five
(5) year monitoring
5.0 Maintenance and Contingency Plans
At least annually during monitoring and any problem areas will be noted by site personnel
and the information will be provided to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) EEP
will evaluate the problem at that time and determine the best course of action Site visits will
also be conducted by the monitoring contractor and EEP on an occasional basis throughout
the year to identify potential problem areas This approach of frequent site visits will ensure
that any developing problem can be addressed before it poses a mayor risk to the success of
the project
6.0 Documenting the As Built Condition (Baseline)
6.1 As- Built/Record Drawings
As -built drawings are located in Appendix 1
6.2 Baseline Data Collection
Baseline data was collected during the As -Built survey which was conducted from
September 1 through 3, 2011 Year 1 monitoring data will be compared to 0 -Year data to
evaluate if there are any problem areas occurring at the site
7 ®EcoEngineenng
dogum oI The k hnR %IcAd,m ( mimi) Inc

l
Meadowbranch Swamp Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03040203
Baseline Monitoring Report • Robeson County, North Carolina November 2011
7.0 References
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) December 2003 2003 Lumber
River Basmwide Water Quality Plan Division of Water Quality
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR), 2005 North Carolina
Waterbodies Listed by Subbasm Report Date 9/30/05
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR), 2006 Surface Water
Classifications http //h2o enr state nc us/csu/swc html
Pierce, Gary J 1993 Planning hydrology for constructed wetlands Wetland Training Institute, Inc
Poolesville, MD
Rantz, S E, et al 1982a Measurement and Computation of Streamflow, Volume 1, Measurement of
Stage and Discharge, U S Geological Survey, USGS Water - Supply Paper 2175
Schafale, Michael P and Weakley, Alan S 1990 Classification of the Natural Communities of
North Carolina Third Approximation NC Department of Environment, Health, and Natural
Resources
Schafale, Michael P and Weakley, Alan S 2003 Classification of the Natural Communities of
North Carolina Fourth Approximation NC Department of Environment, Health, and Natural
Resources Copy obtained through Carolina Vegetative Survey Website obtained July 2006
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual
Technical Report Y -87 -1, January 1987
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2002 Regulatory Guidance Letter RGL No 02 -2,
December 24, 2002
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2003 April 2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines
U S Department of Agriculture (USDA), Soil Conservation Service, 1978 Soil Survey of Robeson
County, North Carolina
U S Department of Agriculture (USDA), 1997 Engineering Field Handbook 210 -EFH, Part 650,
1/92, revised 1997
United States Geological Survey (USGS), 1974 North Carolina Hydrologic Unit Map
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2005 Information Regarding Stream Restoration In The
Outer Coastal Plain Of North Carolina US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District,
Regulatory Division and North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Division of Water Quality December 1, 2005
U S Fish and Wildlife Service, 2006 Robeson County Endangered Species, Threatened Species,
and Federal Species of Concern http //www fws gov /nc -es /es /cntylist/robeson html
FIjEcoEngineering
Adn �wmm The MhnR \k \dam.(amrym Inc

APPENDIX 1
GENERAL FIGURES AND AS -BUILT DRAWINGS
i

- ,..
14 0 'IWO,
4.
s I TE"
r • ! • r
•• • - �. —�_ �. _ tea•- •"..'F�. . 5
r • • • • 1 -.ter - � '.rr —�' � .,I ♦ / �.� •• � �� -• Curt::
t• -yr• � y l• � I r� ,. •ryljy7i i
r_. - ,��,- R r / �,.` r, X211 • �I
�,. • �.- _ e r ! /'°• % .!'�_/` -Ll- ;t! ' `.�) - i A _ '\ Zero DT _
to
` fi t pwc, 7
�,.��• .` If f9 ' i . It 1616 • �, t ti .' j 4
mosimom
.f
LEGEND:
APPROXIMATE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
APPROXIMATE REFERENCE AREA BOUNDARY 03040203
NOTES:
MAP SOURCE: 1982 USGS NW LUMBE:RTON QUAD 2000 0 1000 2000
PROJECT: MEADOWBRANCH. DENR #D07017S
ROBESON COUNTY. NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE: 1" = 2000'
0L EL-P-06050
( ��1j(,�`� m
PROJECT SITE & REFERENCE
SITE VICINITY MAP
AEcoEngineenng
Am.;"OeTrefor.ri W. —Ompmy Emc.
:NGINEERS• PLANNERS• SURVEYORS- ENVIRONMENTAL
EEPOW50
WAM 1" : ��.
RESEARCH TR CLE PARK- CHARLOTTE
1
10 -07 -11
1 I11 Ir�� C�I�ICIII
• m
ef/4J<1� 1
Flat= 1
7� W-d.. IN.It-y, W fi— WC 27719
OOO-7J9- 5696•ww.joimw�aYrtu.com• i-- M: C -0219

NORTH OBERTS AVE. - 1 -95
WEST CARTHAGE
ROAD P 1,
SITE
fEXIT 19
t
LUMBERTON,
(UMBER RIVER ...........
VICINPIY MAP LUMBERTON, NC
NOT TO SCALE
GENERAL NOTES
1. PREPARED FOR INC ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM, 1652 MAIL
SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NC 27699 -1652.
2. AS -BUILT SURVEY PROVIDED BY TURNER LAND SURVEYING, DAVID S.
TURNER, LICENSE NO.: L -4551.
3. EXACT RECORDS CAN BE FOUND ON FILE WITH ECOENGINEERING UNDER
JOB NUMBER EEP- 06050.
4. THE TOTAL EASEMENT ACREAGE FOR THIS PROJECT IS 56.66 ACRES.
EASEMENT BOUNDARY WAS PROVIDED BY OTHERS.
5. NCGS MONUMENTS HOSPITAL AND KATY WERE USED AS CONTROL FOR
SURVEY DATA.
6. THE SENIOR DESIGN CONTACT FOR THIS PROJECT IS JAMES M. HALLEY,
PE OF ECOENGINEERING, 919 - 287 -4262.
7. THE EEP PROJECT MANAGERS ARE TRACY STAPLETON AND HEATHER
SMITH, 919 -715 -5590.
8. THE EEP REVIEW COORDINATOR IS LIN XU, PE, 919- 715 -7571.
BASELINE PROJECT DRA WINGS
MEADOWBRANCH SWAMP WETLAND RESTORATION PROJECT
R OBESON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
NC ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT
SCO# 06- 06731 -01
i
i
k
CANAL e '
EEP ID# 92351
I
GRAPHIC SCALE
500 0 250 500 1000
1 inch = 500 ft.
IPERTY BOUNDARY,
IVIDED BY OTHERS
STATIONING ALONG ACCESS ROAD � UP TO
STATION 30 +74. STATION 30 +74 TO STATION
47 +88 IS ALONG TOP OF BANK (BERM).
/I
TrnZ /COVER SHEET
LATITUDE =
34.6352455' N
---- - - - - --
PLAN VILW
LONGITUDE
= 79.0289021' W
SHEET 5
MMGATION SUMMARY
- - - - --
X06
° y °�—
° CA
°�pr
ti $
co
Co
+ o o $
✓
co
o
N��N_ O pp
to
pp p 10
--
CANAL
AS -BUILT OVERIAY SHEET INDEX:
SHEET I
TrnZ /COVER SHEET
SHEET 2
LEGEND
SHEET 3
PLAN VILW
SHEET 4
PLANTED AREAS
SHEET 5
MMGATION SUMMARY
AS -BUILT SHEET INDEX:
SHEET AB-I
ITTIE. VICRQW MAP. SHEET
INDEX. AND GENERAL NOTES
SHEET AB-2
ROADWAY CUTS
SHEET AB-3
BERM CUTS
SHEET AB-4
REMOVED LOGGING ROAD
BASIS OF BEARINGS:
NC GRID, NAD 83
.0
c�
O
V
W<
y�
0611'
i
C�
z off„
�o
99
A r ai
W
�i
a��
Wx
W�
GQ
Cn
0 o z
`-
0 4 O
O o N
o tr) a z u
W w i
W (n
a
m
z
E
Z
SHELr 1 J S McABA -M

LEGEND
----------- - - - - -- LUMBER RIVER CONSERVANCY PARCEL
ROADS
FENCE
xSEC 1 CROSS—SECTION
C � �
CD
LLJ
PRIVET REMOVAL AREAS O
ROADWAY CUT IRIM �
CUT IN BERM
SEWER LINE
- RANDOM TRANSECTS VEG PLOTS
sGi STREAM GAUGE UPLAND AREAS
MW 7 MONITORING WELL
\ \ \ BOTTOMLAND HARDWOOD
RAIN GAUGE CYPRESS GUM SWAMP
W W W W
MITIGATION SUMMARY LEGEND
i'�'�i.'�'�'�'�i • - - • - • .
PRESERVATION (WETLANDS)
PRESERVATION (UPLANDS)
ACCESS ROAD, STAGING AREA,
�= - - -: & UTILITY EASEMENT
C�
z
0
� g
a�
w�z
w
as
z
Lo
i o
co 0 N
0
� Z ¢
tj i
L
z
m
F �
U
k. fn O
SHEET 2 / l aMcABAMS
ENHANCEMENT OF
WETLANDS
\ (HYDROLOGICAL)
ENHANCEMENT OF
WETLANDS
(HYDROLOGICAL &
VEGETATIVE)
ENHANCEMENT OF
WETLANDS
(VEGETATIVE)
PRESERVATION (WETLANDS)
PRESERVATION (UPLANDS)
ACCESS ROAD, STAGING AREA,
�= - - -: & UTILITY EASEMENT
C�
z
0
� g
a�
w�z
w
as
z
Lo
i o
co 0 N
0
� Z ¢
tj i
L
z
m
F �
U
k. fn O
SHEET 2 / l aMcABAMS

0
0
A& o
BERM CUTS (4)
GRAPHIC SCALE
300 0 150 300 600
BASS OF BEARINGS:
1 inch = 300 ft. %C GRID, NAD 93
1
ANss
LUMBER RIVER CONSERVANCY PARCEL
- -- - --
- ROADS
--
FENCE
XKC 1
CROSS - SECTION
SEWER LINE
RANDOM TRANSECTS
STREAM GAUGE
MONITORING WELL
RAIN GAUGE
- - - - --
4
118 0�
1
116,5
114.9
LEGEND
PRIVET REMOVAL AREAS
ROADWAY CUT
CUT IN BERM
..........
VEG PLOTS
FORMER LOGGING ROAD AND
DITCH FEATURE REMOVED
VPl RAIN GAUGE
i. ►
s
m`�
1�5• � g�
LFFT Ad?
iii►'
i
ROADWAY CUTS (5)
{ I
I �
i
i I
{
{ I
SEEWT 3
C�
.m
C
0
V
W<
0
z
�o
tea'
A
U
a�
a�
a�
o z
o o
t0 0 N
0 0 'n I
d z II M
J
W O
a m
z
F
v s
MCADAMS

\
r . r
• r r
�` r v • r
�\ \ \ \ \ \\
`ter • \
r
•
• •
r r
ZONE 1 - CYPRESS -r1w SWAMP
\ \ \ ZONE 2 - COASTAL PLAIN 130 MLAND HA8Q1I!=
UPLAND
ZONE 1 - CYPR
STEMS PER
ACRE (DESIGN)
ACRES
SPECIES
COMMON NAME
QUANTITY PLANTED
TAXODIUM DISTICHUM
BALD CYPRESS
670
66D
SETULA NIGRA
RIVER BIRCH
600
660
127
DESIGN SUBTOTAL - 127 AC X 660 STEMS /AC - 864 STEMS
PLANTED SUBTOTAL - 1,470 STEMS MINIMUM
ZONE 2 — COASTAL PLAIN BOTTOMLAND HARDWOOD
QUANTITY PLANTED
STEMS PER
ACRE (DESIGN)
ACRES
SPECIES
COMMON NAME
QUERCUS LAURIFOLIA
LAUREL OAK
1000
680
QUERCUS NIGRA
WATER OAK
1000
680
QUERCUS PHELLOS
WILLOW OAK
1000
680
640
BETULA NIGRA
RIVER BIRCH
600
680
FRAXINUS PENNSYVANICA
GREEN ASH
1000
680
GN SUBTOTAL = 6 40 AC X 680 STEMS /AC = 4,352 STEMS
PLANTED SUBTOTAL - 4 600 STEMS MINIMUM
DESIGN TOTAL = 5 216 STEMS
PLANTED TOTAL = 6 070 STEMS
MEADOWBRANCH PLANTING UST SUMMARY COMPILED 5 -16 -11
NC DIVISION OF FOREST RESOURCES BILL OF LADING TICKET
FROM NATIVES INC, OBTAINED DURING PLANTING SITE VISIT 2 -16 -11
PERMANENT SEED WAS APPLIED TO ALL DISTURBED AREAS
POND CYPRESS WAS PLANTED IN WETTER AREAS WHERE POSSIBLE
PLANTING AREA (FORMER LOGGING
ROAD AND CANAL) = 2 88 ACRES
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\
\\\\\\\ \ \\ \\\
\\\\\\\ \\\ \\\
PLANTING AREA
(TREATED PRIVET AREAS)
C � �
uJ
9.0 z
A�
W
03
w�
O
co Lo
O N
O c 1
z II M
w D! o
a
O m
Z
G
0
I
•
�-- -- ---- - - -��_
/r�
PLANT ENTIRE D STU
B
D
PORTION OF AC SS
R
AD WITH
GRAPHIC SCALE
COASTAL PLAIN 0
LAND
HARDWOOD SPECI S
300 0 150 300 600 �1
BASIS OF BEARINGS
1 inch = 300 ft NC GRD NAD 113
SEMLT 4
C � �
uJ
9.0 z
A�
W
03
w�
O
co Lo
O N
O c 1
z II M
w D! o
a
O m
Z
G
0

JHANCEMENT OF WETLANDS \� ENHANCEMENT OF WETLANDS
'DROLOGICAL & VEGETATIVE (VEGETATIVE)
PRESERVATION (WETLANDS) Esm
Now
\ UTILITY EASEMENT
PRESERVATION (UPLAND)
MITIGATION SUMMARY TABLE
PROACT COMPONENT
FORMER LOGGING ROAD
2.68
ENHANCEMENT OF WETLANDS
(HYDROLOGICAL)
39.50
ENHANCEMENT OF WETLANDS
(HYDROLOGICAL & VEGETATIVE)
4.p3
ENHANCEMENT OF WETLANDS
(VEGETATIVE)
0 35
PRESERVATION (WETLANDS)
0.67
PRESERVATION (UPLANDS)
1.59
OTHER:
ACCESS ROAD &
STAGING AREA
UTIUTY EASEMENT
4 6B
0.62
TOTAL
55.40
ENHANCEMENT OF WETLANDS
\ \
(HYDROLOGICAL)
\
FORMER LOGGING ROAD
`
ENHANCEMENT OF WETLANDS
(HYDROLOGICAL)
GRAPHIC SCALE
ACCESS ROAD &
STAGING AREA
300 0 150 300
600
BASS OF BENWGS:
1 inch = 300 ft.
"C am. w w
ENHANCEMENT OF WETLANDS
(HYDROLOGICAL & VEGETATIVE)
SFELT 5
'01111 �
0
zo
Q�
W
q
0
03 �
U
W�
oz
o o
O o 0 N
I z r d-
a- _
W w I
W t/f
o m
Z
z
U <
M-r DAxS

r
I, DAVID & TURNER, AS A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, HEREBY CERTIFY
THAT THE DATA SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING WAS OBTAINED
UNDER MY SUPERVISION, IS AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE
REPRESENTATION OF WHAT WAS CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD
AND THAT THE PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOWN
THUS ARE AS-BUILT CONDITIONS EXCEPT WHERE OTHERWISE
NOTED HEREON WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE
REGISTRATION NUMBER, AND SEAL THIS Sth DAY OF
it LY 2011
!14,04, "+
P X551 "r
VAL
L-401
$41R�`P``�c
AS -BUILT SURVEY OF
MEADOWBRANCH SWAMP WETLAND
RESTORATION
SCO# 06- 06731 -01
ROBESON COUNTY
``+T ` \
!
NOT TO SCALE
/
`psi � ti
/ /rye
V 0 1y2o
\ % J T I
Rio II
sF ��
`99T y
aTr c+}
A 4n
sp9y
J �
1 �
- LUUWTGV
UFF STAn0N
£S DE' D
8 �0- "3
T PC 98 80
CITY OF LUMBERTON
0 B -68 PG 943
!� \ X
OWNER
NORTH CAROLINA ECOSYSTEM
ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
1652 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RAIFJGH NC 27099.1862
(919)7160478
EEP PROD MGR TRACY MORRIS
EEP REVIEW COORDINATOR LIN XU
FOR,
ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY RESOURCES LLC
ARBUTUS MD
(443PO4 -=0
DESIGNER
ECO ENGINEERING
A DIVISION OF THE JOHN R Md1DAMS
COMPANY INC
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
[phone]
SHEET INDEX
SHEET AB -1 - TITLE, VICINITY MAP, SHEET
INDEX, AND GENERAL NOTES
SHEET AB -2 - ROADWAY CUTS
SHEET AB-3 - BERM CUTS
SHEET A13-4 - REMOVED LOGGING ROAD
GENERAL NS
1 ALL DISTANCES ARE HOR¢ONTAL UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED
Z THE VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD29
S THE BASIS OF BEARINGS IS NCGS STATE
PLANE GRID COORDINATES NAM DATUM
BASED ON NODS LMU 49M `HOSPITAL•
AND'KATY' AS PROVIDED BY DESIGNER
4 CONTROL RECOVERED PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION AND VERIFIED DURING
AS -BUILT SURVEY
5 THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION,
SALES OR CONVEYANCES AND DOES NOT
COMPLY WITH G S 47-30 MAPPING
REQUIREMENTS
8 PRWET REMOVAL AREAS LOCATED USING
sU"M7ER GPS GPS UNIT USED WAS A
TRIMBLE GEOXT AND DATA WAS PROCESSED
USING TRIMBLE PATHFINDER
CL
Z
i
ch
�w
� t
Z
Qa
O
O CO g —
JIJ 2 0 q
w
�_
it 1— .
�Zw
J
ca
�Op�'
ap�
W Lu
w
DATE 811 Wl011
SURVEYED BY DSTIEGT
DRAWN 6tY DSTIEGT
RiViWW BY
DSTIEGT
PROJECT
TLS -10-012
FLLE
Ir�ADOYyE9tAI1g1 97x81_
A9 TL8 F
SCJ1Lt= AS SHON41
SKEET AB -1

0
Asu
' \XS -9
XS -10x \ \
ROADWAY
CUT 5
TLS #34 REBAR W /C�
N 323 900 18 USFT
\ E 1 991 260 34 USFT
?? EL 115 52 FT
AS -BUILT SURVEY BY $4o
TURNER LAND SURVEYING PLLC "�� -"-to
SURVEYED JUNE 2011 �" 1--�,�00
100 0 100 200 / ���__ '�— 15400 XS -7
SCALE 1 =100 (22x34)
1 =200 (11x17)
I DAVID 8 TURNER AS A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROUNA, HEREBY CERTIFY
THAT THE DATA SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING WAS OBTAINED
UNDER MY SUPERVISION IS AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE
REPRESENTATION OF WHAT WAS CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD
AND THAT THE PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOWN
THUS ARE AS43ULT CONDITIONS EXCEPT WHERE OTHERWISE
NOTED HEREON WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE
REGISTRATION NUMBER AND SEAL THIS 6th DAY OF
Y 2011
DAVID S TURNER, P L S 1 : `eseigl fM,
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
BY OTHERS
GENERAL NOTES
1 ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED
2 THE VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD29
3 THE BASIS OF BEARINGS IS NCGS STATE
PLANE GRID COORDINATES NAD83 DATUM
BASED ON NCGS MONUMENTS' HOSPITAL'
AND 'KATY' AS PROVIDED BY DESIGNER.
4 CONTROL RECOVERED PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION AND VERIFIED DURING
AS43ULT SURVEY
5 THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION
SALES OR CONVEYANCES AND DOES NOT
COMPLY WITH G S 47-30 MAPPING
REQUIREMENTS
5 PRIVET REMOVAL AREAS LOCATED USING
SUB4AETER GPS WS UNIT USED WAS A
TRIMBLE GEOXT AND DATA WAS PROCESSED
USING TRIMBLE PATHFINDER
ROADWAY
CUT 4
CENTERLINE OF
REMOVED LOGGING ROAD
SEE SHEET AB -4
17400 15+00 16+00 1
CROSS SECTION SCALE
HORIZONTAL 1-10' (22x34)
1'=20'(11x17)
VERTICAL. I (2244)
1 =4 (11x17)
EOGW -EDGE OF GEOWEB
BB-BOTTOM OF BANK
TB-TOP OF BANK
INT4NTERSECTION
SECTION 4
XS;
6
1200 ,
CONSERVATION PRIVET REMOVAL
EASEMENT 0 20 +/- ACRES
BY OTHERS
PRIVET REMOVAL
0 03 +/- ACRES, -
PRIVET REMOVAL
0 09+ /- ACRES
TLS #31 REBAR W /CAP
N 322 737 38 USFT
US / f-2E 1 991 195 71 USFT _ XS� �7
- - EL 11480 FTC XS- 1�C : = ,
3+1� � I I
" --BROADWAY
�
CENTERLINE B+Op-IC' CUT 1
ACCESS ROADS app
XS -4 9+00 �,,�
mo 9+00 r
ROADWAY XS -3' ROADWAY
CUT 3 CUT 2
CANAL 114
NOT SURVEYED
112
N N
112 �oT- 1,a
1 I
ROADWAY CUT 2
i
114 -
a,
n
I
CROSS SECTION 3
114 I- -� - - - -
-� �— 114
110 --
-at ^_ 110
}
r f r i x I -I �I cn
I
iv
I
N
118
`
rn
io--
^ --
- -�- -'
- - -� -s- -
112
105 o
-�
--� — I- - i --
108
114 �� --
s
- -� -- ' ^- --
\
I
x�nl I
1
I
m
-- --
r
-''- -
XS;
6
1200 ,
CONSERVATION PRIVET REMOVAL
EASEMENT 0 20 +/- ACRES
BY OTHERS
PRIVET REMOVAL
0 03 +/- ACRES, -
PRIVET REMOVAL
0 09+ /- ACRES
TLS #31 REBAR W /CAP
N 322 737 38 USFT
US / f-2E 1 991 195 71 USFT _ XS� �7
- - EL 11480 FTC XS- 1�C : = ,
3+1� � I I
" --BROADWAY
�
CENTERLINE B+Op-IC' CUT 1
ACCESS ROADS app
XS -4 9+00 �,,�
mo 9+00 r
ROADWAY XS -3' ROADWAY
CUT 3 CUT 2
CANAL 114
NOT SURVEYED
112
ROADWAY CUT 3
CROSS SECTION b
114
110
105
TLS #3 NAIL
N 322 194 90 USFT
LS #5 NAIL E 1 991 228 60 USFT
N 322 679 11 USFT EL 119 99 FT
E 1 991 075 07 USFT I
EL 11637 FT
i I
Nn
N N
CROSS SECTION 1
i
114 -
a,
n
co— 1
rrr c -�� -
-p-
—F- -rN
114
S I � I I
L
III J
�_
iv
cn
n'4 I
N
118
`
112 - -i—
^ --
- -�- -'
- - -� -s- -
- -g - -- -
ci
z
- L--- -L- -gI
112
o
g
114 �� --
s
ROADWAY CUT 3
CROSS SECTION b
114
110
105
TLS #3 NAIL
N 322 194 90 USFT
LS #5 NAIL E 1 991 228 60 USFT
N 322 679 11 USFT EL 119 99 FT
E 1 991 075 07 USFT I
EL 11637 FT
i I
Nn
N N
�
N1
^
CROSS
SECTION 9
j
X
°0
118
I
S I � I I
L
III J
�_
iv
cn
n'4 I
j
118
`
o
n
`O
--
I I
n
o
g
112
� I
3 2 11 114 110
I
112
GROSS SECTION 5
114 I- - I- -� -- -` -- i 114
f I I
ROADWAY CUT 4 112 I- -A ^ ' — `- 112
- - -- - - - - -_ CROSS SECTION 7 _- -_ - -_— — X II f I
m Z J -I
tO- I -I n =- - 1°�� I - -��- i - - -I- 114
114 n - mac- I a 110 1 -� 1101
I
T4 I ul x cz)
112 - - -- L -- - 1 -- f? = 112 108 - to ,08
o t
- --j 112 108
o S
114 CROSS SECTION 10
CROSS SECTION 6
114
112
110
105
112
110
108
1,2
110
108
114
112
110
108
ROADWAY CUT 5
CROSS
SECTION 9
118
I
S I � I I
L
III J
�_
iv
I
118
`
-I -
--
`— o- - -�
L
� a i
� v
a
114 �� --
-
1
- -� -- ' ^- --
\
I
x�nl I
1
I
I 114
-- --
c�
- — -- 0' -
+
-''- -
CROSS SECTION 6
114
112
110
105
112
110
108
1,2
110
108
114
112
110
108

NNAII L ;'
PRIVET REMOVAL
0 06 +/- ACRES
1 CONSERVATION
7 / i EASEMENT
l BY OTHERS
i
vj PRIVET REMOV
\ k'�
301 RE j'
TOP OF BANK -\
(BERM)
xS -1 XS -18
BERM
CUT 4 \
0 �>
xs -1 \ XS -16
3
BERM
CUT 3
CENTERLINE CANAL,,\\
NOT SURVEYED
i
AS BUILT SURVEY BY \
TURNER LAND SURVEYING PLLC \ \-�
SURVEYED JUNE 2011 '
100 0 100 200 \ k;
xS -1
SCALE 1" =100 (22x34) \
1 =200 (1107) BERM
CUT 2
I DAVID S TURNER, AS A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYOR N THE STATE OF NORTH CAROUN& HEREBY CERTIFY
THAT THE DATA SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING WAS OBTAINED
UNDER MY SUPERVISION IS AN ACCURATE AND C IMPLETE
REPRESENTATION OF WHAT WAS CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD
AND THAT THE PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOWN
THUS ARE AS -BUILT CONDITIONS EXCEPT WHERE OTHERWISE
NOTED HEREON WITNESS MY OWGNAL SIGNATURE
REGISTRATION NUMBER, AND SEAL THIS 5th- DAY OF
JULY 2011
O4
DAVID 8 P S VL^Tl _ AL =
i L4651 Y
y
��d 1
CROSS SECTION SCALE
HORIZONTAL 1 -10' (2bN)
1'=20'(11x17)
VERTICAL. 1--2 (22K44)
1'4' (11x17)
EOM -EDGE OF mATTINO
BB- BOTTOM OF BANK
TB-TOP OF BANK
INT4NTERSECTION
114
_ CROSS SECTION 11
18
�— 116 112
i a - =I n I I -1- I —�
a
o I
114 n I ; - -- 111 110
f i - ol��
T l
112 �- -i-_ -L - _L I _� -J� 112 108
12
I T
,!1 �
w W)
�
Ilo
�I
I
\
112{
I
110f
I
1081
118
BERM_ CUT 2 CROSS SECTION_ 13 _ _ CROSS SECTION 14
-- �- - — 118 114 - - 114
-
`M -�
118 112 112
114 I-- -- j— I - —� -- rn - - - �� -�— I I i 114 110
N^ w I I 1 110
112 -- - I- -I - -1 -L -f -- 1�
I _
L — — R 1112 toe o 108
o
i a a
j= BERM CUT 3
CROSS SECTION 15
` tte a t1s
I
PRIVET REMOVAL ��\% 114 I I r c? ' - - -M - -- I f 114
0 06 +/- ACRES ! -_ { { - L-
,� i
�r _-XS -14 PRIVET REMOVAL
0 05 +/- ACRES
�x
PRIVET REMOVAL
006+/- ACRES
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
BY OTHERS
\
XS -12
BERM xs -11
M
I �
CUT 1 �.
!
V
_
I
d
STATION 0 +00 TO 30 +74 IS
ALONG CENTERLINE ACCESS POAD
��
-,lv�,(
STATION 30+74 TO
5
47 +88 IS
ALONG TOP OF BANK (BERM)
>'
"
114
112
110
108
I
BERM CUT 4 114
CROSS SECTION 17 _
1 1
"'� I � i� I X� N I n I I
116 -�o t zr - -L - - -� ^ 1 - -- 116 112
ID
ID
__
114 - - 1 -- - --j-- -i- -� 114 110
16
r r4
�
�
rn
M
I �
I
I
_
I
�
I
16
r r4
�
�
En
F— I x
I �
—
I
�
v
t ♦ �
CROSS SECTION 18
GENERAL NOTES
1 ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL UNLESS OTHERWSE NOTED
2 THE VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD28
3 THE BASIS OF BEARINGS IS NCGS STATE PLANE GRID COORDINATES NA083 DATUM BASED ON
NCGS MONUMENTS WWITAL" AND KATY' AS PROVIDED BY DESIGNER.
4 CONTROL RECOVERED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND VERIFIED DURING ASaU1LT SURVEY
6 THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION SALES OR CONVEYANCES AND DOES NOT COMPLY WITH
O S 47 30 MAPPING R£OU REMENTS
6 PRIVET REMOVAL AREAS LOCATED USING SU&METER GPS GPS UNIT USED WAS A TRIMBLE
GEOXT AND DATA WAS PROCESSED USING TRIMBLE PATHFINDER
114
112
110
108
1141
112
110

i
i
I `
GRAVEL I
` N % N 3 2 229 61 USFT DRI j I
E 1 99t 622 82 USF
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT CENTERUNE OF
BY OTHERS REMOVED
LOGGING ROAD
VEGETATION I I
PLOT
` TREELINE gSa00 t 1 I 1
N GRADING IN
Z�I j
THIS AREA
'W _ ,�� CENTERLINE OF
3 ::6a `+tti'n ACCESS ROAD SEE
_�� ' 16 57� �� SHEETS AB -2 & -' j / l CONSERVATION
ci AB-3� _/ ,i % EASEMENT I I
AS -BUILT �v BY OTHERS
J SURFACE SURVEY LIMITS i I
WATER ./ E CAN
NOOT T SURVEYED
73+00
72+00
7
7 �
1 DAVID S TURNER, AS A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLNA, HEREBY CERTIFY
THAT THE DATA SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING WAS OBTAINED
UNDER MY SUPERVISION 18 AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE
REPRESENTATION OF WHAT WAS CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD
AND THAT THE PHYSICAL DQKIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOWN
THUS ARE AS40JLT CONDIITONS EXCEPT WHERE OTHERWISE
NOTED HEREON WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE.
REGISTRATION NUMBER, AND SEAL THIS _th DAY OF
Y 2071
jff • CA
DAVID S TURNIER. P.L 8 X557
BFI.
L-401
ti
8Uq ,tF�`•
AS -BUILT SURVEY BY
TURNER LAND SURVEYING PLLC
SURVEYED JUNE 2011
50 0 50 100
SCALE 1 =50 (22x34)
1 =100 (1107)
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1
GENERAL NOTES
1 ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED
2 THE VERTICAL DATUM IS NOVD20
3 THE BASIS OF BEARINGS IS NCGS STATE
PLANE GRID COORDINATES NADS3 DATUM
BASED ON NCGS MONUMENT'S 1408PTTAL
AND "KATY" AS PROVIDED BY DESIGNER
4 CONTROL RECOVERED PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION AND VERIFIED DURM
ASaUfLT SURVEY
S THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION
SALES OR CONVEYANCES AND DOES NOT
COMPLY WITH G S 47-30 MAPPING
REQUBZEMENTS
S PRIVET REMOVAL AREAS LOCATED USING
SUB-M[ETER GPS GPS UNIT USED WAS A
TLRIMBLE OEOXT AND DATA WAS PROCESSED
USING TRIMBLE PATHFINDER
--
VEGETATION
CL J �t
PLOT
CENTERLINE OF
REMOVED
V I
2
VEGETATION LOGGING ROAD
63,AO
�-
o
PLOT -
�AS-BUILT
W
SURVEY
LIMITS
CENTERLINE OF
67 t /'
ACCESS ROAD SEE
SHEETS AB -2 &
AB -3�
t I�t
°
0
az
a_
00Ngo
F_
Z
_
0
C9
OI-fZ�O
I
Z w
GENERAL NOTES
1 ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED
2 THE VERTICAL DATUM IS NOVD20
3 THE BASIS OF BEARINGS IS NCGS STATE
PLANE GRID COORDINATES NADS3 DATUM
BASED ON NCGS MONUMENT'S 1408PTTAL
AND "KATY" AS PROVIDED BY DESIGNER
4 CONTROL RECOVERED PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION AND VERIFIED DURM
ASaUfLT SURVEY
S THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION
SALES OR CONVEYANCES AND DOES NOT
COMPLY WITH G S 47-30 MAPPING
REQUBZEMENTS
S PRIVET REMOVAL AREAS LOCATED USING
SUB-M[ETER GPS GPS UNIT USED WAS A
TLRIMBLE OEOXT AND DATA WAS PROCESSED
USING TRIMBLE PATHFINDER
CL J �t
Z
iOhl
V I
2
o
z
W
a
t I�t
°
0
az
a_
00Ngo
F_
Z
_
0
C9
OI-fZ�O
I
Z w
J m
>
TnZ�
0
a °g
0
W
DATE 811072011
8WRYEYED BY DSTIEGT
DRAWN By DSTZT
REvr1MED BY
DSTIEC3T
PRO,E CT
TLS -70-012
FILE
AO= ADOM9RMIgi_Y79G1_
� TL8_f
AS SHDWN
SHEEr
AB-4

APPENDIX 2
GENERAL PROJECT TABLES

Table 1 a Project Components
Meadowbranch Swamp Wetland Restoration /EEP ID# 92351
Project
Existing
Restoration
Approach
Acreage
Stationing
Mitigation
Mitigation
BMP
Comment
Component
P
Acres
Level
Ratio
Units
Elements '
Former Logging
288
R1
Grading of Road, Removal of Ditch
288
50 +00 —72+50
1 1
288
Road
Feature, & Replanting
Enhancement of
Wetlands
395
E
Improved Hydrologic Connections from
395
21
1975
(Hydrological)
Berm Cuts & Road Crossings
Enhancement of
Improved Hydrologic Connections from
Wetlands
493
E
Berm Cuts & Road Crossings, Privet
493
21
247
(Hydrological &
Removal, Herbicide Treatment, &
Vegetative)
Replanting
Enhancement of
Wetlands
0 35
E
Privet Removal, Herbicide Treatment,
035
21
018
(Vegetative)
&Replanting
Preservation
Wetlands
087
P
Preservation of Existing Wetlands
087
51
017
Preservation
1 59
Preservation of Existing Uplands
1 59
(Uplands)
Access Road &
466
466
Stagging Area
Utility Easement
062
062
Road Crossings
2+00-30+00
5 Total
Berm Cuts
I
1
32 +00 —44+00
4 Total
1 = BR = Bioretention Cell, SF = Sand Filter, SW = Stormwater Wetland, WDP = Wet Detention Pond, DDP = Dry Detention Pond
FS = Filter Strip Grassed Swale = S, LS = Level Spreader, NI = Natural Infiltration Area, O = Other
CF = Cattle Fencing WS = Watering System, CH = Livestock Housing
I Non- Applicable

Table 1b Component Summations
Meadowbranch Swamp Wetland Restoration /EEP ID# 92351
Non -
Restoration
Stream
Riparian
Ripar
Upland
Buffer
Level
(10
Wetland (Ac)
(Ac)
(Ac)
(Ac)
BMP
Non -
Rivenne
Riverine
Restoration
288
Enhancement
395
(Hydrological)
Enhancement
493
(Hydrological & Vegetative)
59
Enhancement (Vegetative)
035
Preservation Wetlands
087
Preservation (Uplands)
4853
Totals Acres
0
4853
0
159
0
0
MU Totalsi
0
2546
0
0
0
0
Non - Applicable

Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Meadowbranch Swamp-Wetland Restoration /EEP ID# 92351
Elapsed Time Since Grading Complete- 1 yr 0 months
Elapsed Time Since Planting Complete 0 yr 7 Months
Number of Reporting Years': 0
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
Apr -07
Jun -07
Final Design — Construction Plans
Oct -10
Dec -10
Construction
NA
Feb -11
Containerized, bare root and B&B plantings for reach /segments 182
NA
Feb -11
Mitigation Plan / As -built Year 0 Monitoring - baseline
Sep-1 1
Oct -11
Year 1 Monitoring
Year 2 Monitoring
Structural maintenance (bench expansion, vane) Reach 1
Year 3 Monitoring
Supplemental planting of containerized material reach/segment 1
Year 4 Monitoring
Bolded items are examples of those items that are not standard, but may come up and should be included
Non - bolded items represent events that are standard components over the course of a typical project
The above are obviously not the extent of potential relevant project activities, but are dust provided as example as part of this exhibit
If planting and morphology are on split monitoring schedules that should be made clear in the table
1 = Equals the number of reports or data points produced excluding the baseline

J
Table 3 Project Contacts Table
Meadowbranch Swamp Wetland Restoration /EEP ID# 92351
FDe
si gner
Firm Information / Address
oEngineering - A Division of The
2905 Meridian Parkway, Durham, NC 27713
John R McAdams Co
Prima ro ect desi n POC
POC name and phone Geroge Buchholz [phone]
Construction Contractor
Firm Information /Address
EQR, LLC
1405 Benson Court, Suite C, Arbutus, MD 21227
Construction contractor POC
POC name and phone James Walker [phone]
Survey Contractor
Firm Information /Address
Turner Land Surveying
P O Box 41023, Raleigh, NC 27629
Survey contractor POC
POC name and phone David Turner [phone]
Planting Contractor
Firm Information /Address
Natives Inc
550 East Westinghouse Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28273
Planting contractor POC
POC name and phone Gregg Antemann (866)527 -1177
Seeding Contractor
Company Information / Address
EQR, LLC
1405 Benson Court, Suite C, Arbutus, MD 21227
Contractor point of contact
POC name and phone James Walker [phone]
Seed Mix Sources
Company and Contact Phone
ERNST Seeds
9066 Mercer Pike, Meadville, PA 16335, (800)873 -3321
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Company and Contact Phone
Cumberland Mountain Nursery
357 Middle Ridge Road, Beersheba Springs TN 37305 (931)692-
2324
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Company and Contact Phone
NC Division of Forest Resources
1616 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699, [phone]
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Company and Contact Phone
NC Division of Forest Resources
1616 Mail Service Center Ralei h, NC 27699, [phone]
Monitoring Performers
Firm Information/ Address
EcoEngineering - A Division of The
2905 Meridian Parkway, Durham, NC 27713
John R McAdams Co
Stream Monitoring POC
POC name and phone
Ve etation Monitoring POC
POC name and phone George Buchholz [phone]
Wetland Monitorinq POC
POC name and hone George Buchholz 919 287 -4262

Table 4 Project Attribute Table
Meadowbranch Swam 3 Wetland Restoration /EEP ID# 92351
I Project County
Robeson
ysiograp is Region
Inner Coastal Plain
coregion
Southeastern Flood plains and Low Terrace
Project River Basin,Lumber
or Project (14 digit)
03040203080010
NCDWQ Sub-basin or Projec
03 -07 -51
Within extent of aters a an
N/A
WRC Hab Class arm, Cool, Cold)
Warm
% of project easement fenced or demarcated
100 %, by canal & by EEP markers
Beaver activity observed during design p ase
yes
Restoration Component Attnbute Table
PROJECT SITE
Meadow Branch Canal Drainage area
344
Stream order
3rd
Restored length (feet)
N/A
Perennial or Intermittent
N/A
Watershed type (Rural, Urban, Developing etc)
Dvl in
Watershed LULC Distribution (e g
Residential
Ag -Row Crop
Ag- Livestock
Forested
Etc
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Watershed impervious cover ( %)
N/A
NCDWQ AU /Index numbe
14 -12
NCDWQ classification
C, SW
303d listed
No
Upstream of a 303d listed segment
No
Reasons for 303d listing or stresso
N/A
Total acreage of easement
554
Total vegetated acreage within the easement
(wetland & privet areas)
5061
Total planted acreage as part of the restoration
(former logging road & privet areas ),
816
Rosgen classification of pre- existin
N/A
Rosgen classification of As -bud
N/A
Valley typ
N/A
Valley slo
N/A
Valley side slope range (e g 2 -3 %
N/A
Valley toe slope range (e g 2 -3 %1
N/A
Cowardin classificatio
N/A
Trout waters designatio
N/A
Species of concern, endangered etc ? (Y /N
N/A
Dominant soil series and characteristics
Sene
Bibb
Dept
N/A
Clay°/
N/A
N/A
N/A
Use N/A for items that may not apply Use"-" for items that are unavailable and "U" for items that are unknown

i
��J
Table 5 Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summaq Table
Meadowbranch Swamp Wetland Restoration /EEP
ID# 92351
Tract
Vegetation Plot ID
Vegetation Survival
Threshold Met9
Tract Mean
Meadowbranch
VPI
Y
100%
VP2
Y
VP3
Y

Table 6 Ve etatton Metadata
Meadowbranch gwamp Wetland Restot atton/EEP ID# 92351
Report Prepared By
George Buchholz
Date Prepared
9/13/2011 13 43
database name
cvs -eel)-ent tool -v2 2 7 mdb
database location
X \Projects\EEP\EEP- 06050 \Storm \Project Phases\Baselme Mon ton ng \CVS Monitoring
Plots
computer name
BUCHHOLZ
file size
49336320
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN
THIS DOCUMENT----- -
Metadata
Descriptton of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of pioject(s) and project
data
Pro j, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre for each year This excludes live
stakes
Pro j, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year This includes live
stakes, all planted stcros, and all natural /volunteer stems
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summtry data live stems dead stems, missing, etc
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems
impacted by each
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by e for each species
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallicd by e for each plot
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot, dead and
missing stems are excluded
PROJECT SUMMARY----------------- - - - - --
Project Code
92351
project Name
Meadowbranch Swamp Wetland Restoration
Description
restore sui face flow and groundwater elevations within the site area by removing the former
logging load and modifying the canal access road
River Basin
Lumber
length(ft)
4788
stream-to-edge width ft
7
areas m
622685
Plots calculated
3
,Required
Sam led Plots
3

Table 7, Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Umarinwhronrh Cwemn Wetland RPSfnrafinn /FFP trig 92351
----------
- - - - -- -
Baseline Monitoring Data MVO, 2011
Aaaval Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
5 ecies T e
92351 -01 -0001
92351 -01 -0002
92351 -01 -0003
MVN 2011
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
Pall
T
PnoLS
Pall
T
POOLS
Pall
T
Batula ni re
river birch
Tree
6
6
6
5
5
5
5
51
16
16
1
Fraxinus enn8 Ivanice
green ash
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
4
4
7
7
QUercus s.
oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
3
Quercus laurifolia
laurel oak
Tree
I
1
1
33
4
Quercus I rata
Over= Oak
Tree
4
2
2
6
6
Quemus n' ra
water oak
Tree
3
3
3
Quercus pagoda
the rk oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus hellos
willow oak
Tree
I
1
1
7
7
7
7
IS
15
1
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Stem count
size (arcs)
sire (ACRES
Species court
Stems per ACRE
15
151
15
19
191
1
22
22
56
56
1
1
1
3
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.07
6 6
6
b
4
4
0
607.03 607.03 607.03
768.90
768.90
768.
890.31
8%.311
M311
755.41321
755.41321 755.41
Notes:
a) Data presented in table was provided to EcoEOgineering from the Carolina Vegetation Survey Data was tat manipulated by EcoEngineering Formatting of table was performed by EcoEngineering.
b) PnoLS = Planted E.xchrding Live Stakes, P -all = All Planted Stems, T = Total Planted and Volunteer Stems

Table 8. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Meadowbrancb Swamp Wetland Restoration /EEP ID# 92351
Dlonf -A Ar— n Ilia
% of
Mapping
CCPV
Number of
Combined
Planted
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
4. Invasive Areas or
Very limited cover of o woody an
0.1 acres
--
0
0
0.00%
1. Bare Areas
herbaceous material.
black
Woody stem densities clearly e ow target
5. Easement
Areas or points (it too small to render as
2. Low Stem Density
levels based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count
0.1 acres
- - --
0
0
0.0%
Areas
criteria.
3. Areas of Poor Growth Areas with woody stems of a size class that 0.25 acres
- - --
0
0
0.0%
Rates or Vigor are obviously small given the monitoring year.
Cumaltive Total
0.00%
% of
Mapping
CCPV
Number of
Combined
Easement
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
4. Invasive Areas or
reas or points (if too small to render as
1000 SF
netting,
9
5.28
9.50%
Concern
polygons at map scale).
black
5. Easement
Areas or points (it too small to render as
0
0
LE
Encroachment Areas
polygons at map scale).
none

Table 9. Stem Count Total by Random Transect Plot
Meadowbranch Swami) Wetland Restoration /EEP ID# 92351
Notes:
a) Two vegetation plots consisting of 50 meter by 2 meter transects were randomly located within the Chinese privet areas. Visual identification
of planted stems occurred along the transecls. No measurements were taken of planted stems.
b) Total = Total planted stems along transect.
Color for Density of Planted Excluding Live Stakes
Exceeds r iranerxc Ill%
Fails io men "snaps bass then 100/0
Baseline Monitoring Data (MVO,
2011)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species T e
Random
Transect 1
Random
Transect 2
Total
Total
Betula ni ra
river birch
Tree
1
Fraxinue penns Ivanica
reen ash
Tree
4
Quercus sp.
oak
Tree
Quercus laurifolia
laurel oak
Tree
Quercus I rata
overcup oak
Tree
Quercus ni ra
water oak
Tree
1
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
9
1
Stem count
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
10
6
0.02
0.02
2
3
404.69
Notes:
a) Two vegetation plots consisting of 50 meter by 2 meter transects were randomly located within the Chinese privet areas. Visual identification
of planted stems occurred along the transecls. No measurements were taken of planted stems.
b) Total = Total planted stems along transect.
Color for Density of Planted Excluding Live Stakes
Exceeds r iranerxc Ill%
Fails io men "snaps bass then 100/0

140
120
100
N
80
d
y=.
3
V
d
N
c 60
40
20
0
Chart 1:
Consecutive Days with Ground Water Elevations within 12" of Ground Surface
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 REF
Notes:
Construction /earthwork completion around 9/15/2010
*Year 2006 data collection began on 10/27/2011
* *Year 2011 data collection ended on 9/1/20100
Monitoring Wells

J
APPENDIX 4
PROJECT SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
i

PHOTO 2: VEGETATION PLOT 2.
IEPROJECT No. EEP -06050 AS ELINE PHOTOS ®: EEP06050.DWG
MEADOWBRANCH Cl �,>� -�- As sHOwri RESTORATION SnU s n=- CR M redY� Ilale�. MaYr 09 -13 -2011 ROBESON COUNW. NORTH CAROUM aMms.....�..,r�.�. -

PHOTO 3. VEGETATION PLOT 3.
PHOTO 4: RANDOM TRANSECT 1 VAT+ -HN THE CHINESE PRIVET AREA.
°'IDC7 NO. FEp-o6o5o
ELINE PHOTOS
®EcoEngineedng1
ell.E� Am: EEP06050. DWIG
DOWBRANCH
r;PY.SMRA'nON
A ei.ido. of llw idm R. McAd® Camany. Loa.
AS SHOWN
STiE
', a>�.
,�.
w
DATE: 09 -13 -201 1
ItOBESON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
�s r;;;— w�T.
°00 "' ""• --- +�°'�"°�. "°°" "• ` , j

o
�
eeorECr no. EEP -06050
ASELIIITE PHOTOS
MiADO W BRANCH
RESTORATION SnE
ROBBSON COUNTY. NORTH CAROUM
PlEcoEngineenng
Adiviknof7W John a.McAdmsCampany.lw-
FUENAME: EEP06050.DWO
scums:
As sH ©wN
¢rW.MM • OLUM s • soQVS On • MVMMQMrAL
,�"" . CHARLOM
•0 -ma"..°.'°�°`°` —."°°"
OAS` 09— i3 -20i1

PHOTO 6: BERM CUT 1.
PHOTO 7: BERM CUT 2.

PHOTO B: BERM CUT 3,
PHOTO 9: BERM CUT 4.
pmocr No. EEP -06050 ASELINE PHOTOS ®ma "�= EEPO6050. DWG MEADOWBRANCH A dlvuim of The Jahn B. MO &� �: AS SHOWN ru�•soRVSmRS- RESMRA'nON SI'I� �• 09 -13 -2011 ROBESON COUNTY. NORTH CAROIM •

PHOTO 10: ROAD CROSSING 1.
PHOTO 11: ROAD CROSSING 2.
raaecr no. EEP -06050
ASELM PHOTOS
�/��, /� �J[]� *T
CH
®F"Er"'E:
A &wim of TIM 16 R 6fcAderSCALD`
EEP06050.DWG
9
AS SHOWN
1r11tLilJO Yr l �i�L71 tl
6RGa1 MI- PLA1l1�8- - �oA,E:
RESTORATION SITE
-13 -2011
ROEUMN COU1 M NORTH CAROUNA
n gods= �."09

PHOTO 12: ROAD CROSSING 3.
PHOTO 13: ROAD CROSSING 1.
06050
BASELINE PHOTOS
NJ EcoEngineering
50.DWG
d
ffD:ATE:
r�DOVMRMCH
AdivisionofTUCJohnB .WcAd�sC�paw. tom.
.PgA, ,, A,
HOWN
RESTORATION snE
�
�' -2011
ROBESON COUNTY, NORM CAROIJNA
.
eowa sas....jrev��.� w.: c m�

PHOTO 14: ROAD CROSSING 5.
PROJECT 1,0. °M -06050
BAS ELINE PH01,OS
nWnDOwsRANCx
RESI�ORATION SIE
ROBESON COUNflY. NORTH CAROLINA
®�: A.�.afTlu
�06050.DM
a �` AS SHOWN
OA7E 09 -13 -2011
��- • E+
���.
e.s r..°.. ..a.. ��
w�ari&Ilf• wwj� mmmaww ,ems -Won Vs- c4