20081540 Ver 1_Mitigation Evaluation_20110414

�,, aer Uls►� 4-o
C.�11
Mitigation Project Evaluations Information Table roacC VLas Sb�
NC Division of Water Quality
Date of Office Review A III Evaluator's Name(s)
Date of Report ) C-4e-4e-r 2D10 Report for Monitoring Year 201
Date of Field Review
Other Individuals /Agencies Present
Weather Conditions (today & recent)
Directions to Site
I Office Review Information
Project Number 20081540
Project Name Little Buffalo Buffer Mitigation Site
County(ies) Johnston
Basin & subbasm Neuse 03020201
Nearest Stream Little Buffalo Creek
Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream
Mitigator Type Full - Delivery (EEP)
DOT Status
Total Mdiaation on Site
Wetland
Stream 17 CH
Buffer
Nutr Offset 1�acres
Approved mitigation plan available? Yes No
Monitoring reports available? es No
Problem areas identified in reports? Yes No
Problem areas addressed on site? Yes No
Mitigation required on site
Associated impacts (if known)
Evaluator's Name(s)
Proiect History
Event
Event Date
Project Instituted
7/1/2005
Construction Completed
9/6/2006
Report Receipt Monitoring
5/27/2008
Report Receipt Monitoring
10/29/2008
Site Visit - Buffer
4/23/2009
*Add significant project- related events reports,
received, construction, planting, repairs, etc
During office review, note success criteria and evaluate each component based on monitoring report
results Record relevant data in Sections II and III
On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and /or to be obtained during site visit
II Summary of Results
Monitoring Success Success
Mitigation Component Year (report) (field) Resolved
20081540 -1 0 acres Nutrient Offset Restoration 6
n q4
Lo lQ L}
Version 10 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2

Mitigation Project Evaluations Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
MITIGATION SUCCESS
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is successful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this project
Additional comments (e g DWQ follow -up actions, recommendations, etc)
Version 10 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2

J Buffer Mitigation Project Evaluations Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Component 18 5 acres Nutrient Offset Restoration Component ID 20081540 -1
Description Buffered ditches to Little Buffalo Creek
Location within project
111 Buffer Site Details
paean Buffer (Streams Only) Nutrient Offset (Streams o Ditches
i
Strea s verified by DWQ Ye No Buffer Width o2oc) Q n YYlM -\
Comments
Total Acres
Restored
Acres
idth 50' > 50' \
hered Site? (EEP Only) Yes
IV Success Criteria Evaluation
Comments Rafmjocr CL-W S (-q-
4- KIC Urfa
Total Acres 1-1 Q y
Restored Acres
Enhanced Acres
�u e�� (A -Lc - S ,�
r'P -SDro Dc -Q-fxk rG � ATea 04
VEGETATION
NOTE Success Criteria is 320 spa
Dominant Plant Species
Species Story TPA/"/ cover
QLkp 31n22 -VPNA
U3 0 0..--
`i C, 1
Monitoring report indicates success? fe No
30G
Average TPA for entire site (per report) J
2G I ,
L �ou+� u-e�- qum (pp5
CQ�'Y�6L�
Observational field data agrees? Yes No
CA-0-ba-PPLL
3 $
Clro.r r1, kxv�k O 0.k. A- G �►1 a.!M
Date of last planting
Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No
General observations on condition of riparian /buffer areas and associated stream
bank (e g bank stability,
overall health of vegetation, etc )
Version 12 (March 5, 2009) Page 1 of 2
nd.or,
1�
� '�

Buffer Mitigation Project Evaluations Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover)
ace-eA- (*i,_M c'k0YY utia -C- c- C zRcgn-t\
Easement Marking Method
List any remaining issues to address (e g plant survival, easement encroachment, etc )
pinol� �houT wyfvL mbr-e dealrabLz '412 cA&-o G-m •--no
cOyylvat L31 C)
rf\_0s -\ oy- "A'0-� Yk)'DV \&R- JCL`
MITIGATION SUCCESS
Compared to the mitigation plan, this component is successful partially successful not successful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component
Additional Comments (e g DWQ follow -up actions, recommendations, etc)
— During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern Label and attach photos to
this report
Attach maps showing photo locations, problem areas, and/or important field observations
Additional notes related to evaluation of this component
Vernon 12 (March 5, 2009) Page 2 of 2