20081368 Ver 1_Mitigation Evaluation_20110414

Mitigation Project Evaluations Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Date of Office Review �IW20tk Evaluator's Name(s) _A
Date of Report LC& 2icss 1(1 Report for Monitoring Year
Date of Field Review
Other Individuals /Agencies Present
Evaluator's Name(s)
Weather Conditions (today & recent)
Directions to Site Site is located approx 0 25 miles south o f Smithfield on the east side of Brogden Road (NCSR 1007) dust
sourh of the 1 -95 interchange
I Office Review Information
Project Number 20081368
Project Name Brogden Road Buffer Restoration Site
County(ies) Johnston
Basin & subbasin Neuse 03020201
Nearest Stream Neuse River
Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream C, NSW
Mitigator Type Full - Delivery (EEP)
DOT Status
Total Mitigation on Site
Event Date
Wetland
7/1/2005
Stream
9/26/2005
Buffer 65340A foof
Nutr Offset C.Q' -F
5/27/2008
Approved mitigation plan available? Yes
No
Monitoring reports available? Yes
No
Problem areas identified in reports? Yes
No
Problem areas addressed on site? Yes
No
Mitigation required on site
Associated impacts (if known)
Proiect History
Event
Event Date
Project Instituted
7/1/2005
Construction Completed
9/26/2005
Report Receipt Monitoring
5/27/2008
Site Visit - Buffer
4/23/2009
Report Receipt Monitoring
7/9/2009
C:tD4 reC61-wAcla :1911�
'Add significant project- related events reports,
received, construction, planting, repairs, etc
- During office review, note success criteria and evaluate each component based on monitoring report
results Record relevant data in Sections II and III
- On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and /or to be obtained during site visit
II Summary of Results
Monitoring Success Success
Mitigation Component Year (report) (field) Resolved
20081368 -6531M sq feet4k4fer Restoration
In `A 4112.8' NO
R
Version 10 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2

Mitigation Project Evaluations Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
MITIGATION SUCCESS
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is
List specific reasons for lack of success for this project
suc ess I partially successful unsuccessful
Additional comments (e g DWQ follow -up actions, recommendations, etc)
Version 10 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2

Buffer Mitigation Project Evaluations Information Table
00 NC Division of Water Quality
Component 653@0 sq feet°Buffef Restoration Component ID 20081368
Description 15 ac, UT and smaller trnb
Location within project See maps
III Buffer Site Details
Buffer (Streams Only)
tenfied by DWQ
Comments
Total Acres
Restored Acres
Enhanced AcrO.
Buffer Width x/50' > 50'
Grandfathered Site? (EEP Only)
IV Success Criteria Evaluation
Nutrient Offset (Streams or Ditches)
Yes /'No Buffer Width r50 — --©D
'7-7�zn
Comments
Total Acres
Restored Acres
Enhanced Acres
VEGETATION
NOTE Success Criteria is 320 spa
Dominant Plant Species
Species Story TPA/"/ cover
wrrvvb�VV V4 ptv�-z
Monitoring report indicates success?
No
U"` �' `S--p
Average TPA for entire site (per report)
Observational field data agrees?
Yes No
aSLQ � -73 LUi
Date of last planting
Date
t��n�2� j2CAStf� �pe a1de� I O�
Vegetation growing successfully?
Yes No
General observations on condition of riparian /buffer areas and associated stream bank (e g bank stability,
overall health of vegetation, etc )
Version 12 (March 5, 2009) Page 1 of 2
IM
r=

Buffer Mitigation Project Evaluations Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover)
Easement Marking Method
List any remaining issues to address (e g plant survival, easement encroachment, etc )
MITIGATION SUCCESS
Compared to the mitigation plan, this component is s ces ful partially successful not successful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component
Additional Comments (e g DWQ follow -up actions, recommendations, etc)
-- yn�IaCA- u3kk k �- rangy -�e� '�v K_VG_ -e
During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern Label and attach photos to
this report
— Attach maps showing photo locations, problem areas, and /or important field observations
Additional notes related to evaluation of this component
Version 12 (March 5, 2009) Page 2 of 2