20061483 Ver 1_Year 4 Monitoring Report_20120127

Vv
JAN 2 7 2012
NC ECOSYSTEAR
EN NCEMENT PROGRAM
UT to Pembroke Creek Wetland and tream
Restoration Monitoring Report
EEP Project # 283
Monitonng Year 04
Submitted to
r 'NI-
�i
Cosy�eme stem
n la��.lit
PROGEAM
NCDENR -EEP, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652
Data Collection 2011
Construction Completed February 2008
Submitted December 2011

Monitoring Firm
KCI
ASSOCIATES OF NC
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Protect Contact Adam Spiller
Email adam spiller(aAkci com
KCI Protect No 12071067C_PM11
Design Firm
[4ftoEngineenng
A.4 Gaon of7hc J An K SIC %dams Common inc
EcoEngmeenng, A Division of the John R McAdams Company Inc
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
UT Pembroke KC /Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2011 MY04

TABLE OF CONTENTS
10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT 1
20 METHODOLOGY 2
30 REFERENCES 2
Appendix A — Protect Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Figure 1
Vicinity Map 4
Table la
Project Restoration Components 5
Table lb
Project Component Summations 5
Table 2
Project Activity and Reporting History 6
Table 3
Project Contacts Table 7
Table 4
Project Attribute Table 8
Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2 Current Condition Plan View 9
Table 5 Vegetation Condition Assessment 12
Photo Point Photos 13
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos 17
Appendix C — Vegetation Plot Data
Table 6 Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table 26
Table 7 CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata 27
Table 8 CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species 28
Appendix D — Wetland Survey Data
Cross - Section Plots 30
Appendix E — Hydrologic Data
30 -70 Percentile Graph 36
Precipitation and Water Level Plots 37
Table 9 Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment 56
UT Pembroke KC1 Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2011 MY04

10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) restored, enhanced, and preserved wetlands
and restored a headwater wetland valley, which is analogous to a stream in this setting at the UT
Pembroke Site in Chowan County, North Carolina The 59 -acre site is located within the USGS 8 -digit
HUC 03010205 of the Pasquotank River Basin These assets and their acreage totals were revised by the
EEP during the summer of 2009 with the revised totals reflected in Table 1 of this report The project
goals and objectives are listed below
Goal Modify the channelized water features, based on reference conditions, with the intent to restore the
site's primary wetland functions such as nutrient cycling, flood storage and wildlife habitat
Objectives
• Improve water quality in the basin by filtering nutrients through on -site wetlands
• Buffer flood flows downstream by increasing infiltration and storage areas
• Design a waterway through the wetland complex with appropriate cross - section, slope, and
pattern as to provide nutrient filtering, flood storage, and wildlife habitat while meeting the
appropriate success criteria for the wetland
• Improve terrestrial and aquatic habitat diversity
• Establish a contiguous buffer along the project that can serve as a migration corridor for local
fauna
The restored wetlands and headwater wetland valley were planted with one of three different planting
zones, each with various species of bare root trees and shrubs Following the CVS -EEP protocol, sixteen
vegetation monitoring plots were established during the baseline data collection immediately after the site
was planted Plot number 14 was damaged during road maintenance and was reset in the same location
during the second year of monitoring The fourth year of monitoring found a site average of 207 planted
stems /acre, with nine of the sixteen vegetation monitoring plots having planted stem densities less than
the five -year success criteria of 260 stems /acre The site's average total stem density including volunteers
is 1,189 stems /acre, with four of the sixteen vegetation plots having densities less than the five -year
success criteria The only exotic species identified at the site are parrotfeather (Myriophyllum aquaticum),
which is present in areas of open standing water, honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), which is scattered
throughout the site, and privet (Ligustrum sinense), which is predominantly found in the enhancement
wetland Some parts of the site have large cattail (Typha latifolia) populations, which may outcompete
desirable vegetation and become problematic There are also areas where the Juncus effusus is growing so
vigorously that there are no planted stems in the surrounding area Supplemental planting of the site was
conducted in December of 2011
The restored headwater wetland valley is stable In the parts of the site where there are large areas of
standing water, the feature becomes less visually defined, but there is still active flow of water across the
site A maintenance plan to increase the rate of draw down through the site was implemented in the fall of
2011 This maintenance included adding a new road crossing and the removal of the top level of the drop
down structure A supplemental report detailing the maintenance actions will be created in the spring of
2012
Fifteen groundwater monitoring wells have been established to monitor wetland hydrology Of these
wells, five (4, 5, 6, 9, and 13) were installed in restored wetlands, two (2 and 3) were installed in
enhanced wetlands, five (7, 8, 10, 11, and 15) were installed in the headwater wetland valley, and two (12
and 16) were installed in the preserved wetlands as reference wells An additional monitoring well,
Monitoring Well 17, was installed in the restored wetland in April 2009 In June 2010, four more
UT Pembroke I KC1 Associates of North Carohna
EEP Protect # 283 2011 MY04

monitoring wells, Monitoring Wells 18, 19, 20, and 21, were installed During the site s fourth growing
season, 15 of the 17 wells in the restoration and enhancement areas met the success cntenon of having
saturated soil conditions occurring within 12 inches of the ground surface for a minimum continuous
penod of 5% (13 days) of the 263 day growing season (March 10 to November 28) during average
climatic conditions The daily rainfall data obtained from a local weather station shows that the area had
average rainfall dunng the 2011 growing season The wells that did not meet the success critena - Wells 2
and 4 - each had water above the junsdictional depth for a maximum of four and ten consecutive days,
respectively Monitoring Well 2 is in the enhanced wetland and Well 4 is in the restored non - riparian
wetland
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and
statistics related to performance of various project and monitonng elements can be found in the tables and
figures in the report appendices Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in
these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly Mitigation Plan) and in the
Mitigation Plan (formerly the Restoration Plan) documents available on the ESP's website All raw data
supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are available from the EEP upon request
20 METHODOLOGY
The cross - sections are surveyed with a total station instrument and stationed according to the distance
between survey shots The stationing is then adjusted to match significant topography changes from the
previous year's cross - sections
The Level 2 of the CVS -EEP protocol (http / /cvs bio unc edu/methods htm) was used to collect
vegetation data from the UT Pembroke site
30 REFERENCES
Lee, M T, R K Peet, S D Roberts, and T R Wentworth 2006 CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, Version 4 0 (http Hcvs bio unc edu/methods htm)
Weakley, A S 2006 Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, and Surrounding Areas
(hn / /www herbarium unc edu/F1oraArchives /WeakleyFlora 2006 -Jan pdf)
UT Pembroke 2 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2011 MY04

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and
Background Tables
UT Pembroke 3 KC/ Associates o, f North Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2011 MY04

Directions to the Project Site
From Raleigh, travel on US -64 E
Stay straight on US -17 N Take
exit 224 and take a left at the top of
the ramp Then take a left onto
Emperor's Landing Rd Then take a
right onto Tip Toe Rd Then take a
right onto Macedonia Rd The site
will be on your right
at �Y
z
b
� 1
H
4
¢ P P
4
ti M 4
J r 1 5 3
T I
Fj 6 7
k r ry Y M `,
w t F
r�
Ss
2i �
Chowan River
k
r~
AaMi7nimeht
Wild,
Rtr i
,s T
r
iw
A
� ? m{ � �° J �.f of �y "� 1 '� ♦ r b � 1 'ti.
1 ^b �9� �` `� 1Y•'1"`TZ wp �
Il '� i� 4 l 1f {� E � f b emar Sound
epp l 4
{6 ra ^ r t x 4 Albe
F " M fz%
Figure 1 Site Vicinity Map
UT Pembroke Creek, Chowan
Project Easement Boundary
05 025 0 05 1
mi.
EEP Protect # 283
N
W� E
S
�6�
MMMW`.
KCI
ASSOCIATES OF NC

Table la Project Restoration Components
Project Number and Name 283 UT to Pembroke Creek
Restoration
Stream
Riparian
Non Ripar,
Upland
Buffer
Level
00
Wetland (Ac)
(Ac)
(Ac)
(Ac)
BMP
' a
Rivenne
Non Riverme
t y
Restoration
4 488
13 81 446 3 F
526 f�
}u
895 2592
- 4
0 2276 �s <
Enhancement
Enhancement I
r06
Enhancement II
Creation
Preservation
Segment/
ao
O
Fes.
°
p
a
W
L.
4,488
R
°D
R
°,—°
w
a.
Reach ID
w
pC
Q
Q
Stationing
MU Totals
Comment
Headwater
1227
0
This feature is 100 feet wide
00+00 to 34 +73 and
Wetland
R
4488
1 1
4 488
for its entire length
40+00 to 58 +72
Valley
encompassing 9 96 acres
Ripanan
R
13 81 ac
1 1
1381
Wetlands
Non Ripanan
R
4 46 ac
1 1
446
Wetlands
Non Riparian
E
5 26 ac
2 1
263
Wetlands
Riparian
Wooded
P
8 95 ac
5 1
1 79
Wetlands
Non Ripanan
Wooded
P
25 92 ac
5 1
5 18
Wetlands
R = Restoration E = Enhancement P = Preservation
Table Ib Project Component Summations
Project Number and Name 283 - UT to Pembroke Creek
Restoration
Stream
Riparian
Non Ripar,
Upland
Buffer
Level
00
Wetland (Ac)
(Ac)
(Ac)
(Ac)
BMP
' a
Rivenne
Non Riverme
t y
Restoration
4 488
13 81 446 3 F
526 f�
}u
895 2592
- 4
0 2276 �s <
Enhancement
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
Creation
Preservation
HQ Preservation
`
Totals
4,488
2276
3564
0
Feet/Acres
MU Totals
4,488
1560
1227
0
UT Pembroke 5 KC1 Associates Qf North Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2011 MY04

Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Project Number and Name 283 UT to Pembroke Creek
Elapsed Time Since Grading Complete 3 yr 10 months
Elapsed Time Since Planting Complete 4 yr 0 months
Number of Reporting Years 4
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Actual
Completion
or Delivery
Restoration Plan
2006
Sep 06
Final Design - 90%
Tp r
Mar 07
Construction
t) an A
Feb 08
As Built Survey
ti�Ad'",k 4t
Nov 07
Bare Root Planting
";W*.4%`tt�X4
Dec 07
Baseline Momtonn (Mitigation Plan
F " sa y "
Oct 08
Year 1 Monitoring
Nov 08
Mar 09
Year 2 Monitoring
Nov 09
Dec 09
Year 3 Monitoring
Nov 10
Dec 10
Year 4 Monitonng
Nov 11
Dec ' I 1
Site Maintenance and Supplemental Planting
44 i;p�
Dec 11
UT Pembroke 6 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2011 MY04

Table 3 Project Contacts Table
Pro ect Number and Name 283 - UT Pembroke
Design Firm
EcoEngmeermg A Division of the
John R McAdams Company Inc
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham North Carolina 27713
Contact Mr James M Halley P E
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Construction Contractor
Backwater Environmental
PO Box 1654
119 Ilex Court
Pittsboro North Carolina 27312
Contact Mr Adam McIntyre
Phone [phone]
Planting Contractor
Carolina Silvics Inc
908 Indian Trail Road
Edenton North Carolina 27932
Phone [phone]
Site Maintenance
Design Firm
KCI Associates of NC
Contact Mr Adam Spiller
"
see below for additional contact information
Construction Contractor
Land Mechanics Designs
126 Circle G Lane
Willow Springs NC 27592
Contact Mr Lloyd Glover
Phone [phone]
Planting Contractor
Bruton Natural Systems
PO Box 1197
Fremont North Carolina 27830
Contact Mr Charlie Bruton
Phone [phone]
Monitoring Performers
Mitigation Plan and MY -01
EcoEngmeermg A Division of the
John R McAdams Company Inc
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham North Carolina 27713
Contact Mr James M Halley P E
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
MY-02,03,04
KCI Associates of NC
Landmark Center II Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Rd
Raleigh NC 27609
Contact Mr Adam Speller
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
UT Pembroke 7 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2011 MY04

Table 4 Project Attribute Table
Protect Number and Name 283 - UT Pembroke
Project County
Chowan County
Drainage Area
0 4 m►
Drainage Impervious Cover Estimate ( %)
<5%
Physiographic Region
Outer Coastal Plain
Easement Acreage
59 4 ac
Planted Acreage
32 6 ac
Total Vegetated Acreage
59 4 ac
Ecore ion
Chesapeake Pamlico Lowlands and Tidal Marshes
Plant Communities
Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp
Nonnvenne Wet Hardwood Forest and
Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest
Dominant Soil Types
Cape Fear Conetoe Dragston Portsmouth
Roanoke and Tomotle
Reference Site ID
Reference Sites 1 2 3 and 4
USGS HUC for Project and References
03010205
Any portion of the project segment 303d listed9
No
Any portion of the project segment upstream of a 303d
listed se ment9
No
Reasons for 303d Listing or Stressor
N/A
% of Project Fenced
0%
UT Pembroke 8 KCl Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2011 MY04

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
UT Pembroke 9 KC1 Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2011 MY04

PROJECT CONDITION
VEG PLOT ACHIEVING
DENSITY CRITERION
VEG PLOT BELOW
DENSITY CRITERION
WETLAND GAUGE ACHIEVING - -- -
HYDROLOGIC CRITERION
WETLAND GAUGE BELOW -
HYDROLOGIC CRITERION
LEGEND
EASEMENT BOUNDARY
AS -BUILT STATIONED CENTERLINE
PHOTO POINT
Q
CROSS - SECTION
-100 -SO 0 100 200
GRAPHIC SCALE
PROJECT CONDITION DETAILS
■ VEG PLOT TOTAL/ PLANTED STEM DENSITY
INAGESOURCE N02010OR7HO11YAGERY
u
9
9901429
T a= !
k
c@€�I I
G A
Z
0
F- Q
<z
y0 �$
w v
U ur?
K
O W z
cc 1, O � z
2 u) z w
W p w o
o
d QZ w
r < w
�z 35
F U
CURRENT
CONDITION
PLAN VIEW

Table 5. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Project Number and Name: 283 - LIT to Pembroke Creek Wetland and Stream
Planted Acreage 32.6 Easement Acreage 59.4
Numberof
Combined
N'e etation Cate =
Definitions
Mapping Threshold
CCPV De iction
Pol ons
Acreage
% of Planted Acreage
Very limited cover both woody
1. Bare Areas
and herbaceous mater ial.
0.1 acres
Pattern and Color
0
0.00
0.0%
2. Low Stem Density
Woody stem densities clearly below
Not Depicted.
Areas
target levels based on MY3. 4. or 5
0.1 acres
Covers Most of
multiple
11.20
34.4%
stem count criteria.
Restoration Area
Total
0
11.20
34.4%
Areas with woody stems of a size
3. Areas of Poor
Growth Rates or Vigor
class that are obviously small given
0.25 acres
Pattern and Color
0
0.00
0.0%
the monitoring year.
Cumulative Totall
0
1 11.20
1 34.4%
4. Invasive Areas of Areas or points (if too small to
Concern render as polygons at map scale).
1000 SF Pattern and Color
0
0.00
0.0%
5. Easement
Areas or points (if too small to
Encroachment Areas
render as polygons at map scale).
none
Pattern and Color
0
0.00
0.0%
UT Pembroke 12 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2011- MY04

Photo Point Photos
Photo Point 1 — 12/2/09 - MY 02 — Facing northwest toward
Wildcat Road.
Photo Point 2 — 12/2/09 - MY 02 — Facing west toward
Macedonia Road.
Photo Point 3 — 12/2/09 - MY 02 — Facing south toward the
downstream end of the project.
Photo Point 1 — 10/19/11 -MY 04— Facing northwest
toward Wildcat Road.
Photo Point 2 — 10/19/11 - MY 04 — Facing west toward
Macedonia Road.
Photo Point 3 — 10/19/11 - MY 04 — Facing south toward the
downstream end of the project.
UT Pembroke 13 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2011- MY04

Photo Point 4 — 12/2/09 - MY 02 — Road Crossing Type A —
Station 17 +75 — Facing west toward Macedonia Road.
Photo Point 5 — 12/2/09 - MY 02 — Road Crossing Type A —
Station 50 +75 — Facing west toward Macedonia Road.
Photo Point 6 — 12/2/09 - MY 02 — Facing northwest toward
Macedonia Road.
Photo Point 4 — 10/19/11 - MY 04 — Road Crossing Type A
— Station 17 +75 — Facing west toward Macedonia Road.
Photo Point 5 — 10/19/11 - MY 04 — Road Crossing Type A
— Station 50 +75 — Facing west toward Macedonia Road.
Photo Point 6 — 10/19/11 - MY 04 — Facing northwest toward
Macedonia Road.
UT Pembroke 14 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2011- MY04

Photo Point 7 — 12/2/09 - MY 02 — Facing south.
Photo Point 8 — 12/2/09 - MY 02 — Road Crossing Type
B — Station 30 +50
Photo Point 9 — 12/2/09 - MY 02 — Road Crossing Type C —
Station 32 +50
Photo Point 7 — 10/19/11 - MY 04 — Facing south.
Photo Point 8 — 10/19/11 - MY 04 — Road Crossing Type B
— Station 30 +50
Photo Point 9 — 10/19/11 - MY 04 — Road Crossing Type C
— Station 32 +50
UT Pembroke 15 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2011 - MY04

Photo Point 10 — 12/2/09 - MY 02 — Grade transition, facing
downstream.
Photo Point 11 — 12/2/09 - MY 02 — Grade transition,
facing upstream
Photo Point 10 — 10/19/11 - MY 04 — Grade transition,
facing downstream.
Photo Point 11 — 10/19/11 - MY 04 — Grade transition,
facing upstream.
UT Pembroke 16 KC1 Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2011- MY04

Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Plot 1 — 10/19/11 - MY 04 - Facing Macedonia Road on the northwestern portion of the site
Plot 2 — 10/19/11 - MY 04 - Facing Macedonia Road on the northwestern portion of the site
UT Pembroke 17 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2011 - MY04

Plot 3 — 10/19/11 - MY 04 - Facing intersection of Macedonia Road and Wildcat Road
Plot 4 — 10/19/11 - MY 04 - Facing Macedonia Road and Wildcat Road on the northeastern
portion of the site
UT Pembroke 18 KCl Associates ojNorth Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2011- MY04

Plot 5 — 10/19/11 - MY 04 - Facing Macedonia Road on western portion of the site
Plot 6 — 10/19/11 - MY 04 - Facing Macedonia Road on the central portion of the site
UT Pembroke 19 KC/ Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2011- MY04

Plot 7 — 10/19/11 - MY 04 - Facing intersection of Macedonia Road on the western portion of the
site
Plot 8 — 10/19/11 - MY 04 - Facing Macedonia Road on central portion of the site just north of
the main road
UT Pembroke 20 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2011- MY04

Plot 9 — 10/19/11 - MY 04 - Facing Macedonia Road on western portion of the site near the pond
Plot 10— 10/19/11 -MY 04- Facing Macedonia Road just southwest of the intersection of the
main road and the dirt access road
UT Pembroke 21 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2011- MY04

Plot 11 — 10/19/11 - MY 04 - Facing Macedonia Road just south of Plot 9 near the pond
Plot 12— 10/19/11 - MY 04 - Facing Macedonia Road just south of the pond
UT Pembroke 22 KCl Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2011 - MY04

�: IL
� v �' i''wf'•
to

Plot 15 — 10/19/11 - MY 04 - Facing east on the southeastern portion of the site
Plot 16 — 10/19/11 - MY 04 - Facing Macedonia Road on the southwestern portion of the site
UT Pembroke 24 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2011 - MY04

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
UT Pembroke 25 KCl Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project 4 283 2011 MY04

Table 6 Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Project Number and Name 283 - UT Pembroke
Vegetation Plot ID
Monitoring Year 04
Planted Stem Density
stems /acre
Vegetation et9 Survival
Threshol d Met�
Monitoring Year 04
Total Stem Density
stems /acre
1
162
No
1,821
2
0
No
890
3
405
Yes
2 388
4
405
Yes
405
5
445
Yes
526
6
0
No
0
7
405
Yes
486
8
405
Yes
445
9
0
No
0
10
324
Yes
2,104
11
162
No
2 104
12
0
No
0
13
0
No
0
14
87
No
931
15
364
Yes
4168
16
162
No
2 752
UT Pembroke 26 KCI Associates ojNorth Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2011 MY04

Table 7 CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Project Number and Name 283 - UT Pembroke
Re rt Prepared By
Apnl Helms
Date Prepared
12/5/20118 54
database name
KCI 2011 A mdb
database location
M \2007 \12071067 2007 EEP OPEN EN D\Veg_data base
computer name 1
12 CV76KF1
file size 159768832
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS
IN THIS DOCUMENT - - -- - - - - --
Metadata
Description of database file the report worksheets and a summary of project(s) and
project data.
Proj, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre for each year This
excludes live stakes
Prol, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre for each year This includes
live stakes all planted stems and all natural /volunteer stems
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems dead stems
missing etc
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots
Vigor b Slip
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of
total stems impacted by each
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by for each plot
Planted Stems by Plot and
Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot dead
and missing stems are excluded
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural
volunteers combined ) for each plot dead and missing stems are excluded
PROJECT SUMMARY--------------------- - - - - -- --- - - - - --
Project Code
283
project Name
UT Pembroke
Description
Stream and wetland restoration site in Chowan County NC
River Basin
Roanoke
length(ft)
4,488
stream-to-edge width ft
50
areas m)
41 691
Required Plots calculated
11
Sampled Plots
16
UT Pembroke 27 KCI Associates offorth Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2011 MY04

Table 8 Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species
Pro tect Number and Name 283 UTPembroke
Current Plot Data l
®mmmmm
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmom�m�mo
:
�000mmm
©©
©00000
©mmm000mmmm�m�mm
�������000mmm�mmmmmmmm000���0
©©
�mmmmmm000mmmmmmmmmmmm000mmmo
©©
�mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
�mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
�mmommmmmomm
�mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
�mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmml
�mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
©.
%
�000mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
southern red oak
�mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm'
®
mmmmmmmmmmmm000mmmmmm000mmm�mm.
�mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�
.
®
000mmm000mmmmmmmmmao
©���������.
�
o0o
mm.
o00
00
©o0o
mmm
mmm
o0o
mmm
mmml
r�+e�
®
mmmmmmmmm000mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm,
�mmmmmmmmommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�mm
�mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�mm
�mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
�mmmmmmmmmmmm
©
©
©mmmoo
©mmmmmmmmm
',
�mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Stem count
(ACRES)
Stems per ACRE
oomoommmmmmmmmm000mmmmmm00000
®'
0000000000
00000ao
©v0000
©000000
©vv
©0000
©v
mmm
oom
mmm
mmm
mmm
o00
mmm
mmm
o00
mmm
UTP b 6 28 ACl4 r J\ hC l v
EFPP / 4 83 010 4/503

Table 8 Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species continued
Project Number and Name 283 UT Pembroke
Current Plot Data (MV4 2011
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
7VDe
E283 -01 -0011
E283 -01 -0 012
E283 -01 0013
E293 -01 -0014
E283 -01-0015
E283 01 -0016
M \4 (2011)
MY3 (2010)
MY2 (2009)
Poo1S
P all
T
PnoLS
P a8
T
P.LS
P all IT
P.LS
P all
T
PnoLS
P a8
T
P.LS
P all IT
PnotS
P all
IT
jPooLS
P all IT
PaoLS
P .0
T
cerrubnrm
red maple
Tree
1
21
18
31
Bac hares
baccharis
Shrub Tree
4
3
7
9
6
Ca rya sp
hickory
Tree
1
Dio%pyros virginiana
common persmunon
Tree
5
Fraxmus PLmisvii anica
green ash
Tree
I
u lans nr ra
black walnut
Tree
4
2
3
U usrrumsinense
Chinese pnwt
Shrub Tree
1
Lr wdambar styraciflua
s%wctgum
Tree
10
74
11
177
148
178
Driodendron rulr i era
tuli tree
Tree
i
1
l
19
19
19
19
19
19
21
21
24
otOu cerr era
wax myrtle
Shrub Tree
I
1
1
1
7
1
9
9
22
9
19
13
9
9
11
svabi ora
swamp tupelo
Tree
11
11
11
11
19
11
14
14
14
Perseu aluvirrs
swamp bay
Tree
I
I
1
I
I
1
1
19
1
1
1
1
Pmus rueda
loblolly pine
Tree
2
Plalanus occidenlahs
Americansycamore
Tree
5
3
23
36
30
1
1
6
Po ulusdelmides
easterncottoiiwood
Tree
I
Pninus serollna
black cherry
Shrub Tree
3
rus allervana
Callery pear
Tree
I
iercus
oak
Shrub Tree
3
5
2
ercus albs
white oak
Tree
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
5
4
4
4
ercus alcaia
southern red oak
Tree
1
I
I
ercus lauri oha
laurel oak
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
ercus 1 rain
o%crcup oak
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
4
5
4
4
4
ercus michauxu
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
4
4
4
8
8
8
8
8
8
10
10
10
ercusnr ra
water oak
Tree
1
1
I
1
1
1
8
8
8
8
8
8
10
10
10
ercus phellos
willowoak
Tree
45
5
5
26
1
1
120
1
1
91
1
1
1
Rhus
sumac
4
6
Rhuv co alhnum
flameleat sumac
Shrub Tree
12
Salt v on ra
black willow
Tree
63
Sahr sericea
silkywilow
Shrub Tree
56
Sambucis cwiwdensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub Tree
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
Taxodium dnochum
Ibald cypress
ITTec
1
Ulmusameriana
jAmerican elm
ITree
2
2
2
2
2
2
10
10
11
10
10
10
11
II
11
__Stem count
size (ACRES)
_ ____Species count
Stems r ACRE
4
4
52
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
23
9
9
103
4
4
68
82
82
470
83
119
396
95
95
468
1
1
1
1
1
1
16
16
16
002
002
002
002
002
002
040
040
040
3
3
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
5
4
4
9
3
3
8
12
12
19
12
12
21
14
14
28
162
162
2104
0
0
0
0
0
0
81
81
931
364
364
4168
162
1 162
127521
207
1 207
1189
210
301
1002
240
240
1 1184
UT/ boA 29 AC /4 1 J\ the l
FFP / / 4 83 010 N103

Appendix D
Wetland Survey Data
UT Pembroke 30 KCl Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2011 MY04

22
21
a
20
w
19
18
17
0
Cross - Section 1
UT Pembroke
EEP Project Number 283 - MY04
J r " '
l
20 40 60 80 100 120
Strtlon (R)
—MY-00 MY -01,10/11/08 • MY-02,10/21/09 - --MY -03,10/27/10 — MY-04, 10/19/11

21
c 19
17
IM
Cross - Section 2
UT Pembroke
EEP Project Number 283 - MY04
u 100 200 300 400 500
Station (ft)
-MY-00 - -MY -01,10/11/08 - MY-02,10/21/09 - AMY -03, 10!27/10 —MY -04,10 /19/11
600
700
i
,1
v
i
�
1
- - -s
: .
u 100 200 300 400 500
Station (ft)
-MY-00 - -MY -01,10/11/08 - MY-02,10/21/09 - AMY -03, 10!27/10 —MY -04,10 /19/11
600
700

20
Is
C
16
W
14
12
10
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Statim (ft)
Cross- Section 3
UT Pembroke
EEP Project Number 283- MV04
–MY-00 MY -01, 10/11/08 • MY-02,10/21/09 —MY-03,10/27/10 —MY-04,10/19/11
350 400

w
Cross - Section 4
UT Pembroke
EEP Project Number 283- MY04
100 120 140 160
Station (R)
-- -MY-00 - -MY -01,10/11/08 -- MY-02,10/ 21/09 MY -03,10/27/10 ---MY -04,10 /19/11

Appendix E
Hydrologic Data
UT Pembroke 35 KC1 Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 283 2011 MY04

16
14
12
10
c
w 8
A
6
4
2
0
UT Pembroke 30 -70 Percentile Graph 2010 -2011
Edenton, NC Monthly Rainfall
0 a
z o
Date
02010 Rainfall 2011 Rainfall +30% Less Than —a-30% Greater Than

UT Pembroke MY04
Groundwater Monitoring Well #2
Ju
5
0
C
-5
a
w
D
-10
3
-15
L
V
-20
-25
-30
-35
-40
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
S
y
oai
2.5 C
w
C
2 a
1.5
1
0.5
0
O O
en
N N N
N
Date
Rainfall
Ground Surface
+ Depth
- Jurisdictional Depth
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
S
y
oai
2.5 C
w
C
2 a
1.5
1
0.5
0

10
0
C
_ -10
�.n
a
d
D
d
w
,d -20
e
O
1.
-30
-40
UT Pembroke MY04
Groundwater Monitoring Well #3
5
4.5
4
3.5
C
3
s
.r
a
d
2.5
w
C
2 4
1.5
0.5
-50 p i ■ 101 1 , a■ 1 11 I 1 L 11 �, 1. 1 1 i 1.1 ■ 1 ■ 1 1 ■ 1 E. Y ,k E ,0 1 �1 I I I 1 1 1 1 0
>
M N N N N
Date
Rainfall --w—Depth Jurisdictional Depth Ground Surface

10
5
0
� -5
-10
D
-15
3
c
V -20
-25
-30
116611
-40
UT Pembroke MY04
Groundwater Monitoring Well #4
i
I Begin Growing Season
3/10/2011
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I I '
I
1
i
End Growing Season I
11/28/2011
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
I
10 Days i
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5
4.5
4
3.5
3 c
o.
2.5 G
w
C
i'i
1.5
1
0.5
[IM
N N
M
N
N
Date
Rainfall
Ground Surface
+ Depth
- Jurisdictional Depth
5
4.5
4
3.5
3 c
o.
2.5 G
w
C
i'i
1.5
1
0.5
[IM

10
5
0
-5
s
a
-10
L
w
3
-15
U -20
-25
-30
-35
-40
UT Pembroke MY04
Groundwater Monitoring Well #5
d A
Begin Growing Season
End Growing Season
1 3/10/2011
11/28/20111
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
I
I
1
I
1
-
.�.
M '^ C7,
N
23 Days i
I
M
I
1
N
N
1
1
Date
1
I
Rainfall
—+— Depth
1
1
I
I
I
1
I
I
Replaced Gauge
i
1
I
I
I
1
1
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
1
1
I
I
1
I
I
1
1
d A
o o
o d d
o 0
Q Q
-
6
O O z Z
M ^ N ^'
�p ,=,
-
.�.
M '^ C7,
N
N
.r.
M
N
N
Date
Rainfall
—+— Depth
— Jurisdictional Depth
Ground Surface
5
4.5
4
3.5
3 O
a
2.5 C
w
C
1.5
-1
- 0.5
0

UT Pembroke MY04
Groundwater Monitoring Well #6
lu
5
0
-5
s
d -10
D
6
v
w
3 -15
b
c
0
6
U -20
-25
-30
-35
-40
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
s
a
d
2.5 C
w
c_
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
,
z° z,
o
M
Date
Rainfall
Ground Surface
+ Depth
Jurisdictional Depth
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
s
a
d
2.5 C
w
c_
2
1.5
1
0.5
0

10
E
0
-5
L
ar
w
L
-10
w
3
'O
-15
O
L
E
-20
-25
-30
-35
UT Pembroke MY04
Groundwater Monitoring Well #7
IBegin Growing Season
1 3/10/2011
I
n a >
End Growing Season
11/28/2011 1
1
I
I
I
� y
t
I
> >
I
1
1
1
I
1
1
I
1
z z
I
I
I
95 Days
1
I
-
N .M-
N C N
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
Ground Surface
Rainfall
0— Depth
Jurisdictional Depth
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
1
VIA.
1.
j
I
I
I
5
4.5
4
3.5
3 E
s
a
2.5 G
w
C
o -.
1.5
1
0.5
0
n a >
>
c c
on ou a
0.
> >
o
¢ ¢
z z
N :2
N .M-
N C N
M
Date
Ground Surface
Rainfall
0— Depth
Jurisdictional Depth
5
4.5
4
3.5
3 E
s
a
2.5 G
w
C
o -.
1.5
1
0.5
0

ION
5
0
° -5
s
a
-10
w
3
V
� -15
0
L
V
-20
-25
-30
-35
UT Pembroke MY04
Groundwater Monitoring Well #8
5
4.5
a
3.5
3 C
s
n.
v
2.5 D
w
c
1.5
1
0.5
0
o
N N
N
M
Date
Rainfall
Ground Surface
6 Depth
Jurisdictional Depth
5
4.5
a
3.5
3 C
s
n.
v
2.5 D
w
c
1.5
1
0.5
0

I
9°
v
9
v
a
0
d
ii
C
A W W N
O v, O to
I -Jan- II
16-Jan-I1
31- Jan -11
15- Feb -II
2 -Mar -I I
17 -Mar -11
1 -Apr -11
16- Apr -11
1- May -11
16- May -I 1
31 -May -11
15- Jun -Il
30 -Jun -11
15- Jul -I 1
30 -Jul -11
14- Aug -11
29- Aug -I1
13- Sep -11
28- Sep -11
13 -Oct -11
28 -Oct -I I
12- Nov -11
27- Nov -11
Groundwater Depth (in)
O CA O tl, O v, O
'..Jl VI VI 'Ji V1
Rainfall Depth (in)
i
O
C
� b
o c
O A
C �
� o
e�
C
I
�
s
w py
a
N �
^f
ago
w
0
0
rn
0
fl.
C7
o
N UQ
CA
�
o�
I
I
i
i
Ira
IA
C7
_ _ - -
-4-
_
'..Jl VI VI 'Ji V1
Rainfall Depth (in)
i
O
C
� b
o c
O A
C �
� o
e�
C

I
5'
9
d
m
0
a
n
O
m
i9
1- Jan -11
16 -Jan-11
31 -Jan-11
15- Feb -11
2 -Mar- I 1
17 -Mar -11
1 -Apr -11
16 -Apr -11
I -May -11
16 -May -I 1
31- May -11
15- Jun -II
30 -Jun -I I
15 -Jul -11
30- Jul -11
14- Aug -11
29- Aug -11
13- Sep -11
28- Sep -11
13 -Oct -11
28 -Oct -11
12- Nov -11
27- Nov -11
Groundwater Depth (in)
O to o to O v� O v� O to O
Ch 11� V� Cn 's
Rainfall Depth (in)
O
C
d �
Q
p O
A
O
A O
.p
O
i
I
I
w
oCLQ
N �.
O
0
ryo
co
co
0
I
I
I
II
I
H
I
j
I �
'o
00
°D C
N
O N
- -
o
d
-
Ch 11� V� Cn 's
Rainfall Depth (in)
O
C
d �
Q
p O
A
O
A O
.p
O

10
5 '
0
C_
.. -5
v
G.
O
d -10
a
3
C
-15
V
-20
-25
-30
-35
UT Pembroke MY04
Groundwater Monitoring Well #11
Begin Growing Season End Growing Season ,
3/10/2011
11/28/2011
,
1
,
1
,
1
,
N
N
147 Days
1
I
N
,
Date
Rainfall
t
,
,
—+— Depth
Jurisdictional Depth
1
I
,
,
,
5
4.5
4
3.5
r—.
3 E
s
a
w
2.5 G
e
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
N
N
M
N
N
Date
Rainfall
Ground Surface
—+— Depth
Jurisdictional Depth
5
4.5
4
3.5
r—.
3 E
s
a
w
2.5 G
e
2
1.5
1
0.5
0

10
WE
0
N
C
o, -10
ai
O
L
3 -15
'O
C
7
y -20
7i
-25
-30
-35
-40
^
UT Pembroke MY04
Groundwater Monitoring Reference Well #12
I �
I Begin Growing Season End Growing Season 1
i 3/10/2011
11/28/2011
I
1
I
1
I
1
0. ^
1 1
I 1
1
I
1
I
I
I
59 Days
L
6
I
1
- --
-
- --
.
M
1
^ N
N
1
I
Date
I
1
I
Rainfall
1
1
Ground Surface
I
1
t
1
I
I
I
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
1
1
I
1
,.C. � .—, -.. L � �,
>. >,
C G ^ ,--
b➢ tap 0.
0. ^
� > >
O O
ti .G L
L
6
V]
¢ ¢
V) O
O
z z
M ,�-, N ^ •-•
.
M
iA
CM M
^ N
N
Date
Rainfall
+ Depth
Jurisdictional Depth
Ground Surface
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
s
a
d
2.5 C
w
C_
2 a
1.5
-1
0.5
0

UT Pembroke MY04
Groundwater Monitoring Well #13
IPA
WE
0
-5
A
-]0
O
L
:3
3 -15
a
0
t7 -20
-25
-30
-35
I
Begin Growing Season End Growing Season
' 3/10/2011 11/28/2011;
I
t
l
I
t
t
I
I
t
° °
l
•- -? ii Q Q
—
Q o o O O
z z
^ ^
t
l
37 Days
I
I
Date
t
I
llllllllllllllllllllRainfall
I
Ground Surface
�
+ Depth
- Jurisdictional Depth
t
,
t
,
t
I
�
I
�
I
t
�
-40
° °
o 0
•- -? ii Q Q
—
Q o o O O
z z
^ ^
M
Date
llllllllllllllllllllRainfall
Ground Surface
+ Depth
- Jurisdictional Depth
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
r
a
2.5 C
c
2 g
1.5
-1
0.5
0

I
a
v
>v
a
0
O
S
0
d•
W W N N
v, O cn O
1 -Jan -11 -
16 -Jan -11
31 -Jan-11
15- Feb -11
2 -Mar-11
17 -Mar-11
1 -Apr -11
16- Apr -11
I - May -11
16 -May -1 I
31 -May -11
15- Jun -11
30- Jun -11
15- Jul -I 1
30- Jul -11
14- Aug -11
29- Aug -11
13- Sep -I1
28- Sep -11
13- Oct -I 1
28 -Oct -11
12- Nov -11
27- Nov -11
Groundwater Depth (in)
to O v� O to O
(!i V� ll1 lh cJl
Rainfall Depth (in)
O
C
O
d �
� y
� b
O �
o �
� O
- - --
i
i
I
- - - - -
--
-
-------
- - - - -- -
- --
- - --
- - --
N
I
O
ti
I
I
i
0
0
I
j
A
•Mi -�
�
v
I
i
m I
n.
C)
0
5•
N �
i
00 1n
N N
O ti
... O
(!i V� ll1 lh cJl
Rainfall Depth (in)
O
C
O
d �
� y
� b
O �
o �
� O

ID
3
u
C
O i
w
�a
L
0
� O
C�
3
a
a
s0,
i
(u!) 91daa Iie ;ul"
v, V, In
v'i 7 M M N N
C
O ^
N
� �
� N
C ^
C
W
I
c
y
m
3
o_
0
C ry
tD °
M
— — ---------------------------------
_
I
______
__
____ --------------
I
'
I
i
i
_
I
I
I
N
a
°
I
I
I
I
i
— — — —
II -AOM-LZ
II -AON -ZI
11- aa0-8Z
1 1-130-£ I
II-daS-8Z
I1-daS-£l
I I-8nV-6Z
II-BnV-til
I l -Inro£
II -Inf-SI
I I- unf-0£
II -unf-SI
I I-ICnW -I£
I [- ,(eW-9I
I I-XEW-I
I I-1dV-9I
I I-1dV -1
I I -JEW-L I
I I-JBW-Z
I I-9a3-S l
II-uEf-1£
11-ugf-9I
I I -ugf- I
IM W11 o v) o W)
N f l cn M
(ul) y ;dad nlempunoig
w
Q
5
a
r
v
p
c"
G
d
od
I

UT Pembroke MY04
Groundwater Monitoring Well #17
iu
5
0
-5
C
Z
-10
O
L
3 -15
b
e
0
V -20
-25
-30
-35
-40
� cad e� a, 0. �'
�• T
G G � �
CiD lift 0. 0. v U > >
u
"A
r:
M .,A, N � � ..
�p r.
M
A 6 c
N N N
Date
Rainfall
Depth
- Jurisdictional Depth
Ground Surface
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
s
a+
a
a,
2.5 C
w
e
2
1.5
1
0.5
0

UT Pembroke MY04
Groundwater Monitoring Well #18
10
W
0
-5
c
-10
O
a
3 -15
�o
C
7
V
U -20
-25
-30
Begin Growing Season End Growing Season
I 3/10/2011 11/28/2011
1 ,
Replaced Gauge
I
I
I
I
1
I
II R Replaced Gauge ,
�Rl Il ,
,
,
,
,
1
I
I
1
1
59 Days
,
,
,
,
I
I
I
,
'
'
1
I
I
I
I
,
,
,
,
I
1
1
I
I
,
I
1
I
,
'
'
I
I
I
I
,
'
'
1
-35
„ c Q Q vJ O O z Z
M N ^ ^ �6 ^ M ^ c� .M. 00 ^ 00
M N N N N
Date
11ainfal I + Depth - Jurisdictional Depth Ground Surface
5
4.5
4
3.5
3 a
a
2.5 G
w
C
2
1.5
1
0.5
0

I
s
e=
q
T
d
m
c
v
v
s
a
a
y
m
A
O
I-Jan-I I
16 -Jan -11
31 -Jan -] 1
15- Feb -11
2 -Mar- I 1
17- Mar -1 I
1- Apr -11
16- Apr -11
1- May -I 1
16- May -11
31 -May -11
15- Jun -11
30- Jun -11
15- Jul -1 1
30 -Jul -11
14- Aug -I1
29- Aug -11
13- Sep -I1
28- Sep -11
13 -Oct -11
28 -Oct -I I
12- Nov -II
27- Nov -11
Groundwater Depth (in)
O O ► N N w w 4. A in
ll� V1 ll� CA U
Rainfall Depth (in)
O
C
D
d �
� y
e9 �
a C
� O
O �
°Qs o
A
- - - -
- - - -
--
y
- - - - - - - -
- - - -
w p7
Q
oa
0
a
m
0
a
'o
y =.
N �
N �
O vwi
►- p
- - - -
- - - -
- --
O O ► N N w w 4. A in
ll� V1 ll� CA U
Rainfall Depth (in)
O
C
D
d �
� y
e9 �
a C
� O
O �
°Qs o
A

10
5
0
-5
r
-10
L
y
fl -15
C
L
U -20
-25
-30
-35
��c0.. t�0+ c0 7 7 7 N V V O O z z
M
Date
UT Pembroke MY04
Groundwater Monitoring Well #20
I Begin Growing Season End Growing Season 1
' 3/10/2011 11/28/2011 I
1 ,
1
I
' 'M'Mr�11�rArAlrjr.
I
I I
1 '
1 '
I '
I
I ,
Replaced Gauge
' 99 Days
I
,
1
'
I
1
,
'
I
1
'
I
I
1
,
,
'
I
I
I
1
,
1
,
1
,
'
I
'
1
I
'
I
'
I
I
1
'
I
,
Rainfall —e— Depth Jurisdictional Depth Ground Surface
5
4.5
4
3.5
3 5
a
ev
2.5 C
w
C
1.5
1
0.5
0

-5
C
s
-15
D
L
3
G
L -25
IS
-35
-45
b
UT Pembroke MY04
Groundwater Monitoring Well #21
Date
Rainfall —*-- Depth — Jurisdictional Depth Ground Surface
5
4.5
4
3.5
3 5
s
a
d
2.5 G
w
C
2 a
1.5
1
0.5
0
w
Q
Q
M
M
N
N
N
N
Date
Rainfall —*-- Depth — Jurisdictional Depth Ground Surface
5
4.5
4
3.5
3 5
s
a
d
2.5 G
w
C
2 a
1.5
1
0.5
0

Table 9 Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment Table
Project Number and Name 283 - UT Pembroke
Success Criteria Achieved / Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season (Percentage)
Gauge
Year 1 2008
Year 2 2009
Year 3 (2010)
Year 4 2011
No /0
No /4
No /4
No /4
Well
(0 %)
(1 5 %)
(15%)
(15%)
No /0
No /4
No /5
Yes/ 13
Well
0 %)
(15%)
(1 9 %)
(50%)
No /0
No /4
No /6
No /10
Well
(0 %)
(1 5 %)
(23%)
(3 8 %)
No /11
Yes/49
Yes/54
Yes /23
Well
(42%)
(186%)
(205%)
(87%)
No /12
Yes/46
Yes/50
Yes/ 17
Well
(46%)
(175%)
(190%)
(64%)
Yes/87
Yes /108
Yes/] 04
Yes/95
Well?
33 1%
41 1%
(395%)
(360%)
No /11
Yes/45
Yes/42
Yes/47
Well
(48%)
17 1%)
(160%)
(178%)
Yes/31
Yes/49
Yes/57
Yes/94
Well
(194%)
(186%)
(217%)
(356%)
Yes/207
Yes/110
Yes/ 103
Yes /101
Well 10
(787%)
(418%)
(392%)
(383%)
Yes/107
Yes /263
Yes/138
Yes /147
Well ll
(407%)
100 %)
(525%)
(357%)
Well 12
Yes /77
Yes/53
Yes/55
Yes/59
Reference
(293%)
(202%)
(209%)
(223%)
No /10
Yes/31
Yes/39
Yes /37
Well 13
(3 8% )
(11 8% )
(148%)
(140%)
Yes/ 174
Yes /107
Yes /133
Yes /146
Well 15
62%)
(407%)
(506%)
(553%)
Well 16
Yes/] 12
Yes/87
Yes/ 120
Yes/101
Reference
(43 %)
(33 1 %)
(456%)
(383%)
Yes/140
Yes/101
Well 17
N/A
N/A
(532%)
(383%)
Yes/63
Yes/59
Well 18
N/A
N/A
(240%)
(223%)
Yes /61
Yes/99
Well 19
N/A
N/A
(232%)
(375%)
Yes/63
Yes/99
Well 20
N/A
N/A
(240%)
(375%)
Yes /25
Yes/99
Well 21
N/A
N/A
(95%)
(375%)
UT Pembroke 56 KC/ Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 183 2011 MY04