20081541 Ver 1_Buffer and nutrient offset audit (2)_20110415

no LA',�k�
Mitigation Project Evaluations Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Date of Office Review `--Illd I 1 Evaluator's Name(s) Niel rL a l .
Date of Report Dec Report for Monitoring Year
Date of Field Review
Other Individuals /Agencies Present
Evaluator's Name(s)
Weather Conditions (today & recent)
Directions to Site Site is located in eastern Greene County approximately 2 5 miles northeast of Hookerton on the east and
west sides of Churchill rd (NCSR 1404)
I Office Review Information
Project Number 20081541
Project Name Howard Farm Property
County(ies) Greene
Basin & subbasin Neuse 03020203
Nearest Stream Mussel Run
Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream
Mitigator Type Full - Delivery (EEP)
DOT Status non -DOT
Total Mitigation on Site
Wetland
Stream A
Buffer 1147996 sq feet
Nutr Offset a U I CI aC.
Approved mitigation plan available?
Yes No
Monitoring reports available?
es No
Problem areas identified in reports?
Yes No
Problem areas addressed on site?
Yes No
Mitigation required on site
2/12/2009
Associated impacts (if known)
4/20/2009
Proiect History
Event
Event Date
Project Instituted
7/1/2005
Construction Completed
5/9/2006
Report Receipt Monitoring
10/29/2008
Report Receipt Monitoring
2/12/2009
Site Visit - Buffer
4/20/2009
C,U zo o u.-+- r-r_ct)utJ<-1 3` 141 DG
*Add significant project- related events reports,
received, construction, planting, repairs, etc
-- During office review, note success criteria and evaluate each component based on monitoring report
results Record relevant data in Sections II and III
- On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and /or to be obtained during site visit
II Summary of Results
Monitoring Success Success
Mitigation Component Year (report) (field) Resolved
20081541 41995 sq -feet Buffer-Restoration
Version 10 (August 22, 2007)
D
Page 1 of 2

Mitigation Project Evaluations Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
MITIGATION SUCCESS
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is successful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this project
Additional comments (e g DWQ follow -up actions, recommendations, etc)
Vernon 10 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2

Buffer Mitigation Project Evaluations Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Component 1147995 sq feet Buffer Restoration Component ID 20081541
Description 26 3 ac planted buffers on Mussel Run and field ditches
Location within project See maps
III Buffer Site Details
Riparian Buffer (Streams Only) Nutrient Offset (Streams or Ditches)
Streams verified by DWQ Yes No Buffer Width
Comments - Comments
Total Acres
Restored Acres
Enhanced Acres
Buffer Width 50' > 50'
Grandfathered Site? (EEP Only)
IV Success Criteria Evaluation
Yes No
Total Acres
Restored Acres
Enhanced Acres
VEGETATION
NOTE Success Criteria is 320 spa
Dominant Plant Species
Species Story TPAP/ cover
Monitoring report indicates success?
S No
Average TPA for entire site (per report)
Observational field data agrees?
Yes No
Date of last planting
Vegetation growing successfully?
Yes No
General observations on condition of riparian /buffer areas and associated stream bank (e g bank stability,
overall health of vegetation, etc )
Version 12 (March 5 2009) Page 1 of 2

Buffer Mitigation Project Evaluations Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover)
Easement Marking Method
List any remaining issues to address (e g plant survival, easement encroachment, etc )
MITIGATION SUCCESS
Compared to the mitigation plan, this component is successful partially successful not successful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component
Additional Comments (e g DWQ follow -up actions, recommendations, etc)
- During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern Label and attach photos to
this report
Attach maps showing photo locations, problem areas, and /or important field observations
Additional notes related to evaluation of this component
Version 12 (March 5, 2009) Page 2 of 2