20090165 Ver 1_Mitigation Evaluation_20110414

O--)k YW fry r-e— P vs t'l NO
Mitigation Project Evaluations Information Table
cn_QCjJAs
NC Division of Water Quality ?<Lr'n "�Q
Date of Office Review L4I �41:2nti
Date of Report I" ]m I C)
Date of Field Review
Evaluator's Name(s) l C'�
Report for Monitoring Year C� DN c,( )
btk u'3Cen
Evaluator's Name(s)
Other Individuals /Agencies Present
Weather Conditions (today & recent)
Directions to Site Site is located to the south of US 64 Alternate approximately 4 miles southeast of Tarboro
I Office Review Information
Project Number 20090165
Project Name Manning Farm
County(ies) Edgecombe
Basm & subbasin Tar - Pamlico 03020103
Nearest Stream Knight Canal
Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream C, NSW
Mitigator Type Full - Delivery (EEP)
DOT Status
Total Mitigation on Site
Wetland ',+I 2 -1,f 4�A
Stream 5
- Buffer -- -43�60 sq feet
utr Offse C1 14 Q ty
Approved mitigation plan available? Yes No
Monitoring reports available? tes No
Problem areas identified to reports No
Problem areas addressed on site? Yes No
Mitigation required on site
Associated impacts (if known)
Proiect History
Event
Event Date
Project Instituted
7/1/2005
Construction Completed
5/9/2006
Report Receipt Monitoring
2/12 /2009
Site Visit - Buffer
4/23/2009
C� oua vecbwlz�ked► 114)01
0 �
*Add significant project- related events reports,
received, construction, planting, repairs, etc
- During office review, note success criteria and evaluate each component based on monitoring report
results Record relevant data in Sections II and III
On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and /or to be obtained during site visit
11 Summary of Results
Monitoring Success Success
Mitigation Component Year (report) (field) Resolved
20090165 -1 435600 sq feet- I3a#feF Restoration
424-2:14 4 ti D
[:
Vernon 10 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2
U4e-11

Mitigation Project Evaluations Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
MITIGATION SUCCESS
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is successful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this project
Additional comments (e g DWQ follow -up actions, recommendations, etc)
Vernon 10 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2

Buffer Mitigation Project Evaluations Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Component 435600 sq feet Buffer Restoration Component ID 20090165 -1
Description 10 acres, 200 -foot buffer along Knight Canal and ditches
Location within project See maps
III Buffer Site Details
Ripa n Buffer (Streams Only) Nutrient Offset (Streams or Ditches)
Streams v fied by DWQ YesNo Buffer Width
Comments
Total Acres
Enbefnced Acres
�pffer Width 50' > 50'
Grandfathered Site? (EEP Only) Yes
IV Success Criteria Evaluation
Comments CC"6m
9­114
cLOk ter"
Total Acres
Restored Acres
Enhanced Acres
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
Species Story TPA/'/ cover
NOTE Success Criteria is 320 spaj�>�U.tY�
Monitoring report indicates success? es No
IcL�o�x i S �r oWAn_
W 1VO l PUU
Average TPA for entire site (per report)
MYL( i{
Observational field data agrees? Yes No
10 P�
�- puir � L-PeocQ3 )
Date of last planting
Inwu- b� rah {C o rY<rnsz. nn�
Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No
General observations on condition of riparian /buffer areas and associated stream bank (e g bank stability,
overall health of vegetation, etc )
Version 12 (March 5, 2009) Page 1 of 2
P�
im

Buffer Mitigation Project Evaluations Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover)
Easement Marking Method
List any remaining issues to address (e g plant survival, easement encroachment, etc )
C. MUY ( U o�
oUD �Lort ed -_b� Gjj u'(�DfD ES ,
MITIGATION SUCCESS
Compared to the mitigation plan, this component is successful partially successful not successful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component
Additional Comments (e g DWQ follow -up actions, recommendations, etc)
c)� WL'u - 'I"kS�e� BCD u�o.tiC��s
During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern Label and attach photos to
this report
Attach maps showing photo locations, problem areas, and /or important field observations
— Additional notes related to evaluation of this component
Vernon 12 (March 5, 2009) Page 2 of 2