20201551 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20210302

DWR
mrlslon of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
October 26, 2020 Ver 3.3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
C Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20201551
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office *
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
City of Sanford - Little Buffalo Creek Outfall Rehab
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Troy Beasley
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
3/2/2021
Nearest Body of Water
Little Buffalo Creek
Basin
Cape Fear
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.475104
Pre -Filing Meeting Information
ID#
20201551
Pre -fling Meeting or Request Date*
12/21/2020
Longitude:
-79.169823
Attach documentation of Pre -Filing Meeting Request here:*
DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form_2020-10-21.pdf
E79MWV-Y.PDF
Version#*
1
What amout is owed?*
r $240.00
r $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Stephanie Goss:eads\sagoss
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
Version
1
51.14KB
581.6K6
A. Processing Information U'
County (or Counties) where the project is located:

Lee
Is this a NCDMS Project
r Yes r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
P Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
r Yes
r No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
W Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 12 - Utility Lines
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
Ild. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
Ile. Is this notification solelyfor the record because written approval is not required?
For the record onlyfor DWR 401 Certification:
For the record onlyfor Corps Permit:
r 401 Water Quality Certification - E)press
r Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
t^ Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
W Owner r Applicant (other than owner)
1e. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
City of Sanford
2b. Deed book and page no.:
WA- Utility Easement
2c. Responsible party:
Paul Weeks - City Engineer
2d.Address
r Yes r No
r Yes r No

Street Address
PO Box3729
Address Line 2
City
Sanford
Postal / Zip Code
27330
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Troy Beasley
4b. Business Name:
WithersRavenel
4c.Address
Street Address
219 Station Road
Address Line 2
Suite 101
CRY
Wilmington
Postal / Zip Code
28405
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
Authority for appointment of Agent -Little Buffalo Creek.pdf
State / Province / Fargion
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
State / Province / legion
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
304.35KB
C. Project Information and Prior Project History C^U
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(d appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Sanford
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
N/A -Utility Easement
2c. Project Address
Street Address
From Alcott Street to E. Chisolm Street
Address Line 2
city
Sanford
Postal / Zip Code
27330
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Little Buffalo Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C
2b. Property size:
Project Area-2.5 acres
State / Province / tegion
NC
Country
USA
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*

Cape Fear
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030300030607
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The proposed sewer alignment is located within existing paved roads, ROW, existing cleared easement and woodlands.
The land use in the general vicinity consists of a mixture of residential and commercial land use.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
USGS Quads-2019.pdf
563.4KB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Lee Co Soil Survey-1989.pdf 1.59MB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.22 acres within project area (impacts)
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
181 If within project area
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the proposed project is to rehabilitate ±5,400 If of existing gravity sewer line to accommodate current sewer flows and repair/replace aging pipes and manholes in an
effort to reduce sewer overflows.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The project proposes to replace ±5,400 If of aging and failing sewer line (both 16" & 18") with an 18" sewer line. The project includes dig and replace methods, pipe bursting, and boring
and jacking where appropriate to rehabilitate existing sewer lines. Most of the sewer line will be replaced in the current location of the pipe and easement within existing paved roads,
ROW, and cleared/maintained easements. However, some portions of the sewer line and easement are being relocated to eliminate existing logistical issues, including sewer lines on
private property without an appropriate easement and even sewer lines being beneath existing structures.
Typical commercial construction equipment and techniques will be used to construct the proposed project.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
LITTLE BUFFALO CREEK IMPACT MAPS.pdf 2.2MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No O Unknown
Comments:
WithersRavenel completed a delineation of the sewer alignment in January 2020. The delineation
identified three streams, including Little Buffalo Creek, and two wetlands within the sewer alignment.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Exhibit and wetland/upland data forms have been
provided in support of the delineation. Please note that we are not requesting issuance of a
Preliminary JD in conjunction with issuance of the NAP 12.
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Alyssa Ricci
Agency/Consultant Company: WithersRavenel
Other:
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
Preliminary JD Exhibit.pdf 331.04KB
DP-1-Wetland A.pdf 30.78KB
DP-2 - Upland.pdf 30.71 KB
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed projector related activity?
No

D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
W Wetlands W Streams -tributaries ❑ Buffers
r Open Waters r Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
2a1 Reason(?)
2b. Impact type * (')
2c. Type of W. *
2d. W. name *
2e. Forested *
2C Type of
Impact
J12g.
Jurisdicition*(?)
area
Im act 2A P
Sewer CrossingT
Headwater Forest
Wetland B
Yes
Both
0.090
(acres)
Im act 2B
P
Temp Construction
P
T
Headwater Forest
Wetland B
Yes
Both
0.030
Easement
(acres)
Impact 4
Sewer Crossing
T
Headwater Forest
Wetland A
No
Both
0.100
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.220
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.220
2h. Comments:
See PCN cover letter for details on impacts.
3. Stream Impacts
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.000
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type *
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type *
3f. Type of
3g. S. width *
3h. Impact
❑
(?)
Jurisdiction*
length*
S1
Impact 1 -Sewer Removal
p
Tem ora
p rY
Other
Stream 1 - Little Buffalo
Perennial
Both
20
10
Creek
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
3Y
Impact 2 -Sewer Crossing
Temporary
Other
Stream 1 - Little Buffalo
Perennial
Both
20
40
Creek
Average (feet)
(linearfee[)
S3
Impact 3 - Sewer Crossing
Temporary
Other
fream 2
Intermittent
Both
10
46
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeet)
�
Impact 5 - Sewer Crossin
P g
Tem orar
P y
Other
Stream 3
Intermittent
Both
10
30
Average (feet)
(liriearfeet)
S5
Impact 5A - Sewer Crossing
Temporary
Other
Stream 1 - Little Buffalo
Perennial
Both
20
55
Creek
Average (feet)
(lirrfeet)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31. Total permanent stream impacts:
0
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
181
3j. Comments:
See PCN cover letter for details on impacts.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
181
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Most of the project will be constructed within the existing sewer corridors that mostly exist in existing roadways. The impacts related to relocated sewer
are necessary due to infrastructure related constraints and elevational constraints related to gravity sewers. Impact 5A is due to the fact the existing
sewer was cast into the bottom of the box culvert system and cannot be replaced with pipe bursting or bore and jack because of elevational
constraints and had to be relocated. Temporary stream impacts resulting from relocation at Impact 1 and 1A are needed to avoid issues related to the
existing configuration for the sewer which could create blockages in the system. Silt fence will be used to protect existing wetlands outside the
construction corridor. Additionally, pipe bursting will be used where appropriate to eliminate the need to dig and replace the existing sewer.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Silt fencing will be installed around all disturbed areas. Access during construction will occur in uplands.

2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
All proposed wetland and stream impacts are temporary and therefore mitigation is not proposed. Additionally, "permanent wetland conversion' impacts are less than 0.10 acres (Impact
2A — 0.09 ac) and therefore mitigation is not proposed.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
If no, explain why:
The proposed project is located in the Cape Fear 03030003 basin, which is not a state buffered basin.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
Comments:
The proposed project consists of replacement of an epsting gravity sewer line and will not create additional impervious area requiring stormwater management.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
,v
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?*
r Yes r No
Comments:*
The project will be funded through the Division of Water Infrastructure (DWI) State Revolving Fund (SRF) and have received the Letter of Intent to
Fund (LOIF) from DWI. Initial conversations with DWI staff confirmed that anticipated environmental impacts not significant and are belowthresholds
for requiring NEPA/SEPA documentation. However, an Environmental Impact Document (EID) will be prepare as part of the SRF application, and DWI
will complete the NEPA/SEPA review for the project.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project consists of replacement of an epsting failing gravity sewer line in order to handle epsting flowwithin an heavily developed area
in Sanford, and will not increase capacity. Therefore, the project is not anticipated to be a catalyst for additional development that could impact nearby
downstream water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated
at a treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
The project consists of replacement of an existing gravity sewer line within the wasting City of Sanford sanitary sewer system.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)

5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r- Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r- Yes r No
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r- No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r- Yes r No
r Unknown
Si. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r- Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
WR reviewed the NC Natural Heritage Program database, located at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/, as well as NCNHP GIS data to identify if there
were any known occurrences of endangered species on or near the proposed project. The review of the NHP data did not identify any recent
occurrences of federally listed threatened or endangered species or critical habitat on the subject property or within 1.0 miles of the project, see
attached NCNHP project review letter. Furthermore, site reviews did not identify any potential habitat for any federally protected species known to
occur in Lee County. Therefore, the proposed project will not adversely affect federally protected species.
Consultation Documentation Upload
NCNHP Project Review Letter_2021-03-01.pdf 226.62KB
USFWS T&E List for Lee County_2020-07-17.pdf 149.03KB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r- Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
WR reviewed the NOAA Essential Fish Habitat online mapper, located at: http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/index.html. There are
no waters classified as EFH in Lee County.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r- Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
WR reviewed the NC State Historic Preservation Office's online database, located at: http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/, to determine if there were any
known historic or cultural resources within or in the vicinity of the proposed project. The sewer alignment is located adjacent to the East Sanford
Historic District (LE0792) and Downtown Sanford Local Historic District (LE0005). However, the construction activities consist of replacement of an
epsting sewer line will not affect any of the historic structures located within the historic districts.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
r Yes r- No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMArequirements:
The proposed project is located within the FEMA 100-Year Floodplain associated with Little Buffalo Creek. The project consists of replacement of an
epsting sewer line, and will not result in fill above epsting grades and therefore will not affect the floodplain or result in a rise of flood elevation.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
wvna.ncfloodmaps.com
Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.

Aerial.pdf 325.89KB
Delineation Exhibit.pdf 330.28KB
PCN Cover Letter.pdf 131.72KB
Signature u
® By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief; and
The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Troy Beasley
Signature
Date
3/2/2021

-■ WithersRavenel
NOOur People. Your Success.
AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
The undersigned contract purchaser, City_ of Sanford (Client) does hereby appoint
WithersRavenel. Inc as his, her, or it's agent for the purpose of petitioning the appropriate
local, state and federal environmental regulatory agencies (US Army Corps of Engineers, NC
Division of Water Quality, NC Division of Coastal Management, local municipalities, etc.) for:
a) review and approval of the jurisdictional boundaries of onsite jurisdictional areas
(wetlands, streams, riparian buffers, etc.) and/or; b) preparation and submittal of appropriate
environmental permit applications/requests for the replacement approximately 5.440
linear feet of 12" ravit sewer with 18" sanita sewer collection lines along Little Buffalo
Creek between 3rd Street and Charlotte Avenue in Sanford NC.
The Client does hereby authorize that said agent has the authority to do the following acts
on behalf of the owner:
(1) To submit appropriate requests/applications and the required
supplemental materials;
(2) To attend meetings to give representation on behalf of the Client.
(3) To authorize access to subject property for the purpose of
environmental review by appropriate regulatory agencies.
This authorization shall continue in effect until completion of the contracted task or
termination by the Client.
Date:
Agent's Name, Address & Telephone: Signature of Client.
WithersRavenel Inc.
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary,NC 27511
Tel. [phone]
Paul M. Weeks, Jr. City E
(Name - Print)
(Sig
Mailing Address
PO Box 3729
Sanford, NC 27330
City State Zip
Phone: [phone]
Email:
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
t: 919.469.3340 l f: 919.467,6008 j www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Asheville I Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

PROJECT LOCATION
LITTLE BUFFALO CREEK OUTFALL USGS QUAD (2019) - SANFORD
SANFORD LEE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
1 inch = 2000 ft.
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 1000 2000
WithersRavenel
Engineers | Planners | Surveyors
PROPOSED SEWER
REHAB ALIGNMENT
LITTLE BUFFALO CREEK OUTFALL USGS QUAD (2019) - SANFORD
SANFORD LEE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
1 inch = 500 ft.
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 250 500
WithersRavenel
Engineers | Planners | Surveyors
PROPOSED SEWER
REHAB ALIGNMENT
LITTLE BUFFALO CREEK OUTFALL LEE CO. SOIL SURVEY (1989) - SHEET 5
SANFORD LEE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
1 inch = 500 ft.
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 250 500
WithersRavenel
Engineers | Planners | Surveyors
SSSS
SS
check area for n/s sewer shown by GIS SSSS
S
S
T
TXX
X X
XX
X
X
X
I
I
I
I
I
IIIIII
I
I
I
I
I
D
D
D
S
S
S
S
SS
S
S
S S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
SS SSSS
SSSSSSMH 100RIM - 351.84IN VCP 6" - 347.59IN PVC 8" - 346.44OUT DIP 8" - 346.35 SSMH 101RIM - 349.77IN DIP 18" E - 334.27IN DIP 8" S - 342.61IN DIP 8" W - 343.5OUT DIP 30" N- 334.21 SSMH 135RIM - 341.75OUT DIP 15" - 336.4DIP 18"DIP 8"DIP 8"VCP 18"VCP 16"CIPP 16"DIP 15"CIPP 16"SSMH 104RIM - 342.14IN DIP 18" SE - 335.32OUT DIP 18" W - 335.29 SSMH 105RIM - 342.3IN DIP 15" S - 336.47IN DIP 15" N - 336.05OUT DIP 18" - 336.2 SSMH 134RIM - 357.34OUT PVC 8" - 351.09SSMH 106RIM - 343.65IN PVC 8" E - 337.98IN DIP 15" S - 336.57OUT DIP 15" - 336.56 SSMH 108RIM - 374.25IN PVC 8" - 366.97OUT DIP 8" - 366.0SSMH 109RIM - 349.76IN DIP 8" E - 344.48IN DIP 15" S - 339.75OUT DIP 15" - 339.74 SSMH 110RIM - 354.81IN PVC 8" - 346.48IN PVC 8" - 346.7OUT DIP 8" - 346.32
SSMH 112
RIM - 378.39
IN PVC 8" E

-

3
7
5
.
4
9
OUT PVC 8"
W

-

3
7
5
.
3
1
SSMH 111
RIM - 356.15
IN PVC 8" E -

3
5
0
.
8
3
IN PVC 8" W

C
/
O

-

3
4
2
.
7
3
IN DIP 15" S

-

3
4
1
.
5
7
OUT DIP 15"
-

3
4
1
.
5
SSMH 113
RIM - 352.51
IN DIP 15" - 3
4
3
.
2
7
IN VCP 12" -

3
4
3
.
7
9
OUT DIP 15
"

-

3
4
3
.
2
8
SSMH 114
RIM - 355.8
2
IN DIP 12"
E

-

3
4
4
.
5
3
IN DIP 15" S -

3
4
4
.
0
4
OUT DIP 15"

W

-

3
4
4
.
0
0
SSMH 115
RIM - 361.53
IN
OUT DIP 15
"

-

3
3
6
.
4
SSMH 118
RIM - 372.31
IN VCP 4" -
3
6
7
.
8
7
OUT VCP 8" -
3
6
7
.
7
4
SSMH 119
RIM - 358.48
IN DIP 15"
S

-

3
4
5
.
6
IN DIP 12"
E

-

3
5
2
.
1
7
OUT DIP 15"
-

3
4
5
.
5
9
SSMH 120
RIM - 364.2
0
OUT DIP 12"
-

3
5
8
.
1
6
SSMH 121
RIM - 355.57
IN DIP 15" -
3
4
6
.
5
5
OUT DIP 1
5
"

-

3
4
6
.
5
0
SSMH 122
RIM - 353.8
2
IN PVC 8" E -
3
4
8
.
1
6
IN DIP 15" S
-

3
4
7
.
4
8
OUT DIP 15
"

-

3
4
7
.
4
5
SSMH 123
RIM - 358.98
OUT PVC 8"
-

3
5
3
.
9
9
SSMH 124
RIM - 355.72
IN DIP 12" E -

3
5
0
.
3
0
IN DIP 15" 3
4
8
.
9
7
OUT DIP 15
"

-

3
4
8
.
7
5
SSMH 126
RIM - 358.54
IN DIP 15" -
3
4
9
.
7
2
OUT DIP 15
"

-

3
4
9
.
6
8
SSMH 127
RIM - 361.34
IN DIP 15" -
3
5
0
.
5
5
OUT DIP 15" -

3
5
0
.
5
1
SSMH 128
RIM - 360.6
1
IN DIP 12" - 3
5
2
.
3
7
IN DIP 15" - 3
5
1
.
3
2
OUT DIP 15"

-

3
5
1
.
5
7
SSMH 129
RIM - 362.94
OUT DIP 12
"

-

3
5
3
.
5
6
SSMH 130
RIM - 362.8
9
IN DIP 15" - 3
5
1
.
6
8
OUT DIP 15"
-

3
5
1
.
6
9
SSMH 131
RIM - 364.06
IN VCP 4" S
W
?
?

-

3
5
3
.
1
5
IN DIP 15"
S

-

3
5
2
.
7
9
OUT DIP 15" -

3
5
2
.
5
5
SSMH 103RIM - 343.57IN DIP 18" - 335.14OUT DIP 18" - 335.13 CIPP 12"PVC 8"PVC 8"CIPP 12"CIPP 12"DIP 15"CIPP 12"DIP 8"DIP 8"CIPP 12"VCP 12"VCP 12"VCP 12"VCP 12"
DIP 15"VCP 12"SSMH 116
RIM - 357.9
8
IN DIP 15" 34
4
.
5
2
OUT DIP 15"

-

3
4
4
.
5
1
SSMH 117
RIM - 358.37
IN DIP 15" 3
4
4
.
8
8
IN VCP 8" E

-

3
4
8
.
2
2
OUT DIP 15" -

3
4
4
.
8
7
VCP 12"
DIP 12"
S
SCIPP 12"CIPP 12"CIPP 12"VCP 12"VCP 12"VCP 12"VCP 12"VCP 12"VCP 12"VCP 12"VCP 12"VC
P

1
2
"
VC
P

1
2
"VCP 12"DIP 12"VCP 12"VCP 12"DI
P

1
2
"
VC
P

1
2
"
VC
P

1
2
"
VC
P

1
2
"
VC
P

1
2
"
PVC 8"
S
S
S
S
S
S
SSSSS SSSS SDDS S
BFP
CO
CO COCO
FH
FH
FH
FHFHFH
FOM
FOM
FOM
FOM
FOM
FOM
GTS
T
TMH
T
TMH
TLP
TLP
TLP
WF B-1
WF B-2
WF BB-1
WF A-1
WF A-2
WM
WM
WM
WM
WM
WM
WM
WM WM
WM
WM
WM
WMWM WMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWM
WV
WV
WV WV
WV
WV
WV WV
WV
WV
WV WV
WV
WV
WV WVWVWVWVWVWVWVWVWVWVWVWMWMWMWMWM
WM
WM
WM
WV
WM
VCP 12"DIP 12"SSMH 107RIM - 348.27IN DIP 8" E - 340.37IN DIP 15" S - 338.14OUT DIP 15" - 338.16
SSMH 125
RIM - 361.81
OUT DIP 15
"

-

3
5
4
.
0
5
CB 3253RIM - 342.02IN RCP 24" - 337.09OUT RCP 30" - 337.0152" RCP - 336.5830" RCP - 336.5152" RCP - 336.68 CB 3700RIM - 343.15OUT RCP 24" - 337.80
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
GWGW
PP
PP
RCP18 - 350.
0
6
S YIELDS R.R. CROS
S
I
N
G
WF BB-2
WF BB-3
S S SSS S SSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SSSSS
S
S
SS
S
S
SSSSSS
SS
SS
SS
S
SS
S
S
S
S1,170 SQ FT OFASPHALT PATCHS
PROPOSED PERMANENTEASEMENTPROPOSED SEWER MAINEX. 10' X 6' BOX CULVERTEX. 10' X 6' BOX CULVERTS
13,
5
5
9

S
Q

F
T

O
F
AS
P
H
A
L
T

P
A
T
C
H
CONS
T
RUC
T
ION

L
IM
I
T SIL
T
F
ENC
E
A&W

R
A
I
LRO
A
D

R
/W
EAST CHISHOLM STREET NORTH FIRST STREETNORTH FIRST STREETNORTH FIRST STREETSOUTH FIRST STREETCHARLOTTE AVENUE
MIDLAND AVENUENORTH AVENUETEMPLE AVENUE
MARKET STREETMCIVER STREET
MARKET STREETHICKORY AVENUE
SYCAMORE AVENUEA
T
L
A
N
T
I
C
W
E
S
T
E
R
N

R
A
I
L
R
O
A
D
SOUTH THIRD STREETCSX RAILROADMAPLE AVENUE
CHERRY STREET
INV IN=335.14 (Structure - (21))OVERALL STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACTSTEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACTS (MAINTAINED) -TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT -WETLANDS AND STREAM IMPACTSINDEXWE-0K:\18\18-0600\180604-Sanford Little Buffalo Creek O\CAD\Const Drawings\Sheets - Impact Maps.dwg- Tuesday, February 23, 2021 2:59:38 PM - TEDDER, KATHLEENNo.Checked ByRevisionDesignerDrawn ByDateByScaleDateJob No.Sheet No.WithersRavenel424 Gallimore Dairy Road, Suite C | Greensboro, NC 27409 | t: 336.605.3009 | license #: C-0832 | www.withersravenel.comEngineers [ /lanners [ STrveyors02180604.00DECEMBER 2020AS NOTEDCITY OF SANFORDLEE COUNTYNORTH CAROLINALM & DODOKEE, TSJ AND MWLITTLE BUFFALO CREEKOUTFALL REHABILITATIONEXHIBIT #1EXHIBIT #2EXHIBIT #4GRAPHIC SCALE1 inch = 300 ft.3000150300600-9649 SF / .22 AC )-181 LF ( 4497 SF / .10 AC )EXHIBIT #3VICINITY MAPSTREAM 2STREAM 3
SSSSSSSSSScheck area for n/s sewer shown by GISSSSSSSXXX
XXXXXXXXSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSMH 101RIM - 349.77IN DIP 18" E - 334.27IN DIP 8" S - 342.61IN DIP 8" W - 343.5OUT DIP 30" N- 334.21DIP 18"DIP 8"DIP 8"VCP 18"VCP 16"CIPP
16"
DIP 15"CIPP 16"SSMH 104RIM - 342.14IN DIP 18" SE - 335.32OUT DIP 18" W - 335.29SSMH 105RIM - 342.3IN DIP 15" S - 336.47IN DIP 15" N - 336.05OUT DIP 18" - 336.2SSMH 106RIM - 343.65IN PVC 8" E - 337.98IN DIP 15" S - 336.57OUT DIP 15" - 336.56SSMH 103RIM - 343.57IN DIP 18" - 335.14OUT DIP 18" - 335.13CIPP 12"PVC 8"PVC 8"CIPP 12"SSSSS350'350'350'350'350'
3
4
5
'345'345'345'340'340'3
4
0
'340'340'3
4
0
'
340'340'340'
340'
335'
3
3
5
'COFHWMWVWVWVWWWW W WWWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWW W
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
W
W
WWWWVWVWWWWWWWWMEEEEUCC
G
GGGGCB 3253RIM - 342.02IN RCP 24" - 337.09OUT RCP 30" - 337.0152" RCP - 336.5830" RCP - 336.5152" RCP - 336.68CB 3700RIM - 343.15OUT RCP 24" - 337.80SSSS1+002+003+004+005+006+007+00SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS0+001+002+00SSExMH - 100ExMH - 101ExMH - 106ExMH - 104SSSSB3TEMPLE AVENUEEAST CHISHOLM STREETNORTH FIRST STREETREHABILITATE 5'DIAMETER MANHOLEWITH EPOXY COATINGREPLACE 16" VCP SEWER MAINWITH 294 LF OF 18" DIP SEWER MAINBY EXCAVATION AND BORE & JACKAND MATCH ORIGINAL INVERTSREPLACE 12" CIPP SEWERMAIN WITH 70 LF OF 18" DIPSEWER MAIN BY EXCAVATIONTHIS SECTION OF SEWER WILL BE RELOCATEDSEE SHEET 14REPLACE 5' DIAMETERMANHOLE WITH 5' DIAMETERPRECAST CONCRETE MANHOLELITTLE BUFFALO CREEKPIPE CRADLEWETLANDS AND STREAM IMPACTSEXHIBIT 11K:\18\18-0600\180604-Sanford Little Buffalo Creek O\CAD\Const Drawings\Sheets - Impact Maps.dwg- Tuesday, February 23, 2021 3:19:56 PM - TEDDER, KATHLEENNo.Checked ByRevisionDesignerDrawn ByDateByScaleDateJob No.Sheet No.WithersRavenel424 Gallimore Dairy Road, Suite C | Greensboro, NC 27409 | t: 336.605.3009 | license #: C-0832 | www.withersravenel.comEngineers [ /lanners [ STrveyors02180604.00DECEMBER 2020AS NOTEDCITY OF SANFORDLEE COUNTYNORTH CAROLINALM & DODOKEE, TSJ AND MWLITTLE BUFFALO CREEKOUTFALL REHABILITATIONGRAPHIC SCALE1 inch = 50 ft.5002550100IMPACT #1ATEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTSEWER CROSSING40 LF (1204 SF / .03 AC)IMPACT #1TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTSEWER REMOVAL10 LF (233 SF / .005 AC)EASEMENT BOUNDARY10' TEMPORARYCONSTRUCTIONEASEMENTIMPACT LEGENDWETLANDS -TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACTS (MAINTAINED) -TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT -LITTLE BUFFALOCREEKEXISTING 12" SEWERLINE TO BE REPLACESEE EXHIBIT 5 FOR BYPASS DETAILFLOODPLAINFLOODPLAINEXISTING 16" SEWERLINE TO BE REPLACED3303353403453503+003+504+004+505+005+506+006+50EXISTING 16" SEWERTO BE REMOVED ANDABANDONEDPROPOSED 18" SEWERLINE TO BE INSTALLED
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIISSSSSSSMH 122RIM - 353.82IN PVC 8" E - 348.16IN DIP 15" S - 347.48OUT DIP 15" - 347.45SSMH 124RIM - 355.72IN DIP 12" E - 350.30IN DIP 15" 348.97OUT DIP 15" - 348.75SSMH 126RIM - 358.54SSSSSSSSSSSSSSVCP 12"VCP 12"VCP 12"VCP 12"VCP 12"DIP 12"36
0
'360'360'360'360'355'355'355'355'355'FOMFOMFOMFOMWMWVWWWMWWUPIN: 9642-88-1886-00JM POPE ELECTRIC LLCDB: 1266PG: 35409 CHATHAM STPIN: 9642-88-5681-00ATLANTIC AND WESTERNPG: 347114 HICKORY AVEDODSON FAMILY LTDPIN: 9642-88-5801-00ATLANTIC AND WESTERNCORPDB: 057PG: 872209 SYCAMORE STPIN: 9642-89-6011-00BYSTRY, BRIAN PAULDB: 691PG: 773202 HICKORY AVEPIN: 9642-89-4092-00MCCRACKEN, DAVIDMALCOLMDB: 1370PG: 192200 HICKORY AVEPIN: 9642-88-6879-00HARRINGTON, ANSON ODB: 698PG: 8720 SYCAMORE STPIN: 9642-88-2762-00KASDORF, CARY SKASDORF, CAROLYN HDB: 1440PG: 957413 CHATHAM STPIN: 9642-88-3605-00KASDORF, CARY SKASDORF, CAROLYN HDB: 1440PG: 9570 CHATHAM STPIN: 9642-89-0210-00ATLANTIC AND WESTERNDB: 057PG: 553311 CHATHAM STPIN: 9642-89-0025-00FUNSTER HOLDINGS LLCDB: 1415PG: 936105 HICKORY AVEIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGWGWPPPPRCP18 - 350.06S YIELDS R.R. CROSSING355'355'355'355'35
5
'
35
5
'355'355'355'355'
35
5
'
355'
355'
355'355'355'355'
355'350'350'350'350'SSSSSSSS37+0038+0039+0040+0041+0042+00SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSEX
3
6
"
CMPSYCAMORE STREETSSSSSS1+0
02+003+004+005+006+007+00SSStructure - (4)STA: 1+69.61RIM:359.000INV IN: 348.28INV OUT: 348.08SS
SS
18"
D
I
P
SStructure - (5)STA: 4+26.23RIM:359.000INV IN: 348.79INV OUT: 348.59SSSSSSSSSS18" DIPSStructure - (6)STA: 7+08.70RIM:358.539SSSSSSSSSSSS18" DIPExMH - 126ExMH - 124ExMH - 12210+0011+0013+0014+0014+96.20SSSS16" DIP16" DIP13,559 SQ FT OFASPHALT PATCHSOUTH SECOND STREETStructure - (3)STA: 0+50.00RIM:353.822INV IN: 347.94SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFWETLANDS AND STREAM IMPACTSEXHIBIT 22K:\18\18-0600\180604-Sanford Little Buffalo Creek O\CAD\Const Drawings\Sheets - Impact Maps-tsj.dwg- Tuesday, March 2, 2021 10:35:23 AM - ST. JOHN, TODDNo.Checked ByRevisionDesignerDrawn ByDateByScaleDateJob No.Sheet No.WithersRavenel424 Gallimore Dairy Road, Suite C | Greensboro, NC 27409 | t: 336.605.3009 | license #: C-0832 | www.withersravenel.comEngineers [ /lanners [ STrveyors02180604.00DECEMBER 2020AS NOTEDCITY OF SANFORDLEE COUNTYNORTH CAROLINALM & DODOKEE, TSJ AND MWLITTLE BUFFALO CREEKOUTFALL REHABILITATIONGRAPHIC SCALE1 inch = 50 ft.5002550100IMPACT #2TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT CONVERSION4088 SF / .09 ACPROPOSED 18" SEWERTO BE INSTALLEDWETLAND BFLOODPLAINFLOODPLAINLITTLE BUFFALOCREEKIMPACT LEGENDWETLANDS -TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACTS (MAINTAINED) -TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT -EXISTING SEWERTO BE ABANDONEDIMPACT #2ATEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT 1152 SF / .03 AC
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSXXXXXXXXXIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIISSSSMH 126RIM - 358.54IN DIP 15" - 349.72OUT DIP 15" - 349.68SSMH 127RIM - 361.34IN DIP 15" - 350.55OUT DIP 15" - 350.51VCP 12"DIP 12"VCP 12"VCP 12"360'360'360'355'355'355'355'355'355'355'355'355'350'FOMFOMWF A-1WF A-2PIN: 9642-88-5681-00ATLANTIC AND WESTERNCORPDB: 007PG: 2240 CHATHAM STPIN: 9642-88-5499-00DODSON FAMILY LTDLIABILITY CO #2DB: 729PG: 877423 CHATHAM STPIN: 9642-98-1642-00PEGUES, GLADYSDB: 1003PG: 01504 THIRD STPIN: 9642-98-1722-00HARRINGTON, ANSON ODB: 1310PG: 641500 THIRD STPIN: 9642-88-6442-00CRAIG, EDWARD LDB: 589PG: 8700 CHATHAM STPIN: 9642-88-8425-00ROYMAC LLCDB: 1136PG: 1060 CHATHAM STPIN: 9642-88-9729-00HARRINGTON, ANSON ODB: 698PG: 872210 SYCAMORE STPIN: 9642-98-1584-00YARBOROUGH, LEENORADB: 837PG: 497506 THIRD STPIN: 9642-98-0025-00 633KOURY FOR THECOMMUNITY INC.CHATHAM STREETWF BB-3355'355'355'355'355'355'355'355'42+0043+0044+0045+0046+0047+0048+00SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS5+006+007+00SStructure - (6)STA: 7+08.70RIM:358.539INV OUT: 349.68SSSSSSSSSS18" DIPExMH - 127ExMH - 126SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFCONSTRUCTION LIMITSILT FENCEWETLANDS AND STREAM IMPACTSEXHIBIT 33K:\18\18-0600\180604-Sanford Little Buffalo Creek O\CAD\Const Drawings\Sheets - Impact Maps.dwg- Tuesday, February 23, 2021 3:24:08 PM - TEDDER, KATHLEENNo.Checked ByRevisionDesignerDrawn ByDateByScaleDateJob No.Sheet No.WithersRavenel424 Gallimore Dairy Road, Suite C | Greensboro, NC 27409 | t: 336.605.3009 | license #: C-0832 | www.withersravenel.comEngineers [ /lanners [ STrveyors02180604.00DECEMBER 2020AS NOTEDCITY OF SANFORDLEE COUNTYNORTH CAROLINALM & DODOKEE, TSJ AND MWLITTLE BUFFALO CREEKOUTFALL REHABILITATIONGRAPHIC SCALE1 inch = 50 ft.5002550100IMPACT #4TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT4409 SF / .10 ACEXISTING 20' SEWER EASEMENTFLOODPLAINLITTLE BUFFALO CREEKIMPACT #3TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTSEWER CROSSING46 LF (940 SF / .02 AC)IMPACT LEGENDWETLANDS -TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACTS (MAINTAINED) -TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT -SEE EXHIBIT 5 FOR BYPASS DETAILABANDON EXISTING SEWERREPLACE EXISTING SEWERPROPOSED 18" SEWERLINE TO BE INSTALLED
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSXX SSSSSMH 128RIM - 360.61IN DIP 12" - 352.37IN DIP 15" - 351.32OUT DIP 15" - 351.57SSMH 129RIM - 362.94OUT DIP 12" - 353.56SSMH 130RIM - 362.89IN DIP 15" - 351.68OUT DIP 15" - 351.69SSMH 131RIM - 364.06IN VCP 4" SW?? - 353.15IN DIP 15" S - 352.79OUT DIP 15" - 352.55VCP 12"VCP 12"VCP 12"SS3
6
0
'360'360'360'3
5
5
'
3
5
5
'WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWGGGGGGGGTCGGGVCP 12"DIP 12"49+0050+0051+0052+00SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSOUTH THIRD STREETSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSExMH - 129ExMH - 130ExMH - 23EX. 10' X 6' BOX CULVERTEX. 10' X 6' BOX CULVERTSExMH-131SSSSSSSSSS48+0048+5049+0049+5050+0050+5051+0051+5052+0052+5053+00EX 16" DIPEX 10' X 6'BOX CULVERTEX 2" GAS183.17' 12" VCP @ 0.32%40.00'12" DIP@ 0.27%SOUTH THIRD STREETSOUTH THIRD STREETPRIVATE PROPERTY (EASEMENT)SOUTH THIRD STREETREPLACE 12" VCP SEWERMAIN WITH 241 LF OF 18"DIP SEWER MAIN BY PIPEBURSTING AND MATCHORIGINAL INVERTSREPLACE 4' DIAMETERMANHOLE WITH A 5' DIAMETERPRECAST CONCRETE MANHOLEAND MATCH ORIGINAL INVERTSC2C1 (NO ROCK)APPROX. PARTIALLY WEATHEREDROCK ELEVATIONALCOTT STREETTHIS SECTION OF SEWER WILL BE RELOCATEDSEE SHEET 16REPLACE 4' DIAMETERMANHOLE WITH A 5'DIAMETER PRECASTCONCRETE MANHOLE ANDMATCH ORIGINAL INVERTSEX 10' X 6' BOX CULVERTWETLANDS AND STREAM IMPACTSEXHIBIT 44K:\18\18-0600\180604-Sanford Little Buffalo Creek O\CAD\Const Drawings\Sheets - Impact Maps.dwg- Tuesday, February 23, 2021 3:02:26 PM - TEDDER, KATHLEENNo.Checked ByRevisionDesignerDrawn ByDateByScaleDateJob No.Sheet No.WithersRavenel424 Gallimore Dairy Road, Suite C | Greensboro, NC 27409 | t: 336.605.3009 | license #: C-0832 | www.withersravenel.comEngineers [ /lanners [ STrveyors02180604.00DECEMBER 2020AS NOTEDCITY OF SANFORDLEE COUNTYNORTH CAROLINALM & DODOKEE, TSJ AND MWLITTLE BUFFALO CREEKOUTFALL REHABILITATIONGRAPHIC SCALE1 inch = 50 ft.5002550100IMPACT #5ATEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT CROSSING55 LF ( 1734 SF / .04 AC )LITTLE BUFFALO CREEKFLOODPLAINPROPOSED 20' PERMANENT EASEMENTINSTALL 18" SEWER LINESEE EXHIBIT 5 FOR BYPASS DETAIL34034535035536048+0048+5049+0049+5050+0050+5051+0051+5052+0052+50IMPACT #5TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT CROSSING30 LF ( 385 SF / .009 AC )IMPACT LEGENDWETLANDS -TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACTS (MAINTAINED) -TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT -SEE EXHIBIT 5 FOR BYPASS DETAILSEWER TO BE ABANDONEDEXISTING SEWER TO BE MAINTAINEDPROPOSED 18" SEWER LINE TO BE INSTALLED
WETLANDS AND STREAM IMPACTSEXHIBIT 55K:\18\18-0600\180604-Sanford Little Buffalo Creek O\CAD\Const Drawings\Sheets - Impact Maps.dwg- Tuesday, February 23, 2021 3:02:42 PM - TEDDER, KATHLEENNo.Checked ByRevisionDesignerDrawn ByDateByScaleDateJob No.Sheet No.WithersRavenel424 Gallimore Dairy Road, Suite C | Greensboro, NC 27409 | t: 336.605.3009 | license #: C-0832 | www.withersravenel.comEngineers [ /lanners [ STrveyors02180604.00DECEMBER 2020AS NOTEDCITY OF SANFORDLEE COUNTYNORTH CAROLINALM & DODOKEE, TSJ AND MWLITTLE BUFFALO CREEKOUTFALL REHABILITATIONTEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING BYPASSNOT TO SCALEPUMPPROPOSED EARTH BERM, TYPCLASS "I" RIP-RAPTEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION STREAM CROSSINGPROPOSED EARTH BERM, TYPSEDIMENT BAGCROSSING PIPECLASS "I" RIP-RAPPOLYETHYLENE FABRIC ONFACE (8 MIL THICK)PROPOSED EARTH BERM (TYP)TOP OF BANKPOLYETHYLENE FABRIC ON FACE(8 MIL THICK)TEMPORARY STONE DAMCROSSING PIPEEX STREAM BOTTOMPOLYETHYLENE FABRIC ONFACE (8 MIL THICK)TEMPORARY CMP12' MINCONSTRUCTION EASEMENT(SEE NOTE 4)12' MIN18" MINNOTES:1.EROSION STONE TO BE "CLASS I" RIP-RAP UNLESS DESIGNATEDDIFFERENTLY ON CONSTRUCTION PLAN.2.TEMPORARY CMP PIPE SIZE AND AMOUNT NEEDED AS SHOWNON PLANS.3.PUMP AND LINE SIZE TO BE DETERMINED BY THE CONTRACTOR.4.WIDTH OF CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT SHALL BE MINIMIZEDBASED UPON FIELD CONDITIONS. ANY DISTRUBANCE(S)EXCEEDING WHAT IS SHOWN ON PLANS MAY REQUIREADDITIONAL WATER QUALITY PERMITTING.CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE1.INSTALL PUMPS UPSTREAM OF TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSINGAND PUMP TO AREA DOWNSTREAM OF CONSTRUCTION AREA.BEGIN PUMPING AND CONTINUE PUMPING WHILE WORKINGWITHIN THE STREAM.2.INSTALL UPSTREAM DAM AND DOWNSTREAM DAM WITHPOLYETHYLENE FACING.3.INSTALL EARTH BERMS ALONG TOP OF BANK ON EACH SIDE OFSTREAM IN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA.4.INSTALL SEDIMENT FILTER BAG AT TOP OF BANK. DEWATERCONSTRUCTION AREA BETWEEN STONE DAM USING THE FILTERBAG.5.INSTALL THE NEW PIPELINE.6.UPON CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION, REMOVE TEMPORARY DAMS,POLYETHYLENE, AND TEMPORARY CMP, DEPRESS TEMPORARYDAM BOTTOMS INTO STREAM BED UNTIL TOP OF RIP RAP IS LEVELWITH STREAM BOTTOM.7.REMOVE TEMPORARY EARTH BERM AND SEDIMENT BAGS ANDSTABILIZE AREAS AS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS.MAINTENANCE NOTES:1.INSPECT WEEKLY AND AFTER EACH RAINFALL EVENT THATPRODUCES 12 INCH OR MORE OF RAIN.2.REMOVE SEDIMENT AND WOODY DEBRIS PROMPTLY.3.REMOVE COLLECTED SEDIMENT FROM STONE/RIPRAPAREAS AS NECESSARY. TOPDRESS WITH 2", WASHED STONEAS NECESSARY.FROM PUMPFLOW ÞFLOW ÞPIPE FLOW ÞTO PUMPPLANSECTION A-ASTREAM FLOW ÞAA*INSTALL SANDBAGS IN PIPE INVERT & FABRIC WHILE PUMPING AROUNDDURING CONSTRUCTION IN STREAM.**REMOVE SANDBAGS & FABRIC TO ALLOW FLOW THROUGH PIPE WHEN NOTPUMPING AROUND.5' MIN***STREAM FLOW ÞTEMPORARY CMPPUMPFLOW Þ
CHATHAM

S
TR
EE
T SOUTH 3RD STREETALCOTT STREETSYCAMORE

S
T
R
E
E
T
HICKORY A
V
E
N
U
E
MAPLE AVE
N
U
E
MCIVER
S
T
R
E
E
T
CHARLOTT
E

A
V
E
N
U
ENORTH 1ST STREETEAST CHI
S
H
O
L
M

S
T
R
E
E
T
MARKET STREETS. 1ST STREETPROPOSED SEWER
REHAB ALIGNMENT
WETLAND B
POTENTIAL WETLAND
WATERS OF US
WETLAND A
POTENTIAL WETLAND
WATERS OF US
STREAM 2
POTENTIAL NON-WETLAND
WATERS OF US
STREAM 3
POTENTIAL NON-WETLAND
WATERS OF US
STREAM 1
LITTLE BUFFALO CREEK
POTENTIAL NON-WETLAND
WATERS OF US
STREAM 1
LITTLE BUFFALO CREEK
POTENTIAL NON-WETLAND
WATERS OF US
LITTLE BUFFALO CREEK PRELIMINARY JD EXHIBIT
SANFORD LEE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
1 inch = 500 ft.
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 250 500
WithersRavenel
Engineers | Planners | Surveyors
NOTES:
1) WETLAND DELINEATION PERFORMED BY WR ON 1/21&29/2020.
2) WETLAND/STREAM/FEMA LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE, BASED ON GPS
LOCATION, LEE CO. GIS DATA AND TOPOGRAPHIC INTERPRETATION.
3) THE REVIEW AREA IS LOCATED WITHIN THE CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN AND
WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF SANFORD; THEREFORE, THE
REVIEW AREA IS NOT SUBJECT TO BUFFERS.
SEWER OUTFALL
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
X No
X No X
X No
X
X
X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
NoYes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
This sampling point was located within Wetland A, at Flag A-2, near the lat/long specified above. This data form also applies for Wetland B, as
conditions were similar.
HYDROLOGY
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
City/County:Little Buffalo Creek Sewer Sanford/Lee Co
DP-1
1/21/2020
City of Sanford NC
No
Section, Township, Range:A. Ricci - WithersRavenel
1
Datum:NAD83-79.17193118835.477111024LRR P, MLRA 136
Bottomland Hardwood ForestNWI classification:Ch - Chewacla silt loam
Slope (%):Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?(If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:

Is the Sampled AreaYes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland?Yes
Wetland hydrology was present at this sampling point.
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
12
8
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
Surface Water Present?
Field Observations:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:x 1 =
1.x 2 =
2.x 3 =
3.x 4 =
4.x 5 =
5.Column Totals:(B)
6.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:X
1.X
2.4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine – All woody vines, regardless of height.
VEGETATION (Five Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.DP-1
Tree Stratum 30' Radius )
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant
Species?
Indicator
Status Dominance Test worksheet:
Pinus taeda 10 Yes FAC Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:Acer rubrum
8 (B)
10 Yes FAC 8 (A)
Platanus occidentalis 10 Yes FACW Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:100.0%
Prevalence Index worksheet:30 =Total Cover
OBL species 0 0
15 6
FACU species 0
Liquidambar styraciflua
360125(A)
Total % Cover of:
0
5 Yes FAC
Multiply by:
FACW species
Prevalence Index = B/A =2.88
UPL species 0 0
15 30
FAC species 110 3305Yes
None
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
15 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
FAC
Quercus nigra 5 Yes FAC
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Acer rubrum
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
5' Radius )
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Juncus effusus 5 No FACW
=Total Cover Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Festuca spp 70 Yes FAC
3 1
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
5 =Total Cover
38 15
Smilax rotundifolia 5 Yes FAC
)
Hydrophytic vegetation was present within this sampling point.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?Yes No
15' Radius )
15' Radius )
30' Radius
75
Tree – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
=Total Cover
8 3
=Total Cover
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
X
Depth (inches):X
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
Hydric soils were present within the sampling point.
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Loc2
Loamy/Clayey80C
Color (moist)
Matrix
10YR 4/3 7.5YR 4/60-14
DP-1SOIL
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches)Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
%
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
%
Prominent redox concentrations
Texture
20 M
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
No X
No X X
No X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
Wetland hydrology was not present at this sampling point.
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
24
24
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
Surface Water Present?
Field Observations:
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?(If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:

Is the Sampled AreaYes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland?Yes
City/County:Little Buffalo Creek Sewer Sanford/Lee Co
DP-2
1/21/2020
City of Sanford NC
No
Section, Township, Range:A. Ricci - WithersRavenel
3
Datum:NAD83-79.17193118835.477111024LRR P, MLRA 136
UplandNWI classification:Ch - Chewacla silt loam
Slope (%):Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
This sampling point was located within uplands adjacent to Wetland A, at Flag A-2, near the lat/long specified above. This data form also applies for
uplands adjacent to Wetland B, as conditions were similar.
HYDROLOGY
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
NoYes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:x 1 =
1.x 2 =
2.x 3 =
3.x 4 =
4.x 5 =
5.Column Totals:(B)
6.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:X
Yes FACU
=Total Cover
Hydrophytic vegetation was not present within this sampling point.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?Yes No
15' Radius )
15' Radius )
30' Radius
50
Tree – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
=Total Cover
8 3
15 =Total Cover
25 10
Smilax rotundifolia 5 Yes FAC
)
Hedera helix 5
Lonicera japonica 5 Yes FACU
8 3
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Festuca spp 50 Yes FAC
20 =Total Cover Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
5' Radius )
10 4
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
FAC
Liriodendron tulipifera 5 Yes FACU
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Acer rubrum
Ligustrum sinense 20 Yes FACU
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
15 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
5 Yes FAC
Multiply by:
FACW species
Prevalence Index = B/A =3.38
UPL species 0 0
0 0
FAC species 75 2255Yes
Prevalence Index worksheet:30 =Total Cover
OBL species 0 0
15 6
FACU species 180
Liquidambar styraciflua
405120(A)
Total % Cover of:
45
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:45.5%
Liriodendron tulipifera
11 (B)
10 Yes FACU 5 (A)
10 Yes Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine – All woody vines, regardless of height.
VEGETATION (Five Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.DP-2
Tree Stratum 30' Radius )
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant
Species?
Indicator
Status Dominance Test worksheet:
Pinus taeda 10 Yes FAC Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Depth (inches):X
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
%Texture
DP-2SOIL
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches)Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
%
Matrix
5YR 4/40-14
Loc2
100
Color (moist)
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
Hydric soils were not present within the sampling point.
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
NCNHDE-14092
March 1, 2021
Troy Beasley
Withers & Ravenel
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511
RE: City of Sanford - Little Buffalo Creek Outfall Rehab ; 02180604.00
Dear Troy Beasley:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached ‘Documented Occurrences’ tables and map.
The attached ‘Potential Occurrences’ table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one-mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one-mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally-listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one-mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund
easement, or an occurrence of a Federally-listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
City of Sanford - Little Buffalo Creek Outfall Rehab
Project No. 02180604.00
March 1, 2021
NCNHDE-14092
No Element Occurrences are Documented within the Project Area
There are no documented element occurrences (of medium to very high accuracy) that intersect with the project area. Please note, however, that although the
NCNHP database does not show records for rare species within the project area, it does not necessarily mean that they are not present; it may simply mean that
the area has not been surveyed. The use of Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys if needed, particularly if the project
area contains suitable habitat for rare species. If rare species are found, the NCNHP would appreciate receiving this information so that we may update our
database.
No Natural Areas are Documented within the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within Project Area*
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
NC Land and Water Fund Project NC DNCR, NC Land and Water Fund State
*NOTE: If the proposed project intersects with a conservation/managed area, please contact the landowner directly for additional information. If the project intersects with a Dedicated Nature Preserve
(DNP), Registered Natural Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally-listed species, NCNHP staff may provide additional correspondence regarding the project.
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/help. Data query generated on March 1, 2021; source: NCNHP, Q4 January 2021. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 4
Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
City of Sanford - Little Buffalo Creek Outfall Rehab
Project No. 02180604.00
March 1, 2021
NCNHDE-14092
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
Group
EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last
Observation
Date
Element
Occurrence
Rank
Accuracy Federal
Status
State
Status
Global
Rank
State
Rank
Dragonfly or
Damselfly
33757 Somatochlora
georgiana
Coppery Emerald 2004-Pre H?5-Very
Low
---Significantly
Rare
G3G4 S1?
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
NC Land and Water Fund Project NC DNCR, NC Land and Water Fund State
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/help. Data query generated on March 1, 2021; source: NCNHP, Q4 January 2021. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 3 of 4
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Page 4 of 4
Endangered Species, Threatened Species, and Candidate Species,
Lee County, North Carolina
Updated: 07-17-2020
Critical Habitat Designations:
Cape Fear shiner - Notropis mekistocholas - Approximately 0.5river mile of Bear Creek, from Chatham
County Road 2156 Bridge downstream to the Rocky River, then downstream in the Rocky River (approximately
4.2river miles) to the Deep River, then downstream in the Deep River (approximately 2.6river miles) to a point
0.3river mile below the Moncure, North Carolina, U.S.Geological Survey Gaging Station. Constituent elements
include clean streams with gravel, cobble, and boulder substrates with pools, riffles, shallow runs and slackwater
areas with large rock outcrops and side channels and pools with water of good quality with relatively low silt
loads.
Federal Register Reference: September 25, 1987, Federal Register, 2: 36034-36039.
Common Name
Vertebrate:
Scientific name
Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
Cape Fear shiner Range by Basin Notropis mekistocholas
Red -cockaded woodpecker Picoides borealis
Invertebrate:
Septima's clubtail
Vascular Plant:
Bog spicebush
Georgia lead -plant
Harperella
Nonvascular Plant:
Lichen:
Gomphus septima
Lindera subcoriacea
Federal
Status
BGPA
E
E
Amorpha georgiana var. georgiana ARS
Ptilimnium nodosum E
Record Status
Current
Current
Historical
Current
Current
Current
Current
Definitions of Federal Status Codes:
E = endangered. A taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range."

T = threatened. A taxon "likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range."
C = candidate. A taxon under consideration for official listing for which there is sufficient information to support
listing. (Formerly "C V candidate species.)
BGPA =Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. See below.
ARS = At Risk Species. Species that are Petitioned, Candidates or Proposed for Listing under the Endangered
Species Act. Consultation under Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA is not required for Candidate or Proposed species;
although a Conference, as described under Section 7(a)(4) of the ESA is recommended for actions affecting
species proposed for listing.
T(S/A) = threatened due to similarity of appearance. A taxon that is threatened due to similarity of appearance
with another listed species and is listed for its protection. Taxa listed as T(S/A) are not biologically endangered
or threatened and are not subject to Section 7 consultation. See below.
EXP = experimental population. A taxon listed as experimental (either essential or nonessential). Experimental,
nonessential populations of endangered species (e.g., red wolf) are treated as threatened species on public land,
for consultation purposes, and as species proposed for listing on private land.
P = proposed. Taxa proposed for official listing as endangered or threatened will be noted as "PE" or "PT",
respectively.
Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGPA)_
In the July 9, 2007 Federal Register( 72:37346-37372), the bald eagle was declared recovered, and removed (de-
listed) from the Federal List of Threatened and Endangered wildlife. This delisting took effect August 8,2007.
After delisting, the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (Eagle Act) (16 U.S.C. 668-668d) becomes the
primary law protecting bald eagles. The Eagle Act prohibits take of bald and golden eagles and provides a
statutory definition of "take" that includes "disturb". The USFWS has developed National Bald Eagle
Management Guidelines to provide guidance to land managers, landowners, and others as to how to avoid
disturbing bald eagles. For mor information, visit hLtp://www.fws-gQyLnigratoryi2irds/baldeagle.htm
Threatened due to similarity of appearance(T(S/A))_
In the November 4, 1997 Federal Register (55822-55825), the northern population of the bog turtle (from New
York south to Maryland) was listed as T (threatened), and the southern population (from Virginia south to
Georgia) was listed as T(S/A) (threatened due to similarity of appearance). The T(S/A) designation bans the
collection and interstate and international commercial trade of bog turtles from the southern population. The
T(S/A) designation has no effect on land management activities by private landowners in North Carolina, part of
the southern population of the species. In addition to its official status as T(S/A), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service considers the southern population of the bog turtle as a Federal species of concern due to habitat loss.
Definitions of Record Status:
Current - Based on NC Natural Heritage Program information, this taxon is considered to be extant in the
county.
Historical - Based on NC Natural Heritage Program information, this taxon is considered to be historical in the
county, meaning that all recorded occurrences are either extirpated, have not been found in recent surveys, or
have not been surveyed recently enough to be confident they are still present.
Obscure - the date and/or location of observation is uncertain.
Incidental/migrant - the species was observed outside of its normal range or habitat.
Probable/potential - the species is considered likely to occur in this county based on the proximity of known
records (in adjacent counties), the presence of potentially suitable habitat, or both.

CHATHAM

S
TR
E
E
T SOUTH 3RD STREETALCOTT STREETSYCAMORE

S
T
R
E
E
T
HICKORY A
V
E
N
U
E
MAPLE AVE
N
U
E
MCIVER

S
T
R
E
E
T
CHARLOTT
E

A
V
E
N
U
ENORTH 1ST STREETEAST CH
I
S
H
O
L
M
S
T
R
E
E
T
PROPOSED SEWER
REHAB ALIGNMENT
LITTLE BUFFALO CREEK OUTFALL AERIAL (2017)
SANFORD LEE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
1 inch = 500 ft.
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 250 500
WithersRavenel
Engineers | Planners | Surveyors
CHATHAM

S
TR
EE
T SOUTH 3RD STREETALCOTT STREETSYCAMORE

S
T
R
E
E
T
HICKORY A
V
E
N
U
E
MAPLE AVE
N
U
E
MCIVER
S
T
R
E
E
T
CHARLOTT
E

A
V
E
N
U
ENORTH 1ST STREETEAST CHI
S
H
O
L
M

S
T
R
E
E
T
PROPOSED SEWER
REHAB ALIGNMENT
MARKET STREETS. 1ST STREETSTREAM 1
PERENNIAL
LITTLE BUFFALO CREEK
STREAM 1
PERENNIAL
LITTLE BUFFALO CREEK
STREAM 2
INTERMITTENT
WETLAND A
(WITHIN EXISTING
CLEARED/MAINTAINED
EASEMENT)
STREAM 3
INTERMITTENT
WETLAND B
LITTLE BUFFALO CREEK WETLAND DELINEATION EXHIBIT
SANFORD LEE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
1 inch = 500 ft.
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 250 500
WithersRavenel
Engineers | Planners | Surveyors
NOTES:
1) WETLAND DELINEATION PERFORMED BY WR ON 1/21&29/2020.
2) WETLAND/STREAM/FEMA LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE, BASED ON GPS
LOCATION, LEE CO. GIS DATA AND TOPOGRAPHIC INTERPRETATION.
3) THE REVIEW AREA IS LOCATED WITHIN THE CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN AND
WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF SANFORD; THEREFORE, THE
REVIEW AREA IS NOT SUBJECT TO BUFFERS.
SEWER OUTFALL

219 Station Road, Suite 101 | Wilmington, NC 28405 
t: 910.256.9277 | www.withersravenel.com | License No. C‐0832 
Asheville | Cary | Greensboro | Pittsboro | Raleigh | Wilmington

March 1, 2021 

US Army Corps of Engineers NC‐Division of Water Resources 
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit 
Mr. James Lastinger Mr. Paul Wojoski 
3331 Heritage Trade Drive 1617 Mail Service Center 
Suite 105 Raleigh, NC 27699 
Wake Forest, NC 27587 

Re:  City of Sanford – Little Buffalo Creek Outfall Rehabilitation  ‐ NWP 12 PCN Submittal 
 Sanford, Lee County 
 WR Project #02180604.00 

Dear Mr. Lastinger and Mr. Wojoski, 
On behalf of the City of Sanford, we are requesting authorization from the USACE to use NWP 
12 for 181 linear feet of temporary stream impacts and 0.22 acres of temporary wetland impacts 
for rehabilitation of ±5,400 lf of gravity sewer line in a highly urban area within the City of Sanford.  
We are also requesting an NCDWR 401 WQC for the above referenced impacts. 

The project is ~ 2.5 acres in size (based on a 20’ sewer corridor width) and runs from Alcott Street 
(Lat: 35.475104°N; Long: ‐79.169823°W) to East Chisholm Street in downtown Sanford in Lee 
County (Latitude: 35.486169°N; Longitude: ‐79.177777°W).   

The project is located in the Cape Fear River basin (HUC: 030300030607) and drains to Little 
Buffalo Creek.  The Water Quality Classification for Little Buffalo Creek is C, and the Stream Index 
Number is: 17‐42. 

Proposed Project 

The purpose of the proposed project is to rehabilitate ±5,400 lf of existing gravity sewer line to 
accommodate current sewer flows and repair/replace aging pipes and manholes in an effort to 
reduce sewer overflows.    

The project proposes to replace ±5,400 lf of aging and failing sewer line (both 16” & 18”) with an 
18” sewer line.  The project includes dig and replace methods, pipe bursting, and boring and jacking 
where appropriate to rehabilitate existing sewer lines.  Most of the sewer line will be replaced in 
the current location of the pipe and easement within existing paved roads, ROW, and 
cleared/maintained easements.  However, some portions of the sewer line and easement are being 
relocated to eliminate existing logistical issues, including sewer lines on private property without 
an appropriate easement and even sewer lines being beneath existing structures.  

Typical commercial construction equipment and techniques will be used to construct the proposed 
project. 

City of Sanford – Little Buffalo Creek Outfall Rehab 
Sandford, Lee Co. 
Page 2 of 3 

Project History 

WithersRavenel completed a delineation of the sewer alignment in January 2020.  The delineation 
identified three streams, including Little Buffalo Creek, and two wetlands within the sewer 
alignment.  A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Exhibit and wetland/upland data forms 
have been provided in support of the delineation.  Please note that we are not requesting issuance 
of a Preliminary JD in conjunction with issuance of the NWP 12. 

Proposed Impacts 

The proposed impacts consist of 181 lf of temporary stream impacts and 0.22 acres of temporary 
wetland impacts for replacement of the sewer line. 

Most of the proposed temporary stream impacts will occur from installation of the new sewer line.  
We have also assessed temporary stream impacts from abandonment of existing sewer lines within 
Little Buffalo Creek where the sewer line/easement has been realigned.  It is anticipated that the 
existing sewer line will be cut off and filled with grout to permanent abandon the line.  However, 
the lines may need to be completely removed from Little Buffalo Creek, and therefore we have 
assumed temporary stream impacts to allow for removal.  The proposed temporary stream impacts 
also include the area needed for installation of temporary coffer dams for dewatering during 
construction. 

Temporary wetland impacts will result from removal of the existing sewer line and installation of 
the new sewer line at Impact 4, and installation of the new sewer line in the new 
alignment/easement at Impact 2. 

During construction activities within streams will be completed “in the dry” by constructing 
temporary coffer dams upstream and downstream of the construction areas and pumping flow 
around the construction areas.  The pump around details are located on Exhibit 5 of the impact 
maps. 

Upon completion of construction, the temporarily impacted streams will be restored to 
preconstruction grades and temporarily stabilized with biodegradable matting on the banks and 
seeded with rye grass.  Matting will not be placed on the stream bed.  Additionally, temporarily 
impacted wetlands will be restored to natural grade and seeded with rye grass to provide 
temporary stabilization until natural recruitment permanently stabilizes the wetlands.   

The entire 20’ permanent utility easement will be mowed/maintained in perpetuity.  Impact 4 is 
located within an existing cleared/maintained sewer easement through Wetland A and therefore 
will not result in permanent wetland conversion impacts.  Impacts 2A is a new utility easement 
through Wetland B and will result in 0.09 acres permanent wetland conversion impacts from 
clearing of forested wetlands. 

City of Sanford – Little Buffalo Creek Outfall Rehab 
Sandford, Lee Co. 
Page 3 of 3 

Avoidance and Minimization 

Most of the project will be constructed within the existing sewer corridors that mostly exist in 
existing roadways. The impacts related to relocated sewer are necessary due to infrastructure 
related constraints and elevational constraints related to gravity sewers. Impact 5A is due to the 
fact the existing sewer was cast into the bottom of the box culvert system and cannot be replaced 
with pipe bursting or bore and jack because of elevational constraints and had to be relocated. 
Temporary stream impacts resulting from relocation at Impact 1 and 1A are needed to avoid issues 
related to the existing configuration for the sewer which could create blockages in the system. Silt 
fence will be used to protect existing wetlands outside the construction corridor. Additionally, pipe 
bursting will be used where appropriate to eliminate the need to dig and replace the existing sewer. 

Mitigation 

All proposed wetland and stream impacts are temporary and therefore mitigation is not proposed.  
Additionally, “permanent wetland conversion” impacts are less than 0.10 acres (Impact 2A – 0.09 
ac) and therefore mitigation is not proposed. 

The current request is for 181 lf of temporary stream impacts and 0.22 ac of temporary wetland 
impacts (see the attached maps and PCN for details). 

Please feel free to call if you have questions or require additional information. 

Sincerely, 
WithersRavenel
 Troy Beasley 
Senior Environmental Scientist 

Attachments: 
 PCN Form 
 Agent Authorization 
 Delineation Exhibit 
 USGS Quads 
 Lee County Soil Survey 
 Preliminary JD Exhibit and Wetland/Upland Data Forms 
 NCNHP Project Review Letter 
 Impact Exhibits 
DWR Pre-Fil ing Meeting Req u est Form
Contact Name *
Contact Email Addre ss *
Proje ct Owne r *
Proje ct Name *
Proje ct County *
Owne r Addre ss:*
Is this a transportation proje ct?*
Type (s) of approv al sought from the DWR:
Doe s this proje ct hav e an e xisting proje ct ID#?*
Do you know the name of the staff me mbe r you would like to re que st a me e ting with?
Ple ase giv e a brie f proje ct de scription be low.*
Please give a couple of dates you are available for a meeting.
Troy Beasley
[e-mail]
City of Sanford
Little Buffalo Creek Sewer Outfall
Lee
City
Sanford
State / Province / Region
NC
Postal / Zip Code
27331
Country
USA
Street Address
225 E. Witherspoon Street
Address Line 2
Yes No
401 Water Quality Certification -
Regular
401 Water Quality Certification -
Express
Individual Permit Modification
Shoreline Stabilization
Yes No
Stephanie Goss
The project consists of the replacement of ±5440 lf of 12" gravity sewer
collection line with an 18" sewer line to meet the existing service needs
along a highly urbanized corridor along Little Buffalo Creek. The majority of
the sewer line will be replaced in its existing location. However, some areas
will be realigned to avoid other existing infrastructure including houses and
private property. There are two stream crossings and a wetland crossing
anticipated for the realignment of the sewer line.
11/9/2020
11/10/2020
Ple ase attach the docume ntation you would like to hav e the me e ting about.
Signature *
Submittal Date
11/11/2020
Wetland Delineation Exhibit 02.04.2020.pdf 343.94KB
pdf only
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:

· This form completes the requirement of the Pre-Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
Rule.
· I understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre-filing
meeting request.
· I also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.

Your project’s thirty-day clock started upon receipt of this application.  You will receive notification regarding meeting location
and time if a meeting is necessary.  You will receive notification when the thirty-day clock has expired, and you can submit an
application.
10/21/2020
For the best experience, open this PDF portfolio in

Acrobat X or Adobe Reader X, or later.

Get Adobe Reader Now!
From: IaserficheCcbncdenr.aov
To: Beasley. Troy
Cc: steohanie.aoss(c ncdenr.aov
Subject: Pre -Filing Meeting is not needed for Little Buffalo Creek Sewer Outfall - 20201551 Ver 1
Date: Saturday, November 21, 2020 12:00:29 AM
The North Carolina Division of Water Resources has received the Pre -Filing Meeting Request
Form for Little Buffalo Creek Sewer Outfall that you submitted on 10/21/2020 9:54 PM. The
ID number for that project is 20201551, Version 1.
It has been decided that no meeting is needed for this project.
Project file link: https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/WaterResources/Browse.aspx?
dbid=0& startid= l 335283
When you submit your application please upload a copy of the attached document in this
email.
This email was automatically generated by Laserfiche workflow. Please do not respond to this
email address, as responses are not monitored.