20080058 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Report_20120109

4 -0059
Unnamed Tributary to Crab Creek
Stream and Wetland Restoration
NCEEP Project Number: 857
Monitoring Year 2
2011 Final Report
Submitted to
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
December 2011
E iancement
PROGRAM
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
REcm o
JA N 9 - 2012
ENHANCEMENT PRWRAAI

Monitoring Firm
I j
E I 9 _ '0� �a
E- NVIRONMENTAL
x CONSULTATION & DESIGN
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
828 - 253 -6856
Project Contact: Win Taylor
Email: win @equinoxenvironmental.com

Unnamed Tributary to Crab Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration
2011 Monitoring Report (MY 2)
Table of Contents
1 0 Executive Summary / Project Abstract
20 Methodology
30 References
Page 1
Page 3
Page 4

Appendix A Pry
Figure 1
Table 1 a
Table 1 b
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Appendices
:)ject Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Vicinity Map and Directions
Protect Components
Component Summations
Protect Activity and Reporting History
Project Contacts
Project Attributes
Appendix B Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2 Integrated Current Condition Plan View
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment
Photo Station Photos
Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7 Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
— Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Table 8 CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Table 9a Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means)
I- Table 9b Planting Zone D Random Circular Plot Data
Appendix D Stream Survey Data
Cross- Sections with Annual Overlays and Photos
Longitudinal Profiles with Annual Overlays
�i Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays
Table I Oa Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table IOb Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic
P Containment Parameter Distributions)
Table l 1 a Monitoring Data — Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional
Parameters — Cross - Sections)
LTable 11 b Monitoring Data — Stream Reach Data Summary
Appendix E Hydrologic Data
Table 12 Verification of Bankfull Events
Monthly Precipitation Data Compared to 30`h and 70`h Percentiles for
Alleghany County, NC
Precipitation and Water Level Plots
Table 13 Wetland Gauge Attainment Data
M

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT
The goals and objectives stated in the Unnamed Tributary to Crab Creek Restoration Plan
(NCEEP 2007) are as follows
Project Goals
• Reduce bank sediment export and nutrient inputs to the receiving watershed of Crab
Creek, a Class C Trout Water,
• Enhance and preserve riparian buffers of a headwater trout stream,
• Enhance aquatic and terrestrial habitat along an Intact stream corridor,
• Improve wetland functions by connecting and expanding the following wetland
communities Swamp Forest -Bog Complex, Southern Appalachian Bog, and Montane
Alluvial Forest and,
• Improve and expand Southern Appalachian Bog wetland habitat for the Bog Turtle
Clemmys muhlenburgit
Project Objectives
• Restore 4,026 linear feet of stream channel with appropriate pattern, profile, and
dimension to support a gravel transport system,
• Re- establish the natural stream features (bed heterogeneity) to restore aquatic habitat,
• Improve aquatic organism passage and habitat corridor continuity by replacing the
culvert, and
• Convert existing croplands into Swamp Forest -Bog Complex and Southern Appalachian
Bog Communities
( l The monitoring year two (MY2) vegetation plot data Indicate that the protect currently meets the
LJ established criterion for planted stem density, which is a minimum survival of 320 planted stems
per acre at the end of the year three monitoring period However, while the average living stem
densities for planted stems in MY2 is approximately 328 stems per acre, several plots (-44 %)
( i did not meet the year three Interim success criteria numbers per acre These Include VP 1, 4, 5,
and 6, which had 121, 162, 121, and 243 stems per acre, respectively Due to dead or missing
stems there was an approximately 13% decrease in total stem densities between MY and MY2
However, when planted and natural stems are combined, the average stem density is 643 stems
per acre, which is above the minimum established criterion
Two planting zones (Zones D and El) were subject to low density planting efforts Planting
zone D Is classified as a Southern Appalachian Bog community in which vegetation
establishment consisted of an open shrub layer with areas dominated by herbaceous vegetation
Zone E1 classified as Montane Alluvial Forest community consisted of a supplemental planting
to enhance the existing vegetative community To capture planting zones with lower, planted
woody stem densities, data was collected from eight temporary, random 200m2 circular plots in
Zone D to document species presence during year two Random circular plots were not
employed in Zone El due to existing mature trees within this zone Woody stem densities within
Zone D ranged from 0 to 324 planted stems per acre The overall average was 71 stems per acre
which Is well above the proposed planting rate of 28 woody stems per acre When planted and
natural stems are combined, the average woody stem density is 202 stems per acre Additionally,
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final I Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

2.0 Methodology
The stream monitoring methodologies utilized in MY2 were intended to replicate those
employed during the previous monitoring years and are based on standard guidance and
procedures documents (Rosgen 1996 and USACE 2003)
Vegetation plot monitoring data were collected following the standard CVS -EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation, Level 11 (Lee et al 2008) To capture conditions within planting zones
with lower, planted woody stem densities, eight 200m2 plots were randomly selected in Zone D
utilizing geographic information system (GIS) and uploaded to a handheld global positioning
system (GPS) unit for field location Field delineation occurred by pulling a tape 7 98 m from a
temporary stake in a circle while the two person team identified and recorded any woody species
located within the interior of the temporary plot Identified stems were considered planted
versus recruits based on the species type and height All other woody stems were classified as
recruits
Wetland hydrology was considered established if groundwater monitoring data indicated
saturated soils within 12 inches of the soil surface for 5% of the growing season Due to the
Alleghany County data set being based on a site with elevations approximately 1,000 feet
different from the project site, the growing season for the site was based on the Natural Resource
Conservation Service (MRCS) data set for Ashe County (MRCS 2009)
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final 3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables

The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of t " 'aa r` \ , �� ' J lit
the NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) and is if�'l
encompassed by a recorded conservation easement but is bordered
by land under private ownership Accessing the site may require
traversing areas near or along the easement boundary and therefor
access by the general public is not permitted Access by authorized
personnel of state and federal agencies or their designees/contractors
involved in the development, oversight and stewardship of the
restornuon site is permitted within the terms and timeframes of their
defined roles Any intended site visitation or activity by any person t
outside of these previously sanctioned roles and activities requires y/ ` 4
prior coordination with NCEEP , r 34 r ,� `, ' t i / ._ t c iii �. r 1 _ " 0 itt� eainr 1;1 '
IJ
/r)rIJ
r -,If/
ac1m,K r� / „`�rl ;, ay �• ;� 1 1 , = \�f`'/I
IG-
`�$�' `` p.y s ♦ _�— r +_ -- -�1 1i �%o ���(1 JI �/ fi} = d ncl\ a b \
fl Zr
lijrrx
\`L�
.r SivannW Ce`Nf
-.'
rr
t `,rJl i{ `1�0��•� � �\ � ��a - L� ! �. '�vJ f :l, � � \\ . r I ' � f I/ /��� � � � � . ) ti>.
UT to Crab Creek Stream
Wetland Restoration Site f i� _ r a � .- + 7- 1� \
lrtl\t`t'�;^d4(
8•V ' 1 _
i 1,4 j -✓r rii�� . 'r (` t - �. re t '� _�� - r �' `y° t ��-' / ✓ i ��� s= ✓ t t \,�
� a , �
V l r� I' `^51�`\
' �\ L, It r � � � - • _ r'`"`�, (� � era ti 1
-
1
- 'Iii,`- � o �`g l �l,lr! �Jr`��Ji�`�!` `_� ="'� .�' `Ir _ . -v`r {� ���xon�\ �` • .L1•� ,�1�1• � \� ✓� ��` - \\ i �
_ / '\ _ 1190 / � -'� �1 (� {�i l r JV ' _ � ' `r / >'r _ \ { �� ;� , t �F , - ' i r r r / -� t '• � Q _ �` (
li I =f .- t\_--J I `�, I,� L r 7''`a(♦ —� _ i ti.�_ � ``r /� A� 1i \ y 1 if, !� ' '� ��
/ r
c— �r - � v cur l '� r
Ctwr r t _ l GvT \
"Y `� r Figure 1- Vicinity Map
f✓✓r1 I Pi 4
Coumy 4! Ur to Gab .. Scream C_. ry
6 WOtIBM R°pnreEOn S.le ,
�
UT to Crab Creek Stream &
r ' EQUINOX jji� /o stpe�m7�,
ear j/- -t ,r c--r ett nun— - t- E1 "gog"eAt chi
`” Wetland Restoration Site PROGRAM
°° "" r t- Project No 857 N
Directions From Rakigh proceed west on 1 40 towards 0 1,250 2 500 5,000
Winston Salem Take Exit 193 B (NC 8N/US 52N) towards Feet
Mount Airy Proceed on US 52N to 174W towards Wytheville Alleghany County, North Carolina
VA Take Exit 5 (177S) and proceed to Exit 100 (Mount
Airy/Galax/NC 89) Turn left and proceed west on NC 89 7 5 Minute Senes Cumberland Knob
Tum left at NC 18 and go approximately 6 miles to the project Quadrangle
site The sue Is located on the north side of NC 18

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Table la. Project Components
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland /Pro ct No 857
Project
Riparian Wetland (Ac)
Non-
a anan
Ac
Upland
(Ac)
Footage
BMP
Rivenne
Non- Rtvenne
Existing
Restoration
Restoration
Stationing
Buffer
BMP Elements
Comment
Component or
Feet/Acres
Level l
Lev
Approach
or
3 1
Acres
Reach ID
Enhancement I
0
Acrea a
Enhancement Il
496
100+00 101 +71
Creation
02
Stream channel stabilized with in
103+00 104 +35
21172
53
R
P3
1775 If
stream structures including step pools
105 +34 112 +29
0
0
and riffle grade control
113 +51 116+88
Totals 6,928
166
and
Ewsssing
0
120+26 124+65
UT I
2 313 If
removed
d
crossing removed
71 103+00
Included revegetatnon mid stream bank
35 105 +34
E
E11
496 If
stabilization
29 113 +51
V116+88
118 +34
Epstmgculvert and
Stream channel stabilized with in
UTCC US
2 0861f
R
P2
2 485 If
10+00 34 +85
crossing replaced
stream structures including step pools
with open bottom
and riffle grade control
arch culvert
UTCC DS
2 172 If
P
2 1721f
34 +85 56 +57
Intact Swamp Forest Bog Complex
UT 1 restoration and enhancement
Wetland 1
0 5 ac
P
0 5 ac
reach goes through this wetland
Wetland preservation limited to areas
outside of the stream buffer
Overfill cropland soil removed
cropland ditches filled wellhead
Wetland 2
67
R
69
removed and site graded to restore
Southern Appalachian Bog
Community hydrology
Preservation of Swamp Forest Bog
Wetland 3
2 7 ac
P
2 7 ac
Complex along UTCC DSreach
Ditch filled and east mg fill debns and
0 9 ac
R
0 8 ac
culvert drain removed E>astnngseep
Wetland 4
heads developed and additional
hardwood trees planted to restore and
3 1 ac
E
3 1 ac
enhance Montane Alluvial Forest
Overfill cropland soil removed
0 3 ac
R
0 3 ac
groundwater springs exposed and bog
Wetland 5
wetland species planted to restore and
00 ac
C
0 2 ac
create Southern Appalachian Bog
Community hydrology
Preservation of Southern Appalachian
Wetland 6
2 2 ac
P
2 2 ac
Bog Community
non Appucame
Table 1b. Component Summations
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland /Pro' ct No. 857
Restoration
Level
Stream
(10
Riparian Wetland (Ac)
Non-
a anan
Ac
Upland
(Ac)
Buffer
(Ac)
BMP
Rivenne
Non- Rtvenne
Restoration
4,260
80
Enhancement
3 1
Enhancement I
0
Enhancement Il
496
Creation
02
Preservation
21172
53
HQ Preservation
0
0
0
166
00
Totals 6,928
166
0
0
0
0
Non - Applicable
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
A -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
December 2011

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Table 3 Project Contacts
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No 857
Designer
Primary Project Design POC
KCI Associates of North Carolina
Landmark Center Il Suite 220 4601 Sic Forks Road
Raleigh NC 27609
April Davis (919) 783 -9214
Construction Contractor
Construction Contractor POC
Carolina Environmental Contracting Inc
P O Box 1905
Mount Airy NC 27030
Stephen lames (336) 320 -3849
Planting Contractor
Planting Contractor POC
Carolina Environmental Contracting Inc
P O Box 1905
Mount Airy NC 27030
Stephen lames (336) 320 -3849
Seeding Contractor
Seeding Contractor POC
Carolina Environmental Contracting Inc
P O Box 1905
Mount Airy NC 27030
Stephen James (336) 320 -3849
Seed M Lx Sources
Green Resources
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Mellow Marsh Farm
[phone]
Momtonng Performers (YO) - 2009
Equinox Environmental Consultation & Design Inc
37 Haywood Street Suite 100
Asheville North Carolina 28801
Stream M onitormg POC
Win Taylor [phone]
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Wm Taylor [phone]
Wetland Monitoring POC
Wm Taylor [phone]
Momtonng Performers ()(l) - 2010
Equmox Environmental Consultation & Design Inc
37 Haywood Street Suite 100
Asheville North Carolina 28801
Stream M onitormg POC
Wm Taylor [phone]
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Wm Taylor (828) 253 -6856
Wetland Monitoring POC
Wm Taylor (828) 253 -6856
Momtonng Performers (Y2) - 2011
Equmox Environmental Consultation & Design Inc
37 Haywood Street Suite 100
Asheville North Carolina 28801
Stream Monitoring POC
Win Taylor (828) 253 -6856
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Wm Taylor (828) 253 -6856
Wetland Monitoring POC
Wm Taylor (828) 253 -6856
Momtonng Performers (Y3)- 2012
Stream Monitoring POC
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Wetland Monitoring POC
Momtonng Performers (Y4)- 2013
Stream Monitoring POC
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Wetland Monitoring POC
Momtonng Performers (Y5)- 2014
Stream M onitormg POC
Vegetation M onitormg POC
Wetland Monitoring POC
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
A4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
December 2011

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data

Figure 2. Integrated Current Condition Plan View
Legend
• - Easement Boundary
- - -- Stream Alignment
Sheet 2
Power Line ROW
. p .`� �
Longitudinal Profile Begin /End
��
Cross Sections
,6 +,
�. Structures
:� �
� Control Points
',, .��1
• Crest Gauges
Rain Gauge
* Photo Points
� Circular Vegetation Plots
Wetlands
® Creation
Restoration
® Enhancement
❑ Preservation
,�;i,
Community Types
Montane Alluvial Forest
Southern Appalachian Bog
Sheet 4
Sheet 3
- Swamp Forest Bog Complex
Year 2 Conditions
Vegetation Plots
■ Criteria Met
�������
.•�
❑ Criteria Not Met
�
Wetland Gauges
...............
•
.....
.:• .. ::...
-
ntena Met
'�;,.
:�:
''
Q Criteria Not Met
�.
Bank/Bed Conditions
':
Bank - Scoured /Eroding
Vegetation Problem Areas
Low Stem Densities
1 250 500 1,000
1
18
® Invasives Dense
Invasives - Present
Prepared for
Project:
UT to Crab Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration
Year 2 Monitoring
Alleghany County, North Carolina
Notes: 1) Base Map from CAD file "Crab—base—final"
2) 2010 Aerial Photo
Provided by KCI Associates of NC P.A.
Prepared by
Y
s'
Ad
Sheet 1 of 4
0 Stem
El arement
EQUINOX
ENS RO�MF.�TAI.
aoesoumow � orsiow
Date
Project Number
PROGRAM
November 2011
NCEEP # 857

1. Integrated Current Condition Plan View
Prepared for (Project: UT to Crab Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration I Notes: 1) Base Map from CAD file "Crab—base—final" Provided by KCI Associates of NC P.A. I Prepared by
E aamemeht
PROGRAM
Year 2 Monitoring
Alleghany County, North Carolina
Sheet 2 of 4
Date
November 2011
2) 2010 Aerial Photo
Project Number
NCEEP # 857
EQUINOX
ENV RONMENTAI.
iOMLYLt�NON i YLfIYN

►d t N
w �
1► p
ee O
� p
a
o
� C
..............
CD
O N (CD
CD W ::
tQ
CD
r�
r+
A �
o
O �
CD
b
p ..
�.
C �!
eb
p
......................... ti :::::::::....' ..........
...............................
................ .................
n
Z o I�
CD AD
f7
CD
z
� C �
00
�1 c 'b
`9 O
a
CD
a
� o
n
Y
Ln
n �
3 S or O1 to n n C7 C7 p� to 3 m :0 n 7 n-0 m n n cn n r :0 -0 (n m
w w f
S z �H I Syb 3 tN o a N w 7 ii j y 0- n o
3 0f (D o
�3 . o cg. m o ur m m O 0 O. m m
p C w m c � rn � 3 m D o 0 CD o o t 3 o su oCD
to D • v Q a N m �' y y � y p a
c�
CD N �' CP do w W N O 7 n
CD m p o n o
a CD 3 m O� � S o m d
.. n y co
1 N O O t0
3 CO (n
m
x :3
Q

Figure 2. Integrated Current Condition Plan View
Prepared for (Project: UT to Crab Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration I Notes: 1) Base Map from CAD file "Crab—base—final" Provided by KCI Associates of NC P.A. I Prepared by
ERamement
PROGRAM
Year 2 Monitoring
Alleghany County, North Carolina
Sheet 4 of 4
Date
November 2011
2) 2010 Aerial Photo
Project Number
NCEEP # 857
r;
EQUINOX
ENVIRONMENTAL.

Appendix B Visual Assessment Data
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No 857 - UTI - Upper
Assessed lAngth 1,832 feet
Number
Number
Footage
Adjusted%
Major Channel
Channel
Stable
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
with
with
for
Category
Subcategory
M etric
Perforttang
Number to
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
as Intended
As-btult
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Woody
Woody
Woody
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1 Bed
1 Agwadation Bar formaiton/growth sufficient to significantly
1 Vertical Stability
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Umts)
2 DcxwWion Evidence of downcuttmg
0
0
100%
2 Rime Condition
1 Teiame/Substrate Riffle maintains coarser substrate
17
17
100%
3 Meander Pool
I Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull Depth?: 1 6)
20
20
1000/
Condition
2 Length appropriate (>300/o of ccnterhne distance between tad of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle)
20
20
100%
1 Thalweg ccnlermg at upstream of memider beod (Run)
20
20
1000/
4 Thalweg Position
2 Thalweg centering m downstream of meander bend (Glide)
19
20
95%
2 Bank
1 Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetmtve cover resulting simply from poor growth
1
25
990/
0
and/or scour and erosion
0
990/
Banks undercut /overlumgmg to the event that mass wastmg appears
2 Undercut
likely Does NOT include undercuts that are modest appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calvmg or collapse
0
0
1000/
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
1
25
99%
0
0
99%
3 Engineered
I Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
15
15
100%
Structures
2 Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
15
15
1000/
2a Piping
Structures lackmg any substantial flow underneath sills or arms
15
15
1000/
3 Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
IS
IS
100%
exceed 15%
Poolfomungstructuresmaunainuig - Max Pool Depth Mean
4 Habitat
Bankfull Depth Rmto? 16 Rootwads/logsprovdingsomecoverm
IS
IS
100%
base -now
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final B -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix B Visual Assessment Data
Table S Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No 857 - UTl - Lower
Assessed Le ngth 438 feet
Number
Number
Footage
Adjusted %
Major Channel
Channel
Stale ,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
vvtth
with
for
Category
Sub -Category
Metric
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
m Intended
As4bwlt
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Woody
Woody
Woody
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1 Bed
1 Awadation Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
Vertical Stability
deflect Bow laterally (not to include point ban)
0
0
100%
(Rime and Run Units)
2 Degradation Evidence of downcuttmg
0
0
100%
2 Rime Condition
1 Texture/Substrate Riffle maintains coarser substrate
5
5
100%
3 Meander Pool
I Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull Depth?[ 6)
4
4
100"/
Condition
2 Length appropriate ( >300/oof centerime distance between tad of
upstream mile and head of downstream riffle)
4
4
100%
1 Thalwegcentenngat upstream of meander bend (Run)
4
4
100%
4 Thalweg Position
100%
2 Thalwegcaitermgat downstream of meander bend (Glide)
4
4
2 Bank
1 Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
0
0
100° /o
N/A
N/A
N/A
and/or scour and erosion
Banks uridercut /overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2 Undercut
likely Does NOT include undercuts that are modest appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving. or collapse
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
3 Engineered
I Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
5
5
100%
Structures
2 Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
5
5
100%
2a Piping
Structures locking any substantial Flow underneath sills or arms
5
5
100%
3 Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
5
5
100%
exceed 15%
Pool forming structures mamtam rig— Max Pool Depth Mean
4 Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio ? 1 6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
5
5
100%
base -flow
.... .. ........... —.. J aa1
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final B -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No 857 - UTCC - US
Assessed Lenob 2.485 feet
Number
Number
Footage
Adjusted%
Nbjor Channel
Chancel
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
mth
with
for
Category
Subcategory
Metric
Number to
Unstable
Unstable
Perforrmng
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
As- tult
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Woody
Woody
Woody
as Intended
a9lntended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1 Bed
I AgWailation Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
1 Vertical Stability
deflect now laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2 Dewailation Evidence of downcutting
0
0
1000/0
2 Riffle Condition
1 Tewure/Substrate Riffle maintains coarser substrate
17
17
1000/0
3 Meander Pool
I Depth Sufficient (M ax Pool Depth M can Bankfull Depth Z 1 6)
15
15
1000/
Condition
2 Lenoh approprmte ( >30%of centerline distance between tad of
upstream nfne and head of downstream riffle)
I S
IS
100%
I Thalwcgcentermgat upstream of meander bend (Run)
15
15
100%
4 Thalweg Position
2 Thalweg cantering at downstream of meander bend (Glide)
15
15
100%
2 Bank
1 Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting sunply frompoorgrowth
1
60
99%
0
0
990/
and/or scour and erosion
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2 Undercut
likely Does NOT include undercuts that are modest appear
0
0
1000/
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calvmg or collapse
0
0
1000/0
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
1
60
990/
0
0
99%
3
I Overall Integrity
g ty
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or l0
P Y fealty [9ed �
7
7
100°/
Structures s
Structures
2 Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
7
7
100%
2a Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow undcmeath sdis or arms
7
7
1000/
3 Bank Protection
Bank
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
7
7
100°/
15%
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth Mean
4 Habitat
lBankfull Depth Ratio> 1 6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
7
7
1000/
base -flow
nun ucm wa um nPV7
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final B -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No 857
Planted Acreage 15 4
Vegetation Category
Definitions
CCPV Depiction
Number of
Combined
% of
Planted
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
1 Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material
N/A
0
0
0%
2 Low Stem Density Areas
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on M Y3
Stipple
2
<1 0
<I%
4 or 5 stem count criteria
Black Dots White Background
Totals
2
0
00/0
3 Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small
N/A
0
0
00/0
given the monitoring year
Cumulative Totals
2
000
0%
Easement Acreage 47 8
of
Vegetation Category
Definitions
CCPV Depiction
Number of
Combined
Easement
Polygons
Acreage
Acre e
4 Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale)
Cross Hatch
20
1 36
3%
(Red - Dense(Yellow - Present)
Stipple
5 Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale)
Orange Dots White Background
0
000
00/0
& ATV Trail
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final B -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Unnamed Tributary 1 — Permanent Photo Station I
Looking Upstream
Unnamed Tributary I — Permanent Photo Station 2
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Looking Upstream
B -6 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Unnamed Tributary I — Permanent Photo Station 3
Looking Upstream
Unnamed Tributary I — Permanent Photo Station 3
Looking Downstream
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
B -7 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Unnamed Tributary l — Permanent Photo Station 4
Looking Upstream
Unnamed Tributary 1 — Permanent Photo Station 5
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Looking Upstream
B -8 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Unnamed Tributary I — Permanent Photo Station 6
Looking Upstream
Unnamed Tributary I — Permanent Photo Station 7
Looking Upstream
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
B -9 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Unnamed Tributary Crab Creek Upper — Permanent Photo Station 7
Looking Upstream
Unnamed Tributary Crab Creek Upper — Permanent Photo Station 7
Looking Downstream
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
B -10 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Wetland Area 2 — Permanent Photo Station 8
Looking North
Wetland Area 2 — Permanent Photo Station 8
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Looking Southwest
B -I I Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Wetland Area 2 — Permanent Photo Station 9
Looking North
Wetland Area 2 — Permanent Photo Station 9
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Looking West
B -12 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Unnamed Tributary Crab Creek Upper — Permanent Photo Station 10
Looking Upstream
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
B -13 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Unnamed Tributary Crab Creek Upper — Permanent Photo Station 11
Looking Upstream
Unnamed Tributary Crab Creek Upper — Permanent Photo Station 11
Looking Downstream
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
B -14 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Unnamed Tributary Crab Creek Upper — Permanent Photo Station 12
Looking Upstream
Unnamed Tributary Crab Creek Upper — Permanent Photo Station 13
Looking Upstream
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
B -15 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Wetland Area 4 — Permanent Photo Station 14
Looking West
Wetland Area 4 — Permanent Photo Station 15
Looking Southwest
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
B -16 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Wetland Area 5 & 6 — Permanent Photo Station 16
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Looking South
B -17 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data

Appendix C
i
�I
7
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
UT Crab Creek / Project No. 857
Vegetation Plot
ID
Vegetation
Survival
Threshold Met?
Tract Mean
1
No
56%
2
Yes
3
Yes
4
No
5
No
6
No
7
Yes
8
Yes
9
Yes
Vegetation Plot Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final C -1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1
Monitoring Year 2 —June 1, 2011
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2
Monitoring Year 2 — June 1, 2011
C -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3
Monitoring Year 2 — June 1, 2011
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4
Monitoring Year 2 —June 1, 2011
C -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 5
Monitoring Year 2 —June 1, 2011
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 6
Monitoring Year 2 —June 1, 2011
C -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 7
Monitoring Year 2 — June 1, 2011
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 8
Monitoring Year 2 —June 1, 2011
C -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 9
Monitoring Year 2 —June 1, 2011
C -6 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Table 8 CVS Vegetation Plot Metadate
UT Crab Creek - 857
Report Prepared By
Kevin Mitchell
Date Prepared
7/13/2011 I IO6
Database Name
Equinox-201 I -A-UTCrab-MY2 mdb
Database Location
Z\ES \NRI &M\EEP Monitorin \UT Crab Creek \UTC -MY2 -201 (\Data \Ve
Computer Name
.1316 K71
File Size
140484864
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS
IN THIS DOCUMENT
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and
project data
Proj Planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year This
excludes hve stakes
Prod Total Stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year This mcludes
We stakes, all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer stems
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems,
missing, etc
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots
Vigor b Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of
total stems impacted by each
Damage by Spp
Damage values tabled by for each species
Dam e by Plot
Damage values tabled by for each plot
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED Irving stems of each species for each plot,
dead and missin g stems are excluded
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total hvmg stems of each species (planted and natural
volunteers combined ) for each plot, dead and missin g stems are excluded
PROJECT SUMMARY-
Project Code 1857
Project Name UT -Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Restoration
Descn tion 1
River Basin jNew
Length(ft)
Stream -to -Ede Width (ft)
Area (s m) j
Re cared Plots (calculated) 1
Sampled Plots 19
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
C -7 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
December 2011

Appendix C Vegetation Arsasmett Data
t�dmgvaorn•s.y 4. [tins to
F�[o mu[ agvvesn[ bum [hs la• _
Ur Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final C 8 Egwnox En"runmmW Consultation and Destg4 Inc
Pmect No 957 December 2011
Momtonng Year 2 of 5
��0000000000000
©moomoom00000
©mmommommm
��mmmmmmmmm000mmmmmm000mmmmmm000000000
_
�®
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm000mmm000000000000mmm
., . :
��mmmmm0000mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmoo
©000mmmom©
��mmmmmmmmmmmommmmmmmmmmmommmmm
©mmommm
��mmm000mmm000000000mmmmmmmmmmmmmm
®000
��mmmmmmoo
©mmmmmmmmmmmmo
©ao
©a000mmm
©om
��mmommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmommmmmm
®
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmommm
®
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmommmmmmmmmmmommmmmm
��mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmommomm
©mm
©mmm
��mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
©v©
..' , . ,
��©©©
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmoo
©000000
v©
ommommmoo
©v
©moom000mmmmmmmm
®oo
®mmm
000000000000
000�0m�000�0
.
©©©©©
oo
©vo
©000
©v
©000000
©oo
©vv
®oom000
t�dmgvaorn•s.y 4. [tins to
F�[o mu[ agvvesn[ bum [hs la• _
Ur Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final C 8 Egwnox En"runmmW Consultation and Destg4 Inc
Pmect No 957 December 2011
Momtonng Year 2 of 5

Appendix C
Vegetation Asstssment Data
Table 9b. Pbmft Tone D Random Cbtcalr Plot Data
UT Crab Cmak Stream & We /PirojecriNte 857
Random Plot 1
Random Rot 2
Random Plot 3
Random Rot 4
Random Plot 5
Randum Plot 6
Plot 7
Random Plot 8
Amtiai Mean %M (2011)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Reerult
Planted'
Total
Recruit
Planted'
Total
Recruit
Planned-
Taal
Recruit
Planted'
Total
Recruit
Plauie&
Taal
Recruit
Ran
Total
Recruit
Plante&
Total
Recruit
Planted'
Total
Recruit
Planree
Total
Alnus scrrulata
Ilaalalder
19
19
4
4
12
12
23
12
35
Amnm atbunfoba
Red choleb
I
I
I
1
0
2
2
Berula lenta var lens
Swcet bath
4
4
0
4
4
Rosa lusins
Swa rose
3
3
1
1
6
6
0
10
10
Pmus simbus
Enstcm what pmc
2
2
2
0
2
Acermbrum
Red inn le
12
12
15
15
27
0
27
Stemcaunn
14
0
14
0
3
3
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
19
2
21
19
6
25
0
16
16
52
28
80
Size (ACRES)
005
005
005
005
005
005
005
005
040
Species count
2
0
2
0
I
I
0
I
I
0
0
0
0
T-0-7-0--
0
0
I
2
3
2
I
3
0
2
2
7
6
6
Stems r AC
283 28
0
283 28
0
W.
60 70
0
20 2J
2023
0
0
0
0
0
0
384 45
4047
424 92
38445
12141
505 86
0
727 75
323 75
I J 152
7062
202 b
Herb—. (%)
65
95
100
100
85
95
90
75
88
nssumem to oe pmtm tweet -.p.- —i tKiglu
UT Cmb Cmek Stream & Weiland Final
Project No 857
Montionng Year 2 of 5
C9
r-
Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design Inc
December 2011

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data

Appendix D
2610
2609
2608
2607
as
w 2606
0
0
> 2605
a�
W
2604
2603
2602
2601
0+00
Stream Survey Data
Unnamed Tributary 1- Upper
Cross - Section 1 - Riffle
Station 106 + 83.73
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0 +45 0+50 0+55
Station (feet)
As -built 6/2/2010 MYl 3/1/2011 —45-- MY2 10/17/2011 - -- Bkf
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -I Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Stream Survey Data
Cross- Section 1 — Riffle.
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 2 — October 17, 2011
Cross - Section 1— Riffle
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 2 — October 17, 2011
UT Crib Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 1— Riffle
(Looking Downstream)
Monitoring Year 2 —October 17, 2011
Cross - Section 1— Riffle
(Looking Upstream)
Monitoring Year 2 — October 17, 2011
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D-3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix D
2609
2608
2607
2606
2605
2604
0
0
2603
a�
W
2602
2601
2600
2599
2598
0+00
Stream Survey Data
Unnamed Triburary 1 - Upper
Cross - Section 2 - Pool
Station 107 + 77.18
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60
Station (feet)
—� As -built 6 /2/2010 M- MY1 3 /1/2011 --4B--- MY2 10/17/2011 --- Bkf
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 2 — Pool
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 2 — October 17, 2011
Cross - Section 2 — Pool
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 2 — October 17, 2011
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross- Section 2 — Pool
(Looking Downstream)
Monitoring Year 2 — October 17, 201
Cross - Section 2 — Pool
(Looking Upstream)
Monitoring Year 2 — October 17, 2011
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D-6 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
2602
2601
2600
2599
w
0 2598
ca
d
W
2597
2596
2595
2594
0+00
Stream Survey Data
Unnamed Tributary 1 - Upper
Cross - Section 3 - Riffle
Station 109 + 65.00
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0+45
Station (feet)
I -- As-built 6/3/20 10 MY13/1/2011 MY210/17/2011 - - --Bkf
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -7 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 2 — October 17, 201
Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 2 — October 17, 2011
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -8 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
(Looking Downstream)
Monitoring Year 2 —October 17, 2011
Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
(Looking Upstream)
Monitoring Year 2 — October 17, 2011
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -9 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
2575
2574
2573
d 2572
w
C
O
CC
2571
W
2570
2569
2568
0+00 0+05
Stream Survey Data
Unnamed Tributary 1 - Lower
Cross - Section 4 - Pool
Station 123 + 11.85
0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0 +45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0 +70 0 +75 0 +80
Station (feet)
T As -built 6/3/2010 MY1 3/2/2011 --0­ MY2 10/17/2011 — --- - Bkf
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -10 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 4 — Pool
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 2 — October 17, 2011
Cross - Section 4 — Pool
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 2 —October 17, 2011
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -11 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 4 — Pool
(Looking Downstream)
Monitoring Year 2 — October 17, 2011
Cross - Section 4 — Pool
(Looking Upstream)
Monitoring Year 2 — October 17, 2011
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -12 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix D
2574
2573
2572
y 2571
0
0
R
w 2570
W
2569
2568
2567
0+00
Stream Survey Data
Unnamed Tributary 1 - Lower
Cross - Section 5 - Riffle
Station 123 + 54.60
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0 +55 0+60 0+65
Station (feet)
As -built 6/3/2010 - MY1 3/2/2011 —41�—MY2 10/17/2011 - -- Bkf
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -13 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 5 — Riffle
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 2 — October 17, 2011
Cross - Section 5 — Riffle
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 2 — October 17, 2011
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -14 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross- Section 5 — Riffle
(Looking Downstream)
Monitoring Year 2 —October 17, 2011
Cross - Section 5 — Riffle
(Looking Upstream)
Monitoring Year 2 — October 17, 2011
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -15 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
2575
2574
2573
w 2572
e
0
?? 2571
W
2570
2569
2568
0+00
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek- Upstream
Cross - Section 6 - Riffle
Station 11 + 47.00
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0 +45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0 +70 0 +75
Station (feet)
- As -built 6/3/2010 ffi MY1 3/2/2011 —45-- MY2 10/17/2011 - -- Bkf
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -16 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 6 — Riffle
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 2 — October 17, 2011
Cross - Section 6 — Riffle
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 2 — October 17, 2011
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -17 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix 1)
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 6 — Riffle
(Looking Downstream)
Monitoring Year 2 — October 17, 2011
Cross - Section 6 — Riffle
(Looking Upstream)
Monitoring Year 2 —October 17, 2011
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D-18 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix D
2575
2574
2573
2572
as
w 2571
a
0
2570
W
2569
2568
2567
2566
0+00 0+05
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek- Upstream
Cross - Section 7 - Pool
Station 12 + 02.03
0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0 +70 0 +75
Station (feet)
—y -- As -built 6/3/2010 MY1 3/2/2011 --4&— MY2 10/17/2011 - -- Bkf
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -19 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 7 — Pool
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 2 — October 17, 2011
Cross - Section 7 — Pool
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 2 — October 17, 2011
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -20 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 7 — Pool
(Looking Downstream)
Monitoring Year 2 — October 17, 2011
Cross- Section 7 — Pool
(Looking Upstream)
Monitoring Year 2 — October 17, 2011
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -21 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix D
2570
2569
2568
2567
.r
a�
w
a
0 2566
a�
W
2565
2564
2563
2562
0+00
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek - Upstream
Cross - Section 8 - Riffle
Station 17 + 49.02
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0 +45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0 +70 0 +75 0 +80 0 +85
Station (feet)
�� As -built 6/3/2010 -- MY1 3/2/2011 —41�— MY2 10/18/2011
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -22 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 8 — Riffle
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 2 — October 18, 2011
Cross - Section 8 — Riffle
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 2 — October 18, 2011
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -23 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 8 — Riffle
(Looking Downstream)
Monitoring Year 2 — October 18, 2011
Cross - Section 8 — Riffle
(Looking Upstream)
Monitoring Year 2 — October 18, 2011
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -24 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix D
2556
2555
2554
d
w
0 2553
as
W
2552
2551
2550
0+00 0+05 0 +1
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek- Upstream
Cross - Section 9 - Pool
Station 32 + 30.85
0 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0 +70 0 +75 0 +80 0 +85 0+90
Station (feet)
—�� As -built 6/4/2010 MYl 3/3/2011 41�— MY2 10/18/2011 - - -• Bkf
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -25 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 9 — Pool
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 2 — October 18, 2011
Cross - Section 9 — Pool
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 2 — October 18, 2011
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -26 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 9 — Pool
(Looking Downstream)
Monitoring Year 2 — October 18, 2011
Cross - Section 9 —Pool
(Looking Upstream)
Monitoring Year 2 — October 18, 2011
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -27 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix D
2556
2555
2554
d
w
0 2553
a
a�
W
2552
2551
2550
0+00
0+05
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek - Upstream
Cross - Section 10 - Riffle
Station 33 + 08.78
0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0 +70 0 +75 0 +80
Station (feet)
— _ -- As -built 6/4/2010 4-- MY1 3/3/2011 —6— MY2 10/18/2011 —
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -28 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross- Section 10 —Riffle
(Looking at Left Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 2 — October 18, 2011
Cross - Section 10 —Riffle
(Looking at Right Bank Descending)
Monitoring Year 2 — October 18, 2011
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -29 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 10 —Riffle
(Looking Downstream)
Monitoring Year 2 — October 18, 2011
Cross - Section 10 —Riffle
(Looking Upstream)
Monitoring Year 2 — October 18, 2011
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -30 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
December 2011

Appendix D
2610
2608
2606
2604
2602
a�
as
0 2600
ca
v
2598
2596
2594
2592
2590
�O
s,�
G
Stream Survey Data
UT to Crab - Upper
Longitudinal Profile
Stationing 105 +63 - 110 +63
log o 119 o I G 1915,19 ,,oho
Station (feet)
M' -As -Built 6/2/2010 T"' -MY1 3/1/2011 • TNN' -NIY2- 10/17/2011 I Bkf -MY2 WS -MY2 0 Structures -MYU
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -31
Project No. 857 Equinox Environmental Consultation � Design, 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
2577
2576
2575
2574
2573
2572
as
w 2571
0
0
2570
W
2569
2568
2567
2566
2565
2564
rj
X66
Stream Survey Data
UT to Crab - Lower
Longitudinal Profile
Stationing 120 +36 - 124 +33
rro�o Ir1�O 121�o o O 190
Station (feet)
TW -As -Built 6/3/2010 TW -MY1 3/2/2011 TW -MY2 10/17/2011 • Bkf -MY2 WS -MY2 Structures -MYO
11�?
Ir
X90
12
O
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -32 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
w 25
°0 25
25
W 25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25.
25.
25-
25-
Stream Survey Data
UT to Crab - Upstream
Longitudinal Profile
Stationing 10+02 - 34+57
Station (feet)
TW -As -Built 6/4/2011 TW -MY1 3/3/2011 — TW -MY2- 10/18/2011 Bkf -MY2 WS -MY2 O Structures -MYO
'bo 'bo X&o 'bo '04,
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D- Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
F3-
--
-
--
-
--
F2-
•
-
--
- -
-
-
- -
- -
- - - --
-
-
--
-
-
- -
F1-
-
-
--
- -
- - --
-
•
-
FO-0-
-
--
- -
- --
- -
- —
- -
-
- - -
-
—
i9.
i
-
--
- -
--
--
--
--
-
--
-
i8
-
•
i7
i6
i5
—
XS6 - R
--
-
XS7 P
i4
-
i2
- - --
il
_ - -_
-
ver
age manillull
51ol
e
i0
—
X38 - R
i9
i8
i7
—
-
•
i6
-
-
-
-
i5
>3
- --
-
- - - - - --
_ _1_ _
it
i0
z i
19
-
XS9- P SIO - R
18 1
1
1
i
i
I I I
I I .
i
Station (feet)
TW -As -Built 6/4/2011 TW -MY1 3/3/2011 — TW -MY2- 10/18/2011 Bkf -MY2 WS -MY2 O Structures -MYO
'bo 'bo X&o 'bo '04,
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D- Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857
UT1 - Upper - Cross - Section 1- Riffle
Pebble Count Summary
D50
Mo omg Year 2
Descnption
Matenal
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Stlt/Clay
sdUclay
0062
1
1%
1%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
7
7%
8%
fine sand
025
4
4%
12%
medium sand
050
20
20%
32%
coarse sand
100
8
8%
40%
very coarse sand
200
7
7%
47%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
2
2%
49%
fine gravel
5 7
3
3%
52%
fine gravel
80
2
2%
54%
medium gravel
113
7
7%
61%
medium gravel
160
9
90/0
70%
coarse gravel
22 3
4
4%
74%
coarse gravel
32
7
7%
81%
very coarse gravel
45
5
5%
86%
very coarse gravel
64
8
8%
94%
Cobble
small cobble
90
2
2%
96%
medium cobble
128
3
3%
990/0
large cobble
180
0
00/0
990/0
very larize cobble
256
1
1%
1000/0
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
1000/0
small boulder
512
0
00/0
1000/0
medium boulder
1024
0
00/0
1000/0
large boulder
2048
0
00/0
100%
very lar a boulder
4096
0
0%
1000/0
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
00/0
1000/0
TOTALS1
100
1000/0
1000/6
S Data
D50
4 6
D84
39
D95
76
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D-34 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -35 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
December 2011
Unnamed Tributary 1 - Upper
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 1 -Riffle
- —
-- --
100%
90
I
80%
a
C
70% I
60 % Gi
`a
50%
d
a
40% >
m
E
I
30%
U
20%
10%
0%
d
m
Particle Size (m m)
MY13 /1/2011 --*—MY210 /18/2011
Unnamed Tributary 1 -Upper
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 1 -Riffle
r - -
- — —
— -- - - - -' -
30%
I
I
25%
20%
9
15%
0
d
a
10%
I
J ) 1
s%
I
o%
N h in h
Q O w O
1O N N Q 00 �O Y
1n 1O N Q O� N
Particle Size (mm)
oMY13 /1/2011 ■MY210/1812011
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -35 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
December 2011

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857
UTl - Upper - Cross- Section 2 - Pool
Pebble Count Summary
D50
M oring Year 2
Descnphon
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
SdVClay
sWclay
0 062
1
1%
1%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
11
11%
12%
fine sand
025
4
4%
16%
medium sand
050
3
3%
19%
coarse sand
100
12
12%
31%
very coarse sand
200
26
26%
57%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
2
2%
59%
fine gravel
57
3
3%
62%
fine gravel
80
1
1%
63%
medium gravel
113
8
8%
71%
medium gravel
160
7
7%
78%
coarse gravel
223
2
2%
80%
coarse gravel
32
2
2%
82%
very coarse gravel
45
1
1%
83%
very coarse gravel
64
3
3%
86%
Cobble
small cobble
90
5
5%
91%
medium cobble
128
9
90/0
1000/0
large cobble
180
0
0%
1000/0
very large cobble
256
0
00/0
1000/0
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
00/0
1000/0
small boulder
512
0
00/0
1000/0
medium boulder
1024
0
00/0
1000/0
large boulder
2048
0
00/0
1000/0
very large boulder
4096
0
00/0
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
1000/0
TOTALS
100
100%
1000/0
Summary Data
D50
1 7
D84
51
D95
110
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -36 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D Stream Survey Data
70%
60
50%
40
30
20
I
10%
0%
Q �o e° �o o ao o �o
�
O O N N1 V1 O O O
O O N Q 9
UT Crab Creek Stream &Wetland Final D -37 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 201
Monitoring Year
2 of 5
Unnamed Tnbutary 1 - Upper
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 2 - Pool
100%
90
80 %
e
m
F
g
cu
e
6
a
o.
m
3
E
U
m
Particle Size (mm)
MV13 /1/2011 - -MY210 /18/2011
Unnamed Tributary 1 - Upper
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 2 - Pool
—
-
-- - -
--
--
- -
30%
i
25%
20%
—
m
e
9
in
15%
I
�
V
d
10% o.
I
I
n
5%
0%
N h
�O N
V1
N
N N
O
Q �O 00 �c N N h O O 00 O
N f7 7 10 O, N OD
�O
V1
N
10
N '0
N
00 V
Q 01
Y
V
O
O
.. ..
N
In
h O
N QO
`
O O
q
Particle Size (mm)
oMY13 /1/2011 ■MY210/18/2011
70%
60
50%
40
30
20
I
10%
0%
Q �o e° �o o ao o �o
�
O O N N1 V1 O O O
O O N Q 9
UT Crab Creek Stream &Wetland Final D -37 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 201
Monitoring Year
2 of 5
2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857
M - Upper - Cross - Section 3 - Riffle
Pebble Count Summary
D50
Mo onng Year 2
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Sdt/Clay
stldc lay
0 062
3
3%
3%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
10
100/0
13%
fine sand
025
2
2%
15%
medium sand
050
7
7%
22%
coarse sand
100
10
100/0
32%
very coarse sand
200
7
7%
39%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
1
1%
40%
fine gravel
57
1
1%
41%
fine gravel
80
3
3%
44%
medium gravel
113
5
5%
49%
medium gravel
160
7
7%
56%
coarse gravel
223
11
11%
67%
coarse gravel
32
9
90/0
76%
very coarse gravel
45
8
8%
84%
very coarse gravel
64
12
12%
96%
Cobble
small cobble
90
2
2%
98%
medium cobble
128
1
1 %
990/0
large cobble
180
1
1%
100%
very large cobble
256
0
00/0
1000/0
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
1000/0
small boulder
512
0
00/0
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
00/0
1000/0
large boulder
2048
0
0%
1000/0
very lar a boulder
4096
0
0%
1000/0
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096 1
0
0%
1000/0
TOTALS
1
100
100%
1000/0
S ary Data
D50
12
D84
45
D95
62
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -38 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D-39 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
December 2011
Unnamed Tributary 1 -Upper
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 3 - Riffle
I
—
100%
90%
I
80%
70% F
L
60 % ti
a
50% g
0
40% >
t
E
30%
U
I
20 o
10%
0%
O
O
m
Particle Size (mm)
MY13 /1/2011 —•— MY210/18/2011
Unnamed Tnbutary 1 - Upper
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 3 - Riffle
I
-
30%
25%
20%
t
i
15%
0
V
L
10% o.
5%
0%
N
h M 1n
D 00 M O w O
O N N V w 10 Y
'O — N R 01 V
M in O O O O
O
O
N Q 9
m
Particle Size (mm)
OMY13 /1/2011 ■MY210/18/2011
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D-39 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
December 2011

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857
UTl - Lower - Cross -Section 4 - Pool
Pebble Count Summary
D50
M oring Year 2
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Sdt/Clay
sdUclay
0 062
2
2%
2%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
9
90/0
11%
fine sand
025
9
9° /U
20%
medium sand
050
5
5%
25%
coarse sand
100
8
8%
33%
very coarse sand
200
16
16%
49%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
1
1%
50%
fine gravel
57
4
4%
54%
fine gravel
80
2
2%
56%
medium gravel
113
6
6%
62%
medium gravel
160
10
100/0
72%
coarse gravel
223
5
5%
77%
coarse gravel
32
5
5%
82%
very coarse gravel
45
2
2%
84%
very coarse gravel
64
6
6%
900/0
Cobble
small cobble
90
5
5%
95%
medium cobble
128
5
5%
100%
large cobble
180
0
0%
1000/0
very large cobble
256
0
00/0
1000/0
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
1000/0
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
00/0
1000/0
large boulder
2048
0
00/0
1000/0
very large boulder 1
40%
0
0%
100%
Bedrock I
bedrock I
>4096
0
0%
1000/0
TOTALS1
1
100
100%
100%
S Data
D50
4
D84
45
D95
90
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -40 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream &Wetland Final 1341 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year
2 of 5
Unnamed Tributary 1 - Lower
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 4 - Pool
100%
90
C
W
80
a
F
[..
C
70
V
V
a
u
L
60
i
3
E
U
50
i
40%
m
Particle Size (m m)
MY 1 3/2/2011 I NIV2 10 /18/2011
Unnamed Tributary 1 -Lower
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
i
Cross Section 4 - Pool
30
30%
i
25%
20
20%
—
o
10%
15%
a
V
d
d
10%
5%
Mal
0%
O O 9
Fill
IF-dif-Jit
9
0%
N
,O
in
r
In
N
h ^
N R 1O 00 = 1O N N h V O 00 O
.� .+ N fry - �O 01 N 00
'O
h
N N R 00
`D N ?
�O
O,
Y
V
O
...
O
O
N
M V1 O O
O
O
O
O
N
R
9
Particle Size (mm)
oMY13/2 /2011 ■MY210 /18/2011
UT Crab Creek Stream &Wetland Final 1341 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year
2 of 5
90
80
70
60
i
50
i
40%
i
30%
i
20
10%
0%
O O 9
9
2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / P%lect No. 857
UT1 - Lover - Cross - Section 5 - Riffle
Pebble Count Summary
D50
Mo ormg Year 2
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Sdt/Clay
sdUclay
0 062
0
00/0
00/0
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
5
5%
5%
fine sand
025
9
90/0
14%
medium sand
050
16
16%
30%
coarse sand
100
10
10%
40%
very coarse sand
200
10
10%
50%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
0
00/0
50%
fine gravel
5 7
5
5%
55%
fine gravel
80
1
1%
56%
medium gravel
113
3
3%
59%
medium gravel
160
10
100/.
69%
coarse gravel
223
5
5%
74%
coarse gravel
32
6
6%
80%
very coarse gravel
45
6
6%
86%
very coarse gravel
64
9
90/0
95%
Cobble
small cobble
90
3
3%
98%
medium cobble
128
2
2%
1000/0
large cobble
180
0
0%
100%
very larize cobble
256
0
0%
1000/0
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
1000/0
small boulder
512
0
00/0
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
00/0
1000/0
large boulder
2048
0
0%
1000/0
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>40%
0
0%
1000/-
TOTALS1
100 1
1000/. 1
1000/.
S Data
D50
2
D84
40
D95
64
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D42 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -43 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
December 2011
Unnamed Tributary 1 - Lower
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 5 - Riffle
— --
— — - - - -- - — --
100%
90%
80
e
m
r
70% F
a,
e
60% [z
I
o
50% g
i
40%
m
6
30%
E
20% U
10%
0%
N
O
r V1
1/I N Q �0 OD �O N N h O O
" �
N_ Q 00 IO Y
N n h O O O
N Q
O
O
y
m
Particle Size (mm)
MY13/2 /2011 - tMY210 /18/2011
Unnamed Tributary 1 -Lower
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 5 - Riffle
-
30%
25%
i
20%
�
V
15%
0
u
iv
10%
5%
EX
0%
N
10
h to
N N
n .. N Q �O 00 to Q O 00 O
R 10 O, N 00
O
b N N Q 00 'O Y
in �O N Q 01 u
O
.�
O
.�
N M h O O O O
N Q V
O
O
m
Particle Size (mm)
oMY13/2 /2011 ■MY210 /18/2011
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -43 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
December 2011

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857
UTCC - Upstream - Cross- Section 6 - Riffle
Pebble Count Summary
D50
Mo oring Year 2
Descnption
Matenal
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Sdt/Clay
sWc lay
0 062
0
0%
0%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
0
0%
00/0
fine sand
025
1
1%
1%
medium sand
050
1
1%
2%
coarse sand
100
6
6%
8%
very coarse sand
200
3
3%
11%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
1
1%
12%
fine gravel
5 7
0
0%
12%
fine gravel
80
0
00/0
12%
medium gravel
113
3
3%
15%
medium gravel
160
6
6%
21%
coarse gravel
223
5
5%
26%
coarse gravel
32
7
7%
33%
very coarse gravel
45
14
14%
47%
very coarse gravel
64
15
15%
62%
Cobble
small cobble
90
16
16%
78%
medium cobble
128
16
16%
94%
large cobble
180
4
4%
98%
very large cobble
256
1
1%
990/0
Boulder
small boulder
362
1
1%
100%
small boulder
512
0
00/0
1000/0
medium boulder
1024
0
00/0
1000/0
large boulder
2048
0
00/0
100%
very large boulder 1
4096
0
0%
1000/0
Bedrock I
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
1000/0
TOTALS1
100
1000/0
1000/0
S Data
D50
48
D84
100
D95
140
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D44 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
UT Crab Creek - Upstream
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 6 -Riffle
Stream Survey Data
Particle Size (m m)
MY13/2/2011 --g—MY210/18/2011
UT Crab Creek - Upstream
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 6 - Riffle
0
30%
25%
e
m
a
F
g
d
a
d
m
E
0
U
20
W
0
�a
15%
0
d
u
d
10% o.
5%
0%
N Vi h tn .. N ? �c w � ... = D N N %n ? O w O �O N N_ R w �O Y
O O O N t7 V1 O O O O
Particle Size (mm)
❑MY1312 /2011 ■MY210/18/2011
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D45 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
WWI
90%
80
70
60
so i
40%
30
20
10%
m
0%
Particle Size (m m)
MY13/2/2011 --g—MY210/18/2011
UT Crab Creek - Upstream
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 6 - Riffle
0
30%
25%
e
m
a
F
g
d
a
d
m
E
0
U
20
W
0
�a
15%
0
d
u
d
10% o.
5%
0%
N Vi h tn .. N ? �c w � ... = D N N %n ? O w O �O N N_ R w �O Y
O O O N t7 V1 O O O O
Particle Size (mm)
❑MY1312 /2011 ■MY210/18/2011
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D45 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857
UTCC - Upstream - Cross- Section 7 - Pool
Pebble Count Summary
D50
M oring Year 2
Descn tion
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Sdt/Clay
sdUclay
0 062
0
00/0
0%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
1
1%
1%
fine sand
025
4
4%
5%
medium sand
050
11
11%
16%
coarse sand
100
14
14%
30%
very coarse sand
200
18
18%
48%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
1 0
00/0
48%
fine gravel
5 7
2
2%
500/o
fine gravel
80
0
0%
50%
medium gravel
113
2
2%
52%
medium gravel
160
2
2%
54%
coarse gravel
223
2
2%
56%
coarse gravel
32
4
4%
60%
very coarse gravel
45
4
4%
64%
very coarse gravel
64
9
90/0
73%
Cobble
small cobble
90
9
90/0
82%
medium cobble
128
12
12%
94%
large cobble
180
6
6%
100%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
1000/0
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
00/0
1000/0
large boulder
2048
0
00/0
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0° /U
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
00/0
1000/0
TOTALS
100
100%
1000/0
Summ ary Data
D50
6
D84
95
D95
140
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D46 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D47 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
December 2011
UT Crab Creek- Upstream
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 7 -Pool
-
- - -
- -- - - - - -
100%
90%
80%
�
e
i
r
70% F
60% Gu
0
50% g
si
40%
m
E
30%
I
U
20%
10%
0%
O
O
O
O
N Q
Particle Size (mm)
MY13/2 /2011 —111—MY210/17/2011
UT Crab Creek - Upstream
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 7 -Pool
- - - - -
30%
25%
20%
�
0
i
15%
o
d
u
10% a
I
5%
0%
N
in h to
N Q �o to Q O a O
10 � N 00
C51,
�a N N_ 7 00 10 Y
h 10 N Q T N
N �
O
O
9
CE
Particle Size (mm)
OMY13/2 /2011 ■MY210/18/2011
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D47 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
December 2011

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857
UTCC - Upstream - Cross- Section 8 - Riffle
Pebble Count Summary
D50
Mo itoring Year 2
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Sdt/Clay
sWclay
0 062
3
3%
3%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
3
3%
6%
fine sand
025
3
3%
90/0
medium sand
050
5
5%
14%
coarse sand
1 00
1
1%
15%
very coarse sand
200
9
90/0
24%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
0
00/0
24%
fine gravel
57
7
7%
31%
fine gravel
80
0
00/0
31%
medium gravel
113
0
00/0
31%
medium gravel
160
5
5%
36%
coarse gravel
223
7
7%
43%
coarse gravel
32
16
16%
59%
very coarse gravel
45
10
100/0
69%
very coarse gravel
64
9
90/0
78%
Cobble
small cobble
90
10
100/0
88%
medium cobble
128
8
80/0
96%
large cobble
180
3
3%
99%
very large cobble
256
1
1%
1000/0
Boulde r
small boulder
362
0
00/0
100%
small boulder
512
0
00/0
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
00/0
1000/0
large boulder
2048
0
00/0
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
00/.
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
00/0
1000/o
TOTALS1
100
100% 1
100%
Summary Data
D50
26
D84
79
D95
120
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D48 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D49 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
December 2011
UT Crab Creek - Upstream
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 8 - Riffle
r
- -- - - - - — - -
100%
i
90%
80%
C
W
I
a
70% i
6
g
0
50
a
40%
m
E
30%
U
20%
10%
I
0%
O
O O O
N Q
7
d
S1
Particle Sae (mm)
MY13/2 /2011 — MY210/18/2011
UT Crab Creek- Upstream
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 8 - Riffle
- -
- — -
-- - - -
30%
25
I
20%
a
0
9
'a
IS%
a
u
iv
10% o.
i
5%
0%
r kn n to
b N_ e4
r4 Q o ao o N N %n a e ae o
N f7
e N N ao o x
O O
N f•1 h O N O� 9
O O
m
Particle Sae (mm)
OMY13/2 /2011 ■MY210 /18/2011
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D49 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
December 2011

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857
UTCC - Upstream - Cross -Section 9 - Pool
Pebble Count Summary
D50
M onng Year 2
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Sdt/Clay
sift/clay
0 062
5
5%
5%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
4
4%
90/0
fine sand
025
1
1%
100/0
medium sand
050
4
4%
14%
coarse sand
100
0
0%
14%
very coarse sand
200
4
4%
18%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
1
1%
190/0
fine gravel
57
0
0%
190/0
fine gravel
80
0
0%
190/0
medium gravel
113
5
5%
24%
medium gravel
160
8
8%
32%
coarse gravel
223
9
9%
41%
coarse gravel
32
18
18%
59%
very coarse gravel
45
14
14%
73%
very coarse gravel
64
12
12%
85%
Cobble
small cobble
90
11
11%
1 96%
medium cobble
128
2
2%
98%
large cobble
180
2
2%
1000/0
very large cobble
256
0
00/0
1000/0
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0° /U
100%
small boulder
512
0
00/0
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
00/0
1000/0
large boulder
2048
0
00/0
100%
very large boulder
40% 1
0
00/0
1000/0
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
00/0
1000/0
TOTALS1
100
100%
1000/0
Summary Data
D50
27
D84
62
D95
87
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -50 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
December 2011

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -51 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
December 2011
UT Crab Creek- Upstream
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 9 - Pool
-
- - - - --
100%
90
80%
e
ae
L
70% F
60°/ [i
50
d
C6
40% >
E
F
10°/
U
20%
I
10%
0%
O
N O
O O
m
Particle Size (mm)
MY1 3/3/2011 I NIY2 10/18/2011
UT Crab Creek- Upstream
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 9 - Pool
25%
20%
—
I
�
r
15%
C
d
V
d
10% 0.
5%
I
0%
N 4n in
In N R 10 00 IA R O 00 O
`O 01 N 00
�O N N C 00 10 Y
h 10 N R O, N
...
N M h O N O L
O O
9
m
Particle Size (m m)
OMY13 /3/2011 ■MY210 /18/2011
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
D -51 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
December 2011

Appendix D
i
1_
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857
UTCC - Upstream - Cross -Section 10 - Riffle
Pebble Count Summary
D50
Mo oring Year 2
Descnption
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Sdt/Clay
sdt/clay
0 062
4
4%
4%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
11
11%
15%
fine sand
025
9
90/0
24%
medium sand
050
7
7%
31%
coarse sand
100
6
6%
37%
very coarse sand
200
1
1%
38%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
0
00/0
38%
fine aravel
57
1
1%
39%
fine gravel
80
0
00/0
39%
medium gravel
113
5
5%
44%
medium gravel
160
8
8%
52%
coarse gravel
223
12
12%
64%
coarse gravel
32
14
14%
78%
very coarse gravel
45
8
8%
86%
very coarse gravel
64
9
90/0
950
Cobble
small cobble
90
2
2%
97%
medium cobble
128
2
2%
990/0
large cobble
180
1
1%
1000/0
very larRe cobble
256
0
00/0
1000/0
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
00/0
1000/0
large boulder
2048
0
00/0
100%
very larize boulder
4096
0
0%
1000/0
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
100
1000/0
1000/.
S Data
D50
15
D84
41
D95
64
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -52 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
UT Crab Creek- Upstream
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 10- Riffle
Stream Survey Data
Particle Size (mm)
MY13/3/2011 — MY210/18/2011
UT Crab Creek - Upstream
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 10 -Riffle
°
30%
a
F
g
a
6
Q
d
a
3
E
e
U
25%
20% m
e
IS%
e
d
V
L
V
10% o.
5%
0%
O = a Y
O O 9
J
Particle Size (mm)
❑MY13/3 /2011 ■MY210 /18/2011
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -53 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
--
—
- -
- -
-
-
tuu•
90%
80
70%
50 °/
40%
1
30
20
10%
0%
� O
m
Particle Size (mm)
MY13/3/2011 — MY210/18/2011
UT Crab Creek - Upstream
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 10 -Riffle
°
30%
a
F
g
a
6
Q
d
a
3
E
e
U
25%
20% m
e
IS%
e
d
V
L
V
10% o.
5%
0%
O = a Y
O O 9
J
Particle Size (mm)
❑MY13/3 /2011 ■MY210 /18/2011
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -53 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
miormauon unavanaoie
N/A Item does not apply
• The design cross - section criteria Here developed usingan analytical design approach Pattern and profile data derived from stable enhancement reaches from the existing UT I data
Non - Applicable
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -54 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Pro ct No 857 - UTl - Upper
500 Let
Parameter
Regional Curve
Pre - dusting Con &tion
Reference Reach Data
Design*
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle
U
UL
I Eq.
Mio
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Min
Meanj
Med I
Max
SD
N
Min
can
Ma:
Min
an
Mad
Ma:
SD
N
Bankfull Width (ft)
99
13 5
136
15 8
251
5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
131
148
153
153
15 7
N/A
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
182
N/A
N/A
>55
N/A
5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
22
33
>100
>100
>100
>100
N/A
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
090
1-20
1 20
1 50
023
5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1 10
1 30
1 50
1 50
1 60
N/A
2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
120
1 80
1 80
240
051
5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
200
240
2 50
2 50
2 50
N/A
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
140 1
141
151
150
159
072
5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
148
203
222
222
240
N/A
2
Width/Depth Ratio
1
65
1 1221
1 1 7
167
4 12
5
N /A
N/A
N/A
N/A
I N/A
I N/A
120
92
107
107
1221
N/A
2
Entrenchment Ratio
1
1 2
1 34
1 3 3
1 >5 6
1 1561
5 1
N/A
I N/A
I N/A
I N/A
I N/A
I N/A I
1 1 7
1 1
>6 4
>6 6
>6 6
1 >6 71
N/A
2
Bank Height Ratio
10
1 16
1 17
2 4
10 54
1 5 1
N/A
N/A
I N/A
I N/A
I N/A
I N/A
10
10
1 1
1 1
1 1 I
1 N/A
2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
58
287
226
682
2342
7
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0 023
0 057
0 014
003
0 014
003
0 014
0 023
0 022
0 033
00-07
7
Pool Length (ft)
70
130
14
47
140
470
35
86
81
198
444
13
Pool Max Depth (ft)
19
2 1
2 1
22
0 13
5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1 0
32
32
32
3 2
N/A
I
Pool Spacing (ft)
600
650
54
126
540
1260
68
389
340
1131
3033
12
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
210
580
32
58
320
580
268
374
40 1
444
706
6
Radius of Curvature (ft)
11 0
370
20
37
200
370
287
347
324
51 3
835
6
Re Bankfull Width (ft /ft)
0 7
37
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1 5
28
19
23
2 1
3 3
N/A
N/A
Meander Wavelength (ft)
90 0
1910
900
1910
900
1910
1179
135 5
1307
1626
20 10
4
Meander Width Ratio
1 3
5 8
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
24
44
26
26
26
27
N/A
2
Transport Parameters
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib /ft=
N/A
208
Max Part Size (mm) Mobilized at Bankfull
N/A
262
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W /m=
N/A
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
G4 /C4
N/A
B4c/C4
Cb
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
39 47
N/A
4 5
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
62
59 71
N/A
66
Valley Length (ft)
N/A
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1 730
N/A
1 621
500
Sinuosity
1 19
N/A
1 14
1 14
Water Surface Slope (ft /ft)
00210
N/A
00210
00238
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
N/A
00251
Bankfull Floodplam Area (acres)
N/A
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
N/A
Biological or Other
N/A
miormauon unavanaoie
N/A Item does not apply
• The design cross - section criteria Here developed usingan analytical design approach Pattern and profile data derived from stable enhancement reaches from the existing UT I data
Non - Applicable
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -54 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
N /Av'Item does not 'apply
• The design cross section criteria vwre developed using an analytical design approach Pattern and profile data derived from stable enhancement reaches from the existing UT I data
Non Applicable
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -55 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Pro ct No 857 - UT1 - Lower 397 feet
Parameter
Regime Curse
Pre- ESusting Conclition
Reference Reach Data
Design"
Momtonng Baseline
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle
IL
UL
I Eq.
Min
Meaul
Med
I Max
SD
N
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
MJn
Mean
Ma:
Mlo
Mean
Med
Mai
SD
N
Bankfull Width (ft)
99
135
136
158
2 5 1
5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
131
1 1 5
115
115
115
N/A
I
Floodprone Width (ft)
182
N/A
N/A
>55
N/A
5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
220
330
>100
>100
>100
>100
N/A
I
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
090
120
1 20
1 50
023
5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1 1
150
150
1 50
1 50
N/A
I
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
120
1 80
1 80
240
051
5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
20
2 50
2 50
2 50
2 50
N/A
I
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ftr)
140
141
151
150
159
072
5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
148
176
176
176
176
N/A
I
Width/Depth Ratio
65
122
1 1 7
167
14 12
5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
120
7 5
7 5
FTTTT5
N/A
I
Entrenchment Ratio
12
34
3 3
1 >5 6
1 1561
5
1 N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1 7
>8 7
>8 7
>8 7
>8 7
N/A
I
Bank Height Ratio
1 0
1 6
1 7
24
1054
5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1 0
1 0
10
1 0
1 1 0
1 N/A
I
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
210
376
402
526
15191
5
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0 023
0 057
0 014
0 030
0 014
0 030
0 020
0 026
0 027
0 033
0 005
5
Pool Length (ft)
70
130
140
470
140
470
1 1 8
174
174
27 1
624
5
Pool Max Depth (ft)
19
2 1
2 1
22
0 13
5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
10
26
26
26
26
N/A
I
Pool Spacing (ft)
600
650
54 0
1260
540
1260
450
71 3
73 4
93 6
21 53
4
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
210
580
32
58
320
590
572
629
642
662
39
4
Radius of Curvature (ft)
110
370
20
37
200
370
31 2
366
378
397
3 8
4
Re Bankfull Width (ft /ft)
07
3 7
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1 5
28
2 71
3 18
328
345
N/A
N/A
Meander Wavelength (ft)
900
191 0
900
1910
900
1910
1420
1%0
2020
2440
N/A
3
Meander Width Ratio
13
5 8
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
24
44
5 58
5 58
5 58
5 58
N/A
I
Transport Parameters
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb /ft=
N/A
1 36
M ax Part Size (mm) Mobilized at Bankfull
N/A
191
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W /m2
N/A
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
G4 /C4
N/A
B4c1C4
C
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
39 47
N/A
4 5
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
62
59 71
N/A
66
Valley Length (ft)
N/A
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1 730
N/A
1 621
397
Sinuosity
1 19
N/A
1 14
1 15
Water Surface Slope (ft /ft)
00210
N/A
00210
00156
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
N/A
00174
Bankfull Floodp lain Area (acres)
N/A
% of Reach with Erodmg Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
N/A
Biological or Other
N/A
N /Av'Item does not 'apply
• The design cross section criteria vwre developed using an analytical design approach Pattern and profile data derived from stable enhancement reaches from the existing UT I data
Non Applicable
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -55 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
imormarion unavauacie
N/A Item doesnot apply
• Existing stream has been channebzed and does not have a natural meander pattern with distinct pool and riffle features
Non Applicable
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D-56
Project No 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
December 2011
9
Table 10a. Baselme Stream Data Summary
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Pro et No 857 - UTCC -US (2,455 feet
Parameter
Regional Curve
Pre- Eidsting Con &eon
Reference Reach Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension & Substrate - Rifle
LL
UL
E4
Min
Wool
Med I
Max
SD
N
Min
Mean
Med
I Max
SD
N
Min
Mean
Ma:
Mln
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Bankfull Width (fl)
176
204
198
24 5
291
4
597
623
623
649
N/A
2
240
250
267
265
287
N/A
3
Floodprone Width (ft)
65
>80
4
200
248
248
296
N/A
2
54 0
>200
>200
>200
>200
N/A
3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
140
1 65
1 70
180
0 17
4
330
335
335
340
N/A
2
14
140
153
1 50
1 70
N/A
3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
240
2 78
275
320
033
4
500
540
540
5 80
N/A
2
23
240
2 50
2 50
260
N/A
3
Bankf ill Cross Sectional Area (ft)
390
308
33 1
337
342
1 57
4
1980
2080
2080
2180
N/A
2
342
370
405
42 1
424
N/A
3-
Width/Depth Ratiol
100
127
115
179
352
4
1 181
1861
191
1
7 1
1 1471
177
1901
1951
N/A
3
Entrenchment Ratiol
1
1
3 1
>4 I
1
4
1 3 1
40
50
2 3
1 1701
175
1 >7 5
1 >8 01
N/A
3
Bank Height Ratiol
I
I
1 10
1 1 I
1 10
1 12
1 0 101
4
1 1 0
1 10
1 10
1 0
N/A
I
1 10.1
1 0
1 0
1 0
HI
N/A
1 3
Prottle
Riffle Length (ft)
149
605
649
1000
22 55
19
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0 020
0 042
0 015
0 029
0 027
0 048
0 012
5
0 014
0 045
0 006
0 013
0 012
0 021
0 005
19
Pool Length (ft)
290
530
210
1050
104
41 1
390
792
21 76
19
Pool Max Depth (ft)
30
3 1
3 1
33
NA
3
19
2 7
29
29
30
N/A
2
Pool Spacing (fl)
950
1160
190 0
161 0
188 0
9370
4
450
1360
517
1307
1132
241 7
52 31
18
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (fl)
130
430
500
N/A
1
750
21 1 0
547
11017
1025
1328
2359
15
Radius of Curvature (ft)
00*
51*
55 1
N/A
1
430
1280
375
51 1
42 5
1467
2621
16
Rc Bankfull Width (ft /ft)
00*
2 9•
088
088
088
088
1 7
5 1
1 5
1 9
16
5 1
N/A
N/A
Meander Wavelength (ft)
'
'
513
159 0
616
540 0
2130
5
200
228 0
238 7
2344
3142
3262
15
Meander Width Ratio
05
24
80
80
80
8 0
N/A
30
84
L36
3 9
39
4 1
N/A
3
Transport Parameters
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib /flu
089
0 73
071
Max Part Size (mm) Mobilized at Eankfulli
130
125
118
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W /m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4
C3
C4
C
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
3 3 38
33
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
197
111 130
117
Valley Length (ft)
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
2086
1 034
2 405
2 455
Sinuosity
1 04
1 20
1 20
1 21
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft /ft)
00090
00088
00080
00080
Bankfull Slope (ft/fl)
00083
Bankfull Floodplam Area (acres)
%of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat M etnc
Channel Stability or Habitat M etnc
Biological or Other
imormarion unavauacie
N/A Item doesnot apply
• Existing stream has been channebzed and does not have a natural meander pattern with distinct pool and riffle features
Non Applicable
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D-56
Project No 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
December 2011
9

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table 10b Baseline Stream Data Summary
(Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
UT to Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No 857 - UT1 -U r 500 feet
Parameter
Pre- Eustng Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
RI % /Ru % /P % /G %/SY
Monitoring Baseline
RI % /Ru % /P°/ /G % /S%
1
1
N/A
N/A
I N/A
N/A
N/A
42
8
24
22
4
12
1 0
SC° /, /Se/ /G % /CP / /B % /Bel.
<1•
10•
59•
28•
3•
0•
<11
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
IS
II
d 16 / D35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / diP / chW (mm)
72*
222*
400'
103 0.
197 0•
104•
150•
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Entrenchment Class
<15/15 199/2 49/50 99/>10
Entrenchment Class
Incision Class
.12/12 149/15 199/>20
<15/15 199/2 49/50 99/>10
N/A Item does not apph
• Nmnbers reported are the mean percentages from the nffle surface pebble cormts
Non Applica
Table 10b Baseline Stream Data Summary
(Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
UT to Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No 857 - UTl -Lower 397 feet
Parameter
Pre Eustrng Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
RI % / Ru % / P% / G% / S° /,
Monitoring Baseline
RI % /Ru % /P°/ /G % /S%
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
I N/A
N/A
48
5
22
25
1
12
1 0
SC° /, /Se /o /G % /C° /, /B % /Be%
<1•
10•
590
28•
30
0•
<11
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
IS
II
d16 /D35 /d50 /d84 /d95 /th" /djW(mm)
72•
222•
400•
1030.
1970•
104•
150•
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Entrenchment Class
<15/15 199/2 49/50 99 >10
Entrenchment Class
Incision Class
<12/12 149/15 199/>20
<15/15 199/2 49/50 99/>10
N/A Item dots not apph
• Ntmbers reported arc the mean percentages from the nfOc surface pebble cotmts
Non Applashle
Table 10b Baseline Stream Data Summary
(Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Contabnment Parameter Distributions)
UT to Crab Creek Stream & Weiland / Project No 857 - UTCC -US (2,455 feet
Parameter
Pre Existing Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
RI % /Ru % /P°/ /G % /S%
1
1
41
9
32
12
1 0
SC°/ /Sa°/ /G% /CP/ /B % /Be%
0•
11
62•
36•
<11
0•
0
18
5
48
IS
II
dl6 /D35 /d50 /d84 /d95 /diP /ch�(mm)
ll•
23•
44•
104•
150•
14
144
512
Entrenchment Class
<15/15 199/2 49/50 99/>10
Incision Class
<12/12 149/15 199/>20
Informal on a wwULDle
• Nmbcm reported are the mean percentages from the nftic surface pebble cotmts
Non Applicable
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D-57 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table lla. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dime nslonal'Parameten - Cross - Sections)
UT Crab Stream & Wetland If Project No. 857 - UTl -Upper (500 feet)
Cross -Section 1
Riffle
Cross -Section 2
Pool
Cross -Section 3
lb le
Dimension
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
NM
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
2,605
2,605
2,605
2,603
2,603
2,603
2,598
2,598
2,598
Bankfull Width (ft)
157
159
153
184
180
176
148
147
149
Floodprone Width (ft)
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
13
12
13
1 9
1 9
18
16
1 6
1 6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
24
24
25
32
32
33
25
25
26
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ftZ)
203
185
193
343
334
322
240
238
238
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
1221
138
121
99
97
96
92
9 1
94
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>6 4
1 >6 3
>6 5
>5 4
>5 5
>5 7
>6 7
>6 8
>6 7
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1 0
1 0
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins (ftZ)
203
190
19 4
1
1
343
336
322
24 3
24 1
242
d50 (mm)
N/A
17
46
N/A
11
17
N/A
23
12
IN /F1 - ncm uucs nvi aPPl7
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -58 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table l la. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross - Sections)
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857 - UTl -Lower (397 feet)
Cross - Section 4
Pool
Cross - Section 5
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
2,571
2,571
2,571
2,571
2,571
2,571
Bankfull Width (ft)
167
143
147
115
122
123
Floodprone Width (ft)
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
11
13
11
15
14
14
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
26
25
24
25
26
26
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area 112
188
180
167
176
j 175
173
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
148
114
129
75
85
88
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>6 0
>7 0
>6 8
>8 7
>82
>81
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
10
10
10
10
10
10
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins (ft)
1891
1801
1671
21 1
21 5
2161
1
d50 (mm)
N/A 1
84 1
4
N/A
091
2
IN/tl - ucm wc5 11Ui aPP'Y
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -59 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D Stream Survey Data
Table l la Monitoring Data - Dimensional Moprboklgy Summary
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross- Sectlons)
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetbmd / Project No 857 - UTCC -US (2,455 feet)
Cross - Section 6
Riffle
Cross-Section 7
Pod
CrossSechon 8
Riffle
Cross-Section 9
Pool
Cross-Section 10
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MVI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
2 571
2 571
2 571
2 571
2 571
2 571
2 566
2 566
2 566
2 554
2 554
2 554
2 554
2 554
2 554
Bankfull Width (ft)
250
247
272
27 7
278
278
28 7
279
280
23 5
23 8
230
265
272
264
Floodprone Width (ft)
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
1 >200
>200
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1 7
1 7
1 5
1 7
1 7
16
1 5
1 4
14
1 7
1 7
1 6
1 4
14
1 4
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
26
25
25
30
34
34
25
24
25
27
29
27
24
24
25
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft'
424
4191
41 3
47 3
47 1
45 1
42 1
395
384
407
40 9
36 1
370
372
359
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
147
146
179
163
164
171
195
197
204
135
139
146
190
199
194
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>80
>81
>7 4
>7 2
>7 2
>7 2
>70
>7 2
>7 I
>8 5
>8 4
>8 7
>7 5
>7 3
77 6
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
10
10
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
11
1 1
10
1 0
10
10
10
10
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins (fl'l
424
419
41 3
473
473
45 1
43 2
40 1
38 5
41 5
41 2
36 I
386
399
37 1
d50 (mm)
N/A
51
48
N/A
32
6
N/A
33
26
N/A
88
27
NA
24
15
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -60 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
a
P, Rdblol Ro Rm /P-Poo1 16 -Ode /S &,p
SC Shat /SA- %=G el /C Cobblc /B B.W&I& Bedmd
P �ccoe F b do nB1 end Poole bbbwmea
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D-61 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Momtonng Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
b
1
r
lTOme1 vmdn� «IleGen
CM Marc
dnbpml «
N/A lof— on dmevol eppl
-sll CV /S4 St d /G -G rel /C CUbbk!B WWdvr /& Hehad
Pore —W b—don NPe end pool pebble a tot
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -62 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Protect No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix D
3m
Rr RIIBo /Ro -Rim /P Pool /f OWelti Si p
W Slt O, ISM S, d'C -On eI IC C bbl /B - Bo I& /Bc H,Amt
Pc — pc bud , ,fn, and po I pcbbl, c—,
f
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Stream Survey Data
n
D-63 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
December 2011

Appendix E
Hydrologic Data

Appendix E
Hydrologic Data
Table 12. Verification ofBankfull Events
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857
Date of Data
Date of
Method
Photo #
Collection
Occurrence
(d available)
2/2/2011
12/2/2010
Crest gauge & wrack Imes
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 857
Monitoring Year I of 5
E -I Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
December 2011

Ap x E Hydrologic Data
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
00
Jan -10 Feb-10 Mar -10 Apr -10 May -10 Jun -10 Jul -10 Aug -10 Sep-10 Oct -10 Nov -10 Dec -10
Data Compared to 301h and 70th Percentiles for Alleehanv Countv. NC
2011 Rainfall 30th Percentile 70th Percentile
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
UTC -1 Preciodation and Water Level Plot
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
50
45
GroundSurfaoe
GBeginninngg�of�
May
Maximum#ofConsecutiveDays >12" 6
%ofHydropenod During GrowingSeason 38%
100
50
4 0
,
00
3 5
;
Required
-50
C
Depth
L
C
-100
...
30
3
O
;
-150
'0
25
7
CL
-200
V
20
0
E.
End of
-250
IL
'
GrovAng Season
t
1 5
October 5
D.
-300
d
'
D
10
'
-350
0 5
Ld
-400
00
I i i
I
I I I
J -450
c
7
c c a
4
ti
c c > > > a a
a' a'
a
Nmr
a
m
> >
Q z° z°
o 4
(b
N (b df l'�
A
N
O
ry 1�f �f
�'if
13
r N (4
N
v- N N
N
r N P.
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
UTC -2 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
50
100
Beginning of
Maximum #of Consecutive Days >12"
30
Growing Season
%ofHydroperiod During GrowingSeason
191%
45
GroundSun'aoe
May 2;
�
so
40
35
VV
Required
-50
c
Depth
C
-100
30
c
O
-150
"v
2 5
End of
C
Growing Season
a
October5
'
-200
So-
o
20
;
L
IL
-25 0
s
15
a
-300
d
10
'
-350
05
-400
00
1 1
1 1
1 -450
W
W
.6
W LL
A
LL
='
_' $
l�0
7 33 7 7 3
t -mAr
m
0 0
R Z Z
r
A
N
N
r
df !'�f
N N
N
00 N j l�f t�
r N
O
r
N
a
r
M
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix E
u i t, -s rrecipitanon ana water >L.evei riot
Hydrologic Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
50
100
Beg
Beginning of ;
Gror�Season
Maxirturn #of Consecutive Days >12' 33
% ofHydroperiod During GrovAngSeason 210%
45
GroundSurfaoe
��
�
50
40
00
35
Required
-50
c
Dept
v
100
3 0
'
.,
c
3
O
-150
},
�
25
End of
c
�
IV
Growing Season
a
1 October 5
'
-200
So-
0
v
LD
20
'
-250
=
a
15
L
-300
d
10
'
'
-350
0 5
-400
0 0
-450
T
T
I
T
T
I
7M
T T
T T
I
W li
T
T
I
li
T T T T
T T T T
I I qI, qI,
T
T
I
W
T
T
I
e�0
T T T T T T
T T T T T T
1 I . . . I
7 %� -7 3 O Q
T T
T T
I 1
Q y0'
T T T T T
T T T T T
1 I 1 1 1
y �1 O O
T T T
T T T
1
T
off
A
ib
N df �1
pD N
��y7 A A
N
T N N
N
!�f
T T
1�
N T
• T-
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
UTC -4 PreciDitahon and Water Level Plot
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -6 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
50
�
1
100
Maximum #ofConsecutive Days >12"
61
;
% ofHydroperiod During GrowingSeason 369%
45
Ground
Surface
1
1
50
40
1
00
Beginning of
Grovwng Season
-50
^
C
3 5
y2
;
; Required
1
I Depth
`
/\
C
;
1
-100
30
'
'
3
c
O
;
-15 0
2 5
i End of
3
Growing Season
O
C.
1
October5
1
-200
IC
1
1
41,
20
'
O
-250
11L
.�
15
C.
-300
d
1
1
1
Q1
10
1
1
'
I
1
1
1
-350
0 5
1
1
;
-40 0
0 0
;
r
V-
-45 0
T- r
I I
!C i0
r r
I I
li
r
I
li
r r r
I I
L
�4
Q
r r
I 1
�q >�
Q A
r
I
>�
r0
r r r r r r r
I I . - I I
c c > > > a a
7 C S > >
r
I
a
m
r T-r r r r
I 1 I 1 1
a � � > > b
nT R C o
r
I
r
I
N
N a
N"t
a
N
d0
i
A
A
N
r N
N r
r
M
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -6 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
UTC -5 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -7 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Momtonng Year 2 of 5
50
45
GroundSurfaoe
Beginning of
Growing Season ;
may�
Maxim W
um #ofConsecue Days >12' 155
%ofHydropedod During GrowingSeason 987%
�
100
50
40
00
35
'
Required
-50
C
Depth
...
.-.
100
Z,'
30
'
3
c
O
-150
'o
25
End of
C
Growing Season
O
p-
Octobers
-200
V
IV
20
'
+O+
a
-250
L
15
p.
-300
d
G
10
'
-350
0 5
-400
0 0
;
41, 1 1
-450
r
C
�o
r
C
r r
C
M m
r
m
r r r r r
�
�p� W
r
�
M
r r r r r r r
C C � - - I I
> > > > c� o�
r r
I I
a r -/[a�
r r r r r
I I 1 I I
> >
g A
r r
I I
A
(b
N ib df �'7
N !� 1�
R
N u'f df
Q
r
N
N
r N N
N
r N
N
N V.
T- Cl)
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -7 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Momtonng Year 2 of 5

Appendix E
U l u -b Yrecipitati011 ana Water Level riot
Hydrologic Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -8 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
50
100
Maximum #of Consecutive Days >1Y 38
%of Hyd ropenod During Grow rig Season 242%
45
Ground
Surface
50
4 0
00
Beginningof
;
Growing Season
.50
C
3 5
May
Required
i Dept
v
100
30
'
v
`
O
-150
25
End of
Growing Season
O
p,
Octobers
-200
02
v
20
'
'
-25 0
a
r
15
a
-300
m
10
'
-350
0 5
Ila"
-400
0
T
T
T T
T
T T T
T
T
T
T T T T T T T
T
T T T T T T
-450
T
T
CO
T
w
T T
i
T
i
T T T
T
T
>
T
T T T T T T T
a I Q
>
T
m
T T T T T T
I
m
2 Q z z
T
T T
?
T
N
N
N
N
^
%
�
Q
r
N
N T-
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -8 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
UTC -7 PreciDitatlon and Water Level Plot
UT Crab Creek Stream &Wetland Final E -9 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year
2 of 5
50
45
Ground Surfae
3eT inniT � of
Growing Seaon
Vay 2
gI
nI g
foT
MT ximT f
a uC m Consecutive DaT s >17 8
9of Hydropetiod During Growing Season 516
y1
0
50
40
00
35
Required
-50
C :C
Depth
..
.L
-10
10 0
3
1
3
O
-15 0
W
5
2
CL
-20 0
2 0
O
-25 0
15
a
-3o o
End of
GrovngSeason
10
Octo 5
ti35 0
5
00
400
T
T
T T
T T
Jill I L11 I
T T T T
T T T T
-45 0
T
C
T
C
T T
.6
4
T
T
L
T T T T
7 T Q
T Q
I m 1
C
T
T T T Q
I I I
O O
T
N N N
N
M
T
VV A
A
N T
T T M
UT Crab Creek Stream &Wetland Final E -9 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Monitoring Year
2 of 5
1
2 of 5

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
UTC -8 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -10 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Momtonng Year 2 of 5
50
45
GroundSurfaae
Beginning of ;
Growing Season ,
May
Maxtmumffof Consecutive Days >17 58
% ofHydropenod During GrouwngSeason 369%
'
100
5 0
40
,
00
35
Required
-50
C
Depth
.:.
C
%
-10 0
�.
30
O
;
;
-150
25
End of
Growing Season
Q
October5
-200
2
v
L
20
'
O
0
a
-25 0
=
15
L
-300
4)
G
10
'
'
,
I
-350
05
-400
00
.450
r
A
r
M
r r
M m
r
m
r r r r
`
r
M
r
s
r r r r r r r
r
a
r
c
r r r r r
i > j1
r r
G
N
N
N
N
A A
r
r
N
M
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final E -10 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 857 December 2011
Momtonng Year 2 of 5

Appendix E
Hydrologic Data
Table 13. Wetland Gauge Attainment Data
Summary of Groundwater Gauge Results
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857
Success Criteria Aclueced/Maa Consecutive Days During Growing Season
(Percentage)
Gauge >D
Year l.
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
(2010)
(2011)
(2012)
(2013)
(2014)
No /6
No /6
UrC -1
3 8 Percent
3 8 Percent
Yes /70
Yes /30
UFC -2
44 6 Percent
19 1 Percent
Yes /35
Yes /33
UTC -3
22 3 Percent
210 Percent
Yes /52
Yes /61
33 1 Percent
38 9 Percent
Yes /157
Yes/ 155
UrC -5
100 0 Percent
98 7 Percent
Yes /22
Yes /38
�C�
14 0 Percent
24 2 Percent
Yes /15
Yes /8
UTC -7
9 6 Percent
5 1 Percent
Yes /37
Yes /58
UrC-8
23 6 Percent
36 9 Percent
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final
Project No 857
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
E -1 I Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
December 2011