20061291 Ver 1_Year 3 Monitoring Report_20111206

a
Timberlake Farm 06,-119
EEP RFP #16- DO6067
Year Three Monitoring Report (2010)
Great ' dY ismal Swamp RestorationBank, LLC
Submitted to NCDENR -EEP
Guy Pearce
2728 Capitol Blvd,
Suite 1H 103
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652
Momtonng by
Needham'
Environmental, Inc.
Table of Contents
ECEIVED
EEP RFP# 16 D06067 Year Three Momtormg Report, 15 November 2011
Great Dismal Swamp RestorationBank LLC by Needham Environmental Inc
DEC 0 6 2011
NC ECOSYSTEM
ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM

II
I Executive Summary - Year Three Monitoring
Page 4 of 15
A Flow Data - ISCO
Page 4 of 15
1 Water Levels
Page 4 of 15
2 Volume
Page 4 of 15
B Macro benthos
Page 4 of 15
1 Control
Page 4 of 15
2 Onsite
Page 4 of 15
C Vegetation
Page 4 of 15
II Project Background Page 5 of 15
A Location and Setting Page 5 of 15
B Project Structure - Mitigation Type Page 5 of 15
C Project History and Background Page 5 of 15
III Introduction Page 7 of 15
IV Flow Sampling
Page 7 of 15
A Materials and Methods
Page 7 of 15
B Water Levels
Page 7 of 15
1 Outlet
Page 7 of 15
2 Flicker
Page 7 of 15
C Flow Volume
Page 7 of 15
1 Outlet
Page 8 of 15
2 Flicker
Page 8 of 15
D Precipitation Recording
Page 8 of 15
1 Onsite Precipitation
Page 8 of 15
2 "Normal" Precipitation
Page 8 of 15
3 Precipitation
Page 8 of 15
V Macro benthos
Page 8 of 15
A Materials and Methods
Page 8 of 15
B Classification of Species
Page 9 of 15
C Onsite Stations
Page 9 of 15
D Reference Stations
Page 9 of 15
E Macro Benthos Results - 2010
Page 9 of 15
1 Richness
Page 9 of 15
2 Abundance
Page 9 of 15
VI Vegetation
Page
10 of 15
A Materials and Methods
Page
10 of 15
B Circular Plot
Paize
10 of 15
C Square Plots
Page
10 of 15
D Vegetation Results
Page
10 of 15
1 Planted Seedlings
Page
10 of 15
2 Invader Seedlings
Page
11 of 15
EEP RFP# 16- DO6067 Year "Three Momtormg Report 15 November 2011
Great Dismal Swamp RestorahonBank, LLC by Needham Environmental Inc

VII Conclusions (Year There Observations)
A Stream Flow
1 Water Level
2 Volume
B Macro Benthos
1 Onsite
2 Reference Stations
VIII Photos
List of Tables
Table 1 - Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 2 - Project Contact Table
Table 3 - Project Background
Table 4 - Timberlake Stream Restoration - Seedlings per Acre
List of Figures
Page 11 of 15
Page
11 of 15
Page
11 of 15
Page
11 of 15
Page
12 of 15
Page
12 of 15
Page
12 of 15
Page 12 of 15
Page 5 of 15
Page 6 of 15
Page 6 of 15
Page 11 of 15
Figure 1 - Surveyed 100' corridor in shrub scrub area Page 13 of 15
Figure 2 - 100' comdor in vicinity of Redwmg Rd Crossing Page 13 of 15
Figure 3 - Note depth of water along corridor Page 14 of 15
Figure 4 - Surveying 100'comdor for placement of Conservation Area signs
Page 14 of 15
Appendices
Appendix 1 - Species and Survival by Plot Page 15 of 15
EEP RFP# 16- D06067 Year Three Momtormg Report, 15 November 2011
Great Dismal Swamp RestorathonBank, LLC by Needham Environmental Inc Page 3 of 15

I. Executive Summary - Year Three Monitoring
A. Flow Data - ISCO
A research team from Duke University under the direction of Dr Emily Bernhardt have
been recording flows at 15 minute intervals since February 2007 They have installed four
ISCO Doppler Velocimeters, model 2680 monitors One is at the lower reach outlet and a
second 843 feet upstream of the upper reach limits, of the 5,000' RFP #16- D06067 Data
from these two flow meters will be included in annual monitoring reports to show net
outflow from the site
1 Water Levels
Duke University began recording water level and flow volume in 2006 prior to the
opening of the pump flap gates Water levels at the Outlet are generally lower than at the
Flicker Road ISCO location This indicates a slight downstream gradient winch would be
expected in a headwater system However, during periods of drought wind tides may
create back flow into the site and under those conditions the Outlet water level can be
higher than at Flicker Road
2 Volume
Timberlake is subject to wind tides The Outlet location does have more periods of
negative volume compared to Flicker which is further upstream and has less wind tide
influence Flicker readings in summer and fall 2009 were affected by a beaver dam which
was constructed on top of the ISCO flow sensor
B. Macro benthos
Mr Jeff Muehlbauer, doctoral candidate working with Dr Martin Doyle of University of
North Carolina (UNQ is sampling macro benthos at several sites at Timberlake and the
Palmetto- Peartree Preserve We include five of the stations sampled by Mr Muehlbauer
1 Control
The control stream is at Palmetto Peartree Preserve and an upstream control above the
southern pump station, two miles south of the EEP 5,000 feet of stream easement
2 Onsite
Stations onsrte are the Outlet, V8 - standing water, and 843' upstream of the upper reach
of the EEP stream easement at Flicker Road bridge crossing
C. Vegetation
Prior to the EEP contract for stream a one -tenth acre circular was established as part of
the monitoring for the MBRT This location is V8 Five additional vegetation sample
plots were installed between V8 and the Redwing Road crossing A sixth new plot was
located at the upstream end of the stream easement These six new plots are 10 meters by
10 meters Surviving seedlings are counted in these plots and converted to trees per acre
for success criteria The shrub -scrub upstream of Redwing Road was not sampled
EEP RFP# 16- DO6067 Year Three Momtonng Report, 15 November 2011
Great Dismal Swamp RestorathonBank, LLC by Needham Environmental Inc Page 4 of 15

II. Project Background
A. Location and Setting
This was fully described in the Nfitigation Plan (As -Bmlt) for RFP #16- 1304016, 8
February 2006 Section 1 C on page 1 with Figures 1 through 6 of vicinity maps and
onsite information Site is approximately 5 miles east of Columbia, Tyrrell County, south
of and adjacent to US highway 64
B. Project Structure - Mitigation Type
The entire length of stream is restoration within a former agricultural field
C. Project History and Background
Prior to submittal of mitigation proposal to EEP this site was an active MBRT approved
wetlands mitigation bank The site was purchased in 1997 by Great Dismal Swamp
RestoratronBank, LLC ( GDSRB) Restoration and monitoring activities began in 1997
prior to the award of EEP RFP #16- DO4016 (455 acres nvenne and non - nvenne) or EEP
RFP #16- 1306067 (5,000' stream) NCDOT purchased 250 credits of restored forest in
1998 Sales to COE permitted activities have occurred GDSRB Timberlake Farm
Mitigation Bank has 2,000+ possible wetland credits (in addition to the 455 acres under
contract to EEP with RFP #16- D04016), of which 1100+ are available for debiting
Table 1 - Project Activity and Reporting History
Activity (related to
RFP # 16- D06067)
Scheduled
Data Collection
Delivery
Restoration Plan
modified from MBRT approved plan
25 January 2005
Final Design
modified from MBRT approved plan
25 January 2005
Construction
began under MBRT plan
October 2004
Temporary S &E
n/a
Seedlings planted
began under MBRT plan
January 2005
AS -Built
29 October 2010
Year 1 Monitoring
December 2008
December 2008
9 November 2010
Year 2 Monitoring
December 2009
December 2009
10 May 2011
Year 3 Monitoring
December 2010
December 2010
October 2010
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2011
November 2011
Year 5 Monitoring
December 2012
EEP RFP# 16- D06067 Year Three Momtormg Report 15 November 2011
Great Dismal Swamp RestorationBank, LLC by Needham Enviromnental Inc Page 5 of 15

Table 2 - Project Contact Table
Designer
Needham Environmental, Inc
Robert N Needham
needhambud @ec rr com or 910 - 371 -6082
Construction
Vico Construction, 4001 S Military Hwy, Chesapeake, VA
Contractor
23323
Emil A Viola
Emil A Viola 757- 487 -3441
Planting Contractor
ForesTree Management Co , Inc , 4038 Flag pond Lop Rd ,
Michael Fernandez
Spring Hope, NC 27882 Phone # [phone]
Seedling Contractor
Super Tree Seedlings (International Paper), P O Box 56,
Geoffrey Hill
Belleville, Ga 30414 Phone # 877 - 8334760
Monitoring Performers
Needham Environmental, Inc , 9100 Charlestowne Rd , SE,
Wetland & Vegetation
Wmnabow, NC 28479
Herbicide Consultant
Charlotte, NC
Butch Harrison
hamson28215 @aol com
Table 3 - Project Background
Timberlake Farm Wetland Mitigation Bank - EEP RFP 416- DO4016
Project County
Tyrrell
Drainage area
Approximately 5 square miles
Impervious cover
< 1%
Physiographic Region
(Middle Atlantic) Coastal plain
Ecoregion
63b - Chesapeake - Pamhco Lowlands and tidal marshes
Cowardin Classification
Palustrme, forested, deciduous,
needle - leaved and broad - leaved
Dominant Soils
Hyde (non- nverme) and Ponzer (nvenne)
Reference Site ID
Palmetto - Peartree Preserve
USGS HUC
03010205
NCDWQ sub -basm
03 -01 -51
NCDWQ classification
SC, Sw
Any portion 303d listed
NO
% of project easement
fenced
none, but 4300 acre site within locked gate access road
EEP RFP# 16- D06067 Year Three Momtonng Report 15 November 2011
Great Dismal Swamp RestorahonBank LLC by Needham Environmental Inc Page 6 of 15

III. Introduction
Seedlings were planted in February 2005 as part of the approved MBRT restoration plan
The flap gates of the main pump station were opened and tack welded with a chain in
February 2007 The entire pump station will be excavated and removed Its continued
presence is only to provide a method of lowering water levels if an unforeseen climatic
event necessitated replanting On 24 July 2006 the MBRT for the remaining portion of
the tract approved an Implementation Plan that recognizes nvenne and stream credits on
this site, quantities to be determined through monitoring The opening of the pump flap
gates was specified in the Implementation Plan
Flow data for this stream restoration project is obtained from Dr Marcelo Ardon of Duke
University The macro benthos data is supplied by Mr Jeff Muehlbauer of UNC
Needham Environmental Inc sample vegetation and compile the data for EEP reporting
IV. Flow Sampling
A. Materials and Methods
A research team from Duke University under the direction of Dr Emily Bernhardt have
been recording flows since February 2007 They have installed four ISCO Doppler
Velocumeters, model 2680 monitors One is at the lower reach Outlet and a second, at
Flicker Road, 843 feet upstream of the upper reach limits, of the 5,000' RFP #16-
D06067 Data from these flow meters is monitored to show net outflow from the site
B. Water Levels
The ISCO meters record water depth which is converted to feet above NGVD 1929 The
data is then charted in Microsoft Excel for the Outlet and Flicker Road recording stations
The entire 100' wide EEP stream corridor has surface inundation throughout the year
1 Outlet
Highest water level at the Outlet was 3 65' on 1 October, and an earlier high water event
of 3 54' on 6 February Lowest level was 127' on 31 July and an annual average of 2 06',
compared to 0 72' in 2008 The average water level for 2010 was 2 12'
2 Flicker
Flicker had a high of 2 92' on 8 February and a later high water event of 2 71' on 4
October Lowest level was 0 71' on 10 August Flicker Road water level average for
2010 was 179' (Chart 1)
C. Flow Volume
The volume of water movement is also recorded by the ISCO meters This data is
supplied by Dr Ardon and is based on cubic meters Periods of wind tide moving into the
site are indicated by negative volume
EEP RFP# 16- DO6067 Year Three Momtonng Report, 15 November 2011
Great Dismal Swamp RestorahonBank, LLC by Needham Environmental Inc Page 7 of 15

1 Outlet
Greatest flow offsite at the Outlet was 46,49 cubic meters (m3) on 14 March The site is
subject to wind tides which cause flows into the site through the culvert under Timberlake
Road Days of rising wind tides result in negative discharge On 10 January, a volume of
-572m3 occurred Average discharge at the Outlet during 2010 was 2,973 m3
2 Flicker
The greatest discharge at Flicker was 22,754 m3 on 8 October Average discharge was
828 m3 (Chart 2) No negative flows were recorded at Flicker Road during 2010
D. Precipitation Recording
1 Onsite Precipitation
Each of the five ISCO's located onsite has a ram gauge Dr Ardon takes the daily rainfall
from all five ISCO's and averages for onsite precipitation This information is provided to
Needham Environmental Inc in an Excel file along with water level and flow volume data
2 "Normal' Precipitation
Long term precipitation data was provided by the State Climate Office from the Plymouth
Research Station The most recent 30 years monthly rainfall data was analyzed to
determine the monthly 30 and 70 percentiles In a statistically "normal" year, 30% of the
months would be drier than "normal", 30% of the months wetter than "normal", and 40%
within the "normal" range
3 Precipitation
Rainfall for 2010 was 55 54" at Plymouth April, June, November and December were
drier than the dry 30 percentile January, February, March, May, September, and October
were wetter than the wet 30 percentile July and August were average (Chart 3)
V. Macro benthos
A. Materials and Methods
Collect macro invertebrates quarterly (Mar, Jun, Sept, Dec) using a modification of a
method developed by the NC DWQ for sampling swamp biota (aptly named the "Swamp
Protocol ") Method involves standing at a fixed point on the bank and sampling everything
that can reach with a 4'D-frame net, mesh size 500 micron This includes the channel
sediment, bank vegetation, and water column Netted samples are then put in a tray and
field - picked until my picking rate is slower than 1 individual per minute, for a maximum of
30 person - minutes (e g 30 minutes for 1 person, or 15 minutes each for 2 people) This is
what DWQ calls "semi- quantitative sampling," as it is fairly accurate at getting a
representative sample of the site, richness, and relative abundance, but produces somewhat
ambiguous true abundance and density data Keep the specimens in 95% ethanol, and
count and ID them in the lab Most identifications are to the genus level, with some
exceptions Determine a specimens "nvenne affinity" based largely on expert opinion and
habitat tables from Merritt, Cummins, & Berg's (2008) "Introduction to the Aquatic
Insects of North America," which is the standard key for benthologists These tables
EEP RFP# 16 D06067 Year Three Monitoring Report 15 November 2011
Great Dismal Swamp RestorationBank LLC by Needham Environmental Inc Page 8 of 15

include genus - specific data on distributions and habitat preferences, based on published
accounts (The above is from Mr Jeff Muehlbauer of UNC, the individual collecting and
analyzing the macro benthos data)
B. Classification of Species
Mr Muehlbauer rates the collected species into three categories These are species
indicative of flowing water, species associated with standing water, and total of all
species, which includes both flowing and standing water species along with species that
have no stream or water classification association
C. Onsite Stations
Three collection stations are associated with the EEP stream easement and contract
These are Outlet, where the stream discharges through a Thigh X 11' wide culvert under
Timberlake Road, V8, an area of open water associated with an MBRT sample plot, and
Flicker, a tunber matt bridge on Flicker Road where the ISCO is located 843' upstream of
the end of the EEP 5,00 foot stream easement These three sample locations are from
downstream to upstream along the stream corridor
D. Reference Stations
A sluggish black water outer coastal plain stream sampled by Mr Muehlbauer on the
Palmetto - Peartree Preserve has been used as a control or reference station for flowing
water habitat A second control was located in the agricultural canal upstream of the
Timberlake Mitigation bank site This site represents the pre - restoration stream conditions
of the mitigation bank Charts of the richness and abundance have the three onsrte stations
plotted in between the reference stream and the agricultural canal The onsrte stations are
solid bars and the reference or control stations are hatched
E. Macro Benthos Results - 2010
1 Richness
Flowing water species were found at all five collection stations Palmetto - Peartree (0 25)
V8 (0 33), Outlet (100), Flicker (1 00) and the Farm Canal (0 75) Note the two onsrte
flowing water stations (Outlet and Flicker) had the highest number of species associated
with flowing waters
Standing water species Richness was greatest at Palmetto (2 8) The Outlet, V8 and
Flicker were (10, 0 7 and 2 8) respectively The farm canal was 0 8 Total species was
greatest at Flicker (6 0) followed by Outlet (5 3) (Chart 4)
2 Abundance
Following water species abundance was greatest at Outlet (7 50) and Flicker (5 75)
Flowing water species were lowest at V8 (0 67) and Palmetto (1 0)
EEP RM I &D06067 Year Three Monitoring Report, 15 November 2011
Great Dismal Swamp RestorationBank LLC by Needham Environmental Inc Page 9 of 15

Standing water species were greatest at Flicker (10 3 ) and Outlet (6 3) Total of all
species was Outlet (32 0), Palmetto (25 3), Flicker (22 8), Farm Canal (8 3), and least at
V8 (1 7)(Chart 5)
VI. Vegetation
A. Materials and Methods
A pre - constructed square was made of polypropylene rope with a diagonal section to
assure a square sample plot A stainless steel ring was in each comer which could be
slipped over a section of 5/8'h inch re-bar which permanently mark the comers of each
plot The re-bar is over one foot long, driven to near soil surface, and when herbaceous
vegetation invades could be located with a survey pin finder
The site received herbicide treatment during 2005 and 2006 The reduction in herbaceous
competition for the first two growing seasons allowed rapid growth of the planted
seedlings The lower elevation areas along the stream corridor were allowed to establish
before the cessation of pumping activities Seedlings would have drown without pumping
B. Circular Plot
The vegetation plot closest to the Outlet was previously sampled as part of the MBRT
restoration plan This plot, V8, is a one -tenth acre circular plot Rather than reduce the
size of that plot it was decided to continue sampling as a circular plot and surviving
seedlings are converted to seedlings per acre
C. Square Plots
Six additional vegetation sample plots were added along the stream corridor These are
evenly spaced and the location was determined by the surveyor prior to establishment in
the field to avoid human bias These square plots are labeled SW1 -SW6 SW6 is
upstream, south, of the shrub -scrub area between Redwing Road and Flicker Road
Following discussions with EEP staff, it was agreed not to sample the shrub -scrub area as
it was vegetated and not planted with seedlings during MBRT restoration
D. Vegetation Results
The fall of 2010 was the sixth year since seedlings were planted The pump was
operational for the 2005 -2006 growing seasons to prevent drowning of the young
seedlings The pump was turned off and the flap gates opened in February 2007
1 Planted Seedlings
Bald cypress, Taxodium dtstichum, was dominant with 308 seedlings per acre Swamp
tupelo, Nyssa sylvathca var biflora, was second at 27 seedlings per acre and water tupelo,
N aquatica, at 9 per acre There was no change from the previous year Survival criteria
for the fifth year was 260 seedlings per acre 2010 was year six after planting and we do
not have a projection for survival after year five The year five minimum was exceeded by
83 seedlings per acre Species and numbers for each of the seven plots are in Appendix 1
EEP RFP# 16- D06067 Year Three Momtormg Report, 15 November 2011
Great Dismal Swamp RestorationBank LLC by Needham Envuomnental Inc Page 10 of 15

Table 4 - Timberlake Stream Restoration - Seedlings per Acre
Species
In planted
pots
fall
2005
fall
2006
fall
2007
fall
2008
fall
2009
fall
2010
# of plots
1
1
1
1
7
7
7
Taxodium distichum
170
170
170
170
325
308
308
Nyssa aquatica
180
180
120
100
14
9
9
N sylvatica var biflora
220
220
210
210
47
27
27
Salix nigra
10
10
0
0
0
0
0
Total
580
580
500
480
387
343
343
# of seedlings
planned/survival criteria
681
450
400
320
290
260
260
Seedlings in excess
of success criteria
130
100
160
97
83
83
2 Invader Seedlings
None of the stream plots had any invader species in 2009 or 2010, the third year of
monitoring for stream corridor vegetation success criteria The permanent surface water
within the 100' stream corridor likely precludes establishment of any invading species
VII. Conclusions (Year There Observations)
A. Stream Flow
1 Water Level
The upstream Flicker site, usually had a lower water elevation than the Outlet site (Chart
1) The ISCO sensor may need to be re- surveyed due to the removal of the beaver dam in
2009
Table 5 - Annual Water Elevation Comparison (most recent three years)
Water elevation
in feet
Maxunum
Average
Minimum
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
Outlet
208
3 92
3 65
072
206
212
-066
108
127
Flicker
1 2 51
1 3 47
1 2 71
117
1 2 11
1 179
015
1 135
1 071
2 Volume
Greatest flows were after periods of heavy precipitation Negative flows result when
water was pushed into the site from Timberlake Canal during rising water events
associated with wind tides on Albemarle Sound Observations by Dr Ardon and Mr
Needham may indicate local wind tides within the mitigation bank itself where there are
EEP RFP# 16 -D06M7 Year Turee Monitoring Report, 15 November 2011
Great Dismal Swamp RestorationBank, LLC by Needham Environmental Inc Page 11 of 15

large areas of shallow water During the early years, when the seedlings were smaller,
wind was observed to create a localized wind tide on site This was also observed by Mr
Kevin Miller formerly of EEP when onsrte with Mr Needham and conducting a dye test
B. Macro Benthos
1 Onsite
Three onsrte sampling stations, with Flicker having the greatest combined species richness
Flicker, and Outlet are similar in species Richness to Palmetto control station
2 Reference Stations
The farm canal (a control station) has the lowest Richness of any of the five stations
VIII. Photos
The captions of the following images are self explanatory
EEP RFP# 16- D06067 Year Three Momtormg Report 15 November 2011
Great Dismal Swamp RestorathonBank, LLC by Needham Environmental Inc Page 12 of 15

Figure 1 - Surveyed 100' corridor in shrub scrub area
Figure 2 - 100' corridor in vicinity of Redwing Rd. Crossing
EEP RFP# 16- D06067, Year Tbree Monitoring Report, 15 November 2011
Great Dismal Swamp RestorationBank, LLC. by Needham Environmental Inc. Page 13 of 15

Figure 3 - Note depth of water along corridor
Figure 4 - Surveying 100'corridor for placement of Conservation Area signs
EEP RFP# 16- D06067, Year Three Monitoring Report, 15 November 2011
Great Dismal Swamp RestorationBank, LLC. by Needham Environmental Inc. Page 14 of 15

Appendix 1 - Species planted and survival by stems per plot (no mortality since 2009)
Surviving Seedlings per plot
Surviving Seedlings per acre
Plot
Species
Planted
2005
2006
2007
Year
one
2008
Year
two
2009
Year
three
2010
Planted
2005
2006
2007
Year
one
2008
Year
two
2009
Year
three
2010
Original MBRT One -Tenth Acre Circular Plot
V8
Taxodium distichum
17
17
17
17
17
17
170
170
170
170
170
170
170
Nyssa aquatica
18
18
12
10
10
6
170
170
120
100
100
60
60
Nyssa sylvatica v biflora
22
22
21
21
21
15
220
220
210
210
210
150
150
Salix mgra
1
1
1 0
1 0
1 0
0
10
10
0
0
0
0
0
EEP stream 10 Meter X 10 Meter square plots installed 2008 after RFP
SW 1
Taxo&um distichum
12
12
486
405
405
SW2
Taxodium distichum
7
7
283
283
283
SW3
Taxodium distichum
9
8
364
324
324
SW4
Taxodium distichum
9
9
364
364
364
SW5
Taxodium distichum
9
9
364
364
364
Nyssa sylvatzca v biflora
2
1
81
40
40
SW6
Taxodium disuchum
6
6
243
243
243
Nyssa sylvahca r b {flora
1
1
40
0
0
Average Stems per Acre for all Seven Plots
570
570
500
480
386
343
343
EEP RFP# 16- D06067 Year Three Monitoring Report 15 November 2011
Great Dismal Swamp RestorationBank LLC by Needham Environmental Inc Page 15 of 15

4.50
W
a
t 3.50
e
r
L
e
e 2.50
1
I
n
F
e 1.50
e
t
Timberlake 2010 Stream Water level
M Rainfall (inches)
— Flicker Rd Level
+Outflow Level
3?7
3.54
0.50 , - 1, ■J _.'F IJL_ 1■ L 'p1 LP p 0r-'.ML 1 M _ 1 1 L 1
f�0 f�8 d dd,$ �Af 9�ry Pp ftb 4/ ✓pI
EEP RFP#16- D06067, year3 monitoring, October 2011
Great Dismal Swamp restoration Bank, LLC, by Needham Environmental Inc.
tt 3.65
1 - - - - - -- - - -- ----- . - - - -- -
Y - 2.71
- -- - -- ----------------------- - - - - --
120 !1? !0 2Q cP, 12 s
Oil
LJ 1 .�1 . 1M 0.00
Oil 00
Chart 1 of 5

50000
40000
D
i
s
c
h 30000
a
r
9
e 20000
1-1
m
3
/ 10000
d
a
y
0
1 -572
46499
Timberlake 2010 Flow Volumes
M Rainfall (inches)
--- Flicker Rd-Q (m3 /day)
— Outflow -Q (M3 /day)
t 42943
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- ---- - - - - --
3.27 22754
---------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - -•- -1 - - --
■.0 1 � .
-10000 ■
I f lJ. f 29 f ✓2� 2�� XA "'P f f J6. f -1Q f
EEP RFP #16- D06067, year 3 monitoring, October 2011
Great Dismal Swamp RestorationBank LLC, by Needham Environmental Inc.
-111 �
- •'A - 0r - 0.00
NC no dnc
Chart 2 of 5

14
I
n 12
c
h
e
s 10
0
f
8
P
r
e
c 6
i
p
a 4
t
i
0
n 2
0
Timberlake 2010 Precipitation
® Plymouth 2010 ® Onsite 2010
— 1980 -2009 dry 30% — 1980 -2009 wet 30%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5.9 5.98 5.61
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- ------- - - - - -- -- - - - - --
5.26 5.57
EL4.24
0 14.34
3.81
--------------------- - - - - -- ------------------- 3.6 ------------------------
09
2.62
2.11
13.04 13.91
5.39
4.95 4.83 �5.1
------ --------------------------- — --------
1.41 1.29 1.42
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
EEP RFP # 16- D06067, year 3 monitoring, October 2011
Great Dismal Swamp RestorationBank LLC, by Needham Environmental Inc. Chart 3 of 5

8
6
t 4
a
x
a
2
2010 Richness
39 Flowing water species
Standing water species
® Total all species
6.0
----------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- - .- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- - - -- - -- ----------------------
5.3
5.0
1
EMN E \ 1 1
o NXXMI ii o NN,�iiiii
Palmetto Outlet V8
EEP RFP #I 6-DO6067, year 3 monitoring, October 2011
Great Dismal Swamp RestorationBank, LLC., by Needham Environmental Inc.
Flicker Farm cana
Chart 4of5

40
30
u.�
I
n
d
i
v 20
i
d
u
a
10
0
2010 Abundance
NK Flowing Water Species
/ Standing water species
® Total all species
32.0
--------------------------------------- - - - - -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
25.3
22.8
10.3
-------------------- - - - - -- j -------------------- - - - - - --
8.3
7.50
5.8 5.75
2.75
1.7 1.3
1.00 0.67 0.7
Palmetto Outlet V8
EEP RFP# 16- D06067, year 3 monitoring, October 2011
Great Dismal Swamp RestorationBank LLC., by Needham Environmental Inc.
Flicker Farm cana
Chart 5 of 5

— — PARCEL 1 A I
L7
SW
KS01 � � CREP SITE I
LENGTH
to80.
�i \ =25 f ACRES
PARCEL 2
/ \ MAP BY TIMOTHY J E80LEN FOR I
WOODLAND CREP SITE
LAST REVISED DATE FES GS 2002
NEW 100 STREAM GREAT DISMAL SWAMP RESTORA71ONBA K LLC I
RESTORATION EASEMENT \\ DJB 181 Po a
�A. ACRES
MAP BY TTIMOTIIAY JJ ESOLEN FOR
S3449 21 yl
Total Area =11 385 Acres \ I
LAST REVISED DATE FES 05 2002
OREATDISMALSWAMP RESTORATIONS" LLC
S20 W53 IN
HATCHED AREA NO SEEDLINGS PLANTED EXISTING SHRUSISCRU6 \ I
\
\
\
D.B. 181 PO 6
NOTE. EASEMENT LINE L14 SET 40 OFFSET AND
L13 \ I
PARALLEL TO POLLEN ROM CENTERLINE 70 BE CLEAR
115;-90
WOODLAND j\ N U�1 \ \
OF L783iTID POWER LINES
432.10
D L3 \ \ rt 10 DILON(TIMBERLAKE) ROM
L7
25326
\
LB
10900
= 300
TIMBERLAKE CANAL V0. ELECTRIC i POWER
29468
GREAT DISMAL SWAMP RESTORATIONBANK LLC
SW e
\ \ POLE LINE EASEMENT
N
DB 181 PO e
121093
D'a P
L12
3 044 19 NACRES �
AREA SUBJECT TO RAYS y
PE
8W1 \ NO Wm'TFI SPECIFIED
` \ 140 tD
14 LINES INSIDE DILON RD RAY
��I I
I
II
I
�I
& I�
� I5
2II2
I
�I
v.
LB
J H!
100 EASEMENT BOUNDARY
LINE TABLE
L7
SW
LINE
LENGTH
BEARING
LI
10000
1MNLL UN�MdISTED 05 PRE015ION LEICI A LESS THAI
L2
242.378
S3449 21 yl
L3
2e
S20 W53 IN
L4
302 e
LD
115;-90
S27"14 3V`E
Le
432.10
S5Mj 45E
L7
25326
S7470 43*E
LB
10900
= 300
L9
29468
7 4
LID
466 e4
N
01
121093
L12
340 34
L13
340 34
L14
243033
I �I
(� I°
' /E)QSTtK712827 AC RE CONSERVATIONp
JEA4EMEM DESCR®ED IN D9 211 PD 926 I w
AND PLAT RECORDED IN P C. C PAGE 245 a
N THE TYRRELL COUNTY REGISTRY
TO BE VACATED BY THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
100 EASEMENT BOUNDARY POINTS
N �A�p�L�Z�'�ET�K
AN ��N 7.0071 UIBR
D
�O CES 6�HRWE,C 0910" D831
04.015, H
\ 9VI3 \
L7
SW
\
\ \
\
\
\ OUTLET
BW 1 \ ISCp
\
\
\
\
1MNLL UN�MdISTED 05 PRE015ION LEICI A LESS THAI
w 'C�NRJC„N°
1 W.
`.1004
s 1
rrF w�`
WESTERN BOUNDARY OF
Ly�
EEP SITE EASEMENT AREA 1
453 ACRES
P C. IV SLD 156
GREAT DISMAL SWAMP RE8TORATIONBANK, LLC
planning puMose5 only and Is not for
DO 151 PG.1
recordetbn kT the . ; Registry
301119 }ACRES
10/25/2010 REV 12/0912010
AREA SUBJECT TO RWS
FEET NOTES
1 PRO501TY BOUNDARIES 94CM ARE GRATA FROM UNRECORDED YAP
PWARED BY ROAMOMC LAND SM0INO "SURVEY FOR TA GREAT
OSMAL S91MP R61ORATON BANK, LLC DA10 NMORE9 15 2004
THE 9AVEVOR OERWO THE NALCY OF THE EASEMMT AREA ONLY
2. TNIS MAP 15 NOT A 9ADMSON OF 1LE LAIM SDNI EAMWff O
ORATED TO ENCOMPASS SPECIFIC LAID FEAT IR I AS RMIESM BY TIE
LAIDOWGR FOR EMwADME1TA1. AID 0DK=VATLON PIRPOSM
7 TM E4E821' 15 CREATED TO BE FUDIE NLID N A D® OF EANIOT
4 IV 9M MALE ®I PLACID Ai ALL ANO.E PONT5
ARID ALOMO 11R EASDNnr Umn As RECd7ARY
LEGEND
O EAEOMT ANOE PONT (No 1 RRBAR SM
N DIEING MONMENTAYM FOUND (A9 NOTED)
EXISTING ROAOMY CONTRUE (IMIPROLED)
en "NO TRTOI DI CANAL
ESSTEW EASEMENT BOUNDARES
NEW EASEMENT BO NUMEES
Daw we
o SW 1 5EGATAROI IiAMME PLOT NTH DEMARCATION TAO
I
GREAT DISMAL SWAMP RESTORATIONS IK LLC
D B 181 PG 6
304119 LACRES
AREA SUBJECT TO WAS
I
I
I
EJOBTING 39 IRON PIPE WITH CAP
PARCEL CORNER
CONTROL. MONUMENT
KC GRID COORDINATES
N 801,478,42
E 2 841 0/1 73
>o
O/ \ Deer
\
hTO�OB R�\
III
V40ODLAM
I�
I
I
Ecosyl t
VICINITY MAP
Nor TO SCALE
U TTLE
ALLIGATOR
RIVER \
COLL40A
SECOND
>IREP,
GEO
GEODETIC SERVICES PC
321 CLEVELMD PL SCALE +eoDP EXHIBIT SHOWING VEGATATION SAMPLE PLOTS WITHIN 11 385 ACRE CONSERVATION EASEMENT Alligator Township Tyrrell County 02710488
l SERVICES ( Nee VA. 21104 R r MAP CABINET C SLIDE 338 for Great Dismal Swamp Restoradonbank LLC I North CaroEna H
I OF 1
1 RU55E1 C SANDERON CLITIPT THAT TIM TUT DO DRAIN ODei MY
=O`� �
Nsupm9y[Dy1EDFRAM ANNpAACIVALL SURIWY MADE WNDMER MY RFERMON
TONDIFPNBiENM0n41
°PAOENL®
`�y9
SEALS
TE Di0 OOOROMARD a iAE WDw�
ev TNsA
0P0 OB6FAVATlGfS IISRNG 7MRri COCA 91030 ROmLWE TIE %Irr S ELTE
L
1MNLL UN�MdISTED 05 PRE015ION LEICI A LESS THAI
w 'C�NRJC„N°
1 W.
`.1004
C SAN
TARS PLAT US PREDARM N ACOMIDANLS NTH Q%47 30 AS APPLICABLE AND
N AYEIDED NTIRR MY OIEWM. 9OIATIRR, NEOETIIATOI 1RAIBEI
MID SEAL TARS 2DW DAY OF OCTOBER 2010
COfINCATDN ON IM6 DATE APPLES ONLY TO ADDITION OF iEGATATIOI SAMPLE PLOT!
TD OEG NAL DOWLRNT RD=ROED A MAP CABINET C SIDE IX
This exhlblt was produced for review and
RUSSELL C SANDEREON q3 L -2195
NOOITIFIED AS TO Mr."M 7 , RAE 2011
planning puMose5 only and Is not for
recordetbn kT the . ; Registry
GRAPHIC SCALE
10/25/2010 REV 12/0912010
0 300 Soo
900 1200 R
= 300
I, 4 ,,W r e w NA. WMAv>A r.el .. the 4WIISAg1Ri or
IWO" PmoMa iwl -vAw4d 4IPM7 a oM 4.Mtk. 1
REMS® 7 Jim 2M1 AM TO LEGEND
er 4Rb~ of W APWSIM
1 PRO501TY BOUNDARIES 94CM ARE GRATA FROM UNRECORDED YAP
PWARED BY ROAMOMC LAND SM0INO "SURVEY FOR TA GREAT
OSMAL S91MP R61ORATON BANK, LLC DA10 NMORE9 15 2004
THE 9AVEVOR OERWO THE NALCY OF THE EASEMMT AREA ONLY
2. TNIS MAP 15 NOT A 9ADMSON OF 1LE LAIM SDNI EAMWff O
ORATED TO ENCOMPASS SPECIFIC LAID FEAT IR I AS RMIESM BY TIE
LAIDOWGR FOR EMwADME1TA1. AID 0DK=VATLON PIRPOSM
7 TM E4E821' 15 CREATED TO BE FUDIE NLID N A D® OF EANIOT
4 IV 9M MALE ®I PLACID Ai ALL ANO.E PONT5
ARID ALOMO 11R EASDNnr Umn As RECd7ARY
LEGEND
O EAEOMT ANOE PONT (No 1 RRBAR SM
N DIEING MONMENTAYM FOUND (A9 NOTED)
EXISTING ROAOMY CONTRUE (IMIPROLED)
en "NO TRTOI DI CANAL
ESSTEW EASEMENT BOUNDARES
NEW EASEMENT BO NUMEES
Daw we
o SW 1 5EGATAROI IiAMME PLOT NTH DEMARCATION TAO
I
GREAT DISMAL SWAMP RESTORATIONS IK LLC
D B 181 PG 6
304119 LACRES
AREA SUBJECT TO WAS
I
I
I
EJOBTING 39 IRON PIPE WITH CAP
PARCEL CORNER
CONTROL. MONUMENT
KC GRID COORDINATES
N 801,478,42
E 2 841 0/1 73
>o
O/ \ Deer
\
hTO�OB R�\
III
V40ODLAM
I�
I
I
Ecosyl t
VICINITY MAP
Nor TO SCALE
U TTLE
ALLIGATOR
RIVER \
COLL40A
SECOND
>IREP,
GEO
GEODETIC SERVICES PC
321 CLEVELMD PL SCALE +eoDP EXHIBIT SHOWING VEGATATION SAMPLE PLOTS WITHIN 11 385 ACRE CONSERVATION EASEMENT Alligator Township Tyrrell County 02710488
l SERVICES ( Nee VA. 21104 R r MAP CABINET C SLIDE 338 for Great Dismal Swamp Restoradonbank LLC I North CaroEna H
I OF 1