20081367 Ver 1_Mitigation Evaluation_20110414

Mitigation Project Evaluations Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Date of Office Review L� 1�:I I 1
Date of Report � ID (, ")f n UiAer ILA I l l
Date of Field Review
Other Individuals /Agencies Present
Weather Conditions (today & recent)
Directions to Site
I Office Review Information
Project Number 20081367
Project Name Conetoe Buffer Restoration Site
County(tes) Pitt
Basin & subbasm Tar - Pamlico 030262D3
Nearest Stream Conetoe Creek 1
Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream
Mitigator Type Full - Delivery (EEP)
DOT Status non -DOT
Total Mitigation on Site
Event
Wetland
Project Instituted
7/1/2005
Stream
Buffer
2/15 /2006
Report Receipt Monitonng
Nutr Offset
(Z
4/23/2009
b
Approved mitigation plan available?
Yes
)N
Monitoring reports available?
ge
No
Problem areas identified to reports?
Yes
No
Problem areas addressed on site?
Yes
No
Mitigation required on site
Associated impacts (if known)
CCU Vrv\ma ire, vs lJ
7, do e_QCt f �- s �j'\_
TC,,-, -?cun �ECZ�
Evaluator's Name(s) l 1
Report for Monitoring Year
Evaluator's Name(s)
Protect History
Event
Event Date
Project Instituted
7/1/2005
Construction Completed
2/15 /2006
Report Receipt Monitonng
7/15/2008
Site Visit - Buffer
4/23/2009
c t oz-1_oua- S1141 11
'Add significant project- related events reports,
received, construction, planting, repairs, etc
During office review, note success criteria and evaluate each component based on monitoring report
results Record relevant data in Sections II and III
On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and /or to be obtained during site visit
II Summary of Results
Monitoring Success Success
Mitigation Component Year (report) (field) Resolved
20081367 -1
Scb �+ r, o
L
Version 10 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2

Mitigation Project Evaluations Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
MITIGATION SUCCESS
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is s , cessfu partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this project
Additional comments (e g DWQ follow -up actions, recommendations, etc)
Version 10 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2

Buffer Mitigation Project Evaluations Information Table
q 53 K p NC Division of Water Quality
Component Component ID 20081367 -1
Description 10 19 ac, Mesic Pine Flatwoods planted to restore sewage sludge spray field
Location within project k--oos rocn�-
III Buffer Site Details
ran Buffer (Streams Only)
Streams rified by DWQ
Comments
Total Acres
Restored Acres
Enhanced re
Buffer Wld 50' > 50'
Gran thered Site? (EEP Only)
IV Success Criteria Evaluation
Nutrient Offset (Streams or Ditches)
Yes o Buffer Width 60 1
Yes No
Comments
Total Acres q 53 N 0 00 19
Restored Acres 1q 56
Enhanced Acres
VEGETATION
NOTE Success Criteria is 320 spa
Dominant Plant Species
Species Story TPA/lo cover
nwr ��rCfn
Monitoring report indicates success? Ye No
Ob`oltt�
Average TPA for entire site (per report) LY
J bcvvv- CCU
Observational field data agrees? Yes No
Date of last planting
Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No
General observations on condition of riparian /buffer areas and associated stream bank (e g bank stability,
overall health of vegetation, etc )
coy_ -A-e -6
Uj
�Xri9 -e-�
sd AO I� OD pvc Isle m ojurjL
se's )
L
-6
Nck-
s t
Vernon 12 (March 5, 200) U10 Cr „ aua9 / `I C 0nv,.� -L�� Page 1 of 2

Buffer Mitigation Project Evaluations Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation
nmc not eGi ivy, rem of or bk)s
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover)
Easement Marking Method
List any remaining issues to address (e g plant survival, easement encroachment, etc )
MITIGATION SUCCESS
Compared to the mitigation plan, this component is uccessf I partially successful not successful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this componen
Additional Comments (e g DWQ follow -up actions, recommendations, etc)
During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern Label and attach photos to
this report
Attach maps showing photo locations, problem areas, and /or important field observations
— Additional notes related to evaluation of this component
Version 12 (March 5, 2009) Page 2 of 2