20061760 Ver 2_Year 4 Monitoring Report_20111019

0
t'
Stricker Branch Stream Restoration
Monitoring Report
Year 4 (2011)
Cabarrus County, North Carolina
USGS HUC: 03040105
Contract# D06054 -G
Prepared for
Ln ua dnent
NCDENR- Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1652
Submitted October 2011
06-)76
RECEIVED
OCT 1 9 2011
NC ECOSYSTEM
ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM

TABLE OF CONTENTS
10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PROJECT ABSTRACT 1
2 0 PROJECT BACKGROUND 2
2 1 LOCATION AND SETTING 2
22 STRUCTURE AND OBJECTIVES 2
3 0 PROJECT CONDITON AND MONITORING RESULTS 5
31 VEGETATION ASSESSMENT 5
3 11 Sod Data 5
3 12 Vegetative Problem Areas 5
3 13 Stem Counts 5
3 14 Vegetation Assessment Summary 7
32 CHANNEL STABILITY ASSESSMENT 8
3 2 1 Cross Sections 8
3 2 2 Bank Full Events 9
323 Loneitudmal Profiles 9
324 Bed Materials
3 2 5 Site Stability Assessment Summary 10
Figure 1 Project Location and Drainage Map
Figure 2 Monitoring Plan View
Figure 3 Vegetative Problem Areas
TABLES
Table I
Project Mitigation Structure and Objectives 3
Table II
Project Activity and Reporting History 4
Table III
Project Contacts 4
Table IV
Preliminary Soil Data 5
Table Va
Stem Counts 6
Table Vb
Stems per Acre by Year 7
Table VI
Bankfull Events 9
Stncker Branch Stream Restoration Project t Monitoring Year 4 of 5

C!
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A Vegetation Data
APPENDIX B Cross Section Data
APPENDIX C Profile Data and Pebble Counts Data
APPENDIX D Photo Logs
APPENDIX E Bank Full Event Photo Log and Rainfall Data
APPENDIX F Morphology Table
Stncker Branch Stream Restoration Project 11
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY/PROJECT ABSTRACT
On behalf of the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program ( NCEEP), Mid -
Atlantic Mitigation, LLC (MMA), with technical assistance from Kimley -Horn and
Associates (KHA) restored, enhanced and preserved 3,209 linear feet of Stacker Branch
in downtown Concord, NC Construction of the project began in April 2007 with
removal of the concrete spillway of a former mill pond, and continued into January 2008
with final planting completed in February 2008 The Stricker Branch Stream Restoration
Project (Project) was proposed to provide NCEEP with approximately 2,906 Stream
Mitigation Units (SMUs)
Stricker Branch was designed using a Rosgen Priority I restoration approach in the old
pond bed and a Priority II restoration approach for all existing stream channel All
designed channels are Rosgen C4/5 The project is divided into three sections, the Lower
Section below Sign Drive, the Middle Section between Sign Drive and the old pond
spillway, and the Upper Section which includes the relic pond area
Upper Section The concrete spillway of the mill pond was removed and the remaining
water drained from the pond This was completed in Spring of 2007 and the pond area
was allowed to "dry out" for approximately 6 months Priority I restoration was done on
this section There is a rip rap spillway between the storm water BMP pond outside of
the easement and the new channel Work on the pond area was completed in January
2008, which completed the construction portion of the project
Middle Section Priority II stream restoration was done in this section There are two rip
rap areas protecting storm water out fall pipes There is also a sewer line crossing
upstream of the culvert and bridge at Sign Drive with two A -vane, step pool structures in
this area, which are not part of the conservation easement or restoration A runoff swale
was incorporated as a storm water feature by digging a shallow channel for the runoff to
enter the stream, which was then protected with matting, seeding and live stakes
Lower Section Work below Sign Drive was completed first, in August of 2007 This
section of the project has had ample time to stabilize and has already held up well
through several bank full events as documented in the photo log in Appendix E Priority
II restoration was done in this section, with the exception of two sewer line crossings
which are not included in the restoration or the conservation easement A constructed
Swale diverts storm water from an adjacent parking lot to a stabilized outlet, before
entering the stream
Based on the As -built drawing, and subsequent survey work the Stricker Branch Site
yields 2,906 stream mitigation units (2,120 linear feet R x 1 = 2,120 priority H R, 786
linear feet R x 1 = 786 priority I R, 2,120+ 786 = 2,906 SMUs) Several easements bisect
the project including a 60 foot power easement, two 30 foot City sewer Imes, 60 foot
County sewer line, Sign Drive right -of way (100 feet) and a crossing for the primary land
owner (30 feet) The actual length of stream contained in those easements is 303' The
Stucker Branch Stream Restoration Project I Monitoring Year 4 of 5

reach from bottom edge of the Duke Power Easement below McGill Road to the center
line of Irish Buffalo Creek is approximately 3,209 feet
Monitoring Plan
The fourth year of monitoring for the Project began on July 6th, 2011 Geomorphic data
collection was completed at that time Strategies and methodologies laid out in the
Monitoring Plan will be followed for a minimum of five years of monitoring The stream
will be monitored for stability of dimension, pattern, and profile using standard practices
including permanent cross sections, longitudinal profile, and pebble counts
Standardized, permanent (10m by 10m) vegetation plots will be monitored for species
diversity and survival Monitoring data will be analyzed to determine what remedial
actions if any are required and any remedial actions proposed will be detailed in the
following monitoring report
20 PROJECT BACKGROUND
2 1 LOCATION AND SETTING
The Stacker Branch Stream Restoration Site (Site) is located in the City of Concord,
Cabarrus County, North Carolina on McGill Avenue next to the Gibson Mill
redevelopment project off Highway 29 A location map is included as Figure 1 The
project site is located in the HUC 03040105 and in the urbanized EEP Targeted
Watershed 03040105020040 of the Yadkin River Basin and the 03 -07 -12 sub -basin The
project watershed is approximately 16 sq mi flowing into Irish Buffalo Creek, a 303(d)-
listed stream The majority of the Site consisted of highly unstable, incised and
straightened stream channel which had been highly altered, degraded, and entrenched
with almost no woody vegetation The upper section of the project area was historically
an impounded water supply for the former textile mill This former textile mill has been
purchased for redevelopment into a mixed use commercial and residential project, now
known as Gibson Mill The lower section was deeply entrenched/mcised and highly
unstable with strong visible evidence of actively failing banks This section was sparsely
wooded and contained invasive species such as Chinese Privet
22 STRUCTURE AND OBJECTIVES
The objective of the restoration approach was to restore the site to a more naturally
functioning stream system designed to address impairment issues typically associated
with highly disturbed urban stream systems The goals include
• The project will provide ecological, functional lift to the existing system by
restoring the stream and riparian habitat to a stable stream type and vegetative
community that is appropriate for its particular valley and watershed conditions
• Water quality will be improved by reducing sediment load through stabilization,
and nutrient and other pollutant input will be reduced through the addition of
forested riparian buffers planted with native species
Strecker Branch Stream Restoration Project 2 Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Forested buffers and reconnection with an active floodplam bench will improve
channel hydraulics and system capacity
Improvements to the ecosystem include the addition of in-stream habitat using in-
stream structures and bank revetments such as root wads and log vanes
By providing an appropriate mix of native forest vegetation to create an
appropriate canopy and under story, the soil structure will improve, leaf litter will
be established to support aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, and shading and
cooling will provide improved water quality
Together, these improvements will provide functional uplift for the watershed as a whole
The dimension, pattern, and profile were restored using Rosgen Priority I and II natural
channel design techniques, which stabilized the banks and added flood storage and
habitat diversity The objective of using these techniques was
• To create a stable bank full dimension and allow greater than bank full storm
events access to the floodplain
• To create a pattern that is appropriate and stable for the given stream and valley
types
• Stream profile was adjusted to decrease the slope by adding length This
improves the channel's ability to handle the sediment load without aggrading or
degrading
• The plan also incorporates the use of storm water BMPs located both outside and
inside the conservation easement to attenuate and treat runoff from the
surrounding development and associated impervious surfaces
The stream restoration project and associated conservation easement are surrounded by a
larger project involving the redevelopment of the old textile mill by South Paw Investors
The stream buffer design will help control access to the restored channel while allowing
for some passive public access and visibility to the restored channel A water quality
detention pond located at the upstream end of the project site was constructed in
conjunction with the stream restoration efforts South Paw Investors will be responsible
for the pond and its associated maintenance, which is not within the conservation
easement
Table I Project Mingahon Structure and Objectives Table
MITIGATION SUMMARY
RESTORATION TYPE
PRIORITY 1
PRIORITY 2
TOTAL
%
11
11
SMUs
RESTORATION
STREAM LENGTH (FEET)
786
2,120
2,906
100%
STREAM MITIGATION
786
2,120
UNITS
Stacker Branch Stream Restoration Project 3 Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Table R Project Activity and Reporting History
*Project was delayed for approximately 2 months by difficult land closings and city
access agreements Original contractor broke ground in April 2007 Disagreements
pertaining to construction scope and quality arose between Mid- Atlantic Mitigation
(MAM) and original contractor in August 2007 The new contractor was assigned to
the protect in November 2007
Table III Project Contacts
Project Manager
Activity or Report
Calendar Year of Completion or
Planned Completion
Actual
Com letion Date
Restoration Plan
January 2007
January 2007
Construction
February 2007*
January 2008
Temporary /Permanent seeding
February 2007
February 2008
Containerized Plantings
March 2007
February 2008
Mitigation Plan
May 2007
March 2008
Year 1 Monitoring
December 2007
October 2008
Year 2 Monitoring
December 2008
October 2009
Year 3 Monitoring
December 2009
October 2010
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2010
July 2011
Year 5 Monitoring
December 2011
*Project was delayed for approximately 2 months by difficult land closings and city
access agreements Original contractor broke ground in April 2007 Disagreements
pertaining to construction scope and quality arose between Mid- Atlantic Mitigation
(MAM) and original contractor in August 2007 The new contractor was assigned to
the protect in November 2007
Table III Project Contacts
Project Manager
909 Capability Drive, Suite 3100
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC
Raleigh, NC 27606
Tommy Cousins (919) 522 -9253
Designer
2000 South Boulevard, Suite 440
Kimley -Horn and Associates Inc
Charlotte, NC 28203
Will Wilhelm (704) 333 -5131
Construction Contractor
343 Chapman Drive
Earthwork Inc
Sanford, NC 27330
Dan Wood (919) 718 -6812
GW Liles Construction Co Inc
325 McGill Ave Suite 120
Concord, NC 28026
Planting & Seeding Contractor
9305 -D Monroe Road
HARP
Charlotte, NC 28270
Alan Peoples (704) 841 -2841
Seed mixes provided by IKEX
Nursery Stock provided by Native Roots Nursery (Formerly Southern
Shade
Monitoring Performers (MY4 and MY5)
2000 South Boulevard, Suite 440
Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc
Charlotte, NC 28203
Jason Diaz 704 333 -5131
Stncker Branch Stream Restoration Protect 4 Monitoring Year 4 of 5

3 0 PROJECT CONDITION AND MONITORING RESULTS
3 1 VEGETATION ASSESSMENT
3 1 1 Soil Data
Table IV Prehnunary Soil Data
Series
Max Depth
in
% Clay on
Surface
K
T
OM
%
Chewacla-
1 70
18-35
28
5
14
3 12 Vegetative Problem Areas
Several Mimosa trees (Albiziajuhbrissin) have encroached upon the easement from the
adjacent tree line into the areas of Cross Sections 5 and 6 These few individuals will be
managed by cutting and treatment with herbicide A small population of kudzu (Pueraria
Montana) has appeared up stream of Veg Plot 4 This problem will be treated quickly and
will be monitored with the goal of complete eradication Growing conditions in the
Middle Reach are the most difficult for the planted species and this area has experienced
a surge in herbaceous growth this season The approximately 2 acre area is dominated by
Lespedeza cuneata Johnson Grass (Sorghum halepense) is also present to a lesser degree
and also shows some degree of stress in the driest conditions The entire site is stabilized
and vegetated with native woody and herbaceous species, which are still doing well
despite competition, particularly in the Upper and Lower reaches A map of the
vegetative problem areas is located with the figures preceding Appendix A
3 13 Stem Counts
Four hardwood planting zones were established as follows Zone 1 — Stream Bank, Zone
2- Riparian/Bank full Bench, Zone 3 — Transitional, and Zone 4 — Upland Live stakes
were installed along the new constructed channel within Zones 1 and 2, and in some
areas of Zone 3 Plantings were spaced approximately 3 feet apart and differed in sizes
ranging from 0 2 inches to 2 inches in diameter and 2 feet to 5 feet in height Zones 2 — 4
consist of bare root seedlings in the first half of the lower section and 1 gallon
containerized plants, which were planted 3 feet to 12 feet apart throughout the project A
reduction in the percentage of nuisance vegetation in areas with existing vegetation to
less than 15% will indicate establishment of native wetland vegetation Study plots
showing that the composition and density of vegetation in the restoration areas compares
closely to the reference areas will indicate restoration success for vegetation Success
will be gauged by stem counts of planted species Stem counts of over 320 woody stems
per acre after 3 years and 260 stems per acre after 5 years will be considered successful
Photos taken at established photo points should indicate maturation of riparian vegetation
community Photographs will help to capture the health of the planted vegetation and the
severity of any invasive or exotic species that establish within the Site Permanent
Stricker Branch Stream Restoration Project 5 Monitoring Year 4 of 5

vegetative plots have been established at 6 locations The success of vegetation plantmgs
will be measured through stems counts These plots will be used to sample primarily
Zones 1 through 3 Each plot covers 100 square meters for tree counts During the
counts, the health of the vegetation will be noted In addition to stem counts, the samples
will inventory species diversity to allow for comparison between the reference and
restoration wetlands and track the percent cover of nuisance species The vegetation
survey will occur during the growing season
On July 6th, 2011, the second year - vegetative monitoring was performed on the
established vegetative plots
Table Va Stem Counts for Each Species Arranged by Plot
Stucker Branch Stream Restoration Protect 6 Momtormg Year 4 of 5
Plots
Initial
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Species
Totals
Totals
Totals
Totals
Totals
Totals
1
2
3
4a
5
6a
Acer negundo
1
1
2
Alnus serrulata
2
7
5
3
2
2
Aroma
1
1
4
3
4
2
2
arbut flora
Betula nigra*
5
3
2
1
1
7
8
9
11
12
Celtis laevigata
2
3
1
1
3
2
Cephalanthus
2
1
2
occidentahs
Cornus
2
25
4
4
2
2
amomum
Fraxmus
2
2
1
1
3
2
pennsylvanica
Hamamelis
1
3
8
8
8
5
4
virginiana
Lindera
2
benzoin
Lrguidambar
1
1
styraciflua
Liriodendron
3
3
1
4
7
5
4
11
11
tulip era
Nyssa
1
1
1
2
5
4
4
4
5
sl vatica*
Populus
6
1
7
deltoides *
Pyrus or
1
1
2
Prunus
Quercus lyrata
1
2
1
Quercus
3
1
1
1
3
3
michauxn
Quercus mgra *
3
2
1
1
2
5
5
7
18
9
Quercus
3
4
1
6
6
6
6
8
hellos
Ulmus alata*
2
1
2
5
Salix nigra*
1
1 10
5
14
12
19
13
16
Stucker Branch Stream Restoration Protect 6 Momtormg Year 4 of 5

Totals
20
17
19
11
12
19
95
63
71
87
98
800
Totals without
12
11
15
10
10
11
95
59
63
74
69
560
volunteers
400
760
560
607
Plot 4
720
440
320
--
--
--
Table Vb Stems per Acre by Year
3 14 Vegetation Assessment Summary
Vegetation success will be defined as tree survival to meet 320 stems per acre (SPA) after
three years and 260 stems per acre after five years inside the permanent vegetative plots
Herbaceous cover greater than 75% coverage after five years will be considered
successful
After the Year 2 vegetation counts, Plot 6 was found to be below 320 SPA, Plot 4 was
found with an SPA of exactly 320, and Plot 1 was borderline with an SPA of 360 A
replant was done in February 2010
Plot 1 currently contains 486 SPA This number does not include a handful of volunteers
including six cottonwoods, one river birch and one water oak It is unlikely, but not
impossible that the water oak is a volunteer, but is more likely an individual missed
during earlier counts If managed properly, cottonwoods are native, desirable volunteers
well suited to the on -site conditions Herbaceous cover was greater than 75%
Plot 2 continues to do well with an SPA of 445 No stems were added to this area during
the replant A large river birch on the outer limits of the plot (not included in the baseline
count) is now being included in the annual count Two additional river birch and one
black willow volunteer were noted in the plot last year and this year and added to the
grid Two winged ehn volunteers and a cottonwood volunteer were also noted this year
Herbaceous cover was greater than 75%
Plot 3 contains 607 stems per acre not including volunteers Two previously uncounted
water oaks were noted this year and added to the grid, they are currently being treated as
Stncker Branch Stream Restoration Project 7 Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Imhal
2008
2009
Replant
2010
2011
2012
Plot 1
480
360
360
800
737
486
Plot 2
680
680
680
680
520
445
Plot 3
560
440
400
760
560
607
Plot 4
720
440
320
--
--
--
Plot 4a
--
--
—
600
400
445
Plot
720
240
480
480
400
445
Plot 6
840
200
280
--
-
--
Plot 6a
--
--
--
840
520
400
Average
without
volunteers
673
393
420
693
523
471
Average with
volunteers
-
446
540
826
686
667
3 14 Vegetation Assessment Summary
Vegetation success will be defined as tree survival to meet 320 stems per acre (SPA) after
three years and 260 stems per acre after five years inside the permanent vegetative plots
Herbaceous cover greater than 75% coverage after five years will be considered
successful
After the Year 2 vegetation counts, Plot 6 was found to be below 320 SPA, Plot 4 was
found with an SPA of exactly 320, and Plot 1 was borderline with an SPA of 360 A
replant was done in February 2010
Plot 1 currently contains 486 SPA This number does not include a handful of volunteers
including six cottonwoods, one river birch and one water oak It is unlikely, but not
impossible that the water oak is a volunteer, but is more likely an individual missed
during earlier counts If managed properly, cottonwoods are native, desirable volunteers
well suited to the on -site conditions Herbaceous cover was greater than 75%
Plot 2 continues to do well with an SPA of 445 No stems were added to this area during
the replant A large river birch on the outer limits of the plot (not included in the baseline
count) is now being included in the annual count Two additional river birch and one
black willow volunteer were noted in the plot last year and this year and added to the
grid Two winged ehn volunteers and a cottonwood volunteer were also noted this year
Herbaceous cover was greater than 75%
Plot 3 contains 607 stems per acre not including volunteers Two previously uncounted
water oaks were noted this year and added to the grid, they are currently being treated as
Stncker Branch Stream Restoration Project 7 Monitoring Year 4 of 5

volunteers Herbaceous cover is greater than 75 %, however native species have been
dominated this season by lespedeza cuneata and some sorghum halepense
Out of concerns that it would continue to sustain damage from sand deposition during
and resulting from bankfull events, Plot 4 was moved after the replant and is now referred
to as Plot 4a The current stem count in the new location is 405 SPA after the replant 2 of
5 individual plants were confirmed dead by the presence of a dead stem All missing
individuals were replants Plot 4a contains herbaceous cover greater than 75% with a
composition similar to Plot 3
Plot 5 now contains 400 stems per acre without counting volunteers No trees were added
to this area during the replant A two year old river birch and winged elm are the only
volunteers present in this plot Plot 5 contains greater than 75% cover with mixed grasses
dominating, including some lespedeza cuneata
As a result of scouring during an over bank event in 2009, Plot 6 was moved to more
protected area slightly upstream and is now refered to as Plot 6a Plot 6a was difficult to
count due to dense herbaceous growth, many individuals have exceeded four feet in
height are now easier to locate, however many individuals were not found Even with
these difficulties Plot 6 contains 445 SPA not including volunteers Several volunteers
including green ash, winged elm, black gum and box elder were noted in the plot
Overall, the Year 4 plant count indicates 62% survival and 471 stems per acre for the site,
not including volunteers This rate of survival (including the replant) and stems per acre
is on target for achieving Year 5 goals
In Appendix A, the vegetative survey data tables show the actual counts of each species
found per plot Stressed and dead plants were also noted
3 2 CHANNEL STABILITY ASSESSMENT
3 2 1 Cross Sections
The plot of cross section 1 (XS 1) indicates that the channel has transitioned to an E -type
channel with the maturation of the vegetation on the banks The bankfull cross - sectional
area has adjusted to more closely match the as -built condition The depth of the XS1
(Pool) shows that the sand deposited in 2009 has been transported through There were
no visual indications of instability
The plot of cross section 2 shows little change since 2008 The reduction in the bankfull
cross - sectional area from the as -built condition is likely due to the shifting of the banks
and the maturation of the vegetation There were no visual indications of instability
The plot of cross section 3 shows little change in the active channel area Some erosion
has caused a localized depression to form on the left bank This depression has become
slightly deeper and wider than last year Since this area is localized and not hydraulically
Stncker Branch Stream Restoration Project 8 Monitoring Year 4 of 5

connected it was not included in the bankfull area calculations At the time of this report
the depression appears to have become stabilized by vegetation and does not appear to be
a problem area There were no visual indications of instability
The plot of cross section 4 indicates that the channel has transitioned to an E -type
channel with the maturation of the vegetation on the banks The bankf ill cross - sectional
area has decreased likely due to slight aggregation There were no visual indications of
instability
The plot of cross section 5 indicates that the right bank has shifted some likely due to the
settling of the rip rap toe protection The plot of cross section 6 indicates very little
change This area was constructed as a rock step -pool system This section has not
changed significantly from the as -built condition and there were no visual indications of
instability
3 2 2 Bankfull Events
A Crest Stage Gage (CSG) was originally located near Vegetation Plot 2, below Sign
Drive in the lower section of the project, on stream bank left The gage was routinely
getting buried in sand and debris and was therefore moved to stream bank right where the
elevation is slightly higher and there is less sand deposition The first event of 2010 was
a mayor storm, nearly submerging the CSG The local USGS rain gage at the Concord
Regional Airport indicated that approximately 2 9 inches of rain over a 24 hour period in
the area The CSG was found to be triggered on a site inspection on March 5th, 2010 The
most likely event preceding this inspection was 2 19 inches of rain recorded on February
5`h, 2010 Rainfall records indicated 172 inches of rainfall from March 28`h to 29`h, 2010
The CSG was inspected on April, 28`h having registered this event Documentation is
shown in the Bankfull Event Photo Log in Appendix E and in the table below Rainfall
data is also presented in table form in Appendix E
Exhibit Table VI Bankfull Events
Site Visit Date
Associated Rainfall Event Date
Rainfall Amount (Inches)
Method Documented
1/25/2010
1/24/2010- 1/25/2010
290
Photos
3/5/2010
2/5/2010
2 19
CSG
4/28/2010
3/28/2010- 3/29/2010
1 72
CSG
3 2 3 Longitudinal Profiles
Flash flood type rainfall events and related bankfull events, which are common in
urbanized areas, are a regular occurrence on the Stricker Branch site It is anticipated that
sand (generated from sources upstream of our project) will likely continue to work
through the system and move downstream Evidence of sand deposition is most notable
below the bridge at Sign Drive The system is designed to continue moving this sand
downstream during bankfull events and survey results indicate that this is occuring The
profile shows that the pools have remained pools and that the pool to pool spacing has
remained consistent In addition, as anticipated the pool depths have fluctuated but
Stncker Branch Stream Restoration Project 9 Monitoring Year 4 of 5

remain fairly consistent with the as -built condition The bankfull slope and water surface
slope are parallel at 0 6%
3 2 4 Bed Matenals
Bed material was also sampled at one riffle in each section on Cross Sections 2, 3, and 5
Cross Section 5, in the upper section, indicated an increase in coarse sand and fine gravel
and a relatively even distribution of larger bed material Cross Section 3, in the middle
section, indicates a relatively even distribution of all particle sizes in the gravel category
and does not indicate an increase in sand or line sediment Cross Section 2, in the lower
section, showed a slight increase in fine to coarse sand particles and a more significant
increase in fine gravel The graph shows a shift towards finer particles due to sand
deposition below Sign Drive In Year 1, accumulation of sand was most noticeable in the
middle section Some of this sand in the middle section is still noticeable, but mayor sand
deposition shifted to the lower section below the bridge at Sign Drive in Year 2 and
continues to move through the system in Year 4 As mentioned above, this sand has and
is expected to continue migrating downstream Overall, the system is trending towards a
coarsening of the bed maternal as the channel width -to -depth ratio continues to shift
towards a E -type channel
3 2 5 Site Summary and Remedial Actions
Overall, the stream channel has stabilized well and experienced multiple bankfull events
Sudden, severe, flash flood type events are typical of urbanized streams No significant
repairs were undertaken in Year 4 The profile, cross section, and pebble count data all
indicate a trend towards equilibrium The system is transporting the excess sediment load
through the project reaches without significant aggredation or degradation The
vegetation plots are currently meeting success criteria The herbaceous vegetative cover
has also developed a healthy and diverse community throughout most of the site The
planted trees and shrubs have also done well and are supplemented by an existing buffer
community which will provide a seed source for volunteers well suited to the current site
conditions No remedial or repair action items for the stream bed and/or banks are
planned at the time of this Report Invasive species treatments are planned to reduce or
eliminate the populations from the site
Stucker Branch Stream Restoration Project 10 Monitoring Year 4 of 5

STRICKER BRANCH 2011 MONITORING FIGURE
.I
Cross Section
ction #4 _ _ I — — —
Cross Section #6 Cross Section #5 Cross Se Cross Section #2
I
65 /
Now A
Vegetation Plot #6a
0 200 400 z `�
Feet a
Vegetation Plot #5
Vegetation Plot #4a
I Crest Staqe Gaqe I
Vegetation Plot #3
I Vegetation Plot #21
Cross Section #1
3,209' \
(2,908' Excluding Other Easements)
Vegetation Plot #1
Legend
Conservation Easement
Q Vegetation Plot (10m x 10m)
Cross Section
Bankfull
Utility Easement
Right of Way
As -Built Thalweg
Priority 1 (788 SMU's)
Priority 2 (2,120 SMU's)

Cross Section #6
1 /
I
STRICKER BRANCH 2011 INVASIVE SPECIES FIGURE
,I
Cross Section
Cross Section #4 _ _ — I — — — — — —
_ _ — i Cross Section #2
Cross Section #5
' LII
�C)
\ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — GI
ra
T — —
I
Vegetation Plot #6a
0 200 400 w
Feet a
Vegetation Plot #5
Vegetation Plot #4a
Crest Stage Gage
Veqetation Plot #31
Vegetation Plot #2
Cross Section #1
IVegetation Plot #11
Legend
Conservation Easement
Vegetation Plot (10m x 10m)
Cross Section
Bankfull
Utility Easement
- Right of Way
As -Built Thalweg
Lespedexa cuneata and Sorghum halepense (Johnson Grass) 2.1 acres)
OPueraria montana (kudzu)
® Albizia julibrissin (mimosa)
A: ea
Vegetation Plot #4a
Crest Stage Gage
Veqetation Plot #31
Vegetation Plot #2
Cross Section #1
IVegetation Plot #11
Legend
Conservation Easement
Vegetation Plot (10m x 10m)
Cross Section
Bankfull
Utility Easement
- Right of Way
As -Built Thalweg
Lespedexa cuneata and Sorghum halepense (Johnson Grass) 2.1 acres)
OPueraria montana (kudzu)
® Albizia julibrissin (mimosa)

Hardwood Tree and Shrub Planting Year 4 Totals for Stricker Branch Stream Restoration Site
Plot 1
Scientific Name
Plot 1
Plot 2
Plot 3
Plot 4
Plot 5
Plot 6
Species Total
65%
Acer negundo
1
0
0
0
0
1
2
100% Vol
Alnus serrulata
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
486
Aronia arbutifolia
1
1
0
0
0
0
2
280
Betula nigra *
5
3
0
2
1
1
12
4 Vol.
Celds laevigata
0
0
2
0
0
0
2
Cephalanthus occidentalis
0
0
2
0
0
0
2
Cornus amomum
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
all livestakes
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
Hamamelis virginiana
1
3
0
0
0
0
4
Lindera benzoin
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Liquidambar styracii lua
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
100% Vol
Liriodendron tulipifera
3
0
0
3
1
4
11
Nyssaslyvadca*
0
1
0
1
1
2
5
1 Vol
Populus deltoides*
6
1
0
0
0
0
7
100% Vol
Pyrus or Prunus?
0
0
0
1
0
1
2
Quercus lvrata
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
Quercus michauxii
0
0
0
3
0
0
3
Quercus nigra*
3
2
0
1
1
2
9
3 Vol?
Quercus phellos
0
3
4
0
0
1
8
Ulmus alala*
0
2
0
0
1
2
5
100% Vol
Salix nigra*
0
1
10
0
5
0
16
11 livestakes, 2 Vol.
Total
20
17
19
11
12
19
98
* Count contains volunteers
Species in bold are planted species
Table 3. Survival & SPA with and w/o volunteers
Total SPA by Yearl
Plot 1
Plot 2
Plot 3
Plot 4
Plot 5
Plot 6
Total
%Survival
68%
65%
63%
67%
61%
52%
62%
Stem Per Acre
486
445
607
445
1 400
445
471
SPA w/ volunteers*
809
688
1 769
486
480
769
667
Total SPA by Yearl
Initial
12008
1 2009
1 Replant
2010
2011
2012
SPAI
673
1 393
1 420
1 693
1 493
471
1
440
SPA w/ Vols.
760
446
1 540
1 826
1 686
667
320
Plot I
Plot 2
Plot 3
Plot 4
Plot 5
Plot 6
Average
Initial 2008 2009 Replant 2010 2011 2012
480
360
360
800
737
486
680
680
680
680
520
445
560
440
400
760
560
607
760
440
320
600
400
445
720
240
480
480
400
445
840
200
280
840
520
400
673
1 393
1 420
1 693
1 521
1 471

Total
.A.-I
X Y Spa' X Y YW 1 X Y Ys 2 X Y Raplsa X Y YW 3 X Y YW 4 X Y YW 5
n/f = not found
VP 1
Initial 2008 2009 Replant 2010 2011 2012
SPA 480 360 360 800 737 486
SPA w/ Vote - 440 640 1040 920 809
30
care
25
20
S-
i 15
10
5
Vd
Val
Red
Uld. Berry
Water ak
OR
Vd
Q
River
BFU
Wien Oak
•
IMI
V
MIE
mm0■■
1M■=mM1M10■■MM
T* Niler
MEM=MMIME
1
1 E=M1E1E"-,=1MM1E=MMM1E0=■■_
•
Tu* POPW
River
Call) —up
MM
IMIC�IEIE0IEIE=MME�-"�MIOIEUM■■_
•
701
■ ■m
■ ■��
®
©�
®mom
©��
®�
■ ■�
■■m■■IMMo
M=01M
EM©MONE©OM■■EM
■ ■m
■ ■�
®�©
®gym
®�R
®��
■ ■�
■■r►!'�■■�om
©ommMMm�©W�■■M
am
am
n/f = not found
VP 1
Initial 2008 2009 Replant 2010 2011 2012
SPA 480 360 360 800 737 486
SPA w/ Vote - 440 640 1040 920 809
30
care
25
20
S-
i 15
10
5
Photo
5 10 15 20 25 30
F- W8 (81— Ber1tQ PQ
*11M rFEB2008 erYW10c12M AYW2J*Z09 RWO FW2010 oYW3Ao .21110 •Y- 4J*2011
Vd
Val
Red
Uld. Berry
Water ak
OR
Vd
Q
River
BFU
Wien Oak
•
Boa e3/M
V
War Oak
T* Niler
qaM
1
•
Tu* POPW
River
Call) —up
®
•
701
Photo
5 10 15 20 25 30
F- W8 (81— Ber1tQ PQ
*11M rFEB2008 erYW10c12M AYW2J*Z09 RWO FW2010 oYW3Ao .21110 •Y- 4J*2011

Total
Total w1vol
X Y Species X Y Yearl X Y Year 2 X Y Year 3 X Y Year 4 X Y Year 5
ma
MOMMMW
IN
©®
Rea Cholosbarn
©®MM©®
So
1Mnow vat
p
©m
®
©MMM©M����■■�
witch
Haw
Black
am
❑
Vfflkw
VOMOOk
am
*
Oak
W&1904
It taws sloth
O
YalbwOak
am
MMMMm©
p
wean
w>ro1
on
Pell
WOMM®n
C
WrWd Elm
vol
®
an
Rim Blrd
an
m�mm����■■�
am
am
M®
IM©MMM®
n©MMO®MMMEN
-I
MW
mmam��m��m��������'
mm
MMIMMmm
MO©MIM©■■MMM
mm
MMMMIMM
MMMW�MM-
W®
W®
w®=MMMM-
MMr.�-
�MW�MMIMM
®
M©
■■�
mm
MMMMIMMIMMmm
on
■■MMM
mm
Fairly large river birch right on the line, not counted in baseline?'
VP 2
IMtlal 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
SPA 680 680 680 520 445
SPA w/Vola - 720 840 760 688
30
25
20
E
915'1
Wat
10
5
Wkah Hazel
IN
Rea Cholosbarn
So
1Mnow vat
p
®
witch
Haw
Black
❑
Vfflkw
VOMOOk
*
Oak
W&1904
It taws sloth
O
YalbwOak
p
wean
w>ro1
Pell
C
WrWd Elm
vol
®
Rim Blrd
mar
0
0
5 10 15 20 25 30
E. WS (Strwn Bang (k)
♦Bas* Wr FEB 2009 aYw 1 Oct 2008 AYw 2 July 2009 oYaw 3 Aria 2010 *Ywr 4 July 2711
Photo

rael
TOW wAa
X V Spscw X Y Veer 1 X V Vrr 2 X V Re 1 X V Vrr 3 X Y Yrr 4 X Y Vrr 5
'Elrk wlto4 We *take a1 line. rwt canted in Wren.
. = not found
MW
Initial 2008 2008 Replant 2010 2011 2012
SPA 580 440 400 760 560 607
SPA .1 Vote - 440 440 800 680 769
30 25 2] R. Eff 1%j15 10 5
0
1a
•
♦
e0r aek
WaW rk
O
•
9Yrk
Eb* Wlbw
w
m ®gym
®��
®gym
®a��
©m
®�
■ ■�
•
6
Wbu OY
ttmle.ry
I.
ix:kbwrq
wfK- Oak
Obek VY
Utct9 Odt
dlbq
am
MMMMMM
am
MOM
am��������omo�mo�■
■�
am
am
'Elrk wlto4 We *take a1 line. rwt canted in Wren.
. = not found
MW
Initial 2008 2008 Replant 2010 2011 2012
SPA 580 440 400 760 560 607
SPA .1 Vote - 440 440 800 680 769
30 25 2] R. Eff 1%j15 10 5
0
1a
5
I- LS
1010 LS
G
15 p
20 3
25
aY LS'
30
Photo
law U. Ftl 21X6 0-1 Od 1008 eYw 2 J* 2M ORWM Ftl ano OYw3AW MO 4Yw4J* M1
•
♦
e0r aek
WaW rk
O
•
9Yrk
Eb* Wlbw
w
WA* Ow L
•
6
Wbu OY
ttmle.ry
I.
ix:kbwrq
wfK- Oak
Obek VY
Utct9 Odt
dlbq
5
I- LS
1010 LS
G
15 p
20 3
25
aY LS'
30
Photo
law U. Ftl 21X6 0-1 Od 1008 eYw 2 J* 2M ORWM Ftl ano OYw3AW MO 4Yw4J* M1

x Y Speaea x Y Year1 x Y Yana
r1 _ _..
TOGI
Tull wNl
The north east quadrant of this plot has been subject to several wash outs and continues
to be inundated with sand and debris, which are hostile to vegetation.
Propose moving this plot slightly south west
Flipped this plot on its western axis, Replant count is new baseline.
origin and photo point remain the same
X Y Replant X Y Yen3 X Y Year4 X Y Year5
Total
Todl WN01
W
laW:la:lu+la:W'1LL-10M�Ow�■■
•
©m
mm�
-=M'
Orp V
©m�����
W©�■■-
®
WM
Pmwoeqk.
S
Cakoealal
©m
••�������
Wald
a
MW
wm�wm
•
C�
TWO
RapbrR
•
®m
Wa1n
Replant
Mm�am�
OekReplrR
w©�W©
W®
30 Cnilrel
�®
Wad
•
=M�
•
811h Oar
OW
mm�am�
©middy
©����
1012
IBM
�IMW�Imw�
lsa�mm
On
©m■�
©
©R lmlm�
mo�no�■■�
n®
a• 'IM®�Im®�
©©
MW
m®-
wff!"rW
MM-
Ma
-mm_
TOGI
Tull wNl
The north east quadrant of this plot has been subject to several wash outs and continues
to be inundated with sand and debris, which are hostile to vegetation.
Propose moving this plot slightly south west
Flipped this plot on its western axis, Replant count is new baseline.
origin and photo point remain the same
X Y Replant X Y Yen3 X Y Year4 X Y Year5
Total
Todl WN01
n/f = not found
1
VP 4
30
T,
20
15
10
5
Initial 2008 2002 Replant 2010 2011 2012
SPA 760 440 320 600 400 405
SPA wf Vols - 520 480 600 440 445
W
laW:la:lu+la:W'1LL-10M�Ow�■■
•
©©EMM
-=M'
Orp V
W©�■■-
®
3
Pmwoeqk.
S
Cakoealal
Wald
a
RatWa
•
C�
TWO
RapbrR
•
Wa1n
Replant
OekReplrR
S Chekad
30 Cnilrel
•
•
811h Oar
IBM
lsa�mm
©m■�
mo
mo�no�■■�
m®-
MM-
Ma
-mm_
n/f = not found
1
VP 4
30
T,
20
15
10
5
Initial 2008 2002 Replant 2010 2011 2012
SPA 760 440 320 600 400 405
SPA wf Vols - 520 480 600 440 445
5 10 15 20 25 30
I, RIB (eaearn Bart) p0
eRWbM Fak 2010 -- 3.ua2010 aYar4My2011
110110
•
Orp V
rOak Raplrt
®
3
Pmwoeqk.
S
Cakoealal
Wald
a
RatWa
•
C�
TWO
RapbrR
•
Wa1n
Replant
OekReplrR
S Chekad
30 Cnilrel
•
•
811h Oar
5 10 15 20 25 30
I, RIB (eaearn Bart) p0
eRWbM Fak 2010 -- 3.ua2010 aYar4My2011
110110

Total
Total -N--
n/f = not found
VP 5
Inidal 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
SPA 720 240 480 400 400
SPA w/ Vola - 240 560 480 480
30
25
20
E
E
i 15
10
5
•
am
a
3
a
x
3
a m
mm�-�mmmmmmmm■■�
MME
IMM=MM=MM=MM�MM�
®m
mm
©®m
=®m
=®m�mm�
®m
mm
®®mMM®m
=®m�MM
Ow
MW'
=MM
=M-
®
MM�xm_
Om
®mi'�
®mom
®mom
®mom
®m��■�
OM
MM
VP 5
Inidal 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
SPA 720 240 480 400 400
SPA w/ Vola - 240 560 480 480
30
25
20
E
E
i 15
10
5
0
0
Photo
5 10 15 20 25 30
E. NIS (SWw BW*) ())
•Bw H FEB 2008 GYM 1Oct 7008 AYM 2J*2000 c'Y=3Au02070 •Yr I Ny 2011
•
a
3
a
x
3
a m
0
0
Photo
5 10 15 20 25 30
E. NIS (SWw BW*) ())
•Bw H FEB 2008 GYM 1Oct 7008 AYM 2J*2000 c'Y=3Au02070 •Yr I Ny 2011

Total
Total wtvol
X V S!:-- X Y Yes 1 X Y Vest 2
moved this plot out of a scour area one meander bend up stream aprox. 25 R
oripn and photo poet remain the same
Ma
•
WYIOad
MW�Mn
•
mm
a1 �MMMMMMM".=.
OM
f ti41LJY•Lll:.a4{Jta
®M�®M�Mm
©wm©Wm
T
©M=MMMMM
RNr Bkh
Rase
-
'®w
MMMMM
®00_
®®
M? ..
mm�mm�mm�
Abler Oronel
Trans OYC
Tulip P
Ofthd
®Mm_
Mn
©m
MMMMM
©m�©m
©00_
mm
MO'
•.a- �MM='
' i
MMMMM
Mm'®
©00_
aim
t Resin
•
MIMUMmm
©®
R,* M
©00�
MM
=Mm®
Oak Orighe
®M
=
®Mm_
•
MM
®M
Q
=®M
Tulp Pools
I
w Rap41t
Wm
Wm�
=M�00_
IMMMMM
MM
M©�MM�Mm�
mm
mm�mm�■z�
on
Ion
MM�MW�00_
moved this plot out of a scour area one meander bend up stream aprox. 25 R
oripn and photo poet remain the same
Ma
•
WYIOad
MW�Mn
•
®W
OM
f ti41LJY•Lll:.a4{Jta
®M�®M�Mm
©wm©Wm
T
Poplar OVw
RNr Bkh
Rase
-
'®w
MMMMM
®00_
®®
M? ..
MMMMM
Abler Oronel
Trans OYC
Tulip P
Ofthd
®Mm_
Mn
MMMMM
Oak ROOM
©00_
MO'
' i
MMMMM
©00_
aim
t Resin
•
MIMUMmm
Black Ourh
R,* M
©00�
®M��MM
Oak Orighe
®M
=
®Mm_
•
Q
•
Tulp Pools
I
w Rap41t
Wm
Wm�
=M�00_
IMMMMM
MM
M©�MM�Mm�
mm
mm�mm�■z�
on
MM�MW�00_
WI
MO�MM
©00_
®O
IM .=
�W
�00_
IMm
IMm=MIMm�00_
Tatel
Total wM4
VP 6
Initial 2008 2009 Replant 2010 2011 2012
SP{ 840 200 280 840 520 445
SPl - - - 1000 840 769
Chart Title
N. UJW 00
Photo 30 25 20 15 10 5
*Rap" Fab 2010 oyes, 3Au9 2010 •Y-4 Ju112011
X Y R lent X V Year 3 X Y year 4 X y yes 5
•
WYIOad
1N
•
OM
©wm©Wm
T
Poplar OVw
RNr Bkh
Rase
-
--
MM
Abler Oronel
Trans OYC
Tulip P
Ofthd
W7
Oak ROOM
Tu1P Poplar
Water 0.
t Resin
•
MOM Town
Black Ourh
R,* M
Oak Orighe
•
Q
•
Tulp Pools
I
w Rap41t
*Rap" Fab 2010 oyes, 3Au9 2010 •Y-4 Ju112011
X Y R lent X V Year 3 X Y year 4 X y yes 5
ntf = not found
5
10
5
1�
j
A
1
I
OM
©wm©Wm
-
--
MM
IMEM
ntf = not found
5
10
5
1�
j
A
1
I

1 11 'All
11�6j A mom
MEMO
11A
I
M,
a
11111,
--
a
li
a
a
>
3
_
_I
H
'4
V1
N
H
M
V
C
a,
w
r
r
r
m
i
it
N
V.
O
d
b
Lzi
D
O
W
d
w
0
N
yW
0`
N
N
O
00
M
V1
0`
N
00
N
n
h
<f
"?
h
M
M
i
a
aD
N
r
V1
v
v
M
v
v
h
r
-
00
N
�
O�
h
O�
V1
00
h
00
V':
00
V1
00
h
00
V'1
00
h
00
h
00
h
00
h
00
h
00
h
w
h
00
V1
w
h
00
V'1
00
h
00
Vl
O�
V1
T
Vl
W
}
y��
r
00
00
O
v1
O
O
O
M
v
oo
M
.p
O
h
O
A
C
�p
M
•-
Vi
N
Vi
Vl
h
V1
1�
h
r
Vl
O
�
N
`O
`D
b
b
r
00
0�0
O
GA
d
a
d
w
0
0
N
�
O
M
00
00
T
1�
T
a0
b
l�
ao
v1
r
N
b
ao
T
v1
v
M
N
O
N
�•-�
M
�
�
h
1�
O
N
M
DO
CO
a:
a`
O
O
:n
O
O
O\
00
00
00
1�
n
r
b
h
h
V
of
V
h
1�
Oo
Oo
1�
n
00
O
.-•
.-+
^
N
N
T
V1
O�
Vl
00
h
00
V1
00
Vl
00
v1
00
h
00
h
00
h
00
V1
00
h
00
V1
00
V1
a0
h
a0
V1
a0
V1
a0
h
00
v1
DD
h
00
V1
00
V1
DD
h
DD
Vf
0.
Vf
0,
T
T
0,
T
Vt
O�
Vt
h
t+=
f
ii
}
yO
r
N
M
a
v
V•:
V1
vt
v1
h�
�
�
�
r
r
r
00
00
00
P
O
O
v
w
N
�
pp,
O
v1
00
M
v
N
N
O`
a,
00
N
O
O
^
Oo
�G
e�
�O
�D
V1
V1
vi
b
00
00
.�
N
N
y
Q`
h
�
h
m
h
m
h
o0
h
00
h
m
h
ao
h
m
h
o0
V1
m
h
oo
00
w
00
O�
V1
T
h
}
C
�
r
�
L
W
g
N
y
�
O
O
--
(A
�
O,
N
�
00
M
r -:
O
t�
O�
b
ao
b
M
"R
1�
n
1�
m
r
0O
0
^
M
N
=
m
V1
ON
h
w
h
00
h
00
V1
w
h
w
h
m
h
0o
h
0o
V1
00
1I•:
T
Vl
O,
h
%i
a
�
O
b
v
'n
W)
Zo
'D
r
r
T
.�
0
3
It
w
w
S
C
o
v
O'
-'
-
00
00
V
v
M
o
v
V1
v
O�
0,
O
a,
V1
b
y
r
r
ao
{i
A
oo
oo
Go
NO
h
v
v
on
r
r
..
d
o.
o.
o0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0o
a
a
a"
FO
M
O\
—
�D
C�
n
0o
Q`
^
o
e
r
v
n
v
0
In
1-
"�o
0
cS
1
v
o
a
'o
d
n
0
0,
_
1 11 'All
11�6j A mom
MEMO
11A
I
M,
11111,
--
a
li
a
a
>
3
_
_I
H
'4
V1
N
H
M
V
C
r
r
r
m
i
it
1 11 'All
11�6j A mom
ANNE
In Mi a
NMI
�f..�
0
0
O
Lri
c•i
O
0
ti
O
N
O
ti
O
0
0
0
m
O
O
O
00
O
O
W
0
Ln
n
O
n
O
Ln
LO
O
O
O
C
Ln
O
O
V
O
O
d'
O
Ln
M
O
0
O
U')
O
O
N
O
Ui
O
O
O
N
0
0
rn rn m a0i 00 000 0000 000 00 ONO
Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln en
MEMO
11A
I
M,
11111,
111
MEN
i
ANNE
In Mi a
NMI
�f..�
0
0
O
Lri
c•i
O
0
ti
O
N
O
ti
O
0
0
0
m
O
O
O
00
O
O
W
0
Ln
n
O
n
O
Ln
LO
O
O
O
C
Ln
O
O
V
O
O
d'
O
Ln
M
O
0
O
U')
O
O
N
O
Ui
O
O
O
N
0
0
rn rn m a0i 00 000 0000 000 00 ONO
Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln en

y
U U
V7
U'IUM
0U o
N J
b lA
VA I
V
A
T A
A A
b N
_
Z;+
00
00
00
00
o
o
ID
Oo
00
C
C,
O.
oo
O
U7
01
l0
O
N
N
V1
O
o
y
O
w
�
N
C
00
b
OD
0o
00
O'
00
U
00
U
00
O\
00
T
00
OO
00
b
00
b
b
Ln
U
N
O
Cr
N
00
U
J
C
�
o
00
c
m
y
.._ ........
..
......
...__.
----
- -' - --
O
�
b
t
•.•
OUO
b
OUO
b
OUO
ono
O .
ono
J
oUO
00
oUO
b
OUO
b
w
p
W
tJ
D
b
b
W
b
O
w
O
N
O
y
"17
lA7
O
.
..
00
J
U
_:.
N
5
•..
lA
b
U
U
U
to
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
A
N
b
00
00
00
00
C\
00
00
00
J
00
J
00
00
W
00
OD
b
b
O
b
W
'
b"
to
9119,
A
J
O
T
0o
b
N
�
T
b
O
O
N
O
___._.
- __- ._-
___.-
.._,._. _.
- _____.___...
__._ -_.
_. -._
10
Q
00
J
0o
N
J
b
J
to
J
N
T
J
Q\
W
U
10
U
U
to
In
U
In
N
o
O
A
b
A
J
A
Q\
A
A
A
A
W
W
0o
W
A
W
U
H
T
10
T
10
C
J
O
-
A
H
w
00
10
In
A
A
O
--
10
W
rn
w
w
A
N
O
C
U
b
U
b
U
b
U
b
U
w
U
w
U
w
U
w
U
w
U
00
U
w
U
w
U
w
U
00
U
w
U
w
U
00
U
00
U
00
U
00
U
w
U
00
U
w
to
W
U
00
U
00
U
b
U
b
U
b
U
b
t
W
P
00
Oo
J
a
T
p
p
T
T
O�
J
J
OD
b
�O
D
N
O
V
w
J
W
w
A
b
N
J
00
J
A
A
w
W
U
O
W
W
n
b
V
N
b
J
b
J
U
N
N
w
n
W
A
U
W
U
O
U
OD
W
N
U
W
T
S
p
00
Q
�
Vl
-_.-
00
00
J
V1
U
Vi
y
A
A
A
A
N
0
0
C7,
A
O
N
O
U
C
O
v
e
—
-- -
--
- - -
C--
�i
_. - --
—
- --
r-
-'
--
U
.D
U
b
U
00
U
00
U
00
U
00
U
00
U
00
U
00
U
00
00
00
00
b
b
A
A
N
b
b
00
T
T
Q\
O.
T
J
_
C
A
c
N
U
N
C
-`
W
T
w
N
00
yn
7
N
O
r
a
m m
m
m
'
O
~ O
lD
00 co
N
Ln
T
Q
�
d
C
t
A

601
600
599
597
596
595
594
592
591
As-built MY1 2008
MY2 2009
MY3 2010 MY4 2011 MYS 2012
Bankf ill Cross Sectional Area:
14.6 13.6
As -built Feb 2008
Year 1 -Sept 2008
Yeaz 2 - Sept 2009
Year 3 - Sept 2010
Year 4 - Sept 2011
Year 5 - Sept 2012
Station
Elevation
Feature
Station
Elevation
Feature
Station
Elevation
Feature
Station
Elevation
Feature
Station
Elevation
Feature
Station
Elevation
Feature
0.0
595.4
0.0
595.38
0.0
595.46
0.0
595.47
0.1
595.47
25.7
593.46
12.6
594.09
10.4
594.52
6.2
595.08
5.0
595.07
29.4
592.60
18.6
593.11
11.9
593.61
10.0
594.48
10.3
594.35
31.2
592.19
24.6
593.90
1 22.1
593.98
12.7
593.45
10.9
593.85
bkf
32.6
592.42
26.0
1 593.79
25.9
593.93
16.7
593.23
11.6
593.30
34.5
592.56
31.8
592.16
27.2
593.41
bkf
18.7
593.30
17.7
592.97
39.4
593.85
bkf
36.8
593.70
27.9
592.86
21.1
593.80
23.0
594.03
48.1
594.60
38.4
593.85
bkf
30.2
592.58
tw
23.6
594.18
24.0
593.85
bkf
As-built Feb 2008
68.0
599.54
52.0
595.25
30.9
592.33
25.6
594.04
27.2
593.21
809
599.82
mill...,R
68.9
599.67
33.5
1 592.32
1 26.7
593.75
28.2
592.51
LEW
Year I Sept 2008
80.8
599.9
35.1
593.09
27.5
593.27
29.4
592.22
Year 2 - Sept 2009
36.2
593.85
28.5
592.78
REW
31.5
591.91
Year 3 - Sept 2010
36.3
594.04
bkf
29.2
592.54
33.5
591.97
PEW
39.5
594.19
30.6
592.30
tw
35.2
592.16
48.9
594.85
31.4
592.25
36.1
593.63
56.5
596.24
1 32.4
592.07
39.0
593.85
bkf
66.3
599.27
33.4
592.24
LEW
43.8
594.27
80.9
599.8
34.7
592.53
53.0
595.37
35.3
592.53
68.0
599.14
36.1
593.85
bkf
81.0
599.57
38.2
594.22
41.7
594.27
46.6
594.90
53.4
595.54
59.9
597.02
66.3
598.98
70.5
599.64
76.4
599.90
81.1
599.84
601
600
599
597
596
595
594
592
591
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0 60.0 65.0 70.0 75.0 80.0 85.0 90.0
As-built MY1 2008
MY2 2009
MY3 2010 MY4 2011 MYS 2012
Bankf ill Cross Sectional Area:
14.6 13.6
11.4
16.11 15.6
Bankfull Width:
18.9 23.3
17.2
19.6 15.0
Bankfull Max Depth-
1.7 1.7
1.5
1.81 1.9
BKF ELEV: 593.85'
As-built Feb 2008
�__Mmm
mill...,R
Year I Sept 2008
imam
Year 2 - Sept 2009
Year 3 - Sept 2010
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0 60.0 65.0 70.0 75.0 80.0 85.0 90.0
As-built MY1 2008
MY2 2009
MY3 2010 MY4 2011 MYS 2012
Bankf ill Cross Sectional Area:
14.6 13.6
11.4
16.11 15.6
Bankfull Width:
18.9 23.3
17.2
19.6 15.0
Bankfull Max Depth-
1.7 1.7
1.5
1.81 1.9
BKF ELEV: 593.85'

Bankfull Cross Sectional Area:
.t
-_____
MY2 2009
55.3
MY3 2010
45.9
EEEEEEEE
As -built Feb 2008
Year I - Sept 2008
Year 2 - Sept 2009
Year 3 - Sept 2010
Year 4 - Sept 2011
Year 5 - Sept 2012
Station
Elevation
Feature
Station
Elevation
Feature
Station
Elevation
Feature
Station
Elevation
Feature
Station
Elevation
Feature
Station
Elevation
Feature
0.0
596.69
0.0
596.71
0.0
596.71
==
0.0
596.71
=
0.4
596.71
__E_
=:::__E
36.4
593.89
= =
19.2
594.77
bkf
17.5
595.18
..t
9.7
595.68
0.5
596.21
EEE_EEElal==5
39.7
592.97
36.4
594.71
=E
30.8
595.15
17.5
595.26
14.6
595.77
=
= ==�=
42.6
590.72
tw
46.7
591.16
tw
1 37.3
594.37
eE-
24.2
595.26
:E
17.0
595.40
52.0
591.87
59.3
594.91
39.5
593.27
LEW
29.7
595.33
32.3
595.06
�.E
EE
54.9
592.82
-.�
65.9
595.77
41.9
591.63
=
33.1
594.77
bkf
34.3
594.77
bkf
_
59.2
594.77
bkf
80.4
599.76
44.6
590.74
•EE'
35.6
594.51
39.1
594.04
80.6
599.62
aMMa==
102.0
600.11
46.0
590.59
37.5
594.44
40.3
593.99
102.0
600.04
50.8
591.17
38A
593.90
1 41.0
593.11
LEW
EEEEEEEEEESEEEEE
53.2
591.69
39.0
593.44
42.6
592.02
E =E
=a==:
54.4
593.17
REW
39.7
593.12
45.3
591.32
54.9
593.61
40.3
592.70
LEW
48.3
591.33
57.1
594.77
bkf
42.2
592.54
51.0
591.65
63.6
595.51
42.4
592.35
53.4
592.26
.
.........
..
68.1
596.64
43.5
591.92
1 54.5
593.04
REW
� ___=
79.3
599.79
E3EEE:
46.4
591.84
G;:==�E_
55.2
594.27
===
E-
__________E-
102.0
600.25
49.4
591.91
59.1
594.77
bkf
52.2
592.22
62.0
595.14
54.3
592.16
67.4
596.27
°
55.5
592.70
REW
76.5
599.03
=EEE?EEEE
= =EEEEEEa.
EEMEEE
55.7
593.16
1
78.5
599.39
=53
HIM.=
=
EEEE'EEE�EEEE
55.8
593.59
81.0
599.67
=
= =
=�
=�E�
;e=
=__--
56.6
594.41
87.0
599.80
_
..Es
...C.p�
0�l.111
1
57.6
594.90
EEE
===
==
aa=EEEEEEEE
=..
_
60.3
595.04
EEE
�....E........�....
__O:
O
63.0
595.49
E
EE
67.3
596.29
As -built
E_
70.6
597.17
-
.
74.4
598.44
.E
E
=E
E
EE
=
=
.,
°
79.1
599.73
-=
- _-=-
-_
_-
=- -
-_m
-
-
-
88.4
599.80
--
.
- -
- -=
101.9
600.21
=E....
=
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area:
.t
-_____
MY2 2009
55.3
MY3 2010
45.9
EEEEEEEE
-
____'___
39.3
23.1
243
•
____
4.1
3.6
-__
2 91
_=
-•
_
_=
-_____-
= =g=
=
_ =
=E
= =E
EEE=
==
=5
=0:
=
= =
=-
__E_
=:::__E
=
= =
=E
gEEEEE
..t
EE=====
......
EEE_EEElal==5
i
.............
=E
= =
=E
= =EEEEEEE
=EEE
= =
= =_E_
=
= ==�=
__E_
=E
_.:_
-
eE-
:E
=E:
E
°EE
=sE
�.E
EE
-.�
=��:9�:
=
=:231=_.6_EEEEEE
_
=:
•EE'
aMMa==
-'-_°-
p
= = =EEri•'-•
EEEEEEEEEESEEEEE
=
a:EEE.'=-
E =E
=a==:
E
.=EEEE
-___:_=
.
.........
..
� ___=
E=
E=
E3EEE:
G;:==�E_
===
E-
__________E-
_____�
-_:
-E
-.___
°
=EEE?EEEE
= =EEEEEEa.
EEMEEE
=C==
'_:=.
=53
HIM.=
=
EEEE'EEE�EEEE
-
=
=
= =
=�
=�E�
;e=
=__--
.�__.._.....
=
_
..Es
...C.p�
0�l.111
1
.
=.ECCE..CCEE.E=.E_G.:.
EEE
===
==
aa=EEEEEEEE
=..
_
EEE
�....E........�....
__O:
O
__=N
E
EE
As -built
E_
-
.
.
.E
E
=E
E
EE
=
=
.,
°
E
-=
- _-=-
-_
_-
=- -
-_m
-
-
-
--
.
- -
- -=
-=
=E....
=
=_
010E
!E
_
:E
-
EEEE=
=E-
EEE_E
=
`=E==E=
= =
=E.E.E.E.E.
:EEE.E.E.E.E
r�=
EE=
=
O=
E=:.-_-=
v:
=
_
=
=
E====
=EE
==E='
: J=EE=
::=
°=
°_
=
�
°- EEE:
EEE
=EE
E_E_
EEE_
= E
E
CEE
= _
m3=
=
_0:
"= -
�='D_
_
:'EEsaisomaiia
=
E.
==
_______.
__
E
EEEEEEE;
_______
__
_
.,
- -
--
EEEEE
=
p
_
_=
E
E'm=
:
= =iE=
�_
EEEEEEEEEEEE�E
�■
EEEE
■�
E
® =�
= ®■E
:�
=
=u■E
=
:EEEEEEEEEEE=
. =■
=
=EEEE■
E EEEEE■
==
®.�..�.....
��.�
of t .� , 1 :� •1 •, 11 1 1 1 1 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area:
wilt
61.8
MYl 2008
412
MY2 2009
55.3
MY3 2010
45.9
MY4 2011 MY5 2012
45.5
Bankfull Width:
34.2
39.3
23.1
243
24.8
Bankfull Max Depth:
4.1
3.6
4.2
2 91
3.5
BKF ELEV: 594.77'

7BKFEILEV: Cross Sectional Area: 69.5 55.7 83.7 82.9 81.3
Width: 29.6 28.1 73.1 70.8 67.4
Max Depth: 4.3 4.2 4.6 4.6 4.6
600.58'
As -built Feb 2008
Year 1 - Sept 2008
Year 2 - Sept 2009
Year 3 - Sept 2010
Year 4 - Sept 2011
Year 5 - Sept 2012
Station
Elevation
Feature Station
Elevation
Feature
Station
Elevation
Feature
Station
Elevation
Feature
Station
Elevation
Feature
Station Elevation
Feature
0.0
600.56
0.0
600.56
0.0
600.56
0.0
600.56
0.0
600.56
22.6
600.89
23.1
600.94
9.2
600.42
13.4
600.37
4.9
600.26
36.1
596.67
33.0
598.04
22.5
600.58
bkf
23.1
600.73
13.4
600.27
38.0
596.29
tw 38.4
596.43
tw
26.7
599.84
1
26.9
599.75
23.5
600.58
bkf
40.2
596.29
52.6
601.02
29.3
598.79
28.4
599.12
25.3
600.09
42.4
596.59
63.2
600.58
bkf
34.2
597.03
30.5
598.39
27.0
599.70
51.7
600.58
bkf 85.0
601.43
35.3
596.96
32.9
597.55
28.3
599.00
83.4
601.39
36.5
596.39
LEW
34.2
596.92
30.5
598.34
84.7
601.53
39.8
595.95
35.9
596.72
1
32.5
597.79
43.2
596.61
36.5
596.44
LEW
33.6
597.88
44.2
597.10
38.0
596.32
34.2
596.84
45.3
597.62
39.9
595.98
35.5
596.77
46.6
597.76
40.8
596.39
R
36.0
596.46
LEW
48.5
599.13
42.6
596.57
37.2
596.20
50.7
600.35
1
43.5
596.56
1
38.5
596.04
58.6
599.95
44.3
597.30
40.0
595.96
68.4
600.21
45.7
597.71
41.0
596.47
REW
83.5
601.41
47.9
598.47
43.7
596.64
48.9
599.63
44.5
597.39
52.8
600.58
bkf
46.6
597.80
58.3
600.13
49.7
599.92
64.0
599.95
52.4
600.41
72.2
600.26
57.1
600.18
84.0
601.44
67.4
600.58
bkf
80.6
601.14
83.82
1 601.49
602
-
1-
600
-.
I
i
IL
I
-
599
r
_
r
r
-
- _
1
l
1
(
j
-
I
-
597
-
-1
Xlo`�
7,;
1
-
'
As-built Fe�
Year 1- Sept
2008
596
I I
tI
-
{
�
I
i i
ri
�
Year 2 - Sept
Year 3 -Sept
2009
2010
595
��-
}! �
�
!
!
'
l
j
--[i Year 4 - July 2011
- - -- Bankfull
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0 60.0 65.0 70.0 75.0 80.0 85.0 90.0
7BKFEILEV: Cross Sectional Area: 69.5 55.7 83.7 82.9 81.3
Width: 29.6 28.1 73.1 70.8 67.4
Max Depth: 4.3 4.2 4.6 4.6 4.6
600.58'

As -built MYl 2008
MY2 2009
MY3 2010
MY4 2011 MY5 2012
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area:
As -built Feb 2008
Year 1 - Sept 2008
Year 2 - Sept 2009
Year 3 - Sept 2010
Year 4 - Sept 2011
Year 5 - Sept 2012
Station
Elevation
Feature
Station
Elevation
Feature Station
4.7
Elevation
Feature
Station
Elevation
Feature
Station
Elevation
Feature
Station
Elevation
Feature
3.0
600.76
2.5
600.63
0.0
600.60
3.0
600.60
3.2
600.60
27.6
600.94
17.4
600.61
11.6
600.78
15.3
600.60
3.6
600.53
37.9
597.22
24.9
600.92
1,4
24.5
600.93
22.2
600.93
21.0
600.62
40.1
596.40
41.9
596.08
31.5
599.39
28.4
600.02
26.8
600.92
bkf
42.6
595.86
tw
57.2
600.51
35.4
598.69
31.8
599.30
30.8
599.55
44.6
597.05
62.3
599.90
36.0
598.18
35.1
598.10
35.1
598.25
55.4
600.92
bkf
73.5
600.40
39.3
597.44
37.2
597.60
35.7
597.66
88.1
601.50
86.3
601.50
40.5
597.02
LEW
38.0
597.50
36.3
597.62
42.2
596.62
38.7
597.00
LEW
37.9
597.02
LEW
42.6
596.43
39.5
596.60
38.5 1
596.60
43.0
596.00
41.8
596.60
40.8
596.13
44.6
597.02
REW
42.0
596.30
42.3
595.85
47.0
597.43
44.3
596.20
44.8
596.40
48.9
597.69
45.6
596.60
45.9
597.09
REW
51.9
598.80
46.3
597.10
REW
46.8
598.07
52.4
600.02
46.6
597.20
1
48.3
598.16
54.0
600.26
47.8
597.90
50.3
599.37
57.1
600.92
bkf
48.9
598.50
54.6
600.62
60.4
600.39
50.8
599.90
63.6
600.52
70.6
600.65
1 52.0
600.60
74.6
600.92
bkf
84.9
601.50
55.3
600.80
82.0
601.17
61.9
600.50
1
88.7
601.75
70.2
600.30
79.8
600.92
bkf
88.1 1
601.50
601
T
TI1
i
�
j
600
599
1
ft
j
-
1
i
I
As -built Feb 2008
I Year 1- Sept 2008
1
597
t
I
} Year 2 - Sept 2009
Year 3- Sept 2010
596
j
�
'
j
1
t
�
i
i
i i
f
! i �
�
; f
,
� �
I �
�
i
j -I
--w- Year 4- July 2011
- - -- Bankfull
595
5.0 40.0 4 .0 50.0 55.0 60.0 65.0 70.0 75.0 80.0 85.0 90.0 95.0
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 3 5
As -built MYl 2008
MY2 2009
MY3 2010
MY4 2011 MY5 2012
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area:
69.8 95.2
78.4
86.7
78.7
Bankfull Width:
27.7 54.7
50.6
76.5
47.8
Bankfull Max Depth:
5.1 4.8
4.9
4.7
5.1
BKF ELEV: 600.92'

0
0
Ln
I
0
Lnm
I
,
N
i
M
r
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
i
i
,
,
i
O
i
I
i
O
i
O
I
I
I ,
M
I i
Ar
O
L/1
i
,
n
I
N
1
I
I
d
O
i
O
to
i I
C
N
O �
,
a v
I
0
N
N
–
—
--
W
a
'
ca
O
N
0
0
I
LA
X
N
L--
I I
o
I
� LL
CU
rn
O
0 Lri
r-i
}r
I
I
�
0 Ln
N
a-•I
a00i a°0i
� v 3 3 3 3 �+ ti
I
� �
I
I
�
Lei
O O C C
d
,
• 1 � I I I I I
_— —.
I
__
0
°o
,
,
N
I
ri
i I
i
I •
0 Ln
vii
� ' �---•—
--
- - -- - - .... --
7
d �
� � a?
�^ ca
a�i 0) 0)
O
Ln
co
O
Ln
N
O
Ln Ln Ln Ln
w Ln Ln Ln Ln
LL d d a+
a00i a°0i
� v 3 3 3 3 �+ ti
I
� �
O O C C
• 1 � I I I I I
_— —.
I
__
,
,
I
;
i I

(XS -2) Stricker Pebble Count Data
Riffle Pebble Count
Year
Year
Year
Year
2008
2009
2010
2011
D16
0 0.062
0
1
0
0
t /clay
ine sand
ine sand
[7very
um sand
coarse sand
very coarse sand
0.062 0.13
0
0
3
0
0.13 0.25
0
0
4
0
0.25 0.5
1
0
3
0
0.5 1
4
14
5
3
1 2
2
0
6
13
very fine gravel
fine gravel
fine gravel
medium gravel
medium gravel
coarse gravel
coarse gravel
very coarse gravel
very coarse gravel
2 4
9
0
26
21
4 6
16
11
25
22
6 8
11
14
7
3
8 11
11
14
10
14
11 16
19
24
4
2
16 22
15
14
7
5
22 32
11
11
8
9
32 45
3
8
4
1
45 64
0
1
8
6
small cobble
medium cobble
large cobble
very large cobble
64 90
0
1
2
0
90 128
1
0
0
1
128 180
0
0
0
0
180 256
0
0
0
0
small boulder
small boulder
medium boulder
large boulder
very large boulder
256 362
0
0
0
0
362 512
0
0
0
0
512 1024
0
0
0
0
1024 2048
0
0
0
0
2048 4096
0
0
0
0
bedrockil
1 0
0
0
0
Total Particle Count:
1 103
1 113
1221
100
Year
-0
C
cN 6
c
w
>
Size percent less than (mm)
v
C
ca
v
C
cN a
sn
ca
o
Percent by substrate type
W
>
a,
,��—
�,
;
W
>
O
N
��—
W
>
a,
N
•��—
D16
D35
D50
D84
D95
silt /clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
2008
4
7
10
21
31
0%
7%
92%
1%
0%
0%
2009
4
8
11
24
39
1%
12%
86%
1%
0%
0%
2010
2
4
5
25
53
0%
17%
81%
2%
0%
0%
2011
2
4
6
24
51
0%
16%
83%
1%
0%
0%
2012
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
>
(6
-0
C
cN 6
c
w
>
v
C
ca
C
v
C
ca
v
C
cN a
sn
ca
o
v
C
ca
to
ca
o
`
W
>
a,
,��—
�,
;
W
>
O
N
��—
W
>
a,
N
•��—
W
>
v,
C
�
a°i
C
C
W
>
v,
C
a�i
C
C
W
>
a,
o
W
>
N
o>
W
L
0
aii
W
L
a�i
>
_W
O
_
W
W
-Q
O
W
Z
O
°�
W
:E
O
°�
2
L
L
0
CU
E
L
0
M
E
L
0
E
L
0
rn
cu
A♦
a
>
Y
O
>
>
■ 2008
■ 2009
112010
■ 2011

(XS -3) Mr Peblount Dat
Riffle Pebble Count
silt /clay 0 0.062
Year
Year
Year
2008
0
2009
0
2010
0
2011
0
very fine sand
fine sand
medium sand
coarse sand
very coarse sand
0.062
0.13
0
0
0
0
0.13
0.25
0
2
0
0
0.25
0.5
7
2
2
1
0.5
1
12
9
9
6
1
2
10
0
12
16
very fine gravel
fine gravel
fine gravel
medium gravel
medium gravel
coarse gravel
coarse gravel
very coarse gravel
very coarse gravel
2
4
8
4
11
4
4
6
7
17
11
13
6
8
6
11
7
11
8
11
7
19
14
6
11
16
9
11
9
2
16
22
5
11
15
21
22
32
5
6
5
3
32
45
4
0
2
7
45
64
3
0
1
1
small cobble
medium cobble
large cobble
very large cobble
64
90
10
3
3
3
90
128
4
2
2
0
128
180
6
4
2
3
180
256
2
0
2
3
small boulder
small boulder
medium boulder
large boulder
very large boulder
256
362
1
1
0
0
362
512
0
0
0
0
512
1024
0
0
0
0
1024
2048
0
0
0
0
2048
4096
0
0
0
0
bedrock
0
0
0
0
Total Particle Count:
106
102
107
100
Year
Size percent less than (mm)
Percent by substrate type
D16
D35
D50
D84
D95
silt /clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
2008
1
4
9
79
160
0%
27%
51%
21%
1%
0%
2009
4
6
9
22
130
0%
13%
77%
9%
1%
0%
2010
1
5
8
22
100
0%
21%
70%
8%
0%
0%
2011
0
5
8
34
145
0%
23%
68%
9%
0%
0%
2012
25
20
15
10
5
a
_0 -a _0 -0 a) a) a) a) a) a) Q) a) a) a) a) a) a) L L L L
C C C C c > > > > > > > :E :E f .Q Cf O
cn cn v� En cLa ca ca cLa o 0 0 0 0 0 _0
a) a� 0 0 rn on 0) m 0) 0) m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 >, m
c c U) E E m °� —
2008
■ 2009
02010
■2011

(XS -5) Stricker Pebble Count Data
F Year
Year
Year
Year
Riffle Pebble Count
silt /clay 0 0.062
2008
0
2009
1
2010
0
2011
0
very fine sand
fine sand
medium sand
coarse sand
very coarse sand
0.062 0.13
0
0
1
0
0.13 0.25
0
0
1
0
0.25 0.5
0
1
12
6
0.5 1
0
15
10
17
1 2
6
0
12
19
very fine gravel
fine gravel
fine gravel
medium gravel
medium gravel
coarse gravel
coarse gravel
very coarse gravel
very coarse gravel
2 4
0
0
11
5
4 6
2
14
23
13
6 8
3
9
2
2
8 11
5
11
8
6
11 16
6
10
7
4
16 22
12
5
8
12
22 32
12
5
4
1
32 45
23
6
1
0
45 64
13
9
3
3
small cobble
medium cobble
large cobble
very large cobble
64 90
12
10
0
4
90 128
4
5
0
6
128 180
3
4
1
1
180 256
0
3
5
1
small boulder
small boulder
medium boulder
large boulderl
very large boulderl
256 362
0
2
2
0
362 512
0
0
0
0
512 1024
0
0
0
0
1024 2048
0
0
0
0
2048 4096
0
0
0
0
bedrockli
0
0
0
0
Total Particle Count:
101
110
111
100
Year
Size percent less than (mm)
Percent by substrate type
D16
D35
D50
D84
D95
silt /clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
2008
11
23
34
69
110
0%
6%
75%
19%
0%
0%
2009
1
7
12
81
100
1%
15%
61%
21%
2%
0%
2010
1
2
5
21
200
0%
32%
60%
5%
2%
0%
2011
0
2
4
23
109
0%
42%
45%
12%
0%
0%
2012
25
20
15
10
5
>, -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 m Z Z m m m Z w w m 0 W W Lm Lm m `m m -�c
c� c C C C C > > > > > > > :E Z :E :E a 0
M M M of M M M M M M M cB -0 -0 _a -0 0
N N N N N 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 >,
C C (n fn N N N 0 N — -0 -0 -0 -0 L -0
4-- D _ L L C c C 1= 1= (n (n �' Z' 1= a� d —_ E m >
0 0 � � L- 7 0 L L 0 0 0 m � RS �
N O O N N 0 0 > > 0 E E ' flS
02008
■ 2009
❑ 2010
■ 2011

CaI�Kimley -Horn
and Associates. Inc.
2000 South Blvd. Suite 440
Charlotte, NC 28203
Stricker Ranch Monitoring Year 4
Photograph Sheet
KHA ]ob No.: 018336004
KHA Rep.: AJD
Date: June 7, 2011
Page: 1 of 13
Photo No. 1
Photo No. 2
fix. W
1
Remarks: Photo Point 1
Remarks: Photo Point 2
Photo No. 3
Photo No. 4
1
Remarks: Photo Point 3 - Veg. Plot 6
Remarks: Photo Point 4

��Kimley -Han
and Associates Inc
2000 South Blvd. Suite 440
Charlotte, NC 28203
Stricker Ranch Monitoring Year 4
Photograph Sheet
KHA Job No.: 018336004
KHA Rep.: AJD
Date: June 7, 2011
Page: 2 of 13
• •
Photo No. 8
i
t
v
rr
q
'1
Photo Point 5
•• ••
Photo No. 7
Photo No. 8
i
t
v
`lt, - . _�, t?e' it f ... E -. .� I1'� Fes'• •,
4
Remarks: Photo Point 7
Remarks: Photo Point 8 - Veg. Plot 5

/��Klmley -Horn
and Assoaate& ft-
2000 South Blvd. Suite 440
Charlotte, NC 28203
Stricker Ranch Monitoring Year 4
Photograph Sheet
rr
`a
No.
KHA )ob No.: 018336004
KHA Rep.: AJD
Date: June 7, 2011
Page: 3 of 13

PPI
Kimley -Horn
Intl Azsoclatea InG
2000 South Blvd. Suite 440
Charlotte, NC 28203
Stricker Ranch Monitoring Year 4
Photograph Sheet
KHA Job No.: 018336004
KHA Rep.: AJD
Date: June 7, 2011
Page: 4 of 13
• • • No. 13
• • •
Photo No. 16
-
r
Ii
y.
• • '•
• • Point
Photo No. 15
Photo No. 16
-
�: r
..
,._t -
V+
Remarks: Photo Point 15-Veg. Plot 4
Remarks: Photo Point 16

o^ KIrT4 Horn
� , and Associates lnc.
2000 South Blvd. Suite 440
Charlotte, NC 28203
Stricker Ranch Monitoring Year 4
Photograph Sheet
KHA Job No.: 018336004
KHA Rep.: AJD
Date: June 7, 2011
Page: 5 of 13
Photo No. 17
Photo No. 18
"i
Remarks: Photo Point 19 - Veg. Plot 3
v
1•
y
r fi
it
Remarks: Photo Point 17
Remarks: Photo Point 18
Photo No. 19
Photo No. 20
Remarks: Photo Point 19 - Veg. Plot 3
Remarks: Photo Point 20

C n KlmNy -Han
and Acsockdas Inc.
2000 South Blvd. Suite 440
Charlotte, NC 28203
Stricker Ranch Monitoring Year 4
Photograph Sheet
KHA Jab No.: 018336004
KHA Rep.:
AJD
Date: June 7, 2011
Page: 6 Of 13

pp-�n Klmley -Horn
and Associates Inc.
2000 South Blvd. Suite 440
Charlotte, NC 28203
Stricker Ranch Monitoring Year 4
Photograph Sheet
,Photo No. 25 Photo No. 26
_ r
r���oto Point 25 Remarks: Photo Point 26
z f
KHA Job No.: 018336004
KHA Rep.: AJD
Date: June 7, 2011
Page: 7 Of 13
IPhoto No. 27
• • •
LL
r
• • '• int 27
Remarks: Photo Point

Kimley -Horn
\ PPI
On ana assxiaros inc
2000 South Blvd. Suibe 440
Charlotte, NC 28203
Stricker Ranch Monitoring Year 4
Photograph Sheet
KHA Job No.: 018336004
KHA Rep.: AJD
Date: June 7, 2011
Page: 8 of 13
• • • • • • 1
P.
'�/7 � 'f Zvi• � � %r %is .-
♦�i`n T 7UJ/
*.w WL"
Re arks: Photo Point 29
a

� Kirnlsy -Han
� anU ALSOCiataS. Inc.
2000 South Blvd. Suite 440
Charlotte, NC 28203
Stricker Ranch Monitoring Year 4
Photograph Sheet
KHA Job No.: 018336004
KHA Rep.: AJD
Date: June 7, 2011
Page: 9 Of 13
'Photo No. 33
r •
�iyL %; , 4:.
It
Remarks: Photo Point 33
Remarks: Photo Point 34

/tinKimley Man
and AtrACiate6, Inc.
2000 South Blvd. Suite 440
Charlotte, NC 28203
Stricker Ranch Monitoring Year 4
Photograph Sheet
KHA ]ob No.: 018336004
KHA Rep.: AJD
Date: June 7, 2011
Page: 10 of 13
Photo No. 39
Photo No. 40
FS
Remarks: Photo Point 39
Remarks: Photo Point 40

and and A -Horn
\ � Associates, Inc.
2000 South Blvd. Suite 440
Charlotte, NC 28203
Strickler Ranch Monitoring Year 4
Photograph Sheet
KHA Job No.: 016336004
KHA Rep.: AJD
Date: June 7, 2011
Page: 11 Of 13
• • •
• • No.
1
x.
Y
Ar
�
�
Mme. • _.•
t•y
i{' _
.•••
Point 44

Kimley -Horn
and Associates, Inc.
2000 South Blvd. Suite 440
Charlotte, NC 28203
Strickler Ranch Monitoring Year 4
Photograph Sheet
KHA Job No.: 018336004
KHA Rep.: AJD
Date: June 7, 2011
Page: 12 of 13
Photo No. 47
Photo No. 48
t
.
Remarks: Photo Point 47
Remarks: Photo Point 48

ZFJKimtey -Horn
and Assoaates, Inc.
2000 South Blvd. Suite 440
Charlotte, NC 28203
Stricker Ranch Monitoring Year 4
Photograph Sheet
KHA Job No.: 018336004
KHA Rep.: AJD
Date: June 7, 2011
Page: 13 of 13
Photo No. 51
Photo No. 52
Remarks:
Remarks:

Bankfull Events Log
2.9 inches of rain fell from 1/24/2010 to 1/25/2010

2.19 inches of rain were recorded on 2/5/2010, the most likely event to trigger the CSG
prior to this inspection.

1.72 inches of rain from 3/28 to 3/29/2010 was the largest event recorded prior to this
inspection.
Rack lines and high water mark debris are easily observed throughout the site.

USGS 352310080424845 CRN -51 RAINGAGE AT CONCORD REGIONAL AIRPORT
DATE
Jan
2010
Feb
2010
Mar
2010
Apr
2010
May
2010
Jun
2010
Jul
2010
Aug
2010
Sep
2010
Oct
2010
Nov
2010
Dec
2010
Jan
2011
Feb
2011
Mar
2011
Apr
2011
May
2011
Jun
2011
Jul
2011
1
OOOP
—
OOOP
OOOP
1
OOOP
044P
OOOP
001 P
OOOP
000A
0 00 A
086A
029A
022A
0 00 A
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
000
2
OOOP
—
030P
OOOP
OOOP
004P
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
0 00 A
000A
OOOA
008A
042A
000A
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
3
OOOP
—
OOOP
OOOP
018P 1
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
001P
000A
0 O1A
OOOA
000A
002A
000A I
OOOP
050P
002P
OOOP
4
OOOP
005P
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
000A
0 51 A
006A
000A
0 89 A
000A
OOOP
051P
OOOP
008P
5
OOOP
219P
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
068P
OOOP
000A
004A
000A
004A
0 93 A
005A
061 P
OOOP
OOOP
001 P
6
OOOP
001P
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
015P
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
000A
OOOA
0 0 1 A
0 04 A
0 00 A
101A
000P
OOOP
000P
102P
7
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
—
OOOP
001 P
OOOP
001 P
OOOP
000A
000A
000A
002A
000A
0 00 A
001 P
OOOP
OOOP
005P
8
001 P
OOOP
OOOP
--
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
0 00 A
0 00 A
000A
000A
0 00 A
000A
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
1 53P
9
OOOP
004P
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
083P
OOOP
OOOP
0 00 A
0 00 A
0 00 A
--
0 00 A
085A
059P
OOOP
OOOP
002P
10
OOOP
002P
005P
OOOP
OOOP
012P
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
0 00 A
0 00 A
OOOA
—
0 00 A
024A
OOOP
003P
OOOP
11
OOOP
OOOP
011 P
OOOP
012P
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
006P
000A
OOOA
000A
—
000A
000A
0 00 P
120P
028P
12
OOOP
020eP
1 Ol P
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
1 53P
OOOP
OOOP
000A
OOOA
0 29 A
000A
000A
000A
004P
OOOP
058P
13
OOOP
0028P
013P
OOOP
OOOP
017P
034P
OOOP
OOOP
000A
000A
000A
000A
000A
000A
001 P
007P
OOOP
14
OOOP
OOOP
002P
OOOP
OOOP
007P
OOOP
007P
OOOP
009A
000A
000A
000A
000A
000A
OOOP
022P
OOOP
15
OOOP
014P
OOOP
OOOP
017P
015P
OOOP
016P
OOOP
000A
000A
001A
000A
000A
009A
OOOP
008P
005P
16
030P
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
064P
OOOP
012P
OOOP
OOOP
000A
003A
013A
000A
000A
000A
112P
022P
003P
17
123P
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
157P
OOOP
071P
OOOP
OOOP
0 00 A
000A
001A
001A
001A
000A
000P
091P
0 00 P
18
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
003P
0 00 P
001 P
005P
OOOP
000A
000A
003A
003A
000A
000A
OOOP
OOOP
016P
19
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
011 P
OOOP
OOOP
515P
OOOP
000A
000A
000A
000A
000A
000A
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
20
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
013P
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
012A
0 00 A
001 A
000A
000A
000A
OOOP
001 P
001 P
21
047P
OOOP
024P
004P
014P
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
001 A
0 00 A
000A
0 00 A
0 00 A
0 00 A
OOOP
OOOP
024P
22
001 P
042P
016P
OOOP
001 P
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
0 00 A
0 00 A
000A
0 00 A
000A
000A
031 P
OOOP
031 P
23
1 OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
001 P
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
0 00 A
003A
000A
000A
000A
000A
002P
0 00 P
001 P
24
215P
017P
OOOP
019P
014P
021P
OOOP
002P
OOOP
0 00 A
001A
OOOA
0 00 A
000A
017A
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
25
075P
002P
OOOP
043P
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
003P
003P
043A
003A
- --
003A
004A
000A
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
26
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
074P
008A
010A
- --
041A
000A
057A
OOOP
002P
0 00 P
27
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
059P
OOOP
OOOP
024P
OOOP
066P
032A
000A
000A
000A
000A
0 11 A
OOOP
058P
OOOP
28
OOOP
OOOP
127P
OOOP
110P
OOOP
024P
OOOP
022P
000A
000A
000A
000A
087A
015A
013P
OOOP
100P
29
—
045P
OOOP
002P
001 P
OOOP
OOOP
000A
000A
OOOA
000A
000A
OOOP
OOOP
002P
30
--
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
069P
OOOP
OOOP
000A
027A
OOOA
OOOA
108A
OOOP
OOOP
OOOP
31
--
0 00 P
125P
OOOP
OOOP
000A
OOOA
OOOA
003A
OOOP
COUNT
28
25
31
28
31
30
31
31
28
31
30
29
28
28
31
30
31
30
9
MAX
216
219
1 27
0 59
157
069
153
515
074
043
0 51
086
041
093
108
1 12
12
1
153
MIN
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Explanation
Provisional data
P
subject to revision
Value has been
e
estimated

USGS 352310080424845 CRN 51 RAINGAGE AT CONCORD REGIONAL AIRPORT
X0
0
0
WOMEN
�W
W
-NIN
WINEEINEENIN
WINEEINENNIN
eM
m
w
W
SE
®
�
INEEINEENIE
m-
WINEEINEENIN
WINNEINEENIN
NE
NO
W
WINEEINNEEIN
WINEEINEENIN
NO
S
eNE
eW
SE
N
NO
_�
WINEEINEENIN
WINEEINEENIN
�
NO
��
WOMEN
�W
W
-NIN
WINEEINEENIN
WINEEINENNIN
eM
m
w
W
SE
®
�
INEEINEENIE
m-
WINEEINEENIN
WINNEINEENIN
NE
NO
W
WINEEINNEEIN
WINEEINEENIN
NO
S
eNE
eW
SE
N
NO
_�
WINEEINEENIN
WINEEINEENIN
�
NO
��

�aa�����m�mm