20041612 Ver 1_Year 4 Monitoring Report_20120103

.. ..... ...
Fft

Executive Summary
The Meredell Farm Stream Restoration project falls within USGS hydrologic unit 03030003
The project lies within a rural setting that includes agricultural, forested, and low density
residential areas The project is located on Meredell Farm, a small farm operation that includes
dairy and row crop production Prior to restoration work, the project stream had been
historically destabilized through channelization and hoof -shear
L_ Baker Engineering designed the restoration plans and restoration was completed in 2008
Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc (KHA) began the stream and riparian monitoring for Meredell
- Farms in 2008 and most recently completed Year 4 stream and riparian monitoring in October
2011
The goal of the project is to restore and improve the stream channel and riparian buffer form and
function on -site through the following objectives
• Restore 3,865 LF of channel dimension, pattern and profile
• Enhance 4,704 LF of channel dimension, and /or profile
• Preserve 5,136 LF of stream channel and riparian buffer
• Improve floodplain functionality by matching floodplam elevation with bankfull stage
• Establish native stream bank and floodplam vegetation in the permanent conservation
easement
• Improve the water quality in the Upper Cape Fear River watershed by fencing cattle out
of the stream and reducing bank erosion
KHA performed stream and riparian monitoring in the fall of 2011 for this Year 4 Monitoring
Report During the monitoring process KHA assessed twelve (12) vegetation quads Seven (7)
of the twelve (12) plots met or exceeded the success criteria of 320 stems /acre (minimum stem
count after 5 years) Areas of isolated non - native /invasive species were located along UT1, M1,
UT3, and UT4
A visual assessment and geomorphic survey were completed for the site, and indicated that the
majority of the project reaches were performing within established success criteria ranges, as
shown below Morphology monitoring includes ten (10) cross sections and four (4) longitudinal
profile segments Channel stability assessment includes the entire restored length of the project
Wracklines were present in the floodplam and the crest gauge indicated that a bankfull event
occurred during this monitoring period
Stream Success Criteria (from approved Restoration Plan 2004)
• Cross - Sections
o There should be little or no change in as -built cross - sections from year to year If
changes do take place, they should be evaluated to determine if they represent a
movement toward a more unstable condition (e g down - cutting, erosion) or are
minor changes that represent an increase in stability (e g settling, vegetative
changes, deposition along the banks, decrease in width/depth ratio and /or cross -
sectional area)
Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011 — Year 4 of 5 can = k

• Longitudinal Profile
o The longitudinal profile data should show that the bedform features are remaining
stable, and are not aggrading or degrading The pools should remain deep with
flat water surface slopes and the riffle should remain steep and shallow
Summary information/data related to performance of various project and monitoring elements
can be found in the table and figures in the report appendices Narrative background and
supporting information formerly found in these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring
Reports (formerly Mitigation Plan) and in the Mitigation Plan (formerly the Restoration Plan)
documents available on EEP's website All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the
appendices is available from EEP upon request
Methodology
• Surveys/topographic data collections were performed using total station, survey grade
GPS, or equivalent such that each survey point has three - dimensional coordinates, and is
georeferenced (NAD83 -State Plane Feet — FIPS3200)
• Longitudinal stationing was developed using the as -built survey thalweg as a baseline
• The particle size distribution protocol used was the Modified - Wolman pebble count
• CVS level 2 was used as the vegetation plot methodology
} References
Rosgen, David L 1996 Applied River Morphology, Second Edition, Wildland Hydrology,
Pagosa Springs, Colorado
Lee, Michael T, Peet, Robert K, Roberts, Steven D, Wentworth, Thomas R 2006 CVS -EEP
Protocol for Recording Vegetation, All Levels of Sampling, Version 4 0,
Environmental Laboratory 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual Technical
Report Y -87 -1 United States Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg,
Mississippi LeGrand HE and S P Hall
i - Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011 — Year 4 of 5 Can naitsodra, un

�1
' I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
APPENDIX A - PROJECT VICINITY AND BACKGROUND TABLES
FIGURE 1
PROJECT VICINITY MAP
TABLE 1
PROJECT COMPONENTS AND MITIGATION CREDITS
TABLE 2
PROJECT ACTIVITY AND REPORTING HISTORY
TABLE 3
PROJECT CONTACTS TABLE
TABLE 4
PROJECT ATTRIBUTE TABLE
APPENDIX B - VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA
FIGURE 2 CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW UPPER
FIGURE 3 CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW LOWER
TABLE 5 1 -5 4 VISUAL STREAM MORPHOLOGY STABILITY ASSESSMENT
TABLE 6 VEGETATION CONDITION ASSESSMENT
APPENDIX C - VEGETATION PLOT DATA
TABLE 7 VEGETATION PLOT CRITERIA ATTAINMENT
TABLE 8 CVS VEGETATION PLOT METADATA
TABLE 9 PLANTED AND TOTAL STEM COUNTS (SPECIES BY PLOT WITH ANNUAL
MEANS)
l _ Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011 — Year 4 of 5 Carr a+Nmdmn m
APPENDIX D - STREAM SURVEY DATA
n
I
STREAM SURVEY DATA
TABLE 9
PLANTED AND TOTAL STEM COUNTS
TABLE 10A 1 -10A 2
BASELINE STREAM DATA SUMMARY
TABLE lOB 1 -1013 2
BASELINE STREAM DATA SUMMARY
�^
TABLE 1 1 A
DIMENSIONAL MORPHOLOGY SUMMARY
TABLE 1 113 1 -1113 2
STREAM REACH DATA SUMMARY
r'
APPENDIX E - HYDROLOGIC DATA
l
TABLE 12
VERIFICATION OF BANKFULL EVENTS
l _ Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011 — Year 4 of 5 Carr a+Nmdmn m

APPENDIX A
PROJECT VICINITY MAP AND
BACKGROUND TABLES

LEGENDS AND SYMBOLS E Directions to the site: Take US -64 West towards Asheboro.
Turn right onto US-421 North. Take the Old Liberty Rd exit,
- - - - Easement Boundary turn left. Turn right on Ramseur Julian Rd, the site will be
on the left in 0.8 miles.
As -Built Centerline
NCDOT Roads (2011)
Sift Access
­10 _ . .
N 0 500 1,000
A Feet
1 in = 1,000 ft
Title I Project Vicinity Map
Prepared For: Project Meredell Farm Stream Restoration Monitoring Year 4 - 2011
Randolph County, North Carolina
Date Project Number Figure
!stem
�' 11 1;11 �l'illl7li 12/19/11 247 1
Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011 - Year 4 of 5 CM^ KMnlay-Horn
and AsaocWm Inc.

t I
J
Meredell Farm Morntonng Report (247) 2011 -Year 4 of 5 r, 2n "=m
Table 1 Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Meredell Farm Stream Restoration S1te1247
IAM9a11 C edit
St
m
R pe
Wt! d
N p W S d
BM
N t N tr 1.111 t
Ph ph
Off t Nutr t
yp
R
RE
R
RE
R
RE
Idt 3V V%4
t 1
57855
$134
P J tC mp t
P l ct C mpo t R
h ID
St b to 0
E. t q F taga/A q
APP (PI P" W)
R Rat t tr t
Eq I t
R s <
0 F t fl
A fl
M tq 0 R 0
tH 1
10~00 21 00
1050
Ell
1100
2 5 1
Ut tb
21 00 2a 60
671
R
780
101
ut2
10-00 18 00
800
El
Soo
151
Ut 21,
18 00 20 84
205
R
294
1 01
M7
10+00 32 54
2103
181
R
2254
101
ut 3.
10-00 15 50
400
1 EJ1
550
2 5 1
Ut 3b
16 50 20 79
836
R
429
101
Ut4
10-00 19 13
913
EII
913
251
ut 5
10-00 20+75
1075
E M
1075
2 5 1
M2
NA
1398
P
1395
5 01
S dy Cr k 1
NA
1033
P
1033
501
S dy C—k 2
NA
801
P
801
501
S. dy C eek 3
NA
1902
P
1902
501
C mPo is mm U
R D U L I
St m
(I f t)
R p Wtl d
( )
N pe Wtl d
( )
Buff
( q f t)
Upt d
( )
R
N R
R et 0
3757
322 000
E h m t
498 000
E h m t 1
800
7
A r
f'1
t )
r
E h m t II
3738
i
C e
P ry e
5134
P rvt
BMP El m t
m t
L cat
P po /F ct
N tee
IS
BR B t t C II SF S d F It SW St mw 1 W b d WDP W t D t t P d DDP Dry D 1 t P d FS F It St p S G m d Swat LS L
I Sp d NI N to I I f h t A
FB F at d B ff
Meredell Farm Morntonng Report (247) 2011 -Year 4 of 5 r, 2n "=m

J
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Meredell Farm Stream Restoration Site /247
Elapsed Time Since Grading Complete 3 yrs 7 months
Elapsed Time Since Planting Complete 3 yrs 6 Months
Number of Reporting Years' 4
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
Sept 04
Final Design — Construction Plans
Mar 06
Construction
NA
Mar 08
Containenzed bare root and B&B plantings
NA
Apr 08
As built Mapping
Nov 07
Apr 08
Mitigation Plan ear 0 Monitoring basline
Year 1 Monitoring
Nov 08
Jun 09
Year 2 Monitoring
Sep 09
Jun 10
ear 3 Monitoring
Oct 10
Mar 11
Year4 Monitoring
Oct 11
ear 5 Monitoring
As -built plan view survey performed by Level Cross Surveying PLLC (No As built monitoring data was collected or reported)
Bolded items are examples of those items that are not standard but may come up and should be included
Non bolded items represent events that are standard components over the course of a typical project
The above are obviously not the extent of potential relevant project activities but are just provided as example as part of this exhibit
if planting and morphology are on split monitoring schedules that should be made dear in the table
l 1 = Equals the number of reports or data points produced excluding the baseline
�_ I
=FJ
Meredeil Farm Mon to ng Report (247) 2011 — Year 4 of 5 and Assockwt°°' ilia

1
I 1
J
Table
3 Project Contacts Table
Meredell
Farm Stream Restoration Site/247
Designer
Buck Engineering PC
8000 Regency Parkway Suite 200 Cary NC 27511
Primary project design POC
Kevin Tweed P E 919 463 5488
Construction Contractor
RiverWorks Inc
8000 Regency Parkway Suite 200 Cary NC 27511
Construction contractor POC
919 459 9001
Survey Contractor
Survey contractor POC
Planting Contractor
Planting contractor POC
Seeding Contractor
Contractor point of contact
Seed Mix Sources
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Monitoring Performers
Kimley Horn and Associates Inc
3001 Westen Parkway Cary NC 27513
Stream Monitoring POC
Daren Pait P E CFM
egetation Monitoring POC
Daren Pait P E CFM
etland Monitoring POC
Daren Pait P E CFM
Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011 — Year 4 of 5 r and Assoctatft trr-

r-�
L
�l
d
[-
I
J
I +
Table 4 Project Attribute Table
Meredell Farm Stream Restoration Site /247
Project County
Randolph
Physiographic Region
Piedmont
Ecoregion
Carolina Slate Belt
Project River Basin
Cape Fear
USGS HUC for Project (14 digit)
03030003020010
NCDWQ Sub basin for Project
03 06 09
Within extent of EEP Watershed Plan?
no
WRC Hab Class (Warm Cool Cold)
warm
% of project easement fenced or demarcated
100
Beaver activity observed during design phase?
No
Restoration Component Attribute
Table
M1
M2
UT1
UT2
UT3
UT4
UT5
Drainage area (acres)
168
265
64
67
148
56
59
Stream order
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
Restored length (feet)
2254
1398
1880
1095
1351
913
1075
Perennial or Intermittent
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Watershed type (Rural Urban Developing etc)
R
I R
R
R
R
R
R
Watershed LULC Distribution (e g )
Residential
Ag Row Crop
Ag Livestock
Forested
Etc
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Watershed impervious cover ( %)
U
I U
U
U
U
U
U
NCDWQ AU /Index number
NCDWQ classification
WS III
WS III
WS III
WS III
WS III
WS III
WS III
303d listed?
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Upstream of a 303d listed segments
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Total acreage of easement
498
Total vegetated acreage within the easement
498
Total planted acreage as part of the restoration
83
0
62
3
22
0
0
Rosgen classification of pre existing
G4c
U
G4
B5 1/E5 1
134c
G5
E5
Rosgen classification of As built
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Valley type
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Valley slope
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Valley side slope range (e g 2 3 %)
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Valley toe slope range (e g 2 3 %)
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Cowardin classification
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Trout waters designation
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Species of concern endangered etc ? (Y /N)
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Dominant soil series and charactenstics
Series
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Depth
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Clay%
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
K
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
T
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Use N/A TOr items mat may not apply use lot items mat are unavallaoie ana u Ior Items mat are unKnOWn
Meredell Fa m Mon tonng Report (247) 2011 - Year 4 of 5 C I \ IOmby-HOm erW
� Aeaodabs,tnG
1

i
APPENDIX B
VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA

N
7300
�___ _ _ .Zap;, •� �' ��
4
100

C •" Kimley -Horn
I ,
Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011 —Year 4 of 5 ard Associates, Inc.
UT2b
3
SSA
4
UT2a
Legend
Easement Boundary
Channel Structures
Structures Condition
Vegetation Condition
+5�
Thalweg - MY2011
Constructed Riffle
0 Not Assessed /Missing
Good Growth
stir• Existing Stream
��
o Failing
Bare Area
• Channel As -Built Centerline
I Log Vane
o Stressed
Low Stem Density Area
S�
- Cross Sections
1
o Fair
Area of Poor Growth Rate or Vigor
000o Boulder Toe Protection
1 Rock Vane
° Stable
Invasive Area of Concern
� Easement Encroachment
�
® Headcut
Split Channel Flow
V Rock Cross Vane
ti
Veg Plots
•-V' Rock A Vane
0
80 16C
Rootwad
S
�" I sJ
Feet
Title
Current Conditions Plan View UT2a and UT2b
Prepared For:
Project
Meredell Faun Stream Restoration Monitoring Year 4 —
2011
r_�s
Randolph County, North Carolina
Eomys Rem
Date
Project Number
Figure
1/3/12
111111,11A:011011
247
3
C •" Kimley -Horn
I ,
Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011 —Year 4 of 5 ard Associates, Inc.

Kimley -Hom
Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011 —Year 4 of 5
G and Associates, he
Legend
'� Easement Boundary
Channel Structures
Structures Condition
Vegetation Condition
Thalweg - MY2011
� •
: � Constructed Riffle
o Not Assessed /Missin g
� Good Growth
r'y- Existing Stream
c Failing
Bare Area
� Channel As -Built Centerline
I Log Vane
o Stressed
Low Stem Density Area
-Cross Sections
o Fair
Area of Poor Growth Rate or Vigor
000o Boulder Toe Protection
000o
�
Rock Vane
® Stable
I Invasive Area of Concern
® Headcut
� Easement Encroachment
��- Split Channel Flow
V Rock Cross Vane
Veg Plots
'"Q' Rock A Vane
0
130 260
Feet
3
•
�♦
12
5
®
900 k
180 S'9
XS6
11
+5�
,`
M1
use ,o
Title
Current Conditions Plan View M1 and SCI
Prepared For:
Project
Meredell Farm Stream Restoration Monitoring Year 4 — 2011
r,
Randolph County, North Carolina
Date
Project Number
Figure
�'1COS�'Stelll ;
13/12
247
4
Kimley -Hom
Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011 —Year 4 of 5
G and Associates, he

Title I Current Conditions Plan View UT3a, UT3b, and UT4
Prepared For:
Project Meredell Farm Stream Restoration Monitoring Year 4 — 2011
Randolph County, North Carolina
Date Project Number Figure
,`tt 1�1i 1/3/12 247 5
Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011 — Year 4 of 5 and m
A -Ho
� and Associates, Mic.

' UT5
_ 4
i`
Legend
i,_, Easement Boundary Channel Structures Structures Condition Vegetation Condition
Thalweg - MY2011 � o Not Assessed /Missing � Good Growth , �
�� Constructed Riffle
. +° Existing Stream o Failing Bare Area
Channel As -Built Centerline I Log Vane o Stressed Low Stem Density Area
- Cross Sections t o Fair Area of Poor Growth Rate or Vigor �'
000o Boulder Toe Protection f o Stable Invasive Area of Concern
000o Rock Vane
® Headcut � Easement Encroachment
��- Split Channel Flow � Rock Cross Vane �' w
I Bo
1 Veg Plots "f%" Rock A Vane 0 200 400
Feet
Title Current Conditions Plan View UT5
Prepared For:
Project Meredell Farm Stream Restoration Monitoring Year 4 — 2011
Randolph County, North Carolina
Date Project Number Figure
1/3/12 1 247 1 6
C•" Kimley -Hom
Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011 — Year 4 of 5 E , and Associates, Inc.

G•/1 Kimley -Horn
Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011 — Year 4 of 5 and Associates, Inc.
`ti`' SANDY CREEK 3
�.
03—
.,� •
,�
,
t4
a
T.
O Y
Legend
Easement Boundary
Channel Structures
Structures Condition
Vegetation Condition
Thalweg - MY2011
� Constructed Riffle
o Not Assessed /Missing
� Good Growth
Existing stream
��
o Failing
Bare Area SANDY CREEK 2
- Channel As -Built Centerline
I Log Vane
o Stressed
Low Stem Density Area
Cross Sections
tt
o Fair
Area of Poor Growth Rate or Vigor
000o Boulder Toe Protection
000o
1
Rock Vane
® Stable
Invasive Area of Concern
� Easement Encroachment
® Headcut
Split Channel Flow
V Rock Cross Vane
N
[�I Veg Plots
''0' Rock A Vane
0
<�;
Rootwad
w
�
i
,�,
Title
Current Conditions Plan View SC2 and SO
Prepared For:
Project
Meredell Farm Stream Restoration Monitoring Year 4 —
2011
Randolph County, North Carolina
,r-;J
Date
Project Number
Figure
L stem
� n.�, =� � 1'•1�'.
1/3/12
247
7
G•/1 Kimley -Horn
Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011 — Year 4 of 5 and Associates, Inc.

Table 5 1 Visual Stream Moruholoav Stability Assessment
ReachlD UT1
Assessed Length 640
Magid g Fm M rut nng Repon ( 47) 2011 - Yea 4 f 5 G n =
at .a aa> Noon oodw., k
Adjusted
Number
Number with
with
for
Major
Stable
Total
Numberof
Amount of
/ Stable
Stabilizing
]Footage
bilzing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number m
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
oody
Woody
Cat o
Sub C o
Metric
as Intended
As buck
S merits
Foote a
as Intended
Ve etatton
elation
V etatton
1 Bed
1 Vertical Stability
1 Aggregation Bar fonnabon/growth sufficient to significanty deflect
0
0
100/
(RAfle and Run units)
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
a
l^sf'a• -. -" r
w
2 Degradation Evidence of downcuthng
0
0
100 ° /
�- �,. € zG '� �,
yy,a_Y
- 7,.
t�` gfr �r SK' 1'w A` It
2. Riffle Concirbon
1 Texture/Substrate Riffle
5
5
"f
100/0
maintains coarser substrate
6>,,� o?'a'„t
3 Meander Pool
Condition
1 Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull Depth _ 1 6)
5
5
100°/
Rr "�"c S
,�.* ate" ���
° ^ �9�-4
,', a may
ij
?s 4
2 I-enath appropriate ( 30 A of centerline distance between tail of
5
5
T y..K+
Sr
100/0
upstream riffle and head of downstrem nffle)
i�v 4a r
4 Thatweg Position
1 Thal eg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
5
5
100 /o
��t era k �r r
J o-�
rfyk,�
2 Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
5
5
��
� �„ Fly � �
100 /
Bank
1 Scourod/Erodmg
Bank lacking vegetative cover resuthng simply from poor growth and/or
-^ ` ,"'' �, _y i
0
0
100 /0
0
0
0
100 /
scour and erosion
} f° �, a
y. V �
Banks undercuttoverhanging to the extent that mass westing appears
2 Undercut
likely Does NOT include undercuts that are modest appear
� ti; � 4i �
0
0
100/0
0
0
1000/
sustainable and are providing habitat
a��
4 a
p
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving or collapse
a - rr" to „a `� ,.t
0
0
1000/
0
0
100°/
Tomr
0
0
100 /0
0
0
100/0
gfS�
1 Overall Integnty
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
25
25
'�•� .. 3n�t « �. r F
s ^° d
100 ° /F
a
2 Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
25
25
2a Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sins or arms
24
25
it (t p iBank
1 ,+
""rLA z ir`
j- r`''vi
3 Bank Protection
erosan within the sWCtures extern of influence does not exceed
15% (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance
document)
25
25
r960/
4 Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth Mean Bankful
25
25
x' � t �f'' '�
Depth rata 1 6 Rootwads/legs providing some cover at base -flow
Magid g Fm M rut nng Repon ( 47) 2011 - Yea 4 f 5 G n =
at .a aa> Noon oodw., k

Table 5 2 Visual Stream Moroholocty Stability Assessment
Reach ID UT2
Assessed Length 350
Mered 11 Fm Mawt mg Rrp it (247) 2011 - Ym 4 r 5 G on = k
Adjusted /e
Number
Number with
for
Mayor
Stable
Total
Number of
Amount of
°/ Stable
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number In
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Cat o
Sub-Cate o
Metric
as Intended
As built
S ments
Foots a
as Intended
V etation
Vegetation
1 Bad
1 Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1 Aggradahon Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include pant bars)
44 �! � ~'` T �✓ r
1
23
93/6
2 Degradation Evidence of downcuthng
Ck`y w s
0
0
1000/
Z Riffle Condition
1 Texture/Substrete Riffle mamtmns coarser substrate
5
5
�" ` ^
1000/
,�,
% �. a
i 9 t
-t `1
�} 4t
M x b j"r $'
3 Meander Pool
Condition
1 De °th Sufficient (Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull Depth _ 1 6)
4
4
100/0
2 Len appropriate ( 30% of centerkne distance between tad of
head downstrem
4
4
it w iy9�..s„
o
100 /o
r 1 4y t z
upstream nffe and of rdfie)
t..
}
1
FThalweg Poartion
1 ThaMeg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
3
3
�" f`
100 /o
,`���[� "�},. fit.3
2 Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
3
3
100°/
5.y
2 Bank
1 Seourad/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetable cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
$, .� tL k n
a p
�4 y..
0
0
100°/
0
0
100°/
scour and erosion
t�l�.-�& y
0
0
1000/
0
0
100°/
2 Undercut
Banks underalloverhanging to the extent that mass westing appears
likely Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
sustainable and are providing habitat
i
n 41
� �
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving or collapse
� ry � c +�
0
0
100/
0
0
100 ° /
add.
0
0
100/0
0
0
100%
�Tota
Engineered
tructure s
1 Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact oath no dislodged boulden or logs
15
15RT
;a a r r
"t� r� n
100°/
. t¢ a h� r
Rt * ryp
100°/
2 Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
15
15
, }
2a Piping
Structures lacking any substantial lbw underneath s4l1s or arms
A � ,
,. t ��3 ��,r�
a :, r1
°/
�
x ,' z
r t �` P �'t -1 �C�rt
3 Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does rLot exceed
15% (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance
15
15
100 /o
document)
'�
4 Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pod Depth Mean Bankfufl
15
15
T ,�
a �- -* .q-�
100 /o
v-» -�
Depth ratio _ 1 8 Roolwadsll s providing some cover a< base -flow
P og W fl
1}"i`-�'✓.._�.�a
- w°.',.+ °
s. `
LLa y�
Mered 11 Fm Mawt mg Rrp it (247) 2011 - Ym 4 r 5 G on = k

Table 5 3 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID M1
Assessed Length 3200
==..= —
Mond 11 Fe`m Munn ring Rep n (247) 011 Ym 4 f 5 " nvnwy I�un
Adjusted /e
Number
Numberwrth
for
Major
Stable
Total
Number of
Amount of
/ Stable
Stabilizing
IFootage
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number m
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Cate o
Sub -Cat o
Metric
as Intended
As built
3 ments
Foote a
as Intended
Ve etation
Vegetation
1 Bed
1 Vertical Stability
1 Aooradetion Bar formation/growth sufficient to 31gnificantty deflect
' 1 �+ ""
0
0
100 ° /
-0
(Riffle and Run units)
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
�y r
2 Dearadabon Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100/0
.i
� l Y " ,2^ r
at .%�4 •t ! 4 a '� car
2 Rrffle Condition
1 Texture/Substrate Riffle maintains coarser substrate
25
25
100/.
a
:71
3 Meander Pool
°ax '
Condition
1 Dep Sufficient (Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull Depth 1 6)
_
23
23
1000/
_
� '�W- swti'T .-
`
3 64 � � ��
s k s - I
2 Lenath appropriate ( 30% of centerline distance between tall of
23
23
100/0
upstream riffle and head of downatrem riffle)
„• r a
2 w,s
( + `F';, �-�'h %
f v y
f i' a"
C q, ro
t
4 Thatweg Posdion
1 Thahveg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
26
26
100 /o
�T
t }
ry
2 ThaMeg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
26
26
�'� I .,0s h�
100/
^�
- • ., .• �,�s..�
.h. y
,,,� ,� w,y ,- 1. .mac � � � � ,.• ,. .. v �"' d 1;� v n..�r � R. Aw �+yr .z�
�
Bank
1 Scoured/Erodmg
Hank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion
�_�1
. c ` a �[ rs
e $
°gi. �1�
0
0
100/0
0
0
100°/
2. Undercut
Banks undercutloverhangng to the extent that mass westing appears
likely Does hffi include undercuts that are modest appear
0
0
100/0
0
0
100°/
sustainable and are providing habitat
k
3 Mas3Washng
Bank slumping calving or collapse
7 >F` '` + ^_
0
0
1000/
0
0
1000/
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs 48
<'I Totals
48
0 0
u 9 4 � }�
-irr"' SS1 d
100°/
100/0
0 0 100/0
i
4 � 1 + f y
3 Engineered
tructures
1 Overall Integrity
2 Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
48
48
100°/
a•� _
N
2a Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms
45
48
qtr
p `^ "¢
in p , �` i Jp
¢
+ � fi 7 r c eyq p t
u, � u �i PA
3 Bank P. otedlon
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does = exceed
15 4 (See guidance for this table m EEP monitoring guidance
48
48
1000/
document)
4 Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth Mean Banldug
48
48
v >n a ^I
t y t `+
100°/
t.-
'�
Depth ratio _ 16 Rootwads/togs providing some cover at base -flow
t t`
,,, a 1`r y••,,9"� -P
==..= —
Mond 11 Fe`m Munn ring Rep n (247) 011 Ym 4 f 5 " nvnwy I�un

Table 6
Planted Acreage'
Vegetation Condition Assessment
337
Easement Acreaaez 556
/ of
Mapping
CCPV
Number of
Combined
Planted
Veaetation Cateaory
Definitions
Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acrea a
Acrea e
1 Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material
0 1 acres
Pattern and
Color
—Maons
1
015
04/o
2 Low Stem Density Areas
Woody stem densities dearly below target levels based on MY3 4 or 5 stem count criteria
0 1 acres
I Pattern and
Color
13
988
29 30/
T tHl
f 14��s
00
n�298 %"
Uky
E
.�"x
eas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale)
none
3 Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
Areas with woody stems of a size Gass that are obviously small given the monitoring year 0 25 acres Pattern and
Color
2
012
0 4 A
umulatl ,Tg
X16
015
301%
Easement Acreaaez 556
1 = Enter the planted acreage within the easement This number is calculated as the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of the understory the channel acreage
crossings or any other elements not directly planted as pan of the project effort
2 = The acreage within the easement boundaries
3 = Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and vnll therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1 2 or 3 in the table and is the result of
encroachment the associated acreage should be tallied in the relevant dem (i a item 1 2 or 3) as well as a parallel tally in item 5
4 = Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage Invasives of concern/interest are listed below The list of high concern spcies are
those with the potential to directly outcompete native Young woody stems ui the short term (e g monitoring penod or shortly thereafter) or affect the community structure for wasting more established tree/shrub stands over
tmefremes that are sligtitly Ion er (e 1 2 decades) The low/rrioderate concern group are those species that generally do not have this capacity over the timeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with
regularity but can be mappeel if in the udgement of the observer their coverage density or distribution is suppressing the viebdity densely or growdh of planted woody stems Decisions as to w?iether remedieUon well be needed are
based on the antegration of risk factors �y EEP such as species present then coverage distribution relatnre po native biomass and the precticagity of treatment For example even modest amounts of Kudzu or Japanese Knotweed
early in th e pigs g history wag warrant contrd but potent� I cov ly agesMcrowm in the herb layer vnY not hky triand the potential impacts of treating extensive amounts oround cover Those spaces with the watlist designator in gray sn3d Relics are of particular interest given they extreme nshre at level for mapping as points whre so tad specimeare fonurse t>e mapped as polygons The symbology schembelow was one that was found to be he p u or symbolzing invasives polygons particulalry for situations where the conditon for an area is some ere between isolated
specimens and dense discreet patches In any case the point or polygoNarea feature can be symbolized to describe Things like high or low concern and spaces can be listed as a map inset in legend items rf the number of species
are limited or in the narrative section of the executiv e summary
Maud 11 F— M tut—g R poi ( 47) 011 — Y. 4 f 5
0/ of
Mapping
CCPV
Number of
Combined
Easement
e etation Cateaory
Definitions
Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
Invasive Areas of Concem4
Areas or pants (if too small to render as polygons at map scale)
1000 SF
Pattern
14
195
35/6
Coband
Uky
5 Easement Encroachment Areas'
eas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale)
none
Pattern
0
000
0 0%
1 = Enter the planted acreage within the easement This number is calculated as the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of the understory the channel acreage
crossings or any other elements not directly planted as pan of the project effort
2 = The acreage within the easement boundaries
3 = Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and vnll therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1 2 or 3 in the table and is the result of
encroachment the associated acreage should be tallied in the relevant dem (i a item 1 2 or 3) as well as a parallel tally in item 5
4 = Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage Invasives of concern/interest are listed below The list of high concern spcies are
those with the potential to directly outcompete native Young woody stems ui the short term (e g monitoring penod or shortly thereafter) or affect the community structure for wasting more established tree/shrub stands over
tmefremes that are sligtitly Ion er (e 1 2 decades) The low/rrioderate concern group are those species that generally do not have this capacity over the timeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with
regularity but can be mappeel if in the udgement of the observer their coverage density or distribution is suppressing the viebdity densely or growdh of planted woody stems Decisions as to w?iether remedieUon well be needed are
based on the antegration of risk factors �y EEP such as species present then coverage distribution relatnre po native biomass and the precticagity of treatment For example even modest amounts of Kudzu or Japanese Knotweed
early in th e pigs g history wag warrant contrd but potent� I cov ly agesMcrowm in the herb layer vnY not hky triand the potential impacts of treating extensive amounts oround cover Those spaces with the watlist designator in gray sn3d Relics are of particular interest given they extreme nshre at level for mapping as points whre so tad specimeare fonurse t>e mapped as polygons The symbology schembelow was one that was found to be he p u or symbolzing invasives polygons particulalry for situations where the conditon for an area is some ere between isolated
specimens and dense discreet patches In any case the point or polygoNarea feature can be symbolized to describe Things like high or low concern and spaces can be listed as a map inset in legend items rf the number of species
are limited or in the narrative section of the executiv e summary
Maud 11 F— M tut—g R poi ( 47) 011 — Y. 4 f 5

Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011— Year 4 of 5 ��/� Kimley -Horn
and Associates, Inc.

Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011— Year 4 of S Kimley -Han
C o Fl end AaocwAiW Ina

Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011 - Year 4 of 5 ��/� Kim WY -Horn
and AMociaft% Inc-

lk
wp-
4, 16 loo
It
-"a'+ • 7 r Ai�1.(���. �, A �1. °e � ` � •,'A � ����� � t.. r� £Y1T� �w rlt�
�► t ` s s a
yy � � PVT � ` ��• •r'' ,..
4.:.` r � . .�•' F � Tom.
vt►�,

-_ \ ,Y \ - X4 :. .+r/ i�� .f� `•rye
or

Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011— Year 4 of 5 Kim Hom
E m n and ssociatw lnc.

Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011— Year 4 of 5 Kim_Hom
CSI , ley
and AswcWft Inc.

Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011— Year 4 of 5 VjmWy_Horn
G uM ApociwW% Inc.

Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011— Year 4 of 5 �^ Kim Hom
CE" end Associatw. kw.

A i' 1 -iir l•�•I ! '� a. w' ham'
'tit'
•-�• � ' /) .�� I; �ls� . '�4 �' Vii.` P � 5,�; �y�{�,:.
t eu.. 9
s ,
r
.
.,
�' SS
A(
F
yq.1
r Y �
U
x
Rn
,4growth on UT4
Taken:
Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011 —Year 4 of 5 Kimley -Horn
C \ and Auocfatm lw-

I
I
APPENDIX C
VEGETATION PLOT DATA

Table 7 Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Meredell Farm Stream Restoration Srtel247
Vegetation Plot ID
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Vegetation Survival
Threshold Met?
Reach Mean
egetatlon Survival
Threshold Mete
Reach Mean
Vegetation Survival
Threshold Mete
Reach Mean
Vegetation Survival
Threshold Met?
Reach Mean
Vegetation Survival
Threshold Met?
Reach Mean
24701 0001
Y
100%
Y
50%
Y
50%
Y
100%
24701 0002
Y
N
N
Y
24701 0003
Y
100%
Y
100%
Y
100%
Y
100%
24701 0004
Y
Y
Y
Y
24701 0005
Y
50%
Y
50/0
N
38%
N
38%
24701 0006
N
N
N
N
24701 0007
N
N
N
N
24701 0008
Y
Y
Y
Y
24701 0009
N
N
N
N
24701 0010
N
N
N
N
24701 0011
Y
Y
Y
Y
24701 0012
1 Y
Y
Y
Meredell Farm Monitonng Report (247) 2011— Year 4 of 5 and A-9 �S Hom
� and SOCietes, Inc.

G0,. Ktmley Horn
Meredell Farm Momtonng Report (247) 2011 — Year 4 of 5 , aW Ae e% Inc-
SWegeatio Plot Metas X.Table S1CV 11. {rA r–c��'a`e
MeredellRFarm Stream+Restoiation Srte/247
Report Prepared By
Josh Allen
Date Prepared
10/27/201118 04
database name
cvs eep entrytool v2 2 6 mdb
database location
K \RAL– Environmental \011795 Meredell Farm Monitoring MDELL \MDELL VEGETATION
computer name
DD83462
file size
57192448
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT— –
Metadata
Description of database file the report worksheets and a summary of project(s) and project data
Proj planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre for each year This excludes live stakes
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre for each year This includes live stakes all planted
Proj total stems
stems and all natural /volunteer stems
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems dead stems missing etc )
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by
Damage
each
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot dead and missing stems are
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
excluded
PROJECT SUMMARY– – – – —
— –
Project Code
247
project Name
Meredell Farm Stream Restoration
Description
stream restoation enhancement and preservation
River Basin
Cape Fear
length(ft)
9601
stream to -edge width (ft)
100
area (sq m)
201 533
Required Plots (calculated)
12
Sampled Plots
12
G0,. Ktmley Horn
Meredell Farm Momtonng Report (247) 2011 — Year 4 of 5 , aW Ae e% Inc-

Table 9 Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means)
TYP, Trw Shrub U-1a t
P PI. b
T TaW
ee.em wnmaw �Rnm .a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TYP, Trw Shrub U-1a t
P PI. b
T TaW
ee.em wnmaw �Rnm .a

U
APPENDIX D
STREAM SURVEY DATA

KMNey -Nom
Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011 — Year 4 of 5 and Aseocia"Ina
PROFILE
i
Water Surface S
I I .. .
�
iiiiiiii
iiiiiiii
ii
iiiiiiiiiiii
• . -
�
'
iilaa
ii�`�,/`_�!!■
�iiiiiiiiiiiiii®
iii
.aii:'■7iiiiiiiiiii
.
i�iiii�►?�i.z�i�
!,'!��R'
�i�
ii�
�
�►`wi�
- '��iii-il�iiiiii�
iii
iii
r
i�iiif\Q►`ri�
1:�iiiiL'aiiiii
iii
ii
iii.�`�./�■
�iiii���I■�
fo
\�iI"`�1i<liiiii
..
iii
iiii
il�n�r�iiiiii�
��i��i
ii��iii■
���
A��
ii
_ii_i_
iii
IliiiiiiNiiiii■
ti■
.iiiiii!
���i0
� ■I
�1•i
iii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii■
ti■
.iiiiiitfii
R
Mi
l IMMC:EMCMCENE'L:Wi�
11
M
C
=C
==CEM�
i
iii.
ti
■.iiiiiiiirii,
�'..'�
iii
11 11
ll 11 .11 11
:11
Legend
S— MY 2009
s,
s
2.
c. G
1
KMNey -Nom
Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011 — Year 4 of 5 and Aseocia"Ina

608
607
606
605
604
c
603
0
.o
d
M 602
601
600
599
598
597
0
�— Water Surface Elevation XS1-
YEAR
PHASE
FACET TYPE
2011
Abkf
Dbkf
III
Bankfull Elevation XS1
1il
d50 (mm)
d84 (mm)
--
--
--
Bed Elevation XS1 -2011
�'I11
11.5
«A
XSl
2009
r
---�— Bed Elevation XS1 -2010
- - Bed Elevation XS1-2009
X51
2008
MYl
POOL
24.0
11.4
- - •- - Bed Elevation XS3 -2008
XS1
2010
MY3
—
—
—
2009
MY2
POOL
22.8
11.0
0.5
XS1
2011
MY4
0.11
9.63
XSl
2010
MY3
POOL
17.2
8.1
0.5
XS1
2011
MY4
POOL
10.4
6.1
0.6
r
f
20 40 60 80 100 120
Station (ft)
1VV
90
80 -
70
c 60 -
V
y 50 -
t= 40 -
a�
30
20
10 -
0
1UV
90
80
70
60
d
r 50
40 E
u
30
20
10
rN ut, u1 O•O N•V I�T00 M'�O N or Vj Ci Oro N,V Oo W Q
O N N .4 O N V1 n .-I rl r,; M q T T .Ni e�i N M ul O O O
V N N N IOn N V Vt .y N M V VI O 00 O b N '� N n
� ry N pf N 00 ut VJ N V
ut O
N
Particle Size (mm)
ID
YEAR
PHASE
FACET TYPE
Wbkf
Abkf
Dbkf
III
YEAR
1il
d50 (mm)
d84 (mm)
XSl
2008
DESIGN
II I
�'I11
11.5
«A
1UV
90
80
70
60
d
r 50
40 E
u
30
20
10
rN ut, u1 O•O N•V I�T00 M'�O N or Vj Ci Oro N,V Oo W Q
O N N .4 O N V1 n .-I rl r,; M q T T .Ni e�i N M ul O O O
V N N N IOn N V Vt .y N M V VI O 00 O b N '� N n
� ry N pf N 00 ut VJ N V
ut O
N
Particle Size (mm)
ID
YEAR
PHASE
FACET TYPE
Wbkf
Abkf
Dbkf
ID
YEAR
PHASE
d50 (mm)
d84 (mm)
XSl
2008
DESIGN
POOL
12.0
11.5
1.0
XSl
2009
MY2
<0.062
0.25
X51
2008
MYl
POOL
24.0
11.4
0.5
XS1
2010
MY3
0.8
18.5
XS1
2009
MY2
POOL
22.8
11.0
0.5
XS1
2011
MY4
0.11
9.63
XSl
2010
MY3
POOL
17.2
8.1
0.5
XS1
2011
MY4
POOL
10.4
6.1
0.6
Kimley -Horn
Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011- Year 4 of 5 �� antl A9socates.inc.

599
2011
�
—�- Bankfull Elevation X52
,
,
i
Bed Elevation XS2 -2011
$
r
Bed Elevation XS2 -2010
—+— Water Surf
- + • - Bed Elevation XS2 -2009
i"1011
i
- - -- - Bed Elevation X52 -2008
3�
I
598
597
c
0
v
100
100
W
596
90
90
80
80
70
70
c
60
60
o
y
50
50
ax
a
595
40
40
E
CL
V
30
30
20
20
10 10
0
0
594
N 1(1 1l1 O O N O
n o0 M 1L1 UJ N V1 0 0 !b O 10 N N a 00 pp
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
V N N N 1011 r4
O LIl O��O N N lv1 a 1p O W O tp N N N^
A � o
Station
(ft)
Particle Size (mm)
ID
YEAR PHASE FACET TYPE Wbkf
Abkf
Dbkf
ID
YEAR
PHASE d50 (mm) d84 (mm)
XS2
2008 DESIGN RIFFLE
7.3
4.5
0.6
XS2
2009
MY2 8 22.6
XS2
2008 MY1 RIFFLE
10.6
4.2
0.4
XS2
2010
MY3 22.05 67.3
XS2
2009 MY2 RIFFLE
11.7
4.3
0.4
XS2
2011
MY4 0.23 59.45
XS2
2010 MY3 RIFFLE
9.5
4.0
0.4
XS2
2011 MY4 RIFFLE
10.1
5.1
0.5
ace Elevation XS2 -
2011
�
—�- Bankfull Elevation X52
,
,
i
Bed Elevation XS2 -2011
i
Bed Elevation XS2 -2010
- + • - Bed Elevation XS2 -2009
i"1011
i
- - -- - Bed Elevation X52 -2008
,
I
i�
,
sssssssssss� ss: zov
:oxn
� ssx zoos
rsx zau
�
,
,
,
i
i
i"1011
i
� KImIEy -Horn
Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011 -Year 4 of 5 � a,w Assocates Inc

601
600
599
598
s=_ 597
C
0
'r.
m
a
d
"' 596
595
594
593
592
0.00
—d — Water Surface Elevation X53-
YEAR
PHASE
�I
Wbkf
2011
11MOM
ID
YEAR
PHASE
t Bankfull Elevation XS3
d84 (mm)
XS3
2008
DESIGN
POOL
12.0
11.5
1.0
Bed Elevation X53 -2011
2009
MY2
�i
r
--�— Bed Elevation XS3 -2010
in
MY1
POOL
12.5
10.1
--
XS3
—
- - Bed Elevation XS3 -2009
0.08
0.45
XS3
2009
- •- - Bed Elevation XS3 -2008
POOL
11.4
8.5
0.7
XS3
2014
MY4
0.11
2.38
XS3
2010
MY3
POOL
11.4
7.3
0.6
1
XS3
2011
i
POOL
10.1
7.4
0.7
20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00
Station (ft)
1oa -
90
80
70
C 60
v
y 50 -
r ao -
a
30
20
10
0
rA
A
N V1 rl1 O O N Q C\ OD M l0 �D N vl Q O 00 O �O N N Q pp pp
l0 N Yf �y O N V1 11 N M I l0 Ol N oo V1 lD N N Q Q
O N M N tD N v Q 1l ti N M u1 O O O
O. O �O N N n
lD N N N M N 00 Yl W N Q
O N N N M N N
u1 O
N
Particle Size (mm)
- 100
90
80
70
60
d
50 '-
40 E
v
30
20
10
0
ID
YEAR
PHASE
�I
Wbkf
Abkf
11MOM
ID
YEAR
PHASE
d50 (mm)
d84 (mm)
XS3
2008
DESIGN
POOL
12.0
11.5
1.0
XS3
2009
MY2
�i
r
XS3
in
MY1
POOL
N V1 rl1 O O N Q C\ OD M l0 �D N vl Q O 00 O �O N N Q pp pp
l0 N Yf �y O N V1 11 N M I l0 Ol N oo V1 lD N N Q Q
O N M N tD N v Q 1l ti N M u1 O O O
O. O �O N N n
lD N N N M N 00 Yl W N Q
O N N N M N N
u1 O
N
Particle Size (mm)
- 100
90
80
70
60
d
50 '-
40 E
v
30
20
10
0
ID
YEAR
PHASE
FACET TYPE
Wbkf
Abkf
Dbkf
ID
YEAR
PHASE
d50 (mm)
d84 (mm)
XS3
2008
DESIGN
POOL
12.0
11.5
1.0
XS3
2009
MY2
0.5
1.0
XS3
2008
MY1
POOL
12.5
10.1
0.8
XS3
2010
MY3
0.08
0.45
XS3
2009
MY2
POOL
11.4
8.5
0.7
XS3
2014
MY4
0.11
2.38
XS3
2010
MY3
POOL
11.4
7.3
0.6
XS3
2011
MY4
POOL
10.1
7.4
0.7
Ktr ey -Horn
Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011 -Year4 of 5 and Ae iatee im

Kimley-Ho.l
MeredelI Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011 — Year 4 of 5 Wn Assoc atea 1'.
I . STREAM • •
OFILE 2011
M
Water Surface Slope li
M�M
ankfull Slope
mom
M
MM
mom
11w,Mw
peas
1;11
1: 1 1.11 1. 1 111 1 1 11
1 1
1
i
� � U
i
1
Kimley-Ho.l
MeredelI Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011 — Year 4 of 5 Wn Assoc atea 1'.

599
598
597
596
c
0
eD
d
W 595
594
593
+ Water Surface Elevation XS4
�
xsxzozz
r_ xsx 2010
� xuzros
xst zou
- - - - - -- xsazoza
— • — • xsx zoos
I
2011
0.00
�•n
Particle Size (mm)
t Bankfull Elevation XS4
40.00 60.00 80.00
100.00 120.00
140.00
Bed Elevation XS4 -2011
MY2 0.5 0.125
XS4
Station (ft)
MY3 0.08 0.15
XS4
i
YEAR
PHASE
FACET TYPE Wbkf
Abkf
- Bed Elevation XS4 -2010
XS4
2008
DESIGN
- - -• - -- Bed Elevation XS4 -2009
4.5
0.6
XS4
2008
MYl
RIFFLE 10.0
- - -- - Bed Elevation XS4 -2008
0.8
i
t
ell
MY2
RIFFLE 7.7
5.4
0.7
XS4
2010
MY3
RIFFLE 9.3
7.3
0.8
XS4
L-J-
L
RIFFLE 9.0
7.1
0.8
592
�
xsxzozz
r_ xsx 2010
� xuzros
xst zou
- - - - - -- xsazoza
— • — • xsx zoos
O N
U N N N V01
lD N
O
N M of O O O
N Ol N 00 V1 tD � a
N ei N M N
ut O
0.00
�•n
Particle Size (mm)
20.00
40.00 60.00 80.00
100.00 120.00
140.00
2009
MY2 0.5 0.125
XS4
Station (ft)
MY3 0.08 0.15
XS4
ID
YEAR
PHASE
FACET TYPE Wbkf
Abkf
Dbkf
XS4
2008
DESIGN
RIFFLE 7.3
4.5
0.6
XS4
2008
MYl
RIFFLE 10.0
8.4
0.8
XS4
2009
MY2
RIFFLE 7.7
5.4
0.7
XS4
2010
MY3
RIFFLE 9.3
7.3
0.8
XS4
2011
MY4
RIFFLE 9.0
7.1
0.8
Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011 - Year 4 of 5
I-
90
80
70
60
O
� 50
t 40
m
a
30
20
10
0
. . . . . . . ........
�
xsxzozz
r_ xsx 2010
� xuzros
xst zou
- - - - - -- xsazoza
— • — • xsx zoos
O N
U N N N V01
lD N
O
N M of O O O
N Ol N 00 V1 tD � a
N ei N M N
ut O
�•n
Particle Size (mm)
ID
YEAR
PHASE dS0 (mm) d84 (mm)
XS4
2009
MY2 0.5 0.125
XS4
A} .S •s
Y
1VU
90
80
70
60 e?
d
50
3
40 E
u
30
zo
10
0
Kimley -Horn
we Associates, Im
N U1 u1 O O N? n 00 M w w N aN V O 00 O lD N N O w w
N O N U1 n �"� N N M i tD m' ao
O N
U N N N V01
lD N
O
N M of O O O
N Ol N 00 V1 tD � a
N ei N M N
ut O
�•n
Particle Size (mm)
ID
YEAR
PHASE dS0 (mm) d84 (mm)
XS4
2009
MY2 0.5 0.125
XS4
2010
MY3 0.08 0.15
XS4
2011
MY4 0.05 0.1158
Kimley -Horn
we Associates, Im

S97
596
595
Z
C
0
594
d
W
593
592
591
0.00
t Water Surface Elevation XS5 -
YEAR
u
�
irr
2011
Abkf
u
ID
�--�� Bankfull Elevation XS5
I
PHASE
d50 (mm)
d84 (mm)
Bed Elevation XS5 -2011
2008
DESIGN
y
12.0
11.5
1.0
�— Bed Elevation XS5 -2010
2009
MY2
<0.062
— • . — Bed Elevation XS5 -2009
XS5
2008
MYl
- - �- - Bed Elevation XS5 -2008
24.2
22.8
i
XS5
2010
MY3
<0.062
;1
XS5
2009
MY2
POOL
17.9
18.2
1.0
XS5
2011
MY3
0.09
0.19
XS5
2010
MY3
POOL
16.5
15.9
1.0
'
i
I
2011
MY4
POOL
17.3
19.0
1.1
.a
20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00
Station (ft)
100
90
80
70
60
0
u 50
t 40
CL 30
20
10
0
r3
I
90
80
70
60
i
50
40 E
u
30
20
r 10
r 0
N M V) 0 0 N� I�r00 M �D ELI N N a 0,00 O l0 N N a,Op, Op
O .y N�i "4 O N ut r` .-I ry M tD Ol N M u1 O O O
N M N N l O
Vl N O N O N N N N
V N N N ut 00 � t0 N M a� O 00 O t0 N n
O N N N M N N
Vf O
Particle Size (mm)
ID
YEAR
u
�
irr
Wbkf
Abkf
u
ID
YEAR
PHASE
d50 (mm)
d84 (mm)
XS5
2008
DESIGN
I
90
80
70
60
i
50
40 E
u
30
20
r 10
r 0
N M V) 0 0 N� I�r00 M �D ELI N N a 0,00 O l0 N N a,Op, Op
O .y N�i "4 O N ut r` .-I ry M tD Ol N M u1 O O O
N M N N l O
Vl N O N O N N N N
V N N N ut 00 � t0 N M a� O 00 O t0 N n
O N N N M N N
Vf O
Particle Size (mm)
ID
YEAR
PHASE
FACET TYPE
Wbkf
Abkf
Dbkf
ID
YEAR
PHASE
d50 (mm)
d84 (mm)
XS5
2008
DESIGN
POOL
12.0
11.5
1.0
XS5
2009
MY2
<0.062
0.125
XS5
2008
MYl
POOL
24.2
22.8
0.9
XS5
2010
MY3
<0.062
0.125
XS5
2009
MY2
POOL
17.9
18.2
1.0
XS5
2011
MY3
0.09
0.19
XS5
2010
MY3
POOL
16.5
15.9
1.0
XS5
2011
MY4
POOL
17.3
19.0
1.1
Kimley -Horn
Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011 —Year4 of 5 G� amass aies.Im

'
NNNNNNNNNN�'
-- — — — — —
MEREDELL M I UPPPER STREAM THALWEG • • 1
-- -- - - -NNN
1•ll--
!NN
- - - - -1
Water Surface -
-0.0 11 .
■
■
■
■
NwNNNNNNNN�
NwNNNNNwNN�
NNN
NwNNNNNwNNN
NNNNNNNNNL
�7��NNNNNNN==l
_--------
N�_
__— _— _------
N�iNNNNNwN
!N
N!_N_w!_!!_!_!_llwNN!!!_w_N_!_N
■
Vi_
wl
_
O���l
NN_N_w!!_!!_NEE_EllE��lMMMlw!!m
Re ikfilll Slope
j
w
MMNM�
Mw
1 1 11.
lN�.—
N"'��L�iiNNNN
NNNNNNNNN
www!!N
Nt--
-
-
-
-
-J
moIN��wNN�Nw���wN����lw!
MENEENEEME
NNNNNwN.
��NR
\��■
1Nl�lINNNNNNNNNNNN
NNNNNNwNN
NwNNNwNrNNn�
/..
fliiilNNNNNwNNNwNNNNNNNNNwlN
!_N_�_w__�!!N!ll�h■■�,,�
/ii '
»!■
�!
�l
NNNN_
w
_w!!!_!w_N__!_!!_w_!_!_!_!_!_N_
NNNNNNNNN��NNi��
_lNwlw�
mmm�
1r
�!�
�!!�
in�i!!ll�wNlNNwIN�!!
N
NNNNNNNNNNNN�
■N�
INNN�'I
o:il
iNl7NN��NNNNNNNNNNN�
N
NNNNNNNNlNN■
■N�
INNN�
��
Ir+�
bdiii
NNNNNNNNNNNNm
NNNNNNNNNN■
■N�
INNNl.��
�,.�
i �I�-
_�asNNNNNwNNNNN
!lNNIN!!�
■!�
I!lNlt.'.�8i\lV
�'=
r�
�i�NlNlww!!ww
NNNNNNNNNNN�
■!�
INNN
lNN�iNr+JiNi:��>�NNr1NNwNNNwNN
N
NNNNwNNNNNN■
■N�
INNNNNNNNN
����NNNNNN
NNNN
N
NNNNNNNNNN■
■N�
INNNNNNNNN
=N�.�:
N�kC
���!!
�NNNN
NNlN
NNNNNNNlN�
■!_�
I!!_!!!!!!!_N_N_r1Rlls��i
iw�N!_N__!__!_!!w
NNNNNNNNlNN■
■!�
�!
�NwNNNwv�t�
I
I �w��t
�!llliwN!
NM
NN�lNN■
■N
I!!N!!!!!!!!Nw!!!
/ice_
=a
IZZX"
--%M
N
!!
!NN■
■Nm
INNNNNNNNNNNNNNI
N
NNNNNlNN■
■NM
INNNNwNNNNNNNNNNL
INN`
N
NNNNwNNNNNE
■
M
INNNNNNNNNNNNwNNNNMEE=
N
N�NNNlN
NNNNNNwNNNNNNNNNNN�.,�.\
������
�
NNNNNNwwNNN
N
N
NNN
1111 off off
off
1
2011 BED ELEVAT10N
2009 BED ELEVATION
0:11
2011 WATER SURFACE
20 10 BED ELEVATI
2008 BED ELEVATION
I.11 111
�1Y JG
GG i
3G 3 i
.� �„ Kinle -�
Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011— Year 4 of 5 �� ano Fasoc stet ��a

590
I
- - •- - Bed Elevation XS6 -2008
I
I
.r
I
1
I
1 �
�
s
111
I`I
589
c
0
0 588
w
W
100
100
90
90
r
80 -
80
70
70
60
60
587
Z
C
so -
d
50 '-
40
40 E
IL
u
30
30
20
20
10
10
0 -
,N'V1'IA,O10,N1011�'001
0
586
M'D'O, Nu10,0'a0'0,O1 N,NO'00, 00
v ' IA Vl O N
O V1 rl M N l0 N u1 O N N N
M O
0.00
20.00 40.00
60.00
80.00
o l^
°° ° N N oo N a^
Station (ft)
Vf O
Particle Size (mm)
ID
YEAR PHASE FACET TYPE
Wbkf
Abkf
Dbkf
ID
YEAR
PHASE d50 (mm) d84 (mm)
XS6
2008 DESIGN RIFFLE
10.2
8.0
0.8
XS6
2009
MY2 <0.062 11.3
XS6
2008 MY1 RIFFLE
19.1
11.9
0.6
XS6
2010
MY3 0.15 9.1
XS6
2009 MY2 RIFFLE
17.7
10.7
0.6
XS6
2011
MY4 7.23 1,051.78
XS6
2010 MY3 RIFFLE
16.4
10.3
0.6
XS6
2011 MY4 RIFFLE
16.3
10.6
0.7
� Water Surface Elevation X56-
2011
t Bankfull Elevation XS6
Bed Elevation XS6 -2011
� —Bed Elevation XS6 -2010
– • � • – Bed Elevation XS6 -2009
I
- - •- - Bed Elevation XS6 -2008
I
I
.r
I
1
I
1 �
�
s
111
I`I
1i I ■�'I 11
� Kimley -Horn
Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011 –Year 4 of 5 � anC Ansooales, lnc
I
I
� Kimley -Horn
Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011 –Year 4 of 5 � anC Ansooales, lnc

594
593
592
591
590
c
0
589
d
W
588
587
586
585
584
0.00
t Water Surface Elevation XS7 -
2011
t Bankfull Elevation X57 -2010
--
--
--
- -�
Bed Elevation XS7 - 2011
1111
Bed Elevation XS7 -2010
– – Bed Elevation XS7 -2009
--
--
—
- - �- - Bed Elevation XS7 -2008
/rll
I
I
20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00
Station (ft)
AVV
90
80
70 -
3 60
u°
y 50
40
o.
30
20
10
0
�I� •III
1W
90
8o
70
60
- 50
m
40
E
0
v
30
20
10
N N V1 O O N O I� DD M� 10 N N O O OO O 10 N N V 0p pp Q
•"� O N N n rl M N V) N 1A V
O N N N 10/1 N O N OO N t'•1 a V) O W O 16 N O N O
V) N N N Ol N W Vt b N 7
O N N t1'1 N N
N O
N
Particle Size (mm)
ID YEAR PHASE FACET TYPE Wbkf Abkf Dbkf ID YEAR PHASE dS0 (mm) d84 (mm)
XS7 2008 DESIGN POOL 15.0 18.5 1.2 XS7 2009 MY2 <0.062 0.5
XS7 2008 MYl POOL 15.9 13.9 0.9 X57 2010 MY3 <0.062 0.2143
XS7 2009 MY2 POOL 15.6 12.3 0.8 XS7 2011 MY4 1.17 37.54
XS7 2010 MY3 POOL 12.0 11.5 1.0
X57 2011 MY4 POOL 13.1 14.4 1.1
Kimley -Horn
Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011 –Year 4 of 5 aW Mimate%Im
1W
90
8o
70
60
- 50
m
40
E
0
v
30
20
10
N N V1 O O N O I� DD M� 10 N N O O OO O 10 N N V 0p pp Q
•"� O N N n rl M N V) N 1A V
O N N N 10/1 N O N OO N t'•1 a V) O W O 16 N O N O
V) N N N Ol N W Vt b N 7
O N N t1'1 N N
N O
N
Particle Size (mm)
ID YEAR PHASE FACET TYPE Wbkf Abkf Dbkf ID YEAR PHASE dS0 (mm) d84 (mm)
XS7 2008 DESIGN POOL 15.0 18.5 1.2 XS7 2009 MY2 <0.062 0.5
XS7 2008 MYl POOL 15.9 13.9 0.9 X57 2010 MY3 <0.062 0.2143
XS7 2009 MY2 POOL 15.6 12.3 0.8 XS7 2011 MY4 1.17 37.54
XS7 2010 MY3 POOL 12.0 11.5 1.0
X57 2011 MY4 POOL 13.1 14.4 1.1
Kimley -Horn
Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011 –Year 4 of 5 aW Mimate%Im
Kimley -Horn
Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011 –Year 4 of 5 aW Mimate%Im

fll�� Kimley -Horn
Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247 )2011— Year 4of5 �� andPssoclatesjnt
MEREDELL MI LOWER STREAM PROFILE
Water Surface Slope
■
�������■
i
=l
Bankfiall Slope
�
���
. •rte=
v
�zx
=������
��������
MMEEMEMEMI
N
��C�iCT��@■.
�C���
111
11 •11 .11
1
1 : III 1
:11 111
1
11 9 T •
II
Channel A�Built Centerline
Channel C—Sectons
Constructed Riffle
t
_0 - `
% ..I-
fll�� Kimley -Horn
Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247 )2011— Year 4of5 �� andPssoclatesjnt

577.00
576.00
c
0
;gi75.00
d
W
574.00
+ Water Surface Elevation XS8 -
2011
t Bank-full Elevation X58
Bed Elevation XS8 -2011
� — Bed Elevation XS8 -2010
– – Bed Elevation XS8 -2009
VA M
- - �- - Bed Elevation XS8 -2008
20.00
i
80.00
100.00
120.00
Station (ft)
i
ID
YEAR
PHASE
FACET TYPE Wbkf
Abkf
Dbkf
XS8
2008
DESIGN
RIFFLE
10.2
8.0
0.8
I
2008
MY1
RIFFLE
11.9
8.7
0.7
XS8
2009
I
'r
a'
RIFFLE
11.7
9.0
9
XS8
2010
I
573.00
VA M
0.00
20.00
40.00 60.00
80.00
100.00
120.00
Station (ft)
ID
YEAR
PHASE
FACET TYPE Wbkf
Abkf
Dbkf
XS8
2008
DESIGN
RIFFLE
10.2
8.0
0.8
XS8
2008
MY1
RIFFLE
11.9
8.7
0.7
XS8
2009
MY2
RIFFLE
11.7
9.0
0.8
XS8
2010
MY3
RIFFLE
13.9
7.9
0.6
XS8
2011
MY4
RIFFLE
20.9
8.8
0.4
Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011 –Year 4 of 5
1VV
90 -
80
70 -
60
u
y 50 -
m 40
d
30
20
10
0
ARN
Jam!
II
' 1VU
90
80
70
60
ar
50 >
40 E
3
u
30
20
10
0
'N•ull VlrOT0 N'O r` 00 M w VJ•N'V1'O O 0010 O N N p 00'00
r0 N N 111
~ N O N N vi N 00 M N N T N I? T
V J o + a D M 00 6 VN 1 VrM L0 l N N Vt N 0 0 N V 0 N d
n
r0 N N N N Ol � W V1 rD N O
0 N N M N N
ut O
N
Particle Size (mm)
ID YEAR PHASE dS0 (mm) d84 (mm)
XS8 2009 MY2 16 90
XS8 2010 MY3 20.95 90
XS8 2011 MY4 29.31 81.41
C� KlMley -Horn
�I1 aWAVaociataalnc,
VA M
' 1VU
90
80
70
60
ar
50 >
40 E
3
u
30
20
10
0
'N•ull VlrOT0 N'O r` 00 M w VJ•N'V1'O O 0010 O N N p 00'00
r0 N N 111
~ N O N N vi N 00 M N N T N I? T
V J o + a D M 00 6 VN 1 VrM L0 l N N Vt N 0 0 N V 0 N d
n
r0 N N N N Ol � W V1 rD N O
0 N N M N N
ut O
N
Particle Size (mm)
ID YEAR PHASE dS0 (mm) d84 (mm)
XS8 2009 MY2 16 90
XS8 2010 MY3 20.95 90
XS8 2011 MY4 29.31 81.41
C� KlMley -Horn
�I1 aWAVaociataalnc,
C� KlMley -Horn
�I1 aWAVaociataalnc,

571
ace Elevation XS9 -
� 2
2011
t Bankfull Elevation X59
I B
Bed Elevation XS9 -2011
i
Bed Elevation XS9 -2010
�� Water Surf
—
— • + • —Bed Elevation XS9 -2009
- - -- - Bed Elevation XS9 -2008
� -
a
570
ti
s{
`
569
e
0
% 568
d
W
100
eel-
100
90
90
80
80
567
70
70
60
60
0?
s
50
SO
•�
�
u
�
40
40
E
566
d
Z
30
30
0-20
20
10
10
o
r� a
'N
565
YI'Vt, 0,0 N a n 00 M l0 10, N,Vf t O 00,0 w N N .1 w w
pNy N N 4 O N Y1 n '+ '~ N m V' 10 m -0
O O
.N-I N M u1 O
N N p N A a
N
V V1 Y1 O N a Yf M O 0
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
p01 N 00 V�1 l0 N 7
NMtiN"
Station (ft)
n o
Particle Size (mm)
ID
YEAR PHASE
FACET TYPE
Wbkf Abkf
Dbkf
ID
YEAR PHASE d50 (mm) d84 (mm)
XS9
2008 DESIGN
RIFFLE
10.2 8.0
0.8
XS9
2009 MY2 8 64
XS9
2008 MY1
RIFFLE
12.9 7.9
0.6
XS9
2010 MY3 41.75 164.94
XS9
2009 MY2
RIFFLE
13.1 9.3
0.7
XS9
2011 MY4 28.86 55.18
XS9
2010 MY3
RIFFLE
14.5 9.3
0.6
XS9
2011 MY4
RIFFLE
14.1 6.9
0.5
� Klmley -Horn
Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011— Year 4 of 5 � ana As9 maces.im
ace Elevation XS9 -
� 2
2011
t Bankfull Elevation X59
I B
Bed Elevation XS9 -2011
i
Bed Elevation XS9 -2010
�
—
— • + • —Bed Elevation XS9 -2009
- - -- - Bed Elevation XS9 -2008
� -
a
ti
s{

571.00
570.00
569.00
568.00
c
67.00
d
W
566.00
565.00
564.00
563.00
0.00
--r- Water Surface Elevation XS10-
2011
t Bankfull Elevation XS10
Bed Elevation XS10 -2011
- Bed Elevation XS10 -2010
- - Bed Elevation XS10 -2009
- - •- - Bed Elevation XS10 -2008
YEAR
PHASE
FACET TYPE
Wbkf
Abkf
Dbkf
ID
i
PHASE
dS0 (mm)
d84 (mm)
XS10
20.00
Station (ft)
40.00
60.00
100
90 -
80
70
60
u°
y 50 -
t 40
a 30
20
10
0
N �l1 �I1 O O N q 1� 00 M �D �D N Vl V O 00 O �O N N a OD DD
N ei1 N {p N Vf e}
V N N N V1 � O� 00 rl �O N M O ip O W O 6 Nr� N n
lD N N N N 01 N 00 t!1 t0 N V
O N N N M N N
V1 O
H
Particle Size (mm)
100
90
80
70
60 F
d
5o •.�-,
m
40 E
u
30
20
10
0
ID
YEAR
PHASE
FACET TYPE
Wbkf
Abkf
Dbkf
ID
YEAR
PHASE
dS0 (mm)
d84 (mm)
XS10
2008
DESIGN
POOL
15.0
III
1.2
XS10
2009
III_
<0.062
16
XS10
2008
MYl
II' �
11.9
12.7
1.1
II I�111'11RA��'I
XS10
2010
MY3
���1�1■
74.4
XS10
N �l1 �I1 O O N q 1� 00 M �D �D N Vl V O 00 O �O N N a OD DD
N ei1 N {p N Vf e}
V N N N V1 � O� 00 rl �O N M O ip O W O 6 Nr� N n
lD N N N N 01 N 00 t!1 t0 N V
O N N N M N N
V1 O
H
Particle Size (mm)
100
90
80
70
60 F
d
5o •.�-,
m
40 E
u
30
20
10
0
ID
YEAR
PHASE
FACET TYPE
Wbkf
Abkf
Dbkf
ID
YEAR
PHASE
dS0 (mm)
d84 (mm)
XS10
2008
DESIGN
POOL
15.0
18.5
1.2
XS10
2009
MY2
<0.062
16
XS10
2008
MYl
POOL
11.9
12.7
1.1
XS10
2010
MY3
20.4
74.4
XS10
2009
MY2
POOL
11.0
13.2
1.2
XS10
2010
MY3
POOL
9.9
14.2
1.4
XS10
2011
MY4
4.0
59.08
XS10
2011
MY4
POOL
10.1
12.4
1.2
KW dey -Horn
Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011 -Year 4 of 5 aWAssocato -Im

Table 10a 1 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Meredell Farm Stream Restoration Site/247 Reach UT1b 780 feet
Parameter lGauge'l
Regional Curve Pre Existing
Condlbon
Reference Reach ea
Data
Design
Monitoring
Baseline
Dlm_e_nslon anA S`ubatrate'�'°, RH11eiOrdy'
LL
UL
Eq
Mean
Mod
Max
SD
n
Mm
Mean
Mad
Max
SDS
n
Mm
Mad
Max
Mm
Mean
Mad
Max
SDS
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
so
64
147
40
6
73
Floodprone Width (ft)
?c,:af
9cs
255
170
590
200
6
Banldull Mean Depth (ft)
r26
02_
06
07
01
6
06
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
Z`�
Vic,
ar caC
09
09
1 1
01
6
07
08
09
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area fir
4 6
3 8
8 3
2 2
6
4 5
Width/Depth Rabo
�,,.'�.,,,
}
�-
14 0
11 8
362
7 4
6
12
Entrenchment Rabo
14
1 3
3 3
2 5
6 9
2 3
6
'Bank Height Rab
11
1 30
1 34
1 46
1 15
6
- Fz
^wr ... . _ -^1
� ' T37
Rrfe Length (ft) AIM TWA MEW
Riffle Slope (ftRi)
0093
0022
0 013
0 018
0 022
Pool Length (ft) �yC
Pod Max depth (ft) "
2 4
1 2
1 5
1 8
Pod Spacing (ft) ',�$
18
1,171
14 7
25 7
367
Channel Bettwidth (ft)jAIj= bttg I= 2M 10
140
26 1 425 59
Radius of Curvature (ft) j� MffA s 13 1
45
1
15 1 185 22
Re Bankfull width (ft/ft) lam` EMI 16
s 8
2 2 5 3
Meander Wavelength (ft) I l 80
400
51 66 81
Meander Width Rab 10
502
7 9 11
3
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lbhj
0 81Y�y
�r +r`.�s�.,,a �' 026
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
fM,'i 50
50
Stream Power trans E2rtEaMEa s
Al
ddtHonal Reach Parameters
ba r € F 3� "yF� 'k�grpr n��v °aK y_` #ra s +S� °F. uk s e
Rosgen Classification
G4 F4b E4b C4b
C4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Valley length (ft)
a
-EEZV� �Y
_
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
1450
uosity (ft)
12
14
Water Surfac Slope nel) (ft/fl)
00258
0 011
lope (ft/fl
MUMME IM- 5
00169
'6ankfull ea saes
MA!2&,A
4/ of Re'n Bank
i�
Channel Stitat Metn
&
�'��
- -
3 T�
ail! s'rb i
s - � 7°s`)i -
l or Othe
I l d m fr bes 2 Fm p M m m—I U P aline th tl><pmp L (Wiled Fnkfu0 wdun tra)
U Lm— yd pado. natmYi ftbeb.n1Ufl..,Ip re h6dwWbathcvwfim .p ftN h- fthetm —Ik,
PrUp fm ..dM6wdmthe V fm«a w mmto & 50f� d5 dthe w 3
M—da F—M otm.gR, (147)7011 Y-4 0 GCI1..e k

Table 10a 2 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Meredell Farm Stream Restoration Site/247 Reach UT2b 294 feet
Parameter IG..ge'l
RegionalCurve Pre Exislang
Condition
Reference Reach es)
Data
Design
Monitoring
Baseline
Mr en_slon an_d SuDstiat -!:RNe Only
LL
UL Eq
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD5
n `
Min
Mean
Mod
Max
SD
n
Min
Mad
Max
Min
Mean
Mad
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width ft)
49
6 6
68
81
1 3
4
73
Flood rune Width (ft)
,4.�,.C`.a
°
LL2 + 3
100
123
110
170
32
4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft
04
06
05
08
02
4
06
' Bankfull Max Depth ft
IRE
A.9L'f,
08
10
1 0
1 2
02
4
07
08
09
Bankfull Cross Sectorial Area ft3
24
37
31
62
18
4
4 5
Rat
Um" o„m �'+
9 8
12 8
116
184
32
4
12
'dth/Depth
Entrenchment Rat
CU � ,,�
1 6
1 9
1 9
2 3
0 3
4
'Bank Height Rat
0. .I�f. ___` >b
22
26
23
37
0 7
1
�E
PIOflMds,3�ia � 'y � a✓ b '�'r� 'a��'
� "'""$ti��' �, 9C�.�t�
�4 g q
"= % 1�r_..'`___.i°
� � �,'.�
��w �.
n Ar. aw °A'
A? t'1^� v9^ �qnr j ^" �a_ a''4 ea � tN�.
v,s
�3' N' �I
Rr le Length (ft)
t
Riffle Slope (fUft)
Imo' e am a2d
00091
0 225
1
1
0 016
0 021
0 027
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Max depth (ft)
EMZIZI ;IM
12
15
1 8
Pool Spacing (ft)
M ME &IM "TIN
147
257
367
`.'�'�4, yid ,±'i:�!
v�J'°•R+'
"i ti�..e'i «G4
5 r r"V t„y "g "i
4' y`@ '
Ai
Channel Belhndth (ft)
jy_ 15
26 1 425 59
Radius of Curvature (ft)jn9Mj3!"jdj=jZnt
1 3 1 13 1 1 1
1
15 1 185 22
Re Bankfull vndth (fVft
r_-MM EU& J&.1_ 04 19 1
1
2 1 25 3
Meander Wavelength (ft)IUWWI
12M 1 1 60 1 95 1 1 1
1
1
1 1 51 1 66 81
Meander Width RabojH2=j9=j2Mj3rMj
88 1 1 1 139 1
7 1 9 11
ranspoR puameters � i ,� 1°� ''� "�'�''�- ''�" .�. � � �,•
"DLL
Reach Shear Stress (competency) I 0 565
> ft" �"rg ' t��- % F'+� " _b g F";
0 439
Max part size (mm) mobllzed at bankfull sand
sand
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m 311
_� �.��FJ�° x
209
ddttlonal Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classificatio n
85 E5
C4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
29
_ r _ • "• b - s d .�
31
Banldull Discharge (cfs)
13
' �t..._
Valley length (ft)�
.3•itL�..b: '^ z_?".
y 2? .?n;a a';'.CA .!�'r.'IDt
Channel ThaM•eg length (ft)
uosity (ft)
112
12
Water Surfacnnel) (fVft)
00321
00134
lope (fVft)
00166
AArea
3Bankfull ea acres
4 / of Rein Bank
= a–
Channel Stitat Mein.
"'' s? - `�,` .
.`".a it%i"'6?` ^ ±'t'�'7YC�if vl
or Othe
L' ��s.gc`2'' �"
.� yd
1 i d Ybm fa Nee pvamdc cm mcbde of ro>•dm fiam boN Ib an wr ery r d ab IoeraudmJ poll F peq d N pm. U G p & o-bpe w N tlr Ico rt cL (dried b 11.ldJ me)
U bm{. ydegpo - fNeb.."a dplm- bW rbodd be Nc"w Gamthemp f6 b& fifstcrtrsrva lop
PrapnO (n�L mdm�bmb� ae cadR bead mtln hrvd V.s far •a�vnmbr®riv�dna f Of v+bn_._._, ad Jibe <�W
M rtdd[Fu M nau P� (117)3011 Yw4 f3 r-an -

Table 1 O 3 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Meredell Farm Stream Restoration Site/247 Reach M1 3200 feet
Parameter
lGauge'l
RogionalCurve Pre Existing
Condition
Reference Reach es Data
Design
monitoring
Baseline
I?!a sl_on and $utietnte�RHfleyOnly
LL
UL
Eq
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SDS
n
Min
Mod
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width ft
4 6
64
67
76
1 3
4
---102
Flood cone Width (ft)
IT f -IV
. '`_�
� A F
6 0
100
105
130
29
4
Bankfull Mean De (ft
0 8
1 0
1 0
1 1
01
4
08
' Bankfull Max Depth ft
R te`
1 2
1 3
1 4
14
01
4
1
1 15
13
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft?
3 7
70
74
94
25
4
86
Width/Depth Rati
Oaf U�"�
5 8
68
67
79
09
4
12
Entrenchment Rati
X
1 2
1 5
15
1 9
03
4
'Bank Height Rabcl
JIMM12MIRMT11
28
1 30
1 29
1 34
1 03
1 4
1
t
Riffle Length (ft)
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) NEBW SIM
0 016 0 021
0 026
Pool Length (ft) sm
Pod Max depth (ft)
1 7 2 1
2 5
Pod Spacing (ft) 'kT
20 3 35 55
50 8
Pitt A
Channel Beltwidth (ft)l JUMIMM3 20
30
36 585 81
Radius of Curvature (ft) ll 16 1
25
20 25 30
Rc Bankfull width (fVR) 25 1
39
2 1 25 1 3
Meander Wavelength (ft)INOMMI) 70 1
170
71 915 112
Meander Width Rati 11 1
266
7 9 11
-
Reach Shear Stress (competency) I 061
"Kra °Z'1 'may). "7A 054
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfulljC2kvgAjaUEnjrNCj2jQMj 52
-�' "' r "+.�', 52
Stream Power trans PO rt as a W/m
r. �.. -..z_
Aditlonal Rea_MTParamet s�,2
s r
c ` *'f u nff IT-
'"s[
Rosgen Classification,,,vs
+�S!? G4c
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
� _ ��_3„ e'„ t
Bankfull Discharge (ds)
' �r y �y
- e u
acr II'vy,
Valley length (ft)o
u.nr
a c^ o+ • x
Via• mceg"�g" s �'r " °x?k ?
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
"
Sinuosity (ft)
108
Water Surface Slope (Channel)
0 013
BF slope
°
' Bankfull Flood lain Area a
V::-=
4/ of Reach with Erodln B
Channel Stability or Habitat M
Biological or
�r���
t° _ P 4 _
R� . r srw a �+• "� *s�L+.>;
1 7 d eeb— frc mse punier .-1 2 FQ i— m r th ea—W U5 p 6 . M the Pmld eueh (bided hetlLll wdutm eR)
3 Lftc— . dWprvdec nemW ftln 6�rtffull (loodplm� move mhehwW hdiemfiom the tap ibekbihe fthe xre ever/YP
I ]? p — finch c 3
M -Ia F—M m e R (247)2011 Y-4 f5 r- on \.,d.�.� -

Table 10b 1 Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate Bed Bank and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
Meredell Farm Stream Restoration Site /247 Reach UT1 b (780 feet)
Parameter
Pro-Existing Condition
Reference Reach es Data
Design
As built/Baseline
rsar_as a mss .
- -
MIA �
jav> T I
i --.X- . >
•g
x _ s - -< I -V
,C A'
4 �
RI / /Ru / /P / /G / /S/
r
�*�
A&
A&
SC / /Sa / /G / /C / /B / /Be/
I
I
I
I
tl16 / d35 d50I d841 d95 / dip / dl (mm
1 081
1121
3841
632
50
,�
ntrenchment Class <1 5 / 1 5 1 99 12 0-4 915 0-9 91 > 1
�'�
y
��S
§ -
'�
i
i —
,
--f—
Incision Class <1 2 / 1 2 1 4911 5-1 991 >2
_
F
' r
yp
Sha*doah MdoMMtld vA4=* db fibbim ,
1 RIIM R Pod in
Gbd. SMp S&Q.Y Sd Gr.M C bNt S.A. B dadC dp —M drap rrax adF-
2 E hw hn � Clm Amg6bn 1 r bobV^ r 1 C— dcmtl d pro 6 N P r Yp f N bW M tl bdp wch ku I N t W Th vI nM ham M muaintl oas to o %Q vmW WM�s
3 Aa OV —M rude b.W. tdo th d— W. daM Raid•M pawdpt fM btIi footpr dt do h WbM Th .9 —A ft— M —bw s m %W M b pM1rd 1prA
Foobbt 2 3 Thus dduw idaMy buA v d M Rog Uer.11 d lunrd by tr d we dl sbd Your do —M f mWn t wreWUt w W bind m —1 � in M Mid a MA inavuw 1 xy apart lar ER raid t be emo,ry
Tt br4hen b,.N M rwarkemura dd.W Wrm t mp Wnabe ah good pn rrt— fth loan[ fljdclnp m W mat M pe.mara g dM n b&At d" HN u conprt w Mr m dIWWJ r
ER d BHR h. bun ad&—d prl A—A m u vAwro* ( pat f dr dept arr y) h r i wbu.*. I IMn k—1 MWy f & M g d=W rmnut pmr hW M mV pr►wn d Ob b f M w p— I g M n loo am Mh uno, N ,qh h,,* w M WAN wc8wi f
M ruck Th m tl M dabtad m b Mew p� hn U dr d M hoa b M aowMCb army[ aM dM bV dwW R M d M cut 1 ER url a bn Wm F wrl;M M typal IorN d W R fi panrb urr4Mp Ii BHR M MM b ym Mow.bp d t aowaxb d Ihtnf n can W n My Wgn M Wr
--910. umpMd ftf f.M wp.m M by pro4Vth dWbA ko rpt wwrybp W aw gM COnpmo
M— &UF —M ma Rs (747)3011 Y-4 f5 Gonad b

Table 10b 2 Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate Bed Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
Meredell Faris Stream Restoration Site/247 Reach UT2b (294 feet)
Parameter
Pre Existing Condition
Reference Reach es Data
Design
As built/Baseline
_�,Nl�t_. ' a'Sii'k •191f -^3. YT 1 ;wr _ _r, d.. =....*
�i.�.iLil� "`Q it %�.�3.
..w.L+ _P aK 4, m.r _= 3�.sS�L.
....TMrSf�J
iCt Vv
t.`& Pt ,M
ir�i30
RI/ IRu/ /P/ /G/ /S
d
I
I
SCA /Sa / /G /IC /IB / /Be/
'�
fc
_.
a
+'r—
Adr09.3
R�L
- .t�i��
'd16 / d35 / d50 I d84 l d95 / tL I dl (mm
0 035
0 051
0 13
0 22
05
Fa,
"&
e ,,,
'' &6
14,a, f
l
-v---
$_,_ I
' g
Entrenchment Class <1 5/1 5-1 99 / 2 0-4 915 0.9 9/ >1
i y
��
Incision Class <1 2 / 1 2 1 4911 5-1 991 >2
o
Y
Shad cd r U t tint W lyp * a c 14d
1 Rme R Pool CJde SUP SIbGq Sri G3 I Cobble Bodda B dock dip n pm dap my abpew
2 Enka U CUa A.Wp lM n fodpe b tti deew mdobtl erW prwtle we pnca�7e f to bid MK fWa each dm A table Tired moot from M nruurra aoaam m rwl euel eq mMea
J Awgnt M near � b M dw d I uM Ro de M P—Uge I U Utd wdr kabo dt d ®ki M Ubl, Th rd rmd hom n � ooasrtOms YM =M kpg9L,drW Poo
Poebul 2A Th daueev bod"b-Ax ridU Ros ndmdkabm"ht n1 Vb dd—di red WMyt rmk f e mrr t mrneWUtc W G In t th beW dMM tme w m rt 1 xy cg—In ER wald lb --ry
Th lerd h n b pr vfd Ih —dukw rm f deso"m nt=V f smile wih (pod gn N corm f le e f hy&dW mbcmnt I the prim g w th nhWhled f M 1 w 0.— b q rifer a a.bbr6o
ER d DH hw bee e*kuwd pm adrtnsoru wb rr;b (wure•ctm put f th d• T ems' y) h w Nees buffow My M foa nW* fa,&� g deems wfhaN prwv q fw—gh preoombukw dNbw f Net pennWn Urvup M nederkonumu w1h ur b dui .q� MMy w n *bbl e m f
do f Th nuns duim dnbiNbo b I prtrmbu hotdd krrkd a ban both aoaswcbo .r rid the g".W POfY d n cue fER In F ample U ".WI rat d dpr fWp--pkrQ Ith SHRe1 ft by dthineabpdt uusMCbon akM r.f—cmee -* tWr dPwde
Rnn cart{YM —nple daft b f f— Parr . llrub' K—kV th dMWOadm .p fo—Y b MO man 9M oar —
Mr-dd F—M to Rpo (247)X111 Yeu4 t5 r-u \.1°"^"d�,,,I -

Table 10b 3 Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate Bed Bank and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
Meredell Farm Stream Restoration Site /247 Reach M1 (3200 feet)
Parameter Pro Existing Condition
Reference Reach es Data
Design
As built/Baseline
Ri /IRu / /P / /G /IS/
LLe�t4�
SC / /Sa /IG / /Ch /B / /Be /
y
d16 / d35 I d50I d84I d95I di I di (mm
o 3
16 5
60 4
129
5
'Entrenchment Class <1 5 / 1 5-1 99 / 2 0.4 9 / 5 0-9 9 / >1
_yg�
,< A
I
SL.,.
�
+�_
;
74sion Class <t 2 / 1 2 1 4911 5.1 991 >2
y1
fad
1.
n+y
, p
_
w
�
Sh.Wtdar dl b fhath«.wtjF4* db.f td
t ROW R Pod Glb Sbp SWCdry S M ( C Me Ba Bedodc dp n P. dp n tube
2 E baf hnt CYa AWW6Wi radfloot- .mbtlrd— ndabdr pr fMpxcrdept fN t*Wn WfuatWt q d— M bbM Th vd tAfromth rtw Wamain nwl m d drt
3 A.Vb b n.ch l•abq rdo tfr dst Nand rim P. w prwe p fn bWr faat -p t dmmM h Th rairmWf ft--,Muth MYtudfxlpf.n
Foafmt 2,3 Ths data to body bult u nd th Rote dnsffl n rid Maid b g tna)u bM wa. A mW fphty t m k f ae t Wp t t .om.wh t w W b"W tl wtrrur. b r.W t th t rfrurr rrinp 1 try t W— f. ER woW at bt eonatry
Th tr h.f. b b R wd. th .dW.— f d W M na ,, formlbo wth good en W n a 1 b rd.rd f tydW g m h m N T pernmbp d th wh bibbd" w.l mfrpuuo b th lu . dtbbul
ER d BHR h b .da.od I pb adnbtfon ubm,* (amadroro prt f th d.tW tw Y) h w r the tub—On W h fa nerdy m fa h3 p do W wbtnN proud p M= gh pnwznnAOn dWbubon f bs pvtvrrbw Inv W d rtb konaun wdh —Vb h t w.hybd h ly m ih tmhl tea f
n w Th rm.rm"M ft.WW b pis p.ranrt w h b ndudt dm from bdhM uon-um .. yt rk drb gbd^Wpr n. d b nrt fER W tMaW F t -ple th typal bgl duWpr at wt t pb•p fb BHRd fib b. dthor. nbpdt aoi 9qi dih ref—c be r"* bg� dpMM
nmr. m 0 ttniplt datrbub f bwae pr�w ft—by p—bV b debbubw Iota -. . wy b Rawdt m gfLd cwrpur•on
Mm UFmmM —o R (247) 2011 Y.tr4 f5 r_mn -- orY -

Tablellal MonttoringData Dimensional
Meradell Farm Stream Restoration Stte,1247 Reach UT1bt79Of*eQ
vdan. an dple arm m ro rurrJ w d .ard dw b�drr Grtl 1 d �d d dm .Ydpw 14, eprwl 1 M N Nmeee e o d» d.oe vlirJi ahoutl a omvr.e aed e...d oe w m Yu an.n..e.e.m.a r N Wd hn h W p N o a a g tl m wr
b pro y— th muM W d—r d Wh EEP r tfr cynot W —t-d bn to g- y. n pat bm b M • th hoild G n W d ftt r b h ucsrd d do m rab N daLac ha be mrn�rd r h m rmorry hnbry w m y aAnriu k bt.d v k*
AddNOnl d b from pro perform n berg equal b p ,,Ie wrhm Lori V km vi be recaloYbd n M­& b a.d con M d t d d temuud b b. r—e—ry
vdan. an dple arm m ro rurrJ w d .ard dw b�drr Grtl 1 d �d d dm .Ydpw 14, eprwl 1 M N Nmeee e o d» d.oe vlirJi ahoutl a omvr.e aed e...d oe w m Yu an.n..e.e.m.a r N Wd hn h W p N o a a g tl m wr
b pro y— th muM W d—r d Wh EEP r tfr cynot W —t-d bn to g- y. n pat bm b M • th hoild G n W d ftt r b h ucsrd d do m rab N daLac ha be mrn�rd r h m rmorry hnbry w m y aAnriu k bt.d v k*
AddNOnl d b from pro perform n berg equal b p ,,Ie wrhm Lori V km vi be recaloYbd n M­& b a.d con M d t d d temuud b b. r—e—ry

Table Ila 2 Monitoring Data Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters — Cross Sections)
Meredell Farm Stream Restoration Stte/247 Reach UT2b (2% feet)
1 w M de. r , u.Q r rvry w b. .M b buYQ — 9 � — ,Wtl.po rM�— I, N Ir.�bo r .0 a m W ha .— — — tM WiwOWm �EVIrG YN PM rmrlm Nw1EMT wqd ro rq iM NWm a�tl
fo pn y—w m b. A.am.d dh EEP tl fn o.m.b b r...n.d m bm fe gw yo m mpw wb mobob. m w h
. * b, rck b d wee OaEe. h s vrarb R w, m r.m rip tl.b.e b a w ftm n to m M ro h st y ww, m y M ru cW.A.0 d var.
AAEWaW A.b. from pro Wfb- b.ro oq mdmpo d canbr b V km A okJ.b.d 1Wn wbr— b nG oon Md.—yd ft- r db b. n...u.ry
ElveJe rM�o+¢y+pm CUA.A rr d Gin r,� to
1 w M de. r , u.Q r rvry w b. .M b buYQ — 9 � — ,Wtl.po rM�— I, N Ir.�bo r .0 a m W ha .— — — tM WiwOWm �EVIrG YN PM rmrlm Nw1EMT wqd ro rq iM NWm a�tl
fo pn y—w m b. A.am.d dh EEP tl fn o.m.b b r...n.d m bm fe gw yo m mpw wb mobob. m w h
. * b, rck b d wee OaEe. h s vrarb R w, m r.m rip tl.b.e b a w ftm n to m M ro h st y ww, m y M ru cW.A.0 d var.
AAEWaW A.b. from pro Wfb- b.ro oq mdmpo d canbr b V km A okJ.b.d 1Wn wbr— b nG oon Md.—yd ft- r db b. n...u.ry
ElveJe rM�o+¢y+pm CUA.A rr d Gin r,� to

--- - -_ �
C� = Cam] = 1--3 L -j C - J - r C-.� Table I 1& 3 Monitoring Data Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters — Cross Sections)
Meredell Farm Stream Restoration Site/247 Reach M1 (3200 fee)
WAOi W depN a im a eeeeM W d — m - E een V drNn WM� d dmnuaoydrpoeOOnY dMOprwrd. hPR IM WNW oud u T —.— w.- ve m beeed Or beer4r dman ubbbhed tl iM pMame I h rbd tlw p leQ r,d vrial acyu bn aW Vn red
b p- ya nthem W O—d Nth EEP "th —tG—K d - b g— yearssporta b trots 9edraW be ndW ddW t h utcM mdth m Raced —h. thm — rph.0 y W-hm y Mfh-- W.WdwW-
Addh rW data from pr perfo w be 8 ortved b pm d oDr*m b V bn wd be r— kaAtrd fWr bero b Red mrs terRd — d d Lean rqd fo be rgceaaary
.
o®©©
mo
©omo
©mo
©omo
©mo
©om
©mmo
©omo
©m
©v
mmmmmmmmmmm
®mmmm
®mmmmmm
®m
®mmmmmmmmm
mmmmmmmmm�mmmmmmmm
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmmm��mmmmm��mmmmm��mmmmm��mmmmm��
mmmmm��
mmmm
®��mmmmm��mmmmm��mmmmm��
mmmmmmmmmm
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
®mmmm
- •mmmmmmm
®mmm
®mmmm
®mmmmmmmmmmm
®
®mmmmm
-
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
-
�mmmm���mmmm���mmmm���mmmm���mmmm��
mmmmmmmmmm�
®mmmmm��mmmmo
®mmmmmmmomm
WAOi W depN a im a eeeeM W d — m - E een V drNn WM� d dmnuaoydrpoeOOnY dMOprwrd. hPR IM WNW oud u T —.— w.- ve m beeed Or beer4r dman ubbbhed tl iM pMame I h rbd tlw p leQ r,d vrial acyu bn aW Vn red
b p- ya nthem W O—d Nth EEP "th —tG—K d - b g— yearssporta b trots 9edraW be ndW ddW t h utcM mdth m Raced —h. thm — rph.0 y W-hm y Mfh-- W.WdwW-
Addh rW data from pr perfo w be 8 ortved b pm d oDr*m b V bn wd be r— kaAtrd fWr bero b Red mrs terRd — d d Lean rqd fo be rgceaaary

J
1 Th d t oub ! thse paramet re m T d de f mob h at Goth th aeaaact rvefa dth yt d at pr f l
2 P port of ca axNht g be b that w d g based th m at rvey f m a. exam t tabl
3 Rd0 R P d Gl de St p Sit 21 Y Sa d Gra d C bbl B Jder Bed k dip max pa d p mac bpe
4 Of d a/ aadad y f th exceed 3
� 0 -- . (.) e f Gun =-
Exhibit Table 11b 1 Monttonng Data Stream Reach Data Summary
Meredell Farm Stream Restoration Site/247 Reach t/T1b 80 feet
Parameter
Baseline
(Design)
MY 1
MY-2
MY 3
MY 4 MY 5
floe aW !199 tr -Rdfle wity`.>v.-
Mn
Mean
M d
Max
SD
M e
M d
M.
SD
M M
Med Max
SD
n
M
M
M.
SD
n
M
Me
M d
Max
SD M M an Med Max SD
B kfu0 W dth (ft)
73
1043
120
12
WA
3
1571
12 54f24
02
WA
3
114 1532
117 2282
WA
3
95
12 69
1722
WA
3
101
102
101
104
WA 3
Floodprone Width (ft)
8053
735919645
WA
3
7158 7852
749 8903
WA
3
6617
7586
91 22
WA
3
64 9
78 0
78 3
90 8
WA 3
Bankfull Moen Depth (R)
0 6
0 867
1 0
1
WA
3
0 553
0 5
0 8
WA
3
036 0 527
0 5 0 74
WA
3
0 42
0 51
N702
064
WA
3
0 5
0 6
0 6
0 7
WA 3
BankftA Max De th R
0 8
1 333
1 6
1 6
WA
3
[3067
1 537
1 5
244
WA
3
0 71 1 157
1 4 1 41
WA
3
0 71
1 253
1 72
WA
3
0 9
1 1
1 1
1 4
WA 3
B Mull C Sect al Ar ft
4 5
9 167
11 5
11 5
WA
3
8 533
10 1
11 36
WA
3
4 28 7 903
8 5 10 97
WA
3
402
6 457
8 07
WA
3
5 1
6 2
8 1
7 4
WA 3
W dth/D pth R 4
12
1233
12 5
12 5
WA
3
31 3
27 1
51 11
WA
3
15 41 31 84
32 6 47 54
WA
3
17 73
2566
3664
WA
3
139
171
176
198
WA 3
Entr nchrne t Rat
564
6 8
7 69
WA
3
3 28 5 73
6 1 781
WA
3
4 08
6 363
7 0
804
WA
3
6 3
7 7
7 8
9 0
WA 3
k H t R t
1
1
1
WA
3
1 1 067
106 112
WA
3
11
1 187
118
122
WA
3
10
12
12
13
WA 3
rA
31.;.i�
�.". E ..n, ',:, '"` _
x'" I-A.
mss.
_
E.Y
.�_
_ �
'l
�i,Lt
.}L--
.�..
--
.^1��
= z' .� nl .L, ''
MIA L gin (R)
597
167
597
R M Sl p (11/R)
00058
00247
00520
P I Length (R)
372
384
693
P I Max d pth (R)
06
09
14
P I Sp n .7 R)
186
545
924
Channel B Itwdth (ft)l I I
I 1 1 _mss >RL_
Radtua of Curvature (MI I
9.1$ --w-f rLs I-- �---
"°- P aem data IWI t tYPcaBY be rdledad deco h al d to dimerc al data pwl data
,._t' egWca t hdb f m bead
„s„>L&
dth (R/R)
wAL r$$ .3'a. �. 1.x MU 'f3:b —t
- Y R Qw Iffin ' �1 EM
.., $ , t Jai �
Mlength (M
' .°e s if3"i� �R ! Artie. �a _
4aakfuH
dth Reh
I ' N' . t >
6 r.i9 Fes§
6c�, : IE M WWrA WL, Me
"It s
awr! } `� MM MM l
mWa- Raei3t Pl
'�i0':"S A '8_ 1SZ4! r z:��F:�_'�"��'�
yK„�_
I.Mssihcab
Ch el ThaMeg I gth (ft)
Stn arty (R)
W t S d Sl p (Ch el) (fttM
BF .J p (fVft)
/ /Ru / /PAIGAIS
SC.6 / S .6 / G ,G / C.6 / B A / B
dl6 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95
A f R ch wth Er d 8
Channel St W ty H b tat M bi
Bi I &� Oth
1 Th d t oub ! thse paramet re m T d de f mob h at Goth th aeaaact rvefa dth yt d at pr f l
2 P port of ca axNht g be b that w d g based th m at rvey f m a. exam t tabl
3 Rd0 R P d Gl de St p Sit 21 Y Sa d Gra d C bbl B Jder Bed k dip max pa d p mac bpe
4 Of d a/ aadad y f th exceed 3
� 0 -- . (.) e f Gun =-

r _
1 Th dstnbu0� f� ttas persmeteram d de f mao h mboth th oa-s cb rvey and in I WUA .1P fl
2 P porn of each exbbb g ba ka that err erod g based M m ual May 1 m m d as seem t t d
3 RAM R Pod CA de St p 9ltla Y Sand Gm d C bbl Boulder Bed do dp max pav d p max uhpe
wavam — r r Czn..—
Exhibit Table 11b 2 Monitonng Data Stream Reach Data Summary
Meredell Farm Stream Restoration Srte/247 Reach UT2 294 feet
Parameter
Bawhm (Design)
MY 1 MY-2
MY 3
MY 4 MY 5
stun and 9ubstreb -RAlla mly,r&
Mm
Men
M d
Mex
SD
M
M
M d
Me:
SD
M M M d
M
SD
n
M
M
M d
Mes
SD
n
M
M
M d
Max
SD n M M M d M. SD
Benklu0 W dth (ft)
7
95
95
12
WA
2
10
1709
171
24 18
WA
2 765 1279 12 8
17 93
WA
2
9 3
1292
12 9
1654
WA
2
90
13 1
131
173
WA 2
Floodpo aNdth(ft)
1157
1158
1158
116
WA
2 8076 9801 980
1153
WA
2
1139
1147
1147
1154
WA
2
1101
1127
1127
1153
WA 2
Bankfug Mean D pth (ft)
06
08
08
1
WA
2
084
089
09
094
WA
2 071 086 0 9
101
WA
2
078
087
0 9
096
WA
2
08
1 0
1 0
1 1
WA 2
Bankfug M Depth ft
08
12
12
16
WA
2
1 5
204
20
211
WA
2 121 1 735 1 7
226
WA
2
1 36
186
1 9
236
WA
2
1 2
1 8
1 8
23
WA 2
Be kfull C os S b al Ar a fir
45
8
80
115
WA
2
842
1559
156
2275
WA
2 54 1179 11 8
18 18
WA
2
729
1159
11 6
1588
WA
2
7 1
13 1
131
190
WA 2
Wd&dD pthR a
12
1225
123
125
WA
2
119
1881
168
2572
WA
2 1077 1426 143
1775
WA
2
1192
1458
1{6
1723
WA
2
112
135
135
158
WA 2
E tr dtm tR 4
{77
8185
82
116
WA
2 643 849 85
1055
WA
2
689
965
97
1241
WA
2
67
95
95
123
WA 2
B k H R 4
1
1
1
1
WA
2 1 1 1
1
WA
2
1.03
108
108
113
WA
2
1 1
1 1
1 1
11
WA 2
_° K
FM
"
zu
�
�d
• fk
sf �
ors
n-1
r. ,L
�
t M
RtfM L gth (ft)
208
353
468
R M SI p (2 1)
00059
00140
00310
Pool L gth (ft)
379
519
776
P I Max d pth (ft)
12
1 6
22
P I Sp a g (ft)
5 77 99
750
96 1y
Y
!
�a�
WYE
. w
.Sf.�1. -L
Ew
4
=
py� ,..!yp gy. cyc ',�(.�,� y
� ,YSI.:+ P&M r_1 , Ala 3!M a +�
Channd Belhwdth (ft)
.` .:G.r` �,.. .a..,c -� i.r :, ....3 ...�
:+_.
f a
a�
.b,U._
t+
x
_1>�
i... y
r '�t
c-JE
'¢� :�` sh'� rM -%C an
Radius of Curvature (ft)
3 3(d;F W - ' _ ...1`x 4
P d dirt wll t tip dry be caU a d Ir d data d macro at data p fl dam dmt
erg MCerd hfmf m bed
�`- hNL fm �
Vag 31 UW IO- � ?tom CA
R B kfull wdth (�)
MA fetes Fitt s
Meander Wwelangtlt (ft)
� MM `x § 3'f
M
Meands WItlOt Reh
� 3 sm me
,Bj. , �
1r3. mil �.( t il� >
sw :964
drhOnai ReiollYParatnalsra
���'�'fic
��
�` .�'�
t�5w 4 �
R gen CI saMcah
Ch d Th Iweg I gth (ft)
SI dy (ft)
W t S rf ce SI p (Ch 1) (ft/ft)
BF .d p (ft/ft)
IS
SC A I S A/ G A/ C A/ B A/ B
a.+ �
.a 2' I
.a1ti.
.ails
.,-. m
r'1,,,�`•..A2..L
��
�^_�'
'd16/d35' I d50 / d84 / d95
A f R h with Eroding Ban
Ch r1n I St b l ly H b tat M m
B I g cal Oth
1 Th dstnbu0� f� ttas persmeteram d de f mao h mboth th oa-s cb rvey and in I WUA .1P fl
2 P porn of each exbbb g ba ka that err erod g based M m ual May 1 m m d as seem t t d
3 RAM R Pod CA de St p 9ltla Y Sand Gm d C bbl Boulder Bed do dp max pav d p max uhpe
wavam — r r Czn..—

7
h; ;M }e Mee pamnrbn a~r #W o-/am 90 ft m bolhth ih b gadr.1 profit
2 Propoft fm h :R�b&V br ko dat re mdrg based the v=W e y from wnl netem Kt"
7 Rd* Rut P 1 Gbd Sbp Sit101ay Sand Gr-W Gabble B W Bedrock dp — par• dap — et,bp M
4 ON" *—dad Ay dTe —.d.3
DaExhlbtt Table 11b 3 Monitoring ta
Meredell Farm Stream Restoration Stte/247 Reach M1 (3200 feet)
.' m
mmm® m
m ©
©mmmmm ©
©mmm ®
®m ©
©mmmmm ©
©mmm ®
®m ©
©������
- • �
������mmmmmOmmmmmOmmm ®
®m0��m�� ©
©������
z :,...rJ .Ye•.''•'.:: "r::.. ^.d1l:a. -.}.!3 :
:r ?: N: 1F„' .,. '.�� ®
® ®
® ®
® ®
®•aiilR:�����m �
�m
wkcWd .
.
.i. . .... : .. .. . .. .. . -. 0
00'"'''0'''•
0 •''�"' � `Q"-'. i
00000 ®
... . ______DO� 0
® ® ®�0�'0'•' 0
000000���':�" 0
... :. - .. A. ..e.:....r4::' R`.J':1.�:i•:1�11L.ir(,+ :' �
�H:. <�y. ..• ... R '
irsiY'.i:�aY Y, l
liFfiLiL -:ri1 "
": \. 'f. 'SJt':C�i =
=(: i
'
h; ;M }e Mee pamnrbn a~r #W o-/am 90 ft m bolhth ih b gadr.1 profit
2 Propoft fm h :R�b&V br ko dat re mdrg based the v=W e y from wnl netem Kt"
7 Rd* Rut P 1 Gbd Sbp Sit101ay Sand Gr-W Gabble B W Bedrock dp — par• dap — et,bp M
4 ON" *—dad Ay dTe —.d.3

)
L�
F-,
Li
APPENDIX E
HYDROLOGIC DATA
I;,

Table 12 Verification of Bankfull Events
Meredell Farm Stream Restoration Site /247
Date of Data
Collection
Date of
Occurrence
Method
Photo #
(if available)
8/4/2010
N/A
Crest Gage Reading 1 96 above WS
SP1
10/20/2011
N/A
Crest Gage indicates BKF event
SP1
Meredell Farm Monitoring Report (247) 2011 —Year 4 of 5
G i and Associates. nx.