HomeMy WebLinkAbout20120698 Ver 1_401 Application_20120712f�
DONALD B STREET
MAYOR
PRESTON W MITCHELL
TOWN MANAGER
Ms Amy Chapman
NCDWQ
1650 Mail Service Certer
Raleigh NC 27699 1650
Town of -ea0bille
Re Buffer Authorization Request for
Stony Creek Greenway
Nashville NC
Ms Chapman
a w e
• y •
TOWN COUNCIL
LOUISE W HINTON
TOMMY ROGERS
CHARLES P TAYLOR
LARRY D TAYLOR
July 9 2012
The Town of Nashville respectfully request authorization from NCDWQ for unavoidable
buffer impacts for the proposed Stony Creek Greenway Impacts consist of 1 181 square
feet of impact to Zone 2 There are no Zone 1 impacts The project has been designed to
avoid and minimize impacts to buffers as much as practicable The US Army Corps of
Engineers has indicated that the project does not require a Section 404 permit because the
three wetland areas that are present will be spanned with a pile supported wooden
boardwalk There fore this application is for a Buffer Authorization only
Please contact us if you have any questions or comments Thank you for your assistance
with this Town of Nashville project
Sincerely
Gene Foxw rth ���1
Planning Director and Development Director �U� j �
Town of Nashville Anc,
.._ 2012 l
POST OFFICE BOX 987 NASHVILLE NORTH CAROLINA 27856 TELEPHONE (252) 459 4511 FAX (252) 459 8926
A
z
Office Use Only
Corps action ID no
DWQ project no
Form Version 1 3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification PCN) Form
A Applicant Information
1
Processing
1 a
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps
❑section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
1 b
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number or General Permit (GP) number
1 c
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Id
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non 404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
le
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification
❑ Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit
❑ Yes ❑ No
1f
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in lieu
fee program
❑ Yes
❑ No
1g
Is the project located in any of NC s twenty coastal counties If yes answer 1 h
below
❑ Yes
® No
1h
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2
Project Information
2a
Name of project
Stony Creek Greenway
2b
County
Nash
2c
Nearest municipality / town
Nashville
2d
Subdivision name
N/A
2e
NCDOT only T I P or state
project no
N/A
3
Owner Information
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed
Town of Nashville
3b
Deed Book and Page No
D B 2492 Pg 247
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
Mr Gene Foxworth Planning Director
3d
Street address
P O Box 987
3e
City state zip
Nashville NC 27856
3f
Telephone no
252 459 4511
3g
Fax no
3h
Email address
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version
4
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
❑ Agent ❑ Other specify
4b
Name
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
4d
Street address
4e
City state zip
4f
Telephone no
4g
Fax no
4h
Email address
5
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
Kevin Varnell
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
Stocks Engineering
5c
Street address
1100 Eastern Avenue
5d
City state zip
Nashville NC
5e
Telephone no
252 459 8196
5f
Fax no
252 459 8197
5g
Email address
kvarnell @stocksengineering com
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version
B Project Information and Prior Project History
1 Property Identification
1a Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
3801 1 84251 031 and 380118425103
Latitude 35 9776 Longitude 779707
1b Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
(DD DDDDDD) ( DD DDDDDD)
1c Property size
5 6 acres
2 Surface Waters
2a Name of nearest body of water (stream river etc ) to
Stony Creek
proposed project
2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
C NSW
2c River basin
Tar Pamlico
3 Project Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
The proposed greenway trail location is located in an area that was clearcut several years ago The area has regrown
with successional vegetation The riparian buffer adjacent to Stony Creek remains undisturbed with with forested
vegetation Wetlands are present on the site and consist primarily of depressional flats that are hydrologically connected
to Stony Creek via surface flow or small linear ditches Land use around the site is primarily commercial development
along NC Highway 58 with undeveloped land occurring on the opposite side of Stony Creek
3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property
15
3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property
Approx 1000
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project
Project purpose is to create a greenway trail for the Town of Nashville Buffer impacts will be limited to Zone 2 and
wetland areas will be spanned
3e Describe the overall project in detail including the type of equipment to be used
The Town of Nashville is proposing to construct an 8 wide greenway trail along Stony Creek The greenway trail will
disturb 0 60 acre of land and will incur 1 181 squate feet of buffer impact in Zone 2 The trail will be constructed of
screening placed at grade Wetland areas will be spanned by pile supported wooden boardwalks To lessen the impact
from construction smaller construction equipment will be used to build this trail Grading for the trail will be incidental and
the trail will have positive drainage
4 Jurisdictional Determinations
4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments Delineation by private consultant
4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination what type
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c If yes who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company
Name (if known) Jeff Harbour
Other
4d If yes list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form —Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version
5 Project History
5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b If yes explain in detail according to help file instructions
6 Future Project Plans
6a Is this a phased project?
—Dyes ®No
6b If yes explain
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version
C Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
1 a Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
❑ Wetlands ❑ Streams tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps 404 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ —non 404 other)
(acres)
Temporary (T)
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g Total wetland impacts
0
2h Comments Consultation and correspondence with Thomas Brown of ACOE has resulted in a no 404 permit required
determination
3 Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number
(PER) or
(Corps 404 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non 404
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
_7
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑DWQ
ih Total stream and tributary impacts
0
31 Comments
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version
4 Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes ponds estuaries tributaries sounds the Atlantic Ocean or any other open water of
the U S then individually list all open water impacts below
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T)
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f Total open water impacts
0
4g Comments
5 Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed then complete the chart below
5a
5b
5c
5d
5e
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f Total
5g Comments
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No - If yes permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
5j Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer then complete the chart below If yes then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a
❑ Neuse ® Tar Pamlico ❑ Other
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b
6c
6d
6e
6f
6g
Buffer impact
number—
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required?
B1 ® P ❑ T
trail
Stony Creek
® Nos
0
1 181
B2 ❑P ❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P ❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
6h Total buffer impacts
0
1 181
61 Comments
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version
D Impact Justification and Mitigation
1 Avoidance and Minimization
la Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
Greenway trail was redsigned by project engineer to avoid Zone 1 impacts and all wetlands are being spanned with pile
supported boardwalks
lb Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
All appropriate BMPs will be employed during the construction of the project pursuant to current state and local requirements
Grading has been reduced to just incidental grading necessary to lay the screenings for the trail s base
2 Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b If yes mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c If yes which mitigation option will be used for this
projects
❑ Mitigation bank
❑Payment to in lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3 Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c Comments
4 Complete if Making a Payment to In lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation stream temperature
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4f Non riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments
5 Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version
6 Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b If yes then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1 5
6f Total buffer mitigation required
6g If buffer mitigation is required discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g payment to private mitigation bank
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration payment into an approved in lieu fee fund)
6h Comments
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version
E
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
lb
If yes then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no explain why
Comments There is no concentrated flow as a result of the trail Screenings will be
❑ Yes ® No
placed at grade
2
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
4%
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan explain why 8 wide trail x 1 340 long = 0 24 acre
impervious surface 0 24 acre of 5 6 total acres = 4% impervious
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan then provide a brief narrative description of the plan
❑ Certified Local Government
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government s jurisdiction is this project?
Town of Nashville
® Phase II
3b
Which of the following locally implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
4a
Which of the following state implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ HQW
❑ ORW
(check all that apply)
❑ Session Law 2006 246
❑ Other
4b
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ® No
5
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements2
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version
F
Supplementary Information
1
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
® Yes
❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b
If you answered yes to the above does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c
If you answered yes to the above has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter )
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments
2
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500) Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300) DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b
Is this an after the fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c
If you answered yes to one or both of the above questions provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b
If you answered yes to the above submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered no provide a short narrative description
4
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project or available capacity of the subject facility
No sewage will be generated by the proposed greenway trail
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version
5
Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a
Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b
Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑ No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c
If yes indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
❑ Asheville
5d
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
6
Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat;
❑ Yes ❑ No
6b
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
7
Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a
Will this project occur in or near an area that the state federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑ No
status (e g National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
8
Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a
Will this project occur in a FEMA designated 100 year floodplain?
❑Yes ❑ No
8b
If yes explain how project meets FEMA requirements
8c
What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Gene Foxworth,
Applicant/Agent s Printed Name
Appl ant/Agent s Signature
Date
(Agent s signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided )
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form —Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version
Stony Creek Greenway Location on 7.5- minute USGS topographic map (Nashville, NC)
I 9 e i= , rori _ =main Tupo uc0 Elapnik
F � P
Ig
5 -- —
• QfE Mapper ?e3 ?� �Lr'�nr ��cil
x
r •,
a
7
1+ .9 in .. c t 0 i .n S
L� s� S
e
,i ..'-r• .r.. � pig i �4 ... —_ __ � —•
�-
f
Fine
r� ` �'S5 ztcuc H_re as e's 1inFS ('Jpdio _aL
X07 m -
s- ' lntemet
Stony Creek Greenway
Applicant: Town of Nashville
Mr. Gene Foxworth - Planning Director
P.O. Box 987
Nashville, NC 27856
Aerial Photograph of Stony Creek Greenway Site, Nashville, NC
Satellite I H:hrid I Terrain j Tops
lob Openings
Search Fur w -d
Op—mgs. Apply For
tldChoices
I X 1 ATION
ti I
[,I l(Jh!" ,� NCGS STA IION
I !s I`.ID f (")ORDS � , . "TOBA,C,C,O)$
I 2 4'7, 8 5 9 . 4 -P +r1 � � �? j1� ^) ? NC GRID C:;OORDS
(.��'' `Clu} 1\1= 248,0833 87M
�. � it f i f�; A ` "rt }- : � Ea�`� E- P`'C' E =7U2, �.5 .765M
}� ,f JFI `~c .'� l { '�'tlt CONTRUC_
f�r7 r C7`.1i )1 CORI\JER �TF1
II z
a p
z
J
N U
"517 -E
z a
z
° 0
LU
rQP -5 4
58
ST
\. (,O {� ,_.... BUFFER IMPACT #1
ZONE 2 = 1,181 S.F. o N
'f US 64 BUSINESS W *�
-3ga�y
r WESTERN A t/E. � cq
8 WIDE 4' SCREENING % WETLAND IMPACT 2
\ s {)0 (. #
((� �y � ,�r WALKING TRAIL (COMPACTED) �2 3.52'' ``• �..� \ = 75 S. F. R 190G Q- a �
,WIDE TAR
\ \ 0 \
�� \ \_. \ s1 >s
.�> \ IV Z - NASHVILLE
son
\
�rciNr r) MAP N. T s
Hl- VISIBILI
TY \"Q.
,
W',
CROSSWALK � � ..r ,. 33,i.` ,,�
\ •\\e- - �♦ J '.` ",,��y�4>,"3cS- ::•I'G - J LS'�G/
05.07 L ri N
NCDOT STD. 12
\ INSTALL f30 L.F. \ -ac .`?fit
r; \. \ art ;
•� �, �A
\. BOARDWALK PER }•I; ;Ll \ \ I'
SOW 112 LB. PER 1,000 S.F. ,;Cr�.��s'\..:.n,�
\ u i ; G ..r DETAIL \ ETLAIyDSr
PERRENIAL WILDFLOWERS IN ,;� �,,�6',y .�' ., � \•. \.
44 �.ti, � h< ,r;};,, • \ DISTURBED AR AS OU TSIDE
AN
OF WALKING TRAIL.
�•,, ® �. j v- ti INSTALL. f30 L.F.
/ \ :', ` ,� \ BOARD WALK PER
TIE WCR TO s, z • o �- ; \ �`s' C ,1
wc/ �, DETAIL
EX. BRIDGE
CONCRETE WETLAND (I!IPACT #3
62 S. F. F '�
8 WIDE 4
4.5' SIDEWALK \` `� ,,,,,.. <. _ �S
4 ,. s? SCREENING
' C_�� X2.1 ® s
#...:; �. : _, WALKING TRAIL o3
�. G \ a Jam: J�9�. `r .� \ WTLAND IMPACT 4
SA WCU T & REMOVE f 16 LF 0 \ av :.: ). "
(COMPACTED) #
JO CURB, & GUTTER TO = 515. S.F. O
INSTALL WCR. 6 WIDE ``Crl/N QF NA ifII�ILLE SOW 1/2 LB. PER 1,
-_ 000 S. Rl Z
tt \,° / \ INSTALL 140 L.F.
CONCRETE \ \a ` = \ t PERRENIAL WILDFLOWERS !N
/ \ L.�. B° ` 2492' - PG. 247 DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE BOARDWALK PER ® Q
SIDEWALK ` ! \.�
1 y' l`
L� F1, 3. 36 PG. 142 OF WALKING TRAIL `` >�;r' ,'� P6 ETAIL
�kl S�J!des} \` J`
RM
"N
` \ \ \\ ` /
,
, � ���{ .' , ;� \,, • \ ;.
4j Q
Gc :ft
LQVV"N77••� ,y �.., , \.\ \\ \ •4S'
aim
C-7) i� f \ i
ftkEFL.lfEjS, ,. y
w q :.� N \ � 5 � r �.," rte y i P3 \
> , \ P �N' , , -,t1 ` (' ` FAA 0
Ck
IY' •cx y.
y,
'W'. } 4 'G�' _...✓ \ \\: \ � \' i�> g Apr ,,.: ti n• �/�) (o "E -
COD
° • V'j.. - _ _ \ '>\ \. '('.i'd : a, ' j ",•* �a
tO r >, •,,,i .\,R;''t/`2. c, n�c„� Njl�
'",4aN� _ `.`�. C. % )h}'t w';'1'i :'•!`CCU �', s:,. V 04-\
Cu?. l
tc`
N � ��: iufl �1s. I \\ \ � ., L \ � ��;s }, r 1 >• .� �j fir'' fi � � � `°. �- _ �
b „',' \ \, \ st•'"e,. \? .} 9 '�•ry Z ., ®
�p '\1J
xcu� 7ryw le��,,a,=r;a � \\ \ � �. - -
j _ —�•"' ""'� �,J
Z40 4%
a °`.e � ° `ti.ti., \ �'r,,�N�,1�,•} 1�,,. ti, ._,.`. Ci.. �� r ���oi�
v•
fi ��, .,� \ \\ � ` 'j.- *">�� /�< ''i ® �''. a\ _ r..,;►.e .-'� \ ^ t y.i .�; ,� r�
as
'.73' ; _ =x .f o\ N'
• \ Rr�o \ ON FLOODWAY PER .. �S �,. t 1 a�
GENERAL NOTES _ __ _ — CREPE MYRTLE r�
� . 7 OX. LOc A TI �,1 8 WIDE 4 ..` S' J,f �' u loft
\ \ • ,�PP(� P 3720�38010t
_ _ _ RATE M. SCREENING (MULTI-STEM 8' \.,,. •> �7 ' ..
T STRIPING TO BE THERMOPLASTIC. �. 6'� \ _._ . __ -__ __ — URANCE RA
1. ALL PAIN a, \ E-t '' >' °3 ?
MEET ., \ :; X1.000 INS WALKING TRAIL TALL ®PLANTING)
2. WHEEL CHAIR RAMPS AND SIDEWALK TO „F ° \4 qua
\ v
ADA STANDARDS, LATEST EDITION. f%-�r
J. WALKING TRAIL TO HAVE A MAXIMUM 2q CROSS' \ JAPANESE MAPLE ^l I
SLOPE AND 59 LONGITUDINAL SLOPE. ` L 10' TALL @ PLANTING LANDSCAPED AREAS TO
4. GRADING FOR SIDEWALK AND WALKING TRAIL Sh'ALL \
RECEIVE WEED BARRIER
<S' \
& 3" BRICK CHIPS.
BE INCIDENTAL AND SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE. L.F.
PRICE FOR EACH " n C) PLANT DAY LILIES 1' 0.G
5. BOARDWALKS TO BE 3 ABOVE GRADE OVER WETLANDS ., , ,> 4' <\ \ � J ,,�\ y, , , / REA40VE EX, RCP &_ 1\ :
J ti�
\\ / 4 \ y \ Kati ° \L`?ti
AND TAPER @ 5q MAX. SLOPE ON BOTH ENDS.
REPLACE W /��' L.F.
6. WALKING TRAIL SHALL BE INSTALLED TO ALLOW FOR < - RCP ®Q 5i MIN.-
POSITIVE DRAINAGE.
'� � s' \ �` �'' --., �,` -'.� �i `t:. .° �' , s;•,,7,, ��' '` c•,1 , J --' • . f'�, �:. 'mac.,?,.., ! u
6. CLEARING AND GRUBBING TO BE DISPOSED OF 1-`T A
PERMITTED SITE. %-
< 4-4 � > REMO VE &
REINSTALL ±64 L.F.
'.
G T. AJL
O E «__., _CONTRAC .TD R F I��.. -, EX CHAIN LINK FENCE
D. 6�5 0 A � .
,.
1 ,t� \
�.... C AND GATES
!S ; l STALLED A TL�'AST _ 5Q- FROM THE . T 0, � \ -Is, � c .: �... , � ,
a .
.: :5; C14EEK _UNLESS 5H ®WAN A5 A \
RAISE EX. M.H.
-BANK ON ... TONY _ . , . .
/ W. CAF I7A LL: CJ,
G
.: _ ....., ter. ..... ,, .... _,., LOCATION
_ _.._ ....,. . __._ ,. . _..._.. APPROX. OF AD 1L T
�
(J e
C P Y EQUIPMENT Cry,
A GEUPCrIA /_ /� /J i LA GROUND EO C?
i SUPPLIED BY THE TOWN A, lD c,y ,�
LIABILITY GCJIi/IF?NY �P Iir�r
co
'� °0
/ \ f') /, E o k ((P �ry'pJ INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR r ,... o'-o ca
D. B. 24~36 PG. 492 4 ¢ f ,
f CA CO M
DISTURBED AREA f0.64 Ac. c� }G, `•`' k� 1� t� rti �!�
.!f, .._
P. B. 3�> f �. 142
RELOCATE DOUBLE S � ADD 4 WIDE ,. I�% `� o
..� I ...111. � r
GATES 10 THIS SIDE. .. ..., c..rr,
ACCESS GATE ` N •d. N
z�, , . � / r � ,�� / 'l • . to �n
'
04
—7 `• n 0 t % _
Z
\
(L o X m
Imo iv PI� Gpl ` H = 'Q 0
/ y / '� jj�\ \ (} ♦ ! Nor ml 7' ', n L� 2
Uj. r��� � �, ref -f- . • ` ,, ' / .''' ��' � �: `� J �°�ur�,u ��
r q 9
L.t i a`
V: MAX SLOPE
\� :, 1: 12
x J, `a " ` TRUNCA TED
,
DOMES „ _ II'i Z
F ` � • � , '_ ..' -+'moo ,/��� � DEM °
to
in
James G. Strickland
Z 03
Laced Surveying, P.A. `� �`�� � , HEEL CHAIR MP ®E-FAIL '` Y "
NOT TO SCALE - h,�=p�, oFESS /0", yam'., U z o z
Q <. �
12,3 West Washington Street' \; 6a ` _ SEAL _ a o
Nashville, North Carolina
27856 \ , 19843 w m =
cn
NORTH CAROLINA CERTIFICATE NUMBER. C- 3721'o ` \ �• �. 5 -15 -12 V 1
.-az
�H EL
TELEPHONE (252) .459 -3838 � '�� S `
FAX (252) 459 -1885 SCALE: 1 " 40'
�q
M
0 40 80 100 120 140: 160 - ca, 1
101.111111,111110,11111111111111 111111 Ill 11,1111 11 1111111, 01 11111 OWN I'll
STRUCTURAL NOTES:
GENERAL:
FOUNDATIONS
1 ENGINEER'S SEAL APPLIES ONLY TO STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS INCLUDING BEAMS,
1)
,,l J MINIMUM TO BE VERIFIED WITH LOCAL
ALLOWABLE SOIL PRESSURE ASSUMED 2000 PS
COLUMNS, PIER, GIRDER AND RAILING SYSTEM
AND STATE JURISDICTIONS.
2 ALL CONSTRUCTION. SHALL CONFORM TO THE APPLICABLE CODES LISTED, PLUS ALL
)
2 )
PILING SHALL BE CARRIED TO LOWER ELEVATIC),NS THAN .THOSE SHOWN ON THE
LOCAL CODES AND REGULATIONS. THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER IS NOT RESPONSIBLE
DRAWINGS IF REQUIRED TO REACH. FIRM SOIL.
FOR, AND WILL NOT HAVE CONTROL OVER CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS,.
3)
FIELD VERIFY AXIAL COMPRESSION CAPACITY CF PILES IS EQUAL TO 7500 LBS AT
TECHNIQUES SEQUENCES OR PROCEDURES, OR FOR SAFETY PRECAUTICNS AND
MAXIMUM DEFLECTION OF 0.3" USING ASTM D1143,` PROCEDURE A. TEST ONE PILE
PROGRAMS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONSTRUCTION WORK; NOR WILL SHE ENGINEER
V
BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO CARRY OUT THE CONSTRUCTION
FOR EACH 50' OF BOARDWALK.
WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.
3) WHERE A CONFLICT BETWEEN. CODE CRITERIA OCCURS, THE MORE STRR,��GENT IS
WOOD:
APPLIED.
1)
ALLOWABLE STRESSES AND GRADES FOR TIMBER FRAMING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE
4) ALL SAFETY REGULATIONS TO BE FOLLOWED STRICTLY. METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION,
///
WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE 'NATIONAL DESIGN SPECIFICATION STRESS -GRADE
SHORING AND ERECTION OF STRUCTURAL MATERIAL IS CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY.
///
LUMBER AND ITS FASTENINGS AS RECOMMENDIE D BY THE NATIONAL FOREST PRODUCTS
5} REFERENCE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR ALIGNMENT AND ADDITIONAL DETAILS.
j//
ASSOCIATION.
2)
ALL FRAMING — SOUTHERN YELLOW PINE NO. 2. (FB = 1200 PSI MIN.) UNLESS NOTED
OTHERWISE
DESIGN CRITERIA:
3)
IF PSL's ARE USED; FABRICATE ALL ENGINEERED LAMINATE VENEER LUMBER IN
1) APPLICABLE CODES:
ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST STANDARD UNIVERSAL PRACTICES OF WOOD PSL'S.
A. 2012 NORTH CAROLINA STATE BUILDING CODE (2009 INTERNATIONAL. BUILDING
4)
MATERIAL PRESERVATIVE SPECIFICATIONS:
CODE WITH REVISIONS)
A. PILING = AWPA UC4C & C3, 0.80 ACQ, O. OCCA, OR 12.0 CREOSOTE
B. 2009 AASHTO LRFD GUIDE SPECIFICATION FOR THE DESIGN OF PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES
B. PILE CAPS, JOISTS = AWPA UC4A & C2, 0..40ACQ, 0,21 CA, OR 10 CREOSOTE
CO3
C. 2005 NATIONAL DESIGN SPECIFICATION (NDS) FOR WOOD CONSTRUC -ION
C. DECKING, HANDRAILS AWPA UC3B & C2, 0.25 ACID 0.10 CA
5)
CONNECTORS: ASTM A305, STAINLESS STEEL
2) DESIGN LIVE LOADS:
6)
FASTENERS: ASTM A305, STAINLESS STEEL
UNIFORM LL= 90 PSF
W
SPACING = 3 X. DIAMETER OF FASTENER
EQUESTRIAN = 1000 LBS CONCENTRATED (4 IN. X 4 IN.)
/ / ' j/ /
EDGE DISTANCE = ` 4 X DIAMETER OF FASTENER
MAINT. VEHICLE = 1500 LBS MAXIMUM
MIN. PENETRATION = 6 X DIAMET -R OF FASTENER
4'
DRAWING NOT TO SCALE
C
L
L
C
- J I LLL UUL I J VV/ UVtKJiLtU 2rJ MIN.
WASHERS CIRCUMFERENCE PILING
1.
2X6 RAIL CAP
4X4 RAIL POST
\-2X10 BLOCKING AT EA.
V
Q
RAIL POST
O
O
///
j
///
O
p
j//
O
p
zz
Q
—�
W
T7
/ / ' j/ /
/ ' ;/
/
(5) 2X10 EVENLY
SPACED
(3) $ "o STAINLESS
2X6 DECKING
$" GAP BETWEEN
BOARDS
G'
I'
(2)
�
- J I LLL UUL I J VV/ UVtKJiLtU 2rJ MIN.
WASHERS CIRCUMFERENCE PILING
1.
THIS DOCUMENT, ANITO AS
O O O O AND DESIGNS EXPRREIN
N ARE THE PROPERTY -
ENGINEERS, AND ARBE
USED, IN WHOLE OR FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT THE EXPRESSED WRCON SENT OF FSP E..
?X12 PILE CAP, TYP.
1~
..................
ON-
\-2X10 BLOCKING AT EA.
V
THIS DOCUMENT, ANITO AS
O O O O AND DESIGNS EXPRREIN
N ARE THE PROPERTY -
ENGINEERS, AND ARBE
USED, IN WHOLE OR FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT THE EXPRESSED WRCON SENT OF FSP E..
?X12 PILE CAP, TYP.
1~
..................
\-2X10 BLOCKING AT EA.
V
Q
RAIL POST
Q
W
W
�
uj
Z
0.
r
2,
J
z
2X10 SCAB SPLICE
�
(3) SCREWS EA. 22 ROW BOLTS EACH END
DECK BOARD TO JOIST ./-i --